20170202 Ver 1_wet file 2_20170217

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Moore Co. Bridge 25 TIP BR620025 Ciry/Counry: Moore County Sampling Date: 2016-03-23
a,ppiicanvowner: NC Department of Transportation State: NC WB-wet
Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): D. Cooper Section, Township, Range: �ackson Springs, NC
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Roadsid2 Sw812 Local relief (concave, convex, none): ConCaVe Slope (%): �%
Subregion (LRR or M�Rn): P, 137 �at: 35.192354 �ong: -79.619753 �atum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Mayodan Fine Sandy Loam, 8-15% Slopes NWI classifcation: N�A
Are climatic / hy^drolopic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes �✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation U Soil �, or Hydrology � signifcantly tlisturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �✓
Are Vegetation�✓ , Soil ✓�, or Hydrology � naturaily problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes � No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No
Remarks:
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes ✓� No �
Wetland is along roadway of SR 1122/Jackson Springs Rd. Soil is altered by road fill adjacent to wetland. Hydrology is
altered by presence of road. Vegetation is altered by mowing road shoulder.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hytlrology Indicators: Secondarv Intlicators (minimum of two reauiredl
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired� check all that aoplv) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surface Water (A7) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Sudace (68)
❑� High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) j]✓ Drainage Pattems (B10)
❑✓ Saturation (A3) �✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) L] Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1) Q Presence of Reducetl Iron (C4) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (82) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilletl Soils (C6) ❑ Cre�sh Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposils (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surtace (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑✓ Iron Deposits (B5) � Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Vsible on Aerial Imagery (B7) � ShallowAquitard (D3)
Q✓ Water-Stained Leaves (69) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
�Aquatic Fauna (B13) Q FAC-Neuhal Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Present? Yes 0 No Q✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes IQ�✓'� No Q Depth (inches): -6,�
Saturation Present? Yes, •� No Q Deplh (inches): -2�� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes II, No �
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recordetl Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if availahle:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Streta) — Use scientific names of plants. TIB BR 620025 Sampling Point: WB-Wet
Absolute Dominant indicator pominanceTestworksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species
�. No trees rooted within wetland That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 (A)
= Total Cover
50 % of total cover: 20°/a of total cover:
Saolinq Shatum (Pbt size: )
�, No saplings rooted within wetland
Shrub Stra�um (Plot
� Aronia arbutifolia
2 Ligustrum sinense
�y Clethra alnifolia
9.1 m
50% of total cover:
= Total Cover
_ 20 % of total cover:
6 Y FACW
3 Y FACU
3 Y FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 6 (g)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 83% (q/g)
Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv�
OBL species Z x 1= 2
FACW species 26 x 2= 52
FAC species 5 x 3= 15
FACU species 3 x 4= 12
UPLspecies � x5=�
Column Totals: 36 (A) 81 �g�
Prevalencelndex =B/A=2.Z5
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Q✓ 2- Dominance Test is >50 %
Q✓ 3- Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
� Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
�Z =TotalCover
Defmitions of Five Venetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 6 20 % of total cover. 2.4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
�.Juncus effusus 10 Y
Z_ Woodwardia areolata g y
3. Bidens aristosa z
q. Athyrium filix-femina (asplenoides) 2
5. Sphagnum sp. 3
7
11
Woodv Vine Siratum (Plot size:
i Smilax laurifolia
phato
50 % of total cover: 12.5
50%o of total cover: �
:fs tlefQ Of on a SepBf
FAC W
FAC W
FAC W
FAC
NI
25 = Total Cover
20°/ ottotalcover: 5
2 Y OBL
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximatety 20 ft(6 m) or more in height antl 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH).
Sapling — Woody plants, exclutling woody vines,
approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 ia p.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding wootly vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb—All herbaceous (non-wootly) plants, inclutling
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and wootly
plants, ezcept woody vines, less than approximately 3
R (7 m) in height.
Woody vine—All woody vines, regardless of height.
2 Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
_ 20°/ oftotal cover: ��4 Present7 Yes, ✓� Non
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains antl Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL TIB BR 620025 Samolina Point WB-`�'�et
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the intlicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) v
Depth Matrix Retlox Features
(inchesl Color fmoist) % Color /moisU % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
0-3" 10YR 5/1 SO% 10YR 4/6 20% C M SL
3-8" 10YR 6/2 80% 10YR 6/6 20% C M SL Meets indicator F3
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Greins. �Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Intlicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
� Histosol (A1) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) 0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, �48) (MLRA 147, 148)
�f Hydrogen Sulfde (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 0 Piedmont Flootlplain Soils (F'19)
� Stratifetl Layers (A5) � Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) � Redox Dark Surface (F6) 0 Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12)
L] Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A11) ❑ Depleted Dark Surtace (F7) L] Other (Explain in Remarks)
L] Thick Dark Surface (Al2) D Redox Depressions (F8)
D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, ❑ Iroo-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
� Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54) ❑ Umbric Surface (F73) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation antl
❑ Sandy Retlox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetlantl hydrology must be present,
❑ Stripped Matriz (S6) � Red Parent Malerial (F2'I) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No ❑
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: Moore Co. Bridge 25 TIP BR620025 City/County: Moore County Sampling Date: 2016-03-23
nppiicanuowner: NC Department of Transportation s[ate: N� Sampling Point: WC-Wet
Investigator(s): D. COOper Section, Township. Range: �aCkson Springs, NC
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillsid@ SeBp Local relief (concave, convex, none): ConVeX Slope (%): 6%
Subregion(LRRorMLRA): P� �3� Lat: 35.192285 �ong: -79.619892 �atum: NAD83
soii nnap unit Name: Mayodan Fine Sandy Loam, 8-15% slopes NWI classification: N/A
Are climatic! hydrolo ic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes �✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetalion � Soil �, or Hydrology � signifcantly disturbetl? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No �
Are Vegetation�, Soil �, or Hydrology� naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �� No �� Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes �I—� NoII within a Wetlantl? Yes � No �
Wetland Hytlrology Present? Yes � y � No r�
Vegetation is altered by mowing a portion of the wetland area in an apparent ROW.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Intlicators (minimum of two reauiredl
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reouired� check all that aoolv) ❑ Surtace Soii Cracks (66)
Q✓ Surtace Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Planis (814) ❑ Sparsety Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Q✓ High Water Table (A2) � Hytlrogen Suifide Odor (C7) Q Drainage Patterns (610)
Q Saturetion (A3) Q Ozidizetl Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (81) Q Presence of Reducetl Iron (C4) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Q Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Q Cra�sh Burrows (CS)
Q Drift Deposits (83) ❑ Thin Muck Surtace (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Di)
0✓ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) ❑ ShallowAquitard (D3)
Q✓ WalerStainetl Leaves (69) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
�Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Fieltl Observations:
Surtace Water Present? Yes 0 No Q Depth (inches): ���
Water Table Present? Yes Q✓ No Q Depth (inches): ���
Saturation Present? Yes ✓Q No Q Depth (inches): ��� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes II No �
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. TIB BR 620025 Sampling Point: WC-wet
Tree Siratum (Plot size: .) % Cover Soecies? Status
�.Acerrubrum 10 Y FAC
Z. Liriodendron tulipifera S Y FACU
3.
4.
5.
6.
18 = Total Cover
50 % of total cover: 9 20% of total cover: 3.6
Saolino Stratum (Plot size: )
�. Ilex opaca 2 Y FACU
Z. Magnolia virginiana 5 Y FACW
� = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 3�5 20°/ of total cover: ��4
ShrubStrafum (Plotsize: 9��m 1
� Aronia arbutifoiia g y
p Viburnum nutlum �p y
3 Vaccinium corymbosum Z
4 Ligus[rum sinense p
FACW
OBL
FACW
FACU
ZZ = Total Cover
50 % of total cover. � � 20% of total cover: 4.4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
�.Athyriumflix-femina(asplenoides) 2
z. Mitchella repens 2
g.Arundinaria gigantea 2
q. Carex sp. 5 y
5, Sphagnum sp. 10 Y
7
Woodv Vine SUatum (Plot size:
�. Smilax laurifolia
� Smilax rotundifolia
(Include
50 % of total cover: 10.5
FACW
FACU
FAC W
FACW
NI
Z� =TotalCover
20% of total cover. 4•2
2 OBL
30 Y FAC
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6+ (q)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 9 (g�
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 67%+ �q�g�
Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv�
OBL species � 2 x 1= � Z
FACW species 24 x 2= 48
FAC species 4� x 3= 120
FACU species 14 x 4= 56
UPL species 0 x 5= �
Co�umn Tota�s: 90 (A) 236 �B�
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.62
LJ 1- Rapitl Test for Hydrophy�ic Vegetation
Q^✓ 2- Dominance Test is >50 %
u 3- Prevalence Indez is <_3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
� Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree — Wootly plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft(fi m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at hreast height (DBH).
Sapling — Wootly plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub— Woody plants, exclutling woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 k(1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb—All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, antl woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Wootly vioe —All woody vines, regardless of height.
3Z Hytlrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation ^ �
50 % of total cover: � 6 20% of total cover: 6�4 Present? Yes �� � No
or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Pietlmont— Version 2.0

SOIL TIB BR 620025 Sampling Point: WC-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moistl % Color (moistl % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks
0-3" 10YR 3/1 100% Loam
3-12" 10YR 5/2 95°/o 10YR 5/6 5% C M Sand
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. �Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matriz.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Intlicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
� Histosol (A1) ❑ Dark Surtace (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surtace (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surtace (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
� Hydrogen Sulfde (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratifed Layers (A5) �✓ Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ,❑ Retlox Dark Surface (F6) � Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12)
[] Deple�ed Below Dark Surtace (A11) � Depleted Dark Surface (F7) � Other (Explain in Remarks)
[] Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Redox Depressions (FS)
D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Um6ric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophy[ic vegetation and
[] Santly Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F79) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
� Strippetl Matrix (S6) � Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbetl or pmblematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soii Present? Yes � No ❑
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains antl Piedmont— Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: Moore Co. Bridge 25 TIP BR620025 City/County: Moore County Samp�ing Date: Z016-03-23
ApplicanUOwner: NC Department of TranSpoffation State: NC Sampling Point: WD-wet
Investigator(s): D. Cooper Section, Township, Range: �ackson Springs, NC
Lantlform (hillslope, terrace, etcJ: topo9faPhiC CfenUlatiOn Local relief (concave, convex, none): COnCBv@ g�oPe �o�p�; 20o/a
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P� � 3� Lat: 35.191819 Long: -�9•619479 Datum: NAD83
soii nnap unit Name: Mayodan Fine Sandy Loam, 8-15% slopes NWI classifcation: N�%�
Are climatic I hy�—dr-olo�` ic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes �✓ No Q(If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation i v � Soil �, or Hydrology � signifcantly disturbetl? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are VegetationQ Soil �, or Hydrology � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, trensects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes ✓� No 0
Vegetation is altered by mowing a portion of the wetland area adjacent to SR 1122 and a private driveway.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hytlrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two reouiredl
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired� check all that aoplvl ❑ Surtace Soil Cracks (B6)
Q✓ Surtace Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (814) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS)
❑✓ High Water Table (A2) � Hydrogen Sulfde Odor (C1) Q Drainage Pattems (B10)
Q Saturation (A3) Q Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1) Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Q Cra�sh Burrows (CS)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3) � Thin Muck Surtace (C7) ❑ Saturation Visihle on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (85) ❑✓ Geamorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Q✓ WaterStained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
�✓ Aquatic Fauna (813) 0✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes � No Q Depth (inches); 3"
Water Table Present? Yes �Q� No Q Depth (inches): ���
Saturation Present? Yes' "' No � Depth (inches): ��� Wetland Hytlrology Present? Yes n No �
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. TIB BR 620025 Sampling Point: WD-wet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
�. Liriodendron tulipifera <2 FACU ThatAre OBL, FACW, or FAQ 5 �n�
2
50% of totai cover. �
Saolina Stratum (Plot size: 1
i. Magnolia virginiana 5
50% of total cover: z.5
ShrubStratum (Plotsize: 9�1m )
� Aronia arbutifolia
2 Viburnum nudum
q Ligus[rum sinense
50% of total cover: 8�5
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% �q�g�
=TotalCover .`.`.`..".""""'�"„""`.
Total % Cover of: Multinlv bv�
20% of total cover. 0�4
OBL species � 3 x 1= 13
Y FACW FAcw species 4� x 2= 94
FAC species 0 x 3= �
FACU species 4 x 4= 16
UPL species � x 5= �
— Column Totals: 64 (A) � 23 �g�
Prevalence Index = B/A= � �92
5 = Total Cover
_ 20°/ ottotal cover: �
10 Y FACW
5 Y OBL
2 FACU
� � = Total Cover
20°/ of total cover 3.4
Herb Siratum (Plot size: )
�. Woodwardia areolata 30 Y
Z.Osmunda (Osmundastrum) cinnamomea 2
7
❑ 1- Rapitl Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Q✓ 2- Dominance Test is >50 %
Q✓ 3- Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provitle supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
0 Problematic Hytlrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetlantl hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Veaefation Streex
� roe– vvoouy yimus, exawing waoQy Vlnes,
approximately 20 ft(fi m) or more in height and 3 in.
FACW (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
FACW Sapling – Woody plants, ezcluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
_ Shrub–Wootlyplants,exclutlingwootlyvines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft('I to 6 m) in height.
_ Herb –All herbaceous (non-wootly) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
— ft (1 m) in height.
Wootly vine – All woody vines, regardless of height.
32 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: � 6 20% of total cover: 6.4
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
�.Smilaxlaurifolia 8 Y OBL
50% of total cover: 4
rs here or on a separate
a Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
_ 20% of total cover: ��6 Present? Yes n No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains antl Piedmont – Version 2.0

SOIL TIB BR 620025 Samplinq Point: WD-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to documentthe indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Retlox Features
(inches) Colorfmoisfl % Colorlmoisfl % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
0-6" 10YR 6/1 100°/a Sand
6-12" 10YR 6/1 95°/o 10YR 6/4 5% C M Sand
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letioq RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Intlicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
0 Histosol (A1) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) 0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 748) ❑ Coast Prairie Retlox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surtace (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148)
[] Hydrogen Sulfde (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyetl Matrix (F2) � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
[] Stratified Layers (A5) � Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) � Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12)
[] Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A11) [] Depleted Dark Surtace (F� r] Other (Explain in Remarks)
[] Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Redox Depressions (F8)
� Santly Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 736)
0 Sandy Gleyetl Matrix (S4) ❑ Um6ric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Intlicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodpiain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hytlrology must 6e present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) � Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless distur6etl or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hytlric Soil Present? Yes ✓❑ No ❑
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Pietlmont — Version 2.0