20130653 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_2016__20170224

MUDDY RUN II STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
PROJECT
MONITORING REPORT
MONITORING YEAR 3
DUPLIN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
CONTRACT No. 004632 - PROJECT # 95354
Prepared for:
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
January 2017

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 3 Monitoring Report• Duplin County, North Carolina • January 2017
Muddy Run II
Duplin County, North Carolina
DMS Project ID 95354
Cape Fear River Basin
HUC 0030007060010
Prepared by:
fires
Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-829-9909
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC ii

Muddy Run H Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 3 Monitoring Report- Duplin County, North Carolina • January 2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration Project is located within an agricultural
watershed in Duplin County, North Carolina, approximately six miles south of Beulaville. The stream
channels were heavily impacted by channelization and agricultural practices. The project involved the
restoration and protection of streams in the Muddy Creek watershed. The purpose of this restoration
project was to restore and enhance a stream/wetland complex located within the Cape Fear River
Basin.
The project lies within USGS Hydrologic Unit Code 03030007060010 (USGS, 1998) and within the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Cape Fear River Subbasin 03-06-22
(NCDENR, 2002). The project consists of six unnamed tributaries to Muddy Creek, but the project
has been divided into nine distinct reaches for design purposes. Reach 1 is one of the upstream -most
portions of the project; it begins on the edge of an existing agricultural field and extends to STA
04+48. Similarly, Reach 2 is one of the upper -most portions of the stream project. It begins in a
disturbed forest corridor between several agricultural fields and extends to STA 19+14. Reach 3a
starts at the confluence of Reaches 1 and 2 (STA 00+00) and flows north north-west through a
disturbed hardwood buffer and several agricultural fields before being partially diverted to enter
Reach 3b near STA 37+23. Reach 3b flows to the north and west where it flows into Reach 3c at STA
57+92. Reach 3c flows through a pine plantation to STA 65+30, where it flows into Reach 3 of the
Muddy Run project. Reach 4 is a perennial channel that flows through a forested area from a ditch
draining an agricultural field. Reach 4 flows into Reach 3A at STA 18+76. Reach 5a consists of the
main stem beginning at STA 00+00 where it adjoins with Reach 1C of the Muddy Run project. Reach
5a flows north and flows into Reach 5b at STA 19+59. Reach 5b is the most downstream reach of the
project, ending at the right-of-way for State Highway 41. Reach 6 begins in a forested area south of
Reach 5 and flows in a northerly direction to the confluence with Reach 5a near STA 9+20. Two
areas containing drained hydric soil were identified for restoration, located along Reach 3b and Reach
5a.
This Year 3 Annual Monitoring Report presents the data from 28 vegetation monitoring plots, four
manual crest gauges, four auto crest gauges, an auto -logging rain gauge, seven wetland restoration
groundwater gauges, three reference groundwater gauges, 59 stream cross sections, 20 sets of bank
pins, and photo reference locations, as required by the approved Mitigation Plan for the site.
The Muddy Run II Year 3 morphological, vegetation, and visual assessment monitoring activities
were completed in November 2016. All Year 3 monitoring data is presented below and in the
appendices. Data presented shows the site has one area of bank erosion along Reach 5A and one area
of low planted stem densities; however, the site meets stream, wetland and vegetation interim success
criteria.
Throughout the Year 3 monitoring season, the restored stream channel remained stable and continued
to provide the intended habitat and hydrologic functions. Minimal changes were noticed for most
Year 3 cross section surveys resulting from stable bed and bank conditions. Bankfull events were
observed during Year 3 monitoring activities on all four crest gauges. During several site visits
throughout Year 3, each stream reach was noted to be flowing during normal conditions.
One stream problem area was observed during the Year 3 monitoring period. The problem area
observed during Year 3 monitoring activities consists of minor right bank erosion on Reach 5A.
Stream problem areas identified during MY2 have been addressed through the adaptive management
plan implemented in early 2016 and are now performing as designed. All repaired areas are stable
and vegetation cover is establishing well in these areas.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC iii

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 3 Monitoring Report- Duplin County, North Carolina • January 2017
All seven wetland gauges achieved the success criteria by remaining continuously within 12 inches of
the soil surface for at least nine percent of the growing season. Groundwater gauge data indicates the
hydroperiods being very responsive to rainfall events.
The Year 3 vegetation monitoring observations for the Muddy Run II Site are summarized in this
report. Planted -stem survival for 27 of the 28 Vegetation Plots (VP) at Muddy Run was above the
interim success criterion of 320 trees per acre at the end of Monitoring Year 3. The average stem
density (excluding live stakes) across all vegetation plots was 645 stems per acre. Volunteers were
noted in five plots and are outlined in the Vegetation Plot data. One vegetation problem area noted
during Monitoring Year 3 resulted from low stem densities, having stem counts less than the MY3
vegetative success criteria of 320 stems/acre. Vegetation problem areas noted during MY2 were
addressed during 2016-MY3 through invasive species management and supplemental planting
performed in April and October. The Muddy Run II Site has met the Year 3 vegetation survival
success criterion of 320 trees per acre as specified in the Mitigation Plan.
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC iv

Muddy Run H Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 3 Monitoring Report- Duplin County, North Carolina • January 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND AND ATTRIBUTES........................................................ 3
1.1 Location and Setting...............................................................................................................
3
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives..................................................................................................3
1.3 Project Structure.....................................................................................................................
4
1.3.1 Restoration Type and Approach.....................................................................................4
1.4 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data.........................................................................
7
1.4.1 Project History................................................................................................................
7
1.4.2 Project Watersheds.........................................................................................................
7
2 SUCCESS CRITERIA...................................................................................................................
8
2.1 Stream Restoration.................................................................................................................
8
2.1.1 Bankfull Events..............................................................................................................
8
2.1.2 Cross Sections................................................................................................................
8
2.1.3 Digital Image Stations....................................................................................................
8
2.2 Wetland Restoration...............................................................................................................
8
2.3 Vegetation..............................................................................................................................
9
2.4 Scheduling/Reporting.............................................................................................................9
3 MONITORING PLAN...................................................................................................................
9
3.1 Stream Restoration.................................................................................................................
9
3.1.1 As -Built Survey..............................................................................................................
9
3.1.2 Bankfull Events..............................................................................................................
9
3.1.3 Cross Sections..............................................................................................................10
3.1.4 Digital Image Stations..................................................................................................10
3.1.5 Bank Pin Arrays...........................................................................................................10
3.1.6 Visual Assessment Monitoring.....................................................................................10
3.1.7 Surface Flow.................................................................................................................
11
3.2 Wetland Hydrology..............................................................................................................11
3.3 Vegetation............................................................................................................................11
4 Maintenance and Contingency plan.............................................................................................
11
4.1 Stream...................................................................................................................................11
4.2 Wetlands...............................................................................................................................11
4.3 Vegetation............................................................................................................................12
5 YEAR 3 MONITORING CONDITIONS (MY3)........................................................................
12
5.1 Year 3 Monitoring Data Collection......................................................................................12
5.1.1 Morphological State of the Channel.............................................................................12
5.1.2 Vegetation.....................................................................................................................13
5.1.3 Photo Documentation...................................................................................................13
5.1.4 Stream Hydrology........................................................................................................13
5.1.5 Wetland Hydrology......................................................................................................13
6 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................
14
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC v

Muddy Run H Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 3 Monitoring Report- Duplin County, North Carolina • January 2017
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Project Background Data and Maps
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Project USGS Map
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3. Current Conditions Plan View Map (CCPV)
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Table 7. Stream Problem Areas
Table 8. Vegetation Problem Areas
Stream Photos
Vegetation Photos
Stream and Vegetation Problem Photos
Stream and Vegetation Remedial Action Repairs/Maintenance Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 9a. Planted Stem Count Summary
Table 9b. Planted Species Totals
Table 9c. Planted Stem Counts (Species by Plot)
Appendix D. Stream Geomorphology Data
Table 10. Morphological Parameters Summary Data
Table 11. Dimensional Morphology Summary — Cross Sections Data
Table 12. Bank Pin Array Summary Data
Cross Section Plots
Appendix E. Hydrology Data
Table 13. Documentation of Geomorphologically Significant Flow Events
Table 14. Rainfall Summary
Table 15a. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
Table 15b. Wetland Hydrology Gauge Summary
Chart 1. 2016 Precipitation Data for Muddy Run II Site
Chart 2. 2016 Groundwater Monitoring Gauge Hydrographs
Crest Gauge Verification Photos
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC vi

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 3 Monitoring Report• Duplin County, North Carolina • January 2017
l PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND AND ATTRIBUTES
1.1 Location and Setting
The Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration Site ("Site") is located in Duplin County
approximately 1.4 miles east of Chinquapin, NC (Figure 1). The project is in the Cape Fear River
Basin (8 -digit USGS HUC 03030007, 14 -digit USGS HUC 0303007060010) (USGS, 1998) and the
NCDWQ Cape Fear 03-06-22 sub -basin (NCDWQ, 2002). To access the Site from the town of
Chinquapin, travel east on Highway 50, take the first left onto Pickett Bay Road (SR 1819), go 1.1
miles, then turn left onto Kenney Crawley Road. This private road is gravel and will split just past the
residential house on the right. Keeping to the left will take you to the Reaches 3b, 3c, 5b, and 6.
Going to the right at the split will take you to Reaches 1, 2, 3a, and 4.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
The Muddy Run II stream and wetland mitigation project will provide numerous ecological and water
quality benefits within the Cape Fear River Basin. While many of these benefits are limited to the
project area, others, such as pollutant removal and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have more
far-reaching effects. Expected improvements to water quality, hydrology, and habitat are outlined
below.
Design Goals and Objectives
Benefits Related to Water Quality
Benefit will be achieved through filtering of runoff from adjacent CAFOs through buffer areas, the
Nutrient removal
conversion of active farm fields to forested buffers, improved denitrification and nutrient uptake
through buffer zones, and installation of BMPs at the headwaters of selected reaches and ditch outlets.
Benefit will be achieved through the stabilization of eroding stream banks and reduction of sediment
Sediment removal
loss from field areas due to lack of vegetative cover. Channel velocities will also be decreased through
a reduction in slope, therefore decreasing erosive forces.
Increase dissolved oxygen
Benefit will be achieved through the construction of instream structures to increase turbulence and
concentration
dissolved oxygen concentrations and lower water temperature to increase dissolved oxygen capacity.
Runoff filtration
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of buffer areas that will receive and filter runoff,
thereby reducing nutrients and sediment concentrations reaching water bodies downstream.
Benefits to Flood Attenuation
Water storage
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of buffer areas which will infiltrate more water during
precipitation events than under current site conditions.
Improved groundwater
Benefit will be achieved through the increased storage of precipitation in buffer areas, ephemeral
recharge
depressions, and reconnection of existing floodplain. Greater storage of water will lead to improved
infiltration and groundwater recharge.
Improved/restored
Benefit will be achieved by restoring the stream to a natural meandering pattern with an appropriately
hydrologic connections
sized channel, such that the channel's floodplain will be flooded more frequently at flows greater than
the bankfull stage.
Benefits Related to Ecological Processes
Restoration of habitats
Benefit will be achieved by restoring riparian buffer habitat to appropriate bottomland hardwood
ecosystem.
Improved substrate and
Benefit will be achieved through the construction of instream structures designed to improve bedform
instream cover
diversity and to trap detritus. Substrate will become more coarse as a result of the stabilization of
stream banks and an overall decrease in the amount of fine materials deposited in the stream.
Resource Environmental Solutions.

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 3 Monitoring Report• Duplin County, North Carolina • January 2017
Addition of large woody
Benefit will be achieved through the addition of wood structures as part of the restoration design.
debris
Such structures may include log vanes, root wads, and log weirs.
Reduced temperature of
water due to shading
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of canopy tree species to the stream buffer areas.
Restoration of terrestrial
habitat
Benefit will be achieved through the restoration of riparian buffer bottomland hardwood habitats.
1.3 Project Structure
Table 1. Muddy Run II Project Components- Stream Mitigation
Reach 4
P 1 Restoration
As -Built
Existing
As -Built
Mitigation
173
Reach
Mitigation Type
Stationing
Length
Length
Ratio
SMUs
Reach 5b
Enhancement II
19+59 to 23+68
(LF)
(LF)
1:2.5
164
Reach 1
Headwater Valley
0+00 to 4+48
438
398
1:1
398
Reach 2
Headwater Valley
0+00 to 5+04
504
504
1:1
504
Reach 2
P1 Restoration
5+04 to 19+14
1,223
1,410
1:1
1,410
Reach 3a
P1 Restoration
0+00 to 37+23
3,301
3,586
1:1
3,586
Reach 3b
P1 Restoration
37+23 to 57+92
NA
1,979
1:1
1,979
Reach 3c
Enhancement I
57+92 to 65+30
737
708
1:1.5
472
Reach 4
P 1 Restoration
0+44 to 2+17
120
173
1:1
173
Reach 5a
P1 Restoration
0+00 to 19+59
1,602
1,926
1:1
1,926
Reach 5b
Enhancement II
19+59 to 23+68
401
409
1:2.5
164
Reach 6
Enhancement II
9+02 to 12+19
317
318
1:2.5
127
8,643
11,411
10,739
Table 2. Muddv Run II Proiect Comuonents — Wetland MitiLyation
Wetland Mitigation Type
Mitigation
Area (ac)
MitigationWMUs
Ratio
WA Restoration
3.60
1:1
3.60
WB Restoration
1.32
1:1
1.32
Total
4.92
4.92
1.3.1 Restoration Type and Approach
Reach 1
Headwater valley restoration approach was performed along Reach 1. The existing channel/ditch was
backfilled, and flow has been directed from its current position along the tree line back to within the
historic valley location down to the confluence with Reaches 2 and 3a. A 100 foot wide forested
buffer has been planted throughout the reach. The upstream limit of Reach 1 ties into an existing
headwater valley system comprised of intermittent sections of single and multiple channels. This
Resource Environmental Solutions. 4

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 3 Monitoring Report• Duplin County, North Carolina • January 2017
system will be used as a reference site for incorporating a small baseflow channel into the headwater
valley restoration design.
Reach 2
Similar to Reach 1, headwater valley restoration was performed along the upper section of Reach 2.
The existing channel was backfilled with existing spoil material located along the channel, a result of
previous dredging activities. Areas within the 100 foot buffer that were disturbed or lack riparian
vegetation were planted. Grade control structures were installed along three ditches that enter Reach 2
at the upstream end of the project. These structures raised the upstream channel bed elevations
slightly to tie into existing ditches to the project reach. An existing CMP culvert located along the
upstream section was removed and replaced outside the easement (upstream) to continue to allow the
landowner access to all areas of his property. Priority 1 restoration was performed for the majority of
Reach 2. Restoration activities involved relocating the channel to the north through an existing
wooded area consisting primarily of pines and a few hardwoods. Existing spoil piles located along the
channel banks were removed and used to fill the existing ditch. Diffuse flow structures have been
installed along several ditches that outlet to the reach from both the north and south. The structures
will attenuate and disperse flows as the existing ditches enter the proposed easement.
Reach 3a
Priority Level I restoration was performed on Reach 3a. The restoration approach on this reach
included relocating the channel on either side of its current location to follow the natural valley and
removing the adjacent roadbed to allow continuous access to the floodplain. Two existing 36" CMP
culvert crossings were located along this reach. Each culvert was removed and replaced in-line with
the proposed stream to allow the landowners to access portions of their respective properties to the
west of the project site. Reach 3a now flows in a northwesterly direction until it reaches a property
line. At this point, the existing ditch that continued to flow in a northerly direction was plugged and a
diversion structure was installed. The structure is designed to pass 100 percent of baseflow and small
storms through the project, and divert up to 70 percent of storms larger than the 25 -yr storm to the
existing ditch and offsite. See Section 7.3.1.1 (Stream Hydrologic Analysis) for hydraulic analysis
details.
Just downstream of the diversion structure, the channel was relocated south of several turkey houses,
and now flows in a westerly direction as Reach 3b. The network of ditches surrounding the turkey
houses appear to cross a small ridge, directing flow away from the project area. An additional culvert
crossing was constructed where flow will be diverted to the west at the turkey houses. Priority I
restoration is appropriate for this channel because it is the only mitigation approach that addresses bed
and bank instability, establishes a forested riparian buffer, and significantly enhances aquatic habitat.
Diffuse flow structures were constructed where existing agricultural ditches enter the easement area.
The diversion structure was constructed at the downstream end of Reach 3a to alleviate and prevent
flooding caused by rerouting flow and increased drainage areas, to provide continued flow through
the existing ditch for storms larger than bankfull (design) events, and to reduce impacts from
proposed grading activities. Per discussions with Mr. Lanier (owner of parcel northwest of proposed
structure), larger storm events overtop the existing ditch flowing to the north. This flooding may be
attributed to inefficiencies with existing structures and ditch alignments in conjunction with low
gradients. The culvert associated with the gravel access road that leads from Ludie Brown Road to the
turkey houses outlets perpendicular to the receiving ditch that flows to the northeast and under Ludie
Brown Road. This ditch continues to the northeast and crosses Route 111, where it flows to the north
into Muddy Creek. By diverting up to 70 percent of higher flows through the existing ditch and
offsite, existing flooding issues will be reduced adjacent to the turkey houses. This diversion also
decreases potential flooding impacts that would occur if 100 percent of storm events were passed
Resource Environmental Solutions.

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 3 Monitoring Report• Duplin County, North Carolina • January 2017
through the proposed channel, Reach 3b. There are several residential parcels within zero to 200 feet
of the proposed easement along Reach 3b. Because the topography is very flat through this area, the
flooding associated with the majority of storm events greater than bankfull would negatively impact
these parcels.
Finally, by diverting a percentage of the proposed higher flows, flooding impacts will also be reduced
along Reaches 5a and 5b and at the existing HWY 41 culvert at the downstream end of the project.
Currently, agricultural fields are present along the north side of Reach 5a. By reducing high flows, the
flooding extent and duration will be reduced; thus, preventing adverse impacts to crops. If 100
percent of higher storm events were allowed to pass through the project, significant grading would be
required to cut floodplain terraces/benches to relieve flooding of the adjacent agricultural fields.
Approximately 1,611 LF of the existing ditch that flows to the north from the Reach 3a/3b diversion
structure will be impacted (dewatered). This length includes the segment of the ditch from the
diversion structure downstream to the Muddy Creek floodplain. The channel impacts resulting from
the proposed channel relocation will be addressed in the ensuing NWP application.
Reach 3b
Priority Level I restoration was performed on Reach 3b. The restoration approach on this reach
included relocating the channel in a westerly direction through an open pasture. The pasture area has
been extensively modified and substantial grading was required. The design then moves the channel
to a historic drainage way as observed on LiDAR and historical aerial photographs. The flow path is
now connected to a small relic channel identified in the forested area west of the pasture. Subsequent
topographic survey confirmed positive drainage along the relic channel which follows a low lying
feature observed on LiDAR. The restoration approach included some minor grading to enlarge the
existing channel and to create a diverse bed habitat by constructing pools. Log grade control
structures were installed at the confluence with Reach 3c and at the connection to the relic channel.
Small, mechanical equipment and hand tools were used to minimize damage to the existing forested
buffer. A livestock protected culvert crossing was constructed near the existing pasture along an
existing farm path to allow the landowner uninterrupted access to his property.
Reach 3c
Enhancement I was performed on Reach 3c as it flows through a forested area downstream from
Reach 3b to Reach 3 of the Muddy Run Stream Mitigation Project. A grade control structure was
installed at the upstream end to stabilize the transition from an existing agricultural ditch to the stable
channel. A crossing was constructed along the upper section to allow the landowner access to both
sides of his property. Enhancement activities included removing portions of existing spoil piles
located along top of banks, cutting floodplain benches and laying back banks, and installing woody
debris habitat structures. Diffuse flow structures were also constructed at the downstream limit where
existing agricultural ditches enter the easement area. Invasive species management was performed
throughout the buffer, and any bare or disturbed areas were planted with native riparian vegetation.
Reach 4
Priority 1 restoration was performed on the downstream end of Reach 4 as it flows through a forested
area below a ditch draining an agricultural field. A grade control structure was installed at the
upstream end to transition from the existing ditch to a stable channel. The lower section of the reach
was constructed into an E -type channel before its confluence with Reach 3a. Invasive species
management was performed throughout the buffer, and any bare or disturbed areas were planted with
native riparian vegetation.
Resource Environmental Solutions.

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 3 Monitoring Report• Duplin County, North Carolina • January 2017
Reach 5a
Priority Level I restoration was performed on Reach 5a. The channel was relocated north of its
current location into the adjacent agricultural field. The existing ditch was backfilled and plugged at
any locations that may cross the proposed channel. The upstream end of the reach ties into Reach IC
of the Muddy Run Stream Mitigation Project. The single -thread channel will flows through proposed
wetland WB beginning approximately 300 feet downstream of the Muddy Run project. A CMP
culvert crossing was installed in-line with the proposed design near the middle of the reach to allow
the landowners access to the adjacent parcels. Priority I restoration is appropriate for this channel
because it is the only mitigation approach that addresses bed and bank instability, establishes a
forested riparian buffer, and significantly enhances aquatic habitat.
Reach 5b
Enhancement Level II was performed on Reach 5b. Several log grade controls and woody debris
structures were installed along the bed to increase aquatic habitat and bed diversity. The right bank
along the reach was laid back and spoil piles along the tops of banks were removed using small
equipment to minimize impacts to the existing buffer. Additionally, invasive species management
was performed throughout the buffer, and any bare or disturbed areas were planted with native
riparian vegetation.
Reach 6
Enhancement Level II was performed on the downstream section of Reach 6 (STA 9+02 to STA
12+19). The right and left banks were laid back, and the channel was backfilled using spoil located
adjacent to the channel such that positive drainage is maintained throughout the reach down to the
confluence with Reach 5a. Invasive species management was performed throughout the buffer where
enhancement took place, and any bare or disturbed areas were planted with native riparian vegetation.
A 50 foot wide buffer was provided along the upper section of Reach 6 (STA 0+00 to STA 9+02);
however, no enhancement activities were performed through this section other than filling portions of
the channel. This additional easement was provided to account for any hydrologic impacts that may
occur as a result of the proposed enhancement activities.
1.4 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data
1.4.1 Project History
The Site was restored by Environmental Banc & Exchange, LLC (EBX) through a full -delivery
contract awarded by NCDMS in 2011. EBX was acquired by Resource Environmental Solutions,
LLC (RES) in 2014 and now oversees the project tasks. Tables 2, 3, and 4 in Appendix A provide a
time sequence and information pertaining to the project activities, history, contacts, and baseline
information.
1.4.2 Project Watersheds
The easement totals 37.6 acres and is broken into nine reaches. Reach 1 has a drainage area of 68
acres; it begins at the start of the restoration project (STA 0+00) and extends west to STA 4+48.
Reach 2 has a drainage area of 114 acres; it begins at STA 0+00 and extends to STA 19+14. Reach 3a
(Sta. 0+00 to 37+23) begins at the confluence of Reaches I and 2 and has a drainage area of 227
acres. Reach 3b has a drainage area of 333 acres and flows west into Reach 3c; it begins at STA
37+23 and extends to STA 57+92. Reach 3c has a drainage area of 370 acres extending north to south
and flows into Reach 3 of the Muddy Run project; it begins at STA 57+92 and extends to STA
65+30. Reach 4 has a drainage area of 46 acres and flows from the east into Reach 3a; it begins at
STA 0+44 and extends to STA STA 2+17. Reach 5a begins at the downstream limit of the Muddy
Resource Environmental Solutions.

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 3 Monitoring Report• Duplin County, North Carolina • January 2017
Run project, flows into Reach 5b, and has a drainage area of 774 acres; it begins at STA 0+00 and
extends to STA 19+59. Reach 5b has a drainage area of 908 acres; it starts at STA 19+59 and extends
to STA 23+68. Reach 6 has a drainage area of 318 acres and flows from the south into Reach 5a; it
starts at STA 9+02 and extends to STA 12+19 (Figure 2). The land use in the project watershed is
approximately 38 percent cultivated, 32 percent evergreen forest, 15 percent shrub/scrub, 6 percent
bottomland forest/hardwood swamp, 5 percent mixed forest, 2 percent developed, and 2 percent
managed herbaceous cover.
2 SUCCESS CRITERIA
The success criteria for the Site stream restoration will follow accepted and approved success criteria
presented in the USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines and subsequent NCDMS and agency
guidance. Specific success criteria components are presented below.
2.1 Stream Restoration
2.1.1 Bankfull Events
Two bankfull flow events must be documented within the five-year monitoring period. The two
bankfull events must occur in separate years. Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until
two bankfull events have been documented in separate years. Bankfull events will be documented
using crest gauges, auto -logging crest gauges, photographs, and visual assessments for evidence of
debris rack lines.
2.1.2 Cross Sections
There should be little change in as -built cross-sections. If changes do take place, they should be
evaluated to determine if they represent a movement toward a less stable condition (for example
down -cutting or erosion), or are minor changes that represent an increase in stability (for example
settling, vegetative changes, deposition along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio). Cross-
sections shall be classified using the Rosgen stream classification method, and all monitored cross-
sections should fall within the quantitative parameters defined for channels of the design stream type.
2.1.3 Digital Image Stations
Digital images will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion,
success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures. Longitudinal images
should not indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or an excessive increase in
channel depth. Lateral images should not indicate excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the
banks over time. A series of images over time should indicate successional maturation of riparian
vegetation.
2.2 Wetland Restoration
The NRCS does not have a current WETS table for Duplin County upon which to base a normal
rainfall amount and average growing season. The closest comparable data was determined to be from
Sampson County. The growing season for Sampson County is 242 days long, extending from March
17 to November 14, and is based on a daily minimum temperature greater than 28 degrees Fahrenheit
occurring in five of ten years.
Because of the surface roughing and shallow depressions, a range of hydroperiods are expected. The
water balance indicates that the site will have a positive water balance in the early part of the growing
Resource Environmental Solutions.

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 3 Monitoring Report• Duplin County, North Carolina • January 2017
season for four to five weeks, on average. The hydrology success criterion for the site is to restore the
water table at the site so that it will remain continuously within 12 inches of the soil surface for at
least nine percent of the growing season (approximately 22 days) at each groundwater gauge location
during normal rainfall years. Overbank flooding events will provide additional inputs that may extend
the hydroperiod in some years.
Gauge data will be compared to reference wetland well data in growing seasons with less than normal
rainfall. In periods of low rainfall, if a restoration gauge hydroperiod exceeds the reference gauge
hydroperiod, and both exceed five percent of the growing season, then the gauge will be deemed
successful. If a gauge location fails to meet these success criteria in the five year monitoring period,
then monitoring may be extended, remedial actions may be undertaken, or the limits of wetland
restoration will be determined.
2.3 Vegetation
Specific and measurable success criteria for plant density within the riparian buffers on the site will
follow NCDMS Guidance. Vegetation monitoring plots are 0.02 acres in size, and cover greater than
two percent of the planted area. Vegetation monitoring will occur annually in the fall of each year.
The interim measures of vegetative success for the site will be the survival of at least 320 three-year-
old trees per acre at the end of Year 3, and the final vegetative success criteria will be 260 trees per
acre at the end of Year 5. Invasive species on the site will be monitored and controlled if necessary
throughout the required vegetation monitoring period.
2.4 Scheduling/Reporting
The monitoring program will be implemented to document system development and progress toward
achieving the success criteria. The restored stream morphology will be assessed to determine the
success of the mitigation. The monitoring program will be undertaken for five years or until the final
success criteria are achieved, whichever is longer.
Monitoring reports will be prepared in the fall of each year of monitoring and submitted to NCDMS.
The monitoring reports will include all information, and will be in the format required by NCDMS in
Version 2.0 of the NCDMS Monitoring Report Template.
3 MONITORING PLAN
Annual monitoring shall be conducted for stream, wetland, and vegetation monitoring parameters as
noted below for five years prior to completion of construction or until success criteria have been met.
3.1 Stream Restoration
3.1.1 As -Built Survey
An as -built survey was conducted following construction to document channel size, condition, and
location. The survey includes a complete profile of thalweg, top of bank, and in stream channel
structures to compare with future geomorphic data. Longitudinal profiles will not be required in
annual monitoring reports unless requested by NCDMS or USACE.
3.1.2 Bankfull Events
Four sets of manual and auto -logging crest gauges were installed on the site, one along Reach 2, one
along Reach 3a, one along Reach 3b, and one along Reach 5a. The auto logging crest gauges were
installed within the channel and will continuously record flow conditions at an hourly interval.
Resource Environmental Solutions.

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 3 Monitoring Report• Duplin County, North Carolina • January 2017
Manual crest gauges were installed on the bank at bankfull elevation. Crest gauges will be checked
during each site visit to determine if a bankfull event has occurred since the last site visit. Crest gauge
readings and debris rack lines will be photographed to document evidence of bankfull events.
3.1.3 Cross Sections
A total of 59 permanent cross sections were installed to monitor channel dimensions and stability.
Four cross sections were installed along Reach 1 and ten cross sections were installed along Reach 2.
There were 21 cross sections (nine runs, nine pools, and three riffles) installed along Reach 3A and
six cross sections installed along Reach 3B. Four cross sections were installed along Reach 3C and
two cross sections were installed along Reach 4. Reach 5A had eight cross sections installed, while
Reach 5B and 6 each had two cross sections installed. Cross sections were typically located at
representative shallow and pool sections along each stream reach. Each cross section was
permanently marked with 3/8 rebar pin to establish a monument location at each end. A marker pole
was also installed at both ends of each cross section to allow ease locating during monitoring
activities. Cross section surveys will be performed once a year during annual monitoring and will
include all breaks in slope including top of bank, bottom of bank, streambed, edge of water, and
thalweg.
3.1.4 Digital Image Stations
Digital photographs will be taken at least once a year to visually document stream and vegetation
conditions. This monitoring practice will continue for five years following construction and planting.
Permanent photo point locations at cross sections and vegetation plots have been established so that
the same directional view and location may be repeated each monitoring year. Monitoring
photographs will also be used to document any stream and vegetation problematic areas such as
erosion, stream and bank instability, easement encroachment and vegetation damage.
3.1.5 Bank Pin Arrays
Twenty bank pin arrays have been installed at cross sections located on meander pools. These bank
pin arrays were installed along the upstream and downstream third of the meander. Bank pins are a
minimum of three feet long, and have been installed just above the water surface and every two feet
above the lowest pin. Bank pin exposure will be recorded at each monitoring event, and the exposed
pin will be driven flush with the bank.
3.1.6 Visual Assessment Monitoring
Visual monitoring of all mitigation areas will be conducted a minimum of twice per monitoring year
by qualified individuals. The visual assessments will include vegetation density, vigor, invasive
species, and easement encroachments. Visual assessments of stream stability will include a complete
stream walk and structure inspection. Digital images will be taken at fixed representative locations to
record each monitoring event as well as any noted problem areas or areas of concern. Results of
visual monitoring will be presented in a plan view exhibit with a brief description of problem areas
and digital images. Photographs will be used to subjectively evaluate channel aggradation or
degradation, bank erosion, success of riparian vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control
measures. Longitudinal photos should indicate the absence of developing bars within the channel or
an excessive increase in channel depth. Lateral photos should not indicate excessive erosion or
continuing degradation of the banks over time. A series of photos over time should indicate
successional maturation of riparian vegetation.
Resource Environmental Solutions. 10

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 3 Monitoring Report• Duplin County, North Carolina • January 2017
3.1.7 Surface Flow
Headwater valley restoration areas will be monitored to document intermittent or seasonal surface
flow. This will be accomplished through direct observation, photo documentation of hydrology
conditions, and dye tests if necessary.
3.2 Wetland Hydrology
Wetland hydrology will be monitored to document hydric conditions in the wetland restoration areas.
Seven automatic recording pressure transducer gauges were installed in representative locations
across the restoration areas and an additional three gauges were installed in reference wetlands. The
gauges will be downloaded quarterly and wetland hydroperiods will be calculated during the growing
season. Gauge installation followed current regulatory and NCDMS guidance. Visual observations of
primary and secondary wetland hydrology indicators will also be recorded during quarterly site visits.
3.3 Vegetation
A total of 28 vegetation plots were randomly established within the planted stream riparian buffer
easement. Each vegetation plot measures 22 feet by 40 feet (0.02 acres) and has all four corners
marked with PVC posts. Planted woody vegetation was assessed within each plot to establish a
baseline dataset. Within each vegetation plot, each planted stem was identified for species, "X" and
"Y" origin located, and measured for height. Reference digital photographs were also captured to
document baseline conditions. Species composition, density, growth patterns, damaged stems, and
survival ratios will be measured and reported on an annual basis. Vegetation plot data will be reported
for each plot as well as an overall site average.
4 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLAN
All identified problematic areas or areas of concern such as stream bank erosion/instability,
aggradation/degradation, lack of targeted vegetation, and invasive/exotic species which prevent the
site from meeting performance success criteria will be evaluated on a case by case basis. These areas
will be documented and adaptive management will be discussed with NCDMS staff. If it is
determined remedial action is required, a plan will be provided.
4.1 Stream
During the Year 3 monitoring activities, one stream problem area was documented. This area (SPA1)
is located on Reach 5A at station 17+40 and consists of minor bank erosion on the right stream bank.
This area is mapped on the CCPV figure in Appendix B. Stream problem area 1 (SPAT) is not
severe enough to require repair. RES will continue to monitor this area to observe if it gets worse and
requires any repair. Stream problem areas identified during MY2 were inspected during MY3
activities and are no longer problem areas. The adaptive management plan presented in the MY2
report was implemented in early 2016 to repair multiple problem areas along stream reaches 3B and
5A. It should be noted that the repaired areas are stable and performing as designed. The IRT and
DMS performed a site visit in late April 2016 to inspect repairs and were satisfied with the site.
4.2 Wetlands
No wetland problem areas were noted during the Year 3 monitoring period. During the 2016 growing
season, all seven wells recorded water continuously within 12 inches of the soil surface for at least
nine percent of the growing season. If any wetland problem areas are noted in the future, they will be
documented and mapped on the Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV) as part of the annual stream
and wetland monitoring report. Detailed wetland hydrology data is provided in Appendix E.
Resource Environmental Solutions. 11

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 3 Monitoring Report• Duplin County, North Carolina • January 2017
4.3 Vegetation
One vegetation problem area was identified during monitoring Year 3 activities and is mapped on the
CCPV figures. The problem area (VPA1) was noted for low stem densities, having stem counts less
than the MY3 vegetative success criteria of 320 stems/acre. It should be noted that this area meets
requirements when considering volunteer species towards the success criteria survival. During last
year's 2015 monitoring activities, eight vegetation problem areas were identified. Invasive Chinese
privet was observed along portions of Reach 2, Reach 3a, Reach 3c, and Reach 5b. Invasive species
management was performed in these areas in October 2016 and consisted of clearing and stump
treatment. Three other problem areas were noted during MY2 for low stem densities, having stem
counts less than the MY3 vegetative success criteria of 320 stems/acre. These areas were replanted in
conjunction with Reach 3B/5A stream repairs and planting activities. Vegetation problem area 1
(VPA1) identified during MY3 will be closely monitored by RES to determine if a replant is
necessary before the end of 2017-MY4. This problem area is small and does not pose a threat to
vegetation success criteria being met. All vegetation issues are described in Appendix B.
5 YEAR 3 MONITORING CONDITIONS (MY3)
The Muddy Run II Year 3 morphological and vegetation monitoring activities were completed in
October and November 2016. All Year 3 monitoring data is present below and in the appendices.
Data presented shows the site has one area of bank erosion along Reach 5A and one area of low
planted stem densities; however, the site is on track to meeting stream, wetland and vegetation interim
success criteria.
5.1 Year 3 Monitoring Data Collection
5.1.1 Morphological State of the Channel
All morphological stream data for the Year 3 survey and dimensions were collected during the annual
monitoring survey performed during November 2016. Appendix D includes summary data tables,
morphological parameters, cross section plots, and bank pin array tables.
Profile
The baseline (MY -0) profiles closely matches the proposed design profiles. The plotted longitudinal
profiles can be found on the As -Built Drawings. Longitudinal profiles will not be performed in annual
monitoring reports unless requested by NCDMS or USACE. Morphological summary data tables can
be found in Appendix D.
Dimension
The Year 3 (MY -3) cross sectional dimensions closely matches the baseline cross section parameters.
Minimal changes were noticed for most Year 3 cross section surveys resulting from stable bed and
bank conditions. Only six out of 59 cross sections showed noticeable changes resulting from
aggradation or degradation. Cross section 43 (Reach 3C) showed evidence of slight-aggradation
during MY3-2016. Cross sections 52, 54, and 55 all located on Reach 5A, exhibited down cutting
and/or widening during MY2 and were repaired during early 2016. Cross sections 52, 53, 54, and 55
were re-established in monitoring Year 3 due to the repair work along Reach 5A. All cross section
plots and data tables can be found in Appendix D.
Resource Environmental Solutions. 12

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 3 Monitoring Report• Duplin County, North Carolina • January 2017
Sediment Transport
The Year 3 conditions show that shear stress and velocities have been reduced for all six restoration
reaches. Pre -construction conditions documented all six reaches as sand bed channels and remain
classified as sand bed channels post -construction. Visual assessments (Appendix B) show the
channels are transporting sediment as designed and will continue to be monitored for aggradation and
degradation.
Bank Pin Arrays
Ten pool cross section locations with bank pin arrays were observed and measured for bank erosion
located on the outside meander bends. If bank pin exposure was noticeable, it was measured,
recorded, photographed, and then driven flush with the bank at each monitoring location. No bank pin
array locations had measurable readings during annual Year 3 monitoring activities. Bank pin array
data tables can be found in Appendix D.
5.1.2 Vegetation
The Year 3 monitoring (MY -3) vegetation survey was completed in November 2016. The Year 3
vegetation monitoring on the Muddy Run II Stream Restoration Site resulted in an average of 645
planted stems per acre, which is above the interim survival density of 320 stems per acre. The average
stems per vegetation plot was 12.9 planted stems. The minimum planted stems per plot was 6 stems
and the maximum was 21 stems per plot. A total of 125 volunteer stems were counted throughout
vegetation plots within the project area. The Muddy Run II Site has met the Year 3 vegetation
survival success criterion of 320 trees per acre as specified in the Mitigation Plan. Vegetation
summary data tables can be found in Appendix C and vegetation plot photos in Appendix B.
5.1.3 Photo Documentation
Permanent photo point locations have been established at cross sections, vegetation plots, stream
crossings, and stream structures by RES staff. Any additional problem areas or areas of concern have
been documented with a digital photograph during monitoring activities. All stream and vegetation
digital photographs can be found in Appendix B.
5.1.4 Stream Hydrology
Multiple bankfull events have been observed during Year 3 monitoring activities on all four crest
gauges. Four sets of manual and auto -logging crest gauges are installed on the site, one along Reach
2, one along Reach 3A, one along Reach 313, and one along Reach 5A to document flow conditions.
Crest gauge 1 recorded its maximum bankfull flow event on October 8' and Crest Gauge 2 recorded
its maximum bankfull flow event on February 5t''. Crest gauges 3 and 4 recorded maximum bankfull
events on October 8' following Hurricane Matthew. During several site visits throughout Year 3,
each stream reach was noted to be flowing during normal conditions. Crest gauge and rainfall data is
presented in Appendix E.
5.1.5 Wetland Hydrology
All seven of the wetland gauges achieved the success criteria by remaining continuously within 12
inches of the soil surface for at least nine percent of the growing season during monitoring year 3.
Groundwater gauge data indicate the hydroperiods being responsive to rainfall events. Two of the
three reference gauges (RAW1 and RAW3) met the nine percent success criteria while the remaining
gauge (RAW2) had a hydroperiod of six percent of the growing season. Wetland gauge and rainfall
data is presented in Appendix E.
Resource Environmental Solutions. 13

Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration • USGS HUC 03030007
Year 3 Monitoring Report• Duplin County, North Carolina • January 2017
6 REFERENCES
Chow, Ven Te. 1959. Open -Channel Hydraulics, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and
Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological
Services, FWS/OBS-79/31. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.
Environmental Banc & Exchange (2012). Muddy Run Stream Restoration Project Final Mitigation
Plan. North Carolina Ecosystems Enhancement Program, Raleigh, NC.
Horton, J. Wright Jr. and Victor A. Zullo. 1991. The Geology of the Carolinas, Carolina Geological
Society Fiftieth Anniversary Volume. The University of Tennessee Press. Knoxville, TN.
Johnson PA. 2006. Assessing stream channel stability at bridges in physiographic regions.
U.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration. Report Number
FHWA-HRT-05-072.
Krstolic, J.L., and Chaplin, J.J. 2007. Bankfull regional curves for streams in the non -urban,
non -tidal Coastal Plain Physiographic Province, Virginia and Maryland: U.S. Geological
Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007-5162, 48 p.
LeGrand, H.E., Jr. and S.P. Hall, eds. 1999. Natural Heritage Program List of the Rare Animal
Species of North Carolina. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North
Carolina.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS). 2007. Stream Restoration Design Handbook (NEH
654), USDA
NCDENR. "Water Quality Stream Classifications for Streams in North Carolina." Water Quality
Section. http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wghome/html (June 2005).
Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles and F.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. The
University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North
Carolina, Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and
Recreation, NCDENR, Raleigh, NC.
Sweet, William V. and Jens W. Geratz. 2003. Bankfull Hydraulic Geometry Relationships and
Recurrence Intervals for North Carolina's Coastal Plain. J. of the American Water Resources
Association (JAWRA) 39(4):861-871.
Tweedy, K. A Methodology for Predicting Channel Form in Coastal Plain Headwater Systems.
Stream Restoration in the Southeast: Advancing the Science and Practice, November 2008, Asheville,
NC. Unpublished Conference Paper, 2008.
http://www.bae.nesu.edu/programs/extension/wqg/srp/2008conference/tweedy_paper.pdf
Resource Environmental Solutions. 14

Appendix A
Project Background Data and Maps
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Figure 1. Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2. Project USGS Map

Appendix A. General Tables and Figures
Table 1 Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Monitoring Report Year 3
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Muddy Run I1 Stream and Wetland Restoration/NCDMS Project # NC -95354
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non-riarian Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen
Nutrient Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
RRE
Totals
10,739
4.92
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Project Components
Project Component -or- Reach ID
As -Built
Stationing/Location (LF)
Existing
Footage/Acreage
Approach
(PI, PII etc.)
Restoration -or-
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration
Footage or
Acreage
Mitigation Ratio
Reach 1
0+00-4+48
438
HWV
Restoration
398
1 : 1
Reach 2
0+00-5+04
504
HWV
Restoration
504
1 : 1
Reach 2
5+04-19+14
1,223
P1
Restoration
1,410
1 : 1
Reach 3A
0+00-37+23
3,301
P1
Restoration
3,586
1 : 1
Reach 3B
37+23 —57+92
NA
P1
Restoration
1,979
1 : 1
Reach 3C
57+92 —65+30
737
Enh. I
Rest. Equivalent
708
1 : 1.5
Reach 4
0+44-2+17
120
P 1
Restoration
173
1: 1
Reach 5A
0+00-19+59
1,602
P1
Restoration
1,926
1 : 1
Reach 5B
19+59 —23+68
401
Enh. II
Rest. Equivalent
409
1 : 2.5
Reach 6
9+02-12+19
317
Enh. II
Rest. Equivalent
318
1 : 2.5
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream
(linear feet)
Riparian Wetland
(acres)
Non -riparian Wetland
(acres)
Buffer
(square feet)
Upland
(acres)
Riverine
Non-Riverine
Restoration
9,074
4.92
Headwater Valley
902
Enhancement
Enhancement 1
708
Enhancement II
727
Creation
Preservation
High Quality
Preservation
BMP Elements
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
BMP Elements
BR = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS = Filter Strip; S = Grassed
Swale; LS = Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forested Buffer

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Project Activity and Reporting History
Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration / NCDMS Project #95354
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Mitigation Plan
NA
January 2014
Final Design — Construction Plans
NA
March 2014
Construction Completed
NA
May 2014
Site Planting Completed
NA
May 2014
Baseline Monitoring Document Year 0 Monitoring — baseline
June 2014
August 2014
Year 1 Monitoring
December 2014
December 2014
Year 2 Monitoring
December 2015
February 2016
Adaptive Management Repair and Supplemental Replanting
Seeding Contractor
Aril 2016
Invasive Species Control
Lupe Cruz
October 2016
Year 3 Monitoring
November 2016
February 2017
Year 4 Monitoring
Resource Environmental Solutions
Year 5 Monitoring
Raleigh, NC 27605
Table 3. Project Contacts
Project Contacts Table
Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration /NCDMS Project # 95354
Designer
WK Dickson and Co., Inc.
720 Corporate Center Drive
Raleigh, NC 27607
[phone]
Frasier Mullen, PE
Construction Contractor
GP Jenkins
6566 HWY 55 W
Kinston, NC 28504
[phone]
Gary Jenkins
Planting Contractor
H&J Forestry
Matt Hitch
Seeding Contractor
Rain Services, Inc.
Lupe Cruz
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arbogen
Full Delivery Provider
Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
[phone]
Project Manager:
Daniel Ingram
Monitoring Performers
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street. Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
[phone]
[Project Manager:
Prian Hockett

Table 4. Project Information
Project Information
Project Name
Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration
County
Duplin
Project Area (acres)
37.6
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
34.8308430 N, -77.792838 ° W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Coastal Plain
River Basin
Cape Fear
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-
digit
03030007
USGS Hydrologic
Unit 14 -digit
0303007060010
DWQ Sub -basin
03-06-22
Project Drainage Area (acres)
908
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Reach Summary Information
Parameters Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3a Reach 3b Reach 3c Reach 4
Reach 5a Reach 5b Reach 6
Length of Reach (linear feet) 398
1914
3586 1979 708 173
1926 409 318
Valley Classification
Drainage Area (acres) 68
114
227 333 370 46
774 908 77
NCDWQ Stream Identification 24.75
24.75
36.5 NA 40.5 32.0
35.5 37.5 20.75
NCDWQ Water Quality NA
NA
NA NA NA NA
NA NA NA
Morphological Description (stream
Evolutionary Trend
Underlying Mapped Soils Rains
Rains
Goldsboro/ Goldsboro/ Goldsboro/ Goldsboro/ Goldsboro / Goldsboro Goldsboro /
Rains Rains Rains Rains Rains Rains
Drainage Class ---
---
--- --- ---
Soil Hydric Status Hydric
Hydric
Hydric Hydric Hydric Hydric
Hydric Hydric Hydric
Slope 0.0043
0.0021
0.0016 0.0023 0.0022 0.0034
0.0024 0.0015 0.0024
FEMA Classification Zone X
Zone X
Zone X Zone X Zone X Zone X
Zone X Zone X Zone X
Native Vegetation Community
Coastal Plain Small Stream Swam
Percent Composition of Exotic 0%
0%
1 0% 1 0% 1 0% 0%
0% 0% 0%
land So ry Information
Parameters
Wetland A
Wetland B
Size of Wetland (acres)
3.60
1.32
Wetland Type (non -riparian, riparian riverine or riparian
Riparian
Riparian
Mapped Soil Series
Goldsboro
Rains
Drainage class
Moderately Well
Poorly
Soil Hydric Status
Yes
Yes
Source of Hydrology
Runoff/Overbank Flows
Runoff/Overbank Flows
Hydrologic Im airment
Ditched/Incised Channel
Ditched/Incised Channel
Native vegetation community
Cultivated
Cultivated
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
NA
NA
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable? Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section 404
X X
USAGE NWP 27
Waters of the United States — Section 401
X X
401 Water Quality Cert.
Endangered Species Act
X X
USFWS (Corr. Letter)
Historic Preservation Act
X X
SHPO (Corr. Letter)
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
N/A N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A N/A
N/A

State
J
Legend
INC Highway
State Roads
Streams
Muddy Run II Easement
Waterbody
HUC 03030007060010
fires
4
i
Road 1 04 Roa
t
Figure 1.
Project Vicinity Map
Muddy Run II Mitigation Site
0 0.75 1.5 3
Miles
1 inch = 1.5 miles
1715
State R l
N\' 1
Pierce Ln
LLI'�"
J
i�t�i�i#���►fir ��ll�n�
DUPLIN COUNTY
Scale: NTS
��

71 r'�
M;— — • I
Towal
r,(.eie j,
all
41
Drainage Area = 1.4 mit
f ,
kr _ _ _ — __ _ • r �5jr�,_ - _ � •
. a
�R15
~� _' �' ` - �'l �,�.. -'7 L57A 999 �'� �.5 �-+. .i—r'�•r� � — ,` f .�? y -
• _. -.- - .x171'.' �. �'l�\ J' ; � 'Y � 7 _
Figure 2. Proposed Streams
USGS/Watershed Map Waterbodies
res Muddy Run II Mitigation Site Muddy Run II Easement
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Muddy Run Easement
Feet
1 inch= 2,000 feet Drainage Area
'���. �
';-,�'.Em ~
- `� f ill ( �r� `},*�
._.•. __ ~` � �
•I�
j��} �.�111'i
iC�rrTi _,�}
�. f � I J
k`� � �r C~ `�
I
li _
�
—
-k
f ,
kr _ _ _ — __ _ • r �5jr�,_ - _ � •
. a
�R15
~� _' �' ` - �'l �,�.. -'7 L57A 999 �'� �.5 �-+. .i—r'�•r� � — ,` f .�? y -
• _. -.- - .x171'.' �. �'l�\ J' ; � 'Y � 7 _
Figure 2. Proposed Streams
USGS/Watershed Map Waterbodies
res Muddy Run II Mitigation Site Muddy Run II Easement
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Muddy Run Easement
Feet
1 inch= 2,000 feet Drainage Area

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3. Current Conditions Plan View Map (CCPV)
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Table 7. Stream Problem Areas
Table 8. Vegetation Problem Areas
Stream Photos
Vegetation Photos
Stream and Vegetation Problem Area Photos
Stream and Vegetation Remedial Action Repairs/Maintenance Photos

Figure 3a.
Muddy Run II
Mitigation Site
Current Conditions Map
Duplin County, NC
Legend
Easement Boundary
Cross Sections
Stream Structures
Reach Breaks
® Crest Gauges
P1 Restoration
HWV Restoration
Enhancement
Enhancement II
Wetland Restoration
Vegetation Plots
Met Year 3 Success
Yes
F7No
Well Hydroperiod
® < 5%
® 5-8%
® > 9%
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
H Present Marginal Absent
d
u Absent No Fill
Q
N
>Present
N IIIII
M ----
c Common

;z
•, 111 hP.
0
A.
b M t 14
VP -15
VP -17 ® AW3
AW2
S,-31 l _
XS -29
XS -30
XS -28
VP -13
AW4
\/DA d
+" '" Reach 6 Enhancement II 318 1:2.5 127
®AW1,-� ' TOTAL 11,411 10,739
r � _
`1 ow
0101 f1
i.o, 47
► 1 1 +� ir*
�1 •'i . �: ,;r ^Y {, « „ SOA
0 75 150 300 s ... :.,
Feet Source: NCOnemap 2016 Imagery ,
VPA1
1
7M
Figure 3b.
Muddy Run II
Mitigation Site
Current Conditions Map
Duplin County, NC
0 r F
Legend
Easement Boundary
Cross Sections
Stream Structures
Reach Breaks
Crest Gauges
P1 Restoration
HWV Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
® Wetland Restoration
Vegetation Plots
Met Year 3 Success
Yes
No
Well Hydroperiod
® < 5%
® 5-8%
® > 9%
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
H Present Mar inal Absent
d
U Absent No Fill
C.
N
>Present
N VIII
W ---
Common __
As -Built
Mitigation
Reach
Mitigation Type
SMUs
Length
Ratio
Reach 1
Headwater Valley
398
1:1
398
Reach 2
Headwater Valley
504
1:1
504
Reach 2
P1 Restoration
1,410
1:1
1,410
Reach 3a
P1 Restoration
3,586
1:1
3,586
Reach 3b
P1 Restoration
1,979
1:1
1,979
Reach 3c
Enhancement I
708
1:1.5
472
Reach 4
P1 Restoration
173
1:1
173
Reach 5a
Pl Restoration
1,926
1:1
1,926
Reach 5b
Enhancement II
409
1:2.5
164
+" '" Reach 6 Enhancement II 318 1:2.5 127
®AW1,-� ' TOTAL 11,411 10,739
r � _
`1 ow
0101 f1
i.o, 47
► 1 1 +� ir*
�1 •'i . �: ,;r ^Y {, « „ SOA
0 75 150 300 s ... :.,
Feet Source: NCOnemap 2016 Imagery ,
VPA1
1
7M
Figure 3b.
Muddy Run II
Mitigation Site
Current Conditions Map
Duplin County, NC
0 r F
Legend
Easement Boundary
Cross Sections
Stream Structures
Reach Breaks
Crest Gauges
P1 Restoration
HWV Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
® Wetland Restoration
Vegetation Plots
Met Year 3 Success
Yes
No
Well Hydroperiod
® < 5%
® 5-8%
® > 9%
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
H Present Mar inal Absent
d
U Absent No Fill
C.
N
>Present
N VIII
W ---
Common __

Figure 3c.
Muddy Run II
Mitigation Site
Current Conditions Map
Duplin County, NC
pres
Legend
Easement Boundary
Cross Sections
� Stream Structures
Reach Breaks
Crest Gauges
P1 Restoration
HWV Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Wetland Restoration
Vegetation Plots
Met Year 3 Success
Yes
No
Well Hydroperiod
® < 5%
® 5-8%
> 9%
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
H Present Mar inal Absent
m
U Absent No Fill
CL
ti
>Present
N IIIII
m ----
Common

Figure 3d.
Muddy Run II
Mitigation Site
Current Conditions Map
Duplin County, NC
fires
Legend
Easement Boundary
Cross Sections
Stream Structures
Reach Breaks
Crest Gauges
P1 Restoration
HWV Restoration
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
® Wetland Restoration
Vegetation Plots
Met Year 3 Success
Yes
No
Well Hydroperiod
®
< 5%
®
5-8%
®
> 9%
Riparian Buffer Conditions
Target Community
H Present Mar inal Absent
m
U Absent No Fill
CL
ti
>Present
N IIIII
m ---
Common

Table 5a Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 1
Assessed Length 398
1 Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
2 Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.
Adjusted %
Number'
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable 2,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
NA
NA
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
NA
NA
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
NA
NA
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
NA
NA
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
NA
NA
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercutloverhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
4
4
o
100/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
4
4
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
4
4
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
0
0
1k
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
0100%
I
1 Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
2 Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.

Table 5b Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 2
Assessed Length 1914
1 Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
2 Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.
Adjusted %
Number'
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable 2,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
NA
NA
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
NA
NA
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
NA
NA
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
NA
NA
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
NA
NA
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercutloverhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
14
14
°
100/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
13
13
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
14
14
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
0
0IL
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
1
1
100%
1 Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
2 Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.

Table 5c Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 3A
Assessed Length 3586
1 Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
2 Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.
Adjusted %
Number'
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable 2,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
NA
NA
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
NA
NA
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
NA
NA
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
NA
NA
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
NA
NA
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercutloverhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
21
21
°
100/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
11
11
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
20
21
95%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
1
1
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
10
10
100%
1 Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
2 Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.

Table 5d Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 3B
Assessed Length 1979
1 Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
2 Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.
Adjusted %
Number'
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable 2,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
NA
NA
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
NA
NA
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
NA
NA
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
NA
NA
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
NA
NA
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercutloverhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
17
17
°
100/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
9
9
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
17
17
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
1
1
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
7100%
1 Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
2 Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.

Table 5e Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 3C
Assessed Length 708
1 Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
2 Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.
Adjusted %
Number'
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable 2,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
1
20
97%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
NA
NA
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
NA
NA
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
NA
NA
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
NA
NA
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
NA
NA
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
2
10
101%
Banks undercutloverhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
2
10
101
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
5
5
°
100/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
3
3
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
5
5
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
0
0
IL
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
2100%
I
I
1 Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
2 Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.

Table 5f Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 4
Assessed Length 173
1 Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
2 Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.
Adjusted %
Number'
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable 2,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
NA
NA
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
NA
NA
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
NA
NA
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
NA
NA
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
NA
NA
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercutloverhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
3
3
°
100/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
2
2
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
3
3
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
0
0
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
1
1
100%
1 Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
2 Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.

Table 5g Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 5A
Assessed Length 1926
1 Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
2 Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.
Adjusted %
Number'
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable 2,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
NA
NA
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
NA
NA
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
NA
NA
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
NA
NA
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
NA
NA
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
1
10
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercutloverhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
1
10
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
22
22
°
100/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
16
16
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
22
22
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
0
0
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
6100%
WIL
1 Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
2 Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.

Table 5h Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID Reach 5B
Assessed Length 409
1 Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
2 Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.
Adjusted %
Number'
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable 2,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Category
Sub-Cateaory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Footage
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
NA
NA
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
NA
NA
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
NA
NA
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
NA
NA
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
NA
NA
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercutloverhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
1
1
o
100/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
1
1
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
1
1
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
0
0
1k
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
0100%
I
1 Bed - Coastal plain sand bed channels have a mobile bed along their entire length during geomorphically significant flows. Therefore, the number of shallows and pools,
bedform shape, and thalweg position will vary by monitoring event and are not suitable indicators of stability or function.
2 Percentage based on visual assessment of channel bed condition.

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Planted Acreage 17
Easement Acreaae` 37.6
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
% of Planted
Vegetation Category
Definitions Threshold
De iction
Pol ons
Acrea a
Acrea e
Combined
Easement
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
De iction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material. 0.1 acres
®
0
0.00
0.0%
1000 SF
® LE
0
0.00
0.0%
2. Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria. 0.1 acres
5. Easement Encroachment Areas'
®
none
1
0.12
0.7%
Total
1
0.12
0.7%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring year. 0.25 acres
0
0.00
0.0%
Cumulative Total
1
0.12
0.79%
Easement Acreaae` 37.6
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage,
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment,
the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are
those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes
that are slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can
be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration
of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will
warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of
treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular
interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons.
The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In
any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the
executive summary.
% of
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Easement
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
De iction
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1000 SF
® LE
0
0.00
0.0%
5. Easement Encroachment Areas'
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none
0
0.00
0.0%
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage,
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment,
the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are
those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes
that are slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can
be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration
of risk factors by EEP such as species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will
warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of
treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular
interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons.
The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In
any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the
executive summary.

Table 7. Stream Problem Areas
Muddy Run H Stream and Wetland Restoration Project - Project # 95354
Feature Issue
Station # / Range
Suspected Cause; Repair
Photo Number
Minor right bank erosion (Head
cut forming)
Reach 5A @ 17+40
Concentrated flow; Repair scour on right bank
with matting and seed.
SPA1
Table 8. Vegetation Problem Areas
Muddy Run II Stream and Wetland Restoration Project - Project # 95354
Feature Category Station Numbers
Suspected Cause; Repair
Photo Number
Low Stem Density Reach 4 @ Sta
1+00-2+00
Low density due to low soil fertility; Plant area
with approximaely 75 trees
VPAl

Appendix B - Stream Photos
Reach 1— Looking Downstream - Sta. 1+25 — MY3
(11/8/2016)
Reach 1— Looking Upstream - Sta. 1+25 — MY3
(11/8/2016)
Reach 2 Looking Downstream Sta. 16+35
MY3 (11/8/2016)
Reach 2 Looking Downstream Sta. 16+35-
MY3 (11/8/2016)
Reach 3A Looking Downstream Sta. 4+25
MY3 (11/8/2016)
Reach 3A Looking Downstream Sta. 7+50-
MY3 (11/8/2016)

Reach 3A Looking Downstream Sta. 19+80-
MY3 (11/8/2016)
Reach 3A Looking Downstream Sta. 31+50- MY3
(11/8/2016)
Reach 3B Sta. 44+75 Looking Downstream MY3
(11/7/2016)
Reach 3B Sta. 44+75 Looking Upstream MY3
(11/7/2016)
Reach 3B Looking Upstream Sta. 48+70 MY3
(11/8/2016)
Reach 3B Looking Downstream Sta. 52+25-MY3
(11/8/2016)

Reach 3C Looking Downstream Sta. 64+00 MY3
Reach 3C Looking Upstream Sta. 64+00- MY3
Reach 4 Looking Downstream Sta. 0+65- MY3
(11/8/2016)
Reach 4 Looking Upstream Sta. 0+65- MY3
(11/8/2016)
Reach 5A Looking Upstream Sta. 8+50 MY3
(11/8/2016)
Reach 5a Looking Downstream Sta. 8+25 — MY3-
(11/8/2016)

Reach 5A Looking Downstream Sta. 17+25 MY3
Reach 5A Looking Downstream Sta. 17+80 MY3
Reach 5B Looking Downstream Sta. 20+05 - MY3
(11/7/2016)
Reach 5B Looking Upstream Sta. 20+05- MY3
(11/7/2016)
Reach 6 Looking Downstream Sta. 9+75- MY3
(11/7/2016)
Reach 6 Looking Upstream Sta. 9+75- MY3
(11/7/2016)

Crest Gauge 1- Reach 2 (4/26/2016)
Crest Gauge 2- Reach 3A (11/8/2016)
Crest Gauge 3- Reach 3B (11/8/2016)
Crest Gauge 4 — Reach 5B (11/9/2016)

Appendix B- Vegetation Plot Photos

11

19

Vegetation Plot 25 (10/21/2016) Vegetation Plot 26 (10/21/2016)

Appendix B - Stream Problem Area Photos
SPA 1- Minor right bank erosion - Reach 5A @ Sta
17+40

Appendix B - Vegetation Problem Area Photos
VPA1 - Low stem density: Reach 4 @ Sta 1+00 —
Sta 2+00
VPA1 - Low stem density: Reach 4 @ Sta 1+00 —
Sta 2+00

Appendix B - MY3 Stream and Vegetation Remedial Action Repairs/Maintenance Photos
SPA5-MY2-2015 Reach 5A Repairs (4/26/2016)
SPA5-MY2-2015 Reach 5A Repairs (4/26/2016) SPA2-MY2-2015 Repaired Structures (4/26/2016)
SPA2-MY2-2015 Repaired Structures (4/26/2016) SPA2-MY2-2015 Repaired Structures (4/26/2016)

SPA5-MY2-2015 Reach 5A Repairs (11/8/2016)
SPA5-MY2-2015 Reach 5A Repairs (11/8/2016)
SPA2-MY2-2015 Repaired Structures (11/8/2016)
SPA5-MY2-2015 Reach 5A Repairs (11/8/2016)
SPA2-MY2-2015 Repaired Structures (11/8/2016)
Invasive Species Control performed October 2016

Invasive Species Control performed October 2016
Invasive Species Control performed October 2016

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 9a. Planted Stem Count Summary
Table 9b. Planted Species Totals
Table 9c. Planted Stem Counts (Species by Plot)

Table 9a. Monitoring Year 3 Stent Count Sunuuary
Table 9b. Planted Species Totals
Species
Common Name
t
7T7axtodium
Trees - Bare Root
distichum
Bald Cypress
1,800
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
1,900
Quercus lyrata
Overcup Oak
1,800
Betula nigra
River birch
1,800
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
2,200
Nyssa biflora
Swamp Tupelo
2,000
Plantanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
2,200
Quercus laurifolia
Laurel Oak
1,800
Total
1 15,500
®mom®�m�mt�m�o�
om�m�m
t�
mt�m�o�
®®
�t
ago
t�
oma®oma
m®�®�m�mt�m®oma
®®gym®®pmt®mom®®
Wim,®®�®moo®moo
Table 9b. Planted Species Totals
Species
Common Name
Total
Planted
7T7axtodium
Trees - Bare Root
distichum
Bald Cypress
1,800
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
1,900
Quercus lyrata
Overcup Oak
1,800
Betula nigra
River birch
1,800
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
2,200
Nyssa biflora
Swamp Tupelo
2,000
Plantanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
2,200
Quercus laurifolia
Laurel Oak
1,800
Total
1 15,500
Live Stakes
Salix nigra Black Willow 3,000
Total 3,000

Table 9c. Planted Stem Counts (Species by Plot)
Vegetation Plot 1
Vegetation Plot 2
Vegetation Plot 3
Vegetation Plot 4
Vegetation Plot 5
Species
Common Name
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
3
3
2
2
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
5
5
4
9
1
1
1
1
Quercus sp.
Unknown Oak sp.
2
2
1
1
1
1
Quercus lyrata
Overcup Oak
2
1
2
2
8
8
8
8
4
4
2
4
1
I
3
3
8
7
6
6
Betula nigra
River birch
6
6
5
5
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
10
6
6
6
2
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
2
1 2
2 1
2
1 2 1
2
2
2
1
l
1
l 1 1
1
I 1
1
1 1
1
1
1
Nyssa biflora
Swamp Tupelo
4
1
2
2
4
4
1
1
3
3
3
3
2
1
1
1
4
2
2
2
Plantanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
3
3
3
3
5
5
2
2
1
1
1
1
Quercus laurifolia
Laurel Oak
4
4
3
3
1
0
3
1
2
2
4
4
3
3
2
3
2
2
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
I
I
Species Count
5
5
5
5
5
4
3
3
6
6
4
4
5
4
4
4
7
6
5
6
Stem Count
16
16
13 1
13
17 1
14
11
11
15
13
9
11
14
12
8
13
l6
12
10
11
Stems per Acre
800
1 800
650 1
650
850 1
700
550
550
750
650
450
550
700
600
400
650
800
600
500
550
Vegetation Plot 6
Vegetation Plot 7
Vegetation Plot 8
Vegetation Plot 9
Vegetation Plot 10
Species
Common Name
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
6
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
I
1
2
2
2
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
Quercus sp.
Unknown Oak sp.
I
I
I
Quercus lyrata
Overcup Oak
2
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
I
3
3
3
2
2
2
Betula nigra
River birch
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
10
6
6
6
3
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
7
1 7
1
6
1 5 1
5
5
1 5 1
7
6
5
5 1 1
1
I 1
1
1 6
5
3
2
Nvssa biflora
Swamp Tupelo
4
4
2
2
1
1
2
2
3
3
2
2
9
6
6
2
4
2
2
2
Plantanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
1
1
3
3
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
Quercus laurifolia
Laurel Oak
5
3
2
1
3
2
2
2
4
4
3
3
3
3
2
2
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
I
I
Species Count
5
5
5
5
6
5
4
4
6
5
5
5
4
3
3
5
5
5
4
4
Stem Count
17
14
15 1
14
15 1
13
12
12
16
14
12
1 13
17
1 11
10
17
14
9
6
6
Stems per Acrel
850
700
750 1
700
750 1
650
600
600
800
700
600
1 650
850
1 550
500
850
700
450
.300
300
Vegetation Plot 11
Vegetation Plot 12
Vegetation Plot 13
Vegetation Plot 14
Vegetation Plot 15
Species
Common Name
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MYO
MVI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MV5
MYO
MVI
MY2
MV3 MY4
MY5 MYO
MVI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
2
2
2
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
Quercus sp.
Unknown Oak sp.
2
1
Quercus lyrata
Overcup Oak
2
2
5
5
3
3
4
4
1
I
3
I
1
Betula nigra
River birch
I
1
1
1
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
2
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
7
1 7
1
6
1 5 1
5
5
1 5 1
7
6
5
5 1 1
1
I 1
1
1 6
5
3
2
Nvssa biflora
Swamp Tupelo
4
4
2
2
4
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
9
6
6
2
3
3
2
2
Plantanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
I
1
1
1
2
1
1
2
5
5
5
1
1
1
1
8
Quercus laurifolia
Laurel Oak
3
3
3
3
1
2
Quercus ni,;ra
Water Oak
I
I
Species Count
6
6
6
6
6
4
4
4
6
5
5
5
4
3
3
4
7
6
7
7
Stem Count
13
13
11 1
11
15 1
9
12
1 13
16
14
14
14
14
10
12
9
15
13
11
19
Stems per Acrel
650
1 650
550 1
550
750 1
450
600
1 650
800
700
700
700
700
500
600
450
750
650
550
950
Vegetation Plot 16
Vegetation Plot 17
Vegetation Plot 18
Vegetation Plot 19
Vegetation Plot 20
Species
Common Name
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Taxodium distichum
Bald Cypress
I
I
I
I
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
6
6
6
6
1
1
2
Quercus sp.
Unknown Oak sp.
I
Quercus lyrata
Overcup Oak
1
I
3
3
4
4
1
I
3
I
1
Betula nigra
River birch
6
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
I
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
7
1 7
7 1
6
1 1 1
1
1
1 1 1
1
1 1
1
I 1
1
1 2 1
3
3
2
Nyssa biflora
Swamp Tupelo
8
8
7
6
4
2
2
2
4
4
4
3
6
3
1
Plantanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
3
3
4
4
5
5
5
5
2
1
Quercus laurifolia
Laurel Oak
1
2
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Species Count
3
2
2
2
5
4
5
5
4
4
4
4
5
4
5
6
3
3
2
5
Stem Count
16
1 15
14 1
12
15 1
10
12
1 12
14
14
1 15
1 14
9
1 8
13 1
12
10 1
7
4
8
Stems per Acrel
800
1 750
1 700 1
600 1
1 1 750 1
500
1 600
1 600 1 1
1 700 1
700
1 750
1 700 1 1 1
450
1 400
1 650 1
600 1
1 1 500 1
350
1 200 1
400

Table 9c. Planted Stem Counts (Species by Plot) Continued
Vegetation Plot 21
Vegetation Plot 22
Vegetation Plot 23
Species
Common Name
Vegetation Plot 24
MYl
MY2
Vegetation Plot 25
Species
Common Name
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Taxodium distichunr
Bald Cypress
2
3
3
8
8
8
8
2
2
2
3
1
1
4
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
6
6
6
4
Quercus lvrata
Overcup Oak
4
4
7
6
6
6
4
4
4
4
Betula nigra
1
Quercus sp.
Unknown Oak sp.
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
2
2
3
3
1
1
1
l
Quercus lvrata
Overcup Oak
3
4
3
3
3
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Plantanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
I
Betula nigra
River birch
I
I
1
1
3
3
3
3
Quercus laurifolia
Laurel Oak
6
3
3
3
4
3
3
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
2
2
3
2
Species Count
5
4
4
2
Nyssa biflora
Swamp Tupelo
4
4
5
5
5
5
Stem Count
11
7
8
1
3
3
3
3
1 6
5
4
14
Plantanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
550
1 350
1 400 1
1000 1
1 1 950 1
850
1 800
1 800 1 1
1 850 1
850
1 750
1
1
7
Quercus laurifolia
Laurel Oak
4
1
5
2
1
2
1
2
2
6
3
1
1
1
5
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Species Count
6
5
3
4
3
3
3
2
5
4
4
5
5
5
4
4
4
3
3
7
Stem Counti
18
16
12
12
16
13
12
11
13
11
12
14
17
11
8
8
16
12
11
21
Stems per Acrel
900
800
600
600
800
650
600
550
650
550
600
700
850
550
400
400
800
600
550
1050
Vegetation Plot 26
Vegetation Plot 27
Vegetation Plot 28
Species
Common Name
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Taxodiuni distichunr
Bald Cypress
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
4
9
9
9
9
Quercus sp.
Unknown Oak sp.
4
Quercus lvrata
Overcup Oak
4
4
5
5
1
4
4
4
4
Betula nigra
River birch
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
2
2
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Nyssa biflora
Swamp Tupelo
3
1
Plantanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
I
I
I
I
1
1
7
7
6
6
Quercus laurifolia
Laurel Oak
2
7
6
5
5
4
4
3
2
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Species Count
5
3
2
7
5
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
Stem Count
11
7
8
20
19
17
16
16
17
17
15
14
Stems per Acre
550
1 350
1 400 1
1000 1
1 1 950 1
850
1 800
1 800 1 1
1 850 1
850
1 750
1 700

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology Data
Table 10. Morphological Parameters Summary Data
Table 11. Dimensional Morphology Summary — Cross Sections Data
Table 12. Bank Pin Array Summary Data
Cross Section Plots

Appendix D. Table 10 - Morphological Paramters Summary Data
Project Name/Number: Muddy Run II Mitigation Project/95354
Existing' '2
xistin t'Z Desi n As-Built/Baseline
Reference Reach MRTT 1 MRTT 2 MRTT 3A MRTT 3R MRTT 3C MRTT 4 MRTT SA MRTT SR MRTT 6 MRTT 2 MRTT 3A !TT/Cl MRTT 3A m/Sl MRTT 3R I MRTT 4 I MRTT SA I MRTT 1 I MRTT 2 1 MRTT 3A aT/Sl I MRTT 3A m/Cl I MRTT 3R MRTT 4 1 MRTT SA
Feature
Pool
Run
Shallow
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Run
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Shallow
Drainage Area ac
286
286
286
68
115
227
NA/313
74/360
45
424/774
583/909
77
115
209
254
333
45
774
68
115
209
254
333
45
774
NC Regional Curve Dischaze cfs
9.3
3
5
8
NA/10
4/11
2
13/18
16/21
4
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Design/Calculated Discharge cfs
---
---
13
---
---
---
---
I ---
---
---
---
---
7
14
16
10
5
40
5
7
14
16
10
5
40
Dimension
BF Width ft
10.9
8.9
7.0
4.8
8.1
6.9
7.1
8.0
4.2
6.7
9.9
6.9
7.6
9.2
12.4
9
5.6
15
9.7
11.28
10.4
11.9
9.8
8.4
14.7
Floodprone Width ft
100
100
100
8.7
10.2
8.1
>50
12.9
6.1
11.9
11.6
10.0
>40
>30
>30
>30
>30
>40
>30
>50
>50
>50
>50
>40
>50
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
11.4
8.4
5.0
2.3
4.1
2.8
2.4
3.9
2.1
6.6
11.1
6.2
5.9
8.7
15.7
8.3
3.3
22.7
3.7
10.2
11.6
16.5
8.0
6.3
23.9
BF Mean Depth ft
LO
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.5
LO
1.1
0.9
0.78
0.9
1.3
0.9
0.6
1.5
0.4
0.9
1.1
1.4
0.9
0.8
1.6
BF Max Depth ft
2.1
1.7
1.3
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.7
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.3
1.5
2.0
1.5
0.9
2.4
1.0
1.6
1.8
2.1
1.4
1.5
2.6
Width/Depth Ratio
10.4
9.5
8.8
9.6
16.2
17.3
20.9
16.0
8.4
6.7
9.0
7.7
9.7
9.8
9.8
9.7
9.3
9.9
25.8
12.9
9.4
8.7
13.9
11.1
9.1
Entrenchment Ratio
9.2
11.2
15.1
1.8
1.3
1.2
>2.2
1.6
1.5
1.8
1.2
1.4
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Wetted Perimeter ft
12.8
9.7
7.4
5.2
8.3
7.1
7.4
8.3
4.6
7.6
11.4
7.8
R.l
9.8
13.2
9.6
6.0
15.9
10.1
11.9
11.2
13.1
10.4
9.1
15.9
Hydraulic Radius ft
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.9
1.0
0.8
0.7
0.9
1.2
0.9
0.5
1.4
0.4
0.8
1.0
1.2
0.9
0.7
1.4
Substrate
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Fine Sand
Pattern
Min
Max
Med
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Channel Beltwidth ft
13.6
31.8
23.1
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
14 32
17 39
22 53
16 38
10 24
27 64
7 17
14 39
16 52
21 44
18 36
8
24
19 68
Radius of Curvature ft
11.0
27.6
17.6
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
11 28
13 34
18 46
13 33
8 21
22 55
10 31
7 28
15 44
12 29
15 45
13
19
23 38
Radius of Curvature Ratio
1.5
3.7
2.3
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
1.5 3.7
1.5 3.7
1.5 3.7
1.5 3.7
1.5 3.7
1.5 3.7
1.0 3.2
0.6 2.5
1.4 4.2
1.0 2.4
1.6 4.5
1.5
2.3
1.6 2.6
Meander Wavelength ft
34.9
68.3
54.5
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
35 69
43 84
58 113
42 82
26 51
70 137
17 38
13 53
31 81
23 53
33 65
23
33
41 77
Meander Width Ratio
LS
4.2
3.1
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
1.8 4.2
1.8 4.2
1.8 4.2
1.8 4.2
1.8 4.2
1.8 4.2
0.7 1.8
1.2 3.5
1.5 5.0
1.7 3.7
1.9 3.7
0.9
2.8
1.3 4.6
Profile
Shallow Len h ft
3.1
30.7
12.6
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
3 31
4 38
5 51
4 37
2 23
6 61
8 12
7 22
7 20
5 45
6 25
6
23
6 35
Run Len h ft
2.2
33.2
11.3
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
2 34
3 41
4 55
3 40
2 25
4 66
8 9
5 16
8 25
5 56
5 20
4
15
8 27
Pool Length ft
4.2
1 9.5 1
5.8
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
4 1 10
5 12
7 16
5 11
3 7
8 19
8 10
14 29
10 28
13 30
13 25
12
15
8 23
Pool -to-Pool Spacing ft
17.5
1 59.8 1
36.3
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
18 1 60
22 74
29 99
21 72
13 45
35 120
15 42
36 60
18 63
25 1 100
17 56
43
75
15 104
Additional Reach Parameters
Valley Length ft
274
382
1678
3301
908
745
90
1620
383
1172
1682
1524
1648
1693
175
1530
376
1682
1524
1648
1693
175
1530
Channel Length ft
309
382
1678
3301
908
745
90
1620
383
1172
1828
1738
1890
1849
202
1790
398
1914
1796
1790
1979
173
1926
Sinuosity
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.09
1.14
1.15
1.09
1.15
1.17
1.1
1.14
1.18
1.09
1.17
0.99
1.26
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
0.004
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Chanel Slope ft/ft
0.003
0.0043
0.0021
0.0016
0.0023
0.0022
0.0034
0.0024
0.0015
0.002427
0.0017
0.0026
0.0005
0.0014
0.0049
0.0017
0.0037
0.0022
0.0038
0.001
0.003
0.008
0.0030
Ros en Classification
E5
G5c
F5
F5
C5
F5
G5c
G5c
G5c
G5c
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
E5
"Habitat Index
Bankfull stage was estimated using NC Regional Curve equations and existing conditions data

1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
Appendix D. Table 11 - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number: Muddy Run II Mitigation Project/95354
Cross Section 1 (Riffle)
Cross Section 2 (Pool)
Cross Section 3 (Pool)
Cross Section 4 (Riffle)
Cross Section 5 (Run)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
53.7
53.7
53.7
53.7
54.1
54.1
54.1
54.1
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.3
58.0
58.0
58.0
58.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.3
4.9
5.2
5.1
6.4
5.6
6.0
6.7
6.3
6.2
5.7
5.9
6.9
6.7
6.4
7.3
14.8
14.5
14.2
14.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.4
0.4
1 0.4 1
0.7
0.6
0.6
1 0.7 1
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.3
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.1
0.9
0.9
2.0
1.8
1.9
2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area L
2.7
2.0
2.1
2.0
4.7
3.5
3.8
4.5
5.0
4.0
3.3
3.1
4.6
4.3
3.2
3.3
15.6
14.5
14.7
15.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.4
12.2
13.2
13.0
8.8
8.7
9.4
10.1
7.9
9.6
9.8
11.2
10.7
10.4
12.6
16.1
14.0
13.7
13.8
13.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 6 (Run)
Cross Section 7 (Riffle)
Cross Section 8 (Pool)
Cross Section 9 (Riffle)
Cross Section 10 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
56.6
56.6
56.6
56.6
55.8
55.8
55.8
55.8
55.5
55.5
55.5
55.5
55.3
55.3
55.3
55.3
54.8
54.8
54.8
54.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.5
13.4
12.7
13.1
8.4
7.6
7.2
7.5
9.4
8.8
8.8
8.6
9.8
9.5
9.2
9.7
7.0
6.7
6.7
6.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.8
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.6
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.9
1.8
1.6
1.7
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area LL
12.7
11.5
10.2
10.3
6.1
5.6
4.5
4.9
9.7
7.8
6.7
7.1
11.3
10.2
9.0
9.5
8.0
7.1
6.2
5.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.5
15.7
15.7
16.7
11.5
10.2
11.4
11.7
9.0
10.0
11.7
10.5
8.5
8.8
9.5
9.9
6.1
6.3
7.3
7.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
L0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
Cross Section 11 (Riffle)
Cross Section 12 (Pool)
Cross Section 13 (Riffle)
Cross Section 14 (Pool)
Cross Section 15 (Run)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
53.9
53.9
53.9
53.9
54.3
54.3
54.3
54.3
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.3
52.8
52.8
52.8
52.8
53.0
53.0
53.0
53.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.0
7.2
7.7
8.0
11.3
10.2
10.4
10.4
12.1
10.2
10.2
9.0
9.0
7.8
10.1
8.5
11.8
11.9
10.8
11.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.7
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.2
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.7
1.0
0.9
0.7
0.8
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.2
2.6
2.3
2.3
2.3
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.2
2.0
1.8
1.5
1.5
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
6.7
5.6
5.0
5.5
15.5
12.7
12.0
13.0
8.7
8.2
6.1
6.1
8.9
7.8
6.8
6.8
13.7
12.9
12.4
12.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.2
9.4
12.0
11.6
8.3
8.2
9.0
8.4
17.0
12.8
17.2
13.2
9.2
9.9
15.0
10.6
10.2
10.9
9.3
10.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
72.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 16 (Run)
Cross Section 17 (Run)
Cross Section 18 (Pool)
Cross Section 19 (Run)
Cross Section 20 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
52.3
52.3
52.3
52.3
50.8
50.8
50.8
50.8
50.1
50.1
50.1
50.1
50.5
50.5
50.5
50.5
50.5
50.5
50.5
50.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.3
11.6
12.2
11.6
10.5
10.5
10.0
10.1
10.6
9.9
10.7
9.9
11.4
11.1
11.3
11.3
9.3
8.9
11.2
9.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.9
0.8
1 0.9
1.2
1.2
1.0
1 1.0
1.3
1.1
0.9
1 1.0
1.3
1.0
0.9
1 0.9
1.2
1.2
1.1
1 1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.9
1.7
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.7
2.0
1.8
1.4
1.5
2.0
1.7
1.6
1.7
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftp
9.8
9.9
9.4
9.9
12.4
10.0
10.6
14.2
11.3
9.6
10.0
14.2
11.1
10.3
10.4
11.3
10.3
11.2
11.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.0
13.6
15.8
13.6
8.9
dO1.5
10.0
9.6
7.9
8.7
12.1
9.8
9.1
11.1
12.5
12.2
7.7
7.7
8.8
7.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
L0
L0
L0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1-0
1-0
1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."

1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
Appendix D. Table 11 - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters -
Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number: Muddy Run II Mitigation Project/95354
Cross Section 21 (Pool)
Cross Section 22 (Pool)
Cross Section 23 (Riffle)
Cross Section 24 (Riffle)
Cross Section 25 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
50.3
50.3
50.3
50.3
49.0
49.0
49.0
49.0
49.3
49.3
49.3
49.3
48.8
48.8
48.8
48.8
48.7
48.7
48.7
48.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.7
9.1
10.0
9.6
9.3
9.3
9.9
9.0
7.8
7.7
7.7
7.3
11.7
11.8
11.3
11.9
14.1
13.9
13.8
14.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.8 1
1.3
1.6
1.2
1.2 1
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.9 1
1.5
1.4
1.2
1.2 1
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.2
2.4
2.1
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.6
1.8
2.1
2.0
1.8
1.7
3.1
2.8
2.6
2.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area flZ
8.6
8.1
7.9
8.1
12.3
14.5
12.1
10.9
8.3
7.9
6.9
6.7
18.0
17.1
13.7
14.6
25.0
24.3
22.9
22.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.0
10.2
12.8
11.4
7.0
6.0
8.0
7.4
7.4
7.5
8.6
8.0
7.6
8.2
9.3
9.7
7.9
8.0
8.3
9.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 26 (Pool)
Cross Section 27 (Run)
Cross Section 28 (Pool)
Cross Section 29 (Run)
Cross Section 30 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
48.6
48.6
48.6
48.6
48.8
48.8
48.8
48.8
48.4
48.4
48.4
48.4
48.3
48.3
48.3
48.3
47.4
47.4
47.4
47.4
Bankfull Width (11)
14.9
15.7
15.0
15.1
12.7
12.4
13.7
13.3
13.4
13.3
14.0
13.9
13.4
13.7
13.9
13.7
12.9
13.1
14.0
13.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.2
3.1
2.6
2.6
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.2
2.9
2.9
2.7
2.5
2.1
2.3
2.0
2.1
2.3
2.2
2.0
2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area LL
24.9
25.7
23.2
21.9
19.4
18.9
19.3
19.1
24.6
23.2
22.2
21.8
19.8
19.7
18.9
18.7
18.4
17.4
16.6
16.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.9
9.6
9.7
10.3
8.3
8.1
9.7
9.2
7.3
7.6
8.8
8.9
9.1
9.5
10.3
10.1
9.1
9.8
11.9
10.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 31 (Run)
Cross Section 32 (Run)
Cross Section 33 (Pool)
Cross Section 34 (Pool)
Cross Section 35 (Run)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
47.5
47.5
47.5
47.5
47.7
47.7
47.7
47.7
47.7
47.7
47.7
47.7
47.2
47.2
47.2
47.2
46.9
46.9
46.9
46.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.7
14.2
14.3
14.7
10.5
10.7
11.3
11.2
11.5
12.0
13.5
13.0
10.4
10.5
9.9
10.1
9.5
8.8
9.0
9.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.7
1.6
1.3
1.4
2.1
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.1
1.9
1.7
1.7
2.2
2.0
2.1
2.0
3.1
2.9
2.6
2.6
3.1
3.0
2.8
2.8
2.0
1.9
1.9
1.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(fl)
15.8
14.6
13.8
1 13.7
13.8
13.4
13.5
13.4
19.5
19.0
17.3
17.8
21.4
20.5
18.2
18.6
12.1
11.7
1 11.1
11.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.9
13.8
14.8
15.9
8.0
8.5
9.5
9.3
6.8
7.6
10.5
9.5
5.0
5.4
5.4
5.5
7.4
6.7
7.4
8.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
1
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 1.0
Cross Section 36 (Pool)
Cross Section 37 (Run)
Cross Section 38 (Pool)
Cross Section 39 (Run)
Cross Section 40 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY + Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
45.6
45.6
45.6
45.6
45.5
45.5
45.5
45.5
45.4
45.4
45.4
45.4
45.2
45.2
45.2
45.2
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.3
9.0
8.6
8.4
12.4
11.9
9.7
9.7
10.0
8.8
9.6
10.2
8.2
7.2
8.2
8.4
10.3
10.3
9.7
10.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.3
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
1.4
1.1
1.0
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.5
1.3
1.5
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2
2.0
1.8
1.8
1.9
1.5
1.5
1.6
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
8.7
8.1
6.7
6.9
6.1
5.8
4.8
4.6
12.6
9.2
9.6
9.1
7.6
M6.5
6.9
6.7
14.3
11.7
9.5
9.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.9
10.1
11.0
10.3
25.4
24.4
19.4
20.5
7.9
8.4
9.7
11.4
8.7
9.7
10.4
7.4
9.0
9.9
12.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."

1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."
Appendix D. Table 11 - Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Project Name/Number: Muddy Run II Mitigation Project/95354
Cross Section 41 (Run)
Cross Section 42 (Run)
Cross Section 43 (Run)
Cross Section 44 (Run)
Cross Section 45 (Run)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
45.1
45.1
45.1
45.1
44.0
44.0
44.0 44.0
41.3
41.3
41.3 41.3
41.5
41.5
41.5
41.5
41.4
41.4
41.4
41.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.9
8.5
8.6
9.0
23.5
24.1
28.1 21.9
9.4
9.2
10.6 8.3
13.723
13.5
13.2
13.9
11.8
11.5
11.2
10.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0 50.0
29.0
29.0
15.0 15.0
22.0
22.0
20.0
20.0
35.3
35.3
30.0
30.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.0
0.9 1
1.7
1.5
1.4 1.4 1
1.4
0.7
0.4 0.3 1
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.2 1
1.2
1.2
1.0
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.7
3.8
3.7
3.6 2.9
2.2
0.9
0.6 0.4
2.0
2.0
1.7
1.7
1.9
2.0
1.7
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area flZ
10.2
9.0
8.8
8.6
39.7
35.7
38.3 31.0
13.2
6.5
4.7 2.5
19.6
18.0
15.2
16.8
14.6
13.8
11.3
10.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.8
8.0
8.3
9.5
13.9
16.2
20.6 15.4
6.7
13.2
23.9 28.0
9.6
10.1
11.0
11.4
9.5
9.6
11.1
11.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
2.1
2.1
1.8 >2.2
>2.2
>2.2
1.4 >2.2
1.6
1.6
1.5
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 46 (Run)
Cross Section 47 (Pool)
Cross Section 48 (Riffle)
Cross Section 49 (Pool)
Cross Section 50 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
49.3
49.3
49.3
49.3
48.2
48.2
48.2 48.2
41.0
41.0
41.0 41.0
40.5
40.5
40.5
40.5
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
Bankfull Width (fl)
8.4
7.2
7.8
6.0
6.7
6.3
8.6 5.7
15.1
15.0
15.1 15.3
16.6
17.0
19.3
17.6
18.5
17.7
21.6
17.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
42.5
42.5
42.5
42.5
50.0
50.0
50.0 50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0 50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.9
0.8
0.5 0.5
1.7
1.7
1.6 1.5
1.7
1.7
1.4
1.6
1.8
1.7
1.5
1.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.5
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.8
1.5
0.9 0.9
2.6
2.7
2.6 2.6
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.3
3.2
3.1
3.2
3.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area LL
6.3
5.1
4.7
3.4
6.0
5.3
4.2 2.9
25.3
24.8
24.0 23.4
27.4
28.5
27.3
28.3
32.9
30.7
31.7
30.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.1
10.2
12.9
10.7
7.3
7.4
17.7 11.3
9.0
9.1
9.5 10.0
10.0
10.2
13.7
11.0
10.4
10.2
14.7
10.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2 >2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2 >2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 51 (Riffle)
Cross Section 52 (Run)
Cross Section 53 (Pool)
Cross Section 54 (Pool)
Cross Section 55 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation'
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
39.8
39.8
39.8 37.0
39.7
39.7
39.7 36.9
38.8
38.8
38.8
35.9
38.0
38.0
38.0
35.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.2
16.1
16.3
15.9
17.7
17.8
19.3 10.6
17.4
17.9
18.1 8.9
15.7
16.7
20.3
11.5
9.7
14.8
20.8
10.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0 50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0 50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.5
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.8
2.1
2.7 1.4
1.9
2.1
2.2 1.5
1.7
2.0
2.2
1.0
1.4
2.2
2.1
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.4
2.3
2.6
2.7
5.9 2.1
3.5
3.8L39.
3.4
2.9
4.0
4.4
1.7
2.2
3.0
3.3
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area flZ
24.7
23.2
23.7
22.7
52.3 14.6
33.8
37.1
13.6
26.1
32.7
45.2
11.7
13.6
33.3
44.4
10.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.6
11.2
11.2
11.1
a31.836.9
7.1 7.7
9.0
8.6
5.8
9.5
8.5
9.1
11.3
7.0
6.6
9.7
9.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2 >2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>22
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
I.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Cross Section 56 (Run)
Cross Section 57 (Run)
Cross Section 58 (Run)
Cross Section 59 (Run)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY+ Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
37.3
37.3
37.3
37.3
35.7
35.7
35.7 35.7
41.0
41.0
41.0 41.0
39.5
39.5
39.5
39.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.6
17.0
17.5
18.4
17.0
16.8
16.0 16.4
14.2
13.7
16.9 14.0
13.5
12.5
11.9
11.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
37.5
37.5
37.5 37.5
50.0
50.0
50.0 50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.6
2.2
2.2
2.1
1.8
1.3
1.4 1.5
2.4
2.3
1.9 2.3
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.7
3.2
3.3
3.4
2.6
2.1
2.1 2.5
3.4
3.3
3.3 3.3
2.2
1.8
1.8
1.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area L
45.3
38.0
37.9
38.1
30.7
22.4
22.7 24.8
33.9
31.7
32.3 32.6
15.2
11.3
11.1
9.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
6.9
7.6
8.0
8.8
9.4
12.5
11.2 10.9
6.0
6.0
8.9 6.0
11.9
13.8
12.7
14.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
2.2
2.2
>2.2 >2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2 >2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 = Widths and depths for annual measurements will be based on the baseline bankfull datum regardless of dimensional/depositional development. Input the elevation used as the datum, which should be consistent and based on the baseline datum established. If the performer has inherited the project and cannot acquire the datum used
for prior years this must be discussed with EEP. If this cannot be resolved in time for a given years report submission a footnote in this should be included that states: "It is uncertain if the monitoring datum has been consistent over the monitoring history, which may influence calculated values.
Additional data from a prior performer is being acquired to provide confirmation. Values will be recalculated in a future submission based on a consistent datum if determined to be necessary."

Table 12.Muddy Run II Bank Pin Array Summary
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Cross Section Location Position Reading Reading Reading Cross Section Location Position Reading Reading Reading
XS 2 @ Sta. 1+35
Reach 1
US
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
Top 0.0 0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 3 @ Sta. 3+45
Reach 1
US
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
Top 0.0 0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 8 @ Sta. 8+55
Reach 2
US
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
To 0.0 0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 10 @ Sta. 11+70
Reach 2
us
Top
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
Top 0.0 0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 12 @ Sta. 16+40
Reach 2
US
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
Top 0.0 0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 18 @ Sta. 8+40
Reach 3A
US
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
Top 0.0 0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 21 @ Sta. 11+20
Reach 3A
US
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
Top 0.0 0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 25 @ Sta. 19+80
Reach 3A
US
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
Top 0.0 0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 26 @ Sta. 25+90
Reach 3A
US
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
Top 0.0 0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 28 @ Sta. 31+40
Reach 3A
US
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
Top 0.0 0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
Notes:
US - Upstream from cross section
DS - Downstream from cross section
Did not replace after Reach 5A repair work in 2016.
XS 30 @ Sta.
35+60 Reach 3A
US
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
Top 0.0 0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 33 @ Sta.
40+90 Reach 3B
US
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
Top 0.0 0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 36 @ Sta.
48+90 Reach 3B
US
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
Top 0.0 0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 38 @ Sta.
52+10 Reach 3B
US
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
MB
0.0
XS 40 @ Sta.
54+15 Reach 3B
US
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
To 0.2 0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 47 @ Sta. 1+90
Reach 4
US
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
To 0.0 0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 49 @ Sta. 2+40
Reach 5A
US
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
To 0.6 0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 50 @ Sta. 8+20
Reach 5A
US
To
0.0
0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
Top 0.0 0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 53 @ Sta.
13+90 Reach 5A
US
To
0.0
0.6 ft
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
DS
Top 0.0 0.0
0.0
Bottom 0.0 0.0
0.0
XS 54 @ Sta.
17+35 Reach 5A
US
To
0.0
missingDidn't
Replace*
Bottom 0.0 missing
Didn't Replace*
DS
Top 0.0 missing
Didn't Replace*
Bottom 1.0 missing
Didn't Replace*

Upstream Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 1 Cross Section 1 - Riffle
58
57
56
c
° 55
a)
W 54
53
52
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Seetion 1 Rife
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elewtion
Base
MY]
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record election blatum) used
53.7
53.7
53.7
53.7
Bankfu0 Width ft
6.3
4.9
5.2
5.1
Flood tone Width ft
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
Bmlcfull Mean Depth ft
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
Bankfull Max De th ft
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Ctos s Sectional Area (ftp
2.7
2.0
2.1
2.0
Bankfull W idtb/De th Ratio
14.4
12.2
13.2
13.0
Bankfuft Entrenchment Ratio I
>2.2 1
>2.2
>2.2
>2,2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

57
56
55
c
0
0 54
w
53
52
L ,,4 ryry
H
Upstream
7.77
Muddy Run II Reach 1 Cross Section 2 - Pool
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 2 Pool
Based on fixed baseline Irankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
54.1
54.1
54.1
54.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.4
5.6
6.0
6.7
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.3
1.1
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (f,2)1
4.7
1 3.5
1 3.8
4.5
Bankfull Width/De th n!L.1
8.8
8.7
9.4
10.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2 1
12.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0

nr
4 S Y. �.
j•, �. TR �
r r' + hid 4t N� Cdr
56
55
54
c
0
A? 53
W
52
51
0
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 1 Cross Section 3 - Pool
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 3 Pool
Bas ed on fixed bus eline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.3
6.2
5.7
5.9
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.5
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.4
1.2
1.1
1.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (f,2),5.0
1 4.0
1 3.3
3.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.9
9.6
9.8
11.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 1 Cross Section 4 - Riffle
56
55.5
55
54.5
c
° 54
w 53.5
53
52.5
52
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 4(Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.9
6.7
6.4
7.3
Floodprone Width ft
35.0
35.0
35.0
35.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.1
1.1
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
4.6
1 4.3
1 3.2
3.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.7
10.4
12.6
16.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

c
0
a'>
W
62
61
60
59
58
57
56
55
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 5 - Run
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 5 Run
Based on fixed baseline Irankfull elevation
Base
� t
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
58.0
58.0
58.0
58.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.8
14.5
14.2
14.3
Floodprone Width ft
45.0
t
� w
''f
Mh�Th�'��'�✓sR '
t"�� . .'.
1.1
1.0
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 5 - Run
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 5 Run
Based on fixed baseline Irankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
58.0
58.0
58.0
58.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.8
14.5
14.2
14.3
Floodprone Width ft
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.1
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.0
1.8
1.9
2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
15.6
1 14.5
1 14.7
15.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.0
13.7
13.8
13.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
7
7
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 6 - Run
60
59
58
c
° 57
ami
W 56
55
54
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 6 Run
Based on fixed baseline hankfall elevation
Base
MY]
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevadon (datum) used
56.6
56.6
56.6
56.6
Bankfall Width (ft)
13.5
13.4
12.7
13.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
12.7
1 11.5
1 10.2
10.3
Bankrull Width/Depth Ratio
14.5
15.7
15.7
16.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratiol
12.2
1 >2.2
1 12.2 1
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

F,
c
0
cc
a�
W
- .•�l s i'' L _[leer i Y
58
57.5
57
56.5
56
55.5
55
54.5
54
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 7 - Riffle
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 7(Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
55.8
55.8
55.8
55.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.4
7.6
7.2
7.5
Flood mne Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
6.1
1 5.6
1 4.5
4.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.5
10.2
11.4
11.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
7
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 8 - Pool
58
57.5
57
56.5
56
r0
° 55.5
Cross Section 8 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
CO
55
55.5
55.5
55.5
w
54.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.4
8.8
54
8.6
Flood mne Width ft
50.0
53.5
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
53
0.9
0.8
0.8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
1.4
Cross Section 8 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datorn) used
55.5
55.5
55.5
55.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.4
8.8
8.8
8.6
Flood mne Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.6
1.4
1.3
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft)
9.7
1 7.8
1 6.7 1
7.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.0
10.0
11.7
10.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
7
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 9 - Riffle
58
57.5
Cross Section 9 Rifle
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
57
56.5
56
r0
° 55.5
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
55
55.3
55.3
w
54.5
y Po s Ar ( II
Z.�Iyil 4 F C!• (�ey�� `y1�*t Yjl M 1 t� k
Bankfull Width (ft)
�
� n'yh
9.5
;_`rC
� �i�!'nin■M�rfl ���Z,y q "fi�� ,� _
� s ' ,; ,,
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 9 - Riffle
58
57.5
Cross Section 9 Rifle
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
57
56.5
56
r0
° 55.5
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
55
55.3
55.3
w
54.5
55.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
54
9.5
9.2
53.5
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
53
50.0
50.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
1.1
Cross Section 9 Rifle
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
55.3
55.3
55.3
55.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.8
9.5
9.2
9.7
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.0
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.9
1.8
1.6
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (f,2),11.3
1 10.2
1 9.0
9.5
Bankfull Width/De thRatio
8.5
8.8
9.5
9.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

c
0
cc
a�
W
58
57
56
55
54
53
52
Upstream
y
@ 6A 4 Wo
L i
sts:. ry k Irl{) r 3f u $
` 'Uli fbV
6 a
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 10 - Pool
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
F� ti
Bas ed on fixed bus eline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
c
0
cc
a�
W
58
57
56
55
54
53
52
Upstream
y
@ 6A 4 Wo
L i
sts:. ry k Irl{) r 3f u $
` 'Uli fbV
6 a
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 10 - Pool
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 10 Pool
Bas ed on fixed bus eline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datmn) used
54.8
54.8
54.8
54.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.0
6.7
6.7
6.7
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.1
1.1
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
Bankfufl Cross Sectional Area (f,2),8.0
1 7.1
1 6.2
5.9
Bankfu0 Width/Depth Ratio
6.'7
6.3
7.3
7.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
7
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

56
55
° 54
r_
w
53
52
0
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 11 - Riffle
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 11(Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
53.9
53.9
53.9
53.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.0
Z2
7.7
8.0
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.7
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
6.7
1 5.6
1 5.0 1
5.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
12.2
9.4
12.0
11.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

c
0
cc
a'>
W
58
57
56
55
54
53
52
51
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 12 - Pool
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 12 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
54.3
54.3
54.3
54.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.3
10.2
10.4
10.4
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.6
2.3
2.3
2.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (f,2),15.5
1 12.7
1 12.0
13.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.3
8.2
9.0
8.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
72.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 13 - Riffle
56
55.5
55
-
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
54.5
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
54
53.3
53.3
° 53.5
CO
53
53.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
W
52.5
10.2
10.2
52
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
51.5
50.0
50.0
51
0.7
0.8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Bankfull Max De th ft
Cross Section 13(Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
53.3
53.3
53.3
53.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.1
10.2
10.2
9.0
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.7
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (f,2),8.7
1 8.2
1 6.1
6.1
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
17.0
12.8
17.2
13.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2 1
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

c
0
cc
a�
W
56
55
54
53
52
51
50
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 14 - Pool
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 14 Pool
Basedon fixed buseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
r
52.8
52.8
52.8
52.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.0
7.8
10.1
8.5
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
c
0
cc
a�
W
56
55
54
53
52
51
50
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 2 Cross Section 14 - Pool
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 14 Pool
Basedon fixed buseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
52.8
52.8
52.8
52.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.0
7.8
10.1
8.5
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.0
0.9
0.7
0.8
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.0
1.8
1.5
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
8.9
1 7.8
1 6.8
6.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.2
9.9
15.0
10.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
7
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 15 - Run
56
55.5
55
Cross Section 15 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
54.5
54
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
0
° 53.5
53.0
53.0
CO
>
53
w
52.5
53.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
52
11.9
10.8
51.5
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
51
50.0
50.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
1.1
Cross Section 15 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datmn) used
53.0
53.0
53.0
53.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.8
11.9
10.8
11.5
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.1
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (f,2),13.7
1 12.9
1 12.4
12.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.2
10.9
9.3
10.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>212
7
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

rs
rT'_f
f �r
Upstream
Downstream
55
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 16 - Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
54.5
MYl
MY2P99
MY4 MY5 MY+
54
52.3
52.3
52.3
53.5
53
11.3
11.6
c
°
.@
52.5
52
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
W
51.5
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.9
0.9
0.8
51
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.9
1.7
1.6
50.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz)
9.8
9.9
9.4
50
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.0
13.6
15.8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
BankfullEntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
Cross Section 16 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2P99
MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
52.3
52.3
52.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.3
11.6
12.2
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.9
0.9
0.8
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.9
1.7
1.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz)
9.8
9.9
9.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.0
13.6
15.8
13.6
BankfullEntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
1.0

54
53
52
c
° 51
a�
W 50
49
48
0
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 17 - Run
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 17 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (dation) used
50.8
50.8
50.8
50.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.5
10.5
10.0
10.1
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
1.2
1.0
1.0
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.8
2.0
1.5
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
12.4
1 12.7
1 10.0
10.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.9
8.6
10.0
9.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

54
53
52
c
° 51
a�
W 50
49
48
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 18 - Pool
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 18 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
50.1
x,
50.1
50.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
9.9
10.7
9.9
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
54
53
52
c
° 51
a�
W 50
49
48
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 18 - Pool
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 18 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
50.1
50.1
50.1
50.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
9.9
10.7
9.9
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.3
1.1
0.9
1.0
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.0
1.8
1.4
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
14.2
1 11.3
1 9.6
10.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.9
8.7
12.1
9.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

c
0
cc
a�
W
54
53
52
51
50
49
48
Upstream
4
;� Yt
i
r
X. ➢
u
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 19 - Run
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 19 Run
Bas ed on fixed bus eline bunkfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elesafion (dation) used
50.5
50.5
50.5
50.5
Ban kfull Width (ft)
11.4
11.1
11.3
11.3
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.3
1.0
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.0
1.7
1.6
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
14.2
1 11.1
1 10.3
10.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.1
11.1
12.5
12.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

c
0
cc
CD
W
54
53
52
51
50
49
48
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 20 - Riffle
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 20 (Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
50.5
50.5
50.5
50.5
Bankfull Width ft
9.3
8.9
11.2
9.0
Flood rove Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth 11
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
11.3
10.3
11.2
1 11.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.7
7.7
8.8
7.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 1.0

Upstream
Downstream
53
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 21 - Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
52.5
50.3
50.3
50.3
52
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.7
9.1
51.5
9.6
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
51
50.0
50.0
0
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.8
°
50.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
a)
50
1 8.1
1 7.9
8.1
LU
16.0
10.2
12.8
11.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
49.5
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0
49
48.5
48
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 21 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
50.3
50.3
50.3
50.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.7
9.1
10.0
9.6
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.7
1.7
1.9
2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
8.6
1 8.1
1 7.9
8.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.0
10.2
12.8
11.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

52
51
50
c
° 49
a�
W 48
47
46
0
Upstream
-yam
P'.
te. 0
2ti yt6 fi Fi*.'��� n
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 22 - Pool
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 22 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datmn) used
49.0
49.0
49.0
49.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.3
9.3
9.9
9.0
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.3
1.6
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.2
2.4
2.1
1.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (f,2),12.3
1 14.5
1 12.1
10.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.0
6.0
8.0
.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

52
51
50
c
0
A? 49
W
48
47
0
INT lD y zJ �p
l
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 23 - Riffle
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 23(Riffle)
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-floo (datum) used
49.3
49.3
49.3
49.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.8
7.7
7.7
7.3
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.7
1.8
L6
1.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft)
8.3
1 7.9
1 6.9 1
6.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.4
75
8.6
8.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
7
>22
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 LO
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 24 - Riffle
53
52
51 -
50
0
> 49
0
W
48
47
46
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 24(Riffle)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
48.8
48.8
48.8
48.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.7
11.8
11.3
11.9
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.5
1.4
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.1
2.0
1.8
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (f,2),18.0
1 17.1
1 13.7
14.6
o
Bankfull Width/Depth Rat"17
7.6
-L
8.2
9.3
9.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 25 - Pool
53
52
51
50
c
° 49
w 48
47
46
45
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 25 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-tion (datum) used
48.7
48.7
48.7
48.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.1
13.9
13.8
14.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.5
13ankfull Max De th(fi)
3.1
2.8
2.6
2.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
25.0
1 24.3
1 22.9
22.6
Bankfull Width/De th Ra!Ll
7.9
8.0
8.3
9.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2 1
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

53
52
51
50
c
49
El 48
47
46
45
0
1
l q iy d
-
l�l
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 26 - Pool
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 26 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-tion (datum) used
48.6
48.6
48.6
48.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.9
15.7
15.0
15.1
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.5
Bankfull Max De th ft
3.2
3.1
2.6
2.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
24.9
1 25.7
1 23.2
21.9
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
8.9
9.6
9.7
10.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>212
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 27 - Run
53
52
51
50
c
0
> 49
a�
w
48
47
46
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 27 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
48.8
48.8
48.8
48.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.7
12.4
13.7
13.3
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
19.4
1 18.9
1 19.3
19.1
Bankfull Width/De thRatio
8.3
8.1
9.7
9.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 28 - Pool
53
52
i
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
51
Record ele-fion (datum) used
48.4
48.4
48.4
48.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.4
13.3
14.0
50
49
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
=
0
48
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.8
J
1.6
LU 47
a
2.9
2.9
Td Mak
46
45
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
24.6
1 23.2
1 22.2
21.8
44
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 28 - Pool
53
52
Cross Section 28 Pool
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
51
Record ele-fion (datum) used
48.4
48.4
48.4
48.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.4
13.3
14.0
50
49
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
=
0
48
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.8
1.7
1.6
LU 47
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.9
2.9
2.7
46
45
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
24.6
1 23.2
1 22.2
21.8
44
7.3
7.6
8.8
8.9
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
1 >2.2
Cross Section 28 Pool
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
48.4
48.4
48.4
48.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.4
13.3
14.0
13.9
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.6
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.9
2.9
2.7
2.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
24.6
1 23.2
1 22.2
21.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.3
7.6
8.8
8.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
1 >2.2
1 >2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1.0

Upstream Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 29 - Run
52
51
50
49
c
0
> 48
a�or
w
47
46
45
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 29 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2P18.7
MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
48.3
48.3
48.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.4
13.7
13.9
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.5
1.4
1.4
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.1
2.3
2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz)
19.8
19.7
18.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.1
9.5
10.3
10.1
BankfullEntrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
1.0

c
0
ro
0
w
52
51
50
49
48
47
46
45
44
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 30 - Pool
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 30 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (dation) used
47.4
47.4
47.4
47.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.9
13.1
14.0
13.2
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.3
2.2
2.0
2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
18.4
1 17.4
1 16.6
16.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.1
9.8
11.9
10.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

c
0
cc
a'>
W
52
51
50
49
48
47
46
45
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 31 - Run
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 31 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
47.5
47.5
47.5
47.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.7
142
14.3
14.7
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.2
1.0
1.0
0.9
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.1
1.9
1.7
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
I5.8
1 14.6
1 13.8
13.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
1 L9
13.8
14.8
159
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

52
51
50
49
c
° 48
ro
w 47
46
45
44
0
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 32 - Run
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 32 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
47.7
47.7
47.7
47.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.5
10.7
11.3
11.2
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.2
2.0
2.1
2.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
13.8
1 13.4
1 13.5
13.4
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
8.0
8.5
9.5
9.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
12.2
12.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

c
0
ro
W
52
51
50
49
48
47
46
45
44
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 33 - Pool
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
s 2
Cross Section 33 Pool
Bas ed on fixed bus eline bank full elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
i
47.7
47.7
AIv
✓
,t�,.�vhy�
T
1 ikT r
11.5
.�y`:
auk S,
�e
�ciT
ti -1tlti R b a� i�.tig J 14 I
"g1t.l
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 33 - Pool
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 33 Pool
Bas ed on fixed bus eline bank full elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
47.7
47.7
47.7
47.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.5
12.0
13.5
13.0
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.7
1.6
1.3
1.4
Bankfull Max De th ft
3.1
2.9
2.6
2.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (f,2),19.5
1 19.0
1 17.3
17.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
6.8
7.6
10.5
9.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
7
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

rl ap T
� t.4
Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 34 - Pool
52
51
Cross Section 34 Pool
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datorn) used
50
47.2
47.2
47.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.4
49
9.9
10.1
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
48
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.1
1.9
1.8
0
> 47
Bankfull Max De th ft
3.1
3.0
2.8
2.8
w 46
21.4
1 20.5
1 18.2
18.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
45
5.4
5.4 15.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
44
1 72.2
72.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1 1.0
43
1.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 34 Pool
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datorn) used
47.2
47.2
47.2
47.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.4
10.5
9.9
10.1
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.1
1.9
1.8
1.8
Bankfull Max De th ft
3.1
3.0
2.8
2.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
21.4
1 20.5
1 18.2
18.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
5.0
5.4
5.4 15.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
1 72.2
72.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

51
50
49
c
48
0
> 47
a>
W
46
45
44
0
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 35 - Run
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Y,
Cross Section 35 Run
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
I qt�S
46.9
46.9
46.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.5
8.8
9.0
9.6
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
Muddy Run II Reach 3A Cross Section 35 - Run
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 35 Run
Basedon fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
46.9
46.9
46.9
46.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.5
8.8
9.0
9.6
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.0
1.9
1.9
1.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
12.1
1 11.7
1 11.1
11.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.4
6.7
7.4
8.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
7
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

50
49
48
c
47
0
> 46
0
W
45
44
43
0
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 36 Cross Section 36 - Pool
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 36 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
45.6
45.6
45.6
45.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.3
9.0
8.6
8.4
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.7
1.5
1.3
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
8.7
1 8.1
1 6.7
6.9
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
9.9
10.1
11.0
10.3
Banl.. Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3B Cross Section 37 - Run
49
48
_ 47
C
O
w
46
45
44
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 37 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
45.5
45.5
45.5
45.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.4
11.9
9.7
9.7
Flood mne Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
6.1
1 5.8
1 4.9
4.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
25.4
24.4
19.4
20.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
7
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

0
0
w
49
48
47
46
45
44
43
42
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 36 Cross Section 38 - Pool
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 38 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datmn) used
45.4
45.4
45.4
45.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.0
8.8
9.6
10.2
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.3
1.1
1.0
0.9
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.0
1.8
1.8
1.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (f,2),12.6
1 9.2
1 9.6
9.1
Bankfull Width/De thRatio
7.9
8.4
9.7
11.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3B Cross Section 39 - Run
48
47
_ 46
c
A000
0
w
45
44
43
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 39 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
45.2
45.2
45.2
45.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.2
7.2
8.2
8.4
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
7.6
1 6.5
1 6.9
6.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
8.7
7.9
9.7
10.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>212
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

c
0
cc
a�
W
48
47
46
45
44
43
42
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 36 Cross Section 40 - Pool
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 40 (Pool)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MY
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
45.0
45.0
45.0
45.0
Bankfull Width ft
10.3
10.3
9.7
10.6
Flood rove Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth 11
1.4
1.1
1.0
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth 11
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
14.3
11.7
9.5
9.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.4
9.0
9.9
12.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

48
47
46
c
° 45
a�
W 44
43
42
0
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3B Cross Section 41 - Run
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 41 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
45.1
45.1
45.1
45.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.9
8.5
8.6
9.0
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.1
1.1
1.0
0.9
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
10.2
1 9.0
1 8B
8.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.8
8.0
8.3
9.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
7
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3C Cross Section 42 - Run
49
48
Cross Section 42 Run
Basedon fixedbaseline bankfull elevation
Base
47
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
46
44.0
44.0
44.0
45
23.5
24.1
28.1
c
° 44
a'� 43
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
W
42
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.7
41
1.4
1.4
13ankfull Max De th(fi)
40
3.7
3.6
2.9
39
39.7
1 35.7
1 38.3
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
13.9
Cross Section 42 Run
Basedon fixedbaseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
44.0
44.0
44.0
44.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
23.5
24.1
28.1
21.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.7
1.5
1.4
1.4
13ankfull Max De th(fi)
3.8
3.7
3.6
2.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
39.7
1 35.7
1 38.3
31.0
o
Bankfull Width/Depth Rat"-1L"1'
13.9
16.2
20.6
15.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.1
2.1
1.8
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

46
45
44
43
c
42
w 41
40
39
38
0
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3C Cross Section 43 - Run
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 43 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
41.3
41.3
41.3
41.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.4
9.2
10.6
8.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
29.0
29.0
15.0
15.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.4
0.7
0.4
0.3
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.2
0.9
0.6
0.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (f,2),13.2
1 6.5
1 4.7
2.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
6.7
13.2
23.9
28.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
1.4
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3C Cross Section 44 - Run
48
47
46
Cross Section 44 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
45
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (dation) used
41.5
44
41.5
41.5
Bankfull Width (ft) 13.723
43
13.2
AFc
Flood mne Width ft
a'� 42
22.0
20.0
20.0
W
41
1.4
zIr
1.2
40
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.0
2.0
39
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
19.6 1
38
1 15.2
16.8
Bankfull Width/Depth n!1219.6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
11.0
Cross Section 44 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (dation) used
41.5
41.5
41.5
41.5
Bankfull Width (ft) 13.723
13.5
13.2
13.9
Flood mne Width ft
2200
22.0
20.0
20.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.0
2.0
1.7
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2)
19.6 1
18.0
1 15.2
16.8
Bankfull Width/Depth n!1219.6
10.1
11.0
11.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
1.6
1.6
1.5
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0 1
1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

W
47
46
45
44
43
42
41
40
39 +
0
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 3C Cross Section 45 - Run
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 45 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datmn) used
41.4
41.4
41.4
41.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.8
11.5
11.2
10.8
Floodprone Width ft
35.3
35.3
30.0
30.0
BankhH Mean Depth ft
1.2
1.2
1.0
1.0
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.9
2.0
1.7
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (f,2),14.6
1 13.8
1 11.3
10.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.5
9.6
11.1
11.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

53
52
51
c
50
co
a�
W 49
48
47
0
Upstream
. J t
tl'`� j rya � �k� Y�•� � r�.
Muddy Run II Reach 4 Cross Section 46 - Run
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 46 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
49.3
49.3
49.3
49.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.4
7.2
7.8
6.0
Floodprone Width ft
42.5
42.5
42.5
42.5
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.5
1.2
1.1
1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
6.3
1 5.1
1 4.7
3.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.1
10.2
12.9
10.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
7
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

52
51
50
c
49
a�
W 48
47
46
0
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 4 Cross Section 47 - Pool
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
s>
Cross Section 47 Pool
Bowdon fixed buseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
52
51
50
c
49
a�
W 48
47
46
0
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 4 Cross Section 47 - Pool
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 47 Pool
Bowdon fixed buseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datorn) used
48.2
48.2
48.2
48.2
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.7
6.3
8.6
5.7
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.5
Bankfull Max De th ft
1.8
1.5
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
6.0
1 5.3
1 4.2
2.9
Bankfull Width/De thRatio
7.3
7.4
17.7
11.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

45
44
43
c
42
0
> 41
a�
W
40
39
38
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 5A Cross Section 48 - Riffle
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 48 Riffle
Based on fixed baseline Irankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
41.0
41.0
41.0
41.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
15.1
15.0
15.1
15.3
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.5
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.6
2.7
2.6
2.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (f,2)1
25.3
1 24.8
1 24.0
23.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.0
9.1
9.5
10.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 5A Cross Section 49 - Pool
45
44
Cross Section 49 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
43
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
40.5
42
40.5
40.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
= 41
17.0
19.3
17.6
0
40
50.0
50.0
50.0
a�
W 39
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.7
1.7
38
1.6
Bankfrdl Max De th ft
3.1
37
3.1
3.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (f,2)1
36
1 28.5
1 27.3
28.3
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
10.2
Cross Section 49 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
40.5
40.5
40.5
40.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.6
17.0
19.3
17.6
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.7
1.7
1.4
1.6
Bankfrdl Max De th ft
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (f,2)1
27.4
1 28.5
1 27.3
28.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.0
10.2
13.7
11.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
7
7
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
45
Muddy Run II Reach 5A Cross Section 50 - Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
44
43
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
18.5
17.7
21.6
17.8
42
41
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
c
°
40
1.7
1.5
1.7
Bankfull Max De th ft
3.2
39
3.2
3.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
32.9
2
W
38
30.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.4
10.2
37
10.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
36
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
35
1.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 50 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
18.5
17.7
21.6
17.8
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.8
1.7
1.5
1.7
Bankfull Max De th ft
3.2
3.1
3.2
3.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
32.9
1 30.7
1 31.7
30.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.4
10.2
14.7
10.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

c
0
w
45
44
43
42
41
40
39
38
37
36
Upstream
a
Muddy Run II Reach 5A Cross Section 51 - Riffle
Downstream
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 51 Riffle
Bas ed on fixed bus eIine bank full elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.2
16.1
16.3
15.9
Floodprone Width ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.5
1.4
1.5
1.4
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.4
2.3
2.6
2.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
24.7
1 23.2
1 23.7
22.7
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
10.6
11.2
11.2
11.1
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

Upstream
45
43
41
c
° 39
a�
W 37
35
33 +
0
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 5A Cross Section 52 - Run
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 52 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-tion (datum) used
39.8
39.8
39.8
37.0
BankhrU Width (ft)
17.7
17.8
19.3
10.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (it)
1.8
2.1
2.7
1.4
13ankfull Max De th(fi)
3.1
4.5
5.9
2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
31.8
1 36.9
1 52.3
14.6
Bankfull Width/De thRatio
9.9
8.6
7.1
7.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 5A Cross Section 53 - Pool
44
42
Nor -
40
0
0
m 38
w
36
34
32
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 53 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
39.7
39.7
39.7
36.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.4
17.9
18.1
8.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth(ft)
1.9
2.1
2.2
1.5
Bankfrdl Max De th(ft)
3.5
3.8
4.1
3.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
33.8
1 37.1
1 39.0
13.6
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
9.0
8.6
8.4
5.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 5A Cross Section 54 - Pool
43
42
Cross Section 54 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
41
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
38.8
40
39
0
38
38.8
35.9
>
0
W 37
15.7
16.7
36
11.5
Flood mne Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
35
34
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.7
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
1.0
Cross Section 54 Pool
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
38.8
38.8
38.8
35.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
15.7
16.7
20.3
11.5
Flood mne Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.7
2.0
2.2
1.0
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.9
4.0
4.4
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
26.1
1 32.7
1 45.2
11.7
Bankfull Width/De th Ra!L.1
9.5
8.5
9.1
11.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

Upstream
s � y
9 �r
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 5A Cross Section 55 - Riffle
42
Cross Section 55 Riffle
Based on fixed baseline Irankfull elevation
41
MYl
MY2
40
Record ele-tioo (datum) used
o
39
38.0
35.6
38
9.7
14.8
_
10.2
Floodprone Width ft
c
37
50.0
y r
36
w
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.4
35
2.1
1.0
t
2.2
3.0
3.3
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
33
33.3
44.4 1
10.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.0
32
9.7
9.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
>2.2
Bankf dl Bank Aei ht Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
1.0
Upstream
s � y
9 �r
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 5A Cross Section 55 - Riffle
42
Cross Section 55 Riffle
Based on fixed baseline Irankfull elevation
41
MYl
MY2
40
Record ele-tioo (datum) used
38.0
39
38.0
35.6
38
9.7
14.8
_
10.2
Floodprone Width ft
c
37
50.0
50.0
36
w
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.4
35
2.1
1.0
34
2.2
3.0
3.3
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
33
33.3
44.4 1
10.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.0
32
9.7
9.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
>2.2
Cross Section 55 Riffle
Based on fixed baseline Irankfull elevation
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-tioo (datum) used
38.0
38.0
38.0
35.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.7
14.8
20.8
10.2
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.4
2.2
2.1
1.0
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.2
3.0
3.3
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
13.6
33.3
44.4 1
10.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
7.0
6.6
9.7
9.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankf dl Bank Aei ht Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 5B Cross Section 56 - Run
43
42
41
40
Cross Section 56 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
39
c
° 38
37.3
37.3
37.3
37
17.6
17.0
17.5
w
36
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
35
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.6
34
2.2
2.1
Bankfull Max De th ft
33
3.2
3.3
3.4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
1 38.0
Cross Section 56 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
37.3
37.3
37.3
37.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.6
17.0
17.5
18.4
Floodprone Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.6
2.2
2.2
2.1
Bankfull Max De th ft
3.7
3.2
3.3
3.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
45.3
1 38.0
1 37.9
38.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
6.9
7.6
8.0
8.8
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 5B Cross Section 57 - Run
41
40
39
Cross Section 57 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
38
Record ele-fion (datum) used
35.7
37
35.7
35.7
0
36
17.0
16.8
>
m
w 35
16.4
Floodprone Width ft
34
33
37.5
37.5
32
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
1.5
Cross Section 57 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
35.7
35.7
35.7
35.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.0
16.8
16.0
16.4
Floodprone Width ft
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.8
1.3
1.4
1.5
Bankfull Max De th ft
2.6
2.1
2.1
2.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
30.7
1 22.4
1 22.7
24.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.4
12.5
11.2
10:9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.2
2.2
>2.2
7
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

Upstream
Downstream
Muddy Run II Reach 6 Cross Section 58 - Run
46
45
Cross Section 58 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
44
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
41.0
43
42
41.0
41.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.2
c
41
40
16.9
14.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
2
W
39
50.0
50.0
50.0
38
2.4
2.3
1.9
37
Bankfull Max De th ft
3.4
3.3
36
3.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
33.9
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
32.6
Cross Section 58 Run
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevfion
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record ele-fion (datum) used
41.0
41.0
41.0
41.0
Bankfull Width (ft)
14.2
13.7
16.9
14.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.4
2.3
1.9
2.3
Bankfull Max De th ft
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
33.9
1 31.7
1 32.3
32.6
Bankfull Width/De th Ratio
6.0
6.0
11.9
6.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Aei ht Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0

44
43
42
s=
41
0
CO 40
?
W
39
38
37
0
Upstream
Muddy Run II Reach 6 Cross Section 59 - Run
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 59 (Run)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
39.5
39.5
39.5
39.5
Bankfull Width ft
13.5
12.5
11.9
11.9
Flood rove Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth 11
1.1
0.9
0.9
x (1(f
z A
2.2
1.8
1.8
1.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')l
15.2
1 11.3
1 11.1
1 9.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.9
13.8
12.7
14.2
BankfullEntrenchmentRatio >2.2
>2.2
7
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
Muddy Run II Reach 6 Cross Section 59 - Run
Downstream
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Distance (ft)
Baseline - Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Approx. Bankfull - Floodprone Area
Cross Section 59 (Run)
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Record elevation (datum) used
39.5
39.5
39.5
39.5
Bankfull Width ft
13.5
12.5
11.9
11.9
Flood rove Width ft
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth 11
1.1
0.9
0.9
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.2
1.8
1.8
1.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')l
15.2
1 11.3
1 11.1
1 9.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.9
13.8
12.7
14.2
BankfullEntrenchmentRatio >2.2
>2.2
7
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0

Appendix E
Hydrology Data
Table 13. Documentation of Geomorphologically Significant Flow Events
Table 14. Rainfall Summary
Table 15a. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
Table 15b. MY1-MY3 Wetland Hydrology Gauges Summary
Chart 1.2016 Precipitation Data for Muddy Run II Site
Chart 2.2016 Groundwater Monitoring Gauge Hydrographs
Crest Gauge Verification Photos

Table 13. Documentation of Geomorphically Significant Flow Events
Crest Gauge
Stream Reach
Number of
Bankfull
Events
Date of Highest
Bankfull Event
Maximum
Bankfull Height
(ft.)
Photo
Number
Crest Gauge 1
Reach 2
4
10/8/2016
1.60
1
Crest Gauge 2
Reach 3A
8
2/5/2016
2.0
2
Crest Gauge 3
Reach 3B
2
10/8/2016
2.18
3
Crest Gauge 4
Reach 5B
1
10/8/2016
3.8
4
Table 14. Rainfall Summary
Month
Average
Normal Limits
Wallace
Station
Precipitation
On -Site Auto
Rain Gaua e
30
Percent
70 Percent
January
4.33
3.32
5.03
3.95
3.82
February
3.23
2.14
3.87
8.66
5.95
March
4.50
3.23
5.32
3.41
2.60
April
3.16
1.70
3.85
3.54
0.79
May
3.68
2.69
4.34
5.40
5.33
June
4.49
3.11
5.34
4.33
4.15
July
6.06
4.16
7.22
2.69
6.36
August
5.40
3.12
6.56
5.24
4.38
September
5.00
2.04
6.07
11.59
5.80
October
3.21
1.62
3.92
8.46
---
November
2.89
1.83
3.49
0.73
---
December
3.24
2.14
3.88
3.42
---
Total
49.19
31.10
58.89
61.42
39.18

Table 15a. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
2016 Max Hydroperiod (Growing Season 17 -Mar through 14 -Nov, 242 days)
Well Data for 17 -Mar through 9 -November
Success Criterion 9% = 22 Consecutive Days
Gauge
Consecutive
Cumulative
Occurrences
Percent of
Days growing
Season
Percent of
Days growing
Season
AW1
22 9
96 39
17
AW2
21 9
87 36
15
AW3
32 13
103 43
12
AW4
95 39
163 67
7
AW5
32 13
130 54
21
AW6
22 9
109 45
22
AW7
36 15
186 77
12
RAW1
33 13
87 36
12
RAW2
15 6
32 13
7
RAW3
32 13
75 31
10
Table 15b. MYl-MY3 Wetland Hydrology Gauge Summary
MYl-2014
MY2-2015
MY3-2016
Consecutive
Consecutive
Consecutive
Gauge
Days
Percent of
growing
Season
Days
Percent of
growing
Season
Days
Percent of
growing
Season
AWI
22
9
63
26
22
9
AW2
22
9
41
17
21
9
AW3
13
5
38
16
32
13
AW4
67
28
77
32
95
39
AW5
7
3
38
16
32
13
AW6
43
18
65
27
22
9
AW7
5
2
72
30
36
15
RAWI
22
9
49
20
33
13
RAW2
10
4
19
8
15
6
RAW3
20
8
41
17
32
13

Chart 1. 2016 Precipitation Data for Muddy Run 11 Site
10.00
1100
8.00
7.00
6.00
L)
.2 500
.2L
L, 4.00
w
IL
3.00
2.00
1.00
C1.00
2016 Precipitation Data for Muddy Run III Site
F m A m i j A S 0 N
Months
�V41VaiN Rw941 �Omwng Seaw � 4n.5"AM Ftw CWge --- *--- Wala Mwft Rawf4l ------ MWM Pe. *
M'Ml�InmIn
Iwo
nil
F m A m i j A S 0 N
Months
�V41VaiN Rw941 �Omwng Seaw � 4n.5"AM Ftw CWge --- *--- Wala Mwft Rawf4l ------ MWM Pe. *

Chart 2. Muddy Run II Groundwater Monitoring Gauge Hydrographs
2018 Muddy Run II Groundwater Gauge AW1
10
0
10
N
w
U
U
E -20
c
0
m _30
W
m
AO
c
0
0
-50
-60
_7p
F f•:1 A F:1 J ., A S O 14 D
Months
and-iU&A-941MFGIAW1
10
0
10
D
m
m _30
W
m
m
-00
0
0
-60
7J ., F hA A h:1 J ,. A S O N
Months
2016 Muddy Run II Groundwater Gauge AW2
Growing Season
a
I
i
10
0
10
D
m
m _30
W
m
m
-00
0
0
-60
7J ., F hA A h:1 J ,. A S O N
Months
2016 Muddy Run II Groundwater Gauge AW2
b
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
Oq
v
c
508
R.
4,00
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
100
9.0
8.0
7.0
m
6.0
U
c
5.0 0
io
Q
4.00
0�
5.0
2.0
1.0
0c
Growing Season
JLL
I
t�
b
10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
Oq
v
c
508
R.
4,00
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
100
9.0
8.0
7.0
m
6.0
U
c
5.0 0
io
Q
4.00
0�
5.0
2.0
1.0
0c

10
0
-10
-60
10
0
-10
m
@
r
-20
C
O
7
m _34
W
m
m
3k -40
S7
c
0
-50
-60
7
.. F M A h:1 J .. A S O K D
Months
SWAM Dais ftWdl - - MPoIANM
2016 Muddy Run II Groundwater Gauge AW3
F M A r:1 J _ P. S O N ❑
Months
�Wi" C iy ftWMI - IAEA AM
2016 Muddy Run II Groundwater Gauge AW4
9.0
8, D
7.0
OF
6.0 t
U
C
c
5.0 p
K
4,0 0
EL
3.0
20
1.0
0,0
14.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
U
C
5.0 p
iv
Q
4,0 ❑
E
13
3.0
20
1.0
DC
Growing Season
i 4
till
F M A r:1 J _ P. S O N ❑
Months
�Wi" C iy ftWMI - IAEA AM
2016 Muddy Run II Groundwater Gauge AW4
9.0
8, D
7.0
OF
6.0 t
U
C
c
5.0 p
K
4,0 0
EL
3.0
20
1.0
0,0
14.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
U
C
5.0 p
iv
Q
4,0 ❑
E
13
3.0
20
1.0
DC

10
0
Sir
O
lu -40
0
-60
-70
J F M A F.! J J A S 0 N 7
Months
�WJk..Daly R'.IWI MRIIAYJ9—G-46—ion
2016 Muddy [tun II Groundwater Gauge AWS
10
0
-10
N
(D
U
-20
C
O
S
-30
W
2016 Muddy Run II Groundwater Gauge AWB
60
-7D
J F M A F.: 1 J A S 0 N 0
Months
—Ww mwft Rarlal MRp A5W �Grwnrj Elsv siuri
10.00
8.00
8.017
7.00
N
6.W L
U
5.00 0
.Q
4.00
a
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
10.00
9.00
8.00
7.00
w
6.00 r
U
G
5.40 D
a
4.00 U
0.
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.40

10
0
-10
H
W
U
-20
C
O
� -30
W
d
lC
U -40
3
0
-60
-70
J F M A F.! J J A S C] N 7
Months
��Wallaco Dily Rirdall MRII A5k7 -Ground Ekvaj.n
2016 Muddy [tun II Groundwater Gauge AWT
10.04
900
a03
N
6.W L
U
C
G
5.04 U
46
Q
4.00 U
W
a
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
2016 Muddy Run II Groundwater Gauge REFAWI
10
10.0
Growing Season
9.0
0
.10
!
7.0
U
U
Z
Z- -20
Cd
m
W
�-
5.0 ai
-30
w
i�
n
mj
a -40
—
4.0 v
2
C
iL
3.0
-50
20
I
1
1.0
IIS
-74�
J
F Li
A hJ
J
J
A
_
S 0-
K'
❑
0.0
Months
�WJ..DWIYRaWoil-MRIIREFAWI

10
0
10
m
t
U
_ -20
c
a
m -30
111
m
p 40
L
0
O
C7
-50
L,911
-70
2016 Muddy Run Il Groundwater Gauge REFAW2
10.0
9,0
8.0
7.0
Months
baa Oaap Ra WallMRII REF AW2
3.0
20
1.0
0.0
2016 Muddy Run II Groundwater Gauge REFAW3
10
10.0
Growing Season
9.0
0
I
1
I I
-10
(D7.0
-------------
I
U
U
Z
iI
N
Z- -20
0
_
U
C
m
W
=
V
5.0 as
-30
�
�
Q
a -40
4.00
2
C
d
3.0
-50
20
1.0
I
ISI
-70
J
F Li
A h:1
J J A
S 0-
K,
❑
0.0
Months
�WJ.. Wily Ra Wall MRII REFAW3

Appendix E — Crest Gauge Verification Photos
Photo 1. Crest Gauge 1 (Reach 2 - 1.6 ft. — 10/8/16)
Photo 3. Crest Gauge 3 (Reach 3B — Wrack Lines. —
10/8/16)
Photo 2. Crest Gauge 2 (Reach 3A — 2.0 ft. — 2/5/16)
Photo 4. Crest Gauge 4 (Reach 5A — 3.8 ft. — 10/8/16)