20170179 Ver 1_wet file 1_20170210

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
arqecusite: Moore Co. 8ridge 19 TIP BR620019 cityicounty: Moare County
Sampling Date: z016-03-29
nppiicanvowner: NC Department of Transportation state: N� sampiing point: WA-wet
Investigator(s): D. Coop@f Section, Taumship, Range: Roseland
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): H88dW8tBf Local relief (conrave, convex, none): C011C2V8 Slo e%: 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P� 137 �at: 35.192532 P��
�ong: -79.619928 Datum: NAD83
soii Map unit Name: Candor Sand, 4-12% slope & Bibb loam, 0-2% slope, freq. floOded NWI Gassification: PF01 B
Are climatic / hydrolo Ic conditions on the site lypical for this time of year7 Yes ✓ No
� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil �, or Hydrology � significaMly disturbetl? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No �
Are Vegetation , Soil �, or Hydrology � naturally problematic7 (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegehation Present7 Yes
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Is the Sampletl Area
wfthin a Wetland? Yes � No �
Wetland abuts a perennial stream, flowing parallel to SR 1112/Roseland Road. Evidence of soil disruption in the form of
berms adjacent to the stream, separating portions of the wetland from the stream channel.
HYDROLOGY
Primarv Intlicators (minimum of one is rea�iretl� check all that aoolvl
Q✓ Surface Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic PIaMs (814)
Q✓ High Water Table (A2) � Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ct)
Q✓ Saturation (A3) Q Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Q Water Marks (B1) Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ DriR Deposits (B3) ❑✓ Thin Muck Surface (C�
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Expiain in Remarks)
❑ Iron Deposits (85)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
Q^✓ Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
LP.quatic Fauna (B13)
Surface Wffier Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation PreseM?
US Army Corps of Engineers
Yes� No0 Depth(inches): �1"
Yes Q No Q Depth (inches): 0��
Yes Q No � Depth (inches); 0"
m gauge, monitoNng well, aerial ohotos. orevin���
❑ surtace soil Crecks (B6)
❑� Spareely Vegetatetl Concave Surtace (BB)
' " ' Dreinage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayflsh Burcows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ SWnted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Microtopogrephic Relief (D4)
Q✓ FAGNeutral Test (D5)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes II No �
Eastem Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. TIB BR 620019 Sampling Point: WA-wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator pominanceTestworksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover i s? tatus Number of Dominant S ecies
�. Acer rubrum 20% Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 10 �q�
2, Lirlodendron tulipifera 5% FACU
Total Number of Dominant
3� Species Across All Strata: 10
(B)
Z5% = Total Caver
50°� of total cover: � 2•5 20% of total cover: 5
Saolina Stratum (Plot size: 1
�, Persea palustris 20% Y
p. Cyrilla racemiflora 20% Y
FACW
FACW
40% =TotalCover
50% of total cover: 20 20% of total cover. $
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 9��^' 1
� Clelhre alndolia 10qo Y
2, Ilex glabre 5% Y
g Vaccinlum corymbosum 5% Y
FAC
FAC
FACW
20 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: � 0 20% of total cover: 4
Herb StraNm (Plot size: )
�, Osmundastrum cinnamomea 5% FACW
Z. Woodwardia virginica 10% Y OBL
3, Woodwardia areolata 5% FACW
q. Sphagnum sp. 10% Y NI
7
1
Woalv vne Stratum (Plot size:
�, Smilax laurifolia
� Vitis rotundifolia
30% - Total Cover
50°k of total cover: � 5 20% of total cover. s
)
10% Y OBL
5% Y FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
Thffi Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% �q�g�
Total % Cover of• Multiolv bv:
OBL species 2� x 1= 2�
FACW species 55 x 2= 110
FAC species 40 x 3= 120
FACU species 5 x 4= 2�
UPL species 0 x 5= �
Column Totals: 120 �q� 270 �g�
Prevalence Index = BIA = 2•25
U 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophy[ic Vegetalion
Q 2- Dominance Test is >50%
❑✓ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provitle supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
❑ Problemadc Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indlcators of hydric soil and wetland hytlrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 R(6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
p.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling — Wootly plants, eucluding woody vines,
approximately 20 tt(6 m) or more in heigM and less
ihan 3 in. p.8 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, exGuding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 @(1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb—All her6aceous (non-woody) plants, inclutling
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and wootly
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in heigM.
Woody vine —All woody vines, regartlless of height.
15% = Total Cover Hydrophytic
Vegetation
50°k of total cover: �•5 20% of total cover. 3 P�eM?
:rs here or on a separate sheet.)
Yesn No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0

SOIL TIB BR 620019 Sampling Point: WA-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth neetled to document the indicator or conTirm the absenee of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Retlox Features
linches) Color (moisfl % Cobr (moist) ___(� Tvoe� Locr Texture Remarks
0-2" 10YR 2/2 700% _ loam Organic layer
2-8" 10YR 2/1 100% muck Muck
8-12"+ 10YR 3/1 100% _ MS _ sand >70% Masked sand grains
'T e: C=Concentration D=De letion RM=Reduced MaVix, MS=Masked Sand Greins. 'Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
� Histosol (A1) Q Dark Surtace (S�
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) D Pol alue Below Surtace S8 MLRA 147, 748 � 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
1'° ( ) ( ) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surtace (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
[] Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) (MLRA 747, 148)
[] Stratified Layers (A5) � Depleted Matrix (F3) � P1edmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surtace (F6) � Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12)
j] Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A11) � Depleted Dark Surtace (F� � Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Suriace (Al2) � Redox Depressions (F8)
D Sandy Mucky Minerel (St) (LRR N, � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 722) 'Indicators of hydrophyBc vegetation and
❑ Sandy Retlox (SS) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetlantl hydrology must be preseM,
❑ Stripped Matri�c (S6) � Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 747) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (If observetl):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydrie Soil Present? Yes � No �
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains antl Piedmont— Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastem Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro)ecv5ite: Moore Co. Bridge 19 TIP BR620019 ciry�Counry: Moore County Samp�ing Date: 2016-03-29
nppiicanuowner: NC Department of Transportation
State: �`1C Sampling Point: WB-Wet
Investigator(s): D. Cooper Section, Township, Range: Roseland
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): H@adWatef Local relief (concave, convex, none): �nCaVe Slope (%): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P� 137 �et: 35.143374 �ong: 79.546274 �atum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb 1o8m, 0-2% slope, freq. flooded PF01 B
NWI class�cation:
Are climatic / hydrolo ic conditians on the site typical for this time of year'? Yes �✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil Q✓ , or Hytlrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No O
Are Vegetation Soil �, or Hydrology � naturaly problemaNc? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetadon Present? Yes L� J No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil PreseMl Yes II No wRhin a Wetland? Yes g No �
Wetland Hydrology Preserrt? Yes �1 No ��
Wetland is located adjacent to SR 1112lRoseland Road. Evidence of soil disturbance in the form of berms adjacent to
the wetland and soil compaction along roadside.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Intlicators (minimum of buo reau(redl
Primarv Indicators (minimum f one is reauir � check all that aoolv) ❑ Surtace Soil Cracks (BB)
❑✓ Surface Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (814) ❑ Sparsely Vegetaled Concave Surtace (88)
Q High Water Table (A2) � Hytlrogen Sulfide Odor (C7) ❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑✓ Saturatlon (A3) � Oxidizetl Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) � Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (B1) � presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ DrySeason Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Depaaits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction tn Tilletl Soils CB
❑ Drifl Deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surtace C7 � � � Creyfish Burtows (CB)
O ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ pther (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressetl Plants (D1)
❑ iron Deposits (85) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Usible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Q Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Micmtopographic Relief (D4)
�Aquatic Fauna (B13) j]✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field 06servations:
Surtace Water PreseM? Yes Q No Q Depth (inches): �� ��
Water Tabie P2seM? Yes Q✓ No Q Depth (inches): 0��
Saturation Present7 Yes ✓Q No � Depth (inches): 0" Wetlantl Hydrology Present? Yes II No �
Includes ca illa fin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

YEGETATION (Five StraW) — Use scientific names of plants. TIB BR 620019 Sampling Point: WB-Wet
Absolute Dominanl Indicator pominanceTestworksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) °k Cover Scecies? Sla s Number of Dominant S ecies
�, Acer rubrum 15% Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAQ 9 �q�
p, Liriodendron tulipifera 10% Y FACU
3.
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 �g�
25% = Total Cover
50% of total cover: � z•5 20% of total cover: 5
$aolina Stratum (Plot size: 1
�. Persea palustris 10% Y FACW
Z. Liquidambar styraciflua 10% Y FACW
ZD% = Total Cover
50% of total cover: � 0 20% of total cover. 4
Shmb Stratum (Plot size: 9�1m �
� Clethra alnifolia
2 Aronia arbutifolia
g Vaccinium corymbosum
q Morella cerifere
5. Lyonia lucida
10% Y FAC
5% FACW
5% FACW
2% FAC
15% Y FACW
37 = Total Cover
50°k of total cover: � 8•5 20% ot total cover. �•4
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
�. Osmundastrum cinnamomea 10% Y FACW
Z.�hagnum sp. 10% N/A NI
1C
11
20% =ToWlCover
50% of total cover. � Q 20% of total cover. 4
Woodv�ne5tratum (Plotsize: )
�, Smilax rotund'rfolia 5% Y FAC
p, Smilax laurifolia 5% Y OBL
g, Vitis rotundifolia 5% Y FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9�% �q�g�
Total % Cover of• MNtiolv bv�
OBL species 5 x 1= 5
FACW species 55 x 2= 110
FAC specles 3� x 3= 111
FACUspecies �� x4=40
UPLspedes � x5=�
ColumnTotals: �0� (A) 266 �g�
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.48
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑I��I 2 - Dominance Test is >50°h
u 3- Prevalence Index is s3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Q Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and weNantl hydroiogy must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Trae— Wootly plants, exclud(ng woody vtnes,
approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3(n.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
3apling — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximate�y 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub— Wootly plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) In height.
Herb—All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and wootly
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine — All woady vines, regardiess of height.
15% = Total Cover Hydrophytic
Vegetation
50% of total cover: �•5 20°� of total cover: 3 P�ent7 Yes II No,�
:rs here or on a separete sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL TIB BR 620019 C�mnlinn D..i..+• WB-WP.1
__...�....�........ ___
Profile Description: (Descrl6e to the depth nceded to doeument the indicator or conflrm the absence of Intlicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox FeaW s
(inchesl Color (moisfl % Color fmoistl � Tvoe L_� Texture Remarks
0-2" 10YR 2/2 100% _ loam Organic layer
2-8" 10YR 2/1 100% muck Muck
8-12"+ 10YR 3!1 100% _ MS _ sand >70% Masked sand grains
'T e: C=Concentration D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Greins. �Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil IntliwWrs: Indiwtors for Problematic Hydric Soils':
� Histosol (A7) Q Dark Surtace (S7)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Pol alue Below Surface S8) (MLRA 147, 148 � 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 747)
7ry ( ) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A18)
❑ Bladc Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (59) (MLRA 747, 148)
f.] Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) (MLRA 747, 148)
[] Stratlfied Layers (A5) De leted Matrix F3 � P�edmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ P i ) (MLRA 736, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) � Redox Dark Surface (F6) � Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12)
r] Depleted Below Dark Surtace (AN) ❑ Depletetl Dark Surtace F
❑ Thick Dark Surtace Al2 (� ❑ a�r (Explain in Remarks)
( ) � Redox Depressions (F8)
,Q Sandy Mucky Minerel (S1) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 722) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Retlox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hytlrology must be present,
❑ Stripped MatPoc (S6) � Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless tlisturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observetl):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hytlrtc Soil Present? Yes � No �
Remarks:
US Army Corys of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecUSite: Moore Co. B�idge 19 TIP
City/Counry: Moore County Sampling Date: 2016-03-29
appiicanvowner: i�� uepaRmenc or i ransportanon State: NC sampiing Point WGwet
Investigator(s): D. Cooper Section, Township, Range: Roseland
Lantlform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Floodplain/bottomland Local relief (concave, convex, none): conCave Slope (%): z%
Subreglon (LRR or MLRA): P, 137 Lat: 35.142574 �ong: -79•544556 �atum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Bibb 108rt1, 0-2% slope, freq. flooded NWI classification: PF01 B
Are climatic! hydrolo ic cond(tions on the sfte lyplc^al for fhis time of year? Yes �✓ No (If no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation� Soil Q, or Hydrolo9Y 1�1 significantly tlislurbed? Are "Nortnal Circumstances" present? Yes � No O
Are Vegetadon Soll �, or Hydrology � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any ansu�ers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS —Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegeta8on PreseM7 Yes
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
Wetland Hydrology Preserrt? Yes
HYDROLOGY
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes 0✓ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secontlarv Intlicators (minimum of two reauiredl
P�aN Intlicators (minimum of one is reauired• check all that aooN) ❑ Surtace Soil Cracks (B6)
Q Surface Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (B14) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (B8)
❑✓ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Hytlrogen Sulfide Otlor (C1) Q Drainage Patterns (B10)
� Saturetion (A3) Q Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Q Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Q Water Marks (B1) � Presence of Retluced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑✓ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilletl Soils C8
( ) ❑ Cra�sh Burtows (C8)
Q Drifi Deposits (B3) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation Vsible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Slressed Plants (D1)
Q Iron Deposits (85) ❑✓ C,eomorphic Positlon (D2)
❑ Inundalion Visible on Aerial Imagery (Bn ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
D Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Q✓ Microtopogrephic Relief (D4)
�✓ Aquatic Fauna (813) 0✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Fleld Observations:
Surface Water PreseM? Yes ✓�I--� No Q Depth (inches): �-�+��
Water Table Present? Yes �.� No Q Depth (inches): ���
Saturetion Present? Yes ✓Q No � Depth (inches): ��� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes II No,�
includes ca illa frin e
Describe Recorded Dap (stream gauge, monitoring weli, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains antl Piedmont— Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. TIB BR 620019 Sampling Point: WGwet
Absolute Dominant Indicator pominanceTestworksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) Cover Soecies7 ta u
q, Acer rubrum 90% Y FAC Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 �q�
z, Liriodendron tulipifera 5% FACU
Total Number of Dominant
3" Specles Across All Strata: 9 �g�
95% =TotalCover
5o°k of total cover: 47.5 20% of total cover: � 9
Saolina Stratum (Plot size: 1
�, Persea palustris 20% Y FACW
2, Cyrilla racemiflora 10% Y FACW
ShrubStratum (Plotsize: 9.tm
� Ciethra alnifolia
2 Aronia arbutifolia
30% = Total Cover
50°h of total cover: � 5 20% of total cover: s
5% Y FAC
5% Y FACW
�� = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of tohal cover: 2
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
�,Arundinariagigantea 90% Y FACW
11
90% = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover. �$
Woodv �ne St2tum (Plot size: )
i. Smilax rotundifolia 5% Y FAC
p, Smilax laurifolia 5% Y OBL
3. Vitis rotundifolia 10% Y FAC
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are 08L, FACW, or FAC: 100% �p,�g�
Total % Cover ofi MultioN bv�
OBL species 5 x 1= 5
FACW specles � 25 x 2= Z50
FAC species 110 X 3= 330
FACU species 5 x 4= 20
UPL species � x 5= �
Column Tota�s: 245 �q� 605 �g�
Prevalence Index = B!A = 2.47
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Q✓ 2- Dominance Test is >50%
Q✓ 3- Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Atlaptations' (Provitle supporling
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
� Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetatiod (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil antl wetlaM hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree— Wootly plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(Z6 cm) or larger in diameter at breasf height (DBH).
Sapling — Wootly plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Wootly plants, excluding waody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb—All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vtnes, regardless of size, antl woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine—All woody vines, regardless of height.
20% = Total Cover Hydrophytic
Vegetation
50% of total cover; 10 20% of total cover: 4 P�ent7
�rs here or on a separele sheetJ
Yes II✓ No�
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountatns and Piedmont— Version 2.0

SOIL TIB BR 620019 Samolina Point• WC-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicaWr or confirm the absence of Indieators.) V
Depth Matrix Redox Features
.(inches) Colorlmoisfl % Calorlmoisfl ' Tvoe�z Texture Remarks
0-2" 10YR 2/2 100% _ loam Organic layer
2-8" lOYR 2/1 100% muck Muck
8-12"+ 10YR 3/1 100% _ MS sand >70% Masked sand grains
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Santl Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lini M=Matrix.
Mytlrie Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hytlric Soils':
0 Histosol (A1) Q Dark Surtace (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) f] Polyvalue Below Surtace (S8) (MLRA 747, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (At6)
❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark SuAace (S9) (MLRA 147, 748) (MLRA 147, 748)
[] Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyetl Matrix (F2) � Piedmont Floadplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratfied Layers (A5) � Depleted MaVix (F3) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) � Redox Dark Surface (F6) �] Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
� Depieted Below Dark Surtace (A11) ❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F� f] Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) n Redox Depressions (F8)
� Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 748) MLRA 136)
� Sandy Gleyed Matra (S4) ❑ Umbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hytlrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Redox (SS) ❑ Pietlmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) weUantl hydrology must be preseM,
❑ Stripped Matrix (SB) � Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrietive Layer (if observed):
Type:
DepN (inches): Hydric Soil Present9 Yes � No �
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont—Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Pro)ecvSite: Moore Co. Bridge 19 TIP BR620019 CityiCounry: Moore County sampitng oate: 2016-03-29
appiicanuowner: NC Department of Transportation State: �`1C sampiing Point: WD-wet
Investigator(s): D. Cooper Section, Township, Range: Roseland
Landform (hillslope, terrece, etc.): Floodplain/bottomland Lopl relief (concave, convex, none): ��CaVe Slope (%): 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P� � 3� Lat: 35.142395 Long: -79.543657 oatum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: B�bb loam, 0-2% slope, freq. flooded N1M c�assi�cation: PF01 B
Are climadc/ hydrolo ic condttlons on the site lypic^al for this time of year7 Yes �✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil Q, or Hydrology J� signifcantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No Q
Are Vegetation Soil �, or Hydrology Q naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic VegeWtion Present7 Yes
Hydric Soil PreseM7 Yes
WeLarW Hydrology PreseM? Yes
HYDROLOGY
No
Is the Sampled Area
wkhin a Wetland7 Yes � No �
Wetland Hytlrology Indicatore: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two reouiredl
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauiretl� check all that aoolvl ❑ Surtace Soil Cracks (B6)
❑✓ Surface Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (814) ❑ Sparsely Vegetaled Concave Surtace (BB)
Q High Water Table (A2) � Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) �! Drainage Pattems (B10)
❑✓ Saturatlon (A3) �✓ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) [] Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑✓ Water Marks (61) � Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑✓ Sediment Depasils (82) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilletl Soils (C6) ❑ Crayfish 8urtows (C8)
❑� Drift Deposits (B3) � Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation vsible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4) ❑ Other (Explain in Remadcs) ❑ StuMed or Stressed Plants (Dt)
❑ Iron Deposits (85) Q✓ Geomorphic Posilion (D2)
D Inundation Ysible on Aerial Imagery (B7) ❑ ShallowAquitard (D3)
T]✓ WatervStalned Leaves (69) Q✓ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
�✓ Aquatic Fauna (B13) Q✓ FAC-Neulral Test (D5)
Fleld Observations: �T
Surtace Water Present? Yes �•� No Q Depth (inches): �-4+"
Water Table Present? Yes Q✓ No Q Depth (inches): ���
Saturetion Present? Yes ✓Q No � Depth (inches): 0�� Wetlantl Hydrology Present? Yes n No �
includes ca ill 6in e
Describe Recorcled Data (sVeam gauge, monitoring well, aerial p�otos, previous inspections),'rfavailable:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. TIB BR 620019 Sampling Point: WD-wet
Absolute Dominant Indicator pominanee Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % C�over Scecies? ta Number of Dominant Species
i, Acer rubrum 90 /o Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9
Z, Liriodendron tulipifera 5% FACU �A�
Total Number of Dominanl
3� S eaes Across All Strata: 9
P (B)
95% =7oNalCover
50% of total cover: 4�•5 20qo of total cover: � 9
Saolina Stratum (Plot size: 1
i, Persea palustris 20% Y FACW
2, Cyrilla racemiflora 10% Y FACW
50% of total cover: 15
ShrubStratum (Plotsize: 9��m 1
� Clethra alnitolia
� Aronia arbutifolia
30% = Total Cover
_ 20% of total cover. s
5% Y FAC
5% Y FACW
�� = Total Cover
50°� M total cover: 5 20% of total cover• 2
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% �q�g�
Totel °k Covef of' MNtioN bv
OBL spedes 5 x 1= 5
FACW species � 25 x 2= 250
FAC species � � 0 x 3= 330
FACU species 5 x 4= 2�
UPLspedes � x5=0
Column Tota�s: 245 �q� 605 �B�
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2•47
U 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
Q 3- P2valence Index is 53.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptalions' (Provide supporGng
tlata in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
� Problematic Hytlrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indlcators of hytlric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) approximatety 20 ft(6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
�, Arundinaria gigantea 90% Y FACW p.8 cm) or larger in diameter at b2ast height (DBH).
7
9�% = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: �$
Woodv vne Stratum (Plot size: )
i, Smilvc rotundifolia 5% Y FAC
Z, Smilax laurifolia 5% Y OBL
g. Vitis rotundifolia 10% Y FAC
Sapling — Woody plants, exGuding woody vines,
approximately 20 fl(6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub — Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximatery 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb—All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plaMs, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine—All woody vines, regardless of height.
20% = Total Cover Hydrophytic
Vegetatlon
50°k of total cover: � � 20°k of total covee. 4 P��t7
:rs here or on a seoarate sheeL)
YesII✓ Non,
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0

SOIL TIB BR 620019 Samnlinn Pnint WD-wet
Profile Description: (DescHbe to the depth neetled to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.),
Depth Matrix Redox Fea ures
linchesl Color (moist) % Color (moistl % Tvoe Loc� Texture Remarks
0-2" 10YR 2/2 100% _ loam Organic layer
2-8" 10YR 2/1 100% muck Muck
8-12"+ 10YR 3/1 100% _ MS sand >70% Masked sand grains
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Mafrix MS=Masked Sand Greins. �Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Intlicators: Indicatore for Problematic Hydric Solls':
� Histosol (A1) Q Dark Surtace (S7) � 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) J] Polyvalue Below Surtace (S8) (MLRA 747, 748) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (At6)
❑ Bladc Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 747, 148) (MLRA 147, 146)
[] Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) 0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Stratified Layers (AS) ,� Depletetl Matrix (F3) ^ (MLRA 136, 14�
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) y� Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
j]+ Depleted Below Dark Surface (At t) ❑ Depleted Dark Surtace (F� L'] Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Retlox Depressions (FS)
� Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, ❑ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 747, 748) MLRA 136)
�] Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surtace (F13) (MLRA 136, 722) 'Intlicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Sandy Retlox (S� f] Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 146) wetlantl hydrology must be presenf,
� Stripped Matrix (S6) ,� Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 14n unless tlisturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soll PresenYl Yes � No ❑
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecuSite: Moore Co. Bridge 19 TIP BR620019 CityiCounry Moore County Sampiing oate: 2016-03-29
appiicanuowner: NC Department of Transportation state: NC Sampling Point: WE-WEt
Invesligator(s): D. Cooper Section, Township, Range: Roseland
Landform (hfllslope, terrace, etc.) Floodplain/bottomland Local relief (concave, convex, none): Co11CaVe Slope (%): �� %
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P� � 37 Lat: 35.141745 �ong: -79.542007 �atum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: B�bb lOam, 0-2% slope, freq. flooded NWI classification: PF01 B
Are climatic/ hy,�drolo@,ic contli6ons on the site rypical for this time of year7 Yes �✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetationl� Soil �, or Hydrology � significanty disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" preseM7 Yes � No Q
Are Vegetafion Soil �, or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If neetled, explain arry answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hytlrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydric Soil Presenl7 Yes
Welland Hydrology Present? Yes
HYDROLOGY
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes ✓0 No 0
Wetland Hytlrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two renui d�
Primarv Indicators (minimum of one is reauired- check all that aoolvl ❑ Surtace Soil Crecks (66)
Q✓ Surface Water (A1) ❑ True Aquatic Plants (814) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑✓ High Water Table (A2) � Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) L]✓ Drainage Patterns (810)
❑✓ Saturation (A3) �✓ Oxidized Rhizosphe2s on Living Roots (C3) Q Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑✓ Water Marks (81) � Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑✓ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Recent Iran Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
✓Q Drift Deposfts (83) ❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7) ❑ Saturation vsible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (84) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (BS) ❑✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) � Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Q✓ Water-Stained Leaves (89) Q✓ Microtopographic Reltef (D4)
�✓ Aquatic Fauna (B13) j]✓ FAGNeutrel Test (DS)
Fieltl Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes �✓ No Q Depth (inches): 1-4+"
Water Table Present7 Yes IQ—� No Q Depth (inches): 0��
Saturation Present7 Yes �.� No Q Depih (inches): ��� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes n No �
includes ca illa fin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspeclions),'rfavailable:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont- Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. TI8 BR 620019 Sampling Point: WE-wet
Absolute Dominant Intlicator pomi�ance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) � Cover Soeaes? tatu Number of Dominant S ecies
�. Acer rubrum 90% Y FAC That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (q)
Z. Liriodendron tulipifera 5% FACU
Tota� Number of Dominant
3' Species Across All Strata: 9 �g�
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% �p,�g�
95% =TotalCover Prevalencelndexworkshei
50% of total cover: 47•5 20% of total cover: 19 TW I°/ C
Saolina Stretum (Plot size: 1
�, Persea palustris 20% Y
Z.�rrilla racemiflora 10% Y
50% of total cover: 15
ShNbStratum (Plotsize: 9�?^�
� Clefhre alniFolie
Aronia arbutifolia
FACW
FACW
30% = Total Cover
_ 20% of total cover: 6
5h
5%
70
FAC
FACW
= Total Cover
a o over of: MNtioW bv�
os� species 5 X �= 5
FACW species � 25 x 2= Z50
FAC species 110 X 3= 330
FACU species 5 x 4= 20
UPL species � X g- 0
Column Tmals: Z45 (A) 605 �g�
Prevalencelndex =B/q=2•47
� 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
❑I�✓.I2 - Dominance Test is >50%
� 3- Prevalence Index is s3.0'
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provitle supporting
daha in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Q Problematic Hytlrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Intlicators of hydric soil and welland hydrology must
be preseM, uniess tlisturbed or problematic.
-------- -----�
50% of total wver: 5 20% of total cover: Z
Tree - Woody plants, exGuding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Piot size: ) approximately 20 R(6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
�, Arundinarla gigantea 90% Y FACW (7.8 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
11
9�% = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 45 20% of total cover: �$
Woodv Vine Stretum (Plot size: )
�, Smilax rotundifolia 5% Y FAC
Z, Smilax laurifolia 5% Y OBL
g, Vitis rotundifolia 10% Y FAC
20% = Totel Cover
50°b of total cover. � � 20% oitotal cover: 4
rs here or on a separate sheet.l
Sapling - Woody plants, exGuding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft(8 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH,
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft(1 to 6 m) in heigM.
Herb-All herbaceous (non-woody) planGs, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, antl woody
plaMs, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine -All woody vines, regartlless of height.
Hydrophytic
VegeWtion
Present? Yes II✓ Non
US Army Corys of Ergineers
Eastem Mountains and Piedmont-Version 2.0

SOIL TIB BR 620019 c�..,..r.... o,.�..�. WF_wat
- _.....r.���y � ..��,.. _ __ _."
Profile Description: (Descri6e to the tlepth needetl to doeument the indicator or eonflrm the absence of intlicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inchesl Colorlmoisfl °k Color(moisfl °k Tvoe Loc� Teuture Remarks
0-2" 10YR 2/2 100% _ loam Organic layer
2-8" 10YR 2/1 100% muck Muck
8-12"+ 10YR 3/1 100% _ MS sand >70% Masked sand grains
'T e: C=Concentretion D=De letion RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Intlieators: Indicatore for Problematic Hydrie Soils':
� Histosol (A1) Q Dark Surtace (S�
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) D Polyvalue Below Surface SS MLRA 147, 748 � z cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
( ) ( ) ❑ Coast Preirie Redox (A16)
❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
[] Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matr� (F2) (MLRA 147, 148)
� Stratified Layers (A5) � Depleted Mahix (F3) � P1edmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (FB) ^ (MLRA 136, 147)
� Depleted Belav Dark Surtace A11 s� Very Shallow Dark Surface (fF12)
( ) ❑ Depleted Dark Surtace (F� � Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark SurFace (Al2) D Redox Depressions (F8)
L] Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, � Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148) MLRA 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Sur(ace (F13) (MLRA 136, 722) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Santly Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 748) wetlantl hydroiogy must be present,
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) � Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 727, 747) unless disturbetl or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soil PresenYt Yea � No ❑
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Englneers Eastem Mountains and Piedmont— Version 2.0