20011511 Ver 4_401 Application_20170303

Via Federal Express and Email
March 1, 2017
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
Attention: Mr. David Shaeffer
Re: Pre -Construction Notification
Proposed WestPark 85 Light Industrial Development
Beltway Boulevard
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
SAW -2017-00098
H&H Job No. FOU -002
Dear David:
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
MAR 0
On behalf of the property developer, Hart & Hickman, PC (H&H) is submitting the attached Pre -
Construction Notification (PCN) application for the proposed construction of dry goods
distribution warehouses in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. This application
replaces the application submitted by Estes Design, Inc. on December 22, 2016. The Site
consists of six parcels along Beltway Blvd (Parcel #s 05320129, 05320128, 05320118,
05320130, 05320102, and 05320124) totaling approximately 104.607 acres. The following table
summarizes the parcel information for the project Site:
Parcel ID
Address
Acreage
05320129
2206 Beltway Blvd
17.906 acres
05320128
2205 Beltway Blvd
16.712 acres
05320118
No address listed
5.28 acres
05320130
No address listed
3.46 acres
05320102
11235 Moores Chapel Road
56.049 acres
05320124
No address listed
5.20 acres
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3334 Hillsborough Street
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704.586.0007 main 919.847.4241 main

Mr. David Shaeffer
March 1, 2017
Page 2
The Site is situated north of Performance Road and west of Margo Drive. H&H is submitting the
PCN application in order to receive verification to use Nationwide Permit #39.
In 2002, a former applicant received a Section 404 permit verification to impact 0.07 acre of
wetland, 130 linear feet (LF) of perennial stream, and 150 LF of intermittent stream to facilitate
the construction of Beltway Blvd including the installation of two culverted roadway crossings
(Action ID 200230067). The 280 LF of stream impacts were mitigated with payment into the
DEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) In -Lieu Fee program (then known as Department
of Environment and Natural Resources [DENR] Division of Water Quality [DWQ] North
Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program [NCWRP]) in the amount of $27,500.00. Prior to the
expiration of the 2002 Section 404 permit, only one culverted roadway crossing totaling 190 LF
of stream impact was installed to facilitate the construction of Beltway Blvd. In 2006, a former
applicant received an additional Section 404 permit verification to install the previously
permitted second culverted roadway crossing totaling 90 LF of intermittent stream impact
(SAW -2006-41762-361). In 2007, a former applicant received an additional Section 404 permit
verification to impact 0.32 acre of wetlands to facilitate the expansion of the Beltway Business
Park (SAW -2007-03357-360). The 2007 Section 404 permit expired prior to the former
applicant executing the permitted wetland impacts of 0.32 acre. The 2002 In -Lieu Fee mitigation
payment receipt, and the 2006 and 2007 Section 404 permits are included in Appendix H.
Matt Bramblett and Danielle Birmingham of H&H and Chris Estes of Estes Design, Inc. met
with Mr. Alan Johnson of the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Division of Water
Resources (DWR) on -Site on February 13, 2017. Matt Bramblett and Danielle Birmingham of
H&H and Chris Estes of Estes Design, Inc. also met with Mr. David Shaeffer of the U.S. Anny
Corps of Engineers (USACE) Charlotte Regulatory Satellite Office on -Site on February 15..
2017. Both meetings served as site review and pre -application meetings.
To obtain a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD), a stream and wetland delineation
was conducted by Mr. Chris Estes in October 2016. There are two streams on the Site: Drainage
14
s hart hickman
S 4AAA-Master Proj ects\Foundry Commercial FOU\FOU 2Westpark8 WedandsWNCo erLetterdoc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Mr. David Shaeffer
March 1, 2017
Page 3
Way 'E' and Drainage Way V. Both Drainage Way `E' and Drainage Way `F' are unnamed
tributaries of the Catawba River located approximately 6,500 ft to the west and southwest of the
Site. Drainage Way `E' is located in the western portion of the Site and encompasses
approximately 1,944 linear feet of on -Site length. Drainage Way `E' drains in a southerly
direction with ultimate discharge to the Catawba River. Drainage Way `F' is an intermittent
stream located in the southern and southeastern portions of the Site and encompasses
approximately 1,952 linear feet of on -Site length. Drainage Way `F' drains in a southwesterly
direction where it converges with Drainage Way `E' on parcel number 05320118.
There are six forested wetlands on the Site: Wetland `A', Wetland `B', Wetland `C', Wetland
`D', Wetland `G', and Wetland `GA'. Wetland `A' and Wetland `B' are located in the west -
central portion of the Site and encompass approximately 0.063 acre and 0.066 acre, respectively.
Wetland `A' and Wetland `B' drainage is conveyed in a southeasterly direction towards
Drainage Way `E'. Wetland `C' is located in the northwestern portion of the Site and
encompasses approximately 1.126 acres. Wetland `C' drainage is conveyed in a southerly
direction towards Drainage Way `E'. Wetland `D' is located in the northwestern portion of the
Site and encompasses approximately 0.586 acre. Wetland `D' drainage is conveyed in a
southerly direction towards Wetland `C' and Drainage Way `E' through a 24 -inch corrugated
metal pipe (CMP), which is likely associated with past agricultural use on the Site. Wetland `G'
is located in the south-central portion of the Site and encompasses approximately 0.355 acre.
Wetland `G' drainage is conveyed in a southwesterly direction towards Drainage Way V.
Wetland `GA' is located in the southeastern portion of the Site and encompasses approximately
0.829 acre. Wetland `GA' drainage is conveyed in a southwesterly direction towards Drainage
Way `F'.
The developer is proposing to impact 98 LF of an on -Site intermittent stream for a roadway
crossing. As discussed with Mr. David Shaeffer during our field meeting, this stream impact is
within an intermittent reach which can be permitted under Nationwide Permit 39 via the 300 ft
limit waiver. Even with these proposed impacts, the total perennial stream impact to date is only
130 LF. The stream impact is located in the eastern portion of intermittent Drainage Way `F'.
hart '- hickman
S W A A -Master P roj e c ts\Foundry Com menial - FOU\FO U-002 W estpark 85 W etlands\PCN\Cover Letter doc
SMARTER #:f VIVONWNTAI SOLUTIONS

Mr. David Shaeffer
March 1, 2017
Page 4
This stream impact involves the development of a secondary roadway crossing for access into
the Site as required by the City of Charlotte. The Site developer will avoid additional impacts to
Drainage Way 'E' to minimise impacts to on -Site Waters of the US. Mitigation is proposed via
the North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NC DMS) In -Lieu Fee program Based on
the NC Stream Assessment Method (NC SAM) evaluation, the stream quality is low and the
proposed mitigation ratio is proposed at 0.5:1.
The developer is proposing to impact 0.405 acre of on -Site wetlands. Impact 1 is to the entirety
of Wetland `A' in the west -central portion of the Site. Impact 1 totals approximately 0.063 acre.
Impact 2 is to the entirety of Wetland `B' in the west -central portion of the Site. Impact 2 totals
approximately 0.066 acre. Both of these wetland impacts involve the development of a level
building pad to facilitate the construction of a warehouse building and parking lot. Impact 3 is
located in the westerly portion of Wetland `C'. Impact 3 totals approximately 0.229 acre.
Likewise, Impact 3 involves the development of a level building pad to facilitate the construction
of a warehouse building and parking lot. Impact 4 is located in the central portion of Wetland
`GA'. Impact 4 total approximately 0.047 acre and involves the development of a secondary
roadway crossing for access into the Site as required by the City of Charlotte. The Site
developer will avoid Wetland `D' and Wetland `G' to minimize impacts to on-site wetlands.
Mitigation is required by the USACE Nationwide Permit #39 for impacts greater than 0.1 acre of
wetlands. Due to the planned impacts of 0.405 acre to on -Site wetlands, compensatory
mitigation is proposed in the form of purchasing mitigation credits from the NC DMS In -Lieu
Fee program The proposed wetlands mitigation ratio is 2:1.
H&H is seeking a Nationwide Permit #39 verification for this development. A copy of the PCN
submittal package has also been forwarded to the NC DEQ DWR.
14
hart hickman
S.\AAA-Master P roj ects\Foundry Commercial - FOU\FOU-002 W estpark 85 W edands\PCN\Cover Letter.doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Mr. David Shaeffer
March 1, 2017
Page 5
Should you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to contact us.
Very truly yours,
Hart & Hickman, PC
14 rix -4411110
Matt Bramblett, PE
Principal and Project Manager
Attachments
Danielle Birmingham
Asst. Project Environmental Scientist
• PCN Form
• Figure 1 —
Site Location Map
• Figure 2 —
Site Map
• Appendix
A
— Agent Authorization
• Appendix
B
— Preliminary Plat & Proposed Wetlands Impacts
• Appendix
C
—Avoidance & Minimization
• Appendix
D
— Supplemental Documents
• Appendix
E
— Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
• Appendix
F
— DEQ DMS In -Lieu Fee Program Acceptance Letter
• Appendix
G
— North Carolina Stream Assessment Method (SAM) Form
• Appendix
H
— Previous Section 404 Permits & In -Lieu Fee Mitigation Receipt
• Appendix
I —
Conceptual Site Plan Prepared by Burton Engineering Associates
cc: NC DWR WBSCP Unit, Raleigh, NC (5 Copies of PCN and $240.00 Check via FedEx)
Mr. Bill Simerville, Foundry Commercial (via email)
Mr. Dan Heath, Foundry Commercial (via email)
Mr. Carlton Burton, Burton Engineering (via email)
Mr. Chase Burton, Burton Engineering (via email)
S.\AAA-Master Proj ects\Foundry Com memial - FOU\FOU-00' W emparl,85 W edands\PCN\Cover Letter doc
hart'- hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONME:NtAI. SOLUTIONS

Pre -Construction Notification
Proposed WestPark 85
Light Industrial Development
Beltway Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. FOU -002
March 1, 2017
hart � hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
#C-1269 Engineering
#-245 Geology
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 3334 Hillsborough Street
Charlotte, NC 28203 Raleigh, NC 27607 www.harthickman.com
704586.000'7 mam 919.847.4241 strain

O�O� WA 'r
9
> cm
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑X Yes ❑ No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
WestPark 85
2b.
County:
Mecklenburg
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Charlotte
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
WestPark 85 Property Holdings, LLC c/o Foundry Commercial
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
31521-665
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr. Bill Simerville
3d.
Street address:
121 W. Trade Street, Suite 2500
3e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
3f.
Telephone no.:
704-705-3863
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ AgentX❑ Other, specify: Property Developer
4b.
Name:
Mr. Dan Heath
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
WestPark 85 Property Holdings, LLC c/o Foundry Commercial
4d.
Street address:
121 West Trade Street, Suite 2500
4e.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28202
4f.
Telephone no.:
704-705-3863
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Matt Bramblett, PE
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Hart and Hickman, PC
5c.
Street address:
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100
5d. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28203
5e.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
5f.
Fax no.:
[phone]
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification Total of six tax parcels - 05320124,
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
05320129, 05320128, 05320118, 05320130, 05320102
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
I Latitude: 35.262737 Longitude: -80.983701
1 c. Property size:
104.607 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Unnamed tributary of Catawba River
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV; B; CA (Catawba River's classification)
2c. River basin:
Catawba
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The Site consists of six parcels (see above) located along Beltway Blvd, north of Performance Road and west of Margo Drive in Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The Site consists primarily of vacant, undeveloped land with one paved public right-of-way, Beltway Blvd, in the
southwestern portion. Residential use is to the north, west, and east, and light industrial use is to the south.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 3.05
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 3,896
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The project proposes to develop distribution warehouses for the break -bulk distribution of dry goods into the local Charlotte economy.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The planned development area will be graded with heavy equipment to prepare level building pads. Stormwater BMPs are included.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
Comments: Steve Chapin issued an Approved JD in 2002.
roject includin all rior hases in the ast?
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
E] Preliminary Q Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: Estes Design, Inc.
Name (if known): Chris Estes
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Mr. Steve Chapin of USACE issued an Approved JD in 2002. H&H recently met Mr. Alan Johnson of DEQ DWR on -Site on February 13, 2017 for a
site review and pre -app meeting. H&H also recently met Mr. David Shaeffer of USACE on February 15, 2017 for a site review and pre -app meeting.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑X Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
In 2002, a Section 404 permit was received to impact 0.07 acre of wetlands, 130 LF of perennial stream, and 150 LF of intermittent
stream (Action ID 200230067). In 2006, an additional Section 404 permit was received to re -permit the 90 LF of intermittent stream
impact that wasn't executed prior to the 2002 permit expiration date (SAW -2006-41762-361). In 2007, an additional Section 404
hermit was received to impact 0.32 acre of wetlands (SAW -2007-03357-360). The 0.32 acre of wetland impact was never executed.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑X Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The construction of Beltwav Blvd is considered Phase I of the nroiect. which was completed from 2002 to 2006. Phase II
of the project involves the construction of two break -bulk distribution warehouses in the western portion of the site. Phase
III of the project involves the construction of likely one additional build -to -suit break -bulk distribution warehouse on the
northeastern parcel of the site. Phase III also involves the construction of a secondary access roadway into the site from
Margo Drive as required by the City of Charlotte.
PCN Form - Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.063
W2 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.066
W3 P
Fill
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.229
W4 P
Culvert
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Yes
Corps
0.047
W5
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.405
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Trib. of Catawba River
INT
Corps
7
98
S2
Choose one
-
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
98
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
o
4g. Comments: Not Applicable
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
Not Applicable
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then vou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑X Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
61 -
Yes/No
B2
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Not Applicable
Page 5 of 10

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See Appendix C
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See Appendix C
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2b.
If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑X Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑X Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Not Applicable
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑X Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
49 linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
warm
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): "
square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
1 acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h.
Comments: The applicant proposes a 0.5:1 mitigation ratio for stream impacts and a 2:1 mitigation ratio for wetland impacts.
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Not applicable.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes X❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
70
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
Stormwater runoff shall be treated and detained per approved BMPs. Wet pond, Sandfilter and Forebay. No stormwater management structures will
be
placed in Waters of the US.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
City of Charlotte Land Development
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
City of Charlotte
X❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑X Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
OCoastal counties
❑HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
[]Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ YesX❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes 0 No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes 0 No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The
project is a phased project and the applicant is applying for Section 404 and Section 401 permits to account for impacts expected with future
phases of the project. Additional phases and/or impacts to Waters of the U.S. are not planned or proposed.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater will enter Charlotte Water sanitary sewer infrastructure and will be piped to an off-site Charlotte Water wastewater treatment plant.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
0 Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
ECS Carolinas, LLC reviewed the US Fish & Wildlife Service on-line database, conducted field reconnaissance,
and submitted information request letters to USFWS and DEQ Natural Heritage Program (See Appendix D)
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ YesX❑ No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
hftp://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/efhmapper/
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes 0 No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeoloqical resources?
ECS Carolinas, LLC reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office database, conducted field reconnaissance, and
submitted an information request letter to NC SHPO (See Appendix D)
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Reviewed FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map ID #3710450500M
Matt V. Bramblett
03-01-2017
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

, !W
APPROXIMATE TITLE
N 0 2000 a000 SITE LOCATION MAP
SCALE IN FEET PROJECT
WESTPARK 85 PRE -CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE MAPhart ''� hickman 2923 South Tryon Street -Suite 10(
Charlotte, North Carolina 28203
704586-0007 (p) 704586-0373 (0
MOUNTAIN ISLAND LAKE, NORTH CAROLINA, 1994 SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS
QUADRANGLE DATE: 3-1-17 REVISION NO: 0
7.5 MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC) JOB NO: FOU -002 FIGURE: 1

Appendix A
Agent Authorization
14
hart hickman
SMARTER MWA)WEHTAL SOLUTIONS

Agent Certification of Authorization
I, '13.0 j1M{^4,4e representing the prospective developer of Parcels
05320102, 05320118, 05320124, 05320128, 05320129, and 05320130 which are
located along Beltway Boulevard in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC (approx.
105 acres), certify that I have authorized Hart & Hickman, PC to act on prospective
developer's behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, and
acceptance of a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (if needed), Buffer
Applicability Determination, and 401/404 permitting for this property.
Prospective Developer's Signature
Name/Title:
Company:
Date
Agent's Signature
Matt Bramblett
Hart & Hickman, PC
3/1/17
Date

Appe ndix B
Preliminary Plat & Proposed Wetland Impacts
hart hickman
SMARTER MMONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

FLOOD CERTIFICATE THE EQUIPMENT USED TO ESTABLISH WETLAND LOCATION TO SURVEYOR'S NOTES:
SUB -METER ACCURACY WAS A NIKON NPL -352 TOTAL STATION
I CERTIFY THAT THE SUBJECT TRACT IS GRAPHICALLY LOCATED IN 'OTHER 1. WETLANDS SHOWN HEREON WERE DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN, INC.
m Ch
FIELD SURVEYED BY BURTON ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, NOVEMBER
AREAS ZONE X' AS DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND mom m > 2016 THRU FEBRUARY 2017.
URBAN DEVELOPMENT/ FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION AS SHOWN ON o
THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP �,c z r c 2. AREAS CALCULATED BY COORDINATE GEOMETRY.
COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 371 0 45 050 0M DATED MONTH SEPTEMBER 2, 2015.
-or- -ny 3. THE PURPOSE OF THIS MAP IS TO SHOW THE APPROXIMATE SECTION
THE NCGS COORDINATES WERE ESTABLISHED BY USING A LEICA MODEL S 404 BOUNDARY (WETLANDS AREA). THIS IS NOT A CERTIFIED BOUNDARY
GS14 (GNSS) AND THE NORTH CAROLINA GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE � SEE SHEET 8 FOR OWNER m OF GIS PARCEL 100 05320102, 05320118, 05320124, 05320128, CLARENCE VERNON HARTIS
SYSTEM (GNSS) REAL TIME NETWORK (RTN) UTILIZING THE NORTH MB 17 PG 323 w rz (TYPICAL) v rz 05320129, AND 05320130. PARCEL IDj 05318919
CAROLINA CONTINUOUSLY OPERATING REFERENCE STATION (CORS) MB 15 PG 113 PIPE FOUND DB 6331 PG 916
L _ _ _ _ _ MB 14 PG 287 FOUND
01 -T - od s oir, I o� fq, I o- Tau moa Tos �� Z.v Ao ojUjp ro To T �o fo Ao � n-
-
o `I� o REBAR/CAP (DISTURBED)
LA
LEGEND - - - - - - I $o' I $ I
T7 -B I ,�7 I ��-B I !° I I - I �f� I �,�tp0�i jI ��p I SI �Po I ����q I �I I 'tE, I I ��,p� I ���,�� I LA ��I ��� I ��'tP.D� �'�afl I �,p I �rPy\ 1 r L2 FOUND M6
05313108 �, Z7 Y7
o+ r a o o� REBAR
BC =BACK OF CURB L7 1tEBAR FOUND #5 N26 S5'21'E OUND+ N26'55'21"E 1 0 / 0.64' NORTH
FOUND #4/ 1246,22' REBAR/CAP OF LINE
P/L = PROPERTY LINE REBAR 1360.23' S86'36'43"E /
SEE DETAIL "A" 3 WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
LF =LINEAR FEET 49.71'
RCP = REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE SHEET 2
CMP = CORRUGATED METAL PIPE 05320121 WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC a Oil
HOLDINGS, LLC FOUND
PARCEL ID/ 05320129 LOCATION OF WETLAND AA AS y, ' I PARCEL IDI 05320128 �o REBAR/CAP
•= MONUMENTATION (SEE DESCRIPTION) DB 31521 PG 665 DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC_. {� p, DB 31521 PG 665
v MB 51 PG 502 2,760 sq.ft. m a MB 51 PG 502 SEE DETAIL "C"
�a5
_ - , 4
LOT B 0.06 acres z I LOT 5 SHEET
-I} o JOHNNIE FRANKLIN JOHNSON AND
DRAINAGE WAY LENGHTS
DRAINAGE
SECTION
LF
WAY
Radius
Length
"E"
SOUTHERN PA
1073
25.00'
TO 66' RCP
586'51'12"E
'E"
66" RCP
91
"E.
66' RCP TO
780
C3
WETLAND FLAG E2
130.89'
"E"
TOTAL
1944
25.00'
INTERSECTION OF
N40'15'06'W
'F'
"E" AND "I" TO
504
352.33'
78" CMP
335.83'
"F'
78" CMP
111
"F'
78" CMP TO
1337
330.00'
EASTERN P/L
N6'21'22"E
"F"
TOTAL
19
r FOUND `�-HILDA SANDERSON JOHNSON
u! �, LOCATION OF WETLAND "C" AS REBAR/CAP PARCEL IDI 5320112
05320122 f DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. DB 3802 PG 442
LOCATION OF WETLAN "B" AS I FOUND
FOUND 49,041 sres MB 17 PG 435
DELINEATED BY ESTES QESIGN INC. S36'3B'10"E REBAR/CAP
1.126 acres TRACT 3
2867 sq.ft. �E ss[ SE:-SSe -•93' 30'15' -\ FOUND
0.066 acres � V^' SSE -SSE -SSE -SS
/ SEE DETAIL "B" FOUND 228.21' N� REBAR/CAP
CATHERINE FAYE PORTER LOCATION OF DRAINAGE WAY "E' AS Cl REBAR CAP /
PARCEL ID/ 05320123 SHEET 3 DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN I C. FOUND C4 / 2`S9�
DB 20895 PG 571, TRACT 2FOUND lrZ" R/C�4
MB 43 PG 735 _
1-e3
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
�O
N 4611
NP
TRACT C SQUARE BARS33'18'Og"Iy W 526 56'43'W
414,87 FOUND X14 -,-E,400010 FOUND 24" CMP c
i RE AR Sl 9-06'32" 1081.40' (TOTAL)
SS S} 3A8. ET j/4 286 01' SET REBAR CAP 1
'3 gE REBAR REBAR 66"RCP LOCATION OF WETLAND "D" AS
i
S83127' 8' PR
EB WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC.
84.62' LOCAl10N OF DRAINAGE WAY 'E" AS
` - HOLDINGS, LLC c� i,. \ 25,545 sges
c� DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. FOUND REBAR/CAP SEE DETAIL "D" �N
LOCATION OF _ _ PARCEL ID# 05320130 NCGS GRID COORDS1 SHEET 5 0 0.586 acres
r� Coo AINAGE WAY "F" � DB 31521 PG 665 I NAD 83 2011 N a' 9. �
o � v� -��� r,`S� MB 51 PG 502 , BELTWAY BLVD. / 1 �, W LA r t^ FOUND X15
? N=556,990.26
-t a ars ss E=1,407,769.16 9.o REBAR
,p, LOT SA 6'� 60' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
N�•a corF u' �
WE TPA B5 PROPER $ -y�• �^
o wo a 0 N i " 3 MB 51 PG 502 CF=0.99984238 0 NCGS MONUMENT "BROCK"
3 HOLDINGS, LLC E C�
Nm N PARCEL IDIS 05320118 ssf 78"CMP.�3ry I N ` NCGS GRID COORDS \ OWNERSHIP UNCLEAR
5 'L 5�' 1'nA y,� R+0 NAD 83/2011 T PARCEL ID 05320196
o f DB 31521 PG TRACT 2 665 S� "W .y69' Z �✓ E=1410,282.62 M 29 G"2278
MB 40 PG 173 ry0 b. 5th- �j WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC 1 CF=0.99984238
o FOUND #4 -LOT 19 -SET ry6. 1� I PARCEL ID# 05320102
'

not surveyed are clearly Me 45 PG 381 R
information found in Book Page LOT 2
I
REBAR
N
36,090 sq.ft. (NET)
0.829
C. Gary Brooks, PLS NC/SC/VA
FOUND Burton Engineering Associates
indicated as drawn from ----.
- that the ratio of precision as calculated is 1: 25.479: that
DENNIS J. SIFAC
I BEVERLY
AND
\
acres (NET) 521'16'31"W
1913.93'
AXLE 5950 Fairview Road, Suits 100
charlotte, NC 28210
this lot was prepared in accordance with The Standards of Practice
P P P
A.
PARCEL IDS
S5 1 2C 2A
05314223
a, at
c 0 ass
I
Phoria [phone]
/ 05320104
for Land Surveying in North Carolina (21 NCAC 56.1600).
1 DB 21527
PG 316
f '
PARCEL ID# 05314401
DB 11368 PG 796
\ abrookeaburtonengneering,com
Thisday of A.D. 2017.
L
_
[phone]
SEE DETAIL "F" STANLEY L FRI
m �I
Surveyor
L-3180
Registration Number
PARCEL ID# 05314302 �
BURTON
THIS DRAWING IS THE
LORETTA N. HIPP REBAR
PARCEL IDI 05314220 �_
ENGINEERING
PROPERTY N
FASSOCIATES,
m I
rn z
ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERING P.C.
AND IS NOT
TORBCOPIED
016.629.00
DB 3614 PG 788, DB 27568 PG 43 _ d
�- I
REPRODUCED IN
CAct s
o r
CIVIL ENGINEERS
WHOLE OR PART. IT IS NOT
SCALE
LAND SURVEYORS
TO BE USED ON ANY OTHER
PARCEL ID# 05314401
DB 11368 PG 796
�
8
PROJECT AND IS TO BE
5950 Fairview Rd. • Suite 100• Charlotte, NC 28210
RETURNED UPON REQUEST,
[phone]
•••••

••,,,
FEET
121 W. TRADE STREET, SUITE 2500
10,1V
1 inch ft.
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
SHEET 1 OF 8

FLOOD CERTInCATE
I CERTIFY THAT THE SUBJECT TRACT IS GRAPHICALLY LOCATED IN "OTHER
AREAS ZONE X' AS DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT/ FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION AS SHOWN ON
THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 3710450500M DATED MONTH SEPTEMBER 2. 2015
BC = BACK OF CURB
PA = PROPERTY LINE
LF = LINEAR FEET
RCP = REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
CMP = CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
•= MONUMENTAT10N (SEE DESCRIPTION)
j0
oll- �00t�5
Nc G��O a
PREL 1 MI NARY PLA T
NOT FOR RECORDATION,
SALES, OR CONVEYANCE.
mass
•
S ■.■_■,■_► a
.EMS..■■■�■,Is
[phone]
■:■
LOCATION OF WETLAND "A" AS
DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC.
2,760 sq.ft.
0.063 acres
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC
PARCEL ID# 05320129
DB 31521 PG 655
MB 51 PG 502
LOT 6
LOCATION OF WETLAND "B" AS
DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC.
2867 sq.ft.
0.066 acres
B
3
N
IR
C.
x -A15 n
z
A14
ry b � ss
p
Bi
82-\ \ \
SSS �B12 34J�477EW��RWNDA
s 46"
1
85
`810
J
B7-- 69
�i.
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
HOLDINGS, LLC
PARCEL ID# 05320128
DB 31521 PG 655
MB 51 PG 502
LOT 5
BELTWAY BLVD.
60' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
MB 51 PG 502
1,16V(TIE UNE)
N26'11'31'E 195.21'
\-88 FOUNDr
DETAIL "A" REBAR/CAP
SCALE 1"=60'
THIS DRAWING IS THE
PROPERTY OF BURTON
ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, P.C.
AND IS NOT TO BE
REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN
WHOLE OR PART. IT IS NOT
TO BE USED ON ANY OTHER
PROJECT AND IS TO BE
RETURNED UPON REQUEST.
�

URF.:
FOUND
REBAR/CAP
CONTACT INFORMATION
C. Gary Brooks, PLS NC/SC/VA
Burton Engineering Associates
5950 Fairview Road, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28210
Phone [phone]
g rooks■b rtonsnaineerina.com
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
SURVEY OF JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF PROJECT NO.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS PARCELS 016.629.006
05320102, 05320118, 05320124, SCALE
05320128, 05320129, AND 05320130. 1" = 60'
DATE
LOCATED IN CITY OF CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
LLC 2/28/2017
DRAWN BY
PTC
CHECKED BY
CGB
CLIENT: DATE OF SURVEY:
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY 10/24/16 THRU 2/24/17
DRAWING NO.
HOLDINGS, LLC 016'629'006-WK1-
WETLANDS.dwg
121 W. TRADE STREET, SUITE 2500 SHEET 2 OF 8
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204
T
Line Table
Curve Table
Line #
Direction
Length
L10
N5347'09'E
7.57'
L11
S6219'02"E
10.74'
L12
543'14'30"E
19.66'
L13
S40'01'12"E
28.01'
L14
S3255'27'E
34.73'
L15
S50'26'01 "E
20.89'
L16
S75'25'12"E
28.63'
L17
N83'33'55"E
6.74'
L18
S2934'08"E
15.06'
1-19
S6537'50'W
35.94'
L20
N4830'02'W
35.35'
L21
N40'48'27"W
24.54'
L22
N34'15'34"W
25.25'
L23
N21 -47-41-W
32.24'
SURVEY OF JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF PROJECT NO.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS PARCELS 016.629.006
05320102, 05320118, 05320124, SCALE
05320128, 05320129, AND 05320130. 1" = 60'
DATE
LOCATED IN CITY OF CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
LLC 2/28/2017
DRAWN BY
PTC
CHECKED BY
CGB
CLIENT: DATE OF SURVEY:
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY 10/24/16 THRU 2/24/17
DRAWING NO.
HOLDINGS, LLC 016'629'006-WK1-
WETLANDS.dwg
121 W. TRADE STREET, SUITE 2500 SHEET 2 OF 8
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204
T
Line Table
Curve Table
Line #
Direction
Length
L24
N47'52'20"W
30.32'
L25
N52"05'25"W
28.66'
L26
N29'30'57"W
24.79'
L27
N27'37'51'W
41.07'
L28
N29'45'06"W
23.54'
L29
N26'10'56"W
50.52'
L30
N82'07'11 "E
26.02'
L31
550'20'25"E
16.08'
L32
513'47'36"E
29.30'
L33
S932'S4"E
27.65'
L34
S32'51'09'E
28.84'
L35
S8'09'1 3"E
26.36'
L36
S33'l3'47"E
34.20'
SURVEY OF JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF PROJECT NO.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS PARCELS 016.629.006
05320102, 05320118, 05320124, SCALE
05320128, 05320129, AND 05320130. 1" = 60'
DATE
LOCATED IN CITY OF CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
LLC 2/28/2017
DRAWN BY
PTC
CHECKED BY
CGB
CLIENT: DATE OF SURVEY:
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY 10/24/16 THRU 2/24/17
DRAWING NO.
HOLDINGS, LLC 016'629'006-WK1-
WETLANDS.dwg
121 W. TRADE STREET, SUITE 2500 SHEET 2 OF 8
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204
T
Curve Table
Curve #
Radius
Length
Chord Direction
Chord Length
C1
25.00'
20.30'
S86'51'12"E
19.75'
C2
55.00'
131.29'
S41'22'08'E
102.27'
C3
55.00'
130.89'
N84'48'23"W
102.12'
C4
25.00'
20.33'
1 N40-15-06- IN
19.77'
SURVEY OF JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF PROJECT NO.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS PARCELS 016.629.006
05320102, 05320118, 05320124, SCALE
05320128, 05320129, AND 05320130. 1" = 60'
DATE
LOCATED IN CITY OF CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINA
LLC 2/28/2017
DRAWN BY
PTC
CHECKED BY
CGB
CLIENT: DATE OF SURVEY:
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY 10/24/16 THRU 2/24/17
DRAWING NO.
HOLDINGS, LLC 016'629'006-WK1-
WETLANDS.dwg
121 W. TRADE STREET, SUITE 2500 SHEET 2 OF 8
CHARLOTTE, NC 28204
T

FIF1 ODD CERTIFICATE
I CERTIFY THAT THE SUBJECT TRACT IS GRAPHICALLY LOCATED IN 'OTHER
AREAS ZONE X' AS DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT/ FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION AS SHOWN ON
THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 3710450500M DATED MONTH SEPTEMBER 2, 2015.
LEGEND
BC = BACK OF CURB
PA = PROPERTY UNE
LF = UNEAR FEET
RCP =REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
CMP = CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
•= MONUMENTATiON (SEE DESCRIPTION)
TOP OF BANK
t0
�
10 O�\PO
�\o NNkr-
CATHERINE FAYE PORTER
PARCEL IDIS 05320123
DB 20895 PG 571, TRACT 2 FOUND X*
MB 43 PG 735 SQUARE BAR
TRACT C
/
/
/
/
/
/355
/
/
/
Curve Table
Curve III Radius Length Chord Direction Chord Length
C5 330.00' 352.33' N32'29'20"W 335.83'
C6 270.00' 287.37' 1 S32 -33-22"E 274.00'
DETAIL "B"
SCALE 1"=100'
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
SET #4 II FOUND
R BAR/CAP
( 371 REBAR
LOCATION OF DRAINAGE WAY "E' AS E26 E23 E22 1557
E24 66"RCP
DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. E28 ai 139
91 LF L75 E E20
si J
S33.18.09.w WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY 3 0129NGS, LLC Egg - E27 $19 32 W L38 L149
PARCEL ID
414.87' DB 31521 PG 665 ET #4 288.01' SET
MB 51 PG 502 6400 `N L g1' REBAR REBAR \
FOUND
LOT 6 57,x. SOaP REBAR/CAP
LOCATION OF DRAINAGE WAY 'E" AS E32 '+a8'
iw DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. FOUND #4 E30
w REBAR E31
L53
S8327'2B'W R®pR
E43 84.62'
E39 SES E33
_ _ �� E38 E36 6 p #1' ' o - 6 E34
E42 ®9>7J� - �eC E35
?I �� � L60 L59
EWESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
N > HOLDINGS, LLC
�� F3
N F2 r ,,. � PARCEL ID# 05320130
f APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF DB 31521 PG 665
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT �� �� MB 51 PG 502
ssE DB 16232 PG 868 ��• r0�0. LOT 5A
FS T�
�ass_ssE� � FOUND
. REBAR/CAP
PERFORMANCE LAND GROUP, LLC
PARCEL IDIS 05320117
DB 1BB01 PG 560
MB 38 PG 575
LOT 20
mMAN.:■:
i.�i �::si■ 1 • t
Is
WAS
Ff
/ -.
[phone]
Line Table
Line N
Direction
Length
L3
N63'04'30"W
51.91'
L4
S63'04'30"E
76.49'
L5
S63'04'30"E
42.98'
1-6
N63'04'30"W
67.56'
37
j N24'44'49"E
14.94'
L38
N35.33'21"E
6.03'
L39
N15'50'48"E
43.78'
L40
N22'00'45"E
51.33'
L41
N27'13'31"E
12.46'
L42
N10'36'38"E
33.22'
L43
N27'1 0'27"E
31.88'
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
SET #4 II FOUND
R BAR/CAP
( 371 REBAR
LOCATION OF DRAINAGE WAY "E' AS E26 E23 E22 1557
E24 66"RCP
DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. E28 ai 139
91 LF L75 E E20
si J
S33.18.09.w WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY 3 0129NGS, LLC Egg - E27 $19 32 W L38 L149
PARCEL ID
414.87' DB 31521 PG 665 ET #4 288.01' SET
MB 51 PG 502 6400 `N L g1' REBAR REBAR \
FOUND
LOT 6 57,x. SOaP REBAR/CAP
LOCATION OF DRAINAGE WAY 'E" AS E32 '+a8'
iw DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. FOUND #4 E30
w REBAR E31
L53
S8327'2B'W R®pR
E43 84.62'
E39 SES E33
_ _ �� E38 E36 6 p #1' ' o - 6 E34
E42 ®9>7J� - �eC E35
?I �� � L60 L59
EWESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
N > HOLDINGS, LLC
�� F3
N F2 r ,,. � PARCEL ID# 05320130
f APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF DB 31521 PG 665
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT �� �� MB 51 PG 502
ssE DB 16232 PG 868 ��• r0�0. LOT 5A
FS T�
�ass_ssE� � FOUND
. REBAR/CAP
PERFORMANCE LAND GROUP, LLC
PARCEL IDIS 05320117
DB 1BB01 PG 560
MB 38 PG 575
LOT 20
mMAN.:■:
i.�i �::si■ 1 • t
Is
WAS
Ff
/ -.
[phone]
Line Table
Line W
Direction
Length
L44
N15'06'36'E
17.46'
L45
N19'31'30"E
61.14'
L46
N25'35.23'E
14.03-
L47
N6'11'51"E
27.39'
L48
N4'32'20"E
43.59'
L49
N3'10'37"E
16.20-
L50
N3'10'37"E
30.14'
L51
N11'58'00"E
30.95'
L52
N7'34'38"E
17.82'
L53
N19'05'10"W
16.01'
L54
N16'06'39'E
11.77'
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
SET #4 II FOUND
R BAR/CAP
( 371 REBAR
LOCATION OF DRAINAGE WAY "E' AS E26 E23 E22 1557
E24 66"RCP
DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. E28 ai 139
91 LF L75 E E20
si J
S33.18.09.w WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY 3 0129NGS, LLC Egg - E27 $19 32 W L38 L149
PARCEL ID
414.87' DB 31521 PG 665 ET #4 288.01' SET
MB 51 PG 502 6400 `N L g1' REBAR REBAR \
FOUND
LOT 6 57,x. SOaP REBAR/CAP
LOCATION OF DRAINAGE WAY 'E" AS E32 '+a8'
iw DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. FOUND #4 E30
w REBAR E31
L53
S8327'2B'W R®pR
E43 84.62'
E39 SES E33
_ _ �� E38 E36 6 p #1' ' o - 6 E34
E42 ®9>7J� - �eC E35
?I �� � L60 L59
EWESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
N > HOLDINGS, LLC
�� F3
N F2 r ,,. � PARCEL ID# 05320130
f APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF DB 31521 PG 665
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT �� �� MB 51 PG 502
ssE DB 16232 PG 868 ��• r0�0. LOT 5A
FS T�
�ass_ssE� � FOUND
. REBAR/CAP
PERFORMANCE LAND GROUP, LLC
PARCEL IDIS 05320117
DB 1BB01 PG 560
MB 38 PG 575
LOT 20
mMAN.:■:
i.�i �::si■ 1 • t
Is
WAS
Ff
/ -.
[phone]
Line Table
Line #
Direction
Length
L55
N11'34'06'E
35.25'
L56
N6'i6'05"E
44.99'
L57
N4'47'25"E
32.36'
L58
NB'02'18"E
36.13'
L59
N12'04'30'E
10.53'
LBO
N12'04'30'E
20.21'
L61
N5'38'07'E
18.08'
L62
N2442.54'E
9.42'
1-63
N10 -01.22"E
31.57'
RN231L64
N41'34'21"E
36.40'
L65
1'34"E
1 33.79'
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
SET #4 II FOUND
R BAR/CAP
( 371 REBAR
LOCATION OF DRAINAGE WAY "E' AS E26 E23 E22 1557
E24 66"RCP
DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. E28 ai 139
91 LF L75 E E20
si J
S33.18.09.w WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY 3 0129NGS, LLC Egg - E27 $19 32 W L38 L149
PARCEL ID
414.87' DB 31521 PG 665 ET #4 288.01' SET
MB 51 PG 502 6400 `N L g1' REBAR REBAR \
FOUND
LOT 6 57,x. SOaP REBAR/CAP
LOCATION OF DRAINAGE WAY 'E" AS E32 '+a8'
iw DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. FOUND #4 E30
w REBAR E31
L53
S8327'2B'W R®pR
E43 84.62'
E39 SES E33
_ _ �� E38 E36 6 p #1' ' o - 6 E34
E42 ®9>7J� - �eC E35
?I �� � L60 L59
EWESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
N > HOLDINGS, LLC
�� F3
N F2 r ,,. � PARCEL ID# 05320130
f APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF DB 31521 PG 665
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT �� �� MB 51 PG 502
ssE DB 16232 PG 868 ��• r0�0. LOT 5A
FS T�
�ass_ssE� � FOUND
. REBAR/CAP
PERFORMANCE LAND GROUP, LLC
PARCEL IDIS 05320117
DB 1BB01 PG 560
MB 38 PG 575
LOT 20
mMAN.:■:
i.�i �::si■ 1 • t
Is
WAS
Ff
/ -.
[phone]
Line Table
Line /
Direction
Length
L66
N4516'51"E
18.08'
L67
N21'22'26'E
32.05'
L68
N32'51'11"E
37.61'
L69
N18'27'32"E
27.39'
L70
N47'30.35"E
27.03'
L71
N33'52'37'E
33.58'
L72
N23'17'53"E
47.05'
L73
N35'38'22'E
42.45'
L74
N40'16'09'E
12.39'
L75
N12 -25-58-E
20.69'
1-76
S88 -05.19-E
6.22'
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
SET #4 II FOUND
R BAR/CAP
( 371 REBAR
LOCATION OF DRAINAGE WAY "E' AS E26 E23 E22 1557
E24 66"RCP
DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. E28 ai 139
91 LF L75 E E20
si J
S33.18.09.w WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY 3 0129NGS, LLC Egg - E27 $19 32 W L38 L149
PARCEL ID
414.87' DB 31521 PG 665 ET #4 288.01' SET
MB 51 PG 502 6400 `N L g1' REBAR REBAR \
FOUND
LOT 6 57,x. SOaP REBAR/CAP
LOCATION OF DRAINAGE WAY 'E" AS E32 '+a8'
iw DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. FOUND #4 E30
w REBAR E31
L53
S8327'2B'W R®pR
E43 84.62'
E39 SES E33
_ _ �� E38 E36 6 p #1' ' o - 6 E34
E42 ®9>7J� - �eC E35
?I �� � L60 L59
EWESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
N > HOLDINGS, LLC
�� F3
N F2 r ,,. � PARCEL ID# 05320130
f APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF DB 31521 PG 665
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT �� �� MB 51 PG 502
ssE DB 16232 PG 868 ��• r0�0. LOT 5A
FS T�
�ass_ssE� � FOUND
. REBAR/CAP
PERFORMANCE LAND GROUP, LLC
PARCEL IDIS 05320117
DB 1BB01 PG 560
MB 38 PG 575
LOT 20
mMAN.:■:
i.�i �::si■ 1 • t
Is
WAS
Ff
/ -.
[phone]
Line Table
Line III
Direction
Length
L77
N80'59'25"E
35.16'
L78
N3429'01"E
17.52'
L79
N51'17'08"E
39.48'
L80
N51'23'10'E
38.66'
L81
N53'09'13'E
47.60'
L82
N76.20'SB'E
44.11-
L83
N7638'52"E
37.44'
L84
N60'53'57'E
29.98-
L85
N5'22'28"W
20.21'
L86
N1757'20"W
30.58'
L87
N46'51'49"E
19.83'
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
SET #4 II FOUND
R BAR/CAP
( 371 REBAR
LOCATION OF DRAINAGE WAY "E' AS E26 E23 E22 1557
E24 66"RCP
DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. E28 ai 139
91 LF L75 E E20
si J
S33.18.09.w WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY 3 0129NGS, LLC Egg - E27 $19 32 W L38 L149
PARCEL ID
414.87' DB 31521 PG 665 ET #4 288.01' SET
MB 51 PG 502 6400 `N L g1' REBAR REBAR \
FOUND
LOT 6 57,x. SOaP REBAR/CAP
LOCATION OF DRAINAGE WAY 'E" AS E32 '+a8'
iw DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. FOUND #4 E30
w REBAR E31
L53
S8327'2B'W R®pR
E43 84.62'
E39 SES E33
_ _ �� E38 E36 6 p #1' ' o - 6 E34
E42 ®9>7J� - �eC E35
?I �� � L60 L59
EWESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
N > HOLDINGS, LLC
�� F3
N F2 r ,,. � PARCEL ID# 05320130
f APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF DB 31521 PG 665
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT �� �� MB 51 PG 502
ssE DB 16232 PG 868 ��• r0�0. LOT 5A
FS T�
�ass_ssE� � FOUND
. REBAR/CAP
PERFORMANCE LAND GROUP, LLC
PARCEL IDIS 05320117
DB 1BB01 PG 560
MB 38 PG 575
LOT 20
mMAN.:■:
i.�i �::si■ 1 • t
Is
WAS
Ff
/ -.
[phone]
Line Table
Une
Direction
Length
L88
N73 -05-30"E
17.71'
L89
N75.57'58"E
17.70'
L90
N75'57'58'E
15.19'
L91
N56'06'13"E
21.70'
L92
N61'12'59"E
25.52'
L93
N70'29'53'E
28.49'
L94
N68'54'44"E
10.86'
L95
S43'34'03'E
38.49'
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
SET #4 II FOUND
R BAR/CAP
( 371 REBAR
LOCATION OF DRAINAGE WAY "E' AS E26 E23 E22 1557
E24 66"RCP
DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. E28 ai 139
91 LF L75 E E20
si J
S33.18.09.w WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY 3 0129NGS, LLC Egg - E27 $19 32 W L38 L149
PARCEL ID
414.87' DB 31521 PG 665 ET #4 288.01' SET
MB 51 PG 502 6400 `N L g1' REBAR REBAR \
FOUND
LOT 6 57,x. SOaP REBAR/CAP
LOCATION OF DRAINAGE WAY 'E" AS E32 '+a8'
iw DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. FOUND #4 E30
w REBAR E31
L53
S8327'2B'W R®pR
E43 84.62'
E39 SES E33
_ _ �� E38 E36 6 p #1' ' o - 6 E34
E42 ®9>7J� - �eC E35
?I �� � L60 L59
EWESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
N > HOLDINGS, LLC
�� F3
N F2 r ,,. � PARCEL ID# 05320130
f APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF DB 31521 PG 665
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT �� �� MB 51 PG 502
ssE DB 16232 PG 868 ��• r0�0. LOT 5A
FS T�
�ass_ssE� � FOUND
. REBAR/CAP
PERFORMANCE LAND GROUP, LLC
PARCEL IDIS 05320117
DB 1BB01 PG 560
MB 38 PG 575
LOT 20
mMAN.:■:
i.�i �::si■ 1 • t
Is
WAS
Ff
/ -.
[phone]
T
PROJECT NO.
016.629.006
SCALE
1" = 100'
DATE
2/28/2017
DRAWN BY
PTC
CHECKED BY
CGB
)ATE OF SURVEY:
10/24/16 THRU 2/24/17
DRAWING NO.
016.629.006-WK1-
WETLANDS.dwg
SHEET 3 OF 8
SURVEY OF JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF
LOCATION OF DRAINAGE WAY "F
��
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS PARCELS
AS DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC.
c \\sSf
�
F6
i 8'T
05320102, 05320118, 05320124,
w VSs
S
F7 FFOUND
\sS
,�

Phone
ahrooks0burtonermIneerina.com
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
T
PROJECT NO.
016.629.006
SCALE
1" = 100'
DATE
2/28/2017
DRAWN BY
PTC
CHECKED BY
CGB
)ATE OF SURVEY:
10/24/16 THRU 2/24/17
DRAWING NO.
016.629.006-WK1-
WETLANDS.dwg
SHEET 3 OF 8

FLOOD CERTIFICATE
I CERTIFY THAT THE SUBJECT TRACT IS
GRAPHICALLY LOCATED IN "OTHER AREAS
ZONE X" AS DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT
OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT/
FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION AS
SHOWN ON THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE
MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 3710450500M
DATED MONTH SEPTEMBER 2. 2015.
LEGEND
BC = BACK OF CURB
PA = PROPERTY LINE
LF = LINEAR FEET
RCP = REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
CMP = CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
•- MONUMENTAT10N (SEE DESCRIPTION)
ros - -- = TOP OF BANk
SET
DETAIL "C"
SCALE 1"=100'
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
DB 24185 PG 97
Line Table
��

[phone]
DETAIL "C.1" o
N
Sy 3E SCALE 1"=50' C1B�
C21J L1s L191
`C202'
2'
C20 9 411'
4.
C6 C17- .64'
L176 �C13 L188(T)
L185 (T) L
C51 </)) C7 C12 �' (SBA "� " 24' LFP D
L175 (T) ` ' 12.85' L178 (T) !�S? C147! 0' ^0m
7.94' 60.86'
0 14 3.33' 12.7 C 11 22.505
C4 C8 \11110
a ` C16
C3 1
L180 C1D 1 C15
C9 1
VICINITY
(NOT TO
�(o
ONP
NG10
GF
T
Curve Table
Curve #
Radius
I Length
I Chord Direction
Chord Length
C3
1 55.00'
130.89'
N84 -48.23"W
102.12'
�`

-
NOT FOR RECORDATION, C. G;yBINFORMATION
PLS NC/SC/VA
Burton Engineering Associates
Charlotte, NC 28210
SALES, OR CONVEYANCE, 5960 FalMew Road, -it. 100
Phone [phone]
ghrookedburtmengineadog tam
SURVEY OF JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF
PROJECT NO.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS PARCELS
016.629.006
05320102, 05320118, 05320124,
SCALE
05320128, 05320129, AND 05320130.
1" = 100
2/28 2017
OWNER: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC
LOCATED IN CITY OF CHARLOTTE
DRAWN BY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
PTC
NORTH CAROLINA
CHECKED BY
CGB
CLIENT:
DATE OF SURVEY:
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
10/24/16 THRU 2/24/17
DRAWING NO.
016'629.006-WK1-
HOLDINGS, LLC
WETLANDS.dwg
121 W. TRADE STREET, SUITE 2500
SHEET 4 OF 8
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202

FLOOD CERTIFICATE
1 CERTIFY THAT THE SUBJECT TRACT IS GRAPHICALLY LOCATED IN 'OTHER
AREAS ZONE X' AS DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT/ FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION AS SHOWN ON
THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP N
COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 3710450500M DATED MONTH SEPTEMBER 2, 2015.
LEGEND p "(0,�� �
BC = BACK OF CURB �� SITE
PA = PROPERTY LINE NO G�1p
LF = LINEAR FEET G
RCP = REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE N r
CMP = CORRUGATED METAL PIPE 1,`
•= MONUMENTATION (SEE DESCRIPTION) I -es FLAN
FOUND
REBAR/CAP
JOHNNIE FRANKLIN JOHNSON AND
HILDA SANDERSON JOHNSON
PARCEL ID/ 5320112
DB 3802 PG 442
MB 17 PG 435
TRACT 3
N3015'52'E
\ APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT
DB 24185 PG 97
SSE D34 D33
—�_)
�(y y1� SSE—SSE�
C) -- ,-
rQ ` D353 S25'O6'39"W
D36 512'2302 W 42.07'
^ryoJ ce
5•
t�B9 of py Cal56 N
5`ry S`ti' T E N23'15'06'E
'
4. 2' 64' t41204 1, 2 45.52' c
C17— �2
L155 (T)y_ X21 \ \-D6
�Z
Y?S l 4 `D5
O ,m 24" CMP Dl E L223 7ti
21'LF LDS— E `D4
■■■��siui
��■�i�sii i �
u■erii �t■
■■i .■..-....
[phone]
THIS DRAWING IS THE
PROPERTY OF BURTON
ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, P.C.
AND IS NOT TO BE
REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN
WHOLE OR PART. IT IS NOT
TO BE USED ON ANY OTHER
PROJECT AND IS TO BE
RETURNED UPON REQUEST.
FOUND
REBAR/CAP
S29'11'19'W D32
45.11'
D31
400,
32 42' 23.799 09"W N483 ,
�D3D� �3_s•t?�E
D7
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
HOLDINGS, LLC
PARCEL ID# 05320102
DB 31521 PG 665
MB 51 PG 502
LOT 4
4S.99B W
s.
415
D8-/
4?�j?fit D28-
` ��D
D9 "E
LOCATION OF WETLAND "D" AS
DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC.
25,545 sq.ft.
0.586 acres
DETAIL "D"
SCALE 1"=50'
D29 'Sem
N84'01'38'W
20.79'
\
—D28`\ \ /FOUND
3 Sj 8 W 581 , / S241
ZY4f' REBAR/CAP
9 54'48 W S29'46'18"W
_ /' D l l 36.53' 42.88'
N84'34'13'E� 1y45
24.06' �382--8-
D12�N4¢4j02.
k 31.16, 4' N4274,
5.77 0 E
D14
D15

�0 L215�\
D20
`�19 L218 1217
D16 r
`D18 1
D17 D19
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
PRELIMINARY PLAT
NOT FOR RECORDATION,
SALES, OR CONVEYANCE.
Line Table
PROJECT NO.
Line #
Direction
Length
L185
564'43'58"W
15.76'
L186
S32'56'26"E
20.78'
L187
S36'48'12'E
17.84'
L188
N64'16'25'E
6.36'
L189
N68'35'30'E
43.92-
L215
N75'44'13"W
7.90-
L216
N1824'56"W
17.65'
L217
N42'51 *23"E
22.67'
L218
N21'53'49"E
26.59'
L219
N43'51'19"E
24.06'
L220
N57'46'11"E
17.89'
L221
NB'43'41'E
22.62'
L222
N6'11'30"W
19.20'
L223
N3833'35"E
35.83'
L224
N39*06'34E
28.05'
L225
N57'49'00"E
10.49'
PRELIMINARY PLAT
NOT FOR RECORDATION,
SALES, OR CONVEYANCE.
PROJECT NO.
SURVEY OF JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS PARCELS
016.629.006
SCALE
05320102, 05320118, 05320124,
05320128, 05320129, AND 05320130.
1" = 50'
DATE
2/28/2017
OWNER: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC
LOCATED IN CITY OF CHARLOTTE
DRAWN BY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
PTC
NORTH CAROLINA
CHECKED BY
CLIENT:
CGB
DATE OF SURVEY.
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
10/24/16 THRU 2/24/17
DRAWING NO.
016.629.006—WK1—
CONTACT INFORMATION
C. Gary Brooks, PLS NC/SC/VA
HOLDINGS LLC
Burton Englneerinq Associates
5950 Fairview Road, Sults 100
Charlotte, NC 28210
121 W. TRADE STREET, SUITE 2500
WETLANDS.dw 9
Phone (7bur 55nginee
ghrooka■hurtonenglneerinq.eom
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
SHEET OF 8

FOUND/
REBAR/CAP
DETAIL "E"
SCALE 1"=50'
-(TIE UNE)
N74'30'58'E 20.58'
F12
10
�. r F13
I
F14
i
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
HOLDINGS, LLC
PARCEL ID# 05320124
DB 31521 PG 665
MB 45 PG 381
LOT 3

F27
L106
L97
F20
:siear" iii■ • 1
1•
(TIE UNE)
�S8312'44'E 47.49'
\N26-18'52*E6'5 � 21ae fG24
�3,'� � sy. G,�9.
\\ rG26
\
F1
SETF26-
#4
qo \
A
REBAR
2.677
S 0li.
0 19>r.'�
F27
L106
L97
F20
G27
F22
�O
°NP
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC
PARCEL ID# 05320102
DB 31521 PG 565
MB 51 PG 502
LOT 4
-G22
� J
Se
�-0��p'^;
\�
LOCATION OF DRAINAGE WAY "F" AS
DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC.
ss.
G21
W U!
-G20
G28
�ip�?.
o�
r �
�7 � �
o
F25
\mss
Line Table
SETF26-
#4
qo \
A
REBAR
2.677
p}�ql ass
F27
24e�F�oc\
L97
N67'50'15"E
\ 9'��Ftir
L98
THIS DRAWING IS THE
PROPERTY OF BURTON
ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, P.C.
AND IS NOT TO BE
REPRODUCED OR COPIED IN
WHOLE OR PART. IT IS NOT
TO BE USED ON ANY OTHER
PROJECT AND IS TO BE
RETURNED UPON REQUEST.
G19
tisS
3?,
+Iso3?y�
2
/-G18 �'y� N41�29,
\_ �G1
G2.-tp047 S4p�20'46'WG4
28' 63' /SSS,
Li20
32848,
m 29g. W
F7RL122 \29
Fl ODD CERTIFICATE
I CERTIFY THAT THE SUBJECT TRACT IS GRAPHICALLY LOCATED IN "OTHER
AREAS ZONE X' AS DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT/ FEDERAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION AS SHOWN ON
THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 3710450500M DATED MONTH SEPTEMBER 2, 2015.
D
BC = BACK OF CURB
PA = PROPERTY LINE
LF = LINEAR FEET
RCP = REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
CMP = CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
0= MONUMENTATION (SEE DESCRIPTION)
Taa - TOP OF BANK
LOCATION OF WETLAND "G" AS
DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC.
15,473 sq,ft,
0.355 acres
7
N4158
016 ' 49, 03, E
Sag 44'05.W
48.43'
G6
S Jj �y 7�J
3S S29'03'27'W F30
33.28'
GA26- 3n
Line Table
Line #
Direction
Length
L96
N77'4436'E
20.99'
L97
N67'50'15"E
33.51'
L98
S66'51'52"E
19.97'
L99
S19'13'48"E
11.88'
L100
S79'13'48"E
12.09'
L101
N89'48'04"E
27.49 -
7.49'L102
Ll 02
S23'16'54"E
15.14'
L103
N72'25'05'E
61.17'
L104
N58'41'11"E
21.24'
L105
N58'41'11'E
11.29'
L106
S32'00'36"E
6.34'
L107
532'00'36"E
13.40'
L108
N74'15'13"E
28.64'
L109
S38'14'04"E
23.52'
L110
N76'13'06"E
32.41'
1-111
585'49'36"E
23.50'
L112
N60'05'19"E
42.87'
L113
N67'23'24"E
16.62'
L114
573'45'46"E
8.09'
L115
N73'57'46'E
19.70'
LOCATION OF WETLAND "G" AS
DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC.
15,473 sq,ft,
0.355 acres
7
N4158
016 ' 49, 03, E
Sag 44'05.W
48.43'
G6
S Jj �y 7�J
3S S29'03'27'W F30
33.28'
GA26- 3n
G15
G141
S31'53'02" 16"
32.15' W 533'39' W ?35o3
33.52'
� S
�G7 �Ibr S9?8
X31-C1Y7�-_\, 32 `GB
G9 � 1-145
G10 G11
-F33
s
SsS
GA 25
0
Ss7 .
rr���
T
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
�i 1/ ►lam >:0 m A
FOR RECORDATION,
Line Table
Line #
Direction
Length
L116
S42'49'45"E
9.01'
L717
S42'49'45'E
10.83'
L118
N67'31'38"E
21.23'
1-119
N35'54'16"E
13.61'
L120
N35'54'16"E
8.34'
L121
NB'28'55"E
3.14'
L122
N8'2W55"E
11.78'
L123
N39'18'52"E
9.24'
L124
N60'09'11"E
43.82 -
3.82'L125
Ll 25
N56'41'20"E
46.43'
L126
N6'20'36"E
17.78'
L127
N17'02'52"E
38.51'
L128
N67'38'34"E
28.97'
L129
N49'16'59"E
33.85'
L144
S1 1'21'35"W
13.66'
L145
537'02'05"W
18.57 -
8.57'L146
Ll 46
S55'48'07"W
12.75'
L147
539'29'32"W
16.74'
L148
N86'33'02"W
12.34'
G15
G141
S31'53'02" 16"
32.15' W 533'39' W ?35o3
33.52'
� S
�G7 �Ibr S9?8
X31-C1Y7�-_\, 32 `GB
G9 � 1-145
G10 G11
-F33
s
SsS
GA 25
0
Ss7 .
rr���
T
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
�i 1/ ►lam >:0 m A
FOR RECORDATION,
,••,,

,,,,"",,,\
Phone [phone]
�hroakamurtmenginaerini
SURVEY OF JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF
PROJECT NO.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS PARCELS
016.629.006
05320102, 05320118, 05320124,
SCALE
05320128, 05320129, AND 05320130.
1" = 50'
OWNER: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC
DATE
2 28 2017
LOCATED IN CITY OF CHARLOTTE
DRAWN BY
MECKLENBURG COUNTY
PTC
NORTH CAROLINA
CHECKED BY
CLIENT:
CGB
DATE OF SURVEY:
2 WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
1024/16 THRU 224/17
HOLDINGS, LLC
DRAWING NO.
016.629.006-WK7-
WETLANDS.dwg
121 W. TRADE STREET, SUITE 2500
SHEET 6 OF 8
�� CHARLOTTE, NC 28202

0 19. r

G9, � L145 � -G12
F30 G10 G11 X144
d 6 \� F33
S
at66 Ste.
561 l'9<J :\ N6 LS p1
8p4S? ass F34
9,
531'43'52"W F3 L133
\
A _ 30.00' /-GA23
\jss G24S31'43'52-
3ss 16.30' ass F36 " F37
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY\
HOLDINGS, LLC S87'47'34'W 4.45'
PARCEL ID# 05320124 GA22' ,
DB 31521 PG 665 S82'34'16"W�j, 1
MB 45 PG 381 25.96' ass
LOT 3 GA21,� S mss
S65'22'05"W 16.9 >> rF
�� 3
625.28' m p>.<'
521'30'40"W A uJ
642.21' (TOTAL)
FOUND #4 a
REBAR \
�s
•10
Off\ O �� I ryO�1
tJORG � NP
DENNIS J. SIRACUSA AND
BEVERLY A. SIRACUSA to
PARCEL ID# 05314223 ,,,
DB 21527 PG 316 w
C
� •own 0111180
e M aw,E: E-0 i
■.:j ice:
MEN
aa�i -0
MEN • 1
:,.;a1. m
.....,.
-GA1
ti
VO
6d'bs.
.0,5r.
ko �GA2
yam.'}}
1�9.
J�
GA3 rn

'•�_ """
�`�
� •own 0111180
e M aw,E: E-0 i
■.:j ice:
MEN
aa�i -0
MEN • 1
:,.;a1. m
.....,.
-GA1
ti
VO
6d'bs.
.0,5r.
ko �GA2
yam.'}}
1�9.
J�
GA3 rn
V
�F38 m Ui
rp
GA4-
m
7J JJRJ
-GA5
W
41 ^ OR
�o
M M
42 -GA-6A
GA 6D
m
L228 GA -6B
1
29
A-6T--
LEGEND
z BC =BACK OF CURB
rn ca P/L = PROPERTY LINE
o � LF = LINEAR FEET ass
=a RCP = REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
CMP = CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
•= MONUMENTATION (SEE DESCRIPTION)
row = TOP OF BANK
FLOOD CERTIFICATE
I CERTIFY THAT THE SUBJECT TRACT IS
GRAPHICALLY LOCATED IN "OTHER AREAS ZONE X"
AS DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT/ FEDERAL INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION AS SHOWN ON THE FEDERAL
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD
INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER
3710450500M DATED MONTH SEPTEMBER 2, 2015
FOUND #5 6010'
REBAR FOUND #5
5950 Fairview Rd. • Suite 100" Charlotte, NC 28210 1 REBAR
[phone] '
FIN1
FIN2
Line Table
Line #
Direction
Length
L126
N6'20'36"E
17.78'
L127
N17'02'52"E
38.51'
L128
N67'38'34'E
28.97'
L129
N49'18'59"E
33.85'
L130
582'37'21"E
23.10'
L131
N4422.01"E
11.90'
L132
N82'09'08'E
9.17'
L133
N82'09'08"E
3.57'
L134
S80'58'06"E
12.80'
L135
N44'09'11"E
23.38'
L136
S8746'1 2"E
33.88'
L137
S43'27'16"E
12.92'
L138
SBB'48'49"E
7.36'
L139
N64'59'49'E
17.27'
L140
S11'33'05"E
26.48'
L141
N65'47'55"E
32.91'
L142
N63'51'37'E
54.57'
L143
N48'14'43'E
42.23'
L144
S1121'35'W
13.66'
L145
S37.02'05'W
18.57'
V
�F38 m Ui
rp
GA4-
m
7J JJRJ
-GA5
W
41 ^ OR
�o
M M
42 -GA-6A
GA 6D
m
L228 GA -6B
1
29
A-6T--
LEGEND
z BC =BACK OF CURB
rn ca P/L = PROPERTY LINE
o � LF = LINEAR FEET ass
=a RCP = REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE
CMP = CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
•= MONUMENTATION (SEE DESCRIPTION)
row = TOP OF BANK
FLOOD CERTIFICATE
I CERTIFY THAT THE SUBJECT TRACT IS
GRAPHICALLY LOCATED IN "OTHER AREAS ZONE X"
AS DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT/ FEDERAL INSURANCE
ADMINISTRATION AS SHOWN ON THE FEDERAL
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD
INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER
3710450500M DATED MONTH SEPTEMBER 2, 2015
FOUND #5 6010'
REBAR FOUND #5
5950 Fairview Rd. • Suite 100" Charlotte, NC 28210 1 REBAR
[phone] '
FIN1
FIN2
r
I -e
/
VICINITY
ISCAL
(NOT
PRELIMINARY PLAT
NOT FOR RECORDATION,
SALES, OR CONVEYANCE
0 -1 --� GA -9A
ro
ro ,Z' GA -9B
,2.1 UPT �_ro L235
LOCATION OF WETLAND "GA" AS �� IN3 \ F46 L277 234 a -"c
DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. T1E 0305 L304 L295 �)8
37,243 sq.ft. (TOTAL) L
1,153 sq.ft. (in UPLAND AREA) 1 FIN29
36,090 sq.ft. (NET) FIN1 `T UP5 UP6 UP7 B 9
0.829 acres (NET) FIN28 I
FIN2 FIN27J �a UP8
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC
PARCEL ID# 05320102 C3 XFIN25 I a
SEE DETAIL "D.1" OMB15121PG PG 5025 FIN3 69 0j �y6 `FIN22
LOT 4 FIN26 00 L299
\`FIN24
`FIN23
GA-9A�
\> GA -9B GA -9 GA -10H FIN4
L2X66
o 3� L235 36
` -237 X-FIN9
L238 GA -10F
SGA -101 L241 /-GA-10E FINS --x"
0 �' c m�83 `26 �FIN11
��
- z
`GA -10G N GA -10E FIN6 m
,FIN11 \ c Gs
F," --1-GA-1OC DETAIL "F.1"Uj65 /
/,-GA-10B��A-GA-10B SCALE 1"=20' FIN7 FIN8 FIN12J 6p
FIN14
FIN131L25 I GA -1
�FIN15 \tea 0 'r5'---GA-10A \3s L2s81 l2 , SURVEY OF JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF PROJECT NO.
S tiT Of s\ SJ -FIN16 \\0 MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS PARCELS 016.629.006 SCALE
RY�gT �'�,, Lze I G05320102, 05320118, 05320124,
\�sse2-�8�FROC ass FIN17J , a 05320128, 05320129, AND 05320130. D = so'
\�Sp Fq 'o \ L255 L254 FIN21 �� /rGA11 OWNER: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC 22/26 2017
sjFMF�l ass FINI8FIN19-/ X53 1 �� LOCATED IN CITY OF CHARLOTTE DRAWN BY
L28FIN Q ' 52 9 MECKLENBURG COUNTY PTC
\3s L2512 F L288 �7" GA12 NORTH CAROLINA CHECKED BY
\ass s L250 1584.6 '
1CGB
18'01 CLIENT:
24.2' 5. 9' 0/24/ 6 THRU 2/24/17
DATE OF SURVEY.
1913,93' (TOTAL)
S21 -16'31'w CONTACT INFORMATION DRAWING 85 PROPERTY DRAWING N0.
C. Gary Brooks, PLS NC/SC/VA016.629.006-WK1-
Barton Engineering Aeaaclatee OLDINGS, LLC
DETAIL "F 5950 Fairview Road, State 100 WETLANDS.dwg
+� Charlotte, NG 28210 121 W. TRADE STREET, SUITE 2500
SCALE 1 =50 Phone [phone] SHEET 7 OF 8
gbrook,0burtonenoineerina.com CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
Line Table
Line #
Direction
Length
L146
S55'48'07'W
12.75'
L226
583'53'55"E
15.26'
L227
S7'35'08'E
13.05'
L228
S2532'40W
13.69'
L229
S60'16'12"E
10.66'
L234
N21'54'02"E
12.35'
L235
N20'30'09"E
16.13'
L236
N36'08'49"E
17.64'
L237
S23'1 3'04"E
11.38'
L238
N27'23'07"E
23.97'
L239
S70'41'34"E
17.49'
L240
N4'39'29"W
14.38'
L241
N23'05'20"E
23.16'
L242
585'54'43"E
25.35'
L243
565'38'16"E
17.65'
L244
N4555'05"W
8.58-
L245
N55'06'11'E
18.81'
L246
N82'31'23"E
18.27'
L247
S86'54'36'E
34.46'
L248
N66'43'38"E
14.87'
r
I -e
/
VICINITY
ISCAL
(NOT
PRELIMINARY PLAT
NOT FOR RECORDATION,
SALES, OR CONVEYANCE
0 -1 --� GA -9A
ro
ro ,Z' GA -9B
,2.1 UPT �_ro L235
LOCATION OF WETLAND "GA" AS �� IN3 \ F46 L277 234 a -"c
DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. T1E 0305 L304 L295 �)8
37,243 sq.ft. (TOTAL) L
1,153 sq.ft. (in UPLAND AREA) 1 FIN29
36,090 sq.ft. (NET) FIN1 `T UP5 UP6 UP7 B 9
0.829 acres (NET) FIN28 I
FIN2 FIN27J �a UP8
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC
PARCEL ID# 05320102 C3 XFIN25 I a
SEE DETAIL "D.1" OMB15121PG PG 5025 FIN3 69 0j �y6 `FIN22
LOT 4 FIN26 00 L299
\`FIN24
`FIN23
GA-9A�
\> GA -9B GA -9 GA -10H FIN4
L2X66
o 3� L235 36
` -237 X-FIN9
L238 GA -10F
SGA -101 L241 /-GA-10E FINS --x"
0 �' c m�83 `26 �FIN11
��
- z
`GA -10G N GA -10E FIN6 m
,FIN11 \ c Gs
F," --1-GA-1OC DETAIL "F.1"Uj65 /
/,-GA-10B��A-GA-10B SCALE 1"=20' FIN7 FIN8 FIN12J 6p
FIN14
FIN131L25 I GA -1
�FIN15 \tea 0 'r5'---GA-10A \3s L2s81 l2 , SURVEY OF JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF PROJECT NO.
S tiT Of s\ SJ -FIN16 \\0 MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS PARCELS 016.629.006 SCALE
RY�gT �'�,, Lze I G05320102, 05320118, 05320124,
\�sse2-�8�FROC ass FIN17J , a 05320128, 05320129, AND 05320130. D = so'
\�Sp Fq 'o \ L255 L254 FIN21 �� /rGA11 OWNER: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC 22/26 2017
sjFMF�l ass FINI8FIN19-/ X53 1 �� LOCATED IN CITY OF CHARLOTTE DRAWN BY
L28FIN Q ' 52 9 MECKLENBURG COUNTY PTC
\3s L2512 F L288 �7" GA12 NORTH CAROLINA CHECKED BY
\ass s L250 1584.6 '
1CGB
18'01 CLIENT:
24.2' 5. 9' 0/24/ 6 THRU 2/24/17
DATE OF SURVEY.
1913,93' (TOTAL)
S21 -16'31'w CONTACT INFORMATION DRAWING 85 PROPERTY DRAWING N0.
C. Gary Brooks, PLS NC/SC/VA016.629.006-WK1-
Barton Engineering Aeaaclatee OLDINGS, LLC
DETAIL "F 5950 Fairview Road, State 100 WETLANDS.dwg
+� Charlotte, NG 28210 121 W. TRADE STREET, SUITE 2500
SCALE 1 =50 Phone [phone] SHEET 7 OF 8
gbrook,0burtonenoineerina.com CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
Line Table
Line #
Direction
Length
L249
S1'39'44"E
24.14'
L250
S70'21'08"W
5.94'
L251
N69'49'51"W
10.04'
L252
S42'58'29"W
14.25'
L253
S48'18'34"W
11.07'
L254
S41'52'41"W
12.88'
L255
S85'51'02"W
13.67'
L256
S78'25'07"W
17.58'
L257
S63'14'30"W
14.71'
L258
549'41.11 "W
11.32'
L259
S35'22'20"W
9.38'
L260
S72'14'35'W
14.87-
L261
S79'02'50"W
10.83'
L262
S43'51'07"W
12.14'
L263
S46'31'31"W
10.09'
L264
569'55'49"E
13.43'
L265
S6'12'28"W
5.59'
L266
N74'00'38'W
9.87'
L267
N76'48'24"W
9.21-
L268
S53'02'52"W
21.69'
r
I -e
/
VICINITY
ISCAL
(NOT
PRELIMINARY PLAT
NOT FOR RECORDATION,
SALES, OR CONVEYANCE
0 -1 --� GA -9A
ro
ro ,Z' GA -9B
,2.1 UPT �_ro L235
LOCATION OF WETLAND "GA" AS �� IN3 \ F46 L277 234 a -"c
DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. T1E 0305 L304 L295 �)8
37,243 sq.ft. (TOTAL) L
1,153 sq.ft. (in UPLAND AREA) 1 FIN29
36,090 sq.ft. (NET) FIN1 `T UP5 UP6 UP7 B 9
0.829 acres (NET) FIN28 I
FIN2 FIN27J �a UP8
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC
PARCEL ID# 05320102 C3 XFIN25 I a
SEE DETAIL "D.1" OMB15121PG PG 5025 FIN3 69 0j �y6 `FIN22
LOT 4 FIN26 00 L299
\`FIN24
`FIN23
GA-9A�
\> GA -9B GA -9 GA -10H FIN4
L2X66
o 3� L235 36
` -237 X-FIN9
L238 GA -10F
SGA -101 L241 /-GA-10E FINS --x"
0 �' c m�83 `26 �FIN11
��
- z
`GA -10G N GA -10E FIN6 m
,FIN11 \ c Gs
F," --1-GA-1OC DETAIL "F.1"Uj65 /
/,-GA-10B��A-GA-10B SCALE 1"=20' FIN7 FIN8 FIN12J 6p
FIN14
FIN131L25 I GA -1
�FIN15 \tea 0 'r5'---GA-10A \3s L2s81 l2 , SURVEY OF JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF PROJECT NO.
S tiT Of s\ SJ -FIN16 \\0 MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS PARCELS 016.629.006 SCALE
RY�gT �'�,, Lze I G05320102, 05320118, 05320124,
\�sse2-�8�FROC ass FIN17J , a 05320128, 05320129, AND 05320130. D = so'
\�Sp Fq 'o \ L255 L254 FIN21 �� /rGA11 OWNER: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC 22/26 2017
sjFMF�l ass FINI8FIN19-/ X53 1 �� LOCATED IN CITY OF CHARLOTTE DRAWN BY
L28FIN Q ' 52 9 MECKLENBURG COUNTY PTC
\3s L2512 F L288 �7" GA12 NORTH CAROLINA CHECKED BY
\ass s L250 1584.6 '
1CGB
18'01 CLIENT:
24.2' 5. 9' 0/24/ 6 THRU 2/24/17
DATE OF SURVEY.
1913,93' (TOTAL)
S21 -16'31'w CONTACT INFORMATION DRAWING 85 PROPERTY DRAWING N0.
C. Gary Brooks, PLS NC/SC/VA016.629.006-WK1-
Barton Engineering Aeaaclatee OLDINGS, LLC
DETAIL "F 5950 Fairview Road, State 100 WETLANDS.dwg
+� Charlotte, NG 28210 121 W. TRADE STREET, SUITE 2500
SCALE 1 =50 Phone [phone] SHEET 7 OF 8
gbrook,0burtonenoineerina.com CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
Line Table
Line #
Direction
Length
L269
S68'28'46'W
11.13'
L270
573'32'48"W
13.74'
L271
S50'29'28'W
14.08'
L273
N11'52'48"E
4.28'
L274
N15'07'32"W
13.01'
L275
N2757'12'E
6.36'
L276
N50'43'54"E
31.97'
L277
N20'40'51 "E
21.12'
L278
N47'16'13'E
17.16'
L279
N55'13'29"E
6.66'
L280
N5821'28"E
28.50'
L281
N6346'39"E
27.89'
L282
N61'08'47"E
43.68'
L283
N66'58'54"E
25.90'
L284
S82'49'12"E
6.37'
L285
S63'51'21'E
5.18'
L286
S29'23'47'E
17.05'
L287
573'05'55"E
16.18'
L288
N65'31'15"E
8.04'
L289
N31'55'01'W
2.98'
r
I -e
/
VICINITY
ISCAL
(NOT
PRELIMINARY PLAT
NOT FOR RECORDATION,
SALES, OR CONVEYANCE
0 -1 --� GA -9A
ro
ro ,Z' GA -9B
,2.1 UPT �_ro L235
LOCATION OF WETLAND "GA" AS �� IN3 \ F46 L277 234 a -"c
DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. T1E 0305 L304 L295 �)8
37,243 sq.ft. (TOTAL) L
1,153 sq.ft. (in UPLAND AREA) 1 FIN29
36,090 sq.ft. (NET) FIN1 `T UP5 UP6 UP7 B 9
0.829 acres (NET) FIN28 I
FIN2 FIN27J �a UP8
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC
PARCEL ID# 05320102 C3 XFIN25 I a
SEE DETAIL "D.1" OMB15121PG PG 5025 FIN3 69 0j �y6 `FIN22
LOT 4 FIN26 00 L299
\`FIN24
`FIN23
GA-9A�
\> GA -9B GA -9 GA -10H FIN4
L2X66
o 3� L235 36
` -237 X-FIN9
L238 GA -10F
SGA -101 L241 /-GA-10E FINS --x"
0 �' c m�83 `26 �FIN11
��
- z
`GA -10G N GA -10E FIN6 m
,FIN11 \ c Gs
F," --1-GA-1OC DETAIL "F.1"Uj65 /
/,-GA-10B��A-GA-10B SCALE 1"=20' FIN7 FIN8 FIN12J 6p
FIN14
FIN131L25 I GA -1
�FIN15 \tea 0 'r5'---GA-10A \3s L2s81 l2 , SURVEY OF JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF PROJECT NO.
S tiT Of s\ SJ -FIN16 \\0 MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS PARCELS 016.629.006 SCALE
RY�gT �'�,, Lze I G05320102, 05320118, 05320124,
\�sse2-�8�FROC ass FIN17J , a 05320128, 05320129, AND 05320130. D = so'
\�Sp Fq 'o \ L255 L254 FIN21 �� /rGA11 OWNER: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC 22/26 2017
sjFMF�l ass FINI8FIN19-/ X53 1 �� LOCATED IN CITY OF CHARLOTTE DRAWN BY
L28FIN Q ' 52 9 MECKLENBURG COUNTY PTC
\3s L2512 F L288 �7" GA12 NORTH CAROLINA CHECKED BY
\ass s L250 1584.6 '
1CGB
18'01 CLIENT:
24.2' 5. 9' 0/24/ 6 THRU 2/24/17
DATE OF SURVEY.
1913,93' (TOTAL)
S21 -16'31'w CONTACT INFORMATION DRAWING 85 PROPERTY DRAWING N0.
C. Gary Brooks, PLS NC/SC/VA016.629.006-WK1-
Barton Engineering Aeaaclatee OLDINGS, LLC
DETAIL "F 5950 Fairview Road, State 100 WETLANDS.dwg
+� Charlotte, NG 28210 121 W. TRADE STREET, SUITE 2500
SCALE 1 =50 Phone [phone] SHEET 7 OF 8
gbrook,0burtonenoineerina.com CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
Line Table
Line #
Direction
Length
L29D
N18'06'38'W
7.03'
L291
N36'46'17"E
8.14'
L292
N53'38'56"E
15.88'
L293
N56'27'34'E
11.43'
L294
N25 -28.26"E
11.23'
L295
N19'04.17"E
10.91'
L296
N50'22'08'E
21.07'
L297
N84'23'58"E
4.19'
L298
SO28'30"W
16.63'
L299
S20'57'17'W
19.10'
L300
S48'40'29'W
12.85'
L301
542'09'33"W
9.47'
L305
S47'51'40"W
16.04'
L309
S63'52'47'W
4.21'
L310
S13'34'28"E
4.17'
r
I -e
/
VICINITY
ISCAL
(NOT
PRELIMINARY PLAT
NOT FOR RECORDATION,
SALES, OR CONVEYANCE
0 -1 --� GA -9A
ro
ro ,Z' GA -9B
,2.1 UPT �_ro L235
LOCATION OF WETLAND "GA" AS �� IN3 \ F46 L277 234 a -"c
DELINEATED BY ESTES DESIGN INC. T1E 0305 L304 L295 �)8
37,243 sq.ft. (TOTAL) L
1,153 sq.ft. (in UPLAND AREA) 1 FIN29
36,090 sq.ft. (NET) FIN1 `T UP5 UP6 UP7 B 9
0.829 acres (NET) FIN28 I
FIN2 FIN27J �a UP8
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC
PARCEL ID# 05320102 C3 XFIN25 I a
SEE DETAIL "D.1" OMB15121PG PG 5025 FIN3 69 0j �y6 `FIN22
LOT 4 FIN26 00 L299
\`FIN24
`FIN23
GA-9A�
\> GA -9B GA -9 GA -10H FIN4
L2X66
o 3� L235 36
` -237 X-FIN9
L238 GA -10F
SGA -101 L241 /-GA-10E FINS --x"
0 �' c m�83 `26 �FIN11
��
- z
`GA -10G N GA -10E FIN6 m
,FIN11 \ c Gs
F," --1-GA-1OC DETAIL "F.1"Uj65 /
/,-GA-10B��A-GA-10B SCALE 1"=20' FIN7 FIN8 FIN12J 6p
FIN14
FIN131L25 I GA -1
�FIN15 \tea 0 'r5'---GA-10A \3s L2s81 l2 , SURVEY OF JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF PROJECT NO.
S tiT Of s\ SJ -FIN16 \\0 MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS PARCELS 016.629.006 SCALE
RY�gT �'�,, Lze I G05320102, 05320118, 05320124,
\�sse2-�8�FROC ass FIN17J , a 05320128, 05320129, AND 05320130. D = so'
\�Sp Fq 'o \ L255 L254 FIN21 �� /rGA11 OWNER: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC 22/26 2017
sjFMF�l ass FINI8FIN19-/ X53 1 �� LOCATED IN CITY OF CHARLOTTE DRAWN BY
L28FIN Q ' 52 9 MECKLENBURG COUNTY PTC
\3s L2512 F L288 �7" GA12 NORTH CAROLINA CHECKED BY
\ass s L250 1584.6 '
1CGB
18'01 CLIENT:
24.2' 5. 9' 0/24/ 6 THRU 2/24/17
DATE OF SURVEY.
1913,93' (TOTAL)
S21 -16'31'w CONTACT INFORMATION DRAWING 85 PROPERTY DRAWING N0.
C. Gary Brooks, PLS NC/SC/VA016.629.006-WK1-
Barton Engineering Aeaaclatee OLDINGS, LLC
DETAIL "F 5950 Fairview Road, State 100 WETLANDS.dwg
+� Charlotte, NG 28210 121 W. TRADE STREET, SUITE 2500
SCALE 1 =50 Phone [phone] SHEET 7 OF 8
gbrook,0burtonenoineerina.com CHARLOTTE, NC 28202

� •
■i�ei,r L�■
..:.......
i■i.�ul■u � •
5950 Fairview Rd. - Suite 100•Charlotte, NC 28210
[phone]
THIS DRAWING IS THE
PROPERTY OF BURTON
ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, P.

......
T
N
I -es
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
PRELIMINARY PLAT
NOT FOR RECORDATION,
SALES, OR CONVEYANCE.
SURVEY OF JURISDICTIONAL WATERS OF PROJECT NO.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY GIS PARCELS 016.629.006
05320102, 05320118, 05320124, SCALE
N/A

�,•
,,���
CONTACT INFORMATION
C. Gary Brooke, PLS NC/SC/VA tes
Burton Engineering
DRAWING NO.
HOLDINGS LLC 016.629.006-WK1-
a,� Fairview za%u«ea100
WETLANDS.dwg
Phone (7bur 5enginm1
121 W. TRADE STREET, SUITE 2500
SHEETOF 8
g6rookse6urtanengineerinq.com
.E
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202

I
ID "A" & "B" IMPA T
SEE SHEET NUMBER 3
IMPACT TYPE: PROPOSED
BUILDING AND PARKING LOT—
I
/
/
/
/
PROPOSED STORMWATER
BMP'S
/
/
/
1 ' WATER PPLY
WATERSHED BUFFER
PER BURTON
I ENGINEERING PER BURTON ENGINEERING
NGINEERING
FINAL WETLAND DELINEATION FINAL WETLAND DELINEATION
DATE: 0310DATE: 0310112017
—T-1-1—� F-7-—T—T—1-7—--7-- —T—T---T—
I ---I — —1/
\
WETLAND ' "IMPA T
SEE SHEET NUMBER 2
21'E
124 22' N26°55'21"E IMPACT TYPE: FILL
1360.23'
si 49.71'
3
r-- --� \
VROPOSED
PROPOSED I I U \
BUILDING'A' ILDING 'B'
260'X 988' 213' X 945' I \
201,285 S.F. S36°38'10"E
F.F.E. 893.00t
256,880 S.F. I g F.F.E. 69944.00. • X49.93
N30°15'S7E
z'15'5 JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND "D'
` I\ 25,540.23 -SF (0.586 AC.)
C36 \ PER BURTON ENGINEERING
L29 I L30—'� \ FINAL WETLAND DELINEATION
S26°56ja w I \ DATE: 0310112017
1081 0'
,Ag 11. S19°06'3 J I
S83'2 9N f -Cr 14 c L — — — — — — — — — — — — \
DRAINAGE WAY "E"
D` PER BURTON ENGINEERING
FINAL WETLAND DELINEATION
X94 DATE: 0310112017
�p5�� BPP�E
S22 -29-44-W 321.29' ,,/" ,go "&,
-- _-5 �... s� 0,�r
X39
DRAINAGE WAY'F" 1952 LF S87°50'28'W
PER BURTON ENGINEERING $ 40796' `
I FINAL WETLAND DELINEATION 41
DATE: 0310112017
s22*2940"w z
-- --�
264.72' 882°25'06"W F
335.88'
I
5z -W4o'W I 1
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND" ' 642.21
15,473 (0.355 AC.) I z
PER BURTON ENGINEERING N
FINAL WETLAND DELINEATION
DATE. 03101/2017
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND "GA"
36,090 (0.829 AC.)
PER BURTON ENGINEERING
FINAL WETLAND DELINEATION _
DATE: 0310112017 — J
I
I
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND "B" \
2,861 -SF (0.066 AC.) \
PER BURTON ENGINEERING \
FINAL WETLAND DELINEATION
DATE: 0310112017 JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND'C" \
49,041 -SF (1.126 AC.) \
PER BURTON ENGINEERING \
FINAL WETLAND DELINEATION
DATE: 0310112017 \
PROPOSED BUILDING'C'
850' X 640' ( 544,000 S.F.)'tX , \
EXPANDABLE TO 1,150'X 640'(736,000 S.F. \
S
S25°12'32"E
127.64'
S21163i*W /
1913.93' /
/
I FUTUREIMPACT
(SEE SHEET #4)
WETLANDS: 0.047 ACRES /
STREAM: 98 LF
1 f V
( tl
o
Zw m
0.11� Z g
ZwQWC5 cc= =m
0 =Z m
i —f�[[Q Ka
U o
cr``Vu)Za ovm
�zco ,i m LL
Cow< o�
c€
3 '^
m
Zo
LL v
voi
cf)
a� Z
�a Na
� J
who
Y W Lu
U
(LZoV
Z Q
a=U2
oi
w> J
w -J.4 Q
oQ Q -m
H W
u)� F->
Jm0
W
m
APP. TRACKING'J
SAW--.:
SCALE: 1" 200'
0
0
� o
N N (O
O o ~ o
o W W H
LL
Q O W
QUw=r
o U) a- co

•�. >�..:: ,; ..� :: .:• �_ ».' . ,. � ► ,ate � ►; ~ . OLLIZ
:'.Z z
_z
I
;
�Zcn ='Z m LL m
mW -CE E5 5E
9�
wd
WETLAND "C" IMPACT
/ 9,964.43 -SF (0.229 AC.)
/ \
cc co
cm
Lu
� aJ CC
Fn
\ \ W
L w
.., � re.. .r',:...'� .'.'.. , ,t e . 4..r- . ..'. r '': .e.. r.. i w ^..., r, r .. . ... e. t.. "�'. ..i '. •Y-
M
355
e n. M1
1 tie
.Y
r
y s rr
i • \ J �
S 3 3 3 3S g SS
\ Im
•
S
S
.. SS •'.'3S$':'....-.•.. •�•3S5'.;�"r.'.�+!�=.•��65" 3SS 3SS 3'3SS
3SS 3SS 35S - ....... .........'.'.'........... .. ... ..-...-
�� >>\ I
..:. . .'...'
_ �- • / � \ /� APP. TRACKING iJ
.........'.
-•-
• 1 ....•_ . . . _ . _ . . �-�r. -. /s \�. _ r, SCALE: 1"J 40'
�/J I
o
_ / JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND .C-4
/ 1 �� ` —� 49,041 -SF 1.126 AC. o 0
_•/ / / / PER BURTON ENGINEERINGw
/ o C?
ui
FINAL WETLAND DELINEATION ( / /6j w Q O w
'1Z
/ l DATE: 0310112017 1 1 / / ¢ U or_ N
/ ---'� / I oU) a_ W

I ---
XX
..: .:.......::::.:........
/ .....
...... \
p
/r -
I WETLAND "A" IMPACT
2,760.18 -SF (0.063 Al
Iz-
/ JU ISDICTIONALWETILAND "A -27 .i F i A
PER BURTON ENGINEERING /
/ FINAL WETLAND DELINEATION
DATE: 0310112017
I
WETLAND "8" IMPACT
i/ 2867.35 -SF (0.066 AC.) /
JURISDICTIONAL 'B"
\ I / IM 689.91
/ \ 2,867.35 (0,066 AC.) 79.87
.:.... PER BURTON ENGINEERING''R E LLC " "''.... • FINAL WETLAND DELINEATION'OU679.6
6LTwky�_ :, DATE: 0310112017 ( C ' I
' .'�ti:=:�:�•
.....
i� /
Ts
AI'F'. I KACKING J:
SAW000000800000000
ss
3
SCALE: 1" 0 40'
to
C)
� O
O � CND
O o ~o
CF,LL
l<0W
QC)w=M
0U)0-�
o
\
Z (n
W
m
w
ZWa w�
OZU ZZ
—O f7Q
m
M of
_
(n wa
$ `- m
Z)ZU) -'z
m l m
mWQ�S
z2
• m
�_
maNa
09
I
WETLAND "8" IMPACT
i/ 2867.35 -SF (0.066 AC.) /
JURISDICTIONAL 'B"
\ I / IM 689.91
/ \ 2,867.35 (0,066 AC.) 79.87
.:.... PER BURTON ENGINEERING''R E LLC " "''.... • FINAL WETLAND DELINEATION'OU679.6
6LTwky�_ :, DATE: 0310112017 ( C ' I
' .'�ti:=:�:�•
.....
i� /
Ts
AI'F'. I KACKING J:
SAW000000800000000
ss
3
SCALE: 1" 0 40'
to
C)
� O
O � CND
O o ~o
CF,LL
l<0W
QC)w=M
0U)0-�

HANDRAIL
41. 5' 35'
4'
n
690 GUARDRAIL I I I I
MODULAR
HEADWALLS x 1-
APPROXINV -
CREEK = 677.2
680
PROPOSED FLOW LINE
OF ERT
120" CMP -
- — �, •--.� .� ice:: ___ ___ -
675
INV BURIED 63" /
(TYP.) /
INV PIPE _/
ELEV = 672.0
4 x 4 x 2 x 2 WWF PROTECTION LAYER
INSTALLED 6" ABOVE GEOGRID
GEOGRID EMBEDMENT
EXIST GRADE
OF CREEK
ELEV = 676.5
•i�
-rr--I 675
INV BURIED 54"
(Ty P. )
BACKFILL PIPE WITH NATIVE
INV PIPE - 670
FROM IMPACTED STREAM AREA �
ELEV = 672.0
665
x
\ RI DICTI NALWETLAND" K
� 36,090 (0.629 AC.)
\ PER BURTON ENGINEERING y
Z\ FINAL WETLAND DELINEATION /
si DATE: 0310112017
i_A._
CULVERT CROSSING
TYPICAL SECTION
CULVERT CROSSING
665 TYPICAL ELEVATION
�\ \ MODULAR
STREAM IMPACT H
98 LF
WETLAND "GA" IMPACT
2,048.90 -SF (0.047 AC.)
1'
\ \ \ �i rr.)
o
Z cf) m
Lu
cr z
OwU wZ I -
F — � < o
o ou) wa $ r
Z)Zco J� y
MWQo,� nm
m E
aoi ii
¢ m
m �
o
LL
0
m a
NJ
�aNa
0
ILL
w(n Ucn
q Z�
ui
W
Z p a
�Ja
zcn a.
Lu z_
`)
Om (�
J c -
w > -
>w m G
0 a } Z
Jmw
W
m
APP. TRACKING
SAWLI,'_L]C7_.
SCALE: 1" _ 40'
0
ti o
of
C:) � cli
�u.iwLL.
Q U � Lu
2 qqT
o (/) 0- n

Appe ndix C
Avoidance and Minimization
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Appendix C
Avoidance and Minimization
WestPark 85
Beltway Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina
H&H Job No. FOU -002
0x7 i;Aanra
The proposed development is located along Beltway Blvd to the north of Performance Road and
to the west of Margo Drive in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The Site consists
of six tax parcels (Parcel #s 05320129, 05320128, 05320118, 05320130, 05320102, 05320124,
05320126) totaling approximately 104.607 acres.
ECS Carolinas, LLP reviewed the Federal Threatened and Endangered Species databases for the
Site and conducted a screening survey of the Site and surrounding area for Federal Threatened
and Endangered Species, and none were identified. ECS Carolinas, LLP also reviewed the North
Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NC SHPO) GIS viewer, and the Site and
surrounding area via visual reconnaissance for the presence of historic, cultural, and/or
archeological sites. No recorded sites were noted on or adjacent to the Site. ECS Carolinas, LLP
requested comment on the Site from the NC SHPO, and ECS Carolinas, LLP requested comment
on the Site from NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) and the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service (FWS). Agency responses are included in Appendix D.
In regards to Site alternatives, the prospective developer has considered and evaluated other
potential properties in the area for development of the proposed light industrial project.
However, properties or property assemblages of this size are difficult to find and purchase
especially at the junction of two major interstates (Interstate 85 and Interstate 485) and within
close proximity to the CLT Airport. Additionally, the Site is ideally zoned as industrial and
commercial. The building footprints have been designed to primarily occupy upland areas to
avoid on -Site wetlands to the maximum extent practicable.
1 hart hickman
S.\AAA-Master Projects\Foundry Commercial - FOU\FOU-002 Westpark 85 WetlandsTCN\C - Avoid and Minimize doc
SMA)MA ENVItONMENTAL s mnvNs

Minimization
To minimize Site impacts, the proposed Site plan was designed to avoid wetland impacts to the
maximum extent practicable. Site buildings, parking, and stormwater management areas have
been designed to primarily occupy upland areas. This Site will be developed with a general
master plan approach. The advantage to the master plan approach is that the wetland impacts are
determined in the context of the overall development, which reduces the potential for multiple
permit submittals for the same Site. The master plan for this project is to develop the western
portion of the Site first and then the central and northern portions of the Site. Utilities and road
access are in place to the western portion of the Site. The central and northern portions of the
Site will be developed second. This sequence is required to be good stewards of an important
area of undeveloped land near the CLT Airport, Interstate 85, and Interstate 485. The Site plan
proposes one secondary access roadway from Margo Drive, which is required by the City of
Charlotte for connectivity.
A previously designed conceptual Site plan prepared by Burton Engineering Associates dated
September 26, 2016 indicates that Proposed Building `B' was originally proposed to be 218,400
square feet. However, the developer decided to reduce the building footprint of Proposed
Building `B' to minimize the impacts to Wetland `C'. The Overall Impacts Plan prepared by
Burton Engineering Associates dated March 1, 2017 includes the Site plan details that we
submitted to the City of Charlotte for approval. The Overall Impacts Plan indicates that the
footprint of Proposed Building `B' was reduced to 201,285 square feet to minimize the impacts
to Wetland `C'. The conceptual Site plan is included in Appendix I and the Overall Impacts Plan
is included in Appendix B.
To further minimize Site impacts, the proposed Site plan was designed to completely avoid
wetland impacts to Wetland `D' in the northwestern portion of the Site and Wetland `G' located
in the south-central portion of the Site, which total approximately 0.94 acre of wetlands.
Furthermore, the currently proposed Site plan was designed to avoid additional impacts to
Drainage Way `E' in the western portion of the Site. Impacts to Wetland `C' have been designed
to impact the narrow finger of the wetland and to keep the majority of the wetland body intact.
Impacts to Wetland `GA' have been designed to impact the narrow areas of the wetland that
2 hart hickman
S.\AAA-Master Projects\Foundry Commercial - FOU\FOU-002 Westpark 85 Wetlands\PCN\C - Avoid and Minimize doc
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

surround an upland island and to keep the majority of the wetland body intact. Of the 3.025 total
acres of on -Site wetlands, the Site has been designed to impact only 13% of on -Site wetlands.
Impacts to Drainage Way `F' have been designed to only impact the area of the stream needed to
install a culvert to facilitate secondary access roadway construction as required by the City of
Charlotte. Of the 3,896 total LF of on -Site streams, the previous and current Site plans have
been designed to only impact 130 LF of perennial stream and 248 LF of intermittent stream. In
addition, during Site development, good erosion and sediment control practices will be followed.
Extensive silt fencing will be used on the construction Site perimeter and along wetland and
stream boundaries.
Mitigation
Mitigation is required by the USACE Nationwide Permit 39 for impacts greater than 0.1 acre of
wetlands. Due to the planned impacts to 0.405 acres of on -Site wetlands and 98 LF of on -Site
streams, compensatory mitigation is proposed in the form of purchasing mitigation credits from
DEQ's Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) In -Lieu Fee program. The DEQ DMS acceptance
letter is attached in Appendix F.
A North Carolina Stream Assessment Method (SAM) form has been completed for the on -Site
intermittent stream, Drainage Way `F'. The SAM form is attached in Appendix G. The overall
SAM rating for the intermittent stream is low quality. Because the stream is of low quality and
intermittent, a mitigation ratio of 0.5:1 is proposed. At a 0.5:1 mitigation ration, 49 LF of
mitigation is proposed via in -lieu fee purchase.
Riparian wetland credits are proposed to be purchased at a 2:1 mitigation ratio. At a 2:1
mitigation ratio and with rounding up to the quarter acre, 1.0 acre of mitigation is proposed via
in -lieu fee purchase.
3 hart hickman
$:\AAA -Master Projects\Foundry Commercial - FOLAFOU-002 Westpark 85 Wetlands\PCNMC - Avoid and Minimize. doc
SMARTER ENVO ONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Appe ndix D
Supplemental Documents
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

ECS CAROLINAS, LLP "Setting the Standard for Service"
Geotechnical a Construction Materials s Environmental o Facilities -
November 21, 2016
Mr. Dan Heath
Foundry Commercial
121 West Trade Street, Suite 503
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Reference: Limited NEPA Report
Beltway Business Park
Beltway Boulevard
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project Nos: 49: 3387 & 3387A
Dear Mr. Heath,
ECS Carolinas, LLP (ECS) is pleased to provide our results of the Limited National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Database Review conducted for the above -referenced site.
Our services were provided in accordance with ECS Proposal Numbers: 49: 2804 & 3432
Revised.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The subject site is located at the end of the cul -da -sac of Beltway Boulevard in Charlotte,
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The site is a reported 106.55 acres in size and according to
the Mecklenburg County Online GIS Database website the Parcel Identification Numbers (PINs)
are 05320102, 05320118, 05320124, 05320126, 05320128, 05320129, and 05320130. The site
consists of undeveloped, wooded land. Surrounding properties consist of single-family residences,
commercial and light industrial business. Based on the United States Geological Survey (USGS)
Topographic Map, two unnamed tributaries to the Catawba River are depicted on the central and
eastern portions of the site.
ECS was contracted to conduct a preliminary threatened and endangered species, and
preliminary cultural and archaeological resources determination for the site. ECS personnel
conducted the field reconnaissance on November 13, 2016.
PRELIMINARY THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES DETERMINATION
Congress passed the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1973. The purpose of the ESA is to
protect and recover imperiled species and the ecosystems upon which they depend. It is
administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the Commerce Department's
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). The USFWS has primary responsibility for terrestrial
and freshwater organisms, while the responsibilities of NMFS are mainly marine wildlife.
Under the ESA, species may be listed as either endangered or threatened. "Endangered"
means a species is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
"Threatened" means a species is likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future. All
ECS Capitol Services, PLLC • ECS Carolinas, LLP • ECS Central, PLLC - ECS Florida. LLC • ECS Mid -Atlantic, LLC • ECS K6,4.est, LLC - ECS Southeast. LLC • ECS Texas. LLP
w,f,.t^l. eCSIImite d.rom

LIIi111@O Nr-rH UaLa Da5e IKeVlew
Beltway Business Park
Beltway Boulevard
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 49: 3387
species of plants and animals, except pest insects, are eligible for listing as endangered or
threatened. For the purposes of the ESA, Congress defined species to include subspecies,
varieties, and, for vertebrates, distinct population segments.
ECS reviewed the USFWS Endangered Species Database to identify federally protected
threatened and endangered species in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The following
federally protected threatened and endangered species were identified on the list of
occurrences for Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
Common Name
Scientific name
Federai Status
Record Status
Vertebrate
Bald Eagle
Haliaeetus /eucocephalus
BGPA
Current
Northern Long -Eared Bat
Myotis sepientrionalis
T
Probable/Potential
Invertebrate
Carolina Heelsplitter
Alasmidonta heterodon
E
Current
Vascular Plant
Michaux's Sumac
Rhus michauxii
E
Current
Schweinitz's Sunflower
Helianthus schweinitzii
E
Current
Smooth Coneflower
Echinacea laevigata
E
Current
BGPA = Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act E = Endangered
T= Threatened
Species/Habitat Description
Bald Eagle
Description: Distinguished by a white head and white tail feathers, bald eagles are powerful,
brown birds that may weigh 14 pounds and have a wingspan of 8 feet. Male eagles are smaller,
weighing as much as 10 pounds and have a wingspan of 6 feet. Sometimes confused with
Golden Eagles, Bald Eagles are mostly dark brown until they are four to five years old and
acquire their characteristic coloring.
Habitat: Bald eagles live near rivers, lakes, and marshes where they can find fish, their staple
food. Bald eagles will also feed on waterfowl, turtles, rabbits, snakes, and other small animals
and carrion. Bald eagles require a good food base, perching areas, and nesting sites. Their
habitat includes estuaries, large lakes, reservoirs, rivers, and some seacoasts. In winter, the
birds congregate near open water in tall trees for spotting prey and night roosts for sheltering.
Conclusions: The site consists of undeveloped, wooded land. The wooded land consists of
mature and immature pine and hardwood species aged 10-40 years. Dense to moderately
dense understory vegetation was observed throughout the wooded land. Small potential
surface waters were identified on site. Dirt access roads are located throughout the site. No

Limited NEPA Database Review
Beltway Business Park
Beltway Boulevard
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 49: 3387
large surface waters are located on or within 660 feet of the site. Additionally, Bald Eagles were
not observed during the site reconnaissance.
Based on our knowledge and site observations, suitable habitat for the Bald Eagle is not present
on the site.
Northern Lona -Eared Bat
Description: The northern long-eared bat is a medium-sized bat about 3 to 3.7 inches in length
but with a wingspan of 9 to 10 inches. As its name suggests, this bat is distinguished by its long
ears, particularly as compared to other bats in its genus, Myotis, which are actually bats noted
for their small ears (Myotis means mouse -eared). The northern long-eared bat is found across
much of the eastern and north central United States and all Canadian provinces from the
Atlantic coast west to the southern Northwest Territories and eastern British Columbia. The
species' range includes 39 states.
Habitat: During summer, northern long-eared bats roost singly or in colonies underneath bark,
in cavities, or in crevices of both live and dead trees. Males and non -reproductive females may
also roost in cooler places, like caves and mines. This bat seems opportunistic in selecting
roosts, using tree species based on suitability to retain bark or provide cavities or crevices. It
has also been found, rarely, roosting in structures like barns and sheds. Northern long-eared
bats spend winter hibernating in caves and mines, called hibernacula. They typically use large
caves or mines with large passages and entrances; constant temperatures; and high humidity
with no air currents. Specific areas where they hibernate have very high humidity, so much so
that droplets of water are often seen on their fur. Within hibernacula, surveyors find them in
small crevices or cracks, often with only the nose and ears visible. Bald eagles live near rivers,
lakes, and marshes where they can find fish, their staple food. Bald eagles will also feed on
waterfowl, turtles, rabbits, snakes, and other small animals and carrion. Bald eagles require a
good food base, perching areas, and nesting sites. Their habitat includes estuaries, large lakes,
reservoirs, rivers, and some seacoasts. In winter, the birds congregate near open water in tall
trees for spotting prey and night roosts for sheltering.
Conclusions: The site consists of undeveloped, wooded land. The wooded land consists of
mature and immature pine and hardwood species aged 10-40 years. Dense to moderately
dense understory vegetation was observed throughout the wooded land. Small potential
surface waters were identified on site. Dirt access roads are located throughout the site and
appear well maintained due to routine clearing and mowing operations. No known hibernation
sites are on or within %4 mile to the project site. According to the USFWS website
https://www.fws.gov/asheville/htmis/project_review/NLEB_in_WNC.html, Mecklenburg County is
is not listed as a county containing confirmed hibernation and maternity sites for this species;
therefore, the project meets the 4(d) rule, and any associated exempt take. The project should
have no effect on the NLEB.
Carolina Heelsplitter
Description: The Carolina Heelsplitter was first described in 1852. It has an ovate, trapezoid -
shaped shell. The outer surface of the shell varies from greenish brown to dark brown in color,
and shells from younger specimens have faint greenish brown or black rays. The nacre (inside
surface) is often pearly white to bluish white, grading to orange in the deepest part of the shell.

Urnnea NhVA Uatanase Keview
Beltway Business Park
Beltway Boulevard
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 49: 3387
However, in older specimens the entire nacre may be a mottled pale orange. The shell of the
largest known specimen of the species measures 4.6 inches in length. Like other freshwater
mussels, the Carolina Heelsplitter feeds by siphoning and filtering food particles from the water
column.
The reproductive cycle of the species is similar to other native mussels. Males release sperm
into the water, and the eggs are fertilized when the sperm are taken in by the females through
their siphons during feeding and respiration. Females retain the fertilized eggs in their gills until
the larvae (glochidia) fully develop. The glochidia are released into the water and must attach to
the gills or fins of the appropriate fish species. They remain attached to their "fish host" for
several weeks, drawing nourishment from the fish while they develop into juvenile mussels.
They do not hurt their "fish host." The juvenile mussels then detach from the fish host and drop
to the bottom of the stream where they continue to develop, provided they land in a suitable
place with good water conditions. This dependence on a certain species of fish increases the
mussels' vulnerability to habitat disturbances. If the fish host is driven off or eliminated because
of habitat or water quality problems, the mussels can't reproduce and will eventually die out.
Habitat: The Carolina Heelsplitter requires cool, clean, well -oxygenated water. Stable, silt -free
stream bottoms appear to be critical to the species. Typically stable areas occur where the
stream banks are well -vegetated with trees and shrubs.
Conclusion: The site consists of undeveloped, wooded land. The wooded land consists of
mature and immature pine and hardwood species aged 10-40 years. Dense to moderately
dense understory vegetation was observed throughout the wooded land. Small surface waters
were identified on site. Dirt access roads are located throughout the site.
No clear oxygenated streams were identified onsite. Based on our knowledge and site
observations, suitable habitat for the Carolina Heelsplitter is not present on the site. ECS does
not recommend additional assessment.
Michaux's Sumac
Description: Michaux's Sumac is a rhizomatous, densely hairy shrub, with erect stems from 1 -
3 feet (ft) (30.5 — 91 centimeters, cm) in height. The compound leaves contain evenly serrated,
oblong to lanceolate, acuminate leaflets. Most plants are unisexual; however, more recent
observations have revealed plants with both male and female flowers on one plant. The flowers
are small, borne in a terminal, erect, dense cluster, and colored greenish yellow to white.
Flowering usually occurs from June to July; while the fruit, a red drupe, is produced through the
months of August to October.
Habitat: Michaux's Sumac grows in sandy or rocky open woods in association with basic soils.
Apparently, this plant survives best in areas where some form of disturbance has provided an
open area. Several populations in North Carolina are on highway rights -of way, roadsides, or on
the edges of artificially maintained clearings. Two other populations are in areas with periodic
fires, and two populations exist on sites undergoing natural succession. One population is
situated in a natural opening on the rim of a Carolina bay.
Conclusion: The site consists of undeveloped, wooded land. The wooded land consists of
mature and immature pine and hardwood species aged 10-40 years. Dense to moderately

LImiieu rverM udEdodse rceview
Beltway Business Park
Beltway Boulevard
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 49: 3387
dense understory vegetation was observed throughout the wooded land. Small potential
surface waters were identified on site. Dirt access roads are located throughout the site.
Carolina Bays and areas with periodic fires are not located on site. Roadsides and artificial
clearings appear to be well maintained. Michaux's sumac was not observed during the site
reconnaissance.
Based on our knowledge and site observations, suitable habitat for the Michaux's Sumac is not
present on the site.
Schweinitz's Sunflower
Description: Schweinitz's Sunflower is a perennial that regularly grows approximately 6.5 feet
(ft) (2.0 meters; m) tall (though it can be shorter if young or injured) and can occasionally reach
heights of 16 ft (4.8 m). It has thickened roots that are used by the plant to store starch. The
stem is purplish in color, and the upper third bears secondary branches at 45 -degree angles.
The leaves are arranged in pairs on the lower part of the stem but usually occur singly (or
alternate) on the upper parts. Leaves are attached to the stem at right angles, and the tips of the
leaves tend to droop. The leaves are thick and stiff, with a rough upper surface. The upper leaf
surfaces have broad spiny hairs that are directed toward the tip and soft white hairs cover the
underside. The plant produces small yellow flowers from late August until frost. This species is
able to colonize through the dispersal of seeds that readily germinate without a dormant period.
Habitat: Schweinitz's sunflower occurs in full to partial sun and is found in areas with poor soils,
such as thin clays that vary from wet to dry. It is believed that this species once occurred in
natural forest openings or grasslands. Many of the remaining populations occur along
roadsides.
Conclusion: The site consists of undeveloped, wooded land. The wooded land consists of
mature and immature pine and hardwood species aged 10-40 years. Dense to moderately
dense understory vegetation was observed throughout the wooded land. Small potential
surface waters were identified on site. Dirt access roads are located throughout the site and
appear well maintained due to routine clearing and mowing.
Based on our knowledge and site observations, potentially suitable habitat for the Schweinitz's
Sunflower is not present on the site. Additionally, no individuals were identified during the site
reconnaissance.
Smooth Coneflower
Description: Smooth Coneflower is a perennial herb in the Aster family (Asteraceae) that
grows up to 3.3 feet (ft) (1 meter; m) tall from a vertical root stock. The large elliptical to broadly
lanceolate basal leaves may reach 8 inches (in) (20 centimeters; cm) in length and 3.0 in (7.5
cm) in width and taper into long petioles toward the base. They are smooth to slightly rough in
texture. The stems are smooth, with few leaves. The mid -stem leaves are smaller than the basal
leaves and have shorter petioles. Flower heads are usually solitary. The rays of the flowers
(petal -like structures) are light pink to purplish in color, usually drooping, and 2 — 3.2 in (5 - 8
cm) long. Flowering occurs from late May through mid-July and fruits develop from late June to

Limited NEPA Database Review
Beltway Business Park
Beltway Boulevard
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 49: 3387
September. The fruiting structures often persist through the fall. Reproduction is accomplished
both sexually (by seed) and asexually (by rhizome).
Habitat: Smooth coneflower is typically found in open woods, glades, cedar barrens, roadsides,
clearcuts, dry limestone bluffs, and power line rights-of-way, usually on magnesium and calcium
rich soils associated with amphibolite, dolomite or limestone (in Virginia), gabbro (in North
Carolina and Virginia), diabase (in North Carolina and South Carolina), and marble (in South
Carolina and Georgia). Smooth coneflower occurs in plant communities that have been
described as xeric hardpan forests, diabase glades or dolomite woodlands. Optimal sites are
characterized by abundant sunlight and little competition in the herbaceous layer. Natural fires,
as well as large herbivores, historically influenced the vegetation in this species' range. Many of
the herbs associated with Smooth coneflower are also sun -loving species that depend on
periodic disturbances to reduce the shade and competition of woody plants.
Conclusion: The site consists of undeveloped, wooded land. The wooded land consists of
mature and immature pine and hardwood species aged 10-40 years. Dense to moderately
dense understory vegetation was observed throughout the wooded land. Small potential
surface waters were identified on site. Dirt access roads are located throughout the site and
appear well maintained due to routine clearing and mowing.
Based on our knowledge and site observations, suitable habitat for the Smooth Coneflower is
not present on the site. Additionally, no individuals were identified during the site
reconnaissance.
PRELIMINARY HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES REVIEW
The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was created by the United States government in
1966 under Section 101 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). The purposes of
SHPO include surveying and recognizing historic properties, reviewing nominations for
properties to be included in the National Register of Historic Places, reviewing undertakings for
the impact on the properties as well as supporting federal organizations, state and local
governments, and the private sector.
ECS was contracted to conduct a preliminary historic and archaeological resources review. The
scope of work included a field reconnaissance to identify potential historic structures, a review of
the SHPO Online GIS mapping, and a review of other available databases.
The site consists of undeveloped, wooded land. The wooded land consists of mature and
immature pine and hardwood species aged 10-40 years. Dense to moderately dense understory
vegetation was observed throughout the wooded land. Dirt access roads are located throughout
the site and appear well maintained due to routine clearing and mowing operations. No large
surface waters are located on or within 660 feet of the site. Surrounding properties consist of
undeveloped, wooded land, single-family residences, and commercial businesses.
During our review of the NCSHPO On -Line GIS Database, ECS noted that no recorded
historical sites are located on the subject site or within 1,000 feet of the site. ECS is not aware
of proposed sales, transfers, or leases of historic properties on the site or within the general
vicinity of the site.

Limited NEPA Database Review
Beltway Business Park
Beltway Boulevard
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 49: 3387
AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE
ECS composed letter requests addressed to the Natural Heritage Program (NHP), the USFWS,
and NCSHPO dated November 11, 2016, to determine if the subject site is located in the
immediate vicinity of registered sightings or habitats for endangered species.
ECS will issue an updated letter once correspondence is received from the agencies listed
above.
CONCLUSIONS
ECS has conducted a preliminary threatened and endangered species determination and a
preliminary historic and archaeological resources review for the site. Please note that our
services did not include detailed studies for threatened and endangered species or historic and
archaeological resources. The site consists of undeveloped, wooded land. The wooded land
consists of mature and immature pine and hardwood species aged 10-40 years. Dense to
moderately dense understory vegetation was observed throughout the wooded land. Small
potential surface waters were identified on site. Dirt access roads are located throughout the
site. Surrounding properties consist of undeveloped, wooded land, single-family residences, and
commercial businesses.
In order to protect aquatic resources, erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed
and maintained between the construction site and any nearby downgradient surface waters. In
addition, ECS recommends maintaining natural, vegetative buffers on streams and surface
waters on site and adjacent to the project area.
ECS is has submitted letters to Federal and State agencies on November 11, 2016. ECS will
provide an updated NEPA letter once correspondence is received from the agencies.

Limited NEPA Database Review
Beltway Business Park
Beltway Boulevard
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
ECS Project No: 49: 3387
CLOSING
ECS appreciates the opportunity to provide our services to you. Please contact us at (919) 861-
9910 if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
ECS Carolinas, LLP
i
Cory . Darnell, PWS
Environmental Project Manager
[e-mail]
919-861-9859
Attachments: Figure 1 — Site Location Map
Figure 2 — Topographic Map
Figure 3 — Aerial Site Map
Photographs
W. Brandon Fulton, LSS; PSC, PWS
Environmental Principal
[e-mail]
704-525-5152

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
December 16, 2016
Mr. Christopher Estes
Estes Design, Inc.
P.O. Box 79133
Charlotte, North Carolina 28271-7050
Dear Mr. Estes:
Subject: Beltway Business Park Project; Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Log No. 4-2-07-361
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the information provided in your
correspondence dated November 17, 2016 (received November 22, 2016) wherein you request
our comments regarding potential impacts to federally protected species. We submit the
following comments in accordance with the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e); the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. §4321
et seq.); and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531-1543) (Act).
Proiect Description
According to the information provided, you are preparing a permit application (likely NWP 39)
for unavoidable impacts to Waters of the U.S. associated with a proposed commercial
development near Belmont, North Carolina. You indicated that the majority of this project was
previously scoped, and permitted in 2002, then again in 2007, but the project was never
completed. According to the information provided, the project area consists of four contiguous
lots totaling approximately 101 acres. The parcels are predominately wooded with some
developed open space. No specific information regarding proposed impacts to jurisdictional
streams or wetlands were included in your recent correspondence. However, a previous
correspondence from this office dated October 10, 2007 (attached), indicates that jurisdictional
features are present at the site.
Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species
According to Service records, suitable summer roosting habitat may be present in the project
area for the federally threatened northern long-eared bat. However, the final 4(d) rule (effective
as of February 16, 2016), exempts incidental take of northern long-eared bat associated with
activities that occur greater than 0.25 miles from a known hibernation site, and greater than 150
feet from a known, occupied maternity roost during the pup season (June 1 — July 31). Based on
the information provided, the project (which may require tree clearing) would occur at a location
where any incidental take that may result from associated activities is exempt under the 4(d) rule.

Our correspondence dated October 10, 2007, requests additional information regarding the
presence of the federally endangered Schweintiz's sunflower (Helianthus schweinitzii).
Specifically, we indicated that suitable habitat exists within the project area and we requested
that surveys for the species be conducted during the optimal flowering season (August —
October) by a qualified biologist. Please provide survey results to this office.
The Service has record of no other federally protected species or suitable habitat for those
species in the project area. In accordance with the Act, it is the responsibility of the appropriate
federal agency or its designated representative to review its activities or programs and to identify
any such activities or programs that may affect endangered or threatened species or their
habitats. If it is determined that the proposed activity may adversely affect any species federally
listed as endangered or threatened, formal consultation with this office must be initiated.
Our October 10, 2007, correspondence provided several recommendations in the interest of
protecting fish and wildlife resources. We wish to reiterate those comments.
The Service appreciates the opportunity to review this project. Please contact Mr. Byron
Hamstead of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 225, if you have any questions. In any future
correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number 4-2-07-361.
Sincerely,
- - 014ginal SI""netl - -
Janet A. Mizzi
Field Supervisor
e.c. Mr. David Schaeffer, USACE

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
December 15, 2016
Christopher Estes
Estes Design, Inc.
PO Box 79133
Charlotte, NC 28271-7050
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Develop Beltway Business Park, Performance Road, Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, ER 16-2165
Dear Mr. Estes:
Thank you for your letter for November 17, 2016, concerning the above project.
We have conducted a review of the project and are aware of no historic resources which would be affected
by the project. Therefore, we have no comment on the project as proposed.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
enviroJunental.reviewL�itlledcr.gov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
i
Ramona M. Bartos
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

Appendix E
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
hart hickman
SMARTER ENOMMENTAI U U TIONS

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmin=gton Nstao
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (.1D) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information. as described within each category. with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager.. if known) via mail, electronic mail. or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on-line at: http::' \� ww.saw.usace.artnv.mil/Missions,'ReLLilatorvPermitProgram.asnx , by
telephoning: 910-251-4633. or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGI LATORI FIELD OFFICE
LAS Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue. Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: 1828! 271-7980
Fax Number: 18281 281-8120
RALEIGH REGI LATORI FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Endgineers
3331 Heritge Trade Drive. Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General \umber: (9191554-4884
Fax Number: [phone]
IIASHINGTON REGI LATORI FIELD OFFICE
l�S Army Corps of Eng=ineers
2407 \Vest Fifth Street
Washineton. North Carolina 27889
General \umber: 010) 251-4610
Fax `umber: (252 ) 975-1399
NI ILMINGTON REGI LATORI FIELD OFFICE
L S Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington. North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: 1910) 351-40''5
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency. please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G,
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all ID
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination. which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USAGE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants. or anticipate participation in USDA programs. you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service. prior to starting work.
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Beltway Boulevard, north of Performance Road and west of Margo Drive
Citv, State: Charlotte, NC
County: Mecklenburg
Directions:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 05320129. 05320128. 05320118, 05320130, 05320102
and 0532012
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address)
Select one:
Matt Bramblett. PE
2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100 Charlotte, NC 28023
704-586-0007
mbramblett@harthickman. com
F] I am the current property owner.
❑✓ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other. please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: WestPark 85 Property Holdings. LLC c/o Foundry Commercial
Mailing Address: 121 W. Trade Street. Suite 2500
Charlotte, NC 28202
Telephone Number: 704-705-3863
Electronic Mail Address;: [e-mail]
✓� Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
I If available
2 Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION;
1, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner ofrecord of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
WestPark 85 Property Holdings,
LLC c/o Foundry Commercial
Property Owner (please print)
Date
See Agent Authorization form in Appendix A - Mr. Bill Simerville is an authorized representative of
WestPark 85 Property Holdings, LLC c/o Foundry Commercial who signed the Agent Authorization form
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
F7I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS' and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved .1D (may or may not
include a survey plat).
° For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USAGE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

F.
a
jurisdictional Determination Request
ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
✓� Size of Property or Project Area 104.607
acres
III verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
❑✓ Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Formb.
ZProject Coordinates: 35.262737 Latitude "80.983701 Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11 x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑✓ Large and small scale maps that depict. at minimum: streets. intersections, towns
❑✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
Z✓ USGS Topographic Map
❑✓ Soil Survey Map
aOther Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps. FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable)':
Wetlands:
7 Wetland Data Sheets8
Tributaries:
❑ USACE. Assessment Forms
✓❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
RV( Landscape Photos, if taken
❑✓ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources. label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections. towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
❑
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map. Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/rep, supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://Portal.ncden(.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364 and,
http://www.saw.usace.army.mif/Portals/59/docs/regulatorylpublicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
❑ Wetland Data Sheets"
Tributaries:
❑ USAC E Assessment Forms
❑ Upland Data Sheets ❑ Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
❑ Landscape Photos, if taken
❑ Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/ linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination Forms) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)')
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency. etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard-
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11"'x17"'
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than l l "x 17". may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification. the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
Must be legible
Must include a North Arrow. Scale(s). "title, Property Information
Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner. USGS monument)
When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of \+,etland polygons
• Must identify each wetlandpolygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identity each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the ►host recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary'
all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
Must include. label accordingly. and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands''. "non -
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes. culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
F]When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundary is depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual. "
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USA CE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner. monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds),
include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): October
2016
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: Attn: Matt Bramblett, Hart &
Hickman, PC, 2923 South Tryon Street, Suite 100, Charlotte, NC, 28203.
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: SAW -2017-00098
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Mecklenburg City: Charlotte
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.262737°, Long. -80.983701°.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest water body: Unnamed tributary of Catawba River
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 3896 linear feet.
Cowardin Class: Riverine
Stream Flow: Intermittent & perennial
Wetlands: 3.025 acres.
Cowardin Class: PSS
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters:
Tidal:
Non -Tidal:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLIES):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit
applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other
general permit verification requiring "pre -construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby
made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which
does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD
could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the
right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit
authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the
applicant's acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable;
(6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any
form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on
the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal
court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as
is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or
individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal,
jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make
an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters
on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.

This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic
features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case
file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: WestPark 85 — Pre -Construction
Notification, prepared by Hart & Hickman, PC, and dated March 1, 2017. Survey of Jurisdictional Waters of Mecklenburg
County GIS Parcels 05320102, 05320118, 05320124, 05320128, 05320129, and 05320130, prepared by Burton Engineering
Associates, and dated February 28, 2017.
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant. *Data sheets prepared by Estes Design, Inc.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Mountain Island Lake, 1997, 1:24,000.
® USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: USDA Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey
of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, 1979. .
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: Beltway Blvd, November 21, 2016.
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: Map Number 3710450100L, revised September 2, 2015.
❑ 100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): Beltway Business Park, prepared by Estes Design, Inc.
or ® Other (Name & Date): Site Photos FOU -001 9/22/2016.
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should
not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
2
See JD Request Form
Signature and date of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
Impracticable)

FOU -002 WestPark 85, Beltwav Blvd, Charlotte, NC
Site
number
Latitude
Longitude
Cowardin
Class
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review area
Class of aquatic
resource
A
35.261421
-80.986688
PSS
0.063 acre
Scrub Shrub Wetland
B
35.261214
-80.986532
PSS
0.066 acre
Scrub Shrub Wetland
C
35.263432
-80.984907
PSS
1.115 acres
Scrub Shrub Wetland
D
35.264645
-80.984157
PSS
0.586 acre
Scrub Shrub Wetland
G
35.260494
-80.983031
PSS
0.355 acre
Scrub Shrub Wetland
GA
35.263523
-80.984857
PSS
0.829 acre
Scrub Shrub Wetland
E
35.262223
-80.985339
Riverine
1944 linear feet
Not Defined
F
35.263523
-80.984857
Riverine
1952 linear feet
Intermittent
Note: Estes Designs, Inc. performed the wetland and stream delineation in October 2016. Estes Designs, Inc. also prepared all
attached Wetland Determination Data Forms, NC DWQ Stream Identification Form, and associated mapping unless
otherwise noted.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed:
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
05320102 105320102
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
L4 M51-502
Land Area
56.049 AC
Fire District
WEST MECKLENBURG
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Property Use
COMMERCIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel inside Water Quality Buffer Yes
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel#
3710450500L
FEMA Panel Date
11/04/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
03/02/2017
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
C/O FOUNDRY COMMERCIAL
HOLDINGS LLC
121 WEST TRADE ST STE
07/28/2006
2500
07/04/1999 $0.00
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Site Location
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date Sale Price
31521-665
01/25/2017
20812-387
07/28/2006
10525-011
07/04/1999 $0.00
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
60.01
Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
District Western Catawba
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I CATAWBA
Regulated Drinking Watershed Districts
Watershed Name LAKE WYLIE
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel Watershed Class PA
BELTWAY BV UNINC
Built -Upon Area Restriction
Limit on amount of Built -Upon Area I Yes
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed:
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
05320118 105320118
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
L19 M40-173
Land Area
5.28 AC
Fire District
WEST MECKLENBURG
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Property Use
COMMERCIAL
03/02/2017
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
C/O FOUNDRY COMMERCIAL
HOLDINGS LLC
121 WEST TRADE ST STE
Zone
2500
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed Sale Date Sale Price
31521-665 01/25/2017
20812-387 07/28/2006
Site Location
Charlotte Historic District INo
Zoning Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area INo
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map. Post Construction District
Water Quality Buffer Stream Watershed Districts
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes
Stream Watershed Name NA
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
Zone
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
BELTWAY BV UNINC
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed:
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
05320124 105320124
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
L3 M45-381
Land Area
5.2 AC
Fire District
WEST MECKLENBURG
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Property Use
COMMERCIAL
03/02/2017
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
C/O FOUNDRY COMMERCIAL
HOLDINGS LLC
121 WEST TRADE ST STE
07/28/2006
2500
07/04/1999 $0.00
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Site Location
Zoning Charlotte Historic District No
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map. Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area lNo
Water Quality Buffer Post Construction District
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes
Stream Watershed Districts
FEMA and Community Floodplain Stream Watershed Name I NA
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed
Sale Date Sale Price
31521-665
01/25/2017
20812-387
07/28/2006
10525-011
07/04/1999 $0.00
Site Location
Zoning Charlotte Historic District No
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map. Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area lNo
Water Quality Buffer Post Construction District
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes
Stream Watershed Districts
FEMA and Community Floodplain Stream Watershed Name I NA
FEMA Flood Zone
OUTMIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
Zone
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
BELTWAY BV UNINC
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed:
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
05320128 105320128
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
L5 M51-502
Land Area
16.712 AC
Fire District
WEST MECKLENBURG
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Property Use
INDUSTRIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel# 3710450500E District Western Catawba
03/02/2017
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
C/O FOUNDRY COMMERCIAL
HOLDINGS LLC
121 WEST TRADE ST STE
No
2500
60.01
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed Sale Date Sale Price
31521-665 01/25/2017
20812-387 07/28/2006
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
60.01
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I CATAWBA
Regulated Drinking Watershed Districts
Watershed Name LAKE WYLIE
Watershed Class PA
Situs Addresses Tied to ParcelBuilt-Upon Area Restriction
BELTWAY BV UNINC Limit on amount of Built -Upon Area Yes
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
FEMA Panel Date
11/04/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUTMIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I CATAWBA
Regulated Drinking Watershed Districts
Watershed Name LAKE WYLIE
Watershed Class PA
Situs Addresses Tied to ParcelBuilt-Upon Area Restriction
BELTWAY BV UNINC Limit on amount of Built -Upon Area Yes
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
05320129 105320129
Property Characteristics
Legal desc
L6 M51-502
Land Area
17.906 AC
Fire District
WEST MECKLENBURG
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Property Use
INDUSTRIAL
Zoning
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Water Quality Buffer
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes Post Construction District
Jurisdiction Charlotte
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Panel# 3710450500E District Western Catawba
03/02/2017
Ownership
Owner Name
Mailing Address
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY
C/O FOUNDRY COMMERCIAL
HOLDINGS LLC
121 WEST TRADE ST STE
No
2500
60.01
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed Sale Date Sale Price
31521-665 01/25/2017
20812-387 07/28/2006
Site Location
ETJ Area
Charlotte
Charlotte Historic District
No
Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area
No
Census Tract #
60.01
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I CATAWBA
Regulated Drinking Watershed Districts
Watershed Name LAKE WYLIE
Watershed Class PA
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
Built -Upon Area Restriction
BELTWAY BV UNINC Limit on amount of Built -Upon Area Yes
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.
FEMA Panel Date
11/04/2009
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
Zone
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
TO VERIFY
Stream Watershed Districts
Stream Watershed Name I CATAWBA
Regulated Drinking Watershed Districts
Watershed Name LAKE WYLIE
Watershed Class PA
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
Built -Upon Area Restriction
BELTWAY BV UNINC Limit on amount of Built -Upon Area Yes
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
information sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.

MECKLENBURG COUNTY, North Carolina
POLARIS 3G PARCEL OWNERSHIP AND GIS SUMMARY
Date Printed: 03/02/2017
Identity
Parcel ID GIS ID
05320130 105320130
Property Characteristics
Legaldesc
L5A M51-502
Land Area
3.46 AC
Fire District
WEST MECKLENBURG
Special District
FIRE SERVICE A
Account Type
NC CORP
Municipality
MECKLENBURG
COUNTY -UNINCORPORATED
Property Use
INDUSTRIAL
Ownership
Owner Name Mailing Address
WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY C/O FOUNDRY COMMERCIAL
HOLDINGS LLC 121 WEST TRADE ST STE
2500
CHARLOTTE NC 28202
Deed Reference(s) and Sale Price
Deed Sale Date Sale Price
31521-665 01/25/2017
20812-387 07/28/2006
Site Location
Charlotte Historic District No
Zoning Charlotte 6/30/2011 Annexation Area I No
Contact appropriate Planning Department or see Map.
Post Construction District
Water Quality Buffer Stream Watershed Districts
Parcel Inside Water Quality Buffer I Yes Stream Watershed Name I NA
FEMA and Community Floodplain
FEMA Flood Zone
OUT:VIEW FEMA FLOODPLAIN TO
VERIFY
Community Flood
OUT:VIEW COMMUNITY FLOODPLAIN
Zone
TO VERIFY
Situs Addresses Tied to Parcel
BELTWAY BV UNINC
This map or report is prepared for the inventory of real property within Mecklenburg County and is compiled from recorded deeds, plats, tax maps,
surveys, planimetric maps, and other public records and data. Users of this map or report are hereby notified that the aforementioned public primary
J nformation sources should be consulted for verification. Mecklenburg County and its mapping contractors assume no legal responsibility for the
information contained herein.

Gr'jtie 0199 ?'d
Chbrhe MEPP Rd
SITE
Y�
MQ°res Chap IV,6
J o�
c� �ro
m
OR
Fie. o�Cq
o,°� in
v
N.0 Or4
�a
Estes, Oesign Inc.
Environmental Design & consultiliq M%tw
PO Box 79133, Charlotte NC 28271
fx?
o,
T�
�D
Q Moores Ch* -i Rd
R
�e�orma�� RO
m
+3'O l^'�ref`iri,t'E� D
n
G 1-85 �ery,o8 R°
P, ■
Km Dc o
m B�1
4
W+Idwood Dr
Wilson Glen [jr
n
BU&Valle+
v
m
�De
a�
O
m
yet
0
i40
Charlotte
7�
Beltway Project Site
Mecklenburg County NC
Location Map Exhibit 1

" AA, 2,
SITE
TI<
Lr
i.30✓ }, 7 7
x
f-
' .FI I Htgh 1r--' Lr
i
NV Q
r
1t9j
(17
A \
U
o e
A
¢ 1.
8098333' W 80.966671 W WGS64 Psi;-.i?UU° W
0 .5 I MISE
0 1000 FEET 0 _ _ 500 t000 METERS
Punted from 70POI @2001 National Ge
agaphic Holding (wavrtopacom)
F�Es De5ion Inc. Beltway Project Site
Mecklenburg County NC
tal Design & Consulting
o33, Charlotte NC 28271 USGS Topo Map Exhibit 2

35N 16'45"
3,904, 000.0
35N 15'
3,902,4(
35N 15'
3,900, 8a
Beltway Business Park, Charlotte, North Carolina
81W 00' 32" 80W 59' 28" SOW 58,25"
499, 20 0.0 500,80 0.0 50 2,400.0
80W 57' 22"
504,000.0
35N 16' 45"
:3,904.000.0
499, 20 0.0 500,80 0.0 50 2,400.0
IdenttfN Results
Longitude: 80' 50'04" Nkrest
Latitude, 35' 15'21" Nurtlt
I lvtlrolugiv I, nil% (M'atershedi)
Ret;ioxt Name: 511util Atl utuL:-(iuil' Rq,,n4m
RegioJt Number: (13
C►ubregion Name: Edlmo salla:
subregion Nttnsher: , ,+
Avrfmnting t:nit Nim: Santm
Accimming t nit Number: 030}51ri
Cataloging t nit Nattte: (,leper Caawbu. N011 11 Carohau. Smirif Caro'llu
t;malogi"gInit lumbe+:G;n,,fom Out tiow Wmera+tudI1�11N)rn
SA:,tc vv in ti orte %prerdv tl �t_:til
�
t�s Desl n Ino,
Environmental oesign & Consulting
PO Box 79133, Charlotte NC 28271
5' 53"
,400.0
5-01"
800.0
7' 22"
504,000.0
Metropolitan ►rca%
Nantr: Charintte-t. im mrs-Rcx-k Ili l 1C '1(
Roads
Nance: 1111et5late lioutc h5
Name: I Ro.,ite ?'t. L s Route
Counties
CDutttY tiatne: MCO.Ict-O.,rl' UMIM
Beltway Project Site
Mecklenburg County NC
USGS Map Exhibit 4

This sod survey was compiled in 1976 by
the U S. Department o/ Agrir_rdture, Soil
Conservation Service and cooperating
agencies.
Esus Dlesn Inc.
-...a...wl�w...w■wl�
Environmental Design & Consulting mitw
PO Box 79133, Charlotte NC 28271
Beltway Project Site
Mecklenburg County NC
Soils Map Exhibit 5
t IN

S. Fish and Wildlife Service
National Wetlands Inventory Beltway Blvd.
November 21, 2016
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Estuarine and Marine Wetland
Freshwater Emergent Wetland
This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife
Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the
base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland [j Other be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the
Wetlands Mapper web site.
Freshwater Pond Ej Riverine
Lake
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
This page was produced by the NWI mapper

/ Beltway I
Tutorials Quick Tips Report Issues GIS Data Store
Parcel ID GIS ID
05320128 05320128
Address located on Property
11245 MOORES CHAPEL RD CHARLOTTE NC 28214
L5 M51-502
Land Area
Owner Name Mailing Address
Fire District
O
West Mecklenburg
Special District
Fire Service A
Account Type
100 S. WACKER DR SUITE
Nc Corp
+
BELTWAY PROPERTIES LLC 850
Municipality
_
CHICAGO IL 60606
unincorporated
Land Use
Industrial
100 S. WACKER DR SUITE
C/O VERUS PROPERTIES LLC 850
CHICAGO IL 60606
oeyo
Link To
Google Street View
Birdseye View maintained by Mecklenburg County
r
Legal Desc
L5 M51-502
Land Area
16.712 AC
Fire District
West Mecklenburg
Special District
Fire Service A
Account Type
Nc Corp
Mecklenburg County
Municipality
unincorporated
Land Use
Industrial
Link To
Tax Values & Building Information
Tax Bill Information
Deed Sale Date Sale Price
20812-387 07/28/2006 $0.00
Link To
Recorded Deeds and Maps (03/01/1990 to Current)
Recorded Deeds and Maps (02/28/1990 and Prior)
http://polari s3g. mecklenburgcountync.gov/#m at=16370&pid=05320128&gisid=05320128 1/1

Figure I Looking from top of culdesac
Figure 2 Stream Crossing F
Estes Deslan Itic. Beltway Business Park, Charlotte
E"Vi(mmentatOesign&Consulting Mecklenburg County North Carolina
POB 79133 Charlotte NC, 29271
Office 704.841.1779 Fax [phone]

Figure 3 Wetland
Figure 4 Wetland GA
EStem Ue (;. Beltway Business Park, Charlotte
EnvironmentalOesign&Consulting Mecklenburg County North Carolina
POB 79133 Charlotte NC, 29271
Office 704.841.1779 Fax [phone]

Figure 5 Wetland C
Figure 6 Wetland AB
Estes Desiun Inc. Beltway Business Park, Charlotte
Environmental Design &consulting Mecklenburg County North Carolina
POB 79133 Charlotte NC, 29271
Office 704.841.1779 Fax [phone]

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Beltway Business Park City/County: Charlotte Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/30/2016
Applicant/Owner: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC State: NC Sampling Point: Al
Investigator(s): Chris Estes Section, Township, Range: City of Charlotte
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): <1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 of LRR P Lat: 35.261421, Long: -80.986688 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil sandy clay loam NWI classification: PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.) surveyed during drought
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks: seep
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
X Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
X Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: NA
Remarks:
Site was delineated in previous years during non -drought conditions and indicated
surface water, saturated condition
and high water table
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: Flag Al
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 )
1. Acer negundo 25 X FACW
Acer rubrum 20 X FAC
6.
45 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 22.5 20% of total cover: 9
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 2Ux2U
1. Ligustrum sinense
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
15 15
40 X FACU
Total % Cover of:
30x30
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Acer rubrum
25
X
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8 (A)
2.
Acer negundo
25
X
FACW
Total Number of Dominant 10
Species Across All Strata: (B)
3 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 X FACW
4
Ulmus americana
10
FACW
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 80% (A/B)
6.
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 40 20% of total cover: 16
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 )
1. Acer negundo 25 X FACW
Acer rubrum 20 X FAC
6.
45 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 22.5 20% of total cover: 9
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 2Ux2U
1. Ligustrum sinense
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
15 15
40 X FACU
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
40 = Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20% of total cover: Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: x )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1.
Juncus effusus
20
X
FACW
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2.
Andropogon virginicus
10
FACU
Sapling —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3
Paspalum laeve
30
X
FAC
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
5.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
g
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
g
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
60
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 30
20% of total cover:
12
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15x15 )
1.
Smilax
2p
X
FACU
2
Lonicera japonica
FAC
3.
4.
5.
40
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover:
8
Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: Flag Al
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-6 5YR 5/2 none sandy loam
6-14 10YR 5/2 5y 5/6 5 C PL sandy loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric So
Dark Surface (S7)
—2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Cray fish chimneys present with depleted matrix exposed
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Beltway Business Park City/County: Charlotte Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/30/2016
Applicant/Owner: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC State: NC Sampling Point: 2A -A1
Investigator(s): Chris Estes Section, Township, Range: City of Charlotte
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): <1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 of LRR P Lat: 35.261421, Long: -80.986688 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil sandy clay loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.) surveyed during drought
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
sample taken in an upland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring
well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: NA
Remarks:
Sample taken in upland
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
2A -A1
Sampling Point:
50% of total cover: 42.5
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 )
1. Acer negundo
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 )
1. Elaeagnus pungens
85 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 17
5 FACW
5 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
on X FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15x15 )
1. Juncus effusus 1 FACW
2. Andropogon virginicus 2 FACU
3 Paspalum laeve 1 FAC
7
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15x15 )
1. Smilax sp.
2.
3.
4.
5.
4 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
30 X FACU
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
30x30
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Acer rubrum
20
X FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3
2.
Acer negundo
15
FACW
Quercus rubrum
30
X FAC
Total Number of Dominant
5
3.
—
Species Across All Strata:
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
20
X FACW
Percent of Dominant Species
60%
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6.
50% of total cover: 42.5
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 )
1. Acer negundo
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 )
1. Elaeagnus pungens
85 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 17
5 FACW
5 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
on X FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15x15 )
1. Juncus effusus 1 FACW
2. Andropogon virginicus 2 FACU
3 Paspalum laeve 1 FAC
7
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15x15 )
1. Smilax sp.
2.
3.
4.
5.
4 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
30 X FACU
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(A)
(B)
(A/B)
(B)
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH)
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
2A -A1
Sampling Point.
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
2-14 5YR 4/4 2.5YR 4/6 <10 sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
Dark Surface (S7)
—2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
sample taken in an upland on an adjacent ridge
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Beltway Business Park City/County: Charlotte Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/30/2016
Applicant/Owner: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC State: NC Sampling Point: 1B -B4
Investigator(s): Chris Estes Section, Township, Range: City of Charlotte
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Swale Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 of LRR P Lat: 35.261214 Long: -80.986532 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil sandy clay loam NWI classification: PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.) surveyed during drought
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
X Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: NA
Remarks:
Prior surveys conducted in non -drought conditions demonstrated saturated conditions
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Acer negundo
3. Quercus rubrum
4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Sampling Point: 113-134
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
20
X
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
15
FACW
30
X
FAC
Total Number of Dominant 4
Species Across All Strata: (B)
20
X
FACW
85 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 42.5 20% of total cover: 17
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 20x20
1. Acer negundo 5 FACW
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2.5 20% of total cover: 1
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20x20
1. Elaeagnus pungens 30 X FACU
5
6
50% of total cover: 15
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15x15 )
1. Juncus effusus
2. Andropogon virginicus
3 Paspalum laeve
4.
7
50% of total cover: 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15x15 )
1. Smilax sp.
2
3.
4.
30 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 6
1
FACW
Purl i
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 75% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
-- Sapling —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
FAC approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
4 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 0.8
15 FACU
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height
15 Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 7'5 20% of total cover: 3 Present? Yes X No
rs here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
1 B -B4
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Dark Surface (S7)
(inches)
Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
_ Black Histic (A3)
0-6
5YR 5/4
2.5YR 4/4 20 C PL
sandy clay loam
6-12
10YR 6/2
10YR 4/3 15 C PL
sandy clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. `Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
—2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Beltway Business Park City/County: Charlotte Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/30/2016
Applicant/Owner: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC State: NC Sampling Point: 213-134
Investigator(s): Chris Estes Section, Township, Range: City of Charlotte
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): <1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 of LRR P Lat: 35.261214 Long: -80.986532 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Cecil sandy clay loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.) surveyed during drought
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
sample taken in an upland
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: NA
Remarks:
Sample taken in upland
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Acer negundo
3. Quercus rubrum
4 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
5.
6.
Sampling Point: 213-64
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
20
X
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
15
FACW
30
X
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
5
Species Across All Strata: (B)
20
X
FACW
Percent of Dominant Species 60%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
85 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 42.5 20% of total cover: 17 Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 OBL species x 1 =
1. Acer negundo 5 FACW FACW species x2=
FAC species x3=
2• FACU species x4=
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4. Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
6. Prevalence Index = B/A =
50% of total cover: 2.5
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20x20
1. Elaeagnus pungens
2.
5 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 1
30 X FACU
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6 be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
30 = Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6 Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15x15 ) approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Juncus effusus 1 FACW (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Andropogon virginicus 2 FACU
3 Paspalum laeve 1 FAC
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
4 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 2 20% of total cover: .8
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15x15 )
1. Smilax sp. 30 X FACU
2.
3.
4.
5.
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 15 20% of total cover: 6
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 26-64
to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
2-12 5YR 5/4 2.5YR <10 sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
sample taken in an upland
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1712) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
on: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sol
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TIF 12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Beltway Business Park City/County: Charlotte Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/30/2016
Applicant/Owner: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC State: NC Sampling Point: 1C -C38
Investigator(s): Chris Estes Section, Township, Range: City of Charlotte
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Drainage way, slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): <2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 of LRR P Lat: 35.263432 Lang: -80.984907 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam NWI classification: PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.) surveyed during drought
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks: seep
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: NA
Remarks:
Sample taken in wetland. Sample was taken during drought conditions.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 )
1. Acer rubrum
2.
Platanus occidentalis
3
Liquidambar styriciflua
4
Quercus falcata
5.
Ulmaus americana
6.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
1 Ligustrum sinense
2 Acer rubrum
3 Ilex opeca
4.
5.
6.
Sampling Point: 1C -C38
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Species?
ccies?
Staattuus
St
Number of Dominant Species
$
25
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
20
X
FACW
30x30
20FAC
X
x 1 =
Total Number of Dominant 12
FACU
FACW species
x 2 =
Species Across All Strata:
10
FAC species
FACU
5
15
FACU species
FACW
Percent of Dominant Species 67%
5.
UPL species
x 5 =
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
(B)
(A/B)
90
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover:
18
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
30x30
1.
OBL species
x 1 =
20 X
FACU
FACW species
x 2 =
10 X
FAC
FAC species
x 3 =
5
FACU
FACU species
x 4 =
5.
UPL species
x 5 =
6.
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20x20
1. Carex sp.
2. Microstegium sp.
3 Paspalum laeve
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 30
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 )
1. Smilax sp.
2 Lonicera japonica
3.
4.
5.
15 X
zn X
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
FACW (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
FAC Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
FAC approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
U" = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 12
10 X FACU
30 X rnr
4U = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
30 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
15 20% of total cover:
6
30x30
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
Elaeagnus pungens
10
FACU
2.
Ligustrum sinense
25 X
FACU
3.
Ilex opeca
20 X
FACU
4.
5.
6.
55 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
27.5 20% of total cover:
11
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20x20
1. Carex sp.
2. Microstegium sp.
3 Paspalum laeve
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 30
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 )
1. Smilax sp.
2 Lonicera japonica
3.
4.
5.
15 X
zn X
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
FACW (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
FAC Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
FAC approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
U" = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 12
10 X FACU
30 X rnr
4U = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
(Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the a
Sampling Point: 1C -C38
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-6 5YR 5/3 None Sandy Loam
6-12 10YR 6/2 5YR 5/8 20 C M clay loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Dark Surface (S7)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
sample taken in wetland during drought conditions
on: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Beltway Business Park City/County: Charlotte Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/30/2016
Applicant/Owner: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC State: NC Sampling Point: 2C -C38
Investigator(s): Chris Estes Section, Township, Range: City of Charlotte
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hill slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): <2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 of LRR P Lat: 35.263432 Long: -80.984907 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.) surveyed during drought
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks: sample taken up slope
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: NA
Remarks:
Sample taken in upland
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Acer negundo
3. Quercus falcata
4 Liquidambar styraciflua
5
6
Sampling Point: 2C -C38
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species 7
20
X
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
15
X
FACW
25 X FACU
20
X
FACU
Total Number of Dominant 12
3.
20 FAC
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Species Across All Strata: (B)
20
X
FAC
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
58%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
75 = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
50% of total cover: 37.5 20% of total cover: 15
Total %Cover of: Multiply by:
30x30 OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Acer negundo 15 X FACW FACW species x 2 =
Ilex opera 10 X FACU FAC species x3=
2. FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4. Column Totals: (A) (B)
6.
25 = Total Cover
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
12.5 20% of total cover: 5
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 t
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Elaeagnus pungens
15 X FACU
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
2. Ligustrum sinense
25 X FACU
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
1
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
20 FAC
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
J
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
40 = Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 20
20% of total cover: $
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
20x20
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Microstegium sp.
20 FAC
Sapling —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3 Paspalum laeve
10 X FAC
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
5.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
g
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
50% of total cover: 15
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 )
j. -Smilax sp.
2. Lonicera japonica
3.
30 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 6
r Y GAr'I I
ID 11r/A.-.
5.
Hydrophytic
20
= Total Cover Vegetation
506% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4 Present?
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 2C -C38
on: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-6 5YR 4/6 sandy loam
7-12 10 YR 4/4
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
sandy clay loam
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
sample taken in adjacent upland
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Beltway Business Park City/County: Charlotte Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/30/2016
Applicant/Owner: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC State: INC Sampling Point: 1D -D3
Investigator(s): Chris Estes Section, Township, Range: City of Charlotte
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): <1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 of LRR P Lat: 35.264645 Long: -80.984157 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam NWI classification: PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.) surveyed during drought
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks: Depression above culvert
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
X Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
X Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131)
_
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
X Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
X Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: NA
Remarks:
Sample taken in wetland. Sample was taken during drought conditions.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 )
1. Acer rubrum
2.
Platanus occidentalis
3.
Quercus falcata
q
Liquidambar styriciflua
5.
Ulmus americana
6.
FACW
1 D -D3
Sampling Point:
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Species? Status
-
Number of Dominant Species g
15
X �
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
10
FACW
20% of total cover:
10
FACU
Total Number of Dominant 11
20x20
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Species Across All Strata: (B)
10
FAC
Stratum (Plot size: 1
15
X FACW
Percent of Dominant Species 73%
1.
Acer negundo
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
23 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 11.5 20% of total cover: 4.6 - 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20x20
1. Elaeagnus pungens
,? Liaustrum sinense
4
5
6
50% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 )
1. Carex sp.
2. Microstegium sp.
3 Paspalum laeve
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 )
1. Smilax sp.
2 Lonicera japonica
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 4
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
_X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
5 X FACU _ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
5 X FACU _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
60 = Total Cover
vrevaience index worksneet:
10 = Total Cover
30 12
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
of total cover:
20% of total cover:
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
30 X FACW
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
20x20
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
OBL species
x 1 =
Sapling
Stratum (Plot size: 1
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1.
Acer negundo
10 X FACW
FACW species
x 2 =
2.
Acer rubrum
10 X FAC
FAC species
x 3 =
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Ilex opeca
3 FACU
FACU species
x 4 =
3
5 X FAC
UPL species
x 5 =
4.
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
23 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 11.5 20% of total cover: 4.6 - 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20x20
1. Elaeagnus pungens
,? Liaustrum sinense
4
5
6
50% of total cover: 5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 )
1. Carex sp.
2. Microstegium sp.
3 Paspalum laeve
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 )
1. Smilax sp.
2 Lonicera japonica
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 4
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
_X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
5 X FACU _ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
5 X FACU _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Hydrophytic
8 = Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover: 1.6 Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
10 = Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20% of total cover: 1
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
30 X FACW
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
30 X FAC
X FAC
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
15
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
75 = Total Cover
20% of total cover:
3 X FACU
5 X FAC
Hydrophytic
8 = Total Cover Vegetation
20% of total cover: 1.6 Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 1 D -D3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
_ Dark Surface (S7)
(inches)
Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
1-4
10YR 5/2
10YR 4/6 3
sandy loam crusting
4-12
10YR 5/2
10YR 4/6 20 C M
sandy clay loam
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
sandy clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
Remarks
sample taken in wetland during drought conditions
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Beltway Business Park City/County: Charlotte Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/30/2016
Applicant/Owner: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC State: NC Sampling Point: 2D -D3
Investigator(s): Chris Estes Section, Township, Range: City of Charlotte
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): up slope of depression Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 of LRR P Lat: 35.264645 Long: -80.984157 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.) surveyed during drought
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks: sample taken up slope
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two regW1p.
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: NA
Remarks:
Sample taken in upland
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
75 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 37.5 20% of total cover: 15
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 )
1. Acer negundo 15
2 Ilex opeca 10
3.
4.
5.
6.
y FerVV
Sampling Point: 2D -D3
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species 7
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 12 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 5800
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Acer rubrum
20
X
FAC
2. Acer negundo
15
X
FACW
3. Quercus falcata
20
X
FACU
4 Liquidambar styraciflua
20
X
FAC
75 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 37.5 20% of total cover: 15
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 )
1. Acer negundo 15
2 Ilex opeca 10
3.
4.
5.
6.
y FerVV
Sampling Point: 2D -D3
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species 7
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 12 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 5800
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Zo = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 12.5 20% of total cover: 5 _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 )
1 Elaeagnus pungens
2. Ligustrum sinense
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 17.5
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 )
1.
2. Microstegium sp.
Paspalum laeve
7
50% of total cover: 15
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 20x20 )
j. -Smilax sp.
2. Lonicera japonica
5.
_X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
15 X FACU _ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
25 X FACU _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
w = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 7
20 FAC
10 X FAC
"" = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 6
5 X FACU
Zu = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover: 4
arks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 2D -D3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-4 5YR 3/4 sandy loam
6-14 5YR 4/4 5YR 4/6 5 RM M sandy loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11;
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
sample taken in adjacent upland
Hydrology not present.
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Beltway Business Park City/County: Charlotte Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/30/2016
Applicant/Owner: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC State: NC Sampling Point: 1GA-GA6
Investigator(s): Chris Estes Section, Township, Range: City of Charlotte
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 of LRR P Lat: 35.263523 Long: -80.984857 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam NWI classification: PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.) surveyed during drought
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (614)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (610)
Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (89)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X_
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: NA
Remarks:
Sample taken in depression
under drought conditions.
Prior surveys in non drought conditions demonstrated saturated soil
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 )
1.
Acer rubrum
2
Platanus occidentalis
3.
Liquidambar styriciflua
4.
Liriodendron tulipifera L.
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
6.
X
50% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30x30
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1 GA-GA6
Sampling Point:
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species 6
15
X
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
30
X
FACW
20
X-
Total Number of Dominant 7
Species Across All Strata:
10
FACU
Percent of Dominant Species 86%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
75 = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
37.5 20% of total cover:
15 Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A)
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30x30
1. Elaeagnus pungens 3 FACU
2. Ligustrum sinense 35 X FACU
3. Ilex opeca 2 FACU
4.
5.
6.
'tu = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover: 8
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 )
1. Microstegium sp. 35 X FAC
2 Carex sp. �- X FACW
Rubus L. 5 FACU
5.
6.
7.
9.
10.
11.
50 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 )
1. Smilax sp. 5 FACU
9 Lonicera iaponica 30 x FAC
5.
35 =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 17.5 20% of total cover: 7
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
(A)
(B)
(A/B)
(B)
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 1 GA-GA6
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-4 5YR 4/3
4-14 10YR 6/2 10YR 6/6 15 C PL sandy clay loam
D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
`Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Beltway Business Park City/County: Charlotte Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/30/2016
Applicant/Owner: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC State: NC Sampling Point: 2GA-G6
Investigator(s): Chris Estes Section, Township, Range: City of Charlotte
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hill slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 2-4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 of LRR P Lat: 35.263523 Long: -80.984857 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.) surveyed during drought
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
upland sample
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: NA
Remarks:
Sample taken in upland
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Liquidambar styriciflua
3. Liriodendron tulipifera L.
4 Quercus rubra
Sampling Point: 2GA-G6
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
20
X FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 (A)
30
X FAC
10
FACW
Total Number of Dominant 8
Species Across All Strata: (B)
5
FAC
X
FAC
FACW species
Percent of Dominant Species 75%
1. Liquidambar styriciflua
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
5.
6.
18 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 9 20% of total cover: 3.6
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 )
1. Elaeagnus pungens 5 FACU
2. Ligustrum sinense 25 X FACU
3.
4.
5
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. be resent unless disturbed or roblematic
50% of total cover: 15
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15x15 )
1. Paspalum laeve
2 Schedonorus arundinaceus
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
10
11
50% of total cover: 7.5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15x15 )
1. Smilax sp.
2. Lonicera japonica
g Campsis radicans
P P
30 =Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20% of total cover: 6
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
10 X FAC (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
5 X FACU
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
15 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 3
4 FACU
25 X FAC
5 FAC
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 17 20% of total cover: 6.8 Present? Yes X No
arks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0
60 = Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
12
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
30 20% of total cover:
OBL species
x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 )
X
FAC
FACW species
x 2 =
1. Liquidambar styriciflua
5
Acer rubrum
10 X
FAC
FAC species
x 3 =
2
lex opaca
3
FACU
FACU species
x 4 =
3
UPL species
x 5 =
4.
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
5.
6.
18 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 9 20% of total cover: 3.6
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 )
1. Elaeagnus pungens 5 FACU
2. Ligustrum sinense 25 X FACU
3.
4.
5
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6. be resent unless disturbed or roblematic
50% of total cover: 15
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 15x15 )
1. Paspalum laeve
2 Schedonorus arundinaceus
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
10
11
50% of total cover: 7.5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 15x15 )
1. Smilax sp.
2. Lonicera japonica
g Campsis radicans
P P
30 =Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20% of total cover: 6
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
10 X FAC (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
5 X FACU
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
15 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 3
4 FACU
25 X FAC
5 FAC
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 17 20% of total cover: 6.8 Present? Yes X No
arks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed
Sampling Point:.2GA-G6
or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Ty e' Loc Texture Remarks
0-6 5YR 4/6 none sandy loam
7-14 10YR 4/4
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
RM=Reduced
sandy clay loam
Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7)
—2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
sample taken in adjacent upland Hydrology not present.
Prior survey during non- drought conditions revealed no hydrology
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Beltway Business Park City/County: Charlotte Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/30/2016
Applicant/Owner: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC State: NC Sampling Point: 1G -G21
Investigator(s): Chris Estes Section, Township, Range: City of Charlotte
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): flood plain & toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 of LRR P Lat: 35.260494 Long: -80.983031 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam NWI classification: PSS
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.) surveyed in drought
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Yes X No
Yes X No
Yes X No
surveyed during drought conditions
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al) _
True Aquatic Plants (614)
X Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3) X
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (61) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
X Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
X Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: NA
Remarks:
During non drought conditions the upper portion of this wetland receives some over bank flow from the
drainage channel that is currently
dry. The lower part of this wetland narrows to toe of slope boundary on the north
and stream channel on the south.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover
Species?
Status
1. Acer rubrum
30
X
FAC
2. Liquidambar styriciflua
20
X
FAC
3. Ulmus americana
15
X
FACW
4.
OBL species
x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
5.
FACW species
x 2 =
1.
6.
10 x FACW
5 x FACU
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Sampling Point: 1G -G21
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species 8
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 11 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 73%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6. Prevalence Index = B/A =
22 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 11 20% of total cover: 4.4 - 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Elaeagnus pungens 5 FACU _ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
2 Ligustrum sinense 30 x FACU _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
6.
65
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 17.5 20% of total cover: 7
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
32.5 13
Total %Cover of:
Multiply by:
3 FACW
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species
x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
3
FACW species
x 2 =
1.
Acer negundo
10 x FACW
5 x FACU
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
10 tel-
FAC species
x3=
2.
Liquidambar styriciflua
x
7.
Sambucus canadensis
2 FAC
FACU species
x4=
3.
UPL species
x5=
g
4.
ft (1 m) in height.
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
6. Prevalence Index = B/A =
22 =Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover: 11 20% of total cover: 4.4 - 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Elaeagnus pungens 5 FACU _ 3 - Prevalence Index is :53.01
2 Ligustrum sinense 30 x FACU _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
1.
6.
35 = Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 17.5 20% of total cover: 7
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1.
Carex sp
3 FACW
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2.
Microstegium sp.
5 x FAC
Sapling -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3
Paspalum laeve
5 x FAC
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
Fern sp.
5 x FACU
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
g
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
18 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 9 20% of total cover: 3.6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Smilax sp. 5 X FACU
2 Lonicera japonica 10 x FAC
3.
4.
5.
15 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3
numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 1G -G21
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
0-6 7.5YR 5/3
2.5YR 5/6 3 C PL
sandy clay loam
6-12 7.5YR 5/2
2.5YR 5/6 3 C PL
sandy clay loam
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced
Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location:
PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) _ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_X Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
— Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
The upper portion of this wetland receives over bank flow from adjacent channel.
The lower portion of this wetland narrows and bounded by a toe of slope to the north and stream channel to the south.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Beltway Business Park City/County: Charlotte Mecklenburg Sampling Date: 10/30/2016
Applicant/Owner: WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC State: NC Sampling Point: 2G -G21
Investigator(s): Chris Estes Section, Township, Range: City of Charlotte
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): flood plain & toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1-2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 of LRR P Lat: 35.260494 Long: -80.983031 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.) surveyed in drought
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
surveyed during drought conditions
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: NA
Remarks:
This sample taken in uplands
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Acer rubrum
2. Liquidambar styriciflua
3. Ulmus americana
4.
5.
6.
Sampling Point: 2G -G21
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species 8
30
X
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
20
X
FAC
)
15
X
FACW
Total Number of Dominant 11
FACW
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Microstegium sp.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
ou = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 32.5 20% of total cover: 13
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Acer negundo 10 x FACW
2. Liquidambar styriciflua 10 x rAT-
3 Sambucus canadensis 2 FAC
4.
« =Total Cover
50% of total cover: 11 20% of total cover: 4.4
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1
1. Elaeagnus pungens 5 FACU
2 Ligustrum sinense 30 x FACU
6.
Percent of Dominant Species 73%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
18 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 9 20% of total cover: 3.6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Smilax sp. 5 x FACU
2. Lonicera japonica 10 x FAC
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
1Hydrophytic
5
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3 Present?
rs here or on a separate sheet.)
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0
35 = Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 17.5 20% of total cover:
7
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
)
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1 • Carex sp
3
FACW
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Microstegium sp.
5 x
FAC
Sapling —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3 Paspalum laeve
5 x
FAC
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4 Fern sp.
5 x
FACU
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
18 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 9 20% of total cover: 3.6
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Smilax sp. 5 x FACU
2. Lonicera japonica 10 x FAC
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
1Hydrophytic
5
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 7.5 20% of total cover: 3 Present?
rs here or on a separate sheet.)
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: 2G -G21
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-8 7.5YR 5/5 sandy clay loam
8-12 7.5YR 5/4 2.5YR 5/6 3 C PL sandy clay loam
D=Depletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Sample taken in upland
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site:City/County: Sampling Date:
Beltway Business Park Charlotte/Mecklenburg 02/16/17
---WESTPARK 85 PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLC
Applicant/Owner: State: NC Sampling Point: SP -1
Investigator(s): WE Section, Township, Range: City of Charlotte
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): UPLAND TERRACE Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 of LLR PLat: 35.260936 Long: -80.982625 Datum:
Soil Ma Unit Name: Cecil sandy clay loam
Map NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil X , or Hydrology X significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
This area is a man made depression associated with incomplete stormwater BMP.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
X Surface Water (A1) _
True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Water Marks (131) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _X_ No
Depth (inches): 4-8
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0-8
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
includes ca ilia fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Surface water is due to runoff being captured by a dike constructed as a Permanent Drainage Easement.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
50% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30x30 )
1. Populus deltoides
2.
3.
50% of total cover: 25
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
Sampling Point: SP -1
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 4
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant 4
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
= Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet:
20% of total cover: Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
50 X FAC FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
50 = Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
20% of total cover: 10 _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
x 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
6'
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
30x30
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
Tree – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Paspalum laeve
10 X FAC
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2 Carex L.
10 X FAC
3 Juncus Effusus
10 X FACW
Sapling –Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5
Shrub – Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7._Herb
– All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
9'
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11.
Woody vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
50% of total cover: 15
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.-
4.
30 = Total Cover
20% of total cover: 6
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: _ 20% of total cover: I Present?
photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: SP -1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(inches)
Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc
Texture Remarks
0-8
5YR 5/4 40
5YR 6/2 20 RM M
sandy clay
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
disturbed
8-12
5YR 5/7 60
5YR 6/2 20 RM M
sandy clay
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
RM=Reduced
Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7)
—2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches): X
p ( ) Hydric Soil Present? Yes No _
narks:
Mixture of high chroma and depleted matrix from surface ponding. Chroma increases with depth in this manmade feature
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site:
Beltway Business City/County: Charlotte/MecklenbuSampling Date:
rg 02115/2017
Applicant/Owner: VlVESTPARK 85 HOLDINGS, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: UP -6
Investigator(s): CJE Section, Township, Range: City of Charlotte
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ISLAND Local relief (concave, convex, none): CONVEX Slope (%): 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 of LLR Plat: 35.260593 Long: -80.982086 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Monacan loam NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
upland Island
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (614)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1 Acernegundo
2 Fraxinus pennsylvanica
3. Ulmus americana
4 Liquidambar styriciflua
50% of total cover: 45
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
6.
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1. Ligustrum sinense
3.
4.
5.
6.
50% of total cover: 20
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
50% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate
Sampling Point: UP -6
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
4
20
X
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
30
X
30
X
FACW
Total Number of Dominant
5
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
20
X
FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
80%
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
90
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
8
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
20% of total cover:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A)
(B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
20% of total cover: _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
40 X FACU _ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
40 be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
20% of total cover: 8
Tree —Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
= Total CoverI Vegetation
20% of total cover: Present? Yes X No
A
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: UP -6
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
Q_6 5YR 514 95 L
6-12 5YR 5/3 50 5yr 5/4 50 C M SCL
D=DeDletion. RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

NC t?WO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 7- 13 •-�
ProjectfSlte: P -e -TU -141
Latitude: S 2-& 3 Z 3
Evaluator:
County:M E •
Longitude:©;1-1��
Total Points:_
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent 2 ? , t,
if t 19 or perennial if 2:30*
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= >t r�"
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1° Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
n
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
No = 0
2
3
5. Activetrelict floodplain
0
1
2
5
6. Depositional bars or benches
a
12
1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
0.5
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
Sketch: �-DOOU4TI-y) bUtJ n.rtn F' S 2
&4::--1 I D �'C.� f'I 7- .
Yes = 3
Cj W 6j-
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = Cir S- )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
03
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C. Bioloqv (Subtotal = CD }
18. Fibrous roots in strearnbed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: �-DOOU4TI-y) bUtJ n.rtn F' S 2
&4::--1 I D �'C.� f'I 7- .
1 1 C
Cj W 6j-
s -

Appendix F
DEQ DMS In -Lieu Fee Program Acceptance Letter
hart hickman
SMARTER EWOMMENTAL SOLUTIONS

Mitigation Services
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Dan Heath
Foundry Commercial
121 W. Trade St., Suite 2500
Charlotte, NC 28202
Project: WestPark 85
ROY COOPER
MICIIAEL S. REGAN
February 27, 2017
Expiration of Acceptance: August 27, 2017
County: Mecklenburg
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the
table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation
program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility
of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will be approved. You must
also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with
the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this
acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS
receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and
payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an
applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact
amounts shown below.
River
Basin
Impact j Catawba
CU Location
(8 -digit HUC)
Cold
03050101 0
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Warm Ri arian jNon-Rii
50 1 0.50 0
Buffer II Buffer li
(Sq. Ft.) + (Sq. Ft.)
it Marsh t
0 0
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation
will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC
02B .0295 as applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jame . Stanfill
Asset anagement Supervisor
cc: Matt Bramblett, PE- agent
State 017'Nr111 Carolina Environmental QtWihrMitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center , Raleigh. NC 27699-1652 ' 217 W. )ones Street Suite 3000
919 707 8976 T

Appe ndix G
North Carolina Stream Assessment Method (SAM) Form
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

NI.; sAM ritLu AsstssmtN I rurcm
Accompanies user Manual version L.1
USACE AID #: SAW -2017-00098 NCDWR #:
INSTRUCTIONS: Attach a sketch of the assessment area and photographs. Attach a copy of the USGS 7.5 -minute topographic quadrangle,
and circle the location of the stream reach under evaluation. If multiple stream reaches will be evaluated on the same property, identify and
number all reaches on the attached map, and include a separate form for each reach. See the NC SAM User Manual for detailed descriptions
and explanations of requested information. Record in the "Notes/Sketch" section if supplementary measurements were performed. See the
NC SAM User Manual for examples of additional measurements that may be relevant.
NOTE EVIDENCE OF STRESSORS AFFECTING THE ASSESSMENT AREA (do not need to be within the assessment area).
PROJECT/SITE INFORMATION:
1. Project name (if any): WestPark 85 2. Date of evaluation: 2/24/17
3. Applicant/owner name: Foundry Commercial 4. Assessor name/organization: DCB - Hart & Hickman, PC
5. County: Mecklenburg 6. Nearest named water body
7. River basin: Catawba (03050101) on USGS 7.5 -minute quad: Paw Creek
8. Site coordinates (decimal degrees, at lower end of assessment reach): 35.260651, -80.982038
STREAM INFORMATION: (depth and width can be approximations)
Approx. 295 linear
9. Site number (show on attached map): IS -1 10. Length of assessment reach evaluated (feet): feet
11. Channel depth from bed (in riffle, if present) to top of bank (feet): Approx. 1.5 feet []Unable to assess channel depth.
12. Channel width at top of bank (feet): 4 13. Is assessment reach a swamp steam? []Yes ❑No
14. Feature type: ❑Perennial flow ®Intermittent flow ❑Tidal Marsh Stream
STREAM CATEGORY INFORMATION:
15. NC SAM Zone: ❑ Mountains (M) ® Piedmont (P) ❑ Inner Coastal Plain (1) ❑ Outer Coastal Plain (0)
16. Estimated geomorphic ®A` J
valley shape (skip for
Tidal Marsh Stream): (more sinuous stream, flatter valley slope)
El
(less sinuous stream, steeper valley slope)
17. Watershed size: (skip ❑Size 1 (< 0.1 miz) ®Size 2 (0.1 to < 0.5 miz) ❑Size 3 (0.5 to < 5 miz) []Size 4 (>_ 5 miz)
for Tidal Marsh Stream)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
18. Were regulatory considerations evaluated? ®Yes []No If Yes, check all that apply to the assessment area.
❑Section 10 water ❑Classified Trout Waters ®Water Supply Watershed (❑I ❑II ❑III ®IV ❑V)
❑Essential Fish Habitat ❑Primary Nursery Area ❑ High Quality Waters/Outstanding Resource Waters
❑Publicly owned property ❑NCDWR Riparian buffer rule in effect El Nutrient Sensitive Waters
❑Anadromous fish ❑303(d) List ❑LAMA Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)
❑Documented presence of a federal and/or state listed protected species within the assessment area.
List species:
❑Designated Critical Habitat (list species)
19. Are additional stream information/supplementary measurements included in "Notes/Sketch" section or attached? ®Yes ❑No
1. Channel Water - assessment reach metric (skip for Size 1 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
®A Water throughout assessment reach.
❑B No flow, water in pools only.
❑C No water in assessment reach.
2. Evidence of Flow Restriction - assessment reach metric
®A At least 10% of assessment reach in -stream habitat or riffle -pool sequence is severely affected by a flow restriction or fill to the
point of obstructing flow or a channel choked with aquatic macrophytes or ponded water or impoundment on flood or ebb within
the assessment reach (examples: undersized or perched culverts, causeways that constrict the channel, tidal gates, debris jams,
beaver dams).
❑B Not A
3. Feature Pattern - assessment reach metric
®A A majority of the assessment reach has altered pattern (examples: straightening, modification above or below culvert).
❑B Not A
4. Feature Longitudinal Profile - assessment reach metric
®A Majority of assessment reach has a substantially altered stream profile (examples: channel down -cutting, existing damming, over
widening, active aggradation, dredging, and excavation where appropriate channel profile has not reformed from any of these
disturbances).
❑B Not
5. Signs of Active Instability - assessment reach metric
Consider only current instability, not past events from which the stream has currently recovered. Examples of instability include
active bank failure, active channel down -cutting (head -cut), active widening, and artificial hardening (such as concrete, gabion, rip -rap).
❑A < 10% of channel unstable
®B 10 to 25% of channel unstable
❑C > 25% of channel unstable

6. Streamside Area Interaction — streamside area metric
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Little or no evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction
®B ®B Moderate evidence of conditions (examples: berms, levees, down -cutting, aggradation, dredging) that adversely affect
reference interaction (examples: limited streamside area access, disruption of flood flows through streamside area, leaky
or intermittent bulkheads, causeways with floodplain constriction, minor ditching [including mosquito ditching])
❑C ❑C Extensive evidence of conditions that adversely affect reference interaction (little to no floodplain/intertidal zone access
[examples: causeways with floodplain and channel constriction, bulkheads, retaining walls, fill, stream incision, disruption
of flood flows through streamside area] or too much floodplain/intertidal zone access [examples: impoundments, intensive
mosquito ditching]) or floodplain/intertidal zone unnaturally absent or assessment reach is a man-made feature on an
interstream divide
7. Water Quality Stressors — assessment reach/intertidal zone metric
Check all that apply.
®A Discolored water in stream or intertidal zone (milky white, blue, unnatural water discoloration, oil sheen, stream foam)
®B Excessive sedimentation (burying of stream features or intertidal zone)
El Noticeable evidence of pollutant discharges entering the assessment reach and causing a water quality problem
❑D Odor (not including natural sulfide odors)
❑E Current published or collected data indicating degraded water quality in the assessment reach. Cite source in "Notes/Sketch"
section.
❑F Livestock with access to stream or intertidal zone
❑G Excessive algae in stream or intertidal zone
❑H Degraded marsh vegetation in the intertidal zone (removal, burning, regular mowing, destruction, etc)
❑I Other: (explain in "Notes/Sketch" section)
❑J Little to no stressors
8. Recent Weather — watershed metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
For Size 1 or 2 streams, D1 drought or higher is considered a drought; for Size 3 or 4 streams, D2 drought or higher is considered a drought.
❑A Drought conditions and no rainfall or rainfall not exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
❑B Drought conditions and rainfall exceeding 1 inch within the last 48 hours
®C No drought conditions
9. Large or Dangerous Stream — assessment reach metric
❑Yes ®No Is stream is too large or dangerous to assess? If Yes, skip to Metric 13 (Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition).
10. Natural In -stream Habitat Types —assessment reach metric
10a. ®Yes ❑No Degraded in -stream habitat over majority of the assessment reach (examples of stressors include excessive
sedimentation, mining, excavation, in -stream hardening [for example, rip -rap], recent dredging, and snagging)
(evaluate for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams only, then skip to Metric 12)
10b. Check all that occur (occurs if > 5% coverage of assessment reach) (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams)
❑A
Multiple aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses
@ N
❑F
5% oysters or other natural hard bottoms
(include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
F M
❑G
Submerged aquatic vegetation
®B
Multiple sticks and/or leaf packs and/or emergento
❑H
Low -tide refugia (pools)
vegetation
x t
❑I
Sand bottom
❑C
Multiple snags and logs (including lap trees)m
❑J
5% vertical bank along the marsh
❑D
5% undercut banks and/or root mats and/or roots
02
❑K
Little or no habitat
in banks extend to the normal wetted perimeter
®E
Little or no habitat
** "**"*************REMAINING QUESTIONS ARE NOT APPLICABLE FOR TIDAL MARSH STREAMS***********"**"*"****"*****
11. Bedform and Substrate —assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
11a. ®Yes ❑No Is assessment reach in a natural sand -bed stream? (skip for Coastal Plain streams)
11 b. Bedform evaluated. Check the appropriate box(es).
❑A Riffle -run section (evaluate 11c)
❑B Pool -glide section (evaluate 11d)
®C Natural bedform absent (skip to Metric 12, Aquatic Life)
11 c. In riffle sections, check all that occur below the normal wetted perimeter of the assessment reach — whether or not submerged. Check
at least one box in each row (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams). Not Present (NP) = absent, Rare
(R) = present but < 10%, Common (C) _ > 10-40%, Abundant (A) _ > 40-70%, Predominant (P) _ > 70%. Cumulative percentages
should not exceed 100% for each assessment reach.
NP R C A P
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Bedrock/saprolite
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Boulder (256 — 4096 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Cobble (64 — 256 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Gravel (2 — 64 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Sand (.062 — 2 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Silt/clay (< 0.062 mm)
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Detritus
® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Artificial (rip -rap, concrete, etc.)
11d. []Yes ❑No Are pools filled with sediment? (skip for Size 4 Coastal Plain streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)

12. Aquatic Life — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
12a. ®Yes ❑No Was an in -stream aquatic life assessment performed as described in the User Manual?
If No, select one of the following reasons and skip to Metric 13. ❑No Water []Other:
12b. ®Yes ❑No Are aquatic organisms present in the assessment reach (look in riffles, pools, then snags)? If Yes, check all that
apply. If No, skip to Metric 13.
1 >1 Numbers over columns refer to "individuals' for Size 1 and 2 streams and "taxa" for Size 3 and 4 streams.
❑ ®Adult frogs
❑ [—]Aquatic reptiles
❑ ❑Aquatic macrophytes and aquatic mosses (include liverworts, lichens, and algal mats)
❑ ❑Beetles
❑ ❑Caddisfly larvae (T)
❑ ❑Asian clam (Corbicula)
❑ ❑Crustacean (isopod/amphipod/crayfish/shrimp)
❑ ❑Damselfly and dragonfly larvae
❑ ❑Dipterans
❑ ❑Mayfly larvae (E)
❑ ❑Megaloptera (alderfly, fishfly, dobsonfly larvae)
❑ ❑Midges/mosquito larvae
❑ []Mosquito fish (Gambusia) or mud minnows (Umbra pygmaea)
❑ ❑Mussels/Clams (not Corbicula)
❑ ❑Other fish
❑ ❑Salama nders/tadpoles
❑ ❑Snails
❑ ❑Stonefly larvae (P)
❑ ❑Tipulid larvae
❑ ❑Worms/leeches
13. Streamside Area Ground Surface Condition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Consider storage capacity with regard to both overbank flow and upland runoff.
LB RB
®A ®A Little or no alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑B ❑B Moderate alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area
❑C ❑C Severe alteration to water storage capacity over a majority of the streamside area (examples: ditches, fill, soil compaction,
livestock disturbance, buildings, man-made levees, drainage pipes)
14. Streamside Area Water Storage — streamside area metric (skip for Size 1 streams, Tidal Marsh Streams, and B valley types)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB) of the streamside area.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water >_ 6 inches deep
❑B ❑B Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water 3 to 6 inches deep
®C ®C Majority of streamside area with depressions able to pond water < 3 inches deep
15. Wetland Presence — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for the Left Bank (LB) and the Right Bank (RB). Do not consider wetlands outside of the streamside area or within the normal
wetted perimeter of assessment reach.
LB RB
®Y ®Y Are wetlands present in the streamside area?
❑N ❑N
16. Baseflow Contributors — assessment reach metric (skip for Size 4 streams and Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all contributors within the assessment reach or within view of and draining to the assessment reach.
❑A Streams and/or springs (jurisdictional discharges)
El Ponds (include wet detention basins; do not include sediment basins or dry detention basins)
❑C Obstruction passing flow during low -flow periods within the assessment area (beaver dam, leaky dam, bottom -release dam, weir)
❑D Evidence of bank seepage or sweating (iron in water indicates seepage)
❑E Stream bed or bank soil reduced (dig through deposited sediment if present)
OF None of the above
17. Baseflow Detractors — assessment area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all that apply.
❑A Evidence of substantial water withdrawals from the assessment reach (includes areas excavated for pump installation)
®B Obstruction not passing flow during low -flow periods affecting the assessment reach (ex: watertight dam, sediment deposit)
❑C Urban stream (>_ 24% impervious surface for watershed)
❑D Evidence that the streamside area has been modified resulting in accelerated drainage into the assessment reach
❑E Assessment reach relocated to valley edge
❑F None of the above
18. Shading — assessment reach metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider aspect. Consider "leaf -on" condition.
®A Stream shading is appropriate for stream category (may include gaps associated with natural processes)
❑B Degraded (example: scattered trees)
❑C Stream shading is gone or largely absent

IV. 6uTTer vvlutn — streammue area metric k5KIP Tor 1 lual marsn atreams)
Consider "vegetated buffer" and "wooded buffer" separately for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) starting at the top of bank out
to the first break.
Vegetated Wooded
LB RB LB RB
®A ®A ❑A ®A >_ 100 feet wide or extends to the edge of the watershed
❑B ❑B ®B ❑B From 50 to < 100 feet wide
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C From 30 to < 50 feet wide
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D From 10 to < 30 feet wide
❑E ❑E ❑E R < 10 feet wide or no trees
20. Buffer Structure — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Vegetated" Buffer Width).
LB RB
❑A ❑A Mature forest
®B ®B Non -mature woody vegetation or modified vegetation structure
❑C ❑C Herbaceous vegetation with or without a strip of trees < 10 feet wide
❑D ❑D Maintained shrubs
❑E ❑E Little or no vegetation
21. Buffer Stressors — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Check all appropriate boxes for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB). Indicate if listed stressor abuts stream (Abuts), does not abut but is
within 30 feet of stream (< 30 feet), or is between 30 to 50 feet of stream (30-50 feet).
If none of the following stressors occurs on either bank, check here and skip to Metric 22: ED
Abuts < 30 feet 30-50 feet
LB RB LB RB LB RB
❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A ❑A Row crops
❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B ❑B Maintained turf
❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C ❑C Pasture (no livestock)/commercial horticulture
❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D ❑D Pasture (active livestock use)
22. Stem Density — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider for left bank (LB) and right bank (RB) for Metric 19 ("Wooded" Buffer Width).
LB RB
®A ®A Medium to high stem density
❑B ❑B Low stem density
❑C ❑C No wooded riparian buffer or predominantly herbaceous species or bare ground
23. Continuity of Vegetated Buffer — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Consider whether vegetated buffer is continuous along stream (parallel). Breaks are areas lacking vegetation > 10 feet wide.
LB RB
®A ®A The total length of buffer breaks is < 25 percent.
❑B ❑B The total length of buffer breaks is between 25 and 50 percent.
❑C ❑C The total length of buffer breaks is > 50 percent.
24. Vegetative Composition — streamside area metric (skip for Tidal Marsh Streams)
Evaluate the dominant vegetation within 100 feet of each bank or to the edge of the watershed (whichever comes first) as it contributes to
assessment reach habitat.
LB RB
❑A ❑A Vegetation is close to undisturbed in species present and their proportions. Lower strata composed of native species,
with non-native invasive species absent or sparse.
®B ®B Vegetation indicates disturbance in terms of species diversity or proportions, but is still largely composed of native
species. This may include communities of weedy native species that develop after clear -cutting or clearing or
communities with non-native invasive species present, but not dominant, over a large portion of the expected strata or
communities missing understory but retaining canopy trees.
❑C ❑C Vegetation is severely disturbed in terms of species diversity or proportions. Mature canopy is absent or communities
with non-native invasive species dominant over a large portion of expected strata or communities composed of planted
stands of non -characteristic species or communities inappropriately composed of a single species or no vegetation.
25. Conductivity — assessment reach metric (skip for all Coastal Plain streams)
25a. ❑Yes ®No Was conductivity measurement recorded?
If No, select one of the following reasons. ❑No Water ❑Other:
25b. Check the box corresponding to the conductivity measurement (units of microsiemens per centimeter).
❑A < 46 ❑B 46 to < 67 ❑C 67 to < 79 ❑D 79 to < 230 ❑E >_ 230
Notes/Sketch:

Stream Site Name WestPark 85
Stream Category Pa2
uratc NU ,AM scream racing meet
Accompanies User Manual Version 2.1
Date of Assessment 2/24/17
Assessor Name/Organization DCB - Hart & Hickman, PC
Notes of Field Assessment Form (Y/N) NO
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N) NO
Additional stream information/supplementary measurements included (Y/N) YES
NC SAM feature type (perennial, intermittent, Tidal Marsh Stream) Intermittent
USACE/
NCDWR
Function Class Rating Summary
All Streams
Intermittent
(1) Hydrology
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Flood Flow
LOW
LOW
(3) Streamside Area Attenuation
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Floodplain Access
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Wooded Riparian Buffer
HIGH
HIGH
(4) Microtopography
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
LOW
LOW
(4) Channel Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(4) Sediment Transport
LOW
LOW
(4) Stream Geomorphology
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream/Intertidal Zone Interaction
NA
NA
(2) Longitudinal Tidal Flow
NA
NA
(2) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(1) Water Quality
LOW
LOW
(2) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(2) Streamside Area Vegetation
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Upland Pollutant Filtration
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Indicators of Stressors
YES
YES
(2) Aquatic Life Tolerance
LOW
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone Filtration
NA
NA
(1) Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(3) Baseflow
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) Substrate
LOW
LOW
(3) Stream Stability
MEDIUM
MEDIUM
(3) In -stream Habitat
LOW
LOW
(2) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Stream -side Habitat
HIGH
HIGH
(3) Thermoregulation
HIGH
HIGH
(2) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(3) Flow Restriction
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh Stream Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Channel Stability
NA
NA
(4) Tidal Marsh Stream Geomorphology
NA
NA
(3) Tidal Marsh In -stream Habitat
NA
NA
(2) Intertidal Zone
NA
NA
Overall
LOW
LOW

Appendix H
Previous Section 404 Penn its & In -Lieu Fee Mitigation Receipt
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOWTIONS

adF W AT �q0 Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
CIOW7 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
RECEIPT
April 11, 2002
Mr. Chris Estes
Estes Design Environmental
515 Pembroke Drive
Weddington, North Carolina 28173
Re: Project: Beltway Business Park
DWQ #: 011511
County: Mecklenburg
The North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) has received a check
in the amount of $ 27,500.00 check number 2061, as payment for the compensatory
mitigation requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification and/or Section 404 Permit
issued for the subject project. This receipt serves as notification that the compensatory
mitigation requirements for this project have been satisfied. Please note that you must
also comply with all other conditions of this certification and any other state, federal or local
government permits or authorization associated with this activity.
The NCWRP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the NCWRP is
responsible for the compensatory mitigation requirements associated with the subject
permit and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified in the permit. The
NCWRP will restore 220 linear feet of stream in Cataloging Unit 03050101 of the Catawba
River basin.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Crystal
Braswell at [phone].
7Sirely,
Ronald E. Ferrell,
Program Manager
cc: Rob Ridings, Wetlands/401 Unit
Steve Chapin, USACOE
file --
Wetlands Restoration Program 1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 276991619 [phone]
Customer ServiceW
320 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27603 Fax: [phone]
1 800 623-7748
NDENR

FRONS : E=siesDesign FAX NO. : 704 941-1779 Mar. 06 2002 10:05PM P3
Action Id. 200230067
L.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WIILMINGTON DISTRICT
county Mecklenburg
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property owner: Mr. Domer Reeves, Performance Rd., LP
Address: 2623 Mt. Isle harbor Dr.
Charlotte, NC 28214
Telephone No,:
Size and Location of project (water body, road name number, town, etc.):
Beltway Business Park located on approx. 200 acre tract on Performance Rd.; in west
_ "Charlotte.
Description of Activity:
Impact approx. 280 LF of unnamed trios to the Catawba R. and 0.07 acre of wetlands for
the purpose of accommodating the construction of the above referenced business park.
Mitigation to offset aquatic resource onsite will be accomplished through appropriate
patent-into-the`8tate Wetland estoratioa Program fund and through buffering remaining
streams and wetlands on the property in accordance with submitted plans.
Applicable Law: X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 U.S_C.1344).
(check all that apply) Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899).
Authorization. Regioned General Permit Nurnbei.
39 Nationwide Permit Number.
Your work is authorized by this Regional General (RGP) or Nationwide Permit (NWP) provided it is
accomplished in strict accordance with the artached conditions and your submitted plans. If your actividy is
subject to Section 404 (if Section 404 block above is checked), before beginning work you trust also receive a
Section 401 water quality certification from the N.C. Division of Environmental Management, telephone (919)
733-1786. For any activity within the twenty coastal counties, before beginning work you must contact the
N.C. Division of Coastal Management, telephone [phone].
Please read and carefully comply with the attached conditions of the RGP or NWP. Any violation of the
conditions of the RGP or the NWP referenced above may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a
restoration order, and/or appropriate legal action.
This Department of the Army RGP or NWP verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to
obtain any other required Federal, State, or local approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact
appropriate State and local agencies before boginning work.
If there are any questions regarding this authorization or any of the conditions of the General Permit or
Nationwide Permit, please contact the Corps Regulatory Official specified below.
Date November 28, 2001
Corps Regulatory Official Steve Chapin Telephone No. 828 271-7980
Expiration Date of Verification November 28, 2003
cc: EstesDesign; NCDE..NR-DWQ (WRP)
CaA W roar. 591

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. SAW -2006-41762-361 County: Mecklenburg LJSGS Quad: Mountain Island Lake
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Beltway Properties, LL
Address: 9450 W. Byrn Mawr, Suite 150
Rosemont, Illinois 60018
Telephone No.:
Size and location of property (water body, road narric/riurnber, town. etc,): Beltway Business Park
located on an 86.3 acre tract - Performance Place Road, near Charlotte
Description of projects area and activity: Install a 90 LF culverted crossing on an unnamed,
intermittent tributary to the Catawba River. Previously, under Action ID. 200230067, two of three
proposed culverted crossings were installed which Impacted 190 LF of unnamed tributary. The
permit that authorized those crossings has since expired. Mitigation to offset loss of stream
channel was already accomplished through Payment into the State Ecosystem Enhancement
Program freceipt dated 4/11/02).
Applicable Law: Z Section 404 (Clean Water Act, -13 LJSC 1344)
F Section 10 (Rivers and I larbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization; Regional General Permit Number
Nationwide Permit Number 39
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the
attached Nationwide conditions, and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation
from your submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate
legal action,
This verification is valid until the NWII is modified, reissued, or revoked. All of tile existing NWPs are
scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked prior to March 18,;2007. It is incumbent upon you to remain
info rined of changes to the NWPs. We will issue a public notice when the NWPs are reissued. Furthermore, if you
commence or are under contract to commence this activity before the date that the relevant nationwide permit is
modified or revoked, you will have twelve (12) months from the date of the modification or revocation of the NWP
to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of this nationwide permit, If prior to the expiration
date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain
valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all new and/or modified terms and
conditions. The District Engineer may, at any time, exercise his discretionary authority to modify, suspend, or
revoke a case specific activity's authorization under and NWp,
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require all individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine
Section 401 requirements.
For activities Occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation tinder the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the At -my verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any ofliet
required Federal, State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program, please contact Steve Chapin at 828-271-7980 x224.
Corps Regulatory Official Steve Chapin Date: December 14, 2006
Expiration Date of Verification: ,Nfarch 18, 2007
Copy Furnished: Estes Design, Inc., P.O. Box 79133, Charlotte, NC 28271-7050

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action ID. SAW -2007-03357-360 County: Mecklenburg USGS Quad'. Mtn. Island Lake
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Property Owner / Authorized Agent: Beltway Properties, LLC:
Address: 9450 W. Byrn Mawr Suite ISO
Rosemont, IL 60018
Telephone No.:
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): Beltway Business Park (5.5
acre expansion) located off of Performance Road; in west Charlotte
Description of projects area and activity: Impact 0.32 acre of wetlands for the purpose of
accomodatinss the expansion of Beltway Business Park. Previously, 0.07 acre of wetlands and 280
LF of stream channel were impacted and authorized under Action ID. 2006-41762. THE
PERMITTEE WILL RECORD RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF
MAINTAINING MITIGATION AREAS (1.7 ACRES OF WETLANDS AND 302 LF OF STREAM
CHANNEL AS STATED IN THE APPLICATION) IN THHEIR NATURAL STATE IN
PERPETUITY, PRIOR TO THE SALE OR CONVEYANCE OF ANY LOTS OR PROPERTY
WITHIN THE BUSINESS PARK. THE PERMITTEE SHALL PROVVIDE A COPY OF THE
RECORDED COVENANTS AND PLAT TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS WITHIN 30 DAYS
OF RECORDATION.
Applicable Law: ® Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403 )
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number:
Nationwide Permit Number: 39
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the
attached conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your
submitted plans may subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action.
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization
is modified, suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit
authorization is reissued and/or modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified
below, provided it complies with all requirements of the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit
authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the activity would no longer comply with
the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are under construction) or
are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the activity
is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide pen -nit's expiration, modification or revocation,
unless discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the
authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality
Certification. You should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine
Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area
Management Act (LAMA), prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other
required Federal, State or local approval s%permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program, please contact Steve Chapin at 828-271-7980.

Corps Regulatory Official Steve Chapin Date: November 16, 2007
Expiration Date of Verification: November 16, 2009
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the attached customer Satisfaction Surveyor visit
]tttp,/'www.saw, usaee.arm ay ni1lWETLANDS/index.html to complete the survey online.
Determination of Jurisdiction:
A. ❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above
described project area. This preliminary determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory
Program Administrative Appeal Process ( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
B. ❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the
permit requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a
period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
C. ® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the
law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years
from the date of this notification.
D. ❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action.
Please reference jurisdictional determination issued —. Action ID
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: The site contains wetlands as determined by the USACE 1987 Wetland
Delineation Manual and is adjacent to stream channels that exhibit indicators of ordinary high water marks. The
stream channelson the property are unnamed tributaries to the Catawba River which flow into the Catawba River
which ultimately flows to the Atlantic Ocean and is a navigable -in -fact waterway in SC.
Appeals Information: (This information does not apply to preliminary determinations as indicated by paragraph A.
above).
Attached to this verification is an approved jurisdictional determination. If you are not in agreement with that
approved jurisdictional determination, you can make an administrative appeal under 33 CFR 331. Enclosed you will
find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal
this determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Program
Attn: Steve Chapin, Project Manager
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the
criteria for appeal under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of
the date of the NAP. Should you decide to submit an RPA form, it must be received at the above address within 60
days from the Issue Date below.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this
correspondence. **
Corps Regulatory Official: _Steve Chapin __
Issue Date: November 16, 2007 Expiration Date: Five years from Issue Dare
Copy Furnished: Estes Design, P.O. Box 79133, Charlotte, NC 28271

Appe ndix I
Conceptual Site Plan Prepared by Burton Engineering Associates
hart hickman
SMARTER ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS

\\---------------� L- I I I I I \\ \ 1 /'� c7mai0¢¢aNz
�o
1---- L- _-L---� Site layout prior to minimization of Proposed ; , \ T,
?paoOaO<
I---T--T---T----__T-__ Building 'B'footprint and impacts to Wetland < ,- 1 / / \ oW WooS a: -a
I I I I T---T---T---T---Ty_ a W Z z
'C' dated September 2016 .1 X¢ Ww=
—�
II I I I j I I I I I---T---T/aZ w=0aw
I I I
-
--
-7 vv i i
\ / Zy
ZW
1 PROPOSED BUILDING 'B' / Z UJ Q..s Ii
Mxrwa / �\ VwZIgG
1 PROPOSED BUILDING 'A' 218AM sr. DuJ
\ '\\
1 iw auro saacExs sr. . 202 aUtp .3
T -MSF
) WAES(OMI03.F.)
rr— —=MT,7=
.................
7F .............
n = Z VUw
sMasF, mW QiuwJ ZdGa dvsm'
$
\ / \
—__ \\ / \\ Engineer's Seal:
1
' � I
1
1 /
1 \
1
1
1 �
1
1 �
\ 1 �
\ 1
1 �
-------- 1
\
Cno
W af
ZjU
w Z
J lL
C/)ca
�
} J
W � 2
a M
J
W
Go
l2
63-1
O
Z
Z
FTZ
y
U
w
CO
NORTH NORTH
Fqc
` E
9SSOCIPTE
ea.
811 Before You Dig
GRAPHIC SCALE
®
( aFEET)
1 i -h -100 n
PHASE I
BUILDING A: 256,880 SF
BUILDING B: 218,400 SF
TOTAL: 475,280 SF
PHASE II—
BUILDING C: 544,000 SFcall
BLDG C EXPSN: 192,000 SF
TOTAL: 736,000 SF
TOTAL: 1,211,280 SF
��
\ \\ _
\\�\ - -- — — _—
�,
--------
�\
-
_ _ — — — — — — — _ \ I I
1 \ I I
\
Drawn
3 n"
Da
09/26/2016
Revisions
Project Number
P-016-637
SP_ 6