NCG120047 DMR SW (9)

February 9, 2017
S A N T E K NCDEQ
VATCentral Files
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
WasteServices Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617 a "4'u =a n ''� )
650 25th Street,N.W,Suite 100 FEB 2(�q p
Cleveland,Tennessee 37311 Re: Tier Two Monitoring l(SDO-2 and SDO-3 UU ii!!
[phone] )
[e-mail] Haywood County (White Oak) LandfillInternet:www.santekenviro.com NPDES Permit Number: NCG120047
To Whom It May Concern:
In accordance with the Tier Two monitoring requirements located in Part II(B) of
General NPDES Permit (NCG120000),please find enclosed one original and one
copy of the January 2017 discharge monitoring reports (DMR) for stormwater
discharge outfalls (SDO-2 and SDO-3). SDO-2 and SDO-3 became subject to the
Tier Two monitoring requirements following two consecutive Total Suspended
Solids (TSS) detections above the benchmark value (100 mg/L) which occurred
on June 30, 2015 and November 2, 2015. Therefore, SDO-2 and SDO-3 are in
the process of being monitored monthly for all of the stormwater parameters until
three consecutive monthly sampling results are below the benchmark values.
A sample was collected at SDO-2 and SDO-3 on January 23, 2017 and the results
show TSS, Fecal Coliform and Chemical Oxygen Demand were below the
benchmark values. Please find attached Table 1 showing two consecutive
sampling results at SDO-2 and SDO-3 being below the benchmark values. Tier
Two monitoring will continue at SDO-2 and SDO-3.
If you have any questions or comments,please feel free to call at [phone].
Sincerely,
Ve/VT
Robert Hudson
Environmental Compliance Coordinator
Enclosure
cc: David Francis, Solid Waste/Tax Administrator, Haywood County
Ira Dove, County Manager, Haywood County
Matt Dillard, Executive V.P. of Operations, Santek
Cheryl Dunson, Executive V.P. of Marketing, Santek
Ron Vail, P.E., Executive V.P. of Engineering, Santek
John Preston, Site Manager, Santek

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG120000
Date 2/9/2017
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCG12 0047 SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2017
FACILITY NAME Haywood County—White Oak Landfill SAMPLE PERIOD ❑Jan-June ❑July-Dec
COUNTY Haywood or ® Monthly1 January (month)
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Kevin Gregg DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW ❑Trout ❑PNA
LABORATORY Pace Analytical Lab Cert.#40 ❑Zero-flow ❑Water Supply OSA
Comments on sample collection or analysis: COD,TSS and Fecal ®Other Class C
Coliform sampled on 1/23/17 for Tier Two Monitoring
PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON THE REVERSE -*
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
No discharge this period?2
Outfall No. Date Sample 24-hour rainfall
Collected) amount, Chemical Oxygen Demand Fecal Coliform Total Suspended Solids
(mo/dd/yr) Inches
p
Benchmarks===> - - 120 mg/L 1000 count per 100 mL 100 mg/L or 50 mg/L4
SDO-2 1/23/17 1.0" <25 340 5.9
SDO-3 1/23/17 1.0" <25 645 29.0
Monthly sampling(instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
2 For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall,you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on-site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit text,Table 3, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. For example,do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL,<PQL, Non-detect, ND,or other similar non-
numerical format. When results are below the applicable limits,they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L",where XX is the numerical value of the
detection limit, reporting limit,etc. in mg/L. Conversely,where fecal coliform results exceed the dilution upper limit, report the result as">XX".
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging> 55 gal of new oil per month.
Permit Date:11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-248,last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 2

n No discharge this period?'
Outfall No. Date Sample 24-hour rainfall
Collected'. amount, Non-polar O&G/TPH by Total Suspended Solids pH
(mo/dd/yr) Inches3 EPA 1664(SGT-HEM)
Benchmarks===> - - 15 mg/L 100 mg/L or 50 mg/1.4 6.0—9.0 SU
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark, you must implement Tier 1, Tier Z or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
FOR PART A AND PART B MONITORING RESULTS:
• A BENCHMARK EXCEEDANCE TRIGGERS TIER 1 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• 2 EXCEEDANCES IN A ROW FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT THE SAME OUTFALL TRIGGER TIER 2 REQUIREMENTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
• TIER 3: HAS YOUR FACILITY HAD 4 OR MORE BENCHMARK EXCEEDENCES FOR THE SAME PARAMETER AT ANY ONE OUTFALL? YES ❑ NO
IF YES, HAVE YOU CONTACTED THE DWQ REGIONAL OFFICE? YES ❑ NO❑
REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACT NAME:
Mail an original and one copy of this DMR, including all"No Discharge"reports, within 30 days of receipt of the lab results(or at end of monitoring period
in the case of"No Discharge"reports)to:
Division of Water Quality
Attn: DWQ Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
YOU MUST SIGN THIS CERTIFICATION FOR ANY INFORMATION REPORTED:
"I certify, under penalty of law,that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to
assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system,or
those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,the information submitted is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true, accurate,and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
z - , -/ 7
(Signature of Permittee) (Date)
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-248, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 2

Table 1
Haywood (White Oak) Landfill Tier 2 SW Sampling Results at SDO-2 and SDO-3
Outfall Parameter Benchmark Value 6/30/2015 11/2/2015 2/3/2016 1/23/2017
COD (mg/L) 120 <25 <25 <25 <25
SDO-2 Fecal Coliform (#1100 mL) 1,000 600 5,000 31.0 340
TSS (mg/L) 100 132 102 29.3 5.9
COD(mg/L) _ _ 120 _ _ 48 <25 _ _. �<25 , , , <25_,
SD0-3 ,, Fecal Coliform (#/100 mL) _'i,,,::' 1,000 7 600 1,000 = . :37.0 _ 645, ._
TSS-(rrig/L) _ 102 - 232 102 " 727.1 : 29.0
Notes:
Bold = Benchmark value exceeded