NC0035157_Final Permit_20010720 (2)

T
r...-ii, . ,‘
. O
.. ,:-: k 3 CI
c+0 ,,, . p... G ,
Q... ... n Iasi -.
O N 3 N V
cC
E M 1 -�
dC) i
-...p.--- ,b 9,T.4: c,-,,,
0
..li .=
,c1 3 1
i 1 E
,_...
,.. _. ,i
,-.) .....)
d.) \}i armil' *'3
0 0
v Vim• ois. t\
U
K a N
N
GJ <5i•r �`n
x
3u, —
.-
_...
..,o ,,---4
E \)
0
\fil.) '.-.-----.k,..,
,c, „s 4' 1.4 g B Di
4,) 6 A .;, i B g .:1Lq ,E g t" ,'N wk
O 2 a A w I d v, U `. a
• o .2 B W V Z A• Ems-+ •4: a E o
i4 Q Rd g 4 E a
9 .
h v 1-0in:
CI
2 WA v O
cA
X �
at P4gy
/� p,
_i ucit
3a b V A A
ee ci d =4 t
li
r y 0 0w c 4-44
3
t/1 EE E ` O w 0 0
o Z x yC E g .. c,v;
2. clit,..,
c C O . 8 . •a� N 0 "d r•
3 0 Lr) a a i 1-=44 .) 0 P4 _ , i j
Q4 cn
00
o b ,5 1
3
A 0 n
gZ o .� o o o C7 • 1 A 3 ',...) 2 ,.... 2--, .
�.
,J Z ‘.4..
4 a 4 O W = 0 18
"CS eu
41Wa a w w a a w A S cg �a U a x U x k 6 x 4 x

r
t
NOV. . -ii) T1Oinil
ACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION .rL 199 2 le
Request# !654-4,i7 QUALITY SECTION
Facility Name: Pinnacle Rest Home ASHEVILLE REGIO AL OFFICE
NPDES No.: NC0035157
Type of Waste: Domestic - 100%
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Receiving Stream: UT South Muddy Creek
Stream Classification: C
Subbasin: 030830
County: McDowell Stream Characteristic:
Regional Office: Asheville USGS # 0213877009
Requestor: Kepler Date: 10/92
Date of Request: 10/24/91 Drainage Area(mi2): 0.2
Topo Quad: E11NW Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 0.05
Winter 7Q10(cfs): 0.08
Average Flow (cfs): 0.3
30Q2 (cfs): 0.1
IWC (%): 8.6%
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken,correspondence with region, EPA,etc.)
Technical Support has completed its evaluation of Pinnacle Rest Home based on corrected
discharge location from Asheville RO. USGS data shows that location has positive S7Q10=0.05
cfs. Model results indicate that BOD5=30 mg/1 will protect DO standard. NH3 toxicity limits are
needed at 0.0046 MGD and at 0.003 MGD (proposed reduction in wasteflow to get acceptable 1
NH3 limit). F&i•(i 4) ..i,1 be f hf-) 643 a,.,LGwt`M Liar f,,,3 /.;k,f il w/ 4x ‘74 N .$4,#.1.1 /4.,./f 4- ,
0'Jt6 L;,4• Cf 1
Spial ched e Requirements and a ditional commen . •m eviewe : !
C, r� Gti wh _�r.Le4--ii 6Le,k,� _ y �' cmc 1___
6 _.-,
Recommended b - Adis ► / / Date: 11/9/92
/
/ i
Reviewed by 1 -
y
Instream Assessment: . td /IL... .4 Date:
Region.. • - 'sor: �� /lbto Date: 3 I ?
Permits&Engineering: OP21______Il/ ,/ Date: / 7-(
DEC 1 1 1992
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:

'
2
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Existing Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
Wasteflow (MGD): 0.0046
BOD5 (mg/1): 30
NH3N (mg/1): monitor
DO(mg/1): nr
TSS (mg/1): 30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml): 1000
pH (SU): 6-9
Residual Chlorine (14/1): monitor
Temperature (C) monitor
Recommended Limits:
Monthly Average with Monthly Average with
Toxicity Test Ammonia Limit
Summer Winter Summer Winter
Wasteflow (MGD): 0.0046 0.0046 0.0046
BOD5(mg/1): 30 30 30
NH3N (mg/1): monitor 6.5 (AT) 20(AT)
DO(mg/1): nr nr nr
TSS (mg/1): 30 30 30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml): 200 200 200
pH (SU): 6-9 6-9 6-9
Residual Chlorine (4/1): monitor monitor monitor
Temperature (C) monitor monitor monitor
Toxicity Test(P/F) Chronic P/F @ %
Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other(onsite toxicity study,interaction,etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures Fecal Coliform, Chlorine
New facility information
_X_ Parameter(s)are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: 100 feet upstream
Downstream Location: 0.25 miles downstream at unimproved road
Parameters: DO,Temp, Conductivity,Fecal Coliform
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
II
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION &SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no,which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model,or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes,explain with attachments.

• L5 tO 11 l�
pI.
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATIO NOV I 6 1992 J
Request# 6345 b
Facility Name: Pinnacle Rest Home WATER QUALITY SECTION
NPDES No.: NC0035157 ASHEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
Type of Waste: Domestic- 100%
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Receiving Stream: UT South Muddy Creek
Stream Classification: C
Subbasin: 030830
County: McDowell Stream Characteristic:
Regional Office: Asheville USGS # 0213877009
Requestor: Kepler Date: 10/92
Date of Request: 10/24/'91 Drainage Area(mi2): 0.2
Topo Quad: El1NW Summer 7Q10(cfs): 0.05
Winter 7Q10(cfs): 0.08
Average Flow (cfs): 0.3
30Q2 (cfs): 0.1
IWC(%): 12
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken,correspondence with region,EPA,etc.)
Technical Support has completed its evaluation of Pinnacle Rest Home based on corrected
discharge location from Asheville RO. USGS data shows that location has positive S7Q10=0.05
cfs. Model results indicate that BOD5=30 mg/1 will protect DO standard. NH3 toxicity limits are
needed at 0.0046 MGD and at 0.003 MGD(proposed reduction in wasteflow to get acceptable
NH3 limit).Facility has been given NH3 Choice Option of existing limits w/toxicity test or
summer/winter NH3 limits.
Special Schedule Requirements and additinal comments from Reviewers:
r, r .
.........,„ .
Recommended by: _22'. / 4 i' /.i Date: 11/'9/'92...7
Reviewed by
i
.
Instream Assessmen .!��. t i P/L,..Z.LW 4A Date:______d-
Re 'on. ,•>4.6,: 'sor: !�� 111‘ i . Date: 1 3/
ri ir . -
Permi ' : gineering: / i a Date: i Z I gi frj.
DEC q 1992
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:

2
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Existing Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
Wasteflow (MGD): 0.0046
BOD5 (mg/1): 30
NH3N(mg/1): monitor
DO(mg/1): nr
TSS (mg/1): 30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml): 1000
pH (SU): 6-9
Residual Chlorine (µg/1): monitor
Temperature (C) monitor
Recommended Limits:
Monthly Average with Monthly Average with
Toxicity Test Ammonia Limit
Summer Winter Summer Winter
Wasteflow (MGD): 0.003 0.00 0.0C
BOD5 (mg/1): 30 30 30
NH3N(mg/1): monitor 9.4 (AT) 29 (AT)
DO(mg/1): nr nr nr
TSS (mg/1): 30 30 30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml): 200 200 200
pH (SU): 6-9 6-9 6-9
Residual Chlorine (14/1): monitor monitor monitor
Temperature (C) monitor monitor monitor
Toxicity Test(P/F) Chronic P/F @ 12%
Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other(onsite toxicity study,interaction,etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures Fecal Coliform, Chlorine
New facility information
X_ Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited,but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: 100 feet upstream
Downstream Location: 0.25 miles downstream at unimproved road
Parameters: DO,Temp, Conductivity,Fecal Coliform
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION&SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no,which parameters cannot be met?
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes,then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model,or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes,explain with attachments.

AT-
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Ann B. Orr
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
December 2 , 1992
Mr. James C. Childres
Pinnacle Rest Home
Route 3, Box 342
Nebo, North Carolina 28761
Subject: Effluent Limitations
J
Pinnacle Rest Home
McDowell County
Dear Mr. Childres:
The Asheville Regional Office recently received the effluent
limitations (based upon actual location of discharge point) proposed
for Pinnacle Rest Home' s new wastewater discharge permit. A copy of
those limitations is attached. The proposed effluent restrictions
differ from existing limits as described in the table below. In the
table, "summer" is the period April through October: "winter" is
November through March.
* * * At currently permitted discharge volume of 0. 0046 MGD * * *
Parameter Existing Limitation Proposed Limitation
NH3-N monitor only 6. 5 mg/1 ( summer)
20. 0 mg/1 (winter)
In lieu of the NH3-N limitation, "Toxicity" may be selected,
Toxicity no limit pass 9%
Fecal Coliform 1000 200
* * * * * *At proposed discharge volume of 0. 0003 MGD * * * * * *
Parameter Existing Limitation Proposed Limitation
NH3-N monitor only 9. 4 mg/1 ( summer)
29.0 mg/1 (winter)
In lieu of the NH3-N limitation, "Toxicity may be selected,
Toxicity no limit pass 12%
Fecal Coliform 1000 200
Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, N.C.. 28801 • Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

James Childres
December 2 , 1992
Page Two
The modifications of limitations and monitoring requirements
for fecal coliform are as a result of more stringent water quality
standards which became effective in October, 1989 . The ammonia
(NH3-N) limitation or toxicity limitation results from the
Environmental Protection Agencies having required the State of North
Carolina to address in-stream ammonia toxicity.
Attached are copies of the "wasteload allocations" detailing
limitations proposed for inclusion in Pinnacle Rest Home' s renewal
permit. Also attached is a printout containing Pinnacle Rest Home' s
most recent 12 months of self-monitoring data. On or before January
15, 1993, please advise me of the manner in which to proceed
concerning Pinnacle Rest Home' s renewal permit. Specifically, at
which flow limitation (0. 0046 or 0. 003 MGD) should the facility be
permitted? Will the NH -N limitation or toxicity be chosen? Do you
wish to generate actual' stream flow data at the point of Pinnacle Rest
Home' s discharge rather than accepting limitations as proposed?
Your cooperation in dealing with this matter is appreciated.
Please phone me at telephone [phone] if there are questions
concerning Pinnacle Rest Home' s wastewater discharge permit.
' ncerely,
dill
J
---_ -_11.-C1,----'-j.---- /, •-_12-:_ C---'(._ _
c James R. Reid
Environmental Chemist
Enclosure
xc : Harry James

- - ....— • .7"------ - • -..:;:-. ,,.7(44.)
• ' •-,‘4 '•,.-,:df!": /11:11,1/4/J1 4$4/ iiiiiI,
,. ,....-.
....
,. -
,,,.
2 ori Cvc
. . -- °3 3° : iggiirr .I
31 7oIL7. s'
' +,i0..kw's- - _ 44:. 0.77,4,
d ?fr 0.4 c if
•
tlJ4a: 0.1dj U z..a.1,6l ,r
Iel
1
.= Vit‘IrSA Ol
•
It Ur 021st 770, p
r ft.)3*o,0644 A(40 _ Ifit= /./••r:` - . - K
r Pi 0.0744,- • Cps¢ -.1,64
0,45%0445 S7pa:0 Z cf3
90:.v 107V6PM�cfi
u1 !c 3°-2 %).S7c6,
Jo /z6.4.r e.I ,c
VI
f .
•
. w1-1 �.. 3/17 .
��vz�.� -sc�
' 4
., . -441€ r.......A.,,-4, 2
0 5-d- 2//0,d- ft Ast,,,,,,,,rmit,,,, ,,_ 4-..7.16—/4 ...„, --- • • - - I
, 1 .15-4.1,7411- - ,.. , .,' 4. 790----- 0, .0. 2- 0 , ie.-,4„,,_ 4_ ,,,,,-
• --)-
74- obpdo,ird/P1:pii- 1._._ i
_ : :-
iP
_14. ._ ._,„
/7d 7 W 4f.' _ - c z¢- - , -
. ' ' . Aif-,A1-l-'--t-----4 °14-4 .11---,-it i 3 ,72,-14 pi ?:/e-y-- -s7//‘ v- /°/////‘, . . .
' - ' if ..e.-6,..ji-- dei.,,,rf 04., a.,d, 6f,--iotz ,.__ ki,—.4., 7f,4-, A4,-,..,,ra-
7 _ -tt- .0,..,.et- — '
H 16#0.4t-_ 6`¢ 2 et 41/7-1 L .(may , , 1- ` .ter` _ __ . 4
1, I )
. -1'1 - - i I fAleo
#(41/14.47 ) 11Zt - Cy% WIS "4,004.4...05 COLvt41 41"1°)A. ,. . d. Cill,yea.J ' , - '-. 1
i 0-, /44.4,..2J 4, i.a„,... iki#3 Pc.....ly 4 1*NIL A ile. . . .,.. - • ,:. -
(
- . '4;0' ''. t- ' '
G1) _-
E �3�r-�v */,SS �-� ,007 �.6 ��
' 0U3 /`tom U86 +I� /r/�► _
L002,4enoi,,./.5-9,1-,as •05,,,7 :•- _ , - .
- ,:271/C., e , uv tC .4070 ; )V('A6b t /. r_!:) „. °7 _x;/224- //t! /Z, 2
S . OS
.
1

4F ": '• . 'il a ♦ _11�"J, -1�.��� - iiYf ., '•1
�°va
(�/��l�i^.s--�� I `--ram [/ I�'_y,+'yC.� _ �� - ` `i • . 's. ^�, A �- , �
•,.R a�asF'
r
"�. �
♦ SAC w _ � ti9. _--�1` _- _, a -.•a'' ,�y '� ]� µ r,. t .', i. � ,7 -.
,` _ '�.
Ilk
s -` :•� ... J-.. � �} :�,- u:�r _ ."Ir;- 1 :. ia. f +:•;,ePli,...i..s;i`�Tr Y'- .__� '�.. o.. - :._d 7"' k�zt
40
-
s .,'.. .-' .; re• D, .�sT_ J9 . - _ --
./y ♦ j 4\ � � cq
<t?r. .; r if _,:. r:_
P T•• _
'.t � y .
�' LN � A lei � O 10 ,.e
_
�g �_. .ry _yam. - _ -
IEyr
`. ; L lC .�t �y x � �• - _ _} cz, - .- i f►�_' . _ .� �•,-
,�".- v. ,-�' �D� Lr �/ / ,�, •-��" - :y' G''-i-.. "�''.' `•fir' _ � '
M � •
.- k . - ram- � �' �� f •_ � � ' � +n. 1 - y. . K ��. '+: i'� 'kor _ -
J. ' ? ��� '' °�`" t ` '`J�r 9�� • . y� . - r, + y� .t N ,r fir; i�t `;i''
:i,.,3 -
�l,' •} s y, `
� � �. AM ��
W.(N(. '� ..�� Q�' �l I „ ,O �-" '•`^'L_ � .a
.,,�; i ���AG/�}-tom' /cat CCC -- .-
i' -, ♦
1
A oo f dp, oo_F1t c o
.ueyp - X, i/ �/ oo"
) . - . - . —
-441 o
�{- gyp- ♦ ~^ t•
71
Yr
x
ter. x o o y7
� - .3R h i. i�j, - '� N � . ' 7 +it • t
T'i„�cyJ�1i ss \. .lam - _ ':3 �• -
L M
� .`,.i, t �' d t�
,.�, r:�
-..
_
.___ - i�^-.+�.+`,'ef••.-�+• J -cam �ScAe.,�r.+�'rt"r7 H'�'.^. ���r""t�,--� --� _ / � _-_ �/ ;
1 � -
t-
9 t.� • J
�
.{r � .�.
wv 1
•
•- I
'_� . 1 T M" I! •i
i
is•' - ..--_ .. �• w< - - y - tkuJ�?- --i ..7
....
0.3
•- M �i x k.' L• -
O,os CA
f 0%1
- 2i� '•iiL -
-'• '. "Y',. _
f �fr� Pam' SPV --/fir �) -
gil4•r+,y,.��• +
C/.1 5 _
�+" •'4�`- •''�:
�. • 1 . I %i'% Q , �J Zc�
- i
♦: - P - � �gI �'��
`aI-
`� • '� � ti �$"- .., - _ r �T si^i' . {� _ - sT.'• _ ♦ i15 . A�• � � �'!1 � \ -- Tip .
- 1�_ +
- i ~ J.
� .' .�-
��1 �` �'
► / �4.i - fi -
K+t 4 _ !��t�pTc•
4� T�:.l. .
-t •'
PV,� a, ail . .� u.C. -
t ��•c •c-
'i .rr ! i � •� � 'x,�.-u y.• -. �r• _ 3 .. _> - --=1 ic_ 'i - �s •rl
J}r
.:.• .1 '1^.k`- - -'Hfi �i� f •il
i�
.�Ir•� ���T�..1 _ 1 F 7 T - S 70

L .
1. ' •aa
e1tv . dish'
/2Y� 0
1 dist S
S e r e cL M . / to u (J.3.SH„
I/ `a o. 6,0,,,' 25
20
1 1 L,-) o. F0„,
(Yla4.ns-tcri, Bei
:k '
51.41e Calculation S ' .
•
.
'1
/Z Y0 - / S`o /11
...3-5--- d . 3 S-#'7,
1
I
/ lin - //6 d ��
;Lar•
'4/ r.:' ;) //d4 - //Z° _
Z� Z�U
bpfI ' it io 1- _ JZO4 % /5-0 it,
i
i
r
________
..• .
.. .
I . ,
_ \I
, .. _ 4 I •-- 0 A 41 . 4 I P
I . 4 . A A . 4 .. . s. . i I 0 -.
;_. 1 I 4.-- . 4. 4 • 4 ,. a. .W I 4.-- \
. . . • 1 • ♦ I I . 1 AI. I .
.
d 'i°6 . . 1 1 I 1
1 1 t . , • - . ,r a 1 I 1
v '
111111111111111111111111111111k .
/2® • 11.111
1 z _tib

•
' pinnacle rest home
AMMONIA ANALYSIS
7Q10: 0.0500 cfs
NH3 Effl. Conc: 13.7000 mg/1
AL (1/1 . 8 mg/1) : 1000 . 00 ug/1
Upstream NH3 Conc. : 220 . 0000 ug/1
Design Flow: 0.0046 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 1902 . 35 ug/1
1 . 902345 mg/1
NH3 Limit: 6469. 845 ug/1
6.469845 mg/1
AMMONIA ANALYSIS (WINTER)
7Q10: , 0 .0800 cfs
NH3 Effl . Conc: 13.7000 mg/1
AL (1/1 . 8 mg/1) : 1800 . 00 ug/1
Upstream NH3 Conc. : 220 . 0000 ug/1
Design Flow: ,. 0. 0046 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 1323. 09 ug/1
1 . 323091 mg/1
NH3 Limit: 19527 . 91 ug/1
19.52791 mg/1

•
pinnacle rest home
AMMONIA ANALYSIS
7Q10: 0 . 0500 cfs
NH3 Effl . Conc: 13. 7000 mg/1
AL (1/1 . 8 mg/1) : 1000 . 00 ug/1
Upstream NH3 Conc. : 220 . 0000 ug/1
Design Flow: _ - 0 . 0030 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 1366. 97 ug/1
1 . 366971 mg/1
NH3 Limit: 9387 . 096 ug/1
9.387096 mg/1
AMMONIA ANALYSIS (WINTER)
7Q10: , 0.0800 cfs
NH3 Effl . Conc: 13.7000 mg/1
AL (1/1 . 8 mg/1) : 1800 . 00 ug/1
Upstream NH3 Conc. : 220 . 0000 ug/1
Design Flow: ..„:. 0 .0030 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 960 .48 ug/1
0 . 960484 mg/1
NH3 Limit:t28982 . 79 ug/1
28. 98279 mg/1

• pinnacle rest home
AMMONIA ANALYSIS
7Q10: 0. 1800 cfs
NH3 Effl . Conc: 13.7000 mg/1
AL (1/1 . 8 mg/1) : 1000 . 00 ug/1
Upstream NH3 Conc. : 220 . 0000 ug/1
Design Flow: .,;, 0. 0046 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 733. 61 ug/1
0 .733612 mg/1
NH3 Limit: 20691 . 44 ug/1
20. 69144 mg/1
AMMONIA ANALYSIS (WINTER)
7Q10: 0.2900 cfs
NH3 Effl. Conc: 13 .7000 mg/1
AL (1/1 . 8 mg/1) : 1800 . 00 ug/1
Upstream NH3 Conc. : 220. 0000 ug/1
Design Flow: s 0. 0046 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 543 . 47 ug/1
0 .543469 mg/1
NH3 Limit: 66063 . 67 ug/1
66.06367 mg/1

pinnacle rest home
AMMONIA ANALYSIS
7Q10: 0. 1800 cfs
NH3 Effl. Conc: 13.7000 mg/1
AL (1/1 . 8 mg/1) : 1000 . 00 ug/1
Upstream NH3 Conc. : 220 . 0000 ug/1
Design Flow: c; 0. 0030 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 559. 46 ug/1
0 .559463 mg/1
NH3 Limit: 31193 .54 ug/1
,,. 31.19354 mg/1
AMMONIA ANALYSIS (WINTER)
7Q10: . . 0.2900 cfs
NH3 Effl . Conc: 13 .7000 mg/1
AL (1/1 . 8 mg/1) : 1800 . 00 ug/1
Upstream NH3 Conc. : 220 . 0000 ug/1
Design Flow: ,m_ 0 .0030 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 432 . 73 ug/1
0 .432733 mg/1
NH3 Limit: 100337 . 6 ug/1
100.3376 mg/1i

SUMMER
MODEL FOR PINNACLE REST HOME
W/ NEW FLOWS (0 . 05 CFS)
MODEL RESULTS
• Discharger : PINNACLE REST HOME
Receiving Stream : UT SOUTH MUDDY CREEK
The End D.O. is 8 . 18 mg/l.
The End CBOD is 2 .27 mg/1.
The End NBOD is 2 . 15 mg/l.
WLA WLA WLA
DO Min CBOD NBOD DO Waste Flow
(mg/1) Mi lepoint Reach # (mg/1) (mg/1) (mg/1) (mgd)
Segment 1 6.51 0 .00 1
Reach 1 45 . 00 90 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00460

*** MODEL SUMMARY DATA ***
Discharger : PINNACLE REST HOME Subbasin : 030830
Receiving Stream : UT SOUTH MUDDY CREEK Stream Class : C
Summer 7Q10 : 0 . 05 Winter 7Q10 : 0 . 08
Design Temperature: 25 . 0
ILENGTHI SLOPEI VELOCITY I DEPTHI Kd I Kd I Ka I Ka I KN I
I mile I ft/mil fps I ft ' design ) @201/2 ' design ' @201/2 Idesignl
Segment 1 I 1 . 601150 . 001 0 . 137 10 .28 10 . 62 10 . 49 141 . 36 137 . 101 0 . 73
Reach 1
Flow I CBOD ) NBOD I D.O. I
cfs I mg/1 I mg/1 I mg/1
Segment 1 Reach 1
Waste I 0 . 007 145 . 000 190 . 000 I 0 . 000
Headwaters ) 0 . 050 1 2 . 000 I 1 . 000 I 7 . 440
Tributary I 0 . 000 I 2 . 000 I 1 . 000 I 7 . 440
* Runoff ) 0. 130 I 2 . 000 I 1 . 000 I 7 . 440
* Runoff flow is in cfs/mile

SUMMER
MODEL FOR PINNACLE REST HOME
W/ NEW FLOWS (0 . 05 CFS)
I Seg # I Reach # I Seg Mi I D.O. I CBOD I NBOD I Flow 1
1 1 0 . 00 6.51 7 . 37 12 . 11 0 . 06
1 1 0 . 10 7 .78 6.20 9.73 0 . 07
1 1 0 .20 7 . 98 5 . 39 8 . 09 0 . 08
1 1 0 . 30 8 . 04 4 . 80 6. 90 0 . 10
1 1 0 . 40 8 . 07 4 . 34 6. 00 0 . 11
1 1 0 .50 8 . 09 3 . 98 5 . 29 0 . 12
1 1 0 . 60 8 . 10 3 . 69 4 .72 0 . 14
1 1 0 . 70 8 . 12 3. 44 4 .26 0 . 15
1 1 0 . 80 8 . 13 3.23 3 . 86 0 . 16
1 1 0 . 90 8 . 14 3. 06 3 .53 0 . 17
1 1 1 . 00 8 . 15 2 . 90 3 .25 0 . 19
1 1 1 . 10 8 . 15 2 . 77 3 . 00 0 .20
1 1 1 .20 8 . 16 2 . 64 2 . 79 0 .21
1 1 1 . 30 8 . 17 2 .54 2 . 60 0 .23
1 1 1 . 40 8 . 17 2 .44 2 . 43 0 .24
1 1 1 .50 8 . 18 2 . 35 2 .28 0 .25
1 1 1 . 60 8 . 18 2 .27 2 . 15 0 .27
I Seg # I Reach # I Seg Mi I D.O. I CBOD I NBOD I Flow 1

mr
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
September 17, 1992
MEMORANDUM
TO: James R. Reid
FROM: Jacquelyn M. Nowel�(�
SUBJECT: Low Flow Procedure .for Pinnacle Rest Home
NPDES Permit No. NC0035157
McDowell County
Attached you will find a copy of the Division's Procedures for Prolectinq
Low Flow Statistics At An Ungacted Site. The Technical Support Branch recommends
that this document be forwarded to the contact person for the subject facility.
The usual procedure is for the permittee to conduct these flow measurements to
determine whether the stream has a positive 7Q10 flow.
It is recommended that the permittee read the procedure carefully and con-
tact the necessary persons to begin the flow study. If there are any questions,
please contact me.
Attachment

�-rre.
� �� k. F.r� Y t ' ' L`• �'A, �1 � • a` r- • • ._ r f N _ ,, � t .,r Zc,.: ..
•Mi L _
i JJ► - ice... i „ ' -' \ � - - � r _ - .A - f -j'�t iY•T. � l A v l'-. (,
�. �'��'1 '"'�l �. - : a 1 '� „'aT�+ - l/� rI�M�W " ff -_ •.^""rir t ! . i i n4 -a. .y . ' � x � �, .
A� JAI
i,. .. - � ra 1 {�.r �.1•. ,;:� ,+} - r,. "�5f .. .. - • _ _'.,` �. - •w�. .}Is c- i..•R�- ,. . 1II
AoL 3 F� +./ `9 � � r� © j •-1- e �-$x, � ._�+�c� �` 1s�{ ; fs+''Yt, [ F• ^(.. ,IjSr•� . �.Z e
AI
f 7,
Ys
N
+;••''' f T '�I/'7� t�►-1 �A - �' }}'����rr 45j" Li�{ah a- '� N ` _
�7 a�--r lei
�'x. "'• �` A r`�•,1--f`• D•f/1 _ _= .� 'I /,V /rI i--..y y. - r. a� -�' 4`...+, r 'ri,
}'+ ! �, - •�- y 11 1 y T :!.' � tea,[ y+;�t�•y �
i � v �l i'w - . _r�.'�• _ ,. ,6�_ A .- y � p�.Tr.. �'y - . -,�.j► � � 4',- i.J+ - � •�1 �'�r*` "i' '^ j � �`y
P _ %� s r1►
d i ! / — _ 9 a ,Ak, w s-'. e,
y cc �: K W i ]' J �0♦ DI tr Tj/f 7 c• 3
+•. fir_ i ,.�T� II � _�_�_,.._ � y" ''> a-� � ( �,
Z7� L'
.,,f C6
• �� r s d. 77 c7fAa
s.
rr, 6'
k 4161
to w
�r �` :.sa .c` Lrn 'f ; r, a.*•�"'$. �. - }�p. ;
,
' ,.,.
a _ y ,1-
77.
{_ yc�?•-
70
e
Al,y J..hJ` y Y ., r` - �iy/ 5 j �C:•I /�L� V • h/
41
1ftip
to `
..Ilk_ — —--- 0
146-
r _ V
M1 -. .y • : •( iG' W� lei ♦/� +(�'/S,
�
' �. .le� '.:a. I - -. �+�46. '� ,`' - *•u �� J�" ���• '`'�.— ai - ~+�� 4 , 3 .. ' * _ v�..' ,'j�. - a -h `r • F -[

•
pinnacle rest home
AMMONIA ANALYSIS
7Q10 : 0 . 0700 cfs
NH3 Effl . Conc: 8 . 0000 mg/1
AL (1/1 . 8 mg/1) : 1000 . 00 ug/1
Upstream NH3 Conc. : 220 . 0000 ug/1
Design Flow: 0 . 0046 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 939. 19 ug/1
0 . 939193 mg/1
NH3 Limit : 8657 . 784 ug/1
8 . 657784 mg/1
AMMONIA ANALYSIS (WINTER)
7Q10 : 0 . 1100 cfs
NH3 Effl . Conc: 12 . 0000 mg/1
AL (1/1 . 8 mg/1) : 1800 . 00 ug/1
Upstream NH3 Conc. : 220 . 0000 ug/1
Design Flow: 0 . 0046 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 937 . 08 ug/1
0 . 937078 mg/1
NH3 Limit : 26175 . 87 ug/1
26. 17587 mg/1
(A) zv1/4)
J

` pinnacle rest home
AMMONIA ANALYSIS
7Q10 : 0 . 0700 cfs
NH3 Effl . Conc: 8 . 0000 mg/1
AL (1/1 . 8 mg/1) : 1000 . 00 ug/1
Upstream NH3 Conc. : 220 . 0000 ug/1
Design Flow: 0 . 0030 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 704 . 62 ug/1
0 . 704621 mg/1
NH3 Limit : 12741 . 93 ug/1
12 .74193 mg/1
AMMONIA ANALYSIS (WINTER)
7Q10 : 0 . 1100 cfs
NH3 Effl . Conc: 12 . 0000 mg/1
AL (1/1 . 8 mg/1) : 1800 . 00 ug/1
Upstream NH3 Conc. : 220 . 0000 ug/1
Design Flow: 0 . 0030 MGD
Predicted NH3 Downstream: 697 . 78 ug/1
0 . 697775 mg/1
NH3 Limit : 39176. 34 ug/1
39. 17634 mg/1
‘‘,0

•
♦ STATE4
, ,,
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Ann B. Orr
William W. Cobey, Jr., SecyS ION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Regional Manager
WATER QUALITY SECTION
March 11, 1992
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jackie Nowell
Instream Assessment Unit
THROUGH: Forrest R. Westa
Water Quality t gi•.f I upervisor
FROM: James R. Rid
Environmental '. - ist
SUBJECT: Pinnacle Res Home
Request for Rerun of Wasteload Allocation
NPDES Permit NC0035157
McDowell County
You previously prepared a wasteload allocation for the subject facility
on 12-20-91; a new wasteload is hereby____requested.
The 12- 20-91 wasteload showed "0" flow in the receiving stream.
Information gathered during a recent site assessment revealed that there
is in fact greater than. "0" flow in the receiving stream. Pinnacle' s
exact outfall point is slightly farther downstream than indicated on the
map accompanying the prior wasteload request. The correct discharge
location should have greater flow than the location previously indicated;
please see attached accurately marked map dated 3-11-92 .
Pinnacle would be unable to comply with either the ammonia or toxicity
limitation appearing on the 12-20-91 wasteload allocation. Compliance
would require construction of a new treatment system or installation of a
new outfall line one mile or more in length. Due to the seriousness of
the consequences to the permittee, consideration of the following factors
is requested when preparing the new wasteload.:
Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, N.C. 28801 •Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

•
Jackie Nowell
March 11, 1992
Page Two
Use the downstream location indicated on the attached map,
Run the wasteload with flows of both 0. 0046 MGD (that currently
permitted) and 0.003 MGD (that which the facility could meet if the
volume would change the effluent NH3 or toxicity limit) ,
Please indicate the receiving stream flow which would be required to
accommodate Pinnacles ammonia discharge concentration without a
toxicity limit, assuming that the facility would discharge 12 . 0 mg/1
NH3 in the winter and 8. 0 mg/1 in the summer.
If a new wasteload reflecting the above items does not produce limits
with which the permittee would be able to comply, his next chosen step
(based upon ARO meeting 3-3-91) would be to measure the actual flow in
the receiving stream in accordance with DEM' s approved procedure. Due to
the volume seen in the stream during the recent site assessment and that
observed during previous inspections (in dry weather) , the stream may be
influenced by a spring which USGS would not have considered in
determining 7/10.
Your assistance with this matter is greatly appreciated. If there are
questions or a need for additional information, please contact me.
Enclosure
xc: Michael R. Parker
Permits and Engineering

�;\\U i2
o , j/ 1 y j U y
• • ?/, l ' / - ..5
1 �/
J i0 1 ��` r \ b\ - – 1
o
,v
v�i� a ``� �/ •
• X/355
•
r
"Ai 41)11
`� \ / /174 o J 1
j° c '0 0. s --->'C\. ..
0 i
o
0
1 •
00 � % \\
\ / it
0
,C5 ��\"
7cem ( N 40/
iiii. \ - O )111 wit: 3947
�� I ..\\ .6 /43.
/�_'' .• 0/488 \ \
OS I 11 c•�� TT \ rte— `I
� '( /4O8 i � — 1
•
/3/3Xli
I• '/
1Q. 1 /•//
j. G� /28p ° ��\ — ° ( I f
1li
•
co
II
fii
1 co-*:
r
IF ''�. Ee
- .%.• )
/484 \\ \
•\ r ilz()
W
$O F.
, T..
/ 0 , 0 / // r - 128 `;� 443
•
\,
% (fie
, . ••.—
\ .\
...,
1 ('
?'"°-
/0. 1$- - ( 4-1.60
.•
, ,
.. / O o it - 3,4e..
1
,,,
, ,
1
,... .
..,,.„ ,.., „.,\ __ 0 , 0,_ -
7
ti--) '---., / '
4
0
\,„ 0 ..)
:.,
/ L,
-** 7 ,14.00 (--1--- ---7—**/
��1 �'„8' `. - I
\/ /683y.,_ �/' \� O � � \ 1
/8 /� P /
/
X/374 a ''
3944•
•
N.
/ i :: ,..5)-1_ ..,,,,,..-j.-—-. 7,3
1600
•
2.0 0 .
0 )11OrciPliji..- ,..-
.<1E-57/ __- '--N -
i, ' ,N,r_, y%,.
„____,--_--2- .
N„.....„
, ....._, ....,..,
\n
.=gi / p �� \p° 28 ,1 r \ // i
unn e ,v�ai, .22 11 ` X43°0°”'N.
'/ em \c-- \u _ 1
418 �/ / Aiti
l \VI) o
a � o .
1•'Q ""0� k'I_. . INTERIOR-GEOLOGICAL SURVEY/ WASHINGTON.D C-
ID YS1973 35°37/30”
s M/. 81°52'30"
SHELBY 36 MI.
ROAD CLASSIFICATION �0
1-
Heavy-duty s
Light-duty'_ s,�A,,
Medium duty ` �4,�`�'—9
Unimproved dirt__ _
0 Interstate Route ��c�F
0 U.S. Route 4, ,,.,,,)
I,� N.c O State Route
l /

•
RECEIVED
Water Qu&►;ty S ctiom
FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION
Request# 6545 `� N 2 - 1`'Q r
q
Facility Name: Pinnacle Rest Home
NPDES No.: NC0035157 Asheville Regional Office
Type of Waste: Domestic - 100% Asheville, North Carotins
Facility Status: Existing
Permit Status: Renewal
Receiving Stream: UT South Muddy Creek
Stream Classification: C
Subbasin: 030830
County: McDowell Stream Characteristic:
Regional Office: Asheville US GS #
Requestor: Kepler Date:
Date of Request: 10/24/91 Drainage Area(mi2): 0.07
Topo Quad: El 1NW Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 0.0
Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 0.0
Average Flow (cfs): 0.05-0.1
30Q2 (cfs): 0.05-0.1
IWC (%): 100
Wasteload Allocation Summary
(approach taken,correspondence with region,EPA, etc.)
Facility requesting renewal of existing limits. Receiving stream has flow w/7Q10=0 and 30Q2>0.
Recommend that facility be given NH3 Choice Option of existing limits with a toxicity test or
summer/winter NH3 limits.
Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers:
.z- -14 rik e--
G-
-t1
y Q
Y,
Recommended by; .' ' / ' Date: 12/20/91
Reviewed by
• Instream Assessme t: auwot.0,0-0-y%_ Date:
Regional .= .• : 1 Date: 1--1 'c
g Il
Permits & n i neering: r' Date: i/! f C'
JAN 2 3 1992
RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY:

•
.- 2
•
CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS
Existing Limits:
Monthly Average
Summer Winter
Wasteflow(MGD): 0.0046
BOD5 (mg/1): 30
NH3N (mg/1): nr
DO(mg/1): nr
TSS (mg/1): 30
Fecal Col. (/100 ml): 1000
pH (SU): 6-9
Residual Chlorine (µg/1):
Oil&Grease(mg/1):
TP(mg/1):
TN(mg/1):
Recommended Limits:
Monthly Average with Monthly Average with
Toxicity Test Ammonia Limit
Summer Winter Summer Winter WQ or EL
Wasteflow (MGD): 0.0046 0.0046 0.0046
BOD5 (mg/1): 30 30 30 WQ
NH3N (mg/1): nr 11.8 WQ
DO(mg/1): .nt nA.ovu. ublu1v✓ ` x4.tfz'r WQ
TSS (mg/1): 30 30 30 WQ
Fecal Col. (/100 ml): 200 1000 1000 WQ
pH (SU): 6-9 6-9 6-9 WQ
Residual Chlorine(µg/1):
Oil&Grease(mg/1):
TP(mg/1):
TN(mg/1):
Toxicity test(P/F): Chronic Pass/Fail @ 90%
Limits Changes Due To: Parameter(s) Affected
Change in 7Q10 data
Change in stream classification
Relocation of discharge
Change in wasteflow
Other(onsite toxicity study,interaction, etc.)
Instream data
New regulations/standards/procedures Fecal Coliform, Chlorine
New facility information
X_ Parameter(s)are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of
the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based
effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed.
OR
No parameters are water quality limited,but this discharge may affect future allocations.

3
INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Upstream Location: 100 feet upstream
Downstream Location: 0.25 miles downstream at unimproved road
Parameters: DO,Temp, Cond,Fecal Coliform
Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION &SPECIAL CONDITIONS
Adequacy of Existing Treatment
Has the facility demonstrat the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment
facilities? Yes No
If no, which parameters cannot be met? t Mo L) ► -Tci ► (UkW
Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes No
If yes,please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional
office recommendations:
74- ke-E) Le t7�L �c:/ /,
�- /7e '?SErrl
ii- ,;/ (Ai 1` 1 ( deo v;56- ceA,--
etted —"Ma
/1
If no, why not?
Special Instructions or Conditions
Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) (Y or N)
(If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet,copy of model,or, if not modeled, then old
assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan)
Additional Information attached? (Y or N) If yes,explain with attachments.

. - D
Facility Name / rvN4d /`£-s T �- Permit �G4 o S/J'"
# 3 Pipe# 0 0
CHRONIC TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT
(QRTRLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit chronic toxicity using test procedures outlined in:
1.) The North Carolina Ceriodaphnia chronic effluent bioassay procedure (North Carolina Chronic Bioassay
Procedure - Revised *September 1989) or subsequent versions.
The effluent concentration at which there may be no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality
is 70 % (defined as treatment two in the North Carolina procedure document). The permit holder shall perform
quarterly monitoring using this procedure to establish compliance with the permit condition. The first test will be
performed after thirty days from the effective date of this permit during the months of
00_ ki Jon) S . Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES
permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge
Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally,DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in
association with the toxicity tests,as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity
sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will
begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will
revert to quarterly in the months specified above.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re-opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism
survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate
retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute
noncompliance with monitoring requirements.
7Q10 D cfs
Permitted Flow •°°4(- MGD R ommended by:
IWC l‘rt, %
Basin & Sub-basin C-n3 30 A, kV'
Receiving Stream UT- C4-• /1L CJ
County i&GJ ate /z/LO/g/
QCL PIF Version 9/91

•
,-
014:11‘;3."'''
�ST'S'o
.h`M1a n.n1�
�[QtNM
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
Asheville Regional Office
James G. Martin, Governor Ann B. Orr
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
January 15, 1992
Ms. Anita Waters, Administrator
Pinnacle Rest Home
Route 3, Box 342
Nebo, North Carolina 28761
Subject: Effluent Limitations
Pinnacle Rest Home
McDowell County
Dear Ms. Waters:
The Asheville Regional Office recently received the effluent
limitations proposed for Pinnacle Rest Home' s new wastewater discharge
permit. A copy of those limitations is attached. The proposed
effluent restrictions differ from existing limits as follows:
Parameter Existing Limitation Proposed Limitation
Fecal Coliform 1000 organisms/100 ml 200 organisms/100 ml
Ammonia Nitrogen no limit 1 . 0 mg/1
(or Toxicity) no limit Pass 90%
Dissolved Oxygen no limit monitor only
chlorine no limit dechlorination
required
The fecal coliform limit change is due to a more restrictive water
quality standard which became effective on October 1, 1989.
Under the renewal permit, Pinnacle Rest Home would have a choice
of a 1 .0 mg/1 ammonia limitation or alternatively, a chronic toxicity
limitation of "pas., Jv jots . 111C cy,iu�ivil_L�i vt l VX1�;l l y 111111 l.d LJ.O1l .L
suggested as a result of the Environmental Protection Agency' s having
required the State of North Carolina to address the issue of instream
ammonia tuitii:ity. Review ui Home' s efliuCill- uaua tot l,iie
previous 12 months revealed inability to comply with the 1 .0 mg/1
ammonia limit.
Interchange Building, 59 Woodfin Place, Asheville, N.C. 28801 •Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

•
Ms . Anita Waters
January 15, 1992
Page Two
Since the Division of Environmental Management has no toxicity
data for Pinnacle Rest Home, a projection could not be made regarding
your ability to meet the proposed 90% toxicity limit. Upon receipt of
this letter, you may wish to arrange with your contract testing firm
for collection and testing of a toxicity sample at the 90% pass level .
Data from that or subsequent samples may be available in time to
influence the outcome of the renewal permit. Please contact me at your
earliest convenience or have your contract testing firm do so in order
to discuss the best manner in which to deal with the toxicity or
ammonia limit for the renewal permit.
The proposed dissolved oxygen monitoring requirement is needed
as a result of new stream flow data which indicates possible dissolved
oxygen depletion as a result of the discharge.
The dechlorination requirement exists as a result of water quality
standards for chlorine which were enacted since the last renewal of
Pinnacle Rest Home' s wastewater discharge permit.
Your attention to these matters is appreciated. Please contact me
at telephone [phone] if there are questions concerning the
proposed wastewater discharge permit.
Sincerely,
(,4;; — la---(76—,
James R. Reid
Environmental Chemist
Enclosure
xc : HydroLogic

•
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION , IIigineer date R #
Facility Name: 4444rilk 4c ,410_ Date i '
,
Existing (Ix
Proposed O .
/AGOG 3 5,LS7
Permit No.: _!:0!.. f - Pipe No. : �11/ County:/,ezi/e.//
PsDesign Capacity (MGD) : 6, aO la , Industrial (% of Flow) : IV" Domestic ( % of Flow) : f j�4
Receiving Stream: Z --?..Z ;,Z .) lass
(�� Sub-Basin: d 30 zrz. 8
g Reference USGS Quad: /// 44, (Please attach) Requestor: /P
;v,r- , Regional CfficeAEL6,7_,
M (Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form. )
Design Imp.: Drainage Area (mit) : 0, 6 7 Avg. Streamf low (cfs) : 0.6 7S . .
.
7Q10 (cfs) 0 Winter 7Q10 (cfs) 0 30Q2 (cfs) 0.4 75
Location of D.O. minimum (miles below outfall) : ? {
Slope (fpm) .7 Q� ftx
Velocity (fps) : Ki (base e, per day) : K2 (base e. oer day) :
i-8Y
Effluent Monthly Effluent �'�nthly
Characteristics Average Comments + Characteristics )_verage Comments
g 43612s 36 bh,14
3° it _ ,
H Ft /000/m4,14
Def 6-9 S.U. I 7
' 1 -N i 7„ n i8 --- , ..... ii 4L,Ait l'Ir ili 4ki..409 iL...401
H
Z •
Orig' 4 4c. 'on 0 Comments: -Dc5ckn WA IN-le.4/ (v' 4e2.7110/L4
Revi • - a 'on 2// 44- 6 v Nr&.2/‘ w ti v ( 4c 4, A C.'f çeA vim,
Gbnfi - on
. spared By: 602/4 j/iReviewed By: )74AxADate:
3(0%

Mf
` For Appropriate .Dischargers, List Complete Guideline Limitations Below
Effluent Monthly Maximum Daily
Characteristics Average Average Comments
•
`
•
Type of Product Produced Lbs/Day Produced Effluent Guideline Reference

e - ..� .. I
,` Request No. :3614
WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM R-F:-." -cE IV E
Waer Ou-P" `'Fnt on
Facility Name : PINNACLE REST HOME
Type of Waste : DOMESTIC • .
Status , : EXISTING FEB 2 5 1287
Receiving Stream : UT SOUTH MUDDY CREEK `;-
Stream Class : C A
Subbas i n : 030830 ,Asheville Region::! Offte
County - : MCDOWELL Drainage Area (sq mi ) : 0.07 Asheville, North Carolina
Regional Office : ARO Summer 7010 (cfs) : 0.0 ,
Requestor : WIGGINS Winter 7010 (cfs) : 0.0 {
Date of Request : 12/5/86 Average Flow (cfs) : .075
Ouad : E11NW 3002 (cfs) : .075
RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS
Wasteflow (mgd) : .0046
5-Day BOD (mg/ I ) • 30 . .
Ammonia n Nitro9 e (m / I ) : NR 2 .
9
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/ i ) • NR ru;;,1'
TSS (mg/ I ) . 30 `_•,.
Fecal Coliform (*/ 100mI ) : 1000 :; -.. o
pH (SU) : 6-9
MONITORING
Upstream (YIN) : N Location:
Downstream (Y/N) : N Location:
COMMENTS
4 NOTIFY DISCHARGER THAT NEXT PERMIT WILL HAVE SUMMER/WINTER LIMITS ` . _ i,4•4..-4q'�,, (.
10 & 4 . d :»;, (""� ';? �,.
tt, ' M.
cttn:
MAR 5 1981
FFRMI7.' NG NEI=R'N ,
Recommended by I I / Date 3/44,5/47 , •
1
f
Reviewed by: / fa
Tech. Support Supervisor - ___r Date 212-3
/Cri .
if Regional Sup i o Date 3Pl
e) 4
Permits & Engineering �` . 7.. . .0i1. , late 3/171, 2 -
r

- yr
Al
,004o 6 A4�
9w= \v
dS -/ c
� �p �. 11d7,�diz• � � =
7,h
y; . _ - - � )� <� • .'/cad � ---
AlL
-
AF
Aw a=
1
�79
W .7Q /d -
■

e cL m A!i,)Jt
ma-;ASte m
SIo F r- Co,I 14-to n s
/320 --/29u �
�% h'► � � MI
• . I ! �� �i11. 1.
�uM
e ltv
disc
7
SIG
/ Z d
26 ;
6 ? j J

Engineer Date Rec. #
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION illi , ( r=°
P;nt..Mcit Z 'a Facility Name: « 4,77.9_____4,77.9_____- Date: �- � �
v Existing Permit No. : /Y e 00.3 s-J r 7 Pipe No. : 0 O � County:
a Proposed I
°�' v Domestic (% of Flow) : AO O 90
2' Design Capacity (MGD) : g2. O O � Industrial (% of Flow) :
V_
taSub-Basin: �� -�8
_ Receiving Stream: (A--7"...S. /4/4-4-41c1-k70r ee-k Class
ea I� PegReference USGS Quad: G kt 1 ; ve (Please attach) Requestor: -9/6 Office
a)
-- (Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.) •
Tem
Design _�JbCf Drainage Area: C". w�.i .2.-- Avg. Streamflow:. OL 3 G FS
Temp. :• � - -
7Q10:, CO • [9 5- G-FS Winter 7Q10: 30Q2: q �--,
+rLocation of D.O.minimum (miles below outfall) : �� �� Slope g L���''��'
� 2,5":
� ,
Velocity (fps) : 0 • K1 (base e, per day, 20oC) : l• D K2 (base e, per day, 20°C) : -� •
E Vel y ( p ) ,
8 0 D,5-
0
C..,
0
y Effluent Monthly
Effluent Monthly
C
Characteristics Average Comments Characteristics Average Comments
AO
4- )�u
eQ .FFca-1 c r-►OV'Nt /oeo/oopx4
;_ .-asca
34 /�
a)
Original Allocation 1 I
Revised Allocation 71 Date(s) of Revision(s)
(Please attach previous allocation)
Confirmation
VDate: Y.—cm,Y
A.,-------L Reviewed By: 42/
��repared By:

For Appropriate Dischargers, List Complete Guideline Limitations Below
Effluent Monthly Maximum Daily
Characteristics Average Average Comments
•
Type of Product Produced Lbs/Day Produced Effluent Guideline Reference

• . . ,- . zo
REQUEST NO. : 308
********************* WASTELOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM *********************
FACILITY NAME : PINNACLE REST HOME
TYPE OF WASTE : DOMESTIC
COUNTY : MCDOWELL
AsKF011-cEr
REGIONAL OFFICE : 44446L REOUESTOR : U. ADKINS
� RECEIVING STREAM : UT SOUTH MUDDY CR . SUBBASIN : 03-08-30
7010 : 0 . 05 CFS W7010 : - CFS 3002 : - CFS
DRAINAGE AREA : 0 . 20 SQ .MI . STREAM CLASS : C
I
k:U********************** RECOMMENDED EFFLUENT LIMITS !:**********:*************.
WASTEFLOW ( S) (MGD) : O .0046 THIS FACILITY IS ALSO KNOWN AS
BOD-5 (MG/L ) : 30 MCDOWELL NURSING HOME .
NH3-N (MG/L) : NR
D . O . (MG/L) : NR
PH ( SU) . 6-9
FECAL COLIFORM ( /100ML) : 1000
TSS (MG/L ) : 30
Ci/
�
**************************:************************:******************************
FACILITY IS : PROPOSED ( ) EXISTING
t Y ► NEW ( ) 1
LIMITS ARE : REVISION ( ) CONFIRMATION ( 1//) OF THOSE PREVIOUSLY ISSUED
REVIEWED ANU RECOMMENDED BY :
MODELEF; : _lI_rL44- ,J• _.___DATE : _l_ _��
4'1
HEAD, TECHNICAL SERVICES BRANCH : _ 4/ �
. ' �._ _DATE : _4
REGIONAL SUPERVISOR : _1__. _ 1 DATE : //4V Z.
PERMITS MANAGER :____.....60_'. 4 .___ __ DATE : _g'7
46L
APPROVED BY :
7 1
DIVISION DIRECTOR . _..;?.a"--
'HTE . _ ___
J

• • '
•. *****?k:****' MODEL RESULTS **********:
DISCHARGER : MCDOWELL NURSING HOME
RECEIVING STREAM : UT SOUTH MUDDY CR .
*************************************************:*********************
THE END D. O. IS 8 . 26 MG/L
**********************************************************************
THE END CBOD IS 13 . 45 MG/L
*************************************: *:c*******************:*****:******
THE END NBOD IS 0 .00 MG/L
*******************:***:************************************************
THE D . O . MIN . OF SEGMENT 1 IS 7 . 11 MG/L
THIS MINIMUM IS LOCATED AT SEGMENT MILEFOINT 0 .05
WHICH IS LOCATED IN REACH NUMBER 1
THE WLA FOR SEGMENT 1 REACH 1 IS 110 MG/L OF CBOD
THE WLA FOR SEGMENT 1 REACH 1 IS 0 MG/L OF NBOD
THE REQUIRED EFFLUENT D . O . IS 0 MG/L
****:********:**:**********:*******`k*******:*******************************

r
••• *** MODEL •
SUMMARY DATA ***
DISCHARGER MCDOWELL NURSING HOME SUE:BASIN 03-08-30
RECEIVING STREAM UT S. MUDDY CR . STREAM CLASS : C
7010 0 .05 CFS WINTER 7010 : -- CFS
DESIGN TEMPERATURE 23 DEGREES C . WASTEFLOW : 0. 0046 MGD
ILENGTHISLOPE I VELOCITY IDEPTH I K1 I Kr I Kn I K2 I Oro I
IMILES IFT/MI 1 FPS 1 FT I /DAY I /DAY 1 /DAY I /DAY ICFS/MII
•I,.._. I I I I I I I l I
SEGMENT c
1 I 1 . 001 89 . 001 0 . 50 I 0.09 I 1 . 15 I 1 . 15 10 .00 137 .53 10 .00 I
REACH 1 I I I I I I I I I 1
ALL RATES ARE AT 23 DEGREES C .
THIS IS ALSO KNOWN AS PINNACLE REST HOME

r �L rsie4,__
FOR DATA MANAGEMENT USE ONLY:
FACILITY NO.
WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION REQUEST
/--/ Actual Facility9--,.1.29f
p� t�
fkl ProP Y osed Facilit Date of Request 0 / ? / 77
7
/00
TO: Mike McGhee, Technical Services Date Needed ig.4112A4—_
Ca(! i ..K.44,...114,s ) ,,eMe --
FROM: JI ccs l a sis , W F)
SUBJECT: Effluent Limits for NPDES Permit No. (001 ) Pipe No. (003 )
Permit Application Received (802 ) Draft to Public Notice (805 )
((-- /)-- .-. 76 s u 3o /9 VC
Discharger Name (103 ) County (104 ) TYPe (400 )
frt C-7)644 GilAWS t 1�Mu s a
Latitude Longitude (116 )
Equiv. Population Served (202 ) (115 )
3. ' o 81/ s".2. 3S—/,
3q o
201 Area (263 ) t208 Area (264 ) Subbasin(112 ) Stream Classification (269 )
........... 03-0?) -30 cce /
Receiving Strea (109 ) Drain. Area(267) 7/10 F 3(270) Ratio Waste 7/10 (303 )
U . 7S ( P1d4CrekI
L / O .)
Design Capacity (207 ) Design Temperature (NKP) Elevation ( )
0
/ `C 000 6P ' 2S G
Location'Discharger (NKP) i'rincipal Product (NKP)
5-c..e, km-Af
Sample No. BOD5(mg/Z) ecai Caiiform Temperature DO (mg/1)
310 100ml 31616 0 F 11 300
41
I - Mo. Average Concentration 01,, /6 /a o o $5/a-S 6.0
- Wk. Avera•e Concentration 02
J - Minimum Concentration 03
K - Maximum Concentration 04
M - Monthly Average Loading 05
- Weekly Average Loading 06
P - Minimum Loading 07
Q - Maximum Loading 08 1
T - Frequency of Analysis 09
W - Sample Type 10
Total NFLIf NH3-N pIf (units)
(mg/Z) 530 (mg/Z) 600 400
I - Mo. Averags Concentration 21 30 i 6 - 5. s-
-
•s_- Wk. Average Concentration 22
J - Minimum Concentration 23 ' I
K - Maximum Concentration 24
M - Monthly Average Loading 25
- Weekly Average Loading 26,
P - Minimum Loading 27
Q - Maximum Loading 28
T - Frequency of Analysis 29
W - Sample Type 30
UOD (NKP) 3 2-, /,Q-

� 1
I - Mo. Average Concentration 31
- Wk. Average Concentration 32
J - Minimum Concentration 33
K - Maximum Concentration 34
M - Monthly Average Loading 35
- Weekly Average Loading 36
P - Minimum Loading 37
Q - Maximum Loading 38
T - Frequency of Analysis 39
W - Sample Type 40

r
�_ • 1 • y
DATE: 11 - 3o -
DATE ALLOCATION NEEDED: 4s ,4 f
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mike McGhee
Technical Services Branch
FROM: YEATti 1"• Doisow1 W PO
SUBJECT: Effluent Limits for NPDES Permit
DISCHARGER: /47ptJj( A /4e...
COUNTY: f/e_ ue.1/
SUB-BASIN:
• h& O 3-D�Fs- 30
RECEIVING STREAM:STREAM: SajaiLitlistc/plY
Crtiek riLudtufy
7Q10 FLOW: 0,40 3),ThODRAINAGE AREA ""K � S . rhj• ELEVATION
oS
LOCATION OF DISCHAR E: See--aLliate4W01 PkAe
DESIGN CAPACITY: 000/ '1
MAXIMUM MONTHLY MEAN EFFLUENT LIMITS:
colt)
ifvF
PARAMETER LIMITSS.2t\
UOD f X10
BODE 3 a /�--
AMMONIA AS N —
TSS 3o-747--
FECAL COLIFORM 201/ ol..lL—
pH 4-4 c. .?.
TEMPERATURE BiF;oS'
D.O.
*INDICATE PARAMETERS TO BE COVERED

ri '1* 11 ' # , '• - 1
.. S •.
ASSIMILATIVE CAPACITY EVALUATION
LEVEL "B" ANALYSIS
SOURCE OF POLLUTION: 1y'I ` DOWELL p,JuQ311 - i'°ati& 69/OA/Act-a 'en' 140•4,e)
Areawide (208) Planning Area: 4u-iv,
_ /64.4.,,,..,,Z42
Facilities (201) Planning Area: ND4
.�.. a A. RECEIVING STREAM UT Sau.Tk mu DOy c Z -EA .
a Classification: 4 G
I
102-31 .0031 : 0.0G 7/10 Flow (Os): O.O
. __ B. ASSIMILATIVE CAPACITY DATA
Water Surface Slope (ft/mi) eci
• Stream Velocity (fps) e)-5-1.25.21)
1 i
Stream Depth (ft) o.o 6
r\ Elevation @Discharge Pt. (ft) 102.::2 z a
'S 9 Drainage Area (sq. mi.) o2-S
7/10 Yield (cfsm) -
t.L Design Temperature (°C) 2-3
VII Groundwater Runoff (cfs/mi) O
_ 6 ZDeoxygenatian Rate (Kl Base e) 1. 17
�' - Q Reaeration R .'"1
(K2 Base a ,S
�` Min. Daily Avg. D.O. (mg/1� 5. 0
.1 C. REQUIRED EFFLUENT LIMITS 7
tI
} Design Flow (MGD) o . o/r
BODS (mg/1)
-
Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/1) —
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/1)
i Total Suspended Solids (mg/1) 30
Fecal Coliform (#/100 ml) D°
pH (S.U.) 6
. r 1
D. COMMENTS bO/AT- g
_ i , , i
1 s - il��
0
?, .
L z 1 -F. ._......1
500 2 r - 11.0 P
400 - -- - - - �,, r ..■■.- .i• ..
.
300 IIH'Ti ".
'il
lab
Zoo. DSd
-i
+ ' -4; i1 D 3:331::: _'�r..i
IIIIIIIILIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIii!ii!IIII I
4 •
1Ci eg II!II1Ill1I!I1II11IIII11I1llI1II1IlHINIL;iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiIi'iiiiliIi'lili
SO •,•I"IU■,■•■!:111I 3::::IUU1.......... -- 11111111111nm11n11111111111:
Z 30 11 munuminimilimn;11Iri iu.. :, r.'.•1111111111:11111 111,1
40I� lll:llli....
\ .11111111111illili►IIIIMIII I.�� !
30 d 1 Illlllilliililllilllil1111l1l11,.. ,..... ,. '
�R�
W ,'i., 11111111111111111 rru •I•in■r.r
11111111111111111111111 .,��•
20 1111111111111111111111.11 1:::.
::111111111111111111111►111
'!!II IIIII I!I!1!IIII!IIII'11111111111111111111111::
1 //zb ': :111111111111111111111:::111111PI111111111111111:
10 .. - :IN ,
0 •DI ,02- .03 null ::
Design Flow (mgd)
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC RESOURCES
s: C i; FIRST UPDATE PAGE SECOND UPDATE THIRD UPDATE
s-zi! -n efiFill 111111111 car-63o, Ma IIIIII
tt5WS * 0 Z , /3 F7- 7 -