Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170184 Ver 1_NCDOT_R-5771_Nationwide 14 Application and Plans_20170214Corps Submittal Cover Sheet Please provide the following info: 1. Project Name: Improve Existing SR1690 (Broadpolnte Dr) to 24 Feet Paved Roadway & Replace Br. 107 2. Name of Property Owner/Applicant: NC �epartment of Transportation 3. Name of Consultant/Agent: N/A *Agent authorization needs to be attached. 4. Related/Previous Action [D number(s); N/A 5. Site Address: N!A 6. Subdivision Name: N�A � Ci�,; Mills River 8. County: Henderson 9. Lat: 35.423131° N 10. Quadrangle Name: Skyland 11. Waterway: McDowell Creek 12. Watershed: French Broad River (06010105) 13. Requested Action: X Nationwide Permit # 14 General Pei7nit # -82.552227° W Jurisdictional Determination Request Pre-Application Request The following information will be completed by Corps office: AID: Prepare File Folder Authorization: Assign number in ORM Section 10 Section 404 Project Description/ Nature of Activity! Project Pwpose: Site/Waters Name: Keywords: Project Center) Begin Date STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMF,NT OF TRANSPORTATION ROY COOPER GOVERNOR February 14, 2017 Ms. Lori Beckwith U. S. Anny Corps of Engineers NCDOT Regulatory Project Manager l51 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Aslieville, NC 28801-2714 JnNtES H, TkoGDON, III SECRETAR7' Subject: Natiomvide 14 Permit Application SR 1690 (Broadpointe Drive) [mprovement and Bridge # l07 Replacement McDowell Creek, Hende�son County, No�1h Carolina TIP No. R-5771, State Project No. 46877.1.1 Dear Ms. Beckwith: The North Carolina Depaitment of Trai�sportation (NCDOT) is proposing to realign, elevate, widen, and pave a 1,300 foot section of SR 1690 (Broadpointe Drive) and replace bridge #107 in Henderson County. The project will improve safety and reduce the road grade for commercial vel�icles accessuig the Broadpointe Industrial Park. An off-site detour will handle traffic during the construction. The esisting timber bridge over McDowell Creek will be replaced with a new 125' concrete beam bridge about 75 feet upstream of the existing bridge. The road ralignment will require replacing and extending a culve�t in a ditched tributary to McDowell Creek and require the additiou of a culvert in the tributary to maintain a farm field access point. Please find enclosed a PCN application, preliminary jurisdictional determination form, Division of Mitigation Seivices acceptance letter, culhu•al resource review forms, maps, pla�� sheets, photographs, and otlier suppo�ting project information. L� Henderson Coanty, Carolina northern flying squirrel (Gln«co�ii}+s snbri�nis coloraltrs), Appalachian elktoe mussel (flJnsi�iido»tn rcrvenelim�n), swamp pink (Helonias bullntn), small �vhorled pogonia (Isotrin medeoloides), bunched an'owhead (Sngittrn•ia fascic�dnta), mountain sweet pitcher plant (Sarraceninjonesii), wliite irisette (Sis�n•incJriuut rlichoto�uum), and northern long-eared bat (NLEB, Myo�is seplenh•ionnlis) have cureent records and are listed as threatened or endangered. Also, the endangered gray bat (rLlyotis grisescens) is a probable species iu the county. The Appafachian elktoe mussel is foimd in well-o:cygenated, cool-water rivers with moderate to fast flowing water and stable, mixed-substrates of silt, sand, gravel, and/or cobble. The Appalachian elktoe records in the region are from relatively large streams such as the French A/ai/iigAAdress: Telephone: (828)5862f41 I.ota(ion: NCDEPARTMEN'1'OPTRANSPORTA7fOV Far:(828)586dW3 NCDEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTA7lON Di��sion I4 Ci�slamrrServire: 1-877-368-0968 Division I-0 253 WeMter Road 253 Webster Road Sy1va,NorthCarolina28779 {(ebsife:x�vwncdWeov Sylva,NorthCarolina28779 R-5771, Henderson County Page 2 February 14, 2017 Broad, Little, and Mills rivers. There a�� no records of occurrence in tributaries to these rivers. McDowell Creek flows into the French Broad River a short distance downstream of tlie bridge, but this reach of the river is several miles do�vnstream of occupied elktoe liabitat. And, McDowell Creek is likely too polluted with sediment and too small to support mussels. The project area is only about 2,020 feet in elevation, so there is no habitat present for tlie Carolina northern flying squirrel. White irisette habitat includes mid-elevation slopes with open dry to mesic oak-hickory forest, typically on rocky steep terrain with shallow soils. This plant has only been found in the eastern part of Henderson County. There is a thin strip of riparian "foresY' iu the project area along McDowell Creek, but it is mostly comprised of thick and disturbed shrub cover and is othernise not suitable for white irisette. Swamp pink and mountain sweet pitcher plants both require saturated-soil wetlands, usually bogs, while bunched arro�vhead is considered a snbmerged aquatic plant that is associated with low flow seepage areas. There are no wetlands in or near the project area and these plants tivere not seen along the tributary to McDowell Creek near the bridge on my October 6, 2016 field survey. Small whorled pogonia may be found in open, dry, deciduous woods with acid soil, often in association �vitli �vhite pine aud rhododendron, though it can also occur on slopes along sheams. The terrestrial habitat in the vicinity of the bridge is frequently disturbed by roadway dust, road maintenance, and agriculhiral operations. As noted, there is only a narrow strip of forest in the project area, but it is mostly comprised of thick shrubs and is not an open mid-story forest type favored by small whorled pagonia, Gray bats usually roost in caves year-round while NLEB only winter in caves or mines witli stable, but not fi•eezing cold temperamres. This project only involves a short road realignment and bridge replacement, so construction �vork will not estend far fi�om tl�e esisting right-of-way into areas where caves may occur. Pile driving �vill occur, but blasting is not anticipated witli tliis project Tliere are no caves or miues visible near the bridge and, according to USGS data, the nearest underground mine is over 10 miles away. Tlierefore, gray bats and hibernating NLEB should not be affected by tlie project. When not hibe�nating, NLEB and sometimes gray bats will roost on structui�es, under the shaggy bark of live trees such as white oaks, sycamores, and hickories, or in cavities and under tlie loose peeling bark of dead trees. The bridge was surveyed on October 6, 2016 attd there �vere no roosting bats or any evidence of bat usage (i.e. staining or guano). The struchire is poorly suited as a bat roost because it is only a few feet above the water surface and cool underneath. Moreover, tlie bridge is not situated in a"Red HUC" where NLEB hibernacula or maternity roost trees are au identified concern and it is several miles away from the nearest "Red HUC". The construction work may require tlie removal of one large black willow with multiple trunks that do not appear suitable for bat roosting. The project is limited in scope to a shoit road realignment and replacement of a bridge. Erosion and sedimentation control measures will be used and maintained to minimize adverse effects of the work on aquatic habitats. Habitats for listed species are lacking at the project site and none of these species were obse�ved during field visits. For these reasons aud tliose discussed above, we recommeud that a determination of "no effecP' on listed species apply to this project, with esception of a"may atfect, uot likely to adversely affecY' for bats. R-5771, Henderson County Page 3 February 14, 2017 This project was revie�ved by NCDOT's Human Environment Unit in 2016 for potential effects to historical architecture and archaeology. Surveys for architecture were not required. A survey for archaeological resources �vas conducted with a determination of no resources present. Impacts to Waters of the United States McDowell C��eek (DWQ Class: C) is shown on tlie USGS topographic map as a perennial stream. The channel is well defined and approximately 16' wide with a substrate of gravel, silt, and sand. McDowell Creek flows into the French Broad River about 1/2 mile downsheam of the bridge. The French Broad River (HiJC 06010105) meets the definition of a Traditional Navigable Water. For tliese reasons, we believe McDowell Creek is a Relatively Pennanent Water and is under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The project will result in impacts to waters of the United States as listed in the table below: Site No. Existing Condition Proposed Condition Net Station Im acts � Timber deck on steel 125' L(span) concrete beam/deck bridge 0' beam bridge 2 McDowell Ci�eek �mpervious dikes and flow diversions as 50' needed for old bridge removal 3 UT McDowell Creek and 2@ 30" x 72' L wlveit replacement and 2�* 36" x 45'L HDPE pipe headwall UT McDowell Creek and impe�vious dike and temporary flow 3A 36" x 45'L HDPE pipe diversion 100 UT McDowell Creek rip rap bank protection and floodplain 3B daylighted by removal of 25' 36" x 40'L HDPE i e bench 4 UT McDo�vell Creek 42" x 3S L RCP pipe with headwall 35' 4A UT McDowell Creek ��nPervious dike and temporary flow 40, diversion Total Permanent Stream Impact for Bridge 0' Total Permanent Tributa�y Impacts fm• Culverts 62' *Site 3 impact is 27' (72' culvert/headwall exteusion - existing 45' culvert removed) Total Temporary Stream and UT Impacts for Dikes and Flow Diversions 190' Tot�l Permanent Tributa�y Impacts for Rip Rap Stabilization 25' Permits Requested NCDOT is hereby requesting authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act to proceed with the conshuction project outlined above. By copy of this letter, I am asking Mrs. Marla Cl�ambers, Western DOT Review Coordinator for the North Carolina Wildlife Resources R-5771, Henderson County Page 4 February 14, 2017 Commission (NCWRC), to comment directly to you concerning the 404 Natiomvide Permit request. I am also requesting authorization under Section 40l of the Clean Water Act from the North Carolina DepaRment of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Resources (DWR). In addition, I am asking Mrs. Chambers and Mr. Reid Whitehead, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer (NCDOT), to comment directly to me concerning this permit request. If you have any questions or need additional infonnation, please contact me at (828) 586-2141. Your attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. Sincere ( �� ���� I7ave McHenry Division 14 Environmental Ofticer Enclosures cc: Ms. Amy Chapman, Divisian of Water Resources, DEQ, Raleigh Ms. Kristie Lynn Carpenter, Division of Water Resources, DEQ, Raleigli Mr. Kevin Barnett, Division of Water Resources, DEQ, Asheville Ms. Marella Bnncick, Biologist, US Fish & Wildlife Service, Asheville Mis. Marla Chambers, Western NCDOT Review Coordinator, NCWRC Mr. Steve Cannon, PE, Division 14 Dishict I Engineer, NCDOT Mr. Reid Whitehead, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer, NCDOT oF wnrFq oa o� Office Use Only: � i � € Corps action ID no. i,�, i o T DW4 project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 7b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes �X No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought (rom lhe DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Ceriification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Qualily CeAification — Express ❑ Riparian euffer Authorization 1e. Is this notification solety for lhe record For the record only for DWQ For the record only (or Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? 401 Cerlification: ❑ Yes X❑ No ❑ Yes ❑X No 1 f. Is paymenl into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigalion of impacts? If so, altach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank �X Yes � No or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h � Yes X❑ No below. 1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concem (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Improve Existing SR1690 (Broadpointe Dr) to 24ft Paved Roadway & Replace Br. 107 2b. Counry: Henderson 2c. Neareslmunicipaliryltown: MiIlsRiver 2d. Subdivision name: N/A 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no: R-5771 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A 3c. Responsibte Pariy (for LLC if Dave McHenry, Division 14 Environmental O�cer applicable): 3d. Street address: 253 Webster Road 3e. City, state, zip: Sylva, NC 28779 3f. Telephone no.: 828-586-2141 3g. Fax no.: 828-586-4043 3h. Email address: dgmchenry@ncdot.gov Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applirant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. Cily, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. AgentlConsultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: Gail F. Kogut, Managing Engineer 5b. Business name MA Engineering Consultants, Inc. (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 598 East Chatham Street, Suite 137 5d. City, stale, zip: Cary, NC 27511-6956 5e. Telephone no.: 919-297-0220 5f. Fax no.: 919-297-0221 5g. Email address: gkogut@maec.com Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Propedy identificalion no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N!A 1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latilude: 35.423131 Longitude: -$2.552227 1c. PropeAy size: N!A acres 2. SurFace Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: McDowell Creek 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C 2c. Riverbasin: French Broad 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing wnditions on the sile and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the lime of this applicalion: Land use in Ihe project vicinity consists primarity af agriculturai and wmmercial developmen6 inGudirg the Asheville Regional Airport, interspersed wilh 8agmenled foresled areas. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wellands on the property: 0 3c. List the iotal estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermitlent and perennial) on the propeAy: 450 3d. Explain the purpose of lhe proposed project: The purpose of the projeG is lo tmprove the veNcal alignment and replace Bridge Number 107 in order to make it suilable for commerGal vehiGes anticipated from the deveiopmen! of Ihis induslrial park and in particular the new manufaGuring (acility which will create newjobs for the region and lo 0 3e. Describe lhe overall project in detail, including the type of equipmenl to be used: Erosion and sedfinenlalion conlrol measures will be installed. M off-site detour will accommodate lraific. The old bridge will be removed and a new bridge will be build on an improved algnmenL Track hces, dump Irucks, bulldozers, aanes, paving equipment, waler pumps, sandbags, diversion pipe and various hand tools will be used to accom Iish Ihe xrork. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or siream determinations by the � Yes OX No ❑ Unknown Corps or State been requesled or obtained for ihis property / ro'ect includin all rior hases in lhe ast? Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what lype of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Oiher: 4d. I( yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and altach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or ceAifications been requested or obtained for �Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to °help file" instruclions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is lhis a phased project? ❑ Yes ❑X No 6b. Ityes, explain. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiclion number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem ora W1 ❑ P❑ T N!A N/A � Yes ❑ Corps N/A ❑ No ❑ DWQ W2 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Gorps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland tmpacts N/A 2h. Comments: N/A 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermiltent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 siream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, W�dth (linear Temporary (T) (INn? other) (feet) feet) 1 � P❑ T Bridge McDowell Creek � PER � Corps 16 0 ❑ INT � DWQ 2� P� T Temporary Dikes/ McDowell Creek � PER � Corps 16 50 Flow Diversions ❑ INT � DWQ 3� P❑ T Culvert Extension UT McDowell ❑ PER � Corps 4 2�, Creek � INT � DWQ 3A ❑ P� T Temporary Dikes! UT McDowell ❑ PER � Corps 4 100 Flow Diversions Creek � INT � DWQ 3B � P❑ T Rip rap UT McDowell ❑ PER � Corps 4 25 Creek � INT � DWQ 4� P 0 T Culvert UT McDowell ❑ PER � Corps 4 35 Creek � INT � DWQ 4A ❑ P� T Temporary Dikes/ UT McDowell ❑ PER � Corps 4 40 Flow Diversions Creek � INT � DWQ 3h. Total Permanent Stream Impacts for Bridge �' Total Permanent Tributary Impacts for Culverts 62' (*Site 3 Impact is 72' culvert/headwall extension-45' existing removed) Total Temporary Stream and Tributary Impacts for Impervious Dikes and Flow Diversions 790' Total Permanent Tributa Im acts for Bank Stabilization 25' 3i. Comments: Page 4 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Open Water Impacts If ihere are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, esluaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of ihe U.S. lhen individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number (if applicabte) Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres) Permanenl (P) or type Tem ora 01 N/A N1A 02 03 04 4i. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construciion ro osed, then com lete ihe chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Pond ID number Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (acres) Slream Impacts (feeq Upland purpose of pond (acres) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated P1 wA P2 5f. Total: 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permif required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surtace area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Melhod of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If projecl will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart balow. If yes, lhen individually list all buffer impacts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of fhis form. 6a, Projeci is in which protected basin? ❑ Neuse � Tar-Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other: Bb. 6c. 6d. 6e. Bf. 6g. Butfer Impact Reason for impact Stream name Buffer Zone 1 Zone 2 number— mitigation impact impact Permanent (P) or required? (square (square Tem ora feet feet B� NfA N/A B2 B3 B4 B5 86 8h. Total Buffer Impacts: 6i. Comments: Page 5 ot 1 U D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization ta. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The bridge is betng replaced with another bridge wilh a lorger span than the exisling. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize lhe proposed impacts fhrough conslruction techniques. BMPs will be Inslalled to minimize etfeGs on aqualic habilaL Flow diversions will be used so �haf old mad fill and lhe e�tisfing bridge can be removed and Ihe new bridge and culverts can be consWcled in dry environments. 2. Com ensato Miti ation for Im acts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensalory Mitigation for ❑X Yes ❑ No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all lhat apply): ❑X DWQ � Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigalion option will be used for this ❑X Payment to in-lieu fee program project? ❑ Permiltee Responsible Miligaiion 3. Com lete if Usin a Miti ation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigaiion Bank: N!A Type: Choose one Quanlily: n/a 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Quantily: Type: Quantity: wn 3c. Comments: 4. Com lete if Makin a Pa ment to In-lieu Fee Pro ram 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. �X Yes 4b. Stream mitigaiion requested: 62 linear feet 4c. If using stream miligalion, stream temperature: cool 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4h. Comments: wA 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan Sa. If using a permiltee �esponsible mifigation plan, provide a description of ihe proposed mifigalion plan. N/A Page 6 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project resull in an impact within a protecled riparian buffer that requires buffer mitigation? ❑ Yes ❑ No 6b. If yes, then identify ihe square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buKer lhat requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. Be. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigalion (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 wn 3(2 for Calawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total 6uffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer miligation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mifigation bank, permiltee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (requlred by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adJacent lo protected riparian buffers identified � Yes �X No within one of lhe NC Ri arian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diHuse flow plan included7 If no, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of lhis project? a�, 2b. Does this ro'ect re uire a Stormwater Mana ement Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narralive descriplion of the plan: The SMP determines that the replacement ot Bridge 107 and realignmenl of SR1690 meets the requirements. Alfhough rea�igned, flow palterns along SR1690 are maintained aM the hydraulic efficiency of Bridge 107 is maintatned for McDovreli Creek. The destgn has been developed lo dif(use 9ow as much as passible. NPDES NCS000250 covers �his projeG. 2e. Who will be responsible for ihe review of the Stormwater Management Plan? 3. Certified Local Govemment Stormwater Review 3a. In which local overnmenYs'urisdicfion is this ro'ect? wA ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater managemenl programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP � Water Supply Watershed � Olher: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan wifh proo( of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Starmwater Pro ram Review �Coastal counties ❑HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwaler management programs apply �ORW (check all ihat apply): ❑Session Law 2006-246 ❑Other: 4b. Has fhe approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No altached? 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? 0 Yes � No 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? QX Yes ❑ No Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) ta. Does fhe project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the 0 Yes ❑ No use of public (federaUslate) land? 1b. If you answered'yes to lhe above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to Ihe requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes X❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? tc. If you answered "yes' to lhe above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of lhe NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Vlolations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violaiion of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ❑X No or Riparian Buf(er Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is ihis an after-the-fact permil application? ❑Yes �X No 2c. If you answered "yes' to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anlicipated future impacts) result in � yes � No additional developmeM, which could impact nearby downstream water qualiry? 3b. If you answered "yes" to lhe above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no; provide a short narrative description. This project only invotves improving an existing open road. Il will nol provide (naease access to undeveloped areas. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultima[e treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. wn Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � yes X� No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � yes 0 No impacls? 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. 5d. What data sources did you use to delermine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designaled Critical Habitat? NC NaWral Heritage Program Dalabase and site visils and during arM after field scoping process. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes �X No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essenfial Fish Habitat? N/A There are no marine or esluarine habitals wilhin fhe Blue Ridge Physiographic Province. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will lhis project occur in or near an area thal the stale, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes X❑ No stalus (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in NoAh Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? 8. Flood Zane Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designaled 100-year floodplain? ❑X Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: This project meets lhe Ooodplain managemenl guidelines MOA as a Type I Project in �hat il has a base flood elevalion increase of less that 0.1 toot. 8c. What source(s) did you use to make lhe floodplain determination7 NC Floodplain Mapping Program David McHenry Division Environmental Officer �� 2 —�y �� ApplicanUAgenPs Printed Name pplicanUAgenl's Signatu Date (Agent's signature is valid onty if an aulhorization teller from lhe a Iicant is rovided. Page 10 of 10 082.5666666° W 082.5500000° W � 082.5333333' W 1 �+1 � ' '�. � � ,j � �( _I ' i c�',: A � i � `��:� 1;�\�'�' • ' ` �', �'i �i� • T ielr;( �� �• �� � :��� � e�.;. : �l ���.' V y� ' � �l � i� , ��� � �� ..� " � .. , � � �� _ 1' �t - ,�%�, . �A J, � � ) EN �''�"'\.� ,, 'H � � � %/:�:� � ,�. .�, OL .'� L/ il�\. ` � �i� -�—i \;� �� ( �' � \ ^ �( \ � 7j�IK �. V � � : '1' :�Tnl) ! ; � _ .;�. �.�� 1�, . � � o� �� � �� � t l� � �� _ � .,r� �. t�n��>� , , ^'3 . . s �� A � t ��,r�ade, . , � � a� - �� . n : r . �\ ' I . ` i z � . �• n � � \ -� a .,: l` _..� ��l .. � �� ''� �� % .l , ^� �. u' 1 A � - �` � r ' `� � S�jE ILIE ' Vo �A . - ) �ia 4 ��� . a ��` ' � � �� � \�. RFGI� Al AIRPORT ��, � �� � � I�'� ;� � 1, , , '.��- �,` 4 '.� . -� ��;..� � -� ,:. �� . ��; 1 , ' � -� �� ���� ,i; . . �� � , � .�� . ur�n �;B�ok �ho ( �''• �� � , � , - 1 , , � � .. 1uI , � � � �, � \ 1 p� C� • � z . (/�� ��� '� � �. � � :' i . �� - � ���. -- � � � � ��� -- z ]] I �!7k� �• M ( �` . � � i / �, 1 . \ /'�� ` n- " - � � I M C� ./ \_ � / ) - % \� ) M M iv ) '! � -% I / ',�;/ . . M M / �)' ` . � �/ . / �:/ LOS a -. \ / �\ \�\ M i � Jr � V M � �' ✓'� � I � I��� �� �.��l� �. � { �G 5,�.. �� , in — A �.-: � .� a ���. -� �,. � � � �,. "' `J - i� '.�_`� L�Mne} � . 4 h ;,:� y i 1 . ��'� ` \. 1 5.-._'- ': —! ! l'�'� : \\ / � ..r I � ti � N75�� � ''��� ..., ��,Oelhe� Ch � J r��� os u,�a¢ Sa� i ' _� i ' � -�� �`'�ti � . OP� � � � �� �� /�� . � -'� .- i- P . ;� � ` " ��t>� � `- �. i � - . � �n �� [' .�-i9' ( ' { Ur (r d R�..gi h � �I �' \ / t . �\-t� � � �/ ,.'I. .I' \ :'SI) Jn G �1 �� _ i:. I, ` �� ,� ( i/ o°� ��, , uFo is� `� -�� iJ If�c .�I �� 0�� ;ni� r Oov A ���FB 19 �!p �� � �. .��+L-��p) �;(1. � 11 1 � y ��� l � '. ��� 1J � � � � . �: , L�. � 1 1 (�� . 1 �'� � - � ��- � . � `� � v I� i � . �. : � � / � �� i �_ . I. �� ' . A/ �, i � . � � �' 1 3.p� AVi! i / �� c . �� �. \� ��`i. �9Fa�r�naCha41 ��' . . ! �r \�,� �S �rn'n �ni . ��� .. . ;\` , _ i. � J ., ... �� . % , , .� . \ \ � � `. I . . � � N 1� . ti � � � � � _ " _ — � Ri—O�' ° � �� � . � �-/ �y I� i�,��� R 5771 Br�dge No. 107 ��1, � Z ' � i � \ n � l'-� I �� \,�. \ : � z ro �iar.sran'� bfrbu�el� � �.�8 � � I C . � '. , ',� � G�� � m _ 1 � . , . f \ \1 ' � , . i 1 -�i I � \ i.. io � � i � `3 .' rP$$i � r\\,' �( � .'- ��i� ��.- �o M, . � � , � �: P(� . � ��� V i /� ; % ' i.xf . r t'�o5o���`-�� M 1�� ��1����� � '� '�',�� n� �� ��� � �:i� ';��'� i �._ _ _ / �� ` ��. . �'f//� 1•.� a�_' r. :.-� /- `. 1 / j� . Q;f � : � / � . �` . �� 1 �: 1 � .� . /� �r ���\'f ���I \� �� \ - j � �� ` 1 \,c Mile 0. �� � i ; �� t �c�iavh? � ( ,./�. i .�5 =_ ♦ �1 . � , � - . . \ /p �// ��1 . .,I.�: � �1 i i` , . \ I� , . _ ! I1 ���ti� (� \ 1 � 1 ' `._.�%% �\ � �� �i� .. .��, . . a ... � \ ��y\1�\r,"� `f�� `��f� V�;i :.����� uFEtp a,��,., . ,' _-. .� . 1� i i . Iibl�Jon�<F, � AR� . �� % 1 �i A -.a.gd.. '1. 0 .'' il '� � � . C J ITPI - 9 \ G` : � ' �1 . .�F __ _ �1 F � F. � - _ �_ ROA \ U� 23 . � �.'.. , m i -. �'� � 't- � ���'. �1��� I: � � ( �UII i f �06 F i �j � � i I �p � � S � � i . . �J P 1� , i . . .I[ul�inw� �Ac:� �� J\ ' �� i �. • � � _.. , �Ai r , • i ,•� �� , / � .1 a : � 'j 1 . . �i . . n Q � �� �\Yaicr a � SCALE 124000 Z `�� ��� �/� �\ . /�� �f0'�k � ` 0 � 1 �dILES Z i � • i ` ,i'!1 � ` � .��. _ o o �i� I \ ��`! .� � / / �a\ .� �\, ` � �•\ 1� � . 0 1000 YAR�S o .� o ` -/ . � / .'� ��..'" _� o a ` � ' �—��EFFRES � � f 0 1 KILOIAETER � L � � _-_ V. . .,�. : �1(� II � --� �.�� —_l � �� Q! ' I , �j� °� Iq 082.5666666° W 082.5506000° W � I 082.533 333' � Name: SKYLAND Locationl 035.4226851° N 082.5533889° W NAD 27 Date: 2/7/2017 Caption: R-5771 Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet SR 1690 (Broadpointe Dr) Bridge # 107 McDowell Creek z i7 _ _ �i�p �. : f�'� �\ . �!?:.. `.. . f� � .�f .#:.. � � \: �.• �i�, �\ f', � " ''�..'. . e \� ���}. ' � '�il :� , � . 1 � � � � �,. .. �` • �l �• . �� �, . t ` .i �� +, ' �� a. � • �`c: � �� :; \ .o. � . a. � � .; ��.� .. � 4 1 . �.�. . . Q\���'.��; . . �) , q � ; f SC � 4� . �� �1 M x� � -.. � , F . � .' �•N Ex ` , . r� ' �- r�` ��� ;� � � :or � � "�� . .'+ o ' , •_ ' - ' <.� '; � , � . 1 � +. -�' ` � � � +��� ca, . ^` 1 . . � m ��r:. o i .'� m �,�, ,-- i ar C� • �o,�,., , , o �-� ; � a '� � �, ��:��`�: - ."t ��"�r�, ' U / _ a. �IL U. � Z Y. 1a y j \ 16 N [w��� . �r O Il . . .. it . . � z �`�7 1 J+ .. _ I�, SQ; p � .,: � ¢._' _. g�i N � - � 4 z; n h�� ���ti��.• � � '��� . . � � r� "�• _ %' �' " ,� _ 1 . _ �. , � �'" . ♦- . . . ri`;� O � .. Sd� �:� y.� . ' � XC: . ,. .: �F • ,6� ,`1 0 . . .� , �`� \ 1. . , � � . . '�`"`'. . � \� . 'l^'Ji � _ �\` .. . . ��: _ . ' �'\: � • ' ' .t� �( + � � . . . � � � . . , . �... � ' � . .4':. � . .F��,. . . C �� . . � . . �•�:. ' � '`.,�•. �. . � . . .. :.1.',.. � �ti r:. - . � . . � . , . . , . �'�. � ' .�. - .n...u:' � �— _ ��� T�' �:i Looking south toward Bridge No. 107 '' i A _ v�__�_ .� /� � , i o�:,�. �, � , - � �� ���.1 �,�� ;, „�, ; � � .•.� r -:,� .,.� :.. ^ �� o,. �' ,..:�� i; i / .p:. ' �P'�(: I � ,.�n+ "•`� � � ; �� � � � r . ���� *y / ' +�} • � .� .. .'_�' . .....:'� Looking at down stream side of Bridge No. 107 . - .. __ _ .. . _ _�, _.._T..'_..r. r i i 1. � � v ' �� 1 `�' �ri��`: �w i ..�y I 1 \ . �t _ � - _ �� wY- � Looking downstream from northwest quadrant .�-�� ' • --- . . . � j�. i`? _�, yaw•�' . , . • j :� iY' �a Ji• . . . _._ . .-.3.�..�.i1.._. .. Looking northwest from south approach of Bridge No. 107. �/TE' 2 I- � . . � . .i I ,. i • 'r, _ _ . t � . ,.54.y - . .` "Y i � .-: � � ` �Y -�} � 3 "1 4 . . ti . I l � �� . .. , '-- . . . _ r . � �.=c: . . . � � 7 Looking southeast from north abutment of Bridge No. 107 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRtINSPORTAT70N HENDERSON COUNTY TIP NO. R-577i Figw•e 2: Improue SR 1Ggo (Broadpointe Drive) and Replace PHOTOGRAPHS Bridge No. 107 ouer McDoiuell Creek i � l �`.3 � � I i � � }` � y f +1.b � � ' � n � � �� - � � ��� � � � '� iYN � .`:�� .�. � 1.. . ��"�T �s� • r # .�+' ° a'y� ^f,:�j.`/` �� �� � ¢� 1.ET`Ti„�;!� � ' - - — i�i .___.` ,:c+�,,.r,,JF:_:.�';vl Looking upstream (southwest) from Bridge No. 107 A� r F 1 I .._ �n� � �� i. - ��4 � 1 �% "!� 5 ' q� .i Y Q� L !� ��� �#' l . b � i �5111 �. ..� .. P �-�������� r . � ¢ .. 'f Y� , Y . ({.� /f f � . , ��7'Jf�fi !� j� y� t 1 +!g �t��()1fI �� A3��� . �l . � . � � l� ♦ . .(' �'1'��5f ` �+ Y �,� � t � -'-� -- ..i s ih 1 \ . ���h}� .'y�, / , t`f��R ��� � :4� k... _. �� '_�f_ � _ _... Looking downstream (northeast) (rom Bridge No. 107. Looking downstream (northeast) at Bridge No. 107. I. : .� _ :;�_ ' . � _ _ �� __ _ � __ Empire Distributors (northwest of Bridge No. 107) +.-"�. : � "6�,.`1> .,, ,.;.t..� -.;__.1 .,_;_�,le�f Lookingatjurisdictlonalstream �vwAr�J /%/E�i U% s�%�3 UPM RaFlatac, Inc (southeast quadrant of 8ridge No. 107) �� NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF T1ltlNSPORTATlON HENDERSON CO UNT'Y TIP NO. R-5��1 Figur•e 2: Impr•oue SR i690 (Brondpointe Drive) and Replace PHOTOGRA.PHS Bridge No. 10� over McDoxuell Creek (coniznued) C'r. Ertvironmeiita! Qua(rty FebruaryR,20f7 Mr. Dave McHenry NCDOT Divisiou I4 Enviroiuneotal Specialist North Caroluia Depnrtment of Transporfalion 253 Webster Road Sylva, NoAh Carolina 28779 Dear Mr. McHenry: Subject: Mitigatioi� Acceplance Letter: ROY COOPER c�, z���- R�IJC�V�� FEBOS2017 DIVISI�N 14 Division 14 Project, TIP Number R-5771, Replace Bridge ]07 0�� SR 1690 (Bloodpointe Drive) over McDowell Creek, Hendersou Counly; IVDS Element 46877. L 1 The purposz of this letter is to notify you that tl�e Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) will provide the compensatory stream miliga[ion for Ihe subject project. Rased on the information received on February 6, 2017, the impacts are located in CU 06010105 of the French Broad River basi�� in [lie Soulhem Mountains (SM) Eco-Regioq and are as follows: French Broad 06010105 SM I Impacts (feeUacres) *Some of the stream a� application for details. Cofd Stream Cool I \Vartv � Ripanan Weflands I IIuRer (Sq. Ft.) 62.0 � 0 I 0 I 0 �acis may be proposed to be mitigated a[ a 1: Zone ] � Zone 2 permit DMS commils to implementing sufticient compensatory stream miligatiou credits to offset the impacts associated with this project as detennined by ihe regulatory agencies in accordance uhth the In-Lieu Pee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then dus mitigation acceptance letter will no louger 6e valid and a new mitigation acceptauce letter will be required frau DMS. If you have any questions or need additioual information, please coutact Ms. Be�h Harnion at 919-707-8420. Sincerely, Jame B. "'taufill Credi n�gemen[ Supervisor cc: Ms. Lori Beckwith, USACE — Asheville Regulatory Field Office Mr. Steve Ca�moi�, P,E., NCDOT—Division 14 District 1 Engineer Ms. Liuda Filzpalrick, NCDOT—PDEA File: SR 1690 — Brrdge 107 — Division 14 ; =� Nothing Compares-ti, SiateoFNurthCaru!ina EnvironmentalQuality 2I74VestJonrsStrect I 1601hIailServiccCerter I Raleigh.\orlhCarolina27699�1601 919 707IIh00 ATTACHMENT PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUNDINFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: David McHenry, NCDOT-Division 14 Environmental Specialist 253 Webster Road Sylva, NC 28779 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC County/parish/borough: Henderson City: Mills River Center coordinates of site (IaUlong in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.423131 °, Long. -82.552227°. Universal Transverse Mercator: 17 3.s'T/oB� �"3 �'Ll�' �`� � Name of nearest waterbody: McDowell Creek Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: Non-wetland waters: 842 linear feet Cowardin Class: Riverine Stream Flow: Perennial and Intermittent Wetlands: N/A Cowardin Class: N/A Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: n/a Non-Tidal: n/a E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): ❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date: � Field Determination. Date(s): 7 /3 —I� 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicanPs acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on ihe site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomp�ish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there °may be"waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): ❑x Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant: . O Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant. ❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: . ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: . ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ❑ USGS NHD data. ❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps. 0 U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:24K Skyland. O USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Soil Survey of Henderson County, NC 1980 ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): . ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: . ❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑O Photographs: 0 Aerial (Name & Date):NC One Map, 2015. or �Other (Name & Date): . ❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: ❑ Other information (please specify): . IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified bv the Corps and should not be relied upon for later iurisdictional determinations. _ Signature and date of Regulatory Project Manager (REQUIRED) / /�J - � . /��t!/!—c Z ' 7'�� /� , �"/L,.,,r '�✓ Signature and date of person requesting preliminary JD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) Cowardin Estimated amount Class of aquatic Site number Latitude Longitude Class of aquatic resource resource in review area McDowell Creek 35.422896 -82.552392 Riverine 437 linear feet Non-section 10 — non-tidal SA 35.423373 -82.552507 Riverine 383 linear feet Non-section 10 — non-tidal 4 3 � . \ \ \ �•., \ \ � '. �.V � ��. �;� � �.: �,� i:�, ' �� �� , 1 ` � �l ��l1 ri ,�r 7 y,' ,l � � /, /, ... � � � ! .. . ,, , � �- �� �� /� ., ,� . ` � ^ r �� r i . � ' C� � � , r � � `. , `' ��..�• / 1 �'' / /'d r � .� A � �., ,y/+.J' f��,, d % . t �� �,."� ���•� � �, �� StudyArea ProjectArea Streams Secondary Roads SF,"�`l�`{EER�i%j PreparetlFor F 4P1N a C.���In' '1 � �W � C�O W� ���� ? UfC[� J� p F rs `6���"�`, f;' - y � �, � �, ��///d3311\`J��'� f`' �_ ,�''''�c' ���'� `. i �� , y ;� . SR 1690 (Broadpointe Drive) Improvements (TIP R-5771) Jurisdiclional Feaulres Map Henderson County, Nath Cardina NC 911 Board, Figure 3 S� i/T /v1�����n e�k NC DNQ S�renm Identification �nrm Version d.l I nd�Dnc� ����r'-" '�� ���1`5�•��r' oeie: ��13-1� ProJecllSlte: �—��7� � Letiwde; 35.d;i33�3 EYaluetor: S County: `�,���on � . Longllude: �,"Z.S�(,�� Total Polnts: Stream oet ry�ip circle one) Othar S� J �o �� d SheamtsaNeastMtermi�ffenf �� �� Ephemeral'I�itermittent erennial ey.QuadNema: {g i0� 8. H drol Sublotal= �b 12, presence ot BasaOow 0 � Z 73. Iron oxidfzinu bacteria 0 2 3 eM3 Of lines oi 6e IdeMified Usim olner me1Md5. See 0 � b.bJ _� 1 � 16 0 0-5 1 1.5 N4 = Q Yes {3 ) 3 2 1 0 �J 2 1 0 p � Z 3 '(}� � 2 3 0 1 7.5 p 1 1.6 p 7 1.5 0 5 1 7.5 CACW d]5 11RI o 1 5 (Nhnr c O 9kElCh; � �'���� gd�kNelght(h�: 4�5� � � ` eank1u11wldihlNl:g �� Wacerdeplh�ln): IZ° �Q� / -��� Channelsubstrale-Clay, ilt a rav Co661e,8edrak � ���� Velttity-tast,mode e /j� nR,a, Clariry-dear, eniryw�6 �ornb Project No: WBS No.: Fer(. Federn! Pmjrcl Tmding Na (Infnnid Urr) 16-08-0009 HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE AND LANDSCAPES NO SURVEY REQUIR�D FORM This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the Archaeology Group. R-5771 56877.1.1 PROJECT INFORMA' Coui�ty: Document APD-1690(001) I Fundl�ig: Yes No Permit Proiecl Descrlutiai: Improve and replace Bridge No. ] 07. SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHICTECTURE Henderson PCE State Federal N WP to 24 feet paved roadway Descrintlon ofrevlew nclivitles. resu/ts, nud conc/trsiais: Review of HPO quad maps, HPO GIS informntion, historic designations roster, and indexes wes undertaken on August 10, 2016 Based on this review, there are no existing NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS properties in the Area of Potential Effects, which is 50' from the centerline each way from end to end of project. There are no properties over fifly years of age hased on a visual inspection of the project area through Google Sheet View and topographic mapping. The area is characterized by modern industrial bnildings. A dilapidated barn associated with a property north of fhe APE is in the vicinity of the project; however it is unremarkable and will not be affected by this project. Bridge NO. 107 is not eligible for National Register listing. There are no National Register listed or eligible properties and no survey is Whv die nvall�b/e Inforrnalion arovirles n reHab/e bnsls for rensoxmb/v nredie!!n¢ lltaf Orere are no unirlen(iTed sip�iircn►it Gfsloric nrdrilecturn! or lm�dscnue resor�rces in llre nro/ect nrea: HPO quad m�ps and GIS information recording NR, SL, LD, DE, and SS properties far the Henderson County survey, Henderson County GISII'ax information, and Google Maps are present. There are no National Register listed or eligible properties within the APE and no survey is required. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Map(s) ❑Pi�evious Survey Info. QPholos �Correspondence �Design Plans FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHIT�CTURAL HISTORIAN NCDOT Architectural Historian -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED Date l/4lancArrhiletlure ms(/�axtrmprs h'O SURYh'YREQU/RF.OJoni/arAlmaiTreuporla/ip� Projal+mQidifitd'u� Iht7W7Pm�meimdfcAgrermotl. Page 1 of 3 o.e 0 0.5 r o Me.rs 1 0 1 } VtES � ������ ■ {�� ���1 i� ti��* �R��i���*�!" ����'1�„ Q� Y)����r�� ��t XONlN (ANULI,1'A llEPAN1.11NA'! OP iNA,\'SI'ONI'AffOY 1/fiA'Ut;RSON COUNl'!' 771' NO, R-S771 SH I6Y0 (druaJpointn DnedNmininA Nirld� /2ouJ) �imm �n��h¢�ut nJ AfrUomell Grerk ta NC I80 /7f.UNA 1: V(f,IN17'Y AIA!' lliVonc Arrhileolnrt nnd LrviJsmpcs A'O SUltl'/iY R50U/R(iU fuim foi M1liuu�7nmr�wbmiai Yrojeals n+(3iol�eAiu Ihr I00] lloArunimnlic Agmenien! P�ge 2 of 3 FIPO GIS. llGmric Arrlri�rnure mrACmiJrzvpu KO Si/R17i Y N(iQU/R/iU/orm farAliuorTrwu/wilrniou f4oj.rls nr Q:nlij:d in tlm 1007 A�gmrxnrnlre AX��'rmnit Pnge 3 of 3 Projecl T�ackin No.: 16-08-0009 NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES �� �'�?�� ELIGIBLE OR LIST�D ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES �-.'�''�i �l� PR�SENT FORM F�'.` f(1� �r��'Q o o° 4��#' 17�is fomi only pertains to ARCE IAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not �,\ `� �•� �`���� valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with llie �`�$� Historic Architecture and Laudscapes Group. PROJECT INFORMATION Project No. Gi'BS No: R-5771 4687711 Carnry: Docmneni. Henderson PCE F.A. No: na Fm:ding: � State ❑ Federal Fecteral Permit Reguired? � Yes ❑ No Permi( Type: NWP# 3 or 14 and TVA Projecl Descrip/imr: The project ca!(s for ineproveir7en! mid realignment ofSR 1690 (Broadpoinle Drine) ai:d Ilre replacement ofBridge No. 107 over McDotinell Creek in Hendersar County. The arclrneologicalArea ofPolential E,/j"ecls (APE) for dre projec! is defrned as a 1, 300 foot (396.24 n:) lwrg corrida• naming along Ure newly proposed a(igrone»f for Broadpoinle Drive, irhich e.rtencls 820 feel (2d9.94 ne) northwesl a�ed 480 feet (146.30 nr) saulheast frair the center of McDoivell Creek. The APE eoi•ri�lor is approxinrately 100 feef (30.48 »r) tivide e.rle�rdi�rg50 feet (15.24 m) on either side ojdie proposed neivi cenierli�ee. SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS The Norlh Cnralinn Depnrhnent ojTrnnsporintion (NCDO7� Archneolagy Grorep reviewerllHe subject project nird determined: � There are no National Register listed or eligible ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES present within the project's area of potential effects. (Attach any notes or documents as needed) ❑ No subsurface archaeological investigations were required for this project. � Subsurface investigations did not reveal tlie presence of any archaeological resources. � Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of auy archaeological resources considered eligible for the National Register. ❑ All identified archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project. Projec( Tracking A'o.: 16-08-0009 Brief descriptiori of revieiv nclivities, resedts of review, nnr! conclusions: Broadpointe Drive and Bridge No. 107 are located just southwest of the Asheville Regional Airport and the French Broad River at the no��thern edge of Henderson County, North Carolina. The project area is plotted near the center of the Skyland USGS 7.S' topographic quadrangle (Figure 1). A map revie�v and site file search was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on August 29, 2016. No previously recorded archaeological sites have been identified within the APE, bu[ 13 known sites (31BN958, 31HN73, 31HN74, 31HN96, 31HNI13, 31HN147, 31HN185, 31HNI56, 3IHN209, and 31 HN287-31 HN290) are reported within a mile from the bridge. According to the North Caroliva State Historic Preservation Office online data base (HPOWEB 2016), tliere are no known historic arcliitectural resources within the APE that ivay yield intact archaeological deposits. Topographic maps, USDA soil survey maps, aerial photographs (NC One Map), historic maps (North Carolina maps website), and Google Street View application were esamined for information on enviromnental and cultural variables that may have contributed to prehistoric or historic settlement within the project limits and to assess the level of ground disturbance. An archaeological field investigation and reconnaissance was carried out on December 28, 2016, to further evaluate the project area. Bridge No. 107 and Broadpointe Drive are proposed to be realigned and improved. The gravel section of Broadpointe Drive will be straightened and paved along a new locatiou, joining the previously paved sections of roadway found on either side of McDowell Creek (Figure 2). Bridge 107 will be relocated southwest of the current bridge. McDowell Creek Flows to the noitheast and is a tributary to tlie French Broad River. This stream was possibly channelized at some point in the past like many other waterways in [he surrounding area. A drainage ditch to alleviate flooding is also crossed by the APE, north of the cun•ent bridge. This ditch runs perpendicular to Broadpointe Road ou its west side and bends to tlie soutlieast after the crossing to run parallel with the iroad. The ditcli joins with McDowell Creekjust noitlieast of the bridge. The APE is situated along a tloodplain and a sloping stream terrace north of tlie stream (Figures 3 and 4), while to the south it consists of a higlt sloping stream terrace tliat rises steeply onto a ridge (Figure 5). Althougli tlte project area is found within an industrial park, the APE is mostly under cultivation. Trees and secondary gro�vth are seen along the wa[envay and adjacent to the road leading up to the ridge. Urban development is only present at eitlier end of the APE along the ridge and stream terraces. Bm•ied utilities do, howevec, ivn alongside the road. A wastewatec line is Iocated on the �vest side of Broadpointe Drive, �vhile a fiber optic cable is on the east side. An unidentified utility, possibly gas, follow McDowell Creek along its southern bank. According to the to the USDA soil survey map, five soils types make up the APE (see Figure 2). The floodplain is composed of Codorus loam (Co). This series is moderately well drained to somewhat poorly drained, nearly level, and subject to fi�equent flooding prior to the placement of the drainage ditch. The adjacent noMhern stream ten•ace consists of Bradson gravelly loam (Bae). This is a well draiued soil with a gentle slope of 2 to 7 percent. The southern terrace is comprised of Delanco loam (DeB). This soil is moderately well drained with a slope also of 2 to 7 percent. Edneyville fine sandy loam (EdE) is found along the slope leading up to the ridge. This is rvell drained with a steep slope of IS to 25 percent. Lastly, the ridge is made up of Hayesville Ioam (HyC), which is well drained with slope of 7 to IS percent. All of these soil types with the esception of the EdE have tlie potential of yielding archaeological sites, since tliey are mostly dry and fairly IeveL This is supported by the identification of several prehistoric sites in the regions found along tlie same soils. EdE is unlikely to produce significant results due to it steep slope, which is not suitable for settlement activities. No subsurface testiug was carried out on this soil type. A review of the site files sl�ows that several previous archaeological investigations have been carried �vithiu the vicinity of the current project. These surveys have resulted in the identification of 13 sites (31 BN958, 3 I HN73, 3 I EIN74, 31 HN96, 3 I HN I I 3, 31 HN 147, 3 l HN 185, 3 l HN 156, 3 I HN209, and 31HN287-31HN290) within a mile of tlie APE. Most all are preliistoric in origin escept for three Projecl Trncking No.: 16-08-0009 (31 FIN 147, 3l HN287, and 31HN288), whicli date to the early 20th century. Nine of the sites are situated in settings similar to the cw•rent project area. This includes: two sites (31 FIN73 and 31HN74) recorded along Codorus loam on Floodplains; one (31BN958) along Delanco loam on a stream terrace; one (31HN96) along Bradson gravefly loam on a stream terrace; and five (31 HN I47 and 3l HN287— 31HN290) along Hayesville loam ou ridges. AlNiough most have been determined not eligible for the National Register, sites 31HN73 and 31HN74 appear have possible intact remains but liave yet to be assessed. The results of these previous surveys suggested the project area had potential for cultm•al resources, and a survey was reco�mnended. A historic map review was also conducted prior to fieldwork. The earliest maps to depict the area with any great detail aze the 1892 and 1905 USGS Pisgali topographic maps (Figures 6 and 7). The 1892 map slio�vs McDowell Creek, but no road or crossing are represented within the project area. The subsequent 1905 map, however, does display tlie early aligiunent for Broadpointe Drive witli a cross at or near the current bridge site. St�vctures are also illus[i�ated but none within or adjacent to the APE. The 1907 Soil Map for Henderson County is a copy of the 1905 map as are other early 20th cenmry maps (Figure 8). In general, it was not expected that any historic archaeological features would be encountered. The archaeological field investigation at Bridge No. 107 included the excavation of seven shovel test placements (STPs) and a surface inspection (see Figure 2). Six STPs were placed north of McDowell Creek at generally 15 meter intervals witli tliree (#1-3) along [he terrace and four (H4�) in [he floodplaiu. Only one STP (#7) was excavated south of the creek ou the high stream terrace. No additional STPs were placed along steep slope or in areas subjected to previous ground disturbance from buried utilities or urban development. Surface visibility was excellent north of the creek at 90 to 100 percent, but visibility south of the creek was poor. No artifacts were observed during the surface inspec[ion. Soil stratigraphy varied across the APE. The northern stream terrace consists of two soil layers. The upper is a dark yellowish brown ( IOYR 4/4) heavily graveled loam that is approximately 20 to 30 cm (ca. 8 to 12 in) thick. This is followed by eitlier a strong brown (7.SYR 4/6) or a dark yellowish brown ( I OYR 3/4) clay or clay loam tvith Iittle to no gravel. The floodplain is made up of a brown ( I OYR 4!3) loam with a moderate amount of gravel near the surface. This layer generally covered the entire depth of tlie STPs to at least 75 cm (ca. 30 in) below the surface. Only in STP �16 was a second layer encountered at approximately 60 cm (ca. 24 in) below the surface. This second layer is a light yellowish browu ( lOYR 6/4) clay loam. The fival STP (#7) on the south side of the creek has an upper layer of dark yellowish brown ( IOYR 4/4) loam with no gravel that is 30 cm (ca. 12 in) thick. It second layer is a brown (7.SYR 4/4) clay Ioam that estends to at least 50 cm (ca. 20 in) be►ow the surface. No cultural resources were identified in any of the STPs. The archaeological investigations for the proposed improvement and realignment of Broadpointe Drive and the replacement of Bridge No. ( 07 over McDowell Creek failed [o record any archaeological resources within the APE. All shovel tests were negative and no a�tifacts �vere observed along the surface. The subsurface of areas not tested were disturbed either by bw•ied utilities or urbau development. No further archaeological work is required for improvements to Broadpointe Drive and the replacement of Bridge No. l07 in Henderson County. However, additional work might be required should design plans change to encompass propert}� outside of the wn�ently defined APE. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: � Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey [nfo Signed: NCDOT ARCAAEOLOGIST /1' �� P�o'ecf Tracking No.: 16-08-0009 ❑Correspondence 12/30/16 Project Trnckiiig No.: 16-08-0009 Pigure 1. Topograpliic Setting of tlie Project Area, Skyland (1965), NC, USGS 7.5' Topographic Quadrangle. Yrojec! Trnckirig �Vo.: 16-08-0009 + •� � +� � I' '�f� ?' , ��� ` , ' , ; 4 l�. U ` „ , f � , . !r ) \ �� r � l, N ��� ��� � \ � . \ '�l ? � � � � ,�j i� n �„� ,�`�. � �:.'y , i"i�� �� ,�;, �r ;• � � � t„ �,�J , �, � �� � ��`. 1/ �i �� i� ��,' , , , � � y <: ��_� , ��, i , ;� `t�' , • �� Cr� jy�. +� � : ,� ' '' � l � �� .�� � f'.%' � � �� � ;, : �� ,, . ,� i � � �/� � '. . .�� �;� R-5771 � .. ..�� ... ` ' . ,� � . APE (Red) � � �„ , ; � i ��,.., � � � � . . �. ;{i ��, a��: � _. > �';� ' . � f' ,;'� .. �� x�i_ .-. . ' ��i � �% ��y, � �/;� ' �y3.�r.`- `�� �. .. . V. // ��4,. /� ffps'�"iZ,.'J!r .'11 . . �� � � i . . ,. ���d� ,j V' "n �r'.',�i e '` . . ,y�'i i ,� -r,ri J�/ i� f; -<�i "� , // .. '� J'.i � �l��`f�! � �., �4 \`�" f, j�ri��5 �` `� t� � 17:J . � . � •, ; p, �} � .. � ; . ,�r� Q .. ,�9+%����. � i % /. o- - • . T} � � < <1il��1��' �. / � � � � 1�1 �;� o i ;k� � � , � �, '� ; � � ,�� �' ;fi ; ,:,r� , �/� <' �4 > �t io � \ � � � �� � � 'S `J°�� � � J �i � ��� {� ( /r / j �� �¢�I u RJ �4 �� ' i i � � 1�� � �tL� �I �r '� .f ! �� � (�t�,y� 13f� �,��� ,. r ;�,/r',lj, : '1t�' � ' .�`� -r - i ' "_ A� „' ��`j.` � r� J� i.' ��"�� , ��`�. i�,;::'1 � r .� � . .- ��� �<; �. r� �r . ' ���y. � r �� �' \i a`\. . , ¢ ��/ry.tr �� i 1I��`��.�� i�/ ��: . ��J il�� i /I, �� ��/ /, ar � � i �� ,�) �l ' � tr .! 6 �. - ' \ . 1'. � � 1 � 6 n rt � �_�/� � � � STPs � � «)� � �: � ,��� ��, �� � - t. �� Contourat4feet � . " ,������'> � �1 �' �i� �,/°/� '_ �• ��•.� � � - ��%o '- . � � ' ♦ �.� � Soils � I / i `� ���b / , � �.. �J, \ � 1 _ Z�p,y� � � � � r>��! l//' .�� ..1,._'_ ?1� 'rJ.f': 0 50o N �� Feet 0 150 W E Henderson CounFy IAelers S Figore 2. Aerial photograph of the APE showing developmen[, laudforms, soils, and STPs within and nearthe project area. 2 �'. e `. . . -- ._._ ..._...._ . i . - - , � _ , - � � -� , , ,.� ._ . . � - . . � - j: .� . .. . 1 . _ ' _ � _ _ ' --. . _ . . . _. " . .. � . ,.. �_' . ., . . _ ar,'.� .. :. .: . . . . .. r - - � . ' ' , , , �'-- . . i � ' ` > - � .' �. � I ` � - � .. . .. \ � . _' ' �� . _ . • , .. ' — ' � - . ' . . . . � \`� � . . . . . . - �� " _ ' �x`� ���Tn}s ;��y . .. ., . . 'A 1 'F . �'-. �"� . . _. .. �,�5 ��" �' Pi'1.�La� TF:��'�+ ", . . . , � � , - ?� ., t a� .:, . _ . � '�.�F " a� =.c` K '`,�ri •.�t � . . ' _ � . - 3 zc.. ... . � . __ � . _. �� 1{: J-. � : ,i�F� ' . .. . - . . . . ��1. � � ' � ... t . .. . .. . . ! t: . . ."'".4sy.��'..-,. . � .. � � � - ' � . . i€ �� � `'�_ J1.. � d � , i �;�d �� y , - I . ��T�; � � * � , vty�1p �� n +�:.�. • h 1 � i y . 1 i � 1' r i, 5i>'I,d � � ni� ��� I i �` i , � � ��'� �� � , - ; � , ' �I`k 1 , s� � � �' . lff ,'. "i: r 1 1 � . I_. I� I . 4 �� � . � 4y',��i ' .. I' � � � y.rv: . .. . .. . ./.,. , � . � . Projzcl7rncAing �\'o.: 16-08-0009 k''gN � � I �I 1 .y// �y �': � � � ! � ,��i ` �` �, � i, p" i. . . � .. . , . . . . Y.: .� � ; . " � .. - � . . . ' � � � . .. - � . j.,�, . _ - . . . ' _ - - a,< � ' . . . r: �.� � - . � ' , . : s= • �. ` k.:a�_c - _ 5 �� ��5� 1 i��. . -.. 'l�i�,� _-P . ��: t ,�� " : . . r,y '� t xft �, � .�:_ I S`"�t .. ` '' �a� � � j M �, h� , .y< St r , � �., i�,:� ! �-' ���y f�ilp � �'. �. , �": Ai��• S 7�/p . sj'Ai,.-� a \" tr�l;a4.�i 'f-"i��:i• i . q:'r ,yM1'X. `"'f �;S.k. .1�a'�3t� ' � Fieure 5. Cieneral Vie�v /lt I11AI1 Ch'PAlll rPl'I'ACP All(I StBPiI AlIIAfP�If clnnP �vitliin fliv APF. cn��rh nf McDowell Creek, looking soutli. � , � � ' ����Project prea �:�; -� , � �� �i "�\ 1 �! . � ��� - � �. r� ��__;, � ' �' ��--�� ).ti,�► ,��_ �� h --�-....�.._ . - N ,;.:: -_�fJ . ' �, - // . �. ;!� �����r�1��� � r�����-���_ .._ -- � ``� -�. _ �� . .� - �. ,, �.�� '� , Figure 6. The USGS 1892 Pisgah [opographic map showiug [he location of the project area. Project Trorking No.: � �7-�g-���9 ...� � i ' � . . � -' . : �( i� . y".a� , � , ' � � � � . _�.'.'� � �a.= ' , // . ,. . !1 ��,.(y+� F ■ � , . � ` � �L,.�.'' 4 �■ a.�,..,',"" `�, I, , ( -,.— � I ` 1 � � ' . '� �J� .', � • �,i `' ". r.� Pro�ec�f Area `' ° ;: _ ' � „ ,f '� ,r . _ � ,..ftJ ;, , w �1.-'' !� -' ., "�''i ,, ��'' ,. jia —�. � �:- �I j -: �� �! � o .�. f�`�1;1►J1atN � 13�PPIIa[;;�, �.n�. I, -��`:;,� `� .. � � r- ���. 1 ���� �1 ��-;, , � 4� � r+,// ��� �� ,.-t` �,,5, � 1 � � 11� ;� �, �', t . 1� • ! � 0 , . ,, t .�,� _�_ .��„�,�'t;1��1`+�`��,,�" ?; `, ';, ��� �;����1. ,1 't'i` .'9_ , � � II .il' , � � � � 1 • �' � � � - �. � 1�. S �. �:�r . �. � � � . � ,�1 l' , ��'�� � . _ . M ��� . /f 1I i�.: � % . _� 1' %! i Y r �• • ��`� 1��. li ' r.I N �� '� ::�� � M : �j� ���' '�� I a P e.i,::. i igure 7. The USGS 1905 Pisgah topographic map showing the location oY'tlie project area. � U W O � � U � � O U See Sl.�e7 /-A Far InOex o( Sh.eels See Sf.eet /-B Fo� Symbolcg� ����� �� ����� �������� llTlf R l lr �` 1( 4111�Y (/�11G' l�.�f 1( r(o 1C�f'S1�7 d� �V �C R-5771 � TH�S PROJECT IS WITHIN THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES OF MILLS RIVER. GItAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA ADT 2000 = 120 50 25 0 50 100 ADT 2037 = 2,000+ PLANS T = 7 % 50 2L___� r� so �po V= 30 MPH ��'� � � PROFILE (HORIZONTAL� FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION: ID 5 0 10 20 RURAL COLLECTOR SUB-REGIONAL TIER PROJECT LENGTH LENGTH ROADIVAY PROJECT R-5771 LENGTH STRDCTURES PROJECT R-5771 TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT R-5771 CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SNALL BE PERFORMED UNLESSALL IGN/�TURESCOMPLETED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. P���� f0r� Ff1'D2IULICS GNCINEER DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS Oivi�ion Il, Z3J 11'e6�mr Rood, $•fva, �\'C I8)]9 — M A Engineer 9 c:;�:�g�g:;f„ �,.s�,.�n� = 0.222 wile � 4 _ ' . z�,,,,o,n Gi Consultants, Inc ;��6.<<a�w pE = 0.02J rai7e = 0.246 mile Iv65LL\U.IFO SPlOF(UIIO]5 RIGNT OF I {'AY DATE: DECEMBER 14, 2016 LGT7ING DATE: ROADII'A3' DESIGN R08ERT W. PORTER, JR PE cNG�NE6'R PHO/EG( ECGA'rcn KEVIN S. HUTCHENS PE vxa�ccr nrsms cccc�zere NCDOT CONTACT: STEVE CANNON, PE DISTRICT 1 ENGINEER, DIV. 14 (628) 891-7911 inww,anon ro eE snowrv oN n.ws WS EL Tukcn � Aner 5!aYon 19C3 �9n. U•slw9e ('�.. <le Freqvenay.. � ..yr Elai .�6 ...11. Ba�zfkod:DiulwRe...._Q(p...cl� Freq�My.._..iW...Y� E4. .�753bS....h. OrMWV'.^3:D::cM9e__._.Gi1"!2.__..c6. frc4oenq'......._I.W.�_._Yc �ev...__.�..�...1Q......_.h. AODRION0.L INFOWM110N AND COMPlRAT10N5 Q4AIN/GE �R£A �4b2 ShcA4E YIIES.FREhCH BROiD BASlN.(ISE USGS STAE/J1ST/SS VEFSIQY ... .... _.. _ _ .._ . ...... ....... 3D FOft UAC/GEO L201IQY IN H/p0.YLGIC fl£CIQY S .... . ..... ..... ...... . .......................... .....Ou...�. b:G ds fUSE_ �AO dsl ..................... FEOELIHEATEO 0.4A1!£0 SP/O/ F(QYS .................. . .......... ..... ................................. Oa � 1210 �s NSE 1£CO Asl FEYA Ou • 910 CFS . ............................................. ................................................................................. Oa ' �� us (USE IKG ds) FEUA Op • I:.ttl CFS ..._._...._....... _.._ ................... ......_............._........................._....................__..._.. _ O.y ' II l0 els (US£ !1W r/sl fEVA 0�• IAJ CFS fUSED FQ4. 0.�SIG4 N.Y(MN.. ElEYI ......................................... .................................. 0� • 2330 ds NSE 23W ds) fEVA (la� 25N CFS Y.,OfIR C/1LV1/II0.55 0/EC I61 USfM1G 0� • f](V CFS ......_ .............................._......._..._.. .. _............_............................._......_..... OETEftVlh'f CRI(lCfLVElDCIiY .... ..... __.. _ ...._ .... ..... YF N�k Y_Y( 0 NHEPE !(� • l I!/ Y BW: D AFS )Il2 n-) . _._ .. ._.. .... (Zwn @c0 MIPERI/LSRVO SIU Cl�BIE Y!X PASfO QM V!A/AL INSPfLTlQY) ...._ .... . ...... . . ... ... Y lIlI3EBD9 X:tt65"' ... ...__ _ ___. ._ _ ..._. ... ... V�2P2 Il/e NElN VElLCIIY 1H UPS/RE/J/ (NASY£U ..... ....... ....... _..._ 4�) V eTH£A£FQ4E USE CYEAR W/Tflt (YAttR/C(IQY 5(U'/R ............................................................................ % .(lK.:f 09/lD.N%W�) )" wHERE x,' mn,o - � rsbes nsq,- �a 3C q, ' �25 ME tY�c • P3sJ:w • uar ....... ......... ......._ ...... . ......._...._...._... �. LILN! 3C 11396i)/lO�Y' 3E P3Af) Y'�. 13.91' WHERE Y.-109" USE G -64 AQ(Ea iHE HEC2 RE0.`LINEA�EO WlLLI INfl/( WAS SEWEhT1lLY CW0.RE0 F(14 MY1'1LII�C . . _ .. .. .. .._ PURfi15E5 THE, GIPLIC/PE fFfEGTNE RYO /LL IqLELS THER£ !FT£R NPJE RESP£CIFlEO . ... ... .... IN FE£! FflOY 1MU(H .... .. .... . __._..._ .._ .... ..... srte onrn Drc'ru�e.trea_46P_SVlA9E__Y!(£S.__....... Sw.ce....._..USGS.S/REHlS/AT$.!F£GICW..?J....._. P�erPa�in fR£MriLL50lD Unroear Po1lU11W1MAfIA]U51 _ _ _._ .__.... _ ..__..... Snwm Cbv F.m+on Ikd� m uow. �sen o���r wm.,. e�cl ._�.._ ...................._..................... oma o� �+sa.y uun,�e . srnr�g_srhy.r.l_A,XLB'7e.!tf[�E w/.i{us�r.N;g<.cw..r�ee,i,,v,;i.... TIYBfR_CMS„W/,,,T,NB£R PII£S�9 Bf0 TO CIILWN ..............Ta1d Wolemv/ Open'n9 .__I,1,3L_._� 1. Wvlem%Openy Pa!ow 1W�r.NS fL (ATI......sl. DebrivPolel l L X..Nadxol> .Hq6 .... oea o� Si.��rEe Up o�d Do..n s..om .V.Si.p(LVF.b7.hA.1L1i2..S�..12.✓7:7A'b.'.IEM1GLH. �.S1.fEk7.. OS�htl STNClUfi£.I]42 ££E( UPS(R£AV FfiUY (qV£lUEAC£ WlTH FflEI.'CH B�lO RNER ..... ......... ........ ......... .......... Deu9n Cmrvd flar. ___.__ " lcrmi+� iuu hn re �`..� ............. N. acruror a rs r3a Cbge A�M1on W._NQ.C/C£, fN YIG.lNfPY.. Penod a10.<mrda .......... N/A ...............................ars IMcDiuM`b......___,M,/A ..............cis. Da<.........N/A........._ Fr��uY........N/A......_ H�vwiml Fkod nfaimanon. IL.V'IX RAYSEY ..... ACW( ON 10 Pmod ol DYat�uOu,YB-1,uw.fN.�.F�.U:cw�r.�rze ftRILGEYAlN:SVP£R/150R �.�� �v....�n. Pencd W Dola._..._..9er_......._N.Fsf. Fre9. _......�e3aurm ............._..._._.__"__.__.._.Nrm�.!ed9q....__..in. Penad af Dma.._...._ Elcv_......._Il.Esl. Fe9. ........p.5wrta ................................._.._._.. Nmnled9a..........{n. 1( loriaol Swvr wo. : Genscl....,,N,/A_..kConhotlion....N/A..._N. luoL...NLA.._fi. rnW..iv�a�...l�i......AYSo�rro .EICIR..WR(k7....NormolVlm:rS�do�.�._....._�i1@__.A. FEYA STUP'& Nn�mr�g'� n LeN O B ?I /N flwmwJ RSiSGS RrahlO B...R?�I�. Saur�e flE(4-p;7SER/RI9,Y .. Flocd SYd�/S•obs ��=L)N£ATEO lkTAllEO SIUO/ f1A4 �20101 , Fmod.q Esnb:�hedi YE$ ... ibod sNd� 100�r D�sCa�6e.. 1�?O..il.y. wS EI. Flood�a�...b.�.�?. N Fbod v/ �.?:?.x.F. � �K�,o,�,�„ 3t PEWUT0.4/ NS E(£/ -'e0(DJ F£YIY fA£hCH fiAlAO BlCK�'.VER DESIGN DATA U5G5 STP£LLSIRS VERSIQY 30 FQ4 ICO% ftEG/0.4 2 WW£RSHEO Mdm!W iml Ilafhod ..............._........_....................................................._....._..._................. 'M�w� �+sn f1e11wd.NfC;RnS.VFAS/CY. 4:lO.fR3(I.IX[�re;(Qrh>$SRIti01......_.__...._.. Fcads EdoINeG: Feq. Q Elee Pad+.mer Eddqe OKn' Ve' �� L.I WY MI PI �ssl� �ry @ u199JaGon .._._IQ___ ____4J0........ ..._�lB._. ....I:l,.... ......_._42........... ......ZS ....... ....../Zb....... .... fi.�...�.b.... ... �:�..... .......... 9:1,........... ...._5,0,...._ ...... (4U.__.. .._ fGSI,d.... ._ �:L .... ........._9:I,........... ......I(U...... _.._ nOJ ....... ......�0'zJ55... ...0)j... ........._S,D,......_... 5W .. .... g300.... f0505 . 04 12 .. V/oiem � openy P�or.d�d 0^ w4vgn V/5 Elv .2913 ! lOtrpwS Flr� ,7.}S7.r7oloL./S/ASd, n�.�.�e eM�nd vear,� �o�.s�� IT. rp,. na�osa orcbmt ve!oor� �oe�s�� 1� �p-. CanpNed Smur Gmxml_ _.M/A.._I ���bn b9 F Ittol . N/A , ry. I� o Rcod � Rew-m Reqm.edt $ BRIDGE SURVEY & HYDRAULIC DESIGN REPORT +ry✓1 � N. G UEPARiMfM OF iRANSPORTA➢ON �� ,11E Y DMS��OUCSIUNRAYS �_Iii V� � WdEIGH, N. C. � IO. No...._R-411..._. PmF'nNo. __.......fCdll.l:l......._.. hd. S`of.on ._....._{:20�7L$.......... � CwM' NENLlFSGN....... Brid9'+ Ore WXKIYEIL (IifEK ..._.... 9Mva Lrv Ho ....16/.... � SR IE:O 5�9 14%9 -.. AC 2£q �� OnHgirc+v/.!f}9}'A'OIM£_bL.. Pet.c�cn{ttIXD.£A,V,.V/AU.�fLY'�E..flRJand._(�:�QV.,H„qYJ..... Ro<o.rm�M.d sm�a.�.o .S[N.CiL..Wf.l(.fIA.t2Y772.:.Nd(.dRiaL..W{.SP_fIATH/iU .._ .............. R .(.�IIYE.N(S.h40.4C/PS.........__ ............._............................_._.._.._.._......................._.. F �p Re<o,i,m:,d<d 1Ydm dRaoa.. f..�P:SlER3.(i9.NMK.22"25.9LL.T.4.WL!_ SLn,......_.LO..'...__.... i: Ve�amneMd L«ufion n( Ip,�l.y0.;-.m� Skeom hmm f�.sfin9 Cresv'nq .............U(5{(2,ElL........... � 5!ole.�iM ice� ❑ Nry:omli� ❑ SWseg:wrcdTer � g g.� �/ak {� _WY!/�Q'. fGIM! BY2G/ISEI£0 AYlA4£ !N BC'K CK' 0.XCR£(E tllflB _ . .... ___.... � .L:SlA FS 9350 fl]26'Ul . ... .___ E'wr ...21P7..j,6,_X. W� N[l,O.fd..... �•.. TemWmnCross�n9 _,5„(lGE.LiA!�5„(FQCCfO;I,.I;,O,TEu/.:p4/{jl.ChV.$.SL.h7./.if.4%I�R :............._......... : Z � ) • � U \ t (_ / d ' \� � k �..- ,_ : �,r -�.I.. � �� . � I 'i . .�'�: F��� . �=—__ �_- ��_ . i y�•�._�_" ��') 0 — ��/ L.' 6; . 2 � J � L i .,, „m,�. `� o•�P�N f�4�ya,, � °+�cssi� +'-, � o.:�e�d br PHCAVEMd'!PC � �E�i f � � u:m<abr sw,w�iiAsrre,cru . . oam.9-2¢,Id.. E. iom ; E PrrveNFyneer Slj'.@fiCO�CH�P£�CFN �� � � � � �MAEnglneeing w,�Y�'ryp�� . Q � m:�sw�urts. 1c. ��y N � Re.ie�d br " �.: i�...� . ...'-- �... E .. .... ,:,e.,....� ... .-y 9lzj� -