20170146 Ver 1_More Info Received_20170302

■■ WikhersRavenel
NoOur People. Your Success.
March 1, 2017
NC -Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Ms. Karen Higgins
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
Re: Buckhorn Preserve - Revised NWP 29 PCN Submittal
WR Project #02160203.00
Dear Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of TAC Buckhorn, LLC, we are submitting a revised PCN for the 401 WQC due to a change
in the proposed temporary impacts as a result of required revisions to the sewer design by the Town
of Apex. The original PCN, dated 01/31/17, proposed 0.483 acres of permanent wetland impacts,
0.112 acres of temporary wetland impacts, 200 If of permanent stream impacts and 42 If of
temporary stream impacts for construction of the proposed project.
The Town of Apex required a sewer line to be relocated from the previously proposed alignment,
resulting in an additional stream crossing (Impact 17 on Sheet E) which will result in an additional
36 If of temporary stream impacts that were not included in the original PCN. Attached to this letter
is the revised PCN and impact maps which have been updated to include the additional Impact 17
for the sewer crossing.
As a result of the revisions to the sewer alignment, we are currently requesting a 401 WQC for
0.483 acres of permanent wetland impacts, 0.112 acres of temporary wetland impacts, 200 If of
permanent stream impacts and 78 If of temporary stream impacts for construction of the proposed
project.
Please note that the Corps has already issued the NWP 29, and we are submitting a request for a
modification of permit to reflect the changes to the temporary impacts.
Please feel free to call if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely
WithersRavenel
Troy Beasley
Senior Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• Revised PCN Form (03/01/17)
• Revised Impact Exhibits (03/01/17)
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403
t: 910.256.9277 1 f: 910.256.2584 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

rq�0F W A Tom,, q
0 Niii� -c
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? 29
❑ Yes
® No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Buckhorn Preserve
2b.
County:
Wake County
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Apex
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
PINs: 0721253839 & 0721361286 — Colin & Bridget McNair
PIN: 0721340537 — Jean and Alfred Goodwin
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
PIN: 0721253839 — Book: 5936; Page: 851
PIN: 0721361145 — Book: 4769; Page: 685
PIN: 0721340537 — Book: 16197; Page: 516
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
See Parcel/Owner Exhibit for Info
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Developer/Contract Purchaser
4b.
Name:
Todd Terwilliger —Vice President
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
TAC Buckhorn, LLC
4d. Street address:
2100 Powers Ferry Road NE
4e.
City, state, zip:
Atlanta, GA 30339
4f.
Telephone no.:
678-777-5577
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Troy Beasley
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Withers and Ravenel
5c.
Street address:
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101
5d.
City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28403
5e. Telephone no.:
910-256-9277
5f.
Fax no.:
910-256-2584
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
PINs: 0721253839; 0721361286; 0721340537
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.715902°N Longitude: - 78.923023°W
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
±121 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Beaver Creek (Stream Index: 16-41-10-(0.5)
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS-IV;NSW
2c. River basin:
Cape Fear (Jordan) - 03030002
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site currently consists of an active horse farm with barns and pastures, active agricultural field, cattle pasture,
ponds and undeveloped woodlands. The general land use in the vicinity of the project consists primarily of residential
land use.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Wetlands — ±6.51 acres
Ponds - ±2.31 acres
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
±3,265 If
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a single family residential subdivision to meet the growing demand for
residential housing in Apex.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project consists of construction of a 344 lot residential subdivision and associated infrastructure, including
roads, utilities, stormwater management and greenways. Additionally, substantial offsite road improvements are being
required by the Town of Apex as part of the approval of the project. Standard commercial construction equipment will be
used to construct the proposed project.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: WithersRavenel
Name (if known): Martin Richmond/Troy Beasley
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Corps of Engineers Preliminary JD (SAW -2016-01065) — Issued 07/22/16
Town of Apex Buffer Determination (16-003) — Issued 05/16/16
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The project as depicted in the attached exhibits will be constructed in Phases, however all impacts necessary for the
entire project have been assessed in this application.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number-
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Tempora T
Impact 1
® P El T
Road Fill
Headwater Forest
® Yes
El No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.22 ac
Impact 2
Retaining Wall
Headwater Forest
® Yes
® Corps
0.013 ac
® P El
Construction/Grading
El No
® DWQ
Impact 5
® P El T
Road Fill
Headwater Forest
® Yes
El No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.042 ac
Impact 8
Lot Fill
Bottomland
® Yes
® Corps
0.033 ac
® P [:1T
Hardwood Forest
❑ No
®DWQ
Impact 9
Greenway Crossing
Bottomland
® Yes
® Corps
0.005 ac
® P El
Hardwood Forest
❑ No
®DWQ
Impact 12
® P El T
Road Crossing
Headwater Forest
® Yes
❑ No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.067 ac
Impact 15
® P El T
Road Crossing
Headwater Forest
® Yes
El No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.046 ac
Impact 16
® P El T
Lot Fill
Headwater Forest
® Yes
El No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.057 ac
Total Permanent Impacts
0.483 ac
Impact 4
[-] P ®T
Sewer Crossing
Headwater Forest
® Yes
El No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.027 ac
Impact 10
Sewer Crossing
Bottomland
® Yes
® Corps
0.012 ac
P ®T
El❑
Hardwood Forest
No
®DWQ
Impact 11
Temporary
Temp
®Yes
®Corps
❑ P ® T
Construction Access
Headwater Forest
❑ No
® DWQ
0.030 ac
for Retaining Wall
Impact 13
E:1 P ®T
Sewer Crossing
Headwater Forest
® Yes
El No
® Corps
® DWQ
0.027 ac
Impact 14
Sewer Crossing
Bottomland
® Yes
® Corps
0.016 ac
P ®T
El❑
Hardwood Forest
No
®DWQ
Total Temporary Impacts
0.112 ac
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.595 ac
2h. Comments:
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Impact 6
Road Crossing
UT to Beaver
® PER
® Corps
10'
190 If
® P ❑ T
Creek
[_1 INT
[I DWQ
Impact 7
Rip -Rap Dissipator
UT to Beaver
® PER
E] Corps
10'
10 If
® P E]T
Creek
E] INT
❑ DWQ
Total Permanent Impacts
200 If
Impact 3
Sewer Crossing
UT to Beaver
E] PER
® Corps
5'
42 If
[_1P ® T
Creek
® INT
®DWQ
Impact 17
Sewer Crossing
UT to Beaver
❑ PER
® Corps
5'
36 If
E]P ® T
Creek
® INT
®DWQ
Total Temporary Impacts
78 If
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
278 If
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
— Permanent (P)
or Temporary
T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑ PEI T
03 ❑ PEI T
04 ❑ PEI T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose of
(acres)
number
pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
K Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ® Other: Jordan
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P)
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
or Temporary
impact
required?
T
131 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑PFIT
F-1 Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
FYes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: Buffer impacts will be permitted through the Town of Apex as the delegated municipality.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands
and "waters" could be minimized. Proposed permanent impacts have been minimized to only those impacts necessary to
construct internal roads, four lots, retaining walls and a greenway crossing. Stream impacts have been minimized to only one
road crossing for Milano Avenue and utilizing pedestrian bridges for greenway stream crossings. Also, elevated boardwalks
for the greenway and retaining walls to stabilize lot fill have been utilized to further minimize wetland impacts.
The proposed site design has gone through several design modifications in order to minimize wetland and stream impacts.
The original site design, dated 05/18/16 (see Appendix), proposed a total of 350 lots. The 05/18/16 site design would have
resulted in ±1.3 acres of permanent wetland impacts, 200 If of permanent stream impacts and ±1.29 acres of jurisdictional
surface water (pond) impacts, which would have required an Individual Permit. The proposed site design proposes 344 lots
and will require 0.483 acres of permanent wetland impacts, 200 If of permanent stream impacts and no jurisdictional surface
water impacts. The proposed site plan represents the minimization of 0.817 acres of permanent wetland impacts and 1.29
acres of jurisdictional surface water (pond) impacts, which makes the project eligible for a Nationwide Permit 29. The
minimization of 2.107 total acres of impacts to jurisdictional features through design revisions resulted in the loss of six lots.
The Town of Apex is requiring offsite road improvements which include widening of Richardson Road along the entire
frontage. Additionally, the Town is requiring that Milano Avenue be constructed as a major collector road, which results in
Milano Avenue being 15' wider than a typical residential road. These improvements result in a significant financial burden o n
the project, as these improvements do not directly benefit the proposed development. The substantial costs associated with
the improvements to Richardson Road and construction of Milano Avenue as a major collector road must be absorbed into the
overall construction costs for the development, with no financial return.
The proposed 344 lots represents the minimum number of lots necessary to be able to offset land purchase costs,
construction costs and offsite road improvement costs, while still having a feasible project. As previously discussed, design
revisions for avoidance and minimization of impacts resulted in a reduction from 350 lots to 344, which is a loss of 6 lots.
Wetland impacts for construction of Lots 393 & 394 (Impact 16) will occur to Wetland Y, which is a very small wetland (±0.10
ac), which is isolated within the landscape. Approximately half of Wetland Y will be impacted by construction of road R006,
which will further reduce the size of Wetland Y. Even if the remnant portion of Wetland Y was not impacted, the integrity and
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

long term viability of a ±0.057 acre wetland pocket could not be maintained. Once surrounded by development, the drainage
area would be eliminated, and the stormwater management system would direct all runoff away from the wetland, ultimately
removing the source of hydrology, and Wetland Y would cease to be a wetland. Since the long term viability of Wetland Y
could not be sustained in the post -development condition, and the project requires 344 lots to be feasible, it was determined
that the functional value of Wetland Y would be better served in a regionally significant mitigation bank and should be
impacted for construction of Lots 393 & 394. The construction of Lots 435 & 436 will result in 0.033 acres of permanent
wetland impacts (Impact 8) for lot fill and backslopes to return lot fill to natural grade. A retaining wall was not feasible due to
construction and future maintenance of the adjacent greenway bridge over the wetlands.
Road crossings for Milano Avenue and Road R001 have been designed to cross the stream and wetlands as close to
perpendicular as possible. Additionally, the alignment of road R011 was constrained by the designated location for the
connection to Richardson Road, which must align with the approved alignment for McCrory Way within the future McKenzie
Ridge development to the west.
Impacts from greenway trails have been minimized to only 0.005 acres of permanent wetland impacts (Impact 9). Previous
designs for the greenway proposed permanent impacts for all wetland and stream crossings, which would have resulted in
±0.2 acres of permanent wetland impacts and 47 If of permanent stream impacts. The greenway design was revised to move
the greenway out of the wetlands where possible and utilize elevated pedestrian boardwalks/bridges to avoid impacts at
wetland and stream crossings. The only proposed permanent wetland impact for construction of the greenway will occur at
Impact 9 (0.005 acres). Due to the topography in this area, even if the greenway crossing would have been proposed to be
bridged crossing, the backslopes from the fill for Lot 264 would have extended into the wetlands. Even if an elevated
boardwalk was proposed to cross the wetlands, there would still be permanent wetland impacts from fill for Lot 264.
The rip -rap dissipater below the culverts under Milano Avenue has been designed such that the rip -rap will be installed so that
the top of the rip -rap matches the pre -construction elevation of the stream bed. This design allows for the section of stream to
be stabilized with rip -rap to continue functioning as a natural stream by maintaining natural water depths and allowing for
passage of aquatic life, and therefore there will not be a loss of function.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Pedestrian bridges and elevated boardwalks will be utilized to minimize impacts to streams and wetlands for the greenway
trail. Retaining walls have been utilize to stabilize lot fill to minimize wetland impacts from lot construction. Silt fencing will be
installed around all disturbed areas to prevent sediment from escaping into adjacent wetlands and waters during construction.
Access during construction will be from high ground.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
® Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 8of13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
380 linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
® warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0.966 acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b.
If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h.
Comments:
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Diffuse flow is not required as the stormwater management systems
consists of bio -retention, stormwater wetlands and wet pond SCMs which provide
® Yes ❑ No
nitrogen removal and discharge at non-erosive flow. The diffuse flow requirements
will be reviewed and approved by the Town of Apex during the review and approval
of the Stormwater Management Plan.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
37.4%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The stormwater management plan consists of a mixture of wet ponds, bio -retention and stormwater wetlands. The
Stormwater Management Plan will be reviewed and approved by the Town of Apex as the certified local government.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Apex
® Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed project is a single and complete project, with no future phases currently proposed. Additionally, the project
is located within a portion of Apex that is actively being developed. Therefore, this specific project is not considered a
catalyst for future development that would impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Town of Apex Beaver Creek Gravity Sewer, with ultimate conveyance to the Western Wake Regional Water Reclamation
Facility.
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
WR reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at http://www.ncnhp.org/web/nhp/home to identify if
there were any known occurrences of endangered species on or near the proposed project. The review of the NHP data
did not identify any occurrences of federally listed threatened or endangered species or critical habitat on the subject
property or within 1.0 miles of the project, see attached NCNHP project review letter. Additionally, pedestrian surveys
were conducted for potential habitat for federally listed threatened and endangered species known to occur within Wake
County. The pedestrian surveys did not identify the presence of any federally listed threatened or endangered species
within the project boundaries. However, there is potential habitat for the Northern Long Eared Bat, and the absence of
bats could not be confirmed.
Potential habitat for the northern Long-eared bat (NLEB) is listed as mature forest with trees over 3" dbh, which is used
for roosting during the day. The proposed project area contains forested areas with trees over 3" DBH, and therefore is
considered potential northern long eared bat habitat. The USFWS Final 4(d) rule for the Northern Long -Eared bat
specifies that tree removal within the White Nose Syndrome (WNS) Zone is not prohibited as long as it occurs more than
0.25 miles from known hibernacula and does not result in destroying known occupied maternity roost trees, or any other
trees within a 150 ft -radius from the maternity tree, during the pup season (June 1 — July 31). The proposed project is not
located within 0.25 miles of any known hibernacula, nor is there any known maternity roost trees present on the project.
Additionally, clearing of mature forest between June 1St and July 31St is not anticipated for construction of the proposed
project. Therefore, WR concludes that the project "may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect" the northern long-
eared bat.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters classified as EFH in Wake County.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
WR coordinated with SHPO for a review of the proposed project. In a letter dated 05/19/16, SHPO stated that there are
no historic resources that would be affected by development of the proposed project, and they have no comment on the
project. A copy of the SHPO letter has been provided as an Appendix.
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
70 Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaps.com
Troy Beasley — WithersRavenel
/
Authorized Agent
03/01/17
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

W WETLAND & STREAM I /
Z SHEET G
0
� U Q
TEMPORARY PERMANENT
a Z aLL
c' w STREAM WETLANDS STREAM WETLANDS IMPACT 1 4
(LF) (SF) (AC) (LF) (SF) (AC) JENKS, RICHARD J 0;1 _\
& JENKS, MONNIE O
1 ROAD GRADING - - - 9,566 0.220 MREC KLP STILLWATER LLC �+ o DB 1626 P6 369
A DEM 12676 PPG 5277 RDSON ROAD PIN °72„60189
GRADING FOR _ R�CHA
2 RETAINING WALL - 564 0.013 PIN 0721142748 I 1145)
S R• — — UNITED STATES C AMERICA
3 SEWER CROSSING q2 RO\N1 _ -- DB 1932 78 120
�rvlC 1`t`j 60 __ / PIN D7„7870,5
B
4 SEWER CROSSING - 1.191 0.027JENKS, - - - RICH J
_ & JENKS, MO IE 0
5 ROAD GRADING - - - - 1,839 DB 1626 PG 69
o.oaz PIN 072116 89 / ......:
....
C 6 ROAD CROSSING - - - 190 •: ::
7 RIP RAP - - - 10 - -
MREC KLP STILLW �. N
D 8 LOT GRADING - - - - 1,450 0.033 I DB 75970 PG
BM 2015 PG 527
O
9
GREENWAY PIN 0721135707 j/ a
CROSSING - - 208 0.005 I 0
E 10 SEWER CROSSING - 532 0.012
17 SEWER CROSSING 36 - - - - - ' SHEET F
8
GRADING FOR 14
11 - 1,293 0.030 - - - D
RETAINING WALL SCM#3 I IMPACTS 11,12, 13
BIORETION
E 12 ROAD GRADING - - - - 2,925 0.067
::.:-- • •••••
13 SEWER CROSSING - 1,158 0.027
G 14 SEWER CROSSING - 692 0.016
RUBIN, WILLIAM SCM 5
FI 15 LOT GRADING - - - - 2,487 0.057 'IN 0721236464 / / /\ ` WETNb I R NDE
16 ROAD GRADING - - - - 2,001 0.046 I OF SHEET H _
TOTAL 78 4667 ,112 366 21640 6.463 IMPACT 15,16 \
` UNITEDB STATES1932
-- / PIN 0711
I OSP
WETLAND & STREAM
IMPACT LEGEND CO
PERMANENT
21 WETLANDS - GREEN �G9LF SHEET E CM#6
A IMPACT 9,10, 17 / WETLAND
® TEMPORARY
WETLANDS - PURPLE IN, CLARENCE KENT HEIRS #z `
DB 1810 PG 192
BM 2014 PG 1021 /
FFl
PIN 0721322964 POND
PERMANENT
STREAM -RED:..c.—L
TEMPORARY �� /�� :: •,. ;::,_/� �' t`
STREAM - BLUE
of
—_ WE7 POND V�\• �� /
SHEET A
zs� V —
IMPACTS 1, 2 SHEET BSHEET C
�, TRUST COMPANY, et SHEET D
IMPACTS 3 4 J °8'5999 PG 557 IMPACTS 5 6 7 IMPACT 8
BM 2000 PG 02192
ATWATER, BM 2014 PG 1415 > >
RICHARCCURTIS W. et al LECTOR PIN 0724441629
ESTATETEFID ILE 99–E-1535
GRAPHIC SCALE DB 3618 PG 442 MARIE R WALDEN, CHARLES E. et al
'•^ 7984 DB PG 1690 1758 TATE FILE 14–E-2698
30214 PG 143 I ESDB 10538 PG 793 ¢NEAR CAROLINAS LLC WALDEN, CHARLES E. et oI
300 0 150 300 600 PIN BM 2000 PG 2192 / DB 15625 PG 702 ESTATE FILE 14–E-2698 /
07274325b6LLAND, UVA LE PIN 0721442048 // PIN 0121450183 TOWN OF APEX DB 70538 PG 817
RICHARDSON \ DB 13689 PG 1283 I PIN 0721474087
ESTATE FILE / BM 2°09 PG 930
!Ib C0—E-2295 / / PIN 0721451759
1 Inch = 300 Ft. I I N 10 2,431 iia \ L
No. Revision Date BV IjIr)_j__ Scale
1 IMPACTREVISION 301/17 SJY I WR 1”=300 WETLAND & STREAM 40 Wit ersRavene
Sheet No.
Drawn By SJY Date '4/2017 B U C K H O R N PRESERVE 1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors \ /C'
Checked By ,ob No. IMPACT —SHEET WS 115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511 V V J
02160203 APEX WAKE NORTH CAROLINA t: 919.469.33401 license #:C-08321 www.withersravenel.com

194
\ \ \ \
� RETAINING WALL 12
WITH SAFETY RAIL
193
5Co
216
190
188/
19
IMPACT#1 i
/ / / / / / (PERMANENT)
ROADWAY GRADING /
0.220 AC.
---
AAL))
�—/213\ \---
14 \
GRAPHIC SCALE
so 0 25 50 100
ING ALL 11
\ X�
AFETY RAIL / ,/ \ 31 \ \ 1 inch = 50 ft.
RETAINING—
/- WITH SAFETY RAIL'
`
-
-—
W X.1. 71
r • \W— W W W I W W I W W / W W T W W W W- W
RETAINING WALL 16 °
WITH SAFETY RAIL — _ L� �� \—
12\ 125 V A WETLAND -
IMPACT — 0
S
_=.__sir t_ SS
_ \ (PERMANENT)
SS
W / / ____ l — — — �� / GRADING FOR RETAINING
8" W_ •';, __ i T \ 0.013 AC. \ \
'' -- — - \
�cl���-Vu— - a w�.c:c $', W 8" W—
% :r ��� �� - - — — _ — — — \ ` S e 300—
CO
00—CO ss ss
CIO
107 I \� 08 _ — \ �' //\ 6" VV -$„W ----
�\ \ \109 110
114
I I 15
o \
\/116\
11
120 —1—@ 122 \
No. Revision Date B Designer WR Scale l"=50'
WETLAND & STREAM 40 Wit ersRavene sheer�o.
Drawn By 5/V Date 1/4,2017 B U C K H O R N PRESERVE 1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors A
Checked BIMPACT SHEET E ET A y I°b N°. - 115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
02150265 APEX WAKE NORTH CAROLINA t: 919.469.33401 license #:C -08321w .withersravenel.com

JVVET ROND
BA
OND BOT -C 42
- 145—'146
GRAPHIC SCALE
AAL)
so 0 25 50 100
1 inch= 50 ft.
— —f PROPOSED 40' \
-- — — — — �_ 29 RIP-RAP DISSIFATOR _ — / TOA SANITARY , / y -� � N
—_— �'� La=28', W1 = 10.5', W2=32.9' _ _ 'SEWER EASEMENT \ .00e
— y USE 22" CLASS "'I" (tl50=13") - � / / L/ /�
OVER GEOTEXTILE FABRIC_
\ \\ r Ir W� W W W—\�\\\ \ �$ — — ,�✓�-----
IMPACT #4
— — — - —� — \ ON — (TEMPORARY) / // t SS // 1 / / �\ \ \ \ �\ —
SEWER CROSSING
; �� �\\ — — — ' \ F� Y 0.027 AC. / / / �� .0/0---/
47-
JG — o\� o \
oe
ND-
717
RIP-RAP DISSIPATOR \ \ _� ' / /
y/TOPOJBAN
_J] �RETAII
La=21', W1 = 10.5', W2=27.3'
WITH
USE 22" CLASS "B" (60=6")I r-
\ OVER GEOTEXTILE FABRIClo
\ \� //
kv
c
Ix -V
- _ izerrE�L
IMPACT#3 �\\ __J /� ------------� �pNE
\ — (TEMPORARY) _ _ _ _ _ — ���
—\ \ \ J - —��/� — ---
- #1 \ / I � \ � SEWER CROSSING 'T�� _ I// / � — — —� — — — — —
t42 LF. / / ( / —
123 \ / 1 11�ET P@ND 1 � I' /\ \ \ � // / % � _ — —�— — — —
1 \\ POND OTTdM:260.0--
--Imo,
/// (ZONE 3 )
PROPOSED 40'
— — — TOA SANITARY—
SEWER EASEMENT / / / / // / / / / �/ i / — —
/ / 50' JORDAN LAKE -—
/ STREAM BUFFER
RETAINING WALL 44 i I / R(gPC/RTY BPJIN / / / / / — // / / / i 'i — — ` _
WITH SAFETY RAIL / / / // / / / �
_PROPERTYBat►NDAR�
No. Revision Date OV Designer Scale
WETLAND & STREAM �0 WithersRavene
WR 1" = 50' sneer"o.
Drawn By Date BUCKHORN PRESERVE rail Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
B
sw uaizov B y
Checked By ]ob No. IMPACT - S H E ET B 115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
02160203 APEX WAKE NORTH CAROLINA t:919.469.33401 license#:C-08321 www.withersravenel.com

RETAINING WALL 0 0
11 275
IfArill
2752,9
` PROPOSED 40'
TOA SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT ——_ — —
270 ` -- --------- ---� \ PROPOSED 30'
TOA SANITARY
SEWER EASEMENT
275
— gS SS — — = SS — — — \
265 265
IMPACT #5
\ (PERMANENT)
ROAD GRADING
— 0.042 AC. RIP -RAP DISSIPATOR
La=9.5', W1 = 9.0', W2=23.0'
260 260 — — — `� / /w USE 18" CLASS "1" (60=11")
( n \
OVER GEOTEXTILE FABRIC w w w w w \ \
ti � L!) LOV °y
N N N C4 —/ �� �� 140.46 LF - 54" RCP @ 1.71 % �" • — w w
1 !� w w w w
I RETAINING WALL 17 \ �:\A \ /<'OR O �`� w w \ ��
-0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 \ WITH SAFETY RAIL \ \ "�� w
w—
RETAINING WALL D \�.,.{�>-4.�6s��'
275
UUP STREAM 275 \\ _ ♦\ ♦ `�\rp,,:,�,�a�:,.. —
1 1 \ w
\ \ _J \ _ — — — SCOUR HOLE
W ry
J _j SCOUR
140.90 LF - 54" RCP @ 0.53% ` — _ �, _ —
\ — _ ♦_ _ �. IMPACT # 7
—i — — 1 \ ?, ♦—� I — (PERMANENT)
�� \ �— �- IMPACT # 6 — RIP RAP DISSIPATOR
270 270=/ _ — — �� — (PERMANENT) — _ 10 LF.
ROAD CROSSING — _ RETAINING WALL 18 \ \ B U F
JZ " \----275 190 LF. — — WITH SAFETY RAIL
El ISTIN G DE �- �� \ — \ — — �� _ ` \ \ \ ^ _\ — — — — — U F
265 1 11 12651— �---� tae—� / — — — — — —
_
260 260 — \ \ \ \ ,� \ ♦ 11 I - — \
"It co 00
cocl� Ci
N N N
-0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50
PROPOSED PLUNGE POOL DETAIL RIP RAP APRON DETAIL
GRADE M5
REETA N LL WALL NrS TOP 00 BANu
E7 ISTING RIP RAP APRON I / \ / ` GRAPHIC SCALE
/I �- / 50 0 25 50 100
PIPE GRADE sEEOETAILo PROPERTY BOUNDARY ` � 7`
TOP 00 RIP RAP TO MATCD
RIP RAP RIP RAP DISSIPATOR PADS SD ALL BE RIP RAP
PRENSTRUCTION / / / �� / \/ / / 1 inch - 50 Ft.
INSTALLED AT OR BELOW EO ISTING GRADED STRE-COAM CONTOUR
No. Revision Date B Designer WR Scale I"=50'
WETLAND &STREAM ;!Wit ersRavene shee�""
Drawn By 5w Date LV4/2017BUCKHORN PRESERVE Engineers I Planners I Surveyors C
Checked By l°b No. IMPACT — SHEET C 115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
02160203 APE)( WAKE NORTH CAROLINA t: 919.469.33401 license#:C-08321 www.withersravenel.com

100 FLOOD PER
100 YEAR FLOOD WR STUDY
PER WR STUDY
GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 25 50 100
1 inch= 50 Ft.
a a a a a a a a a a a PROPERTY
a a a a a a a BOUNDARY
Uj
Z
20' PUBLIC
(� 1 IMPACT # 8 GREENWAY
(PERMANENT) EASEMENT
\ PROPOSED ELEVATED LOT GRADING
a � a a � � a a � �♦ a a � a a a � Q
\ ` GREENWAY BRIDGE . . 0.033 AC. ` a la o
\ \ (NO IMPACT) a a a a a/ _ ♦ a a > a
` 80 LF. a a a �a /t — ♦ a a a I a }
aw
49
.01
a a a a a/ / ♦ ♦ al
1% CHANCE FLOODLINE
/ Is
i a / (ZONE AE)
10'ASPHALT
/ D \ GREENWAY
\ \ 434 435 I ,�
432 \\ I 436
\ \ 1% CHANCE FLOODLINE
\ \ 37 (ZONE X)
No. Revision Date B Designer WR Scale l„-50'
WETLAND & STREAM 40 Wit ersRavene no.
Drawn By SIY Date 1,4,2017 BUCKHORN PRESERVE 1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors D
Checked By Job No.115 MacKenao Drive I Cary, NC 27511
IMPACT - SHEET D
02160203 APEX WAKE NORTH CAROLINA t: 919.469.33401 license #:C-08321 www.withersravenel.com J1

/ 268 \ \ $„ w
I / / PROPOSED 30'
TOA SANITARY
267 ) _ _ SEWER EASEMENT — — / \ GRAPHIC SCALE
IMPACT # 10 \ \ \ 50 0 25 50 100
(TEMPORARY)
266 I 65 SEWER CROSSING
0.012 AC. _ � / / 1 inch = 50 ft.
IMPACT #9
(PERMANENT)
GREENWAY GRADING /
0.005 AC.'\
270
.01
�/ / / / I ' �b�/ ww w♦w/ / —�\� w �wlw
w w � w w / \ / SS \ w o w w 1% CHANCE FLC
7 / \ / \ \ 8w N w w w/w w w I w w w w w w w w w l (ZONE AE)
� / T O F F w w w w y! '1
— / 4- 20' PUBLIC OF
GREENWAYS ) �' w w , TOP BAN \
W
/ EASEMENT
_
21 w w w \ 000 %
\ / 10' ASPHALT \ ON /
GREENWAY B U F F�R I{--\��� —Oe/
.z 4 I 'N
PROPOSED
\ \ N �X—1 ` �r• Q�' /y w w w w w / ��I \ \ \�w/ w
PROPOSED 30' / J / • — V /
o TOA SANITARY �'�� w V
_� / " / / �� FUTURE 1% CHANCE ` w w
\SEWER EASEMENT // w I w w ti0� FLOODLINE (ZONE X) I w w w
l PROPOSED 40' \ 41 \ y J '� ;i - " w
/ TOA SANITARY \ \/ c \ w w w w w ti I + BU
SEWER EASEMENT
/L _ w w PROPOSED ELEVATED w
GREENWAY BRIDGE / /w \ eO
(NO IMPACT)
000l
60 LF.
IMPACT #17
(TEMPORARY)
SEWER CROSSING
36 LF. RI
01
CONSTRUCT
M #6 l
i/I/01/
//// //'' \ ` ' � �` � ♦` / � WET�ANDED
I
No. Revision Date —Bv
Designer Scale
1 IMPACTREVISION 301/17 SJY wR 1"=5°' WETLAND & STREAM �0 Wit ersRavene
Sheet No.
Drawn By SJY Date L4/2ov B U C K H O R N PRESERVE �� Engineers I Planners I Surveyors C
Checked By l°b N°.IMPACT - SHEET E 115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511 C
02160203 APEX WAKE NORTH CAROLINA t: 919.469.33401 license #:C-08321w .withersravenel.com

I�XC.-00 v
mem
I �— 1 \ ♦ /
8 ♦ I Im j� \ SCM#4
/ I I I ��♦ �� I I� V DNSTRUCTE ♦♦
/ I I I / I I �♦ I 1 \ ETLAND
I 45 / � � ♦/ �� \
\ ♦♦
' I I/ � �►
/001/ / / / i 1 ` 344 `�` 1`� 11 MATCH LINE \► \ ` 1
lO 1 SEE SHEET G
FOR MPACT AREAS \ \ I \
PROPOSED ELEVATED /
GREENWAY BRIDGE /
(NO IMPACT)
W
48 LF. W W
RETAINING WALL 19 RETAINING WALL 20
WITH SAFETY RAIL WITH SAFETY RAIL
IMPACT # 11 / / ' \ r s W IMPACT # 13
(TEMPORARY)
I (TEMPORARY)
GRADING FOR RETAINING WALL W SEWER CROSSING
77.04 LF 60RCP @ 5.19% ,.I y I 0.027 AC.0.030 AC.
W
W /
/
/ / � 1 / 0 0 0 0 0- ,i Il i � ` 1 1II I �1 � N {•� i 1 A.I � W�- W w W / W W
I� // / / / / W Wj 'o..,�. I i ll�rir"1►�lr�'► �,�� _►'I W W
RIP-RAP DISSIPATOR /
R-'
i La=6.5', W1 = 5.0', W2=19.0'
USE 12
I W /
I I W
/► ° CLASS °B° (a5o=8") I ► I
1 IOVERGEOTEXTILEFABRIC
/ J
0_00 0 00 OD � •../ I � I / / W oQl
IMPACT # 12 �
vv W W r. w W W W W W W w
(PERMANENT) _ _ I I I/
O
ROAD GRADING I I / m / /
0.067 AC.
Q0
PROPOSED 30' I I SCM
TOA SANITARY NSTR ED
E
SEWEREASEMNT /
� I I WETL D � I RIP-RAP DISSIPATOR /
/ I 1 42 La=15.9', W1 =13', W2=44.7' /
1% CHANCE FLOODLINE USE 22" CLASS "B" (60=6") /
(ZONE AE) OVER GEOTEXTILE FABRIC —
1\
339 340
1 1 I I I 341 I // \ \ / 1 1 %CHANCE FLOODLINE /
(ZONE X) /
I /
GRAPHIC SCALE
\ so 0 25 50 100
1 M..E �i / _ . Pn� SAN1DPRcNi / \ / > 1 inch = 50 Ft.
No. Revision Date By Illn—i—, WR Scale l"=50'
BUCKHORN PRESERVE WETLAND &STREAM ;!Wit ersRavene "eP1NO
Drawn By StY Date 1/4/2017 Engineers Planners I Surveyors F
Checked By 1°b N0.IMPACT — SHEET F 115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
02160203 APEX WAKE NORTH CAROLINA t: 919.469.33401 license #:C-08321 www.withersravenel.com

i
\ 1% CHANCE FLOODLINE
\ (ZONE AE)
s a a a
/\ \ a a a a
\\ \ a a a a a a
\ \\ \ \ \
I � � IMPACT#14
FUTURE 1%\ (TEMPORARY)
CHANCE SEWER CROSS
ING
\ FLOODLINE (ZONE X) / 0.016 AC. O
\ \ \ \ Cv
\ \ \ \ \ •, \ � � � � a > j a a a � j a a > a
0100.
215
��
I,
Q
W �
PROPOSED 3' J w Q
TOA SANITARY W ~
S EASEMENT ¢ v=i
W
W —
L, 0
\i
I
O ♦ /
0000,
♦000
O /
— — — \ E PROPOSED 30' / /
\ \\ \\ I \ I \ \ I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ TOA SANITARY / 5 /
/
SSEWER EASEMENT /
255 � / 34;
lool
GRAPHIC SCALE �— �— —----- --- �' '�
50 0 25 50 100—
Cb / 4
1 inch= 50 ft.
No. Revision Date 1 By Designer WR Scale V 50'
WETLAND &STREAM 40 Wit ersRavene snee.no.
Drawn By SJV Date 1/4/2017 BUCKHORN PRESERVE 1/ Engineers I Planners I Surveyors G
Checked By lob No. IMPACT — SHEET G 115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511
02160203 APEX WAKE NORTH CAROLINA t: 919.469.33401 license #:C-08321 www.withersravenel.com

\ ` 325
\ lAAL)
1 \ 1 322—
/-
9
MI.
SS f M, GRAPHIC SCALE
50 0 2S 50 100
��
' 1inch 50 ft.
�\
C0 I I
110
to00
380 39509
09 382 I - _`
— IMPACT#15
/ 79 / — — (PERMANENT)
IMPACT # 16 I LOT GRADING
(PERMANENT) 0.057 AC.
ROAD GRADING —
\ 1 0.046 AC. _
78 I I —
i — -----� — I /
—
f383 y — -----
, \ 399 -- — —— I 4
---------- -
\ 377 — — — _ I \\ \-- � r iii I �•�–�-._ _.__ _ — I'---_— --
_ \ 393
€° –
\ \ \ \
384 \, \ I —
\ \ \ I \_ � --- 407 --
��\ �\\\\ \ � �\ \ 1 — —_-- —
1 \ \ \ \ 1 \ 1 \ r_ 1 ---
75 -
\ \ \ \ I I 92
-
\ —
_ _ I KC0I _ -
374 I \
� --\\\ \\ \\ � r \ \ \ \ \ \ �� f�40 � \\ \y� \ /— 406 — —
386
373C0
405 \
39
No. Revision I Date I B Designer WR Scale l"=50'
BUCKHORN PRESERVE WETLAND & STREAM ;!Wit ersRavene sheero.
Drawn By StY Date 1/4/2017 Engineers Planners I Surveyors LJ
Checked By lob No. IMPACT — SHEET H 115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 27511 H
02160203 APE)( WAKE NORTH CAROLINA t: 919.469.33401 license#:C-08321 www.withersravenel.com