20140957 Ver 1_U-03_Appendix B_Wilmington_Nash NC waterbodies_Part 2_20170227

Waterbed Data Sheet
'U"Joo "
Survey Description
:f
ProjectName:
State: County:
Tract Number(s):
ey i ype:
one) ElCenterline
:erbody Name:
Waterbody ID:
0,V4 & 00 L
—Crew MW1137efl—Iffials. Photo ID(
Milepost
osTffitT
Entry:
�ilepost
Associated Wetland ID(s):
=EZt,
'7
Re -Route Access Road
Other:
60
1/�// L
Physical Attributes
Stream Classification:
(check one) ElEphemeral Intermittent Perennial
Wa—terb-dy
(check one) ElStream 0 River E] Ditch Pj Pond Lake 00onnecting swale E] Other:
"a (check 0/1 that apply)
Width: Clear line E] Shelving Wrested EIScouring E]Water
ft, on bank vegetation staining
Height: Bent, matted, or Wrack Litter and Abrupt plant
ft, missing vegetation 0 line debris E]Soil characteristic
Width Of Ip _i�_ 1�*ommunity change change
WMEo_dy_- Top Bank to WidthofW—aterbody- aterEdgep Depth of Water at Centerline: — T -
Top of Bank at Centerline: TWater Edge at Centerline: (App -x.) IA71
ft.
S�in_uo.jty.
(check one) Water velocit—y:' _[Ta_n_k Fe ig —ht— da—ii FSlope
N4 0 Straight (Appiox-) Right: ft. Right: degrees
Meandering fps Left: Left:
degrees
Qualitative Attributes
(d,a,^,kens) No water Clear Turbid � Sheen �� Surface Algal Other:
on surface scum mats
Substrate: � Bedrock Gravel Sand Silt/clay Organic � Other:
(check a0 fila! apply)
% of Substrate: _%
Width of �Riparian Zone. Vegetative Layers: _%
(check all that apply) Trees: Shrubs: Herbs
Avg. DBH of Dominants:
(approx.) in. —7, in.
Dominant Bank _Ve_ge1a_1ion_.-&.,
(list)
55"
Aquatic Habitats (ex: submerged or�emeged aquatic legetation, overb,inging batiks/touts
leaf packs, (a rge s ubmerg a d wood, riffles, doa1) pools): 2f -e,? We- Y -C
Aquatic _Organisms Observed:
Invfist)asive and/or T&E Species Observed:
(
nary is:
one) 0 Natural Artificial, Man-rnad, ElManipulated
irbances:
all that apply) Ej Livestock Manure in Waste discharge
access waterbody pipes Other:
lim QIuajyb
one) El High ElModerate
ELow
Form R-_ V2 I i2old
I

Imm Kra a.l Ui 1u1;
Waterbody ID:
High Quality: Natural, natural bank vegetation around entire waterbody'banks stable and protected by roots; water color is clear to tea -colored; no
barriers to fish movement, many fish cover types available; diverse and stable aquatic habitat; no disturbance by livestock or man.
Moderate Quality: Altered by rip -rap; natural vegetation extends 1/3-1/2 of the active channel width on each side; filtering function or bank vegetation
only moderately compromised; banks moderately unstable: water color is cloudy, submerged objects covered with greenish film, moderate odor; minor
barriers to fish movement, fair aquatic habitat: minimum disturbance by livestock or man
Low Quality: Rip rap and channelization excessive; natural vegetation less than 1/3 of the active channel width on each side; lack of regeneration,
filtering function severely compromised, banks unstable (eroding); water color is muddy and turbid, obvious pollutants (algal mats, surface scum,
surface sheen); heavy odor; severe barriers to fish movement, little to no aquatic habitat. severe disturbance from livestock or man.
Notes:
Waterbody Sketch (Include north arrow, centerline distance from centerline, data point locations, survey boundary, and IDs of associated features)
1&127
1128
t�
1-122
6 gCC2
ag*F
Imm Kra a.l Ui 1u1;

onag002
Open water point onag002, facing south

ONAG002 facing east
ONAG002 facing north

ONAG002 facing west

USACE AID#
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAMa] QUALITY
` WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
L Applicant's name:
3. Date of evaluation: - (3 -- ( t
5. Name of stream:Uu Saphony Creek
7. Approximate drainage area: -7 I OL)
9. Length of reach evaluated: � O c)
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):
2. Evaluator's name: Ub
4. Time of evaluation: �(
6. River basin: i fM. t_
8. Stream order:_ j S4-
10. County: �D TV.-IS4+
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude (ex. —77,556611 ):
Method location determined (circle): SPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evahuatt'Jnote nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):_ L n p
15. Recent weather conditions: � L. I'D n �� ( '2 n
16. Site conditions at time of
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known
(AWTrout Waters k(Outstanding Resource Waters
0�Section 10 Tidal Waters ssential Fisheries Habitat
Nutrient Sensitive Waters NA -Water Supply Watershed ,� (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point?
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? DESNO 20.
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential
�L% Forested _o
22. Bankfull width: i n 23
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Y, Flat (0 to 2%) _
YES � O If yes, estimate the water surface area:
Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
Commercial _% Industrial 6 % Agricultural
/o Cleared / Logged _% Other ( {{ )
Bank height (from bed to top of bank): I
Gentle (2 to 4%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends ,Frequent meander
_Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
_Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 51 Comments:
Evaluator's Signatur Datey
This channel evaluatio form is inten o be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Continent, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

SAM t °°

NC DWO .Ctri-am irinn*.4:..,t; *, v .. c7___a__ <N
Date:- (� -
Project/Site:'
Latitude r
� L 5,1
Evaluator:
County:
_
Longitude:, ( 7 a j `�
Total Points:
1
r
Stream is at least intermittent �
Stream Determination cir a oae
i
Ephemeral Intermittent P
Other UNT to Sa hon Creek
p Y
it >_ 19 or perennial if 30*
renniaV
e.g. Quad Name:
! luluuy touyiotal = ; 1. , Dom)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
r
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
,2
2 )
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-pool,0�
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0es
1
1 5
= 3
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
25. Algae
0
0.5 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
Notes:
T2__7
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
Sketch' >
N,
>
\
snah021
\
`\
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
/ 1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0 5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
a.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
a
o = 0
Yes = 3
arfifiriai Hifnc­ pro ­# -f-A...,... d:_ ---- _:___
B. Hvdroloav (suhtntal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1'_
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0es
1
1 5
= 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2 1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2 1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
Q
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1 2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
.5 1
5'
24. Amphibians
0
0.5 1
25. Algae
0
0.5 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; BL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
t -
Sketch' >
N,
>
\
snah021
\
`\
3

snah021
Waterbody snah021 facing west upstream
Waterbody snah021 facing east downstream

snah021
Waterbody snah021 facing north cross stream

USACE AID# 6 -2—
DWQ #__
Site # (indicate on attached man)
' STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: P&A I 0010AI 2. Evaluator's name:2o
3. Date of evaluation: eZ I ' 4. Time of evaluation: 16 a
5. Name of stream: UNT to Saphony Creek 6. River basin: Tar -Pamlico
7. Approximate drainage area:_ -7 ( 0d f AQ 8. Stream order: 2nd
9. Length of reach evaluated: ( bs)k4 10. County: A1
I I. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimalg do rees. 12. Subdivision name if an
f
c �7��
Latihrde(ex.34.f;72312): 35^SS � (� � ,
Longitude (ex. -77.5511611): �
� 7 a r� � � �
Method location determined (circle): GP Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GTS Other
------------
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streatn(s) location)
14. Proposed channel work (if any):_,
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit: lza',z I Zr,
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ____Section 10 _ _ Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters — Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point'? YES � If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential % Commercial o
— _/o Industrial �/o Agricultural
% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: —Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _,Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 76
Comments:
q
Evaluator's Signature
Date
This channel evaluation ftti is intentted to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change – version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

:f5 N, Ha -2--)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET

NC DW_Q Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
Project/Site:
Latitude:'
ZS ° � 11� 7' � tom'
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude: /
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circ)
Other UNT to Saphony Creek
if z 19 or Perennial ifz 30"
Ephemeral Intermittent
erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
St r ng
Absent
Weak
Moderate
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg0
0
1
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
1
2
--ripple-pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3,
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
30
9. Grade control
0
1
2
3
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
0.5
1.5
-artificial ditches are not rated; see di cu ions in manual
Yes = 3
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
.3
14. Leaf litter
1
1
2
3
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
0.5
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
0.5
1
1.5
C. Biology Subtotal =
Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
2
1
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
1
2
3
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
0.5
1
1.5
FACW = 0.75;
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
OBI = 1.5 Other = 0
Notes:
Sketch:
"
snah020

snah020
Waterbody snah020 facing upline cross stream

USACE AID#
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
FID3 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: �n , ,� 2. Evaluator's name:
1,
3. Date of evaluation: 4. Time of evaluation:_ r 11
5. Name of stream: t C v� t� i er basin:_ r TA. (� - � P� yVA L_ C
7. Approximate drainage area: �) > (} 6t 0 -N 8. Stream order: �.
9. Length of reach evaluated: 3 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
ff
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): - ` 4 a L � ' I Longitude (ex. -77.556611):27 e24
Lo _ tbk
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: y f (.iz r " V-
16. .
16. Site conditions at time of visi
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: 0 PP Section 10 /J/""''Tidal Waters Wk -Essential Fisheries Habitat
AFrout Waters Utstandin Resource Waters ��ff �� ' )
g ��` Nutrient Sensitive Waters ���Water Supply Watershed I-IV
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES ��..J 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES L"�
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial/o Agricultural
112% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other (
22. Bankfull width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): (�--
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Xstraight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Commen
Evaluator's Signature
This channel evaluation forr i, inter Ted to �t sed
gathering the data required by the United States sA
quality. The total score resulting from the complel
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subj
Date R
ide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
- version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ncsc cnaracteristics are not assessea in coastal streams.

:�IVIIP02
NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:
S - ) 1_� Project/Site: ��' +/� � Latitude: r
Evaluator: �-- � � �� ►�
�. County: Longitude: .-77�, , 16 /J r
Total Points: ---�� !! _ 7
Stream is at least intermittent Stream Determination (circle Other
ifz 19 or perennial ifz 30" Ephemeral Intermittent erennkar e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = (C-3, D
18.Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple- ool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
o. nuaacuts
y. uraae control
11. Second or greater order channel
artificial ditches are not rated; see dis¢ossions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = (I
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water tab e?
C. Biology (Subtotal = �-
18. Fibrous roots in streambed_
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish
23, Crayfish
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
"perennial streams may also be identified using otl-
Notes:
Absent
Weak Moderate
Strong
0
1 2
3
0
1 2
3
0
-1 2
3
0
2
3
0
1 2
3
0
1 2
3
0 -
1 2
3
0
2
3
0
0.5 1y
1.5
0
1
1.5
No =0 Yes =3
0 1
1.5 1
0 0.
0 0,,
No =0
1 1.5
1 1.5
Yes = 3
1 2
12
ji
0.5 1
0 0.5 1
0 0.5 1
0 0.5 1
FACW = 0.75; BL = 1.5
methods. See p. 35 o anual.
tne-..rFa J, F, ( r _
Sketch: �-
0
iah023
41
M

� � S
e,F r'j
..........I IL}
ice,
- ~ - ,,r•="moi � � �'� � � .�

snah0//
Waterbody snah023facing north Cross Stream

USACE AID#
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: yt, U(7n- 2. Evaluator's name: `aJ_ W- T
3. Date of evaluation: — � - �, 4. Time of evaluation:_ " L-�
5. Name of stream: l �?. 6. River basin:_ IA'P - l- � }1
7. Approximate drainage area: (D __ 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated:,� 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): I I ! Longitude (ex. –77.556611):
Method location determined (circle):GPS�Top. Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): 1\J
15. Recent weather conditions: �CA vv� �—
16. Site conditions at time of visit: f �� 0-1"znA"k
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: %�Aection 10 al Waters Ll�s­sential Fisheries Habitat
(�frout Waters .-Autstanding Resource Waters L2hNutrient Sensitive Waters C AWater Supply Watershed 01 `AV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 0 )If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey�'--E� NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial 2� %Agricultural
Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other
22. Bankfull width: 2_ 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: -Zlat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
_
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends request meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): I t Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date
This channel evaluation for is intended to a used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

�zj Z L
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
nese cnaracteristics are not assessea in coastal streams.

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Orininc " A 11
NC -DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: e- (S;-_ ) JL
_J Project/Site: � Latitude��"
Evaluator: U��W���" County: N � e
Longitude:' �q
Total Points: ! f
Stream is at least intermittent Stream Determination (c' Other
if
z19 or erennial if z 30` - Ephemeral Intermittent erenni e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex, riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ooh se , en
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
artificial ditches are not rated; see discus ions in manual
B. Hydrolog Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria -
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of hi h water to le?
C. Bi)lo (Subtotal =� --
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong
3
0
1
2.
3
0
1
2;;
3
0
1
2
3
0
0
1
1
2
2
3
-- 3.-
1
2
2
- 3
0
- 0
0.5
2
1
3
1.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
No =0
Yes=3
0
-- - _ -- -
1
2
3
1.
1
0.5
0
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
0.5
1
1.
N0 = 0
Yes=`3�V-----
3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
--_-_
-
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
-
2
1
-
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
3
2
1
0.
0
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1. 5
0
0'5
1FACW
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
= 0.75;
=
OBL 1 then = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual
.5
Sketch: \
snah024
41
Z

S
'
� r
--wit yy r
41
5 _
R � � .tiP� � L� 4-T� • -
by
r �rR

snah024
Waterbody snah024 facing north cross -stream

USACE AID#
DWQ#,
tl 0 2- o
Site # (indicate on attached map)
FET STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name:—... �,M x �,g t� 2. Evaluator's name: ( j�
3. Date of evaluation: _ 4. jime of evaluation
5. Name of stream:
1 6 River basin: —
7. Approximate drainage area:? LIZ) fiIti 8. Stream order: l`
9. Length of reach evaluated:i 10. County: jkk
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.8723 t 2).,,LL ' qe Longitude (ex.—77.556611):. 2,7 C/ k 3
Method location determined (circle): PS i Top. Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Plioto/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of A
17. I"TIdentify any special waterway classifications known: k ection 10 V14'T'idal Waters "A—Essential Fisheries Habitat
rout Waters &/'outstanding Resource Waters �'�' Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed/V -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO) If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? ES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Surve ? YE NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial % Agricultural
6/o Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other (
22. Bankfttll width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander X Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): _ Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date C,,--)
This channel evaluation for is intended to a used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

SN,9H�2
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

510-A14 (0 2--2-
NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification .Form Version 4..11
Date: Project/Site:
Evaluator: -(- County:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent �� 7 Stream Determination (circ
f>_ 19 or perennial if? 30" ( Ephemeral Intermittent 44
A. Geomorhology (Subtotal =2-
a,Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le-)ool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
9. Grade control
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
artificial ditches are not rated; see disc ssions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria --
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence ofhigh w ter table?
C. Biology (Subtotal =�j
40
Latitude:
Longitude: � 7 jqg
Other
nial e.g. Quad Name:
Absent
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
No
Weak
1
Moderate Strong
2 3
1
2 3
1
1
2 3
2 3
1
1
2 3
2 3
1
3
1J
2 3
0.5
1 1.5
0.5
1 1.5
=0
Yes=3
- 0 -- ---__ 1 _.- 2 3
0 -----2 -- -
1.5 1_ 0.5 0
-00• 1 1.5
0 .5 11.5
No = 0 Yes ="3
----
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed'
2
1
- ---
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
3
0
2
O ---
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
1
21=0
3
23, Crayfish
0
11.5
24. Amphibians
0
11.5
25, Algae
�
.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
0
0.5
1 .1.5
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
FACW = 0.75;
BL = 1.
O
Notes:
snah022
Sketch: <
<
<
C
C/L
41

.� -. O
j
r
47, y rt

� 1
J
:11
g
°
it r
i A�
w
�- �
� vet �•��� y
r _ d
t
J'

USACE AID#
W]
DWQ 4
ry Hol
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -A9 &A
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
I. Applicant's name: 17� L IA OVA - 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation:` 4. Time of evaluation: Z,
5. Name of stream: o(P"C';, f . River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: j�..a C � 8. Stream order:_
9. Length of reach evaluated: �(�770 - 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): � �
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): ?i� b �,3 ' z 1 2 _2 I f Longitude (ex. -77.556611): � 2 C, -5,7 .
Method location detennined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
1�-J U yu<�—
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
,trr
17. Identify any special out te�
waterway ierway classifications known: "Section 10 ��Tidal Waters A-ssential Fisheries Habitat
M�fWaters �ht�tstanding Resource Waters P-84"Nutrient Sensitive Waters L/�L/kater Supply Watershed & (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the aluation point? YES NO f yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map?OYESNO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey. YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
r0% Forested
22. Bankfull width:
24. Channel slope down center of stream:Flat (0 to 2%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends
% Cleared / Logged _% Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): t n
_Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse). Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date -( - _ /4
This channel evaluation f6rm is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmentalP rofessionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

WORKSHEET

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date:,
Project/Site: (�
Latitude:::`
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 38.25
Stream Determination (cir n
Ephemeral Intermittent erennial`;
Other UNT to Saphony Creek
e.g. Quad Name:
if;2 19 or perennial if z 30*
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
I O
Absent
Weak
Mod ate
Strong
18Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
)
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2 j
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
>
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2 j
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2 ;
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2. '
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
a,1.5
10. Natural valley
0
` 0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
snah018
No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see disc4ssions in manual -f
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 1 110 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
_ 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
No = 0
es =
C. Biology (Subtotal = __LQ, I ,S)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2-) 1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3j
2 1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
3
21, Aquatic Mollusks
0
c 1 1fta
3
22. Fish
0
05 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5 1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
- a
Notes:
Sketch:
<
snah018
.1
t 2-2-
7q(( 'r
< z C/L

snah018
r
Waterbody snah018 facing south upstream
Waterbody snah018 facing north downstream

USACE AID# DWQ # Site #mdtcate on attached ma
( P)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: ' .�e� ? It R tiu^ _ 2. Evaluator's name:1�
3. Date of evaluation: 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of streamu c Qy 6. River basin:
r
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County:
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):. 3 31 % 7 6 Longitude (ex. —77.55661
Method location determined (circle): GP Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation -(note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if nnv)-
15. Recent weather
16. Site conditions :
17. Identify any spec waterway classifications known: USection 10 :�! 9idal Watters AAssential Fisheries Habitat
Lhrout Waters �A
outstanding Resource Waters /A' Nutrient Sensitive Waters / Q" Beater Supply Watershei�I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES e yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NCO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential
b/. Forested
22. Bankfttll width:
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ,Flat (0 to 2%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends
% Commercial _% Industrial /D% Agricultural
_% Cleared / Logged _% Other (_
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
_Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
_Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signatur d44L�Date,��
This channel evaluation form is inteirde o be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
1w � 1a1acwusuus air, iiul assessed in coastal streams.
7
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION
POINT
MANGE
_ ., . . ;
Coastal:;
dmont '
g
' IVioutit
�SCOIZE <.
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream;
no flow or saturation = 0` strop flow = max oints
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
Evidence of past human; alteration
eartensive alteration = 0; no alteration =max Dints
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
Riparian zone
no buffer = 0; contiguous wide buffer = max points
0-6
0-4
0-5
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges;
extensive discharges` = 0; no dischar es = max oints
0-5
0-4
0-4
4
Z
5
Groundwater discharge
no discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = max points)
0- 3
0- 4
0— 4
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
no flood lain = 0; extensive floodplain =max Dints
0-4
0-4
0-2
7
Entrenchment 1 floodplain access
(deeply entrenched = 0• :frequent flooding= max points)0-2
0-5
0- 4
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0
0-4
not wetlands = 0• lar e ad acent wetlands =`max Dints
—6
0 —2
9
Channel sinuosity
0— 5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input 2
0— 5
0-4
extensive deposition= 0• little or no sediment = max oints
0 —4
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
fine, homogenous' = 0• large, diverse sizes = max points
NA*
0-4
0 = 5
J Pte°
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0--75
rw
13
Presence of major bank failures
severe erosion = 0; no erosion stable banks= maxpoints)
0 — 5
0-5
0-5,
14Root
depth and density on banks
H,
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu hoot =max Dints
0� 3
0-4
0 -5
15
lmpact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
substantial impact =0- no evidence = maxpoints)
0 —5
0-4
0-5
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes'
E`
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = max ' outs),
Habitat complexity
01-3
0-5
0-6
17
little or no habitat = 0 fre uent varied habitats = maxpoints)
0-6
0-6
0-6
%
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
no shading vegetation - 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
0-5
0-5
0-5
19
Substrate embeddedness
(deeply ` embedded = 0 loose structure max)
NA
0-4
0— 4
24'Presence
,=
of stream invertebrates (seepage 4)
0— 4
0-5
0
(no evidences = 0; common numerous es = max points)
—5
(
21
Presence of amphibians
O
no evidence= 0• common, numerous types = maxpoints)
0-4
0-4
0-4
l
O
22
Presence of fish
no evidence= 0• common" numerous)es =max Dints0-4
23
Evidence of wildlife use
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max oints)
0 - 6
0 - 5
0-5
1.00
1{3,D
`" 5 r TOTAL SCORE l;also enter on first
page) Z"
F Y�r�Y ; ��
1w � 1a1acwusuus air, iiul assessed in coastal streams.
7

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 9 -- -_ I �- i
Project/Site:
Latitude .L., � .� j '3 �, ( W
Evaluator:
County:
Longitude: -T% u
Total Points: )
Stream is at least intermittent L--5
Stream Deter circle one)
Ephemeral ntermittent Perennial
Other UNT to Saphony Creek
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if z 30*
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = [; l, j
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
3
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex, riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1 j
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
>-
ahop
-->
i �
artificial ditches are not rated; see di ions in manual
s sc
B. Hydroloqy (Subtotal = _ ) _„_11
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1 0.5
('10
1,5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water t le?
No = 0
0.5
es = 3
C. Biology Subtotal = & , �>
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
9
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
q-
(b
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.7 OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manua .
Notes:
Sketch:
1
-_...
>-
ahop
-->
i �
s
�.4

snah019
roll
Waterbody snah019 facing west upstream
Waterbody snah019 facing east downstream

snah019
Waterbody snah019 facing north cross stream

USACE AID= DWO 4 Site - (indicate on auached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT NVORKS�w,HEET
Sr,"
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: ty1 I (> Y\ 2. Evaluator's name: L's 4 L
3. Date of evaluation: h' I �i n 4. Time of evaluation: �Pt-",
5. Name of sireann:� NT )M 'rL1, C 19\11 r' 6. River basin: -0.r^
7. Approximate drainage arca:--L Ooaj.S. Stream order: 11
9. Length of reach evaluated: s lo. County: No"'Cs"
11. Site coordinates (if kkjnottro):(� O prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): h U t'1(,5
Latitude(ex.34.872312): e: s, 69 35 Lon.hude(ex.-77.556611). X7.7. � U3
Method location determined (circle): Y+r Topo Sheet Onho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other -
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): -1 OY
15. Recent weather conditions: rM.M \ t%i A4 r' ,\ V\ 'i �Nr
16. Site conditions at time of visit: A'Vr0,trn /A -x04. H'e'lots
17. Identify any special waterway classifications`known: _Section 10 J Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters s/Water Supply Watershed:er!tV Q -1V)
13. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? (D NO If yes; estimate the water surface area: 10.P'
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial 1 b% Agricultural
Lwylo Forested qb% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
2 7np o ZidV . 2 n
ankful wed n: t 3. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope doom center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) ✓Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>I o°'°)
25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight _Occasional bends Zrrequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions fol' conipleti0n of morkshcet (located on page 2): Begin by detennining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location. terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the workslteet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. if a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. \',here there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream tlows front a pasture
into a forest). the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate fornn used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100. with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):_
Evaluator's Signature AJ1 1 Ww 0046ef Date 111 ! i
This channel evaluation Urnt rs intended to be used o h a guide to assist landowners anda vii nmental professionals in
galherina the data required b} the United States Army corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE• approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Foran subizct to change — t zrsian n6 0=. To Comntem. please call 919-876-8-'.41 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
y i -# S lJS t F i i{ka-. �-1,.�T1��Yi .St3 ',i u 'G �`� � �' i °i �K• ��Y. LY� 5�5 '?
Presence of floiv /persistent pools in stream 0 - 5 0 -4
These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
~''
1
0-5
(no flow or saturation =.0; strop flow =max points
s
Evidence of past human alteration
0 - 6
0 - 5
0-5
"�;;
2
(extensive alteration_= 0; no alteration =max oints)
3
Riparian zone
(no buffer 0 contt uous wide buffer .m points)
0 �5-,,
4
Evidence of nntnent or chemical disdrarges
0-5
0 4 '=
fl 4
+�
5
(eatenstve dischar es 0; no'dischar es =max omt's)
0 3
0-4 '
0=4
J
"Grtiundn'aterdischarge_
(no dischai e 0 s rip s see s, wetlands, titer in ax o pts)
J
Presericeofadjacentfloodplam
0 4
0-4
0-2,
Kms:
6
(no flood lam = 6; extensiveflood Iain =max points)
t
Entrenchment / floodplain access
t"'-
0-5
0-4,
0-2 ...
%
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent floodin : max points)
's.
$
Presenceofadjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0=2
=r
(no wetlands - 0; large adjacent wetlands: max oints)
�s
9
' Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander .= max points)
10
Sediruenf input
-
0 5
0-4 "
0-4 '
(extensive de osition 0; little or no sediment max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*4
0 -4
07,5
/
(fine, homogenous . 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening :
0-5
0-4
0-5
y ,
(deeplyincised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints)
Eaf
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
,
0-5
r,
�E
130-5
=
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks max omts)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
2
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throii, out =- max points)
�=
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 -4
0-5 '
(substantial nnpact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle-poolfripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5 `
0-6
(no riffles/ripples pies or pools = 0• well -developed =max points)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
'
(little or no hal itat = 0; fr uent, varied habitats = max points
�.
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
5
(no shadingve etation = 0; continuous canopy = m ax points)
lg
Substrate embeddedness/
- NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded= 0; loose structure= max)
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
Q
20
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O;
(no evidence = 0; coimnon, numerous types -max points).
Q=
'
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0_4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous es maxi oints)
a,
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5 :
5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points
t TotalPorntsPogsrble Kri;
100
100
100
'
j
TOTAL. SCOI2� (also enter on first �age�j
II`(-/
T. �µ; _
These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

tream Identification Form Version 4.11
canG`
0014
Date:Project/Sfte:
^�,�.%
Latitude:35166
3
EvaluL 2D >�
K
County: � �
Longitude: -� ' q
51
Total
Sfreamittent
Stream Determination-(circl e)Other
Intermittent erenni
bJtr\Si{G�lCrostf°ads
e.g. Quad Name: Nc
3b
Ephemeral;
if>_ 1g 0*
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = S)
Absent Weak
Moderate Strong
13' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
?.
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
1
3
d le- oolse uence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
11
L &I d 1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0.5,
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
z artiflcial ditches are not rated; see dis ussions in manual
B. H drolo (Subtotal =
pp 11
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
'
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
116)
1
2
0.5
3
0
14. Leaf litter
15
0
(r,
1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
No = 0
Yes = 8
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
C. Biology (Subtotal = )
0
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
(3l
2
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
iD:S
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
(O,f
(b}:
1
0.5
2
1
3
1.5
22. Fish
OP
0.5
1_
LS
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
(1;�r
1.5
24. Amphibians
iOON
0.5
2S. AIgae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
I FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Otber.=-0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Sketch:
pf,
s+a,oty co�r•'da�
©HWM w'id+h ', ?i �i
silo -P0&

w
'42 0 s+10 X1,1 :00 l
16
L � tic
R
r.
rs
NS
ti�2014/09/04
" '. x 14AL •_ -fir'

d� '

USACE AIDS DlV"Q = Site -_ (indicate on attached map)
snap 003
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT NVORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
2. Evaluator's name: ES3 .JG. (L ti
4. Time of evaluation: Iy kS
6.Riterbasin:4r&+1('
1. Applicant's name: _fX)VVN 11V% 1 ®Ys
3. Date of evaluation: t syf'i1,���+ /
1 46
. Name of stream: UNT lAd' �IVGy°'
7. Approximate drainage area: So 0.t .
9. Length of reach evaluated: so a
1
8. Stream order: V
lo.county: NOK54'1
11. Site coordinates (if known): 1 prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): ^C)Y�Q.
IS6
l
I. at hude (ex. 34.8723 12): 1 66 6 Loneitude (ex. -77.556611): "''7 ' OC7 k�
Method location determined (circle): I S Topo Sheet Onho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and allach map identifying streanl(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): TBD
15. Recent weather conditions: tr(x N t ..71A3r \Y\
16. Site conditions at time of vi
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters -1/Nutriew Sensitive Waters ater Supply Watershed S\ (I-iV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream ofthe evaluation point? YES Q If yes. estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 1& 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES >o-
21. Estimated watershed land use: _9'o Residential —% Commercial _% industrial 0% f Agricultural
1 Quo Forested 70% Cleared 1 Logged % Other
(Topcf �An�/
22. ankful wid991: ' 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) ZGentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (> I09'0)
25. Channel sinuosity: _Strai;ht Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
instructions for completion of ctarksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location. terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shottn for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how, to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. if a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. \',"here there are obvious char.oes in the character of a stream under review (e.g.. the stream flow s from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):H_
Evaluator's Signature Dateyl % 7
This channel evaluation Urn, is intended to be used nh ' a guide to assist landowners ai;d env -Amental professionals in
Qatheriug the data required by the United States Armv orps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — t ers ion 06 03. To Continent. please call 919-876-5441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
a
t kt
L > if " Sl
o 5x#EiO$I1:x��i1i01E
b`h-i TCS }±SIA.•
<C >*�[oastaISedmont�,1Vluntam
N
-.i Y�i.n,rl'.:Asx+ L
k . Sr9
'0-5
"•
1
Presence of flow /'persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
5
(no flow or saturation =,0; stron flow =max oints)
i
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
2
,3
(extensive alteration 0 no alteration = maxpoints)
-
= Riparian zone:.. -
0-6
0-4
3
(no buffer. 0, conn nous, "gide buffer = maX poi)
4
Eyidenceofnutnento'r.ckemicalilisc7iarges ` 11
0-5
0-4
0-4Y )
2
(ezteh&ediscbar es.,0;no`dise ar es`=max Points)
J
5Groundwaterdiscliarge
v'
0 3
0-4
0;
2
4
(no dischar e 0 s to s seeps, wetlands etc max points
i
2 6
Presence of ad aceni flood lam .
�k J _� P; ,.
' 0 4
�0-4:
0-2,, -
�1
,.
(no flood 1ain-10,extensiveflood lain=max omts)—
G.
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0=5
0-4'
0-2
3
a
`
(dee 1. entrenched = 0; fre uent flooding.- max oints
Presence of adjacent ivetbmds
0-6
0-4
0-2
t£
t
$
(no wetlands - 0: lar a adjacent wetlands., max points)
9
Channel sinuosity 11 1: -
0-5
.. 0-4
_0-3)
i�'
(extensive chaimelization = 0; natural meander = max points
10
Sedimeutinput
0 5
0-4'
0-4''
d
v'
(extensie deposition O; little or no sediment max points)
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate�x
NA
0-4
0-5
✓
k _
11
(fine, hoino enous - 0; large, diverse sizes = max oints) t.,,
�e i
j
. ,
E� idence of channel inc'is'ion or nE.=max
0-5
0-4
0-5
5 5
12
(deepl incised = 0; 'stable bed &banks maxoints .
r;
13
Presence of major bank fail
0-5
0-5
0-5
]�$
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banoints
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0 --:5
'
14
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throe bout - max points)
l
15
Impact b agriculture, livestock, or timber production
P Y d
0-5
0-4 '
0-5 '
y` z
substantial impact =0; no evidence =max points)
Presence ofriffle-pool/rippie=pool complexes
-
0-3
0-5
0-6
2
16
(no r f les/ri ples or pools = 0;well-developed =max oints)
Habitat complexity
0-6
0_ 6
0-6
17
'
(little or no habitat = 0; fr uent, var ed habitats = max points)
pa
Canopy coverage over streamtied
0-5
0_5
0- 5
Z
18
(no shadin vegetation = 0; continuous cano =max points
19
Substrate.embeddeduess
0 - 4
0 - 4
/
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)_
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
O
20
evidence = 0; common, numerous types =max points
Lry
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
21
(no evidence = 0; common. numerous es max points
3
22
Presence of fish
0-4"
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types max' .points)
nrb,
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
Yl
(no evidence 0 abundant evidence maxpoints)
T
i TOM Passible
100
Points
`-Y j„( } ',.v �Jh3 5 '� 3 'L= k4F 3✓y-: �; _i Y
TOTAL SCORE (also enteron first page]
1
V
rz t {
�/
x These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form
Version 4.11
`_) h Cn V� w V J
Date: 951f;�
Project/Site: AC�
Latitude:-3B4O16648
�p��`�
Evaluator. L� t "'`
County: "
�*i CAJ�++Total
Longitude: +�18 '000!
Point�
is at let
Stream Determin arcle one)
Ephemeral I ermitte Perennial
Other �jCtit2Stream
e.g. Quad Name:
if>_ 19 or ere
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= )
Absent Weak
Moderate Strong
12' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0 1
2 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0 1
r2 } 3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0 1
3
ripple -pool se uence
0
2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
0 1
2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0 1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0 1
2 3
3
8. Headcuts
0 1
2
0.5
1 1.5
9. Grade control
0
1 1.5
10. Natural valley
No = 0)
Yes = 3
11. Second or greater order channel
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drolo (Subtotal= )
t'1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 0
U. Iron oxidizing bacteria
00 1
2 3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5 'I')
0.5
1 1.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
No = 0
Y s = 3
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
C. Biology (Subtotal= )
1 0
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2 3
22. Fish
23. Crayfish
24. Amphibians
25.AIgae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 rother,= O,i
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See P. 35 of manual.
Notes: V( i Z
Sketch:
5V4 d� / 6V'64) 7�3
app
cHwm wid+h', 3
-FOP 0� Bark WJ+b.i's

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody snap003 facing north upstream.
Waterbody snap003 facing south downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody snap003 facing west across bank.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

USACE A1D�- DWO = Site - (indicate on attached snap)
snap OOa
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Protide the folloting information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant`s name: 1OD YV- w% i D VA
3. Date ofevaluation:
5. Nanie of stream: U Ni' +o W4','r N944Cf
7. Approximate drainage area: �5b aC.-
9. Length of reach evaluated: S
2. Evaluator's name: LSS LZ Ti Wv.
4. Tirane of evaluation: 1.56 pM
6. River basin:l'�C - Pgw.n�iLh7
8. Stream order: a
10. County: 00a
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal deerees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):1 nk
l f
Latitude(ex. 34.872312): �5'S�bo Longitude (ex. -77.556611): -n - 7 L
Method location deternrined (circle): ( + lbpo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note n�netarby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying- streann(s) location):
( �
14. Proposed channel work (if any): TO
15. Recent weather conditions: WO- rM SC 4f,�4.j
S4t>r r S i to St vY rvu�di +� Q -C� Q.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: 6).� h5 }ti2s
Mc sinily, c(earc uk C.reA
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known:
_Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters
Nutrient Sensitive Waters✓\',tater Supply Watersheds/ -iV)
18. is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YESUD if yes; estimate the stater surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES O
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _?'o Residential
_% Commercial _% industrial \ O °% Agricultural
-0% Forested
Z4'o Cleared /Logged ( )
\ F
A 3 �'
_%Other
Fc
22. ankful n: r
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): .
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%)
Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight _Occasional bends
✓requent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
instructions fol' completion of ttarkslteet (located of page 2): Begin b; detennining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation. stream classification; etc Every characteristic must be scored using the same eco•egion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 protides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. if a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and protide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows fron a pasture
into a forest). the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must ranee between 0 and 100, ttith a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):
Evaluator's Signature_ /L � �" Date M hq
This channel etaluatiom form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and 'em tronmental professionals in
oathering the data required by the United States Army Cops of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio o- requirement. Foran surject io clta174e - \ er'£ion O6 03. To Comment. please call 919-576-5441 x _6.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
k
> f LL Y YXIHu�Z4+v
� �
VkJv�t1kX'. L 3'�OS\L`
r
r�
#„ �.�¢
�•, r C'l'A�2A�TEt2TST�CS= � h : t , `a�L�"a
�,-�'#�•,r�s, �,_ n
#a "� �r�
;.".�Pedmon,` a
n to n
,.' �;� '`
��
1 ,aPr'T' .' � k si ut .'Fl+ .b. n..L
n.1N, wiY ,
t—••�. •'
0 — 5
0 — 4
0 - 5
1
Presence of flow %persistent pools in stream
(no flow or saturation = 0; stron flow = tnax points
Evidence of pas# human alteration
0 — 6
0 — 5.0-5
L'
I?
2
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration =max Dints) .
I2tpanan zone
0 6
0 4.
0 5
3
(no buffer,0 conn uous wide buffer .. max points
."
"4
Ev tdence of riutnent or chemical discharges
0 5
0 —4
0 '.
S
4
(extenstvediscbaj• es 0;nodtschaz es=max 6m6 _
Gioundwaterdtscharge. ,
0 3
0-4
0=4
r 5
no dtschar e 0 s nn s see s, wetlands, etc max points
=1U,`
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 4
10-4
0=2
(no flood lam -, 0; extensive flon plain = max points)
;+
Entrenchment/iloodplainaccess
'_5
0-4
0-2 ''
S
(deeply entrenched — O; freg6ent floodin -max points)
(y
.8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
3
i
(no w—etlands D large adjacent wetlands.—max points)
lit
`.9
Channel sinuosity"
0-5
extensive channelization — 0; natura] meander max Dints
x'
-O
"•, Sedinien#input
t
extensive deposition A- little or no sed ment max Dints)
u-
11NA
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
0-4
0-5
(fine, homogenous - 0; large, diverse sizes =max Dints)
�r :
Evidence of channel incision or widening .. •
0-5
0.-4
0-5
5r;
12
(deepl incised = 0; stable bed &banks =max points).
�+
13
Presence of major bank failures -
0-5 `
0-5
0 _ 5
t 1
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks - max oints)
Root depth and densfty on banks
0-3
0-4
0 = 5
14
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throe hout —max Dints
impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 —4
0-5
r;3-
I S
- (substantial impact =0; no evidence = max � oints)
-
h'
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0 — 3
0 — 5
0 6
16
(no riffles/rip les or pools = 0-_)-e` ll -developed = max oints)
-
�t
xify
IIabitaE
0-6
0-6
0=6
L
17
(little `or no habitat = 0; frequent. ed habitats = max points)
FHy'
M:
"18
Canopy coverstreambed
0_5
0-5 "
0 — 5
Z(no
shadin ve etation = 0;us cavo = max points)
'y
Substrate embeddedness
A
lV s
0-4
0-4
19
(deeDIN, embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
m
t
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4) `,
0-4
0-5
0-5
20
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types =max points)
C7_
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
p:
21
(no evidence = 0; common. numerous types — max points , `_
F
O:
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
q'
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous peg —max. Dints) '
>'
Evidence ofwiIdlifeuse'
0 6
0-5
0-5
23
.;
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence max points
TotalPot>ltsPosstlsle5
,LF 100
109
100
}
,
f::
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first paged ,, ,
These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC AWQ Stream Identification Form
Version 4.11
Sna r 00,
f�
Project/Site: �' cp
Latitude: 35rf1( oc?
��'�; R-Turnlo,��1�j
FStream
County: iS�'r
Longitude:s:
�/
ast intermittent 2lr.
if 30"
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral_.mikCnPerennial
Other
e.g. QuadNamennial
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= �Q-� )
1'' Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent Weak
0 1
Moderate Strong
CD 3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0 1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. rifle -pool, step -pool,
0 le- oolse uence
0
2 3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
1
2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0 cz17
2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0 1
12) 3
7. Recent alluvial depositsCO
=� 1
2 3
8. Headcuts
CO? 1
2 3
9. Grade control
0 0.5L?1
1.5
10. Natural valley
11. Second or greater order channel
0 _ 0.5
.(50 = 0 �a
v-
1 CIU; -
Yes = 3
' artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drolo (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
C2�
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
�Q�
1
2
]a]
14. Leaf litter
1.5
,.-;je'
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
��
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles
05a
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0 LY
C. Biolo (Subtotal = )
0
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
Q_�
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
"�,
1
2
3
22. Fish
1.5
23. Crayfish
24. Amphibians
25. Algae
C0>
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other
'oerennial streams may also be identified using other methods. Seep. 35 of manual.
Sketch:
dNwm w',d+h', 3
74
-'Fop o- Bankw44-W, 3 -4
CZ vj"Ne
T+L.dy Corridor
r Q0�
51"
TO

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
fir,{ - � _ a ...•
- �-��I' fir. � .•''J. 4 ��,� � _ � F
Waterbody snap002 facing northwest upstream.
Waterbody snap002 facing southeast downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody snap002 facing southwest across bank.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

USACE AiD; DIPQ Site =_ (indicate on attached map)
wrap 001
0 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET —AOQP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: / �7
1. Applicant's name: DO k 2. Evaluators name: R� A L' Y.�LN16'+/
3. Date of evaluation: R� � 4. Time of evaluation: � O ;30
1
5. Name of stream: U WT �p �Qr `� \� 6. River basin: '611, &V%-% J C1 [S
7. Approximate drainage area: So n0—t" S. Stream order: 0
9. Length of reach evaluated: SO T+ 10. County: K(frM\ ��, 11
11. Site coordinates (if kk�nown)::� tpreffe.,r`inn decimal decrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): f ok
Laihude(ex. 34.87231'_): rS FS 1055 Z. Loneitude(ex.-77.556611): "-/P'
Method location determined (circle):'ti�� 'Popo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) PhotoiGIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): I Oil) /
15.RecentweatherconditionV
s: C(2tt�\ t a„S% t 1 %.(�.h�Sx
16. Site conditions at time of vi
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters / Nutrient Sensitive Waters ✓ \Pater Supply Watershed 1 V (]-1V)
13. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 0 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES N0 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: _9/o Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial AD% Agricultural
-W/o Forested la.'o Cleared / Logged % Other ( )
(lop or gAn�
22. Bankfulhwtd t: 6 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight /Occasional heads _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for compicciot of ttarksheet (located on page 2): Begat by detennining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location. terrain, vegetation. stream classification; etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of hots to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. if a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g.. the stream Ilotes from a pasture
into a forest). the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate font used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverc_e):
Evaluator's Signature JGLAA.At. Date 1 /'7 117
This channel evaluation rm is intended to be usell o as a guide to assist landowners aiiA eii\Aroilmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE• approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio oi- requirement Font sutject to change — tersiat 06 03. To Comment. please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
x These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ZK CIA2AtTE+12ISTICj�hr x,
v"hOE,
yp
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
a'�gdmpo, 7 �rM_tt3 m
1
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
S
(no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max points
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0_5
0-5
Z
sz.2
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Will zone
zone
_
0 6
0 4
0 .'S
mix
(no buffer. 0 conn uous maxpoints
Evidenceofnutnentorchemicald sepyges'_
0-5 '<
0 4-'
fl 4
3
4'
(extensive dischar es 0; no`dis`char es =max Dmfs)
z t5
Groundwater discharge
0 3
0-4
0' -4
2.
{ no dischar e 0 s Sin s, see s, wetlands, etc max oints)
$ 6
Presence ofadjaccptfloodptabA
0-4
;0-4
0-2;
Z
(no flood lam — 0; extensive flood Iain = max points)
i
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0— 5
0— 4
0— 2 `
3
'2
(deeplyentrenched =0;fre uentfloodmi :=max Dints)
Preseuce of adjacent wetlands
;,tt- i
g
(no wetlands — 0; large adjacent wetlands,— max joints)
0-6
0-4
0-2
t3�
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
3
extensive ebaimelization = 0; natural meander =max D pts)
10
Sediment'input[
0 5
0-4
0-4 `
3
(extensive deposition= 0• little or no sediment —max omts)
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
II=NA
(:ime hoino enous = O; lar e, diverse sizes = max points
0-4
0-5,
N,
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0 — 5
0 — 4
0-5
3
12
(deeply incised '= 0; stable bed & banks =max points).
rHrf
13
Presence of major bank failures '
0-5
0-5
0-5
M
(severe erosion - 0; no erosion, stable banks ,= max points)
Root depth -and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
14
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
'-
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber Production
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
{?;
15
(substantial. impact =0; no evidence = max Dints)
'
Presence of riffle-pool/rippie-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
%y
16
{no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed= niax oints)
17
Habitatcomplexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
i
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, vane habitats =max points)
m
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0— 5
0— 5
0— 5
(no shadin vegetation = 0; continuotas canopy =max points
19
Substrate embeddeduess
=,NA*
0-4
0-4
011
(deeply embedded = O; loose structure =max)
i
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
d
20
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous twes = max points)
�-
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
21
(no evidence = 0; common. numerous types —max points).
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
Q
O
22
(no evidence = 0: common, numerous apes — max._, points)
,:0-4
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
23
(no evidence = 0 abundant evidence — max points
Total Points Possible 1
100
100
4100
'� � TOTAI: SCORE {also entef o>i first paged ' ; } € x
�:
L
z � �
x These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

r, , 1!�()01
NC AWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Lat 9 ProjectlSite: 1"tL Latitude:
tor:County: h Longitude:Points: Stream Detepr�i ion cTryle one) is al least intermittent 2�r� EphemeralIfiteitte Por erennial if? 39"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal= to `�)
Absent
Weak
Moderate Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
®
2
3
r le- oolse uence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
(W
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
Ko 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H dro logy (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
1
�.- 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
C. Biology Subtotal = )
0
1 B. Fibrous roots in streambed '
3
2
1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks.
1
2
1
3
1.5
22. Fish
0
0.5
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
.,. 1.5
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
f FACW = 0.15; OBL = 1.5
Other =,U„%
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Sketch: -Z ! s v/
E � cL
QNWM wld+k , to 5h dy, cOr r�dor
-- p 0T Bd+l' V F�

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody snap001 facing north upstream.
Waterbody snap001 facing south downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody snap001 facing west across bank.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

USAGE A1D- D\i G Site -_ (indicate on attached map)
snao 0 1
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET —AQP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant`s name: p t n \ V1 2. Evaluators name: Gl,,r L
3. Date of evaluation:�"f a. Time of evaluation:
5. Name ofsiream:TaY -eJi� 6. River basin:Tf'("i�pmliLD
7. Approximate drainage area: i 9b Sq vr., i 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: I Ob � 10. County: plash
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any)::
Latitude(ex. 34.872312): 3Sit
i Slozo 1 Longilude(ex.-77.556611): /1S,
Method location detennined (circle): PS Topo Sheet Onho (Aerial) PhoiolGIS Other GIS Other
133.. Location of reach under
}`evaluation nyote lnearby roads and llan�ddma'rrtk�s, and attach map id'pe`nnlifyingo strje/alm(ss)r location):
`' }}}
1 Sas \ D M ( � IIIAI I Wv I �rW V V7 \ "91 �A &'%A a �t "D- P+^tV
14. Proposed channel work
15. Recent weather conditi
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
IAA's
17. Identify any special tvater�vay classifications known: _Section 10 —Tidal \',)mgrs _Essential Fisheries Habitat
—Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters J Water Supply WatershedTV (1-iV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream ofthe
eevaluation point? 'ES NO if yes, estimate the water surface area see rorr�menAS
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? E NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 10 % Residential 2 4o Commercial % Industrial 3n' o Aoricultural
5S% Forested a 4'o Cleared I Logged % Other ( )
� �?opcf �An�) — — Logged
ankful trod t: I3 � 23. Bank height (from bed to top ofbank): > 4 �A,
24. Channel slope down center of stream: —Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) —Moderate (4 to 10%) —Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight Occasional bends _Frequent meander —Very sinuous —Braided channel
Instructions fol- completion, of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location. terrain, veeetation. stream classification. etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shoxin for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. if a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or tveatber conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream tlo\ts from a pasture
into a forest). the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must ranee between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (front reverse): 1 Comments:
44Lo,ke-Royale. (345gc.l '*rat ruvvxe.-oma svha.tt PovxolS arc presen} on +ribt+aries +o tLt<
+Ing eorakv i or.
Evaluator's Signature Clr'[- '_ZL' Date !� t31IV
This channel evaluation f n is intended to be used Aly at a guide to assist landowners antltenvA-0n rental professionals in
ga9tering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Ferns suhject io change- session 06 03. To Comment please call 919-876-5441 x _6.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
k
yyf _
IE {5 7}�Tyr�(�
y,i`'tP Y F f i'4.,` 3 y3 �'�i �� 2 '�9.L`
�
�:1
l%11�5t`:'�Is�a.Y
1G01 E
it
#
t CIi A TEI2 STC
4 xpr� `3£s
}gam
^` �' x'x
,
,,,�a
<a ysi^r r�,
:n
fr+ilaCCfal Dimon re
°•>
1
Presence of floe / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points
Z
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
{;
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints) .
'
iiipariadzone:
0-6
0-4
0 5
3
(no buffer, 0, conte uous, wade buffer =max points
.
Evidence of nutrient or.chenncal d sc7larges
0-5 `.
0 4 %-
fl 4.
4
(eatenstve dlschar' es 0, no"dischar es =max point
Groundwaterdisc harge=
0 �4
�4
(no dlschar e 0 s rm s seeps, wetlands, etc moa pomts)
6
Preserice ofadlacentfloodplain
0 4
0-4
0-2,
y
(no flood lam — 0 extensive flood Iain = max points `
'
. 2
Entrenchment / floodptam access
0-5
0-4
0-2 '
(deepl" entrenched —0•frequent floodin =max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
Y"
0-6
0-4
0-'2 "
j`.".
(no wetlands :—:.O; lar a adjacent wetlands„ max points)
1
;-1,
'
'
Channeisinuosity`"
0-5
0-4
%0-3
Z
o9
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander max nts)
10
Sedimenfinput
0—'5
0-4"
0-4 '
(extensive deposition 0 little or no sediment max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0 —.s
.,
(fine, homogenous . O, lar e, diverse sizes= maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or "widening :.
0-5
0-4
0-5
(deepl incised= 0; stable bed &banks =max points
Presencia of major bank failures '
0-5
0-5
0 = 5
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks =max )ints)
14
Root depth and density on banks ` .
0-3
0-4
0 —^5
'
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout — mak points)
Impact by agriculture, livestock or timber Production
0-5
0 — 4
0-5 '
k €.,
I S
(substantial matt =0; no evidence ='max points)
h'
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool; complexes
0 — 3
0-5
0-6
1,.
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed maxpoints)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0=6
N'
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
Pa;
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 — 5
0 — 5
0 — 5
�.
18
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points
`
Substrate embeddeduess
0-4
0-4
19,NAi
(deeply embedded = O; loose structure =max)
} 20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
'
(no evidence =A; common, numerous es = max points)
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0 4
4'
21
(no evidence = 0-- common, numerous types — max points).:.
O
22
Presence of fish,
fl 4
074
0 4
(no evidence = 0: common numerous types —max Points)
_ Evidenceofwildlifeuse'
0-6
0-5
0-5.
23
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence =max points)
t Total Points Possible ,�''` .- 100
100-
-`100
� i „ r
''�
4
�.
T+f k t /ry ii ♦ 'xtY :F %'� - ?: Jq i""` t
4 S -s
2 Ly
x These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC AWQ Stream Identification Form Version
4.11
5 \n p. ( ft
�''3 `��
Project/Site: AC'P
Latitude: 3`JtSb203 71
EDate:
� �,�.
county: jSh
Longitude: "1$ r C7Oy /�
Eator
�
i5Ephemeral
Stream Determination (circle ne
Intermittent tenni
Othertlent
e.g. Quad Name:
0"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent Weak
Moderate Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2 3-}
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2 3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step-pool,/l
1
2 3
ri le- ool se uence
(; �`
0
1
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
1
2 (3�
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1 1
U.2 I3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
Q1
2 3
8. Headcuts
CO)
1
2 3
9. Grade control
10)
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
No = 0
0.5
Yes_=, a
11. Second or greater order channel
a artiticial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drolo (Subtotal= 13vA ' )
2 Q
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
0
14. Leaf litter
(1„5
1
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1�
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
No = 05
0.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
C. Biology (Subtotal = )
1 0
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2 3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2 3
22. Fish
0
0
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1 •1,.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1 1.5
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Qlher r 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
y1hry�Vvt j 41n'
Sketch: /
P �
Q_
s ilnnt. - nni dOr
n4wm wid+I,', I�p
-Fop o T BA"� w; 4,1 13-L4
TN

y
�• '�� • �"? -- s M?' r � � Vit' ��
q `�.•� rA kti,-
4o
�141'D9f 03 12.04.

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody snao011 facing south across bank.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

a
C
Open Waterbodv Data Sheet
Survey Description
Project Name:
Waterbody Name:
Waterbody ID:
Date:
Southeastern Reliability
Uh�Qyvtp �(OV�G`
Q;�GQ�(�j5
Y/�/� �f
State:
County:
Company:
Crew Member Initials:
Photos:
N C
NOS%
EST
E. ITM
� �, Sor✓tth
Tract Number(s):
Nearest Milepost:
sociated Welland ID(s):
(�-19C�
-313-1.3
W av�ll
Survey Type:
(check one) ®Centerline ORe-Route OAccess Road ❑Other:
Physical Attribute .
Waterbody Type:
(checkone) tock Pond ❑ Natural Pond O Lake O Reservoir O Impoundment O Oxbow O Other.
Hydrologic Regime:
ermanently Flooded ❑ Semipennanently Flooded ❑Seasonally Flooded ❑Temporarily Flooded
OHWM
OHWM Indicator:
(check
an that apply) 16lea, line ❑Shelving ❑Wrested ❑Scouring ❑Water
Height: r
on bank vegetation staining
b ft.
❑Bent, matted, or missing OWrack ❑Litter and OAbrupt plant ❑Soil characteristic change
vegetation line debris community change
Depth of Water:
Bank height (average):
Bank slope (average):
10 ft.
�_ft.
j ( S degrees
NAD
Qualitative Attributes
Water Appearance:
(check one) ONo water fear ❑Turbid ❑Sheen ❑Surface OAlgal ❑Other.
on surface scum mats
Substrate: O Bedrock O Boulder O Cobble O Gravel O Sand 94silt, clay O Organic O Other:
(check all that apply)
�%
% of Substrate: _% % % % % % %
Width of Riparian Zone:
Vegetative Layers:
(check all that apply) ❑Trees: aplings/Shrubs: ❑Herbs
it.
�
2 Avg. DBH of Dominants: in. J in. in.
A
(approz.)
Dominant e
Bank Ve etation (list): C� i C'(2) SA -g k Ge en �� t?�',t r �i QC'teyll li \QL1 t 8amb&y' Sktl rQe i 1FI L.Ja�
(CPV\AIanF%(t5 , . .
-
0CcrCAPciknIrs NCeY'- Y(AbV_C'IPn
Aquatic Habitats lex submerged or emerged aquatic vegetation, overhanging bankelroots, leaf packs. large submerged wood riffles, deep pods, etc.):
Aquatic Organisms Observed (list):
tV{(
T&E Species Observed (lisp:
NP
Disturbances (ex: livestock access, manure in waterbody, waste discharge pipes):
cavo w -'A tin c4
Waterbody is:
(check one) \ O Natural Artificial, man-made O Manipulated
Waterbody Quality 4:
(check one) O High 2 Moderate O Low
Form R°v. wnon_ols

Foran Rev. wnonors
r
ID:
rWaterbody
High Quality: Natural, natural bank vegetation around entire waterbody; banks stable and protected by roots; water color is Gear to tea -colored; no
barriers to fish movement; many fish cover types available; diverse and stable aquatic habitat; no disturbance by livestock or man.
Moderate Quality: Altered by rip -rap; natural vegetation extends 1/3-1/2 of the active channel width on each side; filtering function or bank vegetation
only moderately compromised; banks moderately unstable; water color is cloudy, submerged objects covered with greenish film; moderate odor; minor
barriers to fish movement; fair aquatic habitat; minimum disturbance by livestock or man.
Low Quality. Rip rap and channelization excessive; natural vegetation less than 1/3 of the active channel width on each side; lack of regeneration;
filtering function severely compromised; banks unstable (eroding); water color is muddy and turbid; obvious pollutants (algal mats, surface scum,
surface sheen); heavy odor; severe barriers to fish movement; little to no aquatic habitat; severe disturbance from livestock or man.
Notes:
Waterbody Sketch (Include north arrow, centerline, distance from centerline, data point locations, survey boundary, and IDs of associated features)
d
era
Ce
C"�dS 'I
s;z e
N (vYrr�{Ur)
i
77<
CL
fir) �y.
Foran Rev. wnonors
r

Environmental Field Surveys
Open Water Point Photo Page
Open Waterbody onao005 facing south.
Photo Sheet I of 1

5he,o 010
USACE AID# DWQ # Site #_ (indicate on attached map)
0 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 7D oyy0 Y I o -n
3. Date of evaluation: gzl Lf
5. Name of stream: U N T +o Ta TZi V CY-
7. Approximate drainage area: I ac.
9. Length of reach evaluated: 50 4•
2. Evaluator's name: [ESI - K,. AvKph.cr , ),ft
4. Time of evaluation: 3 % O U PM
6. River basin: �) cus e-
8.
8. Stream
10. Countv: N cts
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): — ' - C,)O-443
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): . 3`J . $ Jr -7 Longitude (ex. -77.556611):
Method location detemrined (circle): 414 Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
1K)OVVvea-s� o(` c4's`HA 04 +IWY 91 ar`d 00, Br-%I�Z
14. Proposed channel work
15. Recent weather conditi(
16. Site conditions at time of visit: dI WN I A -yl cU «iF i ACLd
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 Tidal Waters
� _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters ✓Nutrient Sensitive Waters ✓Water Supply Watershed V(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES a If yes, estimate the water surface area:
C/
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: ( 0 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial 30% Agricultural
D D % Forested _% Cleared / Logged To Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: $ R • 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 3 �
,n, r'ajh in
Civ c.p ,J;kus,A
`f hvs,
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ✓Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality. 2 1�
Total Score (from reverse)): •�a' Comments: 'F 1� `1��ICUI�'"'-G'
a i n.A^" o4 TcAi v-, Th -S12
Evaluator's Signature -' Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
CO a so erste o yrs age. 3�
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
UZZf
;Py F,i5 5� i�J �rnar, p:myCgfr r r w .+ay'�!a� 'Mt " l+7 fiF 'a �r i h'Tm'3�,%A"i 'R 1V' f * i i a "
krke3ence of,f[ol persisentipools.»ream 4T : rn� r # _ �, �,,
�'`flov
r �T,
A.'#lo ozsaturahon Ostro a' o nes�Mr: ' . �4.`:. � �,
2 •
alCeraiio �
��
fi ` u, r:4sx F i f ' K 0 Cz °' F't 10.= N
r' . :
3Riparian
1@1��ale�attoi�0•�`no.�rahon;–,��m
zouI HIM .OY1
wff�,no:b FrrQgffima0,Wpo1n?s4
IMI'! coriti "o s wider of
Evi eenof u Tien ° ch miR'i'ilischarges 2
e ensue, 1$ClaC a,fl cI�Q disc .,c11 eSm
5
t f+9ettlA'I'�R-"�+4`d'� Y�1A1�"'+iK"`-
G ound aIe . Marg
no:dischar e3s sin :seetiands a _ oars�,r
Fnt#]ooclpiain 0 /� '`.
ED,
nIN d . ains0"Lex enSiVe fIOO'�da�n- max. o� -A
�t
n ��y, a esavf+G milp(=�•rf:�et7re3Jrks 4 13"� �` �
FMW .-iitrenchmen _ flo°dplain, access W_ r .
04�,.
_
s deed ,entrencdfre ueri.:flo dina�c.y om s t'5.' `�rs.
8 f
.-�r-KAIN.;r . :�x,��. ��.nx
UK resence of adjat etlands �y .� � `� 41? r L p �2 f oZ
v"
t ro 1 f4IL
:m s ���_=
nd.wetlands,. a andsmax: om s s Ot
- -
k
4 }avre*" a [►.PW.oi u w x
�� �- �Channei"smuosJ '��"���-:
��a�r yrs,:. 0 £0" 4�� 0 3
t u .5,
x;
ex�%nsrve channelizat2on,.0u,na� l,meander .max Dins ,(�r z3F ,w��� ..
i,5e[�lll@entan u� 1� ��fp��'i4����.� 8-•x��ti�Y••���?�� �ti'� `a"�'��''�v"k4, '`�' �. ,�'�" k1x�.`�.
eosrve.de $3,tion, 0�ittl e_ofau. sedifirM.' :max �Lm�s t: -
J
1, .
hex
F, - :0 fd. T,�" ve i 2k1�- � -Yid:Me, +R i Ji YP. d� -
� s �rsychanr be
��"�s��,
�' � :fine-�liomo enous�,�,,0'�>�ar e�dive�se�`skzes,�maa� omts �• �,r}.� ����,z� ,� � ���'��,��.�,.��;
�
N!01" �'�Evidence:"of channel'mc&ion or"wideriiri �,� �a t r �+ �a �"�'�r>
2...
4_s 1 ised 0 stable bed � an A07'PWR Onts
,_: ijee ;' nc`
13,
r
,axnszlx+-=�c+t'�` �:�. .r��r -aw,-� ' gcar�.sa.q• r�,��y �.,`�" �i .
a ' P esence o . m �°r an�a�,3# �� 0" 5apva r�r E
'Xi 5
4 f, � �.: � � , n : "'215
yam? severe;erosions,:0 no_erosxon;stable=banks max o�nts „. �.�t �Pr-..,�,_: .�
� MIXptfi�andfpdensify'on banks 1 `5 ,I,? , �
3r
14=
,"�, to .k.r0
�;,�
no;v�s�lile;roots;,�r,0 'dense roots:;tlrou outs ,� max o�nts , < ,�-.�, � �•R ,�,;,'� . �� ��?�, F�=t ., : a �,, .� µ� r... �,..
r
,X_
F
a mrax .�M c * � t :rfr r - , ^m
Ct
Impact by ar�culture,rl�vestocl, or,hmkers productionta r ,
"y:.-��,1 r IN ri � �r ,� � , 0 5 r 0 4
. � , ,
..._. subskiIltial,im ac �-0 ,na.evidence max Dints 1..
s
Fres'e`n'ce of riffle ool/ri` le ool"com lexes
F PA,� MPS F
� ��+�r�
�F
no:riifleslri les,or Dols.=.0 ,welUdevelo ed... -max- Dints v
`17
Habifatcorii
0 6 �` 0 6 0" 6y 7J
little or no liab�tat`'0 ire "ueni,',�ared'fialii#ats`.., ::niaz i�ofnts yi r F
18 ''
Canopy coverage o er streambed
,.a. F;,
.4� .,
§hadi'n -,ve etation. 0 ,continuous cano-max- Dmfs
Lo
19
>` , " Subs'trate embeddedness' ` ` • r r ' r 0, '4
a 4 —
d 4dee�
1-enib°edded :' 0, inose structure. .max
20
Pesence of `stream invertebrates (see page 4�
r
rio evidence ;0= commoW numerous ` "es . "max oiiits
21:.
P'resenceofam`Fliibians'Y O 4 0,–
C" L 4 0 4
O -
no evidence..0 common; numerous es max- oiiits
C
22 `
Fresence offish
4
(5 evidence .. 0 -common; numeroustypes –"max points
23'
Evidence of wildlife use
0 6 0 5 0 5
no evidence= 0, abundant evidence = max oints
o f -a'n 5l'ossib a
00
1 0 0
CO a so erste o yrs age. 3�
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
SngO 0l0
Date: l (�`(
Project/Site: ACP
Latitude: 3 5 ,'3y -+jI
Evaluator: S, l L • MU✓ hr _/
County: 0.5�)
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 10,
Stream Determination (circle one)
Intermittent
Other 3a�e
Y
o�S
if a 19 or perennial Hz 30"
eral Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal=
__Ab_q__en_t_T
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
2
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits0
24. Amphibians
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
I
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No - 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = --i+-)
12. Presence of Baseflow
UO 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
3
C. Biology Subtotal = It, S
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
311
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.
1.5
25. Algae
I
0
0.51
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
I
FACW =
.75) OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: cNiWK t.56'\k
Sketch: onao 005 v' (^
WvvAO 011e, w
LA
svtao 010
u
ddCL
Ma+Riror
tn�lir�
aawAt;Ae
NC 9}
,{
&ink W iLAM . %-R- So.rvvj
Corri dov

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody snao0l0 facing north upstream.
Waterbody snao010 facing south downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
4-1., � ,
w,-
Waterbody snao010 facing west across.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

Syla0009
USACE AID= DRQ 7� Site =_ (indicate on attached map)
0 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET —AQP
Protide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name:I)!(/XYtI(11On 2. Etalualor's name:
3. Date of evaluation: hl' 1)/4 4. Time of evaluation: a
5. Nance of stream: LAN I �C) T�1� �� 6. Rix er basin:
Nance P -CA< Q'
7. Approximate drainage area: a e ff�s 3. Stream order: 0
9. Length ofreach evaluated: S.OcG' 10. County:N(a S
11. Site coordinates (if kn`/�
ottn)e: pr/efer in decimal deerees. 12. Subdivision name (if an),): A/
Latitude (es. 34.812312):3 , D ` y (as Longitude (ex. —77.556611): v � D
Method location determined (circle): CPS)'ropo Sheet Onho (Aerial) PhoiorGIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streann(s) location):
towed -do -wu_ we,�A, GocppoA (4a110'f/ "WI t�1`16 J(AS+ n1 OfA 0 6Yk'ttl N&Y-1 (�Xqn+IPy Kucr
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
tl
15. Recent weather conditions..- r&`n �n S�UCc, (^TV 36 (`F9 kc)"Yyt
16. Site conditions at time of visit: L KCAO\+24 ('-44-6 rn 1d
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Vl�Iutrient Sensitive Waters ✓Fater Supply `.Watershed I V (]_1V)
13. is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES C)If yes, estimate the water sm-face area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YESNO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES 10
21. Estimated watershed land use: to % Residential _°'o Commercial _% Industrial 30°'o Agricultural
�/ (0b90 Forested % Cleared /Logged _% Other ( I r )
22. Bankfull width: D 0-1 23. rank height (front bed to top of bank): 4 T d
24. Channel slope down center f stream: _Flat (0 to 29%) Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosii : _Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Ittstrucilons for completion of woksheet (located on pane 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location. terrain. vegetation. stream classification. etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shottn for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest). the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (front reverse): 30 Comments: (CGf (" (Ayf- $zt-e(Ci
..inchQS; Rain -/2
Evaluator's Signature -xtu)4 Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to he used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
Qatltering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06 03. To Comment. please call 919-376-3441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
.
Prese-Bcc of flow 'persistent pools in stream
0-5 0-4 0-5
3
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0: strong flow = max points)
1
(no shading ve_ etation = 0; continuous canopy = max Dints)
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6 0-5 075
2
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints) ,
3
. Riparian zone
0— 6 0 4 '. 0 5
2
(no buffer 0, coati nous �vrde buffer =max orris
Substrate embeddedness
NAL,`
ip,-
Evidence of riutrzent or the njca4 discharges
0 — 5 0-74 ' 0� 4
4
19
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure= max)
(extensive drscliar es 0 no disclrar es =max brats). ",. ='
I
5
Groutid3��ater discharge :
0— 3 0- 4 4 =4
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
r
=
(no dischar e — 0, spun s, sees wetlands efic .,, max oints
0-5
U
20
Presence ©f ad1acen# floodplain a
0-4 0-4 a-2
LJ
V
5
(lio floodplain = 0; extensive flood Iain = max omts) .'
Enfrenchnienf I floodplain access
0-5 0-4 0-2
entrenched = - fre Tient flooding.- Mnpoints)
(deeply0
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4.
Presence of adjacent ,*ietlarids
0-6 0 —4
V
F
'r=<
8
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands,=max pohits).
'.
9
Channel sinuosity
0 5 0— 4 0— 3
Presence of fish
,..
0-4
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander.= max oints)
0-4..:
s :
g.
10
Sediment input
0 5 0-4 0-4
u
(extensive de osition= 0• little or no sediment= mai. points)
-
0-6
Size & diversityof channel lied substrate
' 0 —4 075
me, homo enous=-Olar e,diverse sizes -.max points
{no evidence W 0; abundant evidence = max points}
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5 0-4 0 — 5
...
jy
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points).
Presence of major bank failures
6-5 0-5 0=5
f
X.
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Root depth and density on banks
0-3 0-4 0-5
1
(no visible roofs = 0; dense root's throughout = max points)
Impact b a riculture livestock, or timber production
p Y g �.
0-5 0-44—S
,.
,.--
15
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = rnax Dints)
y
Presence of riffle=poollripple-pool complexes
0-3 0-5 0-6
.
16
(no riffles/ripples or dols = 0; well-developed = max points
:j
11
Habitat complexity
0-6. 0-6 0=6
MtrlP or no habitat = 0: frequent. varied habitats = max points)
.
Canopy coverage over streamlied.
0-5
0-5
0-5
1
(no shading ve_ etation = 0; continuous canopy = max Dints)
Substrate embeddedness
NAL,`
0-4
0-4
4
19
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure= max)
y
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
=
0-5
U
20
(no evidence =,O; common, numerous types = max points)
0-4
0
5
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4.
0-4
21
(no evidence = 0; corninon, numerous types = inax points),,
.
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4..:
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points)
E4idenee of wildlife use _ =
0-6
0-5
23
{no evidence W 0; abundant evidence = max points}
.0-5-
...
-.- .. is -. " Y..�'R—.:, .�•,=c. , :._ '.
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
2

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Snavcy24
Date: <�r'1, /14
Project/Site: ACP
Latitude:3 S , 910& S
Evaluator: i/)M(AA0kTe-C
County: Ma)s�
Longitude: (a4
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
eam Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
/n
Other 1� t lei/
Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
e.g. Quad
G
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
l
l /
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
1
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1.5
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
1
2
3
B. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
`artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = (711 5 )
Nfl
12. Presence of Baseflow
1 0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) IQ
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 0
1
2
3
22. Fish
o.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians 0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae (0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
U H kIM
vcsev�F
CL
Sketch:-Sh old
N �
�✓ f (-- / N- M t -�,-Ft
(n 0- k -u Tqr R; 0�e V-

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody snao009 facing south upstream.
Waterbody snao009 facing north downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
",Op
F M _fir •' y {
i ,
;4'Jl
3 �All
� 'x
Waterbody snao009 facing west across.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET , .r
r
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name:WPI't 11h .110 f} 2. Evaluator's name:
.P-6�l�
3. Date of evaluation: 713011 4. Time of evaluation;
5. Name of stream: ,�MT y -D t-SM4- orf 6. River basin: I (f (A S -e
7. Approximate drainage area: U GAS 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: (001R- 10. County: lv Wo'i
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): N
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): ; 5, U 301 - } S Longitude (ex. —77.556613��-
Method location determined (circle): QGPSTopoSheet Ortho,(Aerial)Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluate nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
tow -e6 a,(- Gf� g roe\4 et, konA
14. Proposed channel work (if any):����
15. Recent weather conditions: 6A I� n" j
16. Site conditions at time of visit: M&11` n't&AX- ou I moi.
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known; —Section 10 _--__,Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YESNO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 6P 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential % Commercial _% Industrial 0 % Agricultural
k% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: ( 0 23. Ba height (from bed to top of bank): `..
24. Channel slope down ceneSetrroi
stream: _ Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%} Moderate (4 to 10%} Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ght Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments ;O t*Gk t n.� t
�f , Irn /� r� �
Evaluator's Signature /Ka ' _L6� -7 P/ Date -�-2> (tt
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
j
# �+ a '7',7
�' CHARAG ERIS I�C� S
ECOREGYON'OIN'C
R ANG,
SCO ,
{
, ti
gra. Y�.
fi4 Coastal_ Piedmont
Mountarn�s
,.
.1 r"!� 1, L.
a
1
Presenceof flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0• strongflow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
�}
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max points
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
j
no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
J
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0• no discharges =maxpoints)
"
5
Groundwater discharge
q— 3
0— 4
0— 4
a
no discharge = 0• springs, sees wetlands etc. = maxpoints)
_,..«
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0--2
rte,
no floodplain = 0• extensive floodplain = max oints
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0 -4
0-2
�1
(dee2ty entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = maxpoints)
J
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0--4
0-2
no wetlands = 0• large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
.
9
Channei sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
O
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition= 0• little or no sediment = maxpoints)
a
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate""'*�4+
NAt;
0-4
0-5
—
" .fine
homogenous = 0 large, diverse sizes =max Dints
V-1 a* -
'�''a�•
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0• stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
q_4
0-5
H;
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
livestock,.
15
impact by agriculture, or timber production
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
=0;substantial impact • no evidence = maxpoints)
="
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
V
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well-developed = maxpoints)
E°
•'•
17
Habitat complexity
4-6
0—b
0-6
Z
r -f
little or no habitat = 0• frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
no shading ve etation = 0• continuous canopy= max points)
cft
19
Substrate embeddednessr+r
.°
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded. = 0• loose structure = max
kAC , .
'
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
o-4
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0 • common numerous types = max oints
«�►}
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
q-4
0-4
�}
0
no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = maxpoints)
Op
22
Presence of fish
o-4
0 — 4
0-4
L }
no evidence = 0; common numerous es =max Dints
v'
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max points)
TotalPom s Possible M
'Wi"
5100
100
t, {.. ,ti
s _ tJd
,�
, ,�,
Y 4t,
e �. '� k., i.'_ ..
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 5 t1 AC7O'D <6
Date: //f3//(,f
Project/Site: Acp
Latitude:'%j�-s33ogs
Evaluator: Yl , K64 (e%y'eC,
/
County: NO&r\
Longitude: , (as
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
ntermittent Perennial
OtherL
ga,.1 If.,,,,�N
if>_ 19 or erennial if>_ 30'
Ltahemeral
e.g. Quad Name: 11
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
/'tel
lJ
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
11]
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1011
26. Wetland plants in streambed
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
cSev�
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
jW
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o
Yes = 3
aruncial dlicne5 are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = k" 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
(1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
(0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
1
No = 0
Yes 3
0.5
C. Bioloqv (Subtotal = 5' 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2 1
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish 0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae 0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
-perennial streams may also be identifieo using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
O}{WM
cSev�
Sketch:
C)!+wm / Pin / c '. (v "�-t

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
'x
Waterbody
4 i h ..�jaff ,*&s
snao008 facing south upstream.
Waterbody snao008 facing north downstream.
Photo Sheet 1 of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody snao008 facing west across channel.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

N,
USAGE .AiD-
DWO
5>)a 0 00-7
Site -_ (indicate on attached trial))
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT NVORKSHEET
Pro ide the following information for the stream reach under assessnneut:
1. Applicant'sname: ndm l(1'dn 2. E'valuator's name: K, McM-,,'W(-�-)
3. Date of evaluation: 7/�'Zo/pt 4. Time of evaluation:3' 3U
5. Name of stream: u -)T �d IOtSn A- Suxa"IF 6. River basin: Nem
7. Approximate drainage area: _0 0.Cf`0S S. Stream order: I
9. Length ofreach evaluated: 50��= 10. County: N06\1_\
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if an),): N A
Latitude (en. 34.872312): Longitude (ex.-77556611):-"7� , U3 ( �
N9eiltod location detemtined (circle'1:GP. Topo Sheet Onboa.(Aerial) Pboto,'GIS Other GIS Other -
13. Location of reach under evaluation (tote nearby roads and landmarks and attach trial) identifying streant(s) location):
JDCAk-e� -Io .lwpline os� 01d Scyl"f-hFleIJ rocaA,J(,rs+ PxS+-+6te(hA;nChav\d
14. Proposed channel work (if
15. Recern weather conditions: 7�(it�(�
16. Site conditions at time of visit: (Meta r�C
17. Identify am• special waterway classifications known: coon 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource graters _Nutrient Sensitive Wates —Water Supply Watershed _(1-iV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream ofthe evaluation point? YESNO if yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential ° o Commercial _% Industrial (L° o Agricultural
g04oForested _% Cleared iLogged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: i 23. i3apk height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (1 to 10%) _Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight _Occasional bends _/Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
instructions for completion of worksheet (located on Hage 2): Begin by detennining the most appropriate ecoreeion based on
location. terrain. vegetation. stream classification. etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the -same ecoregioh. Assign points
to each characteristic v ithin the range sho+n for the ecoreeion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the wtorksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. if a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream tlowts from a pasture
into a forest). the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100. with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
hig4est quality. -
Total Scor (from reverse): 51! Comments:
Evaluator's Signature=,/"LWA N Date -/7/30 / (14
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only, as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
utherina the data required by the United States Army Cops of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USAGE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Foran subject to change - %ersion 06 03. To Comment. please call 919-876-8;41 x 26.

A'
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
TERTSTICS
'.-Z:;oaNtalr
;�+�_;"�
`�
Cyt.
..,_ »� i�,.2.,_����•_.-r"��u�.f�"�.e,:...,a- - y
._saP,led�on�r�oualam
,�
1
Presence ofdors /persistent pools in stream
0 – 5
0 – 4
0-5
%)
^ '
(no flow or saturation = 0: strop flow =max points)
Evidence of past human alteration
0– 6
0– 5
0-5
;,-t
2
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration =max oints) .
U,
3
": Riparian zone.
0-6
0-4
0-5
5
(no buffer 0; -Contiguous wide buffer = max points)
;•%
4
Evidence of nutrreut or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4 "-
O'-4
S
{extensive dischar es = 0; no dischar es max opts)
5
G'oondw'ater discharge '." .
0-3
0-4
0=4
3
(no discharge 0 springs, seeps, wetlands etc -max points
6
Presence of adjacentfloodplam
0-4
.0-4
0-2
i
(no floodplain = 0 extensive floodplain =max oints)
Entrenchment /floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
.
(deeply entrenched = 0- frequent floodnr =max oints
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
,-
8
(no wetlands = O; large adjacent wetlands=max points)
g
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
en
(extensive ehatmelization = 0; natural meander =max oints)
Sedimentinput
0-5
0-4
0-4
10
(extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment – max points)
Size & diversity of channel bed suUsfrate
NA*
0 – 4
0-5
.'
I I
fine, homo enous = 0; lar e, diverse sizes =max points)
72
Evidence of channel incision or.widening
0-5
0 –4
0-5
2
(dee 1 incised =0 -stable bed&banks=max points)
Ma'
h
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
14
(no visib15 le roots = 0; dense roots duoughout =inax points) .
E
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
S
(substantial impact =0 no evidence = maxpoints)
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
1
16
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-develo ed = max points
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
3
`
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
0.1
18
Canopy coverage over streamlied
0 5
0 – 5
0 – 5
`G
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
*_
19
Substrate embeddedness
s NA* -
0-4
0-4
—
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
�\
20
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = Inpoints)
V
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O:
21
(no evidence = 0; cotmnon, numerous types max points)..
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
lJ
*-
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous b es – max oints)
Evidence of wildlife use'
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
23
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
* Points Pgssrbte`
: 100
10S. 01
Totai :,
,
TOTAL SCORE_ (also enter on first
G�
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 s,Y)Gi t7 00-7
Date: 7/30/14
Project/Site: AcT
Latitude:�6.SIcAU
Evaluator: ,mot( V)(vc,
County: 10stn
Longitude:-/o,03�\S
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent `�is S
Stream Deter 'rcle one)
Other
if 2:19 or perennial if a 30'
Ephemeral ntermittent erennial
P
e. Quad Name:
g'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
I Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
(2,
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
0
0.5
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
(2)
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
(1
2
3
8. Headcuts
(01
'i
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0
Yes = 3
OCOO
Sketch: 13
�c olb Srn +H� elc�
' artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = q 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
0 )
1 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
(1)
2
3
14. Leaf litter
(1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
Cli
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
_ 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
1
Yes(= 3 }
C. Bioloqv (Subtotal = 5. b ) !�
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
(0
1
2
3
22. Fish
U0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other 0
'perennial streams may also b/identiffleo using other methods. See
p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
OCOO
Sketch: 13
�c olb Srn +H� elc�
�zua�

I FA
Open Waterbody Data Sheet
Survey Description
Project Name:
Waterbody Name:
Waterbody ID:
Date:
Southeastern Reliability
yy�d I-llo �y`
Uy\y�a2
,f)AC C> GO
State:
County:
Company:
Crew Member Initials:
Photos:
NL
N65�-\
ESL
!� KM
-ac 5o(A+L1
Tract Number(s):
Nearest Milepost:
Associated Wetland ID(s):
I<b-2.09
-65y.C2-
WVI000(25
Survey Type:
(check one) ®Centerline ❑Re -Route ❑Access Road ❑Other:
Physical Attribu es
Waterbody Type:
(checkone) pSlock Pond ❑ atural Pond ❑ Lake ❑ Reservoir ❑ Impoundment ❑ Oxbow ❑ Other.
Hydrologic Regime:
Permanently Flooded ❑ Semipermane Illy Flooded ❑Seasonally Flooded ❑Temporarily Flooded
OHWM
OHWM Indicator:
(check
a0that apply) ffClear line ❑Shelving ❑Wrested ❑Scouring ater
Height:
on bank vegetation staining
/Sent,
matted, or missing ❑Wrack ❑Litter and ❑Abrupt plant ❑Soil characteristic change
vegetation line debris community change
Depth of Water://��
Bank height (average):
Bank slope (average):
—LO—ft.
ft.
�5 degrees
N/A❑
Qualitative Attributes
Water Appearance:
/Clear
(check one) ❑No water 12❑Turbid ❑Sheen ❑Surface ❑Algal ❑Other:
on surface scum mats
Substrate; ❑ Bedrock ❑ Boulder ❑ Cobble ❑ Gravel ❑ SandSilt/ clay ❑ Organic ❑ Other:
(check all that apply)
%of Substrate: % % % % % NO %
Width of Riparian Zone:
Vegetative Layers: �
7 56 ft.
(check an that apply) Trees: nSaplings/Shrubs: ❑Herbs
N/A❑ 'f'
Avg. DBH of Dominants: in. in. R in.
(appmz.)
Dominant Bank Vegetation (list):
PCP v(Vbfhm <�YlrlX nit re ,! ��It;�larnb�� Sl�rac�fitc
Aquatic Habitats (ex submerged or emerged aquatic vegetation, memanging banluvmots, leaf packs, large submerged wood, riffles, deep pods, etc.):
Aquatic Organisms Observed (list): ,
Nfl
T&E Species Observed (list): -
N� y
Disturbances (ex livestock access, manure in waterbody, waste discharge'pipes):
Waterbody is:
(checkone) ❑ Natural rtificial, man-made ❑ Manipulated
Waterbody Quality 4: /.
El Moderate
(checkone) High ❑ Low
Form Rev.w/3M22013

F.. Re, W/ OMB
C
ID:
7Waterbody
ONA006 4f
I/
High Quality: Natural, natural bank vegetation around entire waterbody; banks stable and protected by roots; water color is clear to tea -colored; no
barriers to fish movement; many fish cover types available; diverse and stable aquatic habitat; no disturbance by livestock or man.
Moderate Quality: Altered by rip -rap; natural vegetation extends 1/3-1/2 of the active channel width on each side; filtering function or bank vegetation
only moderately compromised; banks moderately unstable; water color is cloudy, submerged objects covered with greenish film; moderate odor; minor
barriers to fish movement; fair aquatic habitat; minimum disturbance by livestock or man.
Low Quality: Rip rap and channelization excessive; natural vegetation less than 1/3 of the active channel Wdth on each side; lack of regeneration;
filtering function severely compromised; banks unstable (eroding); water color is muddy and turbid; obvious pollutants (algal mats, surface scum,
surface sheen); heavy odor; severe barriers to fish movement; little to no aquatic habitat; severe disturbance from livestock or man.
Notes
Waterbody Sketch (Include north arrow, centerline distance from centerline, data point locations, survey boundary, and IDs of associated features)
Ona00 4
� wn� o�� s
��'/ /� (old SMS-tt���zld �Uo.�
F.. Re, W/ OMB
C

y l . ;{
C`• _'- ,�,: �}* �: �'�` P'•' ger ,�_•
.> n

C
Open Waterbody Data Sheet
Survey Description
Project Name:
Southeastern Reliability
Waterbody Name:
1Innnmed I�Ovtp`
aterbody to:
y�(appfsy j
Date:
/31���Gt
State:
County:
Company:
Crew Member Initials:
Photos:
Nc-
NsSh
�Sz
J(, K m
r nlWd
Tract Number(s):
Nearest Milepost:
Associated Wetland ID(s):
(S-aog
354 -.
wh ao Pi
Survey Type:
(check one) ®Centerline ❑Re -Route DAccess Road ❑Other:
Physical Attribute
Waterbody Type:
(check one) Stock Pond D Natural Pond D Lake 'D Reservoir D Impoundment D Oxbow D Other.
Hydrologic Regime:
Permanently Flooded ❑ Semipermanenlly Flooded ❑Seasonally Flooded ❑Temporarily Flooded
OHWM
(check
OHWM Indicator:
all that apply) Clear line ❑Shelving - 'ate
❑Wrested ❑Scouring M r
Height: � (�
IV rr ft.
on bank vegetation staining
❑Bent, matted, or missing DWmck ❑Litter and DAbrupt plant ❑Soil characteristic change
vegetation line debris community change
Depth of Water:''
Bank height (average):
Bank slope (average):
<<
eft.
ft.
• t degrees
N/AD
Qualitative Attributes
Water Appearance: �
(check one) DNo water Wear ❑Turbid ❑Sheen ❑Surface ❑Algal ❑Other:
on surface scum mats
Substrate: D Bedrock D Boulder D Cobble D Gravel FSSand Silt/ clay D Organic D Other.
(check all that apply)
% of Substrate: _% % % % 30 % % % %
Width of Riparian Zone:
Vegetative Layers: �
(check all that apply) Trees: ®'Saplings/Shrubs: K
ZQ It.
VYferbs
N/AO '�''
I
Avg. DBH of Dominants: 'V2 in. Z in. I-" kin.
(appmx.)
Dominant Bank Vegetation (list): .e�-u(q (t7Jp ia/ �Ei^x 6e.Mi o,' 'j-lTitvgC; �t-( t tOx, (� � )rfo 4rk i fd,,
{ixtt lt�le('. <�'/ ta�1\,—e r CGlb ✓rit /Y1
Aquatic Habitats (ec submerged cr emerged aquaUe vegetation, overhanging bankskoots, leaf packs, large submerged wood, riffles, deep pools, etc.):
fkcAvv,-Jrt� evod, Su!QmerKt4 w,0C0J
Aquatic Organisms Observed (list):
T&EnS/pecicies Observed (list):
1 ' ' 1
Disturbances (ex livestock access, manure in waterbody, waste discharge pipes):
C-XcdIVO keJ ,Pu,(Na
Waterbody is:
(check one) D Natural ❑ Artificial, man-madeanipulated
Waterbody Quality':
, J/
(checkone) D High D Moderate dLow
Form Aev.0413012013

Forth Aer 0.1MW3
Waterbody ID:
GNAOOk3
High Quality: Natural, natural bank vegetation around entire waterbody; banks stable and protected by roots; water color is clear to tea -colored; no
barriers to fish movement; many fish cover types available; diverse and stable aquatic habitat; no disturbance by livestock or man.
Moderate Quality: Altered by rip -rap; natural vegetation extends 1/3-1/2 of the active channel width on each side; filtering function or bank vegetation
onlymoderately compromised; banks moderately unstable; water color is cloudy, submerged objects covered with greenish film; moderate odor; minor
barriers to fish movement; fair aquatic habitat; minimum disturbance by livestock or man.
Low Quality: Rip rap and channelization excessive; natural vegetation less than 1/3 of the active channel width on each side; lack of regeneration;
filtering function severely compromised; banks unstable (eroding); water color is muddy and turbid; obvious pollutants (algal mats, surface scum,
surface sheen); heavy odor, severe barriers to fish movement; little to no aquatic habitat; severe disturbance from livestock or man.
Notes:
Waterbody Sketch (Include north arrow, centerlinq distance from centerline, data point locations, survcyboundary, and IDs of associated features)
CL
N � �
V 04�
yI
r
dhA0
Forth Aer 0.1MW3

Environmental Field Surveys
Open Water Point Photo Page
Open Waterbody onao003 facing north.
Photo Sheet I of 1

C
Open Waterbodv Data Sheet
Survey Description
Project Name:
Waterbody Name:
Waterbody ID:
Date:
Southeastern Reliability
V ) )A() 00)'
7(/
; Z//i4
State:
County:
Company:
Crew Member Initials:
Photos:
N C
I Nash
67SE
1,3 -'ex I'<M
�ec;na norkh
Tract Number(s):
Nearest Milepost:
Associated Weiland ID(s):
('�5 —a'i`)'
W Y) Q000 It
Survey Type:
(check one) ®Centerline ❑Re -Route ❑Access Road ❑Other:
Physical Attributes
Waterbody Type:
(check one) tock Pond D Natural Pond D Lake D Reservoir D Impoundment D Oxbow ❑ Other.
Hydrologic Regime:
ermanently Flooded D Semipermanenlly Flooded D Seasonally Flooded D Temporarily Flooded
OHWM
OHWM Indicator:
(check
all that apply) U'Clear line DShelving ❑Wrested DScouring [GVater
Height: tt
on bank vegetation staining
DBent, matted, or missing ❑Wrack ❑Litter and ❑Abrupt plant DSoil characteristic change
vegetation line debris community change
Depth of Water: Bank height (average):
Bank slope (average):
A_ft. ft.
�) degrees
N/AD
Qualitative Attributes
Water Appearance:
(check one) DNo water tear OTurbid ❑Sheen ❑Surface ❑Algal ❑Other.
on surface scum . mats
Substrate: D Bedrock D Boulder D Cobble D Gravel D Sand UVSiltl clay D Organic D Other:
(check all that apply)
�� }
% of Substrate: _% % % % % % % %
Width of Riparian Zone:
.SO
Vegetative Layers: �/
(check all that apply) Trees: Ln Saplings/Shrubs: (9'Herbs
ft
/AD 'r
II t�
Avg. DBH of Dominants: l Z in: I'. in. NN in.
(appnu)
Dominant Bank Vegetation (list): f r 0-, 71 GeV r l7'(G
(.t,y,tbF1r&(1%n s,nPnSe� M'C'NS+e5Gell Irp Ieum
Aquatic Habitats lex submerged or emerged aquatic vegetation, overhanging bankslroots, leaf packs, large submerged mod, riffles, deep pods, etc.):
EXC 9\\/OlvP4 �0()6 ;564 on-eilyza 14))8
Aquatic Organisms Observed (list):
T&E Species Observed (list):
N -A
Disturbances (ex livestock access, manure in waterbody, waste discharge pipes):
[XCsrvvle+ �Q( fan d
Waterbody is:
(check one) D Natural dificial, man-made D Manipulated
Waterbody Quality a:
(check one) D High D Moderate ow
FarmR ,..04/00013
!yl

Form Rer. Mn 013
Waterbody ID:
o 1 A5002
• High Quality: Natural, natural bank vegetation around entire waterbody; banks stable and protected by roots; water color is clear to tea-colored; no
barriers to fish movement; many fish cover types available; diverse and stable aquatic habitat; no disturbance by livestock or man.
Moderate Quality: Altered by rip-rap; natural vegetation extends 113-1/2 of the active channel width on each side; filtering function or bank vegetation
onlymoderately compromised; banks moderately unstable; water color is cloudy, submerged objects covered vAth greenish film; moderate odor; minor
barriers to fish movement; fair aquatic habitat; minimum disturbance by livestock or man.
Low Quality: Rip rap and channelization excessive; natural vegetation less than 1/3 of the active channel width on each side; lack of regeneration;
filtering function severely compromised; banks unstable (eroding); water color is muddy and turbid; obvious pollutants (algal mats, surface scum,
surface sheen); heavy odor; severe barriers to fish movement; little to no aquatic habitat; severe disturbance from livestock or man.
Notes:
Waterbody Sketch (Include north arrow, centerline, distance from centerline, data point locations, survey boundary, and IDs of associated features)
0O 0
1 �
lic
Form Rer. Mn 013

y

Sn1,000 t
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
0 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following �information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: � O(71 t, (\; on ` 2. Evaluator's name: +"L ), frn(A�� V'eC9
3. Date of evaluation: %�30� t' - 4. Time of evaluation: (,
5. Name of stream: (.ANT �—,y'0'1SV,�Ut SWe' vnp 6. River basin: nI
7. Approximate drainage area: !!(i 0.CY 8. Stream order: `0
9. Length of reach evaluated: HCl TF -h. 10. County: No\S\r`
11. Site coordinates (if known):
t (prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): N a
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):Longitude (ex.-77.556611):-7�� U J �_J
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho .Aeriakhmo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation note nearby roads and anmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
La csx} e `a�wepn C,6`0,p 1 (JAL Lyrae (Luau or),A (OW Scvi l��fi ;21d 2 d .
14. Proposed channel work (if
15. Recent weather
16. Site conditions at time of
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed _(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES <@)
@)If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES %NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial Z% Agricultural
':,�O% Forested % Cleared / Logged _% Other (
22. Bankfull width: IQ �A . 23.Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2 - .
24. Channel slope down center f stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>I 0%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ! Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality. 1_
Total Score (from reverse): Comments: �6J11
Evaluator's
3u/(,�
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
3 yF ` i1�.�COREGIONrPOILVT
t
S
!
GHARAC ERISTIC
rRA�iGB�:
-
l.,Coastal Piedmon ountam ��
4
10
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
— 5
0-4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0• strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = maxpoints)
'
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer= 0• contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
2
4
extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = maxpoints)
-Groundwater
5
discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
no discharge = 0• springs, sees wetlands etc. = maxpoints)
Presence floodplain
6
of adjacent
0-4
0-4
0-2
>"
no floodplain = 0• extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
dee I entrenched =0•frequent flooding =maxpoints)
r
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
D
no wetlands = 0• large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
O
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
Q
extensive de osifion= 0• little or no sediment= max oints
e'
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
+,1MA
0-4
0-5
-----
11
fine homogenous= 0; large, diverse sizes = max oints
e ^';Tit"�a�§:'
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-4
0-5
".
pt',
12
(deeply incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max points)0-5
'
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
1-�-
severe erosion = 0• no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
Root depth and density on banks
0 — 4
0-5
14
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout= maxpoints)0-3
14D�.
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber Production
0-5
0-4
—515
substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
a,,
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
�1
&s'
16
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)
CJ
-
17
Habitat complexity
Habitat
0 — 6
0-6
3
or no habitat = 0• frequent varied habitats = maxpoints)0-6
`
lg
treambedr Canopy coverage over s
C
0-5
0-5
0-5
U
no shadin vegetation = 0; continuous canopy =maxpoints)
19
Substrate embeddedness'�'
"*k'�'�`?r'
dNA y�
0-4
0 — 4
(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = max)r
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
U
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points)
r�.Presence
21
of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
0
no evidence = 0; common numerous types = maxpoints)
a
Oy
22
Presence of fish
0 — 4
0-4
\
J
no evidence = 0• common, numerous es = maxpoints)0-4
l
e
Evidence of wildlife use
0 — 5
0-5
23
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = maxpoints)0-6
-.W9,11
. 4���i�.
otal•Pomta osiiibl s
L e..
a, "0
190
100'
� 1
r-�
r �« a., z _.:
�..;�aCO ,(alc °Etrer°nW
oa
wp-ga��.�..,�
,.
;
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Snao 00(,o
Date: //30/I 4
Project/Site: AC I>
LatitudeW 5 17 `a
r
Evaluator: 1�' MU rehy
County: Na Stip
Longitude: -7;s'. o -:�3-2 '
Total Points:
r:isatteastintermittent I
e m Determination (circle one)
Intermittt Pial
E hemeral enPerennial
Other �)O,�i I By I Al C-
Name:
if 19
if >_ 19 or if? 30'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
e.g' Quad
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0]
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
rip le- ool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
- 0
1 '
(23--
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0)
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
(0)
1
- 2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
.2
3
S. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No !JO')
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal= 5. -S)
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
1
C. Biology (Subtotal= d_ 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2 1
ti
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2 1
(0 1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Cln bfkt,Je.Q c1 h -i e 16
S
OF{wM
r<5'e^t-
Sketch:
lrt�v �OSJO to
OfNw IN ( 2 '. 9

b�
I
r a 4 r
�},�• ;Ji °" 1 meq. � ��..r
' �• '4 � r,.,�� � �1e, ray' x ��� r ,�:
I w
'�A �%'r I�v„ .e.14 i V I :�y .I •�I .Pad Yl iv' '��"`��.i
!
11
t w.—_4
ds
Toll
Iw
[
..
to,

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody snao006 facing west across channel.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

S�y\G 0 0C)t3-
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET r
r'
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: DOM' 1� 11 u n 2. Evaluator's name: I+� ► MU
3. Date of evaluation: 7 3w l q 4. Time of evaluation: If ad
5. Name of stream: W - W JeA/4r- COQ. 6. River basin: 1\1
7. Approximate drainage area: 116 r-Crz r 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: Jtr d F 10. County; Na S L')
11. Site coordinates (if known):: prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if army): AIA
Latitude (ex, 34,872312): S, � 13 a Longitude (ex. -77.556611):,7e6 U 7
Method location determined (circle): 6G Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
,JW e( ala J^"&WA- 14WA
14. Proposed channel work (if any): (6D
15. Recent weather conditions: s(A ()e) I
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Flom. -Mat
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters ✓Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YESO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 0 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: 1 6 % Residential
I 0 % Forested
22. B�nkfull width:
24. Channel slope down center f stream; Flat (0 to 2°10)
25. Channel sinuosity: " Straight _Occasional bends
_% Commercial _% Industrial % Agricultural
�% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
23.�ank height (from bed to top of bank):
/Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to I0%) _Steep (>10%0)
Frequent meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality,
Total Score (from reverse): d` Comments: 1 i -C (` mse%ceo+ -tC) A -a EW
Evaluator's Signature -Aid] ZC40 Date 7/3-0/1'T
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist Iandowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06103. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
F��4
=tT�
SC
:..`�.... , •
Coastal P e°fdmon �4Io. uta"
"g°
,,;Presence
1
of flow 1 persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max points
3
Riparian zone
0 - 4
0-5
no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)0-6
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
4
extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = maxpoints)0-5
0 - 4
0-4
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
no discharge = 0• springs, sees wetlands etc. = maxpoints)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
no floodplain = 0• extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = maxpoints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
no wetlands = 0• large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0 - 4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = maxpoints)0-5
,
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
'
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate0-4
A*`�w'
ll
0- 5
�-
fine homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)�
xs t
'
.N
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0--5
0 -4
0-5
��.�
(deeply incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max points)l
H`
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 - 5
0-5
severe erosion = 0• no erosion stable banks = max oints
F=t°
14
Root depth and density on banks
no visible roots = 0• dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
0-3
0-4
0-5
.
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0 - 4
0-5
-0
substantial impact • no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well-developed = maxpoints)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
ti
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
< '
19
Substrate embeddeduess
NA*
0-4
0-4
-�
(deeply embedded = 0• loose structure = maxr
ti >
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max oints
�+
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O.'
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max points
Ly"a"
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
�l
�--�
no evidence = 0• common, numerous Wes = max oints
C/
ua
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
s l m P i e •,
oss b
�
00�
� 100-
*
� 4
„< r n,ta1
Pf-
�
„r
a SCO Tai o `erten on' rstpa�No
-
a
:FAV ice, +�{S 'rd R� . rr �4
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
snaoGUS
Date: 7 _W/fi '
Project/Site: -A CT"
Latltude:35, g i3a�
Evaluator: P4 NI ( kf(?
County: t V�S'�_\
Longitude: -7K qK 0370 f
Total Points: /
Stream is at least intermittent 1 I
ermination (circle one)
Other
if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30' r .`J
l
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 1-c • 5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1M
2 1
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
Col
1 1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
I 0
1 1
2 1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
NorL 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hvdroloqv (Subtotal= r+ )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2 1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
1.5
C. Biolow (Subtotal = S )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 1
3
2
1 1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
r1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
co
1
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5 1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: CL
Oh(W V'oeA4
Sketch:s ha v UDS
N*kA
t ,
o w � F+ /e)01< , 4 jpf

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody snao005 facing north upstream.
Waterbody snao005 facing south downstream.
Photo Sheet 1 of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody snao005 facing west across channel.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
0 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 00 m' r� L, 0 (`, 2. Evaluator's name: CA (to
3. Date of evaluation: n 4. Time of evaluation: 3 U
5. Name of stream: %10 R fiU 6ca�,� Crltk 6. River basin: �JeC�-SQ
7. Approximate drainage area: I S 8. Stream order: C
9. Length of reach evaluated: :50 F E 10. County: N ON S l"
11. Site coordinates (if known))::prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):� P
1\
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3S' " ( I `prfid Longitude (ex. —77.556611): `7y 4/y3?11
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
Lvcg�Q�( bx_4we.en c,�A S(rtr-W1dclP6 Iwod 0(\, Cbtue-CA R,�)OV4,
14. Proposed channel work (if any): 1 DV
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit: L /Vt&)
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters I Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed _(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 0 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES EO) 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential
I-}0 % Forested
22. Bankfull width: 7 f+
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%)
25. Channel sinuosity: _Straight _Occasional bends
_% Commercial _% Industrial 60 % Agricultural
_% Cleared /Logged _% Other (
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): I ��
✓_Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
_Frequent meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 53
Evaluator's Signature Cf Gam" _t&" U Wim/ Date 2 3�)z 14
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
n#
�t
POINR�ANGFaVA;
CRACTERISTICS;
SCORE
"�"
SPieclmont� MuuntaIn..
a.._Cossl
10-5
Presence of flow I persistent pools in stream 0-4
0-5
O
y'
no flow or saturation = 0• strong flow = max poiliN
.
2
Evidence of past human alteration 0-6 0-5
0-5
r C
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone 0-6 0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges 0-5 0-4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge 0-3 0-4
0-4
no discharge = 0• springs, sees wetlands etc. = maxpoints)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain 0-4 0-4
0-2
no floodplain = 0• extensive floodplain = max points
Entrenchment I floodplain access 0-5 0-4
0-2
l
(deeply entrenched = 0• frequent flooding = maxpoints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands 0-6 0-4
0-2
�-
no wetlands = 0• large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
- 5 0 — 4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = maxpoints)0
10
Sediment input 0-5 0-4
0-4
.{
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate t * 0-4
0-5
-
,:
fine homogenous = 0• large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening 0-5 0 — 4
0-5
�:,
(deeply incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max points)
E-1=
13
� Presence of major bank failures
0-5 0-5
0-5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks 0-3 0-4
0-5
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)-
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5 0-4
0-5
r.;.
substantial impact =0• no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pooVripple-pool complexes 0-3 0-5
0-6
t
i
no rifflestripples or pools = 0• well-developed = maxpoints)
17
Habitat complexity
0 — 6
0 — 6
little or no habitat = 0• frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)0-6
18
Canopy coverage over streambed 5 0-5
0-5
no shadingvegetation = 0; continuous canopy= maxpoints)0
?+.
19
Substrate embeddedness�,}:NA*5' ; 0-4
0-4
�---
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max , x
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 — 5
0-5
�\
V
no evidence = 0• common numerous es = maxpoints)0-4
xi. 21
Presence of amphibians
0-4 4 0-4
0-4
V
O
_
no evidence = 0 • common numerous es = max points)
22
Presence of fish 0 — 4 0 -- 4
0 —4
�--�;
no evidence = 0; common numerous es = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use 0-6 0-5
0-5
.'.
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence =max oints
s A a k TDEa1 o ti-Ro 1B " o- 10,
-�i
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: /3U/ I (+
Project/Site: A(_
Latitude: 3S, Yj �� 1
Evaluator: I.�, m pn(ecj
County: Ne1s�
Longitude: -7 � 03 /dam
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
�
Stream Determination circle one )
Other (✓��; tec�7 r.lL
if >: 19 or perennial if>_30' ��
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = L'J )
Absent
I Weak
Moderate
Strong
1aContinuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
O
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
nCL
1
H. Algae 0
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1.5
1
2, 1
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
g. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes
3
- artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrologv (Subtotal= '62, S )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
(0
1
2 1 3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1 11.
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0.5
No = 0
Yes t3
C. Bioloqy (Subtotal = '5% )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3
2)
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed M
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 1 0) 1
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks 1 0 1
1 1
2 1
3
22. Fish 0
0.5
1 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5 .
24. Amphibians _
0.5
1
1.5
H. Algae 0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0)
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: N -r ko Zecoerckaw Creel
If
Sketch: 4
w w
woa�r�r�3
shae004-
c�
CxtwN\� 5 FI_. V"�',�t }Ft.

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody snao004 facing northeast upstream.
t.
ika
y 4
'�L
W
�h 0.
'.f�h' '' t u- yr i ' 4 ye
Waterbody snao004 facing southwest downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 2

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody snao004 facing northwest across channel.
Photo Sheet 2 of 2

snc�o 003
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: � ' n `� n 2. Evaluator's name: �� MCA (A)n
3. Date of evaluation: 7I3UIl' 4. Time of evaluation: 3 r
5. Name of stream: LAN I Fo $a+Jcr Cwct 6. River basin: NSG`'
7. Approximate drainage area: �� �S 8. Stream order:y
9. Length of reach evaluated: So f-'4- 10. County: N 1PS41N
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):35" " I U `+ n 6 Longitude (ex. —77.556611):-7-6
Method location determined (circle): 00 Topo Sheet Ortho (� l Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
S ,MKS RC) oO SM E+11.1Fe,e 2vc598/ ()Uf4l,� 6r P&AI l-,etx� r:
14. Proposed channel work (if any): T eQ
15. Recent weather conditions: Slit n tl Ln
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters 1 Nutrient Sensitive Waters ^Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES @ If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES`0 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES GO)
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential _% Commercial % Industrial Z% Agricultural
L % Forested % Cleared / Logged % Other ( F )
22. Bankfull width: �4 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): fi _
24. Channel slope down center f"strearn: _Flat (0 to 20/@) ✓Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _ Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksbeet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 32 Comments: 6 ''1' Ci„ is �&&, fnA AJ Aq ;�, 14� t�
Evaluator's Signaturej&22 �� Date —)/30/ 1+ k.
This channel evaluation form is intended to be use only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in `
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
�,ECO"REGIOI�T'i',�OlN
R:A,lYG�r
1f /'
Coa tai0, nt
M_autainSCORE
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0 — 4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0• strop flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = maxpoints)
L3
Riparian zone
0 — 4
0-5
no buffer = 0• conti ous wide buffer = maxpoints)0-6
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
o-4
no discharge = 0• springs, sees wetlands etc. = max points
U'
�r
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
no floodplain = 0• extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
A..
Entrenchment I floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
r: rc
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = maxpoints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
•;
no wetlands = 0• large adjacent wetlands = max points
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
'
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
�`
extensive deposition= 0• little or no sediment = maxpoints)
<
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
r� ,''+p
0 —4
0-5
<
fine homogenous = 0• lar e, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
} xNa,
'A �
,-,;.
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
a
yt.
dee I .incised = 0• stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 — S
0-5
severe erosion = 0• no erosion stable banks = maxpoints)0-5
'
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0=4
0-5
U
F'
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
substantial impact =0• no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
v
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well-developed = maxpoints)
Com'
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
r,
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
?j
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
19
Substrate embeddednessz�
ae
0-4
0 — 4
W.
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)+M',
SNA 4 ;.
2a
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 — 5
0-5
no evidence = 0• common numerous es = maxpoints)0-4
rhPresence
21
of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
U
no evidence = 0; common numerous types = maxpoints)
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0--4
0-4
�--�
no evidence= 0• common numerous tMes =max oints
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Tot Pomi's Possibfeu`,„ �'
'ffa"Ooii00
100
x a i X
-F?4e�i"ff�'
,
����'. >: f����•. ��iiC'�, r�'�sl�Sr :i�+I• `.� �,+1+ E5� lh„ 543 „,i%
:.
,
"��
4 OTALSCORIE` alsonte orfirst a 'e)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Shao(z)(2) 3
Date: 71301 (q
Project/Site: AcP
Latitude: 35 b 0q (G
Evaluator: K), l P11fe(
County: N05V�
Longitude: -7 F`j ,Q3
Total Points: /
Stream least 13
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other �A i; t-etl ; 1J C.
30ent
or perennit �5
if _ 19 or erennial if >_ 30`
al
Ephemeral ntermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =-L 5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple-pool0
sequence
/',n
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
(0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No OT'
Yes = 3
`artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydroloqv (Subtotal = L4, 5 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
1
C. Bioloqy (Subtotal=
18. Fibrous roots in streambed2
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
L5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae -
CO)
0.5 11
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other= 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
ON W M r esctAi-
Sketch: /
/ Sc\av6)03
l
i
w� �t1\ w�o11'H

ti
q � � f -t. - ry.�•'_ ,yam _ �Y .,
k
r
1 t
Y Y Y
TY

r f
n

SN ID
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
f"
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name:L�UM�rn lfQ n 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: � i {�� I A 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: LA i1 V W 1cs4rn�rt� St" JO"Af 6. River basin:—N
7. Approximate drainage area: 1<O 8G 8. Stream order: O
9. Length of reach evaluated: SO �{ 10. County: ! V aSVi
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): Nr� dd
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): ;�S •-7 1 —Aq Longitude (ex. -77.556611); l✓ �`k" �
Method location determined (circle):GPS Top, Sheet OrthoAerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and marks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
lD i 1\ kiq i- Z --O t J �P-C4 wee n Si' PAS Ram
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions:t1n�
16. Site conditions at time of visit:_ Ji h�,
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -1V)
18. is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NN If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 60 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: S % Residential % Commercial % Industrial 70% Agricultural
95 % Forested _% Cleared 1 Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): d�
24. Channel slope down center, of stream: _Fiat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends TFrequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream'reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a, pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments: W'\-Ckf, to
Evaluator's Signature t Y �" " v Date / /Aq /S
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06103. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
# °
CHARACTERIST CS ',a$ECOREGION
�OINT,RANGE,
SCORE"
O
Coastal S'
} °� AiMnl t
i Moa x "twin
non' 4'
t
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
no flow or saturation = 0• strongflow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = max points)
V
-
3
Riparian zone
0 — 4
0-5
no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = max points)0-6
e '
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
no discharge = 0• springs, sees wetlands etc. = maxpoints)
V.{::
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
O
no floodplain = 0• extensive floodplain maxpoints)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
(deeply entrenched =0•frequent floodin =maxpoints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
J
no wetlands = 0• laze adjacent wetlands =max points)
h
9
Channel sinuosity
0 4
0-3
extensive channelization =0; natural meander= maxpoints)0-5
—
u�v3
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = max points)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
" NA*'�
0-4
0 — 5`—
fine homogenous = 0• laze diverse sizes —max oints
Evidence of channel incision or widening
>,
12
deeply incised = 0• stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
0-5
0-4
0-5
~'
13
Presence of major bank failures
0 — 5
0 — 5
0-5
3
a
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
1
E f.
no visible roots = 0• dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
(substantial impact =0•noevidence=maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
U
Fno
riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)
'
17
Habitat complexity
0— 6
0— 6
0-6
3
little or no habitat = 0• frequent, varied habitats = max poinis
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 5
0— 5
0— 5
O
no shadingvegetation = 0; continuous canopy= max points)
19
Substrateembeddedness
,NA*�+•�
0-4
0-4
�—
(deeplyembedded = O; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 — 5
0 — 5
J
0
no evidence = 0• common numerous es = maxpoints)0-4
(7r;
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
O
no evidence= 0• common, numerous types = maxpoints)
O}
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
v
►a(no
evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
£i
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
OO
t
1O0dapmv N
jO
W`dEi
.s,
�
'µ
RZ'9' �+ 'Ai,++•R`"*�+Sq"n yYE 'E�'t lg" lW'2%9MN
"TOTA ISCOalso enter on firsitpage)
�t
_',&� :� saFKNsS»,h
a
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
S VVA0 0W,
Date: 7 �,41 (t'
Project/Site: A C�
Latitude:35._79)19
Evaluator: { l (-'l�TV1���
County:
Longitudde:71,Ol 5R
Total is Points: ��
Streaifa19 isatteastintermittent
ermination (circle one)
Ephemeral ntermittent Perennial
Other 20.t t ) �'
Quad Name:
ifs 79 orperennial ifs 30"
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
e.g.
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal =__L0__)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
���
@.J
1
2
il
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
1.5
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No's
Yes = 3
° artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ 7 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
2
3
14. Leaf litter1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0) 1 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
1
C. Biology (Subtotal = j)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
1 3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1 1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5 L
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: i? Ct, rn PA A-;; P l6
O Vf w W
its est"
Sketch:
iz�
147Sr1CtC)00 �
�7-vJYa0002 (A?(ir,-e

"In

titin #,�
r
£+rX t fia,P..�'^� ! ;'- t : w _ �1.�..r `! � `• .' ��, 4 �'� .�,r �';4�,�gy
0r
4

C
Open Waterbody Data Sheet
Survey Description
Project Name:Waterbody
Name:
Waterbody ID:
Date:
Southeastern Reliability
LAnyw v1e� ?Ovid `d
QngQQ(j"l
State:
County:
Company:
Crew Member Initials: Photos:
NL
NOSH-
C_ -1
K/ mac;
ITG 5easy
Tract Number(s):
Nearest Milepost:
Associated Wetland ID(s):
3 5 (o
W n ate 00A
Survey Type:
.
(check one) ®Centerline ORe-Route DAccess Road ❑Other:
Physical Attribute
Waterbody Type,
(check one) Stock Pond D Natural Pond D Lake D Reservoir D Impoundment D Oxbow D Other.
Hydrologic Regime:
permanently Flooded ❑ Semipermanently Flooded C3 Seasonally Flooded ❑Temporarily Flooded
OHWM
OHWM Indicator:
(check
all that apply) M16ler line ❑Shelving OWrested ❑Scoudng DWater
Height
on bank vegetation staining
ft.
DBent, matted, or missing DWrack ❑Litter and ❑Abrupt plant DSoil characteristic change
vegetation line debris community change
Depth of Water:
Bank height (average):
Bank slope (average):
l
10 ft.
6 ft.
N S degrees
iAD
Qualitative Attributes
Water Appearance:
(check one) DNo water OX'Iear []Turbid []Sheen ❑Surface OAlgal []Other:
on surface scum mats
Substrate: D Bedrock D Boulder D Cobble D Gravel ff Sand 15Silticlay O Organic D Other:
(check all that apply)
% of Substrate: % % % % % % % %
Width of Riparian Zone:
Vegetative Layers:
(check all that apply) []Trees: nSaplings/Shrubs:
6 ft-
10`Herbs
Avg. DBH of Dominants: ��p.
r t in.� in. min.
N/AD
_I
(approx.)
Dominant Bank Vegetation (list):
( C -e'_ (U�oarl'11 �Ur�Snnafh✓ S}�rae(�(ac,SAcc��ti�' t aKf�h ,
Aquatic Habitats (ex submerged or emerged aquatic vegetation. overhanging bankslmots, leaf packs, large submerged wood, riffles, deep pods, etc.):
NA
Aquatic Organisms Observed (list):
NA
T&E Species Observed (list):
Disturbances (ex. livestock access, manure in walerbody, waste discharge pipes):
A-isc&\nYo-c- �:Qe ��cevo Pc Q0Ck
Waterbody is: �
(check one) D Natural D Artificial, man-made IffManipulated
Waterbody Quality a:
(checkone) [] High D Moderate Low
Farm Rev. 0,11302013

Forman. NJ30no13
Waterbody ID:
aI as m?11
High Quality. Natural, natural bank vegetation around entire waterbody; banks stable and protected by roots; watercolor is clear to tea -colored; no
barriers to fish movement; many fish cover types available; diverse and stable aquatic habitat; no disturbance by livestock or man.
Moderate Quality: Altered by rip -rap; natural vegetation extends 1/3-1/2 of the active channel Wdth on each side; filtering function or bank vegetation
only moderately compromised; banks moderately unstable; water color is cloudy, submerged objects covered with greenish film; moderate odor; minor
barriers to fish movement; fair aquatic habitat; minimum disturbance by livestock or man.
Low Quality: Rip rap and channelization excessive; natural vegetation less than 1/3 of the active channel width on each side; lack of regeneration;
filtering function severely compromised; banks unstable (eroding); water color is muddy and turbid; obvious pollutants (algal mats, surface scum,
surface sheen); heavy odor; severe barriers to fish movement; little to no aquatic habitat; severe disturbance from livestock or man.
Notes:
Waterbody Sketch (Include north arrow, centerline distance Som centerline, data point locations, survay boundary, and IDs of associated features)
N
�oov�
'�11 rve tt (amu
Forman. NJ30no13

Environmental Field Surveys
Open Water Point Photo Page
Open Waterbody onao001 facing east.
Photo Sheet I of 1

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 H0 3n
Date: I � 1
ProjectlSite:
Latitude:1 5-, 7902
Evaluator: ' -
County: 1/9 /
Longitude:
E
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination circle one)
Ephemeral Perennial
Other
if? 19 or perennial if z 30*
ntermittent
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0)
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1 h
1.5
10. Natural valley
0'
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0 `
Yes = 3
arunciai ortcnes are not ratea; seessi x in manual
B. Hvdrologv (Subtotal = : 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2')
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
0 0.5 1
es = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 2 1
0'
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3,7 2 1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0 2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 1 2
3
22. Fish
0 0.5 1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0 737 1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0' 0.5 1
1.5
25. Algae
0 0.5 1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 they = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p.
35 of manual.
Notes:
�
Sketcly.

j USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: LJLyy-) 61 0 4�a-,-N 2. Evaluator's name: -T, L7t �c y t
3. Date of evaluation: S / I q i (!�­ 4. Time of evaluation: L
5. Name of stream: U 1VT 'T'& 8t i24:Ap rr,arYt�f,, River basin: e LISA
c. i
7. Approximate drainage area: b C v � `� 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: { 0 6 10. County:6�
11. Site coordinates (if 2 �Y � known)::? prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): �t
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35 (
a �C) - Longitude (ex. —77.556611): 7 �. L3 J 19
Method location determined (circle):GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach Linder evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: %
16. Site conditions at time of v
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: LA-)ection 10 j�eTidal Waters /essential Fisheries Habitat
rout Waters N utstanding Resource Waters _ utrient Sens�it�ivee� Waters &hater Supply Watershed �(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (NIf yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: ��e % Residential % Commercial _% Industrial 4rr6 % Agricultural
'2,0 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other
22. Bankfull width: ( D
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): t S-
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ,Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect all overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
L
Total Score (from reverse): Comments: 0Avy-n - IMyA G
Evaluator's SignatureAA 1-� cr>c_, : , __ Date S t i q i i �—
This channel evaluation orm is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

�S°/�';A 1-4o3 c-)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
3
Not
I 1 nese characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

snah030
snah030 facing upstream
snah030 facing downstream

snah030
A
p
F' Y+ M• is � T. � - } �.� r, R 1 • � i. y� - � .
':'...f h �, • ,. . n l.e.r�h �� Y�:.�Y... ads i $nr
�.'j4...'C.l.s�.� �..�� ,4:a�., 'a� G' a.. ��• . ^*�,.. ..
snah030 cross stream
}¢

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 s N"-,) H o 3 )
Date: . ' I (A I i JS-
Project/Site: ftc F
Latitude:S,', 7'16 11-5"
Evaluator: bb (` 9
County: S -H
Longitude: `7 j
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent
Other
if z 19 or perennial if >_ 30" C�
Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = t )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2 }
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
�!
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1.5
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
35 of manual.
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0 '
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =D
Yes = 3
artmcaai ancnes are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = _ )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0 1
2 3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5 1
0. 0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0 0
1 1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5 .
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
es = 3
L. Blology (Subtotal = l , -2- �> )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1 "
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 1
2
3
22. Fish
0 0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0 0.5
1.5
24. Amphibians
0 0,5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0 0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
ACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p.
35 of manual.
Notes:
Sket
� L

--_ _ _.._� _ - _- —
USACE AID# N 1 f3 DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
F-0-1 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: b o YYi i'%1 t c Y'"i 2. Evaluator's name: 1� itr S
3. Date of evaluation: [ 1 q ( 15 4. Time of evaluation: j C)
5. Name of stream: L) A3 T T --b 2 i 64)4 4,- ( PA?ver basin: P o e
7. Approximate drainage area: I- I D b 8. Stream order: [
9. Length of reach evaluated: L60r\�"C— 10. County: NA'7
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): —
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35, 726 ( 1 " Longitude (ex. —77.556611): 78-- 0 `, 3
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ?', � Section 10 W/' Tidal Waters i1J11Essential Fisheries Habitat
iprout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters IiLA Water Supply Watershed �(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES eif yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad snap? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES (N.
21. Estimated watershed land use: IJ®/o Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial 1"1()/o Agricultural
`2,:L % Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfuli width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: 4FIat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: XStraight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality. �}
Total Score (from reverse): ( Comments: �/ GTS rvttC? c Gk
Evaluator's Signature �- ; �'�` L� �• J G Date S / ( q 1 1.5—
This channel evaluation for is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

a,
V.
Adak(&
7F,+N
�
1�i rht�,�e'f-.�. ki �i�'"
sl '�
�'. i ��
L,i� •136,4
' S r . - t..
�• � * max. d'
� '�
r4 8�,1��� #1 .1r��3 dAi l' :g-1 YrY•°r_�9
pp
_

snah031

5l1ao 00
USACE AID# DWQ # Site #_ (indicate on attached map)
0 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the followinginformation for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: Do cn"n) o n 2. Evaluator's name: K, I• A(/U'P }.tib"Crj
3. Date of evaluation: 57a'2 1_` 4. Time of evaluation: S
.�
5. Name of stream: aU 76YN" �LC'1' C(.'C'C[C
Lt31'f �y C� :U Lk n l'
7. Approximate drainage area: I 1 e, c.
9. Length of reach evaluated: !!�6 i^�
11. Site coordinates (if known): /pI1r1efer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3 �' �TS
6. River basin: N e'ytSrC-
8. Stream order: b
10. County: 1 V� )
12. Subdivision name (if any):: V C t� �(
Longitude (ex. -77.556611):'" o -0a `S ('
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
TGSk N kti OF }tie in+,erSCc+ c 1 0z1�' �C;�ay l200� 60d Ct¢en Punct PW&CI.
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: 51 t llc�
16. Site conditions at time
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters —Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed _(I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES @J 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: S % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial % Agricultural
% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: (0 S-(, 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): I1 Comments: 6 1-C C L -N ( (, P,° �-- � -0 ( c
Evaluator's Signature "/ 1wp/ �-fd� "v Date -7/2-25 114
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
ERISTICS `�k "r
� ECOREGIONTOINXRANGE
SCORE,
r
-yam C`oastal,s�
� Vi �
yl ._
Mountain.
t
i y- + ..
1
Presence of flow /persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
`
no flow or saturation = 0• strong flow = maxpoints)
1
r
:a
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0 —
0-5
0 — 5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max oints
' a
3
Riparian zone
0— 6
0— 4
0— 5
no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
"?
l
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive discharges = 4 no discharges =max pints
S
Groundwater discharge
0— 3
0— 4
0— 4
no dischar e = 0• springs, seas wetlands etc. = maxpoints)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0 — 4
0-2
no floodplain = 0• extensive floodplain = maxpoints)0-4
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0 — 4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0• frequent flooding= max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
='
no wetlands = 0• large ad•acent wetlands = max
9
_points)
Channel sinuosity
0 — 4
0-3
extensive channelizatiion = 0• natural meander = max points) -0-5
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition— 0• little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
0-4
0 — 5
—�
fine homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points);
„NA L ;r`
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
S
(deeplyincised = 0• stable bed & banks = max points)
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5severe
r152
erosion = 0• no erosion, stable banks = max pints
Root depth and density on banks0-3
0-4
0-5
Fl.no
visible roots = 0; dense roots throu bout =max pintsImpact
by agriculture, livestock, or timber production�
0-5
0-4
0-5
substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
(J
,..
16
Presence of riffle -pool ripple -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
O
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well-developed = maxpoints)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
O
no shading vegetation = 0• continuous canopy = maxpoints)
19
Substrate embeddeduess
3 � *
NA ;
0-4
0 — 4
(deeply embedded = 0 loose structure = max)
z t
d°r
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = maxpoints)
21Presence
of amphibians
0— 4
0— 4
0— 4
O'
no evidence = 0• common numerous types = max oints
C.
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(�
�--i�no
evidence = 0 common, numerous es =max pints
w
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0 — 5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)0-6
i4! X>- Total Points Passible!w 4? 1 ht +7F -!' f X
w
i y10041"
I i
loo t ,
1ao
61 -
,.
a .,rte ,
�ei�'N��y�y$'TfN�li'�A.'(•"�vl9if'�''pk'9FY'
TOTAL SCORE (also evert otl�
ills]tagV)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
-'snav 001
Date: 7/a'�s/ik-
Project/Site: Acp
Latitude:35, � U` 5)_
Evaluator: I4� r 1 V lLtf Kvo_
County: I Iasln
Longitude:--? 1 69t
Total Points
Stream is at least intermittent `�
St m-ral urination (circle one)
1� t kfC-
Other �r
1/�.
if>_ 19 orperennial if>_30" 1' \ i �`�
phemeral termittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
6
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
_0
1
2)
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
(,0%
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
I. R)
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
05
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
l0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
l
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No -r0
Yes = 3
006 1
' artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual.
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = �' )
12. Presence of Baseflow
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1. 1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes i 3
1.5
C. Biology (Subtotal= S r a5 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1 1 1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1 1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
00.
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.
1
1.5
25. Algae --
0
05
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
'perennial streams may also be identified yqng
other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
(9t(WM
rCst
Sketch:
N
006 1
L)RW M : af-_ I„ 61�F(_

Environmental Field Surveys
Waterbody Photo Page
Waterbody snao001 facing north upstream.
Waterbody snao001 facing south downstream.
Photo Sheet I of 2

,. � ��� � Y�Y 4 a + ,kd`j iw � '�. � { � .�•, � a »• h,� '� ,:_ 1 a a '11?+ � �L ■ :Oy;.';
'� � "rte + "'4'� +�1 ' r* ,� i �.�•i"� �g :� �} � .. ' �w-M • �� �..�
- � � � �._ .� •._ P ��o _ 2 �;Y � ? �• 'lea' .
-:� hi � ass' _ - i'v i ,r„ • _� ?
t
k 4Y