20120748 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_2016_20170224

Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
FINAL
Project Name: Junes Branch Stream Restoration
NCDMS Contract No.: 003979
NCDMS Project No.: 95027
Jackson County, NC
Data Collected: January 2016 - December 2016
Date Submitted: December 2016
Submitted to:
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
NCDEQ-DMS, 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-1652

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Prepared for:
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Prepared by:
EQUINOX
balance through proper planning
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28801

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Contents
1.0 Project Summary...............................................................................................................................
l
1.1. Goals.............................................................................................................................................1
1.2. Success Criteria.............................................................................................................................
1
1.3. Project Setting and Background....................................................................................................
2
1.4. Project Approach..........................................................................................................................
2
1.5. Project Performance......................................................................................................................
3
2.0 Methods.............................................................................................................................................4
3.0 References.........................................................................................................................................6
Appendix A General Tables and Figures......................................................................................................
7
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data.........................................................................................................
15
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data...............................................................................................................
41
Appendix D Stream Geomorphology Data.................................................................................................
51
AppendixE Hydrologic Data......................................................................................................................
99

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
1.1. Goals
The project goals address stressors identified in the Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) and include the
following:
• Improve water quality within the restored channel reaches and downstream watercourses
through:
o reducing turbidity by stabilizing existing stream banks and altering stream channel
dimension, pattern and profile
o reducing nutrient loads and fecal coliform bacteria from adjacent agricultural fields
by fencing the riparian area to keep livestock out of the stream and restoring a
wooded riparian buffer
Improve local aquatic and terrestrial habitat and diversity within the restored channels and
their vicinity through:
o reducing water temperatures by planting native vegetation in the riparian zone and
creating shade
o improving habitat complexity by restoring the stream profile to stable riffle/pool and
step/pool complexes
o improving terrestrial habitat by excluding livestock and creating a riparian buffer
comprised of native plant species
o improving aquatic habitat by establishing tree canopy to provide organic material
such as woody debris and leaf packs to stream
o removing invasive exotic species and planting native vegetation in the riparian buffer
Improve flood flow attenuation on-site and downstream through:
o raising the bed or creating bankfull benches to allow for overbank flows every 1-2
years and improve the connection to the active floodplain
1.2. Success Criteria
1.2.1. Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability
Restored and enhanced streams shall be in compliance with the standards set forth in the USACE 2003
Stream Mitigation Guidelines and should demonstrate morphologic stability to be considered successful.
Stability does not equate to an absence of change, but rather to sustainable rates of change or stable
patterns of variation. Restored streams often demonstrate some level of initial adjustment in the several
months that follow construction and some change/variation subsequent to that is also to be expected.
However, the observed change should not be unidirectional such that it represents a robust trend. If some
trend is evident, it should be very modest or indicate migration to a stable form.
Dimension - Cross-section measurements should indicate little change from the as -built cross-
sections. If changes do occur, they will be evaluated to determine whether the adjustments are
associated with increased stability or whether they indicate movement towards an unstable condition.
Pattern and Profile - Measurements and calculated values should indicate stability with little
deviation from as -built conditions and established morphological ranges for the restored stream type.
Pool depths may vary from year to year, but the majority should maintain depths sufficient to be
observed as distinct features in the profile. The pools should maintain their depth with flatter water
surface slopes, while the riffles should remain shallower and steeper. Pattern measurements will not
be collected unless conditions seem to indicate that a detectable change appears to have occurred based
on channel profile and/or cross-section dimension measurements.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 1 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Substrate - Calculated D5o and D84 values should indicate coarser size class distribution of bed
materials in riffles and finer size class distribution in pools. The majority of riffle pebble counts
should indicate maintenance or coarsening of substrate distributions. Generally, it is anticipated that
the bed material will coarsen over time.
Sediment Transport - Depositional features should be consistent with a stable stream that is
effectively managing its sediment load. Point bar and inner berm features, if present, should develop
without excessive encroachment of the channel. Isolated development of robust (i.e. comprised of
coarse material and/or vegetation actively diverting flow) mid -channel or lateral bars will be
acceptable. Likewise, development of a higher number of mid -channel or lateral bars that are minor in
terms of their permanency such that profile measurements do not indicate systemic aggradation will be
acceptable, but trends in the development of robust mid -channel or alternating bar features will be
considered a destabilizing condition and may require intervention or have success implications.
Surface Water Hydrology - Monitoring of stream surface water stages should indicate recurrence of
a bankfull flow on average every 1 to 2 years. At a minimum, throughout the monitoring period, the
surface water stage should achieve bankfull or greater elevations at least twice. The bankfull events
must occur during separate monitoring years.
1.2.2. Vegetation
Riparian vegetation monitoring shall be conducted for a minimum of five years to ensure that success
criteria are met per USACE (2003) guidelines. Accordingly, success criteria will consist of a minimum
survival of 320 stems per acre by the end of the Year 3 monitoring period and a minimum of 260 stems per
acre at the end of Year 5. If monitoring indicates either that the specified survival rate is not being met or
the development of detrimental conditions (i.e., invasive species, diseased vegetation), appropriate
corrective actions will be developed and implemented.
1.3. Project Setting and Background
The Junes Branch Restoration Site (Site) is located in central Jackson County approximately 2 miles east
of Sylva, NC (Figure 1). The site encompasses 5.8 acres of formerly agricultural land and includes
portions of Bumgarner Branch and three unnamed tributaries that, for purposes of the project, are referred
to as Junes Branch, Higdon Branch, and Doris Branch. The Site is located within the Little Tennessee
River Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 14 -digit Hydrologic Unit 06010203020010, and
the North Carolina Division of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) sub basin 04-04-02. The site watershed
is characteristic of the Blue Ridge region with moderate rainfall with annual precipitation averaging 52.9
inches. Elevation within the site ranges from 2,200 feet at the northwestern extent, to 2,150 feet along
Junes Branch. The drainage area of Bumgarner Branch at the downstream end of the Site is 1.03 square
miles (668 acres). Land use within the watershed is predominately forested (68%) with the remaining
land use composed of low-density residential (21%) and agricultural (11%). Additional information
regarding project setting and background is found in the Final Mitigation Plan (EBX 2013).
1.4. Project Approach
Channel restoration involving improved pattern, dimension, and longitudinal profile was completed on all
four stream reaches. A Priority I approach was applied to all four reaches of the project (Rosgen 1996;
NCSRI 2004).
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 2 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

1.5. Project Performance
Monitoring Year 3 (MY3) data was collected from July through December 2016. Monitoring included
the following activities: visual assessment of all reaches and the surrounding easement, collection of
photos at fourteen permanent photo stations, documentation of vegetation at eight permanent monitoring
plots, surveying of 3,050 feet of longitudinal profile and fifteen cross-sections, and conducting pebble
counts at eight riffles.
Generally, visual assessment of the project as a whole indicates that the streams are performing as desired
and, with the exception of two small bare areas, vegetation is well established throughout the easement.
Summary tables and photos taken at the permanent photo stations associated with the visual assessment
are presented in Appendix B. Visual assessment of the stream was performed to document signs of
instability, such as eroding banks, in -stream structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. No
indication of instability was observed (Table 5 and Figure 2). Structures are intact and performing as
designed. Herbaceous vegetation has become well established in both the wetland fringes along the
stream as well as upland areas. Planted stems are becoming well established; however, two bare areas
totaling 0.07 acre were noted along the Junes Branch reach (Table 6, Figure 2). These areas will be
monitored in future site visits for woody recruitment and the establishment of herbaceous vegetation.
Three additional permanent vegetation monitoring plots, one on Bumgarner Branch and two on Junes
Branch, were added during MY3. These vegetation monitoring plots were installed to capture planted
stems located on the western/right descending bank of both reaches. Monitoring of the permanent
vegetation monitoring plots (n = 8) was completed during June 2016. Summary tables and photographs
associated with MY3 vegetation monitoring can be found in Appendix C. Vegetation data for MY3
indicate that all vegetation monitoring plots, except plot 2, are on track to meet the MY3 interim success
criteria of 320 stems per acre. Low planted stem densities at plot 2 can be attributed to thick herbaceous
vegetation and a large density of recruited black willows (Salix nigra) outcompeting the planted stems.
While vegetation plot 2 is not meeting success criteria for planted stems, with recruits, the stem density is
2,347 stems/ acre, far exceeding the MY3 interim success criteria of 320 stems per acre. Stem densities
ranged from 243 to 971 stems per acre with a mean of 647 stems per acre across all plots. A total of 14
species were documented within the monitoring plots. When volunteer stems are included, densities
ranged between 728 and 2,388 stems per acre with a mean of 1,351 stems per acre across all plots.
Geomorphic data for MY3 was collected from August through December 2016. Summary tables, cross-
section plots, and longitudinal profiles related to stream morphology are located in Appendix D.
Significant changes in the cross-section data between MY2 and MY3 were limited to cross-sections 3, 6,
7, and 13 (Appendix B, Table 11 a). Riffle cross-section 3, where downcutting of the channel was evident
in MY has begun to stabilize, however the maximum water depth still increased by 0.2 feet from MY2 to
MY3. Deposits of fine material and increased vegetation caused the formation of an inner berm on the
left descending bank of cross-section 6, decreasing bankfull width, maximum depth and cross-sectional
area by 1.7 feet, 0.2 foot, and 1.3 feet, respectively. Deposits of finer material in pools led to a significant
decrease in maximum pool depth at cross-sections 7 and 13 over the last two monitoring years.
Generally, longitudinal profile data (Appendix B, Table l lb) indicated relatively little change in riffle and
pool dimensions between MY2 and MY3. Bumgarner Branch I showed a decrease in riffle length of 2.0
feet, from 17.5 feet to 15.5 feet, and a decrease in pool maximum depth of 0.4 foot to 1.9 feet. An
increase in sediment deposition has caused a slight flattening of the riffle slope from 0.028 (ft/ft) to 0.022
(ft/ft). Bumgarner Branch II dimensions remained relatively similar to the MY2 dimensions; however,
pool maximum depths have decreased by 0.3 foot to 2.2 feet. The upper end of Junes Branch saw an
influx of fine sediment flattening the riffle profiles and filling in some of the pools. No other major
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 3 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

changes were noted in the Junes Branch profile. Increased vegetation and drought conditions at the Site
has led to deposition of fine sediment within Higdon Branch. Pool maximum depths have decreased from
1.4 feet to 1.0 foot between MY2 and MY3. This influx of sediment also caused a flattening of the water
surface slope from 0.0184 (ft/ft) to 0.0162 (ft/ft). Aggradation within the upper portion of Higdon Branch
has transitioned approximately the first 100 feet of stream to a linear wetland. This area still maintains
hydrologic function, but riffle/ pool features have become difficult to decipher. Considering the drought
conditions this year, RES will monitor this area during MY4 site visits to determine if any remedial work
is warranted. Doris Branch also displayed a decrease in pool maximum depth from 1.2 feet to 0.9 foot
between MY2 and MY3. As with Higdon Branch, aggradation can be seen throughout the Doris Branch
reach, especially in pools. RES will also monitor this area during MY4 to determine if any remedial work
is warranted. Assessment of recent aerial imagery within the watershed does not identify any off-site
sediment sources affecting Junes Branch, Higdon Branch, or Doris Branch. However, it is expected that
the unstable streams located upstream of the Site are contributing a considerable amount of sediment to
the project. Considering the easements' close proximity to the road, runoff from the Fairview Road is
another expected cause of sedimentation within the reaches. Especially the upper portions of Junes
Branch and Higdon Branch.
Substrate monitoring was also performed during MY3. Riffle D5o has decreased between MY2 and MY3.
The average D50 fell into the fine sand to very coarse sand size class for Bumgarner I, fine gravel for
Bumgarner II, silt/clay to fine gravel for Junes Branch, silt/clay for Higdon Branch, and silt/clay for Doris
Branch. The shift towards finer particle size classes throughout the project is likely due to fine sediment
being transported into the project area from upstream and dropping out of the water column during the
falling limb of high flow events. Additionally, the dense herbaceous vegetation throughout all reaches
increases entrapment of fine material during high flows. As woody vegetation continues to establish,
herbaceous vegetation density in and near the channel will decrease, allowing more efficient transport of
finer particle size classes during high flows. A gravel and cobble layer is still present under a layer of
finer silts and sand at all riffles assessed during pebble counts. Substrate will be monitored in future years
for shifts in size composition.
Overall, documented shifts in stream morphology do not exceed expectations between MY2 and MY3 as
the constructed stream adjusts to conditions at the site. The project is meeting success criteria regarding
stable dimension, pattern, and profile as well as substrate composition and sediment transport.
Two bankfull events were recorded on Bumgarner Branch 11 during MY3. One during a January site visit
and another during a June site visit. A bankfull event was also recorded on Junes Branch during a June
site visit (Appendix E, Table 12). This is the third bankfull event for Burmgarner II and the first for Junes
Branch since construction was completed in June 2014.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or easement encroachment
and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables
and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly Restoration Plan) documents available on DMS's website. All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from DMS upon request.
2.0 METHODS
Visual assessment of the Junes Branch restoration site was performed at the beginning of the monitoring
period. Permanent photostation photos were collected during the initial visual assessment. Vegetation or
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 4 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

stream problem areas occurring outside of the monitoring stations were documented with additional
photographs.
Geomorphic measurements were taken during low flow conditions using a Nikon® NPR 332 Total
Station. Three-dimensional coordinates associated with cross-sections and longitudinal profiles were
collected in the field and geo-referenced (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Morphological data was
limited to 15 cross-sections, and 3,050 feet of longitudinal profile. Survey data were imported into CAD,
ArcGIS®, and Microsoft Excel® for data processing and analysis. Channel substrate was characterized
using a Wolman Pebble Count outlined in the Harrelson et al (1994) and processed using Microsoft
Excel.
Vegetation success is being monitored at 8 permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation monitoring follows
the CVS-EEP Level 2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes
analysis of composition and density of planted species. Data are processed using the CVS data entry tool.
In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with rebar and photos of each plot are
taken from the origin each monitoring year.
Precipitation data were collected using an Onset' HOBO® Data Logging Rain Gauge. Bankfull events
were documented with crest gauges. During quarterly visits to the site, the height of the corkline was
recorded and cross-referenced with known bankfull elevations at each crest gauge.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 5 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

3.0 REFERENCES
EBX (Environmental Banc and Exchange). 2013. Junes Branch Stream Restoration, Final Mitigation
Plan, Jackson County, North Carolina. NCEEP Project No. 95027.
Harrelson, Cheryl, C. Rawlins and J. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated
Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station. USDA Forest Service. Fort Collins, Colorado
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm.
NCSRI (North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute). 2004. Stream Restoration: A Natural Channel
Design Handbook. North Carolina Stream Restoration Institute and North Carolina Sea Grant.
Raleigh. http://www.bae.ncsu.edu/programs/extension/wqg/srR/guidebook.html
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology. Pagosa Springs, Colorado.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission,
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources -Division of Water Quality.
Wilmington District.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 6 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix A
General Tables and Figures

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

f , 1
i�
' r
Ali -
74
23
tC,;lc
74
141
�4W ,
107; June's Branch
116
i _fir
16
�.
Direction, From Asheville, take I-40 West for approximately IS m ,
Take axil 27 onto US -74 toward US-19fClyde,US-23AVaynesville.
Take exit 107 toward .tones Cone Road and merge onto
- - US -23 SouthlUS-74 West Atter approximately 20 miles, take exit
S? toward NC-1071Cullowhee. Keep right at the fork in the ramp
erred continue onto US-23/Asheville Aighway. Make a slight len
1 nio NC-107/East Main Street fix approximately 2 miles before
29 i turning lett onto Fairview Road (SR 1724).
ForeSt Ithe suhimt project silo Is an environmental Ngtoration site ofthe
IICDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is
1
Hills ytoxnpassed by a recarded conservation easement, but is
r
],ordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the site may
require traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and
therefore access by the general public is not permitted. Access by
authorized personnel of state and federal agencies or their
4 designees contractors involved in the development. oversight and
y � .t.wwdship of the restoration site is pert d within the terrns and
i timeframes of their defined roles. Anv intended site visitation or
.l activity by any person outside of these previously sanctioned roles
net actrvilies requires prior coordination with DMS.
Prepared for: Prepared by:
re S
Figure 1: Vicinity Map C 'Q U I N '� J'
June's Branch C
Project No. 95027 Notes: Conservation Easement from Key
Jackson County, North Carolina Mapping & Survey, P.A.
0 0,5 1 2 3
Miles
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 9 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

'BR = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS = Filter
Strip; S = Grassed Swale; LS = Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forested Buffer
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 10 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Junes Branch / Project Number 95027
Mitigation Credits
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -riparian Wetland
Buffer
Nutrient
Offset
Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
ir
Totals
3,162
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Project Components
Project
Approach
PP
Restoration
Restoration
Component -or-
Stationing/Location
Existing
Footage/Acreage
(PI, PH
-or-Mitigation
Restoration
Footage or
Ratio
Reach ID
etc.)
Equivalent
Acreage
Bumgamer Branch
100+21 - 107+49
610
PI
R
631
1:1
I
Bumgamer Branch
107+49 - 112+92
550
PI
R
501
1:1
II
June's Branch
200+97 - 215+77
1,311
PI
R
1,374
1:1
Higdon Branch
300+45 - 304+27
530
PI
R
376
1:1
Doris Branch
400+00 - 402+88
260
PI
R
280
l :l
Component Summation
Restoration
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -riparian
Wetland
Buffer
Upland
Level
(linear feet)
(acres)
(acres)
(square feet)
(acres)
Riverine
Non-Riverine
Restoration
3,162
Enhancement
-
Enhancement
Enhancement
II
Creation
Preservation
High Quality
Preservation
BMP Elements
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
FB
Entire Site
Protect Stream
'BR = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS = Filter
Strip; S = Grassed Swale; LS = Level Spreader; NI = Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forested Buffer
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 10 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Junes Branch / Project Number 95027
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Completion
or Deliver
Mitigation Plan
Aug -12
April -2013
Final Design - Construction Plans
N/A
April -2013
Construction
N/A
June -2014
Temporary S&E Mix Applied to Entire Project Area
May -14
Permanent Seed Mix Applied
May -14
Containerized and B&B Plantings
Ma -14
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0 Monitoring -
Baseline)
July -2014
July -2014
Year 1 Monitoring
Jan - 2015
Feb - 2015
Year 2 Monitoring
Nov - 2015
Nov - 2015
Year 3 Monitoring
Dec - 2016
Dec - 2016
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 11 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Table 3. Project Contacts
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Site — Project # 95027
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson St., Suite 110
Prime Contractor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Brian Hockett [phone]
Wolf Creek Engineering
12-1/2 Wall St., Suite C
Designer
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Grant Ginn [phone] ext 102
Northstate Environmental
2889 Lowery Street
Construction Contractor
Winston Salem, North Carolina 27101
Darrell Westmoreland [phone]
Northstate Environmental
2889 Lowery Street
Planting Contractor
Winston Salem, North Carolina 27101
Darrell Westmoreland [phone]
Kee Mapping and Surveying
PO Box 2566
As -built Surveys
Asheville, North Carolina 28802
Phillip B. Key [phone]
Green Resource
5204 Highgreen Court
Seeding Mix Source
Colfax, North Carolina 27235
[phone]
Dykes & Son Nursery
825 Maude Etter Road
Bare Root Seedlings
McMinnville, Tennessee
[phone]
Foggy Mountain Nursery
797 Helton Creek Road
Live Stakes
Lansing, North Carolina 28643
[phone]
Equinox
Monitoring Performers (YO-MY3)
37 Haywood St.
2014-2016
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Drew Alderman [phone]
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 12 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 13 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Site — Project # 95027
Project Information
Project Name
Junes Branch
County
Jackson County
Project Area (acres)
5.8 ac.
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35357378'N; 83.191391'W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Blue Ridge
River Basin
Little Tennessee
USGSHydrologic Unit 8-digit
06010203 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit
6010203020010
DWQ Sub-basin
4/4/2002
Project Drainage Area (acres)
668
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area <5%
CGIA Land Use Classification
2.01.03 Hay and Pasture Land
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Bumgarner Br.I Bumgarner Br. II Junes Br.
Higdon Br.
Doris Br.
Length of reach (linear feet)
610 550 1,311
530
260
Valley classification (Rosgen)
11 II II
II
II
Drainage area
0.93 1.03 0.23
0.08
0.01
NCDWQ stream identification score
40 40 38
38
29.5
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
C C -
-
-
Morphologieal Description (stream type) (Rosgen)
I( G G
E
G
Evolutionary trend(Rosgen)
C F F
E
G
Underlying mapped soils
CwA, WtB CwA, WtB WtB
CwA
CwA
Drainage class
Somewhat Poorly Somewhat Poorly Somewhat
Drained- Mod Well Drained- Mod Well Mod Well Drained Poorly
Drained Drained Drained
Somewhat
Poorly
Drained
Soil Hydric status
Non-Hydric Non-Hydric Non-Hydric
Non-Hydric
Non-Hydric
Slope
2.20% 2.20% 2.30%
FEMA classification
N/A N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
Native vegetation community
Agricultural Agricultural Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
30% 30% 30%
1 40%
40%
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland 1 Welland2
Size of Wetland (acres)
0.03 0.13
Riparian Riparian
Wetland Type (non-riparian, riparian riverine or riparian non-riverine) Non-Riverine Non-Riverine
Mapped Soil Series
CwA CwA
Drainage class
4imewhat Poorly Drained Somewhat Poorly Drained
Soil Hydric Status
Hydric Hydric
Source of Hydrology
Seep Seep
Hydrologic Impairment
None Dredging/Ditching
Native vegetation community
Scrub-Shrub Forested
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
2% 42%
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable? Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States— Section 404
Yes Resolved
Action ID #2012-01101
Waters of the United States — Section 401
Yes Resolved
NCDWRProject # 20120748
Endangered Species Act
No Yes
ERTR
Historic Preservation Act
No Yes
ERTR
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/
Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA)
No N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N/A N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A N/A
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 13 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 14 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

II^
2. Integrated Current Condition Flan View Dralt
/
/ -.4 /
II IIIII� _ `
_�• r,l� . ,� ..� Bumgarner I1 a '
6,
40000
4'1Bumgarner I
/..DorisBanch . ,HigdonBranch Sro-'61,-
L - �■
y
Prepared for
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 3
Sylva, Jackson County, NC
NCDMS Contract No. 003979
ire NCDMS Project No.: 95027
December 2016
Overview
Hook -Log Run Log Vane
Cross -Section Vegetation Plot Success with Hook
'-N,i Thalweg Criteria Met
{
ABiy 6
Hook Run
Log Sill
Top of Bank ® Criteria Unmet
Contour- Major
q�
U
Boulder -Arch
y Log Sill
no Baffle
Contour- Minor
Boulder -Arch
Brush Toe
�-- 1 Easement
with Log
� Sheet Boundary
Armored Riffle
0 125
250
Notes:
1) Baseline Data Provided by Kee Mapping
2) Orthoimagery provided by NCOneMap (20 10)
500
m Feet
Prepared by
EQUINOX

2. Integrated current Condition Flan View
Stream Problem Areas Vegetation Plot Success
Degradation Criteria Met
Criteria Unmet
Burngarner
soonr•_.
/o
• O O O
. 00 � O O
• / p
.� o
t
Junes Branch
K
f
316
hr
A
xs10
so XS3 % PP9
2
�• / X32 �s1
xs 1 I
rn /• + +
PP 10 w °0+ o • o
+
> + O +
O A
0 • +
.00
' o m
o W09w XS5 XS4 O10000
r�01-
, XS 13 X`S12 ♦�
O PP11 .ffi O Ck PP1
P12 �.I y wow o �A__ r
z�
XS 15 — ' ' -.'�"P 14
XS 14 -b
, -o"O Doris Branch
� ' �
�
. / . _ �� Higdon Branch
,�••�
r..Vr"Man
-
•.
Prepared for Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 3 O Rain Gauge Cross -Section
rp, Sy1Va, Jackson County, NC Q Crest Gauge Long Pro Begin/End
NCDMS Contract No. 003979 Photo Point Thalweg
NCDMS Project No.: 95027
Control Point Top of Bank
December 2016
Sheet 1 of 2 �i Contour- Major
Contour- Minor
Easement
Bumgarner I
So -
r.�
• ` • ` •o'er
O T • ` O
O
' O
+ PPS
L•�
0 50 100
Notes:
1) Baseline Data Provided by Kee Mapping
2) ArcGis World Imagery Layer
200
m Feet
Prepared by
EQUINOX
Hook -Log Run
Log Vane
with Hook
Hook Run
Log Sill
Boulder -Arch
Log Sill
no Baffle
Boulder-Arch�
Brush Toe
with Log
Armored Riffle
r.�
• ` • ` •o'er
O T • ` O
O
' O
+ PPS
L•�
0 50 100
Notes:
1) Baseline Data Provided by Kee Mapping
2) ArcGis World Imagery Layer
200
m Feet
Prepared by
EQUINOX

2. Integrated current Condition Flan View
etation Plot Success Vegetation Problem A
Criteria Met C:.�:..: Bare Area
Criteria Unmet
PP3
I�
000 ' 1
177:71
W :v • / • N O
- �7q'%@VA_W .00010"
nnn o o o N - .. __ . &0 + PP')
o
xS9
k
0 4w*�
Prepared for Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
Monitoring Year 3
rp, Sylva, Jackson County, NC p
NCDMS Contract No. 003979
NCDMS Project No.: 95027
December 2016
Sheet 2 of 2
f +
O♦ O O A
O
N®
O
W ♦
� N
O
-� PPI o
•�
MAMW1
100
z
200
m Feet
Hook -Log Run
Hook Log Vane
Notes:
1) Baseline Data Provided by Kee Mapping
Prepared by
_ ..�
Rain Gauge �� Cross -Section Easement
T
Hook Run
with
Log Sill
2) ArcGis World Imagery Layer
Crest Gauge Long Pro Begin/End
PP70
Photo Point Thalweg
�/ $
Boulder -Arch
�
Log Sill
no Baffle
a
Control Point Top of Bank
Boulder-ArchBrush
so
Toe
EQUINOX
Contour- Major
with Log
Contour- Minor
Armored Riffle

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 20 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bumgarner Branch I
Assessed Len th 631 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable
Performing
ass Intended
nt
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2. Degradation -Evidence of downcutting.
1
37
94%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
13
13
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Denth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
13
13
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
N/A
N/A
N/A
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
13
13
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
12
12
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured / Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
14
14
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
14
14
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
14
14
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
14
14
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining— Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
14
14
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 21 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Table 5 contd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bumgarner Branch II
Assessed Len th 543 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable
Performing
ass Intended
nt
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Degradation -Evidence of downcutting.
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
7
7
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Denth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
8
8
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
2
2
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
8
8
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
8
8
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured / Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
7
7
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
7
7
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
7
7
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
7
7
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining— Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
7
7
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 22 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Junes Branch
Assessed Length 1,375 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Ageradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2. Deeradation -Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
45
45
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth z 1.6).
45
45
100%
Condition
2. Lenpt appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
N/A
N/A
N/A
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
45
45
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
45
45
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
o
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
45
45
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
45
45
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
45
45
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
45
45
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining— Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
45
45
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 23 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Table 5 contd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Higdon Branch
Assessed Len th 376 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable
P
ass Int nd
ntendedd
Total
Number in
As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2. Degradation -Evidence of downcutting.
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
18
18
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Denth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
18
18
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
3
3
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
18
18
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
18
18
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured / Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
15
15
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
15
15
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
15
15
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
15
15
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining— Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
15
15
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 24 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Table 5 contd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Doris Branch
Assessed Len th 288 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable
P
ass Int nd
ntendedd
Total
Number in
As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Degradation -Evidence of downcutting.
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
23
23
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Denth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
23
23
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
N/A
N,A
N/A
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
23
23
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
23
23
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured / Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
23
23
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
23
23
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
23
23
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
23
23
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining— Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
23
23
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 25 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 26 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027
Planted Acreage: 5.81
% of
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Planted
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
N/A
2
0.07
1%
2. Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3,
N/A
0
0.00
0%
4, or 5 stem count criteria.
Totals
2
0.07
1%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
N/A
0
0.00
0%
given the monitoring year.
Cumulative Totals
2
0.07
1%
Easement Acreage: 5.81
of
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
Cross Hatch
0
0.00
0%
(Red -
Dense/Yellow - Present)
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
N/A
0
0.00
0%
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 26 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 1
Station 202+60 - Downstream
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 1
Station 202+60 - Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 27 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2
Station 206+30 - Downstream
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2
Station 206+30 - Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 28 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 3
Looking South/Downstream Junes Branch
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 3
Looking North/Upstream - Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 29 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 4
Station 210+60 - Downstream
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 4
Station 210+60 - Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 30 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 5
Station 211+10 - Upstream
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 6
Station 214+00 - Downstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 31 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 6
Station 214+00 - Upstream
Bumgarner Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 7
Station 100+21 - Downstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 32 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Bumgarner Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 8
Station 102+70 - Downstream
Bumgarner Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 8
Station 102+70- Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 33 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Bumgarner Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 9
Station 105+25 - Downstream
Bumgarner Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 9
Station 105+25 —Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 34 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Bumgarner Branch I — Permanent Photo Station 10
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Junes Branch
Junes Branch — Permanent Photo Station 10
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Bumgarner Branch
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 35 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Bumgarner Branch II — Permanent Photo Station 11
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Higdon Branch
Higdon Branch — Permanent Photo Station 11
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Bumgarner Branch II
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 36 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Bumgarner Branch II — Permanent Photo Station 12
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Doris Branch
Doris Branch — Permanent Photo Station 12
Looking Upstream from Confluence with Bumgarner Branch II
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 37 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Higdon Branch — Permanent Photo Station 13
Station 302+80 - Downstream
Higdon Branch — Permanent Photo Station 13
Station 302+80 - Upstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 38 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Doris Branch — Permanent Photo Station 14
Station 400+00 - Downstream
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 39 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 40 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027
Vegetation Plot ID
Vegetation
Survival Threshold
Met?
Tract Mean
1
Yes
88%
2
No
3
Yes
4
Yes
5
Yes
6
Yes
7
Yes
8
Yes
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 43 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
June 8, 2016
Junes Branch - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
June 8, 2016
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 44 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
June 8, 2016
Junes Branch - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
June 8, 2016
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 45 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
June 8, 2016
Junes Branch - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6
June 8, 2016
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 46 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7
June 8, 2016
Junes Branch - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8
June 8, 2016
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 47 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 48 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Metadata
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027
Report Prepared By
Drew Alderman
Date Prepared
6/10/2016 16:15
database name
Equinox 2016_ A_Junes.mdb
database location
Z:\ES\NRI&M\EBXMonitoring\Junes\MY3-2016\Data\Veg
computer name
FIELD -PC
file size
61181952
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT ------------
M e tadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s)
and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This
excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes
live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems,
missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot;
dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY -------------------------------------
Project Code
95027
project Name
Junes Branch
Description
River Basin
Little Tennessee
le ngth(ft)
stream -to -edge width (ft)
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
8
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 48 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

'PnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
Color Key
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% 41
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Recruit Stems
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 49 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counrt (Species by Plot)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027
Current Plot Data (MY3 2016)
Scientific Name Common Name
Species
Type
Plot 1
PnoLS P -all T
Plot 2 Plot 3
PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T
Plot 4
Plot 5
Plot 6
Plot 7
Plot 8
PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T
Alnusserrulata Hazel Alder
Shrub
1
7
7
7
5
5
5
1 1
1
Betula nigra River Birch
Tree
4 4
4
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
Carpinus caroliniana var. caroliniana Coastal American Hombeam
Tree
3 3
3
1 1
1
Cornus amomum Silky Dogwood
Shrub
1
14
32
Cornus arida Flowering Dogwood
Tree
2 2
2
Diospyros virginiana Common Persimmon
Tree
1
1 2
1
1
11
11
2 2
2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash
Tree
101 10
101
2 2
2
5 5
7
5 5
51
1
1
1
2 2
2
Hamamelis virginiana var. virginiana American Witchhazel
Tree
1 1
1
1 I
1
1
1
1
Juglans nigra Black Walnut
Tree
2
1
1 1
1
Liriodendron tali i era Tuliptrce
Tree
Liriodendron tali ifera var. tuli ifera Tulip -tree, Yellow Poplar, Whitewood
Tree
1 1
1
3 3
3
7
7
7
6
6
6
Platanus occidentalis American Sycamore
Tree
Platanus occidentalis var. occidentalis Sycamore, Plane -tree
Tree
1 1
1
5 5 5 7 7
12
2 2
3
1
6
6
6
7
7
7
15 15
15
Prunus cerasus Sour Cherry
Exotic
2
Prunus serotina var. serotina Black Cherry
Tree
2 2
2
Quercus Oak
Tree
1 1
1
1 1
1
Quercus michauxii Swamp Chestnut Oak
Tree
1 1
1
Quercus phellos Willow Oak
Tree
1
1 2
2
2
Quercus rubra var. rubra Northern Red Oak
Tree
1 1 1
Salix nigra Black Willow
Tree
52
17
2
2
Sambucus canadensis Common Elderberry
Shrub
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
Vitis aestivalis Summer Grape
IVine
Vitis rotundifolia IMuscadine
JVine
Stem count
181 18
20
61 6 58 9 9
33
15 15
19
131 131
181
24
241
38
23
231
59
201 201
22
size (ares)
1
1 I
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02 0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count
61
61
71
21 21
3 2
2
5
7
7
8
6
6
10
6
6
7
6
6
9
4
4
5
Stems perACRE
7281
7281
809
24312,3471
3641
36411,3351
6071
60717691
5261
526
728
9711
971
1,538
9311
931[2j88
8091
809
890
'PnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
Color Key
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% 41
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Recruit Stems
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 49 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

1PnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
Color Key
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Recruit Stems
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 50 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Table 9 Cont'd. Planted and Total Stem Count (Annual Mean)
Junes Branch/ Project No. 95027
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
MY3 (2016)
PnoL P -all T
MY2 (2015)
PnoL P -all T
MY1 (2015)
PnoL P -all T
MYO (2014)
PnoL P -all T
Alnus serrulata
Hazel Alder
Shrub
13
13
14
3
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
9
9
11
5
5
17
6
6
6
11
11
11
Carpinus caroliniana var. caroliniana Coastal American Hornbeam
Tree
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
4
4
Cornus amomum
Silky Dogwood
Shrub
47
2
Cornus florida
Flowering Dogwood
Tree
2
21
2
3
31
3
3
31
3
3
3
3
Diospyros virginiana
Common Persimmon
Tree
3
3
5
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
25
25
27
20
20
26
20
20
20
21
21
21
Hamamelis virginiana var. virginiana
American Witchhazel
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
5
5
5
5
5
Juglans nigra
Black Walnut
Tree
1
1
4
1
1
3
1
l
1
1
1
1
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tuliptree
Tree
4
Liriodendron tulipifera var. tulipifera
Tulip -tree, Yellow Poplar, Whitewood Tree
17
171
17
41
4
4
61
6
61
71
7
7
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
20
Platanus occidentalis var. occidentalis Sycamore, Plane -tree
Tree
43
43
50
16
16
16
17
17
17
17
17
17
Prunus cerasus
Sour Cherry
Exotic
2
Prunus serotina var. serotina
Black Cherry
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
Quercus
Oak
Tree
2
2
2
4
41
4
6
61
6
6
6
6
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Tree
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
2
21
2
1
Quercus rubra var. rubra
Northern Red Oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
6
6
6
5
5
5
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Tree
73
50
78
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
2
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
4
4
4
Vitis aestivalis
Summer Grape
Vine
1
Vitis rotundifolia
Muscadine
Vine
1
Stem count
1281
1281
267
651
651
172
761
761
154
871
871
87
size (ares)
8
5
5
5
size (ACRES)
0.20
0.12
0.12
0.12
Species count
151
151
18
111
111
21
111
111
12
121
12
12
Stems per ACRE
6471
6471
1,351
5261
5261
1,392
6151
6151
1,246
704
704
1PnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
Color Key
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Recruit Stems
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 50 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

N/A - Item does not apply.
Table Ila cont'd. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bumgarner II (543 feet)
Table Ila. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bumgarner I (631 feet)
Cross -Section 4
Pool
Cross -Section 5
Riffle
Dimension
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base
Cross -Section 1 Cross -Section 2
Riffle Pool
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Cross -Section 3
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4
MY5 Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used 2,153.11 2,153.11 2,153.11 2,153.11 2,152.68 2,152.68 2,152.68 2,152.68
2,145.60 2,145.60 2,145.60 2,145.60
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.3
13.4
12.7 12.9 13.4 13.1 13.2 12.7
15.8
16.8
16.3
18.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>79
>79
>79 >79 >124 >124 >124 124
>42
>42
>42
>42
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.8
0.8 0.7 1.5 1.1 0.9 0.9
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.5
1.3
1.3 1.4 2.9 1.9 2.1 2.0
1.2
1.7
1.9
2.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
11.7
11.3
10.2 9.6 20.6 14.0 12.2 11.3
12.2
14.5
14.8
15.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
15.2
15.8
15.8 17.2 8.7 12.3 14.3 14.4
20.4
19.4
18.0
20.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.9
>5.9
>6.2 6.1 >9.3 >9.5 >9.4 >9.7
>2.7
>2.5
>2.6
>2.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm) I
N/A
1 27
0.67 1 1.5 N/A I N/A N/A I N/A:d
N/A
16
0.68
0.24
N/A - Item does not apply.
Table Ila cont'd. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bumgarner II (543 feet)
Cross -Section 4
Pool
Cross -Section 5
Riffle
Dimension
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used 2,140.17 2,140.17 2,140.17 2,140.17 2,139.81 2,139.81 2,139.81 2,139.81
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.5 16.1 16.5 15.2
16.3
15.7
16.2
16.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50 >50 >50 >50
>48
>48
>48
>48
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4 1.2 1.1 1.2
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.6 2.4 2.5 2.3
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
23.0 18.9 18.5 17.9
11.9
13.4
12.6
13.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.9 13.7 14.8 12.8
22.2
18.4
20.8
18.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>3.0 >3.1 >3.0 >3.3
>3.0
>3.1
>3
>3.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
I N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A
25
4.9
4.3
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 53 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

N/A - Item does not apply.
Table Ila cont'd. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Junes (1,375 feet)
Cross -Section 6 Cross -Section 7
Riffle Pool
Cross -Section 8
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Record Elevation(datum)Used 2,172.66 2,172.66 2,172.66 2,172.66 2,171.35 2,171.35 2,171.35 2,171.35
2,163.28 2,163.28 2,163.28 2,163.28
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.6
8.8
8.0 6.3 8.2 8.8 7.8 8.3
9.6
10.8
10.6
10.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
>94
>94
>94 >94 >111 >111 >111 >111
>53
>53
>53
>53
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.5
0.4 0.3 1.0 0.7 0.6 0.4
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
Baukfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.9
0.7 0.5 2.1 1.6 1.3 1.0
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (112)
3.7
4.1
3.0 1.7 8.6 6.1 4.8 3.7
6.4
6.4
5.7
5.6
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
19.7
18.9
21.7 23.0 7.9 12.7 12.7 18.8
14.3
18.2
19.8
20.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>11.0
>10.7
>11.7 >14.8 >13.5 >12.6 >14.2 >13.4
>5.5
>4.9
>5.0
>5.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
N/A
1 1.4
1 0.13 0.062 N/A I N/A N/A I N/A
N/A
4.7
0.65 1
0.062
N/A - Item does not apply.
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 54 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Table Ila cont'd. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Junes (1,375 feet)
Cross -Section 9 Cross -Section 10
Pool Pool
Cross -Section 11
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used 2,162.64 2,162.64 2,162.64 2,162.64 2,144.35 2,144.35 2,144.35 2,144.35
2,143.99 2,143.99 2,143.99 2,143.99
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.5
11.1
10.1 9.8 11.0 10.9 11.0 10.3
9.8
9.0
8.6
9.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
>56
>56
>56 >56 >39 >39 >39 >39
>38
>38
>38
>38
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.8
0.7 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.0
1.8
1.6 2.0 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5
1.2
1.0
1.2
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
10.5
8.4
7.5 8.4 9.0 7.9 7.6 7.6
5.8
5.2
5.2
5.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.4
14.7
13.7 11.5 13.4 15.0 16.1 14.1
16.5
15.9
14.1
14.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>5.3
>5
>5.5 >5.7 >3.5 >3.5 >3.5 >3.8
>3.9
>4.2
>4.4
>4.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
I.0
1.0
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A
12
0.21
4.3
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 54 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Table 11 a. cont'd. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 -Higdon Branch (376 feet)
Cross -Section 14
Riffle
Cross -Section 12
Riffle
Cross -Section 15
Pool
Cross -Section 13
Pool
Dimension
Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Record Elevation(datum)Used 2,140.85 2,140.85 2,140.85 2,140.85 2,140.14 2,140.14 2,140.14 2,140.14
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.6 8.1 7.0 7.7
8.0
7.2
7.0
7.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>40 >40 >40 >40
>30
>30
>30
>30
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3
0.7
0.6
0.3
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7 0.7 0.9 0.7
1.7
1.1
0.5
0.4
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftz)
2.5 2.6 2.4 2.1
5.9
4.0
2.1
1.9
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
17.6 24.7 20.6 28.8
10.8
13.0
23.9
25.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
>6.0 I >4.9 >5.6 >5.2
>3.7
>4.1
>4.2
>4.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
d50 (mm)
N/A 15 0.13 0.062
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A - Item does not apply.
Table 11a. cont'd Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 -Doris Branch (288 feet)
Cross -Section 14
Riffle
Cross -Section 15
Pool
Dimension Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used 2,138.93 2,138.93 2,138.93 2,138.93 2,138.74 2,138.74 2,138.74 2,138.74
Bankfull Width (ft) 6.2 6.6 6.9 7.3
11.6
11.7
11.9
12.4
Floodprone Width (ft) >23 >23 >23 >23
>21
>21
>21
>21
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3
0.8
0.7
0.6 1
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
2.3
1.7
1.4
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftz) 2.3 2.4 1.9 2.1
9.4
8.3
7.4
6.5
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio 16.7 18.2 25.7 25.9
14.3
16.5
19.1
23.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio >3.8 >3.5 >3.4 >3.2
>1.8
>1.8
>1.8
>1.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm) N/A 0.062 0.062 1 0.062
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A - Item does not apply.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 55 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Project Name: Junes Branch XS Number: 1
Reach Name: Burnaarner 1 XS Type: Riffle
Station: 103+31
Left Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Right Descending Bank
56 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report
2157
2156
^
m 2155
2154
t'�
-------------
--------- -----------
-------------------------
- -2152
c2153
2152
F�
2151
2150
2149
0+00
0+05 0+10
MYO
0+15 0+20
Station (feet)
MYl MY2
0+25 0+30 0+35
MY3 ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankful Width (ft)
13.3
13.4
12.7
12.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
79.0
79.0
79.0
79.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.5
1.3
1.3
1.4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
11.7
11.3
10.2
9.6
Width/Depth Ratio
15.2
15.8
15.8
17.2
Entrenchment Ratio
5.9
5.9
6.2
6.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
Left Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Right Descending Bank
56 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Project Name: Junes Branch XS Number: 2 Station: 103+56
Reach Name: BurnLrarner 1 XS Tvne: Pool
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 57 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
2157
2156
^
m 2155
2154
t'�
c2153 -----------------------------
p
2152
F�
2151
2150
2149
0+00
0+05 0+10
MYO
0+15
MYl
0+20
Station (feet)
MY2 -
0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40
MY3 ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankful Width (ft)
13.4
13.1
13.2
12.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
124.0
124.0
124.0
124.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.5
1.1
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.9
1.9
2.1
2.0
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
20.6
14.0
12.2
Width/Depth Ratio
8.7
12.3
14.3
14.4
Entrenchment Ratio
9.3
9.5
9.4
9.7
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 57 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Project Name: Junes Branch XS Number: 3 Station: 106+36
Reach Name: BumQarner I XS Type: Riffle
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 58 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
2149
2148
v 2147
2146 -------------------
°0
----
--------------------
2145
2144
A
2143
2142
2141
0+00
0+05 WHO
MYO
0+15
0+20 0+25
Station (feet)
MY1 -MY2 -MY3
0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45
----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankful Width (ft)
15.8
16.8
16.3
18.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
42.0
42.0
42.0
42.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.7
1.9
2.1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
12.2
14.5
14.8
15.8
Width/Depth Ratio
20.4
19.4
18.0
20.5
Entrenchment Ratio
2.7
2.5
2.6
2.3
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 58 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Project Name: Junes Branch XS Number: 4
Reach Name: BurnLyarner 2 XS Tvne: Pool
Station: 109+24
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 59 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
2144
2143
^
2142
2141
t'�
- ------
--------
---------
-----------------------------------
-------- -2139
c2140
2139
F�
2138
2137
2136
0+00
0+05 0+10 0+15
0+20
0+25
Station (feet)
0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50
MYO MY] -MY2
-MY3
BKF-MYl
- BKF-MY2 BFK-MY3
CHANNELDIMIENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankful Width (ft)
16.5
16.1
16.5
15.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
50.0
50.0
50.0
50.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.4
1.2
1.1
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.6
2.4
2.5
2.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
23.0
18.9
18.5
17.9
Width/Depth Ratio
11.9
13.7
14.8
12.8
Entrenchment Ratio
3.0
3.1
3.0
3.3
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 59 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Project Name: Junes Branch XS Number: 5 Station: 109+58
Reach Name: Bumgarner 2 XS Type: Riffle
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 60 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
2144
2143
^
2142
2141
t'�
c 2140 -
p
----
-----------------------
- ------------------ --------- --------
2139
F�
2138
2137
2136
0+00
0+05 0+10 0+15
MYO
0+20
MYl
0+25
Station (feet)
MY2 -
0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50
MY3 ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankful Width (ft)
16.3
15.7
16.2
16.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
48.0
48.0
48.0
48.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.9
0.8
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
11.9
13.4
12.6
13.7
WidthMepth Ratio
22.2
18.4
20.8
18.6
Entrenchment Ratio
3.0
3.1
3.0
3.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 60 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Project Name: Junes Branch XS Number: 6
Reach Name: Junes XS Type: Riffle
Station: 202+94
Left Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Right Descending Bank
61 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report
2177
2176
^
m 2175
2174
t'�
c 2173 -------------
p
------------
---------
--------- --------------------------
2172
F�
2171
2170
2169
0+00
0+05 0+10
MYO
0+15 0+20
Station (feet)
MYl MY2
0+25 0+30 0+35
MY3 ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankful Width (ft)
8.6
8.8
8.0
6.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
94.0
94.0
94.0
94.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.9
0.7
0.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
3.7
4.1
3.0
1.7
WidthMepth Ratio
19.7
18.9
21.7
23.0
Entrenchment Ratio
11.0
10.7
11.7
14.8
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Right Descending Bank
61 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Project Name: Junes Branch XS Number: 7
Reach Name: Junes XS Type: Pool
Station: 203+50
Left Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Right Descending Bank
62 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report
2176
2175
m 2174
2173
t',
c 2172
-------------
-------------
----
-------------
---
--------------------- -------------
2171
F�
2170
2169
2168
0+00
0+05 0+10
MYO
0+15
MYl
0+20
Station (feet)
MY2 -
0+25 0+30 0+35
MY3 ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankful Width (ft)
8.2
8.8
7.8
8.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
111.0
111.0
111.0
111.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.7
0.6
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.1
1.6
1.3
1.0
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
8.6
6.1
4.8
3.7
Width/Depth Ratio
7.9
12.7
12.7
18.8
Entrenchment Ratio
13.5
12.6
14.2
13.4
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Right Descending Bank
62 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Project Name: Junes Branch XS Number: 8 Station: 206+99
Reach Name: Junes XS Type: Riffle
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 63 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
2167
2166
^
m 2165
2164
:'..
--------------------------
----------
--------
------- ----------- -----------
c2163
p
2162
F�
2161
2160
2159
0+00
0+05 0+10
MYO
0+15
MYl
0+20
Station (feet)
MY2
0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40
MY3 ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankful Width (ft)
9.6
10.8
10.6
10.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
53.0
53.0
53.0
53.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
6.4
6.4
5.7
5.6
Width/Depth Ratio
14.3
18.2
19.8
20.0
Entrenchment Ratio
5.5
4.9
5.0
5.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 63 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Project Name: Junes Branch XS Number: 9 Station: 207+18
Reach Name: Junes XS Type: Pool
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 64 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
2167
2166
^
2165
m
2164
t'�
c 2163 ------------------------
-
-------------
--
----- ----------
--- ------------- -------------------
2162
2162
F�
2161 -
2160
2159
0+00
0+05 0+10
MYO
0+15
0+20 0+25
Station (feet)
MYl -MY2 -MY3
0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45
----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankful Width (ft)
10.5
11.1
10.1
9.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
56.0
56.0
56.0
56.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.8
0.7
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.0
1.8
1.6
2.0
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
10.5
8.4
7.5
8.4
Width/Depth Ratio
10.4
14.7
13.7
11.5
Entrenchment Ratio
5.3
5.0
5.5
5.7
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 64 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Project Name: Junes Branch XS Number: 10 Station: 214+53
Reach Name: Junes XS Type: Pool
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 65 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
2148
2147
^
2146
2145
t'�
--------------------------
-----------
----------
--------------------
c 2144
p
2143
F�
2142
2141
2140
0+00
0+05 0+10
0+15
0+20
Station (feet)
0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40
MYO MY 1
-MY2
-MY3
+ BKF-MY2 -- BFK-MY3 - - - - BKF
CHANNEL DI IENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankful Width (ft)
11.0
13.2
11.0
10.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
39.0
39.0
39.0
39.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.5
1.5
1.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
9.0
7.9
7.6
7.6
Width/Depth Ratio
13.4
15.0
16.1
14.1
Entrenchment Ratio
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.8
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 65 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Project Name: Junes Branch XS Number: 11 Station: 214+65
Reach Name: Junes XS Type: Riffle
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 66 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
2148
2147
^
2146
2145
t'�
c 2144
p
2143
F�
2142
2141
2140
0+00
0+05 0+10
MYO
0+15
MYl
0+20
Station (feet)
MY2
0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40
MY3 ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankful Width (ft)
9.8
9.0
8.6
9.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
38.0
38.0
38.0
38.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.0
1.2
1.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
5.8
5.2
5.2
5.7
WidthMepth Ratio
16.5
15.9
14.1
14.7
Entrenchment Ratio
3.9
4.2
4.4
4.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 66 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Project Name: Junes Branch XS Number: 12 Station: 301+99
Reach Name: Higdon XS Type: Riffle
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 67 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
2145
2144
^
2143
2142
t'�
c 2141 --------------
'R
-----------------
-
- -----------------------------------
�° 2140
F�
2139
2138
2137
0+00
0+05
MYO
0+10
MYl
0+15
Station (feet)
MY2
0+20 0+25 0+30
MY3 ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankful Width (ft)
6.6
8.1
7.0
7.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
40.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
2.5
2.6
2.4
2.1
Width/Depth Ratio
17.6
24.7
20.6
28.8
Entrenchment Ratio
6.0
4.9
5.6
5.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 67 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Project Name: Junes Branch
Reach Name: Higdon
XS Number: 13
XS Type: Pool
Station: 302+26
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 68 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
2144
2143
^
2142
2141
t'�
--- -----
------------------
----------- ----------------------
c 2140 -----------------------
p
2139
F�
2138
2137
2136
0+00
0+05
MYO
0+10
MYl
0+15
Station (feet)
MY2
0+20 0+25 0+30
MY3 ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankful Width (ft)
8.0
7.2
7.0
7.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.6
0.3
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.1
0.5
0.4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
5.9
4.0
2.1
1.9
Width/Depth Ratio
10.8
13.0
23.9
25.5
Entrenchment Ratio
3.7
4.1
4.2
4.3
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 68 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Project Name: Junes Branch XS Number: 14 Station: 401+12
Reach Name: Doris XS Type: Riffle
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 69 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
2143
2142
^
2141
2140
t'�
c 2139
p
2138
F�
2137
2136
2135
0+00
0+05
MYO
0+10
MYl
Station (feet)
-MY2 -MY3
0+15 0+20 0+25
----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankful Width (ft)
6.2
6.6
6.9
7.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
23.0
23.0
23.0
23.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
2.3
2.4
1.9
2.1
WidthMepth Ratio
16.7
18.2
25.7
25.9
Entrenchment Ratio
3.8
3.5
3.4
3.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 69 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Project Name: Junes Branch
Reach Name: Doris
XS Number: 15
XS Type: Pool
Station: 401+35
Left Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Right Descending Bank
70 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report
2142
2141
^
2140
m
2139
2".
--------------------
------------------
---- --- ----------------
c 2138
p
2137
F�
2136
2135
2134
0+00
0+05
MYO
0+10
MYl
Station (feet)
MY2
0+15 0+20 0+25
MY3 ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
Bankful Width (ft)
11.6
11.7
11.9
12.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
21.0
21.0
21.0
21.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.3
1.7
1.4
1.2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
9.4
8.3
7.4
6.5
Width/Depth Ratio
14.3
16.5
19.1
23.6
Entrenchment Ratio
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.7
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Right Descending Bank
70 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G= Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
- Information unavailable
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 71 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Table IIb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Bumgarner I 631 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY-1
MY-2
MY-3
MY- 4 MY- 5
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.3
14.6
14.6 15.8
N/A
2
13.4
15.5
15.5 17.6
3.0
2
12.7
14.5
14.5 16.3
2.5
2
12.9
15.4
15.4 18.0
3.6
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
>42
>61
>61 >79
N/A
2
>42
>61
>61 >79
26.2
2
>42
>61
>61 >79
26.2
2
>42
>60
>60 >79
26.2
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.9
0.9 0.9
N/A
2
0.8
0.8
0.8 0.8
0
2
0.8
0.9
0.9 0.9
0.1
2
0.7
0.8
0.8 0.9
0.1
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.4
1.4 1.5
N/A
2
1.3
1.5
1.5 1.7
0.3
2
1.3
1.6
1.6 1.9
0.4
2
1.4
1.7
1.7 2.1
0.5
2
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area (ft)
11.7
12.0
12.0 12.2
N/A
2
11.3
16.4
16.4 21.4
7.1
2
10.2
12.5
12.5 14.8
3.3
2
9.6
12.7
12.7 15.8
4.3
2
Width/Depth Ratio
15.2
17.8
17.8 20.4
N/A
2
15.8
1 18.6
1 18.6 1 21.4
1 4.0 1
2
1 15.8 1
16.9
16.9 18.0 1
1.6 1
2
1 17.2
1 18.9 1
18.9 20.5
2.3
2
Entrenchment Ratio
>2.7
>4.3
>4.3 >5.9
N/A
2
>2.4
>4.15
>4.15 >5.9
2.5
2
>2.6
>4.4
>4.4 >6.2
2.5
2
>2.3
>">4.2
2.7
2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
N/A
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0.0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0.0
2
1.0
0.1
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
0.5
13.7
14.4 23.0
7.4
14
10.5
17.0
14.5 25.6
5.7
11
11.4
17.5
14.9 26.6
6.1
11
9.4
15.5
12.4 27.3
6.3
11
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.016
0.061
0.039 0.251
0.063
14
0.019
0.030
0.027 0.055
0.010
11
0.017
0.028
0.025 0.040
0.009
11
0.007
0.022
0.021 0.042
0.012
11
Pool Length (ft)
5.2
10.2
9.2 22.5
4.3
12
5.0
7.6
7.3 13.4
2.2
12
5.4
7.7
7.0 12.9
2.1
12
4.9
9.2
8.1 19.1
3.7
12
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.1
2.8
2.8 3.6
0.5
14
1.9
2.5
2.4 3.7
0.5
14
1.9
2.3
2.2 2.7
0.3
14
1.5
1.9
1.9 2.6
0.3
14
Pool Spacing (11)
24.2
45.2
44.1 60.3
10.3
11
25.3
41.8
41.1 59.9
11.9
11
28.8
41.4
37.6 57.5
10.3
11
23.6
41.3
36.3 56.6
10.9
11
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
24.5
25.3
25.3 26.2
N/A
2
_
Radius of Curvature (ft)
41.6
48.3
41.6 60.1
10.3
3
Re: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
2.8
3.3
2.9 4.1
0.7
3
Meander Wavelength (ft)
69.8
81.7
75.9 105.4
16.6
4
Meander Width Ratio
1.9
2.0
2.0 2.1
N/A
2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Be
B
B
B
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
728
713
704
703
Sinuosity (ft)
1.09
1.09
1.07
1.06
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0233
0.0243
0.0247
0.0247
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0235
0.0245
0.0250
0.0254
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%37%
32%
24% 7%
0%
38%
34%
19% 9%
0%
40%
35%
19% 7%
0%
35%
36%
23% 6%
0%
SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%/Belo*
dl6 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
_
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
_
Biological or Other
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G= Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
- Information unavailable
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 71 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri =Riffle / Ru = Run /P = Pool / G = Glide / S= Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
- Information unavailable
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 72 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Table l lb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Junes Branch/ Project No. 95027 - Bum arner II 543 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY -3
MY -4 MY -5
Dimension & Substrate -Riffle
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.3
-
N/A
1
15.7
N/A
1
16.2
-
N/A
1
16.0
N/A
l
Floodprone Width (ft)
>47
-
N/A
I
>48
N/A
1
>48
-
N/A
1
>48
N/A
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
-
N/A
1
0.9
N/A
1
0.8
-
N/A
1
0.9
N/A
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
-
N/A
1
1.3
N/A
1
1.3
-
N/A
1
1.4
-
N/A
1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft 2)
11.9
-
N/A
1
13.4
N/A
1
12.6
-
N/A
1
13.7
N/A
1
Width/Depth Ratio
22.2
-
N/A
1
18.4
N/A
1
20.8
-
N/A
1
18.6
N/A
1
Entrenchment Ratio
>3
-
N/A
1
>3.1
N/A
1
>3.0
-
N/A
1
>3.0
N/A
1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
N/A
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
3.1
29
32.3 38.6
12
7
27.2
34.5
34.5 42.0
5.5
6
26.5
32.9
32.3 42.0
5.9
6
27.9
33.1
30.6 43.2
5.7
6
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.016
0.026
0.020 0.064
0.017
7
0.015
0.017
0.016 0.021
0.002
6
0.013
0.017
0.015 0.024
0.005
6
0.008
0.015
0.016 0.017
0.004
6
Pool Length (ft)
12.1
17.8
19.2 22.4
4
7
9.1
13.9
12.7 25.2
5.6
7
7.9
14.6
14.0 20.1
4.1
7
10.1
17.2
15.9 24.7
5.1
7
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.3
2.9
3.1 3.4
0.4
7
2.2
2.7
2.7 3.2
0.4
7
2.1
2.6
2.7 3.0
0.3
7
1.9
2.3
2.2 2.6
0.3
7
Pool Spacing (11)
61.5
70.2
69.9 80.2
6
6
60.7
66.7
66.4 74.5
5.1
6
59.0
67.6
67.7 75.8
5.7
6
60.3
67.8
68.4 76.6
6.1
6
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
25.4
28.0
26.2 26.2
3.8
3
Radius of Curvature (ft)
39.5
54.4
54.4 69.3
N/A
2
Re: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
3.1
4.3
4.3 5.5
N/A
2
Meander Wavelength (ft)
109.3
123.2
65.2 134.6
12.8
3
Meander Width Ratio
2.0
2.2
2.1 2.6
0.3
3
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Bc
Be
Be
Bc
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
543
522
526
536
Sinuosity (ft)
1.07
1.06
1.07
1.08
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0140
0.0151
0.0166
0.0164
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0152
0.0154
0.0145
0.0154
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
45%
18%
28% 8%
0%
50%
16%
24% 10%
0%
48%
18%
25% 10%
0%
47%
18%
28% 7%
0",,
SC% / SA% / G% / C% / B% / Be%*
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
_
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
AL
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri =Riffle / Ru = Run /P = Pool / G = Glide / S= Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
- Information unavailable
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 72 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri =Riffle / Ru = Run /P =Pool / G = Glide / S= Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G= Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
- Information unavailable
'Number of riffle cross-sections mis-reported in baseline; Corrected value included here.
'Variation in channel thalweg length due to differences in length of monitored longitudinal profile from as -built.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 73 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Table llb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Junes Branch 1,375 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY- 2
MY -3
MY -4 MY- 5
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n'
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft) 8.6
9.3
9.6 9.8
0.6
3
8.8
9.6
9.0 10.8
1.1
3
8.0
9.1
8.6 10.6
1.4
3
6.3
8.7
9.2 10.6
2.17
3
Floodprone Width (ft) >38
>62
>53 >94
29.2
3
>38
>62
>53 >94
29.0
3
>38
>62
>53 >94
29.0
3
>38
>62
>53 >94
29
3
Bankfull Mean Depth ft0.4
0.6
0.6 0.7
0.2
3
0.5
0.5
0.6 0.6
0.1
3
0.4
0.5
0.5 0.6
0.1
3
0.3
0.5
0.5 0.6
0.2
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) 0.7
1.0
1.2 1.2
0.3
3
0.9
1.0
1.0 1.1
0.1
3
0.7
1.0
1.0 1.2
0.3
3
0.5
1.0
1.2 1.3
0.4
3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2) 3.7
5.3
5.8 6.4
1.4
3
4.1
5.2
5.2 6.4
1.2
3
3.0
4.6
5.2 5.7
1.4
3
1.7
4.4
5.6 5.7
2.3
3
Width/Depth Ratio 14.3
16.8
16.5 19.7
2.7
3
15.9
17.7
18.2 18.9
1.6
3
14.1
18.5
19.8 21.7
4.0
3
14.7
19.2
20.0 23.0
4.2
3
Entrenchment Ratio >3.9
>6.8
>5.5 >11
3.7
3
>4.2
>6.6
>4.9 >10.7
3.6
3
>4.4
>7.0
>5.0 >11.7
4.1
3
>4.1
>8.0
>5.0 >14.8
5.9
3
Bank Height Ratio 1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0
3
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0.0
3
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0.0
3
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.1
0.1
3
W�
Riffle Length (ft) 7.8
14.9
14.4 33.7
4.1
44
4.9
13.8
14.1 20.5
3.5
43
5.6
13.6
13.8 20.9
3.4
43
6.2
16.2
16.2 26.9
5.0
43
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.007
0.029
0.030 0.052
0.010
44
0.007
0.030
0.032 0.049
0.010
43
0.014
0.034
0.031 0.093
0.014
43
0.004
0.031
0.028 0.081
0.016
43
Pool Length (ft) 4.7
10.7
10.4 19.5
3.0
42
1.6
7.8
7.6 14.8
2.9
43
3.7
9.7
9.7 14.5
2.7
43
3.1
8.8
9.0 13.8
2.3
43
Pool MaxDepth(ft) 1.3
1.9
1.9 3.2
0.4
44
1.0
2.1
2.0 3.8
0.6
43
0.8
2.0
2.0 3.6
0.6
44
0.9
2.0
1.9 3.5
0.6
45
Pool Spacing (ft) 12.3
30.0
30.5 42.1
6.2
41
19.7
29.8
31.5 38.2
5.4
40
11.9
29.0
30.0 38.6
6.4
41
9.1
29.1
28.9 40.7
7.4
41
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft) 18.5
19.7
20.1 21.0
1.5
3
Radius of Curvature (ft) 31.9
35.8
36.7 38.9
3.6
3
Re: Bankfull Width (ft/ft) 3.3
3.7
3.8 4.0
0.4
3
_
Meander Wavelength (ft) 53.7
67.1
61.4 88.3
12.5
6
Meander Width Ratio 1.9
2.1
2.1 2.2
0.2
3
Additional Reach Parameters
_
Rosgen Classification
Be
B
B
B
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,480
1,4272
1,414
1,424
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0231
0.0245
0.0271
0.0261
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft) 1
0.0246
0.0248
0.0272
0.0263
Ri% /Ru% /P% /G% /S% 111 50%
0%
34% 9%
79�i
47%
0%
26% 18%
9%
46%
0%
33% 13%
8%
55%
1 0%
1 30% 1 8% 1
7%
SC% / SA% / G% / C% / B% / Be%*
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stabilit or Habitat M etric
Biological or Other
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri =Riffle / Ru = Run /P =Pool / G = Glide / S= Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G= Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
- Information unavailable
'Number of riffle cross-sections mis-reported in baseline; Corrected value included here.
'Variation in channel thalweg length due to differences in length of monitored longitudinal profile from as -built.
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 73 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand/ G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
'Corrected Values
- Information unavailable
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 74 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Table 11b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Junes Branch/ Project No. 95027 -Higdon Branch 376 feet
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY -3
MY -4 MY- 5
Dimension & Substrate -Riffle
Min
Mean'
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.0
N/A
1
8.1
-
N/A
1
7.0
N/A
1
7.7
-
N/A
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
>40
-
N/A
1
>40
N/A
1
>39
N/A
1
40.0
N/A
I
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
N/A
1
0.3
N/A
1
-
0.3
N/A
1
0.3
N/A
I
Bankf ill Max Depth (ft)
0.7
N/A
1
0.7
N/A
1
0.9
N/A
1
0.7
N/A
I
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area ft)
2.5
N/A
1
2.6
N/A
1
2.4
N/A
I
2.1
N/A
I
Width/Depth Ratio
17.6
N/A
1
24.7
N/A
1
20.6
N/A
1
28.8
N/A
I
Entrenchment Ratio
>6
N/A
1
>4.9
N/A
]
>5.6
-
N/A
I5.2
N/A
]
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
-
N/A
1
1.1
N/A
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
2.5
7.7
7.6 15
2.9
13
6.5
9.8
9.1 15.6
2.9
13
4.9
8.9
8.4 14.8
2.8
13
3.4
11.2
10.8 17.6
4.0
13
Riffle Slope ft/ft)
0.002
0.021
0.017 0.047
0.012
13
0.007
0.021
0.019 0.040
0.011
13
0.006
0.019
0.016 0.036
0.009
13
0.004
0.021
0.020 0.046
0.011
13
Pool Length (ft)
4.6
8.1
8.4 11
1.8
14
2.5
6.1
6.3 9.1
1.7
14
2.5
5.6
5.5 8.2
1.8
14
1.6
4.5
3.3 10.6
2.5
14
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.7
1.7 2
0.2
13
1.2
1.5
1.4 2.0
0.3
12
1.2
1.4
1.4 1.7
0.2
14
0.6
1.0
1.0 1.5
0.2
14
Pool Spacing (ft)
13.1
18.6
17.5 26.6
3.8
13
14.6
20.3
19.0 31.2
4.5
12
12.7
18.8
18.3 25.8
3.5
13
13.8
18.9
18.7 24.4
3.3
13
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
9.1L19.7
0.6 12.1
2.1
2
Radius of Curvature (ft)
16.0.1
22.9
3.4
3
Rc: Bankfull Width ft/ft)
2.0.5
2.9
0.4
3
Meander Wavelen h (ft)
11.1.5
39.5
9.3
7
Meander Width Ratio
1.1.3
1.5
N/A
2
Additional Reach Parameters
JL
Rosgen Classification
Be
Be
Be
Bc
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
382
370
368
369
Sinuosity (ft)
1.06
1.05
1.06
1.05
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.020
0.0191
0.0184
0.0162
Bankfull Slope ft/ft)
0.018
0.0156
0.0153
0.0164
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
42%
1%
47% 7%
2%
51'! 0
5%
34% 11%
0%
46%
6%
31% 15%
2%
58%
4%
25% 13%
2%
SC% / SA% / G% / C% / B% / Be%*
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand/ G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
'Corrected Values
- Information unavailable
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 74 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
'Corrected Values
- Information unavailable
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 75 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Table l l b. Monitoring Data -Stream Reach Data Summary
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027 - Doris Branch (288 feet)
Parameter
Baseline
MY- 1
MY- 2
MY- 3
MY -4 MY- 5
Dimension&Substrate - Riffle
Min
Mean'
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.2
N/A
1
6.6
N/A
1
6.9
-
N/A
1
7.3
N/A
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
>23
N/A
1
>23
N/A
1
>23
-
N/A
1
23.0
N/A
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
-
N/A
1
0.4
N/A
1
0.3
-
N/A
1
0.3
N/A
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
-
N/A
1
0.7
N/A
1
0.7
-
N/A
1
0.7
N/A
1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area ft)
2.3
-
N/A
1
2.4
N/A
1
1.9
-
N/A
1
2.1
N/A
1
Width/Depth Ratio
16.7
-
N/A
1
18.2
N/A
1
25.7
-
N/A
1
25.9
N/A
I
Entrenchment Ratio
>3.8
-
N/A
1
>3.5
N/A
1
>3.4
N/A
1
3.2
N/A
1
Bank Height Ratio
-
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
N/A
1
1.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
2.5
6.1
6.3 11.4
2.5
18
3.7
6.5
6.5 11.3
2.0
18
3.6
6.3
6.1 9.3
1.9
18
3.2
6.3
5.8 11.9
2.4
18
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.011
0.022
0.013 0.036
0.008
18
0.002
0.023
0.020 0.055
0.014
18
0.004
0.026
0.027 0.056
0.014
18
0.004
0.022
0.022 0.044
0.013
18
Pool Length (ft)
2.4
3.7
3.5 6.6
1
19
2.5
3.8
3.8 5.3
0.8
19
2.5
3.8
3.6 7.3
1.1
19
2.0
3.7
3.4 6.8
1.3
19
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.6
1.6 2.3
0.3
18
0.7
1.1
1.1 1.5
0.2
19
0.6
1.2
1.2 1.8
0.3
19
0.6
0.9
0.9 1.3
0.2
19
Pool Spacing (ft)
7.2
12.4
12.6 19.9
2.9
18
7.5
12.4
13.3 18.4
3.0
18
7.6
12.4
12.9 18.5
3.0
18
8.6
12.6
12.2 18.8
2.9
18
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
9.4
9.9
10.0 10.3
0.5
3
Radius of Curvature (ft)
7.9
12.0
12.0 16.1
5.8
2
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
3.1
4.3
4.3 5.5
N/A
2
Meander Wavelength (ft)
16.6
22.6
24.5 27.1
4.5
6
Meander Width Ratio
2.0
2.1
2.1 2.2
0.1
3
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
Be
Bc
Be
Be
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
288
274
274
278
Sinuosity (ft)
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.08
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.018
0.019
0.020
0.019
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.018
1
0.020
0.020
0.020
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
48%
8%
31% 12%
1%
51%
6%
32'%u
11%
0%
491N.
71N.
31'% 11%
2%
49%
13%
31% 7%
1%
SC% / SA% / G% / C% / B% / Be%*
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
AN
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
SC = Silt -Clay / SA = Sand / G = Gravel / C = Cobble / B = Boulder / Be = Bedrock
'Corrected Values
- Information unavailable
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 75 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

2161
2160
2159
2158
2157
2156
2155
2154
2153
2152
2151
c 2150
2149
a�
W 2148
2147
2146
2145
2144
2143
2142
2141
2140
2139
_119V
X&O
Bumgarner Branch I
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 100+37 to 107+27
IO?x�O IO"X ROUX
Station (feet)
-- TW - MYO 5/10/2011 -- TW - MY1 1/15/2015 TW - MY2 7/07/2015 - TW - MY3 8/10/2016 Structure MYO ♦ SKF ------- WS
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 76 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
XS -1-R
Average Bankfull Slope
a
' ♦
1•
i ♦
XS -3-R
IO?x�O IO"X ROUX
Station (feet)
-- TW - MYO 5/10/2011 -- TW - MY1 1/15/2015 TW - MY2 7/07/2015 - TW - MY3 8/10/2016 Structure MYO ♦ SKF ------- WS
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 76 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

2145
2144
2143
2142
2141
2140
Z
2139
0
2138
W
2137
2136
2135
2134
2133
2132
-10
x2
S
Bumgarner Branch II
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 107+27 to 112+35
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW- MYl 1/15/2015 - TW - MY210/07/2015 - TW - MY3 8/31/2016 • BKF------- WS O Structure - MYO
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 77 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
•
Average Bankfull Slope
--------------
,
,
,
,
•
,
,
--------- -'
XS -S -R
XS -4-P
•
•
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW- MYl 1/15/2015 - TW - MY210/07/2015 - TW - MY3 8/31/2016 • BKF------- WS O Structure - MYO
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 77 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

2180
2179
2178
2177
2176
2175
2174
2173
2172
2171
2170
2169
c 2168
2167
W 2166
2165
2164
2163
2162
2161
2160
2159
2158
2157
2156
Junes Branch - Sheet 1
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 200+97 to 215+15
-3O
Ox
>.S
20;?X 10Vx s 10�x s
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW -MYI 1/15/15 TW - MY2 11/11/15 - TW - MY3 12/7/2016 o Structure - MYO d BKF------- WS
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 78 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
A
Average Bankfull Slope
1
1
.1,
1 •
1 I
I I
I •h_
I I
I
I
1 I
1
1
XS -6-R
•
XS -7-P
--
1
1
y. 1
1 -
-y.
1 •
I
1
I 1
I 1
I
I
I
XS -8-R
I
Ln!--p
-3O
Ox
>.S
20;?X 10Vx s 10�x s
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW -MYI 1/15/15 TW - MY2 11/11/15 - TW - MY3 12/7/2016 o Structure - MYO d BKF------- WS
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 78 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

2160
2159
2158
2157
2156
2155
2154
2153
2152
2151
2150
2149
4•,
s~ 2148
0
2147
W 2146
2145
2144
2143
2142
2141
04EIIII
2139
2138
2137
2136
Junes Branch - Sheet 2
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 200+97 to 215+15
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW - MYl 1/15/15 TW - MY2 11/11/15 TW - MY3 12/7/2016 o Structure - MYO • BKF ---- - - - WS
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 79 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Average Bankfull Slope
- •
O
•
•
•
XS -11-R
-
r,-'V---
I '
I ,
I ,
I
I
I ,
I
1
I ,
1 '
1 '
I
XS -10-P
Station (feet)
TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW - MYl 1/15/15 TW - MY2 11/11/15 TW - MY3 12/7/2016 o Structure - MYO • BKF ---- - - - WS
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 79 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

2144
2143
2142
2141
W
2139
2138
2137
2136
Hidgon Branch
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 300+46 to 304+22
.?OOxs .?19jx2s &O,xs 1?19�x2s .?O�xs .219�x2s &O�xs
Station (feet)
- TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW - MYl 1/15/2015 - TW - MY2 11/10/15 - TW - MY3 6/28/16 o Structure - MYO------- WS I BKF
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 80 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Average Bankfull Slope
kA
•
- - - - _♦
.
XS -12-R ...........
V". VJ
XS -13-P
♦
.?OOxs .?19jx2s &O,xs 1?19�x2s .?O�xs .219�x2s &O�xs
Station (feet)
- TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW - MYl 1/15/2015 - TW - MY2 11/10/15 - TW - MY3 6/28/16 o Structure - MYO------- WS I BKF
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 80 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

2142
2141
2140
2139
y 2138
4.
0
2137
W
2136
2135
2134
2133
Doris Branch
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 400+00 to 402+82
Ir.
ox
OO
srooXso srofxoo volxso srorXoo uorxso
Station (feet)
- TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW - MYl 1/15/2015 - TW - MY211/10/15 - TW - MY3 7/21/2016 4 Structure - MYO • BKF - - - - - - - WS
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 81 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Average Bankfull Slope
•
A
•
XS -14-R
i
-
XS -15-P
Ir.
ox
OO
srooXso srofxoo volxso srorXoo uorxso
Station (feet)
- TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW - MYl 1/15/2015 - TW - MY211/10/15 - TW - MY3 7/21/2016 4 Structure - MYO • BKF - - - - - - - WS
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 81 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 82 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY3
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
10
9.6%
10%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
10%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
10%
0.25-0.5
5
4.8%
14%
0.5 - 1.0
12
11.5%
26%
1 -2
40
38.5%
64%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
64%
4 - 8
5
4.8%
69%
8-16
8
7.7%
77%
16-32
8
7.7%
85%
32-64
9
8.7%
93%
64-128
4
3.8%
97%
128-256
2
1.9%
99%
256-512
1
1.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
104
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
1.5
D84
30
D95
87
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 83
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

90%
20%
70%
°
L9
m
60%
50%
m
~ 40%
`m
u
30%
211%
10%
D35
o
°
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 1 -Riffle
10035
90%
80%
70%
a
P
0
[7
a+ 60%
N
T
rJtl%
N
t
40%
d
C
30%
20%
14%
Junes Branch
Pebble Cou t Percent Individual
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
a`o
°. °dti y��'• °ti`'" °h• � ''�• '''� �P` yti'� ,y`'`� y1'v' y°tiny` �°�� ��
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 84 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
i
�— MYl Cumulative %
INMY2
Cumulative %
f MY3 Cumulative %
y
r—
10035
90%
80%
70%
a
P
0
[7
a+ 60%
N
T
rJtl%
N
t
40%
d
C
30%
20%
14%
Junes Branch
Pebble Cou t Percent Individual
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
a`o
°. °dti y��'• °ti`'" °h• � ''�• '''� �P` yti'� ,y`'`� y1'v' y°tiny` �°�� ��
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 84 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY3
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
14
12.7%
13%
0.062 - 0.125
14
12.7%
25%
0.125-0.25
29
26.4%
52%
0.25-0.5
10
9.1%
61%
0.5 - 1.0
16
14.5%
75%
1 -2
1
0.9%
76%
2 - 4
2
1.8%
78%
4 - 8
1
0.9%
79%
8-16
5
4.5%
84%
16-32
6
5.5%
89%
32-64
8
7.3%
96%
64-128
4
3.6%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
110
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.24
D84
17
D95
49
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 85 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 86 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
7unesSranch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 3 -Riffle
10035
90%
'
or
80%
70%
a
■
�— Myl Cumulative %
L9
d
50%
f MY2 Cumulative %
f MY3 Cumulative %
L
50%
H
d
40%
C_
30%
211%
10%
fns
O
O5
',�
y' b 3; t< p 4 .�E' '''1'
yob` 1'S4i
,g
Particle Size Groups
Suneslkanch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section -Riffle
10035
90%
80%
70%
P
■ MY1 %by Size Group
■ MY2 %by Size Group
d
N
60%
s
�
■ MY3 %by Size Group
50%
m
s
`d
40%
30%
20%
10%
J
L
M_
0%
O`
p�ti
O
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 86 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 5 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY3
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
1
0.9%
1%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
1%
0.125-0.25
13
11.5%
12%
0.25-0.5
4
3.5%
16%
0.5 - 1.0
8
7.1%
23%
1 -2
27
23.9%
47%
2 - 4
3
2.7%
50%
4 - 8
9
8.0%
58%
8-16
4
3.5%
61%
16-32
17
15.0%
76%
32-64
17
15.0%
91%
64-128
10
8.8%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
113
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
4.3
D84
45
D95
82
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 87
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

90%
20%
70%
a
a 60%
� so%
a
40%
c
30%
20%
10%
0%
d°ti y� ati5 a`' ti° ti ti ti tk 4 lb
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross section 5 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross section 5 -Riffle
70%
6
'a
g
a 60%
a
50%
m
s
~ 40%
d
c
30%
20%
10%
0%
■ MY1 % by Size Group
■ MY2 % by Size Group
■ MY3 %by Size Group
d'ti ti oti5 C", 1a :'11 ti a a 'o �ti tiy$ ti`�� �'� a�� o� �° 4&
oti.4', off. �• 1y ,,y �.; titin ��,� htiti~ yo�a;� �$P 10
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 88 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
�— MY1 Cumulative %
/j
i'
—11-- MY2 Cumulative %
f MY3 Cumulative %
r
4
70%
6
'a
g
a 60%
a
50%
m
s
~ 40%
d
c
30%
20%
10%
0%
■ MY1 % by Size Group
■ MY2 % by Size Group
■ MY3 %by Size Group
d'ti ti oti5 C", 1a :'11 ti a a 'o �ti tiy$ ti`�� �'� a�� o� �° 4&
oti.4', off. �• 1y ,,y �.; titin ��,� htiti~ yo�a;� �$P 10
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 88 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY3
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
73
67.6%
68%
0.062 - 0.125
18
16.7%
84%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
84%
0.25-0.5
7
6.5%
91%
0.5 - 1.0
5
4.6%
95%
1 -2
1
0.9%
96%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
96%
4 - 8
2
1.9%
98%
8-16
0
0.0%
98%
16-32
0
0.0%
98%
32-64
1
0.9%
99%
64-128
0
0.0%
99%
128-256
1
0.9%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
108
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.062
D84
0.12
D95
0.95
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 89
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

90%
20%
70%
20%
10%
a%
°
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
a`o
100%
90%
80%
70%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
P
d 60% ■ MY2 %by Size Group
N
s ■ MY3 %by Size Group
� 50%
m
s
`d
44%
30%
20%
10%
CJ N
°. °dti ���• °ti`'" °h• � ''�• '''� �P` titiro ,y`'`� h1tiy �°tiny` �°�� ��
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 90 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
■
■
�— Myl Cumulative %
IF
_a '
MY2 Cumulative %
f MY3 Cumulative %
r ---------- ■rr
h` ■
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
a`o
100%
90%
80%
70%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
P
d 60% ■ MY2 %by Size Group
N
s ■ MY3 %by Size Group
� 50%
m
s
`d
44%
30%
20%
10%
CJ N
°. °dti ���• °ti`'" °h• � ''�• '''� �P` titiro ,y`'`� h1tiy �°tiny` �°�� ��
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 90 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY3
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
72
67.3%
67%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
67%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
67%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
67%
0.5 - 1.0
22
20.6%
88%
1 -2
11
10.3%
98%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
98%
4 - 8
0
0.0%
98%
8-16
0
0.0%
98%
16-32
1
0.9%
99%
32-64
0
0.0%
99%
64-128
1
0.9%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
107
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.062
D84
0.88
D95
1.6
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 91 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

90%
80%
70%
a
a 60%
� So%
a
40%
c
30%
20%
10%
0%
op ti a wtiy 0l`2 0 �� 3ti °a 45 0
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
■
i
MY1 Cumulative %
■�—�a
—11-- MY2 Cumulative %
f MY3 Cumulative %
■�
1
70%
6
'a
g
a 60%
a
50%
m
s
~ 40%
d
c
30%
20%
10%
0%
4: ;ya�eT
■ MY1 % by Size Group
■ MY2 % by Size Group
■ MY3 %by Size Group
tia Mti ,yb ti �� aryb oh o o&
10
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 92 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 11 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY3
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
26
23.2%
23%
0.062 - 0.125
4
3.6%
27%
0.125-0.25
6
5.4%
32%
0.25-0.5
3
2.7%
35%
0.5 - 1.0
6
5.4%
40%
1 -2
10
8.9%
49%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
49%
4 - 8
9
8.0%
57%
8-16
9
8.0%
65%
16-32
12
10.7%
76%
32-64
20
17.9%
94%
64-128
7
6.3%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
112
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
4.3
D84
50
D95
69
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 93
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

90%
20%
70%
°
a 60%
T
� So%
s
a
40%
c
30%
20%
10%
0%
ti °tis (I< ti° ti ti a
C5
op ti
1Z, do °.
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section I I - Riffle
100%
90%
80%
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 11 -Riffle
70%
6
g
a 60%
a
50%
m
s
~ 40%
d
c
30%
20%
10%
0%
■ MY1 % by Size Group
■ MY2 % by Size Group
■ MY3 %by Size Group
°�
10
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 94 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
�— MY1 Cumulative %
—0-- MY2 Cumulative %
f MY3 Cumulative %
70%
6
g
a 60%
a
50%
m
s
~ 40%
d
c
30%
20%
10%
0%
■ MY1 % by Size Group
■ MY2 % by Size Group
■ MY3 %by Size Group
°�
10
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 94 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 12 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY3
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
105
100.0%
100%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
100%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
100%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
100%
0.5 - 1.0
0
0.0%
100%
1 -2
0
0.0%
100%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
100%
4 - 8
0
0.0%
100%
8-16
0
0.0%
100%
16-32
0
0.0%
100%
32-64
0
0.0%
100%
64-128
0
0.0%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
105
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.062
D84
0.062
D95
0.062
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 95 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

90%
20%
70%
°
L9
m
60%
50%
m
~ 40%
`m
30%
20%
10%
a%
�ry y ply Oh p1' 3; pro tib ,,y �' 1�lb
'L* 5�ry 9•ya CY"' y°
0
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 12 -Riffle
10035
90%
80%
70%
a
P
0
[7
a+ 60%
N
T
rJtl%
N
t
40%
d
C
30%
20%
10%
0%
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 12 -Riffle
a`o
�$ tips° ov° c� oj4 i°Z�
o, odti ���• oti`' o`•' � ''w 3ti � titiro ,�`''� h1tiy �°tinti° �°�� ��
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 96 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
r
�— MY1 Cumulative %
O1
—0-- MY2 Cumulative %
f MY3 Cumulative %
ar
r
10035
90%
80%
70%
a
P
0
[7
a+ 60%
N
T
rJtl%
N
t
40%
d
C
30%
20%
10%
0%
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 12 -Riffle
a`o
�$ tips° ov° c� oj4 i°Z�
o, odti ���• oti`' o`•' � ''w 3ti � titiro ,�`''� h1tiy �°tinti° �°�� ��
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 96 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Junes Branch
Cross Section 14 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY3
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
90
85.7%
86%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
86%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
86%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
86%
0.5 - 1.0
0
0.0%
86%
1 -2
0
0.0%
86%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
86%
4 - 8
3
2.9%
89%
8-16
2
1.9%
90%
16-32
5
4.8%
95%
32-64
2
1.9%
97%
64-128
3
2.9%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
105
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.062
D84
0.062
D95
31
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 97
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 98 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
Cross Section 14-Riffle
1[3035
■
90%
r
ao%
_r
70%
a
Myl Cumulative %
L
m
50%
—w-- MY2 Cumulative %
f MY3 Cumulative %
X
50%
m
s
~
d
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
a%
b G 4 .�E' '''1'
yob`
515
O
'p
y' p
3;
1'S4i
0� �rzao
0 -0
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch
Pebble Count Percent Individual
Cross Section 14 -Riffle
10035
90%
80%
70%
a
■ MY1 %by Size Group
■ MY2 %by Size Group
�+
N
60%
s
■ MY3 %by Size Group
50%
m
s
`u
c
44%
30%
20%
1a%
0%
O`
pdPti pti O�� p�
p�ti S��• O��'
O
vp
pc�'
L d d $ "p 3ti
4a ti° 3'L
IJI
�'
yi'b
.yytd
y,'L'1 �pyd:L �od$SQ 0�
Particle Size Groups
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 98 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Photo Verification of Bankfull Events
Photo 1: Bumgarner I Bankfull Event 1/11/2016
Photo 3: Junes Branch Bankfull Event 6/23/2016
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 101
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Photo 2: Bumgarner I Bankfull Event 6/23/2016
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Junes Branch / Project No. 95027
Bumgarner I1
Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
Feet Above
Bankfidl
Elevation
Photo #
(if available)
7/28/2015
Unknown
Crest Gauge
0.10
MY2
E- Submission
1/11/2016
Unknown
Crest Gauge
0.23
1
6/23/2016
Unknown
Crest Gauge
0.23
2
Junes Branch
Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence Method
Feet Above
Bankfull
Elevation
Photo #
(if available)
6/23/2016
Unknown Crest Gauge
0.66
3
Photo Verification of Bankfull Events
Photo 1: Bumgarner I Bankfull Event 1/11/2016
Photo 3: Junes Branch Bankfull Event 6/23/2016
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 101
NCDMS Project No. 95027
Monitoring Year 3 of 5
Photo 2: Bumgarner I Bankfull Event 6/23/2016
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Figure 3. Dailv Precipitation Totals for the Junes Branch Restoration Proiect
1-
1-6
1-4
w
1.2
C
C
1
.Q
OB
U
a
0-6
a
0.4
0.2
0
UD LO LD W W L
C W OL -
M v M 3 _
2 7 O t.
Figure 4. Mo
7.0
6.0
5.0
N
d
t
v
4.0
C
O
= 3.0
.Q
L
a
2.0
1.0
0.0 '
Data C;omnared to Average. 30"`. and 70"' Percentiles for Jackson Uoi
Growing Season
I ,
I '
I
� I a
� I ,
♦ I ♦ I
' a I
a i
a
' a r
I a
a r'
ia
e �
I�
Rain Gauge Malfunction
i
I
I
I
Jan -16 Feb -16 Mar -16 Apr -16 May -16 Jun -16 Jul -16 Aug -16 Sep -16 Oct -16 Nov -16 Dec -16
CRONOS Monthly Rainfall — — — • 30th Percentile — — 70th Percentile Average
inty
Junes Branch Stream Restoration Project 102 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95027 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 3 of 5