The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20170227 Ver 1_Combined Permit Package 230126 Submitted 2017-01-24_20170220January 17, 2016 Wilmington Regulatory Field Office US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Avenue Wilmington, NC 28403 ATTN: Liz Hair NCDOT Coordinatar Dear Madam: Subject: Pre-Construction Notification for proposed replacement of Bridge No. 230126 over Gum Swamp on SR 1005 (Peacock Rd.) in Columbus County The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the existing two span (2 @ 20'-2") reinforced concrete deck on steel I beam on concrete cap with timber piles and timber abutments with a two span (1 @ 45' and 1@ 35'-21") cared slab with 2'-6" caps and sloping abutments. Trafiic will follow an offsite detour during construction. Permanent impacts to jurisdictional resources cover approximately 0.04 acres resulting from installation of the new bridge and abutments and movement of a roadside ditch. Temporary wetland impacts totaling 0.05 acres are due to hand clearing and sediment and erosion control devices. Please see enclosed copies of the LIBR Spreadsheet, Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form, USACE wetland/upland forms, NCDWR wetland forms, NCDWR stream forms, USACE stream quality forms, stormwater management plan, and permit drawings for the above-referenced project. This project was let on 6/2/2015. Regulatory Approvals Section 404 Permit: The NCDOT requests that these activities be authorized under Nationwide 14. Section 401 Pernut: The NCDOT requests that these activities be authorized under Water Quality Certification Number 3886. We anticipate that written approval from the NC Department of Water Resources will be required. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (910) 437-0207. Sincerely, � ,�cv S % Jame� J. Rerko Division Environmental Officer — Division 6 � Low/Minimal Impact Bridge ProJect Data Sheet 12128/2076 T1P '476P.6,R.fi3 {Bridge 23Q126� Cofumb�s County PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIQNAL DETERMINATION FQRM BACKGRC)UND INFtaRMATIQN A. REPQRT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMIN�IRY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATIDM (JD}: B. NAME AMD ADDRE�S OF PERS�N REQUESTING PRELiMfNARY JD; James J. Rerko, PWS NCDOT Box 11 D5 Fayette�ille, NC 28342 C. D�STRICT OFFICE, FILE NAl1AE, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATiON(Sj AND BACKGROUND INFORMATlON:9.23 miles S af the intersection of SR 1Q05 and US 76 (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TQ D�CUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State:NC CauntyfparishlbaroughColumbus Gity: Tabor City Center coordinates of site {lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 34.2Q29° Pick List, Long. -78.7959° Pick List. Universal Trans�erse MerGator: Name o� nearest waterbody: Gum Swamp Identify (estimate} amount of waters in the re�iew area: Non-wetland waters: 50 linea� feet: ft.width (ft) andlor Cowardin Class: Riverine Stream Flow: Perennial Wetlands_ a.04 acres. Cowardin Class: farested Name of any water bodies on the site #hat ha�e been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: f�on-Tidal: E. REViEW PERFORMED F{?R SITE EVALUA710N (CHECK ALL THAT APPLIO: ❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: ❑ Field Determination. Date(s}: 1. The Corps of Engineers belie�es that �here may be jurisdictional wa#ers of the United States on the subjecf site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised o# his or her option to request and obtain an appro�ed jurisdictional determination (JD) #or that site. Neve�theless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance ancf at this time. �. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Natior�wide General Permit (NWP} or other general permit verification requiring "pre-coRstruction notification" �PCIU), or requests verificatian far a non-reparting NWP or other genera[ permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an appraved JD �or the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware af the following: (1) the permit appficant has elected to seek a permit autharization based on a preliminary JD, which does not m�lce an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that #he applfcant has #he optian to request an approved JD before accepting the t�rms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit autharization on an approved JD could possibly r�sult in less compensatory mitigation being required or ciifferent special conditir�ns; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; {4) that the applieant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with al( the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigafion requiremen#s the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5} that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subjec# permit authorizatian withou# requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use af the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be pracessed as saan as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) ar unctertaking any activity in reliance on any farm af Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetfands and other water bodies an the site affected in any way by tt�at activity are jurisdictior�al waters of the United 5tates, and precludes any challenge io sueh jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial campliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD wili be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained #herein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictianal issues can be raised {see 33 C.F.R. 331.5{a}(2)}. If, during that aelministrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, ar to provide an official �elineation af jurisdictional waters on the si#e, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waiers of the United States on the subject project siie, and ider�tifies al( aquatic features on the site thafi could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked iiems shvuld be included in case fife and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): 2 � Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf af the applicanticonsulfant: . � Data sheets pre�aredlsubmi#ted by ar an behalf of the applican#Iconsultant. ❑ Office concurs with data sheetsfdeiineation report. ❑ Office do�s no� cane�r with data sheetsl'delineation report. ❑ Data sh�:eis prepared by the Carps: . [Q Corps navigable wat�rs' study: � U.S. Gealogical Survey Hydra9ogic Atlas: . ❑ USGS NHD data. ❑ USGS 8 artd '�2 digit HUC maps. � U.S. Geological Survey map{s). Cite scale & c�uad name: Chadbourn, NC, ❑ USDA Na#ural R�sources Conserva#ion Service Soil Survey. Citatian: ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: [] 5tate/Local wet�and inwer�tory map(s): . [] FEMA/FIRN1 maps: . ❑ 100-year Flo4dplain Elevatio� is: {Nat�anal Geoelectic Vertical Datum of 'I 929) ❑ Photographs: ❑ Aeriaf (Name & Date): . or ❑ �ther (Name & Da#e): ❑ Previous determinatEon{s). File r�o. and date of response [etter: ❑ Other information {p�ease specify): IMP�RTANT NOTE: The informaiivn recorded on this farm has not necessarily been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations. ,� T,, � Signature and date of Regulatory Project Manager {REQUIRED} 3 t �f�/,/�►'/ 4� ature,and date p�Fson recjGesting preliminary JD {F�QUIRED, unless obtaining the sign�#ur� is impracticable) 17BP.6.R.63 Br�d e 23C1126 Cal�mb�us Gaur�t Estimated Site Cowardin amount of Cfass af number Latitude Longi�ude Class �qu�tic aquati�c resource �n resource review area 1 34.2q29 -78.7960 Riverine 0,04 ac�e Nvn-sectian 10 -wetland 1 34.2a20 -78.796� Rnrerine 50�F Non-section 10 non—weiland Y• � � y� .�� i�y '� T 4 . "T,F , � _ �4 � ' w + � ��rt �' -i � , . � � ' � � � � �rb:_ +-~4 . i ' {4J�'%� �w'-�---�'��' �.�-�.r"" . � t' 1f� �. ia�.+�-+i�=.�'�_i �r'.'x � �•a.twi- .,� � � ___�� - r- _ �-- '- _ . . � - wi� _ � y' � } � � - -- . '. ' '] E ' ' __ �' y ' , Mi v` - _ _ - - - . — - — . . ._ _ �� ,`�l� �� _ - — - ' _ .._ � � ^ ,s�� t �. �'i, . .'� .' j� j,`� � . I �~, '' '-~ " �' � e � , � .J�`�'. � ''s �� i , � � .; • • "'"L�.i. �f� ' 1•..a . � �� .4•'��, , '� . o ��j,I��Q 4.��.+ '. 1 (�� t•i� �, w` �"� 4.� .&� �� .,r�� 4 , , � � ��4- �,` ."� �' �, 1 • � i. ,, ' }p � � �. � ` /�.� � '�� `�•: ,a. , ~�. � . ,.. � �� ' -� 1� 'i� � • � . � • ' �: . �• � 4. - � � i "1: � ` � ; • A .3, ':' ` , ��4� � "' . �.'� .R•h � �i r• � L. � 1 . ,' , • .,j � , ' � �. �, ,`' �� r _'-"� c,}� � . - . , : t.• � �;-, . �. , �.1 '� WBMIC=UP .y! �,",�*, "� 'v_ �' � � Lc'. r .�:*� . ; '�'+. � �� y� i i � '�..r�__ �' -�"'� r j� '� 'r�• ^ ..�� .fi.L � �' „��~��'y. � - �♦ , .T '.�r'� O 0�-. � r ,!'. � L .1�( � �. ✓ � \,'. f ti �_� 1'a''��' �G� ' ._ � , 1, _ ,•.•� 14.C� �'��K �!, .�. "4, �§ �` 1� F. . . � . . . . �.� �� r ,4 }�'�' '.o.- ��f 4 � �.� a` � �-' ',�'yt�'�-�'"4. WBIW��-WET.' - � , � '` �v `':� ' *�. : 1` ?�n'� -+ � '..R Y w�j 1 `��• � j�} � lAt - ' .. •Y� ,�. �[,y!�� S4. .T� • , I�1l�.Y, � � • �� ',1j' � �_ `�" � ,� � � . � - • ' r 1 � "TI � � �t��, .r � 7 �� . .- .. • 'i , . ._ , � Ae � S � y} � � ,' � �• ��A• ti� r �T N' � �� ,� �/ �f�'��r ' ;,R �.��,5 , `# ,y��• ,� �i �. . �iltl�'. � i�.�'� T'�, ' ;• `�'u' '��'+•"� � S ' �J� �., _'� � �.�` .�" if�� t �' ' `� �' ` > s : ''.,, ,�r.�. �.. GU . �l . '' s � . j .� t. � . . . i!. � �';$. `r ;� �4 r� �►' -�i't'� j`• '. j � , � . . • �� t y' • � • w� ` 5 ,•y`• � , j i ��I:.�� :�.' �t, '�.1t " � �.� ,�.ti5r'' y�.�' �'�y '` i " , '-w. ` '-� � ��. � 4 � �f � � . \ ry 1 I *'4. i �� , • ,�„� '�' � Yt ` +?`�„ ,�p .� i �• T � i+� ..� ► �, '-� �7l- ' ?• �1�'� �i'M;�,.��, • ` 1r , C'��* �, ��` �` +�T/, � . r � r' - 4 ` :� "� i+ .. - f . � � �. . � ' J .f i � , � , , � ! ��. ri � . , , . T 4 4 � �f,� � �. � � ��i � � t� Legenc! . � �� - ` � � �„. �; --"' �'• . } r '� v.` r � Fie�d Notes � �{ ° ��1�, �� '• �. .S . ••` J� , r ' � 1 • 5iream Points � � � .. ;�_aS8 ...�.ti . ' �±� !�" �.,i.i �, ' •!.. Pond Points -��, rt� '` � `�' ` �`�,;��' �4��, �l �Li _ ` , ��. � ti ,�ll . ! Wetland Points ^i �- ..' � , " y,� �. �4 . �E Pond Bour�dary ' '�� ;.' -[,� "� .>�."`WA`;WE7 . �', 1 �-i�i" ^ � `•t'� , A � , VLIA,:'U p � . . , � ' � � �� Wetland Boundary ,�' , -�;• p;�;,. �', � � 4`'i•;„ c� ,� �' r - r .+,. \ ` � `T �' 1 • `;} Streams r. �, ;;� t K�1. � _ , � « � •.'. • +.� ` � %� --� Tributaries ta Jurisdictsonal Waters Pol line `�� . " ` �. �'��''• �� . � • � ' � Y ) � 4�, � �",�'�;' , . � ,., i � r , � i .- ; � i.:. : . � •,, 1'+,: . `' Tr�buiaries to Jurisdictional Waters (Polygon) -r '�-}�: { . � �, si�''� � I •. r . ' � `��, � � Project Study Area "' :� t � � - -_ '�, ' �k :.'� , � J; � ~_,t;; � o � ao Zoo ,'. � , �-� F@�t ' yf '�,i�.��i,. �l� �-.rnp nr°�� x�;�.:at3Ci�c, irinc� �i,ria�fio'i� a.n�� n.r3ail,.�4�4� �jr � ;ic,:,r.i i , � . ,Qf lyORTk C e °� /4 �-' FP �" �; .� .p ;qo, � �f�TOF3RA?o:S?; Fic�ure 3: Aerial Image DiWision 6 Bridges - Structure #230126 Columbus Caunty, NC August 2�14 WETLAND �ETERMINATION DATA F�RM — A#lan#ic and Gulf Coastaf Plain Region Prnjectlsite: Structure # 230126 c;�y�county: Columbus County Samp�ing oate: 8/21/2014 AppliranUUwner. NCDOT 5tate: NC samp��n9 point: WA-UP Investigator{s}; �• Hartshorn (KHA), R. Sullivan (KHA) Secticsn, Tawnship, Range: Landform {Fsillslope, terrace, etc.�: Fill slope Local re#ief (cont.ave, canvex, none}; None �bQ� �ry,�; 2% subreg+an (�Rt2 or M�RA)� LRR P LBt: 34.202937 �ong: -78J95987 Qaturrm NAD 1983 so�i �nap un�s wame: Meggett fine sandy loam HWI ciassi5catian: N/A Are Gimalic 1 hydroiogic cond�tions on tf�e site typical for this time af year? Yes � Nr �(If no, expiain in Remarka.) Are Vegetation Soil ar Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Narmal Gireumstances" prasen#7 Yes � No� Are Vegetation 5oi[ or Hydrology naturally problematic7 {If needed, expiain any answers in ftemarks.j SUMAAARY OF FlN�INGS — Att�ch site map showing sarrepiing paint locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic VegeSation Presenf? Hydric Sofl Present? Wetland Hydrology Present7 Yes No Yes Na Yes Ma Is the 5ampled Area wi#hin a We#iand? Yes No Wetland WA is bounded on the east by a roadside fill slope and by an agricultural field to the south. The upland data point is approximately 15' east and 1' higher than wetland data point WA-WET. A roadside ditch separates the two data points. Columbus County Airport reported 0.7" of precipitation on 8/20/2014. HYDROL�GY Wetland Hydrfllogy Indicators: Secondarv kndicators irnfnimum of two reauired] Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reouired; oheck all that aovlv) Surface 5ail Cracks (SBj 5urface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13} Sparsely Vegetated Cancave SurFace �88j High Water Ta61e (A2j Marl Deposits (615} (LRR U) �rainage Patterns (810) Saturetion (A3} Hydrogen Suifide Qrior (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B1B) Water Marks (Bi ) �xidizeci Rhizospheres along Living Rcsots (C3j Dry-5eason Water Table (C2j Sedirnen! Qeposits (B2J Presence of Reduced lron (C4) Crayfish 6uRows (C8) [7rfft Deposits {83j F2ecen# Iron Reduction in Tflled 5oils [CS} Saturation Visi6le on Aenal Imagery {C9} Algai Mat or Crust (Bd) Thin Muck Surtace (G7} Geomorphic Position (L�2a Iron Deposits {B5) �er (Explain in Remarksj 5hallow Aquitard (D3} Inundation Visible on Aerfal Imagery (B7} FAC-Neutral Test (D5y Watar-Stain�d Leaves (B9y Sphagnum mass (QSj (LRR T, W} Fie[d Observations: Surtaee Water Preserrt? Yes hFo depth (inches}: NOfI@ Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches�: �24�� Saturation Present? Yes Ma Gepth (inches): ��`�'�� YYetiand Hydrolagy Present7 Yes � No� includes c� illa frin e Qesexibe Recorded l3ata (stream gauge, morritvring well, aeriai photos, pre�ious inspections}, if a�ailahle: Remarks: No indicators of wetland hydrology were observed at this location during the site visit. lJ5 Army Cofps of Engi�teers Atlantic and Gulf Coasfal Plain I�egion — Version 2.Q VEGETATION [Four Strata) - Use seientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30� } % Cover Soecies? Status �. None 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 50% of total cover: Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' � �. None 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 50% of total cover: Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5� ) � . Paspalum dilatatum 2. Kyllin�a odorata 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. 91. 12. 50% of total cover: Woodv Vine Stratum (Pl�t size: 30' � �. None 2. 3. 4. 5. = Total Cover 20% of total cover: = Total Cover 20% of total cover: Sampling Point: WA-UP �ominance Test worksheet: Numher of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FAC11U, or FAC: 1 (A) Tatal Number of Daminant Species Across All 5trata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species 1��% That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain� 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 90% Y FAC ba present, unless disturbed or problematic. 10% N FACW Definitians af Four Vegetation Strata: 100% - Total Cover 5�% 20% of total cover: 2�% 50% of total cover: Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (i.6 cm} or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Saplingl5hruh - Woady plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herh - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic = Total Cover Vegetation 20% r�f total cover: Present? Yes No Data point collected on a roadside fill slope that was dominated by few weedy grass/sedge species. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: WA-UP Profile Description: (Descrihe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the a6sence of indicators.j Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks 0-4" 2.5Y 3/3 100% Loam 4-12" 2.5Y 5/4 90% Sandy Loam Split matrix 10YR 6/6 10% Sandy Loam 12-24" lOYR 6/6 95% Sandy Loam Split matrix 10YR 8/1 5% Sandy Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.] Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U} 1 cm Muck (A9) {LRR OJ Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR 5, T, ll) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S] Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside M LRA 150A,B] Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F99) (LRR P, S, Tj Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, Uj Redox Dark Surtaee (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) [LRR P, T, UJ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U] Redox Depressions (FS) Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) 9 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, Tj Marl (F10) (LRR Uj Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surtace (Al2) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, Tj 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umhric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, Uj wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, 5} Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA'151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 950A, 1508j Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F99) (MLRA 149Aj Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous 8right Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 949A, 153C, 953D) Dark Surface (S7) [LRR P, S, T, Uj Restrictive Layer [if observed}: Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No � Remarks: No indicators observed at data point location during site visit. WA-UP is a roadside fill slope. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA F�RM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastaf Plain Region Prnjectlsite: Structure # 230126 c;�y�county: Columbus County Samp�ing oate: 8/21/2014 AppliranvClwner. NCDOT 5tate: NC Sampl�ng Point: WA-W� Investigator{sy, �• Hartshorn (KHA), R. SUIIIVan (KHA) 5ectian, Township, Range: Landform {Fsillslope, terrace, etc.): Slight hiIISIOpe Lacal relief (concave, can�ex, ncN,e}: None �bQ� �ry,�; 1-2% subreg+vn (�RR or M�RA)� LRR P LBt; 34.202944 �a�g; -78.795934 pat�m� NAD 1983 so�i �ap un�s Name: Meggett fine sandy loam NWI ciassifiicatian: N/A Are Gimalie 1 hydroiagic cnnditions on the site typical fqr this time af year? Yes � No �(If no, �xpiain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soi! ar Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Narmal Gireumstances" presen#7 Yes � No� Are Vegetation 5oi[ or Hydrology naturally prohlematic? {If needed, expiain any answers in ftemarkaj SUMMARY OF F1N�INGS — Attach sit,e map showing sarrepfing point locatians, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Presenf? Hydric Sofl Present? Wetland Hydrology Present7 Yes No Yes No Yes Na Is the 5ampled Area within a We#iand7 Yes Na Wetland WA is a low-lying wetland located adjacent to and within the floodplain of Gum Branch. HYDROL�GY Wetland Hydrology Indicatora: Secondarv kndieaters irnfnimum of two reauired] Primarv Indicators {minimum of one is reouired; check all that aovlv) Surface 5ail Cracks (86) SurFace Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13} Sparsely Vegetated Cancave SurFace {SSj High W2ter Ta61e (A2) Marl Deposits (615} (LRR U) �rainage Patterns (810) Saturation (A3} Hydrogen Suifide Odor (C1 j Mvss Trim Lines (B1B) Water Marks (Bi ] �xidize�i Rhiaospheres along Living Rcsots (C3j Dry-5eason Water Table {C2j Sedirnen! Qeposits (B2) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Crayfish 6uRows (C8) �rfft Deposits {B3j Recen# Iron F2eduction in Tilled 5oi18 [Cfi} Saturation Visi6{e on Aerial Imagery {C9} Algai Mat or Crust (Bd) Thin Muck Surtace (G7} Geomorphic Position (L�2a Iron Deposits {B5) O#her (Explain in Remarksj 5hallow Aquitard (D3} Inundation Visible on Aerfal Imagery (B7) FAC-Neutral Test (D5} Water-Stain@d leaaes {B9y Sphagnum mass (Q8j (LRR T, U} Fietd Observations: Surtaee Water Preserrt? Yes hFo depth (inches}: Water Table Present? Yes No �epth (fnchesj: Saturation Present? Yes Na Depth (inches): YYetland Hydrology Present7 Yes No inclucies c� illa frin e Qescribe Recorded l3ata (stream gauge, monitvring well, aeriai photos, pre�ious inspections}, if a�ailahle: Remarks: Neither the water table nor soil saturation was observed at data point WA-WET. However, most of WA appears to be inundated for much of the year with some of the lowest areas having surface water to N 1' deep during the site visit. There were obvious signs of flooding from Gum Swamp. Hydrology for this wetland system is likely derived from overland flooding from Gum Swamp, precipitation, and groundwater. The data point was taken at wetland fringe near the road. LJ5 Army Cofps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain I�egian — Version 2.0 VEGETATION [Four Strata) — Use seientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: } % Cover Soecies? Status 1. None 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) �. Liquidambarstyraciflua 20% Y Z. Acer rubrum 10% Y 3. Baccharis halimifolia 10% Y 4. Frcz�cinus pennsylvanica 10% Y 5. Pinus taeda 10% Y g. Cephalanthus occidentalis 10% Y 7. 8. FAC FAC FAC FACW FAC OBL ��% = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 35% 20% of total cover: 14% Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) �. Juncus coriaceus 30% Y FACW z. Rubus argutus 10% Y FAC 3. Onoclea sensibilis 10% Y FACW 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. 91. 12. 50% - Total Cover 50% of total cover: 25% 20% of total cover: 10% Sampling Point: WA-WET �ominance Test worksheet: Numher of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 12 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All 5trata: 13 (B) Percent of Dominant Species 92.3% That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2- Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain� 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must ba present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitians af Four Vegetation Strata: Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (i.6 cm} or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Saplingl5hruh — Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herh — All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine —All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Woodv Vine Stratum (Pl�t size: ) � Toxicodendron radicans 10% Y FAC z. Parthenocissus quinquefolia 5% Y FACU 3 Campsis radicans 5% Y FAC q Gelsemium sempervirens 5% Y FAC �� Hydrophytic 25% = Total Cover Vegetation 12.5 /o o ' 50% of total cover: ° 20 /o of total cover: 5% resen . Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Yes � No � Location of the wetland data point was in a power line easement that had not been recently maintained. Many trees in WA displayed significant buttressing. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: WA-WET Profile Description: (Descrihe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the a6sence of indicators.j Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks 0-4" 2.5Y 3/2 95% 7.5YR 5/6 5% C PL Sandy Loam 4-10" 2.5Y 4/2 80% 10YR 5/6 20% C M Sandy Loam 10-16" 2.5Y 6/4 85% 10YR 6/6 15% C M Loamy Sand 16-24" lOYR 3/1 95% lOYR 5/6 5% C M Sandy Clay Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.] Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U} 1 cm Muck (A9) {LRR OJ Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR 5, T, ll) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S] Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside M LRA 150A,B] Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F99) (LRR P, S, Tj Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, Uj Redox Dark Surtaee (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) [LRR P, T, UJ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U] Redox Depressions (FS) Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) 9 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, Tj Marl (F10) (LRR Uj Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surtace (Al2) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, Tj 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umhric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, Uj wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, 5} Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA'151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 950A, 1508j Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F99) (MLRA 149Aj Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous 8right Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 949A, 153C, 953D) Dark Surface (S7) [LRR P, S, T, Uj Restrictive Layer [if observed}: Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No � Remarks: Soils were indicative of past disturbance from ditch or powerline construction. No saturaion or water table was observed at data point location during the site visit. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND �ETERMINATION DATA F�RM — A#lan#ic and Gulf Coastaf Plain Region Prnjectlsite: Structure # 230126 c;�y�county: Columbus County Samp�ing Qate: 8/21/2014 AppliranUClwner. NCDOT 5tate: NC samp��n9 point: WB/WC-UP Investigator{s}; �• Hartshorn (KHA), R. Sullivan (KHA) 5ecticsn, Tawnship, Range: Landform {Fsillslope, terrace, etc.�: Terrace Local re#ief (concave, canvex, ncH,e}; None e�bQ� �ry,}; < 1% subreg+an (�Rt2 or M�RA)� LRR P LBt; 34.204031 �an9, -7HJ97004 Qaturrm NAD 1983 so�i �nap un�s wame: Meggett fine sandy loam HWI ciassi5catic�n: N/A Are Gimalic 1 hydroiogic cond�tions on tf�e site typical fqr this time af year? Yes � Nr �(If no, expiain in Remarka.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Narmal Gireumstances" prasen#7 Yes � No� Are Vegetation 5oi[ or Hydrology naturally problematic7 {If needed, expiain any answers in ftemarks.j SUMMARY OF F1N�INGS — Att�ch site map showing sarrepfing point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Presenf? Hydric Sofl Present? Wetland Hydrology Present7 Yes No Yes Na Yes Ma Is the 5ampled Area wi#hin a We#iand? Yes No The upland area is experiencing drainage effect from Pond PA. The upland data point is N 40' north of the wetland data point WB/WC-WET. Columbus County Airport reported 0.7" of precipitation on 8/20/2014. HYDROL�GY Wetland Hydrfllogy Indicators: Secondarv kndicators irnfnimum af two reauired] Primarv Indicatars {minimum of one is reouired; otsecic all that aovlv) Surface 5ail Cracks (SBj Surface Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13} Sparsely Vegetated Cancave SurFace �88j High Water Ta61e (A2j Marl Deposits (615} (LRR Uj �rainage Patterns (81Q) Saturetion (A3} Hydrogen Suifide Qrior (C1) Moss Trim Lines (B1B) Water Marks (Bi ] �xidize�i Rhizospheres along Living Rcsots (C3j Dry-5eason Water Table {C2j Sedirnen! Qeposits (B2J Presence of Reduced lron (C4) Crayfish 6uRows (C8) [7rfft Deposits {B3j Recerti Iron Reduction in Tflled 5oils [Cfi} Saturation Visi6{e on Aenal Imagery {C9} Algai Mat or Crust (Bd) Thin Muck Surtace (G7} Geomorphic Position (Li2a Iron Deposits {B5) �er (Explain in Remarksj Shallow Aquitard (D3} Inundation Visible on Aerfal Imagery (B7) FAG-Neutral Test (D5y Watar-Stain�d Leaaes (B9y Sphagnum mass (QSj (LRR T, W} Fietd Observations: Surtaee Water Preserrt? Yes hFo depth (inches}: NOfI@ Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches�: �24�� Saturation Present? Yes Ma Depth (inches): ��`�'�� YYetiand Hydrolagy Present7 Yes � No� includes c� illa frin e Qescribe Recorded l3ata (stream gauge, morritvring well, aeriai photos, pre�ious inspections}, if a�ailahle: Remarks: No indicators of wetland hydrology were observed at this location during the site visit. Neither saturation nor the water table was observed within 24" of the soil profile. 115 Army Cofps of Engi�teers Atlantic and Gulf Coasfal Plain I�egian — Version 2.Q VEGETATION [Four Strata) — Use seientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30� } % Cover Soecies? Status �. Liguidambarstyraciflua 30% Y FAC 2. Acer rubrum 30% Y FAC 3. Prunus serotina 20% Y FACU q. Quercus laurifolia 20% Y FACW �. 6. 7. 8. 50% of total cover: 50% Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' � � . Quercus nigra Z. Liquidambar styraciflua 3. Acer rubrum 4. Morella cerifera 5. Paccinium fuscatum g. Cyrilla racemiflora 7. 8. 10�% = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 20% 10% Y 10% Y 10% Y 10% Y 5% N 5% N FAC FAC FAC FAC FACW FACW 50% = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 25% 20% of total cover: 1�% Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5� ) � . Woodwardia areolata z. Osmundastrum cinnamomeum 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. $. 9. 10. 91. 12. 50% of total cover 10% Y OBL 5% Y FACW 15% - Total Cover 7.5% 20% of total cover: 3 Woodv Vine Stratum (Pl�t size: 30 � � Toxicodendron radicans 5% Y FAC z. Parthenocissus quinquefolia 5% Y FACU 3. Smilc� rotundzfolia 5% Y FAC 4. 5. 15% = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 7•5% 20% of total cover: 3% Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). No morphological adaptations observed during site visit. Sampling Point: WB�WC-UP �ominance Test worksheet: Numher of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: l� (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All 5trata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL. FACW, or FAC: 13 �B� 84.6% ��B� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2- Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain� 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must ba present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitians af Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (i.6 cm} or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Saplingl5hruh - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herh - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: WB�WC-UP Profile Description: (Descrihe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the a6sence of indicators.j Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks 0-2" 2.5Y 6/2 100% Loamy Sand 2-14" 2.5Y 3/1 100% Sandy Loam 30% UCS 14-24" 2.5Y 6/4 90% 2.5Y 6/8 10% C M Loamy Sand 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.] Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U} 1 cm Muck (A9) {LRR OJ Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR 5, T, ll) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S] Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside M LRA 150A,B] Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F99) (LRR P, S, Tj Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, Uj Redox Dark Surtaee (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) [LRR P, T, UJ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U] Redox Depressions (FS) Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) 9 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, Tj Marl (F10) (LRR Uj Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surtace (Al2) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, Tj 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umhric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, Uj wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, 5} Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA'151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 950A, 1508j Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F99) (MLRA 149Aj Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous 8right Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 949A, 153C, 953D) Dark Surface (S7) [LRR P, S, T, Uj Restrictive Layer [if observed}: Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No � Remarks: No indicators of hydric soil were observed during site visit. Neither saturation nor the water table was observed. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FDRM — Atlan#ic and Gulf Coastaf Plain Region Prnjectlsite: Structure # 230126 c;�y�county: Columbus County Samp�ing oate: 8/21/2014 AppliranvClwner. NCDOT 5tate: NC Sampling Point: WB�WC-W� Investigator{sy, �• Hdl'tSh01'n (KHA), R. SUIIIVan (KHA) 5ecticsn, Tawnship, Range: Landform {Fsillslope, terrace, etc.): Lacal re#ief (concave, eanvex, none}; NOn2 e�bQ� �ry,}; <1% subreg+an (�Rt2 or M�RA)� LRR P LBt; 34.203940 �a�g; -78J96900 Daturrm NAD 1983 so�i �nap un�s wame: Meggett fine sandy loam HWI ciassi5catic�n: PFO1Cd Are Gimalic 1 hydroiagic conditions on the site typical fqr this time af year? Yes � Nr �(If no, �xpiain is� Remarka.) Are Vegetation Soil ar Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Narmal Gireumstances" prasen#7 Yes � No� Are Vegetation 5oi[ or Hydrology naturally problematic? {If needed, expiain any answers in ftemarks.j SUMMARY OF F1N�INGS — Attach site map showing sarrepfing paint locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Presenf? Hydric Sofl Present? Wetland Hydrology Present7 Yes No Yes No Yes Ma Is the 5ampled Area wi#hin a We#iand7 Yes No Wetlands WB and WC are both bottomland wetlands situated adjacent to Gum Swamp just west of Peacock Road. Historical human ditching/fill activities were observed in both wetlands. Both wetlands were similar in vegetation and soils. Columbus County Airport reported 0.7" of precipitation on 8/20/2014. HYDROL�GY Wetland Hydrfllogy Indicators: Secondarv kndieaters irnfnimum af two reauired] Primarv Indicatars {minimum of one is reouired; otseck all that aovlv) Surface 5ail Cracks (86) SurFace Water (A1) Aquatic Fauna (B13} Sparsely Vegetated Cancave SurFace �88j High W2ter Ta61e (A2) Marl Deposits (615} (LRR Uj �rainage Patterns (810) Saturetinn (A3} Hydrogen Suifide Orior (C1 j Moss Trim Lines (B1B) Water Marks (Bi ] �xidizeci Rhizospheres along Living Rcsots (C3j Dry-5eason Water Table (C2j Sedirnen! Qeposits (B2J Presence of Reduced lron (C4) Crayfish 6uRows (C8) �rfft Deposits {B3j Recerti Iron F2eduction in Tilled 5oi18 [CS} Saturation Visi6{e on Aenal Imagery {C9} Algai Mat or Crust (Bd) Thin Muck Surtace (G7} Geomorphic Position (Li2a Iron Deposits {B5) t�ther (Explain in Remarksj 5hallow Aquitard (D3} Inundation Visible on Aerfal Imagery (B7) FAG-Neutral Test (D5} Water-Stain@d Leaaes {B9y Sphagnum mass (Q8j (LRR T, W} Fietd Observations: Surtaee Water Preserrt? Yes hFo agPcn t�n�nas7: None Water Table Present? Yes No �epth (inches�: �24 �� Saturation Present? Yes Ma Qepth (inches): 18�� YYetiand Hydrolagy Present7 Yes � No � includes c� illa frin e Qescribe Recorded l3ata (stream gauge, morritvring well, aeriai photos, pre�ious inspections}, if a�ailahle: Remarks: Wetlands receives hydrology from precipitation events, overland flow, groundwater, and flood events from Gum Swamp. Soil saturation was observed at 18", but the water table was not observed within 24" of the soils surface. 115 Army Cofps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain I�egian — Version 2.D VEGETATION [Four Strata) - Use seientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) % Cover Soecies? Status �. Quercus laurifolia 30% Y FACW 2. Liquidambar sryraciflua 20% Y FAC 3. Acer rubrum 20% Y FAC q. Pinus taeda 10% N FAC �. 6. 7. 8. 50% of total cover: 4�% Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15' � �. Morella cerifera Z. Quercus laurifolia 3. Viburnum dentatum 4. 5. 6. 7. _ 8. 80% = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 16% 20% Y FAC 15% Y FACW 15% Y FAC 35% = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 1%•S% 20% of total cover: �% Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5� ) � . Arundinaria gigantea 40% 2. Woodwardia areolata 10% 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 91. 12. Y FACW Y OBL 50% - Total Cover 50% of total cover: 25% 20% of total cover: 1�% Woodv Vine Stratum (Pl�t size: 30' � q. Smilar rotundifolia 10% Y FAC z. Vitis rotundifolia 10% Y FAC 3. 4. 5. 20% = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 10% 20% of total cover: 4% Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below). Sampling Point: WB�WC-WET �ominance Test worksheet: Numher of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: l� (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All 5trata: Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL. FACW, or FAC: 1� �B� 100% ��B� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiplv hv: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation X 2- Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain� 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must ba present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitians af Four Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (i.6 cm} or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. Saplingl5hruh - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herh - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Morphological adaptations were not as distinct at the wetland data point, but became much more distinct towards Gum Swamp with buttressed trees. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: WB�WC-WET Profile Description: (Descrihe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the a6sence of indicators.j Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks 0-6" 2.5Y 2.5/1 100% Loam 6-18" 2.5Y 4/1 90% 10YR 4/6 10% C M Clay Loam 18-24" 2.5Y 6/4 80% 10YR 4/6 20% C M Sandy Loam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.] Indicators for Prohlematic Hydric Soils3: Histosol (A1) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U} 1 cm Muck (A9) {LRR OJ Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surtace (S9) [LRR 5, T, ll) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S] Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside M LRA 150A,B] Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F99) (LRR P, S, Tj Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, Uj Redox Dark Surtaee (F6) (MLRA 153B) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) [LRR P, T, UJ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Red Parent Material (TF2) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U] Redox Depressions (FS) Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) 9 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, Tj Marl (F10) (LRR Uj Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surtace (Al2) Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, Tj 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umhric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, Uj wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, 5} Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA'151) unless disturbed or problematic. Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 950A, 1508j Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F99) (MLRA 149Aj Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous 8right Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 949A, 153C, 953D) Dark Surface (S7) [LRR P, S, T, Uj Restrictive Layer [if observed}: Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No � Remarks: The soil was saturated at 18". No water table observed within 24" of the soil's surface. US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 W�TIAND RATING WORKSHEEt Fourth version I�TR #230126 — WA Project Name: Structure #230126 IVeares# road: Peacock Rd County: Columbus WetEand area: 0.3 acres Wetland width: 400 #eet Name of Eva(uafor: J. Hartshorn, R. Sulli�an Date: g�v2p�q, Wetland Loaatipn on pand or lake X an parennia! stream on intermittent stream within interstream di�ide other: 5oil Series predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) � preclominantly mineral (non-sandy) predominantly sandy Hydrolic factors steep topography ditched or channelized X fotal riparian wetlanc! widih � 1Dp ft Adjacent land use (within'/z mile upstream,upslope, or radius) X forested/natural vegetatian 2� X agriculture, urbanlsuburban 70 X impervious service 5 Dominant vegetation 1) Liqurdambar styracrflua 2j Nyssa biflora 3] Acer rubrum � Floading and wetness semipermanently to �ermently �ocaded or inundated X seasonalfy flooded ar inundated intermittently fiaoded or temparary sur#ace water na evidence of flooding or s�urface water Wetland type (select one) X Baitomland hardwood forest Pine savanna Headwater forest Fresh►nrater marsh Swamp fores# Bagff�n Wet fla# Ephemeral wetlancf Pocosin Carolina Bay Bag forest Other *Th� rating sysk�m cannot ba appllied #a salt or brackish rnarshes or siream channels R Water Storage A Bank/Shoreline stabilization T Pollutant remaval I Wridlife habitat N Aquatic life G RecreaiionlEducation waight 5 x 4.DQ = 12 3 x 4.fl0 = 12 5 x 5.�0 = 25 5 x 2.00 = 10 5 x 4.Ofl = 20 1 x 1.Q0 — 1 Tota! Score� 80 1Add 1 point if in sensitive watershed and ?1 [}°!o nanpoint disturbance within'/ mile radius. WETLAND RATiNG WORKSH�ET Fourth version STR #230126 WB Project Name: Structure #23Q926 Nearest road: Peacock Rd County: Columbus Wetland area: 0,24 acres Wet�and width: 3D0 feet Narne af EUaluatar: J. Nartshorn, R. Sullivan Late: g/��2Q14 Wetland Locatinn on ponc� or lake X on perennial stream on intermittent streatn within interstream divide other; 5oil Series predominantly organic (humus, muck, or peat) X predaminantly mineral {non-sandy) predominantly sandy Hydrolic factors steep topography ditched or channelized X total riparian wetfand width � 100 ff Adjacent land use {within'/z mile upstream,upslope, or radius) X forested/naturai vegatation 30 X agricultwre, urbanlsuburban 65 X impervious service � Dominant vegetatian 1) Lrquidambar styraciflua 2) Nyssa biflQra 3) Acer rubrum � Flooding and wetness semiperrnanently to permentfy flooded Qr inundated X seasonally flooded or inundated intermittentiy flooded or temporary surface water no evidence of ilooding or surface water Wetland #ype (select one) X Bottorr�land hardwood fqrest Pine sauanna' Hsadwater forest Freshwater rroarsh Swarnp forest Bog/fen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pacosin Carolina 8ay Bag farest Other "The rating system eannot be appllied to salt ar brackish marshes or stream channels weight R Water Storage 5 x 4.00 = 12 A Bank/Shoreline stabilizatian 3 x 4.�0 = 12 T Poflutant rernovaf 5 x b.40 = 25 I Wildlife habitat 5 x �.00 = 10 N Aquatic life 4 x 4.OD = 16 G Recrea#io�/�ducation 1 x 1.�Q = 1 Tntal Score' 76 �Add 1 poirtt if in sensiti�e watershed and >� 0°la nonpoint disturbance within'/ mils radius. WET�,4N� RATING WdRKSHEET Fourth vers►on STR #230126 WC Project Name: Structure #234126 Nearest road: Peacock Rd County: Golumbus Wetland area: Q.14 acres Wetland width: 2DD feet Name of E�aivator: .i. Hartshorn, R. SulliWan Date: 912/2094 Wetland Loca#ion an pond ar lake X on perennial stream on intermittent stream within interstream divide okher: Soil Series predominantly organic (hurnus, muck, or peat) X pradpminantly mineral (non-sandy) predominantly sandy Hydrolic factors steep topography ditched or channelized X tatal riparian wetiand wid#h � 1[1Q fk Adjacenf land use (rnrithin'/Z mile upstream,upslope, or radius) X forestedlnatura! vege#ation 4D X agricuEture, urban/su�urban 56 X im�ervi�pus senrice y Dominant vegetation 1) Liquidambar styraciflua 2) Nyssa 6if�c�ra 3) Acer rubrum Flooding and wetness semipermanently to permently flooded or inundated X seasonalfy flooded or inundated intermittently flvoded or temporary surFaee water no evidence of floading or surtace water Wetland type (select one) X Bottomland h�rdwood farest Pine savanna Ffeadwater forest Freshwa#er marsh Swamp forest Boglfen Wet flat Ephemeral wetland Pocosin Carolina Bay Bog forest Other *The reting system cannat be appllied ta salt ar brackish marshes or stream ct�ann�ls weight R Vl/ater Storage 5 x 4.0� = 12 A Bank/Shorefine stabilization 3 x 4.0� = 92 T Pollutant remaval 5 x 5.Q17 = 25 i Wildlife habikat 5 x 2.OQ = 10 N Aquatic life 5 x 4.0� = 20 G RecreatianlEducation 1 x 1.OQ = 1 Total Scorei 80 �Add i point rf in sensitive wa#ershec3 and >10% nonpoint disturbance within'/ mile radius. North Carolina Di�isian of Water Quality - Stream identification Form, Version 4.11 Date: 8/2112fl14 ProjecUSite: Structure23�126 Latitude: 34.2031fi Feature SB Evaluator: �• Hartsnom (KHa} �ount : Columbus Lon itude; -78.795995 R. Sulfivan (KHA) y 9 To#al Points: �� rmination (circEe one) Other Stream is at least inEermittent �phemeral termiktent Perennial e.g. C�ued Name: if a 19 or perer�nia! if � 30 A. Geamorphofogy Subtotal= 6 18. Continuity Qfi channel bed and bank 2. Sinuasity of ci�annel alang thalweg 3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pi size of stream substrate ional bars or benches alluvial depasits 9. Grade control 10. Natural valley 11. Second or greater order ct�ann�l ° ariificial dikches are not rated � see discussians in B. Hydrology Subtotal = 5 Wsak 1 � 9 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 Moderate Stra� z � 2 3 2 3 2 3 � 3 "� 3 2 3 2 3 1 1.5 1 7.5 Yes = 3 Scare �� 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 C. Biofogy Subtatal = 3.5 Notes: Feature SB is a linear ditch dug within a wet[and, likely in an attemRi to cirain the wetland or convey surface watar. 7he ditch has an ordinary high water mark and permant surFace water, however no flow was obsen�ed and khe feature has clearly been dug out and i�istorically channelized. USACE AID# � y DWQ # ^ Siie'� (indicate oi� attached ma}�) I � ;,;,,�; s��A� c�uAL�� ass�ss�E�v� wo�sxEET Prov�de the follawing info�•matio� fiad• the streain rear.h under assess�ent: i. Applicant's name: �'C�aT 2. �,valuator's narrie: �• '��`��01"I�, R. SU��IVal1 3. L)ate o�'evaluation: 08f �1/'�C�14 5. Name of streai��: StruCture Z30126 - SB 7. Approximate clrainage area: �� dC�"e 4. Lengtt� oFreaclti evaluated� �-�� 1�'. Site caordinates (if kna�vri): prefeP in decimal de�rces. Lar;tudecex ��.s��.3iz�: 34•2�3165 �l. Time of evaluation: 11:Q0 a111 6. River basin: �Umb�r �. Stream arder: FIrS� �Cd21" ]0. �c�unty: eC7��.1'f11�7US 12. SuUdivisiors nan7e (if any): n,/a Ltangilude (e�. —77.SSEi6l 1 i: `78. 79�g$8' Methad loc.aii�n det�rn�ined (circle): ✓��'1'S�1'opn Sheet�rthr� (Aeria]) Phato/GIS�Jther GIS�ther 13. Lcscation of reach under ev�luatic�n (note i�earby roads and landn�at�ks anr� a�tacl� inap identifying strea�tj(s) ]acation): Feat�re SB is located ea�t 4f Peaeock IRoad, south of GUr�-� Swamp, and b�egir�s at the raacfside ditci�. 1�. Proposed channel work (if any): �1�� rs. RE��„� WE�cr,er�a�ldEt�ons: �ot �nd h�um�id, �.7" Qf ra4nfall recc�rde� vuuthon 4� hours (isolated shawers} i�. s�r� �ana�t�o�,s ac t;n,� o� �m5�c: Ho�, �pproxi�nately 90 degrees and clear, r�o indicatioru af recent rain. 17. Identify any special �vaterway classifications krrown: �5ection 10 _�Tidal Waters �Essential Fisheries Habitat nTrout Waters �,Outstand'tng Resource Waters �Nuh�ient Sensit'tve Waters IIWater Sup�ly Watershed (f-IV) � S. Is there a pond or lake locatecl upstrea�t� of the evahiation ,p�inC? Np If yes, esti�nate the water sur€ace area: �f� 19. Does chann�l appear on USGS quad map? f�Jp 20. Dc�es channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? NC} 21. Gstimated watershed land use: % Residential �o °/a Forested 22. Bankfull width: �� 2�3. Cl�annel slope down center caf stream: ��Fl�t (Q to 2%) 25. C1�annel sinuasiry: �St�-ai�;ht �Occasional bends _% C'ommercial i°% Industria� _% Aga�acultural % Cleared / I,o�ged �Q % Other ( RC}�dway � 23. Bank heiglit (from bed ta top af banl'k}: 4� �Gentle (2 to 4°/a) �1Vlc�derate (4 to 10%) �Steep {: ] 0°%) �Freq�tent mea��der �Very sinuous �$raided channel Instructoons fo�� completion of worksheet (loca�ted on page 2): Begin by detennining the i3�ost appropriate ecore�ion basesi on locatiorQ, terraii�, vegetation, stream c:lassifeati�n, ete. Every citara�ieristic must be seored tEsing the sarne ecore�ic�i�. Assign pouUs to each chara�teristic withiit dhe ran�e shawn for tlte ecaregion. Page i provides a brieF deseripfion nf how to review tl�e characterisCics identi�ied in the worksheei. Scares s➢�ould r•e£iect an overal] assessment of the streaen reach undez- evaliaatiars. �f a characteristic car�not be eva[uated due to si[e or weather coi�ditions, enter (1 �n the scarit�g box an�l provide an explanation in tlte canment section. Where there are obvious changes in the characYer oi� slream under review (e,,�., lhe stre�m tlows froi� a�asture into a forest), the stre�tn tttiay be divi�ied ineo smal�er reaehes tliat display rnore cantinuity, and � separate fori» used to evaluate each reach. The tatal score assagned to a stream reac�� must range �etweer� {i at�d 1Q4, rwitii � score of 1fJ0 representie�g a strearn of the highest quality. Tata1 Score (from reve�•se}: �8 Coanments: Feature SB is a linear maan-rmade ditch constructed througf� a wetland, likelv ta drairo the swstem or convev surt`ace water Evaluator's Signature ��`�„� rt: '��'`z•r`�',�',c'.'''i Date �$I �1I2��-4 This �han�c� evaluat�on forr�n is inter�ded ko 6e used only as a guide to assist la��downers and environmenFa� }�roi'essionals in gathering Ehe d�t� reqauired by �he l�nited States �.x•my Carps of Engineers to make a p�reiimir�at•y assessmcnt of streart� qualiYy. The to�al seore �•esvitin6 fr-om the completion of this farns is subject to U�ACE approva{ and does nat impl,y a partic��lar mitigatian ratic� or recjuirement. Fonr� sisbject ta change — version OblO �. To Cam»-�znt, �tease call 919-87G-$441 x 26. Structure Z3�126 - SB STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET F.CI��ION NOIN?' RANGE � C IiAR�C'TERIST(CS (:ns�tal � piedmnnt �tanntsin SCORE Pre�ence af tIviv / persistent paols in stream i o-s o-a �-s 3 (no fiow or saturatie�n = 0; stron filc�w = rr�ax oinls.) ' [�:vidence of pas# hnman �lteration {ext�nsive altei�ation = U: na alterotioa = rnax oints) ��' a- 5 0-� � � Ri�arian zane p_ b n-� 0- 5 Z iio �iuffer = 0; canti uc�us, +vide buf'fer = max nints � Evidence af nutrient ar chem':cal discharges �_ S 0- 4 U- 4 z (exten5ive diseh�e�e�_ d_ no diseiiargcs,- ma!e�ain�s)_, 4 � �l--------- C:roundwater discE�arge 0- 3 il - 4 0_$ 1 � (nu dischar e= 0; s rin s, sce s, wett;�nds, ete. - max oints) Presence ofadjAcent flnndplein� � } � o-� o--a o-z {no Elacxi lain = 0; extensive tiaodplain -= n�ax points) 0. � Entrenehment � lluudplain access �y _� Q_.} p.- � 1 (dce 1- entranche�f = 0; frequettt flnodin - max oints) Presenee uf adjacent wetlaric�s 8 (1-6 4-=� Q-? a (po wetlands - 0; large arE'�cent wetlands�max�oinis) 9 '' Channel sinuosi�r• ; Q- S 0-� 4- 3 � exlensive ehannetizat�on =�i; natural rn�an3cr = max nints) i 4 �ediment in}�at � - � fl - � @ u 4 � extensivc depositissn (!: tittle or nn scdiment - m�x c�it�s) Si�e c4� d�vercity� of ehannel becl substrate � II `:A U-� 4-5 lfin�, hamv enous � 0; large, divcrse siaes = max ` nintsi N�A Evidence of ch�nnel incision or widening 12 U-5 p--� fl_g Z � {deeply incised r- U; stabie bed � 0anks_= max,�aint� �� Presence +of majar b�nk failures fl w{ 0- g fl - 5 4 ,,,,, tsevere erosion = 0; no erosinn, stable hanks = n�ax ints) ' � Itoo1 cfepth and dens'rty on banks � .� 14 0-3 0--4' 0-5 E,,,, {j�o visiblc raots== D; dense rocrts tl�rc�ughc�ut = rttaa� ints) � Impaet by agricuiture. livestock. or tirober praduction � IS _ 0-S 0-� 0_5 (sul�stantiz�t im act U: oo"evidence '- ma�c 4rints} �6 Presenc� of riffle-PooUripple-poot romplcxeR � 3 Q�'S �� ttia riffles-r� tes or aols � Q; we�l-c�cvekc� ed =� ma�; ��ints 1 i Q Habitat ramplcxit�• �., 1'1 4-5 0-b U-5 � � f ii�Iie c�r nu habitat =(l: frtquent, �•aricd habitats � os�ax �>ints Canopy coverage aver streambed 4 �� ; q_� ` D-5 0-5 Q (no shadin ve etation = 0, c�ntinuotis ca;to �= rnux ointsf � Substrate emheddedness i9 �;�� o-a o-�. N/A {deepl � cmbedd�d - U; inase structurc =� tnas) zQ Presence aPstre�m inverte�rates (str pa�;e �) tl -� 0-- 5 0- 5 Q �„ na e�vidence = 0; comn�on, numereus t�s = ma�; ints (� i Presence of am�thibia�ns Q 2I 0-4 i}--.� 0�-� 4 {E►a evide�ce - Q: coxttmvn. numerous��es � max`pointsl - "�G � �,2 � - ------ — — Presence af Gsh ; � _ U - � � U - 4 ` 0 - 4 {) � fno cvidence - 0; con�mon, numer�us tv es - max poir�ts) 2� Evidencc of wildlife use d- G Q- 5 4- 5 (no rvider�ce - 0; abund�nt evideric4 ma� �c�ints} 2 Tott�l PoioG� Pucsihle i0D IOU lU0 TOTAL SC+�R�: (alsu entrr c�n tirst page} 28 * These characEeristics are not assessed in coastal streams, North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11 Date: 81211201�4 Project/5ite; �tructure 230126 Latitude: 34.203441 Feature 5G EValU2t01': J_ Hartshom (KHA) �oU��_ �plumbus Longitude: -78.7964a9 R. Sullivan (KHA) Total Paints: 14.5 rmination (circle one) Other 5tream is at least intermittenF Ephemeral termittent PerennEal e.g. Quad Name: it a 19 or perennia! if a 3fl A. Geomorpholagy Subtota� _ 1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2. 5inuosity of channel along thalweg 3. In-channel struc#ure: ex. riffEe-pool, pool sequence 4, Particle size of stream substrate S. Ackive/relic floodplain 6, pepositianal bars or benches 7. Recent alluvial deposits 8. Haadcuts 8. Grade control 10. �Eatural �al[ey 11. 5econd or greater order channel ° artficial ditches are not rated; see discussions i B. Hydrology 5ubtatal = 5 Moderate Stro� 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 1 7.� 1 1.5 Yes = 3 Score 3 9 1 9 0 0 0 0 8 C. Biology Subtotal = 3.5 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 p � 19. Rooted upland plants in stream6ed 3 2 � a 9 20. Macrobenthas note di�ersit and abundance D 1 2 3 Q 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 p 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1,� p 23. Cra ish 0 0.5 1 1.5 p 24. Am hibians 0 D.5 1 1.5 � 25. AI ae 0 D.5 1 1.5 0 26. Wetland plants in streambecE FACW = 0.75; QBL =�1.5; Other = 0 ,,� `perennial streams may alsa be identified ussng ottter methods. See p. 35 of rnanual. Notes: Feature SC is a linear ditch that begins as a roadsirle drainage ditch and turns and flows inta a lare�e wetland west of Peacock Road. 5C has an ordinarY hi�h water mark but low water fe�els ►n�ere observed with lic�ht vegetatian cover. LJSA�CE AID# D'v��Q #k SiEe # (irtdicate on attaclied map) ;,�,; STREAM QUALITY ASSESSIVI�N�' WQR�SI��ET � Provide ihe foilowing in!'ormatian fc►r the stream reach uader assessment: 1. r1p}�licant's natne: N�D�T 2. EvaYuator's name: �• �artsharn, f�. �LI��]Vafl 3. Daie of evaluatian: ��21%2�14 S. Name of strea��: S�rUC'�111"E 23�1�26 - SC 7. Appraximate drainage arca: � 1 aCr2 9. �.ength of reach evaluated: �� 11. Site coordinates (if kno�vn): prcfer i�� dcc`r«7a! c�egrees. �,at9tude ce.. Ja s�z3�zj: 34.203418 4. Time of evaluation: �� Od P� 6. Rive�- basin: ��Mb21 8. 5tream order: �II"St C�I'd2C' io. cou,�cy: Calurnbus 12. Sui�divisi�i� nanfe (if any): �� Lursgiturie (ex. —77 5�6C 1 l ): -%'�'. %��%4 Meihoc] locatinn determined (eircle}: ✓�',PS�'o�n Sheet[]L�a-tho {F,es•ial} PhotolGlS�)ther GI50C1ther 13. I.acation of�reach un�i�r evaluation {�lote nearby roads and lanc�ma�•ks and attacll inap 'icieniifying stream(s) ]ocation;l: Feature S� is Eocated west af Peacoc�C Road, soUth of Gum Swamp, and is � roadside �'itch �hat enters a wetland. 14. Proposed chant�el work {if any}: �� I�. Recent weatl�er conditions: HOt �11d �11�111�d, Q.7" of rainfall recorded within 48 haurs {isolated showers) 16. s;te ��,,�;t;p„� �t t;rne o��c�;t: ��t, approximately 90 degr�es and clear, no indication of r�cent rai�. 17, [dentify any s}�ecial �v�terway cCassifications known: �5ection l(? �'�'idal Waters �Esseniial Fisheri�s Habitat �Trottt Waters �(�utstandinj Resmurce'Waters �N'utt`ient Serrsi#ave Waters nWater Suppty Waterslsed (I-1V� 18. Is there a pond ar lake located upstream of the evaluation �oint? �}p If yes, estimale tltie water surface a��ea: �� 14. �oes channel appear oi7 L1SGS quad map'? Np 2f). Does channel appear on LTSDA Sail Survey? NO 21. L-;stintatecl �vatershed land use: °/fl Residentiai 5fl 6�� Forested ��. 8ankfull t�ridth: �'� °�o Commerc►al % Industrial _% Agric�ilttGral _% Cleared / Lc�gged �� % Otlfer � �'�aa�"'��Y 23. F3ank height {from bed to top of bank): �� 24. Channel slope dowti center of strean�: �Flat ({i to 2%) �Geiitle (2 to 4%) �l�7odcrate (�k to I Q°%1 �5teep (=-10%} 25. Channel sinuosity: �SiraighY �t7ccasionaf bends �Frec�uent meander �Vzry sinuous �Braided cliannel [rxstructio�s for cou��letion ot worksheet (lucated ar� ,�age 2): Begin by delerntanir�g che most appr�priate ec�region �ased c�n location, terrair�, aeoetaeion, stream classiftcat�c�n, e�c. �very characte�•istic niiast be scorzd using Yhe same ecoregion. Assign pc�ints tcr e�ch characteristic within the ranbe showvn for the ecoregiaia, P�ge 3 provides a brief descriptian of hc,w t� review the characteristics ide��tifi�d in the worltsheet. 5a:ores should refle�t an ovea-all assessrnent of tl�e strearn reacli under evafuatic�n. If a characteristic cannot be evaliaated due to site or weathee conditiacis, entee 0 in the scorin,� 6�x and pravide an explaitation iia tl�� cotnntent seetion. Where there are abvious changes in the chlracter of a stream under revierv (e.g., the stream flaws fi-om a pastut`e into a forest�, tl7e stream may be divided into smailer reaches that display more eoartinaity, and a separate for�n used to :,valuate e�ch reach. "d'h� tatal score assi��ed to a stream reaeli must raa�ge between 0 and �00, �Nitli a score of 1b0 representin� a streai� of the higf7est qisality. '�otal Score (fronz revepse): �� Cornmeraks; Feature SC is a roadside drainaqe ditch that runs alo�q P�ae�ck Road and turns to drai� to wetland. SC did �o� have any fEow at time af observatian, he�wever ardfnary high water mark was observed. �vaivator's Signa�ure ��rzs.c�7�, �:�Fc-r,r��,�.n��-r� D�tc �}8%21��4 This channel evaluatio» fortn is in�endecU tv be used onty as a guide to assist lanc�o�vners �nc� envirot�mental professiona�s i� gathering the data required by the l7nited States Artny Carps of Engiueers to malte a prelim��ac•y assessment of ste�eam quality. Th� tntal s�ore resulting ft•om the completion nf this form is subje�t to L�S.4CE approval and does �ot im�ly a pa�rtie�lar n�itigatior� r�tio or e�equirerrnent. Fom� s�ibject to cliange — versifl» Ob/43. �'o Cotnitient, please call 919-&76-8�41 x 2G. Structure 230126 - SC STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WURK�HEET �� CHARACTERISTIL`� F.COR�GI 1V POTI'3`�` RANG'�: , (:oa�� Picdmont-- -;ltountain SC�RE � j Presence of �low !�ersistent punls in ctream ��` S �- 4 �- 4 2 � (na fl�w or saturatian 0; stron flow ma� ints) 2 �4idence of past huroan alteration 0-- 6 U- 5 (extensi�•e alteration - D: no altrratian = max �ints) �-� � 3 Riparian zone fl_ 6 Q-4 0- 5 1 no huffcr = 4; conti uous. wide buffer = tnas�ointsl � E�•idence of nutrieni nr chemical clisrhar�es Q_� p.� ,� 4- 4 � — -- texte�sive dischar�es -_0; nn dischar�es _ jttax p.omts) ;' � 5 --- --- Groundwater dis€har�e 0- 3 4-- 4 0-� 1 (na dischar e- 0; s�rin s, see s, �veilands, etc. -- ��ax ointsl � Presence of adjacent ilovct�tain � � � o-a o--� a-2 (no flood lain =�1; extensive flood lain = rtla.x ❑ints) � � Entrenchment / itoodplain actess 0�� p_:� �- 2 1 {dee ]v enirench�d - q: frcquent flaadin = rnax oints} g Aresence ot ac4jarent ��ellands �- 6 0-�i 0-.. ; � � (no ��etlands = 0: }arge ad_�acent u�etlnnds °= rna.�tpoit�ts) � ' Channel sinuosiry � 4 n-s o-a o-� (extensive channeliz�tion - 0; natural mrander = max nint�) ;� SecEiment input 4- 5 U-� p-.� {exiel�szve denosifion= 6; (itlle or no sediment = ��iax points 2 Size & diversity af �channel t�ed st�bctrate . 11 ., tiA'� 0--� 0 5'. fine, hume� ennus = O�e�diverse sizes -- naux oints) ��A' Ev➢denee of ehannel incision or widening � 1� 0-5 tI-� 0-3 �_ fdeep(v �nrtsed w Q; stairle tsed & banks � max points} __ ^,. Presence of ma,jor bank f■ilures � �� : , Qs o-'S �a-i �� 4 r„ (severe ernsirin �- t�; np erosion, stabfe banks � max �oinrs m liont depth and density on banlcs ¢�., « Inn �visible rar�ts - (1: dense co�ot,s throt��ihat�t -� ma.�cc oints � - � � V � 4 -'� � � �mpxct E��v agricuhure hvestock, or ti�uber production i� : o-s , a.� o-s 3 (su�istantial im act -0:"no evidenae - max pc�ints) ' �� Prese�ce uf riffle--•�ooE/ripplNpao! enmpfexes �-� 0-� a� 6 1 � no riffles;ri 1es or ools - U; welE-devel� cd = maa: oints d NaUitat complexity � 17 U-6 0:.-6 i}--6 � {littie or na hai�itat ={l; frequcnt, ��aried habitats �- max po'rnts) 4� Cannpy ca��era�E over sireambecf �� l8 0-5 0-5 D-5 Q �,_ (na shadin�; ve�etation �= 0; con�i�uous canop} = max points) Sabsirate embedde�,lness N�A {�l ti:\• D-4 Q-�! dee 1 embedded 0; luose structure - rnax ) ',; Presence of sfrearr+ invertebratex (see pa�e �t 1 � � `0 fno evidence = 0; cnminun, numerous fv es = m� ints) �- 4 0-� �-- 5 U Prese�re of amphibians , O 2i 0-� (1-�3 0-� C�.� fno erric3ence = U; coinn�on. nUmrmus tvpes = niaxpoir�ts) , _ - O 22 Presencc of �sh ': U-� 0- A� D-- 4 Q � (no evidence - Q, ec�rnmt�n, numerous pes �- maac irits) �.� Evidence of wildlife use 0- 6 0- 5 U- 5 Z (no e�°i�ence 0; ahuiadant c+�idence -- ��ax points) Total Foints Pnc�ible I QC1 I�0 I00 TQTAL SiCOR�: [als�� enter un iirst �a��) 30 �� nese cnaraeeeristics are not assessea �n coastao streams. f li��l�� 1�' North Carolina Department of Transportation � 51t3C113�4`ilif"F� I _. Highway Stormwater Program ��- STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN - . (Version 2.04; Released November 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 17BP.6.R.63 TIP No.: County(ies): Columbus Page 1 of 1 General Project Information WBS Element: 17BP.6.R.63 TIP Number: Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 11/22/2016 NCDOT Contact: Jonathan Moore Contractor / Designer: Brandon Barham, PE - Ecological Engineerin Address: 1000 Birch Ridge Drive Address: 1151 SE Cary Parkway Raleigh, NC 27610 Suite 101 Car , NC 27518 Phone: 919-707-6738 Phone: 919-557-0929 Email: 'Imoore6@ncdot. ov Email: bbarham@ecolo icalen .com Cit /Town: Tabor Cit Count (ies): Columbus River Basin(s : Lumber CAMA Count ? No Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes Pro'ect Descri tion Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 0.01 Miles Surroundin Land Use: Rural area with forest and agricultural land use Pro osed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Built-U on Area ac. 0.4 ac. 0.3 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: 2@10.0 ft lane with 4.4 ft shoulders and 1.1 ft guardrail with total bridge width of 33.0 ft 2@10.0 ft lanes with total bridge width of 24.0 ft and total bridge length of 41 ft. and a total bridge length of 80 ft. Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 1300 Year: 2013 Existin : 1300 Year: 2013 General Project Narrative: State project 176P.6.R.63 involves the replacement of the existing NCDOT Bridge #230126 on SR 1005 over Gum Swamp. Bridge #230126 consists of 2@20'-2" RC deck on (Description of Minimization of Water Steel I beam on concrete cap with timber piles and timber abutments. The proposed bridge at #230126 will be 1�a 45', 1@35' 21" Cored Slab with 2'-6" caps and sloping Quality Impacts) abutments. The proposed bridge is located in Zone AE of FIRM Map number 3720016600J and was studied by "Limited Detailed" methods. No deck drains are proposed. One stormwater outfalls is proposed which will be placed at a distance to minimize disturbance to adjacent wetlands. A Rip Rap pad will be utilized to dissipate the energy. Waterbod Information Surface Water Body (1): Gum Swamp NCDWR Stream Index No.: 15-17-1-12-3 NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C Sup iemental Classification: Swam Waters (Sw) Other Stream Classification: None Impairments: None A uatic T&E S ecies? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: Gum Swam Buffer Rules in Effect: Project Includes Brid e S anning Water Bod ? Yes Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? No Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) See Sheet 9A For Index of Sheets See Sheet 98 For Conventionol Symbols See Sheet 9C Fo� Survey Control Sheet ., � V W O � � � � � V � � O V • DETOUR ROUTE + TO SR 1315 (CARL STEPHENS RD.) � � �� Y ��JL�I. �' S„s� ��171�� L � COL UMB US CO U1�TY LOCATI011t: BRIDGE 1110.230126 011t SR 1005 (PEACOCK RD.) OVER GUM SWAMP TYPE OF WORK GRADI11tG, DRAINAGE, PAVI11tG, A1VD STRUCTURE WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT BEGIN BRIDGE -L- STA. 13 + 50.81 �„��., �� .,.�� T�� y�� ,(��1� �F � — �K _ _ � — _ _WLB—'� y ,(c �f � \ - _ _ _ _ � ,� � '�� --� � � + � � � � � � �` � � � �� >� �,��^�� ,� \\� � � � \ � A � /.� '� / � - � � -�-� --�-- � � - � � ,� � i � �-T �---w�a�---�----„�-__� 3 - � � �` � � I � '� � � � .k � �` ,� M � � N "`�� ^`,�� `� � "`� ��,� �`,� `�� i � � � � � � � � � � � �` /� a1 'k � F` � ,k � h` ,k �' ,k , /F , A` a U' ,. � � /� k � � h� h' a= 0 w� �_ a= � ,� o 0 + � � (O�p ��BBTpW 9 N R�•) PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 4 DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL 11NLE35 ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH Prepa�ed ln tl� Office of: HYDRAULICS ENGINEER — � ��1r�1� 504 Meadowland Drive Hillsborough, NC 27278-8551 ADT 2013 = 1300 �°"e �9,9"3Z-3883 Faz:(919)732-6776 rJO �I5 O rJO �OO DESIGNANDENGINEERINGSERVICES wwwsummilde.net �G ��p� T= b% * LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT - 0.083 MILES FIRMNO P�0339 �� c� 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATlONS 9• �� PLANS V= 55 MPH LENGTH STRUCTURES PROJECT = 0.016 MILES � � P.E. TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT = 0.099 MILES s.cxarua�� ': 50 25 0 50 l00 = TTST =3% DUAL 3% RIGHT OF WAY DATE: TRACY N. PARROTf. PE g � JUNE 2, 2015 reo�ecr ENcixESR ROADWAY DESIGN PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) FUNC CLASS = ENG71vEER �� l0 5 0 l0 2o MINOR RURAL COLLECTOR NCDOT CONTACT: VIRGINIA MABRY LETTING DATE: BRANDON W. JOHNSON, PE �� p�p�� MANAGER, PRIOR77Y PROfEC7S UN77 J U N E 2, Z O� 5 PROJECT DESlGN ENGINEER Y.E. PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB-REGIONAL TIER srcxATuxe: TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLAND � L � � \ iv�o--�/ i —'_= �� _ —� � .�= - � �-- - srai4+s2.00 � S ITE 2 END APP.SLAB —/ — CT A /AlAAl1l1 � —L— Jl KlJt9U.V(/ — —. . _. . . .--- i S ITE 1 PC Sta. 15+0%52 TEMPORARY FILL SPECIAL CUT TEMPORARY FILL SITE 1 3'BASE DITCH IN WETLAND IN WETLAND SEE DETAIL 1 SPECIAL CI � 3' BASE DI' SEE DETAIL ,K � ., � ,K ,� ,K c �F /F " A� \ � � � �` � � �` �` � � � �` 1 M � � � � � / h� � � � �` � � � � �` � � � � \ v � � J � N A� _ _� I ,� , . —_ — p6� .� �-� �D pE — � �_ � � � ' � '- _... \� 1 �SZ�1l \ , /u� � �� —� � � DENOTES HAND CLEARING Z oF F DENOTES FILL IN °� WETLAND �DENOTES TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLAND 120 � --- � __. . -- _._ � .__ _--- �oo -L- � -� — - � - ,- �---------- � � I � �` ,� � I � � � -- �_ - -WLB � _ _ -� -�E � �= �` � / � � �` � � �` �" �-- �` �� / � � �� ` �� ,� � �h �iie� '� � � /� � /� � '� � � ,� , � A� , �` a i, � � � k � � � . � DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLAND PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 4 . . . . �- i---=- -- --- -- � y��„ F � � c � E �END SPECIAL CUT SBGF60 3'BASE DITCH SEE DETAIL 1 15" RCP—III `CLASS B RIP RAP E5T 1 TON E5T 5 $Y GEOTEXTILE BdCLY W. CRIB2 ��, 336 PG 55? END CONSTRUCTION —/ — CT A /C1J'1!1 M 50' 0' 100' GRAPHIC SCALE 2 5' 0' 5 0' INSET GRAPHIC SCALE ��i�o��oo�m��o�i�� o��i��m ��o��o��o�� YN��i 13�E9601�i139�99�i11�ri68EEEEi��a9i! 1�39�E9ElIIIi189�6i1i11139� ,........�.......v...._........a..... :, ............................� ii�iiiiiioiiiiiiin�iiiiiwiiiii�ii�iiiiii ' ' " '• " iiii�iiiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiii ��a��a��o��a��a��o�� o��oi 9»C:T.CCCCII�m�CC�COC�R�CC:C=CI�i:CCI I��C�CCCCCII�CC»CmOCC1��C:CI ��o��m��o�o��a�� oo��a��o��oi PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 178P.6.R.63 4 2W SHEEf NO. :OADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER INCOA'IIIDL]E E IDLr�NS DO NOT I;SE FOR 6 W ACQUI9ITION PItELIMIN RY PLANS DO NOT USE FO CqN9TRUCTION DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED �r �R red 'in �he ' FpM �iccN � No�F- o{_ � � Ii515E CarySParkwo> cN �3 a� � � O SITE 2 e��evee �to�m�e�eeo��ee�e,m,ee�=�e�� 1»O�CCOmC1�1�C�CCOCCI»m�Gh:�::::e�:::�=E�Ee��9cee:e�9�e��ee:eeae�ee�eaeeEe �� ua� �� ■ i��wu��o�u�� 1 �N�� nN��n��N��p��A�n��A��e��Y��■N��N�N�� o�� n��n��A��e��O��nn��p�n��n�� o��u� �o��m�u��o��mu��uu��o�u��e��a�m��o��o��o�o�� ,._ _..... ._ _ . . -- -- - ---i- -- - - - r-- i , , , , i . _.. i _ _ _ _._.:- - . ..... - - - - - ---- - - -- --- - - - - -- - � �.' � � � � � � � � - �� 90 � Pl = N+25.00 , BEGIN BRIDGE L END BRIDGE '_. � � , , - L EL = 673T -L- STA l+52.00 � -L- STA /4+ 200 ; _. _, _ _ _ r---- � , � EL = 68.43 - EL = 68J3 � - -- _ - - -- ' — -�..___ z , � - � - _ ___ _ ; � ' vc = ioa , , � _ _ _ � - ��, K= 35/ _ : END GRADE �� DS =�65MPH p� = 12 f75.pp Pl = I5+50.00 -L- STA 16t00.00 � � 80 �: EL = 68.75• EL = 67.66' EL = 67.8/ � � � T ' '-- , L _�.__. __ __ __ _----- r-- - BEGIN GRADE VC = l50' VC = l00' , �' � - -L- STA 10+75A0 K = ll4 DS =� )55MPH '- � : � � � _ � EL = 67A5 DS = 55MPH ----- 6 70 --�-- _-I - : ----_ _. -----_ ' ---- -i II_ (+J09200% 1-10.3964% � ' -� ------ --- -------------- - � - ; 1+J0.6400% � � � � (-)02538% 3 --� - . ._I _ _ � .. ----- -. . _ I----- , �. _ ro - -_�. � - h 60 :-_ � _ - � o _ � ; ; _- � � r--r_ _ �_ ,;- � i I-1- � i � � , ., , ... . ..... . ' . . _J._ . .._ ;__ . ._ .. . ___._._ .. . ______ __. .___ _ i . J .._ . � J � L 5� � � � ; c=i � EXISTING GRADE vo I _ � a � � (t�./636% - � .j, � � - -- - -- - -_ _ _. _ w ----- --- - --- - . _ 2pr,.� --- O�r7 i _ � --- ----- � i � i , : C�IQ�� 2�� ! I � 4O � � �� m�n W � W�n W �', ! � _ - - -- -- - -- - - -�-' ' _I '--1 ; _ - w �_ � _ i i � __ �- I--- I_ i_ i - I- �- ; - , - , � � - � �� aro �� 10 11 12 13 14 �� (+) 025/3% � �—_� ��,�_-� I �� ~J _ � U �b o`+; �+` �'� Za'� O�r.�j z n c�e u o�c`I° nW mc~i�W W�W 15 16 , , �i�� - ... � J i I � � EXISTING GRADE � � �I � � �� d� f+�.3446% � �_ . 2�� 5 _ '�.. �¢u � �i m%iiW -- � � -I- - - ��I 17 TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLAND � L � � \ ��-� �� -- _ - � _ - srai4+s2.00 � S ITE 2 END APP.SLAB —/ — CT A /AlAAl1l1 � -- —L— Jl KlJt9U.V(/ — —. . _. . . .--- i S ITE 1 PC Sta. 15+0%52 TEMPORARY FILL SPECIAL CUT TEMPORARY FILL SITE 1 3'BASE DITCH IN WETLAND IN WETLAND SEE DETAIL 1 SPECIAL CI � 3' BASE DI' SEE DETAIL ,K � ., � ,K "' � '� � m � � .,� A� \ � � � �` � � �` �` � � �` 1 M � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � d � � � � /F� , \ __ N� _-�,� J � _ � �-� - — � —_ -= Fs6� '� F -F -,k - --- D� � pE �- � � �" � _ � _ ` �-� � �.F . F� .P� , , - ._ � s � _i_ � i d --=t � DENOTES HAND CLEARING Z o F F DENOTES FILL IN °� WETLAND �DENOTES TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLAND 120 � --- � __. . -- _._ � .__ _--- �oo _� --------__------ -� .. . __�1 � �� — _ � _ — � _ _ =-- --�— -- ti` I � ,K /F / � � ,k— — —w�e � — — -� K�E�� f � DE � � � ��` �/� � n� � �� ` � � � � � ��fiE�-- .. �� /�� d -__ ,� � /F � 'K VLB� � /F � .(� � � � � ,`= � '� � � � � � � � �F � � � � k � DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLAND PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 3 OF 4 - . � - - ,---_- ._ ___ ._ _ �F^ F � — 3—_-. c � � E SBGF60 SEI �-15" RCP-III —CLASS B RIP RAP E5T 1 TON E5T 5 $Y GEOTEXTILE SdCLY W. CRIB2 ��, 336 PG 55? END CONSTRUCTION —/ — CT A /C1J'1!1 M 50' 0' 100' GRAPHIC SCALE 2 5' 0' 5 0' INSET GRAPHIC SCALE ��i�o��oo�m��o�i�� o��i��m ��o��o��o�� YN��i 13�E9601�i139�99�i11�ri68EEEEi��a9i! 1�39�E9ElIIIi189�6i1i11139� ,........�.......v...._........a..... :, ............................� ii�iiiiiioiiiiiiin�iiiiiwiiiii�ii�iiiiii ' ' " '• " iiii�iiiiiiii�iiiiiiiiiiiiii ��a��a��o��a��a��o�� o��oi 9»C:T.CCCCII�m�CC�COC�R�CC:C=CI�i:CCI I��C�CCCCCII�CC»CmOCC1��C:CI ��o��m��o�o��a�� oo��a��o��oi PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 178P.6.R.63 4 2W SHEEf NO. :OADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER INCOA'IIIDL]E E IDLr�NS DO NOT I;SE FOR 6 W ACQUI9ITION PItELIMIN RY PLANS DO NOT USE FO CqN9TRUCTION DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED �r �R red 'in �he ' FpM �iccN � No�F- o{_ � � Ii515E CarySParkwo> W �i d�� O SITE 2 e��evee �to�m�e�eeo��ee�e,m,ee�=�e�� 1»O�CCOmC1�1�C�CCOCCI»m�Gh:�::::e�:::�=E�Ee��9cee:e�9�e��ee:eeae�ee�eaeeEe �� ua� �� ■ i��wu��o�u�� 1 �N�� nN��n��N��p��A�n��A��e��Y��■N��N�N�� o�� n��n��A��e��O��nn��p�n��n�� o��u� �o��m�u��o��mu��uu��o�u��e��a�m��o��o��o�o�� ,._ _..... ._ _ . . -- -- - ---i- -- - - - r-- i , , , , i . _.. i _ _ _ _._.:- - . ..... - - - - - ---- - - -- --- - - - - -- - �. � � � e � � s90 I _; _. ; _ _ _____ . _ r---- ._ � _ II EL =1,673� _ , BLGISTA 1�+52.00 � EL� S�A�+ 200 _ � �I I- r---__ _ _. ____ ;_._. _ ' ._-- - - _ _ , � � � EL 68.43 EL 68J3 , _ —�-- 0 � - ' ' vc - ioa _ � I _ Pl =__ 12+75.00 EL = 67.66' -L-_ STA 16t00.00 , _ � '� _ j ��, K= 35/ EL 68.75 - ELD G67� E � � DS = �65MPH Pl - I5+50.00 I � F 80 � � � � _,.__. __ __ __ __---- �-- - BEGIN GRADE VC = l50' VC l00' , �' � - -L- STA 10+75A0 K = ll4 DS =� )55MPH '— � : � � � _ � EL = 67A5 DS = 55MPH ----- 6 70 --�-- _-I - : ----_ _. -----_ ' ---- -i II_ (+J09200% 1-10.3964% � ' -� ------ --- -------------- — � — ; 1+J0.6400% � � � � (-)02538% 3 --� - . ._I _ _ � .. ----- -. . _ I----- , �. _ ro - -_�. � - h 60 :-_ � _ - � o _ � ; ; _- � � r--r_ _ �_ ,;- � i I-1- � i � � , ., , ... . ..... . ' . . _J._ . .._ ;__ . ._ .. . ___._._ .. . ______ __. .___ _ i . J .._ . � J � L 5� � � � ; c=i � EXISTING GRADE vo I _ � a � � (t�./636% - � .j, � � - -- - -- - -_ _ _. _ w ----- --- - --- - . _ 2pr,.� --- O�r7 i _ � --- ----- � i � i , : C�IQ�� 2�� ! I � 4O � � �� m�n W � W�n W �', ! � _ - - -- -- - -- - - -�-' ' _I '--1 ; _ - w �_ � _ i i � __ �- I--- I_ i_ i - I- �- ; - , - , � � — j �ro a� o� �� 10 11 12 13 14 �� (+) 025/3% � �—_� ��,�_-� I �� ~J _ � U �b o`+; �+` �'� Za'� O�r.�j z n c�e u o�c`I° nW mc~i�W W�W 15 16 , , �i�� - ... � J i I � � EXISTING GRADE � � �I � � �� d� f+�.3446% � �_ . 2�� 5 _ '�.. �¢u � �i m%iiW -- � � -I- - - ��I 17 WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size/Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands inWetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ft ft ft 1 11+66/13+20 -L- LT. 1@35', 1@45' 21" CS w/ 2'-6" Ca s 0.02 0.01 2 14+20/15+24 -L- LT. 1@35', 1@45' 21" CS w/ 2'-6" Ca s 0.01 0.02 0.01 <0.01 TOTALS`: 0.01 0.04 0.02 <0.01 0 0 0 'Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts Permanent Fill in Temp. Fill in Excavation in Hand NOTES: Impacts Wetlands (Sq. Ft.) Wetlands (Sq. Wetlands Clearing in Ft.) (Sq. Ft.) Wetlands (Sq. Ft.) Site 1 0 962 605 0 Site 2 565 801 569 253 Total 565 1763 1174 253 �