20170217 Ver 1_401 Application_20170217

CAROLINA
WETLAND SERVICES
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 - Phone
704-527-1133 - Fax 2 0 1 7 C2
TO: Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDWR—NC DWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N Salisbury St
9th Floor, Archdale Building
Raleigh, NC 27604
A,�vD
Date: 2-20-2017
CWS Project #: 2015-3740
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
- , 7
WE ARE SENDING YOU: ®Attached ❑Under separate cover via the following items:
❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ JD Package ❑ Specifications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order ❑ Wetland Survey ® Other
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE
DATE COPIESDESCRIPTION
1 2-20-2017 4 Permit Application for Individual WQC
2 2-3-2017 1 Application Fee ($570)
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
®For approval []Approved as submitted ❑Resubmit copies for approval
®For your use []Approved as noted ❑Submit copies for distribution
❑As requested ❑Returned for corrections ❑Return corrected prints
❑For review and comment ❑For your verification and signature
REMARKS: Karen, please find attached five copies of the Individual Water Quality Certification application for South
Mill Creek Sewer project. A check for the application fee of $570 is also attached.
Copy to: File
Thank you,
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Principal Scientist
NORTH CAROLINA • SOUTH CAROLINA

CAROLINA WETLAND SERVICES, INC.
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28273
704-527-1177 (office)
704-527-1133 (fax)
February 20, 2017 D
Mr. John Thomas
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 2 j 2017
331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
512 N. Salisbury St., 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
Subject: Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and Pre -Construction
Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 12
South Mill Creek Sewer Project
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Dear Mr. John Thomas and Ms. Higgins,
The South Mill Creek Sewer project is approximately 3.2 miles in length (32.32 acres in extent) and is
located south of the Reynolda Road and Yadkinville Road intersection in Winston-Salem, North Carolina
(Figures 1 and 2, attached). The purpose of this project is to construct approximately 20,013 linear feet of
30 -inch, 36 -inch, and 48 -inch gravity sewer along Mill Creek, beginning at the downstream portion of
Reynolda Road and ending at the confluence of Mill Creek and Muddy Creek in Winston-Salem, North
Carolina. On behalf of the City of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County Utilities, Gavel & Dorn
Engineering, PLLC has subcontracted Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) to delineate the extent of
jurisdictional waters of the U.S. within the project limits and to provide Section 404/401 permitting
services for this project. An executed agent authorization form is attached.
Applicant Name: City of Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Utilities; Mr. Bill Ward
Mailing Address: Utilities Administration - P.O. Box 2511, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27102
Phone Number of Owner/Applicant: (W) 336-747-7306 and (M) 336-403-3955
Street Address of Project: Located south of the Reynolda Road and the Yadkinville Road intersection
in Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Waterway: Mill Creek
Basin: Upper Pee Dee (HUC` 03040101)
City: Winston-Salem
County: Forsyth
Tax Parcel No(s): Multiple (sewerline easement)
Decimal Degree Coordinate Location of Project Site: 36.153833°, -80.3119251
USGS Quadrangle Name: Rural Hall, NC (1994) and Winston-Salem, NC (1997)
' "HUC" is the Hydrologic Unit Code. U.S. Geological Survey, 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map, State of North Carolina.
NORTH CAROLINA - SOUTH CAROLINA
WWW.CWS-INC.NET
Page 1 of 11

South Mill Creek Sewer February 20, 2017
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12 CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Current Land Use
The project area consists of sewerline right-of-ways, maintained open areas, and forested areas. Typical
on-site vegetation consists of American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), river birch (Betula nigra),
black cherry (Prunus serotina), southern red oak (Quercus falcata), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera),
box elder (Acer negundo), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) black willow (Salix nigra), eastern red
cedar (Juniperus virginiana), red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciva), shortleaf
pine (Pinus echinata), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), sawtooth
blackberry (Rubus argutus), giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea), greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), Japanese
honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans),
ground ivy (Glechoma hederacea), English ivy (Hedera helix), wingstem (Verbesina alternifolia),
goldenrod (Solidago canadensis), deertongue (Dichanthelium clandestinum), Nepalese browntop
(Microstegium vimineum), woolgrass (Scirpus cyperinus), nutgrass (Cyperus rotundus), yellow nutsedge
(Cyperus esculentus), common rush (Juncus effusus), reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), curly
dock (Rumex crispus), wild onion (Allium vineale), and various grasses (Festuca spp.) and sedges (Carex
spp.).
According to the United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service
(USDA-NRCS) Soil Surveys of Forsyth County2 (Figures 4 and 5, attached), on-site soils consist of nine
soil types. Of the on-site soils, Banister fine sandy loam (BaB), Codorus loam (CoA), Dan River loam
(DaA), and Hatboro loam (HaA), are listed in the North Carolina Hydric Soils List for Forsyth County'
and the National Hydric Soils List4 as containing hydric inclusions. On -Site soils are summarized in
Table 1, below.
Table 1. Summary of On -Site Soils for the South Mill Creek Sewer Project in Forsvth Countv.
National Wetlands Inventory
Wetlands are an important source of biodiversity and provide a multitude of ecological services. The
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), created by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is a program which
provides wetland data and analysis to the public. A review of the NWI GIS layer depicts multiple
potential wetland features within the project limits (Figure 6, attached).
United States Department of Agriculture, 2013. Soil Survey of Forsyth County, North Carolina.
3 United States Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999. North Carolina Hydric Soils List, USDA-NRCS
North Carolina State Office, Raleigh.
4 United States Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2015. 2015 National Hydric Soils List by State.
Page 2 of 11
Soil Unit Name and Description
Hydric
Coverage (%)
BaB
113anister fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes, rarely flooded
Yes
1.4
CoA
Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Yes
68.3
DaA
Dan River loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Yes
11.3
FaB
Fairview fine sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes
No
0.1
FaD
Fairview fine sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes
No
0.2
FaF
Fairview fine sandy loam, 15 to 45 percent slopes
No
3.7
FcD2
Fairview clay loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes
No
1.2
HaA
Hatboro loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded
Yes
4.4
Ud
Udorthents, loamy
No
1.5
W
Water
-
7.9
Total Coverage:
100%
National Wetlands Inventory
Wetlands are an important source of biodiversity and provide a multitude of ecological services. The
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), created by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is a program which
provides wetland data and analysis to the public. A review of the NWI GIS layer depicts multiple
potential wetland features within the project limits (Figure 6, attached).
United States Department of Agriculture, 2013. Soil Survey of Forsyth County, North Carolina.
3 United States Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1999. North Carolina Hydric Soils List, USDA-NRCS
North Carolina State Office, Raleigh.
4 United States Department of Agriculture — Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2015. 2015 National Hydric Soils List by State.
Page 2 of 11

South Mill Creek Sewer
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12
Jurisdictional Delineation
February 20, 2017
CWS Project No: 2015-3740
On December 14, 15, 19, 20, and 21, 2016, Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (CWS) scientists Kerry
Wright, Staff Scientist I, and Caleb Sullivan, Staff Scientist I, delineated on-site jurisdictional waters of
the U.S., including wetlands. Jurisdictional areas were delineated (flagged in the field), classified, and
mapped with a sub -foot Trimble Geo7X GPS unit using the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Routine On -Site Determination Method. This method is defined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Delineation Manual,' the 2007 USACE Jurisdictional Form Instructional Guidebook,' with further
technical guidance from the 2012 Eastern Mountains & Piedmont Regional Supplement.'
Jurisdictional stream channels were classified according to the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) guidance. These classifications include sampling with a D -shaped dip
net, photograph documentation, and defining approximate breakpoints (location at which stream channel
changes classification) within each on-site stream channel. NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms
representative of jurisdictional stream channels are attached (SCP1-SCP8). As the on-site Mill Creek and
Muddy Creek are known streams and are depicted on both the USGS map (Figure 2, attached) and the
USDA-NRCS Historic Soil Survey map (Figure 5, attached), NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms were
not completed. Wetland Determination Data Forms representative of on-site jurisdictional wetland areas
and corresponding non jurisdictional upland areas are attached as DPI=DP18. Locations of the stream
classification points and the Wetland Determination Data Forms are depicted on Figures 7-14 (attached).
Results
Based on the results of this field investigation, there are 17 jurisdictional waters of the U.S. located within
the project boundary (Figures 7-14, attached). These waters consist of ten jurisdictional stream channels
(Streams A -J) and seven jurisdictional wetland (Wetland AA -GG). The on-site jurisdictional waters drain
to, and include Mill Creek. Mill Creek is part of the Upper Pee Dee River Basin (HUC 03040101) and is
classified as "Class C Waters" by the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ).
According to the NCDEQ, Class C Waters are defined as: "Waters protected for uses such as secondary
recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish consumption, aquatic life including propagation, survival and
maintenance of biological integrity, and agriculture.""
On -Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. total approximately 0.79 acre, including 1,806 linear feet of
jurisdictional stream channel (Figures 7-14). On -Site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. are summarized in
Table 2 (next page).
5 Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual", Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
6 USACE Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook. 2007. USACE Regulatory National Standard Operating Procedures for
conducting an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) and documenting practices to support an approved JD. USACE Headquarters,
Washington, DC.
US Army Corps of Engineers, April 2012. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains
and Piedmont Region. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
s NCDEQ. "Surface Water Classifications." http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/csu/classifications.
Page 3 of 11

South Mill Creek Sewer February 20, 2017
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12 CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Table 2. Summary of On -Site Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S., including Wetlands
Jurisdictional
Stream
Jurisdiction
Stream
Cowardin Classification
Classification Point
(SCP)
NCDEQ
Stream
Classification
Score
Photo #
Linear
Feet (If)
Acreage
(ac.)
USACE/EPA
Rapanos
Classification'
Mill Creek)
RPW
R2UB110 N/A
30+
1
1,159
0.32
Stream B
RPW
R2UB2" SCP1
34.5
?
42
0.01
Stream C
RPW
R2UB2 SCP2
33.0
3
129
0.03
Stream D
RPW
R2U131 SCP3
31.5
4
83
0.01
Stream E
RPW
R2UB2 SCP4
30.0
5
81
0.01
Stream
RPW
R2UB1 SCP5
45.5
6
26
0.01
Stream G
(Muddy Creek
RPW
R2UB1 N/A
30+
7
66
0.02
Stream H
Seasonal RPW
R4SB412 SCP6
24.5
8
65
0.003
Stream I
Seasonal RPW
R405" SCP7
25.0
9
73
0.002
Stream J
Seasonal RPW
R4SB5 SCP8
19.5
10
82
0.002
Stream Total:
1,806 if
0.42 ac.
Jurisdictional WetlandData
Jurisdiction
USACE/EPA Rapanos
Classification
Point
(DP)
Photo #
Linear
Feet (If)
Acreage
(ac.)
Wetland AA
Forested
Adjacent to RPW
DPI
1 I
-
0.13
Wetland BB
Forested
Adjacent to RPW
DP3
12
-
0.05
Wetland CC
Forested
Adjacent to RPW
DP5
13
-
0.008
Wetland DD
Forested
Herbaceous
Adjacent to RPW
Adjacent to RPW
DP8
DP7
14
15
-
0.04
-
0.05
Wetland EE
Forested
Adjacent to RPW
DP 10
16
-
0.038
Wetland FF
Forested
Adjacent to RPW
DP 12
17
-
0.004
Wetland GG
Herbaceous
Directly Abutting RPW
DP 13
18
-
0.06
Wetland Total:
N/A
0.37 ac.
Total Jurisdictional Waters of the tl.S.:.
1,806 If
0.79 ac.
Agency Correspondence
Cultural Resources
CWS consulted the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) online GIS service14 on
April 15, 2016 to determine the presence of any historical structures, buildings, or districts within the
project boundaries. Based on the review of the SHPO online GIS service, there were no historical
structures, buildings, or districts within the project area. In addition, a letter was forwarded to SHPO on
October 19, 2016 to determine any resources of architectural, historic, or archaeological significance that
would be affected by the project. Based on a response letter from SHPO dated October 28, 2016,
' Classifications of streams include Traditionally Navigable Waters (TNWs), Relatively Permanent Waters (RPWs), and Non -Relatively
Permanent Waters (Non-RPWs). Subcategories of RPWs include perennial streams that typically have year-round flow, and seasonal streams
that have continuous flow at least seasonally. Two classifications of jurisdictional wetlands are used to describe proximity and connection to
TNWs. These classifications include either adjacent or directly abutting. Adjacent wetlands are defined as wetlands within floodplains or in
close proximity to a TNW but without a direct visible connection. Abutting wetlands have a direct surface water connection traceable to a
TNW.
° R2UB 1 = Lower perennial stream with cobble -gravel bottom, Cowardin et al. Classification System, 1979.
" MUM = Lower perennial stream with sandy bottom, Cowardin et al. Classification System, 1979.
12 R4SB4 = Lower perennial stream with sandy bottom, Cowardin et al, Classification System, 1979.
" R4S135 = Lower perennial stream with mud bottom, Cowardin ct al, Classification System, 1979.
14 North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office, http://gis.neder.gov/hpoweb/. Accessed April 15, 2016.
Page 4 of 11

South Mill Creek Sewer
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12
February 20, 2017
CWS Project No. 2015-3740
SHPO states "We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources
which would be affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as
proposed." A copy of the response letter is attached.
Protected Species
CWS performed a data review using North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer15
on April 15, 2016 to determine the presence of any federally -listed, candidate endangered, threatened
species, or critical habitat located within the project area. Based on the NCNHP review, there are no
records of federally -protected species within the project limits or within a mile of the project. A copy of
the data review report is attached.
In addition, on April 19 and 20, 2016 and on September 27, 2016, CWS scientists Michelle LaForge,
Project Scientist, Kaitlin McCulloch, Wetland Professional in Training (WPIT), and Kerry Wright, Staff
Scientist I, conducted a pedestrian survey of the project limits to search for federally -protected species
and potential habitat for the species. The project area was surveyed for the presence of individuals or
habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), small-anthered bittercress (Cardamine
micranthera), bog turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergii), red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), roanoke
perch (Pereina rex), and the northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis). No individual species were
observed during the pedestrian survey. Marginal habitat did exist for the northern long-eared bat.
On October 28, 2016, a letter was forwarded to the United States Fish and Wildlife Services requesting
concurrence of our findings. In a response letter dated November 30, 2016, the USFWS states "We have
no record of federally protected species or designated critical habitat in the vicinity of the proposed
project. Based on the information provided, we believe that the probability for take of the northern
long-eared bat as a result of this project would be insignificant or discountable." Therefore, the USFWS
concurred that the northern long-eared bat may be affected, but is not likely to be adversely
affected and that all other federally protected species will not be affected by the project. A copy of
the response letter is attached.
Purpose and Need for the Project
The purpose of this project is to construct approximately 20,013 linear feet of 30 -inch, 36 -inch, and
48 -inch gravity sewer along Mill Creek, beginning at the downstream portion of Reynolda Road and
ending at the confluence of Mill Creek and Muddy Creek in Winston-Salem, North Carolina (Figures
15-21). The South Mill Creek Sewer is the first phase of the entire Mill Creek Sewer project. The second
phase, North Mill Creek Sewer, is in the process of being finalized and may be submitted mid -2017.
The proposed sewerline will parallel the existing sewer (in most areas) along Mill Creek. The proposed
sewerline does not intend to formally abandon the existing easement and does not intend to remove the
existing pipe, it will be abandoned in place. The existing 30 -inch sewer was installed in 1959 and several
sections were replaced in the 1980s. Gavel & Dorn Engineering, PLLC was contracted to evaluate the
existing sewer and determine whether it was best to replace the sewer in-situ or construct a parallel sewer
relief.
The primary driver for the proposed sewer is capacity limitations. The need for gravity sewer was
identified in the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The
15 North Carolina Natural Heritage Data Explorer, https:Hnenhde.natureserve.org/. Accessed April 15 2016.
Page 5 of 11

South Mill Creek Sewer February 20, 2017
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12 CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Utilities Commission expects increases in population growth and
employment from 2011 to 2041. As a result of increased population and employment rates, flow rates for
sewer interceptors will increase, resulting in maximum capacity. Specifically for the Mill Creek sewer
interceptor, upon the completion of upstream projects, the existing Mill Creek sewer interceptor would be
unable to withstand potential overflow and surcharging during a five-year storm event. Gavel & Dorn
Engineering, PLLC have designed the current sewer so that it can handle a five-year storm event and
increased flows from the completion of upstream projects.
Avoidance and Minimization
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable.
The South Mill Creek sewer has been designed to avoid impacts to jurisdictional waters wherever
possible and minimize the extent of necessary impacts to jurisdictional waters. The proposed sewerline
alignment and associated easements were designed based upon a preliminary wetlands investigation in
order to reduce impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. to the greatest extent practicable. Proper
sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters.
Construction activities and impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with Water
Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3884.
No Build Alternative
A no -build alternative would result in the current sewer reaching maximum capacity due to current and
ongoing development in the upper drainage area of the Mill Creek. With the continued growth in
Winston-Salem, a no -build alternative could result in overflowing and surcharging sewers during storm
events. The need for an increased public sewer size and length to withstand storm events and flow rates,
rendered a no -action alternative impracticable and environmentally detrimental. Therefore, a no -build
alternative was eliminated from further consideration since it would not be reasonable or feasible given
the projected growth and ongoing and future development within the service area
Preliminary Corridor Investigation Area
Constraints identified in determining a proposed alignment were largely based on the condition and
location of the current alignment and a preliminary wetlands field determination performed by CWS in
April and September 2016. The primary goal of the design effort was to develop an alignment that would
avoid or minimize potential impacts to wetlands, streams, steep slopes, cultural resources, riparian
buffers, and other identified environmental constraints, to the maximum extent practicable, without
compromising engineering requirements. The preliminary wetlands field determination consisted of a
200 -foot corridor (approximately 97 acres in extent) with the existing sewerline as the centerline (Figure
22, attached). Within the 200 -foot preliminary corridor, approximately 6.74 acres of wetlands were
located within the project limits (Table 3, below). The proposed alignment was designed using the
preliminary alignment and avoids 82% of the wetland features located within the preliminary alignment.
Table 3. Comparison of Wetland Acreage between Alternative Preliminary and Proposed Corridors.
Alternative Wetland Acreage
200 -foot Preliminary Corridor 6.74
Proposed Corridor 0.37
Percent Avoided in the Proposed Corridor: 82%
Page 6 of 11

South Mill Creek Sewer February 20, 2017
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12 CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Proposed Sewer Alignment
The proposed sewer alignment consists of approximately 20,013 linear feet of 30 -inch, 36 -inch, and
48 -inch gravity sewer along Mill Creek. The construction corridor (temporary construction easement
[TCE]) will exceed a 40 -foot corridor width through wetlands and streams. The proposed sewerline does
not intend to formally abandon the existing easement and does not intend to remove the existing pipe, it
will be abandoned in place. Therefore, there are areas where the proposed easement directly abuts the
existing easement. This results in a greater than 40 -foot construction corridor in areas along the proposed
sewerline.
The permanent maintained portion of the right-of-way (R/W) corridor will exceed 15 feet in width
through wetlands and at stream crossings. The 30 -foot to 45 -foot permanently maintained easement
width is necessary in order for future maintenance of the sewerline due to topography and local
vegetation. The sewer line will be buried 10 feet and deeper throughout the entirety of the proposed
permanent easement. In order to comply with Water Quality Certificate No. 3884, the permanent
easement was restricted during the planning stage to determine feasibility. It was determined that the
15 -foot permanent easement was not wide enough to allow the necessary maintenance equipment to
access the gravity fed sewerline at the buried depths of 10 feet and deeper (See Typical Stream Crossing,
attached). With a 15 -foot restricted permanent easement, a temporary easement would be required to be
obtained for each maintenance event. As the sewerline runs adjacent to Mill Creek and several other
streams, a maintenance emergency would take longer to rectify. Therefore, it was concluded that the
15 -foot permanent easement at each jurisdictional waters of the U.S. impact location would restrict future
maintenance and was removed from the design.
Access roads will be needed throughout the project area to access the sewer and perform routine
maintenance on the sewerline. Proposed access roads will follow the existing sewerline and the existing
access roads will be abandoned. The proposed access roads are depicted as "Construction Access" points
in Figures 18 and 20 (attached). A maximum 15 -foot access road will be constructed within the proposed
permanent easement to minimize additional impacts to jurisdictional features.
Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream
waters. Anti -seep collars will be installed at the downstream wetland boundary and every 150 feet up the
gradient until the sewer trunk exits the wetland. Sewer trunks will be sited greater than 10 feet from
parallel stream channels. All unavoidable stream crossings will be at a near perpendicular angle. All
channel work will be constructed in the dry in accordance with Water Quality Certification No. 3884. In
addition, all permanent maintained right-of-way through wetlands will be permanently marked in the field
to avoid mowing and maintenance of additional wetland areas.
Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters
Under Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 12, unavoidable impacts associated with the construction of the
South Mill Creek Sewer project include the mechanized clearing of forested and herbaceous wetland
vegetation and jurisdictional stream crossings (Figures 15-21, attached). Permanent impacts will be the
result of a 30 -foot to 45 -foot wide permanently maintained easement in which forested and herbaceous
wetlands will be cleared, converted, and maintained as herbaceous wetlands. Temporary impacts will be
the result of a permanent easement through 23 stream crossings and a temporary construction easement
through wetlands.
Page 7 of 11

South Mill Creek Sewer February 20, 2017
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12 CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Stream Impacts
All stream impacts will be temporary (Figures 15-21, attached). Temporary stream crossings will be
returned to their original grade and stabilized using bioengineering and replanted with native hardwood
trees and shrubs. No rip rap will be placed in the stream bed. Stream impacts are summarized in Table 4
(below). The number of crossings has been kept to the minimum necessary to provide access for
maintenance and at the request of property owners. The utility crossings will not result in any loss of
waters of the U.S.
Table 4. Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S.
Jurisdictional
USACE/EPA
Temporary/
Figure
Planset
Approximate
Approximate
Feature
Rapanos
Impact Xo.
Impact Type
Permanent
No.
Page No.
Length (If)
Acreage (ac.)
Classification
S 1, S2, S4,
S5, S6, S8,
Utility
EC 6-9 &
S11, S13,
Crossings
Temporary
16-21
EC 11-15
683
0.19
S15, S17,
Stream A
PIPW
S18
(Mill Creek)
S16
Stream Ford
Temporary
20
EC 7
40
0.011
Culvert for
S22
Access Road
Temporary
20-21
ECS
40
0.011
Stream B
RP W
S3
Utility Crossing
Temporary
16
EC 14
42
0.01
Stream C
RP W
S7
Utility Crossing
Temporary
17
EC 11
129
0.03
S9
Utility Crossing,Temporary
18
EC 10
51
0.007
Construction
Stream D
RPW
S10
Access
Temporary
18
EC 10
32
0.004
Stream E
RPW
S12
Utility Crossing
Temporary
18
EC 9
81
0.01
Stream H
Seasonal RPW
S14
Utility Crossing
Temporary
19
EC 7
65
0.003
Stream I
Seasonal RPW
S20
Utility Crossing
Temporary
20
EC 6
73
0.002
Stream F
RPW
S19
Construction
Temporary
20
EC 6
26
0.01
Access
Stream J
Seasonal RPW
S21
Utility Crossing
Temporary
20
EC 6
82
0.002
Stream G
RPW
S23
Utility Crossing
Temporary
21
EC 3
66
0.02
(Muddy Creek)
Temporary Stream Impact Total:
1,410 if
0.31 ac.
Wetland Impacts
Unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional wetlands total approximately 0.37 acre. Impacts are the result of
clearing of both forested and herbaceous wetlands to facilitate the construction of the proposed sewerline
(Figures 16-20, attached). Permanent impacts to on-site wetlands total 0.082 acre and are the result of a
30 -foot to 45 -foot wide permanent maintained easement through Wetlands AA -GG, in which forested and
herbaceous wetlands will be cleared and permanently converted to maintained herbaceous wetlands. The
approximately 0. 182 acre of temporary forested wetland impacts to Wetlands AA -FF (Figures 16-20,
attached) will be mitigated through reforestation. All impacted areas will be returned to their
pre -construction grades. Wetland impacts are summarized in Table 5 (next page).
Page 8 of 11

South Mill Creek Sewer
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12
Table 'S. Proposed Impacts to Jurisdictional Wetlands.
February 20, 2017
CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Jurisdictional
Feature
Impact
No.
Forested/
Herbaceous
Impact Type
Figure
No.
Planset
Page No.
Temporary
Impacts (ac.)
Permanent
Impacts (ac.)
Wetland AA
Wl
Forested
Clearing
16
EC 14
0.115
0.013
Wetland BB
W2
Forested
Clearing
16
EC 12-13
0.012
0.038
Wetland CC
W3
Forested
Clearing
17
EC 11
-
0.008
Wetland DD
W4
W5
Herbaceous
Forested
Clearing
Clearing
19
19
EC 8-9
EC 8-9
0.049
0.026
-
0.016
Wetland EE
W6
Forested
Clearing
19
EC 8
0.026
0.002
Wetland FF
W7
Forested
Clearing
19
EC 7
0.003
0.001
Wetland GG
W8
Herbaceous
Clearing
20
EC 6
0.061
0.004
Total Wetland Impacts:
0.292 ac.
0.082 ac.
Temporary
Wetland Impacts to be Reforested:
0.182 ac.
N/A
Permanent Forested Weiland Impacts:
N/A
0.078 ac.
On behalf of City of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County Utilities, CWS is submitting a Pre -Construction
Notification Application with attachments in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition No.
31 (attached) and pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 12.
Compensatory Mitigation
The majority of impacts associated with this project are temporary. Permanent impacts have been limited
to a total of approximately 0.082 acre and are the result of clearing forested wetlands that fall within the
permanent easement. The forested wetland within the permanent easement will be converted to
permanently maintained herbaceous wetlands. Additionally, existing herbaceous wetlands within the
permanent easement will become permanently maintained herbaceous wetlands. All impacted areas will
be returned to their pre -impact grades and there will be no permanent fill associated with this project.
Restoration of Wetlands
Permanent impacts have been limited to a total 0.082 acre and are the result of clearing forested and
herbaceous wetlands that fall within the proposed permanent easement. These areas will be converted to
maintained herbaceous wetlands. All impacted areas will be returned to their pre -impact grades; there
will be no permanent fill in jurisdictional areas.
All impacted wetland areas will be returned to their original pre -construction grade and will be seeded
with a native wetland vegetation seed mix. In addition, all cleared forested wetlands, with the exception
of the permanent maintained easement, will be reforested with native bare -root trees or live stakes as
appropriate. Trees will be planted in naturalistic drifts at an average spacing of 10 -foot centers for an
overall average density of 450 trees per acre. If containerized plants (1 gallon) are used they shall be a
minimum of one year old with a height of 12-24 inches tall, with a root collar diameter (base of stem) of
1/4 - 3/8 inches. Areas to be reforested shall be hand cleared to remove construction debris and rocks
(larger than 6 inches in any dimension). Plants shall be planted in random mixtures of species which may
include the following species:
Trees
1.
ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana)
2.
box elder (Acer negundo)
3.
willow oak (Quercus phellos)
4.
green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica)
Shrubs
Page 9 of 11

South Mill Creek Sewer February 20, 2017
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12 CWS Project No. 2015-3740
1. Silky dogwood (Cornus amomum)
2. Elderberry (Sambucus canadensis)
3. Silky willow (Salix sericea)
4. Beauty berry (Callicarpa americana)
A minimum of four tree species and two shrub species should be selected to revegetate the appropriate
areas. All areas with a survival rate of less than 300 plants per acre after one full growing season shall be
replanted to achieve this final planting density.
Mitigation for Permanently Impacted Wetlands
Permanent impacts to jurisdictional wetland areas have been limited to 0.082 acre, which is less than 0.1
acre of permanent impacts. Therefore, mitigation for the proposed impacts is not required.
Restoration of Streams
All areas disturbed by the work shall be re -graded to leave the area in a smooth condition, sloped for
drainage. All impacted stream banks shall be stabilized with rip rap below the ordinary high water mark
and plantings above the high water mark. Stabilized stream banks shall include all bank areas disturbed
by construction activities. Banks shall be restored to their original contours. The stream banks shall be
stabilized with biodegradable coir fiber matting or other coconut fiber matting. Plantings shall consist of
dormant native live stakes conforming to the City of Winston Salem/Forsyth County requirements, and
shall be installed in the winter during the period from November to March. The live stakes shall be
planted so that buds point upward and approximately 2 to 3 inches of wood is above the ground. At least
three buds on each stake should be installed below ground to encourage root growth. Live stake species
should include silky dogwood, silky willow, and elderberry only.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services on this important project. Please do not hesitate
to contact Gregg Antemann at 704-408-1683 or [e-mail] should you have any questions or
comments regarding this report.
Sincerely,
Z7 --a- C1. AVZ--�
Gregg Antemann, PWS
Principal Scientist
Page 10 of 11
&X4kAO&L
Kaitlin McCulloch, WPIT
Project Manager
_.,� -;7,);�,-
Michelle LaForge
Project Scientist

South Mill Creek Sewer
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12
February 20, 2017
CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: USGS Site Location
Figure 3: Aerial Imagery
Figure 4: USDA-NRCS Current Soil Survey of Forsyth County
Figure 5: USDA-NRCS Historic Soil Survey of Forsyth County
Figure 6: National Wetlands Inventory
Figure 7: Jurisdictional Boundaries
Figure 8: Jurisdictional Boundaries: Extent Locations
Figure 9: Jurisdictional Boundaries: Extent 1 Location
Figure 10: Jurisdictional Boundaries: Extent 2 Location
Figure 11: Jurisdictional Boundaries: Extent 3 Location
Figure 12: Jurisdictional Boundaries: Extent 4 Location
Figure 13: Jurisdictional Boundaries: Extent 5 Location
Figure 14: Jurisdictional Boundaries: Extent 6 Location
Figure 15: Proposed Impacts: Extent Locations
Figure 16: Proposed Impacts: Extent 1 Location
Figure 17: Proposed Impacts: Extent 2 Location
Figure 18: Proposed Impacts: Extent 3 Location
Figure 19: Proposed Impacts: Extent 4 Location
Figure 20: Proposed Impacts: Extent 5 Location
Figure 21: Proposed Impacts: Extent 6 Location
Figure 22: Preliminary Investigation Area
Typical Stream Crossing
Agent Authorization
Pre -Construction Notification Pursuant to Nationwide Permit No. 12
Jurisdictional Determination Request Form
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
NCDEQ Stream Classification Forms (SCP 1-SCP8)
USACE Wetland Determination Data Forms (DPI-DPI8)
Photopage (Photographs 1-22)
SHPO Agency Correspondence
NCNHP Agency Correspondence
USFWS Agency Correspondence
Construction Plan Set
Page 11 of 11

0°s
Long C reek
Golf
C lub
H4"
09
at ct Maple 1,
Goff :I'
Bethania !'.""k C.ountir,
f-1,11
,ell
ti,
o
C
tvhl7torral03
Park 4til
:;`
0. Zr n
Pfafflown .3diinvillo Rd
Nor V, A.
61
0 0%
s Mill Creek Road .._
I's
p cod 4P:, t, e e Road WaW Forest
spice* Unrversity
7.
Oki
Town Club
Robinflood Rd ra 0010 "- 14%4
Rd
op
Forsrh z 01
Country
C lub Rd tai ti
G`a
Goys S�
C ou n trj, C1 Legend
7,
Project Limits (32.32 ac.)
000421
7WO1
i
5, 2,500 0 5,000 Feet
REFERENC :BACKGROUND VICINITY MAP PROVIDED BY ESRI, DATED 2015. 000
Q LA
SCALE: DATE: I inch = 5,000 feet 12/29/2016 Vicinity Map FIGURE NO.
CWS PROJECT NO: DRAVIN BY:
2015-3740 CPS South Mill Creek Sewer
�CLICANTNO: CHECKED BY: CAROLINA Winston-Salem, North Carolina
GCA WETLAND SERVICES CWS Project No. 2015-3740
U:\2015kCWS\2015 ProjectsU015-3740Mill Creek Smer\2016 South Mill Creek\JD and Perrnftting\ArcGIS\Figuw I Vicinity.—d

U:\2015\CWS\2015 Projects\2015-3740 Mill Creek Smer\2016 South Mill Cmek\]D and Permit4ng\ArcGIS\Figum 2_USGS.mxd

1r,771
'
_. r ..
r -
* r � ,. x°. *' l' 13.\ (� DR_'- 4♦ Af
sqµ. B1T 14 R54b 1 f', F Y .
,,.•'� d.. ,,,,^.. M^ ,�":'_' .-._. , _. � � y ,. w. i
° ,• Y "0P, J.W J . -� • � 's " A'� - .fes. � �-
. (+ PO
r r
i r
Y
"Y ..
W
sR r
1 1i;1� IILI vLy
lA. DE
1, ■,d �TL� i 11 i w
{ w .)
y
,' r ""''°mow.• ✓, f p �• . `,' '� 'y., j
to
10D. LN
xv
v
* 477 1.
�1 ii
7\ D RD
I O
h J
73
(1111 \' DR --fir ^ft! � ,.,,$
1.
44
_ \ , , Iy
w \t�°' tom„
kill
C
*--erg
v.: . \. ' '.,• ,i
/ q
• y, p' i. ,, t ,.i ti k !.
+ tiit<J
�.
1'111LY,\1ZK I)}Z + cYs +"+j►
r+ �!w ♦ kA
°
jL
75
RV
y q
} _
✓ate• -• -_ ,t � � ' �
dy,
Y � d
h
4
I I](ARND/ALI; DRd
F `
r °
� dry
r ®
r,
a
Legend
rq
Project Limits (32.32 ac.)Roads
• , PROVIDED BY v
BACKGROUND GIs LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY FORSYTH COUNTY GIs DEPARTMENT, DATED 2015.
fi

U:\2015\CWS\2015 Projects\2015-3740 Mill Creek Smer\2016 South Mill Creek\JD and Permitting\ArcGIS\Figum 4_Current Soils.mxd

U:\2015\CWS\201SProjects\2015-3740MiU Creek Smer\2016 South Mill Creek\JD and Permitting\ArcGIS\Figum 5_Histodc Soils.mxd

U:\2015\CWS\2015Projects\2015-374O Mill Creek Sewer\2016 South Mill Creek\VD and Petmit6ng\ArcGIS\Figure 6_NWI.mxd

U:\?015\CWS\2015 Projects22015-3740 Mill Creek Sewer1016 South Mill Creek\JD and Permitting\ArcGISTig Lire 7_JD.mxd

UiQ015\CWS\2015 Projects\2015-3740 Mill Creek Sewer\2016 South Mill Creek\JD and Permilling\Permitting\ArcGIS\Pigure 9 1Dextentlocations.mxd

U:\2015\CWS\2015 Projects\2015-3740 Mill Creek Sewer\2016 South Mill Creek\JD and Perri itting\Permitting\ArcGIS\Figure IS_ImpactExten[Locations.mxd

N
M
z
200
x .
�d
1 leen = !),UUU teet
MALLARD 9CR
200 Feet
COO
tiG� N U
U� _ '9Ar> ❑ o v
O
_ O �
O �
N M
• • o t/'1
Z
0
z
o <
a U
Tmparary! Figure Plan Set Apprsmate Approamat0 1
�G� t Jurisdictional Feature Impact N0. Impact Type Permanent No. Page No. Length (it) Acreage (aa)
Sl. S2, S4, S5. S6;
wG : SS, Sit, S13,S13, UtilitvCrossings Temporary 16-21 EC&9S 683 0.19 r(N
EC 11-1
CS
317,SIS
3 "i W
Stream A (Mdt Creek) Z_
S16 Stream Ford Temporary 20 EC 7 40 0.011 >
S22 Cuh— fLLJor Access Temporary 10-21 EC 5 40 0.011 J N
StreamB S3 Uhl ity Cro s s ing Tempotuy 16 EC 14 42 0.01 C)
Z
RPW Stream A (Mill Creek)4"4 StreamC S7 Utilitycrossiag Temporary 17 ECiI 129 0.03 Lr.Q
J
Temporary Impact: 61 if (of total 763 lf) s,:<amD s9 L'tilityCrossing Temporary 1s EC 10 51 0.007 Q�_
w
Impact No.: S6 (Utility Crossing) rr� `40,,(: 910 Construc6onAccess Temporary 18 EC to 32 0.004 U�
Stream S12 UtdityCrossing Temporary 16 EC9 Sl 0.01
Stream S14 Un'lityCrossing Temporary 19 EC7 65 0.003
Strum [ 920 Utility crossing Temporary 20 EC 6 73 0.002
Stream F S19 Utility Crossing Temporary 20 EC 6 26 0.01
Stream S21 UtilityCrossina Temporary 20 EC6 82 0.002
Stream G Nuddv Creek) S23 Utility Crossing Temporary 21 EC 3 66 0.07
Stream Impact Total: 1,410 If 0.331 au
Wetland CC (Forested) Forested/ Figure Planet T
Jurisdictional Featare Impact No. Impact Type Temporary Permanent
Permanent Impact: 0.008 ac. Herbaceous No. Pagexo. Impact(ac-) Lapaets(ae.) N
Impact No.: W3 (Clearing) 4letlandAA A'1 Cleating Forested 16 16 0.115 0.013
Wetland BB W2 Clearing Forested 16 16 0.012 0.038
o
Wetland CC W3 Clearing Forested 17 17 NIA 0.009
� M
WS Cleating Herbaceous 19 19 0.049 N,A W Cd
Wetland DD °) U v'
W5 Cleating Forested 19 19 0.026 1 0.016 s N
L
vv WetlaadEE A'6 Clearing Forested 19 19 0.026 0.002 C.Jami p
L
C WedandFF W7 Clearing Forested 19 19 0.003 0.001 Qr U Z
_ u
E
Wetland GG R"S Clearing Y:erbaceous 30 20 O.P61 O.OD3 � a+
el 'o
Wetland Impact Total: 0.192 ac 0.082 ac.
RPW Stream A (Mill Creek)
Temporary Impact: 62 if (of total 763 If)
Impact No.: S8 (Utility Crossing) Legend o
QProject limits & Temporary Easement (32.32 ac.) ;Af Permanent Easement per.
® Forested Wetland: Permanent Impact •""""' Proposed Sewerline
® Forested Wetland: Temporary Impact RPW
- Herbaceous Wetland: Permanent Impact Off -Site RPW
C)
Herbaceous Wetland: Temporary Impact - - - Seasonal RPW
z RPW Stream C
Temprary Impact: 129 If T RPW: Temporary Impact Off -Site Seasonal RPW
Impact No.: S7 (Utility Crossing) ' ' Seasonal RPW: Temporary Impact Roads
FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND GIS LAYER(S) PROVIDED BYFORSYTH COUNTY GIs DEPARTMENT, DATED 2016.
BACKGROUND VICINITY LAYER PROVIDED BY ESRI, DATED 2016.
17
, s NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELINEATED (FLAGGED IN THE FIELD), CLASSIFIED, AND
MAPPED USING A SUB -FOOT GPS UNIT BY CWS, INC. ON DECEMBER 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 2016. JURISDICTIONAL
�A— FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE.

�G
N
Wetland FF (Forested)
Permanent Impact: 0.001 ac.
1 inch = 5,000 feet
Wetland FF (Forested)
Temporary Impact: 0.003 ac.
I inch = 50 feet
RPW Stream A (Mill Creek)
Temporary Impact: 601f (of total 763 If)
Impact No.: S 15 (Utility Crossing)
Seasonal RPW Stream H
Temporary Impact: 65 if
Impact No.: S14 (Utility Crossing)
Wetland DD (Forested)
Permanent Impact: 0.016 ac.
Wetland DD (Herbaceous)
Temporary Impact: 0.049 ac.
Impact No.: W4 (Clearing)
Wetland DD (Forested)
Temporary Impact: 0.016 ac.
1 inch = 50 feet
RPW Stream A (Mill Creek)
Temporary Impact: 641f (of total 763 If)
Impact No.: S13 (Utility Crossing)
Wetland EE (Forested)
Permanent Impact: 0.002 ac.
Impact No.: W6 (Clearing)
Wetland EE (Forested)
Temporary Impact: 0.026 ac.
Impact No.: W6 (Clearing)
Wetland FF (Forested)
Permanent Impact: 0.001 ac.
Impact No.: W6 (Clearing)
A Wetland FF (Forested)
�.� Temporary Impact: 0.003 ac.
,,.•''e' Impact No.: W6 (Clearing)
200 100 0 200 Feet
F14"-
Ntl
Wetland DD (Forested)
Temporary Impact: 0.026 ac
Impact No.: W5 (Clearing)
Wetland DD (Forested)
Permanent Impact: 0.016 ac.
Impact No.: W5 (Clearing)
Jnrisdictiond Feature,
Im9att Nt.
1mpa"TF9e,
Iemporarr/ ligare
Permanent No.
Plan set .4"rweame Appre®nut
Page Aa. Len`* (IQ Acr p Iao4
Stean A (NO:retk)
Sf S' SS. S1 S6
SR. S11 5Il. . I;Ii
517 i1R
-
IThliy Cr—mgs
Temp—,y
16..71
EC 6-9k
EC 11-15
6R:
019
S16
SYerm Ford
Temporary
20
EC 7
40
0.011
$22
C3certt:0r A:cess
Road
remporuv
20.21
F%5
40
0.011
St.—B
53
tinStyCnssiia
Temporary
16
EC 14
42
OAl
StreanC
S'
UttltyCressng
lemportry
II
he 11
I_'9
0.03
54
Jtaitycressitg
I mponry
15
EC IQ
:2
0.007
Skean D
310
CunehuW—A-- Tempmmy
13
EC
32
0.001
StremE
S12
Stilitc•Cressitg
Tempora:♦•
11
EZI9
Rl
0.01
See—H
513
_tihn-f--mg
Temporary
19
EC'.
65
0.003
Streart1
S2u
Uhtty(:resseg
I"orary
29
LC6
e,3
U.ou
StreamF
S19
'jt&yCressing
Traponry
20
EC 1
26
0.01
Stam;
521
Uh1'tyC--ing
T.•mparuy
20
LC6
82
0.002
RremnG _,:ud&CreeL)
S23
tifiri•Cressin¢
Tempor—
2l I
E:3
66
00'
Stream Impact Total:
1.410 If
131 ar.
Jurisdictional Feamrs
Impact Na,
lmj�
Foreared�
Herbaceous
rigare
tin
P4aset
Page Po,
lemperu±
Impaet lae.l
permanent
Impaaaa(aa}
W etand _'IA
Wl
6learmu
forested
16
16
011)
U.913
WedandBB
W2
Clearing
Forested
16
16
0.012
0.038
Weamal CC
V43
Cleaning
F..ta1
17
L7
\.A
0.001
W4
clearing
Herbaceous
19
19
0.049
N'A
Wetlartl DD
00.5
Claming
F—,td
19
19
0026
0.016
N edand lP.
W6
Clearing
forested
19
W
UU26
11W2
'YetlandFF
007
Cleating
Forested
19
19
0.003
0.001
Wedand GG
W9
Maria.
Pabaceous
20
20
0.061
0.004
WetlandlmWaTotal:
0,292 t%
I O.OB'eae.
Legend
Q Project limits & Temporary Easement (32.32 ac.)
® Forested Wetland: Permanent Impact
® Forested Wetland: Temporary Impact
Herbaceous Wetland: Permanent Impact
Herbaceous Wetland: Temporary Impact
RPW: Temporary Impact
- Seasonal RPW: Temporary Impact
Permanent Easement
a•.^a.. Proposed Sewerline
RPW
Off -Site RPW
- - Seasonal RPW
Off -Site Seasonal RPW
Roads
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND GIS LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY FORSYTH COUNTY GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2016. BACKGROUND VICINITY LAYER PROVIDED BY SSRI, DATED 2016.
NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELINEATED (FLAGGED IN THE FIELD), CLASSIFIED, AND MAPPED USING A SUB -FOOT GPS UNIT BY CWS, INC. ON DECEMBER 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 2016. JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE.
QN
w
U
�5;
—Ir
JW
LO
❑U
MQ
QJ
Ld
U
FIGURE NO.
19

1 inch 5.000 feet
Legend
Q Project limits & Temporary Easement (32.32 ac.)
® Forested Wetland: Permanent Impact
® Forested Wetland: Temporary Impact
Herbaceous Wetland: Permanent Impact
{ r Herbaceous Wetland: Temporary Impact
RPW: Temporary Impact
Seasonal RPW: Temporary Impact
Permanent Easement
...•..... Proposed Sewerline
RPW
Off -Site RPW
Seasonal RPW
Off -Site Seasonal RPW
Roads
RPW Stream A (Mill Creek) t\
Temporary Impact: 601f (of total 763 If) o Q
Impact No.: S 15 (Utility Crossing) o CU7
`"'•. z
Wetland GG (Herbaceous) RPW Stream A (Mill Creek) 8
_ = Temporary Impact•. 0.061 ac. Temporary Impact: 40 If (of total 763 If) °•, •••
Impact No.: S16 (Stream Ford) „ �•°"`
..�. ,..,..
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Wetland GG (Herbaceous)
Permanent Impact: 0.004 ac.
Seasonal RPW Stream I
Temprary Impact: 73 if
Impact No. S20 (Utility Crossing)
Wetland GG (Herbaceous)
Permanent Impacts: 0.004 ac.
1 inch = 50 feet I Impact No. W8 (Clearing)
Seasonal RPW Stream 3 0.•'`
Temprary Impact: 82 If
Impact No. S21 (Utility Crossing)
RPW Stream F
Temprary Impact: 261f
Impact No. S 19 (Construction Access)
Wetland GG (Herbaceous)
Temporary Impacts: 0.061 ac.
Impact No. W8 (Clearing)
RPW Stream A (Mill Creek)
Temporary Impact: 621f (of total 763 If)
Impact No.: S18 (Utility Crossing)
RPW Stream A (Mill Creek)
Temporary Impact: 401f (of total 1,159 If)
Impact No.: S22 (Construction Access)
ROLLING KNOLLLN
Jansdicrional Feature
Stream A (aft] Creek)
StreamB
Stream C
Stream D
Sae=E
Steam H
Steam I
Stream F
Stream J
Stream G (Muddy Creek;
Impact'No
St, 5d, 54, S), S6,
S8, S 11, S13, S15,
517, 5t8
q16
S22
S3
S7
s9
Slo
$12
Sit
520
S19
521
S23
Jurisdictional Feature
Impact Vo.
R'etland.--1
WI
Wetland BB
n2
l mbmACC
R•i
Wad—dM
W4
W5
al'edmdlE
R'6
R'etlaadFF
•d^.
WetlaxndGG
\l'S
QIn
w
Z;
_Ir
F1Jw
to
00
Lta
QJ
w
U
RPW Stream A (Mill Creek)
Temporary Impact: 61 If (of total 763 If)
Impact No.: S 17 (Utility Crossing)
ImpactType
Temponryl Ftgsre
Plaaset
proximate Approximate
Permanent
No.
Page No.
Lengi6 (It)
.Acreage (ac.)
Utility Crossings Tenporary• 1421 EC 6A do 693 119
EC 11-15
Cmatn Ford Temp. -T 70 F.t” J0 0011
cuh,ftt for Access Temporary 20-21 EC5 40 0.011
Road
W
V
a
3 ve rref
0
y rV
CD
1'•Z o
V
Ut0ityCrossing Iertporan• 16 EC td 42 0.01
UtslityCrossing Temporary 17 EC 11 1:9 0.03
Utdity Crooning Temporary 1S EC to 51 6.007U
Constrtstiort.Aeeess Temporary 1B EC 10 320.004
UtilityCrossing Temporary 18 EC 9 81 0.01
Utility Crcaaing
Temporary
19
EC7
65
0.003
it
00
z
%^ V
=
o
q
°U
L'ZtlityCrossiag Temporary 20 EC6 73 0.002
Uhli[yCrossing Temporary » EC6 26 0.01
Utility eroaaing temporary » iC6 az 0.aoz
Utility Crossins Tenporar<• 21 EC3 66 0,02
Stream Impact Total: 1,4101F 031 ac.
Impact Type Forested' Figure Plaaset Temporary Pernumeat
Herhaceoas
No.
Pave No.
Impact(ac.)
Impacts(ac.)
Cleating Forested 16 16 0.115 0.013
Clearing Forested 16 16 0.012 0.038
l7ewrinS Ftrested 17 1-, VtA 0008
Clearing Hertmeeoas 19 19 0.049 NIA
Clearing Forested 19 19 0.026 0.016
cl—v s Faeated 19 19 OA26 0.002
Clearing Forested 19 19 0.003 0.001
FIGURE
NO.
Cleating Herbaceous 20 t' 0.061 0.004
R'et6ad impaa Itaal: 0.292 afl 0.082 ac
200 100 0 200 Feet REFERENCE: BACKGROUND GIs LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY FORSYTH COUNTI' GIS DEPARTMENT, DATED 2016. BACKGROUND VICINITY LAYER PROVIDED BY ESRI, DATED 2016. O
NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELINEATED (FLAGGED IN THE FIELD), CLASSIFIED, AND MAPPED USING A SUB -FOOT GPS UNIT BYCWS, INC. ON DECEMBER
14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 2016. JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USACE.

I inch = 5,000 feet
RPW Stream G (Muddy Creek)
Temporary Impact: 66 If
Impact No. S23 (Utility Crossing)
200 100 0 200 Feet
RPW Stream A (Mill Creek)
Temporary Impact: 401f (of total 763 If)
Impact No.: S22 (Construction Access)
Legend
QProject limits & Temporary Easement (32.32 ac.)
® Forested Wetland: Permanent Impact
® Forested Wetland: Temporary Impact
Herbaceous Wetland: Permanent Impact
Herbaceous Wetland: Temporary Impact
RPW: Temporary Impact
Seasonal RPW: Temporary Impact
Permanent Easement
Proposed Sewerline
RPW
Off -Site RPW
Seasonal RPW
– Off -Site Seasonal RPW
Roads
�NJ
YETI
Jurisdictional Feature
Impsct'No,
Impact Type
Temporarct
Permanent
Figure
No.
Plan Set Approximate Approximate
Page No. Length (it) Acreage (ac.)
Stream A (DisH Creels)
S1,S2, S4, S5, S61
SS, SI I,S13,S15,
S17,918
UtitkyCrossings
Temporary
16-21
6-9&
EC EC -9&
1-15
683
0.19
S16
Stream Ford
Temporary
20
EC 7
40
0.011
S22
Cuh-erttff r cress
ad
Temporary
20-21
EC 5
40
0.011
Stream
S3
Ut kyCroasing
Temporary
16
EC 14
42
0.01
Stream C
S7
Utt1'ty Crossing
Temporary
17
EC 11
129
0.03
Stream D
S9
UtsltyCrossmg
Temporary
IS
EC 10
51
0.007
910
Construction Access
Temporary
18
EC10
32
0.004
Stream
S12
UtUityCrossing
Temporary
IS
EC9
81
0.01
Stream
S14
UtsltyCrossing
Temporary
19
EC7
65
0.003
Stream I
S20
UtRy Crossing
Temporary
20
EC 6
73
0.002
Stream
S19
Utility Crossing
Temporary
20
EC6
26
0.01
Stream J
S21
Utility Crossing
Temporary
20
EC 6
82
0.002
StreamG(Muddy Cred:j
S_3
Utility Crossing
Temporary
21
EC3
66
0.02
Stream Impact Tout•
1,410 If
031 ac.
Jurisdictional Feature
Impact No.
ImpactT)pe
Forested�
Herbaceous
Figure
Na
Plaaset
Page Na
Temporary
Impact (ac.)
Permanent
Impacts (ac.)
Wetland.AA
WI
Clearing
Forested
16
16
0.115
0.013
WedandBB
tt2
Clearing
Forested
16
16
0.012
0.038
Wetland CC
W3
Cleating
Forested
17
17
NA
0.008
a*atlana DD
W4
Clearing
Herbaceous
19
19
0.049
N'A
W5
Clearing
Forested
19
19
0.026
OA16
R'etlarsdE6
W6
Clearing
Forested
19
19
0.026
0.002
'Wetland FF
R 7
Clearing
Forested
19
19
0.003
0A01
Wetland GG
NA,S
Clearing
Herbaceous
20
20
OA61
0.001
Wetland Impact Total:
0.292 as
0.082 ac.
REFERENCE: BACKGROUND GIS LAYER(S) PROVIDED BY FORSYTH COUNTY GIs DEPARTMENT, DATED 2016. BACKGROUND VICINITY LAYER PROVIDED BY ESRI, DATED 2016.
NOTE: JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DELINEATED (FLAGGED IN THE FIELD), CLASSIFIED, AND MAPPED USING A SUB -FOOT GPS UNIT BY CWS, INC. ON DECEMBER 14, 15, 19, 20, 21, 2016. JURISDICTIONAL FEATURES HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE USAGE.
QN
w
z
—ry
wn1w
In
00
MQ
QJ
F
U�
ii
d res
a3a U to
�•+ X N
V
CI, Uzz
0 8 v
u
o ° to
�:
0 3v
it
a
FIGURE NO.
21

FLOW DIRECTION
.m
10.0'
10.0' 25.0'
PUMP
7.5' 10.0' 7.5'
WORK TRENCH WORK
AREA AREA
10.0' 1 5.0'
APPROX.
TOP OF BANK
FLOW DIRECTION
LBERM
L BERM
PUMP DISCHARGE
\ _ INTAKE SUMP
W/SILT SACK
(AS NEEDED)
EX. SAN. SEWER
0
(TO BE REMOVED IN
SOME LOCATIONS)
NEW 48" SEWER
CREEK CROSSING SCHEMATIC
SCALE: 1"=10'

AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified
herein, do authorize representative of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of
conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of
the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdictional under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
I, Mr. Bill Ward, representing the City of Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Utilities,
hereby certify that I have authorized Gregg Antemann of Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and
acceptance of this request for wetlands determination / permitting and any and all
standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify that the above information submitted in this application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge.
Applicant's signature
/A�
Date
Agent's signature
1-18-2017
Date
Completion of this form will allow the agent to sign all future application correspondence.

I
Jurisdictional Determination Request
0
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting.a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on-line at: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug I�ryPermitProgram.aspx , by
telephoning: 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-2514633
Fax Number: [phone]
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: December 2013 Page 2

jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address:
City, State:
County:
Directions:
located south of the Reynolda Road and YadkinAlle Road intersection in WinstonSalem, North Carolina
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Forsyth
located south of the Reynoida Road-Yadkinville Road intersection in Winston-Salem, North Carolina
proposed sewerline continues until Mill Creek and Muddy Creek confluence
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address':
multiple; existing sew dine easement
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.; POC: Mr. Gregg Antemann, PWS
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28273
704-408-1683
[e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: City of Winston-Salem/Forsyth County; POC: Mr. Bill Ward
Mailing Address: utilities Administration - P.O. Box 2511 Winston-Salem, NC 27102
Telephone Number: (W) 336-747-7306, (M) 336403-3955
Electronic Mail Address3:
❑ Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
1 If available
Z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Coils of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
Mr. Bill Ward
Property Owner (please print)
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
- iLZ,.>/r�
Date
RI am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps provide a 6eliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS5 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
° For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
❑✓ Size of Property or Project Area 32.32 acres
ly l 1 verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑✓ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
❑V Project Coordinates: 36.153833 Latitude "80.311925 Longitude
Maps (no larger than l 1x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑✓ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑✓ USGS Topographic Map
❑✓ Soil Survey Map
0✓ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

. Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
0✓ Wetland Data Sheets8
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑✓ Upland Data Sheets Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑✓ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑✓ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/res supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://Portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/set file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364 and,
http://www.saw.usace.army.miI/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/Dublicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
❑ USACE Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
F] Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard-
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11"x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11 "x 17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
❑ Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
❑ Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
❑ Must be legible
❑ Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
❑ Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
F1Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
❑ Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
❑ all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
❑ Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non -
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
❑ Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
❑ When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USA CE Action ID No.:
❑ When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 2-16-2017
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.; POC: Gregg
Antemann, PWS; 550 E Westinghouse Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28273
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Asheville Office — Charlotte Satelitte
Office
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Located south of the Reynolda Road
and Yadkinville Road intersection in Winston-Salem, North Carolina along Mill Creek
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Mecklenburg City: Winston-Salem
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 36.153833° Long.: -80.311925°
Universal Transverse Mercator: NAD83
Name of nearest waterbody: Mill Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site Number
Latitude
Longitude
Estimated amount
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority to
(decimal
(decimal
of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic resource
degrees)
degrees)
resources in review
wetland vs. non-
"may be" subject (i.e.,
area (acreage and
wetland waters)
Section 404 or Section
linear feet, if
10/404)
applicable
Mill Creek
Non -wetland
Stream A)
19,516 if
waters
Section 404 -Non -Section 10
Stream B
36.131861
-80.337549
421f
Non -wetland
Section 404 -Non -Section 10
waters
Stream C
36.144447
-80.321044
129 if
Non -wetland
Section 404 -Non -Section 10
waters
Stream D
36.141983
-80.322231
3721f
Non -wetland
Section 404 -Non -Section 10
waters
Stream E
36.138242
-80.326017
81 If
Non -wetland
Section 404 -Non -Section 10
waters
Stream F
36.130911
-80.437931
261f
Non -wetland
Section 404 -Non -Section 10
waters
Stream G
661f
Non -wetland
Section 404 -Non -Section 10
(Muddy Creek)
waters
Stream H
36.133147
-80.332522
65 if
Non -wetland
Section 404 -Non -Section 10
waters
Stream I
36.131339
-80.339136
73 if
Non -wetland
Section 404 -Non -Section 10
waters
Stream J
36.131622
-80.337489
821f
Non -wetland
Section 404 -Non -Section 10
waters

Site Number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic
resources in review
area (acreage and
linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404)
Wetland AA
36.152554
-80.315008
0.13 ac.
wetland
Section 404 -Non -Section 10
Wetland BB
36.149894
-80.319759
0.05 ac.
wetland
Section 404 -Non -Section 10
Wetland CC
36.146215
-80.321393
0.01 ac.
wetland
Section 404 -Non -Section 10
Wetland DD
36.137416
-80.327351
0.09 ac.
wetland
Section 404 -Non -Section 10
Wetland EE
36.133688
-80.331777
0.02 ac.
wetland
Section 404 -Non -Section 10
Wetland FF
36.133055
-80.332331
0.01 ac.
wetland
Section 404 -Non -Section 10
Wetland GG
36.131813
-80.337367
0.06 ac.
wetland
Section 404 -Non -Section 10

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1: 24,000 Winston-Salem West, NC (1997)
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Forsyth County Soil Surveys: Current USDA
& Historic USDA (1972)
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: NWI NC 2015
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): ESRI 2013
or ®Other (Name & Date): Site Photographs, dated 2016_
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
2-16-2017
Signature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable) 1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no. _
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
N Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes N No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply).-
pply):❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
0
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes N No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes M No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes N
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes M No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
South Mill Creek Sewer Project
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
(City of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County Utilities; Sewerline Easement)
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
(City of Winston-Salem and Forsyth County Utilities; Sewerline Easement)
3d.
Street address:
Utilities Administration - P.O. Box 2511
3e.
City, state, zip:Winston-Salem,
North Carolina 27102
3f.
Telephone no.:
(W) 336-747-7306 and (M) 336-403-3955
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
Agent Other, specify: Local Government
4b.
Name:
Mr. Bill Ward
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
City of Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Utilities
4d. Street address:
P.O. Box 2511
4e.
City, state, zip:Winston-Salem,
North Carolina 27102
4f.
Telephone no.:
(W) 336-747-7306 and (M) 336-403-3955
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
WILLIAM [e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Gregg Antemann, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
550 E. Westinghouse Blvd.
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28273
5e.
Telephone no.:
704-408-1683
5f.
Fax no.:
704-527-1133
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Multiple (sewerline easement)
1b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.153833° Longitude: -80.311925°
1 c.
Property size:
32.32 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Mill Creek
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c.
River basin:
Upper Pee Dee (HUC# 03040101)
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area consists of sewerline right-of-ways, maintained open areas, and forested areas. Typical on-site
vegetation consists of American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), river birch (Betula nigra), black cherry (Prunus
serotina), southern red oak (Quercus falcata), tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera), box elder (Acer negundo),
green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) black willow (Salix nigra), eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), red maple
(Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata), Chinese privet (Ligustrum
sinense), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), sawtooth blackberry (Rubus argutus), giant cane (Arundinaria
gigantea), greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), muscadine (Vitis
rotundifolia), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), ground ivy (Glechoma hederacea), English ivy (Hedera helix),
wingstem (Verbesina alternifolia), goldenrod (Solidago canadensis), deertongue (Dichanthelium clandestinum),
Nepalese browntop (Microstegium vimineum), woolgrass (Scirpus cyperinus), nutgrass (Cyperus rotundus), yellow
nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus), common rush (Juncus effusus), reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), curly
dock (Rumex crispus), wild onion (Allium vineale), and various grasses (Festuca spp.) and sedges (Carex spp.).
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.37 ac.
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,806 If
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to construct approximately 20,013 linear feet of 30-inch, 36-inch, and 48-inch gravity sewer
along Mill Creek, beginning at the downstream portion of Reynolda Road and ending at the confluence of Mill Creek and
Muddy Creek in Winston -Salem, North Carolina. The South Mill Creek Sewer is the first phase of the entire Mill Creek
Sewer project. The second phase, North Mill Creek Sewer, is in the process of being finalized and may be submitted mid-
2017.
The proposed sewerline will parallel the existing sewer (in most areas) along Mill Creek. The proposed sewerline does not
intend to formally abandon the existing easement and does not intend to remove the existing pipe, it will be abandoned in
place. The existing 30-inch sewer was installed in 1959 and several sections were replaced in the 1980s. Gavel & Dorn
Engineering, PLLC was contracted to evaluate the existing sewer and determine whether it was best to replace the sewer
in-situ or construct a parallel sewer relief.
The primary driver for the proposed sewer is capacity limitations. The need for gravity sewer was identified in the Winston-
Salem/Forsyth County Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Utilities Commission expects
increases in population growth and employment from 2011 to 2041. As a result of increased population and employment
rates, flow rates for sewer interceptors will increase, resulting in maximum capacity. Specifically for the Mill Creek sewer
interceptor, upon the completion of upstream projects, the existing Mill Creek sewer interceptor would be unable to
withstand potential overflow and surcharging during a five-year storm event. Gavel & Dorn Engineering, PLLC have
designed the current sewer so that it can handle a five-year storm event and increased flows from the completion of
upstream projects.
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Under Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 12, unavoidable impacts associated with the construction of the South Mill Creek
Sewer project include the mechanized clearing of forested and herbaceous wetland vegetation and jurisdictional stream
crossings. Permanent impacts will be the result of a 30-foot to 45-foot wide permanently maintained easement in which
forested and herbaceous wetlands will be cleared, converted, and maintained as herbaceous wetlands. Temporary
impacts will be the result of a permanent easement through 23 stream crossings and a temporary construction easement
through wetlands.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Yes No Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
" Preliminary Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: CWS, Inc.
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
Yes No IM Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
The South Mill Creek Sewer is the first phase of the entire Mill Creek Sewer project. The second phase, North Mill Creek
Sewer, is in the process of being finalized and may be submitted mid-2017.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for you project (check all that apply)
© Wetlands 0 Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2e.
2f.
Wetland Impact number -
2b.
2c.
2d.
Type of
Area of
Permanent (P) or
Type of Impact
Type of Wetland
Forested
jurisdiction
impact (acres)
Tempora (T)
W1 - T & P
Clearing
Wetland AA
Yes
Corps
0.115 (T)
0.013 P)
W2 - T & P
Clearing
Wetland BB
Yes
Corps
0.012 (T)
0.038 P
W3 - P
Clearing
Wetland CC
Yes
Corps
0.008 (P)
W4 -T
Clearing
Wetland DD
No
Corps
0.049 (T)
W5 -T& P
Clearing
Wetland DD
Yes
Corps
0.026 (T)
0.016 P)
W6 -T & P
Clearing
Wetland EE
Yes
Corps
0.026 (T)
0.002 (P)
W7 -T & P
Clearing
Wetland FF
Yes
Corps
0.003 (T)
0.001 (P)
W8 -T & P
Clearing
Wetland GG
No
Corps
0.061 (T)
0.004 P
2g. Total Wetland
Impacts
0.078 ac.
2h. Comments:
Temporary impacts total 0.292 acre of wetland and permanent total 0.082 acre of wetland (forested and
herbaceous). Permanent forested wetland impacts total 0.078 acre of wetland.
Pages 5 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then
complete this question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream Impact
number-
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
(T)
3b.
Type of Impact
3c.
Stream
Name
3d.
Perennial
(PER)or
Intermittent
(INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average '
stream
width (feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear feet)
S1 -T
Utility Crossing
Mill Creek
PER
Corps
12
60
S2 - T
Utility Crossing
Mill Creek
PER
Corps
12
66
S3 -T
Utility Crossing
Stream B
PER
Corps
5
42
S4 -T
Utility Crossing
Mill Creek
PER
Corps
12
64
S5 -T
Utility Crossing
Mill Creek
PER
Corps
12
61
S6 -T
Utility Crossing
Mill Creek
PER
Corps
12
61
S7 -T
Utility Crossing
Stream C
PER
Corps
5
129
S8 -T
Utility Crossing
Mill Creek
PER
Corps
12
62
S9 -T
Utility Crossing
Stream D
PER
Corps
6
51
S10 -T
Construction
Access
Stream D
PER
Corps
6
32
S11 -T
Utility Crossing
Mill Creek
PER
Corps
12
62
S12 -T
Utility Crossing
Stream E
PER
Corps
5
81
S13 -T
Utility Crossing
Mill Creek
PER
Corps
12
64
S14 -T
Utility Crossing
Stream H
INT
Corps
2
65
S15 -T
Utility Crossing
Mill Creek
PER
Corps
12
60
S16 -T
Stream Ford
Mill Creek
PER
Corps
12
40
S17 -T
Utility Crossing
Mill Creek
PER
Corps
12
61
S18 -T
Utility Crossing
Mill Creek
PER
Corps
12
62
S19 -T
Utility Crossing
Stream F
PER
Corps
6
26
S20 -T
Utility Crossing
Stream I
INT
Corps
2
73
S21 -T
Utility Crossing
Stream J
INT
Corps
2
82
S22 -T
Culvert
Mill Creek
PER
Corps
12
40
S23 -T
Utility Crossing
Muddy
Creek
PER
Corps
12
66
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
1,410 If
3i. Comments:
In total, 1,410 If of streams will be temporarily impacted. There are no permanent impacts proposed.
Pages 6 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivii ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Tempora (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01
_
Choose One
Choose
02
-
Choose One
Choose
03
-
Choose One
Choose
04
Choose One
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b. 5c.
Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres)
purpose of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated
5d. 5e.
Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled Excavated
P1
Choose One
P2
Choose One
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number-
Permanent (P) or
Tempora (T)
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet)
B1
-
Yes/No
B2
_
Yes/No
B3
_
Yes/No
B4
Yes/No
B5
Yes/No
B6
_
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form -Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. The South Mill
Creek sewer has been designed to avoid impacts to jurisdictional waters wherever possible and minimize the extent of
necessary impacts to jurisdictional waters. The proposed sewerline alignment and associated easements were designed
based upon a preliminary wetlands investigation in order to reduce impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U.S. to the
greatest extent practicable. Proper sediment and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to
downstream waters. Construction activities and impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with Water
Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3884.
No Build Alternative:
A no -build alternative would result in the current sewer reaching maximum capacity due to current and ongoing
development in the upper drainage area of the Mill Creek. With the continued growth in Winston-Salem, a no -build
alternative could result in overflowing and surcharging sewers during storm events. The need for an increased public
sewer size and length to withstand storm events and flow rates, rendered a no -action alternative impracticable and
environmentally detrimental. Therefore, a no -build alternative was eliminated from further consideration since it would not
be reasonable or feasible given the projected growth and ongoing and future development within the service area
Preliminary Corridor Investigation Area:
Constraints identified in determining a proposed alignment were largely based on the condition and location of the current
alignment and a preliminary wetlands field determination performed by CWS in April and September 2016. The primary
goal of the design effort was to develop an alignment that would avoid or minimize potential impacts to wetlands, streams,
steep slopes, cultural resources, riparian buffers, and other identified environmental constraints, to the maximum extent
practicable, without compromising engineering requirements. The preliminary wetlands field determination consisted of a
200 -foot corridor (approximately 97 acres in extent) with the existing sewerline as the centerline. Within the 200 -foot
preliminary corridor, approximately 6.74 acres of wetlands were located within the project limits. The proposed alignment
was designed using the preliminary alignment and avoids 82% of the wetland features located within the preliminary
alignment.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. have been reduced to the maximum extent practicable. Proper sediment
and erosion control measures will be used to minimize disturbances to downstream waters. Construction activities and
impacts to on-site jurisdictional waters of the U.S. will comply with all conditions of Nationwide Permit 12 and Water Quality
Certificate No. 3884. All work will be constructed in the dry.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
Yes No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
DWQ Corps
Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose One
Type: Choose One
Type: Choose One
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose One
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
Yes
No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Yes
No
This project is associated with a stormwater infrastructure maintenance project and
does not require a DFP.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
Yes
No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
This project is associated with a sewerline infrastructure project and does not require a SMP.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is this project?
Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
NSW
apply (check all that apply):
USMP
Water Supply Watershed
Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
Yes
No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
Coastal counties
4a.
Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
HQW
ORW
(check all that apply):
Session Law 2006-246
Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
Yes
No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
Yes
No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
Yes
No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the;
Yes No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
Yes No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
Yes No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
Yes No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
Yes No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
Yes No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge)
of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
Yes No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
CWS performed a data review using North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) Data Explorer on April 15, 2016 to
determine the presence of any federally -listed, candidate endangered, threatened species, or critical habitat located within
the project area. Based on the NCNHP review, there are no records of federally -protected species within the project limits
or within a mile of the project. A copy of the data review report is attached to this permit application.
In addition, on April 19 and 20, 2016 and on September 27, 2016, CWS scientists Michelle LaForge, Project Scientist,
Kaitlin McCulloch, Wetland Professional in Training (WPIT), and Kerry Wright, Staff Scientist I, conducted a pedestrian
survey of the project limits to search for federally -protected species and potential habitat for the species. The project area
was surveyed for the presence of individuals or habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii), small-anthered
bittercress (Cardamine micranthera), bog turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergh), red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis),
roanoke perch (Percina rex), and the northern long-eared bat (Myotic septentrionalis). No individual species were
observed during the pedestrian survey. Marginal habitat did exist for the northern long-eared bat.
On October 28, 2016, a letter was forwarded to the United States Fish and Wildlife Services requesting concurrence of our
findings. In a response letter dated November 30, 2016, the USFWS states "We have no record of federally protected
species or designated critical habitat in the vicinity of the proposed project. Based on the information provided, we believe
that the probability for take of the northern long-eared bat as a result of this project would be insignificant or discountable."
Therefore, the USFWS concurred that the northern long-eared bat may be affected, but is not likely to be adversely
affected and that all other federally protected species will not be affected by the project. A copy of the response letter is
attached to this permit application.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
Yes 13 No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Fisheries: http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/habitatmapper.html
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes F1 No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
CWS consulted the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) online GIS service on April 15, 2016 to
determine the presence of any historical structures, buildings, or districts within the project boundaries. Based on the
review of the SHPO online GIS service, there were no historical structures, buildings, or districts within the project area. In
addition, a letter was forwarded to SHPO on October 19, 2016 to determine any resources of architectural, historic, or
archaeological significance that would be affected by the project. Based on a response letter from SHPO dated October
28, 2016, SHPO states "We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be
affected by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed." A copy of the response letter is
attached to this permit application.
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
Li Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
This is a sewerline infrastructure project.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
FEMA Firm No. 3710680700J, 371081700J, 3710680600J
ZT-1 C.
Gregg Antemann
"x�
b
2-16-2017
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: \2�
Project/Site: Vw q C. vee.(- _'1Vt,rf-
Latitude:
Evaluator: ���� GQcJ
County: '�T&r-5
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other 5GP I ���✓
Stream is at least intermittent [,(,
Ephemeral Intermittent egni
e.g. Quad Name: .
if 2 19 or perennial if Z 30*
2
3
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = tS,S
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
1.5
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
C5
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
Yes <- 3
3
5. Active/relict floodplain •
0
1
CD
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
c=D
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
0'
3
8. Headcuts
1�)
1
2
3
9. Grade control
cl7
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
e
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channelo
=
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 13 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
14. Leaf litter
1.5
2
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1 CaD
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1 :5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0.5
No = 0
Yes <- 3
C. Bioloov (Subtotal = Ca )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed Q
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) CD
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish CID
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians a
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5 -
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =1.5
Oth -
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 6ec.. (fit ,2014,
Project/Site: MW Cfeeii< r
Latitude: g(,, MV49
Evaluator:
County:ocs
Longitude: -
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent ?yj
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
if Z 19 or perennial !f Z 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =j • S )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
C>
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
02
0 0.5
CD
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
Y
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
c )
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
C>
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
Q
3
8. Headcuts
CD
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
10. Natural valley
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N
- b
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= It .,S- )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
CD
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
CD
3
14. Leaf litter
C5D 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
c2D
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
CD
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Y
= 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
022
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
®
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
(.37.>
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
05
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
(�t>
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: �ec. �S " .o Wo
Project/Site: �/�;�( �ceeV r
Latitude: 36. 1gl?83
Evaluator: �iN� CQ C,
County: �S U
Longitude:. �jj, 3ZZ,25/
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other vo -+
Stream is at least intermittent S
if 2! 19 or perennial if 2 30; '
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_i3 .S )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
16. Organic debris lines or piles
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
Q7
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
QJ
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
(::5)
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
C --TD
10. Natural valley
CDS
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = I l )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1 2
C3.)
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 2
3
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
efP 1 0.5
0 0.5 Q-*!,
0
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5 1
3
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 Yes 3
2
C. Bioloqv (Subtotal = 7 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed CID
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) C:rD
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks CD
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish 0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be Identifled using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

V
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: SQL, (� t . v'� t(a
Project/Site: ML (t C,fec,,V !. C
Latitude: ' . 13&Z4/a
Evaluator: Cl?s
County:
Longitude: -go. -Z,2Zd 17
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circ aOther
5L�
Stream is at least intermittent
if >_ 19 orperennial if z 30* SD
Ephemeral Intermltten is
e.g. Quad Name
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 13)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
L3j
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
Q
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0 0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1Yes 3
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
CD
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1:2D
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
<=>
3
8. Headcuts
0
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
Cil~m.
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions In manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = I I )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
+
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 (n
2
3
14. Leaf fitter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
CID
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
1Yes 3
1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 11, )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish)
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Othe =
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: lb&C 20((o
Project/Site: J4V(( Clee-r Z4;4W_P
Latitude: 7y 13Cfj/(
Evaluator: �i �
County: �:-" 5 4k
Longitude: _ go. Y3793/
Total Points:
Stream Is at least intermittent `/ o
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other (2Rn)
e.g. Quad Name:
if Z 19 orperennial if 2 30"
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =��`
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
Q
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
1 0.5
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
es =
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
C
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2'
3'
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
1.5
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
1.5
8. Headcuts
0
1
2'
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
<1b
10. Natural valley
0
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Yes = 3
Sketch:
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal= (3 -S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
1.
0
1
0.5
0.5 0
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
1
No = 0
es =
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = `6 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
CD2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
cc>
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
er -
*perennlal streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: s
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: pe li (b
Project/Site: C( -MV 5&4c r
Latitude: 3G , /�Z /Y 7
Evaluator: Kai) , Cps
County: ��
Longitude: _ Xb. rye.
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other SPc1bnG� ABY
Stream is at least intermittent
if a 19 or erennial if 30• S
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 9 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
,a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
CD
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
m
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
�
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
®
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
m
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
<2
3
8. Headcuts
<M
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
<n
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No -
Yes = 3
Sketch:
" artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal = A 01 S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 CD
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
<a3 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
d33 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Ye - 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = & )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
Q
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
C>
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
'U
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Otheri5
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: ,Z),
ProJect/Slte:iUU( Crt'E(C j
Latitude:,
Evaluator: �t�t T'. (rC�
County: . �it
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circle one)
p_�p
Other I'1,f w
Stream is at least intermittent a67 Z7-
if >_ 19 or perennial if z 30*
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name: SCP
A. Geomorphology Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
Q
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
2
3
3. in -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
01Q
0 0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
Cp
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
Notes:
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
CD
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
C 0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
CN -6-=-7 =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrolociv (Subtotal= `t D )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
(D
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
<�D 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
d::)
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
3
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1
1.
17. Solkbased evidence of high water table?
No = 0
1
s = 3
C. Biolociv (Subtotal = & }
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
1
0.5
2
1
3
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae C30
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 er =70)
Notes:
Sketch:

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: bei_ ,'Z.01 'LD ((o
Project/Site: At(.( Cree(- Sart
Latitude: 7
Evaluator: �/�� C
County: rs ��
Longitude: _ So X37 y8�
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent f'q
Stream Determination (circle one)
emer Intermittent Perennial
Other 90-0,Iq % R /"VT
e.g. Quad Name: S e p4r
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1.5
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_�)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1e' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1.5
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
sequence
0
1
2
3
-ripple-pool
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
0.5
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
CAD
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
CID
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
®
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o = 0
Yes = 3
Sketch:
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 6,S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
CD
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
01Q
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
<
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es =
1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = 4 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
Q
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
I3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
U
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
CID
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
®
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
®
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
dther =_b)
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: C7( �l �/ !! 41, 6' � -S P�/"Clty/County: ' Sytl^ Sampling Date: �e�p1� , �,,�(1�� ,.
Applicant/Owner:�aa,ml 22 Ort, State: �y-1 }� _ Sampling Polnt:� Orb 7 ">
t
Investigator(s): <t o 4- Section, Township, Range: f.O ZVJ6- v✓—
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): r-L00eJ1I­ ZLc-; " Local relief (concave, convex, none): C-0 r l C�0, . Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MUA I -R, Lat: '3(0. 15 V- l Long: - f(D. 328303 Dat ttOA8 — �3
Soil Map Unit Name: Goo oL'JJ GOa NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain In Remarks,)
Are Vegetation , Soli or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation , Sol] or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓� No Is the Sampled Area
Hydrlc Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required•
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
S rface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
High Water Table (A2)
_?✓
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1).
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
V Saturation (A3)
_N!!"Oxldlzed Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_✓Water
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solls (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_
_ Iron Deposits (135)
"-Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aqultard (D3)
_,,'water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
ri
12
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No
✓No
Depth (Inches): O ��
� �
Saturation Present? Yes
Depih (Inches): !7
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
nciudes capillary frlh e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available:
Remarks:
(,:r -6Q,
(L I -y W au- 4 _S
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: ppb- bbl;7"
r
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species C�
1. Ace -r Sti brv,+1
- 70
*�
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: / (A)
2. Ski
1 Ace- r- to Lj J,-1 a_.N
V' C
Total Number of Dominant
-I�ZE�L A'�"
3.
3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
'
Percent of Dominant Species
010
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 00 (ASB)
7.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm) or
. Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
196 Total Cover
50% of total cover:q2­15'20%
of total cover:_
OBL species
x 1 =
ding/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: (5 r )
10
FACW species
x 2 =
1 Ace- r- to Lj J,-1 a_.N
��
FAC species
FACU species
x 3 =
x4=
2
3
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
UPL species
Column -Totals:
x 5 =
(A) (B)
'
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
,ZC 2 -Dominance lest Is >50%
9• _ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.01
= Total Cover 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: a 20% of total cover:
� data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb �Stratum - (Plot size: -4-)
��K PtiCw, ls- r+ _ _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1. —I— 'Indicators of hydric soll and wetland hydrology must
3. be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
3
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
-ks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
k v-0 ", 04 GW �M�rt/c1.v� � � � Is
US Army Corps of Endineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm) or
6.
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8'
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 It (1
m) tall.
10
11.
Herb - All herbaceousnon-wood
( y) plants, regardless
=Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover: IZ•s 20% of total cover: S
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft In
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
height.
1. - - --
3
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
-ks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
k v-0 ", 04 GW �M�rt/c1.v� � � � Is
US Army Corps of Endineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
c—ii— Dnint. tiY!K _bb_ f
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Onches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Colo(moist) % Type Loci Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentratlon, D=De letlon, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrlx.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_
_ Hlstic Eplpedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19)
_
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (173) (MLRA 136, 147)
_
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6) — Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
_
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (1721) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (Inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
t �,1 d_x t c Sa L
1
\ N o�C a� ,J c Ave- �mse,2C
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: Sm L'� /0/'// ! L %Pt ! �tif� City/County: �brs �� Sampling Date:�—
Applicant/Owner: Gr1 v /1 D %� /State: G Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): GS/ A- Section, Township, Range: V ✓ / �7f7`a�l ' � f�
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): F100 "Slope
Local retie oncave, convex, none): e-4
®��+ �'P °
): /► r � ^ 13 Lat:
�c
O I �S �/ S Long: — Ot/ 1-7 �
Subregion (LRR or ML
Soil Map Unit Name: co V 0 4 P-0-14 al �' � NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ,� No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes -/- No
Is the Sampled Area �(
Hydric Sol] Present? Yes _ No within a Wetland? Yes � ` No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes YC No
Remarks: o
DG t �' l d i'n 7` l'S fP� /'O',. ? n i/ G
vire fr�ii 7 is nn i sc r(,6 -SA�� b ��'7-)q nnl
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
_
No
(Includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
ISP i-1 �►�
y C/4o lady rP r�sr n T
f'
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2,0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: %CWer aoe�
1. %��nuj BCC/` trttu/iJ• `(
2. vere^vf - C�7S -
3. C { T /-c,6 /clwl
4. 5ab, Vf1p, 10
5. 11 ((/
6.
7
Sampling Point: l w �t AA
idicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
^
S�ta�tus'
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
x 2 =
Total Number of Dominant]
x 3 =
_
Or� �
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
i
Percent of Dominant Species
+�
8�
L
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(AIB)
•� �- Total Cover
50% of total cover: J 7f total cover: 1
sapling!Shrub Stratum (Plot size: /31 )
1 er ry b /-L/i aQ �i9tL
2.Erc, r *A of � t'n nsy f/Gr►I(9 —ice
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7`' 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
6 T 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9 _ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
�,s'T Total
° = Cover — 4 - Morphological Adaptations (Provide supporting
S 50% of total cover: 20 /° of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1, Al,.Cfo, <{ �ti /yt (/�M��fa►+� 20 1 F4cV —Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2' 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3. be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
7
10.
11.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: i O 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum� ,(�ot size- I_V 1 ,_)
2.
3. --
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In. DBH'and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
M) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
_77 =Total Cover r Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
s: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet•)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point; DP1 Wer
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
inches Color moist % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
% loo
og- aD 10Y 1�5 S y, 7S C. PL
'Tvpe: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. `Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histfc Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
^_
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_, Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
��dar Soil . X0 / T
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ _ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: S© tet% A1111 tt��Sel'Wr City/County: &rsrA Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: ell i/? a w 0,0 /?7 State: G Sampling Point:%
Investigator(s): C -T Section, Township, Range: V►' 1�,/7 SO Ile 1-M
Landform (hillslope, terrace, �etc.): n i/UO a if
Local
relief (concave, (concave, convex, none): 'Co ha `R ve— Slope
Subregion (LRR or ML -7 , i� Long: v Datum:/164,D
3
Lat. Sal Map Unit Name:, d�/YPf(—o 14
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes A No (If no, explain in Remarks.) �(
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes >\ No
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No__x_ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No--Ik-_
Remarks:
DcitqoiA-t— U 0flr f ' yr f/"ve v L//'ITc/l,r7 )Dv►G
up lei r t
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that aaoly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solis (C6)
— Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographlc Relief (D4)
_
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Yes
No Depth (inches):
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present? Yes
—i--
No —IL Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No %� Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary.fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
t 4 n
wci it, pbf r -lo or v. -f
ate° tai %i 4
ara
&6,rC, t0 if q P r'� �
VVY. A 1) C�f( A
i
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 9p°?_ VPL'
7•
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
f
° Cover
SO
Species? �StatTus
rJl `V
Number of Dominant Species
FAC: (A)
1. cvs (, -O%4
ru Stratum (Plot size: 1.9otal cover:
� � 1::�Wy
FACW species
FAC species
That Are OBL, FACW, or _�
2, v 't !' iQ
ra-
M11
.Total Number of Dominant
3. (� D !
�Species
Across All Strata: (B)
x 4=
2
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
3
d�
'I (i
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: vZ (A/B)
7•
o S = Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
32,5 20% of total cover)
50%t:_
OBL species
x 1 =
Sa li
ru Stratum (Plot size: 1.9otal cover:
� � 1::�Wy
FACW species
FAC species
x 2 =
x 3 =
Total Cover
V % UM -C --1 1
50% of total cover:
_ =
20% of total cover:_
C nP Q U4 0 / V � {i
FACU species
x 4=
2
UPL species
x 5 =
3
d�
'I (i
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
4
)v
5
ST�''r''t %!i CAS P
Prevalence Index =
B/A =
7•
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8•
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9•
Total Cover
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
50% of total cover:
_ =
20% of total cover:_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
^
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size:^� )
� 1
7S
d�
'I (i
_Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
1.
Ir i U rY► 1/im i5eil
fVA 1nq ik A�Garr-c
)v
2.
ST�''r''t %!i CAS P
F!�CV
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3.
/ ?c.✓t 0 ! o to
V
be present, unless disturbed or problematic,
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
4 7 jY >'o I rw
5.
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
6.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7
height.
8.
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g,
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
in
m) tall.
11. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9S = Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover: µ� S 20% of total cover: Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) yheight.
1. ,'ril
2.T-oxi Co r"nc 4?"? i'P rt S' 10
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Z—= Total Cover Present? Yes No _
50% of total cover: 17 9 20% of total cover:_7
narks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
677 0 4e cl(%i ;i '. C?p f i.* i, f yrf Mrd• aF} �• ,fi r
''.te•
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Qfd-V10Z-
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' Loc' Texture Remarks
4�1
IDYL s/-
k-� M
_
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
!D Y !' "/-T 7 sLf 'f/.r 'V
Z
a©
10r� ��- 10�
(MLRA 147, 148)
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De lesion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_, Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
` ,.SD � r�r)J1'CG10rT Ar� P07` ,0'[.W`4
�Xdr,C_ l
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

1.
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains a d Piedmont Region �} �l
ProjecUSite: Sov�h�C �t� h1r/�City/County:©r�Y �� A/ Sampling Date: �d 7 ���,�/ / (RC1
Applicant/Owner ��/� �" fi �� "State: /�' G Sapling Point: �` 1/ V t'L r'�%
Investigator(s): C -S 1 L_1/ Section, Township, Range: �(/ �}'IS'7`�n �59�7.0"
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): p d Floo 4 r Local relief (concave, convex, none): Dr -)
D Ip-) 1-4 I/C Slopesp �
Subregion (LRR orMLRA : `�l�7�%3f� It Lat: r �Q Long: — uV . I / I � Datum/: 1"Q �.J
Soil Map Unit Name: © :�t� V A � � Co A NWI classification: Pa�(
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil . or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes —K_ No
Are Vegetation . Soil . or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 7` No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
j6:,
o,e I -e 6 '
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required• check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_
_ High Water Table (A2)
Sulfide Odor (C1)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
,,Hydrogen
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No 11>11 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No is Depth (inches):
X
Saturation Present? Yes
No �_ Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes / No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Ff C? S e r 0 �el w4q r Y"
q , 0;�o te"r 0
77r
are
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plotsize- %Over
Status
(/ ©n-1 /7 f I ` / es? 6 S' "C4
OM 6ql' Ir 4e 156-4 A
5
Sampling Point: p P3 - LW?
g
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are 013L, FACW, or FAC: I Q (A/B)
7.
—73' - Total Cover Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: OBL species x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: FACW species x 2 =
1 FAC species x 3 =
2 FACU species x 4 =
3 UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5
6
7
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
I7
8
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic vegetation indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
emarks: (Include photo num
1D0070 0+. -
VV
Fw P71"(�,
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in, DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tail.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
= Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
20% of total cover,
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 it in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present?
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
ers here or on a separate sheet.)
6 't .J'/'�9 n 7' E/�" _I �'''*— 7-X
Yes /_ No
// � lei 7�nc�J'
1 c: rT- ,
or—
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point:
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
,X Depleted Matrix (173)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
— Redox Depressions (178)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
y�
'
Depth (inches):
Hydric
Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
Y WP -j'C S0'Crf
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern
-MountainXnd Piedmont Region
SL h �U(I �l C�P� I �t� City/County: I V f� �`j Sampling Date: a -� y i<
Project/Site: r�
Applicant/Owner G� fre, l Cin DOf/f �Sta�te: (� Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): SI/0" �� k-11, Section, Township, Range: '�(/'!" 17 - -� �� &1
Landform (hlllslope, terrace, etc.):;
�%�
Local relief (concave, convex, none): %7 � - Slope
Subregion (_RR or MLRA): "01- "f � Lat: 101 7 � Long: © .700 3 4a =4
Soil Map Unit Name: rtr q Iyl Co.� NWI classification: �/
0011
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes /, No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ,L No
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
ci iMMAPV nF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophy[ic Vegetation Present? Yes� No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No_:�_' within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No_,)(—
Remarks: /
DIPf G Q � n y`_. �V �/'� /"g ��..("Q.�r` +��•",F",,�.,r" fir' { �r �'�> � F� — J vl�;�'CC s P�,�`"�O�-.r,/
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Seconder Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check ail that apply)
, Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
— True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (38)
_
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns 0310)
_
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or. Stressed Plants (D1)
_
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_
Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Yes No Depth (inches):
Surface Water Present?
%
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No�_
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
jO r Absolute Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover S e ies?
5
6
7
70= Total Cover 1
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1,
7
8
9
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: S )
1 �/yrt IYtAi/'q r(I'.��i ;1 �S Qo
2.oM < «tirP�r 1 S
3. Set /n
a.Srrl i l0 ft. n . u A, ' 14G
7
9.
10.
11.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: a7.S 20% of total cover:___�[�
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot sizer n (/
1. m N;x ro�f11'I 1 1'a Or� 1
2.
3.
4.
5.
,S=Total Cover
50% of total cover: la 20% of total cover
numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: 9,pz�- L4L-
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
X2=
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index =
B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7� 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point;
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color moi % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
T S0 S C/
d dor 9 `16 /00 IS"s14V
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De lesion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,14B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 135, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (1721) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Laver (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
N yc/r,,c so i'/ �-o /T.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X_
n o 71-- 10 IOOJ-eI77
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: SoVIj 4A r ftrI, 114-y eo— City/County: 60 t -S 1 T4
Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner GG vel .9,?cf Dom State: 4/6-
Sampling Point: PS —
Investigator(s): CS 11"'A -L✓ Section, Township, Range: �� ✓tSi�r?" i /'n�
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): dif/00 � tirn Local relief concave, convex, none): �Onye Slope (%): ©mss
Subregion (LRR or MLR/A'):mL���/ " IJ C Lat: �'Sa ! Long: - `� a r �`� 7 Datum: 1111f 10
Map Unit Name: C O /-yf o'? � (Co/fl _ NWI classification: r ��
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year'? Yes No X (If no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation " Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No is the Sampled Area X
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes / No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
f, a r'n �- E' S r t/6 �`;'.S�f'�,1 l 7 tom- s q v �'r ;R r �6f'J"�'
I / L V �� 4 1/°� C f 6 ,e eV V ` t1i / / 0 � / J V /, N / / /'�� � � Al 7-//
o'rlrsrvrAF�i '9 rl �t-o (,✓q• c�iStf,r�c," ,
UVnDnl nr-V
Wetland Hydrology indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primly Indicators (minimum of one is
required: check all that aooly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
_
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled
Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_
Iron Deposits (135)
—yGeomorphic Position (D2)
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
S
Surface Water Present? Yes_
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No %it, Depth (inches):
�/
Saturation Present? Yes
No _ A Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes /� No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerlal photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
w P -r Icy,l
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1 That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
7
50% of total cover: _
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:_ )
1.
4
5
6
7
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
3
7
10
11
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Saplingl5hrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
= Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20% of total cover:
— Woody vine –All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes No _
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
irks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Ve8 e -11G P'01'7 ►' i S n i " 61171 W(,glu(ierl d ve & c le'
-ra#, G j r1 Sewir-11n(
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
_ 20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
-
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53,0'
= Total Cover
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
— 20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Saplingl5hrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
= Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20% of total cover:
— Woody vine –All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes No _
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
irks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Ve8 e -11G P'01'7 ►' i S n i " 61171 W(,glu(ierl d ve & c le'
-ra#, G j r1 Sewir-11n(
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

LITW
Sampling Point:,tRrD -'r( c'm
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Redox Features
Loc Texture Remarks
% Color (moist) % -Ty ae
Color (moist)
O-(
lI 1` 3
100
Silk
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
too
—t
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS -Masked Sand Grains, ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_
2 cm Muck (A10) (_RR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
^ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (_RR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (_RR N,
MLRA 147,148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
'Indicators of hydrophytib vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic,
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
/ al,ee-- ro
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ,X_ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2,0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: a0yr� /$ifl Cfee k SPwel— City/County: _ / 0�' 7-h Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:y`' ve /Q � r� �dState: AIC Sampling Point: D P 60
/rV
Investigator(s): CS Z / 1 L'� / Section, Township, Range: Wt 1l0n �' 1 e�
/Op C �G �✓I Local relief (concave, convex, none): NA✓1 L Slope (°k): 0 's
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): _� / 7
Subregion (LRR or ML,R^A): IM L- r7 -11 � Lat; 3� /fib ��3 Long: J a� © Datum: NSD 8�
Soil Map Unit Name:.i" B o /-yf a / l collf NWI classification: Pr C2
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _)/1 No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Si1MMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ' ' No is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Nowithin a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _2� No
Remarks: /
Dei tq rPSPn trt T /'vC O � r) C�/► `.� c�fa.�' d>f.�`t`,�!d��/
VP AW r, req,
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
_
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (0
_ Oxidized Rhlzospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_
Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No i, Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge,
monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
/? "' 1-1 (! lev✓f 1,1q nW
1 m la, r ah
�r y
C/ -.J (. co
i 0�,,) lo�
pre se rl
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

t
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
r Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:_) % Cover Species? Status
2. Af l,' I-rb rV•M r-70
3.GnvJ c l' rn Yet if R 0 jV
4. � 91r S7~Yr9r/*19'b9• 10
5.
7.
90 = Total Cover f p
50% of total cover: �S 20% of total cover: O
lin /,rub Stratum (Plot size: O
1 cp / lit Qc�n o
7
Total Cover
50% of total cover: JG? 20% of total cover: It
Herb tratum (Plot size:
2. 1. ►dlvltfvwt sinln_Te_ �- �— 'iF�✓
5
7
10
11
10 = Total Cover
5o% total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1 QA#Yo rfro/► rg IC4n f I S
2.
Sampling Point:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AIB)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply bv:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index =
B/A =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7,6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine –All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover ?�7 Present?
snw of rntA rnver: 71S 20% of total cover: J
narks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
r•
Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: b�� -.1.
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color moist
`raq
%
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks
0-3
I 6
1Dd
�o
3-a0
1 i s
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
SSG/Ga
_
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) _
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al) _
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) _
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,14B)
_
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) _
Depleted Matrix (173)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) —
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _,
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, _
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
X,
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Y
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

4
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjectlSite: -SO rr 74 I/r'// L rt r' ` Sr�e /_ City/County: _/ TA �Sampling Date: 0-0-16
{�
Applicant/Owner: �� drP � -/V-- ! O�State: Sampling Point: �7 "'e'f
Investigator(s): S / Section, Township, Range: W'n ftp — S� lei
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 'r wavc �' �� Local relief (concave, convex, none): rOh rS ve Slope (%): O
Subregion (LRR or MLRAA)):� 4 � 1,� Lat: 3 , � 3 7 N'S j Long: — $a' 3 °� 7 Datum: NSD U
Soil Map Unit Name: C O r �yf lO rq'Ir? (_ CO NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _2L No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes X Na
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Dt to ,�► �S �' �' ' (rte . `r t vfr`JCs/ 'e-
f( -6G (Poc.,-s w -et- na
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required• check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_
Water Marks (B1)
— Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_
Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_
Drift Deposits (63)
! Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(87)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
— FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Yes
No Depth (inches):
Surface Water Present?
X
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
�'
Saturation Present? Yes
No is Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes ca illa fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge,
monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
-►^^G��
CyC �
iArel'fr
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

I
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
3
5
Sampling Point: DP 7- bbAlelb
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0) (A)
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
Total Number of Dominant
50% of total cover:
Species Across All Strata: (B)
OBL species
Percent of Dominant Species /00
height.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC; (A/B)
7
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
5.
=Total Cover
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
6.
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species
x 1 =
height.
8•
FACW species
x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10.
m) tall.
FAC species
x 3 =
1
3O
FACU species
x 4 =
50% of total cover:
2
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
UPL species
x 5 =
3
1.
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
5
17
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
H—erb90 Li btratum (Plot size: )
f/vtael,v f tn�s 2t 0 L/ TQC"
Prevalence Index = B/A = I
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2
3. G /•e x
4 SVS �t%� SSS
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5.
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
6.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7
height.
8•
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
g•
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10.
m) tall.
11.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
3O
6 0 = Total Cover
1 a
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover:
z0% of total cover:
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
s.
4• Hydrophytic
5 Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
�nt UCP � Ti'r� �� �/iC or were
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
v
Sampling Point: P7- D� �
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
inches
0-1
Matrix
Color moist
10yR1 y
%
100
Redox Features
Color (moist) °k Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
Gl�o
�-8
10 Yas/a
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Z_ 0
_
Black Histic (A3)
T14
$p
_
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
8-16
117 ,
oto
CIG o
HydricS,!T Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils :
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
_
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
_
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (57) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
;Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ' ` No
ydo c.. 's-0/7
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
° �r1s�✓1l�+:
l a '1q —�
Project/Site: Sova -A /VI) CYPe% Sei,,erCity/County: 0/ Sampling Date
Applicant/Owner: State: ^'c_Sampling
Point:
Investigator(s): P• 9
C.S ` i/� Section, Township, Range:
L✓/ ✓t �Jb�? ' J fi ���'►�
G O
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): f I0 o C l4/'/1 Local rrellief (concave, convex, none): 4 e1,'7if- - Slope (%): C9 ^�
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): /H ` 13 Lat: JC-. 13 7 ` L Long: D ©r 3 R 777?l �Datum: MtD V
Soil Map Unit Name: L .0 Wag O Q 41 ( -yA N,WI classification: � Y
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes L No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _Z_— No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes_ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No__1K_ within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
h
1 �%? `J /W 'r`�' r`?6FI°� Ji/�/S /CyRfi14��
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
^ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_, Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Present? YesNo Depth (inches):
Surface Water
Water Table Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
x
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
'7)/-; l
in V(1, C 4 � �:t . 0
wC �-`�a �o h `�a�ro�©gyp
rn 4
I y
I J/y
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant
Tree Stratum (Plot size: -�-) % Cover Sec es?
1. l P✓ /) C v/i GI Q 0
2. a tit 11 UI OCC/ v lr'tz. i'(' 10
7.
= Total Cover
50%!f jptal cover: _1 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
17
7
a S = Total Cover
7 50% of total cover: �a S 20% of total cover: -S
SHeb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. ►'r Q�r�t1%vwl c(a� Pj't�nr,,,� �d Y l%9G
2. P/ i /tq Q tel -171 /*q Q0 raf el
3. S a q o Ce, 7 c! oxo/` a 0
4, IK 1,C✓0-34P";ff,(- -I /rn I/1 Cfi411 • /0
5. A V vJ cy Rk v I-Vg' /-U— G
7
11
Woody Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
�= Total Cover )
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sampling Point: �)M-CIF
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FAC W, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: � (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FAC W, or FAC: / (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x4=
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals; (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
,Z 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must-
be
ustbe present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes A No
50% of total cover: _ 20% of total cover:
(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
YO
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
,Z 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must-
be
ustbe present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 It in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes A No
50% of total cover: _ 20% of total cover:
(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
YO
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
inches ©lor moist % Color (moist) - % Tvoe Loci Texture Remarks
O . IT /610GSL o
q'=1 A /G too CU -0
10 t I?
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Sol] Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,14B)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1713) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplaln Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type: f tr o G
Depth (inches): 10 i'
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

A WETLANDDETERMINATIONDETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: St 44 m t, // 1 Cle e A Seale r City/County:�� �Si 7"_ /I �/'G Sampling Date: /�
ApplicantlOwner: G W_-,707 q''t & Do %� State: /y Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): CS' / A- IV- Section, Township, Range: IV� W S__70,1 --4.11-0-4
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): r/6,6 Local relief (concave, convex, none)/: C©'l Com! ve Slope (%).
Subregion (LRR or MLRAj):'� 13 La[: 36 ' J Long: r 0 f � Datum: �0
Soil Map Unit Name: C- C� r� 'Q � Co ,NWI classification:
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes __ /S, No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes __2S,_ No
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _)(- No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes --79C7No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Seconder Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that aooly)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
Surface Water (Al)
_- True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
-,_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
24, Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
), Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No _Z1_ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes >< No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available:
Remarks:
Sero/1 ,�
7.0 o�-
wfy-ly /I
! C110 /0 are' 0,eese47
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
to
the indicator or confirm the absence
Sampling Point; 0)510_,E -E5. -
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Colormoist % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
--
D 1 I © Y((/ /00
fee
RM=Reduced
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils":
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (MLRA 147, 148)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
— Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147,148)
— Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) "
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,14B)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type: 1 ( 0 C
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
H Idle rC
US Army Corps of Engineers
S.o f" ( ,iId/r- 7'0/-1
Hydric Soil Present? Yes —2—( No
r,l�se.7 r
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
7
8
9
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
3
4
7
50% of total cover:,
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
= Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20% of total cover:
Woody vine —All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
100 04 0 D� A,� lfxr� /7 1' VP�<7-QfTi 0 ,e7 1,5", rl�-C off'io
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
S Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum
(Plot size: )
h w
%%,,Cover ecies?
—b CJ F�G
Number of Dominant Species
(A)
1,
re / �ti
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2•
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
©�
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multioly by:
Total Cover /�
q0
OBL x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover: /b
species
Sapling(Shrub
Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
1
FACU species x4=
2
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A)
(B)
4
7
8
9
50% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
3
4
7
50% of total cover:,
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
= Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
20% of total cover:
Woody vine —All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
100 04 0 D� A,� lfxr� /7 1' VP�<7-QfTi 0 ,e7 1,5", rl�-C off'io
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

6
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains Ind Piedmont Region 9
Project/Site: rA /"r r 116le S P4/r� City/County: O rS Sampling Date: Imo( ~/
Applicant/Owner: / G9 of �' A �� IState: Sampling Point: __L P
Investigator(s): CS k Section, Township, Range: VV 1 �✓t f
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): �� l4 �� Local relief (concave, convex, none): brn vex Slope (96): 0� J
7
Subregion (LRR or MLRRA'):1nL —IJLat: 3 . l3 3Y9 Long: - 301 I'T / D tVm
Soil Map Unit Name: l e) / �"�') CQ NWI classification: /y
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area �/
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ,Z� No
Remarks:
r j /� ap/,i ' G'f 1 •;�`GP'� :?/ � �
(//s!G el G/ q lP R .
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required* check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
%_ Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CO)
_ Drift Deposits (83) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present.? Yes No %�
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
pt-eSeerr,
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) -• Use scientific names of plants.
► Absolute Dominant
Tree St atum (Plot size: 3D ) % Cover S ecies?
1, c( r lvh/vrh -70 �`�
2. dCer n P w p �-
3. %!t VS et r'/1G t1
Sampling Point: 0P / / - UP 1
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
1,17 cl-
17cl- Total Number of Dominant
v� Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
7.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sa lin /Shrub Stratum (Plot size:�I -S _�` ,7 O Y ��[
1. r ee, /i CQ f. n u_
2. Ace/, /�ym r1fC
5
o.
7.
8.
9.
Total Cover
//50% of total cover: 1 -to 20% of total cover: !'
erb�Strat rn (Plot size: )
1. Ll v r��rrt S ,•/I c�SG s(fi
3. ei,e,Gc ser, 41 /2
5
7.-
B.-
9.-
Woody
.-
8.9. -
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1, --
3
4
5
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species I x 3 = q19 _0
FACU species a x4= 100
UP species X5= aS
Column Totals: /170 (A) 4O- (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = 3. 19'
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height,
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
' 3 �% = Total Cover ^ of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: O
Woody vine —All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation X
= Total Cover Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover;
marks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) /'
0 7_ dojnalrt VP e t F7"i0n !' S r/ 4l w ilrte<
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: r UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
inches Color moist % Color (moist) `Yo Type Loc Texture Remarks
11 6' /00 ' 7Z/
t I?c .rs
102
MS=Masked
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,14B)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (1`13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Sandy Redox (55)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
Restrictive La r (if ob erved):
Type: 0 �.
Depth (inches): 7 f
on: PL=Pore Lininq, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147,148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WET ANND/jDETERR-MINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: r -O IT
SO"fi/ ' • ' 1 /1 ` lPC� YP�� City/County: / Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: 0 Ry R n 11>f �n State: &G Samplin Point:
� -/�
Investigator(s): k,,' -W1
Section, Township, Range: '1!�`04 —T le i
Landform (hlllslope, terrace, etc.): r 00 ,. 4 vY1 Local relief (concave, convex, none): CO17 04 �- Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)):'^ML 174 �' I Lat: —TJ a [ Long: — 601 /7? p ADatum:
/ f�
Soil Map Unit Name: C. Q 0 �C/.t l o C1G r 0 NWI classification: r
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of,year? Yes -/-,\ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil . or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area1>41
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes i< No
Remarks:
�n rPsr�� �•� f�G 7C/
HYDROLOGY
�e 'Y' &-C 0 7C g J ��is� z77roe? F
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
PrimarXlndicators (minimum of one Is required• check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_^ Water Marks (81)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
X Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
^_
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3) .
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No )� Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
/< Depth (Inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillaryErin e)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Gry Rnot
orCf/;,/y WeI--A.11 �10A-9/,11y
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: A/ J?" Fr ,F�r
3.01
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:)
1. At, e 1,' 111-V b �l/I�
% Cover
70
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2• o t/ix 'i / Q /-4
_ �—
,_fj
� `—
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
Total Number of Dominant j
3.
m) tall.
11.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4
= Total Cover
Percent of Dominant Speciesr 0 O
5.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
That Are 06L, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total Cover Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: J 7S 20% of total cover:_ OBL species x 1 =
Saoling!lShrub Stratum (Plot size: ) FACW species x 2 =
1 FAG species x 3 =
2 FACU species x 4 =
3 UP species x 5 =
4 Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
7• 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8, 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9. _ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. I sec. -e f� S �% _ —Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
2' 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3• be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4. Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
ti.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8'
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10.
m) tall.
11.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
= Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover:20°� of total cover:
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
height.
1,
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes No _
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
rks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
V o j 0 r 010i. / f°� �.,r r✓T� Q/
l,L/C
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or
Sampling Point: PP(12-1ffiF1r
Depth Matrix
Inches) Color moist
%
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
i_a Q /®Y/1 ;t
WQ
"'r J ` R /R `fid
C/G!i
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic 03)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A71)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
— Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
_ Red Parent Material (1721) (MLRA 127, 147)
on: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -- Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: VV %-(( Cf'eeK cSeae-r City/County: I �csZ-S,/ (x Sampling Date:,Is 7 Xe OU140
Applicant/Owner: c L( li a," State: 0C- Sampling Point: bl— 13 — 641 h4r`6
Investlgator(s): k �� ti l C Section, Township, Range: L,),..1 S �.n _ _v
Landform (hlllslope, terrace, etc.): RoODLazVI Local relief (concave, convex, none): ©� `e- Slope (%)A_J /a
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MfRA -13 t0 Lat: t*7a ( T9 A- Long: ,25p • S17 3r2 �tDaatum: "Its- $3
Soli Map Unit Name; bo.,, &We—r LDavyl ( DG, NWI classiflcatlon: , r 44
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain In Remarks,)
Are Vegetation Sol] or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes _2 No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes_ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes cX No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
D o, t -Of r oi/i 7' i`S � �� �e TPn �� 7 i'� o�
t,le f ,,
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one Is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (81)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solis (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aqultard (133)
_ Water-Stalned Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observation's:
Surface Water Present? Yes.-- No
Depth (Inches): 3_
Water Table Present? Yes --,X— No
Depth (Inches); D ��
Saturation Present? Yesrr
)<_ No
Depth (Inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes. No
Includes capillary frlh e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge; monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), If available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
1.
4.
7
50% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
6.
7.
a Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
96
2��c,�ncivl-%k�t:w•w ��czv'V�S-�rJuwt•� �l �'
3. Y��C �i75�Q t�iJwt � •� 1M'i v� � � w� �t_� F�
4.379,10 C-?
6. gJ v PC — ., CS iC Q J S.
7.
8.
1C
11
/�= Total Cover
50% of total cover: L/7-1 U 20% of total cover:' Z�
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
5,
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sampling Point: NP(3- '�-4 ha, ­6
Number of Dominant Species
�2
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
.�
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
t ao (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
.Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x2=
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
(B)
Prevalence Index - B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test Is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytfc Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In. DBH and greater than or equal to 3,28 R (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft In
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes_ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point; 1*4p G-4 {110
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Calor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
2 ?v o 5� 2,53 ���a W1 LW -WL
RM=Reduced
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Hlstosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulflde (A4)
_ Stratifled Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (Inches):
Remarks:
Sand Grains. 'Locatlon: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix,
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sol
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (rF12)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N.
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes -/K— No
Bre- ase. 4
US Army Corps or Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProJecUSite: Ot/f�l ��/rI �hC%C>°�� SL'l��I� City/County:' +S��-�� Sampling Date: 2d6
Appllcant/Owner: .�K.l- x + &4t N State: 11, r Sampling Point: pA �� -vp't
Investigator(s): �► L3 CSS Section, Township, Range: NS�w� . SGl�vtn
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 7_7L.9,Q[- Di6= i Local relief (concave, convex, none): -D otc-'r.4-e- Slope (%): 0-A 3
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): IML" l3(o Lat: SILO . \S;Z� Long: -E5o . SSG a>-/D�attum: 8 - 0 --.)Sol[ Map Unit Name: X>&,\�l t` Loo-mv& A a- Al NWI classlflcation: � l/ lA
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes __X_ No (If no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _�( No
Are Vegetation , Sall , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No_-_)(. within a Wetland? Yes No—)(
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes N.--,X—
Remarks:
boc(c;_ eA
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one Is required: check all that apply)
— Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots
(C3) _ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils (C6) _ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water-Stalned Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No _,Y, Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No _� Depth (Inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No < Depth (Inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Dh e- S2c�w�oQa'r•`�
JoCIU aL.� is ei� �,e � .
Twv Secr.►�d�a�
-6,u
e s-k� (A:s. V,
vuq AM Co Lt
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

■
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: DA N— 41
Absolute Dominant Indicator ( Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Specles? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
3
6.
7.
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ©D (A/B)
5.
7
9.
4-0_ - Total Cover
50% of total cover:g 7 20% of total cover:_
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Fie 64-0 c.a.
2. V.n
5.
7
10.
11.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: tS
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test Is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soll and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapitng/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
M) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft In
4.
Hydrophytic
5. Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
,IDD %© -r VO
r►-t�'�Q� V e e fief y -i o✓� 1 f
t o 0/e f -r(1,^,
US Army Corps of Endineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
50% of total coven
20% of total cover:
OBL species
x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
/
FACW species
x2=
1 �r rve4 J tj 61-0
\ yc� � ��
FAC species
x 3 =
2. T�taal\ v1 S �CCJL�-h'tF. tiS
FACU species
x 4 =
3. sol_y lG; rp—.
k L) C)I&t
UPL species
X5=
A
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
5.
7
9.
4-0_ - Total Cover
50% of total cover:g 7 20% of total cover:_
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Fie 64-0 c.a.
2. V.n
5.
7
10.
11.
=Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: tS
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test Is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soll and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.6 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapitng/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 In. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
M) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft In
4.
Hydrophytic
5. Vegetation
= Total Cover Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
,IDD %© -r VO
r►-t�'�Q� V e e fief y -i o✓� 1 f
t o 0/e f -r(1,^,
US Army Corps of Endineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
to
or
Sampling Point:gypi4-,jD(
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
o_gliovr q ILI dao Lx):'."
Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Hlstosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ Hlstic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Black Hlstic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Stratl8ed Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
2 cm Muck (Al 0) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19) (MLRA 148)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: rO
Depth Qnches): g
g
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
0_vt e- �'S,"
No X_
US Army Corps of Englneers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains/ and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Sol/ *0 Cl e [ SPW f r City/County: _%/ T n �1/ Sampling Date:'
Applicant/Owner: / '� t/P I n f�'' !�1 State:
' f� C
Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):G Section, Township, Range: V✓�✓I inrl K
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): no CXP An Local relief (concave, convex, none): 4/011 Slope (%):
Subregion (LR R or MLRA): Mt -6A '/
-3/Lat: 3�� I S 3' 7 7 Long: ' $ t% 3 19 � 7 Datum: VNM
Soil Map Unit Name: o rt l ' 0 c ✓n i -° NWI classification: /G 0 1.
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _K, No (If no, explain in Remarks.) �[
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _� No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No= within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No�_
Remarks: / }
J%CfI`ti 00/nT 1'j %f 1efeo tq 17/f Il a ' ,.';�.(ys'r� +Z. dd
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al) _ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No _� Depth (inches):
�(
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓ '
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: �p ) %Cover S e ies? Status
2. rtv Iq ti lArli !
J. t rV✓9vr ..S'41 ro r/0 el �- �1 _ F Cf/
5
7.
= Total Cover
50% 1 total cover: 17-S 20% of total cover: 7
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: I 1
Strum t'r1jIf a S Y GLV
2. I70-9 n7 u l t+ Flo" TO- Fq-C c/
7
10.
11.
= Total Cover 1 /'
50%o�[otal cover: 20% of total cover: 6
Wood Vine Stratum (Plot size: S ) G
,, trtS /Vtun / A �S f
2. 1,011 )'C Cr4 jr- f0nfrq �-
Sampling PoinJft '-- V+ `-
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are 013L, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant j
Species Across All Strata: r (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/8)
Total % Cover of:
-7 = Total Cover
/M—total 7
OBL species
50% of
total cover: 20% of
total cover:
titMv.
(PI9t size:
2i01W4 1�$A��r4
)
. SS
+/
T r* IV
2. /_1'9t
vSt{v S +'ry -r
► .s
(A) (B)
3.
R of vltf l— to /x',
• 10
T
4.
- Vt 0 ;V0q vP`
v f vm e 1 D
5.
0 'C a r0i C1
/Ile t e 1 0
6
1c A q n rh C livA , Cc,4
eqif7o"�
� t�
7.
10.
11.
= Total Cover 1 /'
50%o�[otal cover: 20% of total cover: 6
Wood Vine Stratum (Plot size: S ) G
,, trtS /Vtun / A �S f
2. 1,011 )'C Cr4 jr- f0nfrq �-
Sampling PoinJft '-- V+ `-
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are 013L, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant j
Species Across All Strata: r (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/8)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 93.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
M) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation �(
= Total Cover^ Present? Yes +` No
50% of total cover: 12, 20% of total cover: J
s: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
/ �� �,�;�Qq t UPS � �E�����
6, 7 - �s. � �`or
I-rr �.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: W 11!5�_ VPL
Profile Description: (Describe to the del
Depth Matrix
inches Colors %
� 1 D it z
Hydric Soil Indicators:
to
or confirm the absence
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type Locz Texture
Sf L.p
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
_ Histosoi (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Belgw Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks
'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
— Dark Surface (S7)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (173)
. (MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
— Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2,0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: SQfi/�".h ,f'r/II ��1�e �- SPS%r,/City/County: �O 1Sampling Date: 12—IS-16, 21S1p
Applicant/Owner: p/?? State; �/� Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): CS Section, Township, Range: W /4r`O�
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): F79 j� [JLocal relief (concave, convex, none): IVO �' V O/7le- Slope (°�):0
Subregion (LRR or MLR ): `�'r 74 Lat: TC. I17-�ong: a v� s °i /
Soil Map Unit Name: o r� 0 G /►'7(CoL. NWI classlficatlon:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ < No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes - No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No--X—within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
De t" Po i fir i`s ff P l-PSe/7 Vq 7-r� C cdj ��1 � A
(/P /,, G/ a I—egf
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply) _
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14) _
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) _
Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7) _
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks) _
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ _
FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes NoDepth
(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
V Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
of ('rs ra p
q re
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
3D t Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species? Status
/
1, If{cl/ 1766rcen 60
2. l tv If n/ izt , /S f! Gw
3., PX/n(.S ,Pf nS'yi"'7iC/O til I-V
7
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot
1.
7
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 17
= Total Cover
t 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb.Stratum yPlot size; )
1. tvnWin G0 4 g /A L 3S r
2.� QSq 1`101 -El I -7-/1 %Q —/�S�
3, In IC/OSr< fc," (/1,mtn1 ' f ec-,,t �
4. f' vSr�t� s ► n CrrSe- 1,0
5. G 1`C 0,-n c► P /r 4 / F �J'-
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
Sampling Point: PPt/( — v/ L`
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence index =
B/A =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
V be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
11.
�,�-/� = Total Cover
50% oftotalcover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) )
1. nn1,r t'lti to 0t71C'cj 1S
2. O X O CO l -7rm� R f i' 'i't r
3.r r.7ti h C X 10 �—V
4. 5M/1" rO t�/1 / 0 /G t / ('� _.
�Z = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 9Q -S 20% of total cover:
rs here or on a separate sheet.)
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
v
C-3 /0 % 11,e8 !"t . ;r 1'`00 t'.�^ �, G 0/ k/" I
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Dpya —UPL-
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color moist % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
©- a 7,S YT 4/1 100
a -i0 ZS Ms/,r /00 sGG n
RM=Reduced
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches).
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (178)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (1713) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
�-) C S© I /I Clt?- J� /S A /P /7617" /V /?�'�. '0/77-
d(-11'
y
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region ,(
Project/Site: -50-vtA /14,7/ Cler A- 5eiv?,-- City/County:_'t A Sampling Date:
ApplicantlOwner: (T ci V{ ci o% State: /VG Sampling hint: Q?J7
Investigator(s): CJ_ tlt Section, Township, Range: W,%i f ro/j SS lea,
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): r►F�DO A i7%1�/ T�Loocallrrelief (concave, convex, nonne,)r:� On � Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): A L r `A - i3 Lat: -Tk, / 1 V ! S-3 . Long; '� O I -Md d 7 Datum: N� L
Soil Map Unit Name: fG i(y i e L,i -F%O { S�n�`j �D 4 M ( / gr NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes )/- No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks,)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
a+af� to 1 ir
°r sS ��aa",.f,�,�, 74.�� ��-�e�ar� Jvti�'a�cT/oma a/
t/0 r�r/1 t5fr r Fy,
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (Be)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131) _
u_
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (62) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or.Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131)
Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (132)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No x
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No i�
Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary Erin e)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
s �C-o ti�� �y , „���4
��, o Vic /,,
C/,-vl01r e.,e-
rIPS-ep, 7
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: D F-17 ~ (/PL
7
I
�Q
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (plot size:
f v G
/
)
% Cover
S eci s9 Status
V�
Number of Dominant Species 7
1,
2. 4nvS"
.©CCir� /�1f� it .Y
x 1 =
5C
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
3. CCi ry
��
x 2=
/��G
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: C1_ (B)
4. L- /� t/ I' 4 r✓t 6 G /' S f � y /G ! 1 '� v cj
J "
J%► c�
2.
L -i i v #'C(4 rri k f sr rC Cr f- /vy
y
FACU species
x 4 =
Percent of Dominant Species79
5.
1 0 �/qCy
UPL species
x 5 =
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
7
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total Cover (�
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
7.
50% o total cover: �a
20% of total cover: Q
OBL species
x 1 =
SaDlino/Shrub
Stratum (Plot size:
_ 4 _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
FACW species
x 2=
1.
Cf t' A/ i'v I'Vt
a �_ ��G
FAC species
x 3 =
2.
L -i i v #'C(4 rri k f sr rC Cr f- /vy
y
FACU species
x 4 =
3.
/-j VSTr"n S //I :l/ij'C -
1 0 �/qCy
UPL species
x 5 =
total cover:
Woofdy vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size; )
('T -(S � o �a f o r
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
5'
6
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
7.
X 2 -Dominance Test is >50%
9'_
height.
3 - Prevalence Index Is 53.0'
Total Cover
a 20% total
_ 4 _ Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1. M t c/0S,r r i(iM
C X50% of total cover: .J of cover:
J ) 1 / r1fC
vi m m l tlr-i 0� f
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2, Lit vS-rV rn
J-1^ t llrf� I r �U
m) tall.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3•
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4.
= Total Cover �
1�
npnnitinnQ nf Fniir Vanatatinn ctrnta-
6'
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9•
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10,
m) tall.
11.
JO
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
= Total Cover �
1�
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover:
/
2091. of
total cover:
Woofdy vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size; )
('T -(S � o �a f o r
t.
,.
2. M f.Jtix /yT(ir1 01/'cf
10
��i�9�L-
f'r ,—
3.
4'
Hydrophytic
5.
Vegetation
A = Total Cover I.
1 Q It
Present? Yes No
50% of total cover:
20% of
total cover: f
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
790
t?� �p yn inr7 ny- Uo e7z;;r/o17 /j, 5W Or wr77-</'
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

i
L
SOIL
to the depth needed to
or
of
Sampling Point:
Depth
inches
Matrix
Redox Features
Texture Remarks
Color moist
% Color (moist) % Type Loc
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
77 A 6
`�
G 4
- I
My
___. Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
I a +
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
R eAsT
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Re_du_ced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains, ZLocation: PL=Pore Lininq, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
___. Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (176)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (171712)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type: I WL- t- R
Depth (inches): % e2 ♦ Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 1X__
marks:
t'n ter/ `C Iq fo /`s
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

I
WETLAND{
��DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region ,+
ProjectlSite: So Vt A / Y t 01 C✓ef tt Se—"_ City/County: 60 %` r'4 Sampling Date: J
/ r
Applicant/Owner: Ga Ve / W,-7 cif 01) lel State: � Sampling Point: pp
Investigator(s): el -T X A- 6l Section, Township, Range: Wi,1s/0/7 — SS' le'27 n
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): f loo rrGii�f Local relief (concave, convex, none): Qi'ly� Slope (%): �J
Subregion (LRR or MLR�A�): ML -f(,+ -)Y6'Lat: 36, /.F� y'9� Long: — TO 13 ? 7 F/ 7 wD�atum: y✓r0 Y.T
Soil Map Unit Name: rC c) 0 /&S 0' /e7) e>/ NWI classification: /y��
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes k,_ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation . Soil . or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �_ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No= within a Wetland? Yes No —
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No
Remarks:
DGrG Aim i:S' rey oesen 7v'ri>,e o -r .,.-)v,7 - jvarWI,r rl
r/ q, .
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
US
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
1!y, Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_, Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No — Depth (inches):T
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
p(Imary c/r W
st Co 11 r, 11 ir) `c Ori wltl��cr
y fro �a y
re
are-
US Army Corps of Engineers
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants
' Absolute Dominant
Tree 4tratum (Plot size: 0 ) 1 cover Species?1. oc'-G.s t�c?`efr ?'.F �; f'r j Y
2. f it G Idles f�fV-
3, f fl►�► Q r
7.
Total Cover J 3
50% of o� I cover: -b +f' 20% of total cover:
Sa lin /Shru Stratum(Plot size -
1.
1. rfe— f7fqu
2.
3
7
9.
S = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7, 209'o of total cover:_
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3,
4.
Sampling Point: D r -
Dominance Test worksheet.-
orksheet:Number
Multioly by:
Numberof Dominant Species
l�
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
x 3 =
Species Across All Strata:
�' (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
�I
That Are CBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multioly by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x5=_
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index =
B/A =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53,0'
— 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data In Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
6.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
7'
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
8.
9
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10.
m) tall.
11.
Herb – All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
= Total Cover
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft In
1.
height.
Hydrophytic
5' Vegetation Y
= Total Cover Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
100 %a 0 c/0 Wir'�Q .17T 7'XV 7 1-s FIC 0r- i✓tt�f%
t
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 1! FI$
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(Inches) Color(moist)%
Color (moist) % Type Loc
Texture Remarks
! I©(✓
-1� 7, / 90
C
_r
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
?Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
— Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (AS)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
— 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
— Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF1 2)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (177)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127,147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
J
✓�
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
- vnL

South Mill Creek Sewer February 20, 2017
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12: Representative Photographs CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Photograph 1. View of RPW Stream A (Mill Creek), facing downstream.
Photograph 2. View of RPW Stream B, facing upstream.
Photopage 1 of 11

South Mill Creek Sewer February 20, 2017
Request for RID and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12: Representative Photographs CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Photograph 3. View of RPW Stream C, facing downstream.
Photograph 4. View of RPW Stream D, facing upstream.
Photopage 2 of 11

South Mill Creek Sewer February 20, 2017
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12: Representative Photographs CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Photograph 5. View of RPW Stream E, facing upstream.
Photograph 6. View of RPW Stream F, facing downstream.
Photopage 3 of 11

South Mill Creek Sewer February 20, 2017
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12: Representative Photographs CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Photograph 7. View of RPW Stream G (Muddy Creek), facing upstream.
Photograph 8. View of Seasonal RPW Stream H, facing upstream.
Photopage 4 of 11

South Mill Creek Sewer February 20, 2017
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12: Representative Photographs CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Photograph 9. View of Seasonal RPW Stream I, facing upstream.
Photograph 10. View of Seasonal RPW Stream J, facing downstream.
Photopage 5 of 1 I

South Mill Creek Sewer February 20, 2017
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12: Representative Photographs CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Photograph 11. View of Wetland AA facing west.
Photograph 12. View of Wetland BB, facing east south-east.
Photopage 6 of 11

South Mill Creek Sewer February 20, 2017
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12: Representative Photographs CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Photograph 13. View of Wetland CC, facing west
Photograph 14. View of forested Wetland DD, facing west.
Photopage 7 of 11

South Mill Creek Sewer February 20, 2017
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12: Representative Photographs CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Photograph 15. View of herbaceous Wetland DD, facing west.
Photograph 16. View of Wetland EE, facing north.
Photopage 8 of 11

South Mill Creek Sewer February 20, 2017
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12: Representative Photographs CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Photograph 17. View of Wetland FF, facing east.
Photograph 18. View of Wetland GG, facing west-northwest.
Photopage 9 of i l

South Mill Creek Sewer February 20, 2017
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12: Representative Photographs CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Photograph 19. View of non jurisdictional upland (DP15), facing west.
Photograph 20. View of non -jurisdictional upland (DP16), facing east.
Photopage 10 of 11

South Mill Creek Sewer February 20, 2017
Request for PJD and PCN Pursuant to NWP 12: Representative Photographs CWS Project No. 2015-3740
Photograph 21. View of non jurisdictional upland (DP17), facing north north-west.
Photograph 211 View of non jurisdictional upland (DP 18), facing north north-east.
Photopage 11 of 11

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
October 28, 2016
Kaitlin McCulloch
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: South Mill Creek Sewer Line, Winston-Salem, CWS 2015-3740, Forsyth County, ER 16-1961
Dear Ms. McCulloch:
Thank you for your letter of October 19, 2016, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.reviewgncdcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
6T,� Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
Pat McCrory Bryan Gossage Susan Kluttz
Governor Executive Director Secretary
Clean Water Management Trust Fund
April 14, 2016
Kaitlin McCulloch
Carolina Wetlands Inc
550 East Westinghouse Blvd
Charlotte, NC 28273
[e-mail]
RE: Mill Creek Sewer; 2015-3740
Dear Kaitlin McCulloch:
NCNHDE-1497
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources from our database that have been compiled for the project referenced
above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary submitted
with your request for information. These results are presented in the attached 'Documented Occurrences'
table and map.
Also attached is a table summarizing rare species and natural communities that have been documented
within a one -mile radius of the project boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that these natural
heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is included for
reference. In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that
we may update our records. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile
radius, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning,
project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory
decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written
notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications.
Maps of NC Natural Heritage Program data may not be redistributed without permission from the NCNHP.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence
if a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), or an occurrence of a Federally -
listed species is documented within or near the project area.
Thank you for your inquiry. If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need
additional assistance, please contact John Finnegan at or 919.707.8630.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Page 1 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
Mill Creek Sewer
Project No. 2015-3740
April 14, 2016
NCNHDE-1497
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Status
Vascular Plant 26598 Silphium perfoliatum Northern Cup-plant 2008-07 Current 3-Medium --- Threatened G5 S1
No Natural Areas are Documented within the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area'
Managed Area Name Owner Owner Type
Forsyth County Open Space Forsyth County: multiple local government Local Government
Forsyth County Open Space Forsyth County: multiple local government Local Government
Piedmont Land Conservancy Easement Piedmont Land Conservancy Private
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Natural
Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on April 14, 2016; source: NCNHP, Q4 October 2015. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 4

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Mill Creek Sewer
Project No. 2015-3740
April 14, 2016
NCNHDE-1497
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Last Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
Group Observation Occurrence Status Status Rank Rank
Date Status
Vascular Plant 26598 Silphium perfoliatum Northern Cup -plant 2008-07 Current 3 -Medium --- Threatened G5 S1
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating Collective Rating
Historic Bethabara Natural Area R2 (Very High) C5 (General)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name
Owner
Forsyth County Open Space
Forsyth County: multiple local government
Forsyth County Open Space
Forsyth County: multiple local government
Forsyth County Open Space
Forsyth County: multiple local government
Forsyth County Open Space
Forsyth County: multiple local government
Forsyth County Open Space
Forsyth County: multiple local government
Forsyth County Open Space
Forsyth County: multiple local government
Forsyth County Open Space
Forsyth County: multiple local government
Forsyth County Open Space
Forsyth County: multiple local government
Forsyth County Open Space
Forsyth County: multiple local government
Piedmont Land Conservancy Easement
Piedmont Land Conservancy
Piedmont Land Conservancy Easement
Piedmont Land Conservancy
Owner Type
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Local Government
Private
Private
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on April 14, 2016; source: NCNHP, Q4 October 2015. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 3 of 4

NCNHDE-1497: Mill Creek Sewer
o
F—
o..hvr„ Leurbar:.
yni Ve1in.�,
r l�aH f
Forayd,
FdasroneR° - Ctatfirnvn a `+a. M—HA
.. YnM`rw•.
C—
R
Rill R.nx.a
4 -
- ��J
2
- /.•�. . /t.u.rh /oG
April 14, 2016
❑ Project Boundary ❑ Managed Area (MAREA)
❑ Buffered Project Boundary
NHP Natural Area (NHNA)
Page 4 of 4
C Pr
TAm yy,n.,C aF:rr4 f3:vo W. �c.,i ,,�
6�gro
enmu,n rca _ a RoJI
<y
a S e J D,
Want F..
una•rsy
Waa q
'Outn<a
P34
(ioyail Dr s11•s.0
C
- Otl Tom
V6i 1.d
'f n
1Mirell[%, �� a
1:41,482
0 0.35 0.7 1.4 mi
00,5 1 2 km
Sources: Eli, HERE, Dei -a—, Irdl—p, increment P Corp., GEBCO.
USGS. FAO, NPS, NRCAN. G -Base, IGN, K.U.I. NL Ordnance Survey,

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
November 30, 2016
Mr. Gregg Antemann
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc.
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
Dear Mr. Antemann:
Subject: South Mill Creek Sewer Project; Forsyth County, North Carolina
Log No. 4-2-17-055
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the information provided in your
correspondence dated October 28, 2016, wherein you request our comments regarding your
biological effect determinations to federally protected species for the project referenced above.
We submit the following comments in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. §4321 et seq.); and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
Project Description
According to the information provided, you are preparing permit applications to install a 3.2 mile
long sewer line in western Winston-Salem, North Carolina. The project corridor would
encompass about 97 acres of mixed alluvial hardwood forest and existing maintained sewer and
gas utility line rights of way within the floodplain of Mill Creek. According to the information
provided, it appears that the proposed alignment would require several stream crossings of Mill
Creek, its tributaries, and adjacent wetlands. However, no project plans were included in your
correspondence and there was no description of proposed impacts to jurisdictional features.
Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
According to the information provided, CWS biologists conducted a desktop evaluation for
federally protected species and their respective habitats within the project area and also
conducted pedestrian surveys on April 19 and 20, 2016, and on September 27, 2016. No
federally protected species were observed during surveys. You concluded that the proposed
project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the federally threatened northern long-
eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), and that the project would have no effect on any other
federally protected species.
We have no record of federally protected species or designated critical habitat in the vicinity of
the proposed project. Based on the information provided, we believe that the probability for take
of the northern long-eared bat as a result of this project would be insignificant or discountable.

Therefore, we concur with your effect determination for the northern long-eared bat. Our
concurrence is not required for your "no effect" determinations. Therefore, we consider the
requirements under the Act to be complete at this time.
Please be aware that obligations under section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered if. (1) new
information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical
habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in a
manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is
determined that may be affected by the identified action.
We offer the following recommendations in the interest of protecting fish, wildlife, and other
natural resources.
Sewer Line Crossings
Where utility line crossings of streams cannot be avoided, we recommend that you first consider
the use of directional boring. Where the underlying geology is conducive and safe, directional
boring under streams can significantly minimize impacts to aquatic resources and riparian
buffers.
If directional boring is not a feasible option and open -cut trenching is determined to be the only
viable method, every effort should be made to ensure that impacts to in -stream features are
minimized and stable upon completion of the project. Our past experiences with open -trench
crossings indicate that this technique increases the likelihood for future lateral movement of the
stream (which could undercut or erode around the utility line), and the correction of such
problems could result in costly future maintenance and devastating impacts to natural resources.
Therefore, any instream work should be accomplished in the dry, and the amount of riparian
disturbance should not exceed what will be stabilized by the end of the workday.
Regardless of the crossing method, all utility lines should cross streams perpendicularly. We
strongly encourage that a qualified biologist monitor the stream crossing work areas until the
work is complete in order to identify any additional on-site impact -minimization measures. The
Service may be available to assist you in this effort.
To determine if any maintenance is required, the work site should be monitored at least every
3 months during the first 24 months and annually thereafter. Moreover, we recommend the
development of a riparian monitoring and maintenance program that would outline procedures
for the prompt stabilization of streambanks near the utility crossing (should any streambank
erosion or destabilization occur) throughout the life of this project. Special consideration should
be made with regard to sewer lines associated with crossing areas. These lines should be
maintained at all times in a manner that prevents hazardous discharges to land or surface waters
and should be constructed of ductile iron or a material of equal durability.
Floodplains
Executive Order 11988 requires federal agencies (and their designated nonfederal
representatives) to consider and protect floodplain functions. We believe the examples of
flooding in this area of North Carolina highlight the importance of avoiding the long- and

short-term impacts associated with the occupancy and modification of floodplains and that we
should avoid any direct or indirect support of floodplain development. Therefore, we do not
believe the subject project should be built in the 100 -year floodplain or in any way result in the
alteration of the 100 -year floodplain.
Erosion and Sedimentation Control
Construction activities near streams, rivers, and lakes have the potential to cause water pollution
and stream degradation if measures to control site runoff are not properly installed and
maintained. In order to effectively reduce erosion and sedimentation impacts, Best Management
Practices specific to the extent and type of construction should be designed and installed during
land -disturbing activities and maintained until the project is complete and appropriate storm
water conveyances and vegetation are re-established on-site.
A complete design manual, which provides extensive details and procedures for developing
site-specific plans to control erosion and sediment and is consistent with the requirements of the
North Carolina Sedimentation and Pollution Control Act and Administrative Rules, is available
at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/Ir/publications. Additional resources can be found at
http://www.ncdot.gov/doh/operations/dp_chief eng/roadside/fieldops/downloads/
For maximum benefits to water quality and bank stabilization, riparian areas should be forested
but if maintained in grass, should not be mowed. We recommend planting disturbed areas with
native riparian species. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service can provide information on potential
sources of plant material upon request.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to review this project. Please contact Mr. Byron
Hamstead of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 225, if you have any questions. In any future
correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-17-055.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet A. Mizzi
Field Supervisor
Ec: John Thomas, USACE
Vann Stancil, NCWRC

WINSTON e SAILIEM/FORSYTH
VICINITY MAP
NTS
DESIGN COMPANY:
PLANS PREPARED BY: GAVEL & DORN ENGINEERING, PLLC
ADDRESS: 615 ST. GEORGE SQUARE CT.
WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27103
PHONE: [phone]
COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIES
WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
MILI, CREEK INTERCEPTOR
REHABILITATION PROJECT
JANUARY 2017
CITY OF tiVINS7['ON-SALEM CIP# 717776
�.• •1M• ',~r - BVI • ��� • i ��•
�C.�.. �� II III ip„ r , , i �, ♦, R • :F,,
v '
1
Sir
IN
0 VA
KEY MAP
1 "=500'
INDEX OF DRAWINGS
SHEET N0.
TITLE
C-0
COVER
C-1
GENERAL NOTES
C-2
SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
EC -1
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES & EROSION CONTROL KEY
EC -2 TO EC -16
CONSTRUCTON ENTRANCES & EROSON CONTROL
SS -1
PLAN & PROFILE - STA. 0+00-10+00
SS -2
PLAN & PROFILE - STA. 10+00-20+00
SS -3
PLAN & PROFILE - STA. 20+00-30+00
SS -4
PLAN & PROFILE - STA. 30+00-40+00
SS -5
PLAN & PROF LE - STA. 40+00-50+00
SS -6
PLAN & PROFILE - STA. 50+00-60+00
SS -7
PLAN & PROFILE - STA. 60+00-70+00
SS -8
PLAN & PROF LE - STA. 70+00-80+00
SS -9
PLAN & PROFILE - STA. 80+00-90+00
SS -10
PLAN & PROF LE - STA. 90+00-100+00
SS -11
PLAN & PROFILE - STA. 100+00-110+00
SS -12
PLAN & PROF -STA. 110+00-120+00
SS -13
PLAN & PROFILE - STA. 120+00-130+00
SS -14
PLAN & PROFILE - STA. 130+00-140+00
SS -15
PLAN & PROFILE - STA. 140+00-150+00
SS -16
PLAN & PROF LE - STA. 1 50+OD-160+00
SS -17A
PLAN - STA. 160+00 -END
SS -17B
PROFILE - STA. 160+00 -END
SS -18
PLAN & PROFILE - STREAM CROSSINGS 3 & 4
SS -19
PLAN & PROFILE - STREAM CROSSINGS 5 & 6
SS -20
PLAN & PROFILE - STREAM CROSSINGS 7 & 8
SS -21
PLAN & PROF LE - STREAM CROSSING 10
SS -22
PLAN & PROFILE - REYNOLDA RD COLLECTOR
D-1 TO D-7
DETAILS
S3o8f10 98 2i31VAA-03C)
LIOZ�P'=-j-
Q
PLAN SET FOR 90% COMPLETION
SURVEY COMPANY:
SURVEYED BY: STEWART ENGINEERING INC.
ADDRESS: 101 N. TRYON ST.
PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW ONLY
SUITE 1400
PHONE: CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
704-334-7925
Wlnmon-s— . Fon Ih Co—Ty
//��,,�� '�y, •
�WIIII�'�es
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM EMERGENCY CONTACT:
co
CONTACT: BILL WARD, P.E.
K"O~ ��s below.
Gavel &Dorn Engineering, PLLC
ADDRESS: 101 N. MAIN STREET �
, Call before you dig.
6155 St. George Square Ct.
35
-SALEM,
NSainston103
PHONE: WI)ITE
NSTON NC 27101
704-483-2054-zo54
336-747-7306
License No. P-o6oi

GENERAL
NOTES
PLACEHOLDER
WINSTON—SALEM NOTES
GENERAL
1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO START OF
CONSTRUCTION.
2. ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH THE MOST CURRENT STANDARDS OF THE LAND QUALITY SECTION OF THE NCDENR.
3. STABILIZATION STONE UNDER PIPING TO BE PLACED AS REQUIRED BY CITY INSPECTOR WHEN
CONDITIONS WARRANT.
4. AS A MINIMUM REQUIREMENT, ALL GRADED AREAS NOT UNDER PAVEMENT AND WITHIN THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY AND/OR EASEMENTS SHALL BE PREPARED, FERTILIZED AND LIMED, SEEDED, AND
MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION AS FOLLOWS (APPLICATION
RATE PER LODO SQUARE FEET):
TYPE I SEEDING (LAWNS OR OTHER FOCAL AREAS)
100 LBS. OF LIME
20 LBS. OF 10-20-20 OR 20 LBS. OF 10-10,10 IN COMBINATION WITH 4 LBS OF 0-460
5 LBS. OF TALL FESCUE, CONTAINING A BLEND OF 2 OR MORE TALL FESCUES
1 LB. OF KENBLUE OR KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS
1 I.B. OF WINTER ANNUAL RYE (NOVEMBER 1 TO MARCH 1)
TYPE R SEEDING (GENERAL OR LOW MAINTENANCE AREAS)
SOD LBS. OF LIME
15 LBS. OF 10-20-20 OR 15 LBS. OF 10-10-10 IN COMBINATION WITH 3 LBS. OF 0-46-0
4 IBS. OF TALL FESCUE, CONTAINING A BLEND OF 2 OR MORE TALL FESCUES
1 LB. OF SERICEA LESPEDEZA (USE UNSCARIFIED SEED AUGUST 15 TO FEBRUARY 1)
1/4 LB. OF GERMAN MILLET (MAY 1 TO AUGUST 15)
1 LB. OF RYE GRAIN (PRIOR TO MAY 1 OR AFTER AUGUST 15)
SEEDING MIXTURES OTHER THAN THOSE LISTED ABOVE MUST BE APPROVED BY THE CITY
INSPECTOR PRIOR TO SEEDING.
S. PRIOR TO REQUESTING A FINAL INSPECTION, THE OWNER MUST SUBMIT RECORD DRAWINGS
AND ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEERING DIVISION'S RECORD CENTER. THE OWNER
MUST ALSO SUBMIT THE CONSTRUCTION CHECKLIST TO THE CITY INSPECTOR.
6. ALL WORK MUST CARRY A ONE-YEAR WARRANTY TO COVERALL DEFECTS IN MATERIALS AND
WORKMANSHIP
7. PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK WITHIN NCDOT RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE CONTRACTOR MUST
HAVE A COPY OF THE THREE -PARTY ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT ON THE JOB SITE. CONTACT
336.703-6600.
8. PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK, THE CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFYTHE ENGINEERING FIELD
OFFICE (727- TO ARRANGE FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION.
9. CALL CITYLINK AT 336-727-8000 FOR STREET CUT PERMIT AND PRIOR TO ANY STREET CUTS.
WATER AND/OR SANITARY SEWER:
1. THE MOST CURRENT EDITION OF THE THE CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM TECHNICAL
SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL DRAWINGS FOR WATER LINE AND SANITARY SEWER LINE
CONSTRUCTION WILL GOVERN ALL WATER AND SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION.
2. ACCEPTABLE WORKING CONDITIONS OF SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES AND PIPING SHALL BE
VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL CONDITIONS FOUND TO BE UNACCEPTABLE SHALL BE
REPORTED TO UTILITIES CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AT 336-727-8000, PRIOR TO ANY
CONNECTIONS, EXTENSIONS, OR STRUCTURES BEING INSTALLED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANUP AND REPAIR OF UNACCEPTABLE CONDITIONS THAT RESULT FROM
FAILURE TO REPORT SUCH CONDITIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK OR THAT RESULT FROM
WORK BEING PERFORMED.
3. DENSITY TESTS BY AN INDEPENDENT TESTING LAB ARE TO BE MADE AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY
INSPECTOR AT THE OWNER'S EXPENSE.
FINAL INSPECTION PROCEDURE:
1. OWNER SUBMITS RECORD DRAWINGS AND ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEERING
DIVISION'S RECORD CENTER.
2. UPON APPROVAL BY THE RECORD CENTER, OWNER MAY REQUEST FINAL INSPECTION FOR
WATER AND/OR SANITARY SEWER. OWNER SHALL THEN SUBMIT THE CONSTRUCTION CHECKLIST
FOR WATER AND/OR SANITARY SEWER TO THE CITY INSPECTOR.
EROSION CONTROL
NOTES/CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. THE PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PERMIT ISSUED BY
NC DENR FOR PROJECT.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT EROSION OF SOIL AND SEDIMENTATION ON THE SITE AND ON
ADJACENT PROPERTY RESULTING FROM HIS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. EROSION AND
SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AS SHOWN ON SHEETS EC -1 TO EC -16 SHALL BE INSTALLED
PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES UNTILTHE COMPLETION OF
CONSTRUCTION AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER TO REMOVE.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALLTAKE ALL REASONABLE MEASURES TO PREVENT TRACKING MUD/SOIL
ON ACTIVE ROADWAYS. ANY MUD/SOILTRACKED ON ROADWAYS SHALL BE CLEANED DAILY.
4. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE CONTRACTOR. EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES IN NEED OF REPAIR WILL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO
CONTINUING WITH THE PROJECT WORK.
5. IF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, IN ADDITION TO THOSE SPECIFIED AND REQUIRED ON THE
DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEER DUE TO THE ACTION OR PROCESSES OF THE
CONTRACTOR, ALL COST SHALL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE AND AT NO ADDITIONAL
COST TO THE OWNER.
6. FOR ON SITE TEMPORARY STOCKPILE OF SOIL MATERIAL THE CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL
SILT FENCE CONTAINMENT AREA IN ACCORDANCE WITH DETAIL SB.
7. PER NPDES NCGO1, GROUND STABILIZATION ON PERIMETER AREAS AND SLOPES GREATER
THAN 3:1 SHALL BE COMPLETED IN 7 DAYS. GROUND STABILIZATION ON ALL OTHER AREAS
SHALL BE COMPLETED IN 14 DAYS. SEEDING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT
SPECIFICATIONS OR AS DIRECTED BY PLANS.
8. A PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER SUFFICIENT TO RESTRAIN ACCELERATED EROSION SHALL
BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS. TEMPORARY VEGETATIVE COVER SHALL BE
ESTABLISHED DURING ALL TIMES OF THE YEAR NOT SUITABLE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER. ANY TEMPORARY SEEDING THAT THE INSPECTOR
DETERMINES AS FAILING WILL BE RE -SEEDED UPON NOTIFICATION OF THE CONTRACTOR.
9. AT THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK OR AT SUCH TIME AS THE ENGINEER, OWNER, AND
STATE REGULATORY AGENCY DETERMINE THAT ADEQUATE PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE THE EROSION
CONTROL MEASURES AND DISPOSE THEM OFF SITE.
OUTER LIMITS OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
AND/OR PERMANENT SEWER EASEMENT ARE EQUAL TO
THE LIMITS OF DISTURBED AREA ON ALL SHEETS
DISTURBED AREA = 37.75 ACRES
LEGEND
cm O.RIER
D
RXE W ROA MAY
—
CUM FIRE HY[ NIF
lJ
OM SUR OR SNI. SEW Di1flB
BMW MON im
O
OOSIYIC MATH WIDE
TcE
OORNO MATER I N
w
OORNG E SNRNT/ SIxR
5S
OOST. SW SM MMNIE SIRI URE
OOSINO Gly IMM_�
EX41N0 Ol5 somm
FORE
w SrKcw
0
UND04MED FOR
LIWEIRRD SRRUCRIE
O
a" RIL
WRSIL PUQ MDINO OR LYE
UfAE/0
�u—
BIZTRC
PERS
oe
POWM POLFtW W
wmu1
PIX)PEmr UE
— —
RIP - RIP
--�
RW/RWET R/M
SOKK FORE (SIT FENCE) SM. LB
sOF1NK--
- - - - - - -
SR✓OT M (LABEL TYRO
4
RUN MWQtATDI BllK YARD NO DROP NET —
TOMER uE
�w
TREE k JIM
Q
UDEIKFA 0 CABLE
UEIEROIOIRD BFLTRC
IIIOFIVAIN) TaO
oc
uc
MAIEA N1FR
D
MATER W1L1E
T
TWE LIE
'-y-y -1'-1
BIM LNE
%S WACE 1IMMIGAIXIIIO
PEINMW LIMY EA41OR
TIPORW mKsiRIC" EA9300
SEW GSR
TcE
Gly DlSH1AR
SSE
E
SET
- - - - -
30' SWAN SIFTER
U7
L1J
J_
_U
J
CID
}
F -
Z
D
O
U
F-
}
U)
O
LL
W
J
Q
U]
I
Z
O
F-
U)
Z
Of F—
O U
F- W
W O U)
U W
W Z O
Z 0 J
w� w
W J Z
Of- w
U Q (�
J =
cJ_ NWN
G LL
1 12-12-16 1
MGL
1 "=401
� IbrR.RrM6ldeEa
(Ii BEIOnJI�Ri� Project Number.
PRELIMINARY — FOR REVIEW ONLY ll5b"` C-1

Au erProbes
Boreholes
Soft -digs
Station
Coordinates Depth to
Station
Coordinates
Depth to
Station
Coordinates Depth to
Sample ID Sheet Station
Offset 1t)
Fastin
Northing Refusal (ft.)
Sample ID
Sheet Station
Oftel 11.
Eastin
NorthM
Recusal (R
Sam le ID
Sheet
Station
Offset fL
Eastin
NorthingU81 in.)
a o
AP -1
SS -1 6+52.16
1603059286
867610.226 17.0
BH -1
SS -3 25+64.82
230.38
1604053.226
868826.787
18.0
SDA
SS -3
25+71.82
36.73
1604198.403
868700.416 50.5
AP -11
SS -10 98+98.65
AP -2
SS -2 12+95.16
872619.988
1603560.154
887978.495 15.0
BH -2
SS -3 28+03.13
16.75
1604087.660
868868.651
30.0
SD -2
SS -3
26+26.07
-
1604216.057
868760.881 Uncompleted
SS -13123+48.65
AP -3
SSS 30+00
72.48
1804138.352
869017.484 16.0
BH -3
SS -5 46+97.14
-
1605617.141
869575.781
30.0
SD -3
SS -4
32+82,10
-
1604307.346
869218.367 53.0
c vP�na
•
AP -4
SSS 39+02.29
93.22
1604854.318
869387.420 7.0
BH -4
SS -5 47+57.09
30.98
1605677.537
869561.256
30.0
SD -4
SS -4
36+28
4.65
1604564.334
869436.551 53.5
o z
AP -5
SSS 53+96.85
63.80
1608152.480
670012.374 30.0
BH -5
SS -15 143+95.82
19.28
1610945.922
876730.489
11.5
SD -5
SS -14
134+68.51
40.19
1610301.667
876057.305 52.0
E
AP -6
SS -7 63+48.65
-
1606833.060
870378.091 20.0
BH -6
SS -15 145+33,79
-
1611054.325
876646.363
12.5
SDS
SS -15
141+43.36
-
1610705.574
876545.026 63.5
o ° $
AP -7
SSS 73+48.65
1607460.514
871156.690 19.0
8M4
SS -4s 346+47-.78
-
3644487.535
8745ti6426
Reawyed
SD -7
SS -15
145+54.59
-
1611077.954
876650.418 Uncompleted
APS
SS -9 83+48.65
1808207.002
871773.308 15.0
BH -8
SS-17AB 160+18.95
1612388.709
876958.411
26.0
SDS
SS-17AB
165+61.81
1612782.113
877284.340 Uncompleted
AP -9
SS -9 88+94.75
27.88
1808689.256
872031.764 Uncom feted
BH -9
SS-17AB 163+06.82
1612635.715
877075.131
27.0
SD -9
SS-17AB
166+59.48
1612822.092
877370.152 60.0
v
AP -10
SS -10 91+77.55
1608961.151
872105.242 Uncompleted
BH -10
SS-17AB 164+73.65
1612746.197
877207.346
18.0
SD -10
SS -3
27+23.59
1604161.099
868835.935 Uncompleted
BH -11
SS-17AB 166+33.80
51.63
1612767.377
877374.958
14.0
SD -11
SS -6
51+40.04
8159
1605842.630
869916.492 Uncompleted
SD -12
SS -8
70+96.70
36.90
1607277.651
870978.323 Uncompleted
W
J_
H
U_
J
z
m �H
O
OU
H
Q
O
O
W
j � a
U)
OU
W
H O
z -
z
H Y Q
W
W H
U
(n W J
<
LLm
0
_
J_
U)
W
U)
Q
z
O
z
Apprvd.
Dale:
10-20-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Drwn:
MGL
Scale:
1 "=40'
Project Number:
PRELIMINARY -FOR REVIEW ONLY
Sheet
C-2
AP -11
SS -10 98+98.65
1609461.310
872619.988
Uncompleted
AP -t2
SS -11 106+18.04
27 19
1609602.940
873327.741
25.0
AP -13
SS -11 109+18.98
23.86
1809868.381
873615.162
20.0
AP -14
SS -13123+48.65
1609951.775
875001.723
20.0
AP -15
SS -14 133+98.65
86.82
1610235.558
876009.347
21.0
AP -16
SS -16 152+10.12
159.31
1611533.511
677087.373
22.5

MATCHLINE (SEE THIS SHEET)
V)
0\
M
'XI
MATCHLINE
(SEE THI'S SHEET)
U
V
LA
0 =T1
w;
C3
n
IEJ
--SII
-1) C"7
31 L,
2
C)
L
\A
0,
Tn
,LON
h
< I
>\
�0
A
U
%
t
to
14
MATCHLINE (SEE THIS SHEET)
MATCHLINE (SEETHIS SHEET)
-3
U Ip.
no
VVINSTON-SALEM/FORSYTH COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIES
PREPAREDBY:
l
3
Cn
MILL CREEK INTERCEPTOR
Ee
M
REHABILITATION PROJECT
Gavel & Dom Engineering, PLLC
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE KEY
625 St. George Square Ct.
Winston-Salem, NC 27103
704-483-2054
License No. P-o6o1

GRAPHIC SCALES
06 HORIZONTAL
� wE � o
PROP. 30' SAN. SEWER R/W
EXTENDS 125 THIS
FO a
DIRECTION TO FOXGLOVE
DRIVEo
c z n w
Ecca o La
EXISTING ASPHALT GREENWAY / PROP. PERM 30'
TO BE CLOSED DURING
HEAVY
CONSTRUCTION. (DO NOT USE / CONST. VEHICLES) A
FOR ACCESS UNLESS NOTED) V
`3
/
Lu
w
/ w
U
Z
U
/ y44. y., O U Z
PROPERTY LINE w a W O
EROSION CONTROL NOTES: / °-c�c�'� (TMP) I I w O F-
1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED (�
~
AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON / / .�.;.� ^N s aN Z U
COMPLETION CONSTRUCTION.
SP P b
2. WHERE LOW SPOTS EXIST IN -
TOPOGRAPHY THAT CONCENTRATE FLOWO w
ALONG SILT FENCE, INSTALL SILT
FENCE OUTLET PER DETAIL 5-C.
...... / W F- Y Q O
m i wF- U
06
00
'c IJ
Nm° tiv k Ow -'_ °
EXIST. SAN SWR �� G JJ_ w
I I SWR.R/W SAN Ni9 c� ` w G Z
C �F O
Q
U
SILT FENCE t' °' O O
a PER DTL 5-B aa: 2
� PROP. TEMP. 6729 a, (n
e .c CONST. ESMT d3' RSH 75T J
co GROUND 7st,P0' O
J41.49'(fl'V.C.P>
_ - w
NO CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES
)' HALLOWED ON BRIDGE {/ \ L- ' - 1 EXIST. 30 SAN SWR R W
�`./ / 1 \\�-APPROX- LOCATION \ - /
350 LF GPS CROSSING �) _ j / / :�..y I \ \ `1 \ \ \ EXISTING 12' GAS MAIN I - �� NO ACCESS VIA REDWING
_ PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G r - EXISTING GAS __ CONTRACTOR TO FIELD / i / _ _-�, CIRCLE! _ -
-eek Greenway f '4 _ �. 330 LF GAS CROSSING "' 8,'n ` I ,� EASEMENT LOCATED 8 PROTECT -
Ieoz\ieaToeao uTM• _ � ' PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G/ PER DTL 5-C
EXiHISA�'pSW_
SWR 2 ') RPW STREAM ' \ SAN
—"-
= 7 (taozaTeaaS.eaTas3.4To .... :.. \ \ �` -- - � — --
GROUND ='i5 s' (MUDDY CREEK)
f.✓ '� 4732 i ] ::.�
IN = J3 .3i6 D.:P) 66 LF i. E _- _�
GROUND = 37 E E
]
] 4.9 (30'R C.P.) � �
- /.1NV. _ E E-._ - t
INV. =.724 '(36'RL.P.)
- f
i
... .. .... IN ..... .TGE. -...-.--..TGE ..'. .-t.--.TGE. /......i�
... / •,•, 5..---. :TGE "'�: SCE.....-.; SCE .n
..... ... . B ... ....TGE ... ......
b;
9D—
..............
� b
]398
J'
na s
c •vc
o)
re
C V
tN
36
•R C
P)
( RC
2
46
...............
x
................
.....................
f Cf
¢.� ..f. 7,68•. 3 E
"'Sff B+Oa
�;Iff ...-
+o0 236.10' w
8.40 59 6• R.c.P. S311'06 28 ss� c'. z
W _ l
Pe 5• �'
"W ( e.
/ z re&' :: ,. '• ..y.�../�� r 3 ryt S31'OB'28'W ! - fm
E.+. --_-.-.^$SF.. .. _ T::::.— ..—SSE ..... .%._ SSE ....::.::........:
i...............
Alel
_ Qr �_—�-"—�-� --_--- — _ . _/�i.• �^ S...O .. 1. Date:
i - PROP. 30' _ "',.,� ':\e _
)
P.—
_:. ..
ra'ss=„ SWR R/W ......:: y— Ti r•
-- •—l_ SILT FENCE ~� �J^°�Bv--. -�,.�� ! Chkd:
--.
CROSSING A STREAMBANK- ..- .- .-.` '; %"^r'-.....,,. - _ _ PER DTL 5-8,
RESTORATION PER UIL 6 -A, -7a.,-- —_ �,4 (afi JT/SM
40 LF EACH SIDE .'��; .: "v _=:r `--� `Y.?n�"^- _�.'�fo-a.-- — - _isu.-.. �� �.� oo''t:??}:.r bn.
3600 SF RIP RAP STABILIZATION a•�.'•'�;".��._ .,_ _ _ "�<--- �;T i �� \ ..� \ MGL
- - �.-^-"-m'• ±6==0��0----SF MAT k PLANTINGS — --% so.... '_ \ \\ \*� Dr
Ahu Creek ' r"�-^ _-_ �, -'_' S Scole:
111_40'
Project Number:
- s
)
sneeL:
- EC -
3

GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
o�io Cj
I Ince 40 tL
a � o
QTU
w Oyu
oG?co�
Cn23
00 _
MORSE CORRAL \ '^
(1 fi042B1.508.88MQS.SB2} Vw W
t
/ N/F (s 2
/ REMOVE AND PROPERTY LINE wau6M PMIL[P a. F. �a. \ \ Io-° �� .. U
0 (IYP.) O.B. 24]4 P.G. 2126
REINSTALL EXIST. APPROX. LOCATION 6806-48-1258 _ ,� Z
CHNN LINK FENCE EXISTING GAS EXISTING 12' GAS MAIN / \ \ e Q
EASEMENT CONTRACTOR TO FIELD
REMOVE & REPLACE f20 LF CAS CROSSING t © / LOCATED h PROTECT / \�
PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G
IX. GREENWAY PER - / r.^i c t
PER DTL 5-G \ ;;_PROP. TEMPDTL 7-B (ft00 SY)i:20 LF GAS CROSSING`� .�{�CONST. ESMTv, �,.W.ICE1x, f, . . rcE .,...--^- E PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G / �m I-
GEF... ..;TEE. .,�..:TS.E..,.,.. .fTGE.
.'..I•Ga 5M0.1•.7:39:25::::::"::':::':'::.: iCE E (180.5775.842.888083.148 f50 LF GAS CROSSING \ U Z
H \.:.
..r PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G 1
c W
E
�6!'R. _
2 3
1
C
T
E
C
E
E
tLL ]. n
i
r
E
Bae B oeo tuez .x5t
r. z
E
LE I
W
E n
ti
E
f I
1
T
20 LF GAS CROSSING
CE
-.� _ U
7
C N
- U
LL
PROTECT PER DETAIL 5 G
u: Z
E t
R 7 �
E
SS
%E
LL
a
0
$ c r
Q:
00
E
E
MIS::
11 i
?SFR
.. E
Q
a C
io«e0 lOd67• -6• a.rr. sst3
'ter. .
}} I
7
30, W
23969, 1TE "� - MV�.:
9 T
.6 C
9
T .
Z
_ _ F. .
ry
— 3.
O .
56320k7 -''� _ .c_�. - - � _ .. 15+0o
'� GS S69y60{'Ty
239.3150-.'_.�--��-•_ ..3.:......:.::............�:�:� ..(t8a228.1128682{7.268-
- SSE ... � G...:. '.'..�.: �.:�. �.. .. :�...,
:c.:: ..�..7: 56• Y Q O
� �— � ^'•y _- � -569•!6-""�'ss�^;�::�3 �: �:�:: �.: �.:. .::.; �
_n r'm� - •"e-�_ W ....• .....,-...- E -� 04!'W'w..,,.,.,.,,�..,�w y ie.0 `_���.5''',', _:3: r126' W �_ U
C, -336, ssE B�YI
�''• iBf ooyoB D (N
n W J «S
'tea w / c ...] 85. � - h Mao -•. .. .� -" � _- � ) � � 0570.02'1{yy 20^ � ` 66E L.L LL
5 -
_ / r�P 3r PIPE . 233c .- SILT FENCE .� "•�\ s ''6 .�...:..� O
u+ - C'- C CREEK -]2850 -� '� '_� PER DTL 5-B = \ - J J
w'sv_ )ao ^ _. / EXIST. SAN SWR EXIST. 30' SAN ,�.?--.r^-.,.....'^°�-� '�� „^Nr \ - cc J W ly
ut EXISTING ASPHALTR---, - /W r v G
>. i' \ JI SWR R -
ru TO BE CLOSED DURING - _ --' $u _�,�36 c
z CONSTRUCTION. (DO NOT USE .. - .- q• .' \O\L� . , \ \ b__.\'� h I \ \ J C Z
_ FOR ACCESS UNLESS NOTED)\ 1
y
//,�, — _ — -_=�..•�3rta a+arap =�. _ � _ ss '_—�—�\\ \ � \ j t)`�� es.—�---- � R � \ `Z. — 0
U)
© \ } \
µ u`µ WEST A/RY
O.B. 30 P.G.45 1458
_ 6806-- 3]-55. ]60
�t PACf 6i j3 M JwF
SENT TREE FARM ASSOC.
' 0.86806-47-8013
55
..u,.nnA,. w..w \ `✓s
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED Apprvd
AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON
COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
2. WHERE LOW SPOTS EXIST IN
TOPOGRAPHY THAT CONCENTRATE FLOW
ALONG SILT FENCE, INSTALL SILT Date:
FENCE OUTLET PER DETAIL 5-C. 12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Dre°:
MGL
Scale:
11.=40'
Project Number:
Sheel:
EC-4

EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED
AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON
COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
2. WHERE LOW SPOTS EXIST IN
TOPOGRAPHY THAT CONCENTRATE FLOW
GRAPHIC SCALES
0 20 .0
a_ 1 inch 40 ft
...� \ ALONG SILT FENCE, INSTALL SILT
FENCE OUTLET PER DETAIL 5-C.
° CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
t}\ PER DTL 5-3 REMOVE
AND REINSTALL / (/
.';•� GUARDRAIL AS REQUIRED/;
HOMEOWNER ACCESS NOTES:
4
ACCESS FOR HOMEOWNERS SHALL BECONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. DURING / ,F�'�f PER DTL 5-3 //� 1 -f46.07')'Do
CONSTRUCTION PERIODS WHERE ACCESS TO 146
r ii / / / ../ ( - a 00 f.
THE PRIVATE BRIDGE IS NOT AVAILABLE, k
w / CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT A SAFE, PROPERTY UNE 0
PASSABLE ROUTE IS AVAILABLE VIA THE
NORTHERN CONSTRUCTION ,N ENTRANCEoyp•) /,e/ // /tib \\ PROP. 30' SAN /s (teoalseiaeaeaeaa.ne).,�1 \1 SWR R/W
225.112.15M47255)—
°
\ ° ±50 LF GAS CROSSING
:, w 1604278.00D,868277.331) r)9• .... :1'• -� r �,'
ol
`� PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G
EXISTING GAS (1604208.620,668682482
EASEMENT
CROSSING 1 \ ° \ - / -➢ ' /�, q.. j't ( ✓ - Z �' " I PROP. TEMP.
.":. i PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G \ __ \ \\ :� / �64: j _ 4. -.. 'TrV`T ` CONST. ESIAT
(I W4261.508.868465.392 \ \ /-' j8g•03 / c+
i
:1:. .Tc�'.3�r96 t�\r 4 ,dA': �` '� O'22'��E /;' :,/ /.u[ /✓l// < \\ 'ti:`..
/ EXIST. 30' SAN \ \�
a>�:.. �. :'a'. ,.1.:; / �j� OBE -.•a ` / ±100 LF�GAS CROSSING,,. . �� VO/ Lam- SWR R/W
' ? i PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G _- �i O / Zi1 \_ t �- •\ L�. \. Ib
.':.:: .. 9.00
p ...
1 \
00 .E i s' 51623'55 � - --\m. '�i� / 17,
`� � - ._' � '!� f •: \
IV{
DO NOT CLEAR SEWER RIGHT
OF WAY THIS AREA UNLESS
REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION f 06o43ozeeos62zta.36a)
\/:..� _ "i SLE_. ^ nx 71}ry' •� / - ' / ,i- _ _ _ \ T a m 604316.334.869227.564)
moi...- _ I \ \ 1
� � ' yOt'94j1/ _- :gam � �" --� � - j :/ v� � \\ \\\ \ �\ � PER DTL 5-B \ ±60 LF GAS CROSSING
PER DETAIL 5-G
TEMP. STREAM CROSSING "_ •� �" ,\ _ / �R•,% . �._..-�/ %/'i:�/ __ \ \ \\\\ \\ \ �� ` I , •\ c \ \i..,. ..C� PROTECT
PER DTL 5-A IN "S _ •/ / / �� "�, \ \\ �\ '. "�
(5) 36' CULVERT PIPE
�.u.e���-- r,. \_ = J \ __ '�' F''o %. �j4�.-•j �M iii% ', �.--'- \ -�\� �\�� \\\ �� '�N� :\
SRO x150 � M � y / / '/ � � \ \�\ \ \ \ \\\ �• \ \ :9 \ '�P
- � � 1M��0 = , 15 ) �` /a :� Sd ✓.(,1, i sF;;= �'yis' / / / ' ._.=\ _ ti. \-- \�\\\ \\I � \ � .\ � � `P�
ONSTRUCTION VEHICLES
ALLOWED ON BRIDGE
STREAM BANK RESTORATION PER
DTL 6-A.`"`
40 LF EACH SIDE
±600 SF RIP RAP STABIU-1,41
3600 SF MAT & PLANT
'::..'. / % % • i / ' ' - _-._-.�od,� \I\I .\ \ C\\ ``\� "\� \ ::..
. i%•, % / 5 ' �i / %L� \ \ \ \ \\\\�\ \\ \ \ \ AAP PROX.LOCATION
/
ISTING 12"
SILT FENCE----- - _ ' ' /, ® j/ � /• � � '�ty / 1 . � !I _ � `y \ \\\\ \\\\\\\\\ \\ \\ \ � ECONTRACTOR TO FIE
PER DTL 5-g
✓ `// i/i /..L/� r / / _ \\\ . \ \\\\ \\\\\ \\ \\ \ LOCATED
DTL 5 C
�// .977
�\
\ \\
\\ w
` �' /� / � '• � `/ � � I � \\ \ \ \\ 111111 \ \ \ \ \ � � \�� __- � _ -\ w I \
Z
111 1111 1AA111 V A\ \V A 1 1 A A v.v v U
12-12-16
chAe:
JT/SM
Drbn:
MGL
Scale:
111=40'
Project Number:
Sheet:
EC -5
a
M
G o
e6
m n
c
hz nZ
Qed
E
6c94
ca
o
3
as
� ❑
t7
W
f—
W
J_
z
Q
_U
J
NWED ()L [--
D
O
z
W
O
W O
H
O
W z
U
Z O
�
Y Q
O
}•
W H
()
()
W J
025
m
O
U
=
J
O
LL
2i
J
J W
�
W
Z
Q
O
U)
U
z
z
O
O�
0
W
12-12-16
chAe:
JT/SM
Drbn:
MGL
Scale:
111=40'
Project Number:
Sheet:
EC -5

MINOR STREAMBANK RESTORATION
PER DTL 6-B
40 LF EACH SIDE
*200 SF RIP RAP STABILIZATION SEASONAL fr
*200 SF MAT PLANTINGS \ RPW STREAM (j
82 LF
*20 LF GAS CROSSING
*20 LF GAS CROSSING E PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G
PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
�' , . E i ; E 1804584.3081859442.202)
(160 889376.520 E itli•= , ; ;;;;;:::::.:.:. 1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED
APPROX. LOCATIONtf AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON
EXISTING 12' GAS MPJN COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
CONTRACTOR TO FIELD 2. WHERE LOW SPOTS EXIST IN
A
LOCATED do PROTECT t TOPOGRAPHY THAT CONCENTRATE FLOW
PER DTL 5-G t ALONG SILT FENCE. INSTALL SILT
.._..... .. i v� FENCE OUTLET PER DETAIL 5-C.
2
PROP. TEMP.
. uE68,.5;OD :::.,..:.;'; •':. � ' �::::::::::::::::: :. a CONST. ESMT
40, x -"cam .,.v.+.4. 1 n'"`,,..s, •'.•ij, -Q y, ro �a�9 *20 LF GAS CROSSING
/ - I / PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G
/f\\,
SEASONAL
w15wi7s.5z1.95Y5{2.354) RPW STREAM
\. CR2 TEMP. STREAM
OSSINGS PER DTL
i \ —. — '°T \.'''. ''' S-A (24- SO PIPE)
...D ...', REPAIR STREAMBANK \
\ \
w i!L Creek _ / �\\ � 40 � . ' ' PER DTL 6-8 ~•\.r_
_z� O© �=.i `,.., •\ �� `� \ / 1 mss,^`.,,.,,•.,, .> I. ..S�y. 3 _ :':=o .' i � ..: E HERBACEOUS WETLANDS
i:� / '� % •\ t`\. - __\\� :¢ % 's�39+K, 4'4' 201 SF WrrHIN PROPOSED EASEMENT
2605 SF WITHIN TEMPORARY
\- � _ -. _ i /� \ -._ .__ \\ \ \\ @' i'. � D � � // ' I •--�-��\^ CONSTRUCRON EASEMENT
EXISTING GAS
EASEMENT "4
\. \ / C .� •\• \ C� .h _ - SILT FENCE
PER DTLS=B
EXIST. SAN SWR
EXIST. 30' SAN \ \
_ I \ SWR R/W
I C _ STREAMBANK RESTORATION PER r r• �\ �� 7 ��-- ` .` \ ?�, .� \ E PROP. 30' SAN
DTL40 LF EACH SIDE'Re?? WR /W
�\] %jam( l �� .. 5 R
�> a" *600 SF RIP RAP STABILIZATION
*600 SF MAT h PLANTINGS
—___=_�- _ , \\ \ I I' ` I ( /I d \ 111 I I IIF' , \.\ \; ._a\c ?,w.rr`f Err _ \ \ \\ �\ l _ \ �.� Si0•17'/s• _\. (1 95.D80,
` \ _ �\ \ � \\\\\ \ \ �j � \•\ \ �` ,1 � .\•` � \ -—�s\\�:�.� ,'„tel'\ s'F.� `b .+'+,
\\\ \ 111
\�\111:k` \\\ I I I '\ \\\ A PROPERTY LINE
1
RPW STREAM
\ 26 LF \1111/ _ \� •�./� — y.
0
OEEO H ` 1
R III � l %. ,` f �.� _ _ � \\ \..:• \
`moo
ACCESS SEWER EASEMENT VIA
PETREE ROAD
GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
o�w
1 !m6 a 40 tL
1-18-17
Chkd:
JT/SM
Dr*n:
MGL
Scale:
111=40'
a c"
c � n
aC U o O
zNa
41
31
U)
Lu
F
W
Z
_J
Q
U_
J
z
M
D
w
Z
O
O_
~
Lu O
::)
()�
Z)
U
LU Z
z O
cf)
w �
O
(n
W J
06�
0 m
Q
J
_OLL
J
O
�
�
wG
CJC NwN
Lr—
Z
J
Q
O
!^
!
C)
Z
Z
O
OU)
w
1-18-17
Chkd:
JT/SM
Dr*n:
MGL
Scale:
111=40'

GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
Lw�
I t -h - 40 fL
y/ .4 M
69oi 3a•, p C) �i 4
somas i NO ACCESS TO STREET .v 2 a a
`M SEWER EASEMENT • oz
EcS�o
MAJOR STREAMBANK RESTORATION
03 p PER DTL 6-A
R[q \ }
aiy .a/.3P. 40 EACH SIDE
±6000 SF RIP RAP 5TABILIZA7ION o
F�.3�6 <s n•v.� ±600 SF MAT & PLANTINGS
Wl
/ Ck4 EK - 39.0'
Aa
PROPOSED PERMANENT ✓_ c +g \\ - f� �- \� �_ W
\
ACCESS EASEMENT
CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR
±30 LF GAS CROSSING V a.a,�
\ / -�'� PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G
AP
PROX. LOCATION n - _ u _ J Z
4 7, `;mIl, I I CD Q' H LLl
r EXISTING 12' GAS MAIN - — -i 808842.6d088BDt6.-2 \ '3s_r6
CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT
_. - \ I ���
LOCATED &PROTECT , .:b � 1805645 848 eeDD20.232) \ � � _ � � �. � I " O U Z
`4 PER DTL 5-G i •-. z4' -' — ' / \ I� 1� - /) I ' �- �' LLJ O
EX PIEDMONT GPS /. y_. (' / W O
CC BE UTILIZED
II� I FOR ACCESS m 3 � 3 c Y /+ EXISTING GAS � �,'JJ Ir\ N
EASEMENT �/j 1 \ � �( I \ Z U W U
±30 LF GPS CROSSING
f PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G 14'
(1605595.080.8 9637.505) e�� f ,n""" `�.... _Lr+ •'; \\ l \�\\ `\ I Z
..r' 2cE •qi•
co w
06
/ \
I sE \
LL O
'7'
Q
•����°�25'50 A � \\\\ VAV �'�� \ W
��'� / // �I�, I ✓ / � /tea : ' � .� ',..- � S v �.� . - EXlsr. SAN swRit Lu Z
/ Exlsr. 30' SAN ��;a Q O
\ \. s`03�\\6 ;'`�� % /` 3DB?5 .�✓,� / `i d _ " �� \\\\ ss✓ SWR R/W \ ` i/` U
i/ I z
°
SILT FENCE'
�'iar•-_^ F ft > ///. .'f / `c•
PER DTL 5-B �� PROP. TEMP. `.
CONST. ESMT a
\ U �'-L /.r✓.�, S� " / /.� �: :/,, / / / 6Boa 6ya� r PROP. 30' SAN
SWR R/W
MAJOR STREAMBANK RESTORATION
PER DTE O
40 LF EACH
SIDE
±600 SF RIP RAP STABILIZATION ..._
±600 SF MAT -& PLANTINGS eo6
r
PROPERTY LINE
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED
AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON
COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
2. WHERE LOW SPOTS EXIST IN
TOPOGRAPHY THAT CONCENTRATE FLOW
ALONG SILT FENCE. INSTALL SILT
FENCE OUTLET PER DETAIL 5-C.
O
\ \\ P 'Q LU
SE
J20.36'-�i'9$-?-�"-�yry
1
SILT FENCE \
PER DTL 5-B \ /� - � APFd.
1 SEASONAL
RPW STREAM
65 LF \ \ Dale:
W 1-18-17
FORESTED WETLANDS \
43 SF WITHIN PROPOSED EASEMENT \ Chkd:
130 SFWITHIN TEMPORARY ? JT/SM
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT Drwa:
MGL
xak:
1 "=40'
Project Number:
Sheet:
EC -7

GRAPIIIC SCALES
0 20
l�- � �+' . �•� \-_-� �.�' '\• --- -- 45..E - \ �� \ "+,. O ©-...— � �� 3 +aon = aD ft.
PROPERTY UNE ' \\ � _ 0' L
%'/ $ ' (TYp-) - i .... \ ,.rte \ - - Q• .� E M z
�\ a ��~~��� % \
� - /� �' :..�.+' APPROX. LOCATION
w'O \ ' EXISTING 12" GAS MAIN r `� -'- " - �"�� 'may E c
�'`.. �• EXISTING GAS °, i` \ --.`\ \ —�_ \ - o d
Ci E --(-�_ E E EASEMENT R om .a - -_. 23 •\ ,yl
*50 LF CAS CROSSING ^ u E\ .�`........
...., E E E E `' ` C epi 9�w
�^ t wL' /' ,_, �,.Sr•,w^^ PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G " - "^^^^^^^ PROP. 30' SANm
/.�+ ms'-^^^..µ,...........
.717.660 \ SWR RAW ^^^^..-.-...-.-......,.....�;..,..w-,..,.,,",........+..,_......._........... E _� i / Ev`' \E \L o
NAL- T�--'G ""'"^^"1^'
FU- _ 4.,a i 35SIS \
$¢ —" •`-11 LR{�P. �` 3 3 3—�G�—G\ INV. 'p_S'(1807277.Q51 A70B7&:
- G INV. _ la,�S2�(A'0.�P.)
\ E 355 .�y. _5rj..0Q..-53 - 324 ' \ 3 3 3 G GJflV, _ >40..
320 _ c
6 6 3 \ !^
q _-� \,:w - - �C+Qd- -- �� .746.6DD 3 3
x W 538.09 46'W "� �5+ 303.00' '� 3E• R.C.. w_ ////��
til •G �—+_ 1F"^"�w. \ R - VJ
ggx� ao�9>> .. ,.,,r,�d..-53978'13 W — — 6s�o0 295.49' - 1y17�r��.. F"
3 -'q.- d6: 3 ,.`M6 9� i - .. YN5'" , •3 Ol.x �0«ea �" J U
F
....XX SX
ER1�8
'1• O INV. 739.06 ]+ <
\ b g 3d
iOf
s�p FORESTED WETLANDS �'ao �, i
L Oo / iE
100 SF WITHIN PROPOSED a s CONST. ESMT / \ EXIST. SAN SWR RNV.
PROP. TEMP. / � f'` � U
.- -. EASEMENT
- J
64 SF WITHIN TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
J -- _ EXIST. 30' SAN = m f--
.
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT -.. ...__ \ PER DTL 5-B .._._. _ ._...__ ._ SWR R/W = ` p (, z
FORESTED WETLANDS 1 as
TDA -� \ PROPERTY UNE / '- ._- __.... __ ,_ _. � \.__ .._... ._ � w p U
120 SF WITHIN TEMPORARY = � _
CONSTRUCTION_ EASEMENT Z.
z
FORESTED WER 'NDS \- _ ; �- ...._- - . - ¢ \ W
8 SF WITHIN TEMPORARY / / _._ - - �-�
'--
/ CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT - \
-— — — — YQ O
\ /
w U
U) W J
_
PROP. TEMP. 06Q
O
CONST.
ESMT
LL
J
EROSION CONTROL NOTES: w Z
Lu
SJl:;: ::::'..... .,. .::. :.;... 1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED
AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON � O
...,.,•.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,ti 3—G 301'-- _,_3Si.;.;.;:;:;:.,..;...;..;.;..;..,.;...:...:...:...:....:....:..:......::.; 3tx .. �i` COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. Q
33l. 2. WHERE LOW SPOTS EXIST IN U
�� I\\�/' •6 ,i``�. c `"'9�1: .... ..:.?..., )g TOPOGRAPHY THAT CONCENTRATE FLOW 1
EXISTING EASEMENT CONNECTS TO 3�Y'::;:::::.; ....
1 <— r9r �.3 SOCCER FIELD AT GREENBRIAR FARM .: ALONG SILT FENCE, INSTALL SILT z Z
MINDONA LANE NO CONSTRUCTIONw_�1��� 3 —G�— CIRCLE *1000 LF FENCE OUTLET PER DETAIL 5-C. p
ACCESS v EXISTING GAS , "� 3 c __ -`a<�::::::r; �:,;::::;;`:..:. p� �_
MAJOR STREAMBANK RESTORATION7) EASEMENT oe tiA \ _ _""',-.-->•+ 3 �r -.5:
PER DTL 6-A j1 f t' �Hp es b �> ..A.':... .::,y a�i33J '`-- - << ./ Y'f A�—G— � p
40 LF EACH SIDE f '9"rA°r •e _ .. 4 '-�"� z
*600 SF RIP RAP STABILIZATION •,?e, : �!a`s.'.. f' his ''" -= =-� . - '� -w"� ��"'"" ''"""��-�
*600 SF MAT & PLANTINGS j �S`k' `'-� (% W
i
F 41
.> -
\y/ v 1 /T
o-119
W
_ =
- - " r is _ ^• � �� � ,; t os. _ _ AA I(�l � i ��/ � � � � � � � � \ �_� „_,.,.,.,,�.,..
y-` z .�,.• '� �. � I ^ // / �
EXIST.\\ SWR
EXIST �o A
Creek _
I Cre f *30 LF GAS >'-O %� ( - "'s-� r•. � ._._ __ /"/ r � % -� \ SWR R� SAN
I /,c� i ` 1 \•� ( �.' .Q _ `/ .".-,.,. l�
PROTECT PER i_ ho Ao ac4 ,f \\ _%
_ DETAIL 5-G :: 2 �'; T f , - �' , i 1 t = _
i.. .' E 1807270.036,870685.648) — y - \ . % .. i ,-..�+!:
-E \ 601(�7277.851.870Y78.323 / _ '- \ $ ' ,\) ffE — A7Prvd.
\ wLL
\ 1 �'' t ..•,. J 75
� 2U - - _
1'�r�3A._,8 pll'> .•: .,:� _ � ]3�00rn ra 3 g
�ROU"'D to .7�¢ VEP _� 13' ..s r .. w 1 ✓..,..�'.^,"Sid+^^ - _yiV' t6• RC �a-�- 4 _�-
1.., sse µ'24W E ` Date: 1-18-17
-41
02•
7
Chkd:
%S `.�/ 2 ,,.,,•.,-,.,..r. :;\ .
JT/SM
1
PROP. TEMP. /'� \' \ �.. w. \ MGL
CONST. ESMIT / / , / / - PROP. 30' SAN\' \ q
/ sM 1 SILT FENCE B 4•n PROPERTY UNE -^�*., Sc
''Y'9DC17� S1hl�y / / �/ SWR R/W \ \ \\'.. PER DTL 5-B -
�J61 (TYPJ �"�"��. 11=40'
APPROX. LOCATION (� `\ // �/ / / / / / / / / % ( FORESTED WETLANDS-
4 oB Project Number:
EXISTING 12' GFS MAIN / ; / 725 SF WITHIN PROPOSED
CONTRACTOR TO FlELD 'sb ) i l 1� EASEMENT \\ 'J.yQ
LOCATED & PROTECT - _ 4
565 SF WITHIN TEMP �isp9
ORARY \
\ CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT = - \ \ \ _ Sheet:
EC -8

EROSION CONTROL NOTES: GRAPHIC SCAT
1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED �b
AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON
COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
2. WHERE LOW SPOTS EXIST IN I xucn 40 R
TOPOGRAPHY THAT CONCENTRATE FLOW M
ALONG SILT FENCE, INSTALL SILT ZS
FENCE OUTLET PER DETAIL 5-C. 00
e >r xr
U
• W l R
o
�0
a o o
0
\CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE PER DTL
REMOVE AND
..... PROPERTY LINE ss (/�
REPLACE EXISTING z
FENCE AS REQUIRED (TYP/
..,�•) FOR ACCESS / W
„^---�3x PROP. TEMP. 4`”`*..., �_ W
isi: .:....: ....:....:....:...... CONST. ESM!
"^^..«. EXISTING ASPHALT // J U
t.........:..:.:.:::::::.':::::.::,:;.:;.:;.:;;:::;:_:::,::;�..::::::_::::;::.:,::.::;:; :::.::_:.._.;,; _:.. a� EXISTING GAS GREENWAY TO BE / _
f20 LF GAS CROSSING EASEMENT _
PROTECTED / Q
PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G
:. :::": r::::::i ::::i;'i'. :i:.::: [::.""}? ^,.. f20 LF GAS CROSSING
(teoeszo.as�.enwz>aoe PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G
}fit
a.— E APPROX. LOCATION.,,
G— 3�""`�.1Jt" �� EXISTING 12' GAS MAIN "..,
G—'t.`>'�' E CONTRACTOR TO FI 3'
Jt
„� .„ ... ' .. .. a TED k PROTECT
�`'`s. .._1 v"\,-.,-",.,-..,,.,,, J \� E E/ PER DTL 5-G O
W
_ E } W 0 U
Q .z.,s] _ _ /" _ --�s _ \ \\\� \ �\ -- 1 \ f i.✓� M \ • O LW Z F-
P. STREAM CROSSING Z (�!
x(L Cre k
TEM
- SILT FENCE • - ?\ _ ` ` ✓� .� PER DTL 5-A INSTALL 2 G 3 G Z
a \ "� J �j i \ 24' CULVERT PIPE ��•iae :':'.�' -\\ (x eoe91v.s1e,e7zzse.642 .r`,, a - Y Q O
Fr' F
PER DTL 5-B � i� .................. } W F— U
SAN SWR
EXIST. . SEASONAL RPW \ , 1 1 '�3 \�3j'� / W J
-,..so*e _ — __— " ...�v-- _ 's•ve : Lf°" ..^^,," 1 Y EXIST. 30, SAN U)
/ - SWR R/W
81 LF
06
K RESTORATION y
\ MINOR STREAM84N = O
444 J
40LFEACH SIDE
7200 SF RIP RAP STABILIZATION SILT FENCE 'S+> \ I�\
c W
.. - DTL 5-B ' 'Sae, PROP. TEMP. ``^^.-�.�,.,......,,, C Z
xne � 270,77• /^ _ _ 1200 SF MAT &PLANTINGS PER / W O
6 `8 ` �1j CONST. ESMT
:, .: - oie t36•s .P.) \ a 555'15_:38 \ NO,
�1� ,y,.,,.,, ". Q
\//�Iil�!\
p � '"' —,_–' c ;,x.t-mom \ \ •-,-w'-".,,\ � ' Z
'::: '�•,'. '... B 1,A \ � EXTENTS •ei,'Ai'ti s° '"` �::: �^ \ ._ .—._ O -.,.. o r
:i\..;.. Geo Q•tip `r6a g�G_ a �f�q O.oO Y� _ �_ <O rs f. __ - MAJOR STRFAMBANK RESTORATION I O
6-A 1
UP
STABILIZATION O
..x Z
MAT k PLANTINGS O
o.
4% \ � '— - \ \ � .,,,, u° �t \'Mr. ��"��- ?4ygZ. yb ph �i \�\ .. �\• �\ _- g � W
. o moi .q •. •. .; '' . PROP. TEMP. 30' \ / �" PROP. 30 SAN \I `_ I �y 1 rNv.' �'S89, \, 6"W� \ _ - - / _ ..Y; \. - �.\�1 \ � ri W
SAN SWR R/W OVER \ \ \ �+I'; �z
Si EXIST ACCESS ROADtu.
FORESTED WETLANDS i
565 SF WITHIN TEMPORARY 'f°w
4i 1;,.L t
ONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ,�.: / v >asp,`�``�
HERBACEOUS WETLANDS /
2160 SF WITHIN TEMPORARY
11
'1p CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT � >1.l' �,yc '� tns. 2983• yb R; �n,.iQn 455
..19x. / 1
tSL: I
PROP. PERM.
30' SAN SWR
/ CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE PER DTL
5-E
UNIMPROVED RIGHT
OF WAY LEADS TO
RED COPPER DRIVE
R/W :Not hn, ' aa�
j75 SG.
tA
I
...........
'
Date:
1-18-17
Chka:
JT/SM
Drr,a:
MGL
Scale:
111=40'
Project Number:
Sheet:
EC -9

I / /1 GRAPBIC SCAT
�� 4,. �•.,�.T'�' ." _^3 J✓G{ EXISTING GREENWAY
NO ACCESS THIS LOCATION
..i EXISTING GAS % i ee Ay5
.."'��'" EASEMENT
y\ - EXISTING 12' s" '
GPS AWN
r ,
aat%
\ ` SILT FENCE
PER DTL 5—B
\
TEMP. CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
RIMr= 7 s'
IN ]d564' O6'v.C� -.-
PROP. TEMP.
CONST. ESMT
/ PROPERTY LINE
x ..N-4.
uQ ..
i
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED
AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON
COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
2. WHERE LOW SPOTS EXIST IN
TOPOGRAPHY THAT CONCENTRATE FLOW
ALONG SILT FENCE, INSTALL SILT
FENCE OUTLET PER DETAIL 5—C.
1-18-17
Chkd:
JT/SM
Drwn:
MGL
Scale:
1 "=40'
EC -10
�
m
n
cv20Y
Qo)
a
d 6
of?c0
0
3 1;S
d5 v�
c
U
Un
w
Un
w
U
z
Q
U
J
z
fn
w
O�U
z
O
Hw
O
�
of w
D
O
U
w z
Z O
Y Q
O
>
w
U
Un
_�
wOr_
Ir m
O
U Q
J
O
w
_
J w
Lu
z
Q
O
Un
U
z
z
O
O
F—
Un
U
O
z
n�
i
w
1-18-17
Chkd:
JT/SM
Drwn:
MGL
Scale:
1 "=40'
EC -10

F
gR� /
I
EXISTING ASPHALT GREENWAY
TO BE CLOSED DURING
CONSTRUCTION. RUBBER TIRE
VEHICLES ONLY. PROTECT
ASPHALT PATH
I PROPERTY UNE
(TYP.)
EXISTING SEWER
TO REMNN
R
I m
RIM = I66.c6'
GROUND JSSI]'
INV = 75001 (8-D.I.P.)
EROSION CONTROL NOTES: I
1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEE
AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON
COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
2. WHERE LOW SPOTS EXIST IN
TOPOGRAPHY THAT CONCENTRATE
ALONG SILT FENCE, INSTALL SILT
FENCE OUTLET PER DETAIL 5–C.
I
±20 LF GAS CROSSING -
PROTECT PER DETAIL 5–G E
EXISTING GAS E E —
ass_� ' EASEMENT E --� � —
E --
3n ss APPROX. LOCATION E DUSTING ASPHALT � G
EXISTING 12' GAS MAIN E L G
�-4- CONTRACTOR TO FIELD Z E C E GACCESA THIS:�� G�� 1 G~
LOCATED & PROTECT E E O Q POINT -- 0�
PER DTL 5–G 3 n_
E E E d ��\ �G3 3 i ��,•• N
' ----------
E
E
1 E �..w. "��� G 3 /
E ... � G
AVEDPATH �G---------
-3
I --- ate.,. A^�"'"`.,«� \ � �y �,..„r„-•�r"`• % � )\\� f,�t'�+•�"`'t �'
�\ TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 0J
PER DTL 5–Eul
iv
.,(f�
CROUNDi�i15669' / \\_ -_ \\ ~ �\ .�.7z \
'NV - 114054'307y.CP.)
_/ •` / % - ---_.i i / \ \� EXIST. SAN SWR 1 _
DTL 6–A Y i t\\ ^'� EXIST. 30' SAN / I �\ ��\ FORESTED WETLANDS
_ STRFAMBANK RESTORA710N PER / \ / / SWR R/W \\ �� 362 SF WITHIN EXISTING
40 LF EACH SIDE _ 1 /' �\ \ J� EASEMENT
_ ±600 SF RIP RAP STABILIZATION �� / \� i / \ -- – J r \ i _/�
f600 SF MAT &
7. PLANTINGS
o _
\\\ % w .✓ - =
REMO POSED 36"
MAIN PER DTL 4B ' r n+co re+ 4a oo` . /� 355.96' \ __.. '-L'o+eo rz}+oD
w
\ TUP PIFN ,So66 RPW STREAM / 5'39?TW
129 3naT 'ina \ 3nd ane \\ vK -_ W -- M M•
� � ;. ��``Z '''/ n...+. ' � ,ro / tN ., ,.+e.r,•�,ov.ce� ;_ �.�:�:� SCE-.._ :.._ � IR�>�-r!'-_1�`ttl�`�!A
— SILT FENCE PROP. TEMP. _.... —
5p0.g3'5.8
26�yW„ / PER OTL 5-8 CONST. ESMT i
SWR R/W
r
1+2+00 — y�e - TEMP. STREAM CROSSING PER DTL \� /
.' �� A INSTALL MIN (2) 36'
2091 5
CULVERT PIPE
ana .3N
' � I 4-.�s i8,G'DLPi.) P.)T �INVTSaGO
SEWER EASEMENT o
m : = MINOR STREAMBANK RESTORATION \ ' r `�`\\� `_ a >ar , q TN TO MILL CREEK
PER DTL v\_ RD
f40 LF
200 SF EACH
RIPSIRAP STABILIZATION ACCE S CONST.
1200 SF MAT &PLANTINGS
GRAPHIC SCALES
a�
w d0
U v
na
W p� 6
E c5 o v
od u� c 3
U
U)
L1J
U)
L1J
U
Z
Q
_U
J
LY]
LZ
O
Lu L
O
W O
�-
O
U
W z
Z O
U)j
Y Q
O
>-
W F-
U
(n
W
06
O
U 00
J
LL
•J
=w
O
J
W
Z
Q
O
U)
U
z
z
O
OC0
LL
1-18-17
Chkd:
JT/SM
Dren:
MGL
Scale:
1 "=40'
EC -11

EXISTING ASPHALT GREENWAY
- E �
� E -
- f -G-
V
N
Z
EROSION CONTROL NOTES: GRAPTUC SCALES
1. ALL DISTURBED TO BE SEEDED �
AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON
COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. �
2. WHERE LOW SPOTS EXIST IN t -11 = so rt
TOPOGRAPHY THAT CONCENTRATE FLOW
ALONG SILT FENCE, INSTALL SILT
FENCE OUTLET PER DETAIL 5—C.
1621 SF WITHIN PROPOSED EASEMENT
514 SF WITHIN TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
/
4TNUNt1 = 'GG j?��
Ao
pXd
w
�/J '^
1
U
U_
f-
EROSION CONTROL NOTES: GRAPTUC SCALES
1. ALL DISTURBED TO BE SEEDED �
AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON
COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. �
2. WHERE LOW SPOTS EXIST IN t -11 = so rt
TOPOGRAPHY THAT CONCENTRATE FLOW
ALONG SILT FENCE, INSTALL SILT
FENCE OUTLET PER DETAIL 5—C.
1621 SF WITHIN PROPOSED EASEMENT
514 SF WITHIN TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
/
a
Ao
pXd
w
�/J '^
J
U
U_
f-
J
Z
w
0(-)
Z
O
_
"
w
�-
Z
U
U
C)
F-
?—
j
IIS
Y Q
O
�l
U)
w ~
U
w
w Co06
:=
O
J Q
O
wOf
a
W
cJ
C LL N
J
O
U)
U
zO
/�/�
V/
I L
V
`z_
W
1 1-18-17 1
MGL
Scale:
1 "=40'
EC -12

GRAPHIC SCALES
W M
O
ec
U
• M z ff 0 a
E E z
E oo
O > O
'd n
Q
C
`y PROPERTY LINE
r-
\ - 'faN ,,�( ,ATV' vY / � . ,Ll✓ J1`4 �
a Y
\ ! 4 O U z
ti EXIST 30 SAN �•\ - �,ryL�y�'---..1� .. (. "I O W z
w EXISTING SEWER .\ SWR R/W l,yl\ U O (n
6 99 ���.1
PROP. TEMP. e0unn =�so.uo' �- Jr % a / t` N Z
,( CONST. 6Mf ^"� ,r,�� INV -
t . '� ass. 3ss�� r nssfiv 3 s 17n'� Tm yCt' 4 `s," O
H...."�' '.^^^^ ..... �.........,�.ci. '('.... \L...wu....... ...A,...iuw�,, w.........,��...3?T� 35S 35S _ _ 3/J W
Z \ IVY • r,. �.1<[\ Z STREAMBANK RESTORATION PER OZf
-ssE. SSE ssE E _. _. — �,,,E.�7,/7,!-/r/�7' ,, (T .. - - ,� DTL B -A
r r SSE SSE ,( ssE r:7 s ` •i. .\ _ — _ v - 40 LF EACH SIDE
m
tBOSF RIP RAP STABILZATION Q O
AteooSF MAT & PLNTINGS J
J = �
7 J
o'
W.
y
— H
J
_l- Y...
, O
'"' iAt ilbL ai4 Twc
• as. 270.99' 137 OD tx+oa O
S3 00'40'W - '- 7 S37'00'40'W '�535'54'!7-W mob, O
59.06 � I- hp sv�
SILT FENCE (tem 715.4e2,976547.024 it -� "•n
PER DTL 5-B f LF CAS CROSSING . z 1'.� W
PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-13 }� n
PROP. 30' SAN a APPROX. LOCATION \E
SWR R/W EXISTING 12' CAS MAIN - Z--"
CONTRACTOR TO FIELD
LOCATE & PROTECT PER I o \
DTL 5-G \ s
1 EXISTING GAS : s
6
EASEMENT
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTURBEDAREAS TO BE SEEDED
AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON
COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
2. WHERE LOW SPOTS EXIST IN
TOPOGRAPHY THAT CONCENTRATE FLOW
ALONG SILT FENCE, INSTALL SILT Apprvd.
FENCE OUTLET PER DETAIL 5-C.
Tate:
1-18-17
Chkd:
JT/SM
Ihwn:
MGL
Scale:
111=40'
Project Number:
Sheet:
EC -13

oEP /
EROSION CONTROL NOTES: GRAPHIC SCALES
1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED
AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON �w
COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
2. WHERE LOW SPOTS EXIST IN 1 Leah - 40 fL
TOPOGRAPHY THAT CONCENTRATE FLOW
ALONG SILT FENCE, INSTALL SILT M
FENCE OUTLET PER DETAIL 5-C.
c .pp
I I m
EOO
\ �I
(COO)
�ONZ
I "1 EXIST. 30' SAN '17 E E?o
SWR R/W I C x
EXIST. SAN SWR o
IF APPROX. EDGE / IX1�T0 REMAIN a
OF GRAVEL LOT .rc
I;% �lc4l.
MAJOR STREAMBANK RESTORATION
PER DTH 6-A I S - -
1C 20 LF EACH SIDE ,� � ssc� � ���'� p w
/ ±400 SF RIP RAP STABILIZATION „ _ _ "� �'_ �_> �_ W
F j ±400 SF MAT do PLANTINGS /6814'
42 tF G E
NV. t7Bh41 (4" Pl —T_ Z
PROP. 30' SAN \ ^_ Z i / tNb _ >��I _ / W SWR R r / i Q
� �_ � � � .GJ!
�I Ip R TEMP. CONSTRUCTION CONST. ESMT
_
ENTRANCE PER DTL 5-E. rte_ a1 N63.42
F - LLJ
II I SILT FENCE PER, 5-B
" SCEP-.;..'.'.'
I1 /
oo Tss.s2'_"�-- _ _ } W O
3 �4O'p
289.3 .,..., ssE .✓r'' � ./ � �` we -_.�' O w Z LL
O! n'
L � L
�/ __ ... . �cw✓ o?- c'` PROP. 30' SAN CoW
.✓ ."_mss �/� / / J 06
SWR R/W ry�
FORESTED WETLANDSQ Q
LL
raEE�, \ ...oa....,.....^"'�� - / _ / /�'e,✓i" we .: 499 SF WITHIN PROPOSED W J
EASEMENT c J w
5171 SF WITHIN TEMPORARY G c
PROP. TEMP. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT N W C z
CONST. ESMT O
w Q
SILT FENCE '- U) U
/� PER DTL 5-B
20 S C ? I Z
F
_ � Z
- - - I 02510 W
t.w."\..\�
TEMP. CONSTRUCTION
c
ENTRANCE PER DTL 5-E. \ \ \ E e'""'^^"-�•,.,.,,,,,.,,,� _
_ r _
APPROX. LOCATION iiC y / � \ � _.. ___ _ _ �- I G "'.•,.��..E —� E -
EXISTING 12' GAS MAIN I��I�� /<�/ \ / \ / ��- — _.... __ _. \ \ 3 —c ^^-•�,..
CONTRACTOR TO FIELD
LOCATED do PROTECT
PER DTL 5-G
R }S \\ ` \_\ �\ = _ —EXISTING GAS
t e.B 4 ApMd.
I,qI T 3
6B1B1
E 2681 �=�_-3-"' �`�
1-15-17
' PROPERTY LINE„_Y^= Drwn:
(TYP,) -- -- — ..--- MGL
xole:
11.=40'
EC -14

�)\
CONSTRUCTION
GREENWAY VIA
SAA K TION ENTRANCE AT
_ 1 ek
ss 20 _ MIDKIFF ROAD Ore
\ �'s • „_... . _ ACCESS POINT FOR
r ! I DEOF IX. MH
� L J
- DEMOLISHING - EXISTING ASPHALT GREENWAY
---� CONSTRUCTION.
TO BE CLOSED DURING
•y \ \\\ I_ ;`- -
f £' IIS PRO lC GAS CROSSING
�\` �\ -\ \\\ �, G• 1 PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G } �f /, � / /"� W
1812673550,87 495.294 & fi F— W
w 1XER Z
J U
N' P 0' t�816 Jb Ic {r� �� EXISTING SEW
-b-- TO REMAIN r Pte•
G�-NoT,.--
- tg4 i� � f-�w�. � �Q/
' -: • � , �; I I � - � - 1NJ '. � \ \ _ "-- ✓.�. / e°a /,rte^ U
-
U M�.,•� F- W
I L
l r-- W 0
W 0
\ _ \�� � I II \ � �>90q '. \091J. It. t •r'Sd C � ,, 1 ... � t -e- /\/
SILT
PER DTL 5-B _ _ \� "� '.: 1\ CONST. ESMT
Q O
% PROP. 30' SAN`. \\ £ 500 - t' tte n ,fib as ts' sap a
\ #\ �t� "Nv h5nz' ` ' (t°tz7e3.231.ana2oslt) / b N '� Esq w i- W F- U
SWR R/W 0 c
UA WIT cl� 06
0 m J
EXIST. SAN SWR a °Fe ` 1 �` ll J =
U
REMOVE & REPLACE EXIST. 30' SAN jl1 � s>• / I 1 "' � / _ _ J W
ASPHALT PARKING LOT SWR R/W;lS�e' / ..:` _ c F-
�� PER DTL 7-C { ,� �!'{/' '�\ W G Z
REMOVE & REPLACE />
CONC. C&G PER DTL 7-A :; f;.`. _ \
r � i a1v� " - �tataez2o9z.°n37o.tsz) I
�� _ \ ..' 9/ Sco ou •F s ..Z`'S• AynN, - _ U) U
MLIOR STREAMBANK RESTORATION L *30 LF GAS CROSSING \� t
.._ \�"1 `: S3 1 ° `� .. f • O PER DTL 6 A �I I . ' €�.} III . 52C� PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G
\ I�: 40 LF EACH SIDE I - jIII I �'' 1 p0 - ` -� \ \� t\� w" 0
*800 SF I'S
RAP STABILJZATION I \\\ m `-e6^ \\ 0 —
s `- \ *800 SF MAT &PLANTINGS 4 ,�I`
._..._ �.;• . I �... PROTECT IX. � (i �_� i � `as
WATER MAIN /1. _ sl' .I _ "\�� �, %/ j > 0
f STRFAMBANK RESTORATION \� I.. • '. '`. ���: dcE .':: "> ! i '° I ' b \-------
MAJOR
i
\ N
a
PER DTL 6-A P l� Ae .. ..::-i:^'' \ \ ` /-'�j00�-� W
i
\ \ n^ 40 LF EACH SIDE \•.� �' �s\.\ 3?�s\``. -rr. ': i�i.::i' �.,'.O .i'�. II I 1.._ \...; PROPERTY LINE
\ *800 SF RIP RAP STABILIZATION .._ �..S>d„- \ mak, - `� 3f/ `� (TYp•) __......
1`
e 1800 SF MAT & PLANTINGS \ \._.�:'- 6W
S
B
�' �...._ _- c/ r/ // f k•. \. tezwe 56.8 / 34 / :;/ ! II� �. :r. r, :. EIXA.ISEMl&GAS
\ 4 '' $42,5136eWj
APPROX. LOCATION
It/ //I (I / I/��, :EXISTING 12"GAS MLN
CONTRACTOROR R ECT
FIELDLOCATED & PROTECT
PER DTL 5-G
�\ •'', \\\\\1 \ TEMP. CONSTRUCTION -
1 0.. OAS �• ETRANCE PER DTL 5
PROTECT IX. GATE --
TEMP. N" " '. TEMP. CONSTRUCTION
�,a:4 REMOVE & RtiPIACE IX. ENTRANCE PER DTL 5-E.
\ - - GREENWAY PATH AS DIRECTED
BY ENGINEER (*150 SY)•-- - }
EXISTING GAS 7 : MDrvd.
APPROX. LOCATION �� EASEMENT
""-"'--.:.....-.,..,..,-.....,.,- ......,.,.,,>, EXISTING 12' GAS kWN\ z; /� / %•
- I F y Dote:
-12-16
12
Chkd:
Drrn:
MGL
Scale:
1 "=40'
Project Number:
Sheet:
EC -15
GRAPHIC SCAT
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
4�'P
1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED
AND MULCHED IMMEDIATELY UPON
I Imh 40 K-
COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION.
2. WHERE LOW SPOTS EXIST IN
w rj ti
TOPOGRAPHY THAT CONCENTRATE FLOW
ALONG SILT FENCE, INSTALL SILT
FENCE OUTLET PER DETAIL 5-C.
C m N Cq
m g d
W o m�Z
E c o
� ffi c
�)\
CONSTRUCTION
GREENWAY VIA
SAA K TION ENTRANCE AT
_ 1 ek
ss 20 _ MIDKIFF ROAD Ore
\ �'s • „_... . _ ACCESS POINT FOR
r ! I DEOF IX. MH
� L J
- DEMOLISHING - EXISTING ASPHALT GREENWAY
---� CONSTRUCTION.
TO BE CLOSED DURING
•y \ \\\ I_ ;`- -
f £' IIS PRO lC GAS CROSSING
�\` �\ -\ \\\ �, G• 1 PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G } �f /, � / /"� W
1812673550,87 495.294 & fi F— W
w 1XER Z
J U
N' P 0' t�816 Jb Ic {r� �� EXISTING SEW
-b-- TO REMAIN r Pte•
G�-NoT,.--
- tg4 i� � f-�w�. � �Q/
' -: • � , �; I I � - � - 1NJ '. � \ \ _ "-- ✓.�. / e°a /,rte^ U
-
U M�.,•� F- W
I L
l r-- W 0
W 0
\ _ \�� � I II \ � �>90q '. \091J. It. t •r'Sd C � ,, 1 ... � t -e- /\/
SILT
PER DTL 5-B _ _ \� "� '.: 1\ CONST. ESMT
Q O
% PROP. 30' SAN`. \\ £ 500 - t' tte n ,fib as ts' sap a
\ #\ �t� "Nv h5nz' ` ' (t°tz7e3.231.ana2oslt) / b N '� Esq w i- W F- U
SWR R/W 0 c
UA WIT cl� 06
0 m J
EXIST. SAN SWR a °Fe ` 1 �` ll J =
U
REMOVE & REPLACE EXIST. 30' SAN jl1 � s>• / I 1 "' � / _ _ J W
ASPHALT PARKING LOT SWR R/W;lS�e' / ..:` _ c F-
�� PER DTL 7-C { ,� �!'{/' '�\ W G Z
REMOVE & REPLACE />
CONC. C&G PER DTL 7-A :; f;.`. _ \
r � i a1v� " - �tataez2o9z.°n37o.tsz) I
�� _ \ ..' 9/ Sco ou •F s ..Z`'S• AynN, - _ U) U
MLIOR STREAMBANK RESTORATION L *30 LF GAS CROSSING \� t
.._ \�"1 `: S3 1 ° `� .. f • O PER DTL 6 A �I I . ' €�.} III . 52C� PROTECT PER DETAIL 5-G
\ I�: 40 LF EACH SIDE I - jIII I �'' 1 p0 - ` -� \ \� t\� w" 0
*800 SF I'S
RAP STABILJZATION I \\\ m `-e6^ \\ 0 —
s `- \ *800 SF MAT &PLANTINGS 4 ,�I`
._..._ �.;• . I �... PROTECT IX. � (i �_� i � `as
WATER MAIN /1. _ sl' .I _ "\�� �, %/ j > 0
f STRFAMBANK RESTORATION \� I.. • '. '`. ���: dcE .':: "> ! i '° I ' b \-------
MAJOR
i
\ N
a
PER DTL 6-A P l� Ae .. ..::-i:^'' \ \ ` /-'�j00�-� W
i
\ \ n^ 40 LF EACH SIDE \•.� �' �s\.\ 3?�s\``. -rr. ': i�i.::i' �.,'.O .i'�. II I 1.._ \...; PROPERTY LINE
\ *800 SF RIP RAP STABILIZATION .._ �..S>d„- \ mak, - `� 3f/ `� (TYp•) __......
1`
e 1800 SF MAT & PLANTINGS \ \._.�:'- 6W
S
B
�' �...._ _- c/ r/ // f k•. \. tezwe 56.8 / 34 / :;/ ! II� �. :r. r, :. EIXA.ISEMl&GAS
\ 4 '' $42,5136eWj
APPROX. LOCATION
It/ //I (I / I/��, :EXISTING 12"GAS MLN
CONTRACTOROR R ECT
FIELDLOCATED & PROTECT
PER DTL 5-G
�\ •'', \\\\\1 \ TEMP. CONSTRUCTION -
1 0.. OAS �• ETRANCE PER DTL 5
PROTECT IX. GATE --
TEMP. N" " '. TEMP. CONSTRUCTION
�,a:4 REMOVE & RtiPIACE IX. ENTRANCE PER DTL 5-E.
\ - - GREENWAY PATH AS DIRECTED
BY ENGINEER (*150 SY)•-- - }
EXISTING GAS 7 : MDrvd.
APPROX. LOCATION �� EASEMENT
""-"'--.:.....-.,..,..,-.....,.,- ......,.,.,,>, EXISTING 12' GAS kWN\ z; /� / %•
- I F y Dote:
-12-16
12
Chkd:
Drrn:
MGL
Scale:
1 "=40'
Project Number:
Sheet:
EC -15

�i
MATCHLINE (SEE SHEET EC -15)
k i �
X
A'
� O m
JNC
N �0
O
mDti�O p
mz rOOmig�=
n Z���CNO
mcg op
mmr
��OOOZ
0
OZ0Q s..
nyy ZOCm
nHm ?-Vr/
Z8
O p
-
rn
Cn
-
q
-
o
N
rn
WINSTON-SALEM/FORSYTH COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIES
MILL CREEK INTERCEPTOR
REHABILITATION PROJECT
PREPARED 9Y:
ce
Gavel& Dorn Engineering, PLLC
615 St. George Square Ct.
Winston-Salem, NC 27103
704-483-2054
License No. P-o6o1
EROSION CONTROL & CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES

v+vo 1+00 2+oo 3+00
PLUG EXIST. MAIN AND REMOVE
EX T. MANHOLE
RELISOUTE 6" SERVICE LATERALTO
NEW MANHOLE PER DErAIL4-F
Creek PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
NO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC
34 G 173p
EXIST. SAN. SEWER TO BE
/L c u ABANDONED IN PLACE ITYPJ
GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
VERTICAL
o
Lu
00
Lu 0
Lu
4+00 5+00 6+00 r+oo a+no s+oo 10+00
�
ui
7405 —J
C ST
ON RUCTION ACCESS
DEMOLISH ABANDONED
PUNIPSTATION
INSTALL 15 LF OF 42" RCP
SAN rAR1 SEWER T
MATCH CROWNS ATTRUNK
LINE
7-7
ICE. U
IVE TC
MANHOLE 100
�ROP. MANHOLE 100
-11.20
ROP. MANHOLE 1002 _��_Z40.26
ET EC -2 FOR
RIM 740.00 AP -1
SEE SHE
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS -".y
w STA. 6.52.16 Apprvd.
30'STREAM BUFF -'R (1603D59.296,867610.226)
Afuz Ilk
STA. 2+81.68
-12-16
12
40.00
MGL
FEMA FLOODPLAII.
ZONEAE =40'
FEMAFLOODPIAIN
ZONE X (TYP.) Project Number
PRELIMINARY FOR REVIE sheet; ss -1

12+00 13+00
O J "N FEMA IAIN
ZONENEAEAE (TYP.)
' �"� FEMA FLOODPLAIN
ZONE X (TYP.)
14+00
1
15+00
16+00 17+00
18+00
19-f-00
20+00
GRAPHIC SCALPS
HORIZONTAL
�p
I mon - 40 a
i 0
VERTICAL
U
N y2 O0.
I h-{ ft
ma
• �
z
E m a
E
o d
o 18
�a
U)
w
J_
F-
D
U_
J
M
d
W
w0
J
(
�W
LL
Ov
F- z0
a
=zp
F-
Y Q
°6
�-
W F-
z
(n
w J
0 m
a
O
Q
LL
J =
J_
W
J
Q
z
0
F-
U)
z
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Drwn:
MGL
Scale:
1 "=40'
Project Number:
Sheet:
SS -2

J I - uu JLtL)IJ dbtVU _544 -UL) 35+00 36+00
SEASONAL
RPW STREAM
STA. 52+16.39 \ 82 LF E -
PROP. MANHOLE 10161REMOVE AND RE-LAY 4" SERVICE LATERAL TO CONNECT E \
RIM = 748.05TO TRUN\ LINE MANHOLE AT MAX. 90' ANGL
INSTALL CKLEANOUT AT PROPOSED EASEMENTE E
STA 32+92.30 MINOR STREAM CROSSING :.,►'y'
37}.:.��oc ,��\ (1604307.346,969218.367) REPAIR PER DETAIL
37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00
- RECONNECT 4" SERVICE LATERAL TO
MANHOLE TRUNK LINE AT MAX WANGLE
INSTALL CLEANOUT AT PROPOSED EASEMENT
SD -0 /
STA. 36.28.00
(1604564.334,869436.551)
TC{ \
��-fir%: ✓--254,46`00 �, i-.—^
371':: /y iy \
i 47
Ems,-�'.""'\�.`__\ ��d
R' S - �.Bf•
�'Pi
-?a �' ::;\:; v�,:; �;::� :}��.�-�'—
-
--� _y��: .t::. �;.�
C
00 544•?g
sox _ - ---j .r..
��..
M\34, �-54T�'•Z75s�
cC ,. cF'�
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
NONE
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MONS■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ummoo■
o
c�z0.
N
1 Inch = 4 M
W O m �
No
■■■■■■■■M■■■■■
MMMMM■■■■■■MMM■Mtl��®/.11■■■MMM■■■
■MM■■■/1■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■N■■a■MM
MEN
■ONS ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■pni.2
MMM■N
':■��M■■■M
■■■■■NMMSMN■■MMMM®ri■NII■■■■MMM■■
a
M■M■MMM■M■M■■■MMMMMMMMMMMMA.iMM■NNNN■M�■NM■■■■■■■■■■■E
�i
MN■■M■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■MNIdoMMN■■■■■■■■■M■■■■■N■■■■■u4.
ESSM■NN■■N
■■■M■■■�■�•���M■MMMM■11■MM■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■i■■■i■■■M■■MMI
I©!l1F�]■■M■idllliy■■MO■■■■■■■M■■■■■■■MM■■MN�y�MMM■■■MS■■NMOMS■M■■■■■M■!9t■I/l�MM�N_o
ME MAO N■■S■M
MEN ■■M■N■■■■■■■■Sr71■/I■■■M■■M
■■ ■MM■■MMM■■■■O
■MMI I -r�.
G ' Pi��]■NGUI'S�M■■■M■■■
■■MMMMM■■■■
M■ �1'�/MMM■MMM
MMM■■■M■NMN
■■ ■):�%�% ■���■
■ 4 ■■■■■M■NN■■■■
■■■11 �iLiL
■N■M■NiH
JiM■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■
■■w%IINNN■■■■■�■M=MONS■■■�■■
■■■■■iAMEN
■N■M■NN■■M■■■■■■■■■■MI
ILilt�i�fJ�ON■�UIMNNNN■■N■NNNN■■■■■■N■■NNN■■NI91:��7r■MN■■■N■■N■N■NN■■■■N■■N■11■■SN■■■N■
=MM■■■■■■MMMMMMMMMM■MI1�t„'1EMif�%MMMII9".
■■■■M■MM■■M■M■■■MI�OM■M■r�MMM■MM■■M
■MM■■■■MN■M■■■■MMM■MIIIM■■■MSM■■Mlh�t%%■■N■MM■■■■N■■NS■M■■■MMM■Mw■rrMM■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■NW1S■■IIU►.%SMMM■MN
1�1■■N■■MMM■■■■M■MMM■■■III
■MMM■■M■S■■nM■MM■■■■N■��••::�•S■■■MNi!■MElm
M■N■■■■■■■■■■MN■■■■NGIlli�iiilillM■■M■MM■M
IIIe'A@M■■■■■N■■■MM■ME�:iIII
Nlt�\■NMN■■MIIM■■M■■��Gi/■��M■M�N��■N■M�■fii■MM■■■■MMM■■■NM■■■■MMM■■■I%IYIM■■■■■MMN
ISM SMS■■■■
IsmooN■■MEOi■N■MMM■■■■1
■■■■■■■M■■■■■■MM■■■■■III■M■MM■■INS■MAIM■■■■�■■■■M■■■■■■■■■■■■NOM%MINNNIMM■M■NMN■■�■■■■■■■■■MM■■■'II
/.i%■■M■SINMMM■���N■MMIIII■■�■�i/M■■MS■M■■M■N
NN■M■■M■H/E�IUi�G/N■■■■NNS■■■OSNM■MM■■■1■■/■ieC��■■N■■■■■��E�:ii■■■■■■O■■'ll'■MM■M■M■■
HIMMM■N■■■■N■■MS■■■■■■■■■E�■MIYI■■■■■■M■■
■■■■M■M■■N■■■■■■■■MM■III■■■■■■li�Ilili■MInIM■MMM
■■F7,4■■■■NN■■■■■■■■S■■MNON■
OMEN
■■■■■■■MS■NS■■M■■■L//■MIIIIlINlI!!IS■■■■■S■MN■■S■M■M■SM■■■NII■■■■N■■■M
■■MIII ■■NN■■■■■■■N■■■■■■■■■■■■N■■■III■NI■■■■■S■■N■M■■M■■■N■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■MM
n ■■■M■wm■M
■■■ ■■ N■■■■■■■■M■■OIC■■■
�I,� '
■NII■N ■■■■■■
■■NS■■■■■ ■■
..IIl��I■O■■■■■■■N■■O■■■■
■■■■SN n■■■ ■■■■■
M■■M■■■■M■■■■■N■■■In■M■
d IL
l■MIN■■■■■■■■■■N■■■■■■
■
■■■■■■�11■■■■■■M■
■■■■■MMM■■■MIIii��I�■■■■M■IIISMMMMM■■M■■IN■■■■■N■N■■■M■■NN■NI■MMMM■■■SViu�ii�irfir�i■■■NMN■■■■■NMMO■■■S■■II�O■I/r■■■
MMMMM■MMM■■MN
■■NSMN■NN■OMM■■■M■■■■IN■■■■■■N■■■NII■■■■■■■NNSAwNONO■J■M�JN!M�JL�O�JL�■!:Ia■N=■EIENEEMEEMMN:MMNNGMiriMNi■i11iMr■■■■■■
N■■O■O■III■■MMSM■■■■■11■■N■■■MN■N■■■/i■■��;,'��'F.NfN■■M■■■In■NM■NM■■■NMN■■N■■■■NM■■■MO■N
■J1�1!■JC■�Je
�J!•OOCNlaMNI!MMMMEMMEMEENEIN
MMMMM■■■■■MM■■■■■■■■■III
■■MM■MM■NN■■■■■M■■■■■III■■■MOSMN■MMII■■■■■■■M■■■■MNM■MS■■■■■■■■■■1111■MOMMO�JL�O�JC'
EM9Ei9ElENNi::
■■M■■■MM■MM11■■■MM■■■■M■MMM■■MMM■■■MM■■MMllli■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MM■■■■i�G�IY�%NIIMM■■■■■MS
i■N:iGGiGMiiiiiMriMi■i■MN■■■■■MIII■■MM■■■■■■■MM■■N■■N■MMSl9!I!I!J!A■
11 ■MN■M■■■M
E_EM_EIE :i_M_C_i_ammas
:■___
■■■■■■■■■■
"' nl■Nfii�d�/Li�:iBM■■N■■■■■■NNGWfiifir�■irlN■■■■I
■NNN■■■IINNN�M■���■■w�Sl�%�N��N�I
111■■■M■M■M■■A-.
MINN■■N■■■■I�IM11i�Mly■
-
1!■■■■N■■Nll■■■■■■■■■
MM
■■■MNnNM■■■EMN■
NSMLM!! 11! �""'�7r!�T.!'�■■■■■■M111■?SAN-
����SMN■■■�■N■■■111■■■M■■■■■■■ll........■.......■..a
�3'�iN■■M■MM■■■N::i4�iaiL3:iLi�'L':�■MMI
1�.;'
nINMM■MMNM■iii�irllfif�i
a..;lU----------------------=---����________
.
ii1M■■■M■NM■11■■■■■■■■■
____—=====Eii/GE■�:i:..i■.■■■.■■■■:.�.�■■■■■�■��■�■��■�1�l�ANIN�i�rli�����i�������������i■iii■MnM■M■■■MMM
■■■■M■M■■N■■MMMMM■■N■NI■
■■MM■■■MMII!!■AlllM■I!N■■IN!!■■MM■M■MNiriii
iia #��MMM■NMNI■■■M■MM■■NM■■M■NNM■NMN■■M■■11■■M■■■M■M
_■■■■■■■■■MM■■■■■MM■■NIM
■N■■MM�MM4>,�f>�t--><�.�—/�!M■MMM■MM���'�"J■■■■■NLIIIIlI■��lrlM/L!�■MM■MM■■M■■■■M■■■■1�I/11.4���!7S�1.3ii
.YL'JLLAhT4GTid1E� lrii•
■■■■NN■MM■■■MMS■■■■■L��■��I:�o■%■■Nllil"iffiiiiililM■(�iMS■■■■iilYc'C��rl�!i��iM■■NN■N;:ama��nwi■■MM■M■■MS■NM■MS■Mr■►b�13t3■!�en�
■N■NMMMM■■MMM■■■■■■NM■iL1L'i��i���l�Li%■■■MN■■■MMM■SN■■MS■N■■■■■■■■MMNMOI:'1'Ilr1.ES
■■■■■M■MM■■■■■M■MM■M■■■■■■■■■M■■MMM■MM■■■■■■■■MM■■■■■■■■MM■■■M■rr■MN�M■MM■MM■■■■■■■■■■■MMMMM■■■■■■■N
.7MRZ7M■SM■■■MN■■MM■NM■rO���i•T.�OM
J I - uu JLtL)IJ dbtVU _544 -UL) 35+00 36+00
SEASONAL
RPW STREAM
STA. 52+16.39 \ 82 LF E -
PROP. MANHOLE 10161REMOVE AND RE-LAY 4" SERVICE LATERAL TO CONNECT E \
RIM = 748.05TO TRUN\ LINE MANHOLE AT MAX. 90' ANGL
INSTALL CKLEANOUT AT PROPOSED EASEMENTE E
STA 32+92.30 MINOR STREAM CROSSING :.,►'y'
37}.:.��oc ,��\ (1604307.346,969218.367) REPAIR PER DETAIL
37+00 38+00 39+00 40+00
- RECONNECT 4" SERVICE LATERAL TO
MANHOLE TRUNK LINE AT MAX WANGLE
INSTALL CLEANOUT AT PROPOSED EASEMENT
SD -0 /
STA. 36.28.00
(1604564.334,869436.551)
TC{ \
��-fir%: ✓--254,46`00 �, i-.—^
371':: /y iy \
i 47
Ems,-�'.""'\�.`__\ ��d
R' S - �.Bf•
�'Pi
-?a �' ::;\:; v�,:; �;::� :}��.�-�'—
-
--� _y��: .t::. �;.�
C
00 544•?g
sox _ - ---j .r..
��..
M\34, �-54T�'•Z75s�
cC ,. cF'�
VERTICAL"
r-':^�...
� '' ': '•"•-n' SSE i �,» =\ \ �"��- \ J ����/" \ ` e4 �\� \� �C�. �""'•.��
SSE j STAT. 33�\ \ \ STA.
— i r/�T� ' ROP. MANHOLE 1018"
N
SSE \ j ROP. MANHOLE 1017 f% = 74 745 76, --_�
11l/ = 5.02 _
,f5 \ I miu Creek ✓/ , / �j\
a EXLST.SAN.SEWERTOBE \I 1 vy / \� p©- ..�" L�_\`l /' \ '\S TA. 39+05.22
ABANDONED IN PLACE (TVP.) / / ` - PROP. MANHOLE 1019
Q 'EXIST. MANHOLE TO BE _ f/ '/f �' — — _ .... \ % �\ \ L RIM 748 8�
G r,. ABANDONED IN PLACE (TYP) ^\ /
= 1 — �1 % �� ---- — _� —i STREAM CROSS/NG #3
� \\. - _.c\� / % \ C �•\ \ (SEE SHEET 55-1B)
(��%v v �` / 30' STREAM BUFFER I^\\
(TYP - -- - A
,ice C11
FEMA FLOODWAY(TYP.) / f STA. 39+0229'"= x�
(1604854.318,869387.420)
FEMA FLOODPLAIN
ZONE
FEMA FLOODP IN
J _
v
-
OZONE%(TYP.)
5T 26 LF
z
u
GRAPHIC SCALES
.�
1 hie�L
VERTICAL"
o
c�z0.
N
1 Inch = 4 M
W O m �
E �a
z
u
GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
1 hie�L
VERTICAL"
o
c�z0.
N
1 Inch = 4 M
W O m �
E �a
a
PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW ONLY
U)
W
U
m � �
} a- -3
�Wo
Z U �
o z
U Z O
� w �
Cf) w J
ct� Q—
O U Q
H J =
75 J W
W
J
Q
Cf)
Z
0
f—
z
07
i
Lu
J
LL
0
a-
06
z
Q
J
a
1 12-12-16 1
MGL
Scale:
111=40'
SS -4

SEASONAL
RPW STREAM
73 LF
40 212.73'-
57B'S7'39-W.
/ N
O
z �
I—
� a
MMEMENO
SOMEONE
No
Iii :■■■■� ■■�
II ■■■E■
■ MEN� NEM'
MOONS
■MEMO
t r Tvv-+�-rvv F.�'rvv -F4Tvv 4JTUU 40tUU 4i+UU 473+U0 49+00 50+00
FEMAFLOODPLAIN
ZONEX ITVP.) ,
GRAPHIC SCALES
Apprvd.
0
HORIZONTAL
Z
Chkd:
1 i—h - 40 IL
JT/SM
a
VERTICAL
w U 4
nz
1 inch - 4 (t
'c aw
c zO
w o��
1 "=40'
E c�
Project Number:
0
�yc�r,
PRELIMINARY —FOR REVIEW ONLY
Shee7:
SS -5
m
U
CO
LiJ
J
_U
J
M
CL
O LU
LU O
zU�
_U
o
w z
O
U
O
�
=z�
F
Y Q
aS
>-
LU F-
z
Co
W -1
Q
O
U Q
n
J =
J LlJ
W
J
Q
U)
z
O
I—
U)
Z
uWWi �I !
Apprvd.
0
Date: 12-12-16
Z
Chkd:
=
JT/SM
U
Drvm:
MGL
Scale:
1 "=40'
Project Number:
PRELIMINARY —FOR REVIEW ONLY
Shee7:
SS -5

■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�����■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■EEM■EE■■N■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
MMwgMMMMMMM
MMMMMMEN■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MMMMMMMMMMMM■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
METEM
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
1 Inc
W � O
■MMMMMMMMMMMMMMN■EM■�ii
PRNMM■M■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Es7l■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■f��:1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■NOM■NE■■■MMr
■■■■ ■■■
EE■■M■M■■■■E:1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
G m2
■■■■■sINVN■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■I�l�M!/
ON■■■N■■N■■■■TNN■E■MEE�l�iiN■■■■■NN■NN1�1�l11�!NN■■■■O■■MMEM■NAdI�Ytit�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
q y
U
■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■[■■■_[■■,Fsz�■■■■■■■■■IE�i��E■■■■■■■■■■■■■■SII,ad
Obi■■■■■_■■■■■■■_■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
MEN
Lu O
w
Z
O w
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■G�LGC�Q�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■MNNE7■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
Ow
z
O
■■�4■■NN■■■■■■14aQ��■■■O■N■N■NN■■NN■O:\
~ O
Q�
z
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■III ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■NNN■i73'■■
=
F_
mx
Kl
' F__
Z
(n
■■■■!%■■■\'■■■■N
EIEzioMMME■EMO■N■E■M■IIM�
�
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ILII■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■�■■■■■■\[■■■■I��llll+���■■■■■■■■■
U Q
CL
■ ■1111■■■I •O■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
J =
■NCI■■■■■■■■■■
��■■■■■■■■■■►\■IIS%■■M�■■■■■-
■■■■�■■■■■■■\�II�■/■■
■/■:JII3��■■■■■■■
■■■���—�In■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■NEEM■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
J W
III'■■■I■■■i._E��.====C�3G:ii■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■■11■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
11■■■■��■�■■���■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1111■■■■■■Er■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
W
MEMO E■EEO■EEIII■■EE■
■■■■MM■E■■■■EI111■■■■M■■■MEN■■■■■■MNNNIIIEM■■NNNM■M■■■NEE■■■■MMMONN■MMN■LEI■NM■■NNN■■■■EON■■NN■■■■M■■■■M■E
■■■MOO■/�GIi7EMIL"�M■■■M■■■MMENEE■■■M■E■INN■■■■E■O■MM■■■EEM1i1iiOEE■■NMM■1111■■■■■OE■EE![�l�CEJc!■■E■=9EEEEEEE
MMM■■M■MME■EMO
J
EIII■N■NN■■■NN■■NNNENENMME■■EEE■M■N1111■■■■MN■MEMM■O■■■■■■E■MNN■■■■■■■
N■Z4■■/■■■■■NIIII■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IN■■N■■N■■■■N■[!�!t•IEmmomENEENEENE
M■■■E■■■■■■M■ILII[NNNNNc:NCNNE=ENEE3EE1:1■113IGiGiErii■NNr■N■■■■N■■■■N■N■■1111■■I■■■■■■■N■■■■■■■N■■NN■■■■■■■■■
EEEEEM3EEiGiMiiiiEiEEN■NEM■■■■■■■MM■■MIIIOMM■■M■■■
MON■NNN■■M■NNIIIINN■■■
■EE■■■N■EE■■M■■■EE■M■■1111■■I■■■■MM■■M■■ON■■■MN[■!■JEMeeMEc
EIIIMo:3GGii�i■iNi■■■■■■■■■�■■■Nm ■■
rJEN IE EEEEMEE::IGN�iGiEi"iiMM_iiE■M■M■■=MEM■M■■■M■■■MMMIIII■M■MMMMNE[tommomen-■■■■■■■TEEM■■■EE■■■EMN■
■ ■■NNllid���ilirrtTNNN■■■EE��E■■■■11■■■■O��■■■■■■m••
�_ ��-MO�-------���
��������IIIIE■M■E■M-
MENEM ■ ■ E■■1111MEEEM■��Iw�r
11--------*--����������■Ili■■■■■■■■■■■M���E��■■E���������III�����M■
MMN■E■■ ■■■■■EI1NN■■■ENE■■■NNMNEM■■MNNlE[
__--------
E!►rsr"7■EOE■■■■ME■M■EO■M■MEIru.�L.�Li,rE�M■M■EE■■■■IIIIONM■
L��!*■MO■MEN■■■■■■
■■IIIIIoEEE■■MET■■■■■
-------------- ----
E��E
�JL�lEC11!11=�=3EE■EE3NG3GG iriNEii■rr■■NNNN
■M■■■M■■■■■MM■■
MEN MEIIII■EM■EEM■M■MMM■■0■mown
111-----����...:iiii■i�����NNN�
■■■■r^'a[rfit^;■MO■■ EM■M■
E�E■ 1'T'!�^"'\r!;�lt'■MMN�EN M�
M■2EMMEMMN■■■1111■N■M■iir�Gii�iii�iiilW■NMMNNII■M■�■
iiEEEEEEEEEEEiII'_••���������_---_—����n�����
■■■■■■■■■■■■MrrJINNLII�O�IINJ��E�����■M■■111■N!
■■■E■■■M■■MMMM,s;E�1z�TM_MEENMMMEEMEEMO'""'.
_.
------
i�.�EfilE■■■EM■EM■IIIIIM■■■�E■■■�inl�■r��■NO��M■EO■��■■
■■■■■■■!■■■■■■���..���
--------------111=====___
�i���■■�■■■■■MMMNN��■I■■■NNNMMNMN■E■■E■■■MNNN■■■M■■■■
-<!M M■■■■ON■■■■MNMN■■TNN■11/1?_;�'[_!_f3i■MM■EMNEME■MN■■■EMN■■
■E■■■MM■NEE■M■NEHMENi�ETrr�s;ne�TEMMMMMEMENMMEEEMMMMEE
■����--------------------------
=_—=_�����I.��..���ris■■
■EMM■■■NMMMMEE�i1W��`�!��.�ir1!■■■E■E■■M■■M■Iliiiii�i�
• . ■EMNM■■E M■■■E■■■■■MM■■MMMNOMM■■■■OE■NEE■MME■TME■MM
M■rS'©M■■■■■NN■■iliiiliif■fiiirriiii■■NNNNN■■M■NNN■■■N
MNNN■N■■N��■■■■NNNN■■NNN■■■NNN■■NNNN■■■NNN■■■NN■■FI►�'■N
J I t u u
J J + u u
54+UU
55+00
56+00
57+00 58+00 59+00
\ RPWSTREAM—
65 LF
60+00
GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
W
1 Inc
W � O
VERTICAL
czo�
A.
1 xwh= bit•
G m2
W v
E 6D 4o
q y
U
c�
59 OC�
�ZE:-TC FORESTED WETLANDS
/ B SF WITHIN TEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
FORESTED WETLANDS
43 SF WITHIN 1300 WITHIN TEMPORARY
PEMENT PRELIMINARY -FOR REVIEW ONLY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
a
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
om:
'v' ^ L
Scale:
ll.= "=40'
SS -6
W
U
m
Lu O
w
Z
O w
Ow
z
O
U
~ O
Q�
z
a
=
F_
mx
Kl
' F__
Z
(n
W J
J
�
� —
O
U Q
CL
LL
J =
:_�
J W
W
J
Q
C9
z
O
Z
a
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
om:
'v' ^ L
Scale:
ll.= "=40'
SS -6

L '48
="~,=�m -^~^ ~~~~^ '~�, ' PROP. ^A,H«LL ,«»"' ------ ----_' -- -
RIM 749.99 / mw~75mno --_-� /�-�- ---- —
PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW ONLY
,
/
o1+oo
00)
E
o 00
ui
L '48
="~,=�m -^~^ ~~~~^ '~�, ' PROP. ^A,H«LL ,«»"' ------ ----_' -- -
RIM 749.99 / mw~75mno --_-� /�-�- ---- —
PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW ONLY
,
/
1-18-17
MGL
00)
E
o 00
ui
ED
LU 0
LU
IL
LL
06
LU
1-18-17
MGL

71 +00
7 9
STREAM CROSSING #5
(SEE SHEET SS -19)
/ > a"r`2
t hy.ryv
PROP. SOFT -DIG /
(UNCOMPLETED)
SD -12 E
STA.70E96.70
(1607277.651,870978.323)
�G
72+00 73+00 74+00 75+00 76+00 77+00 78+00 79+00 80+00
.yG.. .,.? .�qc � .=.-���,u�.,.,.� �� ice' .": -✓ �
;30'STREAM BU FER (
EXN
LST. GAS MAIy _
STREAM CROSSING I / / , / .O'Ya \\\ If - I I I
_
','�^'���- "-- -•+•='.a• / /:i / ,_-- EXIST. SAN. SEWERTO
ABANDONED IN PLACE (TYP)
' EXIST.\
_ 7 / - 'YABAN MAN
HOLE I-
AP- BE y„ \ �p��'(�I•'' �' \
- STA 73+49.6
ABAND IN PUKE (IYP)
(1607460.514,871156.690) //"r
CQf % w. \� STA. 78+01.80
SSE
/
- a.cP- i 74th � /. R HOLE 103
\ = 75.92
"'� .. 1 0. „03.68•_
POP
538•I7 48 �Wv
�DTSTA. 74+50.98 Rane tr Rc \ \ \
PROP. MANHOLE 103 Ir \ \ \
—RIM = 754.74
v l FEMA FLOODWAY (TYPJ
F
STA. 70+78.25
ROP. MANHOLE 1031
oRIM = 752.0, / / / STb 7h+99.32 1
+ ° / 1 , t / ) (PROP. MANHOLE 103
o / ;
RI = 750.1,6+
6 /
v~ai \ FEMAFLOODPLAIN
ZONE AE(IYP.) i i '" i. , " j /' WETIANDS ANTI SEEP \\
%�. COLLAR PER DETAIL \
FEMA FLOODPLAIN
ZONEX (TVP.)' FORESTED WETIANDS
725 SF WITHIN PROPOSED EASEMENT
565SFWITHINTEMPORARY
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
2p2 A5
536.44 .,
OB 41
BC
gas• -ac...
m
' o
GRAPHIC SCALES
{HORIZONTAL
G�u
I hnh-40R
h o
VERTICAL
en
d QZo
o d P.
1 lnon { R
60
Wo
o I
w
E cod
j R u
0 C
i
f7
PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW ONLY
U)
w
J_
U
m � H
d F --O W
w O
D0 Of
of a -
W
Z
=z0
H Y Q
>- w
co wIt of
J
O U 00
U- J =
J w
J IX
Q
Z
O
U)
z
E
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Drwn:
MGL
Soak:
111=40'
ss -8
LU
.__I
H
O
rr
a_
z
Q
J
d

7l�uu yz-ruu y6f u 94+00 95+00 96+00 97+00 98+00 99+00 100+00
3 -G E f � j✓r / j�f 3
�// t / / ,�~'v`�•Yrti.M /0 7 __GMK E f /
h
x
_� �� J I ` "�-�....,..n =,^amu. �,�,,,.+�- �•'r ��/) i
i, Z \\ 'il \ / �,`,." fit- f ••-r^- ` yj
EXIST. SAN. SEWERTOBE 30'STREAM BUFFER \��~ WFFIANDSANTI SEEP
ABANDONED IN PLACE (TYP,) �_ k, COLLAR PER DETAIL
'•.r�9 �' ..+'-- / \ \ ,. jam/ ,-,. �— - aEe•�;.:.=_=" �' _ ,f' j—_ '>
4!'• - love >�� ^ �.�� j `-
� \ � i' /; // WETLANDS
ETLAHERBACEOUS(TYP
?� G D ]5L7T` / - l - /
'C? -7�iv T65.50' (36' V.C.P). .� �.�. \ ,� ,S 7A. 95176.13 ' STA. 99+06.16 - ;p.o° �A25
— \ PROP. MANHOLE 104
PROP. MANHOLE 104 _ .=
RIM = 754.97 — ----- �� R1M = 754.59
GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
L_.�4
I Inch - 40 R
VERTICAL
I hmh- 4R
',jJ 1 L 9 451'-u 00 E .. \�
I/ \\ '_ ��3Jr _ 03.00362.52•__ 95+00 96+ 91.00 _319.93• 9 00 •,
77 PROP. AUGER PROBE
L
(UNCOMPLETED)�t�r ... 5!2'0527-W S!2.0I'2!-W
AP -10 .SSS ...---'—�55E.. ,.... ,....iSE.....'---^-- SFE... .. ssE .... ..........?iE, ..... .. SSE.. SSE .:.—•--�--- r-SSE:::.....—T—T- 35E .,SSE...'371'• ..:... J1..., RIM - 755.13
�\ \ STA. 91+77.55::,'(. GROUND. ='SI 61'
1608961.151872105.
�
1 6D3' 06 v<.F.
242
�:.'. ,�•'..:'�::;':::::: �: �.'.':'::':.'.': .'.:: :'.':::'.::::•: �: �:.: �:,.��:'.': �.,':.:.^�.. ,�., , .._._ �..�., �, ._..'.. 371
��?31 f .
\� srA. 21s.7o RIR 19
+
\ �\ \ GROu ,. PROP. AUGER PROBE
FEMA FLOODPLAIN ROP. MANHOLE 1040 v ra5.ea' :3e'•..0)v / /
ZONE AE (TYP.) INWETLANDS ANTI SEEP (UNCOMPLETED)
\ , • AP -11
RIM = 53.07/ \ COLLAR PER DETAIL
FEMA FLOODPLAIN STA. 98.98.65
ZONE X (TYP.) FEMA FLOODWAY (TYP.) LIMITS OF FORESTED (1609461.310,872619.988
WETLANDS(TYP.)
_ - PRELIMINARY -FOR REVIEW ONLY
1 12-12-16 1
MGL
Scale
111=40'
SS -10
wrjo
c d R
v U
O
RzNa
C N M C
E Is < d
o o
� � S
vl
W
J
U
J
M
f-
a
W
Z
U ()�
J
oO
W
z
O
U
O
Y Q
°6
>-W
H
z
U)
Lu �,
g
O
U Q
a
ui
cJ_
G
Q
Z
O
VJ
Z
1 12-12-16 1
MGL
Scale
111=40'
SS -10

101+00 102+00 103+00 104+00 105+00 106+00 107+00 108+00 109+00 110+00
...,..I / / / ��`"'°°`"'�`"°"y`3 � ...�..""....••'_m"-•'/ ,f```- ILII '� I
3 \
`-'=
\ X -
t
\ z -
_x - EXIST. MANHOLE TO BE QTYP
-- — _ ABANDONED IN PLACE `-
30' STREAM BUFFER 1
I
>'� � /i ) � � I I - AP 13 \
_.�, ` _ = \�� — ✓ I % \ ��'ROP. MANHOLE 10451-::— STa
RPW STREAM I / -J 1M — 75 19 - (1609666.361,873615.162) _� a
51 LF I III E: : I i' —
e
w
I00 Yee.. .: ... iC t,RlJUNU .'
-,STA. 104+'20.76'
/ tcE:& °!t°° �"O u `.6?'':. •:::.:.:'' .:f .:. c6. v. 7:71,11,
>_`-PROP. MANHOLE 104
'
R1 - 756.02szs47;
M 5p1.352 0 WyE o i
..SSE 1°4+'0
;CE SSE
_ � 1
SSE
— rc ......r `Su+-->�" ssE257.64'x°
CROSSEXIST. TRU NK
1°°«00 256.96
S IZ 4
,.. S1242'58•W �F......,_...
/
--�..�...SsEE:,..,...:.:'','..:`..�......�;.4.':Ct:�'..:�.i::,:'r.��.�.t�.�;``','��''.::':`;:��::`�;:��'�;:i��:��::`�:�:i..;:.:.�:`.
5 I.
SSE...:...:•-r.SSE'...:..'.:''.:'.'.:'.:'.::.'.:\'.:.:..:'::::::::::::
:::.:. :.: ::...:
:::::.,:,:.::_:...: ia..
''' ':
We)
E 1�
TA. 101 t 3.12
_..� -
....:..:...
R )56.35.
REMOVE EXPOSED PIPE
• \
ROP. MANHOLE 1043 i
\ RIM = 756.19
GR =75.53'EXIST.
I- v. • )46.35' tip'v.
�'':;..�
ACCESS ROAD J
Q. CULVERT TO REMAIN
m
i
\.::Y-'.'.:10H.:::::..Q
,
\
FEMA FLOODWAY(rYPJ
/ IM c,., )SS 9J'
F -
RPW STREAM �
32 LF
f r 1 SEWER AT STA. 108+59.80
\ _ AaANDANEDSEWERIN PL CE / 6 STA. 109+55.49 'moo 0
t I ABANDONED IN PLACE Q1'P.I' / ;PROP. MANHOLE 104
o aa� yY / 1M = -758.55
"- STA. 106+18.04
60 /
m I x(16092.940,873327.741) � \
MILL CREEK RD COLLECTOR \
')--(SEE SHEET SS -20) Te o
A\
e IRGop
8 -
GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
L;_.�
I Inch - 40 R
VERTICAL
1 Inch - 4 tL
PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW ONLY
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Dren:
MGL
Scale:
111=40'
w �jo
c � n
aCi p��V �
C P O
9 9
We)
E 1�
0
cgs
m
i
W_
F -
_J
F-
_U
J
M
Ctf F-
W
W O
J
Z
U
O
w z
O
U
F- O
Z -
d
06
>_
W F-
Z
U
W J
Q
O
ULL Q
J =
J Lu
L ti
n -
J
Q
z
O
U)
Z
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Dren:
MGL
Scale:
111=40'

111+00 112+00 113+00 114+00 115+00 116+00 117+00 118+00 119+00 120+00
Z.17 EXIST MANHOLE TO BE
;=
ST M BU ABANDONED IN PLACE ITYP)
3�0.1'P )REA FFER /i EX6T. SAN. SEWERT08E
, 'A...� A&1NDONED IN PLACE (TYP.)
STREAM
CROSSING 7 ;:1 C �" / ass ass ass ass ass/ ass
(SEE SH£Er SS -20) \ /
7E--1 t9+oo0P PIPt ]•U'6
t4REEK 14192' �' �R l.. c TLE TLE TLE TCEMt 6F'V.0 P.>TCa.vs N,—..jINS
srA. 11s+8oso
----------� � ��� _ � � --'-TLE ROP. MANHOLE 1048
s\ RIM = 757.82
0I2
•
ikOUND 75129' k, ^w.^.. '"\ �,_,_uE _ •s \_ \. \ \\ FEMA FLOODWAY (TYP.)
NV.. ]4]A3' (36' V.C.P.> E ..^^ -
SS - - -._..,,�
' \
112-0
nt+
320.91' / "�1�� -- � \ \
Z
`SLE
511 56 06-W 3otl.B' 'r- RPW STR z O •„�b�
S _ I I
\� .-`e--� INv. - ]a]55• r3u' v.C.F tr m _ '1291F \, I \ — n.
�-�___� Apprvd.
N T ROP. MANHOLE 1047
2 \
STA. 112+76.42
RIM = 757.91
12-12-16
sm
DrND:
MGL
e \ ? / �.
Z � � GROUND
U �..
INV, ]szs9a•D.i.P.� 1 n�Or
T
Q „1 / / I Project Number:
O PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW ONLY
Sheet:
TOWN
SS-12
GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
q m w
I torntoah - 41) &
VERTICAL
a�s
1 boon - 4 R
w Ci o
� O
U
m�zpw
-' o ��z
3
rn �
Qci�o�
m
V
�a
co
W
J_
U
C0
OF--
d
LU
w O
J
D
a-
U-
0
LU
z0
{_
Y Q
06
}-
LU I-
z
U)
LU J
w
W -
O
U Q
d
LL
J2
�E
J W
W
(Y
J
Q
U)
Z
O
f—
U)
Z

121+00 122-F00 123-1-00 124-F00 125+00 126+00 127+00 128-F00 129+00 130+00
4
"q
tq
STREAM CROSSING #8
(SEE SHEET SS -21)
REMOVE 14 IF OF
EXIST 8 DIP SEWER 30'STREAM BUFFER
11 PLUG PIPE OPENING IN (NP.)
EXIST. MANHOLE
WTALL D EXIST. SAN. SEWER TO BE
ROP MANHOLE
75 AT
69 ABANDONED IN PLACE (TYP.)
TRUNK LINE TO
.54 C,p.) CONNECT 8" DIP
COLLECTOR LINE AP -14 j '�RADIO ANTENNA
Z
123+48.65
FORESTEDWETLANDS 1609951.77SST,&875001.723)
7,7 :n
EXIST*MANHOLE
TO BE
362 SF WITHIN EXISTING EASEMENT
A�ABAI�DONED IN PLACE (TYP.)
Q -
SSE SSE SSE —SSE E
E,—SSE SSE
3
3k, 2 71
. .. . . .... ....
00
23+N
no 122 352.39'
j SSE
S15*46'z-.i-w t2EIG .......
S22 2 3f'
.. ..... .........
f2u
TCE A E
cur R
ROP. MANHOLE 1049-- 750,74 B' D.I.P., q 0 RADIO ANTENNA Ee
RIM = 758.98 STA. 123+88.64 1 148B2 136- STA. 129+37.43
PROP. MANHOLE 105 LOCATE EXISTING UNDERGROUND PPnP AJA I r f fn) 91
RIM 760.15
GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
ui
I i—h 40 JR.
VRIMCAL
1 i—h 4 tL
0
Q0
E rS v
rn
PRELIMINARY — FOR REVIEW ONLY
U)
ui
co
D
0 C)
CL
OW
a- --)
Lu 0
w
a-
FL
0
uj z
0
1-0
Q�
IL
F-
<
06
>-
Lu �
z
co
w J
<
co
w Fn
-i
0
<
a_
u-
_j Lu
W
u?
z
0
U)
z
12-12-16
Chkd
JT/SM
Dr*n:
MGL
Sole:
1 11=40'
SS -13

_ STA 131+72.32
PROP. MANHOLE 10
RIM = 761.00
1 JJtuu
1 ,94+UU
/6,/;
1621 SF WITHIN PROPOSED EASEMENT
514 SF W FTHIN TEMPORARY -
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
136+00
PROP. MANHOLE 1054
RIM = 76 1. 00
/
arjo
b n o
v U
z O
c h°va
137+00
GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
Lm--�
1 i—h-40 fL
VERTICAL
z
1 Inch - 4 fL
13t5+uu 139+00 140+00
i \
27i _
/ STA. 137+44.52 /
ROP. MANHOLE 1055
RIM = 761. 10.
FEMA FLOODWAY(TYP.) �0
_ � I
O
N -
-.33A...... Z I .
— irtprpQ—
C
PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW ONLY
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Orwn:
MGL
Scale:
111=40'
SS -14
arjo
b n o
v U
z O
c h°va
W o�z
oao�0d
❑ y y
'd u�
SSC_
j � S
VJ
_W
LJ
f
U_
J
m
� F-
O�
CL
W
w O
W
Z
U �
IL
LL
O
LLJ Z
O
U
~ O
I-
Y Q
06
i-
W I—
z
(n
W J
J
�
� —
O
U Q
a
LJ
=
J
Lu
Q
U)
Z
O
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Orwn:
MGL
Scale:
111=40'
SS -14

151+00
1 I
AP -16
STA. 152+10.12
(1611533.511,877087.373)
RPW STREAM
42 LF
ICEi�/
tl �
-°' n 4144eE `fin
7i .
L N 239.71 Jli :�1 v
w Iv
�a .�8+45'17 '✓
P. MANHOLE 1057
�z = 7 9.5��.
u - - —
tGE .:aS,j
F�^
4e r
152+00 153+00 154+00 155+00 156+00 157+00 158+00 159+00
ID922
RIM = 771.00'
GROUND - 771.00'
INV.: 752.60<06'V.CP.)
160+00
EXIST. PRIVATE
SEWERTO REMAIN
D921
PIN 769.28'
GROUND 769.'3'
INV. = 757.83' c36'V.C.F.>
SNIP
-
/
y'1
env n
�
U
C vP]z c�Va
1 f—h- 4 RIZ
w
o R
o a Og
P
P
R
0 � o "
Z
GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
6-77p
I Inch 40 R
-
y 0
VERTICAL
env n
U
C vP]z c�Va
1 f—h- 4 RIZ
o a Og
E
Ecc
o
0 � o "
31 u� c
c7
ce
U)
W
J_
_U
J
O U
I— LLI
O
J
ZLU
U
O
w z
O
U
~ O
�
H
F-
Y Q
<
C6
>-
W I--
z
(n
W J
Q
J
O
U Q
n
LL
J =
w
:5
J
Q
z
O
z
PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW ONLY
12-12-16
Chkd:
JUSM
Dmr,:
MGL
Scale:
111=40'
Project Number:
sheer SS -16

'S AO AO
f�E yE A'
A
CONNECT E%IST. PRIVATE
MAIN TO PROPOSED
TRUNK LINE -
� q q
`EXIST. MANHOLE TO BE
ABANDONED IN PLACE (TYP)
�. STA. 160+62.45
PROP. MANHOLE 106 '
\\\M = 770,96 rlos ii / F
EXIST.SAN SEWTOPE
BA
'� G \ANDONED IN PLACE
(nPJ
x E roe"` _ \
4
1� T_... /
X _ -T�—
7CNA s -OCA 1 _
- JS''Ap 9Ag. L
�B ry A
sa ��
,CCoa�6C
GDE NOTE.
_ PRNATE MANHOLE AT
STATION 160+62.45
FTO BE
PROFILED FORR100100 %
/ SUBMITTAL
BH -8 REYNOLDA COLLECTOR (LONG)
STA. 160+18.95
(SEE SHEET SS -23)
(1612388.709,876958.411)
\
BH -'
STA. 163+06.62
(1612635.715,877075.131)
��• 6J Q/� /6
r1 F 60
\ \\I
,\ DMA
f a
/ 9
�h
ABANDON EXIST. '
H
STREAM CROSSING
ji•, 4'// is
BH -10
STA. 164+73.65 '
(1612746 197 877207 346) -
1 II II IIT
1 9 y5
A � /
!�
$4r51'3e'Wi"' �
67.8`+ •'.1AL•�: !J/ � /// / 1 /�
STA. 1 +3f.40
�\ ,"PROP. MANHOLE 106
R11 = 775.00
1,
v e ,� STA. ?62+51.45
/ ROP. MANHOLE 1066
lM =..Z z,74 -
f +
ROP. MANHOLE 1065,/
\,
RIM /'a
REYNOLDA COLLECTOR (SHORT)
(SEE SHEET SS -23)
EXIST. MANHOLE TO BE
ABANDONED IN PLACE (TYP.)
- EXIST. SAN. SEWER TO BE
1y.ABANDONED IN PLACE (TYP.)
_.._..
R/VY-R/W
r a;�' I
.�' SWAMPY AREAy �' •J /.i-�✓ /.r
�TA. 16f+92.54
PROP. 7AN�H/O1LE 106o
a�R0�N�1•,3K
SWAMPY AREA
//�� T
�-
6 �6 by \CAO v66 e4yeH U�-L�- / `FE MAFLOODWAY(T'P.)
b \N 140 IF 01 1" LATERAL
yo ,\FY
WITH (2) CLEANOUTS
EXIST. 6" PVC LATEP 1, 't1
SrA. 166+64.48
++ 4.48
ROP. MANHOLE
770,47
\` \N
_-� FEMA FLOODPLAIN - /
�� STA. 166+33.80 ZONE AE (TYP.) _ -
_� "
SD -9 �
• i - % -_ —' \\\ FEMA FIOODPIAIN�i
STA. 166+59.48 ZONE X (TYP.)
(1612822.092,877370.152)160 LF
1\ \ . -7-
GUARANTEED
F GUARA TEE MIN.
GUARANTEEDTRENCHLESS / jj �1\�
CROSSING i -
PROP. SOFT -DIG'
l(UNCOMPLETED)
SD -8 L .
STA. 165+61.81
(1612782.113,877284.340)
GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
1 Loon - 40 R
VERTICAL
1Laan-an.
PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW ONLY
,1�.,--
O
\.
G
4
,CONFIRM
EXIST.
MANHOLE LOCATION,
\'
�I
D{
CO
l �
J
_.._..
R/VY-R/W
r a;�' I
.�' SWAMPY AREAy �' •J /.i-�✓ /.r
�TA. 16f+92.54
PROP. 7AN�H/O1LE 106o
a�R0�N�1•,3K
SWAMPY AREA
//�� T
�-
6 �6 by \CAO v66 e4yeH U�-L�- / `FE MAFLOODWAY(T'P.)
b \N 140 IF 01 1" LATERAL
yo ,\FY
WITH (2) CLEANOUTS
EXIST. 6" PVC LATEP 1, 't1
SrA. 166+64.48
++ 4.48
ROP. MANHOLE
770,47
\` \N
_-� FEMA FLOODPLAIN - /
�� STA. 166+33.80 ZONE AE (TYP.) _ -
_� "
SD -9 �
• i - % -_ —' \\\ FEMA FIOODPIAIN�i
STA. 166+59.48 ZONE X (TYP.)
(1612822.092,877370.152)160 LF
1\ \ . -7-
GUARANTEED
F GUARA TEE MIN.
GUARANTEEDTRENCHLESS / jj �1\�
CROSSING i -
PROP. SOFT -DIG'
l(UNCOMPLETED)
SD -8 L .
STA. 165+61.81
(1612782.113,877284.340)
GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
1 Loon - 40 R
VERTICAL
1Laan-an.
PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW ONLY
O
\.
G
4
,CONFIRM
EXIST.
MANHOLE LOCATION,
\'
11 DEPTH, AND INVERTS
I I
D{
CO
_.._..
R/VY-R/W
r a;�' I
.�' SWAMPY AREAy �' •J /.i-�✓ /.r
�TA. 16f+92.54
PROP. 7AN�H/O1LE 106o
a�R0�N�1•,3K
SWAMPY AREA
//�� T
�-
6 �6 by \CAO v66 e4yeH U�-L�- / `FE MAFLOODWAY(T'P.)
b \N 140 IF 01 1" LATERAL
yo ,\FY
WITH (2) CLEANOUTS
EXIST. 6" PVC LATEP 1, 't1
SrA. 166+64.48
++ 4.48
ROP. MANHOLE
770,47
\` \N
_-� FEMA FLOODPLAIN - /
�� STA. 166+33.80 ZONE AE (TYP.) _ -
_� "
SD -9 �
• i - % -_ —' \\\ FEMA FIOODPIAIN�i
STA. 166+59.48 ZONE X (TYP.)
(1612822.092,877370.152)160 LF
1\ \ . -7-
GUARANTEED
F GUARA TEE MIN.
GUARANTEEDTRENCHLESS / jj �1\�
CROSSING i -
PROP. SOFT -DIG'
l(UNCOMPLETED)
SD -8 L .
STA. 165+61.81
(1612782.113,877284.340)
GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
1 Loon - 40 R
VERTICAL
1Laan-an.
PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW ONLY
1 12-12-16 1
MGL
Scale:
1 "=40'
SS -17A
O
C v N O
v °U �0
W o N� �
0 C7 C G
dt 3
U
CO
L1J
J
D
U_
J
O U
Lu O
z
U �
O
LLJ
O
z
Z —
Q
>-Lu
wN
N)
LL
LL
O
U Q
L\
J 2
Lu
J
Q
z
O
1 12-12-16 1
MGL
Scale:
1 "=40'
SS -17A

GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
L-.�4
S
I J..h - 4 rL
-6
VERTICAL
z o
linen -<a
Ny
6
c adz
Ar
790
790
. .. .
. .... .......
...... .....
. .... ......
.......
.. ..... .
..... .. . ... ....... ...... ...... . .
....
...... . ..... .......
.......
....... .
..... ........
....
. .......
sb.
. .
Im
.. .......
. .... . .
... . .......
...... .......
.. ....
...... .... . . .. ..... .
.......
- - -
- - --- ---
. ..
.....
....... .....
.... .
__
. .
.
....... ...... . .... . . ... ......
..... . ..
...
..... . ....
.. . .
...... .....
. ... ....
aw M
[?A .
....... ...
..... . . ...
..... .. .....
....... ......
.
......
... ... . ..... ......
. . ....
DE
Lm W
. ......
.....
. ....
. . ...
. . .......
...... . .....
.......
.......
.............
....... . .
. . . ...
. ..... .......
....
...... ......
... . .. ...
.....
..... . .
...... ...... ..
..... . ........
.... ....... .
.....
....... ...... .... . . ...... ......
.......
....... . .. . ....
.. . . ....... ...... ...... .... .
....... ..
. . ... ... . ... . ..
. .... ......
...... .......
.. ......
...... ...
....... ..
. . .....
....... ......
.. ...... ......
... . ......
...... ... . .
.... ......
..
. . . . . ...
. . . . ......
..... ...
. . ......
....... ...
. ..... .
.....
..... .. ...
kc
. . .
.... .... ... .
.
.. ......
. . . . .... .....
...... ...... ..... ..... .......
r
.. . .
. . . ....
......
+
...
....... .......
4-
H-4
-T -
r-
Q
M
7
LU
. . . ......
....
L
.....
...... ...
.. ...... ......
. . . ... .....
yia
... ...... .
Z-2
.11 ..... ... . .
. .
....
..
......
....
i0oo,
-W
LH
t
ti IF-
..... ..... .
..... .......
....... .....
...... . .
,
Ct
--- ----
. ..
.......
-==
ClIF i�
.. . .......
. ..
. ......
..... .. . . ...
H
...
. . .....
...... ...... ...
-T,
34,
..... . ...... ....
D 0 C)
7o
0
7 C
w...
.. . ..
... . ...
. .....
. . .. .......
...... ......
.....
. ... .......
...
...... ......
...... ... .
.. .........
......
....... ....
..
LU 0
......
.......
. . .
..... - . ..... .... -
ct�4v
w z
Lli
......
....... .. - ..
...... .....o
U-11
jl:.-::��
...... .......
......
....... ....
.... ....... .... �
-1 -
...
. ......
.. - -
.
.. ... .......
. . .
.... ---- ---
.... ......
...... . .
. .......
......
. . . .
....... .......
...... ....
....... ... .
... .......
....... ......
.
.... -
...... .
.... ......
U
L
0
.... .......
<
F j
760
U) Lij �j
.... . ....
.....
.. . .... ....... .....
.
. . .
. . ..
....... ......
......Ij
.
..... ...... . . . .......
Fo
. ..... . ......
.. ....... .......
. ...
.. .
....... ..
S EA =M)JOINT
T- , Ofl ss"
G
COP
CO
NEC r a-
ki A
Ri 6
TAU
-
... ......
....
- --
- -
- -
- -
- -
-
0 U
<
. . .. .... ......
IL. s.
�
LL _j
IC70-L ��E iR c'.
=RD
_j LLJ
...
.......
KA
.. .......
.
.. .... ....... .......
......
..... ......
.....
Ui :5 ct�
E%IST-mu
E
o EA
PROP.
ZZ
T)
5111
16 5 3
imp
. ......
..... . .......
...... ..
. - ---- ----
- .... ......
.... . ...
.
..... .. . ..
....... .......
<
...... ......
So. SE WO
�47
418�
j- I I
750
F
?UT:4744.00
48 1
750
0
F
. . .... .......
U)
. ...... .. .....
lk
OER
P! j
.
.. ..... .
z
F1 q
R t
.25
N
.
. ....
..... . . ....
....... .........
. .
. ..... ..
.... ... . .....
....... ..... .
. ... .......
...... ......
1-1114 1
F...(.......7
: ?752.8
-f L
OUD
�T
r =4
v
.4.3
U
)f
5 55
IN#4� .219
l-
41-1
......
.......
..... . ...... ....... ....... .....
... . ....
....... . . ..... ......
....
......
. . .
....... .......
...
vfik
,
-2-
-- ---- -
�40 $W.
-
I SMO fix
ItL
=
I I
161-+-00 162+00
163-+-00
164-+-00
165+00
166-+-00
167-+-00 168-+-00
169-+-00 170+00
Apprvd.
Date:
12-12-16
Chkd
JT/SM
D -
MGL
scale:
1 "=40'
Project Number:
PRELIMINARY FOR REVIEW ONLY
Sheet:
SS -17B

I
FEMA FLOODWAY (TYP )
0+00 1+00 2+00
STREAM CROSSING #3
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1"=40'
VERTICAL 1"-0'
4-` Qa 4
\ .
\ 30'STREAM BUFFER\ \
(n'P.)
Stream Crossing S A. O+O(
Prop. Trunk Line: STA. 39+05.22
PROP. MANHOLE 1019 /
R1. = 7 86 ) I
3+00
Ii
FEMA FLOODWAY (TYP.)
\ (Typ.)STREAM BUFFER
(IYP.1
o
--*', SIS'51
,i.
1`70.38-4,
:Yee lCE
t i
STA. 1+
PROP. MANHOLE 1019
FE_ : i53.0 I `fir% FEMA FLOODWAY (TYP.)
o+oo
1+00
2+00
c O'YSL :338
4+00
GRAPHIC SCAM
.
I lm�tHORIZONTAL
�1
j
VERTICAL
o
c P.' n O
d U O
'Z P+
1 Incl - 4 [L
G N N
Ef
�z
oo
Ec�oo�
c�
(n
W
I-
J_
F--
U
D O U
a. � w
w O
Z U Q�
=) D� a.
0 Lu z
~ O
z_
I-
F- Y Q
r w f -
(n w J
Q� cl� -
O U Q
LL J =
�5 _j w
w 7; ct�
J
Q
U)
Z
O
I-
U)
z
i
i
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Drwn: F,,1n1
Scole: MGL
111=40'
SS -18
NT
06
C'7
O
Z_
U)
O
Q'
U
Q
w
0
H
U)
w
J
LL
O
Q'
n
06
Z
a

r
(
FEMA FLOODWAY (TYP.)
r � �
\ j
8"
OIPP SAN.
_I
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00
STREAM CROSSING #5
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1"=40'
VERTICAL I'=4' \
treom Crossing 15: STA. 0+00
s Prop. Trunk Line: STA. 70+78.25 I
Pm. PROP. MANHOLE 1031
�r9
A STA. 1+98.63
ROP. MANHOLE 103fA
RIM = 751. 15
Ck
:. Y\. .S'.: :. :: n'.'�A3�5iw�3S5 355
i
N2/'0/'02'W 2778.32
19 _
`\
98.63 Sll OS 35 E 1..................w..'^�
\ 3S5 ^SS ..� 355 35S 3
0
- b \ '...''771 3�A
yo,A
Q \ _ FEMA FLOODWAY (TYP.)
E m'aa SEE SHEET EC -7 FOR
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
3
30'ST EAM BUFFER
(TYP) '
FEMA FLOODWAY (TYP.)
L
GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
�p
1 1—h - 40 fL
VER71CAL
linch-4N.
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00
STREAM CROSSING #6
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1"=40'
VERTICAL I"=4' \
j
37
FEMA FLOOD", (TYP.)
'STA. 1+13.05
ROP. MANHOLE 1039
Tc TDG /M = 756.09
NI<'S6'3l'WI.�S3 SSE
- J H
319E
I �
SSE-
3�i I
rea Crossing �6' STA. O+d f � f
i< :Pro Trunk Line: STA. 88+84.05 SEE SHEET EC -7 FOR
P' Co
CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
- PROP. MANHOLE 1039 I GGPS-9R}2�
754.o111
LA 0'09
PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW ONLY
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Dr*n:
MGL
scale:
1 "=40'
SS -19
..1
w � o
cRzo�
o% z
_W
J_
CO
F—
�5
U
Cf)
CD
CO
[r F—
Z
D
O U
Cn
a-
F— W
Cn
w O
O
U
W Z
F-- O
Q
z—
W
<U)
W
co
W J
I
!Y
O' mW
O
U QJ
U-
J =
' LL
J Lu
�
Lu !
J
i-
U)06
Z
Z
O
F—
1L
Z
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Dr*n:
MGL
scale:
1 "=40'
SS -19

0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00
Mill Creek Rd Collector. STA. 0+00'
Prop. Trunk Line: 57A. 106+52.81
PROP. MANHOLE 1045
RIM = 755.19
J/ {
z�/lll. ,l \ \
1J{�/l 30' STREAM BUFFER
r /
ABANDON EXIST �
MANHOLE AND REPAIR_
STREAM BANK
11/
111!/1/I3j,
�EXISr MANHOLE SUH10125
ea ,RIM = 756.30
STA. 0+92.93
PROP. MANHOLE 1045B
RlM — 755.q,4
TEMPORARY ACCESS
EASEMENT
" c%
I
0+00 1+00 2+00
- �5 1\ I I
- __7 X (� , 1 /' " , �' L
STA. 1+25.44
ROP. MANHOLE 1047A
RIM = 758.33
a
' 00 I 2 .44 °
GRAPHIC SCAT
J 2
HORIZONTAL
L__;�
C^jJ
I Inch = 40 tt
2
y O
VERTICAL
c
__j
Q^
m n
U
o
IV
Ii -h -4R
60 o
o 0
KJ
7
„l ❑
0
a
U)
MONSOON
LU
06
Of
IIIIIIM
NII
o
U
-i
J
O
a-
�w
Uri
w O
Z
D
U E
cLw
O
LLJ z
wcn
w 0
=
ligi
U
01110AM
I'd`
ONE No
f
Y Q
—i
11 Moll
M MEN
U
w I—
w J
—I
W
illiollimilnilomill
ME I
I
0 0
O
U
'
,_,_
Q
w �--
illoilloorimorm-i'PEEE
OROP. a Di
I'm
Fox
11111
ii IMMUNE
111
IIIIIIII
SHE
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00
Mill Creek Rd Collector. STA. 0+00'
Prop. Trunk Line: 57A. 106+52.81
PROP. MANHOLE 1045
RIM = 755.19
J/ {
z�/lll. ,l \ \
1J{�/l 30' STREAM BUFFER
r /
ABANDON EXIST �
MANHOLE AND REPAIR_
STREAM BANK
11/
111!/1/I3j,
�EXISr MANHOLE SUH10125
ea ,RIM = 756.30
STA. 0+92.93
PROP. MANHOLE 1045B
RlM — 755.q,4
TEMPORARY ACCESS
EASEMENT
" c%
I
0+00 1+00 2+00
- �5 1\ I I
- __7 X (� , 1 /' " , �' L
STA. 1+25.44
ROP. MANHOLE 1047A
RIM = 758.33
a
' 00 I 2 .44 °
GRAPHIC SCAT
J 2
HORIZONTAL
L__;�
C^jJ
I Inch = 40 tt
2
y O
VERTICAL
c
__j
Q^
m n
U
o
IV
Ii -h -4R
60 o
o 0
KJ
7
„l ❑
0
a
U)
LU
06
Of
o
U
-i
J
O
a-
�w
Uri
w O
Z
D
U E
cLw
O
LLJ z
wcn
w 0
=
Z
U
U
f
Y Q
—i
U
w I—
w J
—I
W
CO
O
U
'
,_,_
Q
w �--
3+00
J 2
—I U
LLJJ
w
2
°
__j
Q^
$I
X
KJ
a�l
I
� I
I
SEE SHEET EC -7 FOR
/ CONSTRUCTION ACCESS
PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW ONLY
12-12-16
JT/SM
MGL
1 "=40'
Number.
SS -20

I
8.
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00
'STREAM CROSSING #8
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1"-00'
VERTICAL I"=4'
I 11
^eam Crossing S�A. 0t00
Dp. Trunk Line: STA. 123+88.64
OP. MANHOLE 1050
d - 7,5"I 00
FEMA FLOODWAY
p O
�6 2\ LO c.'Ze6L 'boB
t
dan ass i
30'STREAM BUFFER Y
(TYP)
m �
"
l
GRAPHIC SCALLS
HORIZONTAL
0+00
1+00 2+00 3+00
{ I I ISTREAM CROSSING a
_. SCALE: HO0.IZONTAL 1"=40" `
VERTICAL 1"3'
STA. J+ 30.
e
PROP. MANHOLE 1054
:....:. I }
RIM \761.94\ . .
S
4+00 5+00 6+00
iDE NOTE:
;MH10787 MAY NEED TO BE REVISED
fOA NEW DOGHOUSE MANHOLE FOR
.00%SUBMLTTAL
STA. 4+61.71
EX/ST. MANHOLE SMH 10787
< I
RIM = 761.27 \
a w2 s`
WE \ SSE SSE SE` \SSE SSE
N73'S55 W r A d[ to
t .s7a•ss a3•E -- —
SSE SSE SSE 'SSE SSEc—SSE E Sy
\\ C i 1
STA. 1+02.72 1 — \� '1
ROP. MANHOLE 1054A `, CORE E%IST. MANHOLE
RIM = 761.87 \ AND RESHAPE INVERT I SEE SHEET EC -7 FOR
� / i � \ CoNSTRUCFM)N ACCESS
rream�# rrossIn 19: STA. 0+00
Prop. Trunk Line: STA. 134+73.53
PROP. MANHOLE 1054 =
/ / FEMA FLOODWAV P. ELC6,d6�6g9IL
30'STREAM BUFFER �/ (TV' ) 6`1x o
PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW ONLY
J 0)
00
U_ /n
J
M Q' F— z
O U U)
w F— w cn
w O
zUCy- U
o wz
U O Q
z _ w
fy
F- Y Q F-
>- W F- (n
(n W J
Q� 0� mW
O U Q J
u— J = LL
:�i J w O
W cr- fY
J n
Q 06
1 Z
O a-
12-12-16 12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Drwn
MGL
Sc.IE:
1 "=40'
SS -21

0+00 'I+00
2+00 3+00
4+00
5+00 6+00 7+00
8+00 9+00
oc�7o�C
STREAM CROSSING J10
,1` \
// / /
Stream Crossing ,f 10: SrA. 6+00 /
Prop. Trunk Line: STA. 142+98.44
PROP. MANHOLE 1057 p�
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1"=40' ^\
VERTICAL I"=4'
30' STREAM BUFFER
(TY P)�
E \
GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
�b
VERTICAL
li—n=arc
EXIST. 4" LATERAL
(TO REMAIN)
— 270 LF 4" CI. LATERAL AT MIN.
1% SLOPE PER DETAIL4-G
CLEANOUT PER DETAIL 4-G
— TIE INTO EXIST. CLEANOUT
��._
y aj603p �. ' ABANDON EXIST. MANHOLE
�I � <.i. 10774 UP TO EXIST. 4"
�AIATERAL INVERT
Y ..OfiII—
`/ 1130 LF 4' C.I. LATERAL AT
MIN. 1% SLOPE PER DETAIL
PRELIMINARY -FOR REVIEW ONLY
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
DMn:
MGL
Scale:
1"=40'
SS -22
O
S i N S
U v
cNz-4
o ��z
oc�7o�C
Z
� � S
A
U
U)
W
J
O
U
O
J
Z
Cfl
U
�
nW
U
O
�a
Q
OU
LU
ZO
z
Of
Y Q
cn
cn
w J
w
af
nf —
J
00
Q
�w
(If
W
Of
J
06
Q
U)
Z
Z
O
d
cn
Z_
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
DMn:
MGL
Scale:
1"=40'
SS -22

m
O U
10
10to
btJ �O^L\i 's,�LI
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00
REYNOLDA COLLECTOR (LONG)
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1"=40'
VERTICAL 1"=4' /
s� j'
FEMA FLOODWAY MP.) STA. 2+36.13 /
Reyno/da Co/lector (Long): STA. 0+00 ROP. MANHOLE 1066A-- - z_
Prop. Trunk Line: STA. 162+51.45 RIM = 774.0.0
PROP. MANHOLE 1066 `, REMOVE AND REPLACE o N
RIM = 772.74 'S EXIST. ASPHALT DRIVEWAY S,
"PER DETAIL 7-D z2205Y \ //
w
Alf
a
30' STREAM BUFFER'
cryp
\ t
z�; , . , ROP. MANHOLE 1066 / i Fr
08'29'W ° RIM = ;7. 1 - / /
615 1/— f-._ U r z�..'. �y' / -- / / E/i'
1240 LF OF CU ,W -
GUTTER TO BE REMOVED
� AND REPLACED
E%6TING PER DETAIL 7 A �R /
GRAPHIC SCALES
HORIZONTAL
Lm--�
1 i—h-40 R
VERTICAL
{{
1�
Ii—h- 4}L
GDE NOTE:
ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATION
NEEDED ON UPSTREAM
INVERT BEFORE BID TO
CONFIRM DEPTH
0+00 1+00 2+00
REYNOLDA COLLECTOR (SHORT)
SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1"=40'
VERTICALI"=4'
ITYP.)
oldo Collector (Short : STA. 0+00
Trunk Line: STA. 164+31.40
'. MANHOLE 1067
= 77�
PROP. MANHOLE f067Ak;�
PRELIMINARY - FOR REVIEW ONLY
12-12-16 12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Drwn:
MGL
Scale:
1 "=40'
SS -23
a
� o
v
U 0
-4
N a
m>��aa�z
[U
�
U C O v
a
U)
LU
U)
J
ry
O
w
_U
J
M
J
O
OL
F
a- --,)
w O
[)�
Z
U Q�
Q
13� w
o
w
1-0
O
i
>-
LU I—
w
UN)
LU J
LL
O
U Q
w
LL-
J =
-_' w
w
�
�
Q
w
Un
I
06
z
Z
O
g
I—
U)
a-
12-12-16 12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Drwn:
MGL
Scale:
1 "=40'
SS -23

4 FT. PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE
MT TOP SECTORS USED
SHALL BE DESIGNED TO
FOUR FOOT MANHOLE TO BE
BURRO NT AN H-20 WHEEL
LOAD. USE OF A MT lOP
USED FOR PIPE WITH A DIAMETER
OF LESS THAN 18' UNlF55 OTHER -
MUST BE APPROVED BY
ME ENGINEER.
FOR 4 FOOT AND S FOOT PRECAST
REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLES.
MSE SPEGFlm BY THE ENGINEER.
TYPE I OR 2 p1w�
On EDA 114 OR BUTYL RUBBER
PIPEMFR'S
RING AND COVER -
TYPE 2 M BE
NSKET IN ALL JOINTS. JOINTS ON
PRECAST CONCRETE MANHOLES SHALL
BOLTED TO CONE
W/ 4 -TYPE 304
OUTSIDE OF MANHOLE TO BE
RAPPED WITH 6' WIDE BUM
CONFORM TO ASTM C-478. MANHOLES
(MUST BE ALLOWED TO CURE A MN-
STANLESS STEEL
EXPANSION ANCHORS
IMUM OF J DAYS PRIOR TO SHIPMENT.
THE DATE OF MANUFACTURE AND NAME
(J/1' HILT KINK BOLT 1
OF MANUFACTURER SHAT BE ON ALL
OR APPROVED EQUAL)MANHOLE
SECTIONS. CONCRETE SHALL
BE 4,000 PSI. CIRCUMFERENTIAL
REINFORCEMENT MILL BE PLACED AT A
MAX 3 GOUREES OE M=
MINIMUM OF 0.12 SO. INS. PER
LINEAL FOOT.
(8 B.) OR 2-5' C
RINGS MAY BE ADDE
VERTIWI.Y._
(NOT ALLOWED WITH
TYPE 2 RING k COY
-'
`RAGE STABILIZATION
UTYL RUBBER GASKET UNDER RING
ND ALL GRADE RINGS
STONE UNDER COLLAR
SECTION
FOR 4 FOOT AND S FOOT PRECAST
REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLES.
\V
4'-0' OR 5'-0'
On EDA 114 OR BUTYL RUBBER
PIPEMFR'S
3.
NSKET IN ALL JOINTS. JOINTS ON
MA% 2t' FROM
V
OUTSIDE OF MANHOLE TO BE
RAPPED WITH 6' WIDE BUM
TOP OF ftWG !
COVER TO TOP STEP-
oZ1 I� yyC_
DHESIVE TAPE ALL UFT HOLES
BE COMPLETELY FILLED WITH
TOP STEP MUSE BE
DAX.
ON -SHRINK GROUT AFTER
N CONE SECTION
ANHOLE IS SET.
12I
,� �f'
ECCENTRIC
Ia'
RISER SECTION
CONE SECTION
lu
'�
S'
1•+'
FLEDIIBLE CONNECTOR
STEPS NOT TO BE PLACED
'
OVER INFLUENT OR EF
FLUENT PIPES. STEPS TO
BE HONG VERTICAL WAL
•:.I
T3 REVISED
SURFACE FROM SHELF TO TOPOF CONE.
6�-g-
BPI; W NOT BOLT ING
MU
w
TO CONE IF DIRT OR
SURROUNDS.�
A -CONCRETE
THE RING (E%: YARD,
BASE SECTION
SHOULDER. ETC.)
w O
CITY OF WINSTON—SALEM
Z
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DMSION
1�-1�•S
N.T.S. REVISED 9-1-08
O
APPROVED
J
DETAIL 1—A
0
OUTSIDE DROP MANHOLE
MANHOLE TO BE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE MIN CITY
STANDARD DETAILS FOR 4' AND/OR 5' MANHOLES.
MAI. 3 COURSES OF BRICK (8' OR 2-5' GRADE RINGS
MAY BE ADDED VERTICALLY,
D.I.Y.J. LEE
JOINT OF D.I. PIPE (MAX, BK SLOPE)
STONE
`^^"•^'^^^"" -FERNCO COUPLING
(OR APPROVED EQUAL)
D.I. NIPPLE (18- LONG) INSIDE
FLEXIBLE CONNECTOR.
—D.I. PIPE (1 PIECE OR
FLANGED PIECES).
—CONCRETE COLLAR
-D.I.M.J. 90° BEND
-D.I. NIPPLE (18' LONG) INSIDE
FLDBLE CONNECTOR.
MONOLITHIC BASE SECTION
CITY OF WINSTON—SALEM
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DMSION`�
N.T.S. REVISED 9-1-08 APPROVED
DETAIL 1—E
PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE
WITH PRECAST INVERT
NOTES:
Y"Ig1E SHALL BE
MANUFACTURED AS PER
THE REWIREMENIS OF
ASTM C -Na.
STANDARD FALL THROUGH
MANHOLE 6 1' (.08')
(INCLUDNG 4' AND 6 -
CONNECTIONS
CONNECTIONS INTO
—.0u:).
MIN. ANGLE
DETAIL 1—B
TYPE "B" 4' & 5' PRECAST REINFORCED
CONCRETE MANHOLE
��-•�� RING k COVER. TYPE 3 CAST IN
MH TOP AT CONCRETE PUNT.
�\
WALL RPE TO BE CAST W MH
--•I�. TOP AT CONCRETE PLANT.
(SHO- RADIUED � D.1. BENDS
2 FEET ABOVE THE 100 R FLANGED 0.1. RETURN BEND.
YEAR FLOW ELEVATION
TYPE 304 STAINLESS
STEEEL SCREEN
FLANGED JEANIE (18 4 18 MESH)
NN.S' COMPANION FLANGE WITH
MT TOP 4' OPENING.
.. —�3' 4' D.L PIPE.
OGLING JOINT OR
MANHOLE TO CONFORM TO CITY
STANDARD DETAILS FOR 4' AND
/OR 5' PRECAST CONCRETE
MANHOLES.
NOTE:
ALL MAHHOCES SHALL HAVE WALL
PIPE INt£D. IF NO VENT IS
SHOWN ON ENGINEERS DRAWING,
WNL PIPE SWAT BE CAPPED
ACTH 4' D.I. BUND FLANGE.
CITY OF WINSTON—SALEM
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
f
N.T.S. REVISED 9-1-oE APPROVED
DETAIL 1—F
POLYPROPYLENE MANHOLE STEP
10 3/4' ,
1'
POLYPPROPYLENE
MIN. S' WALL 1/2• GRACE 80 STEEL
REINFORCEMENT
d
4 '• 5' MIN. 5 1/2' Mn. SECTION A -A
16
CITY OF WINSTON—SALEM
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DMSION 15�
i APPROYID
DETAIL 1—C
MANHOLE BUIILT OVER EXISTING LINE
NEW SEWER UNE
FING-
FLEXIBLE CONNECTOR
-CONCRETE COLLAR
6' ALL
MOUND PIPE
3� (TYP.)
00 �
eo B
V E%I6
LIN SEWER
U n QUO LINE
UBO e
U Oe Oo UU
OLIO
O U �0 oO U 1. RACE HORSESHOE MH BASE IN WET CONCRETE (4000 PSI).
2. AFTER CONCRETE SETS CORE HOLE 8 SET NEW SEWER LINE.
3. CUT OUT TOP HALF OF EXISTING PIPE FINISH INVERTS
Z��U��NESTOEXTENDED k WATERPROOF ALL COLD JOINTS k ARWND ALL RPE
12'PAST CONCRETE BASE OR 4. FOUR CONCRETE COEURS.
TO THE UNDISTURBED EARTH. PLAN
B
UNPLIMATION 1 ­441
`RAGE STABILIZATION
RISER SECTIONS AND CONE TO BE
ADDED AS PFR DETAX DRAWINGS
STONE UNDER COLLAR
SECTION
FOR 4 FOOT AND S FOOT PRECAST
REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLES.
\V
4'-0' OR 5'-0'
CITY OF WINSTON—SALEM
PIPEMFR'S
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
IPE MFR'S
UCPROVID
WyR
-IAFR'S JOIN
- --- --
APPROVED JOINT
FINISHED GRADE "0"
oZ1 I� yyC_
' SIDPE
F,
DAX.
ARIES
RISER UNIT
BASE UNIT
12I
6-10' MANHOLE
- �O1
MAX
12JL
J
YIN. BOTTOM 6' AT C/L
SECTION
CITY OF WINSTON—SALEM
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING OMSION
Z�T�eC7a.—
T3 REVISED
9-1-05
APPROVED
DETAIL 1—B
TYPE "B" 4' & 5' PRECAST REINFORCED
CONCRETE MANHOLE
��-•�� RING k COVER. TYPE 3 CAST IN
MH TOP AT CONCRETE PUNT.
�\
WALL RPE TO BE CAST W MH
--•I�. TOP AT CONCRETE PLANT.
(SHO- RADIUED � D.1. BENDS
2 FEET ABOVE THE 100 R FLANGED 0.1. RETURN BEND.
YEAR FLOW ELEVATION
TYPE 304 STAINLESS
STEEEL SCREEN
FLANGED JEANIE (18 4 18 MESH)
NN.S' COMPANION FLANGE WITH
MT TOP 4' OPENING.
.. —�3' 4' D.L PIPE.
OGLING JOINT OR
MANHOLE TO CONFORM TO CITY
STANDARD DETAILS FOR 4' AND
/OR 5' PRECAST CONCRETE
MANHOLES.
NOTE:
ALL MAHHOCES SHALL HAVE WALL
PIPE INt£D. IF NO VENT IS
SHOWN ON ENGINEERS DRAWING,
WNL PIPE SWAT BE CAPPED
ACTH 4' D.I. BUND FLANGE.
CITY OF WINSTON—SALEM
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
f
N.T.S. REVISED 9-1-oE APPROVED
DETAIL 1—F
POLYPROPYLENE MANHOLE STEP
10 3/4' ,
1'
POLYPPROPYLENE
MIN. S' WALL 1/2• GRACE 80 STEEL
REINFORCEMENT
d
4 '• 5' MIN. 5 1/2' Mn. SECTION A -A
16
CITY OF WINSTON—SALEM
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DMSION 15�
i APPROYID
DETAIL 1—C
MANHOLE BUIILT OVER EXISTING LINE
NEW SEWER UNE
FING-
FLEXIBLE CONNECTOR
-CONCRETE COLLAR
6' ALL
MOUND PIPE
3� (TYP.)
00 �
eo B
V E%I6
LIN SEWER
U n QUO LINE
UBO e
U Oe Oo UU
OLIO
O U �0 oO U 1. RACE HORSESHOE MH BASE IN WET CONCRETE (4000 PSI).
2. AFTER CONCRETE SETS CORE HOLE 8 SET NEW SEWER LINE.
3. CUT OUT TOP HALF OF EXISTING PIPE FINISH INVERTS
Z��U��NESTOEXTENDED k WATERPROOF ALL COLD JOINTS k ARWND ALL RPE
12'PAST CONCRETE BASE OR 4. FOUR CONCRETE COEURS.
TO THE UNDISTURBED EARTH. PLAN
B
UNPLIMATION 1 ­441
`RAGE STABILIZATION
STONE
STONE UNDER COLLAR
SECTION
OR POUR CONCRETE
TO UNDISTRUBED EARTH
\V
(TYPM.LL).
CITY OF WINSTON—SALEM
3. ALL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON DETAIL 1-F
SHALL APPLY TO 6-10 FOOT MANHOLES.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
TOP
a ENGINEERING DIVISION
Nr9wm
DETAIL 1—G
NOTES:
1. THIS UTILIZED TO BE REFERENCED FOR DIMENSIONS
OF 6 -FOOT, B -FOOT, AND 10 -FOOT MANHOLES.
2, REFER TO DETAIL 1-F (MNSTCN-SALEM -TYPE B 4' MN RING
RISFA UNIT
& 5' PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE MANHOLE') 8 COVER
\V
FOR ADDITIONAL SPEOFICARONS.
o
3. ALL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON DETAIL 1-F
SHALL APPLY TO 6-10 FOOT MANHOLES.
W Oaly
pm
'.aQy
TOP
VIEW
VARIES
FINISHED GRADE "0"
oZ1 I� yyC_
6'-10'
F,
ARIES
RISER UNIT
BASE UNIT
6-10' MANHOLE
DETAIL 1—D
FLEXIBLE MANHOLE CONNECTOR
NOTE: FLEXIBLE MANHOLE CONNECTORS SHALL CONFORM
TO ASTM 0923. CONNECTORS BY PRESS -SEAL
GASKET CORPORATION, HAMILTON KM OR NPC,
INC. ME ACCEPTABLE. MALIMUM DEFLECTION FOR
CONNECTOR IS A (1=). SLOPES GREATER
THMN 12% MUST HAVE CONNECTORS DESIGNED
FOR HIGHER DEFLECTION.
MIN. 5'
WAIL ALL STANLESS STEEL
IXPANSIW RING
STAINLESS STFEl CLAMP
(Z RE US) FOR 15' V.C.
(ZC
�FLE%IBIE CONNECTOR
MONOLRHIC
CITY OF WINSTON—SALEM
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
DETAIL 1—H
1 12-12-16 1
MGL
Scale:
111=40'
D-1
d P9
O
C N O
aa
v O V N O
o
W Oaly
pm
'.aQy
Ep C G
oZ1 I� yyC_
F,
a
v/
W
J
I—
MU
w
LL F—
a-
� W
w O
Z
(Uyy (tYT
LL a.
//�
VJ
O
w Z
J
0
Z
�
=
W
F—
Y Q
Lu I—
(n
W J
O
U co
LL
J =
:�E
J W
Lu
J
vJ
1
Z
O
I``—^^
U)
>Z
1 12-12-16 1
MGL
Scale:
111=40'
D-1

DETAIL 2-A
GROUND
MANHOLE RING & COVER
COMPACTED
MANHOLE RING & COVER
$
MANHOLE RING & COVER
KFlLL
EE3`c��
12'
_---- _
SPECIFIED BACKFILL
CONCRETE ANTI -SEEPAGE COLLAR
-__ -
TYPE 1
MATERIAL
TYPE 2
N4c
=
TYPE 3
W
r1I T
(�pOq
NO7E TWO HOES TO BE SPACED
OPPOSITE TO VLH OTHER
N THE CUTER RING AS
SHM. (HOLES TO BE 1'
9
O
2 - 1/2' R 13/4 HOHFAD,
4 - 1' DIA STAINLESSSTEEL BOLTS AT 19U°
ANCHOR f10LE5 COUNTERSUNK. BOLTS TO BE
TWE 316 STANLESS STEEL.
NOTE
Q.O.' RING AND COVER WILL HAVE
y P AHD
MACHAST. W35B.CONFORM
A
+I 12' 81tl11. NIOVURTHH
TRENCH WALL
\
(NOTE 3)
TO A45INED . CLASS
CYP-)
U_
e
f ^ v
O
DETAIL 'C C'
C/YJ(
NOTE:
RING AND COVER WILL
DETAIL 'C C'
TWO HOLES TO BE SPACED
OPPOSITE TO EACH OTHER IN
0 THE OUTER RING AS SHOWN.
(HOLES TO E I' DIAMETER)
OETAL 'C C'
/7
TOP OF COVER
KIAVE MACHINED SEAT
AND WILL CONFORM TO
ASTM A46, GWR SSB.
MATCH
TOP OF COVER
Y
MATCH GROOVES
GY1 J\ TOP OF COVER
=U LE IRON
SEWER MAy1
O BE NIO COVER WILL
BE DIESK�H-20 EO TO SUPPORT
a
O NOTE:
RING AND COVER WILL HAVE
O
O
J
BOTID4 OF COVER
3/4'R AN N-20 WHEEL LOAD.
BOTTOM a COVER
CONFINED SEAT ANO WILL
3/4'it CONFORM TO ASTM A46,
GLASS 358. RING AND COVER
?. BOTTOM OF COVER
_,R, STAB0.12AOON STONE MP.)
��j
Y Q
1
>_
WILL EESI
iryi DESIGNED TO SUPPORT
3/4Zt
WJ
O
Qy
L
O O
1 2, O AN H-20 WHEEL LOM.
O
2 -AIDN-PENETRATING
IN PICK HOLES
CONCRETE MRI -SEEPAGE
I~
/A.AO
J =
V 'L
4-1/2'A 1 3/4' HEXHEAD.
STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS
AT BO° COUNTERSUNK.
A COLLAR (CUSS 'B' CONCRETE)
PLAN
DETAIL '11 B'
PUN MINIMUM AVERAGE WEOIIfS
RING 190 LBS.
COVER 120 LBS.
O
d9 A;
,T T F,
MINIMUM AVERAGE WF]FHIS
PLAN RING 180 LBS.
COVER 120 LBS.
BOLTS TOE TYPE 318
STAINLESS STEEL.
PUN
CONRNVOUS RUBBER
25 1/4" 310 185.
3 4' 3 3/4'
DETAL 'B C
310 LBS.
GASKET (1/8' THICK)
14' GLUED TO RING SEAT.
23 1
25 1/4-
1 Tl
3 4• 23 7
5/6•
3 4'
�\"" DUCTILE IRON1"
/%� SMANR \\
vl
ry 2 "
y Y4.
\_ri
•
a ry
16'
1 1 I
1B'wN. I 6'MIN. INTO
I _ I UNDISTURBED EARTH
I ALL SIDES
I I
1 4•}I
14'136
MINIMUM AVERAGE WEIGHTS
I
LBS.
I t �. STABIUZARON
STONE
STOKE
4 24 1'
y 4CLNG
OVER 120 LBS.
I I
u 1/4'
33 1 P
256 LBS.
L ----------J
SEGIlON
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION A - A
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS �� /�
ENGINEERING DMSION `l..i frl -S�
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS �-7
ENGINEERING DMSK)N �S'C'".—
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
N.T.S. REVISED 9-2O—Ot APPROVED
APPROVED
N.T.S. RENSED 9-20—Ot
ENGINEERING DMSIONJ '1�
� r.J
NT,,,REVISED 9-20-01 APPROVED
ENGINEERING DIVISION `
'�"C
PROVE
AR O
N�T.Data SMS -13
WlRylpwe_4rvwm/p/mNJd«-b'P1 ASI V�-(e
uIEY-FPK_tlrawi^W/Mtrl�b'M2.dw9 VU -17
_ _. ___ _
Utl WEDntyOrm/collc -
Mp nlA -6—Mg,cMar.tlw9
DETAIL 2-A
GROUND
1107
1. 12' MINIMUM COVER OVER THE CROWN OF THE PIPE WRH SPECIFIED BACKFILL
MATERW.. THE MAXIMUM COVER SWILL NOT EXCEED 1/2 THE DIAMETER OF THE
PIPE
2. FOUNDATION STONE REQUIRED WHEN SOIL CONDRONS ARE UNSTABLE
3. 4' TO 6' BEDDING UNDER THE PIPE
4. CLEAR DISTANCE NOT LESS THAN 12' EACH SIDE
5. INITIAL BACKFTLL SHALL BE PLACED IN 6' UFTS AND COMPACTED. INITIAL
BACKFILL SHALL CONTAIN NO MATERIAL OVER 1 1/2' IN DIAMETER, FROZEN,
ORGANO, LUMPS, OR DEBRIS.
e. BACKFILL SWILL BE COMPACTED M 959 STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY.
NEW PIPE EMBEDMENT kye
48' FIBERGLASS PIPE N.T.S.
DETAIL 2-E
DETAIL 2-B
co (•crm 3' `� �/ NCAOT j57 STONE
UNDISTURBED
N_ 2>
NQIES:
1. 4' TYPICAL, 6' DEPTH IF IN ROCK.
2. FOUNDATION STONE REQUIRED WHEN SOIL CONDMONS ARE
UNSTABLE
3. INITIAL BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED IN 6' UFTS AND COMPACTED.
INITIAL BACKFILL SINLL CONTAIN NO MATERIAL OVER 1 1/2' IN
DIAMETER, FROZEN LUMPS, OR DEBRIS.
4. BACKFILL SKWl BE COMPACTED TO 959 STANDARD PROCTOR
DENSITY.
NEW DUCTILE IRON SEWER PIPE EMBEDMENT
N.T.S.
DETAIL 2-F
DETAIL 2-C
NEW MANHOLE SEE
STANDARD DETAIL
TER TO PIPE EMBEDMENT DETAIL
NEW SEWER PIPE - SILE SECTION OF PIPE
(( TERIAL AS SPECIFIED)
$DE
NOTE 2 rCOUPUNG - SEE NOTE 3
17 f
EXIST
SEWER 1WN
REFER TO PIPE
EMBEDMENT DETAIL
NOTES-
1.
OTES1, CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THIS DETAIL WHEN CONNECTING EXISTING
SEWERS TO NEW MANHOLES INCLUDING CONNECTING EXISTING SEWERS
TO NEW EXTERNAL DROP CONNECTIONS.
2. THIS DETAIL DEPICTS RECONNECTING ONE PIPE TO A NEW MANHOLE. ALL
INCOMING PIPES AND THE OUTGOING PIPE SHALL BE RECONNECTED PER
THIS DETAIL — EACH SEWER SHALL BE RECONNECTED WITH UP TO 7
FEET OF NEW PIPE
3. SEE STANDARD PIPE COUPLING DETAIL FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS.
APPROVED MANUFACTURER(S) AND SPECIFIC PRODUCT NUMBERS.
NEW MANHOLE INSTALLATION ON EXISTING N.T.S.
SEWER, CUT -IN °`t°I No.
DETAIL 2-G
DETAIL 2-D
COMPACTED
0. M
O
$
CJ �
KFlLL
EE3`c��
12'
_---- _
SPECIFIED BACKFILL
�
-__ -
---
MATERIAL
wo
W
N4c
=
_
W
--
- -_-
UNDISTURBED
BEDDING
\
\
(NOTE 3)
1107
1. 12' MINIMUM COVER OVER THE CROWN OF THE PIPE WRH SPECIFIED BACKFILL
MATERW.. THE MAXIMUM COVER SWILL NOT EXCEED 1/2 THE DIAMETER OF THE
PIPE
2. FOUNDATION STONE REQUIRED WHEN SOIL CONDRONS ARE UNSTABLE
3. 4' TO 6' BEDDING UNDER THE PIPE
4. CLEAR DISTANCE NOT LESS THAN 12' EACH SIDE
5. INITIAL BACKFTLL SHALL BE PLACED IN 6' UFTS AND COMPACTED. INITIAL
BACKFILL SHALL CONTAIN NO MATERIAL OVER 1 1/2' IN DIAMETER, FROZEN,
ORGANO, LUMPS, OR DEBRIS.
e. BACKFILL SWILL BE COMPACTED M 959 STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY.
NEW PIPE EMBEDMENT kye
48' FIBERGLASS PIPE N.T.S.
DETAIL 2-E
DETAIL 2-B
co (•crm 3' `� �/ NCAOT j57 STONE
UNDISTURBED
N_ 2>
NQIES:
1. 4' TYPICAL, 6' DEPTH IF IN ROCK.
2. FOUNDATION STONE REQUIRED WHEN SOIL CONDMONS ARE
UNSTABLE
3. INITIAL BACKFILL SHALL BE PLACED IN 6' UFTS AND COMPACTED.
INITIAL BACKFILL SINLL CONTAIN NO MATERIAL OVER 1 1/2' IN
DIAMETER, FROZEN LUMPS, OR DEBRIS.
4. BACKFILL SKWl BE COMPACTED TO 959 STANDARD PROCTOR
DENSITY.
NEW DUCTILE IRON SEWER PIPE EMBEDMENT
N.T.S.
DETAIL 2-F
DETAIL 2-C
NEW MANHOLE SEE
STANDARD DETAIL
TER TO PIPE EMBEDMENT DETAIL
NEW SEWER PIPE - SILE SECTION OF PIPE
(( TERIAL AS SPECIFIED)
$DE
NOTE 2 rCOUPUNG - SEE NOTE 3
17 f
EXIST
SEWER 1WN
REFER TO PIPE
EMBEDMENT DETAIL
NOTES-
1.
OTES1, CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THIS DETAIL WHEN CONNECTING EXISTING
SEWERS TO NEW MANHOLES INCLUDING CONNECTING EXISTING SEWERS
TO NEW EXTERNAL DROP CONNECTIONS.
2. THIS DETAIL DEPICTS RECONNECTING ONE PIPE TO A NEW MANHOLE. ALL
INCOMING PIPES AND THE OUTGOING PIPE SHALL BE RECONNECTED PER
THIS DETAIL — EACH SEWER SHALL BE RECONNECTED WITH UP TO 7
FEET OF NEW PIPE
3. SEE STANDARD PIPE COUPLING DETAIL FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS.
APPROVED MANUFACTURER(S) AND SPECIFIC PRODUCT NUMBERS.
NEW MANHOLE INSTALLATION ON EXISTING N.T.S.
SEWER, CUT -IN °`t°I No.
DETAIL 2-G
DETAIL 2-D
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Drwn:
MGL
Sc.k:
1 N=40'
Sheet:
D-2
0. M
O
CJ �
aCi O
m�zNa
EE3`c��
41 U L �(
41r� G
U)
W
J
U_
J
M
O_
W
Z
U �
a
co
O
W z
J
U
z O
<
Y Q
W
>_
W I-
U)
WJ
Ll
Qy
L
O
U Q
LL
J =
�
J W
W
J
Q
U)
Z
O
vl
Z
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Drwn:
MGL
Sc.k:
1 N=40'
Sheet:
D-2

121.6'
T
8' DIP
454 lF CLASS SI MEGK-LM DIP
54.0'
16.0' 18.0' I8.0' I8.0'
10 —�
2.5'
15.4' 2.0' 2.0' J 2.4'
15. J
4'
CONC. COLLAR
PER DETAIL D-2 CONC. PIER
PVSH ON JOINT 4.0' MIN. PER DETAIL PRECAST
8' DIPi = . I (TYP.) MANHOLE MIN.
T_ 2' FROM Ex
GRADE TO
BOTTOM OF
MANHOLE
NOTES:
1. DETAIL BASED ON ASSUMED 18' PIPE LENGTHS- ADJUSTMENTS TO BE MADE PER ACTUAL PIPE
LEND H.
2. MAX. SPAN BETWEEN PIERS - 30' IS" PIPE)
3. FOOTING DEPTH SHALL BE TO SUITABLE GRADE AS DETERMINED By THE ENGINEER.
4. CLASS52 MECK-LOK PIPE RIGID RESTRAINED JOINT (OR EQUAL) TO BE USED WHERE NOTED ON
PLAN.
AERIAL STREAM CROSSING
DETAIL 3—A
z
a -
ni m
p STREAMBANK
ix RESTORATION
o c AS NOTED PER
PLAN
VARIES
DIP (PUSH I DIP (PUSH
ON JOINT) I ON JOINT)
RIGID R 10" DIP L RIGID
RESTRAINED RESTRAINED FRP TO DIP
ANTI -FLOATATION COLLAR PER DETAIL JOINT JOINT TRANSITION
2-1LOCATED 5' FROM END OF DIP NOTES: (PER
1. DETAIL BASED ON ASSUMED 20' PIPE LENGTHS. ADJUSTMENTS TO BE MADE PER ACTUAL PIPE MANUFACTURERS
LENGTH. RECOMMENDATION)
2. DUCTILEIRON PIPE WITH PROTECTO 401 PER WINSTON SALEM SPECIFICATIONS,
3. DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL HAVE RIGID RESTRAINED JOINTS WHERE NOTED.
BURIED STREAM CROSSING — 8—INCH & 10—INCH DIP
DETAIL 3—D
VARIABLE
i
$^ Y a
� L gzZ
1 ' U
J
Q �
VI
W a
Z
VARIABLE
W w
W
V
o +o W o
U �
4 U=
=$ i
g
CITY OF WINSTON—SALEM
DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
N.T.S. REVISED 9-20-01 APPROVED
R:\Dot,\UtjIRy\Utility Spec D-119e/11nn PW detail W29.d�9 VD -29
48" FRP
DETAIL 3—B
NORMAL FOOTING
THICKNESS SEE
NOTE I
GONG FOR
LEVELING MAT BE y
POURED WITH
FOOTING
18' MIN.
i
(TYPICAL)
0
6-T
0
IN
CLEAR
#8 BARS
GROUTED IN
2" DIA.
HOLES
0 o
b o
NOTES:
1. MINIMUM THICKNESS OF FOOTING ABOVE ROCK TO BE SAME AS BASE
THICKNESS OF PIER.
2. MAT STEEL FOR FETING SHALL BE TIED TO DOWELS.
3. CONCRETE SHALL BE 3600 PSI
z
U Q
O]
W
STREAMBANK
RESTORATION
AS NOTED PER
PIAN
VARIES
48" FRP
PIER FOOTING ON ROCK
RIGID RIGIDFRP
RESTRAINED RESTRAINED
TO DIP
48" ANTI JOINT JOINT
TRANSITION
FLOTATION COLLAR
(PER
PER DETAIL 3-F NOTES:
MANUFACTURERS
LOCATED 5' FROM END OF DIP 1. DETAIL BASED ON ASSUMED 20' PIPE LENGTHS. ADJUSTMENTS TO BE MADE PER ACTUAL
LENGTH.
PIPE
RECOMMENDATION)
2.FRP PIPE PER PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.
3.DUCTILE IRON PIPE WITH PROTECM 401 PER WINSTON SALEM SPECIFICATIONS.
4. DUCTILE IRON PIPE SHALL HAVE RIGID RESTRAINED JOINTS.
BURIED STREAM CROSSING — 48—INCH SEWER
DETAIL 3—E
DETAIL 3—C
NOTES:
I. FORMS NOT REQUIRED BELOW SPRING UNE. CONCRETE MAY BE
HA
PLACED AGAINST SPED BANKS IN LIEU OF FORMS
48—INCH SEWER ANTI FLOTATION COLLAR
DETAIL 3—F
w
J_
U_
J
a- F_ W
w O
ZU�y/ ror�A'
Ll LL V
0 w Z J
= Z O F-
H Y Q W
? w
(n W J
O U m
L _J =
—1 w
Lu 73 ct
J
Q
U)
Z
O
H
z
I
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Dr—
MGL
Scale:
111=40'
D-3
M
0
WO)
C N z N 4
�dx
d w
EO TD C G
a
m .o
w
J_
U_
J
a- F_ W
w O
ZU�y/ ror�A'
Ll LL V
0 w Z J
= Z O F-
H Y Q W
? w
(n W J
O U m
L _J =
—1 w
Lu 73 ct
J
Q
U)
Z
O
H
z
I
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Dr—
MGL
Scale:
111=40'
D-3

IBM FRAME It WAR AND
RETURN TO CRY AT
A DESD ATED LOCATION.
EGDDORD CONE SECTION
SEE NOTE 2
REMOVE TOP
SECTION OF MANHOLE
SEE NOTE 3
301 SEE NOTE 5
EXRTNG BRICK
OR—
BLOCK MANHOLE 'o
WALL
SEE NOTE 4
EXISTING
BENCHING
�- MANHOLE DIAMETER
VARIES SEE NOTE
2
7. REFER ET THIS DETAIL WHEN PIING BRING EXISTING MANHOLES IN PLACE
2. THIS TO
DES AN AN DOTTING ILL VARY. MANHOLE WITH A TYPICAL CHIMNEY SECTION.
MANOLESHAPES AND PORTION.
IN WILL VARY.
3. REMOVE FO UPPER SUBG, IE IN PG CONE SECTION OF STRUCTURES TOA DEPTH R AT
LEASTREMOVE 1 FOOT BELOW SUBGRADE IN PAVED AND FOUNDS FE AREAS. FOR ALL OTHER AREAS,
GADS ALL Of THE CONE ER. T 70 A DEPTH OF 3 FEET BROW FINISHED R EN OR
CPAOE, WHICHEVER 5 LOWER. THE BOTTOM OF STRUCRIR6 51W11 BE BROKEN OR
PERFORATED 7DCONDUITS
PREVENT THE TION TO T E WATER.
4. SEAL Nl CONDUITS L OF CONNECTION TO THE STRUCTURES OR ENDS OF COHORT TO BE
LL
or RIC ED AND
A WALL OF CONCRETE NOT LESS THAN 8 INCHES MILK OR AN 8 -INCH WALL
OF RICK PND MORTAR.
5. FILL SM DENSLY VOIDS WITH MOISTURE
FILL OR CRUSHED STONE COMPACTED TO 9016 OF
MACK DENSITY AT OPTIMUM REMAINDER
OF CONTENT WI ! SUITABLE
BY ASTM IU_ I
8. BACKFILL AND COMPACT REMVNDER OF TRENCH WITH SURADLE BACKFILL IN CONFORMANCE
WITH STANOVN SPECIFICATIONS.
Scale
MANHOLE ABANDONMENT N.T.S.
Detail
ail Na.
DETAIL 4—A
EXCAVATE
EX. PIPE AT
TOP OF BANK
EXCAVATE
EX. PIPE AT
TOP OF BANK p
`Jo
STREAMBANK s
RESTORATION
AS NOTED PER
PLAN
PIPE PLUG
PER DETAIL
4-C
STREAMBANK
RESTORATION
/REQUIRED ONLY
IF DISTURBED
FILL EX. PIPE WITH PER -DETAIL XI TIN
FLOWABLE FILL 4 -CBE
MANHOLE TO
BURIED PIPE CROSSING ABANDONED
PER DETAIL
4-A
z
'Y STREAMBANK
rz RESTORATION
o
AS NOTED PER
PLAN
7 77 _
PIP P _ — — — — — —
PER DETAIL LIMITS OF PIPE REMOVAL
4-C
NOIFS:
I. IF PIPE REMOVAL IS REQUIRED WHERE NO COFFER DAM IS PRESENT. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL DIG DOWN ON THE PIPE AT THE TOP OF BANK h PLUG
THE PIPES (BOTH ENDS). ONLY UPON CURING OF PIPE PLUG SHALL THE
CONTRACTOR ME REMOVE PIPE IN STREAM.
EXPOSED PIPE CROSSING
CREEK CROSSING ABANDONMENT — EXISTING TRUNK
"�FINISH 1
GRADE
G
�i;
1
W WELDED STEEL
2'-0' MAX
NG OR TUNNEL
MASONRY BULKHEAD EACH END
Lwxa
nENw• Y6 eye:: d
mlalEn nu
o •o • '
g~�=
� $T
m�€fig
NOTE:
CARRIER PIPE D.I.P. REQUIRED
T2 CLEAR DIAMETER
O —PLUG - USE ONE
OF METHODS BELOW:
it A TAPPING Z
MACHINE
MACHINE ANO SADDLE
APPROVED BY ME (
CASING
SPACERS
BORE IS
ES.
CASING SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF N.C. DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION SPECIFICATIONS.
2. CASING SPIDERS SUCH AS THOSE MANUFACTURED BY SPIDER MANUFACTURING.
INC. OR OTHER APPROVED EQUAL SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ME CASING.
3. MIN. 1 SPACERS PER CARRIER PIPE SECTION.
4. ME ANNULAR SPACE BETWEEN ME CASING PIPE AND DIP BARREL SHALL BE
SEALED ON ROM ENDS WITH A BULKHEAD AS SHOWN.
5. THE ANNULAR SPACE SMALL BE FILLED WITH FIOWABLE FILL OR GROUT AFTER
COMPLETION OF SUCCESSFUL FINAL TESTING OF CARRIER PIPE.
TRENCHLESS INSTALLATION
DETAIL 4—D
A
G
�i;
I I
`i
�
�$ (EI'�
$
SiQ
Lwxa
nENw• Y6 eye:: d
mlalEn nu
o •o • '
g~�=
� $T
m�€fig
NOTE:
0 MNC JONT OR RUBBER —0 4' C.O. (SEE NOTE FOR LOCATION)
L LIEU OF WYE'S THE
q LATERAL MAY 8E
COIMECTED TO THE MAIN
O —PLUG - USE ONE
OF METHODS BELOW:
it A TAPPING Z
MACHINE
MACHINE ANO SADDLE
APPROVED BY ME (
1/16 C.I. SOIL PIPE BEND 4• C.I. FERRULE W/ 3' 1. BRASS CLEANOUT.
S
S
SECTION OF NAB SECTION OF CONCRETE
PIPE PLUG p3pE PLLJo
MADE INTO A MANHOLE
PLAN O.D. PLUG)- C.O. FLUSH NO -HUS COUPLING,
WITH TOP OF PIPE BELL 3. WICK SELL PLUG
n ra
Ej9 i
(,IT, 1/27 (BY FERNCO).
J
o
�
4. T ' CONE
E11 i
w
K� tl��EC
Ela AEw IgTE; �:
1f' O.Ow ETTIIw NQ wEEMY w IMe Mr L.xRX" It. r.l rEW KK M1W
LacuTE wr w um.f• n raao awr.
16j
d
>i
GURB @ GUTTER.
5. C.I. PWG WTIH
a
a
c2
f.wE maerf wia w• w iNw a uN w
1E• ow e�isYi wwia. Jl�o wiNx nu w
o.
x
M
m
3 c
_- 4' COMBINATION
2
w• 1w
ENTERS THE MAN (NOT REWIRED IFWYE
IS USED). WILL
C
E.Ew
W =
840.71
1/16 C.I. SOL PPE
C.I. SOL PIPE, SERVICE WEIGHT
L-
840.71
DETAIL 4—E
DETAIL 4—C
CLEANOUT (SEE 4'
CONNECTION MAIMING)
4' OR S' MANHOLE
4XO*3RROM
HIM'
PLUG AS PER 4'
CLEANOUT SEAL BE LOCATED WITHIN ME CRASS STRIP WHEN APPLICABLE. F MERE IS NO GRASS
STRIP MEN THE CLEANOUT SHALL BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET FROM THE R/W OR EASEMENT
SCNDI CONNECTION
UNE IN NO CASE SHAM CLEANOUT BE PLACED WITHIN SIDEWALK. DRIVEWAY, OR INSIDE A FENCE
NOTE:
0 MNC JONT OR RUBBER —0 4' C.O. (SEE NOTE FOR LOCATION)
L LIEU OF WYE'S THE
q LATERAL MAY 8E
COIMECTED TO THE MAIN
O —PLUG - USE ONE
OF METHODS BELOW:
it A TAPPING Z
MACHINE
MACHINE ANO SADDLE
APPROVED BY ME (
1/16 C.I. SOIL PIPE BEND 4• C.I. FERRULE W/ 3' 1. BRASS CLEANOUT.
ENGNFER, OR THE
CONNECTION MAY BE
.WyE BRA55 PLUG (3 1/2• 2. C.I. PLUG WITH
MADE INTO A MANHOLE
PLAN O.D. PLUG)- C.O. FLUSH NO -HUS COUPLING,
WITH TOP OF PIPE BELL 3. WICK SELL PLUG
t
(,IT, 1/27 (BY FERNCO).
OMBMUTKXN WYEIE
AND 1/6 BEND.
4. T ' CONE
W
STANDARD OR VALUE! �•'•EXPANDABLE STOPPER
t - (Sr 401 BY ErCO).
GURB @ GUTTER.
5. C.I. PWG WTIH
RUBBER GASKET.
_- 4' COMBINATION
ETE BLOCK TO BE POURED MME AND Ya BEND.
IW FROM WHERE CONNECRON
ENTERS THE MAN (NOT REWIRED IFWYE
IS USED). WILL
_
PROTECT fl/Yl OR
MAIN WHEN Po�NGK
SECTION EASEMENT LINE (WHICHEVERO 15
FURDEST FROM MAN).
1/16 C.I. SOL PPE
C.I. SOL PIPE, SERVICE WEIGHT
L-
MIN. 1% SLOPE 11 MAX. 2% SLOPE PLUG
JOINTS SHALL BE RUBBER CASKET
0 RING JOINT OR
O
RUBBER GASKET CONNECTIONS TO OUTFALLS MUST HAVE 5' BETWEEN ME OUTFALL k CLEANOUT.
- - `•:
CONNECTIONS TO 15' OJiFAVS 6: CHEATER MIST 8E MADE IMO MANHOLE.
ON OUTFALLS TO BE 3' ABOVE GROUND.
NOTE
�� MAY BE REOURm TO AY
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
CONNECTION AS SHOWN BY DABIED LINES IF
ELEVARCN IS CRITICAL DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
5 ENGINEERING DIVISION
N.T.S. REVISED 11-1a-13
4" SEWER CONNECTION S�
DETAIL 4—E
DETAIL 4—C
CLEANOUT (SEE 4'
CONNECTION MAIMING)
4' OR S' MANHOLE
4XO*3RROM
EE TROIGH TO BE BUILT TO DIRECT
6' CONNECTKN TO EFFLUENT RPE
PLUG AS PER 4'
� o
SCNDI CONNECTION
'
o
DPwNG
W O'" vv
cmE
U
6' C.I. SOIL RP[ SEFMCE HEIGHT1x
O C O d
o
U
SIOPE MAX. 2x SLOPE
6'
CONNECTOR � B
OMBMUTKXN WYEIE
AND 1/6 BEND.
RR GASKET
W
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM
DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
6" SEWER CONNECTION
>Nt-oe
APPROVED
DETAIL 4—F
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Dr—
MGL
Scale:
111=40'
D-4
� o
Z N P
C
'
o
W O'" vv
cmE
U
O C O d
o
U
U)
W
_J
Il I—
Ow
}
O
Z)
LJ- a
u)
O
w Z
—�
2
Z O
~
W
w
I¢-
(A
W J
00
O
U
LLL
J =
-� W
W
af
J
Q
E
Z
O
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Dr—
MGL
Scale:
111=40'
D-4

TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
DETAIL 5—A
NOTES
1. INLET MAINTENANCE SHALL BE DOCUMENTED IN PROJECT LOG BOOK.
2. FILTER TYPES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR PRIOR
TO INSTALLATION.
3. FILTER BAITS My BE REMOVED WHEN SITE IS STABILIZED AT
THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER.
4.FILTER FLAGS SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO STREET ACCEPTANCE
5. FILTER BAGS SEWl 8E CLEANED OR REPLACED ON A REGULAR
BASIS (NOT BE MORE TNN HALF FULL AT ANY TME).
I—
e-O,
MINIMUM
2'-0' MIN.
STEEL
LIN
SEDIMENT INLET PROTECTION DEVICE
FENCE MATERIAL
ORANGE, UV RESISTANT
HIGH TENSILE STRENGTH
POLYETHYLENE LAMINAR
BARRICADE FABRIC —,
3' TYP.
DETAIL 5—D
6' STONE
CROSSING OVER
GAS MAIN PER
PIEDMONT GAS
REQUIREMENTS.
GRADE
6" STONE CROSSING OVER GAS AWN PER
PIEDMONT GAS REOUIREMENTS.
PIEDMONT GAS CROSSING DETAIL
DETAIL 5—C
I ITI 11 11 II==..TI -
��=11 II II II II II=1 II II II II II=11 II II II N
11=II=11==11=11=11=11=11-II-11=II-II-II-II-II=II=11=1R I=11=11
=11=11=11 1=11=11=11=II=11=�=II=11-11=11=11=11=II=11= II=11=
- -=11=11=11=11-=11=11=11=11=II=11=11 II=1
rs.r `• NDns:
1. =T=I—nre .uo RxDII aT RVCC a To RDwN mP nKKN or
u U.AST f�D cvE RmL. wKnN a s w[ ArNs wnH
N T N wK uT mp www �,
.o _DL, :no.0 soxN w nue a rus xx or sons
µor P—D. nxv..c.ossss+Nrws. oTORs. W.RAMe DR oTRR
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
DETAIL 5—B
191
NOTES
/ SI• a. GMVELRADTOBE lYKSWAND—HKR MINIMUM
N e TURR�NGPApUSSI1FFKIEMTO
—OMMODATE WRGE TRUCKli STO SE
PPCPVBXD
c. ENIRANCE15) SNW LD BE LOGTEO LD
6'MIN F vROVIDE TOR MAXIMUM UTILITY BY qLy
C0115TRLIEM N VFIBED
OWHMICN NOW
1.
PERE CROWOIMUDONTO51ONES.
COARSE AGGREGATE } MLLOeE NECE-LRMY, KEEP
15014 ORNDY.
l'B ANY MATERML WINCH RILL MAKES IT
ONTO THF ROAD MUST BF CLEANED UP
OU lY.
'N S$&CORABLE AT ALL PI INIS n6T
O, 1GPE5i B EGRESS NTC SIR R
?NABIU2E 1 AREQIIEM CNECY3OF
F DDME AND TIMELY
MNNTENANCE MUST BE PRONGED.
NDTES:
1. GAS MAIN LOCATION SHOWN ON PLAN
IS APPROXIMATE.
2. CONTRACTOR ALL COORDINATE
WITH PIEDMONT GAS TO FIELD
LOCATED GAS MAIN.
3. INSTALL ORANGE SAFETY FENCE 3
FEET EACH SIDE OF GAS MAIN. ONE
SIDE ONLY WHERE CONSTRUCTION
ACCESS DOES NOT REQUIRE BOTH
SIDES.
4. COORDINATE LOCATION OF GAS UNE
CROSSINGS WITH PIEDMONT GAS. NO
CROSSING SHALL BE UNPROTECTED.
ORANGE SAFETY FENCE
(AS REQUIRED)
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT
DETAIL 5—E
DETAIL 5—C
u�
♦ IAN nAn row wr RIouR NRTRN¢Y Nvntr ax Tw WXrrx
H. —E TE sTRX:NRF WHEN NO LONGER NEEDED.
(NOT N I,— 1
II.E
R
"4LNMON, oEscX VIE STNucN F TO vA55 Z rFM
,,,���M//
/
DM DW WDHp,r p.ERTDPPnD
—N FL�RET.s �x . THE 0—T
RECE— sIREMI CNANxFL ERS rpt ME
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING
DETAIL 5—A
NOTES
1. INLET MAINTENANCE SHALL BE DOCUMENTED IN PROJECT LOG BOOK.
2. FILTER TYPES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR PRIOR
TO INSTALLATION.
3. FILTER BAITS My BE REMOVED WHEN SITE IS STABILIZED AT
THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER.
4.FILTER FLAGS SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO STREET ACCEPTANCE
5. FILTER BAGS SEWl 8E CLEANED OR REPLACED ON A REGULAR
BASIS (NOT BE MORE TNN HALF FULL AT ANY TME).
I—
e-O,
MINIMUM
2'-0' MIN.
STEEL
LIN
SEDIMENT INLET PROTECTION DEVICE
FENCE MATERIAL
ORANGE, UV RESISTANT
HIGH TENSILE STRENGTH
POLYETHYLENE LAMINAR
BARRICADE FABRIC —,
3' TYP.
DETAIL 5—D
6' STONE
CROSSING OVER
GAS MAIN PER
PIEDMONT GAS
REQUIREMENTS.
GRADE
6" STONE CROSSING OVER GAS AWN PER
PIEDMONT GAS REOUIREMENTS.
PIEDMONT GAS CROSSING DETAIL
DETAIL 5—C
I ITI 11 11 II==..TI -
��=11 II II II II II=1 II II II II II=11 II II II N
11=II=11==11=11=11=11=11-II-11=II-II-II-II-II=II=11=1R I=11=11
=11=11=11 1=11=11=11=II=11=�=II=11-11=11=11=11=II=11= II=11=
- -=11=11=11=11-=11=11=11=11=II=11=11 II=1
rs.r `• NDns:
1. =T=I—nre .uo RxDII aT RVCC a To RDwN mP nKKN or
u U.AST f�D cvE RmL. wKnN a s w[ ArNs wnH
N T N wK uT mp www �,
.o _DL, :no.0 soxN w nue a rus xx or sons
µor P—D. nxv..c.ossss+Nrws. oTORs. W.RAMe DR oTRR
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
DETAIL 5—B
191
NOTES
/ SI• a. GMVELRADTOBE lYKSWAND—HKR MINIMUM
N e TURR�NGPApUSSI1FFKIEMTO
—OMMODATE WRGE TRUCKli STO SE
PPCPVBXD
c. ENIRANCE15) SNW LD BE LOGTEO LD
6'MIN F vROVIDE TOR MAXIMUM UTILITY BY qLy
C0115TRLIEM N VFIBED
OWHMICN NOW
1.
PERE CROWOIMUDONTO51ONES.
COARSE AGGREGATE } MLLOeE NECE-LRMY, KEEP
15014 ORNDY.
l'B ANY MATERML WINCH RILL MAKES IT
ONTO THF ROAD MUST BF CLEANED UP
OU lY.
'N S$&CORABLE AT ALL PI INIS n6T
O, 1GPE5i B EGRESS NTC SIR R
?NABIU2E 1 AREQIIEM CNECY3OF
F DDME AND TIMELY
MNNTENANCE MUST BE PRONGED.
NDTES:
1. GAS MAIN LOCATION SHOWN ON PLAN
IS APPROXIMATE.
2. CONTRACTOR ALL COORDINATE
WITH PIEDMONT GAS TO FIELD
LOCATED GAS MAIN.
3. INSTALL ORANGE SAFETY FENCE 3
FEET EACH SIDE OF GAS MAIN. ONE
SIDE ONLY WHERE CONSTRUCTION
ACCESS DOES NOT REQUIRE BOTH
SIDES.
4. COORDINATE LOCATION OF GAS UNE
CROSSINGS WITH PIEDMONT GAS. NO
CROSSING SHALL BE UNPROTECTED.
ORANGE SAFETY FENCE
(AS REQUIRED)
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT
DETAIL 5—E
DETAIL 5—C
u�
♦ IAN nAn row wr RIouR NRTRN¢Y Nvntr ax Tw WXrrx
((A5 OETNI. loGlE'�
II.E
tILE of xISlNlcixw)A�)n
nc m m
DPO:IFD�T VIE
LVN.STw.CnoN)
WJRbRNW r Nc� mx
-BEE
1� � i+o� rse NP scam
va
TGspwrc vnNc
w N.v� ogEE1
�9 F>aMo �
Y NOTES.
' ,lsr¢swa�nae`o'�
El IN CRE£K SN BE MNMEO TILMNYR TE Nu1.W OR Obn a
NE SERVE N OCJa V TUI Ip rz ANO No
x IN ME c 1 INLEss Al LEASTLMREE DAYS mrNW* xnn Is AN—TEED
oR DISNRBED CREEK BED AND BANKS ARE T) BE STABILIZED PRIOR TO ME END
(IDIX AS p EAC. W_ DPr.
m AT FNATENcER CREEKS. coNsmuc� sNwlD DC— DN ®E s pE
WOIAo w
a,--wv lEl AT A E L
m a�AK:IoM • UNgR D sin0 COmp
CREEK FLMY OLKRNG aNSmOCTON.
TYPICAL PUMP AROUND SETUP
PUANVIEW
-DI LCNGTN III If
EKrEREYNC� \—
rAiIGN Ai'O:NTERE
SECTION ALONG FENCE
cournoi sraxi
' usxr aEn
w'A`sHiosroni
LY Ar CEATER
IVR IABRIE�
SECWN ALONG FENCE R
DETAIL 5—F
COFFER DAM DETAIL
4➢RElli RIBI smFAx euw
BRD
Nc caourvo �wry rros[
/ sTREPN
Da amA¢
(NIA-RaITN) na
RIP RM PAD
Mx. rHE,wEa
nes
a OmptCR'SB p� pA AL> ro DFITAmANc
AT
FILKEII
STIAR BALENLi IFKX AU�•IHOIIEYTR —0,-
-c—
OPEAAIE ro —W NL PUNPED�-- r0 BE RTZ ro
PRENNT sErNENrz FRaM ERmINc AND NDNNo DET ss
TEMPORARY DEWATERING STRUCTURE
(SPECIAL STIWNG BASIN)
PROFILE VIEW
TEMPORARY STREAM BYPASS
DETAIL 5—H
riY111H fLL a
E]EYMa11 s6T/1U.nOI1
` Ellf
LSE LXNTERDW OCTAL TOR SPQ]FiC
CONSTRUCIpN RE. --0,
rEI. DPAR1' COETERDAN (--pKE)
TENPORgRY COFFER OATH
PROHLE VIEW
W
J_
I-
U_
J
m � �
d w
w0
Z U W
=) O' 11
W
Z
=z�
W H
(n W J
0 UILL Q
� J =
2E J W
W 2i Of
Q
Z
0
U)
Z
i
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
DmD:
MGL
Scole:
111=40'

C
of
roNEI IufRu�fl IInwBk i
C
NOrf3:
1 S r C "BE' 'AT A$
SHOWN IN.—I f "H5 SHEM
O 1rvF5 A,=
, A51-1..—ID 1N55HC[11H
O FlIrFR fABNC. KIRIM1I W FWT:.
C1A551RV O S 1' 1R'rMCf WliHhl lB PUWlING 455nOWn M -.1C IMIS SnfFil
DETAIL A - STREAMBANK RESTORATION
DETAIL 6-A
DETAIL C
JOINT PLANTING (IN RIP RAP)
la•
Rsfm,eR n.x,w.oa�vle ��Kxf..a .r1rf�R I
DETAIL E
// rwlwnrmaeia.oeamanwfra COIR FABRIC ANCHOR DETAIL
Iw rK,I�melb
DETAIL D
LIVE STAKE (IN EARTH)
DETAIL 6-D
65Um EOR REVIEW
MAY 2015
r<
I
DETAIL 6-B
j9d 0�urBY[Gerxrrox
R��(DZONE A• • •
ZONE B .xo S.fiFiciDx
r/a M
nwxi: fi�u„fwnf • . • . ZONEC aR a' MINIMW
CREEK CENTERLINE
PLAN VIEW SPACING PATTERN FOR
LIVE STAKING AND JOINT PLANTING
DETAIL 6-C
ZONE .w1R.n ar •. x ,,,,rr w.,r . n. ..
IuvuNoroxfl "^`--',7—
ZONE
P +^
,..�Bn,�x1Rn, rNr.x r ,ror." 1..,x,.1.Wr.r,x. ..x r«1YrI, .er�aBf ,> „• R1.,..rwrn»<H "„r<.:, , r,:x,�xr.
ZONES
lavv.•xoefl .n•o.. ns.—l— rax s,. ma.e,. , Isv ,m„ �,«,.swr,,.:x.R,, .. w,l.x �x:Rl+a.x_....x.n, x.�.fw,llx+n.lwo.�w rxYen,xrsw•..1.v �.:U«r.
m1.Tno+.oxi.1" nl111.1, .rn:..a,.,rmrwar. BA -1 ,.-o AT-rl
fxiRrxmsx,�R x1:.., .wrvosw,
s�.,rmmw.inw-ru�rn..Rwi
ZONE "`°w�•'�+`• .. x.,rw
nowERuaxl
DETAIL 6-E
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Drwn:
MGL
Scale:
1"=40'
D-6
M
a � o
en
U
cN z ry O
O
w
E
EO C7 c p
V t; _u
j � 7
U)
W
J
U_
J
m
W
00
d
W
W O
D
w a
U)
O
W Z
J
U
I-
ZO
Y
H
U)
W J
U 00
O
LL
�
J =
J W
W
J
Q
U)
1
Z
O
H
U)
_Z
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
Drwn:
MGL
Scale:
1"=40'
D-6

_ ��e• mus
STANDARD 2'-6" CURB AND GUTTER
V-6" STANDARD CURB AND GUTTER
2'-0" STANDARD CURB & GUTTER
oz iT/fr .os Fri/ _Fr
03 FT/FT
SLOPE FOR VARIABLE
S P R VI�ATION RATES
STANDARD CURB AND CUTTER
DETAIL 7—A
DETAIL 7—B
DETAIL 7—C
Dote:
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
D—
MGL
Scok:
1 "=40'
D-7
H
a6o
U
C N z V O
oQOV A z
y
.Mo
! n J
�
W.
U
a
J_
U_
J
W
H
10
Z
U of
Q� d
U)
O
LLJ z
J
F-
Z O
1w--
2
F-
Y Q
<
Q
W F-
U)
W J
m
O
U
U-
J =
—� W
W
J
Q
U)
Z
O
U)
z
Dote:
12-12-16
Chkd:
JT/SM
D—
MGL
Scok:
1 "=40'
D-7