NC0003468_6. DRSS CAP Part 2_Appx C_FINAL_20160210

Appendix C
Addendum to Soil
Sorption Evaluation

This page intentionally left blank

Addendum to Soil Sorption Evaluation
Dan River Steam Station
Rockingham County, NC

Prepared for:
HDR Engineering, Inc.
Hydropower Services
440 S. Church St, Suite 1000
Charlotte, NC 28202
Investigators:
William G. Langley, Ph.D., P.E.
Dongwook Kim, Ph.D.

UNC Charlotte / Lee College of Engineering
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
EPIC Building 3252
9201 University City Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28223

February 2, 2016

This page intentionally left blank
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 1
2 Results ................................................................................................................................ 1
3 Comments and Recommendations ..................................................................................... 1
4 References ......................................................................................................................... 3
TABLES
Table 1. Antimony
Table 2. Arsenic
Table 3 Boron
Table 4 Cadmium
Table 5 Cobalt
Table 6 Molybdenum
Table 7 Selenium
Table 8 Thallium
Table 9 Vanadium

FIGURES
(See Tables 1-9 for figure numbers)

1

1 Background
This addendum provides three sorption isotherm equations for batch data analyzed and initially
reported in the Soil Sorption Evaluation for Dan River Steam Station (Langley and Oza 2015).
The isotherm model equations are:

Linear: S = KdC

Linear with S0 > 0: S = KdC + S0

Freundlich: S = KfC1/n

where S is the constituent concentration on soil (ug/g), Kd is the linear sorption coefficient (ml/g),
C is the constituent concentration in water (ug/l), S0 is the soil concentration at C = 0, n is the
unitless Freundlich exponent, and Kf is the Freundlich constant (l1/nug(1-1/n)/g). The parameters
Kd, S0, Kf, and n are estimated using linear regressions on the sorption data. The parameter S0
represents that portion of constituent concentration on the soil that is sorbed irreversibly.

2 Results
Results are provided in Tables 1 through 8 by constituent and sample. The results include
parameter estimates and indicators of the goodness-of-fit of the resulting model equations to the
sorption data.

3 Comments and Recommendations
In addition to the general comments and qualifiers offered in the Results and Table 16 of the
original report, the following comments and recommendations are provided.

For the fate and transport model, the range of sorption estimates (maximum and minimum)
should be used as the upper and lower limits for selecting a calibrated value that is consistent
with measured constituents.

For a specific constituent and sample, the isotherm model with the minimum chi-square value
best represents the lab data in its arithmetic form.

Linear isotherms with S0 < 0 are considered not applicable because they imply negative soil
concentrations (S) as constituent concentration (C) approaches zero.

For linear isotherms with S0 > 0, the y-intercept S0 is assumed to represent irreversible sorption
as opposed to previous exposure to the constituent in the field which is manifested as a
negative-sloping or irregular isotherm as would have been noted in the original report.

2

Freundlich isotherms with n < 1 are considered not applicable because they are not concave
downward (Freundlich 1924).

For constituents not considered for Dan River, sorption values may be transferable from other
sites with similar geochemical settings, or may be estimated using site-specific data from the
Comprehensive Site Assessment in a geochemical model.

3

4 References
Freundlich H. 1924. The Elements of Colloidal Chemistry, translated by George Barger. Dutton
and Company Publishers: New York, NY, pp. 58-61.
Langley, W.G. and Oz, Shubhashini. Soil Sorption Evaluation for Dan River Steam Station,
UNC-Charlotte, October 2015.
Ho, Yuh-Shan, Wen-Ta Chiu, and Chung-Chi Wang. "Regression analysis for the sorption
isotherms of basic dyes on sugarcane dust." Bioresource technology 96.11 (2005): 1285-1291.
Matott, L. Shawn, IsoFit Documentation and User’s Guide Version 1.2, State University of New
York at Buffalo Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Version 1.2,
updated 01/18/07.
Table 1 Antimony
Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2
l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g
AB – 30 BR (32-34) 3 3 0.940 0.961 1.597 1.140 0.958 1.822 0.754 1.133 0.968 0.251 0.917 1.110 0.950 0.389 1.672 0.716 0.934 0.199 1.870 0.719 0.857 0.397 1,2
AB – 30 BR (43-44) 5 5 0.210 0.977 2.257 0.195 0.960 3.566 0.183 0.619 0.997 0.036 0.165 0.767 0.989 0.146 0.625 0.647 0.987 0.088 0.667 0.630 0.999 0.006 3,4
AB – 105 L 5 5 0.072 0.997 0.084 0.068 0.996 0.057 0.072 0.001 0.992 0.084 0.081 0.964 0.977 0.089 5,6
AS – 2D 5 5 0.028 0.989 0.138 0.038 0.907 1.122 0.034 0.943 0.960 0.176 7,8
AS – 10D 5 5 0.031 0.971 0.631 0.037 0.977 0.685 0.029 0.227 0.926 0.261 0.032 0.430 0.977 0.124 0.107 0.715 0.936 0.382 0.118 0.740 0.961 0.118 9,10
GWA – 10 5 5 0.014 0.973 0.195 0.015 0.970 0.212 0.014 0.979 0.935 0.214 11,12
GWA – 5BR 5 5 0.046 0.988 0.302 0.045 0.992 0.381 0.045 0.074 0.969 0.209 0.041 0.237 0.988 0.063 0.103 0.796 0.959 0.292 0.119 0.763 0.980 0.141 13,14
GWA – 4D 5 5 0.187 0.937 4.355 0.190 0.938 4.568 0.155 0.865 0.962 0.483 0.157 0.876 0.968 0.399 0.652 0.643 0.979 0.140 0.678 0.637 0.992 0.060 15,16
GWA – 11D 5 5 0.136 0.948 5.709 0.123 0.934 5.689 0.113 0.839 0.987 0.160 0.101 0.895 0.973 0.306 0.652 0.568 0.998 0.017 0.586 0.595 0.999 0.009 17,18
GWA – 12D 5 5 0.024 0.997 0.107 0.025 0.996 0.083 0.023 0.078 0.992 0.057 0.025 0.061 0.987 0.054 0.048 0.843 0.971 0.092 0.044 0.873 0.984 0.075 19,20
GWA – 1S 5 5 0.772 0.990 0.279 0.824 0.994 0.224 0.734 0.235 0.984 0.250 0.805 0.104 0.988 0.218 21,22
GWA – 3S 5 5 0.117 0.973 1.616 0.103 0.968 1.962 0.101 0.607 0.988 0.115 0.088 0.647 0.987 0.129 0.359 0.698 0.990 0.048 0.357 0.675 0.989 0.046 23,24
Linear S0=0
Kd Kd So Kf 1/n
Maximum 1.140 0.917 1.133 1.870 0.979
Minimum 0.014 0.023 0.001 0.014 0.568
Median 0.087 0.101 0.607 0.357 0.716
Notes
a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005, Ng et al. 2002).
c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g
d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.
(e)
(e)
FreundlichLinear S0>0
(d)
(d)
(d)
(e)(e)
(e)
(d)
(d)
Well ID
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Trial A Trial B Fig. Nos.Trial A Trial B
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Trial A
Freundlich isotherm
Trial B
No.
data points
Trial A Trial B
Table 2 Arsenic
Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2
l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g
AB – 30 BR (32-34) 3 3 2.919 0.973 0.649 2.778 0.981 0.496 25,26
AB – 30 BR (43-44) 3 3 2.031 0.997 0.096 2.088 0.997 0.109 27,28
AB – 105 L 3 3 1.957 0.999 0.058 1.853 0.998 0.050 29,30
AS – 2D 5 5 0.478 0.995 0.240 0.527 0.996 0.353 0.448 0.349 0.997 0.049 0.498 0.302 0.998 0.063 0.640 0.895 0.999 0.011 0.738 0.853 0.976 0.097 31,32
AS – 10D 5 5 0.539 0.999 0.058 0.570 0.998 0.071 0.529 0.101 0.999 0.020 0.549 0.200 0.999 0.021 0.630 0.924 0.994 0.040 0.662 0.943 0.999 0.008 33,34
GWA – 10 5 5 0.082 0.976 0.878 0.084 0.979 0.840 0.072 0.599 0.982 0.209 0.073 0.584 0.986 0.066 0.179 0.828 0.989 0.089 0.184 0.823 0.990 0.066 35,36
GWA – 5BR 5 5 0.548 0.993 0.265 0.522 0.979 0.933 0.515 0.331 0.993 0.122 0.468 0.599 0.982 0.295 0.689 0.917 0.986 0.079 0.811 0.848 0.987 0.145 37,38
GWA – 4D 5 5 1.007 0.966 1.161 1.062 0.957 1.342 39,40
GWA – 11D 3 3 1.817 0.999 0.039 1.701 0.996 0.107 1.813 0.014 0.996 0.040 1.614 0.313 0.990 0.088 1.792 0.980 0.978 0.085 41,42
GWA – 12D 4 5 0.724 0.982 0.866 0.669 0.961 1.711 0.635 0.752 0.991 0.129 0.624 0.377 0.905 1.203 1.170 0.802 0.994 0.039 0.973 0.762 0.617 1.542 43,44
GWA – 1S 3 3 1.810 0.999 0.863 1.775 1.000 0.798 45,46
GWA – 3S 5 4 1.339 0.993 0.348 1.513 0.997 0.132 47,48
Linear S0=0
Kd Kd So Kf 1/n
Maximum 2.919 1.813 0.752 1.792 0.980
Minimum 0.082 0.072 0.014 0.179 0.762
Median 1.200 0.522 0.340 0.689 0.853
Notes
a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g
d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.
Fig. Nos.Trial B
Linear S0>0 Freundlich
Well ID
Linear Isotherm, So = 0 Linear isotherm, So > 0 Freundlich isotherm
Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B Trial A
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
No.
data points
Trial A Trial B
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(d)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
Table 3 Boron
Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2
l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g
AB – 30 BR (32-34) 5 5 0.002 0.920 0.281 0.002 0.982 0.062 49,50
AB – 30 BR (43-44) 5 5 0.001 0.949 0.117 0.002 0.943 0.172 51,52
AB – 105 L 5 4 0.000 0.971 3.592 0.001 0.714 0.598 53,54
AS – 2D 5 5 0.001 0.986 0.550 0.002 0.773 0.885 55,56
AS – 10D 5 5 0.002 0.633 2.472 0.002 0.808 0.945 57,58
GWA – 10 5 5 0.004 0.990 0.061 0.004 0.993 0.034 59,60
GWA – 5BR 5 5 0.002 0.885 0.393 0.001 0.928 0.168 0.001 0.271 0.053 0.160 0.030 0.458 0.081 0.164 61,62
GWA – 4D 5 5 0.0004 0.843 0.166 0.0004 1.000 1.164 63,64
GWA – 11D 5 5 0.001 1.000 0.301 0.001 0.999 0.635 0.000 0.225 1.000 0.463 0.034 0.423 1.000 0.450 65,66
GWA – 12D 5 3 0.003 0.995 0.025 0.003 0.999 0.002 0.002 0.201 0.981 0.003 0.002 0.075 0.993 0.001 0.011 0.745 0.985 0.003 0.005 0.881 0.992 0.001 67,68
GWA – 1S 5 5 0.002 0.962 0.156 0.002 0.983 0.064 69,70
GWA – 3S 5 5 0.002 0.995 0.024 0.003 0.918 0.405 0.003 0.993 0.904 0.024 71,72
Linear S0=0
Kd Kd So Kf 1/n
Maximum 0.004 0.002 0.271 0.034 0.993
Minimum 0.0004 0.0005 0.075 0.003 0.423
Median 0.002 0.001 0.213 0.011 0.745
Notes
a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g
d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
Trial B
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
Linear S0>0 Freundlich
Well ID
Linear Isotherm, So = 0No.
data points
Trial A Trial B
Fig. Nos.
Linear isotherm, So > 0 Freundlich isotherm
Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B Trial A
Table 4 Cadium
Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2
l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g
AB – 30 BR (32-34) 5 5 0.209 0.998 0.064 0.201 73,74
AB – 30 BR (43-44) 5 5 0.505 0.934 1.057 0.537 0.988 0.319 75,76
AB – 105 L 1 1 5.869 5.869 77,78
AS – 2D 5 5 1.049 0.832 2.317 0.956 0.970 0.604 79,80
AS – 10D 5 5 0.456 0.842 1.986 0.539 0.911 1.038 81,82
GWA – 10 1 1 5.869 5.869 83,84
GWA – 5BR 5 5 0.747 0.960 0.778 0.870 0.988 0.367 85,86
GWA – 4D 5 5 0.206 0.963 0.687 0.216 0.965 0.727 87,88
GWA – 11D 5 5 0.317 0.969 0.634 0.310 0.983 0.421 89,90
GWA – 12D 1 1 5.869 5.869 91,92
GWA – 1S 5 5 0.167 0.958 0.789 0.171 0.958 0.693 93,94
GWA – 3S 5 5 0.560 0.991 0.242 0.583 0.980 0.434 95,96
Linear S0=0
Kd Kd So Kf 1/n
Maximum 5.869 - - - -
Minimum 0.167 - - - -
Median 0.549 - - - -
Notes
a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g
d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
No.
data points
Trial A Trial B
(f)
(f)
(f)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(e)
(e)
(d)
(d)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
Linear S0>0 Freundlich
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(f) (f)
(f)
(f)(f)
(f)
(f)
Fig. Nos.Well ID
Linear Isotherm, So = 0 Linear isotherm, So > 0 Freundlich isotherm
Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B
Table 5 Cobalt
Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2
l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g
AB – 30 BR (32-34) 5 5 0.365 0.937 4.774 0.430 0.892 2.816 97,98
AB – 30 BR (43-44) 5 5 0.592 0.561 11.380 0.706 0.604 9.631 0.496 0.510 0.029 11.350 99,100
AB – 105 L 2 2 4.666 0.971 0.452 4.965 0.954 0.684 101,102
AS – 2D 2 3 3.325 1.000 0.0004 3.271 0.939 1.228 103,104
AS – 10D 5 5 1.262 0.892 6.509 1.368 0.702 10.363 105,106
GWA – 10 2 2 3.415 1.000 0.001 3.568 0.999 0.013 107,108
GWA – 5BR 4 5 2.613 0.872 2.710 2.378 0.728 6.107 109,110
GWA – 4D 5 5 0.268 0.476 15.999 0.285 0.518 13.270 111,112
GWA – 11D 5 5 0.748 0.932 1.981 0.717 0.908 2.501 113,114
GWA – 12D 1 1 8.396 8.396 115,116
GWA – 1S 5 5 0.558 0.711 6.463 0.496 0.569 11.455 117,118
GWA – 3S 5 5 1.370 0.926 1.647 1.334 0.969 0.993 119,120
Linear S0=0
Kd Kd So Kf 1/n
Maximum 8.396 - - - -
Minimum 0.268 - - - -
Median 1.351 - - - -
Notes
a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g
d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.
No.
data points
Trial A Trial B
(f)(f)
(e)(e)
(e)(e)
(d)
(d)(d)
(f)
(e)
(e)(e)
(e)
(e)(e)
(e)(e)
(e)
(e)(e)
(e)
(f)
(e)
(d)
(f)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(e)(e)
(e)(e)
(e)(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
Fig. Nos.Trial B
Linear S0>0 Freundlich
Well ID
Linear Isotherm, So = 0 Linear isotherm, So > 0 Freundlich isotherm
Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B Trial A
(f)
(f)
(d)
Table 6 Molybdenum
Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2
l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g
AB - 30 BR (32-34) 1 1 121,122
AB – 30 BR (43-44) 4 4 0.352 0.937 5.329 0.384 0.923 7.234 0.293 1.132 0.967 0.385 0.316 1.215 0.955 0.557 1.064 0.662 0.978 0.130 1.169 0.661 0.947 0.309 123,124
AB – 105 L 5 5 0.009 0.914 1.553 0.009 0.903 1.654 0.006 0.754 0.916 0.103 0.005 0.777 0.887 0.136 0.116 0.540 0.982 0.032 0.114 0.535 0.933 0.071 125,126
AS – 2D 5 5 0.007 0.809 3.940 0.009 0.925 1.819 0.003 0.941 0.731 0.167 0.006 0.738 0.975 0.038 0.251 0.357 0.909 0.073 0.139 0.508 0.999 0.002 127,128
AS – 10D 5 5 0.057 0.896 11.748 0.056 0.878 14.479 0.044 1.218 0.946 0.533 0.043 1.293 0.936 0.644 0.564 0.505 0.986 0.075 0.601 0.498 0.993 0.059 129,130
GWA – 10 0 0 -,-
GWA – 5BR 5 5 0.013 0.886 4.384 0.012 0.871 5.636 0.008 0.926 0.936 0.131 0.007 0.952 0.948 0.116 0.232 0.465 0.994 0.015 0.267 0.424 0.984 0.025 131,132
GWA – 4D 3 3 1.510 0.997 0.090 1.551 0.980 0.807 1.407 0.456 0.999 0.013 1.329 0.991 0.972 0.275 1.777 0.902 0.999 0.003 2.094 0.832 0.935 0.247 133,134
GWA – 11D 2 2 2.467 0.987 0.444 2.465 0.987 0.446 135,136
GWA – 12D 5 4 0.004 0.825 2.164 0.004 0.822 1.872 0.001 0.812 0.611 0.056 0.001 0.860 0.325 0.084 0.306 0.237 0.806 0.033 0.354 0.205 0.598 0.059 137,138
GWA – 1S 2 2 5.106 0.958 0.651 5.368 0.940 0.896 139,140
GWA – 3S 3 3 0.442 0.927 8.645 0.531 0.933 6.702 0.329 1.903 0.978 1.538 0.400 1.847 0.977 1.570 1.814 0.519 0.996 0.733 1.849 0.551 0.991 0.802 141,142
Linear S0=0
Kd Kd So Kf 1/n
Maximum 5.368 1.407 1.903 2.094 0.902
Minimum 0.004 0.001 0.456 0.114 0.205
Median 0.204 0.026 0.946 0.459 0.514
Notes
a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g
d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.
(e)
(e)(e)
(e)(d)
(d)(d)
(d)
(f)(f)(f)
Linear S0>0 Freundlich
Well ID
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Trial A Trial B
No.
data points
Trial A Trial B
Fig. Nos.
(g) (g)(g)(g)(g)(g)
Trial B
Linear isotherm, So > 0 Freundlich isotherm
Trial A Trial B Trial A
(f)(f)(f)
Table 7 Selenium
Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2
l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g
AB – 30 BR (32-34) 2 2 7.981 0.871 2.474 7.348 0.928 1.411 143,144
AB – 30 BR (43-44) 5 5 1.239 0.976 1.132 1.324 0.985 0.932 145,146
AB – 105 L 5 5 0.180 0.999 0.049 0.176 0.999 0.056 0.175 0.030 0.998 0.060 147,148
AS – 2D 5 5 0.115 0.983 1.274 0.125 0.986 1.256 0.102 0.827 0.993 0.148 0.111 0.776 0.996 0.093 0.282 0.797 0.997 0.025 0.312 0.782 0.990 0.043 149,150
AS – 10D 5 5 0.260 0.991 0.548 0.268 0.988 0.604 0.243 0.512 0.988 0.217 0.247 0.614 0.988 0.247 0.410 0.869 0.981 0.173 0.406 0.893 0.991 0.135 151,152
GWA – 10 5 5 0.058 0.960 1.803 0.060 0.966 1.577 0.049 0.964 0.956 0.610 0.051 0.903 0.964 0.375 0.137 0.838 0.954 0.420 0.136 0.844 0.951 0.375 153,154
GWA – 5BR 5 5 0.135 0.985 0.881 0.121 0.976 1.847 0.121 0.722 0.989 0.215 0.106 0.945 0.989 0.231 0.265 0.843 0.988 0.093 0.325 0.775 0.993 0.061 155,156
GWA – 4D 5 5 1.067 0.806 6.164 1.165 0.820 5.797 157,158
GWA – 11D 3 3 3.042 0.993 2.223 2.838 0.986 2.241 3.030 0.035 0.975 2.260 2.635 0.635 0.960 2.781 3.033 0.959 0.881 2.437 159,160
GWA – 12D 5 5 0.055 0.973 1.935 0.050 0.952 2.811 0.047 0.941 0.990 0.130 0.043 0.741 0.906 1.133 0.215 0.722 0.999 0.005 0.226 0.661 0.742 1.442 161,162
GWA – 1S 2 2 4.753 1.000 0.002 5.436 0.995 0.120 163,164
GWA – 3S 5 4 1.313 0.990 0.559 1.553 0.998 0.052 1.234 0.485 0.985 0.404 1.550 0.014 0.996 0.048 1.469 0.978 0.962 0.392 165,166
Linear S0=0
Kd Kd So Kf 1/n
Maximum 7.981 3.030 0.964 3.033 0.978
Minimum 0.050 0.043 0.014 0.136 0.661
Median 0.668 0.121 0.722 0.297 0.840
Notes
a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g
d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.
(d)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(d)(e)(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
Trial B
Linear S0>0 Freundlich
(d)
(d)(d)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
Fig. Nos.Well ID
Linear Isotherm, So = 0 Linear isotherm, So > 0 Freundlich isotherm
Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B Trial A
No.
data points
Trial A Trial B
Table 8 Thallium
Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2
l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g
AB – 30 BR (32-34) 5 5 0.576 0.990 0.639 0.585 0.988 1.062 0.531 0.643 0.992 0.174 0.530 0.778 0.995 0.128 0.849 0.870 0.995 0.068 0.980 0.823 0.997 0.020 167,168
AB – 30 BR (43-44) 3 3 3.391 0.961 1.021 3.554 0.986 0.518 169,170
AB – 105 L 3 3 4.383 0.922 2.051 4.581 0.944 1.615 171,172
AS – 2D 2 2 7.783 0.905 1.861 7.232 0.943 1.163 173,174
AS – 10D 3 2 1.534 0.743 6.189 1.809 0.945 4.802 0.945 2.806 0.218 5.397 1.221 3.531 1.000 0.000 2.598 0.627 0.536 5.404 4.752 0.475 1.000 0.000 175,176
GWA – 10 5 5 0.718 0.939 2.351 0.726 0.938 2.461 177,178
GWA – 5BR 2 2 7.756 0.907 1.818 7.603 0.919 1.596 179,180
GWA – 4D 5 5 0.379 0.989 0.431 0.382 0.996 0.281 181,182
GWA – 11D 4 4 1.100 0.986 0.902 1.069 0.978 1.602 0.979 0.972 0.990 0.186 0.930 1.184 0.988 0.247 1.641 0.834 0.994 0.068 1.784 0.791 0.987 0.098 183,184
GWA – 12D 2 2 5.038 0.999 0.018 4.960 1.000 0.009 185,186
GWA – 1S 5 5 0.547 1.000 0.063 0.551 0.998 0.179 0.534 0.177 1.000 0.003 0.527 0.346 0.999 0.015 0.656 0.929 0.999 0.019 0.722 0.901 0.997 0.015 187,188
GWA – 3S 3 3 2.183 0.968 2.053 2.908 0.990 0.479 1.818 1.595 0.954 0.627 2.764 0.443 0.969 0.425 3.147 0.779 0.866 0.642 189,190
Linear S0=0
Kd Kd So Kf 1/n
Maximum 7.783 2.764 3.531 4.752 0.929
Minimum 0.379 0.527 0.177 0.656 0.475
Median 1.996 0.937 0.875 1.641 0.823
Notes
a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g
d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.
(e)(e)
(e)
(e)(e)
(e)(e)
(e)(e)(d)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(d)(d)
Trial B
Linear S0>0 Freundlich
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)(d)
(d)(d)
(d)
Fig. Nos.Well ID
Linear Isotherm, So = 0 Linear isotherm, So > 0 Freundlich isotherm
Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B Trial A
No.
data points
Trial A Trial B
Table 9 Vanadium
Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2
l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g
AB – 30 BR (32-34) 1 1 191,192
AB – 30 BR (43-44) 2 2 2.301 0.929 0.437 2.189 0.950 0.319 193,194
AB – 105 L 5 5 0.583 0.971 0.559 0.546 0.972 0.528 0.561 0.089 0.938 0.527 0.518 0.126 0.943 0.476 195,196
AS – 2D 5 4 0.409 0.999 0.014 0.437 0.997 0.043 0.420 0.100 0.994 0.032 197,198
AS – 10D 5 5 0.467 0.994 0.126 0.463 0.969 0.526 199,200
GWA – 10 5 5 0.065 0.974 0.441 0.067 0.977 0.420 0.056 0.279 0.981 0.083 0.058 0.271 0.987 0.022 0.141 0.797 0.993 0.027 0.142 0.799 0.991 0.022 201,202
GWA – 5BR 5 5 0.429 0.972 0.565 0.383 0.979 0.349 0.409 0.111 0.941 0.468 0.359 0.151 0.960 0.303 0.465 0.934 0.786 0.519 203,204
GWA – 4D 1 1 3.664 3.664 205,206
GWA – 11D 1 1 3.664 3.664 207,208
GWA – 12D 5 5 0.425 0.997 0.045 0.342 0.866 1.185 0.414 0.060 0.994 0.048 0.390 0.777 0.514 1.868 209,210
GWA – 1S 1 1 3.664 3.664 211,212
GWA – 3S 2 2 1.979 0.977 0.160 2.295 0.930 0.430 213,214
Linear S0=0
Kd Kd So Kf 1/n
Maximum 3.664 0.561 0.279 0.465 0.934
Minimum 0.065 0.056 0.060 0.141 0.777
Median 0.565 0.411 0.118 0.266 0.798
Notes
a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g
d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.
(f)
(f)
(f) (f)
(f)
(f)
(e)(e)(d)(d)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(e)
(f)(f)(f)
(f)(f)
(f)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
(f)
Trial B
Linear S0>0 Freundlich
(f) (f)(f)(f)(f)(f)
(d)
(f)(f)(f)
(f)(f)
Fig. Nos.Well ID
Linear Isotherm, So = 0 Linear isotherm, So > 0 Freundlich isotherm
Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B Trial A
No.
data points
Trial A Trial B
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 1 Antimony Isotherms for AB –30 BR (32-34)
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 2 Antimony Isotherms for AB –30 BR (32-34)
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 3 Antimony Isotherms for AB –30 BR (43-44)
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 4 Antimony Isotherms for AB –30 BR (43-44)
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 5 Antimony Isotherms for AB –105 L
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 6 Antimony Isotherms for AB –105 L
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 7 Antimony Isotherms for AS –2D
Trial - A linear So=0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 8 Antimony Isotherms for AS –2D
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 9 Antimony Isotherms for AS –10D
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 10 Antimony Isotherms for AS –10D
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 11 Antimony Isotherms for GWA –10
Trial - A linear So=0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 12 Antimony Isotherms for GWA –10
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 13 Antimony Isotherms for GWA –5BR
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 14 Antimony Isotherms for GWA –5BR
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 15 Antimony Isotherms for GWA –4D
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 16 Antimony Isotherms for GWA –4D
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 10 20 30 40 50
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 17 Antimony Isotherms for GWA –11D
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 18 Antimony Isotherms for GWA –11D
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 19 Antimony Isotherms for GWA –12D
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 20 Antimony Isotherms for GWA –12D
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 21 Antimony Isotherms for GWA –1S
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 22 Antimony Isotherms for GWA –1S
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 23 Antimony Isotherms for GWA –3S
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 24 Antimony Isotherms for GWA –3S
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 25 Arsenic Isotherms for AB –30 BR (32-34)
Trial - A linear S0=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 26 Arsenic Isotherms for AB –30 BR (32-34)
Trial - B linear S0=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 27 Arsenic Isotherms for AB –30 BR (43-44)
Trial - A linear S0=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 28 Arsenic Isotherms for AB –30 BR (43-44)
Trial - B linear S0=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 29 Arsenic Isotherms for AB –105 L
Trial - A linear S0=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 30 Arsenic Isotherms for AB –105 L
Trial - B linear S0=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 31 Arsenic Isotherms for AS –2D
Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 32 Arsenic Isotherms for AS –2D
Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 33 Arsenic Isotherms for AS –10D
Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 34 Arsenic Isotherms for AS –10D
Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 35 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA –10
Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 36 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA –10
Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 37 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA –5BR
Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 38 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA –5BR
Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 39 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA –4D
Trial - A linear S0=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 40 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA –4D
Trial - B linear S0=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 41 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA –11D
Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 42 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA –11D
Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 43 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA –12D
Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 44 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA –12D
Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 45 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA –1S
Trial - A linear S0=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 46 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA –1S
Trial - A linear S0=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 47 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA –3S
Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 48 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA –3S
Trial - B linear S0=0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 49 Boron Isotherms for AB –30 BR (32-34)
Trial - A linear So=0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 50 Boron Isotherms for AB –30 BR (32-34)
Trial - B linear So=0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 51 Boron Isotherms for AB –30 BR (43-44)
Trial - A linear So=0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 52 Boron Isotherms for AB –30 BR (43-44)
Trial - B linear So=0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 80 160 240 320 400 480
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 53 Boron Isotherms for AB –105 L
Trial - A linear So=0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 54 Boron Isotherms for AB –105 L
Trial - B linear So=0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 55 Boron Isotherms for AS –2D
Trial - A linear So=0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 56 Boron Isotherms for AS –2D
Trial - B linear So=0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 57 Boron Isotherms for AS –10D
Trial - A linear So=0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 58 Boron Isotherms for AS –10D
Trial - B linear So=0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 59 Boron Isotherms for GWA –10
Trial - A linear So=0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 60 Boron Isotherms for GWA –10
Trial - B linear So=0
0.0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 61 Boron Isotherms for GWA –5BR
Trial - A linear So=0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 62 Boron Isotherms for GWA –5BR
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 63 Boron Isotherms for GWA –4D
Trial - A linear So=0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 64 Boron Isotherms for GWA –4D
Trial - B linear So=0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0 100 200 300 400 500
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 65 Boron Isotherms for GWA –11D
Trial - A linear So=0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0 100 200 300 400 500
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 66 Boron Isotherms for GWA –11D
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 67 Boron Isotherms for GWA –12D
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 68 Boron Isotherms for GWA –12D
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 69 Boron Isotherms for GWA –1S
Trial - A linear So=0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 70 Boron Isotherms for GWA –1S
Trial - A linear So=0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 71 Boron Isotherms for GWA –3S
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
0 70 140 210 280 350 420
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 72 Boron Isotherms for GWA –3S
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 73 Cadmium Isotherms for AB –30 BR (32-34)
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 74 Cadmium Isotherms for AB –30 BR (32-34)
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 2 4 6 8 10
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 75 Cadmium Isotherms for AB –30 BR (43-44)
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 2 4 6 8 10
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 76 Cadmium Isotherms for AB –30 BR (43-44)
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.0 0.5 1.0
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 77 Cadmium Isotherms for AB –105 L
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.0 0.5 1.0
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 78 Cadmium Isotherms for AB –105 L
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1 2 3 4
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 79 Cadmium Isotherms for AS –2D
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 80 Cadmium Isotherms for AS –2D
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 81 Cadmium Isotherms for AS –10D
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 82 Cadmium Isotherms for AS –10D
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.0 0.5 1.0
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 83 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA –10
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.0 0.5 1.0
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 84 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA –10
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 85 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA –5BR
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 86 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA –5BR
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 4 8 12 16 20 24
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 87 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA –4D
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 4 8 12 16 20 24
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 88 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA –4D
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 3 6 9 12 15 18
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 89 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA –11D
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 3 6 9 12 15 18
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 90 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA –11D
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.0 0.5 1.0
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 91 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA –12D
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0.0 0.5 1.0
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 92 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA –12D
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 93 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA –1S
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 94 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA –1S
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 95 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA –3S
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 96 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA –3S
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 4 8 12 16 20
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 97 Cobalt Isotherms for AB –30 BR (32-34)
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 98 Cobalt Isotherms for AB –30 BR (32-34)
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 99 Cobalt Isotherms for AB –30 BR (43-44)
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 100 Cobalt Isotherms for AB –30 BR (43-44)
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 101 Cobalt Isotherms for AB –105 L
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 102 Cobalt Isotherms for AB –105 L
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 103 Cobalt Isotherms for AS –2D
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 104 Cobalt Isotherms for AS –2D
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 105 Cobalt Isotherms for AS –10D
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 106 Cobalt Isotherms for AS –10D
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 107 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA –10
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 108 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA –10
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 109 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA –5BR
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 110 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA –5BR
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 111 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA –4D
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 112 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA –4D
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 2 4 6 8 10
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 113 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA –11D
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 2 4 6 8 10
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 114 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA –11D
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 115 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA –12D
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 116 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA –12D
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 117 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA –1S
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 118 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA –1S
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 119 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA –3S
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 120 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA –3S
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 121 Molybdenum Isotherms for AB -30 BR (32-34)
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 122 Molybdenum Isotherms for AB -30 BR (32-34)
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 5 10 15 20 25
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 123 Molybdenum Isotherms for AB –30 BR (43-44)
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 5 10 15 20 25
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 124 Molybdenum Isotherms for AB –30 BR (43-44)
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
0 60 120 180 240 300
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 125 Molybdenum Isotherms for AB –105 L
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
0 60 120 180 240 300
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 126 Molybdenum Isotherms for AB –105 L
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 127 Molybdenum Isotherms for AS –2D
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 128 Molybdenum Isotherms for AS –2D
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 25 50 75 100 125
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 129 Molybdenum Isotherms for AS –10D
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 25 50 75 100 125
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 130 Molybdenum Isotherms for AS –10D
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
0 60 120 180 240 300
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 131 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA –5BR
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
0 60 120 180 240 300
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 132 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA –5BR
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 133 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA –4D
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 134 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA –4D
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 135 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA –11D
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 136 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA –11D
Trial - B linear So=0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 137 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA –12D
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 138 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA –12D
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 139 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA –1S
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 1 2
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 140 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA –1S
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 5 10 15 20
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 141 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA –3S
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 5 10 15 20
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 142 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA –3S
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 143 Selenium Isotherms for AB –30 BR (32-34)
Trial - A linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 144 Selenium Isotherms for AB –30 BR (32-34)
Trial - B linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 145 Selenium Isotherms for AB –30 BR (43-44)
Trial - A linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 146 Selenium Isotherms for AB –30 BR (43-44)
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 147 Selenium Isotherms for AB –105 L
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 148 Selenium Isotherms for AB –105 L
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84 91
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 149 Selenium Isotherms for AS –2D
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84 91
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 150 Selenium Isotherms for AS –2D
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
0 11 22 33 44
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 151 Selenium Isotherms for AS –10D
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
0 11 22 33 44
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 152 Selenium Isotherms for AS –10D
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 16 32 48 64 80 96 112 128 144 160
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 153 Selenium Isotherms for GWA –10
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 16 32 48 64 80 96 112 128 144 160
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 154 Selenium Isotherms for GWA –10
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 155 Selenium Isotherms for GWA –5BR
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 156 Selenium Isotherms for GWA –5BR
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 157 Selenium Isotherms for GWA –4D
Trial - A linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 158 Selenium Isotherms for GWA –4D
Trial - B linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3 4 5
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 159 Selenium Isotherms for GWA –11D
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3 4 5
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 160 Selenium Isotherms for GWA –11D
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 17 34 51 68 85 102 119 136 153 170
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 161 Selenium Isotherms for GWA –12D
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 162 Selenium Isotherms for GWA –12D
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 163 Selenium Isotherms for GWA –1S
Trial - A linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 164 Selenium Isotherms for GWA –1S
Trial - A linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 165 Selenium Isotherms for GWA –3S
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 166 Selenium Isotherms for GWA –3S
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 167 Thallium Isotherms for AB –30 BR (32-34)
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 168 Thallium Isotherms for AB –30 BR (32-34)
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 169 Thallium Isotherms for AB –30 BR (43-44)
Trial - A linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 170 Thallium Isotherms for AB –30 BR (43-44)
Trial - B linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 171 Thallium Isotherms for AB –105 L
Trial - A linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 172 Thallium Isotherms for AB –105 L
Trial - B linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 173 Thallium Isotherms for AS –2D
Trial - A linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 174 Thallium Isotherms for AS –2D
Trial - B linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 6 7
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 175 Thallium Isotherms for AS –10D
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 6 7
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 176 Thallium Isotherms for AS –10D
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 177 Thallium Isotherms for GWA –10
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 178 Thallium Isotherms for GWA –10
Trial - B linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 179 Thallium Isotherms for GWA –5BR
Trial - A linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 180 Thallium Isotherms for GWA –5BR
Trial - B linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 181 Thallium Isotherms for GWA –4D
Trial - A linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 182 Thallium Isotherms for GWA –4D
Trial - B linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 183 Thallium Isotherms for GWA –11D
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 184 Thallium Isotherms for GWA –11D
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 185 Thallium Isotherms for GWA –12D
Trial - A linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 186 Thallium Isotherms for GWA –12D
Trial - B linear So=0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 6 12 18 24
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 187 Thallium Isotherms for GWA –1S
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 6 12 18 24
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 188 Thallium Isotherms for GWA –1S
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 189 Thallium Isotherms for GWA –3S
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 190 Thallium Isotherms for GWA –3S
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 191 Vanadium Isotherms for AB –30 BR (32-34)
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
0 0 0 1 1 1
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 192 Vanadium Isotherms for AB –30 BR (32-34)
Trial - B linear So=0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 193 Vanadium Isotherms for AB –30 BR (43-44)
Trial - A linear So=0
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 194 Vanadium Isotherms for AB –30 BR (43-44)
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 195 Vanadium Isotherms for AB –105 L
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 196 Vanadium Isotherms for AB –105 L
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 197 Vanadium Isotherms for AS –2D
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 198 Vanadium Isotherms for AS –2D
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0
0
1
2
3
4
0 2 4 6 8
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 199 Vanadium Isotherms for AS –10D
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
0 2 4 6 8
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 200 Vanadium Isotherms for AS –10D
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
0 8 16 24 32 40 48
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 201 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA –10
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
0 8 16 24 32 40 48
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 202 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA –10
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 203 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA –5BR
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 204 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA –5BR
Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0
0
1
2
3
4
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 205 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA –4D
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 206 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA –4D
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 207 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA –11D
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 208 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA –11D
Trial - B linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
0 3 6 9
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 209 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA –12D
Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0
0
1
2
3
4
0 3 6 9
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 210 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA –12D
Trial - B linear So=0 Freundlich
0
1
2
3
4
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 211 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA –1S
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 212 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA –1S
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 213 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA –3S
Trial - A linear So=0
0
1
2
3
4
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
S
(
u
g
/
g
)
C (ug/l)
Figure 214 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA –3S
Trial - B linear So=0