20130957 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_2016_20170224

YEAR 2 of 5 Monitoring Report
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration
Union County, North Carolina
DMS Project Number: 95022
Contract No: 003982
USACE Action Id No: SAW 2013-01680
Yadkin River
03040105
Prepared for:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Data Collection Period October 2015
Submitted: January 2017

YEAR 2 of 5 Monitoring Report
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration
Union County, North Carolina
DMS Project Number: 95022
Contract No: 003982
USACE Action Id No: SAW 2013-01680
Yadkin River
03040105
Prepared for:
NC Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Prepared by:
L=COM
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
January 2017

Table of Contents
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY......................................................................................................... 1
2.0 METHODOLOGY................................................................................................................. 2
2.1 VEGETATION.................................................................................................................. 3
2.2 STREAM ASSESSMENT................................................................................................. 3
2.3 VISUAL ASSESSMENT................................................................................................... 3
2.4 DIGITAL PHOTOS........................................................................................................... 3
3.0 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................... 3
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 2 (2016) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

APPENDICIES
Appendix A — Background Tables
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: Stream Assets Map
Table 1: Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts
Table 4: Project Baseline Information and Attribute
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3: Current Condition Plan View
Table 5: Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6: Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photos: Stream Stations
Photos: Vegetation Plots
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7: Vegetation Plot Counts and Densities
Appendix D — Stream Geomorphology Data
Cross -Sections
Longitudinal Profiles
Pebble Counts
Table 8: Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9a: Cross -Section Morphology Data
Table 9b: Stream Reach Morphology Data
Appendix E — Hydrologic Data
Table 10: Verification of Bankfull Events
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 2 (2016) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
The Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration Project is located in Union County, North
Carolina in the Yadkin River Basin, (HUC 03040105081010), and within a North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) Division of Mitigation Services
(DMS) Targeted Local Watershed (TLW). It is also located within the watershed of Lanes Creek,
a 303d -listed stream and Water Supply Watershed.
The project site consists of four headwater stream channels that flow through agricultural land
and prior to restoration efforts were devoid of riparian vegetation. Past and present agricultural
use of the land had severely impacted and degraded the channels. The project goals address
stressors identified in the TLW and include the following:
• Improved water quality in Wicker Branch.
• Improve aquatic habitat in the tributary channels.
• Provide aesthetic value, wildlife habitat, and bank stability through the creation of a
riparian zone.
• Create a contiguous wildlife corridor, with connection of some isolated adjacent natural
habitats to larger downstream forested tracts.
• Provide shading and biomass input to the stream and mast for wildlife when vegetation
is mature.
These objectives were achieved through restoring, enhancing, and preserving 4020 feet of
perennial and intermittent stream channel. The riparian areas were also planted with native
vegetation to improve habitat and protect water quality. The project reaches consist of Tributary
1A (Priority 1 Restoration), Tributary 1B (Enhancement Level II including invasive species
control), Tributary 2 (Preservation), Tributary 3 (Enhancement Levels I and II), and Tributary 4
(Enhancement Level II)(See Table 1 in Appendix A and Figure 2 in Appendix A).
Project success will be determined by monitoring channel stability and vegetation within the
easement. Success criteria have been outlined in the 2013 Mitigation Plan and include a stable
dimension, pattern, and profile documented through the surveying of cross-sections and
longitudinal profiles. Vegetation monitoring plots will have a minimum of 260 stems per acre
after 5 years.
Project design was completed in December 2013 and the project constructed in September and
October 2014. Planting was complete in March 2015 (See Table 2 in Appendix A). Tributary
1A was constructed as designed. Several log sills were not installed on Tributary 3. These
primarily were sills that were to be placed on the upper reach between the wetland areas the
channel to help maintain stability. This area had developed significant vegetation following the
establishment of the Conservation Easement and had already stabilized. Therefore, the log sills
were determined to be unnecessary.
In late November shortly after completion of the construction there was a significant bankfull
flow event. While the channel held up well during the flow event, there were several locations
where scouring occurred on the floodplain of Tributary 1A and 3. Due to the wet spring, repairs
were not performed until June. Soil was removed from the adjacent slopes to rebuild the
floodplains. The floodplains were regraded to eliminate the low points that allowed for
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 2 (2016) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

concentration of flows. Small berms perpendicular to the channel were placed periodically in
the floodplain to disrupt flows and direct flows back into the channel. Following the grading
activities, the disturbed areas were reseeded with both a temporary and a permanent seed mix,
and covered with straw. These areas were shown as Vegetation Problem Areas in the Y1
Monitoring Report. The areas were replanted with woody stems in March 2016 and appear to
have stabilized. These areas are no longer considered Vegetation Problem Areas.
A log sill that had been installed at a headcut at the lower end of Tributary 1 B was also rebuilt.
During the high flow events a scour hole had formed upstream of the sill. The sill was rebuilt and
larger stone was placed both in the plunge pool below the sill as well as above the sill. The coir
matting was reinstalled and the disturbed areas were reseeded.
Herbaceous vegetation is well established though out the easement. The vegetation monitoring
plots show an average density of 442 stems per acre down from baseline planting of 684 stems
per acre but still well above the 320 stems per acre at end of year 3 and 260 stems per acre at
year 5. Two plots do not meet the vegetation success criteria. Plot 6 is at 202 stems per acre
and plot 10 is at 242 stems per acre. A number of volunteer woody stems were observed this
year. Volunteer species included persimmon, oaks, sweetgum, pine, willows, elderberry, and
red bud.
Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) is present in the buffer along Tributary 1 B. An extensive
removal effort occurred during construction in 2014 but stems remain. A second treatment
occurred in the spring of 2016 but it was not very effective and it will need to be retreated.
These areas will be addressed again more vigorously during spring and summer of 2017.
The stream channels appear to be stable with no areas of bank erosion observed. Flows were
observed in all channels during a site visit on March 16, 2016. Tributary 1A and 113 were dry
during a site visit on June 22, 2016 (Tributaries 3 and 4 had flow) and all the channels were dry
during the monitoring visit on September 14, and 15. Installation of a gauge to measure flows in
Tributary 1A was unsuccessful. A trail camera has been installed at the lower end of Tributary
1A on a trial basis to see if it is effective in documenting stream flows.
The adjacent fields were planted in soybeans in 2016. Additional signage was installed in the
spring of 2016 to address encroachments along the edges of the field. There is still some
encroachment into the easements at the equipment crossings and AECOM will continue to work
with the landowner and the current farmer to address these encroachments. The areas of
encroachment are shown on Figure 3 in Appendix B.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
Vegetation survival, channel stability, and wetland hydrology were monitored on the project site.
Post restoration monitoring will occur for a minimum of five years or until success criteria are
met.
2
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 2 (2016) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

2.1 VEGETATION
Eleven vegetation plots were established and assess for the baseline vegetation monitoring.
The Carolina Vegetative Survey-EEP Protocol Level 2 methodology was used to sample
vegetation on October 14 and 15, 2015 (Lee et al. 2006, http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm).
2.2 STREAM ASSESSMENT
Twelve permanent monitoring cross-sections have been established on the site as follows:
• Tributary 1A (1,390 feet) — 4 riffle and 3 pool cross-sections
• Tributary 3 (640 feet) — 2 riffle and 1 pool cross-sections
• Tributary 4 (631 feet) — 2 riffle cross-sections
Wolman pebble counts were conducted on each cross-section. Particle sizes less than 2.0
millimeters (mm) were determined by touch using the following guidelines:
• Silt — Smooth feeling (not gritty)
• Fine sand — Slightly gritty texture
• Coarse sand — Very gritty texture
Multiple parameters were located including top of bank, thalweg, and water surface. Pool and
riffle features were called out to calculate feature slopes and lengths. The survey was performed
with a survey grade GPS (Trimble TCS3 with an R8 Model 3 GNSS receiver).
2.3 VISUAL ASSESSMENT
A visual assessment of the stream was performed to assess the bank (lateral stability), bed
(vertical stability), the easement boundary, and site vegetation.
2.4 DIGITAL PHOTOS
Digital photos of each of the vegetation plots and each cross-section were also taken as seen in
Appendix B.
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, T.R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation Version 4.0.
3
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 2 (2016) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

APPENDIX A — General Figures and Tables
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Figure 2: Stream Assets Map
Table 1: Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts
Table 4: Project Baseline Information and Attribute
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 2 (2016) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

IN
Tributaries of Wicker Branch'
Stream Restoration Site
From the sourtheast of Monroe take US Highway 601 South
6.3 miles to Griffin Cemetery Road. Turn left onto Griffin Cemetery
Road. Follow Griffin Cemetery Road approximately 0.7 miles and
turn right onto gravel drive. Follow gravel drive to farm field and to
the head of Tributary 1A.
Site Boundary
STANLY
a
D:
1. Vicinity Map
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Stream Restoration Site (DMS No. 95022)
Union County, NC
0 0.5 1 2
Miles

E
' d
I
`,k Tributary 1A
Tributary 1 B
Legend
Site Boundary
Easement Boundary
Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
w • d� ,
y�.
Tributary 3
4 # 1
Y Tributary 4
AL
1 0
�ABARRUp 1
\ / STANLY
BUkG 1
i l
U N 74
i
I
2. Stream Assets Map
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Stream Restoration Site (DMS No. 95022)
Union County, NC
0 250 500 1,000
Feet

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian Wetland Non-riparian Wetland Buffer
Nitrogen
Offset
Phosphorous Offset
Type R
RE
R RE R RE
Totals 2540
0
Project Components
Project Component
Stationing/Location Existing Footage Approach Restoration or Restoration Restoration Footage Mitigation
Equivalent Ratio
SMUs by
Reach
Tributary 1A
1293 Restoration Restoration
1390
1:1
1390
Tributary 1 B
1095 Enhancement II Enhancement II
1095
3:1
365
Tributary 2
330 N/A N/A
330
N/A
0
Tributary 3
264 Enhancement II Enhancement II
264
2.5:1
106
Tributary 3
640 Enhancement I Enhancement 1
640
1.5:1
427
Tributary 4
631 Enhancement 11 Enhancement II
631
2.5:1
252
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream
linear feet)
Riparian Wetland Non-Riparian Wetland
(acres) (acres)
Buffer
(square feet)
Upland
(acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration
1390
Enhancement
Enhancement 1
640
Enhancement II
1990
Creation
Preservation
High Quality Preservation

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
Dec -13
Dec -13
Final Design — Construction Plans
Mar -14
Mar -14
Construction
Nov -14
Nov -14
Permanent seed applied to entire site
Nov -14
Nov -14
Plantings for entire site
Mar -15
Mar -15
Mitigation Plan Year 0 Monitoring — baseline)
May -15
Jan -16
Year 1 Monitoring
Oct -15
Mar -16
Year 2 Monitoring
Oct -16
Dec -16
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring

Table 3. Project Contact Table
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Owner
Harry Tsomides
NCDENR - Division of Mitigation Services
NCDENR - Division of Mitigation
5 Ravenscroft Drive, Suite 102
Services
Asheville, NC 28801
[phone]
Designer
Ron Johnson, Project Manager
AECOM of North Carolina, Inc.
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
Raleigh, NC 27607
919 854-6210
Landowner
3308 Old Pageland Monroe Rd.
Richard Simpson
Monroe, NC 28112
704-506-5184
Riverworks
Construction Contractor
6105 Chapel Hill Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Efird's Landscaping
Planting Contractor
42759 Greenview Drive
Albemarle, NC 38001
704 985-6559
Seeding Contractor
Riverworks
Monitoring Performer
701 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 475
AECOM of North Carolina, Inc.
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-760-4000

Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Project Information
Project Name
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Project County
Union
Project Area (acres)
15.49
Project Coordinates (lat/long)
34.8946849, -80.4472082
Project Watershed Summary
Physiographic Province
Carolina Slate Belt - Piedmont
Project River Basin
Yadkin-Pee Dee
USGS HUC for Project
3040105081010
NCDWQ Sub-basin for Project
3/7/2014
Project Drainage Area (acres)
173
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
2% to 3%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Cultivated/Managed Herbaceous Cover
Reach Summary Information (Pre-restoration)
Parameters
Trib 1A
Trib 1B
Trib 2
Trib 3
Trib 4
Length of Reach (feet)
1293
1095
330
1184
631
Valley Classification
Type II
Type II
Type II
Type II
Type II
Drainage area (acres)
71.5
94.5
17.6
32.7
29.8
NCDWQ Stream ID Score
38.5
38.5
27
43
31.5
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
WS-V
WS-V
WS-V
WS-V
WS-V
Morphological Description
B4c, G4c, F4
C4/1`4
N/A
F/B6c/F6
N/A*
Evolutionary Trend
G41`4C
N/A
N/A
G41`4C
N/A
Underlying Mapped Soils
Cid channery silt
loam
Chewacla silt
loam
Cid channery silt
loam, Badin
channery silt
loam
Cid channery silt
loam
Cid channery silt
loam, Goldston-
Badin complex
Drainage Class
Moderately well
drained/
somewhat poorly
drained
Somewhat poorlydrained/
drained
Moderately well
somewhat poorly
drained, well
drained
Moderately well
drained/
somewhat poorly
drained
Somewhat poorly
drained to
excessively
drained
Soil Hydric Status
No
Yes
No
No
No
Slope
1.30%
1.00%
1.70%
1.40%
1.00%
FEMA Classification
Zone X
Zone X
Zone X
Zone X
Zone X
Native Vegetation
None
Mesic Mixed
Hardwoods
None
None
None
Percent Composition of Exotic Invasive Vegetation
1 0
150 % Understory
1 0
1 0
0
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable
Resolved
Waters of the US — Section 404
Yes
Yes
Waters of the US — Section 401
Yes
Yes
Endangered Species Act
Yes
Yes
Historic Preservation Act
No
N/A
CZMA/CAMA
No
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A

APPENDIX B — VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figure 3: Current Condition Plan View
Table 5: Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6: Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photos: Stream Stations
Photos: Vegetation Plots
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 2 (2016) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

+w Tributary 4
• tiff
°figure 3c
I1� �
II �p
II \\
VA q
r
Tributary 3
Tributary 1 B
Tributary 1A
\1
• ,1
o
� o
44L
(D
ami
LL
• o c
LO
• CU
• U)
rr e o
Figure 3a Figure 3b ,
c
Wicker Branch 3 .o
sTributary 2 >
t.
N
a
z a,
Y r 2 C nd'f n e% -F-6
•.. _
ea o iio s
z
Photo Locations
m U
C
.q
N
X
W
L c 0
Invasives
0
M
•
c
-o
ami
O
0
m
c
• `
CL
U)
E
E
o
>
J
Cn
U)
W
m
Vegetation Plots
U
U)
o
C-
U
W
U
�
c
N
�
fA
o
—
(n
2
C U
W
O
Criteria Not Met
r
W
J
Tributary 1 B
Tributary 1A
\1
• ,1
o
� o
44L
(D
ami
LL
• o c
LO
• CU
• U)
rr e o
Figure 3a Figure 3b ,
c
Wicker Branch 3 .o
sTributary 2 >
t.
N
a
z a,
Y r 2 C nd'f n e% -F-6
•.. _
ea o iio s
z
Photo Locations
m U
.q
L c 0
Invasives
0
•
Enchroachment
• `
o
ti
Vegetation Problem Area
Vegetation Plots
'X
W
Criteria Met
Criteria Not Met
r
W
CO
Souryce: Esri, DigittalGdobe, GeoEye, Earths ar Geographies, CN,
�
the G�S�ser Community

} -
Tributary 1A
I
pint 1+00
._ 4
t
Tributary 2
'1 Oow
u .p
X11 +00 12+00LL
C:) c
LO
CU
Cn
C:
3(Z0
VI
�
Tributary 1A
r ry
E N
M N
Year
1 Conditions
a zm
)
c
o 0
0
Stationing_
z
Photo Locations
mU,a0i
� o
L �
a) o
Invasives
�j
Enchroachment
2E
0,0
Vegetation Problem Areas
N a
Vegetation
Plots
W
Criteria Met
Criteria Not Met
W
U
(1`
I

12+00
Tributary 1B
Tributary 1A �-
r ..I
NIA"
Privet scattered throughout
wooded area regenerating
following initial treatments
N
a
o
r o
- � a
E
W U c
I I ii
c
O
-o 0
co m
aD
E E
U)
q
J CA W
w O
o U
U
U) E —_
N Q
N
2 O
C U W
J
Wicker Branch
O
O
.-�6
0
m
4+00
LL
U)
O
L o
CU
U
c
ry
r.
O
Year 1 Conditions
FL
C
O
Wicker Branch
3
.-�6
U)
c
ry
r.
(B N
Year 1 Conditions
FL
�z�
p
c o
t Stationing
z
rr�
Photo Locations P
m U ami
00 o
L
a� o
- Invasives
�j
U)
Enchroachment
o 0
Vegetation Problem Areas
N
a
Vegetation Plots
W
Criteria Met
Criteria Not Met
W
ource: Esri, Digi alGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographies, CN
the GI, User Community +'

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Reach ID Tributary 1
Assessed Length 2485
Footage
Number
Number with
with
Adjusted %
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
for Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow
laterally (not to include point bars)
1
10
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
49 50
98%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
49 49
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream
riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
49 49
100%
4.Thalweg Position
11. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
50 50
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
1 50 1 50
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
32
33
o
97/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
33
33
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
33
33
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%.
(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
33
33
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth
ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
33
33
100%

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Reach ID Tributary 3
Assessed Length 904
Footage
Number
Number with
with
Adjusted %
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
for Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow
laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
12 12
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Death Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
12 12
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream
riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
12 12
100%
4.Thalweg Position
11. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
12 12
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
12 1 2
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
13
13
o
100/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
13
13
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
13
13
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%.
(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
13
13
100%
4. Habitat
rming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth
T_0�100'1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
13
13
100%

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Reach ID Tributary 4
Assessed Length 630
Footage
Number
Number with
with
Adjusted %
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
for Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect flow
laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
4 4
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Death Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
4 4
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of upstream
riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
4 4
100%
4.Thalweg Position
11. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
4 4
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
4 1 4
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or scour
and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
4
4
°
100/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
4
4
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
4
4
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed 15%.
(See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4
4
100%
4. Habitat
rming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth
Tr-ot'00'1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
4
4
100%

Easement Acreaae' 15.49
Vegetation Category
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
De fiction
Number
of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Easement
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern'
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
1000 SF
Yellow Hatch
4
1.00
6.5%
Planted Acreage
11.57
5. Easement Encroachment Areas3 Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale). none I Green Hatch
3
0.08
0.570
Number
% of
Mapping
CCPV
of
Combined
Planted
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
Area
Beige dot
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
0.1 acres
0
0.00
0.0%
pattern
2. Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.
0.1 acres
Red Hatch
0
0.00
0.0%
Total
0
0.00
0.0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year.
0.25 acresN/A
0
0.00
0.0%
Vigor
Cumulative Total
0
0.00
0.0%
Easement Acreaae' 15.49
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
De fiction
Number
of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Easement
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern'
Presence of Chinese privet.
1000 SF
Yellow Hatch
4
1.00
6.5%
5. Easement Encroachment Areas3 Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale). none I Green Hatch
3
0.08
0.570
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of
understory, the channel acreage, crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will there25fore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the to
and is the result of encroachment, the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel fally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The
of high concern spcies are those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure
existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes that are slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over
timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regular y, but can be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viabil
density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage, distnbut
relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control, but potentially lai
coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree /shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of treat
extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red ita,
are of particular interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, der
patches will of course be mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one Fa -f was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for
area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species c
be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the executive summary.

Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1 — 9/15/16
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2 — 9/15/16
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3 — 9/15/16
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 2 (2016) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4 — 9/15/16
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5 — 9/15/16
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6 — 9/15/16

Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7 — 9/15/16
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8 — 9/15/16
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 9 — 9/15/16
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 2 (2016) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022
b t.
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 10 — 9/15/16
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 11 — 9/15/16

Cross Section 1 (looking upstream) — 9/15/16
Cross Section 2 (looking upstream) — 9/15/16
Cross Section 3 (looking upstream) — 9/15/16
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 2 (2016) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022
Cross Section 4 (looking upstream) — 9/15/16
Cross Section 5 (looking upstream) — 9/15/16
Cross Section 6 (looking upstream) — 9/15/16

Cross Section 7 (looking upstream) — 9/15/16
Cross Section 8 (looking upstream) — 9/15/16
Cross Section 9 (looking upstream) — 9/15/16
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 2 (2016) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022
Cross Section 10 (looking upstream) — 9/15/16
Cross Section 11 (looking upstream) — 9/15/16
Cross Section 12 (looking upstream) — 9/15/16

Photo Monitoring Point 1 — 10/16/15
Photo Monitoring Point 3 — 10/16/15
Photo Monitoring Point 5 — 10/16/15
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 2 (2016) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022
Photo Monitoring Point 2 — 10/16/15
Photo Monitoring Point 4 — 10/16/15
Photo Monitoring Point 6 — 10/16/15

APPENDIX C: VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7: Vegetation Plot Counts and Densities
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 2 (2016) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Stem Count Summary
DMS Project Code 95022. Project Name: Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Current Plot Data (MY2 2016)
Current Plot Data (MY2 2016)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95022-01-0001
PnoLSIP-all T
95022-01-0002
Pnol-S P -all T
95022-01-0003
PnoLS P -all T
95022-01-0004
PnoLS P -all T
MY2 (2016)
PnoLS I P -all T
95022-01-0005
PnoLS P -all T
MY1(2015)
Pnol-S P -all T
95022-01-0006
Pnol-S P -all T
95022-01-0007
PnoLS P -all T
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
1
1
2
3
Cercis canadensis
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
2
2
3
26
3
3
5
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
4
4
5
1
1
1
9
9
1
1
1
3
3
3
21
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
1
1
21
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
7
7
7
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
1
2
1
13
6
tuliptree
Tree
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
17
161
16
21
21
3
41
4
4
1 1
1
1
1
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
1
2
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
Quercus
oak
Tree
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
41
4
41
3 3
3
1 11
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
31
3
31
2
211
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
4
4
4
5 5 5
6
6
6
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
4
4
5
1
1
2
20
20
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
1
11
1
I
I
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
1
Rhus glabra
smooth sumac
shrub
1
1
Rhus glabra
smooth sumac
shrub
Robinia pseudoacacia
black locust
Tree
1 1
1
1 1
2
8
Robinia pseudoacacia
black locust
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
2
black willow
lTree
1
2
4
4
5
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
1
1
1
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
11
1
1
1
4
21 21
2 2
2
3
17
17
20
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
51
5
5
31
31
4
3
3
3
1
1
2
1
2
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
1
11
11
1
11
1
1
1
1
Unknown
1
Shrub or Tree
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)0.02
Species count
Stems per ACRE
11
5
445.2
11 11
1
5 5
445.21445.21
101 101
1
1 0.02
4 4 5
404.71404.71445.21
6 61
1
0.02
4 4 5
242.81 242.81 364.21323.71
81
6
81
1
0.02
6
323.71
15
9
6071
1201
9
441.51
1211 168
11
0.27
10 17
445.2 618.1
121
10
445.2
122 122
11
0.27
11 11
448.81 448.81
186
10
684.31
187
11
0.27
11
6881
187
11
688
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
20
8
809.4
20
1
0.02
8
809.4
25
10
1012
131
7
526.1
131 18
1
0.02
7 9
526.1 728.4
9
4
364.2
9 16
1
0.02
4 9
364.2 647.5
10
5
404.7
11 19
1
0.02
6 8
445.2 768.9
14
5
566.6
14 21
1
0.02
5 6
566.6 849.81202.31
5 5 5
1
0.02
1 1 1
202.31 202.31
141
4
566.61
141 18
1
0.02
4 5
566.61 728.4
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Current Plot Data (MY2 2016)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95022-01-0008
PnoLSIP-all T
95022-01-0009
Pnol-S P -all T
95022-01-0010
PnoLS P -all T
95022-01-0011
Pnol-S P -all T
MY2 (2016)
PnoLS I P -all T
MY1(2015)
Pnol-S P -all T
MYO(2015)
PnoLS P -all T
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
1
3
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
3 3
3
2 2
2 1
1
1
22
22
25
21
21
21
26
26
26
Cornus amomum
silky dogwood
Shrub
1
1
1
9
9
10
18
18
18
21
21
21
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
4
4
41
2
7
7
101
6
6
6
7
7
7
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
2
2
13
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
3 3
3
11
11
2
151
15
17
161
16
16
38
38
38
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
41
4
41
3 3
3
1 11
1 2
2
2
34
34
35
26
26
261
41
41
41
Quercus falcata
southern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
7
7
9
10
10
10
20
20
20
Rhus copallinum
flameleaf sumac
shrub
I
I
1
1
Rhus glabra
smooth sumac
shrub
1
1
Robinia pseudoacacia
black locust
Tree
1 1
1
1 1
2
8
8
14
7
7
7
9
91
9
Salix nigra
black willow
lTree
1
4
1
1
1
1
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
11
1
1
21 21
2 2
2
3
17
17
20
15
15
15
21
21
21
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
1
2
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
11
11
1
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)0.02
Species count
Stems per ACRE
11
5
445.2
11 11
1
5 5
445.21445.21
101 101
1
1 0.02
4 4 5
404.71404.71445.21
6 61
1
0.02
4 4 5
242.81 242.81 364.21323.71
81
6
81
1
0.02
6
323.71
15
9
6071
1201
9
441.51
1211 168
11
0.27
10 17
445.2 618.1
121
10
445.2
122 122
11
0.27
11 11
448.81 448.81
186
10
684.31
187
11
0.27
11
6881
187
11
688
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%

APPENDIX D: STREAM GEOMORPHOLOGY DATA
Cross -Sections
Longitudinal Profiles
Pebble Counts
Table 8: Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 9a: Cross -Section Morphology Data
Table 9b: Stream Reach Morphology Data
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 2 (2016) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -1, Sta. 4+65
Feature
Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.15
Date
9/15/2016
Field Crew
ISteven Pires, Chris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0
578.8 LTPIN
0.05
578.2 LBPIN
6.13
577.49 GR
12.97
577.48 GR
18.41
577.58 TOB
18.82
577.28 TOE
20.13
577.17 TW
21.31
577.23 TOE
22.42
577.71 TOB
29.34
577.58 GR
35.13
577.72 GR
39.9
577.98 RBPIN
40
578.59 RTPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
577.67
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.07
Floodprone Width (ft)
50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.42
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
1.28
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.31
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
16.29
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
579
578.5
w
c
°M 578
Q)
Q)
w
577.5
577
Photo: Cross-section 1 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 1, XS -1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
- Bankfull - - - Floodprone Area Asbuilt Y1 Y2

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -2, Sta. 5+05
Feature
Pool
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.15
Date
9/15/2016
Field Crew
Steven Pires, Chris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0
578.56 LTPIN
0
577.90 LBPIN
4.37
577.18 GR
10.69
577.08 GR
17.72
577.03 TOB
19.7
575.54 TOE
20.24
575.40 TW
21.19
575.69 TOE
23.06
576.71 TOB
29.4
576.99 GR
35.68
576.90 GR
39.96
577.27 RBPIN
40.02
578.08 RTPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
576.78
Bankfull Width (ft)
5.85
Floodprone Width (ft)
50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.69
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.38
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
4.03
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
8.5
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
Photo: Cross-section 2 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 1, XS -2
579
578.5
578
577.5
w
c
577
576.5
576
575.5
575
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
- - -Bankfull - --FloodproneArea Asbuilt Yl Y2

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -3, Sta. 9+34
Feature
Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.15
Date
9/15/2016
Field Crew
ISteven Pires, Chris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0
572.51 LTPIN
0.1
571.84 LBPIN
3.79
571.62 GR
8.56
570.94 GR
13.11
571.45 GR
16.99
571.62 TOB
19.08
570.83 TOE
19.79
570.60 TW
20.92
570.76 TOE
22.09
571.61 TOB
29.01
571.34 GR
36.37
571.50 GR
39.79
571.72 RBPIN
39.81
572.27 RTPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
571.82
Bankfull Width (ft)
5.08
Floodprone Width (ft)
50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.22
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
4.06
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
6.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
9.8
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
0.9
Photo: Cross-section 3 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 1, XS -3
573.5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
573
572.5
572
571.5
a
W
571
570.5
570
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
- - - Bankfull - - - Floodprone Area Asbuilt Y1 Y2

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -4, Sta. 9+72
Feature
Pool
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.15
Date
9/15/2016
Field Crew
ISteven Pires, Chris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0.13
572.19 LTPIN
0.19
571.69 LBPIN
9.41
571.03 GR
12.93
571.05 TOB
14.98
569.80 TOE
15.56
569.73 TW
16.54
569.96 TOE
18.49
571.21 TOB
25.79
570.99 GR
33.88
570.97 GR
39.87
571.45 RBPIN
40.02
572.08 RTPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
571.23
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
50
0.83
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
5.17
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
8.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
Photo: Cross-section 4 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 1, XS -4
573
572.5
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
572
571.5
0
--
-- - -- ----
----
----
571
W
570.5
570
IL
569.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
- - - Bankfull - - - Floodprone Area Asbuilt Yl Y2

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -5, Sta. 12+10
Feature
Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.15
Date
9/15/2016
Field Crew
ISteven Pires, Chris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0.09
569.15 LTPIN
0.15
568.70 LBPIN
10.19
568.03 GR
17.49
568.13 TOB
18.15
567.84 TOE
19.52
567.72 TW
20.53
567.73 TOE
21.32
568.25 TOB
27.38
568.23 GR
35.64
568.46 GR
40.14
568.80 RBPIN
40
569.53 RTPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
568.17
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.45
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
1.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
13.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
Photo: Cross-section 5 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 1, XS -5
570
569.5
569
c
0
m
v 568.5
_ _
_ _ _ _ __
_ _ _
__ _ _
W
568
567.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
- - - Bankfull - - - Floodprone Area Asbuilt Yl Y2

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -6, Sta. 12+37
Feature
Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.15
Date
9/15/2016
Field Crew
ISteven Pires, Chris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0
569.01 LTPIN
0
568.14 LBPIN
9.59
567.90 GR
17.77
567.85 TOB
18.74
567.41 TOE
20.07
567.39 TW
21.19
567.36 TOE
22.18
567.94 TOB
27.73
567.86 GR
33.73
567.95 GR
36.63
568.32 GR
40
569.01 RBPIN
40
569.70 RTPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
567.89
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.37
Floodprone Width (ft)
50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
1.73
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.97
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
11.4
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
Photo: Cross-section 6 looking uptream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 1, XS -6
570
569.5
569
w
c
568.5
- - - -
- - - - -
- - - -
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
M
w
LU
568
567.5
567
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
- - -Bankfull - --Floodprone Area Asbuilt Y1 Y2

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -7, Sta. 12+72
Feature
Pool
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.15
Date
9/15/2016
Field Crew
ISteven Pires, Chris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0.00
568.81 LTPIN
0.00
567.90 LPIN
10.21
567.28 GR
24.15
567.42 TOB
26.04
566.57 TOE
26.90
566.50 TW
28.27
566.61 TOE
30.36
567.33 TOB
35.17
567.43 GR
39.86
568.40 RPIN
39.85
569.15 RTPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
567.42
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.94
Floodprone Width (ft)
40
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.97
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
3.98
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
24.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.02
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
Photo: Cross-section 7 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 1, XS -7
569.5
569
568.5
- - - -
- - -
- - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
- - - -
568
0
a 567.5
LU
567
14
566.5
566
0 5 10 15 20 Distance (ft) 25 30 35 40 45
- --Bankfull - -- FloodproneArea Asbuilt Y1 -Y2

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -8, Sta. 1+83
Feature
Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.05
Date
9/15/2016
Field Crew
ISteven Pires, Chris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0
575.57 LTPIN
0
574.93 LBPIN
6.99
574.64 GR
13.38
574.40 GR
18.44
574.42 JOB
20.29
573.91 JOE
20.9
573.83 TW
21.52
573.95 RTOE
22.77
574.44 RTOB
29.43
574.47 GR
36.89
574.47 GR
40
574.86 RBPIN
40
575.54 RTPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
574.41
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
40
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.33
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
1.38
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
9.48
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
576
575.5
575
c
0
v 574.5
w
574
573.5
Photo: Cross-section 8 looking downstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 3, XS -8
0 5 10 15 20Distance(ft) 2S 30 35 40 45
- -
-Bankfull - - - Floodprone Area Asbuilt Y1 Y2

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -9, Sta 3+19
Feature
Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.05
Date
9/15/2016
Field Crew
ISteven Pires, Chris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0
573.70 LTPIN
0
573.55 LBPIN
4.23
573.04 GR
12.55
572.70 GR
19.15
572.62 JOB
20.02
572.22 LTOE
20.84
572.09 TW
21.68
572.20 RTOE
22.86
572.74 RTOB
28.01
572.68 GR
31.64
572.60 GR
33.83
572.65 GR
39.99
573.87 RBPIN
40
574.55 RBPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
572.58
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
32
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.31
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.49
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
1.01
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
9.77
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
Photo: Cross-section 9 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 3, XS -9
575
574.5
574
c
573.5
m
v
u,
- - -
- - - -
- - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
- - - - -
573
572.5
----
- --
572
0 5 10 15 20Distance(ft) 25 30 35 40 45
- - -Bankfull - - - Floodprone Area Asbuilt Y1 Y2

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -10, Sta. 4+95
Feature
Pool
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.05
Date
9/15/2016
Field Crew
ISteven Pires, Chris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0
574.53 LTPIN
0
573.87 LBPIN
10.8
570.78 GR
15.75
570.61 TOB
17.21
569.69 JOE
18.81
569.53 TW
20
569.57 RTOE
22.25
570.69 RTOB
29.05
570.57 GR
36.58
571.49 GR
40.64
572.17 RBPIN
40.78
572.78 RTPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
570.76
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.61
Floodprone Width (ft)
33
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.84
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.22
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
5.53
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.87
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.96
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
Photo: Cross-section 10 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 3, XS -10
574
573.5
573
572.5
572
c
571.5
M
v 571
-
- - - -----
570.5
570
569.5
569
0 5 10 15 20 Distance (ft) 25 30 35 40 45
- - - Bankfull - - - Floodprone Area Asbuilt Yl Y2

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -11, Sta. 3+61
Feature
Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.05
Date
9/15/2016
Field Crew
ISteven Pires, Chris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0
576.80 LTPIN
0.05
576.24 LBPIN
5.31
576.01 GR
11.91
575.50 GR
18.42
574.71 JOB
19.28
574.24 LTOE
20
574.13 TW
20.58
574.31 RTOE
21.33
574.76 RTOB
25.52
575.08 GR
31.31
575.42 GR
40
575.94 RBPIN
40
576.52 RTOP
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
574.75
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.22
Floodprone Width (ft)
18
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.35
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.62
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
1.12
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5.42
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
Photo: Cross-section 11 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 4, XS -11
577
576.5
576
w
= 575.5
o
- - - -
- - - - -
-
_ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _
575
574.5
574
573.5
0 5 10 15 20 Distance (ft) 25 30 35 40 45
- - -Bankfull - -- FloodproneArea Asbuilt Y1 Y2

Cross-section Plot Exhibit
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed
Wicker Branch
X -Sec ID
XS -12, Sta. 6+42
Feature
Riffle
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.05
Date
9/15/2016
Field Crew
ISteven Pires, Chris Inscore
Station
Elevation
0.00
573.27 RTPIN
0.00
572.68 RBPIN
3.74
572.72 GR
10.65
572.63 GR
17.29
572.39 RTOB
19.18
571.90 RTOE
20.18
571.70 TW
20.92
571.74 LTOE
21.98
572.18 JOB
27.40
572.67 GR
34.54
573.29 GR
39.94
573.95 LBPIN
40.00
574.53 LTPIN
Summary Data
Bankfull Elevation
572.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.18
Floodprone Width (ft)
24
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.28
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
1.19
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.93
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5.83
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
Photo: Cross-section 12 looking upstream
Tributaries of Wicker Branch
Tributary 4, XS -12
575
574.5
574
573.5
r
0
Y
M
573
l!J-
- - -
- - - -
- -
- - - -
- - - - - - -
- - -
572.5
572
----
- -
- --
-----
571.5
0 5 10
15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
- - -Bankfull
- - • Floodprone Area Asbuilt Y1 Y2

588.00
586.00
584.00
582.00
580.00
c�
578.00
w
576.00
574.00
572 00
Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Tributary 1A Longitudinal Profile
578.00
576.00
574.00
$ 572.00
r-
0
> 570.00
d
w
568.00
566.00
564 00
1+00
2+00
3+00 4+00
Station (ft)
• BKF — — — Asbuilt TW Y1 TW Y2 TW
q+nn
Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Tributary 1A Longitudianl Profile
6+00
7+00
Cross Section 3
•
Section 5 Cross Section 7
•
•
Cross Section 1
•
•
•
•
•
•
• •
•
•!
AA
Cross Section
4
• •
• • ♦ •
Section 2
• ♦ • ♦
Cross
♦
578.00
576.00
574.00
$ 572.00
r-
0
> 570.00
d
w
568.00
566.00
564 00
1+00
2+00
3+00 4+00
Station (ft)
• BKF — — — Asbuilt TW Y1 TW Y2 TW
q+nn
Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Tributary 1A Longitudianl Profile
6+00
7+00
7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00
Station (ft)
• BKF — — — Asbuilt TW Y1 TW Y2 TW
12+00
13+00
14+00
Cross Section 3
•
Section 5 Cross Section 7
•
•
Cross
•
•
•
•
•!
AA
Cross Section
4
• •
• • ♦ •
♦
Cross Section 6
7+00 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00
Station (ft)
• BKF — — — Asbuilt TW Y1 TW Y2 TW
12+00
13+00
14+00

578
576
574
c 572
w 570
568
566
Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Tributary 3 Longitudinal Profile
♦ ♦
Section 9
— — —
Cross
♦♦
Cross Section 12
♦
♦ ♦
Cross Section
10
A
Cross Section
8
Cross Section 11
578
576
574
w
ca
ami 572
w
570
568
1+00
2+00
3+00 4+00
Station (ft)
BKF — — — Asbuilt TW Y1 TW Y2 TW
Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Tributary 4 Longitudinal Profile
5+00
6+00
7+00
♦ •
Cross Section 12
A
Cross Section 11
2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00
Station (ft)
• BKF — — — Asbuilt TW , ': T -. 1 2 T%?
r of
8+00

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 1
Feature: Riffle
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total k
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
3
6%
6%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
6%
A
Fine
.125-.25
0
0%
6%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
6%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
0
0%
6%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
0
0%
6%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
0
0%
6%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
0
0%
6%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
0
0%
6%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
1
2%
8%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
4
8%
16%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
5
10%
26%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0
13
26%
52%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
13
26%
78%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
7
14%
92%
C
Small
64-90
4
8%
100%
O
Small
90-128
0
0%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
So
100%
Summary Data
D50 31
D84 53
D95 74
X -Sec 1
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
m
50%
40%
L)
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
,-Asbuilt —Y1 —Y2
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
X -Sec 1
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 2
Feature: Pool
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
14
28%
28%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
28%
A
Fine
.125-.25
0
0%
28%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
28%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
18
36%
64%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
0
0%
64%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
0
0%
64%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
0
0%
64%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
0
0%
64%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
0
0%
64%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
3
6%
70%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
3
6%
76%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0
2
4%
80%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
6
12%
92%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
1
2%
94%
C
Small
64-90
2
4%
98%
O
Small
90-128
1
2%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
So
100%
Summary Data
D50 0.81
D84 36
D95 70
X -Sec 2
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
m
50%
40%
L)
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
,-Asbuilt —Y1 —Y2
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
X -Sec 2
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 3
Feature: Riffle
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
SIC
Silt/Clay
<0.062
2
3%
3%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
3%
A
Fine
.125-.25
0
0%
3%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
3%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
0
0%
3%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
1
2%
5%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
2
3%
8%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
3
5%
13%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
6
10%
23%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
3
5%
28%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
6
10%
38%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
6
10%
48%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0
1
2% 1
50%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
6
10%
60%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
6
10%
70%
C
Small
64-90
13
22%
92%
O
Small
90-128
3
5%
97%
B
Large
128-180
2
3%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg 1
1024-2048 1
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
60
100%
Summary Data
D50 73
D84 124
D95 167
X -Sec 3
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90% AN
80% —
70%
60% AZ
">
— so%
E 40%
Q
U
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
tMbuilt -Y1 -Y2
X -Sec 3
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90i
80%
A. 70%
60%
U
s0%
.5
v 40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 .Y2 •Y3 •Y4 .Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 4
Feature: Pool
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
SIC
Silt/Clay
<0.062
33
65%
65%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
65%
A
Fine
.125-.25
0
0%
65%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
65%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
8
16%
80%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
0
0%
80%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
0
0%
80%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
0
0%
80%
R
Fine
S.7-8.0
0
0%
80--/.—
0%A
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
1
2%
82%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
1
2%
84%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
2
4%
88/
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0
2
4% 1
92%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
2
4%
96%
Very Coarse
4S.0-64.0
1
2%
98%
C
Small
64-90
1
2%
100%
O
Small
90-128
0
0%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
51
100%
Summary Data
D50 0.05
D84 15
D95 41
X -Sec 4
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
">
— so%
E 40%
Q
U
30%
20%
10%
C)%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
,Asbuilt �Y1 Y2
X -Sec 4
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
a 76
60%
U
50%
— ao%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ®Y2 •Y3 •Y4 •Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 5
Feature: Riffle
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
sic
Silt/Clay
<0.062
1
2%
2%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
2%
A
Fine
.125-.25
0
0%
2%
N
Medium
.25-.50
4
8%
10%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
4
8%
18%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
1
2%
20%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
0
0%
20%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
0
0%
20%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
0
0%
20%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
0
0%
20%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
0
0%
20%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
0
0%
20%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0 1
7
14% 1
34%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
8
16%
50%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
18
36%
86%
C
Small
64-90
4
8%
94%
O
Small
90-128
3
6%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
So
100%
Summary Data
D50 45
D84 63
D95 96
X -Sec 5
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
m
50%
3 40%
L)
30%
20%
10%
0% —
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
--11--Asbuilt tY1 — Y2
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
X -Sec 5
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 6
Feature: Riffle
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
4
8%
8%
S
Very Fine
.062-125
0
0%
8%
A
Fine
.125-.25
3
6%
14%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
14%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
3
6%
20%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
0
0%
20%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
2
4%
24%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
0
0%
24%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
0
0%
24%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
0
0%
24%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
0
0%
24%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
0
0%
24%
L.
Coarse
22.6-32.0
2
4%
28%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
15
30%
58%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
13
26%
84%
C
Small
64-90
7
14%
98%
O
Small
90-128
1
2%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L.
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L.
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
So
100%
Summary Data
D50 41
D84 64
D95 84
X -Sec 6
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
m
50%
40%
L)
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
,-Asbuilt —Y1 —Y2
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
X -Sec 6
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 7
Feature: Pool
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
16
32%
32%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
32%
A
Fine
.125-.25
5
10%
42%
N
Medium
.25-.50
1
2%
44%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
5
10%
54%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
0
0%
54%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
5
10%
64%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
0
0%
64%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
0
0%
64%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
0
0%
64%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
2
4%
68%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
6
12%
80%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0
5
10%
90%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
4
8%
98%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
0
0%
98%
C
Small
64-90
1
2%
100%
O
Small
90-128
0
0%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
so
100%
Summary Data
D50 0.8
D84 26
D95 40
X -Sec 7
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
m
50%
40%
L)
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
,-Asbuilt —Y1 —Y2
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
X -Sec 7
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 1 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 8
Feature: Riffle
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
48
96%
96%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
96%
A
Fine
.125-.25
1
2%
98%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
98%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
0
0%
98%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
0
0%
98%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
1
2%
100%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
0
0%
100%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
0
0%
100%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
0
0%
100%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
0
0%
100%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
0
0%
100%
L.
Coarse
22.6-32.0
0
0%
100%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
0
0%
100%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
0
0%
100%
C
Small
64-90
0
0%
100%
O
Small
90-128
0
0%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L.
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L.
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
so
100%
Summary Data
D50 0.03
D84 0.05
D95 0.06
X -Sec 8
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 3 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
70%
w 60%
m
50%
40%
L)
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
�Asbuilt —Y1 —Y2
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
X -Sec 8
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 3 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 9
Feature: Riffle
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
40
78%
78%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
78%
A
Fine
.125-.25
0
0%
78%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
78%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
0
0%
78%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
1
2%
80%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
0
0%
80%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
0
0%
80%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
0
0%
80%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
0
0%
80%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
0
0%
80%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
0
0%
80%
L.
Coarse
22.6-32.0
1
2%
82%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
3
6%
88%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
5
10%
98%
C
Small
64-90
1
2%
100%
O
Small
90-128
0
0%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L.
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L.
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
51
100%
Summary Data
D50 0.04
D84 36
D95 58
X -Sec 9
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 3 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
60%
70%
60%
m
50%
40%
L)
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
�Asbuilt —Y1 —Y2
100%
90%
60%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
X -Sec 9
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary3 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 10
Feature: Pool
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total p
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
50
100%
100%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
100%
A
Fine
.125-.25
0
0%
100%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
100%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
0
0%
100%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
0
0%
100%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
0
0%
100%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
0
0%
100%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
0
0%
100%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
0
0%
100%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
0
0%
100%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
0
0%
100%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0
0
0%
100%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
0
0%
100%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
0
0%
100%
C
Small
64-90
0
0%
100%
O
Small
90-128
0
0%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
So
100%
Summary Data
D50 0.03
D84 0.05
D95 0.06
X -Sec 10
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 3 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100
90%
80%
70%
w 60%
m
50%
40%
L)
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
—11—Asbuilt tY1 — Y2
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
X -Sec 10
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 3 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name : Tributaries of Wickers Branch
Cross Section: 11
Feature: Riffle
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total #
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
50
100%
100%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
100%
A
Fine
.125-.25
0
0%
100%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
100%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
0
0%
100%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
0
0%
100%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
0
0%
100%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
0
0%
100%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
0
0%
100%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
0
0%
100%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
0
0%
100%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
0
0%
100%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0
0
0%
100%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
0
0%
100%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
0
0%
100%
C
Small
64-90
0
0%
100%
O
Small
90-128
0
0%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
so
100%
Summary Data
D50 0.03
D84 0.05
D95 0.06
X -Sec 11
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 4 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
loon
90%
s0%
70%
w 60%
m
50%
40%
L)
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
�Asbuilt —Y1 —Y2
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
X -Sec 11
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 4 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 ■Y2 ■Y3 ■Y4 ■Y5

Cross - Section Pebble Count
Project Name: Tributaries of Wickens Branch
Cross Section: 12
Feature: Riffle
Description
Particle
Millimeter
Total p
Item %
Cum %
S/C
Silt/Clay
<0.062
46
92%
92%
S
Very Fine
.062-125 .125
0
0%
92%
A
Fine
.125-.25
0
0%
92%
N
Medium
.25-.50
0
0%
92%
D
Coarse
.50-1.0
1
2%
94%
S
Very Coarse
1.0-2.0
0
0%
94%
Very Fine
2.0-4.0
1
2%
96%
G
Fine
4.0-5.7
0
0%
96%
R
Fine
5.7-8.0
0
0%
96%
A
Medium
8.0-11.3
0
0%
96%
V
Medium
11.3-16.0
0
0%
96%
E
Coarse
16.0-22.6
1
2%
98%
L
Coarse
22.6-32.0
1
2%
100%
S
Very Coarse
32.0-45.0
0
0%
100%
Very Coarse
45.0-64.0
0
0%
100%
C
Small
64-90
0
0%
100%
O
Small
90-128
0
0%
100%
B
Large
128-180
0
0%
100%
L
Large
180-256
0
0%
100%
B
Small
256-362
0
0%
100%
L
Small
362-512
0
0%
100%
D
Medium
512-1024
0
0%
100%
R
Lrg- Very Lrg
1024-2048
0
0%
100%
BDRK
Bedrock
0
0%
100%
Totals
SO
100%
Summary Data
D50 0.03
D84 0.06
D95 3
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.01
X -Sec 12
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 4 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Size (mm)
f-Asbuilt �Semsl — Y2
X -Sec 12
Particle Size Distribution
Tributary 4 - Tributaries of Wicker Branch - Union County, NC
0.01 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 6 8 11 16 22 32 45 64 90 128 180 256 362 512 1024 2048
Particle Size (mm)
■Asbuilt ■Y1 •Y2 •Y3 •Y4 -Y5

Runs and Glides are too short to obtain meaningful measurements
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Parameter
Existing Trib lA to Wickers
Branch
Reference
Reach- Spencer
Creek
Reference Reach
Rockwell Pastures
LIT4
Proposed Trip 1 to Wickers
Branch
As-built Baseline
(Tributary 1A)
Stream Type
Drainage Area (sq mi)
G4IB4c
0.14
C4
0.5
C4
0.11
E4
0.1
Dimension
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
n
BF Width (ft)
3.27
3.90
3.58
12.30
7.30
4.00
3.93
4.93
4.43
4
BF Cress Sectional Area (fl?)
1.52
1.99
1.74
10.80
4.20
1.50
1.62
2.80
1.94
4
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.43
0.61
0.50
0.88
0.60
0.38
0.30
0.61
0.41
4
BF Max Depth (ft)
0.54
1.10
0.76
1.80
1.10
0.50
0.42
0.69
0.53
4
Width/Depth Ratio
5.36
8.48
7.37
13.98
12.60
10.52
7.49
14.94
11.56
4
Entrenchment Ratio
1.54
1.88
1.70
>2.20
2.70
>2.20
7.16
1 10.18
1 8.63
4
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
3.94
4.31
4.17
14.13
5.77
4.76
4.31
5.09
4.73
4
Hydraulic radius (ft)
0.39
0.47
0.43
0.76
0.76
0.32
0.29
0.55
0.38
4
Bank Height Ratio
2.21
2.41
2.32
1.10
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
4
Pool Area/Riffle Area
NIA
1.17
1.00
5.70
1.98
Max riffle depth/mean riffle depth
1.08
1.22
1.52
2.05
1.90
1.32
1.29
Max pool depth/mean riffle depth
1.22
2.3
1.76
2.38
2.5
6.50
2.76
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
7
10
9
24
52
38
3.20
5.70
4.40
15
30
23
18
25
22
Radius of Curvature (ft)
6
8
7
5
22
13
5
13
9
5
30
18
6
20
12
Meander Wavelength
27
497
181
54
196
125
10.00
17.00
13.60
30
110
70
34
106
50
Meander Width ratio
1.98
2.79
2.39
1.95
4.23
3.09
0.40
0.80
0.60
1.80
4.50
3.15
5.0
Meander Length ratio
7.64
138.78
50.53
4.39
15.93
10.16
1.40
2.30
1.90
7.50
27.50
17.50
11.20
Radius of Curvature/Riffle Width (ft)
1.68
2.23
1.96
0.44
4.23
1.05
0.70
1.70
1.20
1.00
4.20
2.60
1.35
4.06
2.71
Pool Length/Riffle Width
3.91
7.65
5.53
0.76
1.94
1.45
NIA
1.05
3.75
2.40
2.50
Pool to Pool Spacing/ Riffle Width
5.50
26.26
13.08
1.06
3.78
1.97
2.40
3.30
2.90
3.50
14.75
9.13
2.93
13.77
6.00
Riffle Length/Riffle Width
1.90
2035
8.13
0.30
1.84
1.07
N/A
2.45
11.00
6.73
1.85
10.61
3.54
Profile
Pool length (ft)
14.0
27.4
19.8
9.3
23.9
17.8
N/A
4.2
15.0
9.8
4.9
17.8
11.3
49
Pool spacing (ft)
19.7
94.0
46.8
13.0
46.5
24.2
17.6
24.1
20.8
14.0
59.0
26.5
13.0
61.0
26.6
48
Riffle length (ft)
6.8
74.3
29.1
3.7
22.6
13.1
NIA
9.8
44.0
26.9
8.2
47.0
15.7
50
Riffle slope (ft/ft)
0.014
0.027
0.02
0.020
0.036
0.026
0.006
0.049
0.028
0.018
0.029
0.02
0.01
0.48
0.03
50
Pool slope (ft/ft)
0.006
0.017
0.012
0.000
0.005
0.003
0.008
0.014
0.010
0.018
0.029
0.024
0.010
0.001
0.005
48
Run slope (ft/ft)
0.009
0.025
0.018
0.028
0.059
0.041
N/A
NIA'
N/A*
Glide slope (ft/ft)
0.006
0.016
0.01
0.000
0.012
0.003
N/A
NIA'
N/A*
Riffle Slope/Avg. Water Surface Slope
1.09
2.11
1.56
1.52
2.73
1.97
0.40
3.20
1.80
1.29
2.09
1.69
2.36
Run slope/Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.73
1.95
1.41
2.12
4.47
3.11
NIA
N/A*
NIA*
Pool Slope/Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.47
1.33
0.94
0.00
0.38
0.23
0.50
0.90
0.60
1.29
2.09
1.69
0.39
Glide Slope/Avg.Water Surface Slope
0.50
1.25
0.78
0.00
0.91
0.23
N/A
NIA*
N/A*
Substrate
d50 (mm)
2.5
23.32
10.09
8.6
12.70
13.8
35.5
25.6
4
d84 (mm)
10.38
44.3
25.7
77.00
38.00
123
37
88
65.3
4
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length (ft)
1285
235
N/A
1284
1285
Channel Length (ft)
1293
266
NIA
1395
1390
Valley Slope (ft/ft)
0.0113
0.0138
0.0132
0.0139
0.0173
0.0132
0.0129
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)0.0080
0.0177
0.0128
0.0132
0.0156
0.0139
0.0127
Sinuosity
1
1.1
1.05
1.1
1.1
Runs and Glides are too short to obtain meaningful measurements

• Tributary 3 and 4 - The Pattern of the channel was not altered. Tributary 4 only minimal work consisting of altering dimension was performed.
•' Tributary modified/channelized in past so application of classification of natural channels may not be applicable
"'Note on Tributaries 3 and 4 Pattern Data. These two tributaries are relatively straight channels. Beltwidth, radius of curvature, and other measurements are not applicable.
••** Runs and glides are too short to obtain meaningfull measurements
Table 8. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Parameter
Existing Trib 3 to Wickers
Branch
Existing Trib 4 to Wickers
Branch
Reference
Reach. Spencer
Creek
Reference Reach
Rockwell Pastures
UT4
Proposed Trib 3 & 4 to
Wickers Branch*
As -built Baseline
(Tributary 3)
As -built Baseline
(Tributary 4)
Stream Type
B6c
E6"
C4
C4
C4
Drainage Area (sq mi)
0.05
0.05
0.5
0.11
0.05
Dimension
Min
I Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
o
Min
Max
Avg
BF Width (ft)
2.55
2.66
2.61
2.90
3.66
3.28
12.30
7.30
3.60
3.58
6.74
4.70
3
3.53
4.29
3.91
2
BF Cress Sectional Area (fl?)
0.40
0.63
0.52
0.83
1.13
0.98
10.80
4.20
1.08
1.16
6.98
3.2
3
1.21
1.23
1.22
2
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.15
0.25
0.20
0.23
0.39
0.31
0.88
0.60
0.30
0.32
1.04
0.59
3
0.29
0.34
0.32
2
BF Max Depth (ft)
0.38
0.45
0.42
0.38
0.65
0.52
1.80
1.10
0.60
0.49
1.53
0.89
3
0.43
0.69
0.56
2
Width/Depth Ratio
10.20
17.73
13.97
7.44
15.91
11.68
13.98
12.60
12.00
6.48
11.19
9.15
3
10.38
14.79
12.59
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.36
1.88
1.62
2.46
4.84
3.65
>2.20
2.70
>2.20
5.12
8.60
7.20
3
4.26
5.50
4.88
2
Wetted Perimeter (ft)
2.83
2.84
2.84
3.26
3.77
3.52
14.13
5.77
4.20
3.59
6.80
5.20
2
3.81
4.42
4.12
2
Hydraulic radius (ft)
0.14
0.22
0.18
0.22
0.35
0.29
0.76
0.76
0.26
0.24
0.72
0.48
2
0.28
0.32
0.3
2
Bank Height Ratio
2.24
3.32
2.78
1.00
1.60
1.30
1.10
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Pool Area/Riffle Area
NIA
N/A
1.17
1.00
8.00
0.52
N/A
Max riffle depth/mean riffle depth
1.9
2.25
2.08
1.68
2.05
1.90
2.00
1.51
1.78
Max pool depth/mean riffle depth
2.15
3.4
2.78
1.13
1.97
1.55
2.38
2.5
8.30
2.64
N/A
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
5
9
7
NIA
24
52
38
3.20
5.70
4.40
N/A*
N/A***
N/A***
Radius of Curvature(ft)
2
8
5
NIA
5
22
13
5
13
9
N/A*
NIA**"
NIA**"
Meander Wavelength
109
312
189
N/A
54
196
125
10.00
17.00
13.60
NIA*
N/A***
NIA*"
Meander Width ratio
2.00
3.31
2.65
N/A
1.95
4.23
3.09
0.40
0.80
0.60
N/A*
N/A***
N/A"*
Meander Length ratio
41.68
119.38
72.24
N/A
4.39
15.93
10.16
1.40
2.30
1.90
N/A*
N/A"*
N/A*'*
Radius of Curvature/Riffle Width (ft)
0.69
3.07
1.88
N/A
0.44
4.23
1.05
0.70
1.70
1.20
N/A*
N/A**"
NIA ­
Pool Length/Riffle Width
6.79
14.39
9.13
3.60
10.09
6.22
0.76
1.94
1.45
N/A
1.11
1.67
NIA*
2.19
2.38
Pool to Pool Spacing/ Riffle Width
14.80
34.66
24.86
5.46
15.70
9.91
1.06
3.78
1.97
2.40
3.30
2.90
5.56
16.11
10.83
11
37
Riffle Length/Riffle Width
2.72
8.58
5.40
5.46
11.16
8.45
0.30
1.84
1.07
N/A
4.44
14.44
9.44
8.64
35.29
Profile
Pool length (ft)
17.7
37.6
23.8
11.8
33.1
20.4
9.3
23.9
17.8
N/A
4.0
6.0
5.0
7.7
17.7
10.3
11
7.6
11.2
9.3
4
Pool spacing (ft)
38.6
90.5
64.9
17.9
51.5
32.5
13.0
46.5
24.2
17.6
24.1
20.8
20.0
58.0
45.3
34.7
88
52
10
140
150
145
4
Riffle length (ft)
7.1
22.4
14.1
17.9
36.62
27.7
3.7
22.6
13.1
N/A
16.0
52.0
34.0
22.2
74.9
40.6
10
133
145
138
3
Riffle slope (ft/ft)
0.011
0.027
0.019
0.008
0.014
0.0095
0.020
0.036
0.026
0.006
0.049
0.028
0.018
0.029
0.02
0.0048
0.0179
0.0115
10
0.007
0.014
0.009
3
Pool slope (ft"t)
0.012
0.013
0.011
0.008
0.009
0.0085
0.000
0.005
0.003
0.008
0.014
0.010
0.018
0.029
0.024
0.0001
0.0048
0.0025
10
0.0001
0.0012
0.0007
4
Run slope(fUft)
0.013
0.034
0.023
0.008
0.030
0.0125
0.028
0.059
0.041
N/A
N/A
N/A""
N/A****
Glide slope (ft/ft)
0.008
0.020
0.012
0.0050
0.0460
0.015
0.000
0.012
0.003
N/A
N/A
N/A'***
N/A****
Riffle Slope/Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.79
1.93
1.36
0.89
1.56
1.06
1.52
2.73
1.97
0.40
3.20
1.80
1.29
2.09
1.69
0.97
0.95
Run slope/Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.93
2.43
1.64
0.87
3.33
1.39
2.12
4.47
3.11
N/A
N/A
N/A""
N/A*"*
Pool Slope/Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.86
0.93
0.79
0.89
0.97
0.94
0.00
0.38
0.23
0.50
0.90
0.60
1.29
2.09
1.69
0.21
0.07
Glide Slope/Avg.Water Surface Slope
0.57
1.43
0.86
0.56
5.11
1.67
0.00
0.91
0.23
NIA
NIA
NIW"'
N/A*'**
Substrate
d50 (mm)
0.04
0.04
8.6
12.70
0.06
16
7.1
3
0.03
4.7
2.4
2
d84 (mm)
0.06
6.16
77.00
38.00
108
5
29
17
3
0.05
14
7
2
Additional Reach Parameters
_
Valley Length (ft)
1184
629
235
NIA
1284
1184
629
Channel Length (ft)
1184
631
266
N/A
1395
1184
631
Valley Slope (ft/ft)
0.0116
0.0164
0.0135
0.0087
0.0122
0.0095
0.0139
0.0173
0.0132
0.0119
0.0097
Water Surface Slope (fUft)
0.0100
0.0176
0.0140
0.0090
0.0090
0.0090
0.0132
0.0156
0.0139
0.0119
0.0095
Sinuosity
1
1
1.1
1.05
1.1
1.0
1.0
• Tributary 3 and 4 - The Pattern of the channel was not altered. Tributary 4 only minimal work consisting of altering dimension was performed.
•' Tributary modified/channelized in past so application of classification of natural channels may not be applicable
"'Note on Tributaries 3 and 4 Pattern Data. These two tributaries are relatively straight channels. Beltwidth, radius of curvature, and other measurements are not applicable.
••** Runs and glides are too short to obtain meaningfull measurements

Table 9a. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Cross Section 1 (Riffle)
Cross Section 2 (Pool)
Cross Section 3 (Riffle)
Cross Section 4 (Pool)
Cross Section 5 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.97
3.93
3.07
5.13
6.09
5.85
4.51
4.57
5.08
5.14
5.31
6.2
4.76
4.27
3.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.38
0.41
0.42
0.78
0.7
0.69
0.68
0.61
0.8
0.72
0.68
0.83
0.32
0.3
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.53
0.51
0.5
1.19
1.21
1.38
1
0.69
1.22
1.33
1.26
1.5
0.79
0.42
0.45
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
1.51
1.62
1.28
3.98
4.27
4.03
3.08
2.8
4.06
3.72
3.59
5.17
1.54
1.7
1.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.45
9.59
7.31
6.58
8.7
8.5
6.63
7.49
6.4
7.14
7.81
7.4
14.87
14.23
11.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
10.06
10.18
16.29
7.79
6.57
8.5
11.1
8.72
9.8
9.7
7.49
8.1
10.5
8.44
13.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.9
1
1
1
1
1
1
Based on current/developing bankfull feature
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft)
d50 (mm)
35.5
32.9
31.2
7.7
6.9
0.8
25.7
32
73
0.03
0.04
0.05
27.3
42.4
1 45
Cross
Section 6 (Riffle)
Cross Section 7 (Pool)
Cross Section
Cross Section
Cross Section
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.39
4.93
4.37
6.59
6.21
9.94
Floodprone Width (ft)
50
50
50
40
40
40
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.39
0.33
0.4
0.49
0.59
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.58
0.5
0.5
0.85
0.92
0.97
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
1.72
1.64
1.73
3.21
3.69
3.98
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.26
14.94
10.97
13.45
10.53
24.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
11.4
7.16
11.4
6.1
6.37
4.02
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
1
1
Based on current/developing current/developingbankfull feature
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft).
d50 (mm)l
13.8
12.9
41
11.2
6.3
0.8

Table 9a. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Cross Section 8 (Pool)
Cross Section 9 (Riffle)
Cross Section 10 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY+
Bankfull Width (ft)
4
4.3
4.2
3.58
3.48
3.3
6.74
6.19
6.61
Floodprone Width (ft)
32
32
40
31
31
32
35
35
33
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.41
0.38
0.33
0.32
0.24
0.31
1.04
0.79
0.84
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.65
0.71
0.6
0.49
0.38
0.49
1.53
1.29
1.22
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
1.66
1.65
1.38
1.16
0.85
1.01
6.98
4.87
5.53
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.78
11.32
12.8
11.19
14.5
10.6
6.48
7.84
7.87
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
7.9
9.31
9.48
8.6
6.89
9.77
5.12
5.1
4.96
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Based on current/developing bankfull feature
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft 2)
d50 (mm)
5.42
0.04
0.03
16
0.04
0.04
0.06
0.04
0.03
Cross Section 11 (Riffle)
Cross Section 12 (Riffle)
Cross Section
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.53
2.98
3.22
4.29
4.17
4.18
Floodprone Width (ft)
19.5
19.5
18
18.3
18.3
24
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.34
0.41
0.35
0.29
0.25
0.28
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.69
0.69
0.62
0.43
0.44
0.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
1.21
1.22
1.12
1.23
1.05
1.19
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.38
7.27
9.2
14.79
16.68
14.93
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5.5
6.39
5.42
4.26
5.4
5.83
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
1
1
1
Based on current/developing bankfull feature
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Sectional Area between end pins (ft 2)
d50 (mm)l
0.03
1 0.03
1 0.03 1
4.7
1 0.03
1 0.03

Table 9b. Stream Reach Data Summary
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Parameter
MY 0
Trib 1A
MY 1
Trib 1A
MY 2
Trib 1A
MY 3 MY 4 MY 5
Trib 1A Trib 1A Trib 1A
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.97
4.76
4.41
3.93
4.93
4.43
3.07
5.08
4.08
Floodprone Width (ft)
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.32
0.68
0.44
0.30
0.61
0.41
0.30
0.80
0.48
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.53
1.00
0.73
0.42
0.69
0.53
0.45
1.22
0.67
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
1.51
3.08
1.96
1.62
2.80
1.94
1.28
4.06
2.09
Width/Depth Ratio
6.63
14.87
10.80
7.49
14.94
11.56
6.40
11.50
9.05
Entrenchment Ratio
10.1
11.4
10.8
7.16
10.18
8.63
9.80
16.29
12.67
'Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
8.2
47
15.7
6.3
46
14.4
10
47
16
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0125
0.475
0.0253
0.007
0.047
0.024
0.006
0.047
0.022
Pool Length (ft)
4.9
17.8
11.3
7.8
17.9
13.1
7.9
18
12.9
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.27
1.78
1.53
1.15
1.92
1.49
1.14
1.8
1.47
Pool Spacing (ft)
13
61
26.6
13.8
60
26.9
12.7
60
27.6
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
18
25
22
18
25
22
18
25
22
Radius of Curvature (ft)
6
20
12
6
20
12
6
20
12
Rc/Bankfull width (ft/ft)
1.36
4.54
2.72
1.35
4.51
2.71
1.47
4.90
2.94
Meander Wavelength (ft)
34
106
50
34
106
50
34
106
50
Meander Width Ratio
5.0
5.0
5.4
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley length (ft)
1285
1285
1285
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1390
1390
1390
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0127
0.0127
0.0127
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0129
0.0129
0.0129
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4Proportion over wide (%)
'
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other

*Note on Tributary 3 Pattern Data. This tributary is a relatively straight channel. Beltwidth, radius of curvature, and other pattern measurements
does not provide meaningfull information
Table 9b. Stream Reach Data Summary
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Parameter
MY 0
Trib 3
MY 1
Trib 3
MY 2
Trib 3
MY 3 MY 4 MY 5
Trib 3 Trib 3 Trib 3
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.58
6.74
4.77
3.48
6.19
4.66
3.30
6.61
4.70
Floodprone Width (ft)
31.00
35.00
32.67
31
35
32.70
32
40
35
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.32
1.04
0.59
0.24
0.79
0.47
0.31
0.84
0.49
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.49
1.53
0.89
0.38
1.29
0.79
0.49
1.22
0.77
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
1.16
6.98
3.27
0.85
4.87
2.45
1.01
5.53
2.64
Width/Depth Ratio
6.48
11.19
9.15
7.84
14.5
11.22
7.87
12.80
10.42
Entrenchment Ratio
5.12
8.60
7.21
5.1
9.31
7.10
4.96
9.77
8.07
'Bank Height Ratio
1
1
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
22.2
74.9
40.6
22.2
74.9
40.6
24
73
43
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.0048
0.0179
0.0115
0.0048
0.019
0.013
0.0048
0.0179
0.0115
Pool Length (ft)
7.7
17.7
10.3
7.6
17.8
10.4
6
12
9.4
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.01
1.97
1.56
1
1.95
1.52
0.9
1.7
1.3
Pool Spacing (ft)
34.7
88
52
34.8
88.1
52
31
84
52
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Rc/Bankfull width (ft/ft)
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Meander Wavelength (ft)
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Meander Width Ratio
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley length (ft)
1184
1184
1184
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1184
1184
1184
Sinuosity (ft)
1.0
1.0
1.0
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0119
0.0119
0.0119
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0119
0.0119
0.0119
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4Proportion over wide (%)
'
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
*Note on Tributary 3 Pattern Data. This tributary is a relatively straight channel. Beltwidth, radius of curvature, and other pattern measurements
does not provide meaningfull information

*Note on Tributary 4 Pattern Data. This tributary is a relatively straight channel. Beltwidth, radius of curvature, and other pattern measurements
does not provide meaningfull information
Table 9b. Stream Reach Data Summary
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Parameter
MY 0
Trib 4
MY 1
Trib 4
MY 2
Trib 4
MY 3 MY 4 MY 5
Trib 4 Trib 4 Trib 4
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg
Min
Max
Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg Min Max Avg
Bankfull Width (ft)
3.53
4.29
3.91
2.98
4.17
3.57
3.57
4.17
2.98
Floodprone Width (ft)
18.30
19.50
18.90
18.3
19.5
18.9
18.9
19.5
18.3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.29
0.34
0.32
0.25
0.41
0.33
0.33
0.41
0.25
'Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.43
0.69
0.56
0.44
0.69
0.56
0.56
0.69
0.44
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (fe)
1.21
1.23
1.22
1.05
1.22
1.13
1.13
1.22
1.05
Width/Depth Ratio
10.38
14.79
12.59
7.27
16.68
11.97
11.97
16.68
7.27
Entrenchment Ratio
4.26
5.50
4.88
5.4
6.39
5.89
5.89
6.39
5.40
'Bank Height Ratio
Profile
1
1
1
Riffle Length (ft)
133
145
138
130
145
136
140
160
148
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.007
0.014
0.009
0.006
0.014
0.009
0.006
0.014
0.009
Pool Length (ft)
7.6
11.2
9.3
7.4
11.1
9.2
7.1
13
10.6
Pool Max depth (ft)
1.39
2.35
1.78
1.37
2.35
1.77
1.18
1.79
1.46
Pool Spacing (ft)
140
150
145
140
150
145
140
150
145
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Rc/Bankfull width (ft/ft)
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Meander Wavelength (ft)
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Meander Width Ratio
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
N/A*
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
Valley length (ft)
631
631
631
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
631
631
631
Sinuosity (ft)
1.0
1.0
1.0
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.00972
0.00972
0.00972
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0095
0.0095
0.0095
3Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
4Proportion over wide (%
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
*Note on Tributary 4 Pattern Data. This tributary is a relatively straight channel. Beltwidth, radius of curvature, and other pattern measurements
does not provide meaningfull information

APPENDIX E: HYDROLOGIC DATA
Table 10 — Verification of Bankfull Events
Tributaries to Wickers Branch Stream Restoration Site
Year 2 (2016) Monitoring Report
DMS Project No. 95022

Table 10. Documentation of Geomorphologically Significant Flow Events
Tributaries of Wicker Branch Stream Restoration/ DMS No. 95022
Greater Than
Date of Date of Qgs=Q2*0.66 Greater than Qbkf
Observation occurrence Method Stage Stage?
Notes
Photo on-site
12/3/2014 11/23/2014 wrack line Yes
See photo below
Wrack -Lin*:
i