Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20170179 Ver 1_wte file 2_20170210WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Projecvsite: Moore Co. Brid e 19 TIP BR620019 cityicounry: Moore Coun Samp�ing �ate: 2016-03-29 appiican�owner: NC Department of Transportation State: �`1C sam i�n p' g Point: WF-W2i Investlgator(s): D. Cooper Section, Townshlp, Range: Roseland Lantlform (hillslope. terrace, etc.): Floodplain/bottomland Local relief (concave, convex, none): ConC2ve � o subregion (�RR or MUZq): P, 137 Lat: 35.142797 S�ope (%): 1/o Long: -79.543712 Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: B�bb I08117, 0-2% slope, freq. flooded NWI Gassification: PF01 B Are climatic / hydrolo ic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation� Soil �, or Hydrolo9Y significaMly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ Are Vegetation Soil �, or H tlrol � No � Y o9Y naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hytlrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes Hydric Soil Present9 Yes Wetland Hydrology Preserrt? Yes HYDROLOGY Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is re�+uired• check all that aoolvl ❑ Surtace Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ High Water Table (A2) � Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) 0✓ Saturation (A3) Q Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Rooffi (C3) ❑ Water MaAcs (B1) � p�gence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Sediment Deposits (82) � Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CB) Q DriR Deposits (B3) ❑ Thln Muck Surtace (C� ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Iron Depostts (BS) ❑ Inundation Ysible on Aerial Imagery (87) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (89) �Aquatic Fauna (B13) SurFace Water Present? Yes � No Q✓ Depth (inches): _ VJater Table Present? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches); _ Saturetion Present? Yes Q No,�] Depth (inches): -10" (includes caDillary fnnqe) Descnbe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitonng well, aerial ohotos. orevi US Army Corps of Engineers Yes �✓ No � ❑ Surtace Soil Cracks (Bg) ❑ Sparsely Vegetatetl Concave Surtace (68) � Drainage Pattems (B10) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B76) ❑ DrySeason Water Table (C2) ❑ Crayflsh BuRows (C8) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Planta (D1) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) � FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes II No,� Eastem Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Streta) — Use scientific names of plants. T�B BR 620019 Sampling Point: WF-wet Absolute Dominant IndiCator pominanceTestworksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Soecies� Status �, Acer rubrum 90% Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, orFAC: 7 p. Lmodendron tulipifera 5% FACU �A� 3. Total Number of Dominant 4 Specles Across All Strata: 7 �g� Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (,q�B) 95��a = Total Cover Prevalence Index worksheet: 50% of total cover: 47.5 p0°k of total cover. 19 - Total % Cover oP Multiolv bv� Saolina Stratum (Plot size: � OBL species 5 x 1= 5 �, Persea palustris 20% Y FACW FAcw species 65 X z=130 p, Cyrilla racemiflora 10% Y FACW FAc species 110 x a= 330 3. FACU species 5 x 4= 20 4. UPLspecies � Xg=O 5, CoNmnTotals: 1s5 �q� 485 �g� 50% of total cover: 15 ShrubStratum (Plotsize: 9��m � Clethra alnifolia � Aronia arbutifolia 30% =TotalCover _ 20% of total cover. s 5% FAC 5°� FACW 10 = Total Cover 50% of total cover: 5 20°h of total cover: 2 Herb Shatum (Pbt size: � �.Arundinariagigantea 30% Y FACW 30% = Total Cover 50% of total cover: � 5 20% of total cover: 6 Waodv Vine Stretum (Plot size: � �, Smilax rotundifolia 5% Y FAC 2, Smilax laurifolia 5% Y OBL g, Vitis rotundifolia 10% Y FAC 20% = Total Cover 50% of total cover: � 0 20°k of total cover: 4 rs here or on a separete sheet] US Army Corps of Engineers Prevalence Index = B/A= 2.62 U 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Q✓ 2- Dominance Test is >50°h ❑✓ 3- Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) � Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbetl or problematic. Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height antl 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 fl(6 m) or more in hetght and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximatey 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) in height. Herb-All herbaceous (non•woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except wootly vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Wootly vine - All woody vines, regardless of height. Hydrophytic Vegetatlon ✓ PreseM7 Yes n No,n Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Version 2.0 SOIL TIB BR 620019 Sampling Point: WF-wet ProHle Description: (Describe to the depth needetl to document the intlicator or confirm the absence of intlicators.) Depth Matrix Red x Feature linchesl Color fmoistl �_ Color (moistl °/, Twe Loc 7eMure Remark 0-3" 10YR 3/1 100% Muck 3-8" 10YR 511 80% 10YR 5!8 20% C M SL 8-14" 10YR 7/1 80% 10YR 5!8 20% C M C 'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'LocaGon: PL=Pore Lini M=Matrix. Hydric Sofl Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydrie Soils': � Histosol (A1) Q Dark Surface (S'n ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) � pol alue Below Surtace S8 MLRA 147, 148 p Z cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147) ❑ Black Histic (A3) � � % ( ) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) [] Hytlrogen Sutfide (A4) � Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148) (MLRA 147, 748) ❑ Stratified La ers A5 ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) � Piedmorn Floodplain Soils (F19) Y () � Depleted Matriz (F3) (MLRA 136, 74� ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surtace (F6) Q Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) �+ Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A17) � Depleted Dark Surface (F7) ❑ Thick Dark Surtace (Al2) � Other (Explain in Remarks) � Retlox Depressions (F8) D Santly Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLR,4147, 148) MLRA 736) ❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hytlrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Sotls (F19) (MLRA 748) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Stripped Matrix (SB) ,0 Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless tlislurbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (If observed): Type: Depth (Inches): Hytlric Soll Presenfl Yes � No � Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains antl Piedmont — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region ProjecuSite: Moore Co. Brid e 19 TIP BR620019 ciryicounty: Moore County A N Sampling Date: 2016-03-29 ppiicanvowner: C Department of Transportation state: NC Sampling Point: WG-Wet Investigator(s): D. Cooper Sec[ion, Township, Range: Roseland Landfortn (hillslope, terrece, etc.): Floodplain/bottomland Local relief (concave, convex, none : conCave o Subre lon LRR or MLRA : P, 137 � Slope (°k): <1 /o 9� ) Lat: 35.143167 Long: -79.544751 oatum: NAD83 Soi� Map Unit Name: Bibb loam, 0-2% slope, freq. flooded NWlclassification: PF01B Are Gimatic / hydrolo ic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No Are Ve etation � (If no, explain in Remarks.) 9 � Soil �, or Hydrology significantly distur6ed7 Are "Nortnal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ Are Vegeqtion Soil �, or H drolo � No � Y 9y naturelly problematic? (If neetled, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetatlon Present7 Yes Hytlric Soil PreseM7 Yes Wetlantl Hydrology PresenC? Yes HYDROLOGY Is the Sampled Area wlthin a Wetland7 Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired� ch ck all that aoolv� ❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ High Water Table (A2) [] Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Saturation (A3) �✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Water MaAcs (B1) � presence of Reducetl Iron (C4) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) � Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Q✓ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Iron Deposlts (B� ❑I� Inundation vsible on Aerial Imagery (B� � • � Water-Stained Leaves (69) �Aquatic Fauna (B13) Surtace Water Present? Yes � No Q✓ Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes Q✓ No Q Depth (inches): -5" Saturatlon Presenl7 Yes ✓Q No � Depth (inches): -4" (inGudes caoillary finqe) Descnbe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitonnp well, aerial ohotos. nm�„��� US Army Corps of Engineers Yes �✓ Na � 1_I Surface Soil Cracks (B6) ❑ Sparsely Vegetatetl Concave Surtace (B8) Q Drainage Pattems (B10) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16) ❑ DrySeason Water Table (C2) ❑ CreyFlsh Burrows (CS) ❑ Saturation Vlsible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Stuntetl or Stressetl Plants (D1) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) Q FAC-NeuVal Test (D5) Wetland Hytlrology Present? Yes II No � Eastem MouMains and Pfedmont—Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. T�B BR 620019 Sampling Point: WG-wet Tree Stratum (Plot size: Absolute Dominant Indicator pominanee Tast worksheet: ) % over Scecies� St tus �, Acer rubrum 90% Y FAC Number of Dominant Species 2, Linodendron tulipifera 50�o That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 7 �q� FACU 3. Total Number of Dominant 4. Species Across All Strata: 7 �B� 95% = Total Cover SOqo of total cover: 47.5 20% of total cover: � 9 $aolina Stratum (pbt size: � �. Persea palustris 20% Y FACW 2, Cynlla racemiflora 10% Y FACW 3. ShrubStratum (Plotsize: 9��m �. Clethre alnifolia p_ Aronia arbufifolia 30% = Totai Cover 50°k of total cover: � 5 20% of tohal cover: s 5% FAC 5% FACW �� = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% �q�g� _ Total % Cover oP MuHiolv bv� OBL species 5 X �= 5 FACW species 65 X 2=130 FAC species 110 x 3= 330 FACU species 5 x 4= 20 UPL species � X 5- p Co�umn Topls: 185 �q� 485 �g� Prevalence Index = B/q = 2.62 � 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation IQ�1 2- Dominance Test is >50% 6J 3- Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting I--I tlata in Remarks or on a separate sheet) yJ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hytlric soil and wetland hydrology must be preseM, unless dtsturbetl or problematic. SOqo M total cover: 5 20°h of total cover: 2 �� � aa"'"�r, �ira�s: Herb Stra m(Plot size: � Tree- Woody plants, exGuding wootly vines, 7. Arundinaria i antea 30% Y FACW approximately 2o ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). 2. 71 30% = Totai Cover 50°� of total cover: � 5 20% of total cover: 6 Wootiv Vine Stratum (Plot size: � �, Smilax rotundifolia 5% Y FAC 2, Smilax launfolia 5% Y OBL g, Vitis rotundifolia 10% Y FAC d 50°h of total cover: � 0 rs nere or on a seoaree 20°�a = Total Cover _ 20% of total cover: 4 Sapling - Wootly plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7,6 cm) DBH. Shrub - Woody planGs, exGuding woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) in height. Herb-All herbaceous (non-wootly) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except wootly vines, less ihan approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Woody vine-All woody vines, regerdless of height. Hydrophyt7c VegeWdon ✓ Present7 Yes,a No,� US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Pietlmont-Version 2.0 SOIL TIB BR 620019 c��,,,.r.,,. D..i..4� WG-WPT _...�....�....�� __ Proflle Descrlption: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Intlicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) DepN Matrix Retlox Featu s .(inchesl Color (moistl °k Color (moisfl % Tvoe Loc TeMure Remarks 0-3" 10YR 3/1 100°/a Muck 3-8" 10YR 5/1 80% 10YR 5/8 20% C M SL 8-14" 10YR 7/1 80_/0 10YR 5/S 20% C M C 'T e: C=ConceMraGon, D=De lelion, RM=Reduced Matriz, MS=Masked Santl Greins. 'Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indiwtors: Intlicators for Problematie Hydric Soils': 0 Histosol (A1) Q Dark Surface (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 747) ❑ Histic Epipetlon (A2) D polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) ❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surtace (S9) (MLRA 147, 748) [] Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) (MLRA 147, 748) ❑ Stratified Layers (A5) � De letetl Matrix F3 � Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) � P � ) (MLRA 136, 74� ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Retlox Dark Surtace (F6) L] Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) � Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) f] Depleted Dark Surtace (F7) f] pther (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Thick Dark SurFace (Al2) n Redox Depressions (FS) D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 736) ❑ Santly Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Um6ric Surface (F13) (MLRA 736, 122) 'IrMicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Santly Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Flootlplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) welland hydrology must be present, ❑ SlrippeU Matrix (S6) � Retl Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 747) unless disturbed or problema4c. Restrictive Layer (if observed�: Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present9 Yes � No � Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region arojecvsite: Moore Co. Bridge 19 TIP BR620019 ciryicounty: Moore County 201 ApplicanVOwner: Investigator(s): � Landform (hillslope, terrece, etc.): Tef1'aCe Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P, 137 Lat: 35.' soii Map unit Name: Edge of Candor sand 4-12% & Sampling Date: 6-03-29 Slate: NC Sampling Point: A-E, Up _ Section, Township, Range: Roseland Local relief (concave, convex, none): convex Slope (%): 4% 9 Long: -79.545893 Datum: NAD83 loam, 0-2% slope, freq. floode N1�n classiflration: PF01 B Are Gimatic / hydrolo ic conditions on the site typical for fhis time of year7 Yes r^ Are Vegehation Soil �, or Hytlrology significantly disturbetl? Are Vegetation Soil �, or Hytlrology �naturally problematic7 No �1 (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are `Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No � (If needed, explain eny answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, trensects, Important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetatlon PreseM? Yes Hydric Soil Present? Yes Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Slightly upslope and south of Wetland A. HYDROLOGY Is the Sampletl Area within a Wetlantl? Primarv Intlicators fminimum of one is reauir d� check all that aoolvl ❑ Surface Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ High Water Table (A2) � Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Saturation (A3) � Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Water Marks (81) � Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Sediment Depasits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Drift Deposits (83) ❑ Thin Muck Surtace (C� ❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain In Remarks) ❑ Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Inundation Vstble on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) �Aquatic Fauna (B13) Surface Water Present? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches): Water Table Present7 Yes Q No Q Depth (inches): Saturatlon Present? Yes Q No Q✓ Depth (inches): (includes capillarv frinpe) Descnbe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial ohotos. orevin��� US Army Corps of Engineers Yes Q No � ❑ Sudace Soil Cracks (BB)—�� ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (Bg) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (6�6) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ Stunted or Stresaetl Plants (D1) ❑ Geomorphic PosiGon (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Mlcrotopographic Relief (D4) ❑ FAC-Neutrel Test (D5) Wetland Hydrology Present7 Yes n No,� Eastem Mountalns antl Piedmont—Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. TIB BR 620019 Sampling Point: A-E, Up Absolute Domtnant Indicator pominaneeTestworksheet: T2eStretum (Plotsize: o ) k Cover Soecies� S atus �, Pinus taeda S5% Y FAC Number of Dominant Species Z. Linodendron tulipifera 5a�o That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 6 �q� FACU 3. Total Number of Dominant 4. Species Aaoss AII Strata: 6 �B� 90'�" = Total Cover 5o°�oftotalcover:45 20%oftotalcover:�$ Saolina Stratum (Plot size: � �, Persea palustris 15% Y FACW z, Acer rubrum 10% Y FAC 3. Quercus marilandica 10% N/A NI 35% = Totai Cover 50% of total cover: � ��5 p0°k of total cover: � ShrubStratum (Plotsize: 9�1m � � Ilex glabra Z. Clethre alnifolia 15% 10% Percent of Dominarrt Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (aB) _ TMaI % Cover oP Multiolv bv� OBL species � X �= 0 FACW species � 5 X 2= 30 FAC species 125 X 3= 375 FACU species 5 X q= 20 UPL species � X 5- 0 Cowmn 7ota�s: 145 �q� 425 �g� Prevalence Index = B/p= 2.93 � 1- Rapid Test for Hytlrophytic VegetaGon Q 2- Dominance Test is >50% Y FAC LI 3- Prevalence Index is 53.0' Y FAC ❑ 4- Morphologiral Adapta8ons' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) � Problematic Hydraphytic Vegetation' (Expiain) 25qo = Total Cover 50%oftotalcover: �2•5 zo%oftotalcover.5 Herb Stratum (Plot size: � �. No herbs in this upland area. 11 = Total Cover 50°h of total cover: 20% of total cover: Woodv �ne Stret m (plot size: � �, Vitis rotundifolia 5% Y FAC 5% = Total Cover 50°h of total cover: Z•5 20°k of total cover: � :rs here or on a separate sheet.l 'Intlicators of hyddc soll antl weGand hytlrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH). Sapling — Woody plants, eaccluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more In height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub— Woody plants, excluding wootly vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) in heigM. Herb —All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3 ft ('I m) in height. IWoody vine — All wootly vines, regardless of heigh[. Hya.oPnye�� Vegetation ✓ Present? Yes II No� US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains antl Piedmont- Version 2.0 SOIL TIB BR 620019 Sampling Point: A-E, Up Profile DescNption: (Deseribe to the depth needed W document the intlicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features finches) Color (moisfl % Color fmoistl . qo Tvoe oc TeMure R marks 0-0.5" 2.5YR 3/1 100% loam Organic layer 0.5-3" 10YR 6/3 100% _ sand No MS grains or </=2 chroma 3-72"+ 10YR 6/8 100% sand 'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'LoraGon: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil IntliwWrs: Indieators for Problematic Hydric Solls': � Histosol (A1) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ pol alue Below Surtace S8 MLRA 147, 748 'g 2 cm Muck (q10) (MLRA 147) ❑ Black Histic (A3) � � � ( ) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide q4 ❑ Thin Dark SurFace (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) (MLRA 147, �48) ( ) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) [] Stratified Layers (A5) L] Depleted Matrix (F3) � P�edmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 736, 747) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) D Redox Dark Surtace (F6) � Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) L] Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A11) ❑ Depletetl Dark Surface (F� ❑ Other (Euplain in Remarks) ❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Redox Depressions (F8) L] Sandy Mucky Mineral (St) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 747,'148) MLRA 738) ❑ Sandy Gleyed MaMx (S4) ❑ Umbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122 ' ) Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and ❑ Sandy Retlox (S� ❑ piedmont Flootlplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 748) wetland hydrology must be present, ❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) � Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 747) unless disturbed or problematic. RestricUve Layer Qf observe�: Type: Depth (inches): Hytlric Soll Present? Yes � No � Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains antl Piedmont — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region Projeaisite: Moore Co. Brid e 19 TIP BR620019 cityicounry: Moore County appnranuowner. NC Department of Transportation sampiing oate: 2016-03-29 Inves6gator(s): D. Cooper Shate: NC Sampling Point: Up F, G Section, Township, Range: Roseland Lantlform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ro8dside Local relief (concave, convex, none): none o Subregion (LRR or MLR,4): P, 137 Lat: 35.143227 —�— Slope (%): 5/o Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb lOam, 0-2% slope, freq. flooded �ong: -79.545069 oatum: NAD83 Are ci(matic / hydrolo Ic condiGons on the site rypiql for this time of yeaR Yes �/ No NWI classification: PF01 B Are Ve etation � (If no, explain in Remarks.) 9 Soil �, or Hytlrology significantly disturbed? Are "Nortnal Circumstances" present7 Yes � No � Are Vegetation Soil �, or HytlroloBY �naturelly problematic7 (If needed, e�cplain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS –Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hytlrophylic Vegetatlon Presem? Yes Hydric Soil Present7 Yes Wetlantl Hydrology PreseM? Yes HYDROLOGY No Is the 3ampletl Area within a Wedand7 Primarv Indic�+ors fminimum of one is reouired� ch ck all that aoolvl ❑ SurFace Water (A1) ❑ Tme Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ High Water Table (A2) � Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Saturation (A3) [] Oxitlized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) ❑ Water Marks (61) � presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilletl Sofls (C6) ❑ Drift Deposits (B3) ❑ Th(n Muck Surtace (C7) ❑ Algal Mat or Gust (64) � pther (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Inuntlation Visible on Aerlal Imagery (B7) ❑ WatervStained Leaves (B9) nAquatic Fauna (613) Surface Water Present? Water Table Present? Saturaflon Preserrt? Yes � No Q Depth (nches): Yes IQ--� No Q✓ Depth (inches): Yes `J. No Q Depth (inches): Y�� No 0 Surtace Soil Cracks (B6) L_I Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) ❑ Dreinage Pattems (610) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616) ❑ Dry-Season Water Teble (C2) ❑ Cra�sh Burzows (C8) ❑ Saturation Ysible on Aerial Imagery (C9) ❑ StuMetl or SVessed Plants (Dt) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4) L] FAC-Neutrel Teat (D5) WetlandHydrologyPresent? Yes,a No� US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains antl Piedmont - Version 2.0 VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. TIB BR 620019 Sampling point: Up F, G Tree St2tum (Plot size: Absolute Dominant Intlirator pominance Test worksheet: Acer rubrum � % ov r s es? s atus �' 40% Y FAC Number of Dominant Species p_ Liriodendron tulipifera 5a�o That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5 �A� FACU 3. Pinus taeda 40% Y FAC Total Number of Dominant q. Liquidambar styraciflua 10% FAC species ncross <vi strata 6 �B� 5� Percent of Dominant Species 6. That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: $3% (q�8) 95% = Total Cover 50°k of total cover: 47.5 20% of total cover: 19 Saolinq Stratum (Plot size: � �.Liquidambarstyraciflua 10% Y FAC z. Ligustrum sinense 15% Y FACU 25% = Total Cover 5o%oftotalcover: �2•5 Zo%oftotalcover.5 ShrubStratum (Plotsize: 9��m � �_ Clethra alniFolia 10% Y FAC �� = Total Cover 50°k of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2 HerbStratum (plotsize: � i. No herbs at samplin point 30% = Toql Cover 50�0 of total cover: � 5 20Yo of total cover: 6 Woodv Vine Stratum (piot size: � �. Smilax rotundifolia 5% Y FAC z. _ Tohal % C— °�._ . Multiolv bv: OBL species 0 X �= 0 FACW species � x 2= 0 FAC species 115 X 3= 345 FACU species 20 x 4= 80 UPL species 0 X 5- Q Column Totals: 135 �q� qZs �B� Prevalence Index = B/A = 3.15 ❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetatlon Q 2- Dominance Test is >50% Q3- Prevalence Index is 53.0' ❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provitle supporting daia in Remarks or on a separete sheet) � Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Euplain) 'Indirators of hytlric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless tlisturbetl or pro6lematic. Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height antl 3 in. (7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast hefght (DBH). Sapling — Waody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH. Shrub — Woody plants, excludfng woody vines, approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) in height. Herb—qll herbaceous (non-woody) plants, Including her6aceous vines, regardless of size, and woody plants, eucept wootly vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1 m) in height. Wootly vine—All woody vines, regartlless of height. 5p = Total Cover Vegeqt onic 50% of totai cover: 2•5 p0°� of total cover. � P�ent? rs here or on a seoarate sh>Pf � Yes n No� US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Pietlmont— Version 2.0 SOIL TIB BR 620019 Sampling Point: Up F, G De th - ---- -- --"'^'�^• •��n ���a�caror or confirm trye absence of intlicaWrs.) inches _ Color f oecnX o etl x Fea ure �-2° 10YR 2/1 � 0 Color �m�t�ri � Tw� �o� Texture Remaiic 2-5" 10YR 3/2 0 —_ SL No MS = no A11 100 /o SL 5-14" 10YR 5/1 60% lOYR 3/2 40% p No MS = r10 A11 — _ _ M S L nytlric Soll Indfwtors: 0 Histasol(A1) ❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Black Histic (A3) � Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Stratified Layers (q6) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR ry) � Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A11) ❑ Thick Dark Surtace (q1p) � Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRq 147, 748) ❑ Santly Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Santly Retlox (S5) � SWPPed Matrix (S61 Type: Depth (inches): US Artny Corps of Engineers oew..__�.._._,. .._ .�_ ❑ Dark SuRace (S� f] Polyvalue Below Surtace (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRq 747, 148) ❑ Loamy Gleyed MaUix (F2) � Depletetl Matrix (F3) ❑ Redox Dark Surtace (F6) � Depletetl Dark SuAace (F� � Retlox Depressions (F8) ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 736) ❑ Umbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 722) ❑ Piedmont Floodplaln Soils (F19) (MLRq 1qg) ❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 727, 1q7� Indicators for Problematic Hytlric S� � 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRq 147) ❑ Coast Preirie Redox (A16) ^ (MLRA 147, 748) y� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12) � Other (Explain in Remarks) 'Indicators of hytlrophytic vegetation antl wetland hytlrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydric So11 present9 Yes � No � Eastern Mourrtains and Piedmont-Version 2.0