20081473 Ver 4_Phase II Yr 4 Monitoring Report_20170210

MONITORING REPORT
YEAR 4 of 5
Arrington Bridge II
Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
DWQ Project # 2008-1473v.4
Wayne County, North Carolina
Neuse River Basin
Prepared For:
EBX-Neuse I, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605
919-829-9909
Prepared by:
pres
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, NC 27605

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT...........................................................................2
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives........................................................................................................ 2
1.2 Project Background......................................................................................................................2
1.3 Vegetation Condition.................................................................................................................... 3
2.0 METHODOLOGY................................................................................................................................. 3
2.1 Vegetation Monitoring Plots........................................................................................................ 3
2.2 Photo Stations............................................................................................................................... 3
3.0 REFERENCES......................................................................................................................................4
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Site Maps
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Site Overview Exhibit
Figure 2A Neuse Buffer & Nutrient Offset Restoration Areas
Figure 3 Monitoring Locations Map
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Photos MY4 — 2016 Vegetation Plot Photos
Photos MY4 — 2016 Photo Station Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 1 Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals
Table 2 CVS Stem Count Total and Planted with/without Livestakes by Plot and Species
Plot Data CVS Vegetation Plot Sampling Datasheets
Arrington Bridge II — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4
I
Monitoring Report: Year 4
February 2017

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
The goals of this nutrient offset mitigation project are to:
Improve the overall water quality and aquatic habitat in and around the unnamed tributary of
the Neuse River by reducing nutrient and sediment loads into the streams caused by
agricultural influences,
Improve the richness and diversity of the plant species within the conservation easement, and
Provide perpetual protection for the unnamed tributary to the Neuse River and associated
riparian and upland buffers.
These goals will be met through the following objectives:
• By establishing a native plant community to match the endemic plant species at the Bank Site,
• By reducing the quantities of exotic invasive species at the Bank Parcel through chemical
methods,
• By establishing a conservation easement to provide long-term protection for the Bank Site,
and
• By donation of the conservation easement and all of its interests, in perpetuity, to an
accredited or approved land trust or stewardship program.
1.2 Project Background
Located off of Arrington Bridge Road, at its intersection with John Street in Goldsboro, North Carolina
(Figure 1) is the Neuse buffer and nutrient offset restoration area previously referred to as the Wayne
County Development Alliance Bank Parcel and currently known as the Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel
(hereafter referred to as the Bank Site). The Bank Site was developed in two (2) phases: Phase I and Phase
II. According to the Wayne County Development Alliance Bank Parcel Development Package
(EcoEngineering, April 2012), Phase II consists of Parcel Numbers 2598632250 and 2598543857. Since
approval of the Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP), Parcel Number 2598632250 has been
subdivided into two parcels (Parcel Numbers 2598538731 and 2598622980). Parcel Number 2598538731
is located immediately adjacent to the east of John Street, while Parcel Number 2598622980 is located
immediately adjacent to the east of Parcel Number 2598538731. Phase II construction of the Bank Site
easement consists of 13.973 acres on Parcel Number 2598538731 (Figure 2). Figure 2A (Appendix A) is
provided to illustrate the constructed Phase II Conservation Easement (CE) compared to the approved Bank
Site as described within the BPDP. Future construction within the Bank Site will be consistent with the
previously approved BPDP.
The Bank Site and the Bank Site Service Area is contained within 8 -digit USGS HUC 03020201.
Stormwater runoff from the Bank Site drains into an unnamed tributary of the Neuse River (Stream Index
#27-(56)). According to the Basinwide Information Management System (BIMS), the Neuse River is
classified as Class C and NSW (Nutrient Sensitive Waters) in this location. The purpose of this Bank Site
is to improve water quality within the Neuse River watershed by providing off-site mitigation for
development (both existing and proposed) requiring Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Credits.
The Bank Site will provide Neuse Riparian Buffer Mitigation Credits and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Credits
for development impacts within the Neuse River Basin USGS HUC 03020201 (Figure 3). The Phase II CE
of the Bank Site is 13.973 acres and contains a Neuse Riparian Buffer restoration area of 4.460 acres
(194,267 sf) that will be used to generate 4.460 acres (194,267 sf) of Neuse Riparian Buffer Credits. The
remaining 7.788 acres (339,245 sf) of riparian restoration area within the Phase 11 CE (i.e. areas outside of
Arrington Bridge II — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 4
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 February 2017

the Neuse Buffer) will provide Nutrient Offset Credits for nitrogen (currently based on 2,273.02 lbs of
nitrogen/ac of riparian restoration). Therefore, Phase II of the Bank Site will provide 17,702.28 pounds of
Nitrogen Nutrient Offset Credits.
This Bank Site has been established under the terms and conditions of the EBX Neuse Riparian Buffer
Umbrella Mitigation Bank (Bank) made and entered into by EBX Neuse I, LLC (EBX), acting as the Bank
Sponsor, and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water
Quality (DWQ), and was entered into by the parties on November 10, 2008. The Division of Water Quality
is now hereby referred to as Division of Water Resources (DWR).
1.3 Vegetation Condition
Current stem counts (i.e. stem is defined as single living tree species) were calculated using vegetation plot
monitoring data. Success will be defined as the survival of a minimum density of 320 planted stems per
acre after five (5) years. Monitoring Year 4 activities at the Bank Parcel documented four (4) plots
encompassing 0.0988 acres, containing 44 planted stems, which yielded a density of 445 planted stems per
acre. Monitoring Year 4 field activities were conducted on December 8, 2016. The planted vegetation
survival threshold was met for all four vegetation plots. On December 8, 2016, CVS Level 2 was performed
in Year 4 to document volunteer generation. A total of 8 volunteers were observed across all 4 vegetation
plots and were primarily located in Plot 1. Year 4 monitoring recorded an average of 445 planted stems per
acre and 526 total stems per acre (planted and volunteers) across all vegetation plots. Year 3 - 2015
monitoring activities documented areas of encroachment and low stem density survival. All problematic
areas were addressed during late 2015 and early 2016. NCDWR was notified in June 2016 with the
Remediation Work memo to notify planting and encroachment had been addressed. All 4 of the Vegetation
Monitoring Plots were successful during monitoring Year 4 and are a track to meeting Year 5 minimal
density of 320 planted stems per acre. Summary tables of the data collected are provided in Appendix C.
PXI U 1 �_y [I 1 9 19"
2.1 Vegetation Monitoring Plots
All monitoring methodologies follow the most current templates and guidelines provided by NC DMS
(EEP, 2010; EEP, 2011). Baseline vegetation monitoring was conducted in accordance with CVS-EEP
Protocol for Recording Vegetation (CVS-EEP, v4.2). All four (4) vegetation plots were located in
Monitoring Year 4. Table 1 (Appendix C) provides a success summary for each vegetation monitoring
plot. Based on the Year 4 vegetation monitoring, all four (4) vegetation monitoring plots were above the
five (5) year monitoring period requirement. Table 2 (Appendix C) provides a stem count total and planted
stem total by each individual vegetation plot.
Vegetation monitoring plots were photographed and are located in Appendix B. Vegetation Monitoring
Plot Data Sheets are provided in Appendix C. Each Vegetation Monitoring Plot Data Sheet provides
measurements, location, and vigor of each planted species within a respective vegetation monitoring plot.
2.2 Photo Stations
Photographic documentation is a key essential to monitoring the success of the Bank Parcel. Digital
photographs provide a visual assessment of the vegetation conditions. Four photo stations are located
across the Arrington Bridge II easement and are visited each year during annual monitoring activities.
Each photo station location is mapped on (Figure 3 Appendix A). A photo log of the photo stations can
be located in Appendix B.
Arrington Bridge II — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 4
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 February 2017

3.0 REFERENCES
EcoEngineering — A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. April 27, 2012. Wayne County
Development Alliance Bank Parcel Bank Parcel Development Package.
The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. April 27, 2015. Arrington Bridge Bank Parcel Neuse Riparian
Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation, Phase I and Phase I Expansion — As- Built Report.
Lee Michael T., Peet Robert K., Roberts Steven D., and Wentworth Thomas R., 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol
for Recording Vegetation Level. Version 4.2
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) October 2004. Guidelines for Riparian Buffer
Restoration.
Available at internet site: http://www.nceep.net/news/reportsibuffers.pdf.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) January 15, 2010. Procedural Guidance and
Content Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports.
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) November 7, 2011. Monitoring Requirements
and Performance Standards for Stream and/or Wetland Mitigation.
Schafale MP and AS Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina: Third
Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, Department
of Environment and Natural Resources. Raleigh, North Carolina.
Arrington Bridge II — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 4
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 February 2017
4

Appendix A
Site Maps
Arrington Bridge II — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 4
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 February 2017
A-1

FIGURE 1 - USGS QUAD
0- SW/SE GOLDSBORO EcoEngineerin
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 g
1 inch = 2,000 feet Feet A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.

aw ami +aAlm .tee INM am, a
rpr�Apnre w
a M Irl aw f a mm" r m 60. aaala7Jiac
FIGURE 2
mdw�mm.ffi-,w
"PRELIMINARY PLAT"
NOT FOR SALES, CONVEYANCES,
OR RECORDATION.
• �..r�w[xr iY. - aa[f.0 9 [fit.' s+•
x..qY avry +'Y !;.M 175 r=
011�R Y�
Now "m
E8x-NIEUSE I, ac
. Z%. Mn
rarMa`t a aa; aR awaarra ara..
a�wtrrq+r�. aa�aaav
_awrwsas
.wsa��nrr
r�.aari
wMrsr�iaws a�rK
raaaa�sasfrawK � �e ��+►R
rrA���enara[aaaa +t

FIGURE 2A - NEUSE BUFFER
& NUTRIENT OFFSET RESTORATION AREAS[JEcoEngineeringPHASE II
0 255 510 1,020
Feet A division of The John R. McAdams Company, Inc.
1 inch = 500 feet

VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SYALE)
FLOOD STATEMENT
ROS PROPERTY lS LOCATED IN
AND
/5 LOCATED WITHIN A SPECML FOOD HAZARD
AREA, AS OERRMINEO BY NFIP RATE WP
DECEMBER 2 2005 CUMMUNITY RA—
'T
ANEL
N i, NO NO GRID MONUMENTS WERE LOCATED WRHIN 2000' OF
ALLSOINCES
2 ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND MEASUREMEN/S /N
FEET & DEG/MALS )HEREOF, VNLE55 OTHERWISE NOTED.
3. TH5 PROPERTY 5 A PORTION OF P/N NO 2598.632250_
/ I
/
PH= hA H 4 /
/
EV5TING 1`7
EASEMENT
y 5' EAC SIGE OF CENTERLINE /• l /
I
�
v I
Lax-NEusE I. GL.
n(^ /// / PC2 N9BSLP88084
°Iecxxx:'sicxx
A
alSTING 00' IDE15' EACH SIDEWOF C£ANTERLIN£--
Be 2777
/
SOURCE OF
0999. 15 Ps I l
i �G+ X' \
F \ �P
f \�
ACREAGE LurR) o
1.3.933 A-
rCrT 4
�iS il) STAT(AJ 3
S
IJP
i
-
nI ae o a c°ss oRQ
PC L SL R9 -H9
Is�W7 111111
g, G]y gyEq�
� a Sog A
UNf
�� // ❑ ❑❑� To s�s a T � \
w
r �
3/
R/E CRY OF GOLOSBORO
0BC2038, ,9569
4 L -
I REVIEW OFFlCER OF
WAYNE COUNTY, CERIIFI' ]HAT TH£ MAP OR PLAT TO
WHICHTHIS CERTIFICATION IS AfFINEO MEETS ALL STATUTORY
REQUIREMENTS FOR RECORDING
REVIEW GFFlCER
DALF
REcSraATiON
112011. M
PLAT CABINET PAGE _
REOISTEft OF DEEDS
WAYNE COUNTY
"PRELIMINARY PLAT"
NOT FOR SALES, CONVEYANCES,
OR RECORDATION.
IOTAL GONSERNAT/ON EASEMENT AREA = 608,616 SF (1.1,9] ares)
RIPAaMN BVFFER PREA (GREEN AREAS )= 199.691 5F (4.4] orrea)
NUTRIENT OFFSET AREA (ORANGE AREAS) _ 329.708 EF (7.80 oc�cc}
ODISEMHAMN EA 11ENf
SI Wr FOR
EB%-NEUSE 1, LLC.
GOLDSBORO TOWNSHIP JANUARY 29, 2013
WAYNE COUNTY, NO SCALE: 1" = 120'
120' 60' 0 120' 240'
GRAPHIC SCALE
R/W
= RIGH OF
C 5
WAY
= NEW IRON Sl E
EIS
FAN
= EXISTING IRON STAKE
N-
EPK
(TL)
= EXISTING PK NAIL
= BE UNE
(CIA
—---
- --L
=AOJ[NNI RGPERry LINE
I. CHRISTOPHER K PAGER/CK. PROFESSIONAL LANG SUR—
NO. 4189, CER7f THAT TNIS SURVEY IS OF ANOTHER
CATEGORY. TO WIT, AN EASEMENT SURVEY.
Elm
STATE " NORM CAROL NA WAYNE COUNTY
1. ,HER K. PAGER/CK CERTIFY — TH/8
PLAT -T DRAWN NO£R 1AY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL
RECOROE1 MAP & DEED'—
" 0J,£9H°£SCRIR SON
-T — ARE ILEA11AS OP WN
FROM /NFORMATION REFERENCED EREONV TNA, _ _D
OF PRECISION AS CALCULATED I5 T WNR70.000+, THAT THS PUT
WANAMENDED, WRNE55 MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE,, REOISTPoIRON
NUMBER ANO SEAL THIS 29TH — OF JANUARY
2013

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Arrington Bridge II — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 4
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 February 2017

Vegetation Plot 1 (12/8/2016)
Vegetation Plot 2 (12/8/2016)
Vegetation Plot 3 (12/8/2016)
Vegetation Plot 1 (12/8/2016)
Vegetation Plot 2 (12/8/2016)
Vegetation Plot 3 (12/8/2016)
Arrington Bridge II — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 4
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 February 2017

Vegetation Plot 4 (12/8/2016)
MY4 — 2016 Photo Station Photos
Photo Station 1 (12/8/2016)
Photo Station 3 (12/8/2016)
Vegetation Plot 4 (12/8/2016)
Photo Station 2 (12/8/2016)
Photo Station 4 (12/8/2016)
Arrington Bridge II — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 4
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 February 2017

General Conditions (12/8/2016)
General Conditions (12/8/2016)
Arrington Bridge II — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 4
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 February 2017

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Arrington Bridge II — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 4
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 February 2017

Table 1. Riparian Buffer Vegetation Totals (Per Acre)
Arrington Bridge II, Wayne County
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4
Plot #
Riparian
Buffer
Stems'
Success
Criteria
Met?
1
324
Yes, barely
2
486
Yes
3
405
Yes
4
567
Yes
Project Avg
445
Yes
1 —Native planted hardwood trees. Does NOT include shrubs. No pine. No Vines.
Arrington Bridge II — Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 4
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 February 2017

Table 2. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted with/without Livestakes by Plot and Species
Arrington Bridge II, Wayne County
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4
Color Key for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10.9
Arrington Bridge 11— Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 4
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 February 2017
Current Plot Data (MY4 2016)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
20081473-01-0001
20081473-01-0002
20081473-01-0003
20081473-01-0004
MY4 (2016)
MY3 (2015)
PnoLS P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-SIP-all T Pnol-S P -all T
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
1
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
5
5
5
2
2
2
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
2
2
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
2
2
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore Tree
5
5
5
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
12
12
12
8
8
8
Pyrus calleryana
Callery pear
Exotic
3
3
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
4
4
4
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
5
5
5
4
4
4
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
1
1
Taxodium distichum
bald cypress
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
6
6
6
10
10
10
11
11
11
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
8
8
16
12
12
12
10
10
10
14
14
14
44
44
52
30
30
30
1 1 1 1 4 4
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.10 0.10
4 4 8 7 7 7 4 4 4 6 6 6 8 8 12 7 7
7
324 324 647 486 486 486 405 405 405 567 567 567 445 445 526 304 304
304
Color Key for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10% Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10% Fails to meet requirements by more than 10.9
Arrington Bridge 11— Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Site Monitoring Report: Year 4
DWQ # 2008-1473v.4 February 2017

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 20081473-01-0001
VMD Year (1-5): F5] Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
584078.436 Datum: NAD83/W
2295853.494 UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg):
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Kole
10 Y: 10 ❑ plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (
Date last planted:
Newlanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
is 90 degrees to the right of X
Dec 2016 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
2
Platanus occidentalis
0
c
R
9.6
2.1
165.0
1.0 F-]
3
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
6.6
2.9
55.0
0-1 cm
4
Quercus michauxii
O
R
3.7
3.8
54.0
5
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
0.3
4.3
55.0
6
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
2.4
6.4
65.0
7
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
3.2
0.4
Missing
❑
9
Taxodium distichum
R
5.2
7.6
56.0
1-1
11
Quercus nigra
R
1.6
9.2
260.0
2.0
12
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
4.8
9.1
80.0
# stems: 9 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
Natural Woody Stems -tallied by species Explanation of cut-off
& subsamulin¢**:
ei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain why totheright): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
c
SEEDLINGS
- HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
- DBH
TREES - DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 cm
100 cm
137 em
sub-
saps
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required ifcit-off >10cmorsubsample?100%. 101
•2
•3
0
111164
00
"5
00
}-•6
'a
�7
�8
} )
�10 FormWS2,ver9.1
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Map of stems on plot 20081473-01-0001
rd
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 5o # stems: 9
map size:
0— N small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 20081473-01-0002
VMD Year (1-5): F5] Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
584101.084 Datum: NAR 83/W
2296153.300 UTM Zone:17N
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): �16
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Kole
Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10Y; 10 El Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Dec 2016 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
13
Quercus phellos
R
1.2
1.5
93.0
1-1
15
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
®
R
1.3
6.2
95.0
16
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
12
8.2
Missing
❑
19
Taxodium distichum
O
R
6.1
7.9
110.0
DBH"? J
20
Betula nigra
O
R
3.8
6.2
300.0
2.5
21
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
2.1
4.2
175.0
2.0
22
Taxodium distichum
R
4.3
4.2
105.0
DBH?
23
Betula nigra
O
R
3.6
1.6
300.0
3.07
24
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
5.7
1.7
120.0
1.0 J
27
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
6.3
4.1
130.0
DBH?
28
Quercus michauxii
O
R
5.9
5.7
160.0
1.5 J
29
Taxodium distichum
R
8.9
5.6
100.0
30
Quercus lyrata
R
8.2
5.7
48.0
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
El
# stems: 13 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 20081473-01-0002
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Dec 2016 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(mm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling**:
Uei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain whytotheright): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50em ❑ 100em ❑ 137em
Species Name
CSI
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 em
100 cm
137 cm
Sub_
sap,
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required if cit -off >10cmorsubsample?100%. •I
•2
•
• 3
••
•*4
•♦
NS
••
:67
•
�8I:Z
�10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 20081473-01-0002
Y:4�
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 16' # stems: 13
0map size:
N small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, OtheriUnknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 20081473-01-0003
VMD Year (1-5): F5] Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
583482.505 Datum: NAD83/W
2296006.449 UTM Zone: 17N
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg):
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Kole
Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10Y; 10 El Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Dec 2016 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
31
Quercus michauxii®
R
1.3
0.0
100.0
❑
32
Taxodium distichum
O
R
4.7
2.0
Missing
❑
33
Taxodium distichum
R
3.5
2.0
160.0
2.0
34
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
4.4
5.7
201.0
3.0
35
Taxodium distichum
O
R
6.0
3.8
260.0
3.0 ❑
36
Quercus nigra
(1)
R
6.7
1.5
180.0
1.0 ❑
37
Taxodium distichum
J)
R
9.6
1.7
300.0
4.0 ❑
38
Platanus occidentalis
0
R
8.9
3.0
340.0
4.0 ❑
39
Taxodium distichum
R
9.7
5.4
290.0
3.0 ❑
40
Taxodium distichum
O
R
8.3
5.8
230.0
2.0 ❑
42
Taxodium distichum
O
R
9.5
7.9
280.0
3.0
43
Taxodium distichum
J)
R
8.4
9.2
Missing
❑
46
Taxodium distichum
O
R
0.0
9.2
Missing
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
# stems: 13 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued):
20081473-01-0003
Dec 2016 Data
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ID Species
map source X Y
ddh Height DBH
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
char (m) (m) I
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(mm) (cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cut-off
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsamplina**: 7
el ht Cut -Off (All stems shorter than this are ignored. If >10cm, explain why to the right.): ❑ 10Cm ❑ 50cm ❑ 100Cm ❑ 137cm
Species Name
0
e
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm-
50 cm
50 cm-
100 cm
100 cm-
137 cm
sub-
sapl
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBI
®
0
5rr
T
0
4
**Required if cut-off >1Ocm or subsample ? 100%. 01
•2
•3
•164
•-•5
:46
::8
1 }
0 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 20081473-01-0003
(0,0) X:5m
– X-axis: 3' # stems: 13
mai size:
0— N small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
l=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to I Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1
0
O
®
0
5rr
T
0
4
(0,0) X:5m
– X-axis: 3' # stems: 13
mai size:
0— N small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
l=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to I Ocm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Vegetation Monitoring Data (VMD) Datasheet
Plot 20081473-01-0004
VMD Year (1-5): L51 Date:
Taxonomic Standard:
Taxonomic Standard DATE:
Latitude or UTM-N:
(dec.deg. or m)
Longitude or UTM-E:
Coordinate Accuracy (m):
Plot Dimensions: X:
583144.541 Datum: NAR 83/W
2295690.904 UTM Zone:17N
0.5 X -Axis bearing (deg): �32
Please fill in any missing data and correct any errors.
Kole
Date last planted:
New lanting date m/yy?
Check box if plot was not
Notes: sampled, specify reason below
10Y; 10 El Plot has reverse orientation for X and Y axis (Y is 90 degrees to the right of X
Dec 2016 Data THIS YEAR'S DATA
Map Source* X Y Height DBH Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
ID Species Name char 0.1m 0.1m lcm* 1 cm lcm* 1 cm sprout
47
Quercus michauxii
R
0.2
0.8
260.0
1.5
52
Platanus occidentalis
R
7.5
8.1
270.0
1.5
55
Betula nigra
O
R
3.2
3.6
200.0
2.0
123
Quercus phellos
O
R
2.0
2.0
60.0
J
124
Quercus lyrata
R
6.8
1.0
51.0
125
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
9.0
1.5
58.0
126
Platanus occidentalis
O
R
7.5
3.6
60.0
127
Quercus lyrata
$)
R
5.0
3.6
70.0
128
Platanus occidentalis
®
R
2.5
6.0
62.0
129
Quercus lyrata
R
4.5
6.0
43.0
130
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
R
8.7
7.6
78.0
El
131
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
O
R
6.0
7.6
120.0
DBH?
132
Quercus phellos
Q
R
2.5
8.1
50.01
133
Quercus michauxii
®
R
1.5
7.6
30.0
El I
❑
❑
ElEl
❑
ElEl
El
El❑
❑
# stems: 14 New Stems, not included last year, but are obviously planted. If more space needed, use blank PWS (Planted Woody Stems) Form:
X Y Height DBH
Species Name Source* (m) (m) 1 cm* 1 cm Vigor* Damage* Notes
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1

Plot (continued): 20081473-01-0004
map source X Y
ID Species char (m) (m)
Dec 2016 Data
ddh Height DBH
(mm) (cm) (cm)
(mm)
THIS YEAR'S DATA
ddh Height DBH Re- Vigor* Damage* Notes
(cm) (cm) sprout
Explanation of cutoff
Natural Woody Stems - tallied by species & subsampling**:
Uei htCut-Off(Allstemsshorterthanthisareignored. If>10cm,explain whytotheright): ❑ 10cm ❑ 50em ❑ 100em ❑ 137em
Species Name
CSI
c
SEEDLINGS
— HEIGHT
CLASSES
SAPLINGS
— DBH
TREES — DBH
Sub-
Seed
10 cm
50 cm
50 cm
100 em
100 cm
137 cm
Sub_
sap,
0-1 cm
1-2.5
2.5-
5-
=10
(write DBH)
**Required if cit -off >10cmorsubsample?100%. •I
•2
• 3
•*4
NS
:67
::83
::10 Form WS2, ver 9.1
Map of stems on plot 20081473-01-0004
Y:4�
(0,0) X:5m
X-axis: 32 ° # stems: 14
ON map size:
small
*VIGOR: 4=excellent, 3=good, 2=fair, *DAMAGE: REMoval, CUT, MOWing, BEAVer, DEER, RODents, INSects, GAME, LIVESTock, Other/Unknown
1=unlikely to survive year, 0=dead, ANIMal, Human TRAMpled, Site Too WET, Site Too DRY, FLOOD, DROUght, STORM, HURRicane, DISeased, VINE
M=missing. Strangulation, UNKNown, specify other.
*HEIGHT PRECISION drops to 10cm if >2.5m and 50cm if >4m. Printed in the CVS-EEP Entry Tool ver. 2.3.1