20180110_17BP 3 R 61 Sampson 16_20170216

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FIELD SCOPING MEETING WORKSHEET
Let Date: 3/1/18
Pxo�CT NO.: 17BP.3.R.61 FIELD SCOPING MEETING DATE: February 1, 2017 11:30 a.m.
Div�slolv: 3 LOCATION: Sampson 16
COLJNTY: Sampson
ROUTE (LTS / NC / SR): SR 1145
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replace Bridge 16 over Buckhorn Creek BRIDGE NO.: 16
TIER:
MPO / RPO AREA:
MUNICIPALITY:
ATTENDEES NAME (PRINT) PHONE No E-MAIL ATTENDED
DIVISION BRIDGE Kevin Bowen 910-341-2000 [e-mail]
RESIDENT ENGINEER/PROJECT A1 Edgerton 910-341-2000 [e-mail] �/
MANANGER
ASST PROJECT MANAGER Caitlin Marks 910-341-2000 [e-mail] �/
DIV 3 BRIDGE PROGRAM Justin Knight 910-259-2488 [e-mail] �/
DIV 3 BRIDGE PROGRAM Daniel Perry 252-287-8043 [e-mail] �/
DIVISION iTTILITY Steve Davis 910-341-2000 [e-mail] �/
COORDINATOR
DNISION ENVIRONMENTAL Mason Herndon 910-341-2000 [e-mail] �/
OFFICER
ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST Anneliese 910-341-2000 [e-mail]
Wes hal
DIVISION DESIGN CONSTRUCT David Leonard 910-341-2000 [e-mail]
REPRESENTATIVE
HYDRAULICS REPRESENTATIVE Jon Moore 919-707-6738 [e-mail] �/
STRUCTURE DESIGN Greg Dickey 919-707-6469 [e-mail]
REPRESENTATIVE
LOCATION AND SURVEYS Rick Neal 910-341-0550 [e-mail] �/
REPRESENTATIVE
STRUCTURE DESIGN Korey Newton 919-707-6539 [e-mail]
REPRESENTATIVE
DIVISION OF WATER Joanne 910-796-7306 joanne.steenhuis@ncdenr �/
RESOURCES Steenhuis .gov
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Brad Shaver 910-251-4611 [e-mail]
m .mil
WILDLIFE RESOURCES Travis Wilson 919-707-0370 Travis.Wilson@ncwildlif COMMENTS
COMMISSION e.org SUBMITTED
US FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICES Gary Jordan 919-856-4520, ext. 32 gary,[e-mail]
DIVISION BRIDGE Ron Van Cleef 910-341-2000 [e-mail]
1

MAINTENANCE ENGINEER
GEOTECHNICAL LTNIT Dean 252-355-9054 [e-mail] �/
Ar enbri ht
HYDRAULICS/DRAINAGE/EROSI Josh Dalton jdalton@sungatedesign.c �/
ON CONTROL CONSLTLTANT om
NEPA/ENVIRONMENTAL Craig Young Craig.young@threeoakse �/
CONSULTANT ngineering.com
PROJECT MANAGER - David Wilver [e-mail] �/
CONSULTANT m
ROADWAY CONSLTLTANT Matt Pickens [e-mail]
m
ROADWAY CONSiTLTANT Ed Robbins [e-mail] �/
STRUCTURES CONSLTLTANT Tom Harris [e-mail] �/
DIVISION (COMI'LETED BY DIVISION STAFF AND SENT WITH THE FSM LETTER)
EXISTING FEATURES
FEATURE BRIDGED: Branch Crane Creek
(BRIDGE / CULVERT) LENGTH 36' DECK WIDTH (OUT TO OUT) 25.826'
WATER DEPTH: 3.5' HEIGHT BED-T0.CROWN: 13.3'
PRIOR SURVEY DATE: POSTED: SV 26 TTST: 39
STRUCTURE TYPE: SteeUtimber substructure; concrete overlay; 2-span
SPAN TYPE: 19lines 6x14 timber joists; 2 span; 1@17'9; 1@18'1
HISTORIC HIGH WATER (ELEV. TO THE TOP OF RAIL ):
-L- BASE YEAR: 2012 ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: 360 % TRUCKS/DUALS: 6°/a
SiJFFICIENCY RATING: 26.41
POSTED SPEED LIMIT IN PROJECT VICINITY: 55 mph (MPH / STATUTORY SSMPI�
DETOUR: OFF-SITE: Y ON-SITE: N STAGE CONSTRUCTION: N
IF DETOUR IS OFF-SITE, PROVIDE DESCRIPTION OF DETOUR ROUTE: From SR 1149: R on US 701; R on SR 1146
APPROXIMATE LENGTH OF DETOUR? 10.5 miles
IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO ROAD ON DETOUR? COMMENTS: SR 1146 is currently closed due to Hurricane
Matthew but should be repaired by the time the project begins
IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED TO BRIDGES ON DETOUR? N/A
ARE BRIDGES ON DETOUR CURRENTLY PROGRAMMED ON TIP? COMMENTS:
ARE THERE EMS, SCHOOL, OR BUSINESS ACCESS ISSiJES? Moderate COMMENTS: Concern for Detour Length
from schools
ARE THERE ANY RAILROAD CROSSINGS ON DETOUR? NO COMMENTS:
WILL RAILROAD INVOLVEMENT BE REQUIRED? NO
SHOULD WORK ZONE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS BE MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION? NO
REASONS:
EXISTING R/W WIDTH:
IMPACT RATING TO LJTILITIES:

POWER TRANSMISSION LINES: 4county AERIAL/UGBOTH: OH IN CONFLICT: Possibility to de-energize
TELEPHONE: Star AERIAL/LTG/BOTH: UG IN CONFLICT: Yes
CABLE TV: Star AERIAL/UG/BOTH: UG IN CONFLICT: Yes
FIBER OPTIC: AERIAL/iJGBOTH: IN CONFLICT: Yes
WATER: Sampson IN CONFLICT: Yes
SEWER: IN CONFLICT: --------
NATURAL GAS: IN CONFLICT: --------
OTHER IN CONFLICT: --------
BASED ON THE PAST HISTORY NEAR THIS PROJECT SITE, WHAT IS THE ESTIMATED TIME REQLTIRED TO
COMPLETE UTILITY ADNSTMENTS MONTHS
WHICH UTILITIES WILL REQLTIRE PERMITS FOR RELOCATION? All; Utility permit drawings showing aerial;
maintain low coordinate of bridge; Show where bore locations will be
WHAT TYPE PERMIT? Normal (not CAMA)
WHO WILL BE OBTAINING PERMITS FOR iTTILITY RELOCATION? PEF (Sub: So Deep); dry utilities should be
moved at the latest 1 month prior to let date; wet utilities will be moved as part of the construction contract
IS THERE ANY FUTURE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION ANTICIPATED IN THE PROJECT AREA?
IS A FEMA BUY-OUT PROPERTY BEING IMPACTED?
EXISTING UTILITY DRAWING ATTACHED?
HYDRAULICS (COMPLETED BY HYDRAULICS ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE FSM)
WILL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE A FEMA PERMIT? Yes
IS THERE UNUSUAL SCOUR POTENTIAL? No IS PROTECTION NEEDED? Std
ARF. BANKS STABLE? No (Hurricane Matthew) IS PROTECTION NEEDED? STD
DOES STREAM CARRY APPRECIABLE AMOiJNT OF LARGE DEBRIS? No
WILL THE PLACEMENT OF BENTS IN THE WATER BE ALLOWED? No COMMENTS: 80' Single span 33" box beam
BRIDGE TO PIPE CANDIDATE? No COMMENTS:
WILL THIS PROJECT REQUIRE A STATE STORMWATER PERMIT?
HOW WILL ROADSIDE DRAINAGE AND / OR TREATMENT OF STORMWATER VIA THE BRIDGE DECK BE
ADDRESSED FOR EACH QUADRANT? Flumes likely
NE QUADRANT:
SE QUADRANT:
SW QUADRANT:
NW QUADRANT:
GEOTECHNICAL UNIT (COMPLETED BY GEOTECHNICAL UNIT PRIOR TO THE FSM)
EXISTING FOLJNDATION REPORTS? No IF SO, ATTACH.
KNOWN GEOLOGICAL FEATURES IN AREA VVHICH MAY AFFECT DESIGN: No
ARE PERMITS NEEDED FOR INVESTIGATIVE WORK AT SITE? No COMMENTS:
ARE THERE ANY HISTORICAL AND / OR VIBRATION SENSITIVE STRUCTURES NEAR BY? No COMMEN'TS: House is
not close enough; waiting to hear back about the fallen structure up creek
ARE THERE ANY KNOWN LANDFILLS AND / OR GEOENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD SITES AT OR WITHIN CLOSE
3

PROXIMITY TO THE PROJECT SITE? No CONIMENTS:
DEPTH OF WEATHERED ROCK OR ROCK BELOW STREAIVIBED? N/A (FT.)
ARE ANY IMPACTS ANTCIPATED TO NATURAL SPRINGS OR ARTESIAN WELLS? No COMMENTS: Our boreholes
will be sealed
POSSIBLE FOUNDATION TYPE: Pile — Recommend bents be placed a minimum of 5 feet away from ea�isting bents.
ENVIRONMENTAL �coNrnLETED BY DEo sTaFF P�ox To T� FSM�
WETLANDS AT SITE? No COlVIMENTS: National Wetlands Inventory Classified as PFO1C (Freshwater Forrested/Shrub
Wetland) adjacent to site.
KNOWN ENDANGERED SPECIES POPULATIONS IN AREA? No COMMEN'TS: None
BLTFFER REQUIREMENTS? None
CAMA COLINTY: No PRIMARY NURSERY AREA: No DCM CLAIMING: No
MORATORIA: No IF YES-DURATION: N/A
COMMENTS: None
IS WATER FEATURE CLASSIFIED AS A WILD AND SCENIC RIVER? No COMN�NTS: None required
WHAT IS THE WATER QUALITY CLASSIFICATION FOR THIS PROJECT:C;Sw STREAM ID# 18-68-2-12-2
WILL A COAST GUARD PERMIT BE REQUIRED? No CONIlVIENTS: None required
IS THE PROJECT SITE IN OR NEAR ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
NATIONAL FOREST: No
WILDLIFE REFUGE: No
STATE, COiJNTY, OR LOCAL PARK: No
AIRPORT: No
A LAKE FOR RECREATION OR POWER GENERATION: No
WATER SUPPLY RESERVOIR: No
NUTRIENT SENSITIVE WATERS: No
PUBLIC USE BOAT RAMP: No
CEMETARIES: No
WILL A FEDERAL ENERGY REGiJLATORY COMMISSION (FERC) PERMIT BE REQUIRED? No
IS THE PROJECT AREA KNOWN FOR POTENTIAL INDIAN, COLONIAL, OR OTHER ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES? TBD
(NCSHPO)
KNOWN OR POTENTIAL HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE AREA? TBD (NCSHPO)
IS THE BRIDGE STRUCTURE ITSELF, OR ANY PART THEREOF, CONSIDERED HISTORIC? TBD (NCSHPO)
WILL THE PROJECT IMPACT A CHURCH, COMMLJNITY CENTER, OR OTHER PUBLIC FACILITY? No
IS THIS PROJECT ON A STATEWIDE BICYCLE ROLJTE OR A LOCAL NON-MARKED BICYCLE ROiTTE? No
ANY CLARIFICATION OR COMMENTS ON ITEMS ABOVE: Vann-Boney Mill NCSHPO SP0139 (Surveyed Only) — waiting
on info about this; Mason will send updated photos to show the structure has fallen
CONSTRUCTABILITY AND ACCESS (DISCUSSED AT THE FSM BY DIVISION BRIDGE MANAGER)
4

METHOD OF ACCESS: Road Closure will provide room for all of the following:
TOP-DOWN: Yes
MATERIAL AND EQLTIPMENT ACCESS TO SITE: Yes
TRACTOR-TRAILER ACCESS: Yes BARGE ACCESS: Yes HEAVI' EQUIPMENT ACCESS: Yes
POSTED ROADS AND POSTED BRIDGES IN VICINITY THAT MAY AFFECT ACCESS? TBD
ARE CONSTRUCTION STAGING AREAS AVAILABLE NEAR SITE? Yes
ANY ANTICIPATED AREAS OF TEMPORARY SHORING REQLTIRED? No
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: 80' box beams will require a larger crane than normal; powerlines may be an issue
ROADWAY (COMPLETED BY ROADWAY ENGINEER PRIOR TO FSM)
ALIGNMENT: EXISTING HORIZONTAL: Straight
EXISTING VERTICAL: Flat
POSSIBLE DESIGN STANDARDS: Sub Regional Tier
POSSIBLE DESIGN SPEED: 60 MPH
POSSIBLE DESIGN EXCEPTIONS: No CONIMENTS:
APPROXIMATE PROJECT LENGTH: 800 FT APPROXIMATE PROJECT LENGTH: S00 FT
SHOULD THIS PROJECT HAVE CURB AND GLTTTER OR SHOULDER APPROACHES? Shoulder
COMMENTS:
TOTAL SHOLJLDER WIDTH: 3 foot min. (4 ft/ GR) TOTAL SHOULDER WIDTH: 3 foot min. (4 ft / GR)
CLEAR ROADWAY ON STRUCTURE: 28 foot min.
WILL EXISTING DRIVEWAYS, BUSINESS ACCESS, -Y- LINES OR RAMPS NEED TO BE RELOCATED? No
COMMENTS: Guardrail will need to be shortened for the driveway to the old mill.
ARE THERE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY / PERMANENT EASEMENTS / TEMPORARY EASEMENTS ANTICIPATED
FOR CONSTRUCTION? TCE COMMENTS:
ARE ANY RETAINING WALLS ANTICIPATED? No
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Bridge will be 33 feet out to out (additional width requested by division for farm equipment)
ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED / RESOLVED AT FSM BY ATTENDEES
ALTERNATIVES TO BE STUDIED BY ROADWAY DESIGN (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OFF-SITE DETOUR � ON-SITE DETOUR ❑ NEW LOCATION ❑
CHECK ONE
TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT (CHECK ONE)
LIBR ATT G �
PROGRAMMATIC CATIGORICAL EXCLUSION (PCE) ❑
MINIMUM CRITERIA RULE COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST ❑
THE OPTIMUM LET DATE FOR THIS PROJECT IS: March 1, 2018
SURVEY LIMITS: 50' L/R; 400' up and down; more info about Hurricane Matthew (Shannon Bailor)
POSSIBLE SUPERSTRUCTURE: Box Beam
5

NUMBER OF SPANS: 1
LENGTH OF SPANS: 80'
TOTAL PROPOSED LENGTH: 80'
TOTAL PROPOSED WIDTH: 33' OTO
BRIDGE SKEW: 90 degree
ROW BY: December 2017
PERMITS: December 2017
METHOD OF CLEARING: Modified Method III
SALVAGEABLE MATERIALS: No
REMOVAL OF REMENANT ABUTMENTS / PIERS: Completely Remove
DECK OVERLAY TYPE Asphalt
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Do not include deck drains on the bridge; plans should use a scale of 50
APPROACH SLAB ON SKEW OR PERPENDICLTLAR: Perpendicular
SHOULD PILES BE NON-CORROSIVE MATERIAL: No

*Note: Detour will go down Moseley Avenue instead of Cartertown Rd (maps has blocked it due to
Hurricane Washout):

� �
14 r�in ., i0-: 04��1�s; � *b �
via r.-,r.erlow�n Rd antl Chance; Rd
1um!n:�.u-:cu'rr�"r,r. �
2a2�-2�29 Chancey Road
,_ _.,
- Take� Cartertov:n Rtl IIo US-70� 5
J ri9 I: �7 f�'I/
s� I��m left Oni� LIS-7�7 S�
_ nin,' : r'ii
. rcllow C�nancey� Rm ta 6aneg f,1tll Rc]
i i_: rvb
1916-2�22 8oney hlill Road
_ � .. r;: --,.�'-
Tp=x ]i2:�or.� era>arplanrnry p�rPGs�s onlp �, -.-3� `vi tl�a:
cnnnrutli�r r,rc}s;is. traffi�. rreather. nrm[hdr �:erc� ��.; cs��e
io.•�:s'r:l -5n='ran .,iIL-�n'��� ufinfar.,.,i..,.,_
'::I'Jil]U'i �� 'I'l -.•B�.�CII -_PSCrtPftiiES �9'JIR".]Lf! 9
�Iy
s
_,
,:u
'_23
azi
I��
, ,,,�,��.,,
� ,.:,
lld
v.uanmy AULV
I15i