NCG030376 DMR SW (15)

Prvsmian . PIYSMIAN
Group Draka
2151 North Church Street
Rocky Mount,NC 27804
Operations Phone [phone]
July 28, 2016 Operations Fax. [phone]
Storm Water Permitting Unit
Division of Energy, Mineral,and Land Resources
Attention: Bradley Bennett
1612 Mail
Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 1612 ��Qq�6
Re: Storm Water Discharge Monitoring Report 0c3 �� ��'�AG
Draka Elevator, Inc. C�F`\:k 0:k )
2151 Church Street S-CC-).°
Rocky Mount, NC 27804
Certificate of Coverage NCG030376
Dear Sir/Madam:
Enclosed are two copies of the Storm Water Discharge Outfall (SDO) Monitoring Report for the Draka Elevator, Inc.
facility located at 2151 North Church Street, Rocky Mount, Nash County, North Carolina.
During the month of May 2016,tiered monitoring was conducted as required at Outfalls 001, 002, and 003 as well
as a background sample for comparison (BG001). The table below summarizes the results for this monitoring
period. Exceedences of BMV criteria were detected in any of the samples.
Sample Copper(mg/L): Zinc(Zn)(mg/L):
BMV=0.007 BMV=0.067
OF001 0.0089* 0.0874*
OF002 0.0128* 0.1000*
OF003 0.0059 0.0809*
BG001 0.0156* 0.1030*
*=BMV Exceedence
A tiered monitoring event for Cu and Zn will be conducted during June 2016 in accordance with with Part II,Section
B of the general permit. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at(252) 972-6025, or
our environmental consultant, Rob Duffy of Antea Group at(704)324-7035.
Sincerely,
Wynne Ellis
Global Director of Operations
Draka Elevator, Inc.
Enclosures

Semi-annual Stormwater Discharge Monitoring Report
for North Carolina Division of Water Quality General Permit No. NCG030000
Date submitted July 15, 2016
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE NO. NCGO3 0 3 7 6 SAMPLE COLLECTION YEAR 2016 _
FACILITY NAME Draka Elevator, Inc. SAMPLE PERIOD ❑Jan-June July-Dec
COUNTY Nash or 0 Monthly' May (month)
PERSON COLLECTING SAMPLES Charlie Dickens DISCHARGING TO CLASS ❑ORW ❑HQW (Trout ❑PNA
LABORATORY Pace Analytical Lab Cert.# 40 ❑Zero-flow ❑Water Supply fSA
Comments on sample collection or analysis:
NA C $ X❑Other N; CSW
,y VED PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN ON PAGES 2 AND/OR 3 4
Alit; 08 20,6
Part A: Stormwater Benchmarks and Monitoring Results
DENR-LAND Oi!,l, ,, No discharge this period?2
D- IVI NATER PER'vll;�
7;(V(; Non-Polar O&G/
Date Sample 24-hour rainfall pH, Total Toxic
Outfall No. Collected' amount, Total Suspended Solids Standard units Copper Lead Zinc Total Petroleum Organics5
(mo/dd/yr) Inches3 Hydrocarbons
Benchmarks===> - - 100 mg/L or 50 mg/L4 6.0—9.0 0.007 mg/L 0.03 mg/L 0.067 mg/L 15 mg/L 1 mg/L
OF001 05/29/2016 0.29 0.0089 0.0874
OF002 05/29/2016 0.29 0.0128 0.1000
OF003 05/29/2016 0.29 0.0059 0.0809
BG001 05/29/2016 0.29 0.0156 0.1030
1 Monthly sampling (instead of semi-annual) must begin with the second consecutive benchmark exceedance for the same parameter at the same outfall.
2 For sampling periods with no discharge at any single outfall,you must still submit this discharge monitoring report with a checkmark here.
3The total precipitation must be recorded using data from an on-site rain gauge. Unattended sites may be eligible for a waiver of the rain gauge requirement.
4 See General Permit,Table 3 identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
5 Total Toxic Organics sampling is applicable only for those facilities which perform metal finishing operations, manufacture semiconductors, manufacture
electronic crystals, or manufacture cathode ray tubes. For purposes of this permit the definition of Total Toxic Organics is that definition contained in the EPA
Effluent Guidelines for the facility subject to the requirement to sample (for metal finishing use the definition as found in 40 CFR 433.11;for semiconductor
manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.12;for electronic crystal manufacture use the definition as found in 40 CFR 469.22; and for cathode ray
tube manufacture use the definition found in 40 CFR 469.31).
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245,last revised 10/25/2012
Page 1 of 3

Facilities that incorporate a solvent management plan into the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan may so certify, and the requirement for TTO monitoring
may be waived. The solvent management plan shall include a list of the total toxic organic compounds used and the other elements listed in the General
Permit. For those facilities electing to employ the TTO monitoring waiver,the discharger shall sign the following certification statement: NA
"Based upon my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit monitoring requirement for total toxic organics
(TTO), I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concentrated toxic organics into the stormwater or areas which are exposed to rainfall or
stormwater runoff has occurred since filing the last discharge monitoring report I further certify that this facility is implementing the all the provisions of the
solvent management plan included in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan."
N (/ f
mei( t name)
dfr? * (/� D,1f
Title(Prin title)
/ - f/ _7
(Sign. re) (Date)
Note: Results must be reported in numerical format. Do not report Below Detection Limit, BDL, <PQL, Non-detect, ND, or other similar non-numerical
format. When results are below the applicable limits,they must be reported in the format, "<XX mg/L",where XX is the numerical value of the detection
limit, reporting limit, etc. in mg/L.
Note: If you report a sample value in excess of the benchmark,you must implement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
Part B: Vehicle Maintenance Area Monitoring Results: only for facilities averaging> 55 gal of new oil per month. NA
No discharge this period?2
Date Sample 24-hour rainfall
Outfall No. �
Collected amount, Non-polar O&G/TPH by
(mo/dd/yr) Inches3 EPA 1664(SGT-HEM) Total Suspended Solids pH
Benchmarks===> _ - 15 mg/L 100 mg/L or 50 mg/L* 6.0—9.0 SU
Footnotes from Part A also apply to this Part B
*See General Permit text,Table 5, identifying the especially sensitive receiving water classifications where the more protective benchmark applies.
Permit Date: 11/1/2012-10/31/2017 SWU-245,last revised 10/25/2012
Page 2 of 3

'-iIement Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 responses. See General Permit text.
--'NTS. SEE PERMIT PART II SECTION B.
OUTFALL? YES XD NO
he lab results(or at end of monitoring period
i
upervision in accordance with a system designed to
/y of the person or persons who manage the system,or
.)f my knowledge and belief,true, accurate,and complete. I
(nes and imprisonment for knowing violations."
iate)
/
SWU-245, last revised 10/25/2012
Page 3 of 3