Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20161039 Ver 1_More Info Received_20170214 Homewood, Sue From:Russ Willard <rwillard8@triad.rr.com> Sent:Tuesday, February 14, 2017 10:26 AM To:Homewood, Sue Cc:Pete Ramey; JIM ARMENTROUT; Gibby, Jean B CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Mark Anderson Taylor Subject:RAE's Creek at Oak Valley Stream Restoration Plan - Response to Comments Attachments:Oak Valley Rae's Creek Lot Lines 35ft SB Site Plan.pdf; Oak Valley RAE's Creek Design Narrative Issued 2-13-17.pdf SUE: Per your email comments of Feb. 7, 2017, please find the following: A design narrative for the RAE’s Creek Stream Restoration Plan as prepared by  S&ME. With respect to the lot fill slope encroachment into the stream buffer, the developer  will either adjust the slope fill angle such that the slope toe will not encroach into the buffer area or construct a segmental retaining wall outside of the buffer to ensure the buffer is not disturbed by the fill slope. The attached site plan illustrates the surrounding features of the entire tract which, in turn, required lot layouts and proposed building pads as noted on the plan. The project area site plan illustrating the property line descriptions for each lot. The  plat for these lots has not yet been recorded. Please let me know if have any questions or require additional information. Thank you, Russ Willard For Oak Valley Associates Limited Partnership 336.655.7339 From: Homewood, Sue Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 12:23 PM To: Russ Willard ; Mark Anderson Taylor Cc: Pete Ramey ; JIM ARMENTROUT ; Gibby, Jean B CIV USARMY CESAW (US) Subject: RE: RAE's Creek at Oak Valley Stream Restoration Plan Russ and Mark, I've reviewed the plans that were submitted for the RAES Creek restoration and have a couple questions:  Mark, can you provide a short narrative indicating what you used as a reference reach for the design please.  Russ, since a portion of the stream will have fill slope very close to the top of bank, would you provide an explanation of how the two lot sizes were determined and if you've investigated any other options for reducing the fill slope at this 1 location. I understood that there was likely to be a different buffer vegetation proposal for that area but a fill slope close to a stream bank is of more concern and wouldn't be something we would see in a stream restoration proposal.  Russ, from on line GIS mapping it appears that this area is still under ownership of Oak Valley Assoc. Have the two proposed lots been subdivided? Would you please provide a map that shows the legal boundaries of these lots. Thanks, Sue Homewood Division of Water Resources, Winston Salem Regional Office Department of Environmental Quality 336 776 9693 office 336 813 1863 mobile Sue.Homewood@ncdenr.gov 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd, Suite 300 Winston Salem NC 27105 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. -----Original Message----- From: Thomas, John T Jr CIV CESAW CESAD (US) \[mailto:John.T.Thomas.JR@usace.army.mil\] Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 8:48 AM To: Homewood, Sue <sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov>; Russ Willard <rwillard8@triad.rr.com> Cc: Pete Ramey <peteramey@earthlink.net>; JIM ARMENTROUT <jim@ramey-inc.com>; Mark Anderson Taylor <mataylor@smeinc.com> Subject: RE: RAE's Creek at Oak Valley Stream Restoration Plan Russ, I concur with Sue's approval of extension. Thank you for keeping me inform and I look forward to completing the resolution of this action in the next few weeks. John Thomas Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 919 554-4884 ext. 25 -----Original Message----- From: Homewood, Sue \[mailto:sue.homewood@ncdenr.gov\] Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 8:36 AM To: Russ Willard <rwillard8@triad.rr.com> Cc: Thomas, John T Jr CIV CESAW CESAD (US) <John.T.Thomas.JR@usace.army.mil>; Pete Ramey <peteramey@earthlink.net>; JIM ARMENTROUT <jim@ramey-inc.com>; Mark Anderson Taylor <mataylor@smeinc.com> Subject: \[EXTERNAL\] RE: RAE's Creek at Oak Valley Stream Restoration Plan Russ, 2 • February 13, 2017 Ramey, Inc. P.O. Box 10 Bethania, NC 27010 Attention: Mr. Russ Willard Reference: RAE's Creek Design Narrative RAE's Creek Stream Restoration Advance, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 7235-16-021 NC PE Firm License No. F-0176 Dear Mr. Willard: S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is providing this design narrative for your use. The design narrative was requested by Sue Homewood of the Winston Salem Regional Office of the NC Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources (heretofore NCDWR) in response to the previously submitted Rae's Creek Restoration plans developed by S&ME and dated January 20, 2017. The project site is located on Oak Valley Boulevard west of a cul-de-sac on Aviara Drive in Advance, Davie County, North Carolina. A new channel is being proposed to restore approximately 185 feet of channel that was previously encapsulated. ❖ Design Approach Baseline data for the existing stream were collected from two locations upstream and used to establish a bankfull discharge for the proposed design. These locations were located approximately 1,700 and 2,300 feet upstream and to the northwest of the project site and were selected due to the established channel features and minimal channel modifications. Data from each channel cross section was collected and an upstream and downstream head of riffle was observed for determining the slope across the observed cross section. Following collection of data from the existing stream channel, S&ME performed hydraulic analysis of each riffle cross section. Using RiverMORPH° software, hydraulics by stage was calculated utilizing Manning's equation for each of the existing riffle cross sections observed. The drainage area was estimated using the online USGS StreamStats application for the observed cross sections and the project site. After determining the watershed size, the channel dimension and discharge values were compared to known published regional curve values in order to validate the observed values. S&ME used regional curves to validate the bankfull discharge, area, width and mean depth. The regional curve values were compared to the observed riffle cross section values in the table below. S&ME used the published regional curves for the North Carolina Mountain and Piedmont, North Carolina Tennessee (discharge), and Eastern US (area, mean depth, and width). S&ME, Inc. 16515 Nightingale Lane I Knoxville, TN 379091 p 865.934.6023 1 f NA I www.smeinc.com RAE's Creek Design Narrative RAE's Creek Stream Restoration Advance, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 7235-16-021 Table 1 Regional Curve Values for Drainage Area of 0.34 Square Miles. Regional Curve Riffle Cross Sectional Area (ft2) Width (ft) Mean Depth (ft) Discharge (ft3/sec) Eastern US/*North Carolina and Tennessee 10.34 9.44 1.09 *20 North Carolina Mountain and Piedmont 10.07 8.59 1.16 39 Existing Cross Section 1 10.41 9.96 1.04 24 Existing Cross Section 2 10.78 10.58 1.02 23 Note: * Discharge was derived from the North Carolina - Tennessee Regional curve as a discharge value for the Eastern US curve is not available. Following calibration of the bankfull discharge for the observed sections, the bankfull discharge was established for the proposed stream reach at the project site. The bankfull discharge was determined by scaling the difference between the regional curve values and the calculated values for the existing sections and applying the scaling factor to the regional curve values observed for the project site's drainage area. The slope was estimated based on the anticipated length of the proposed alignment at the project site, and a new riffle cross section developed. Using RiverMORPH° software, hydraulics by stages was calculated utilizing Manning's equation for the proposed riffle cross section. The regional curve values and the proposed riffle cross section values area shown in the table below. Table 2 Regional Curve Values for Drainage Area of 0.48 Square Miles. Note: * Discharge was derived from the North Carolina - Tennessee Regional curve as a discharge value for the Eastern US curve is not available. Because of the short length of channel proposed to be restored, a site specific reference reach was not identified and assessed for this project. Instead, S&ME used reference reach values collected from a previous observed reference reach (Long Hope Creek) which is a C4 Rosgen Stream Type located in Watauga County, North Carolina and has a similar slope as the proposed reach at the project site. The reference reach values and the proposed design values used during the design process for the proposed stream reach at the project site are attached. February 13, 2017 • Summary & Closure RAE's Creek Design Narrative RAE's Creek Stream Restoration Advance, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 7235-16-021 S&ME completed the stream restoration design plans for RAE'S Creek dated January 20, 2017 using a natural channel design approach. The design discharge was established by evaluating cross sections of the existing channel where impacts from the adjacent golf course and residential development were minimal. The channel dimensions and discharges were validated using regional curves, and a new design discharge was selected. A riffle cross section was developed for the proposed discharge and anticipated slope. Reference reach data from a C4 Rosgen stream type was used to further establish dimension, pattern, and profile relationships for the proposed design. Because of the short reach of stream proposed for restoration, some of the stream design values (Meander Length Ratio, Meander Width Ratio, and Pool to Pool Spacing) fall outside of the reference reach ranges, but they are not anticipated to be a concern for the long term stability of the stream. As vegetation matures and sediment moves through the stream, it is expected that the stream channel will narrow over time through natural processes. The resulting values for these ratios would increase and trend towards the values from the reference reach. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or need further information related to the previously provided stream restoration plans or the design narrative detailed herein. Sincerely, S&ME, Inc. Michael K. Pannell, CPESC Staff Scientist February 13, 2017 MAUAI�W-' Mark A. Taylor, P.E. Senior Engineer �,.�""QtH CaRp�� ►•� Parameter Drainage (Sq. Mile) Stream Type Cross Sectional area Bankful width Bankful mean depth Width/Depth ratio Width of flood prone area Entrenchment ratio Bankful velocity Bankful discharge Max depth @ bankfull Max depth ratio Bank Heigh Bank Height Ratio Meander Length Meander Length Ratio Radius of Curvature Radius of Curvature Ratio Belt Width Meander Width Ratio Channel Slope Riffle Length Riffle Length Ratio Pool max depth Pool max depth Ratio Pool area Pool area ratio Pool width Pool width ratio Pool -Pool spacing Pool -Pool spacing ratio RAE's Creek Stream Restoration Advance, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 7235-16-021 Natural Channel Design Values Reference Reach Design median min max median 2.2 0.48 24.80 8.54 16.30 9.0 1.50 0.85 min max Abkf 22.7 27 Wbkf 16 16.6 Dbkf 1.4 1.6 Wbkf/Dbkf 10.40 11.40 Wfpa 160 245 Wfpa/Wbkf 9.80 15.00 Vbkf 15.56 11.74 4.00 Qbkf 2.70 107.00 Dmax 2.1 2.2 Dmax/Dbkf 1.40 1.50 Dtob 1.48 1.58 Dtob/Dmax 1.50 1.30 Lm 128 266 Lm/Wbkf 8.00 16.00 Rc 32.0 97.8 Rc/Wbkf 2.00 6.00 W blt 42 77 Wblt/Wbkf 2.60 4.70 Save 2.56 4.56 3.20 Lrif 15.00 7.6 81 Lrif/Wbkf 0.50 4.90 Dpool 2.30 2.50 Dpool/Dbkf 1.50 2.50 Apool 35.3 37.1 Apool/Abkf 1.40 1.50 Wpool 2.40 Wpool/Wbkf 0.90 1.15 P -P 68.3 127.4 P-P/Wbkf 4.20 7.80 Dimensionless Ratio 97.5 32.3 39.9 36.8 6.00 3.59 4.43 4.09 2/13/2017 S&ME. Inc. 10.90 10.56 203 65.00 140.00 105.67 12.40 7.22 15.56 11.74 4.00 2.70 107.00 33.00 2.15 1.26 1.35 1.30 1.45 1.48 1.58 1.53 1.50 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.00 1.03 0.96 1.00 196.00 65 75 70 12.00 6.84 7.87 7.76 64.90 23.0 41.0 28.8 3.00 2.56 4.56 3.20 57.70 15.00 29.00 21.5 3.60 1.58 3.05 2.38 0.009 0.0100 33.20 5.3 46.5 15.3 2.00 0.58 5.17 1.69 2.40 2.00 1.60 2.35 36.20 13.1 1.50 1.53 17.90 8.5 10.9 10.5 1.10 0.90 1.15 1.11 97.5 32.3 39.9 36.8 6.00 3.59 4.43 4.09 2/13/2017 S&ME. Inc. -" C'C: SPINDLE N:816351.79' E:1573377.48' CSF:0.999925322 I- J � J C —J) 4 PROPOSED LAYOUT AND GRADING FOR 35' SETBACK FROM THE R/W • This map is PRELIMINARY for illustrative purposes and is NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. • Lots shown have been proposed and reviewed by Davie County planning, however, the lots are not currently recorded with the register of deeds. • Existing topo, existing conditions and new conditions are from prior surveys by Beeson & Carter, P.A. • This site is located in a FEMA designated flood area. The 1 % annual chance, 0.2% annual chance flood lines, floodways and base flood elevations shown are from FEMA DFIRM digital data, Map 37007C, dated 06-16-2009. • Minimum Building Lines (MBL) as shown are 35' Front, 10' Side and 5' from Floodway line. No rear is shown due to lot depths. • 1500 CY of fill needed to prepare home sites. • 1180 CY of fill needed to close up remaining pond area. FAIRWAY #18 �K V PLLEY O A LEV 6�UtotWayVX�•t�,{!_.. t 20, Landscape a Easement ' 314„ Private Drainage Easement oQ a or_ � cn NOTES: 1. All distances shown on this plat are horizontal distances unless otherwise noted 2. 3/4" iron pipe at all corners unless otherwise noted. 3. There are no NCGS or USC&G or other Geodetic Survey Monuments within 2000' feet of this site. 4. All bearings shown on this plat are based on NC Grid - NAD83(2011), as noted. 5. Parcel Areas are calculated using the coordinate method. 6. Site is currently located in a FEMA designated flood area. The 1 % annual chance, 0.2% annual chance flood lines, floodways and base flood elevations shown are from FEMA DFIRM digital data, Map 37007C, dated 06-16-2009. SYMBOL LEGEND I LOCATION MAP N.T.S. • Pt. Calculated Point (As Shown) A IPS Iron Pin Set (3/4" conduit) O EIP Existing Iron Pipe (As Shown) O EIR Existing Iron Rebar °t- Stone Found FG Flush with ground AG x.xx' Above ground (Distance in ft.) UG x.xx' Underground (Distance in ft.) ® Sanitary Sewer Manhole PURPOSE STATEMENT: The purpose of this map is to illustrate the proposed layout for single family homes and grading needed for a 35' setback from the R/W. This map is PRELIMINARY FOR REVIEW ONLY AND NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. PROJECT: SHEET NO: 1 of 1 BEESOR &CRRTER, PR. CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS LAND PLANNING 503 HIGH STREET, WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27101 OFFICE:(336) 748-0071 FAX:(336) 748-0470 WEB: www.beesonengineering.com Corp No.: C-4017 1201 L O W J � J C > (.0 O (D OCD I— 0 Co co O Z3 p M co LU LLI LL co co LU olf ti U O Z -0 M Z a) CO 0 � W iQ V) M o Z Co OMs�0- a CLIENTS: OAK VALLEY ASSOCIATES LTD PARTNERSHIP C/O Pete Ramey PO Box 10 Bethania, NC 27010 DRAWN BY: ATC / TLBC FIELDWORK: EE / MH CHECKED BY: JEB DATE: 10.20.2016 JOB NO: 15-034 SCALE: 1" = 60' SHEET NO: 1 of 1 BEESOR &CRRTER, PR. CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND SURVEYORS LAND PLANNING 503 HIGH STREET, WINSTON-SALEM, NC 27101 OFFICE:(336) 748-0071 FAX:(336) 748-0470 WEB: www.beesonengineering.com Corp No.: C-4017 1201