17BP.3.R.58 Duplin 161

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FIELD SCOPING MEETING WORKSHEET
Let Date: �� � March 1, 2018
PROJECT NO.: 17BP.3.R.58 FIELD SCOPING MEETING DATE: February 1, 2017
10:00 a.m.
D�v�s�oN: 3 LOCATION: Duplin 161
COUNTY: Duplin
ROUTE (US / NC / SR): SR 1711
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replace Bridge 161 over Unnamed Creek BRIDGE NO.: 161
TIER:
MPO / RPO AREA:
MUNICIPALITY:
ATTENDEES NAME (PRINT) PHONE No E-MAIL ATTENDED
DIVISION BRIDGE Kevin Bowen 910-341-2000 [e-mail]
RESIDENT ENGINEER/PROJECT A1 Edgerton 910-341-2000 [e-mail] �/
MANANGER
ASST PROJECT MANAGER Caitlin Marks 910-341-2000 [e-mail] �/
DIV 3 BRIDGE PROGRAM Justin Knight 910-259-2488 [e-mail] �/
DIV 3 BRIDGE PROGRAM Daniel Perry 252-287-8043 [e-mail] �/
DIVISION UTILITY COORDINATOR Steve Davis 910-341-2000 [e-mail] �/
DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL Mason Herndon 910-341-2000 [e-mail] �/
OFFICER
ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST Anneliese Westphal 910-341-2000 [e-mail]
D1VIS10N DESIGN CONSTRUCT David Leonard 910-341-2000 [e-mail]
REPRESENTATIVE
HYDRAULICS REPRESENTATIVE Jon Moore 919-707-6738 [e-mail] �/
STRUCTURE DESIGN Greg Dickey 919-707-6469 [e-mail]
REPRESENTATIVE
LOCATION AND SURVEYS Rick Neal 910-341-0550 [e-mail] �/
REPRESENTATIVE
STRUCTURE DESIGN Korey Newton 919-707-6539 [e-mail]
REPRESENTATIVE
DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Joanne Steenhuis 910-796-7306 [e-mail] �/
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Brad Shaver 910-251-4611 [e-mail]
WILDLIFE RESOURCES Travis Wilson 919-707-0370 [e-mail] COMMENTS
COMMISSION SUBMITTED
US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICES Gary Jordan 919-856- gary�[e-mail]
4520, ext. 32
1

DIVISION BRIDGE MAINTENANCE Ron Van Cleef 910-341-2000 [e-mail]
ENGINEER
GEOTECHNICAL LJNIT Dean Argenbright 252-355-9054 [e-mail] �/
HYDRALTLICS/DRAINAGE/EROSION Josh Dalton [e-mail] �/
CONTROL CONSULTANT
NEPA/ENVIRONMENTAL Craig Young Craig.young@threeoaksenginee �/
CONSLTLTANT ring.com
PROJECT MANAGER - David Wilver [e-mail] �/
CONSULTANT
ROADWAY CONSULTANT Matt Pickens [e-mail]
ROADWAY CONSLTLTANT Ed Robbins [e-mail] �/
STRUCTURES CONSULTANT Tom Harris [e-mail] �/
DIVISION (COMPLETED BY DIVISION STAFF AND SENT WITH THE FSM LETTER)
EXISTING FEATURES
FEATURE BRIDGED: Little Limestone Creek
(BRIDGE / CULVERT) LENGTH 35' DECK WIDTH (OUT TO OUT) 25.328'
WATER DEPTH: 2.5' HEIGHT BED-TO-CROWN: 7'
PRIOR SURVEY DATE: POSTED: SV 16 TTST: 23
STRUCTURE TYPE: timber w/ concrete repairs, concrete overlay
SPAN TYPE: 19 6x12" timber joists; 2 spans; 1@17'7", 1@17'9"
HISTORIC HIGH WATER (ELEV. TO THE TOP OF RAIL ):
-L- BASE YEAR: 2013 ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 310 % TRUCKS/DUALS: 6%
SiJFFICIENCY RATING: 27.85
POSTED SPEED LIMIT IN PROJECT VICINITY: (MPH / STATUTORY SSMPI�
DETOUR: OFF-SITE: Y ON-SITE: N STAGE CONSTRUCTION: N
IF DETOUR IS OFF-SITE, PROVIDE DESCRIPTION OF DETOUR ROUTE: R on 5R 1710; R on NC 241 N; R on SR1711
APPROXIMATE LENGTH OF DETOUR? 4.2 miles
IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO ROAD ON DETOUR? COMMENTS: NC 241 is on the verge of needing resurfaced;
contact Jerri Parker (CME) if let date changes; if patching is needed she will patch before the let date; touch base with
her again as the project develops more.
IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO BRIDGES ON DETOUR? No
ARE BRIDGES ON DETOUR CURRENTLY PROGItAMMED ON TIP? COMMENTS:
ARE THERE EMS, SCHOOL, OR BUSINESS ACCESS ISSUES? None COMMENTS: No responses from School/EMS
ARE THERE ANY RAILROAD CROSSINGS ON DETOUR? NO COMMENTS:
WILL RAILROAD INVOLVEMENT BE REQUIRED? NO
SHOULD WORK ZONE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION? NO
REASONS:
EXISTING R/W WIDTH:
IMPACT RATING TO UTILITIES:
POWER TRANSMISSION LINES: Tri-county AERIAL/UG/BOTH: OH IN CONFLICT:

TELEPHONE: Century Link AERIAL/UGBOTH: UG IN CONFLICT: --------
CABLE TV: AERIAL/UG/BOTH: IN CONFLICT: --------
FIBER OPTIC: AERIAL/UG/BOTH: IN CONFLICT: --------
WATER: Duplin IN CONFLICT: --------
SEWER: IN CONFLICT: --------
NATURAL GAS: IN CONFLICT: --------
OTHER IN CONFLICT: --------
BASED ON THE PAST HISTORY NEAR THIS PROJECT SITE, WHAT IS THE ESTIMAT`ED TIME REQLTIRED TO
COMPLETE UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS MONTHS
WHICH UTILITIES WILL REQLTIRE PERMITS FOR RELOCATION? All; Utility permit drawings showing aerial;
maintain low coordinate of bridge; Show where bore locations will be; additional hand clearing to move lines
WHAT TYPE PERMIT? Normal not CAMA
WHO WILL BE OBTAINING PERMITS FOR UTILITY RELOCATION? PEF (Sub: So Deep); dry utilities should be
moved at the latest 1 month prior to let date; wet utilities will be moved as part of the construction contract
IS THERE ANY FUTURE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION ANTICIPATED IN THE PROJECT AREA?
IS A FEMA BUY-OUT PROPERTY BEING IMPACTED?
EXISTING UTILITY DRAWING ATTACHED?
HYDRAULICS (COMPLETED BY HYDRAULICS ENGINEER AFTER THE FSM)
WILL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE A FEMA PERMIT? Yes
IS THERE UNUSUAL SCOUR POTENTIAL? No IS PROTECTION NEEDED? Std
ARF. BANKS STABLE? Yes IS PROTECTION NEEDED? Std
DOES STREAM CARRY APPRECIABLE AMOiJNT OF LARGE DEBRIS? No
WILL THE PLACEMENT OF BENTS IN THE WATER BE ALLOWED? No COMMENTS: 1 span @ 55'
BRIDGE TO PIPE CANDIDATE? No COMMENTS:
WILL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE A STATE STORMWATER PERMIT? No
HOW WILL ROADSIDE DRAINAGE AND / OR TREATMENT OF STORMWATER VIA THE BRIDGE DECK BE
ADDRESSED FOR EACH QUADRANT?
NE QUADRANT: DIs & Outlet Pipe Depending on Roadway Grade
SE QUADRANT: DIs & Outlet Pipe Depending on Roadway Grade
SW QUADRANT: DIs & Outlet Pipe Depending on Roadway Grade
NW QUADRANT: DIs & Outlet Pipe Depending on Roadway Grade
GEOTECHNICAL UNIT (COMPLETED BY GEOTECHNICAL UNIT PRIOR TO THE FSM)
EXISTING FOLJNDATION REPORTS? No IF SO, ATTACH.
KNOWN GEOLOGICAL FEATURES IN AREA WHICH MAY AFFECT DESIGN: Limestone
ARE PERMITS NEEDED FOR INVESTIGATIVE WORK AT SITE? No COMMENTS:
ARE THERE ANY HISTORICAL AND / OR VIBRATION SENSITIVE STRUCTURES NEAR BY? Yes COMMENTS: Private
Residence (Mobile Home)
ARE THERE ANY KNOWN LANDFILLS AND / OR GEOENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD SITES AT OR WITHIN CLOSE
PROXIMITY TO THE PROJECT SITE? No COMMENTS:
3

DEPTH OF WEATHERED ROCK OR ROCK BELOW STREAMBED? 60 feet (FT.)
ARE ANY IMPACTS ANTCIPATED TO NATURAL SPRINGS OR ARTESIAN WELLS? No COMMENTS: Our boreholes
will be sealed
POSSIBLE FOUNDATION TYPE: Pile — Recommend bents be placed a minimum of 5 feet away from eausting bents.
ENVIRONMENTAL �co�rrLETED BY DEo sTaFF P�ox To T� FSM�
WETLANDS AT SITE? In the quadrant across from the mobile home COMMENTS: National Wetlands Inventory
Classified as PFOlA (Freshwater Forrested/Shrub Wetland) adjacent to site.
KNOWN ENDANGERED SPECIES POPULATIONS IN AREA? No COMMENTS: N/A
BLTFFER REQUIREMENTS? None
CAMA COUNTY: No PRIMARY NURSERY AREA: No DCM CLAIMING: No
MORATORIA: No IF YES-DURATION: N/A
COMMENTS: None
IS WATER FEATURE CLASSIFIED AS A WILD AND SCENIC RIVER? No COMMENTS: None
WHAT IS THE WATER QUALITY CLASSIFICATION FOR THIS PROJECT: C;Sw STREAM ID# 18-74-23-.5
WILL A COAST GUARD PERMIT BE REQUIRED? No COMMENTS: None required
IS THE PROJECT SITE IN OR NEAR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
NATIONAL FOREST: No
WILDLIFE REFUGE: No
STATE, COLJNTY, OR LOCAL PARK: No
AIRPORT: No
A LAKE FOR RECREATION OR POWER GENERATION: No
WATER SUPPLY RESERVOIR: No
NUTRIENT SENSITIVE WATERS: No
PUBLIC USE BOAT RAMP: No
CEMETARIES: No
WILL A FEDERAL ENERGY REGiJLATORY COMMISSION (FERC) PERMIT BE REQiJIRED? No
IS THE PROJECT AREA KNOWN FOR POTENTIAL INDIAN, COLONIAL, OR OTHER ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES? TBD
(NCSHPO)
KNOWN OR POTENTIAL HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE AREA? TBD (NCSHPO)
IS THE BRIDGE STRUCTURE ITSELF, OR ANY PART THEREOF, CONSIDERED HISTORIC? TBD (NCSHPO)
WILL THE PROJECT IMPACT A CHURCH, COMMLJNITY CENTER, OR OTHER PUBLIC FACILITY? No
IS THIS PROJECT ON A STATEWIDE BICYCLE ROiJTE OR A LOCAL NON-MARKED BICYCLE ROiTfE? No
ANY CLARIFICATION OR COMMENTS ON ITEMS ABOVE: None
CONSTRUCTABILITY AND ACCESS (DISCUSSED AT THE FSM BY DIVISION BRIDGE MANAGER)
METHOD OF ACCESS: Road Closure will provide room for all of the following:
TOP-DOWN: Yes
MATERIAL AND EQLTIPMENT ACCESS TO SITE: Yes
TRACTOR-TRAILER ACCESS: Yes BARGE ACCESS: Yes HEAVY EQiJIPMENT ACCESS: Yes
4

POSTED ROADS AND POSTED BRIDGES IN VICINITY THAT MAY AFFECT ACCESS? TBD
ARE CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS AVAILABLE NEAR SITE? Yes
ANY ANTICIPATED AREAS OF TEMPORARY SHORING REQLTIRED? No
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Swing on one side where it is clear to avoid power lines on the other side
ROADWAY (COMPLETED BY ROADWAY ENGINEER PRIOR TO FSM)
ALIGNIVIENT: EXISTING HORIZONTAL: Straight
EXISTING VERTICAL: Flat
POSSIBLE DESIGN STANDARDS: Sub Regional Tier
POSSIBLE DESIGN SPEED: 60 MPH
POSSIBLE DESIGN EXCEPTIONS: No COMIV�NTS:
APPROXIMATE PROJECT LENGTH: 600 feet APPROXIMATE PROJECT LENGTH: 600 feet
SHOULD THIS PROJECT HAVE CURB AND GUTTER OR SHOULDER APPROACHE S? Shoulder
COMMENTS:
TOTAL SHOiJLDER WIDTH: 3 foot min. (4 ft / GR)
CLEAR ROADWAY ON STRUCTURE: 28 foot min.
TOTAL SHOULDER WIDTH: 3 foot min. (4 ft / GR)
WILL EXISTING DRIVEWAYS, BUSINESS ACCESS, -Y- LINES OR RAMPS NEED TO BE RELOCATED? No
COMMENTS:
ARE THERE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY / PERMANENT EASEMENTS / TEMPORARY EASEMENTS ANTICIPATED
FOR CONSTRUCTION? TCE COMIV�NTS:
ARE ANY RETAINING WALLS ANTICIPATED? No
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Bridge will be 33 feet out to out (additional width requested by division for farm equipment)
ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED / RESOLVED AT FSM BY ATTENDEES
ALTERNATIVES TO BE STUDIED BY ROADWAY DESIGN (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OFF-SITE DETOUR �
CHECK ONE
ON-SITE DETOUR ❑
TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (CHECK ONE)
LIBR ATT G �
PROGRAMMATIC CATIGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE) ❑
MINIMUM CRITERIA RULE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST ❑
THE OPTIMUM LET DATE FOR THIS PROJECT IS: March 1, 2018
SURVEY LIMITS: 300' on each side of bridge; 40-50' L/R
POSSIBLE SUPERSTRUCTURE: Cored Slab
TYPE:
NUMBER OF SPANS: 1
LENGTH OF SPANS: 55'
TOTAL PROPOSED LENGTH: 55'
TOTAL PROPOSED WIDTH: 33' OTO
5
NEW LOCATION ❑

BRIDGE SKEW: 90 degrees
ROW BY: DEC 2017
PERMITS: DEC 2017
METHOD OF CLEARING: Modified Method III
SALVAGEABLE MATERIALS: No
REMOVAL OF REMENANT ABLTTMENTS / PIERS: Completely; pull timber don't cut
DECK OVERLAY TYPE Asphalt
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Do not include deck drains on the bridge; plans should use a scale of 50
APPROACH SLAB ON SKEW OR PERPENDICLTLAR: Perpendicular
SHOiJLD PILES BE NON-CORROSIVE MATERIAL: No
C�

J
�S — - - -r • �
.
- ;.
�i � �� `.', �=�'d�i i ;, a,. "�
.m _.,}.�,•r�: -� •,
� �a" i1i,:Y�i��
�
`.�tR`•�.��Sh .�r a_ . 3 •
., . � �- °
•i
� � �r;t�,a�,�t �, owr.ii ►'� �.r9 �.m..o �5a �'
a
� � c�d t�I �'Rh 'i � � E�i#1 �d � C�'
�
� 1'"+m r�p�! �4 kii;,�"!i 5 �
A� "'�I �'�1'�{�+l�H
: A
, �_a 1� � i�'�1 �'[1i71C�!' �, �9 � �� �41'�i P �
�
.aru.sr-it�;�-- „_�a�a a�-i.�
w
-=�'ir�i #�. ��f�s�r �sa .i4�:it�+fei�a �
-.w L�Ne e�ci R. .T...�oa rw, �.� rtari rr
+��� �i.. rr.� isi �ir.,ri � ir�in.+►r�w1
a•.��T �-F
M1��� i -�+(.,i
r
P
�
�
�
4
:=: � �