20170259 Ver 1_401 Application_20170303

�`� ECOLOGICAL
ENGINEERING
March 1, 2017
NC Division of Water Resources
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Attn: Karen Higgins
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1650
1151 SE Cary Parkway, Suite 101
Cary, North Carolina 27518
Re: Request for Sedion 401 Approval & Buffer Authorization
White Oak Creek Greenway Projed - Wake County, North Carolina
TIP U-55301B, NCDWR Project ID NBRRO# 14-485
Ms. Higgins,
[phone]
www. ecologicaleng. com
Ecological Engineering, LLP (Ecological Engineering), on behalf of Stewart, Inc. and the Town of Cary,
respectfully requests project approval per Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, as amended, for impacts
associated with the White Oak Creek Greenway project. In accordance with environmental permitting
requirements, we have attached five copies of each of the following documents to assist in your review:
• Completed Pre-Construction Notification
• Permit drawings denoting impacts tojurisdictional and buffer resources
• NCDWR buffer determination letter
• USFWS concurrence letter
• NC SHPO environmental review letter
• Signed PCE document
• Agent Authorization Form
The previously submitted and reviewed Stream Origin/Buffer Applicability Determination is not included
in this submittal, but is available upon request. Wetlands in the amount of 0.07 acre will be permanently
impacted by the project, and the placement of timber mats for construction access will result in an
additional temporary impact to 0.19 acre of wetlands. Buffer impacts in the amount of 7,106 SF of Zone
1 and 3,997 SF of Zone 2 will result from project implementation. These impacts are addressed on the
PCN form. No impacts are proposed to streams or open waters. Please find the review fee enclosed.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this submittal, please do not hesitate to contact me at
919.557.0929 or via email at [e-mail].
Respectfully submitted,
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, LLP
���
David Cooper
Project Scientist
cc: Sareh Alexander, Town of Cary; Victor Lebsock, Stewart
Ecological Engineering, lLP Project No. 10502-095 Page 1 of 1

��FW�TF9
0
> �
o -c
Office Use Only:
Corps adion ID no.
DWQ project no.
Fortn Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre-Construction Notification CN Form
A. A licant Information
1. Prceessing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought � Section 404 Pertnit ❑ Section 10 Permit
fran the Corps:
1b. Specify Natiornvide Pertnit (NWP) number: 14 or Generel Permit (GP) number.
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
� 401 Water Quality Cert�cation — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional Generel Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Cert�cation — E�ress � Riparian BufferAuthorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for For the record only for For the record only for Corps Permit:
the record because written DWQ 401 CertiFication:
approval is not required?
❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No
1f. Is payment into a mdigation bank or in-lieu fee program
proposed for mdigation of impacts? If so, attach the � Yes � No
acceptance letter from mdigation bank or in-lieu fee
program.
1 g. Is the project bcated in any of NC's twenty coastal ❑ Yes � No
counties. if yes, answer 1 h below.
1h. Is the project bcated within a NC DCM Area of � Yes � No
Environmental Concern (AEC)?
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: White Oak Creek Greernvay— Green Level Church Road to American Tobacco Trail
2b. County: Wake
2c. Nearestmunicipality/town: Apex
2d. Subdivision name: Project includes a portion of Beckwith at Green Level Crossing
2e. NCDOT onry, T.I.P. or state U-5530 IB
project no:
n���� V �
W Ma� o � Zon
Page 1 of 13 PCN Fortn — Version 1.4 January 2009

3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded
Deed:
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC
if applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Greenway crosses multiple private parcels, public parcels, and public rights-of-way.
Easements obtained. Please refer to list of parcels in table below.
n, Mnaiou s s�nnH. nnie� c
i.4AlFY C XOVREN. Ha�{Y 5
xc n �v �m rrnav
IpWNOi
LOWN04
NG�ONAOVISO0.5llG
iCIL T18ENT MtIPXAY Xfl9$
IpL, PEGGY 5
rawrv ut
c.�s,
i uc vsc>_ a�n
IOM i5]
� HC 2)502 O<5)
GIZflPUPHNO
SHAM PA 19W4-I3] 1
iOx 8005
V NC 215128005
�OM 800.5
V NC ]]93�8�05
i]6iS.)>5: - ----'�"-"
i pE9KiA A YNMCf IX[C
SGflEEN1EVfLWfSTMO N�NElI5lf0
%NCUSi3��5Q3
�1GqEENIEVfIWESfPp �6385/�B�
%NC 31513�]Slfi
tlOMHWf OtLtil9/W66�.
IV NC El5]]�l005
ni
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent � Other, specify: Municipality/Town of Cary
4b. Name: Sarah Alexander, RLA, LEED AP; Town of Cary Facilities Design 8 Transportation Services
4c. Business name (if Town of Cary
applicable):
4d Street address: 316 N. Academy Street
4e. City, state, zip: Cary, NC 27513
4f. Telephone no.: [phone]
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address: [e-mail]
5. AgenUConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: David Cooper
Sb. Business name (if Ecological Engineering, LLP
applicable):
5c. Street address: 1151 SE Cary Parkway, Suite 101
5d. City. state, zip: Cary, NC 27518
Se. Telephone no.: [phone]
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 13 PCN Form — Version �.4 January 2009

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax Multiple; please see response to Section A, question 3.
PIN or parcel ID):
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal Latitude: 35.776024 Longitude: -78.911610
degrees):
1c. Property size: Study area = approximately 7.44 acres across multiple parcels
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water White Oak Creek
to proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of White Oak Creek: WS-IV; NSW
nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin: Cape Fear (Jordan)
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The proposed multi-use trail, located in the Town of Apex in western Wake County, consists of approximately 1.8 miles of
asphalt, boardwalk, and concrete greenway trail. The trail will connect to an existing trail section east of Green Level Church
Road, and will progress west to connect to the American Tobacco Trail. Existing conditions in the project vicinity include
forested floodplain, sewer easements, and recent/ongoing residential development projects. Surrounding land use is primarily
residential and forest. Easements have been acquired for the length of the project.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing 2.90 acres within project study area (includes portions of both JD
wetlands on the property: areas)
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Within the study area
Perennial stream 103 linear feet
Intermittent stream 31 linear feet
' Total stream 134 linear feet
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The greenway will add to the existing western Wake County trail network. This trail section will serve as a vital connection between
two existing trail sections. The completion of this greenway project will support bicycle and pedestrian travel between residential and
recreational centers creating a well-rounded integrated transportation system.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Town of Cary proposes to construct an approximately 1.8-mile greenway along the White Oak Creek corridor which will connect
existing greenway at Green Level Church Road with the American Tobacco Trail. The trail will consist primarily of asphalt and
boardwalk, with a small section of concrete trail where necessary under the existing Green Level Church Road bridge over White Oak
Creek. The greenway will begin at the American Tobacco Trail as a 10-foot wide asphalt trail, and will progress west within Town
property, right-of-way, and easements. Seven boardwalks will be utilized over four tributary streams and several wetlands.
The location of the proposed trail avoids and minimizes impacts to jurisdictional resources to the maximum extent practicable. Where
feasible, boardwalk will be used to further avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional resources. The contractor selected for the
project will determine the equipment used on the project. Trail contractors generally use small paving machines and earth moving
equipment which results in smaller impacts to the project area than traditional highway construction equipment. Boardwalks will be
constructed utilizing a"top down" approach to avoid disturbance to the wetland ground surface during construction. Timber mats will
be utilized where temporary access roads are necessary within jurisdictional areas to minimize disturbance. Nationwide Permit 14
General Conditions will be included in the construction documents to direct contractor operations in and around wetlands.
Page 3 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
� Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: The project area contains portions of two separate USACE approval areas;
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or An existing JD, Action ID 2016-02142, covers the project area south and west of
stream determinations by the 35.768785/-78.916859. The project area north and east of this point was delineated by
Corps or State been requested
or obtained for this property / the Agent/Consultant and a request for Preliminary JD was submitted. The delineation
project (including all prior Was field verified by Ms: Tasha Alexander, and the project was assigned Action ID
phases) in the past?
2015-00043. In the vicinity of the proposed greenway trail, wetland and stream
determinations reflect the results of these two determinations.
4b. If the Corps made the � Preliminary � Final
jurisdictional determination, Comment.� The Agent/Consultant assumes a Final JD was made forAction ID 2016-
what type of determination was 02942. A Prelimina JD was re uested forAction ID 2095-00043.
made? ry q
Agency/Consultant Company for 2015-00043:
4c. If yes, who delineated the Ecological Engineering, LLP
jurisdictional areas? 1151 SE Cary Parkway, Suite 101
Name (if known): David Cooper Cary, NC 27518
& Wyatt Brown, LSS
Unknown for Action ID 2016-02142.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
AID 2015-00043, north and east of 35.768785/-78.916859: A USACE Preliminary JD meeting was held on-site with Ms. Tasha
Alexander on December 8, 2016. To date, a determination letter has not been received for this project. A NCDWR buffer
determination meeting was held on-site with Mr. James Graham on January 8, 2015. The project was assigned NBRRO # 14-
485. A determination letter dated January 21, 2015 verified the features subject to buffers within the project area. It should be
noted that the letter contains a typo — the project is in the Cape Fear basin/Jordan Lake watershed, not the Neuse basin — but the
buffer subjectivity determinations remain unchanged.
AID 2016-02142, south and west of 35.768785/-78.916859: The Agent/Consultant does not have documentation of the
Corps jurisdictional determination dates for this AID, which was submitted by others for a development project.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications
been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior � Yes ❑ No � Unknown
phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, e�lain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
NOTE: it is assumed that other phases of this greenway trail have obtained permits; however, the Agent/Consultant was
not responsible for these submittals and does not have this information.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? � Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The proposed greenway segment connects existing greenway trail (previous pha'se) located east of Green Level Church
Road with the American Tobacco Trail.
Page 4 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
� Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries � Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact number Type of jurisdiction Area of
Permanent (P) or Temporary (T) Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Corps —(404, 10) impact (acres)
DWQ — (401, other)
W1 � P❑ T Proposed Greenway Trail Bottomland � Yes � Corps <0.01
Hardwood ❑ No ❑ DWQ
Bottomland � Yes � Corps
W2 � P � T Proposed Greenway Trail Hardwood ❑ No ❑ p�VQ 0.01
W3 � P❑ T Proposed Greenway Trail Bottomland � Yes � Corps <0.01
Hardwood ❑ No ❑ DWQ
Herbaceous (sewer
W4 � P❑ T Proposed Greenway Trail line) & Bottomland � Yes � Corps 0.05
Hardwood — partially � No ❑ DWQ
forested
W5 ❑ P� T Proposed Timber Mat Herbaceous (sewer ❑ Yes � Corps 0.19
line) � No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total Wetland Impacts 0.26
2h. Comments:
W1 = permit drawings site #2 (corresponds to AID 2015-00043 Pre-JD Wetland G/H)
W2 = permit drawings site #4 (corresponds to AID 2095-00043 Pre-JD Wetland D/E/�
W3 = permit drawings site #5 (corresponds to AID 2015-00043 Pre-JD Wetland D/E/�
W4 & W5 = permit drawings site #7(corresponds to AID 2015-00043 Pre-JD Wetland B/C/ZJ
Trail construction will be limited to upland areas to the extent practicable. Impacts to tributaries and wetlands will be avoided
and minimized by the construction of elevated boardwalk segments. A construction access haul road necessary to construct
boardwalks will utilize timber mats to avoid ground disturbance in wetlands. A small area of hand clearing of wetlands will be
re uired in order to construct these boardwalks.
Page 5 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 39•
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial or Type of Average Impact length
number- intermittent? jurisdiction stream width (linear feet)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T) �
S1 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
No stream impacts are proposed. Stream crossings will be boardwalk, which will completely span the channels
and adjacent side slopes in order to avoid impacts to jurisdictional streams.
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
— Permanent
(P) or
Tem ora T
01 ❑P❑T n/a
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T •
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: There are no Open Water impacts.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose of pond (acres)
number Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P 1 n/a
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: No pond or lake construction is proposed.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes � No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman � Other: Jordan
Pro ect is in which rotected basin?
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) Stream name mitigation impact (square feet)
or Temporary required? (square feet)
(T)
Elevated (AID 2016-02142) UT to White � Yes
B1 � P❑ T Boardwalk/Approach Oak Creek � No 2041 1052
Slab & Stabilization [STA 12+gg to 14+10]
Elevated (AID 2015-00043) UT to White � Yes
B2 � P❑ T Boardwalk/Approach Oak Creek/Stream G � No 1717 962
Slab [STA 36+40 to 37+54]
Elevated (AID 2015-00043) UT to White � Yes
B3 � P❑ T Boardwalk/Approach Oak Creek/Stream C � No 1403 1118
Slab [STA 74+g2 to 76+29]
Elevated (AID 2015-00043) UT to White � Yes
B4 � P❑ T Boardwalk/Concrete Oak Creek/ Stream I � No 1945 865
Trail [STA 100+76 to 102+65]
6h. Total buffer impacts 7106 3997
6i. Comments:
Greenway trails are an allowable use within buffer zones. No practical alternative exists which would accomplish the project
goal of constructing a greenway trail to connect nearby existing trail segments.
The following list correlates buffer impacts listed in the table. with the impact site label on the permit drawi
B1 = permit drawings site #1 (corresponds to JD forAlD 2096-02142 stream, unknown map ID)
B2 = permit drawings site #3 (corresponds to Pre-JD forA1D 2015-00043 Stream G)
B3 = permit drawings site #6 (corresponds to Pre-JD forAlD 2015-00043 Stream C)
64 = permit drawings site #8 (corresponds to Pre-JD forAlD 2015-00043 Stream I)
NOTE: Town of Apex riparian buffers located between 50' and 100' from the top of bank of perennial streams also exist within
the project area. Impacts to these municipal buffers are being coordinated by otherAgenbConsultants through the Town of
Apex.
Page 7 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The construction of the White Oak Creek greenway trail will result in no temporary or permanent stream impacts. Permanent
wetland impacts are 0.07 acre, and temporary wetland impacts necessary to construct the greenway are 0.19 acre. Buffer
impacts are perpendicular where possible. The following measures have been taken to avoid and minimize impacts to
jurisdictional waters:
Corridor Alignment — The horizontal corridor alignment was designed to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands, streams,
and buffers to the extent practicable.
Trail Design — Sections of trail which cross wetlands and tributaries will be constructed using elevated boardwalk to avoid
impacts to these waters.
Minimize Stream Crossings - A detailed analysis was perFormed at all proposed stream crossings to identify the best crossing
location. This analysis included locating narrow crossing locations and, where feasible, crossing perpendicular to the stream.
Boardwalks will be used to cross streams.
Minimize Grading — The trail has been designed, to the extent possible, to match existing grade in order to minimize the
amount of fill, reducing the overall project footprint, and thus the impacts to jurisdictional resources.
Minimize Clearing — Where feasible, the trail has been located within cleared sewer easements, minimizing tree clearing in
regulated buffer areas and jurisdictional waters.
Stormwater Treatment — All ditches have been designed to outlet as diffuse flow.
Erosion Control — Silt fence will be installed along fill slopes and upstream of all wetlands and streams. Tree protection fence
will be utilized to demarcate buffer zones in order to maximize protection of riparian areas during construction.
Buffer impacts are perpendicular where possible and primarily result from the necessity to construct boardwalk to avoid
wetland impacts. The only non-perpendicular buffer impact, at permit drawing Site 8, is the result of the inability to create
sharp angles in boardwalk trail segments due to the nature of the material used.
Impervious surface in the buffer, especially Zone 1, is minimized to the extent practicable. Boardwalk approach slabs are
required at permit drawing Sites 1, 3, and 6. At permit drawing Site 1, riprap stabilization is required to slow water velocity due
to the steep 7% slope and drainage area of ditches on either side of the trail through a stream buffer. At permit drawing Site 3,
a proposed drainage ditch was designed to collect overland flow from the greenway and offsite areas. A riprap dissipator pad
was placed at the end of the ditch to reduce velocity and ensure diffuse flow into the buffer. The ditch was designed to
discharge outside both zones of the riparian buffer. At permit drawing Site 8, impervious surface is required in Zone 1 due to
the inability to place a boardwalk structure under a NCDOT bridge, the narrow available project area, and flood modeling
concerns associated with the elevated boardwalk in a FEMA regulated floodway. For these reasons, concrete trail is shown
under and adjacent to the bridge and Green Level Church road ROW.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The contractor shall be responsible for minimizing impacts through construction techniques. The bid specifications will call
for, where possible, hand clearing, the use of construction mats and low impact machines in sensitive areas, and small paving
machines. Multiple construction entrances have been provided to minimize heavy equipment trip distances. Nationwide 14
General Conditions will be included in the construction specifications.
Page 8 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes � No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 9 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer iVlitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments: No mitigation required. Greenway impacts to riparian buffers are an allowable use within the Cape Fear River
basin in the Jordan Lake watershed (15A NCAC 02B.0267). No practical alternatives exist which would accomplish the
purpose of the project, and the design and construction avoids and minimizes impacts to the extent practicable.
Page 10 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Velocity of all runoff directed to riparian buffers will be lowered by NCDOT ❑ Yes � No
standard-sized rip rap velocity dissipator pads.
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 16.4% (impervious trail) within
study area
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
A Stormwater Management Plan is not applicable for this type of project.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? Town of Apex
� Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs � NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
� Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes � No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other: �
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ❑ Yes � No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 11 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter. )
Comments: NCDOT and FHWA have reviewed and approved a Programmatic � Yes ❑ No
Categorical Exclusion for this project. The project changed since the submittal of .
the original PCE document, and NCDOT determined that subsequent field
investigations for T/E species were sufficient to state that the original PCE did not
need revision in order to remain valid.
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
Construction of the proposed greenway trail is not anticipated to catalyze an increase in nearby development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Not applicable.
Page 12 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No
impacts?
� Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Ecological Engineering reviewed the USFWS list of federally protected species documented from Wake County and the
NC Natural Heritage Program database, conducted habitat evaluations, and surveyed for federally protected species for
which potentially suitable habitat was found within the study area. Conclusions were documented in the approved PCE
and submitted to the USFWS Raleigh Field Office. In a letter dated October 4, 2016, the USFWS concurred with "no
effect" determinations for all,species except the northern long-eared bat (NLEB), and noted that the NLEB is covered by
an existing agreement. The project is in compliance with the Endangered Species Act.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NOAA Fisheries Service Essential Fish Habitat Mapper website/database
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Stewart Engineering coordinated with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). In a letter dated 4/10/2015, the
SHPO indicated they have reviewed the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
The project has been coordinated through the Local Floodplain administrator and FEMA (via the NC Floodplain Mapping
Program). No-rise Certifications were submitted and subsequently approved on 10/31/16 and a Conditional Letter of map
Revision (CLOMR) was approved on 2/20/17 for two proposed greenway crossings and development impacting three
FEMA detailed study areas.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping Program
David Cooper ����
2/23/2017
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letterfrom the applicant Date
is provided.)
Page 13 of 13 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

BEGIN
:7
I�
"°`� �Y� END�
i �
BEGIN PROJE
_..�_ � � '�.c �
VICIVIT}' MAP
SITE 1 -1 '
/i\, �
r =so
50 25 0 50 100
�1���
PLANS
f;'::::::
�
GRAPHIC SCALES
,°=so
25 0 50
7�11���
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
TOWN OF CARY
NORTH CAROLINA
' WHITE OAK GREENWAY
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, PAVING, DRAINAGE, STRUCTURES,
EROSION CONTROL /
/
/
.
� ITE 4
J � SITE 3 �
�BOARDWALK #2
�
SITE
�_
#3
7
#4 •
DESIGN DATA
DESIGN SPEED = 20 MPH
20
' LEAN ANGLE = 20
FUNC CLASSIFICATION = GREENWAY
TIP # U-5530IB
INDEX OF SHEETS _ ___ ___
1 TITLE
2 TYPICAL SECTIONS
4- 10 PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 12
BUFFER, WETLAND AND SURFACE
WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
�AR 0 3 2017
tts
�� = W o
` -L- P T St . +4
-L2- P07 Sta.88+a0.00 w o
`� ' ��
` wU
.\?'.:'.: � �
8\F ���� � . . �U GREEN
LEVEL WES7 ROAD
\ e. �/ _ �
\
BOARDWALK #6�
SITE 7
�
w
w I
w/
�
i v w Y
h�TF
�BOARDWALK N7
SITE 8
\ O/
PROJECT LENGTH
LENGTH OF ASPHALT TRAIL =,82 MI
LENGTH OF CONCRETE TRAIL =.14 MI
LENGTH OF BOARDWALK = ,85 MI _ _
LENGTH OF PRO]ECT = 1.81 MI
�
�
_
f.
�W
�
�w
Q6r�n'"
UW>n
LLOfy'
0�02
2=U>
;�au
fwu
z-
u�
z
W
/� i���
�,� ��:,
�� ������'
� �;
� , � r,
�::2 =�i��
}
Q>
>
z
W
U..�
�
�
O
W
�-
�
_>
>
�znY
_i
Ea p~; �
Q ���
13
�
_�
F4 � ���.�EER
RO]EQ NO.:
H 14012.00
vr
1

'�k xxxxx ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 // �� `� "�
N /
P /
�i /
���A A A A A A
�������� ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 0
�� '� � �� / �l//d
�l �� %" ,",� ',", �'�' �
� i�
; , i i :, i I, I � �� �/ / � �i�, , i ���
�I� II i iI Iil �/,/i�''. ',% � �__-
, I i i � ��� � / �/ az—
�,�i� � � �' � . ' � / % � � -�_
�I � � ��� �;�(��� ������ I ��__= -�
, ��i� l� ii ;/ _ - i
� � � I �,
� I� I � � � _
'I I I I� I � � DETAIL 1 ... - �
� � � � � � Ni D�L�X � I
I����������s �
do
��, �� � � �� � r�:��e���a�eP���M d F. '�, I
iROM SiA13�W i0 SiAI]�]5Pi.-ll-
�I n I I \\\\\ n\ \� ��\ . FROM SiA. l] � 00 i0 $iA.13 �]5 LL. -Ll- � ��
�` � .
' �`\� \\\\\ \ \. � . � � �
� � �� ��������� ; ��V����� , i I �I � I 'i� � �
e��
\ ���� � �
,
s,e �
��\� �
�� \� ��.
� ���O��Y��YY�Y�� g� ���0����
!'seP�!���=s=:'s,:�:��ees�:es ��8���������:ee9e;;:
I•��������������:������\�� ���p�� ��
��B= aa: :�E:= :::6. � a ........
�533�SEEl�96e7ee4E5•_•_•_7e•_Ee7er� �E�=•_•_g•_7����3E1311119s;�=g•_•_
. _�
�.i
280 �T
I_
_ 270 _ --
i..
260 _ �
-Ll- STA. 8 i 9].00
EL. = 26725'•:=
�i�, o y i��
� <�r ortcH
c ` see oeru� i
�` �.� �c F ' F F F � < c c
^ r — ---------�
�
�, �-_--- - -- -----�
<<<<<<<<<<<<<
SITE ���1
\
-Ll-
Pl = 9+20.�
EL = 26679
VC = 40
�_:__ i ..._..�.i �- .
Pl = 10+00.(�
EL = 270b3'
VC = Sd Pl = U+I5.00
EL = 267.47'
VC = 5d
• ����A�����C��YY�Y��Ny�� yy • � y�y Y YII`iY �
y •�y ��������������������������������������Y�tA��������tN���A����������� ����N
� ���,A����������M���Y���Ytl��tl� L�����AA���������������N������������YY�����������������n���O������S+Y����1������������
���p�� �����tl • ���������p��������A���������N��A�AN���O��t������n�������������� � ��� � \��� V� A�i��O�
��� ����������A���A������q0 � Y�t��\�����A�������� ������n�����������Ns� ��� A������ �0��.����������O��Y ����� ����A������Y
1
8 9 10 11
� � �
r N
m w
EL = 2665d
vc = sa
"iA.ib_,�IHUIyE, !�
N % OO.p� SfF S�E q x
w
� Fr, f.
� �n �Can
_ \ �n Qn�n
. \ VWYn
LLGW
O�a
~ 1 \ Z V C
T��au
` V FWu
�
z�
�� �� + oi
i � � ,��
��� ��
IOROA NKE ��.�
uPARInN BUFFER �' I�h� W�
SITE 1 ," �, � ,a';�
� �- i
,,
� �
� \ \ �1 �
I � �
J� Q
.1 i� j �
I '_��= j �
— � w
�� �
� � Q
" �
� �� ��/J W
�����I // -�'� �
/J ! I =
� �� �
� �,��,� �� , E ,
' PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 12 =P'
p�;
-- Ee 3
- �
- - - Q
��.
J ~
I �
0
0
o zso
o ra���Ev�,�EEa
PROPOSE� GRADE AT
CL OF GREENWAY
BLGIN P
❑- SiA
EL = Y'
Pl = 13+10.00 '�
EL = 257.40'
VC = 40 /
J
EXISTING GRADE AT
CL OF GREENWAY
12 13 14 15
+
�
Q 2%0
r
� 260
2
U
�
250
16
2ao H 14012.00
4

' , • ' , . • \ NO IMPACTS ON THIS =
, PLAN SHEET �'
fW
��
. • ' . • • ' * `� \ <_»-
uw>�'.
' , , , � , , , ' � \ 3ya+
, ` � , . ' � , � ��-° -�� /��Q FW��
. , . , _-- -_F -�`\\\c �PD =�
� ! F � �
f • F � r�\ � �Si'
9 • � \ \� �
! '{ , , • � , C C (-� � 1 �
5 �yJ� . � / 1 �'i
O� C` . � l�O • i" � � �� �� �I
i }
-oo. .�• � . �. \ 1\ � i �/
F��" ' � . ' � , Pj t \ \ ,. � � . -?� v. � .
�": m ,'^• • • , \ �
✓�� . . � . • • � � \ /
m`�s N 0. _ , ' �a `Dr23 '��\ �\ _ . srA. za o0 00� se -ii_ . }
' � o.' . ' .
. . ' . . . .PG ` \ � / % E SHEET 5 Q
. ' \ �
. . . \ �
, • ' . ' � , . ' , a . • , . ' �595` � � , � PC Sta. +8050 u�, �, . , Z
, \ / I
, ` � • � � • , � � • ' . ' • . PT�Sta. _ \� �� oescH mMr�ereo ev� 1 . ` w11 1
, , • , � , • , ' • , , \ WIiHW0.5 8 iAVErvEL FOP + � � v , W
rne eooincio�+ eeo cr �� \ �
�
. � ' . � � � + N �' rn
I
i
� • • � � • � • � • / � � � � J/ k Y
. � . � . . � � a aa �i ,// � LJ
, ` ` . ' . " A „z � F _����� jo �
� � • � • � • • � • ` • � � /� � � � _ �/ � �
` ` � • ` • � • � � �� F � f ��L _��i�` lJi G . O
� � � • � � � � � • � ' � � • � ' � . � ' � � � � • � ' � � � • � ' � � � � � f � r B >IF N.:P + '� � � _ � — T � i % � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � . � ` � � �"
, ` . . . � . . [si : roHs v v�F l � � � � � ' H
. • . � . • � • Esi sv sv
, ' . . • . • . EortxntF � . � � ' _
. . , � . . ,` � � � /� . V1 ' .
• � � , • ' � � � � , � � • � � • , � � � • , � \~�, � • � � • � � �
'' , , �, `, , , ' ' �, •, •, ' ` �• •, '' , , �, •, , , , �, •' ' , , ., O �`� '\'' , , , • •' •, , , , • , , _ - _
• ' ' . • ' ' • • ' • ' . • ' , o • o . •� � � ' . . � ' ' � PERMIT DRAWING --_ =
' . • ' �\ ' ' ,-„ �'� ' , • ' ' .o ° o o�� . J• , . � ' � , . \� \� j i SHEET 3 OF 12 _n��3'
, _
E" .
` ' ' -Ll - ` � � ~
8� � � 280 �
r-i T-- � � : —`-
�. ':.:.'. � _ . y 1 I '. �.�.�i � i �. � � —::. I �-F�i-.. IT- � � � :.� �' '— — — � ..
. .. . . . �r.� :{ i� �{ �: �
{{ [ �
P!= l6+f5A0 ':-. — ._ u-.,siA.ie-000a ._: —! 'I-I I.:I I ..... �i ., - � .. . . l . ��I� 4 � Yli F � -'L� r �-:�� I ._.. J �. f - ' w
_ EYD�. B04HOWALB l I
70 . i � -- e� - 2sszo I I PI - 2I+60.ftl � � .,, t �� � _. _ 270
J EL = 2552d .. . _ . . I , � �. �
i . _ . . �. . . . . � � . . EL 253b0' . . . � �. _. . . . . ., I .
p � � �. � . . . � �. VC = 50' �. . . . . . . �. . � . o I : _ , _ � I
0
b� p � . �- PROPOSED GRADE PT � � - z60
p - � / Cl OP GREeN\N.nY .. O I _. 'er.-i [v�rae:a
+ (+bLa.'CJO% ____ f+1.4 % � + � - I-lOb3l3% � T � �
� l-X7516/% - __-_________--- � � .:�.� �
____-__-_ --____-._- � .
50 (�—_— _—__—_ ��:i
. � ... . . . . . � DUAL Y4" A.CP � . Q . — �', ?SO
_ `- EL ,25� d .J. . ` � i , �.'. � CL OF GREENWnY .VC =23�25.0� Pl�=-24�+251XJ .. - - . .. w ..
AO J _. _ . . _"; ... . ....,..,i:.:_ . .......... ... .. EXISTING GRnDE AT . EL - 256.LYY EL - 256LXY . .::.. . , ��i ..� .... _ �� .. :� Z4O
N �7:.� ��� �.�"�""'. . . '__,.: .. . .....�....� .I:... . INV�-.CL-252.26' ........... ... ..�.—. �... �..I:� I
� -� �.::: 1� 171;:-.. 1 i'. i '. .l y:' �_-[� �.._ . . y_'�_'�_.'�. U 1."- ati's�oi �nTe
_ _. �:I �� " ly��_u � Q r-
r
a -,
30 f _ - � � � � 230 . :
, '
_ { r ,
-� , i � , � �
� :1 -- I � :—j - I �i ir�:_ � �� L..� �. ��i� H� i � �_ �_� I .: . � .. I I�� _ i. I- . :.i it �� eamecrNo:
� { _. � { � � ' �' _. _. 7 . _ � _.:; I .: . �. i i 17. i � ;� i"�— �-�—�"� . ; .. i � � i i i h' I ,. -� _— F. . � �- ,
?Q i ' ' I I ' � T � i I h + �_ff �. �.'. .
�. __ _ --_ � 22o H14012.00
_, _ _ _
_ : , ; 4A
16 17 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DETAIL 1 \
SPECIAL CUT �RM �
�A.� z,� �� °`
�.�o- i.o w . � � �
fROM STA.]I�S�TO $TA.33�]S li.-Ll- / /
iROM SiA.3)+61 TO $iA.11+00 Li.{_ J �
/ ;
/� , � �
O `
��<
i /J
��
�
/ �
/
� / � ' - �� / � $PECIAL Clli DIiCX IGEOiEttILk � '
/ I $EE DFIPIL 3 /
�ESIGN COmPLETEP BY I /
I I W1iHER5 6 MKNEI FOR — / ' �_-
1B" 0.CV
�// � LHF WEO�INGNN PPOJECi /1 _' - _
/ I �
i .
. L—SC � � � � b � t
I � F ` / �
� 1--����. � _! J
� 4 0 � t ! �
� � � \ k
�
, , , � -
/ II\ r �
��� ���II� � �1� �� �
Q,O I _-= `�
/ � —__
INSTALL SIGN —���--
h -L- STA_ 34 � 80.00 10' Li � _
�
wt s
18,,, 8,
,
� CL155 B FIP RAo
y. ESi 3 iON� C
esr io sr 70' ASPHALT TRAIL � i _
: : oeo,Ezri�E-
/ e
{ s
V F Y i V
F � !
� x ' x
x � � + +
/ I .— . r � x � � � ��
, � � � _. /� �� p r f v F r r r '� . � . Ai' _c
`/ / ,� c�� a.
I �/ //4 �� ' . ` r , t' < • 'J�I� t.Z �� + � �� �
,� � , o , s
\,�, 4/ � 4 i � 1i � � F
r� I I � CUSS B AP � , , ` , � , Y' ♦ Y
- � e / / r �. z .oKs .
/ / esr � sr 1NSTALL SIG
� �� / -Ll- STA.37-90.00, 70' T ` . - ` , -, ' � —
/ � W 5 8E Ihi BOARDWALK 2•
1 x18' � � + �"
� �� j /�BEGIN APP S�,e • SITE 3����
I � � , _ �,_`�z ,�o.� �
I �u � �
I , �� )J SEE SHEET 4A • . � �0 .
. o � �i�
U- STA.28+00.00 — --�
LINE - � ��� . – �
�TCH ������� qLLOWABLE IMPACTS Z NE 2' � �
• 7EMPORAR ILIJ � �
DENOTES TEMPORARY ,�� iN wer _
� Kx xxxxx ALLOWABLE IMPACTS Z E 1
,�","% RLL IN WETLAND � � '
—Ll —
290
��ff�� -�I�I�1
GUQ �
J
I
O
O
_..270 p Pl= 28+30D0
� EL = 253.99'
+ VC = 3d
260 Q
H
�
w ��
250 Z
_
U
240 � '
4
230
P! = 30+00.0;1
EL = 2542/'
VC = 40'
18" RCP
WV.{��CL=253.52'
Pl = 31+35.C1�
EL = 25689' �
o VC = 40 '' �pc
N V+u
N pNn
p ��II
J
w Wl~i�4
El ZSdB3'
IO0.GAN IAI(E
RIPP0.IPN BUFfER
�
sa
EXIST�NG GRP.DE ATJ �++�..
CL OF GREENWAV .
+j ..
,
�.
�
_
W
� w
� >p�.,
uw>�
��WV
,%. ��<_
9 =_�>
� A �we"
lX��• z -
c ��
�O /�r =
W
//OOS('�\ // ��
`�- � � E F �� � � �
%/�%� � � SyFF I,�I��'�
�` � t r T \ _�,
r . ' � . ' � 6
Y F �
,� � Y � !^ � Y �.
��2\� '� � F �'�'!" \£ F i y—L��
Y�\ t f 'F gJ �
e � �'"�e >
SITE 3 z
w
� � w
I/ \ �
m �, U`
'I m� � kZz�`
� �+�1- �tN Y
�' -- o
— ` ' Y /
s r — — �
� — - ��1� � � �
_ � F �
��� — -V F 2
�
PERMIT DRAWING c==m�
SHEET 4 OF 12 -P'
— G F—
�
z90 Q
..� �
� + . , ,. �
2ao W
J ~
I v /�
O
O
J tlOAHDWALK P] O 27O
STA.3I+10.00
= 25P 8] � -_.�� rvnvrro
� Pl - 39+10.00 +
EL = 25/24' Pl = 40+80.(XJ
VC = 3/' EL = 25234' �
PROPOSED GRAOE AT VC = 4' �
CL OF GREENWnY �
(-X7$427% !+)0 �35% �+)1 � 105% 25 w
Z
r---��, o.�i -= Pi -ao.z5.000 r- r., imoo, _
El = 25050P/ _ �+4p,pp �
P/ = 37+Sp.pp � Q
EL = zszs9' Q o E� = 2s17a �
vc = 3a � N VC = 3/'
�II
�<��
m�w
28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
260
250
240
230 �H14012.00�
5

F F DENOTES RLL IN �
WETLAND I �� w
. . . . DENOTES �� �\ �-. ���� ' iJ m "�� . . - � 3/95 a�w
*.�. � MECHANIZED y I � Y;��C� � l NAD Q6Nn
CLEARING . I I wwNc.oxrve ' __ _ /�/� I _ . . . . _ . � �w n
_ �
� >
; � i � � I o�o�
I � J � ' � = a e
11 /� �- -_� n:
I ,.� \ � - �-- �� _ f w e °
=--' ' z ..�__ ¢�
\= -
Jf... .� . �::� u
� �I . /.... � � WE7LAND5 �� � �
i . . � \ ' '
-ri_ y�n ia � i oo � . DETAR 2 /� - \ \�� �� � . �
cor+sraucrior+ nccess o �r �O sPeani cu. oi.cn F �- � /
iRqIL T0 BE CONSiRVC FD � � � Na e sa. ... - � ` 4������%
� � BY Oin S � � � Pe� ���_ . � C . . / � � / �
� � rv. M1. hei ma -c6b �y /C (��
II � / � co.a l� p F � C' �
V I / �n0� i0F � `��� � \ \
`
y � � aemovna�eeo�uxos Faom 5ran.00ro su.ai-�o�*.-i � MECHANIZED PROPOSED BOARDWALK #3� _
I ..�� CLEARING r
� SIT� 4 m Q
� . I : �.._.___.. � � .
tn � I c_` —` c_� = .
s==_<w� mr oircH � � �� < �-- �— c � �
sne oernn z . -- � c
� � _— — .
� rl � c � __ __\` \ .. . I
�� �� r �� c
f r � � e µ �e r � z
p � � � �� � rt�K � k F���� � c c c c —1 w
O .I / c �%— / �/ �« rc k M R F �\\ c � ➢ W
� C � / �/ �.. µ µ M K' � � \ � � �
ri . T / � ���/ i'�/ �� µ x v � " " � � � � s � . r � /n
r V
� F � �/ R�5 i��/ i��' �` � µ k 10'ASPNALT TRAIL � k " " � w + Y
� \ R=zi� < T � � i/ �i� �µ k �e " " k µ µ � w x K w k µ k �e K� w ." � � -L- 51+50. Ok a k � k � r + " � Q
K µ
l F k � ��/ � K k � M � � � µ µ � k � � � µ µ � µ � � � µ rt y � � µ � � � / � rt � N � � O
Z � I µ a. w µ. M*..� w w"�� µ µ k�. �e +""� µ µ��. r�""" µ µ�� �, M•�" µ N N O
M k k µ�� K k Av k µ� µ �t M k F � k K M �t M k � µ µ Y. � k � m
\ � µ K � r µ µ � r � � r � �. r -�- 51 + 0.00 � '� :� � k I—I
� � ���L��� � � �-�� � � � � k � � � � � � � � � k � � � � � � � � � k w K � � � � � � � M � � � � � � � k � � � ���. � � � � �
U k µµ µ�� µ ��k µ kµ µk µM m
�'( � `µ Y � �I µ I � � M µ � � M µ � k � µ � � µ � M � µ � � µ � k � � k k k µ µ � � � � � µ k M µ k � � � � � k k � k � � no
`� n k k � N k k � � µ � a �
� y 1f µ� k h � µ M� µ� M µ� � K. Y M K' � �� k � rv.�i
� y—M�� M w M * µ k y M M k µ k N' k M M N k µ k k N k' k � °iaZnY
M k k M - I � � p1� �
�_f + ♦ . x .. � k .. . — n� 3
____ _ PERMIT DRAWING �e
Y � e E �
� � F- ' _ z w
i _ —_ _ ____ - --- — -- —_ SHEET 5 OF 12 � ' P =
n� m
- -- __- — LL v �
— - -{ ; - — — �' �
LL ~
300 _ � - — -- 300
; � L
.�._ __ ._ �� . .. . . ,: ._ - -. �;
.. , _ _ _ ._� .. . , � � � � ' � �
290 J + J 290 � W
i _ - -- _ i �
o : _� � � : ' .,' i'$; - ' , . . . . . �.
280 0 _ 1 = � � , , .,- �. �� __ _� 1 . :� I - :-� -- -: - . 0 280
, . . ,_: .
o ;y. ,_ o ,P�. � �N�,�,«�
+ � ..._,_ �„ � .' -: �. BF IN B ARDWAIX R �
V
.... '-- �... -L- AA 51-6000 ' .. �'.
.274. Q . .. . . :- i ' EL =5205551V e� = zn.oe� . . Q 270
� _ ' �
Pl = 43+94A0 Pl = 44+66LL'7 Pl = q6+33.GC1 Pl = 48+q0110 VC = 30" �
w Pl= 41+85.Q7 EL = 255.4/' EL = 25536' Peovoseo cw,oe ni w
260 Z
EL = 25294' VC = 60' VC = 24' EL = 254b7' EL = 25496' Cl oF GREENwnv Z
-� VC = 27' VC = 46' (+)fd847% l+XJCA�00% (-X7b000% _� 260
= VC = 45'
V (-IOD449% (+)1247 '. !' Z � 0�% f+)12320% (-A24Q,'1�% = aev�s�oms:
F 4g7 �'� > (+)I1TJ(A7% �'1 J V
3 �_ / �+ 3 !+X)7500% � rvo. onTe
250 2 '.- - + 2Ao� • a -_
'/, Pl =4l+75.� Pl = 52+70.00 � 250 _
EI = 252IXJ p� = qp+50D0 Pl = 44+q0.pp Pl = 45+%DO �. Pl = 47+89D'J Pl = 49+301�7 EL = 25928"
PI = 4/+30.00 _ '- Pamec7 No.:
EL - 255.48' � EL = 25599' EL = 25634' _ EL = 25623' EL = 256D7• �... . Pl = 52+80D0
EC - 2532/' � VC 26' VC = 25' ' � VC - 45' VC - 44' exiSnN� �2noe ni EL = 25928'
z4a vc - 3a vc = sa �o� _ _ - a oF �eeeNwnv 240 H14012.00
_ OpN
od°
w�W 641 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 SO 51 42 53 54

; ,.--
__=
"�1�
\ i
/ABLE BOLLAftDS
�CONSTRUCTION
TRAIL TO BE C(
BY OTHERS
70' ASPHALT TRAIL �
t '
F
L � F
K Y
�� ��� < ` r—\\ � TC'y!,
.
SITE 5
�]'fUPVF � / `�' .. i _ 1 k � + t\ �/
wioeumc � � x ,.. � r � + � a r < r �C
� ` � r ' t ' i ` . � a r°h ��
e .� . . W t q r ' a ° � + i ° x � y � ��� �
� .. ' rL— ♦ 90'.00 x F i s � x ' � .s ' r i � . i + r % .r \ / s%�
I
� V � � )' ` � z r � '. x t x r t . x � � . x
ry�' P u r -�- 56 B09 . ' a a x + : �+� �� � i,"� 6i
L�54 5.00 o r t x. � t r t x ` + y : ° .e . ' x t � $ + X
.� � END @OARfSWALK 3 f t ` f t � F r .r. r r ` . ' .� � �a � x �� � e Q
' -L-�d ��' � 00 � � � � x � � � � r � � x � � � .. x � e � t O�
F � �F F S. �! � t � �K � F £ !� � F t ! F r t y O
` �PROPOSED BOARDWALK »3 + � y. '� } x * r � x � t r x i e k x ' ' i�
q� , t � F , < < . � , .� : ° � � � _ � �
S t j � +� e � + t + r ._ +' ,� +' _ �, t PROPOSED BOARDWALK rd � ' � t ' x , � t .SCC�
4X tO: t ' . _ . ` e . x � , < . ' � ` � t � . . , x � sy
Op � � ' . ' t ' � * � ' � ' 1 F ' � t . t x ' r t r� , , .
I F i F F Y Y i Y i i�� Y + a i �C�
n a t ♦ x t x t s x x . + +
II OO 1 k C F . F. 'F Y F F F f F ! c 2 e • f i ,`
{ n F f Y� Y t { Y . �! k 1
S 2 e � .�/ Y � �� s � e � F � k � i � Y � � t e � x � I
L SITE 5 FF ' �+ , . ,/ , • , . � . � F „ t ` ' -'�_ •_ , ' ' " ' ' x . , . � � _
S/5/[� ' ' f/ �F. �F �F t £ i t 1� Y F i' i +
� x t � ! � Y� � �Y � �C � 1� � F .. � ! � Y 1� � �F � 1� + F � i � 8
�MFCHHNI;'FD FT �i x a + e + + :s a x a x t < < -
QEARING) 6 i� • ♦ t a e t t t e t a t r
Y Y Y t M i Y t Y �P� l Y Y t
t £ f x t � Y� � i t ! { F � 1 E ♦ F � Y � i
a t JF �1 Y i F Y Y t �1 i
�e ,F F ! t ! i� Y i F
, F � � � F � i x t N F + ! Y !
+ DENOTES MECHANIZED � r ' , ' ' * � � �-�
Y t � F � ! £
�
Z
w
��
��a:
Q6n„
VW>r
LLOfti
O�ypi
22ui
3Caa
Owiu
hWu
2�
�m
Z
W
�.�_:
�X ^.!� ��U
Im����� ��i���
�!
4 � �
z ��.
• - CL[ARING . : . x , \ J � _-
" ' t , � � � � ��� __ PERMIT DRAWING � ��;_- -
. , .
_ — �
` ------ �� -- SNEE� o C)F 12 =" _-
-- - , - - -�;
300
290 i
J
0
0
280 00
�
�
270 Q
2b0 ?
U
250 2
240
5
� ,
� i .i � �
� _ i--I� i p �i-�ni 11 N�� � � i 4 -_ �. �� '- �; _ i hl.� al�- !_ � ���I-
, + � �- �:-! ��.= :^� - �:i � . � � . ` .;_I ��
l-y - i� - � I_�_-: [t i..` h-d�
I � -{ - - - {.: � ,. - � �i�.
I� � I I� �. �- �� I' �rt�� n i-
� `
� � i'
i�t � i{: i I� '-n h
� � f�
. i �� � - - �� �. _.. � ..i t I ' �i�. � -.- — ._� � i���i{;�.�.il � : rii r1
._. ... ,_ . ._ C'�r � ..�� __ �_- -j i.-� h ��t�1T�� li rrti
1 � ; , '
� eNo ocna�wn�K : s ... o.w '� n owa .K ea � � P1= 59+I0.(b .. �. � I �i _� 1 � i i i� � i i i �� i i � i i • t I i`�
� �- srn. ss-?soo t srn se .=o oa EL = 25834' PI = 59+9pq� � Pl = 62+201t� . - . .
A
e� _ :se.n e� = zse.ne� . . �. Pl= 59+80.W EL = 256.OG' . . _ �... EL = 256.72' . . . . . .
� PI = 55+50,00 PI = 56+60IIX1 �ggg EL = 25624' Pl = 60+OO.Op � . . . . . . . . .
� EL = 25696' EL = 25798' . � . � � EL = 256D6' . . . . . .
vc = sa vc = za
)bOL�% _ I-»rvv,..., � r+125000� f+.�7.4500% !-,b7000% � !-i�.,.,,.,... � � . . � . � fsX13000%
— . . ...___ ia�nlYWl% ____
r�----' f+XJB4D9% -'--
Pl = 55+OOA7 . . � �
EL = 25796'
VC=25' ..:� -. .
55 56
Pl = 56+90.00 �
EL = 258b3' .
57 58
Pl = 58+30� PI = 59+�,pp
EL = 25926' � � EL = 258b4'
P! = SB+90,00 . .
EL = 258P4'
59
60
f+X73000% � -' . .. �.
E �� ��-
61 62 63
Pl = 63+90f10� � .
EL = 25B25' . �. �
EXISTING GRADE AT-
CL OF GREENWAV
�
64 65
m
_ p =
_ �
�
300 � Q
1 '
290 w
F--
�
280
"C.IL PIGiNCEa
Q 270
� 260
J
= FrV:n:t:1:5:
- � _— ;�A;�_ _
a
f 250
cao�ecr nio.:
zao H 14012.00
67 �

�
x
a
y, Or
� --��
I� END BOARDWALK 4
� �
� --70-20.00
+ IN WSTALL �
1 PSIJCE INDSCREEN
� �
� �
< . � � ; , �
PLACE A MINIMUM
OF 3' OF FILL OVER
� SEWER DUCT
APPROX.SEWER
DUQ LOCATION �
10' ASPHALT TRAIL �
� ��
_ � ��
x x x � x � F�
.µ ♦ � x �, t �\�-�,� C-_ 1�
Y '�` � � ! � � x � � 1` K
/ y� i k � ,� Y !
\ t 'k µ ! 'F x � yv V
%^ ,� ♦ x x .� � ,� �
l
��� � �, � y x � � x � � � INSTALL SIGN '� � �
y a + yL- STA. 69+70.00, 10' RT
� l+ n x � x a� W1_5 - � x
� � x x + ' � .� < +` 18"x18" � y� r
l� � t '� t �,� PROPOSED BOA�RDWA�Ks#d �,� x
�T <
< � n +` +
9 � �` °t`�, , � ��" `,� �
�
6 xO� % x x� � x ..:� x SS-
,� x + '� � � � y� :
�O � � r � + � k .� x !�.
��,� y... x ..��� �
� � � �e x + k � + � �e-�- �
sy � , � . __ _-
(C� x " _
tC ' � x
%` + °
� F
' � Y
�� � x — �
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 a x �
F
\������ ALLO`/dABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 -----�'� -
1 :
300
290 i
J
�
E �
O
a .z8a O
0
+
- �
�
- 270 Q
_ �
� w
260 �
_
' v
Q
250 f
p 24a
��
a �,
�„ 67
�
ix ��
I x + ��
�n � t �\,
END �IJSTIyL + ��
l xFENCE W�fNDSC�,REEN.� +�
x +
I y � � � x ��
� � � < � � �
A x � � } F
IR x � x � y �� �
/
I x t ♦ n 1� � 6 a
_�� y. e
x �
__7_� �� � , � �,
�F ° �
\ �F _� _f _F _r _.
f �
� � F F F �
WSTALL SIGN
-L- STA. 73+20.00, 10' RT
W�-5 SITE b
18"x18„
'. . -I-�5+�000
uxe
auvrex
/ ---=
�
t 'C '�` � \� � �
� y a� �
� ° , . �, �\
�
x� �
e
— , ,. ���
� � �>_
� x �
,� < � YMUYVSt
�� � � � � � � �
� ,N \ i � f �\,C .
y. J 'F � � ♦ f �
\ � � Y
F � Y X k
_�_j{ we �F t` X Y
� _ "` - Y_ � \ '� ..
�� �� �
�� Y
� � + l
�� 1
� � � �
BOARDWALK ��� � + �
SPAN � � '� \ x �
j � � <
� i�
/ —�
. �
� .
-� r
� �a +
�
�x
�
� \ G
� �,
/ ��\�� ,
/ �,`G
X
�� � �
�
BOARDWALK #\
2
W
ff
�¢rc�
Uw>n
LL�wu
O�ai
zza¢
1�-Weu
2'
� n
2
W
:e� �
�> �
�: d �r, m
�
��, -
\ Z�__
� }
z
w
w
�
Y
Q
�
�
_
�
PERMIT DRAWING - =
SHEET 7 OF 12� ="3
PI = 68+Lt�.�
EL = 259.48'
m
Pl= 70+60A0 tL = L5(1.[C
E� = 2s92z vc = sa
vc = 3a
:-
�
69 70 71
Pl = 72+95.�
PROPOSED GR.4DE AT EL = 26535'
CL OF GREENWAY VC = 6d
72 7
v� = ew
�(+)�
E%ISTING GRADE ATJ
GL OF GREENWAY
74 75
Pl = 76+�.00 PI = 77+pO1p
EL = 26295' EL = 26225'
— 20'80ARDWALK SPAN
76 77 78
+
0
�
d
�
�
l+XJ3000% Z
_
V
Q
�
���
79 80
prn
E^ i
_ �
�
300 �
' �
290 W
�
�
zso
-F� � E���vEEa
270
260
25�
enrr I
zao IH14oiz.00�
�!��

���
290
E
280
270
260
E
250
240
_
/
� _
�
� � .. _ ..__ __. . �----�2>� �. I P
/ �
..�_� i �� � �i
1.l! � 2 ---_ _ _—_-_._ I
�
6
Q
_ /� _ � . . _ . . ��' � —J � I I Z
(n . ...., / / __� \� —_� = O
W _ __ .. —�`___ . . _ _ .. A
W �—' � H
v� -�� ..... �. ` � w
O : —� �6 � � � � � �,� � 2
o , ,,���' � — �s� i 3� � ` �' �� ��se� g �n
o � \ � '—,y
a t � Y Y t�, Y��. , I r•' Y l��-]. �� t-Y� 9� W
� � y
+ s ;���� � � � �,�—° �,�_��, � � ,� , . � _� : � , � � �� ,o�o��RErE��,�� SITE 7 �
p�p x :� —� 3�s_a � . �i� c ...� / � n z s s x � ��� � � a .._i \f" - '` - _ ySSHEETEDRAWING N BOAR�WALK 6 O
�� � E � � h'10 FOR BLOW UP -
� _ _x x .� a _ ' ::� \��o-- s s � � z r z � `\� � �_ .. � I/� CONA� UCSION QO
N "+� z x t � � � . � t `-E=� �3s-� z � s � j ...
-- -�_ A }
� '" '--_.�_ r � r � � � . ,��� �>.� .-,-�__ A� c,�
� , , � , � - _
J ss �� � �� Q.
' �.,,, _aa- � � .
-.�_t � � t s t � x r x a ':._�_ � .-�i r- .. . _—_-Z.` -_ __ .__' —.__. __
�- Q
W " � � � t � t � � � ` S � � c � `�� -
-.:� 35��s�- �� (~/7
Z --- ` F,
� _ � � . . � * _ �s_ _ �- �� -�� �-� F� _
,_ — - - ` i
� ' -- _. � � � � � � . � , � � . _- r , , . . �
� ' - - -.,,� � � � � . � � � < . �\ f -s��^-�<.� . N
. , � , . . . �u,
PROPOSED BOARDWALK #5 ' _ -R° �`-�`��
-_ .,e �� _. --_ .:____-__._. '\ �
_ J
� . _
WALK ()
-L2- +9 . �Q
� PROPOSED BOARDWALK >6 1
<
J
�
0
O
0
O
+
0
�
H
N
Z
x
v
�
�
�
Pl = 80+8011,1�
EL = 26/55'
81
PROPOSED GRA�E AT
CL OF GREENWAY
rer�i-r.��}a
r— I-- rr� -�T�—r+ �-1 �;+— ; 1—F- 4 � i
i T ���� '
1 � �� � � �� 1 T � � �_i__ � �'i ""ll'TTTiTT`i,..
82 83 84 85 86
�if?�'////1 DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
�li::
P, _ �,� ,'
EL = 26/55'
EXISTING GRADE AT�
CL OP GREENWAY
87
Pl= 88+SOD0
EL = 26/95'
EL - 4620Y
b
-�- 2��
� d u
mi�nW
88 89
�
� � PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 8 (�F 12
� �_
WqLK 45
a se oo Pl = 9/+55D5
� EL = ZSZZP BEGIN BOAR�WALF
-LY- STA. 91- Bl.l J
VC = 3d E� = zaz.as
Pl = 89�106.00 Pl = 9/+8214
EL = 261b9" EL = 26295'
vc = za
Pl = 89+70.Q7
EL = 26483
VC = l�
,i
N
�
W
m
Pl = 90+9p[p
EL = 26379
vc = sa
91 92
300
i 290
J
0
0
0 280
+
Q 270
n
� 260
Pl = 92+2214 Q
EL = 26395' � z50
93
�
Z
W
��¢n
<6x
VW>r
LL�FU
O (i p 2
22° '
��a'
Owi�
FWm
2�
� n
z
W
F r>\�.
i��� `� �iJ
� ��I
� i.l z%I
1�,
� �i
�
z
U..�
W
�
Y
O
W
�
2
�
-g o -i
Pg
p:�
;
� �
�
>''
1 W
'�^
v ' �
.�n:� erve�rveee
DATE
IVV.:
2ao H 14012.00
�

� ����j i
o. `�\��, /_ -J __�
r � f
W� ' . \ _.... � ..�.��� \ � / � �__ J
� ��
w -�
N
,,/\ �
p � ; � r : f '� __ ��.� •
� r s z s � �i . � s
s-_� � s a �
o �
_ + ` �
. �
P __
Q e / ^�'
v~i - SITE 7
I TEMPORARY FlILIN
J WETLANDS FOR
� CONSTRUCTION ACCE55
(11MBER MAT� ,
Z
_' SEE PERMIT DRAWING
� SHEET 10 FOR SITE 7
� �
� xxxxx ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1
�
��������
������� ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
I��7I DENOTES EfLL�IN
riiy� WEr�o
300
290
2$0
270
260
_ 250
240
F �� --
i �
\ y
1� t t � i
� �
�
/ \� f � #
\\ �I� � �
��
� � z s �
�
t � ..� �
� �
� � r � �
�
� � � , ����� � �
� ,
�z x � � I
1
` f Y t
\ \
` � � � ,
�
,. , � � �
�� .
i
aPPROxIMhiF k
_ LOUiION Of�\ � � �
w lif O K CRFf
�DENOTES TEMPORARY a� �Eas" �
, FILL IN WETLAND
' ' * # DENOTES MECHANIZED
� ` ° CLEARING
. . . .
-BW 6- E� _,
280
A +
EL = 26858
Z %O T\ X/STING g���,�
�' — (—/,
�`\ �
\���.�T.o �r. �o
:
.
.
:
C.
..
"i're'i::.m.e::::.. ! rn.:x'-R...T.:.:. : .""'m.:e"''=::
veeee@'r.ee��ee9eeeE�: :@:���:e�E :Ea��e:E ::_
�eee=°=e�' =?e32e=e=�. ��s �� � °.�:! ° ��:::::_:��
• oo� m i o�o
N�N�����L �� L O �Y�S� M6�O���OO�NNA
wiiiiiiiii�uii��:ii ��iu�n�r�i� uiii� w�i�iiiiiiiiiii� m�
E:�::::::��:: :::S�C:�:::�:�C�S.'::::6�=�::�:::::: �: ' �C�
Eee�e2's22222��2� e •�EEE:eE�eeeeee�e8's°eE �� eeeeee=eee� ::
iii�iiiiiiiiiiiis i� i �iiiiiiwoiiiiiii�uiGiii�i��iiiiiiiiii�ii wim
��NN��������0 • �� 0��� ����O�p�� ��uN���N� \����������YMI
93 94 95 96 97
--__, PERMIT DRAWING �
SHEET 9 OF 12 ,P
�°'
/� � a
, ,. _-------- --
_ � ., �— �------------ --
., /
,�' � " . / ���
� s � � � ��
� /� i��
�,,\ ,, ;,�
� ,
,,�� i � � � � � . � � � ,,\\,\\\ �;��
�i �� � � � � � � . � � r �� �-��'
< ''� `
"�
i�Fil � � � � , � � ,-
Il�mi�l I t 1 Y Y 4 Y t t i II III� � �C �.� � Y I I
��
� � �, � � �
��q�hPY� E . � M �,
��_�
� a �
� t� t
�' � r. ,� °
� ;
� ;
� � .
�� k �oaonH wKe
RIPARIAN BI1FfE0.
= �
'i
�� � � �
��
��:
0
� Pl = 98+75.00
1� EL = 2643/'
VC = 28'
(+X1.7000% (+12099% !—l0.368%F
N ��.� �� ,� � �,� ��� � i
! /
� �/
/
�
{I lw � �,
P ��'�i � � ii
��- � � a� /
, ,
�' � �� �' � �` �� !
� _ � �� ,
� � `;
_ �� j �, ;� iy .
� � � � � % ?:
r
1 �
� � _ ��.—� '
Pl = 1�+4p.� PI = l0/+2UJ0
EL = 263.37' EL = 2633d
VC = 3d VC = 20'
zr..oe� �
Pl = 99+32A0 Pl = 99+80.00 Pl = 100+70IJ
_ EL = 265.00' E� = 264b5' EL = 263B2"
- VC = 2d VC = 45' VC = 29"
+'.
98 99 100 101
�
SITE 8
P/ _
Pl = l0/+70.00 E� �
EL = 2633d
�+f,+lID000'/.
20' BOARDWALK SPAN
TIE TO ESISTING GREENWA'
�- STA.104 -64A2
EL = 268.SY
102 103
104
.
_
w
�W
•���
Qyn`n
UW>n
LL�wu
DU'°az
�Zarc
�w��
__
��
z
w
%
ie����
II�;S�
�\ �` �_
280
�.�...: �vc,�vEEa
270
260
R�VIS:ON$'.
no. onre
250
PRO]KT NO.:
zao H 14012.00
1�

SITE 7
�DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
� DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
*, *� �� • DENOTES MECHANIZED
� +� * +� CLEARING
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 10 OF 12
�
_
W
� 4
��K
aa»�
uwrn
LLOfU
D�a2
=Zai
FWnu
z-
uT
z
w
e�\�
� ��,� ��
� �
\ ��`'��
� �
�
Q
�
z
w
w
�
C�
Y
Q
O
w
�
�
2
�
rRA � EN���FEa
H 14012.00
�

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing permanent
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Non-
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts mitigable
No. (MAP ID) SizelType Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Impacts
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (tt) (ft)
-L1- STA. 32+76 TO STA.
2 32+80 ProposedGreenwayTrail <0.01
-L- STA. 41+51 TO STA.
4 42+10 Proposed Greenway Trail <0.01 <0.01
-L- STA. 54+25 TO STA.
5 54+47 Proposed Greenway Trail <0.01
-L- STA. 98+05 TO STA.
7 98+95 Proposed Greenway Trail 0.03 0.02
-L- STA. 92+50 TO STA.
7 97+75 Proposed Timber Mat 0.2
TOTALS': 0.04 0.2 0.03
'Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
2013 10 24
Mechanized
Permanent Fill Temp. Fill in Clearing in
Site in Wetlands (SF) Wetlands (SF) Wetlands (SF)
Site 2 13 0 0
Site 4 179 0 395
Site 5 0 0 173
Site 7 1545 8370 643
Total 1737 8370 1211

BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY ,
IMPACT BUFFER
TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT
ROAD PARALLEL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2
SITE NO. STRUCTURE SIZE /TYPE STATION (MAP ID) CROSSING BRIDGE IMPACT (ftZ) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft�) (ftZ) (ft2) (ftZ)
ELEVATED
BOARDWALK/GREENWAY -Li- STA. 12+99 TO
1 CROSSING STA.14+10 X 2041 1052 3093
ELEVATED
BOARDWALK/GREENWAY -L- STA. 36+40 TO
3 CROSSING STA.37+54 X 1717 962 2679
ELEVATED
BOARDWALK/GREENWAY -L- STA. 74+92 TO
6 CROSSING STA.76+29 X 1403 1118 2521
ELEVATED
BOARDWALWGREENWAY -L- STA. 100+76 TO
8 CROSSING STA.102+65 X X 1945 865 2810
TOTAL: 7106 3997 11103 0.0 0.0 0.0
Rev. May 2006

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE)
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
For use by a Local Governncent Agency
TIP Project No. U-5530 IB
WBS Element 44111.1.F10
Federal Project No. STPDA-0503(32)
A. Project Description:
The Town of Cary (Town) proposes to constnict an appr•oximately 2.0-mile greenway
along the White Oak Creek stream corridor between Green Level Church Road and
Wimberly Road, connecting to the American Tobacco Trail. The project will connect the
Town's existing White Oak Creek Greenway with the American Tobacco Trail. Trail
sections will either follow existing utility easements or will be constructed within upland
and floodplain forests. Two spurs are proposed to provide connectivity to a subdivision
currently under construction, and an additional spur is proposed to connect Green Level
Church Road to the new greenway.
The trail is designed as a multi-use bicycling and pedestrian facility. The trail will be
constructed as a 10-foot wide asphalt and concrete path, with an aggregate base, and two-
foot wide shoulders on either side. 10-foot wide wooden boardwalks will be constructed
over wetlands and streams to limit environmental impacts. The trail will cross under
Green Level Church Road. The bridge � was recently replaced, and designed to
accommodate the firture greenway trail. There is a large berm under the bridge, and
vertical clearance is in excess of 9 feet (see photo on attachment 1).
The completion of this greenway project will be a very valuable recreational asset to both
Apex and Cary residents as it connects neighborhoods to parks and schools and gives the
community a scenic place to walk, bike, or run.
Please refer to the attached project location figures (attachments 1 and 2).
B. Purpose and Need:
In 2003 the Town of Cary developed a Parks, Recreation & Cultural Resources Master
Plan. The Plan proposed to improve connectivity as well as provide for the health and
well-being of its residents. Since then the town's greenway network has grown to over 62
miles of trails creating an interconnected system weaving through t11e town of Caiy and
connecting to adjacent jurisdictions. The 2012 Parks, Recreation & Cultural Resources
Master Plan Update has been adopted by the Town Council. To determine need the
planning effort included a citizen survey which concluded need for additional greenway
facilities. Based upon citizen needs a primary goal is "to provide citizens with a highly
fitnctional, safe, well-maintained greenway network that provides recreation;
transportation, and educational opportunities and wildlife benefits for the Town."
The purpose of the White Oak Greenway is to provide a connection within the Cary
Greenway network and on a larger regional/state-wade bases a significant missing piece
in the East Coast Greenway (ECG). The greenway and trails section of the 2012 Master
Plan shows the White Oak Creek Greenway as a proposed segment and part of the larger
Umstead Park to American Tobacco Trail greenway corridor. This corridor is also a part
of an even more extensive ECG. The ECG begins in Maine and extends along the east
coast to Florida. The White Oak Creek Greenway is one of the few remaining missing
PCE-100L 1 July 2015

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE)
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
segments on the ECG within Nor[h Carolina. This trail is needed to further the
completion of the ECG, an important recreational and economic amenity on the east
coast and the interconnectivity of the Cary Greenway network. Additionally, the White
Oak Creek Greenway is part of a 14.06 mile long corridor that is within a quar[er mile of
17 pazks, 5 schools, and 99 neighborhoods, and intersects 13 other trails. This project
will put the town of Cary a step closer to connecting the highly regazded Umstead Pazk to
the American Tobacco Trail both of which are widely used by mm�ers and cyclists for
both commuting, and recreational enjoyment. The Town of Cary Comprehensive
Pedestrian Plan (2007) also points out that Cary's younger demographic will demand
and need more pedestrian facilities such as greenways for recreation and exercise, safer
routes to school, and more connections to pazks and librazies.
C. Pronosed Imnrovements — Select ALL Activities that apply to the Project,
regazdless of TYPE
Circle one or more of the following Type I activities:
1. Non-construction activities (program activities).
2. Approval of utility installations along or across a transportation facility.
3O. Construction of bicycle and pedestrian lanes, paths, and facilities.
4. Activities included in the State's "highway safety plan" under 23 USC 402
(programs administered by the Division of Motor Vehicles).
5. Transfer of Federal lands pursuant to 23 USC 317 when the subsequent
action is not a FHWA action.
6. The installation of noise barriers or alterations to existing publicly owned
buildings to provide for noise reduction.
7. Landscaping.
8. Installation of fencing, signs, pavement mazkings, small passenger
shelters, traffic signals, and railroad warning devices.
9. Emergency repairs under 23 USC 125 (Governor Declazed Emergency).
10. Acquisition of scenic easements.
11. Determination of payback under 23 CFR Part 480 for property previously
acquired with federal-aid participation.
12. Improvements to existing rest azeas and truck weigh stations.
13. Ridesharing activities.
14. Bus and Rail caz rehabilitation.
15. Alterations to £acilities or vehicles in order to make them accessible for
elderly and handicapped persons.
PCE-100L 2 July 2015

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE�
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
16. Program administration, technical assistance activities, and operating
assistance to transit authorities to continue existing service or increase
service to meet changes in routine demand.
17. The purchase of vehicles by the applicant where the use of these vehicles
can be accommodated by existing facilities or by new facilities which
themselves are within a CE.
18. Track and rail bed maintenance and improvements when carried out
within the existing right of way.
19. Purchase and installation of operating or maintenance equipment to be
located within the transit facility and with no significant impacts off the
site.
20. Promulgation of rules, regulations and directives.
21. Replacement of guardrail.
Circle one or more of the following Type II activities:
Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation,
reconstruction, adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking,
weaving, turning, climbing).
a. Restoring, Resurfacing, Rehabilitating, and Reconstructing
pavement (3R and 4R improvements)
b. Widening roadway and shoulders without adding through lanes
c. Modernizing gore treatments
d. Constructing lane improvements (merge, auxiliary, and turn lanes)
e. Adding shoulder drains
f. Replacing and rehabilitating culverts, inlets, and drainage pipes,
including safety treatments
g. Providing driveway pipes
h. Performing minor bridge widening. (less than one through lane)
i. Slide Stabilization
j. Structural BMP's for water quality improvement
2. Highway safety or trafFic operations iinprovement projects including the
installation of ramp metering control devices and lighting.
a. Installing ramp metering devices
b. Installing lights
c. Adding or upgrading guardrail
d. Installing safety barriers including Jersey type barriers and pier
protection
e. Installing or replacing impact attenuators
f. Upgrading medians including adding or upgrading median barriers
g. Improving intersections including relocation and/or realignment
h. Making minor roadway realignment
i. Channelizing traffic
j. Performing clear zone safety improvements including removing
hazards and flattening slopes
k. Implementing traffic aid systems, signals, and motorist aid
PCE-100L 3 July 2015

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE)
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
1. Installing bridge safety hardware including bridge rail retrofit
Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of
grade separation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings.
a. Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach slabs
b. Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks
c. Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint), scour
repair, fender systems, and minor structural improvements
d. Replacing a bridge (structure and/or fill)
4. Transportation corridor fringe paxlung facilities.
5. Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest areas.
6. Approvals for disposal of excess right-of-way or for joint or limited use of
right-of-way, where the proposed use does not have significant adverse
impacts.
7. Approvals for changes in access control.
Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and located on or near
a street with adequate capacity to handle anticipated bus and support
vehicle traffic.
9. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and
ancillary facilities where only minor amounts of additional land are
required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users.
10. Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open area consisting of
passenger shelters, boarding areas, kiosks and related street
improvements) when located in a commercial area or other high activity
center in which there is adequate street capacity for projected bus traffic.
11. Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there is no
significant noise impact on the surrounding community.
12. Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes, advance land
acquisition loans under section 3(b) of the UMT Act. Hardship and
protective buying will be permitted only for a particular parcel or a limited
number of parcels. These types of land acquisition qualify for a CE only
where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of alternatives,
including shifts in alignment for planned construction projects, which may
be required in the NEPA process. No project development on such land
may proceed until the NEPA process has been completed.
13. Acquisition and construction of wetland, stream and endangered species
mitigation sites.
PCE-100L 4 July 2015

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE�
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
14. Remedial activities involving the removal, treatment or monitoring of soil
or groundwater contamination pursuant to state or federal remediation
guidelines.
D. Special Project Information:
Threatened and Endangered Species
As of Apri12, 2015, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists five
federally protected species for Wake County (Table 1). A brief description of each
species' habitat requirements follows, along with the biological conclusion rendered
based on survey results in the study area. Habitat requirements for each species are based
on the current best available information from referenced literature and/or USFWS.
able 1. Federally Protected Species Listed for Wake County
Scientific Name Common Federal abitat Biological
arne Status Present Conclusion
Red-
icoides borealis cocicaded Endangered o o Effect
Wood ecker
hus michauxii Michaux's Endangered Yes o Effect
Sumac
lasmidonta warf Endangered o o Effect
eterodon Wed emussel
orthern ay Affect — Lilcely to
yotis septentrionalis long-eared hreatened es Adversely Affect
bat
aliaeetus Bald & Golden
leucocephalus Bald Eagle Eagle Protection o o Effect
Act
Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borenlis)
Habitat Description: The red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) typically occupies open,
mature stands of southern pines, particularly longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), for foraging
and nesting/roosting habitat. The RCW excavates cavities for nesting and roosting in
living pine trees, aged 60 years or older, which are contiguous with pine stands at least
30 years of age to provide foraging habitat. The foraging range of the RCW is normally
no more than 0.5 miles.
A desktop-GIS assessment of the project study area was performed in August 2014 using
2013 color aerials. Areas which appeared to be dominated by pine trees were identified
as potentially suitable habitat for red-cockaded woodpeckers and targeted for field
survey. Field surveys of the study area were conducted on August 21, 2014 and
September 3, 2014. Additionally, a review of the NCNHI' database on September 21,
2014 revealed no known occurrences of this species �within 1 mile of the project study
area.
Visual inspection of the project area determined that areas dominated by pine do not
constitute suitable nesting or foraging habitat. No pine stands appear old enough to serve
as nesting habitat. Pine stands are entirely loblolly (Pinus taeda), and potentially suitable
foraging habitat quality is degraded by dense spacing of trees, tall, dense understory, and
lack of herbaceous ground cover. All areas of potentially suitable habitat were traversed
on foot by two biologists, and no areas of suitable habitat were identiiied in the field.
PCE-100L 5 July 2015

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE)
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
Due to the lack of suitable habitat, the lack of known occun•ences within 1 mile of the
study area, and the minimal impact anticipated for this project, it has been determined
that this project will not affect this species.
Michaux's Sumac (Rlaus michauxia�
Habitat Description: Michaux's sumac, endemic to the inner Coastal Plain and lower
Piedmont, grows in sandy or rocky, open, upland woods on acidic or circumneutral, well-
drained sands or sandy loam soils with low cation exchange capacities. The species is
also found on sandy or submesic loamy swales and depressions in the fall line Sandhills
region as well as in openings along the rim of Carolina bays; maintained railroad,
roadside, power line, and utility rights-of-way; areas where forest canopies have been
opened up by blowdowns and/or storm damage; small wildlife food plots; abandoned
building sites; under sparse to moderately dense pine or pine/hardwood canopies; and in
and along edges of other artificially maintained clearings undergoing nahiral succession.
In the central Piedmont, it occurs on clayey soils derived from mafic rocks. The plant is
shade intolerant and, therefoc•e, grows best where disturbance (e.g., mowing, clearing,
grazing, periodic fire) maintains its open habitat.
A desktop-GIS assessment of the project study area was performed in September, 2014
using 2013 color aerials. Areas with an open canopy such as utility line rights-of-way,
old road beds, forest clearings, and road edges were identified as potentially suitable
habitat for Michaux's sumac and targeted for field survey. A field survey of the project
shtdy area was conducted on August 21 and September 3, 2014. Additionally, a review of
the NCNHP database on September 21, 2014 revealed no known occurrences of this
species within 1 mile of the project shidy area.
Visual inspection ofthe project area determined that suitable habitat is limited. The
majority of the open canopy areas identified by desktop assessment were observed to be
generally too moist to support this species. All areas of potentially suitable habitat were
traversed on foot by two biologists in search of Michaux's sumac, with the result that no
specimens were located. Due to the lack of observed specimens, limited amounts of
suitable habitat, the lack of known occurrences within 1 mile of the study area, and the
minimal impact anticipated for this project, it has been determined that this project will
not affect this species.
Dwarf Wedgemussel (Alasmidonta hetero�ton)
Habitat Description: In North Carolina, the dwarf wedgemussel is known from the
Neuse and Tar River drainages. The mussel inhabits creek and river areas with a slow to
moderate current and sand, gravel, or firm silt bottoms. Water in these areas must be well
oxygenated. Stream banks in these areas are generally stable with extensive root systems
holding soils in place. Shells of the dwarf wedgemussel can be distinguished from other
mussels in the area by the presence of two lateral teeth in the right valve.
The study area is located in the Cape Fear River basin which is not known to support this
species. A review of the NCNHP database on September 21, 2014 revealed no known
occurrences of this species within 1 mile of the project st�idy area. The closest known
population is located in the Neuse river basin approximately 18 miles from the study
area. A desktop-GIS assessment of the project study area was performed in September
2014 using 2013 color aerials. One stream in the shidy area, a tributary to White Oak
Creek, was identified as potentially large enough to support mussels and was targeted for
a cursory field survey. Field surveys of the project study area were conducted on August
21, 2014 and September 3, 2014. No live mussels, shells, or middens were observed
during cursory investigations of tributaries within the study area.
PCE-100L 6 July 2015

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE)
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM �
Northern long-eared bat
Habitat Description: In North Carolina, the Northern long-eared bat (NLEB) occurs in
the mountains, with scattered records in the Piedmont and coastal plain. In western
North Carolina, NLEB spend winter hibernating in caves and mines. Since this species is
not known to be a long-distance migrant, and caves and subterranean mines are
extremely rare in eastern North Carolina, it is uncertain whether or where NLEB
hibernate in eastern North Carolina. During the summer, NLEB roost singly or in
colonies underneath bark, in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees (typically
>3 inches dbh). Males and non-reproductive females may also roost in cooler places, like
caves and mines. This bat also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like barns and
sheds, under eaves of buildings, behind window shutters, in bridges, and in bat houses.
Foraging occurs on forested hillsides and ridges, and occasionally over forest clearings,
over water, and along tree-lined corridors. Mature forests may be an important habitat
type for foraging.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service has developed a programmatic biological opinion
(PBO) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE), and NCDOT for the NLEB in eastern North Carolina.
The PBO covers the entu•e NCDOT program in Divisions 1-8, including all NCDOT
projects and activities. The programmatic determination for NLEB for the NCDOT
program in Divisions 1-8 is "May Affect, Likely to Adversely Affect." The PBO will
provide incidental take coverage for NLEB and will ensure compliance with Section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act for five years for all NCDOT projects with a federal nexus
in Divisions 1-8, which includes Walce County, where the White Oa1c Creek Greenway
(TIP U-5530 IB) is located.
BALD AND GOLDEN EAGLE PROTECTION ACT
Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)
Habitat Description: Habitat for the bald eagle primarily consists of mahire forest in
proximity to large bodies of open water for foraging. Large dominant trees are utilized
for nesting sites, typically within 1.0 mile of open water.
A desktop-GIS assessment of the project study area, as well as the area within a
1.13-mile radius (1.0 mile plus 660 feet) of the project limits, was performed in
September 2014 using 2013 color aerials. There are no water bodies large enough and
sufficiently open to be considered a potential feeding source within this radius. Because
there was no potentially suitable foraging habitat adjacent to the study area, no survey of
the project study area was conducted. A review of the NCNHP database on September
21, 2014 revealed no known occurrences of this species within 1.13 miles of the project
study area.
Due to the lack of suitable foraging habitat, the lack of known occun-ences, and the
minimal impact anticipated for this project, it has been determined that this project will
not affect this species.
National Historic Preservation Act
This project has been reviewed by the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources,
State Historic Preservation Office (NCSHPO). In their response letter dated April 10,
2015, they have reviewed the project and are aware of no historic resources which would
be affected by the project (see attachment 3).
PCE-100L 7 July 2015

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE�
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
Right of Way/Easements
Much of the project is on Town of Cary property or within the existing right-of-way and
a small segment is within NCDOT property however the White Oak Creek Greenway
will impact 5 private property owners.
The largest impact is on the Toll Brothers property where a planned development is
already being constructed. A permanent greenway easement and a wider temporary
construction easement will be obtained through this section as part of their development
plans with the Town of Apex.
On two of the remaining properties the permanent greenway easements will be located
inside of an existing sewer easement.
All permanent easements are located in open space typically within the 100 year flood
boundaries or in wetland areas. The same is true for the temporary construction
easements and neither easement will affect any permanent structures. The Town of Cary
will negotiate the acquisition of all necessary permanent greenway and temporary
construction easements for the project, in accordance with the Uniform Act.
Section 4(�
The project will not impact any Section 4(fl resources.
Section 6(f�
The project will not impact any Section 6(fl resources.
Permits and Environmental Commitments
The following permits and authorizations may be required for the project:
• USACE 404 pennit
• NCDWR 401 Water Quality Certification
• NCDEMLR Land Quality permit
• Neuse Riparian Buffer authorization
• Town of Cary Floodplain Development Permit
• FEMA No-rise or Conditional Letter of Map Revision
• Project requirement for PBO compliance: the contract administrator for
construction must submit to the NCDOT Natural Environment Section (Neil
Medlin, Biological Surveys Group Leader) the actual amount of tree clearing that
occurred for the project. That information must be sent before the project is
completed and should be reported in tenths of acres.
PCE-100L 8 July 2015

E. Threshold Criteria
The following evaluation of threshold criteria must be completed. See Local
Programs Management Handbook for more guidance on how to answer these
questions.
ECOLOGICAL
Will the project have a substantial impact on any
unique or important natural resource?
Does the project involve habitat where federally
listed endangered or threatened species may occur?
Will the project affect anadromous fish?
YES
�
�
�
(4) If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of
permanent and/or temporary wetland taking less than
one-tenth (1/10) of an acre and have all practicable measures
to avoid and minimize wetland takings been evaluated? X
(Top down constructed boardwalk thru wetlands — 0.0 ac permanent
Impact; 0.05 ac temporary impact)
(5)
(6)
��)
�g)
(9)
Will the project require the use of U. S. Forest Service lands?
Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely
impacted by proposed construction activities?
�
Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding Water ❑
Resources (OWR) and/or High Quality Waters (HQV�?
Will the project require fill in waters of the United States
in any of the designated mountain trout counties?
Does the project involve any known underground storage
tanks (UST's) or hazardous materials sites?
PERMITS AND COORDINATION
(10) If the project is located within a CAMA county, will the
project significantly affect the coastal zone and/or any
"Area of Environmental Concem" (AEC)?
(I1)
(12)
Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act
resources?
Will a U. S. Coast Guard permit be required?
(13) Will the project result in the modification of any existing
PCE-100L
�
�
YES
NO
X
X
�
X
X
X
X
X
NO
X
X
X
July 2015

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE�
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
regulatory floodway? 0
(14) Will the project require any stream relocations or channel ❑
changes?
SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
(15)
(16)
Will the project induce substantial impacts to planned
growth or land use for the area?
Will the project require the relocation of any family or
business?
(17) Will the project have a disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental effect on any minority or
low-income population?
(18) If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the
amount of right of way acquisition considered minor?
(19) Will the project involve any changes in access control?
(20)
(21)
Will the project substantially alter the usefulness
and/or land use of adjacent property?
Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent
local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness?
(22) Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan
and/or Transportation Improvement Program (and is,
therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990)?
(23) Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic
volumes?
YES
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
X
�
X
X
NO
X
X
X
�
X
X
X
�
X
(24) Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing ❑
roads, staged construction, or on-site detours? X
(25) If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge
be replaced at its existing location (along the existing facility)
and will all construction proposed in association with the ❑
bridge replacement project be contained on the existing facility? N/A
(26)
�2�)
Is there substantial controversy on social, economic, or
environmental grounds concerning the project?
Is the project consistent with all Federal, State, and local laws
relating to the environmental aspects of the proj ect?
(28) Will the project have an "effect" on structures/properties
eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places?
PCE-100L 10
❑ X
X �
X
July 2015

NCDOT PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE�
ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
(29) Will the project affect any archaeological remains which are
important to history or pre-history? X
(30) Will the project require the use of Section 4(fl resources
(public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges,
historic sites, or historic bridges, as defined in Section 4(�
of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966)? X
(31) Will the project result in any conversion of assisted public
recreation sites or facilities to non-recreation uses, as defined
by Section 6(� of the Land and Water Conservation Act
of 1965, as amended? X
(32) Will the project involve construction in, across, or adjacent
to a river designated as a component of or proposed for
inclusion in the National System of Wild and Scenic Rivers? X
F. Additional Documentation Required for Unfavorable Responses in Part E
2. Suitable habitat for Michaux's sumac was identified within the study area.
See comments in Section "D. Special Project Information" — Related to Northern
Long Eared Bat Programmatic Biological Opinion.
PCE-100L 11 July 2015

G.
NCDU'f PItOGIZAMMA7lc'CA'I'IiCit)Itl('i11. IiXc'LUStON IPCEI
ACTION CLASSIFICA7'ION FORM
PCE Aporoval
TIP Project No. U-55301B
WBS Element 4411I.i.F10
Federal-AidProjectNo. STPDA-0503(32)
Proicri I)cscri�uion:
The Town oP Cary (Town) proposes to construct an approximately 2.0-mile greenwey
ebng the White Oak Creek sVeam corridor between Green Levcl Church Road and
Wimbcrly Road, connxting to the Amaican Tobacco Trail. The project will connect the
"fown's existing White Oak Creek Greenway with the American Tobacco Trail. Trail
sections will either follow existing utility easements or will be conslructed within upland
and floodplain forasts. Two spurs are proposed to provide connectivity W eacisting
parking and public access areas. One spur is proposed ta connect Green L.evel Chureh
Road to the new �yeenway. A second spur is proposed at the wasteweter lift slation in
order [o provide access from an existing parking area to the greenway.
The wmpletion of this greenway project will be e very vnluable recreational assel lo both
Apex and Cary residents es it connects neighborhoods to parks and schools end givcs the
community a scenic plece to walk, bike, or run.
Please refer to the attached project locetion figures (ettechmeots 1 and 2).
C'atc6uric�l @sclusiun Acliim Clasxilication: (Chcck one)
TYPE I (A)
X TYPE ] (B)
TYPE lI(A)
TYPE II(B)
NO BOXES Checked
ANY BOX Checked
NO BOXES Cheeked
ANY BOX is Cheeked
SE11L
Preoared Br %�/ 's 3� � =
.APr/" �r___" • .
8/31l2015 Michael'I'at•lix_ PE Ititnior Koadway lin incrr I� 1' �' Q' �'`
k 1 %!CL'`�G�NEFs��O.
� Date Natne> ���iUc '•., FL E.'�P�,;:
Stewart, Inc, 919•866-4736 '•"������•"`'
Company/Agency, Telephone #
Prenared For: Town of Cary
Local Govemment Agency
Reviewed:
��s
ate
Aooroved: ForType 1(B) or II(B) proje ts on�
��31 I5 ��.�.;y� �
Date l��� Division Administrator
Federal Highway Administration
PCE• 1001. 12 July 2015

PROJECT COMMITMENTS
White Oak Creek Greenway
Cary, Wake County
Federal-Aid Project STPDA-0503(32)
WBS No. 44111.2.F10
TIP Project U-5530IB
All commitments developed during the project development and design phase are listed below.
Project requirement for PBO compliance: the contract administrator for construction must
submit to the NCDOT Natural Environment Section (Neil Medlin, Biological Surveys
Group Leader) the actual ainount of tree clearing that occurred for the project. That
information must be sent before the project is completed and should be reported in tenths
of acres.
C-5168 Commitment Sheet

r
., ; �.r.,w�
i li�Se., � L��.�.i':
.Ai'"�!� �'.�.�u JC . � . �
�
.��.r� �.. •_;.,
l: r r�t Y �•
' S'� ' '�'.�'� *' ��,y
i ' � '� r irrl�� "i � �I
�;� �i�,h � �c� �+
aAs . F'.
, � ' � ' :.)�.
� '+ �v � � + .,y . � �
s�`' , ,.J`t�'�,Id�, � �'�,�Xy�r,. k"
;�/�
�� . � "� 'n�'S�L,A
.. r ` , r �.�� J
y, � '_;�, L �W. ." a i
'�I tM1 �T.�16`�'��'� �.'.���7���}�p
4
\ T' e s y ��: �� ��"r�lF�
_ ���� ! � �
' _ } `r
1�4 �'ii'.., 4��' I ,�. �� 13 � �;
4�1 . �'�?
� , :'�� � �, q •,q µ � :
� : � �..�7 �„� ,N
.�. �' . '.'7 �,' ..
.�� ��� �l � � y� C , � <�,�" ��,
n .
iY� „�;,r � �,',.. �� �'';f���r��
C�t�
.,,: � �1 • :� �.— y.4 `' , i" „,, , ' a�'! r . �F ��. :3r �. � ,,,.,4 �
, ��§�� � ��'� {�, x : + � 4 i * �`' S �' r���j,+'`��� ,4 , ti' � �?
� . .��, • ����� � Ta Tu y,�{� d.�y ,'� .� �: �( ; c�.
� ` +� �Q i . 1� � ���' C .', �' �Ri��' ra�y�-�,' . ^ �A C `
���`l�/{ �11�y`y �1 v �4 �y� }y���A� �:4t v _..J ��f J
� � 4 f� .
e . �,,yr X(�, � � t �,.�� � r
�'� �'4''�',���� � ��� ., r� � �, `'�.�ar �'� �+ , ' !� � � ', �4
'�s r,3S�+"`�'' , yyi�i�'r� , ' � i r . � "�'r
:. a 9 . v; a. � t �. � .
��! V � '� '�t ��.
� � . i �r� '..�'� .{„p.� �'w' r.iiaYx�Y ����"i ea ,., � ,.'�" ,( � .�1
� 'R y. "I11,.1�V� !"� J
: F. ��
':�,9 � rA����j� q ♦YL^ a511 ly --n ��f� f'W R�
'�✓ � �'f'�. � ria�fR�p �a{ 1� S� � y�S�'.. � � ? �. ,�(�., "An
. . � .. t � � Y �., � 1N:. � �,a� < y...y � . h � �,
. Y �' ' S h a� 4 I�+ *p +�' .i � F'T3 � .
� . t� v t�. � ��( I l i 4
� I �� r �� ��. � li �), t � � � � � �,) �'�A� �. /`l ♦
-�,�} �{ A ��,�1 a . � �� 1 � �
` �� � . �.r�,li S � •. Y'� � "ri.i � � Ir"4k'^�'� '� Y''?7'!'�� . l :; � "�"• �
� > '��� �t��_�';":�i�n�^�� �� 4 �y� i {,��� ��� t{`! :��b.
y. 'n . N i
7., 1^.. _ ' _ S" 'Y 1.♦ - . :. L Jt: �4iG .
.. : � , ��.� - � . :.,. . ��1 '.. y �� -�**�_�y, .'-..� e Mi?.. .
.�:. .�.��i4 � .. .'�zakf'4..�•�ii...e..�'r9��.__�.L^ _._�SIHi-1.. �' _ .1._]Mi_..Y�LII1.� :.W.aM, •
i
u'Aa_?9 ��snncin L Poea blilb �nci
i
� V \ •N
� k �
��,, , N i
� . _ ",
_ i
1' �1': � � � .
+ � �'
♦ ,y
C�l?�0 u .�� L�F'�:.' '�,�J _._. �1(' [
� - > ' wil� .+�.
„ .-.i .�-i�„ .
,.�_ni I c.ir,ini_� i, �i .afc. Ih�ii • II
:Ty 4�1,�'�,�.`$ f �•'
r��
� � r �� '
r ��� y ��,.F ���Cr�.•. '
� � �.<< ,•a� w.t�.r'�:
� �� ��
�J ; � f
:� ° 1$� r•
�..�r�L.x± �.i?', . _. .
FI� '
f �

,
,^.�..:_"�c:.r.;a�_..,�,.....: . �.-.,� �,; ���� ,.. ....:..,� .
u,._�._ �_ .- ar_re-�--s,�- '— m _ __ _... _ ��y. .. . .....�
..�,.—_— ...�o.._,.�m � .._...�_._._.. � __. �, � ox��_xc
0
�USGS , �, ,,, ,. „�� .�,
�.,.u`sropo ,.,, ..

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SBRVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 2763b-372b
October 4, 2016
David Cooper �
Ecological Engineering
1151 SE Cary Parkway, Suite 101
Cary, North Carolina 275I8 .
Dear Mr. Cooper:
This letter is in response to your letter of September 26, 2016 which provided the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) with the biologicai conclusions of the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) and the Federal Highway Administration for federally threatened and
endangered species potentially affected by the construction of the White Oak Creek Greenway (TIP
No. U-5530 IB) in Cary, Wake County, North Carolina. The following comments are provided in
accordance with Section 7 af the Endangered, Species Act (ESA) of i973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531-1543).
The biologica) conclusion for all federally threatened and endangered species listed in Wake County,
with the exception of the northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis}, is "no effect". Based on
the submitted information and other available information, the Secvice concurs with this conclusion.
The 6iolagical conciusian for the northern long-eared bat is "may affect, likely to adversely affect".
However, formal Section 7 consultation was previously concluded for this species, and a
programmatic biological opinion was issued by the Service to provide incidental take coverage for
the species in NCDOT Divisions 1-8.
We believe that the requirements of Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA have been satisfied for this project.
We remind you that obligations under Section 7 consult�tion must be reconsidered if: (1) new
information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in
a manner not previously considered in this review; (2) th'ss action is subsequently modifted in a
manner that was not considered in this review; or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat
determined that may be affected by this identified action. The Service appreciates the opportunity to
review this project. If you have any questions regarding our response, please contact Mr. Gary
Jordan at [phone] (Ext. 32).
Sincerely,
�- Pete Benjamin
Field Supervisor
Electronic copy:
Eric Alsmeyer, USAC6, Wake Forest, NC
Travis Wilson, NCWRC, Creedmoor, NC

�'
�Q`�
NCDENR
� North Carofina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory
Governor �
Donald R. van der Vaart
Secretary
.� . _ . . .. .. . _..... . ._ .. . ..... .. . ...
..... . . ..... _... . .. . . . . . ..... ........ . . ...
..... ... ......... .... ..... ...... . ..... ..... . .. January 21;'20'IS-... ..
Town of Cary
Sarah Alexander
316 N. Academy St
Cary, NC 27513
Subject: Buffer Determination
� NBRRO#14-485
Wake County
Determination Type:
Buffer Call lsolated or EIP Call
� Neuse (15A NCAC 2B .0233) �
❑ Tar-Parrtlico (15A NCAC 2B .0259) � Ephemeral/Intermittent/Perennial Determination
❑ Jordan (15A NCAC 2B .0267) � Isolated Wetland Determination
Project Name:
Location/Directions
Subject Streain:
White Oak Creek Gree
Property is located south and generally Parallel with Green Level West
Rd and extends westward from the American Tobacco Trail to Green
Level Church Rd.
White Oak Creek
Determinatian Date: January 08, 2015 Staff:� James Graham
Feature/Flag Not Subject �/I/P* Start@ Stop@ Soil USGS
Subject "a"o Survey Topo
To Buffers
Buffers
A X Not present �{
B X Not Present }{
C X P X X
D X E X X
E X E }{
F X Not present �(
� G X I }{
No�e Carolina
�tlf!'R���l,�
North Carolina Division of Water Resources 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone [phone]
Internet: www.ncwateraualitv.orq Location: 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh, NC 27809 Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/A�rmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

VV L11LG LJtIR I.tGGK UI'CC[lW�ly
Wake County
January 21, 2015
Page 2 of 2
�i
White Oak
Creek
. ....._ ......_........*.E/1/P - E�
x r
X P
X P
x x
X X
X X
1 ..... . ......... ........ ......_.... ..._.......,__� .......:..................... ...�............._. ......................... ..................._......._...._...
Explanation: The feature(s) listed above has or have been located on the Soil Survey of Wake County, North
Carolina or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1:24,000 scale. Each feature that is checked
"Not Subject" has been determined not to be a stream or is not present on the property. Features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be a stream. There may be
other streams located on your property that do not show up on the maps referenced above but, still may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and/or to the Division of Water Resources
(DWR).
This on-site defermination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected parties that
dispuie a determination made by the DWR or Delegated Local Authority may request a determination by the
Director. An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date the affected
party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Karen Higgins, DWR WeBSCaPe Unit, 1650 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal within sixty (60)
days. '
The owner/future owners should notify the Division of Water Resources (inctuding any other Local, State, and
Federal Agencies) of this decision concerning any future correspondences regarding the subject property (stated
above). This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the Division of Water Resources (Central OfFce) at (919)-807-6300, and the US Army Corp of Engineers
(Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free.to contact James Graham at [phone].
cc: RRO/SWP File Copy
'�.pavid Cooper
Ecoloaical Engineering LLP.
1151SE Cary Parkway, Suite 101
Cary; NC 27518
R�pe�
�
�
U `�
�,�.�
Danny
Water
Raleigh Regional Office

.e 1'I� ���I�' �P ��.�. M�
���
r
a � '.,
� �.I il�l p�� 'i�{ Ir li ii
i �� ��
'i��li ii��il�i�'� I� �
�I^II���II�LI�I �11���1 ��� �
I � ��.YY udVl u+�w.M .L I. e�
� I
,
��. � � 1, t:�l�p ] 716. IPiJ`,I,�.' . _
j'i
Ile'
� �. ...-«. i ,«...,.. .yo ^ q . m, . . '' '�.
" y. �
3 xYa M
I n
�y�bll � � E" �I�i ^ i �ul i i
' ��' �-++. �w ; � � r �', � . ,�.
I
" aNl �� 1 a � �,,'� " �i �
��I ��I. iLlil I���14I�iA'i I� �'Inl�i i6� � ��� �i 4�'�I�i� I W' I
" �h 9� " ��Y�Ni��iif � h� i '� i di, � il �.fJ��•p�
r u� ia � ��W
{ 4 w� ..o. �,� i
� �r���'II�^�� �. �1 ,�„,�� ao-1 �I� �.. °w1i�.
Y M' 1 u ti. �� i Yµy`hn��uii�i i<
� � � N
d , q , �'
�4� i- �� q " �''i d�r � . 9 � i �� � � .
� � ��"� w
'� ai I P 1 � '�+I
���,.�+ �, u".+,,�.�� .,'��dari �Y N i � uilii�il�":.
�� �
�'{�"'S�i ;iM�� , i�y�l �� . ii r''.
+ �"�
y i I I � ai
.- i� rp� �{ YI���d�
'lY�'ws �. f, j!� � { I��,�� 1: I ��iYNMM��u�'-. 'JWiE.
li ii ��. �'�I� 9.
� �y �
� t�Y'':i
�
�i�
i h°
..l I������+1'�� i��.�«
�
� ^I
y � d.d
d'�y��l'"�4 � ii , S, ' F�"�,,: III +w
x, , ' , u ., G i� ��i
� , +o �� ' i �F' i
ri
� � � + u
�.,�.� .o �-:
�� . �ym,,, � �, _.
��i��
�`� ���� .
�,,�
�
��,
�
� '�
���1NII1'�ur v+JMM�Y .rwrWWero���a w..�W� ����
,r�i .a �, , r. 1 � t a ia�l "vv6�, � s: ^� � .
X'�A,� I i� I � w �il� i^ ��� .�r y�9 i'� ', i"'W I I i' I � i� �
Y � � � aCm Yr�l � 7�
wk
i P�a �i � i i uV .�t} � I 41 � �i I i F i��r� I i i�I a
� � .ii i I i i ��hi � i
�u �dw'�I .��
� � �� �� �� �� I � �m i„I� �. , �I i ��i i ��, i � �� ,, '
5 i. t i��y� p� �� i '� li . . �.. � ��� � IJ i. ':��.:
" �� ''� i � nl' �o-i. ,
.. "�Ipl�lli',I i
� � �¢3+ i�
.�6� I IIII � � 4. ,,,��� �
� � i �91
«
Ilui i � ��I i„. i I�i
�" I
i 1
i i.
i .
I i I
M
.. . . . i . .. �h,
, p�� . iii� i . u
� . . , �. . . � ,y,. �
. � �� h . �� .�
� �'�I . i �, '.
`,� " „�� '.; . i .. a
y�,�y� . � . .. . . .. �: . .. � - �� �I �..
. M .... M
��"�T': �..K .I. p li�� �..I��`" r�.
�`. ,
� a �:.. �'al i YIvItNC. ' . . .�� U �. Y . . � i� 4
,., „�, v I . ��j�y
� . m I. �:. . . , ,.. ..r� . I.n�.. �� .
3 �,. . � .. , . . .. . . . ,.�,�'� ,. ...
. ��. . .. . .� .,...�..�� . �..
�.�,.. �.rl...r,..: ... . ..>�i. . . ��...,I
... .. , . � . �. ... I . � , �..;��
. �. �. . . .. r� r� i a �,a, . , �+
.�y. . ,�. .�..�:�. _� j „ ., .. ..
"$� � u ""��•i<. " �d � i� � II � ',4"�'Mli � liik���tpl"� tl�if''.. .�I �li I� .,.��ry 'h�yl .�,

�
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
TOWN OF CARY
Project Name:
Project Location:
Date:
White Oak Greenway
7own of Cary, Wake County
November 2014
The Town of Cary, undersigned, does hereby authorize:
The Professional Engineers and Scientists
of
(Contractor / Agent)
Ecologica! Engineering, LLP
(Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance anci acceptance of this
permit or certification and any and ail standard and special conditions attacheti.
Sarah Alexander, RLA
Town of Cary
Facilities Design and Transportation Services
316 N. Academy Street ,
Cary, NC 27513
(919} 462-2075
I hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and accurate to the
best of my knowledge.
Sara lex nder, RLA
l.andscape Architect
.1 � ' �'�-0 �7"
Date