The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20170168 Ver 1_401 Application_20170208ROY COOPER GOVERNOR STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION February 8, 2017 N.C. Department of Environmental Quality Winston-Salem Regional Office 450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 Winston Salem, NC 27105 ATT'N: Mr. David Wanucha NCDOT Division 7 Project Coordinator JAMES H. TROGDON, III SECRETARY SUBJECT: Application for Jordan Lake Watershed Riparian Buffer Authorization for the replacement of Bridge No. 85 over Phil's Creek on SR 1005 (Old Greensboro Road), Division 7, Orange County, North Carolina. Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP — 1005 (31), TIP Project No. B-5348. Debit $240.00 from WBS 46062.1.1 Dear Sir: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDO"1� proposes to replace Bridge No. 85 over Phil's Creek on SR 1005 (Old Greensboro Road) in Orange County. The project will consist of replacing the existing 3-span, 52-foot structure with a one-span, 104.25-foot structure on the existing alignment. An off-site detour will be employed. No jurisdictional wetland or stream impacts are proposed forthis project. Proposed buffer impacts include Allowable Bridge impacts totaling 4,027 square ft. in Zone 1 and 469 square ft. in Zone 2; Allowable Road Crossing impacts totaling 1,268 square ft. in Zone 1 and 2,082 square ft. in Zone 2; and Allowable Aerial Utility Impacts Other Than Perpendicular Crossings totaling 300 square ft. in Zone 2. Please fnd enclosed the Pre-Construction Notification, Stormwater Management Plan, buffer drawings; utility buffer drawings, and roadway plans for the subject project. A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed for this project in May 2016. MailingAddress: Telephone: (919)707-6000 Locu�ion: NC DEPnxTMErr[ OF'IknNSP0RTA770N Fux: (919) 212-5785 1020 ButCH RIDGE DxtvE Nn7'Uxa� Ertvut0i�t�7' SECnON Customer Servrce: 1-877-368-4968 Rnt.EtGH NC 27610 1598 MAII. SERVICE CEN7'ER Websi�e: tvwtv.ncdot.gov Rn��GH NC 27699-1598 The proposed let date for this project is August 15, 2017, with a let review date of June 27, 2017. However, the let date may advance as additional funds become available. A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT Website at https://connect.ncdot.�ov/resourt•ces/Fnviror�mental!Pa�es/default.aspa, under Quick Links > Permit Applications. A copy of the PCE is also available at the above website address under Quick Links > Environmental Documents. Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Jim Mason at either jsmason@ncdot.gov or (919) 707-6136. Sincerely, -�ji � Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M. Natural Environment Section Head cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List B-5348 Permit Application Page 2 of 2 o`'�� W A r�RQG � r � � a � � , , , � o -c Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express � Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No � Yes ❑ No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 85 over Phil'sCreek on SR 1005 (Old Greesnboro Road) 2b. County: Orange 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Carrboro 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_5348 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6136 3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785 3h. Email address: jsmason@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. AgenUConsultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.905674 Longitude: - 79.116252 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 1.04 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Phil's Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-II, HQW, NSW 2c. River basin: Cape Fear 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Old Greensboro Rd is classified as a Major Collector in the Statewide Functional Classification System and is not a National Highway System Route. Land use within the vicinity primarily consists of forested land , agriculture, and low density residential. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.0 acres 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 167 linear feet (Phil's Creek) 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project will consist of replacing the existing 3-span, 52-foot structure with a one-span, 104.25-foot structure on the existing alignment. An ofF-site detour will be employed. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown Comments: A PJD Request was submitted to Andy Williams (USACE) on 5/22/2013. No response was received 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn Name (if known): Beth Reed, Jason Hartshorn Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries � Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) (acres) Tem ora T Site 2❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 3❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 3❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 5❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 0 Perm. 0 Temp. 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet) Permanent (P) or intermitte (Corps - width Temporary (T) nt (INT)? 404, 10 (feet) DWQ — non-404, other) Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 1❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps � ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 0 Perm. 0 Temp. 3i. Comments: 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number— waterbody Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) type Tem ora T O ❑P❑T O ❑P❑T O ❑P❑T O ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 0 ac Permanent 0 ac Temporary 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland (acres) Pond ID Proposed use or Flo number purpose of pond Flo�ode Filled Excavated od Filled Excavated Flooded ed P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico � Other: Jordan Lake Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Permanent (P) or Reason for Buffer mitigation Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Tem ora T im act Stream name re uired? s uare feet s uare feet Site 1� P❑ T Bridge Phil's Creek � Nas 4,027 469 Site 1� P❑ T C oss ng Phil's Creek � NoS 1,268 2,082 Aerial I m pacts Utility Other Than Phil's Creek � Yes 0 300 Site 1� P❑ T Perp. � No Crossings ❑ Yes Site ❑P❑T ❑No Site ❑ P ❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 5,295 2,851 6i. Comments: Aerial Utility Impacts Perpendicularly Crossing the Stream will also occur on the north side of the bridge. These are due to the line relocation. The clearing width for the line installation is 30 linear feet along the stream, which is less than the 150 linear foot threshold; therefore, these impacts are considered Exempt. D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The proposed bridge is 52 feet longer than the existing bridge; Minimization and avoidance measures incorporated into the design include elimination of direct discharge, increasing buffer treatment of discharges, utilizing an existing end bent to minimize stream impacts, removal of an interior bent and vegetative treatment of shoulder section discharges. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Due to the project's location within the Jordan Lake Watershed, Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds will be employed; NCDOT Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities and Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters will be employed. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory � Yes � No Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, explain: No wetland or stream impacts. 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that � DWQ ❑ Corps apply): ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is ❑ Yes attached. 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold temperature: 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that ❑ Yes � No requires buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Reason for impact Total Multiplier Required mitigation Zone impact (square feet) (square feet Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why. � Yes ❑ No Comments: Please see attached permit drawings 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: Please see attached permit drawings. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? not applicable ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 10 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No impacts? � Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NC Natural Heritage Program data, USFWS website, NCDOT field surveys; Michaux's sumac and smooth coneflower were last surveyed in June 2016 and a Biol. Concl. of No Effect was rendered; Dwarf wedgemussel was surveyed for in August 2013 and has a Biol. Concl. of No Effect; There will be no impact on bald eagle; the northern long-eared bat (NLEB) is covered by the Programmatic Biological Opinion for Divisions 1 through 8. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps Philip S. Harris III, P.E., C.P.M. Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Date Applicant/AgenYs Signature (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided. 11 E��ti �ati, North Carolina Department of Transportation St[)a 1ll�vdt+['!' Highway Stormwater Program �� STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.06; Released June 2016) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 46062.1.1 TIP No.: B-5348 County ies): Orange Page 1 of 1 General Project Information WBS Element: 46062.1.1 TIP Number: B-5348 Project T pe: Brid e Replacement Date: 8/15/2016 NCDOT Contact: William H. Elam Jr., PE Contractor / Designer: Michael Kell Address: 1020 Birch Ridge Dr, Address: 1020 Birch Ridge Dr. Raleigh, NC 27610 Raleigh, NC 27610 Phone: 919.707.6718 Phone: 919.707.6731 Email: belam ncdot. ov Email: mkelly ncdot. ov Cit /Town: Carrboro, NC Count ies : Oran e River Basin(s): Cape Fear CAMA County? No Wetlands within Project Limits? No Pro'ect Description Project Len th lin. miles or feet : 0.085mi. Surrounding Land Use: Rural, Wooded, Residental Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Built-U on Area ac. 0.3 ac. 0.2 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: Two 12' travel lanes w/ 0' to 6.0' paved shoulders, 0' to 6' grass shoulders and Two 11' travel lanes w/ 4' to 8' grassed shoulders and side slopes side slopes. Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hrlday): Design/Future: 5,800 Year: 2035 Existing: 4,300 Year: 2013 General Project Narrative: B-5348 is a Transportation Improvement Project to replace Bridge #0085 in Orange County crossing Phils Creek. The existing bridge is a three span timber deck on I-beams (Description of Minimization of Water w/two interior bents. The new bridge will be a 105' single span box beam structure. Minimization and avoidance measures incorporated into the design include elimination of Quality Impacts) direct discharge, increasing buffer treatment of discharges, utilizing an existing end bent to minimize stream impacts, removal of an interior bents and vegetative treatment of shoulder section discharges. Waterbod Information Surface Water Body (1): Phils Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 16-41-2-2-(0.3) NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primar Classification: Water Supply II WS-II Supplemental Classification: Hi h Qualit Waters HQW NSW Other Stream Classification: Impairments: None A uatic T&E S ecies? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: 16-41-2-2-(0.3 Buffer Rules in Effect: Jordan Lake Pro'ect Includes Brid e S annin Water Bod ? Yes Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? No Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Bod ? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) � � � m � _ N H ?I � £I ai �. 2 ro� v M � m � �� m� �� 3 � o � � V o � � � o � � � � �, E cA c f» o � z W tA � I�� ' � ��,�� d��w �� -�Q O .� ��G ] ��L` '� a v�f»w o � ��n V �T �� d x en �».» (V Y/�y��. C� � � fAb3+fl � (AlA _ .� � �+°�° , zoi3 o�remyy25 S � � �� tsu z� . ' a � �9aa r � � � z 2038 ° ��-��zo3� p is i� I�� an�� ep �03 � TIP PROIECT \ B-5348 ioos 1945 _ . ..r� � � zosa '� � LAKE VICINITY MAP OFFSITE DETOUR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNALS ��°�� IF 1�� IIF�� I[$�II�1I1�� ORAI�GE CO U1�lTY �� B-5348 46062.1.1 BRSTP-1005(� 46062.2.1 I LOCATI0IV: BRIDGE NO. 85 OVER PHILS CREEK O1V SR 1005 (OLD GREENSBORO ROAD) TYPE OF WORK GRADIIIIG DRAl11lAGE, PAVING, TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGIVALS A111D STI�UCTURE TO SR E(WHITE CI STA.12+50.00 -L- BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-5348 BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT *DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR SAG VERTICAL CURVES AND ASSOCIATED NIGHTTIME STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH Prepo�ed !n !he Office of: ADT 2017 = 4,575 DIVISI011t OF HIGHWAYS 5� 2$ � 5� �� ADT 2035 = 5�8�� ]000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 p 2012 ST9NDARD SPEC/FICATPoNS PLANS D= 65 �o LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5348 = 0.046 MI. 5o z5 o so �oo T= 3 0�0 * LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-5348 = 0.020 MI. RIGHT OF WAY DATE: JAMES A. SPEER, PE V= 50 MPH TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-5348 = 0.066 MI. AUGUST 19, 2016_ PR°'E°T F"�'"FFR PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST =1% DUAL =2% l0 5 0 l0 20 FUNC CLASS=COILECTOR LETTING DATE: DANIEL W. GARDNER JR., PE AUGUST 15, �LO�7 �'ROJECT DESIGN ENG7NEER PROFILE (VERTICAL) "SUB-REGIONAL TIER" TO SR 1942 —(JONES FERRY ROAD) ) CONSTRUCTION STA. 16 + 2 0. 00 HYDRA ULICS ENGIMEER P.E. SlGNATURE: ROADWAY DESIGN ENGIIVEER SlGNATURE: P.E. � P.E. RNJ & UTILITIES N I Z M � 0 Z BUFFER DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 5 O � N sr (NTS) PS — PAVED SHOULDER SBG — SHOULDER BERM GUTTER SKETCH SHOWING BRIDGFiROADWAY RELATIONSHIP ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 ,� � ,� ..... ..... 11 DETAIL A TOE PROTECTION lNo��o s�oiel O� 2��'(�E0. sioe[ caouHo J d F�A d=1.5 Ft. cEOTezraF Type of Liner= CLASS B Ri�Rop FROM STA.15+20 TO STA.15+50-L-RT. / � / / \ / \ i \ // . y \ EIP \ \ \� \ I/ �. I � �' 1 �, �, � � , I y ,1 � � MiCNAE��W. SEBALD �� \ \N \ ,� \ � m � �� . � \w000s , \ \ +67.00 -L- +90.00 -L- 61.00' LT. +7 00 -L- m \ � 50.00' LT. +00.00 -L- 65. LT. ^ 63.00' LT. � \ +00.0 -L- ooaa, +70.00 -L- 70_00' LT_ ) � 2A=�'r�6 R E F' � PJ@ 1 INV=397 8 • w000s �4 ✓- _ � � 040 g 2� --- _ �E s�_Nc aiw� 2 OWS �1S �Hor�o S�al�� Slope Vones F�or�e� no,��oi 2, °��S�oee �,o��d y F F—MI d 6=50 Ft. - �Gea�exale Type of Liner= CL455 B Rip-Rop FROM STA.15 i 10 TO STA.15 � 20-L-RT. FROM STA.15+10 TO STA.15-20.L-LT. >> Z4'B57 �z I I -�—TO SR l95/lWHITE CROSS ROl �.�S��RCP�� ..�,J""'-�n'-1"�r� rn, / 1� � � /WOODS �a � la � �i � ' / I� I ��m � �2 � � Ieo.00_� :IA` CUT DITCH � Hbr o S�nle� Zl'BST � — 4 —uY}v�vu woaos m � � h �ti T< m�ti +90.00 -L- 30.44' RT. 60.00' RT. +10.00 -L- 30 45' RT. 40 00' RT. +75. 0 -L- 60.00' RT. 30. 6' RT. 8M#1 50 0' RT. �' \a� 2 � \ CHERYL KOZEL \ ? JOAN KOZEL VAN OR ��S�s $TEPNAWE K,CRUBBS� � � JONATNAN GRUBBS .. Gea�e•��le� I Min.L{=1.0 F. : of Liner= CLASS B Rip Rop Mox y 1.5 Ft. FROM $TA.15-�.-20 O STA.15-50.L- T 0 BOBBiE A�WREWS ST4NFORp & CHARLES ASHLEY ST4NFORD DETAIL B DETAIL -L - Pl S�o ut5027 o = o�4r i5.o� rRr, D = / 07' l4T L = 62.83' T = 31.42' R = 5J1228' SE = SEE PLANS ar� Nn��".. RO � Nn S�o.� I5+50 L lT. 1 M13cf O� 1 fi4cfs 2 Ifs V .2.4ls os d os I.BOcI: �0113ft-H � L0.356 ier-Closs B I ;. w000s -rttr'��,.r' W' `t+' w' � � G R/W _ � � _ _ � � � = �� \F � 3 � `SEE KTAIL A �j 3 L � a.oa 2t. ��D�� L B 1 EX{ VATIZ5Kh �/ � .�TO�vL= i-835 � / 40.00 - - � JF' � /� i%I / 90.00' T. G Q � / r��X I �� m OODS <� �� la h � m�v ti 1� 90.00 -L� +12.00 -L- �, � t �� 116.00' RT. �737.00' RT. �� X �� SR1005 OLD GREENSBO RD 24'BSr TO SR /942 (JONES FfRkY ROI� � �'v^�� Fc — — "�r - i PP ExisriNc aiw EIP 'g. WW WOODS +20.00 -L- 30.00' RT. +�a.00 -�- 30.00' RT. .� ' 5 a. =15 F 50—L—RT. Q -1 89cfs V=1 6fs d-06 �2�08cir 006]Wfi e .t 1.Jis L Closs B 00 tir_ � � wooDs � RNJ SHEET NO. DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC ENGINEER ENGINEER DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED O N Z M � 0 Z m O L.STEVE & DONNA HARWARD PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 5 SEE SHEET 5 FOR PROFILE SEE SHEETS S-1 THRU S—? FOR STRUCTURE PLANS 0 K N sr (NTS) PS - PAVED SHOULDER SBG - SHOULDER BERM GUTTER SKETCH SHOWING BRIDGFiROADWAY RELATIONSHIP ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 11 1 11 ..... ..... .. DETAIL A TOE PROTECTION lNo��o s�oiel O� 2��'(�E0. sioe[ caouHo J d F�A d=1.5 Ft. cEOTezraF Type of Liner= CLASS B Ri�Rop FROM STA.15+20 TO STA.15+50-L-RT. / � / / \ / \ i \ // . y \ EIP \ \ \� \ I/ �. I � \ \ . , �� \ o MiCNAE� W. SEBALD \ \ � \ \ — N I � _� m � .. � . _ _. , w000� , \ \ ... � ) � ` .. % +67.00 _L . \ \�..._ \ � . 61.00' Lj. . m �{. � +90.00 -L- � +7 0 -L- / \\\\\ \ / � } `�� , � fu0.00' LT. ! � 65. ' LT. '� � �+00.00 -L / �, � � � �� 63.00' LT. . � \ ! I +00.0 -L- , i �oo. �� .��fd�� R � ) 1� a I �� J 1 %� � +70 Ub L- 70.00�� E F J �Naoa / y 1� �\ � INV 397 8 � _� 1 � � �� , � � �- _ _ _ ��, � 0406 gti � � _ , ,�.�� —�sr� R�w, � ows �� ' �� RS � �� \ _ ` : �Q40 O�U 3 _' . p . __ .iOF �447 . � , \ �- �� -\~ � -. _ 10 11 . ' .'��. -- �:� __� -� 24`557. j lz �—TG SP lA5/(WHl E CROSS FOl � 53 �YQST \ / I / �� —F —.--- _, �_ _ _ �Hor�o S�al�� Slope Vones F�or�e� no,��oi 2, °��S�oee c�o��a �� e d 6=50 Ft. - �Gea�exale Type of Liner= CL455 B Rip-Rop FROM STA.15 i 10 TO STA.15 � 20-L-RT. FROM STA.15+10 TO STA.15-20.L-LT. Ir /� 1MSN/y -- � yi t W"'V—LO�F7aRX % �. � _ ... m —� � � ��) ,i��l � , �a,� - � � r,� ry EX�V I I,I ' � � TOi¢L .+ '� � ,i��' I r I � /WOODS I � : .. i��+ ��ll��\� � / mti �/ 2 �` / \\ � � � �.3000 yL. � �°/ ��" 1 �`� ( 1 �� 60 QO° RT +10.00 -L- � 4 /// J I �m `I `. I.. ' - '.� 30 45' RT. (/ x }y� ''L '^� 4000'RT +75. 0 L /{ � I� I I 60.00 RT � 30 6' NT �"�� I � 8M#1 � 50 0' RT y„ so.00� 'I A `� � y, \\ r �a \�� . � � I � � `�� CHERYL KOZEL � �� 5 3 JOAN KOZEL VAN OR �II� $TEPNAWE K,GRUBBS� f� i - JONATNAN GRUBBS .. :IA` CUT DITCH � Hbr o S�nle� Gea�e•��le� I Min.L{=1.0 F. : of Liner= CLASS B Rip Rop Mox y 1.5 Ft. FROM $TA.15-�.-20 O STA.15-50.L- T / YU.UU/ttl. r � I �� / � i . —L — Pl S�o ut5027 o = o�4r i5.o� rRr, D = / 07' l4T L = 62.83' T = 31.42' R = 5J1228' SE = SEE PLANS 0 BOBBiE A�WREWS ST4NFORp & CHARLES ASHLEY ST4NFORD �a�,///%J1((��111p��t$��// � � //;� � I I I I I I�// 6��.I51 f� � I � Q�q��Sfs �F P L LT: 4i I,�III ill��i`�I� lr��f� \�� L�rFCassB �.. � / � ` � �li ��f000�.�L �:� DE IL B� 30 p0 LT� �� see oerai��c as op Cr. � w000s -,� p � � ` - � f �, : ` : _- \ �, �— ��: �`"n"'_ Ex � �— � — '�� 005 QCD GREENSBO � RD 24'BSr S �o sa ry4e ��oNcs FeRar Rn� � � � yJ� y�4 Prr' I ' I �XISTNG F _ tIY...48" WW J� "`//� � � WO�DS � �--� K �+zo o -�- l �� 000� . _ � see ggra n �e oo �\ � � 30 00 RT .: ` � \ � -� / � , �_. — ,.�-\� c �,s. �.\��\ \ s��u.5oi�r.� � ` � \\\ o�� \\ \\ Q_-1 89cfs\ ` V 16fs d-0 6' � � Q 2Oeds 0O6]Wfi - 0.1 1 Jis L ner Closs B 06 -�.,� tir_ . .. . � WOODS � RNJ SHEET NO. DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC ENGINEER ENGINEER DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED O N Z M � 0 Z m O L.STEVE & DONNA HARWARD PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 3 OF 5 SEE SHEET 5 FOR PROFILE SEE SHEETS S-1 THRU S-? FOR STRUCTURE PLANS ■. . .. • � • -• �. -• , �� 0 ` 0_-��__--- - -_-_____--- 0 " ' -0- '��__--- - -_-_____--- - -_-_____--- - -_-_____--- - -_-_____--- - -_-_____--- - -_-_____--- - -_-_____--- - -_-_____--- - -_-_____--- - -_-_____--- - -_-_____--- - -_-_____--- - -_-_____--- - -_-_____--- - -_-_____--- - -_-_____--- - -_-_____--- � -�� -- Rev. May 2006 6� L Q �T ¢ � � ro ui m C � a � a � � 0 z � \ \ E�P \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ oopo j �� w000s �1:� �;�—�::�; �— BEGIN TIP PROJEC —L— STA. 12 + 50.00 / I CL B RIP RAP EST. 1 TON E5T.5 SY GEOTEXTILE O � 489' E i zresr — FTO SR l95/!WH/TE CRO55 Fi \ / �- — _ I.," RCF - _ _ - _ - � � - �� w000s � i� �i i� I i� I �I � O m �� O O PER RT. ti 0 ?e w000s �`^�r� \ m CLA55 II P RAP (STR. PAY ITEM)' � �, gy 2 T �� / a � �c � � x �o e n ) ' I OODS �� wIm� /\ ry � 1 y�� i F m~ � \ 1\' I EXCAVATION pBUTMENT E%�A� _ +/-310q �� Y (RDWY. PAY ITEM) �,-��` � STR. PAY ITE ;u ��yr-w'z ABUTMENT EXCAVATION +/-270cy (STR. PAY ITEM) —L— Pl S�o 11+5027 o= o� ar i5.o� rRr� D = I' 07' l4T L = 6283' T = 3/.42' R = 5J1228` SE = SEE PLANS O — 30' HAND CLEARING; PERMIT WILL BE EXEMPT, BECAUSE PERPENDICULARLY CROSSES THE STREAM + w000s ' �w �w�� "�" ex�srwc R e— — _ � � SRI005 OLD GREENSBOR RO 24'B5T N 80� 30' 02.6' E g ro sk r�9e ��omFs FeaRr Ra� � `Lr+'2r�wrn'v^i - - - _ - '�� W '_z�SiirvG aiw � � � � . EIP ' 8" WW w000s PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-5348 4 RNJ SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRP.UlICS ENGINEER ENGINEER DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED UTILITY RELOCATION BY OTHERS POWER POLES AND LINE CREATED AUGUST 17,2016 REVISED JANUARY 17, 2017 O N Z M � � Q Z HAND CLEARING IS ALLOWABLE IN ZONE 2 END TIP PROJECT B-5348 \ 30' HAND CLEARING —L— STA. � 6+ OO.00 WCODS � � ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE z: 300 SQFT (1 14 . 6 FEET ) � . . . . . . •� . . . . , � ,� ,� � � � . � � -• � �� -. ��-� • • • ' • • • ` • • .� .. • • • . -_-_ 11 11 _-- -_-____-- -_-____-- -_-____-- -_-____-- -_-____-- -_-____-- -_-____-- -_-____-- -_-____-- -_-____-- -_-____-- -_-____-- -_-____-- -_-____-- -_-____-- -_-____-- -_-____-- -_-____-- -_-____-- � � -� 11 11 _-- NOTES: 1. North side of bridge hand clearing will be exempt because line perpendicularly crosses the stream and impact is less than 150 linear feet (Impact is 30 linear ft). 2.South side of bridge hand clearing will be allowable in zone 2 and is considered impact other than perpendicular crossing. r i � � � � T, � � m � M � mf �f �, o: N Lf Q�L �� T= o °� N�� o� ��. as � �F ��F �22 � 722t i FOr �dPX OT –�h2E 5 See Sheet IB For Conventlonal Symbols See sheet 9C- I For Surve Control Sheet • Ve201fi I015 I 54 / s I �io� 2019 m C s oox �a19J5 f/ I p. 2013 � 1945 0 [n201> -� �I = zasa ` 54 / a o 1909 � J — R Z e � R � 2054 2036 a F 2p2 2038 � 20�J 2026 � � a�M203J o£ ` — � 1991 ` 2033 < p t� 2036 o I`` ob 1944 202 � e 2035 � 2034 ��' 203 TIP PROJECT \ B-5348 �oas 1945 _ � � 2058 f �OSJ � 1005 \ �� 943 � = 0 � zo4� Fe� z � �,� � � I �946 _ or 194 l� —� ` 2093 � v o, ��,`�� uwveRsirv LAKE VICINITY MAP OFFSITE DETOUR � TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIGNALS �� V �J10�J1J1 �� 1LU � V 1� � � � � �1.G' � 1L lY J1 `�J' � V V � 1l � ORA1�lGE CO U1�TY ATE 5]'wTC PROJECT RCPERENCC N SHROT TOTAL sT °� . sxeeTs � �� B-5348 � . . . . . . . I . . . 46062'1�.1 BRSTPP1005(31) I P ER'PT, 46062.2.1 � WW & UTILITIES LOCATIOIV: BRIDGE NO. 85 OVER PHILS CREEK 0111 SR I005 (OLD GREENSBORO ROAD) TYPE OF WORK GRADI11lG DRAIIVAGE, PAVI11lG, TEMPORARY TRAFFIC SIG11lALS A11tD STI�UCTURE � (WHITE CI STA.12+50.00 —L— BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-5348 �*DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR SAG VERTICAL CURVES AND ASSOCIATED NIGHTTIME STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. TO SR 1942 _ (JONES FERRY ROAD) ) CONSTRUCTION STA. 16 + 2 0. 00 Iz M � 0 Z DOGUMENT NOT GONSIDERED PINAL UNlE55 ALLSIGNATURES COMPLETEO HYDRAULICS ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH Prepa�eo in tne ottice ot: so z5 0 50 �oo ADT 2017 = 4,575 DIVISIOIV OF HIGHWAYS p ADT 2035 = 5,80� 1000 Birch Ridge Or., Roleigh NC, 27610 /�C� qi �o �I�I1�� p 20/2 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS /a� �O PLANS K— 9 0° LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5348 = 0.046 MI. r.E. � � D= 65 /o LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-5348 = 0.020 MI. S'�nAT°RE: � � 50 25 0 50 100 T= 3 %* RIGHT OF WAY DATE: JAMES A. SPEER, PE a � V= 50 MPH TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-5348 = 0.066 MI. AUGUST 19, 2016 P"°'F°TFN�`NFFR RoanwaY nEsrcN ��, a ENGINEER PROFILE HORIZONTAL � ( ) * TTST =1% DUAL =2% ��par% l0 5 0 l0 20 FUNC CLASS=COLLECTOR LETTING DATE: DAN�EL W. GARDNER, JR., PE AUGUST 15, �IO�% PROJECT DESlGN ENGINEER PROFILE (VERTICAL) "SUB—REGIONAL TIER" PE SIGNATURE: BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.• State Line ----- ----- County Line Township Line City Line Reservation Line Property Line Existing Iron Pin � Property Comer —x Property Monument C Parcel/Sequence Number 123 Existing Fence Line - � x- Proposed Woven Wire Fence e Proposed Chain Link Fence � Proposed Barbed Wire Fence �� Existing Wetland Boundary - - - -w�a- - - - Proposed Wetland Boundary WLe Existing Endangered Animal Boundary E^a Existing Endangered Plant Boundary EPa Existing Historic Property Boundary �'A Known Contamination Area: Soil � � Potential Contamination Area: Soil -� � Known Contamination Area: Water - � � Potential Contamination Area: Water - � � Contaminated Site: Known or Potential �� BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE.• Gas Pump Vent or WG Tank Cap O $ign � Well � Small Mine �` Foundation 0 Area Outline I —I Cemetery �l� Building � School 0 Church � Dam HYDROLOGY.• Stream or Body of Water Hydro, Pool or Reservoir i i Jurisdictional Stream �S Buffer Zone 1 sz i Buffer Zone 2 az z Flow Arrow � -- Disappearing Stream Spring �- �_..�— Wetland � Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch � False Sump � ��1Le �� AV` ��ll�L ��11ll��1L��S]19 llJ/�L V' �L��L�� ll' lllL:L�ll�1 VV 571�� CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS Note: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering RAILROADS.• Standard Gauge RR Signal Milepost Switch RR Abandoned RR Dismantled RIGHT OF Wfl Y.• Baseline Control Point Existing Right of Way Marker Existing Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line with Iron Pin and Cap Marker Proposed Right of Way Line with Concrete or Granite WW Marker Proposed Control of Access Line with Concrete C/A Marker Existing Control of Access Proposed Control of Access Existing Easement Line - Proposed Temporary Construction Easement Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement Proposed Permanent Utility Easement Proposed Temporary Utility Easement Proposed Aerial Utility Easement - - � csx rRnmsPoarnriom Mi�e �; _; 0 swircn � � W W � � -_ 'S_� _ � — i — E TDE PDE DUE PUE TUE AUE Proposed Permanent Easement with O Iron Pin and Cap Marker � ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES.• Existing Edge of Pavement Existing Curb --- Orchard Vineyard EXISTING STRUCTURES.• MAJOR: Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall - MINOR: Head and End Wall Pipe Culvert Footbridge Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB Paved Ditch Gutter Storm Sewer Manhole Storm Sewer UTILITIES.• POWER: Existing Power Pole Proposed Power Pole Existing Joint Use Pole Proposed Joint Use Pole Power Manhole Power Line Tower Power Transformer U/G Power Cable Hand Hole H-Frame Pole U/G Power Line LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Power Line LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Power Line LOS D(S.U.E.*) — TELEPHONE: Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- �--- Proposed Slope Stakes Fill --- F--- Proposed Curb Ramp � Existing Metal Guardrail '- Proposed Guardrail T T T T- Existing Cable Guiderail ° ° u Proposed Cable Guiderail -° ° ° ° Equality Symbol Q Pavement Removal � I�EGETf1TION.• Single Tree �`� Single Shrub � Hedge ^,v,�„"-^ ^^"" �-'"Y Woods Line ��'-�`'-"''- Existing Telephone Pole Proposed Telephone Pole Telephone Manhole Telephone Pedestal Telephone Cell Tower U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole U/G Telephone Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Telephone Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Telephone Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) U/G Telephone Conduit LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Telephone Conduit LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Telephone Conduit LOS D(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) �? f� � f� ��neya-�, � ��N� � �_onc ww � WATER: Water Manhole Water Meter Water Valve Water Hydrant U/G Water Line LOS B(S.U.E*) U/G Water Line LOS C(S.U.E*) U/G Water Line LOS D(S.U.E*) Above Ground Water Line rv: �„N� �W N Pedestal - N Tower �--------� U/G TV Cable Hand Hole � B U/G TV Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G N Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) ,� U/G TV Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) � U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) �• a GAS: Gas Valve Gas Meter U/G Gas Line LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Gas Line LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Gas Line LOS D(S.U.E.*) Above Ground Gas Line SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary Sewer Manhole Sanitary Sewer Cleanout WG Sanitary Sewer Line Above Ground Sanitary Sewer SS Forced Main Line LOS B(S.U.E.*) SS Forced Main Line LOS C(S.U.E.*) SS Forced Main Line LOS D(S.U.E.*) MISCELLANEOUS: Utility Pole Utility Pole with Base Utility Located Object Utility Traffic Signal Box Utility Unknown WG Line LOS B(S.U.E.*) WG Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. - A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Geoenvironmental Boring U/G Test Hole LOS A(S.U.E.*) Abandoned According to Utility Records - End of Information P/G Weter O � �,H � • � � n 0 usT 0 � 0 AATUR E.O.I. NAD N83 �RID NA 2011 NCDOi BAS�I.WC STATION "8�_3" N = 784524.445!) F = 1965098.57<0 � B-5348 S UR VEY C01�TROL SHEET BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-5348 —L— STA. 12 + 50.00 E (TO SR 1951 (WHITE CROSS RD) � -- - — � / � NOTES 1. THE CONTROL DATA FOR THIS PROJECT CAN BE FOUND ELECTRONICALLY BY SELECTING PROJECT CONTROL DATA AT: HTTP.//WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC. US/PRECONSTRUCT/HIGHWAY/LOCATION/PROJECT/ THE FILES TO BE FOUND ARE AS FOLLOWS: b5348_ls_control_151005.txt SITE CALIBRATION INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT.IF FUftTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED,PLEASE CONTACT THE LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT. � INDICATES GEODETIC CONTROL MONUMENTS USED OR SET FOR HORIZONTAL PROJECT CONTROL BY THE NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT. PROJECT CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM. �CJOT B�S�LWE STATION gL-q" ' N = 784555.0'700I i = 19655�5.7t90 � /� / % �� 'y m � G� � i �� BMI � Q'� ELEV = 395,29 � �� J N END TIP PROJECT B-5348 —L— STA. 17 + 00.00 SR 1005 OLD GREENSBORO RD. PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-5348 1C-1 Location and Survevs BM� �.E� EV - 449.69 � TO SR 1942 (JONES FERRY RD.) - - - � - NCDOT BAStVNE STATION RL-5" N = 784638.7830 L = 1966129�0110 BASELINE DATA �_ PeiN� �Fsc. NeaTH FAST Fir.vA u uN � sTATs�N oFFSET 3 BL-3 7E45G4�445� 1u55�D98.522�D 443.GB OUTSICIE rROJECT LIMIT; 4 BL-4 784555.�IID(� 1965575.7:98 4+T1.�5 13�97.24 15.42' F21 ._ BL-5 78A�638.783N 1966124.�iI1@ *i4�.59 OUTSICiE PROJECT LIMITS 2 B5348-2 784758.7538 1966661.8980 453.58 OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS 1 E=�348-1 784E2 L 2958 1967522.773� 484.72 OUTSICIE PROJECT LIMI?S DATUM DESCRIPTION THE LOCALIZED COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPE� FOR THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE C�ORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY NCDOT FOR MONUMENT "85348-2"' WITH NAD 83/NA 2011 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF NORTHING: 784758.7530(ftl EASTING: 1966661.8980(ftl ELEVATION: 453.581ft) THE AVERAGE COMBINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT (GROUND TO GRID) IS: 0.9999208814 THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM "85348-2" TO -L- STATION 12+50.00 IS 5 80°18'18" W 1252.00" A�L LINEAR OIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES VERTICAL DATUM USED IS NAVD 88 BENCHMARK DATA 8M' ELEVATION - 395.8q' N 784473 E 1965526 GL SIATION 9�23.Bm 78' RIGHT R/R SPIKE IN BRSE OF t8" PINE .......................................< BM2 ELEVATION - 449.69� N 784750 E 1966247 BL STATION 16-77.eB 81' LEFT R/R S�PSYE IN �R=.E OF 24" F'OPLAR � �a` a�- NOTE: DRAWING NOT TO SCALE PAVEMENT SCHEDULE �� PROP. APPROX. 1.5" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5B, E� PROP. APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.0B, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 168 LBS. PER S�. YD. AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE B25.0B, �Z PROP. APPROX. 3" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE S9.5B, E2 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 168 LBS. PER S�. YD IN EACH OF TWO LAYERS. BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 3" IN DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 5.5" IN DEPTH. PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE TYPE S9.5B, C3 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 112 LBS. PER S�. YD. PER 1�' DEPTH. TO T EARTH MATERIAL. BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED 1.5" IN DEPTH. p� PROP. APPROX. 2.5" ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE, U EXISTING PAVEMENT. TYPE I19.06, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 285 LBS. PER S�. YD. PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE, D2 TYPE I19.08, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER S�. YD. PER 1" �y VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) DEPTH, TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 2.5'� IN DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 4" IN DEPTH. 7TE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1:1 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE G'-9„ 2.75„ TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 C� -L- 36' OUT TO OUT 33'-6" CLEAR ROADWAY 12' 12' 6.75" C� 2.75„ � -3" /�--- NAL GROUND 2-BAR .,_ __......... 2-BAR METAL RAIL �C� �� GRADE ( W� Cl METAL RAIL � POINT 1" O/S � „ �� .02 _.02, �� TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2 NOTE: SR 1005 (OLD GREENSBORO ROAD) IS DESIGNATED PART OF THE "MOUNTAINS TO SEA" BIKE ROUTE PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-5348 2A—1 ROADWAY DESIGN PAVEMENT DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED � SURVEY -� ��1� .' _ `._`L�� - _ _ _ _ ��5„Yj�� _�\�� z 5„ \.� �j — — _ _ 3„ .� MIN.� � MIN. MIN. '� 3„ Detail Showing Method of Wedging � MIN. NOTE: TRANSITION FROM EXISTING TO TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 -L- STA. 12 + 50.00 TO STA. 13 + 00.00 TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 -L- STA. 13+00.00 TO STA. 13+98.38 (BEGIN BRIDGE) -L- STA. 15+02.63 (END BRIDGE) TO STA. 15+50.00 NOTE: TRANSITION FROM TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 TO EXISTING -L- STA. 15 + 50.00 TO STA. 16 + 00.00 TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2 -L- STA. 13+98.38 (BEGIN BRIDGE) TO STA. 15+02.63 (END BRIDGE) N Z O z / �\ � � �e w ' s 560 55 �\ 422' � � � i � /. � / \� \ ��P \ po\ \ --z� � � � � � z � � � �a � p a3 �R 4� � � _ . i � � �� ,\ o � � M ' I �I� I j� � m� \ � \ o o M� �� CL B RIP RAP � \\ Nm O � c`^ � � � EST. 1 TON O� � 1� \ p � '� � \ � � EST. 5 SY GEOTEXTILE � O e�n � \ � O UN , f \ J J 1 \\ � � \ � � MICHAEL W. SEBALD � � \ \ m� \n� DB 964 PG i70 ii � \ _ PB 29 PC 161 � a \ m \ s�P, .-' � \ I N � � , u n -L- STA. 12 + 50.00 �� I t • WO l�s � - � I 4 / ��- ✓,-�4r .n+ �. � - s.9" E i 1 za-asr 1 i �-ro sa i9sirvvro�e cRoss Ho� � � is acP � �-�f`�„"u��- � 1m I w000s �� waoos ��= ' �, iz I= I / � IA I I �� co.00 I m O J � A v� �n - =m w� � , � v a -L - P/ Sta I1+50.27 0= 0° 42' 15.0" fRTI D = l' 07' 14.7" L = 62.83' T = 31.42' R = 5J12.28' SE = SEE PLANS v) � � O ~ � � V, BOBBIE ANDREWS STANFORD & � ? CHARLES ASHLEY STANFORD J � � � DB 3196 PC 347 � � il PB 93 PG 4 I � J a � g � +15.00 -L- �' m� �o.00� �T. END CONSTRUCTION -L- STA. 16 + 20.00 I m � `� SEE DETAIL 6 �°� m S� SEE DETAIL C � �C � 2� � ��NC. +20.00 �- �{ E �TYP. ao.00'�r. w000s ' � 'OOn� 45.00'LT. m� E T � � C C VE �� i F� - �-- , r,--c.; : .. .� .; -•, :. .��-4ir� _ . -� Txsrwc aiw � i Z a T. & 'V1005 011l GREEN550R RD 24'B>! N 80' 30 02.6 E- ro sR i9az r�omEs rc�r Rai � - - �� - _ ,J- � � � ,.�, .,, _ � �,� � -�- ''� ex_ Nc n�w F.iP 4e�� ww w000s r .- "/ � Q �+�e.oa -�- 50' TAPER ��° 1F ,'�' � 3.i3 �- so.00 eT. r LT. & RL P g v � mti � 30.00' RT. p1' 'r� � 5 Y� �50.00' RT. +90.00 �- �^�, �,,, 30.44'RT. E-EV�M95.8_' � / ` � � SEEDETAILA ,� 60.00' RT. +10.00 -L- �t� HEET I-I j� '�f SE Je `eF� g +40.00 - "� 30.45' RT. � 90.00, Q � . ao.00 aT. +�s.00 - 60.00' RT. 30.56' . - �� I � ~�,N 50.00' T. r � � � _�� i I � 0� x DODC � . � - rv ] 4 � +i2.oa �- N +g0.00 -L-�"� /\m 116.00' RT. 137.00' RT. �J. �� l � � � �� \ �� . � WOODS \ . � ".'\L' I E%CAVATION O m =+/�IOcY ABUTMFNT �X¢AVATION -1. � 2 � �; (RDWY. PAY ITEM) ^�Sq-� Y r 1� � � ��,r'-��` (STR. PAY ITEM� CHERYL KOZEL �m � � � _ � �,�"`�� JOAN KOZEL VAN OR� W�`��'� � � STEPHANIE K. GRUBBS �.;� ABUTMENT EXCAVATION JONATHAN CRUBBS ' +�270y DB 3473 PG 341 ""` �Sie.7av iiern� PB 27 PG 113 - DETAIL A DETAIL B DETAIL C TOE PROTECTION TOE PROTECTION SPECIAL NT DITCH ( Not �o Smle� � N t �o Scola) ( No� ro Scnla� D'i1cM1 �c�olexne s ore F slope vanes P°es rvow�oi z 1\o e� siape F Na�ural ,�� `�S\o G.o�nd ./ p F cROUN�� Ground _ y . F d ��q �,1 d �eotenae d=15 it. d=15 Ft. Min. D=1A Ft. 6=5.0 N. Geotextile Type of�iner CLASS B Ri�Rop Mox.d=1.5 Ff. Type oftiner= CLASS B Rlp-Rop Type afLiner= CLASS B Rip-Rap FROM $TA.15+20 TO $TA.15+50 -L- LT FROM STA.15+20 TO STA. 15+50 -L- RT. FROM STA.75-r70 TO STA.75+20 -L- RT. E5T.14 TONS RIP RAP EST.14 TONS RIP RAP EST.7 TONS RIP RAP EST.39 SY GEOTEXTILE EST.39 SY GEOTE%TILE EST.19 SY GEOTE%TIIE FROM STA. 15 �i- 10 TO STA. IS i� 20 -L- LT. EST.7 TONS RIP RP,P EST.19 SY GEOTE%TILE PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-5348 4 R/W SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED 0 N Z M DO � Z � smr - ELF.V - 449.G9' � S�E iHE�T IC-I 1 END TIP PROJECT B-5348 -L- STA. 16 + 00.00 O L.STEVE & DONNA HARWARD DB 1470 PG 327 P8 76 PG 34 SEE SHEET 5 FOR PROFILE SEE SHEETS 5-1 THRU S-? FOR STRUCTURE PLANS 0 Ll �G C � � �� VW -�¢ 9 �r? �i� i�W -�� CCLy) 0 Ll �G C � � �� VW -�¢ 9 �r? �i� i�W -�� CCLy) 0 Ll �G C � � �� VW -�¢ 9 �r? �i� i�W -�� CCLy)