The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20170202 Ver 1_wet file 1_20170217WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region ProjecvSite: Moore Co. Bridge 25 TIP BR620025 City/Counry: Moore County Sampling Date: 2016-03-23 appiicanuowner: NC Department of Transportation state: NC sampiing Point: WE-wet Investigator(s): D. Cooper Seciion, Township, Range: �aCkSon Springs, NC Landform (hillslope, terrace, etcJ: flOOdplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): CoflCave Slope (%): 2.7% Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P, 137 Lat: 35.191420 Long: -�9.618690 Datum: NADS3 Soil Map Unit Name: Wehadkee loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classification: PF01 C Are climatic I hytlrolo ic contlitions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes �✓ No Q(If no, explain in Remarks J Are Vegetation ✓� Soil �, or Hydrology � signifcantly tlisturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No � Are Vegetation�, Soil �, or Hytlrology � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes L� J No �J Is the Sampletl Area Hytlric Soil Present? Yes �I—� NoII within a Wetland? Yes � No � Wetlantl Hydrology Present? Yes � v � No �� Vegetation is partially altered by mowing a portion of the wetland area adjacent to SR 1122 and a private driveway. Hydrology is altered by the adjacent road. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Intlicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two reauiretll Primarv Indicators lminimum of one is reauired� check all that aoolv) ❑ Surface Soil Crecks (B6) ❑✓ Surtace Water (A1) ❑ Tme Aquatic Plants (614) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (B8) Q High Water Table (A2) � Hydrogen Sulfide Otlor (C1) Q Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑✓ Saturalion (A3) Q Oxitlized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B1fi) ❑ Water Marks (B1) �✓ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) ❑✓ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑✓ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Thin Muck Surtace (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stuntetl or Stressed Plants (D1) ❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Geomarphic Position (D2) D Inundation Visi6le on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Q WatervStained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) �Aquatic Fauna (B13) Q✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surtace Water Present? Yes � No Q Depth (inches): 1 S" Water Table Present? Yes Q�✓� No Q Depth (inches): �� Saturation Present? Yes' "' No Q Depth (inches): �� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No includes ca illa frin e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont– Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. TIB BR 620025 Sampling Point: WE-wet Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Soecies� Status �. Liquidambar styraciflua 20 Y FAC Z. Liriodendron tulipifera 10 FACU 3, Acer rubrum 30 Y FAC 4. Magnolia virginiana 10 FACW 5. Ilex opaca 20 Y FACU 90 =TotalCover 50% of total cover: 45 20 % of total cover: � 8 SapGnq Stfafum (Plot SiZe: ) �, Magnolia virginiana 20 Y FACW 2. Persea palustris 5 Y FACW 50% of total cover .12.5 ShrubSira�um (Plotsize: 9�1m � Aronia arbutifolia � Vaccinium corymbosum 25 = Total Cover _ 20% of total cover: 5 10 Y FACW 10 Y FACW Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: $ �q� Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 9 (g� Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: $9% (q/g� Total % Cover of: MNtiolv bv OBL species $ x 1 = $ FACW species � 4� x 2= 280 FAC species 50 X 3= 150 FACU species 30 x 4= 120 UPL species � x 5= � Column Totals: 22$ �q� 558 �g� Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.45 ❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation ❑I��I 2 - Dominance Test is >50 % � 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' ❑ 4- Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 6 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbetl or problematic. Z� = Total Cover Definitions of Five Vegetation St�ata: 50% of total cover: � � 20% of total cover: 4 Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) approximately 20 R(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. �. Arundinaria gigantea 15 FACW p.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Z, Leucothoe axillaris 70 Y FACW Sapling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, 3� approzimately 20 fl(6 m) or more in height and less q. than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. 7 10. 11. 85 = Tota1 Cover 50% of total cover: 4Z.5 20 % of total cover: � � Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) �. Smilax laurifolia g y pg� Shrub — Wootly plants, exclutling woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) in height. Herb—All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, antl woody plants, ezcept woody vines, less than approximately 3 R (7 m) in height. Woody vine—All woody vines, regardless of height. 8 Hydrophytic =TotalCover VegeWtion 50% of total cover: 4 20 % of total cover: ��6 Present? Yes �✓ Non numbers here or on a US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0 SOIL TIB BR 620025 Samplinq Point: WE-wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth neetled to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Retloz Features (inchesl Color (moistl % Color (moistl % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks 0-4" 10YR 4/1 100% Loam 4-12" 10YR 4/1 75% 10YR 6/8 25% C M, PL SL 'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masketl Sand Grains. �Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sails': � Histosol (A1) ❑ Dark Surtace (S7) � 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A76) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surtace (59) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 747, 148) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfde (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) � Piedmont Flootlplain Soils (F19) [] Stratifed Layers (A5) j] �epleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 736, 147) [] 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ,Q Redox Dark Surface (F6) � Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) J� Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) � Depleted Dark Surface (F7) �J Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) D Retlox Depressions (FS) D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) 0 Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 13Q 122) �Intlicators of hydrophytic vegetation and [] Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) � Red Parent Material (F2'I) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No ❑ Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Pietlmont— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region ProjecVSite: Moore Co. Bridge 25 TIP BR620025 City�County: Moore County Sampling �ate: Z016-03-23 nppiicanuowner: NC Department of Transportation state: NC Sampling Point: WF-Wet Investigator(s): D. Cooper Section, Township, Range: �aCkson Springs, NC Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): floodPlain Local relief (concave, convex, none): �one Slope (%): �� % Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P� �3� Lat: 35.191916 Long: -�9�618759 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: Wehadkee loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI classifcation: PF01 C Are climatic! hytlrolo ic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes �✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation �✓ Soil �, or Hydrology � significantly distur6ed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No � Are Vegetation�, Soil �, or Hydrology � naturally problematic? (If needetl, explain any answers in Remarks J SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �� No �J Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes �� NoII within a Wetiand? Yes 0 No � Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes �� No �� Vegetation is partially altered by mowing a portion of the wetland area adjacent to SR 1122. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secontlarv Intlicators (minimum of two reouiredl Primarv Indicators fminimum of one is reouired� check all that aoolvl ❑ Surtace Soil Cracks (86) Q✓ Surtace Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (814) ❑ Sparsely Vegetatetl Concave Surtace (68) ❑✓ High Water Table (A2) � Hydrogen Sulfde Odor (C7) Q Drainage Patterns (B10) Q Saturation (A3) � Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (81) � Presence of Retluced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (82) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Cra�sh Burmws (C8) ❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) ❑I�I Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) L Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) D WatervStained Leaves (B9) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) �Aquatic Fauna (B13) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) ❑✓ FAGNeutral Test (DS) Field Observations: Surtace Water Present? Yes 0 No Q Depth (inches): �� Water Table Present? Yes Q✓ No Q Depih (inches): 0„ Saturation Present? Yes ✓Q No � Depth (inches): �� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No � includes ca illa frin e Describe Recordetl Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Streta) – Use scientific names of plants. TIB BR 620025 Sampling Point: WF-wet -- —_..__......_.__._. Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Soecies? Status �. Liquidambar styraciflua 20 Y FAC p. Liriodendron tulipifera 10 FACU g,Acerrubrum 30 Y FAC q, Magnolia virginiana 10 FACW 5, Ilex opaca 20 Y FACU 9� = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: �$ SaolinqStratum (Plotsize: 1 �. Magnolia virginiana 20 Y FACW Z, Persea palustris 5 Y FACW Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 9��m � Aronia arbutifolia � Vaccinium corymbosum z5 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: � 2�5 20% of total cover: 5 10 Y FACW 10 Y FACW Z� = Total Cover 50 % of total cover: � 0 20 % of total cover: 4 Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) �,Arundinariagigantea 15 FACW p. Leucothoe axillaris 70 Y FACW 7 85 = Total Cover 50 % of total cover: 42.5 20% of total cover: � � Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) �, Smilax laurifolia g 50% of total cover: 4 rs here or on a sepan Y OBL Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC� $ (q) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 9 �g� Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAQ 89% (,q�g� Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv� OBL species 8 x 1= 8 FACW species � 4� x 2= 280 FAC species 50 x 3= 1 SO FACU species 3� x 4= 120 UPLspecies � x5=� Column Totals: zz$ (q) 558 �g� Prevalencelndez =B/A=2.45 ❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophylic Vegetation Q✓ 2- Dominance Test is >50 % � 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0' ❑ 4 - Morphological Atlaptations' (Provide supporting tlata in Remarks or on a separate sheet) � Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Intlicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definrtons of Frve Vegetation Strata: 7ree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling — Wootly plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height antl less than 3 ia (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub — Woody plants, excluding wootly vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) in height. Herb—All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, inclutling herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and wootly plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine — All woody vines, regardless of height. $ Hydrophytic = Total Cover Vegetation _ 20% oftotalcover:��s Present? Yes n No� US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0 SOIL TIB BR 620025 Samnlina Point WF-wet Profile Description: (Describe to the tlepth needed to tlocument the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) V Depth Matrix Redoz Features (inchesl Color(moisfl % Color(moistl % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks 0-10" 10YR 3/1 100% Sand 10-24" 10YR 4/1 100% Sand Dark surtace 'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. �Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hytlric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hytlric Soils': ❑ Histosol (A1) D Dark Surtace (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) D Polyvalue Below Surtace (SS) (MLRA 747, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Retlox (Ai 6) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, 148) [] Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matriz (F2) 0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) [] Stratifed Layers (AS) L] Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A1 D) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) �] Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) [] Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A17) � Depleted Dark Surtace (F7) � Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Thick Dark Surtace (Al2) � Redox Depressions (F8) D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) � Santly Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 736, 122) 3lndicators of hydrophy[ic vegetation and [] Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Pietlmont Floodpiain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Strippetl Matrix (S6) � Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No ❑ Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Project/Site: Moore Co. Bridge 25 TIP BR620025 City/County: Moore County Sampling Date: 2016-03-23 ApplicantlOwner: NC Department of TranspORation State: NC Sampling Point: WG-wet Investigator(s): D. Cooper Section, Township, Range: �ackson Springs, NC Landform (hillslope, terrace, etcJ: slope to floodplain Local relief (concave, convez, none): COnCBVe Slope (%): 2.$°�a Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P� 137 �at; 35.191493 Long: -�9.617555 Datum: NADS3 soii Map Unit Name: Wehadkee loam, 0-2°/o slopes, frequently flooded NWI classifcation: PF01 C Are climatic / hy�drol,o`i�c conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes �✓ No Q(If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation � v � Soil �, or Hydrology � signifcantly disturbetl? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No � Are Vegetation�, Soil �, or Hydrology � naturally problematic? (If neetled, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetalion Present? Yes Hydric Soil Present? Yes Wetiand Hytlrology Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes � No � Vegetation is altered by predominance of invasive Chinese privet which has taken over the area following a timber harvest. Hydrology is altered by the presence of a gravel road immediately up-slope from this area. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators /minimum of two reouiredl Primarv Intlicators (minimum of one is reouired� check all that aoolv) ❑ Surtace Soil Cracks (66) Q✓ Surtace Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS) ❑✓ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hytlrogen Sulide Odor (C1) L]✓ Drainage Pattems (B10) Q✓ Saturation (A3) ✓� Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616) ❑ Water Marks (Bt) Q✓ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (62) ❑ Recent Imn Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ✓❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visi6le on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Q✓ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑✓ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ ShallowAquitard (D3) Q✓ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) �Aquatic Fauna (B13) � FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches): �� Water Table Present? Yes QfT✓ No Q Depth (inches): p,� Saturation Present? Yes, .� No Q Depth (inches): �� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No � includes ca illa frin e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. TIB BR 620025 Sampling Point: WG-wet Absolute Dominani Indicator pominanceTestworksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species �, Pinus taeda 30 Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) 30 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: � 5 20% of total cover: 6 SaplinqStratum (Plotsize: ) �. Liriodendron tulipifera 10 Y FACU Z_Acerrubrum 30 Y FAC 4� = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 2� 20 % of total cover: $ ShrubStratum (Plotsize: 9��m ) � Ligustrum sinense 50 Y FACU 50 - Total Cover 50% of total cover: ZS 20% of total cover: � � Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) �, No herbs in wetland 7 11 Wootiv Vine Stratum (Plot size: �, Smilax rotundifolia 50% of total cover: = Total Cover 20% of total cover: 5 Y FAC 5 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 2�5 20°/ of tolal cover: � numbers here or on a Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 5 (g) Percent of �ominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 60% �q�g� Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv' OBL species � x 1= � FACW species � x 2= 0 FAC species 65 x 3= 195 FACU species 6� x 4= z40 UPLspecies � x5=� Column Totals: 125 (A) 435 �g� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.48 ❑ 7- Rapid Test for Hytlrophytic Vegetation Q✓ 2- Dominance Test is >50% Q3- Prevalence Intlex is <_3.0' ❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Intlicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 6e present, unless disturbed or problematic. Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata: Tree - Woody plants, exclutling wootly vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding wootly vines, approximately 20 R(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) �BH. Shrub- Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) in height. Herb-All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regartlless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less ihan approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes� No� US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Version 2.0 SOIL TIB BR 620025 Samplinp Point: WG-wet Profile Description: (Describe to the tlepth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features finches) Cobr fmoisB % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks 0-10" 10YR 5/1 95% 10YR 5/8 5% C M CL Hole collapsed @ 10" (water) 'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains �Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': 0 Histosol (A1) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) 0 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) L] Polyvalue Below Surtace (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redoz (A16) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark SuAace (S9) (MLRA 147, 748) (MLRA 147, 148) 0 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyetl Matrix (F2) 0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) ❑ Stratified Layers (AS) n Depleted Matrix (F3) (MLRA 136, 747) [] 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Retlox Dark Surface (F6) � Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) L] Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) L] Other (Explain in Remarks) � Thick Dark Suriace (Al2) � Redox Depressions (FS) ,Q Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 747, 148) MLRA 136) � Sandy Gleyetl Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 736, 122) 'Intlicators of hytlrophytic vegetation and [] Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Fioodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, � Stripped Matrix (S6) � Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soii Present? Yes � No ❑ Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region ProjecVSite: Moore Co. Bridge 25 TIP BR620025 City/County: Moore County Sampling Date: 2016-03-23 nppiicanvowner: NC Department of Transportation State: NC Sampling Point: WH-Wet Investigator(s): D. Cooper Sedioq Township, Range: �ackson Springs, NC Lantlform (hillslope, terrace, etcJ: flOodplain Local relief (concave, convex, none): COnCaV2 Slope (%): ��8% Subregion (LRR or M�RA): P� � 37 Lat: 35.191005 �ong: -79.617508 oaWm: NAD83 soii Map unit Name: Wehadkee loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently tlooded NWI classifcation: PF01 C Are climatic / hy^drologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes �✓ No Q(If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation u Soil � or Hydrology � signifcantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No � Are Vegetation�, Soil �, or Hydrology � naturally problematic? Qf needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes Hydric Soil Present? Yes Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes HYDROLOGY No Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0 Wetlantl Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two reouired) Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reouiretl� check all that aoolvl ❑ Surtace Soil Cracks (B6) Q✓ Surtace Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (614) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS) �✓ High Water Table (A2) � Hydrogen SulSde Otlor (C1) � Drainage Pattems (810) ❑✓ Saturation (A3) 0✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ Water Marks (B1) Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilletl Soils (C6) ❑✓ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Other (Ezplain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Q✓ Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Geomorphic Pasition (D2) ❑I�I Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) ❑ ShallowAquitard (D3) ,• � Water-Stainetl Leaves (89) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) �Aquatic Fauna (B13) Q✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes 0 No Q Depth (inches): �� Water Table Present? Yes Q✓ No Q Depth (inches); 0" Saturation Present? Yes Q No � Depth (inches): �� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No� includes ca illa frin e Describe Recortled Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. TIB BR 620025 Sampling Point: WH-wet Absolute Dominant Indicator pominanceTestworksheet: Tree Stratum (Piot size: ) % Cover Soecies? Status Numher of Dominant Species �. Pinus taeda 15 FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAQ 7 �q� p. Liriodendron tulipifera 40 Y FACU Total Number of Dominant 3, Liquidambar styraciflua 40 Y FAC Species Across All Strata: $ �g� 50% oftotalcover: 47.5 Saolino Stratum (Plot size: �. Salix nigra 50% of total cover: 2�5 ShmbStratum (Plotsize: 9�1m � Aronia arbufifolia 95 = Total Cover 20 % of total cover: � 9 ��•�i7E71 5 = Total Cover _ 20% of total cover: � 10 Y FACW �� = Total Cover 50% of total cover. 5 20% of total cover. 2 Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) �.Arisaematriphyllum 2 Y FACW Z. Woodwardia areolata 5 Y FACW tl 1 D. 11. � = Total Cover 50 % of total cover: 3�5 20 / of total cover: 1.4 Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) �. Smilax rotundifolia 10 Y FAC Z Lonicera japonica 10 Y FAC � 4 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: � � 20 % of total cover: 4 :rs here or on a seoarate sheet 1 Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 8��5% (pJB) Total % Cover of: Multiolv bv OBL species 5 x 1= 5 FACW species � � x 2= 34 FAC species �5 x 3= Zz5 FACUspecies 4� x4=160 UPL species � x 5= � Column Totals: 137 �q� 424 �g� Prevalence Intlex = B/A = 3.09 ❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hytlrophytic Vegetation ❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is �50% Q 3- Prevalence Index is <-3.0' ❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 0 Problematic Hydrophylic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hytlrology must be present, uNess disturbed or problematic. Tree - Wootly plants, ezcluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, ezcluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height antl less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody plants, exclutling wootly vines, approzimately 3 to 20 R(1 to 6 m) in height. Herb-Ali herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine - All wootly vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yesn No� US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains antl Piedmont - Version 2.0 SOIL TIB BR 620025 Samnlinn Pnint WH-wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the intlicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)' Depth Matrix Retlox Features (inchesl Color (moistl % Color (moistl % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks 0-12" 10YR 5/1 SO% 1 DYR 5/6 20% C M Clay 'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Retluced Mahix, MS=Masked Sand Grains �Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Intlicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': 0 Histosol (A1) ❑ Dark Surtace (S7) � 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) [� Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surtace (S9) (MLRA 747, 148) (MLRA 147, 748) ❑ Hytlrogen Sulfde (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matriz (F2) 0 Piedmont Flootlplain Soils (F19) [] Stratified Layers (AS) j]✓ Depleted Mahix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) f] Redoz Dark Surface (F6) � Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) L] Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A11) � Depletetl Dark Surface (F7) L] Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Redox Depressions (F8) � Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR N, � Iron-Manganese Masses (F72) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136) � Sandy Gleyed Matrix (54) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and f] Sandy Retloz (S5) ❑ Pietlmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Stripped Mahiz (S6) � Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if observed): Type: Depth (inches): Hytlric Soil Present? Yes � No ❑ Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.D