The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNC0000396_App D Soil Sorption Evaluation_20160219 Addendum to Soil Sorption Evaluation Asheville Steam Electric Plant Buncombe County, NC Prepared for: Synterra 148 River Road Suite 220 Greenville SC 29601 Investigators: William G. Langley, Ph.D., P.E. Dongwook Kim, Ph.D. UNC Charlotte / Lee College of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering EPIC Building 3252 9201 University City Blvd. Charlotte, NC 28223 February 2, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Background ......................................................................................................................... 1 2 Results ................................................................................................................................ 1 3 Comments and Recommendations ..................................................................................... 1 4 References ......................................................................................................................... 3 TABLES Table 1. Antimony Table 2. Arsenic Table 3. Beryllium Table 4. Boron Table 5. Cadmium Table 6. Chromium Table 7. Cobalt Table 8. Nickel Table 9. Selenium Table 10. Thallium Table 11. Vanadium FIGURES (See Tables 1-11 for figure numbers) 1 1 Background This addendum provides three sorption isotherm equations for batch data analyzed and initially reported in the Soil Sorption Evaluation for Asheville Steam Electric Plant (Langley and Oza 2015). The isotherm model equations are: Linear: S = KdC Linear with S0 > 0: S = KdC + S0 Freundlich: S = KfC1/n where S is the constituent concentration on soil (ug/g), Kd is the linear sorption coefficient (ml/g), C is the constituent concentration in water (ug/l), S0 is the soil concentration at C = 0, n is the unitless Freundlich exponent, and Kf is the Freundlich constant (l1/nug(1-1/n)/g). The parameters Kd, S0, Kf, and n are estimated using linear regressions on the sorption data. The parameter S0 represents that portion of constituent concentration on the soil that is sorbed irreversibly. 2 Results Results are provided in Tables 1 through 6 by constituent and sample. The results include parameter estimates and indicators of the goodness-of-fit of the resulting model equations to the sorption data. 3 Comments and Recommendations In addition to the general comments and qualifiers offered in the original report, the following comments and recommendations are provided. For the fate and transport model, the range of sorption estimates (maximum and minimum) should be used as the upper and lower limits for selecting a calibrated value that is consistent with measured constituents. For a specific constituent and sample, the isotherm model with the minimum chi-square value best represents the lab data in its arithmetic form. Linear isotherms with S0 < 0 are considered not applicable because they imply negative soil concentrations (S) as constituent concentration (C) approaches zero. For linear isotherms with S0 > 0, the y-intercept S0 is assumed to represent irreversible sorption as opposed to previous exposure to the constituent in the field which is manifested as a negative-sloping or irregular isotherm as would have been noted in the original report. 2 Freundlich isotherms with n < 1 are considered not applicable because they are not concave downward (Freundlich 1924). For constituents not considered for Asheville, sorption values may be transferable from other sites with similar geochemical settings, or may be estimated using site-specific data from the Comprehensive Site Assessment in a geochemical model. 3 4 References Freundlich H. 1924. The Elements of Colloidal Chemistry, translated by George Barger. Dutton and Company Publishers: New York, NY, pp. 58-61. Langley, W.G. and Oz, Shubhashini. Soil Sorption Evaluation for Asheville Steam Electric Plant, UNC-Charlotte, October 2015. Ho, Yuh-Shan, Wen-Ta Chiu, and Chung-Chi Wang. "Regression analysis for the sorption isotherms of basic dyes on sugarcane dust." Bioresource technology 96.11 (2005): 1285-1291. Matott, L. Shawn, IsoFit Documentation and User’s Guide Version 1.2, State University of New York at Buffalo Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Version 1.2, updated 01/18/07. Table 1 Antimony Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g AB – 09 SB 5 5 0.028 0.998 0.109 0.028 0.995 0.229 0.027 0.220 0.999 0.009 0.026 0.288 0.995 0.028 0.053 0.871 0.996 0.028 0.066 0.824 0.991 0.065 1,2 ABMW – 05 SB 5 5 0.192 0.968 3.887 0.183 0.961 4.231 0.165 1.044 0.991 0.167 0.156 1.109 0.985 0.266 0.676 0.662 0.995 0.031 0.665 0.663 0.998 0.014 3,4 ABMW – 07 SB 5 5 0.042 0.994 0.238 0.041 0.994 0.186 0.038 0.392 0.996 0.055 0.038 0.372 0.995 0.050 0.073 0.890 0.994 0.029 0.068 0.903 0.998 0.020 5,6 ICB – 08 SB 5 5 0.021 0.950 3.536 0.021 0.952 3.536 0.016 0.931 0.993 0.053 0.016 0.913 0.993 0.051 0.219 0.558 0.992 0.046 0.223 0.552 0.990 0.066 7,8 MW – 03 SB 5 5 0.290 0.967 2.161 0.323 0.979 1.226 0.252 0.964 0.975 0.506 0.288 0.786 0.983 0.347 0.603 0.806 0.983 0.238 0.567 0.847 0.989 0.163 9,10 MW – 05 SB 5 5 0.579 0.974 2.231 0.564 0.971 2.572 0.508 0.945 0.988 0.268 0.492 0.992 0.986 0.314 1.139 0.766 0.993 0.056 1.153 0.757 0.992 0.074 11,12 MW – 07 SB 5 5 0.084 0.968 4.178 0.086 0.970 3.889 0.071 0.994 0.997 0.068 0.073 0.974 0.997 0.063 0.438 0.620 0.995 0.060 0.433 0.627 0.996 0.060 13,14 MW – 08 SB 5 5 0.052 0.897 11.559 0.059 0.907 23.631 0.040 1.435 0.949 0.581 0.046 1.423 0.964 0.441 0.503 0.545 0.994 0.055 0.834 0.421 0.936 0.345 15,16 MW – 09 SB 5 5 0.129 0.882 24.758 0.135 0.886 19.860 0.102 1.683 0.943 1.022 0.107 1.645 0.938 1.134 1.101 0.505 0.991 0.103 0.995 0.533 0.960 0.294 17,18 MW – 16 SB 5 5 0.075 0.942 7.677 0.074 0.938 7.910 0.061 1.231 0.983 0.252 0.060 1.255 0.980 0.297 0.515 0.578 0.986 0.051 0.516 0.578 0.985 0.052 19,20 MW – 18 SB (6-7) 5 5 0.070 0.973 2.726 0.073 0.974 2.699 0.059 0.898 0.997 0.056 0.062 0.896 0.997 0.055 0.319 0.663 0.998 0.029 0.328 0.665 0.998 0.029 21,22 MW – 18 SB (20-22)5 5 0.022 0.903 1.676 0.022 0.895 1.796 23,24 Linear S0=0 Kd Kd So Kf 1/n Maximum 0.579 0.508 1.683 1.153 0.903 Minimum 0.021 0.016 0.220 0.053 0.421 Median 0.074 0.062 0.969 0.509 0.662 Notes a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005). b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005, Ng et al. 2002). c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression. e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007). f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio. g. Isotherm data not available. Fig. Nos.Trial A Trial B Linear isotherm, So > 0 Trial A Freundlich isotherm Trial B (e) Well ID Linear Isotherm, So = 0 Trial A Trial B No. data points Trial A Trial B FreundlichLinear S0>0 (d)(d)(e) Table 2 Arsenic Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g AB – 09 SB 5 5 1.600 0.993 0.417 1.659 0.996 0.248 1.526 0.477 0.988 0.362 1.604 0.336 0.994 0.231 1.722 0.993 0.982 0.333 25,26 ABMW – 05 SB 5 5 0.571 0.838 13.095 0.629 0.892 12.884 0.011 2.393 0.472 7.010 27,28 ABMW – 07 SB 3 3 2.073 0.976 1.827 2.499 0.964 3.100 1.727 2.025 0.982 0.300 2.045 2.215 0.956 0.748 3.317 0.765 0.974 0.182 3.896 0.749 0.879 0.739 29,30 ICB – 08 SB 5 5 0.268 0.997 0.204 0.272 0.996 0.227 0.265 0.109 0.994 0.139 0.271 0.030 0.991 0.209 0.371 0.899 0.991 0.205 0.369 0.901 0.989 0.274 31,32 MW – 03 SB 5 5 1.876 0.978 1.658 1.907 0.977 1.742 33,34 MW – 05 SB 3 3 4.490 0.991 0.525 4.476 0.990 0.555 35,36 MW – 07 SB 5 5 1.108 0.989 1.099 1.153 0.989 1.115 1.017 0.867 0.993 0.280 1.055 0.910 0.993 0.260 1.568 0.869 0.975 0.182 1.647 0.867 0.988 0.130 37,38 MW – 08 SB 5 5 0.052 0.897 11.559 0.059 0.907 23.631 0.040 1.435 0.949 0.581 0.046 1.423 0.964 0.441 0.503 0.545 0.994 0.055 0.834 0.421 0.936 0.345 39,40 MW – 09 SB 2 2 4.068 0.985 0.922 4.153 0.986 0.826 3.199 2.788 1.000 0.000 3.294 2.693 1.000 0.000 5.988 0.685 1.000 0.000 5.988 0.696 1.000 0.000 41,42 MW – 16 SB 5 5 0.552 0.989 1.373 0.519 0.978 2.366 0.503 0.934 0.997 0.143 0.448 1.526 0.989 0.623 0.981 0.816 0.987 0.073 1.154 0.756 0.996 0.178 43,44 MW – 18 SB (6-7) 5 5 0.530 0.984 1.490 0.535 0.980 1.716 0.478 1.050 0.990 0.325 0.481 1.067 0.983 0.547 0.907 0.844 0.993 0.121 0.887 0.855 0.974 0.332 45,46 MW – 18 SB (20-22)5 5 0.378 0.992 0.805 0.368 0.991 1.162 0.349 0.788 0.997 0.098 0.336 0.876 0.999 0.052 0.633 0.854 0.996 0.026 0.714 0.807 0.999 0.011 47,48 Linear S0=0 Kd Kd So Kf 1/n Maximum 4.490 3.294 2.788 5.988 2.393 Minimum 0.052 0.040 0.030 0.011 0.421 Median 0.868 0.492 0.992 0.944 0.830 Notes a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005). b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005). c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression. e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007). f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio. g. Isotherm data not available. Fig. Nos.Trial B Linear S0>0 Freundlich Well ID Linear Isotherm, So = 0 Linear isotherm, So > 0 Freundlich isotherm Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B Trial A (d) (e) (e) (e) (e) No. data points Trial A Trial B (e) (e)(d) (d) (d) (d) (d) Table 3 Beryllium Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g AB – 09 SB 1 0 15.122 49,- ABMW – 05 SB 4 4 1.984 0.979 1.158 2.170 0.985 2.011 1.955 1.120 0.983 0.564 1.871 0.998 0.868 1.275 2.525 0.884 0.816 1.171 50,51 ABMW – 07 SB 3 3 3.734 0.997 0.170 4.072 0.990 0.616 4.024 0.132 0.965 0.610 52,53 ICB – 08 SB 5 5 2.927 0.940 3.286 3.051 0.915 3.965 54,55 MW – 03 SB 5 5 0.352 0.957 1.861 0.306 0.989 0.660 56,57 MW – 05 SB 2 2 8.490 0.969 0.873 7.808 0.985 0.463 58,59 MW – 07 SB 5 5 16.818 0.764 8.747 22.802 0.877 5.578 8.403 0.646 0.168 17.636 60,61 MW – 08 SB 5 5 0.4875 0.905 18.353 1.4358 0.988 2.897 0.398 2.277 0.939 2.059 1.797 0.647 0.946 1.072 1.459 0.942 0.861 4.416 62,63 MW – 09 SB 5 5 2.958 0.883 4.620 2.779 0.927 3.513 64,65 MW – 16 SB 5 5 1.100 0.963 1.131 1.108 0.996 0.268 1.094 0.132 0.992 0.275 66,67 MW – 18 SB (6-7) 5 5 1.892 0.977 1.439 1.824 0.943 2.988 68,69 MW – 18 SB (20-22)3 3 6.696 0.900 3.314 4.384 0.991 0.540 70,71 Linear S0=0 Kd Kd So Kf 1/n Maximum 22.802 4.024 2.277 8.403 0.998 Minimum 0.3064 0.3975 0.132 1.459 0.646 Median 2.927 1.524 0.626 1.871 0.884 Notes a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005). b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005). c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression. e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007). f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio. g. Isotherm data not available. Fig. Nos. Linear isotherm, So > 0 Freundlich isotherm Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B Trial A Linear S0>0 Freundlich Well ID Linear Isotherm, So = 0No. data points Trial A Trial B (g)(f) (d) (d) (d) (d) Trial B (f) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (f) (d) (d) (d) (d) (g) (d) (d) (d) (d) (e) (e) (g) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e)(d) (d) (d) (e) (e)(d) (d) (d) Table 4 Boron Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g AB – 09 SB 0 0 -,- ABMW – 05 SB 0 0 -,- ABMW – 07 SB 0 0 -,- ICB – 08 SB 4 5 0.0005 0.980 0.019 0.0004 0.822 0.203 72,73 MW – 03 SB 0 0 -,- MW – 05 SB 5 5 0.001 0.933 0.118 0.001 0.949 0.082 74,75 MW – 07 SB 0 0 -,- MW – 08 SB 0 0 -,- MW – 09 SB 5 5 0.002 0.973 0.135 0.003 0.978 0.126 0.001 0.450 0.872 0.013 0.002 0.167 0.697 0.100 0.049 0.495 0.918 0.010 0.012 0.735 0.597 0.105 76,77 MW – 16 SB 0 0 -,- MW – 18 SB (6-7) 0 0 -,- MW – 18 SB (20-22)4 4 0.000 0.924 0.024 0.000 0.863 0.062 78,79 Linear S0=0 Kd Kd So Kf 1/n Maximum 0.003 0.002 0.450 0.049 0.735 Minimum 0.0001 0.0012 0.167 0.012 0.495 Median 0.001 0.002 0.308 0.031 0.615 Notes a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005). b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005). c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression. e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007). f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio. g. Isotherm data not available. Linear S0>0 Freundlich (g)(g)(g) (g) (g) (d)(d)(e) (g)(g)(g)(g) (g) (g)(g) (e) (g)(g)(g)(g) (d)(d)(e)(e) (g)(g)(g)(g) (d)(d)(e)(e) (g)(g)(g)(g) (g)(g)(g)(g) Well ID No. data points Linear Isotherm, So = 0 Linear isotherm, So > 0 Freundlich isotherm Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B Fig. Nos.Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g) (g)(g) (g) Table 5 Cadmium Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g AB – 09 SB 4 4 2.637 0.980 0.916 2.765 0.980 0.927 80,81 ABMW – 05 SB 5 5 0.382 0.934 1.879 0.421 0.981 0.747 82,83 ABMW – 07 SB 5 5 0.973 0.989 0.313 1.054 0.999 0.131 84,85 ICB – 08 SB 5 5 0.051 0.861 3.448 0.053 0.860 3.435 86,87 MW – 03 SB 5 5 0.026 0.780 4.618 0.025 0.815 3.792 88,89 MW – 05 SB 5 5 0.237 0.935 1.970 0.236 0.947 1.693 90,91 MW – 07 SB 5 5 0.718 0.923 2.823 0.730 0.898 3.497 92,93 MW – 08 SB 5 5 0.094 0.865 3.766 0.103 0.878 3.217 94,95 MW – 09 SB 5 5 0.608 0.944 1.916 0.586 0.944 2.015 96,97 MW – 16 SB 5 5 0.044 0.862 3.139 0.045 0.861 3.194 98,99 MW – 18 SB (6-7) 5 5 0.067 0.910 2.529 0.068 0.893 2.932 100,101 MW – 18 SB (20-22)5 5 1.707 0.894 3.116 1.400 0.988 0.640 102,103 Linear S0=0 Kd Kd So Kf 1/n Maximum 2.765 - - - - Minimum 0.025 - - - - Median 0.310 - - - - Notes a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005). b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005). c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression. e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007). f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio. g. Isotherm data not available. (d) (d) (d) (d) No. data points Trial A Trial B (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) Linear S0>0 Freundlich (d) (d) (d) (d) Fig. Nos.Well ID Linear Isotherm, So = 0 Linear isotherm, So > 0 Freundlich isotherm Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B Table 6 Chromium Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g AB – 09 SB 3 0 0.256 0.995 0.042 0.254 0.020 0.929 0.042 104,- ABMW – 05 SB 5 5 1.056 0.981 1.271 0.983 0.976 1.776 0.992 0.565 0.965 0.998 0.884 0.988 0.973 0.819 1.226 0.949 0.931 0.950 1.356 0.906 0.950 0.688 105,106 ABMW – 07 SB 4 4 0.080 0.958 0.549 0.078 0.946 0.671 107,108 ICB – 08 SB 3 3 0.739 0.899 18.987 0.768 0.901 17.921 0.536 3.339 0.955 0.668 0.559 3.310 0.955 0.662 3.300 0.491 0.928 0.418 2.199 0.659 0.815 1.961 109,110 MW – 03 SB 5 5 0.938 0.974 1.866 0.832 0.966 2.947 0.844 0.988 0.969 0.940 0.729 1.248 0.969 0.936 1.277 0.915 0.943 0.817 1.393 0.840 0.960 0.636 111,112 MW – 05 SB 5 5 19.099 0.951 5.290 20.490 0.959 3.978 16.414 1.501 0.958 1.367 17.896 1.316 0.958 1.359 19.496 0.802 0.925 1.020 20.459 0.836 0.899 1.127 113,114 MW – 07 SB 1 0 13.672 115,- MW – 08 SB 5 5 0.202 0.921 2.857 0.142 0.591 16.037 0.091 2.183 0.179 14.589 0.318 0.767 0.568 15.548 116,117 MW – 09 SB 5 5 0.453 0.994 0.972 0.459 0.996 0.473 0.421 0.650 0.998 0.064 0.441 0.355 0.995 0.180 0.823 0.800 0.993 0.140 0.666 0.867 0.973 0.250 118,119 MW – 16 SB 5 5 0.226 0.909 23.880 0.217 0.898 27.393 0.183 2.062 0.961 1.027 0.174 2.145 0.952 1.277 1.468 0.537 0.986 0.103 1.499 0.531 0.978 0.189 120,121 MW – 18 SB (6-7) 5 5 0.245 0.936 12.345 0.250 0.936 11.019 0.202 1.807 0.974 0.681 0.207 1.783 0.971 0.788 1.177 0.602 0.998 0.034 1.094 0.627 0.983 0.165 122,123 MW – 18 SB (20-22)4 4 4.649 0.821 5.464 3.340 0.943 2.274 124,125 Linear S0=0 Kd Kd So Kf 1/n Maximum 20.490 17.896 3.339 20.459 0.949 Minimum 0.078 0.091 0.020 0.318 0.491 Median 0.599 0.488 1.409 1.356 0.800 Notes a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005). b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005). c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression. e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007). f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio. g. Isotherm data not available. Fig. Nos.Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial BWell ID No. data points Linear Isotherm, So = 0 Linear isotherm, So > 0 Freundlich isotherm Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B (g)(e)(g) (f)(g)(f)(g) (d)(d)(e)(e) (d)(d)(e)(e) (d)(e) Linear S0>0 Freundlich (g) (g)(f) Table 7 Cobalt Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g AB – 09 SB 5 5 0.573 0.963 3.561 0.591 0.964 1.074 126,127 ABMW – 05 SB 5 5 0.104 0.778 3.548 0.108 0.809 2.302 0.097 0.213 0.499 3.138 0.104 0.128 0.564 2.295 0.287 0.654 0.675 4.248 0.156 0.862 0.808 2.774 128,129 ABMW – 07 SB 5 5 0.193 0.972 0.818 0.205 0.964 0.985 130,131 ICB – 08 SB 5 5 0.013 0.970 0.280 0.014 0.991 0.077 0.011 0.325 0.917 0.178 0.013 0.175 0.975 0.061 0.023 0.895 0.917 0.154 0.018 0.959 0.979 0.051 132,133 MW – 03 SB 0 0 -,- MW – 05 SB 5 5 0.026 0.877 1.601 0.026 0.887 1.469 134,135 MW – 07 SB 5 5 0.078 0.713 4.707 0.076 0.664 5.596 136,137 MW – 08 SB 5 5 0.019 0.944 0.705 0.021 0.950 0.578 138,139 MW – 09 SB 5 5 0.116 0.943 1.181 0.112 0.942 1.175 140,141 MW – 16 SB 0 0 -,- MW – 18 SB (6-7) 4 4 0.002 0.991 0.018 0.002 0.994 0.011 0.002 0.125 0.784 0.014 0.007 0.816 0.822 0.014 142,143 MW – 18 SB (20-22)5 5 0.485 0.936 1.175 0.364 0.989 0.367 144,145 Linear S0=0 Kd Kd So Kf 1/n Maximum 0.591 0.104 0.325 0.287 0.959 Minimum 0.002 0.002 0.125 0.007 0.654 Median 0.091 0.013 0.175 0.023 0.862 Notes a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005). b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005). c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression. e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007). f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio. g. Isotherm data not available. Well ID Linear Isotherm, So = 0 Linear isotherm, So > 0 Freundlich isotherm Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B Trial A No. data points Trial A Trial B Fig. Nos.Trial B Linear S0>0 Freundlich (d) (g) (d) (g)(g) (e)(d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (g) (d) (d) (e) (e) (e) (e)(e) (e)(e) (e) (e) (g) (e) (e) (e)(e) (d)(d) (g) (d) (g) (d) (g) (g) (g) (g) (e) (g) (d) (d) Table 8 Nickel Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g AB – 09 SB 5 5 0.741 0.976 1.070 0.785 0.985 0.717 146,147 ABMW – 05 SB 5 5 0.170 0.894 2.590 0.179 0.929 2.062 148,149 ABMW – 07 SB 5 5 0.508 0.999 0.094 0.613 0.993 0.375 150,151 ICB – 08 SB 5 5 0.032 0.919 1.648 0.034 0.907 1.824 152,153 MW – 03 SB 5 5 0.004 0.299 18.968 0.004 0.337 15.181 154,155 MW – 05 SB 5 5 0.081 0.925 1.834 0.081 0.935 1.628 156,157 MW – 07 SB 5 5 0.264 0.981 0.781 0.271 0.968 1.214 158,159 MW – 08 SB 5 5 0.054 0.869 2.886 0.059 0.890 2.344 160,161 MW – 09 SB 5 5 0.291 0.940 1.872 0.283 0.924 2.223 162,163 MW – 16 SB 5 5 0.019 0.878 1.829 0.019 0.863 2.040 164,165 MW – 18 SB (6-7) 5 5 0.026 0.919 1.495 0.026 0.902 1.788 166,167 MW – 18 SB (20-22)5 5 1.113 0.970 0.831 0.968 0.993 0.334 168,169 Linear S0=0 Kd Kd So Kf 1/n Maximum 1.113 - - - - Minimum 0.004 - - - - Median 0.125 - - - - Notes a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005). b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005). c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression. e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007). f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio. g. Isotherm data not available. Fig. Nos. (d)(d)(e)(e) Trial B Linear isotherm, So > 0 Freundlich isotherm Trial A Trial B Trial A (e)(e) Well ID Linear Isotherm, So = 0 Trial A Trial B No. data points Trial A Trial B (d)(d) Linear S0>0 Freundlich (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d)(d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) Table 9 Selenium Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g AB – 09 SB 5 5 0.196 0.995 0.227 0.206 0.998 0.121 0.186 0.388 0.994 0.126 0.199 0.261 0.998 0.058 0.245 0.951 0.990 0.090 0.249 0.954 0.993 0.046 170,171 ABMW – 05 SB 5 5 0.285 0.605 13.047 0.236 0.491 21.808 1.884 0.159 0.002 28.456 172,173 ABMW – 07 SB 5 5 0.309 0.992 0.480 0.297 0.983 1.006 0.289 0.511 0.992 0.228 0.270 0.728 0.982 0.448 0.408 0.930 0.977 0.186 0.437 0.909 0.963 0.357 174,175 ICB – 08 SB 5 5 0.038 0.857 17.471 0.039 0.860 16.935 0.028 1.734 0.916 0.875 0.029 1.732 0.917 0.889 0.524 0.512 0.970 0.194 0.518 0.520 0.972 0.204 176,177 MW – 03 SB 5 5 0.146 0.217 96.037 0.154 0.228 88.206 178,179 MW – 05 SB 5 5 0.650 0.382 35.738 0.645 0.384 34.864 180,181 MW – 07 SB 5 5 0.166 0.964 2.957 0.177 0.965 2.573 0.144 1.016 0.964 0.818 0.154 1.042 0.968 0.739 0.397 0.784 0.861 0.738 0.378 0.825 0.928 0.582 182,183 MW – 08 SB 4 4 0.318 0.974 1.759 0.437 0.978 2.138 0.281 1.005 0.968 0.601 0.405 0.612 0.956 0.772 0.692 0.769 0.950 0.437 1.033 0.667 0.872 1.307 184,185 MW – 09 SB 3 3 1.341 0.963 2.634 1.646 0.969 1.931 1.075 1.939 0.979 0.274 1.349 1.740 0.975 0.333 2.729 0.748 0.955 0.241 186,187 MW – 16 SB 5 5 0.414 0.992 0.524 0.386 0.966 2.110 0.390 0.461 0.989 0.330 0.348 0.791 0.948 1.328 0.496 0.957 0.958 0.318 0.495 0.950 0.867 1.393 188,189 MW – 18 SB (6-7) 5 4 0.448 0.972 1.587 0.454 0.977 1.306 190,191 MW – 18 SB (20-22)5 5 0.033 0.993 0.203 0.035 0.998 0.101 0.030 0.415 0.992 0.075 0.033 0.281 1.000 0.009 0.054 0.912 0.995 0.039 0.057 0.907 0.999 0.005 192,193 Linear S0=0 Kd Kd So Kf 1/n Maximum 1.646 1.349 1.939 2.729 0.957 Minimum 0.033 0.028 0.261 0.054 0.159 Median 0.291 0.235 0.760 0.466 0.866 Notes a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005). b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005). c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression. e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007). f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio. g. Isotherm data not available. Fig. Nos.Well ID Linear Isotherm, So = 0 Linear isotherm, So > 0 Freundlich isotherm Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B Trial A No. data points Trial A Trial B Trial B Linear S0>0 Freundlich (d) (e)(d)(d) (e) (d)(e)(e) (e) (e) (d) (d) (d) (d) (e) (e) Table 10 Thallium Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g AB – 09 SB 5 5 0.141 0.995 0.268 0.150 0.991 0.325 194,195 ABMW – 05 SB 5 5 0.078 0.898 2.302 0.081 0.939 1.646 196,197 ABMW – 07 SB 5 5 0.118 0.967 1.128 0.115 0.972 0.953 198,199 ICB – 08 SB 5 5 0.232 1.000 0.011 0.242 1.000 0.005 0.231 0.033 0.999 0.013 0.252 0.984 0.999 0.007 200,201 MW – 03 SB 5 5 0.077 0.978 0.678 0.073 0.991 0.340 202,203 MW – 05 SB 5 5 0.086 0.993 0.286 0.085 0.995 0.248 204,205 MW – 07 SB 5 5 0.434 0.983 0.834 0.483 0.992 0.335 0.393 0.630 0.985 0.287 0.452 0.408 0.991 0.171 0.663 0.872 0.987 0.154 0.899 0.779 1.000 0.318 206,207 MW – 08 SB 5 5 0.165 0.995 0.611 0.170 0.992 3.634 0.165 0.020 0.988 0.558 0.164 0.187 0.984 1.147 0.328 0.769 0.912 0.788 0.675 0.533 0.774 2.467 208,209 MW – 09 SB 5 5 0.111 0.994 0.135 0.110 0.989 0.371 210,211 MW – 16 SB 4 4 0.028 0.993 0.100 0.029 0.994 0.093 0.025 0.244 0.983 0.040 0.027 0.183 0.977 0.052 0.055 0.849 0.951 0.042 0.053 0.863 0.941 0.057 212,213 MW – 18 SB (6-7) 5 5 0.050 0.978 0.545 0.059 0.917 1.751 214,215 MW – 18 SB (20-22)4 4 0.944 0.992 0.273 0.905 0.994 0.608 0.940 0.027 0.979 0.255 0.836 0.526 0.995 0.083 1.169 0.861 0.974 0.310 1.359 0.795 0.981 0.137 216,217 Linear S0=0 Kd Kd So Kf 1/n Maximum 0.944 0.940 0.630 1.359 0.984 Minimum 0.028 0.025 0.020 0.053 0.533 Median 0.113 0.231 0.187 0.663 0.849 Notes a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005). b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005). c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression. e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007). f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio. g. Isotherm data not available. Fig. Nos.Well ID Linear Isotherm, So = 0 Linear isotherm, So > 0 Freundlich isotherm Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B Trial A No. data points Trial A Trial B Trial B Linear S0>0 Freundlich (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d)(d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (d) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e)(e) (e) (e) (e) (e) (e) Table 11 Vanadium Kd R2 χ2 Kd R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kd So R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 Kf 1/n R2 χ2 l/g -µg/g l/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g l/g µg/g -µg/g (c) - -µg/g (c) - -µg/g AB – 09 SB 5 5 0.957 0.993 0.259 1.053 0.998 0.106 0.922 0.261 0.988 0.264 1.048 0.034 0.996 0.111 218,219 ABMW – 05 SB 4 4 1.463 0.928 1.831 1.520 0.993 0.674 1.455 0.323 0.986 0.374 1.269 0.981 0.729 2.350 1.885 0.842 0.919 0.450 220,221 ABMW – 07 SB 3 3 1.278 0.987 0.871 1.255 0.963 2.394 1.096 1.212 0.998 0.023 1.006 1.756 0.977 0.273 2.128 0.743 1.000 0.001 2.403 0.700 0.969 0.155 222,223 ICB – 08 SB 5 5 0.155 0.880 29.503 0.160 0.883 27.932 0.122 1.758 0.943 1.097 0.126 1.745 0.945 1.071 1.285 0.496 0.980 0.148 1.276 0.502 0.981 0.144 224,225 MW – 03 SB 5 5 6.148 0.993 0.439 6.134 0.970 1.262 5.755 0.971 0.927 0.525 5.305 0.909 0.784 1.741 226,227 MW – 05 SB 5 5 15.587 0.997 0.227 17.853 0.989 0.675 228,229 MW – 07 SB 3 3 1.039 0.946 4.212 1.157 0.950 3.632 0.805 2.044 0.971 0.345 0.904 1.964 0.970 0.362 2.447 0.636 0.960 0.195 2.490 0.659 0.951 0.235 230,231 MW – 08 SB 3 3 1.527 0.981 0.975 1.721 0.969 1.777 1.293 1.317 0.987 0.163 1.420 1.518 0.965 0.425 2.324 0.786 0.983 0.089 2.646 0.767 0.915 0.385 232,233 MW – 09 SB 3 3 2.398 0.979 1.066 2.190 0.962 2.425 2.116 0.978 0.952 0.583 1.817 1.461 0.935 0.787 2.878 0.872 0.856 0.620 3.123 0.749 0.788 0.880 234,235 MW – 16 SB 3 3 0.914 0.977 2.119 0.797 0.899 14.838 0.752 1.537 0.998 0.018 0.579 2.588 0.943 0.662 2.078 0.641 0.996 0.027 2.910 0.496 0.844 0.653 236,237 MW – 18 SB (6-7) 3 3 0.829 0.923 7.886 0.831 0.919 8.718 0.619 2.347 0.961 0.453 0.618 2.390 0.958 0.494 2.544 0.566 0.938 0.286 2.606 0.557 0.923 0.346 238,239 MW – 18 SB (20-22)5 5 0.168 0.997 0.213 0.161 0.997 0.250 0.159 0.367 0.999 0.037 0.153 0.332 0.998 0.035 0.244 0.906 0.996 0.016 0.261 0.867 0.988 0.069 240,241 Linear S0=0 Kd Kd So Kf 1/n Maximum 17.853 2.116 2.588 5.755 0.981 Minimum 0.155 0.122 0.034 0.244 0.496 Median 1.206 0.904 1.518 2.425 0.746 Notes a.Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005). b.Minimum chi-square (χ2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005). c.units: l(1/n)µg(1-1/n)/g d.Not applicable for S0<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression. e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007). f.For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil-to-solution ratio. g. Isotherm data not available. Fig. Nos.Well ID Linear Isotherm, So = 0 Linear isotherm, So > 0 Freundlich isotherm Trial A Trial B Trial A Trial B Trial A No. data points Trial A Trial B (e)(e) Trial B Linear S0>0 Freundlich (e)(e) (d) (d)(d) (d)(d) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 50 100 150 200 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 1. Antimony Isotherms for AB –09 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 50 100 150 200 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 2. Antimony Isotherms for AB –09 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 3. Antimony Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 4. Antimony Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 50 100 150 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 5. Antimony Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 50 100 150 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 6. Antimony Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 50 100 150 200 250 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 7. Antimony Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 50 100 150 200 250 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 8. Antimony Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 9. Antimony Isotherms for MW –03 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 10. Antimony Isotherms for MW –03 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 5 10 15 20 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 11. Antimony Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 0 5 10 15 20 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 12. Antimony Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20 40 60 80 100 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 13. Antimony Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20 40 60 80 100 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 14. Antimony Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 15. Antimony Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 16. Antimony Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 17. Antimony Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 18. Antimony Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 20 40 60 80 100 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 19. Antimony Isotherms for MW –16 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 20 40 60 80 100 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 20. Antimony Isotherms for MW –16 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 21. Antimony Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 22. Antimony Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 50 100 150 200 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 23. Antimony Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 50 100 150 200 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 24. Antimony Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 25. Arsenic Isotherms for AB –09 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 26. Arsenic Isotherms for AB –09 SB Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 5 10 15 20 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 27. Arsenic Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 5 10 15 20 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 28. Arsenic Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - B linear S0=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 29. Arsenic Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 30. Arsenic Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 10 20 30 40 50 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 31. Arsenic Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 10 20 30 40 50 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 32. Arsenic Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 33. Arsenic Isotherms for MW –03 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 34. Arsenic Isotherms for MW –03 SB Trial - B linear S0=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 35. Arsenic Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 36. Arsenic Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - B linear S0=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 37. Arsenic Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 38. Arsenic Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 39. Arsenic Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 40. Arsenic Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 41. Arsenic Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 42. Arsenic Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 43. Arsenic Isotherms for MW –16 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 44. Arsenic Isotherms for MW –16 SB Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 45. Arsenic Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - A linear S0=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 46. Arsenic Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - B linear S0=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 47. Arsenic Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 48. Arsenic Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 49. Beryllium Isotherms for AB –09 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 50. Beryllium Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - A linear So=0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 51. Beryllium Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 52. Beryllium Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 53. Beryllium Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 54. Beryllium Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 55. Beryllium Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 10 20 30 40 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 56. Beryllium Isotherms for MW –03 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 10 20 30 40 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 57. Beryllium Isotherms for MW –03 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 58. Beryllium Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 59. Beryllium Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 60. Beryllium Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - A linear So=0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 61. Beryllium Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 62. Beryllium Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 63. Beryllium Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 1 2 3 4 5 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 64. Beryllium Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 1 2 3 4 5 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 65. Beryllium Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 66. Beryllium Isotherms for MW –16 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 67. Beryllium Isotherms for MW –16 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 68. Beryllium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 69. Beryllium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 70. Beryllium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 71. Beryllium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - B linear So=0 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0 100 200 300 400 500 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 72. Boron Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0 100 200 300 400 500 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 73. Boron Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0 100 200 300 400 500 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 74. Boron Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 0 100 200 300 400 500 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 75. Boron Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 0 100 200 300 400 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 76. Boron Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 0 100 200 300 400 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 77. Boron Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0 100 200 300 400 500 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 78. Boron Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - A linear So=0 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0 100 200 300 400 500 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 79. Boron Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 80. Cadmium Isotherms for AB –09 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 81. Cadmium Isotherms for AB –09 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 5 10 15 20 25 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 82. Cadmium Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 5 10 15 20 25 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 83. Cadmium Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 84. Cadmium Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 85. Cadmium Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 86. Cadmium Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 87. Cadmium Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 50 100 150 200 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 88. Cadmium Isotherms for MW –03 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 50 100 150 200 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 89. Cadmium Isotherms for MW –03 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 90. Cadmium Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 91. Cadmium Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 92. Cadmium Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 93. Cadmium Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 94. Cadmium Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 95. Cadmium Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 5 10 15 20 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 96. Cadmium Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 5 10 15 20 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 97. Cadmium Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 98. Cadmium Isotherms for MW –16 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 99. Cadmium Isotherms for MW –16 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 100. Cadmium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 101. Cadmium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 102. Cadmium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 103. Cadmium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - B linear So=0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 104. Chromium Isotherms for AB –09 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 105. Chromium Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 106. Chromium Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 107. Chromium Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 108. Chromium Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - B linear S0=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 5 10 15 20 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 109. Chromium Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 5 10 15 20 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 110. Chromium Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 111. Chromium Isotherms for MW –03 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 5 10 15 20 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 112. Chromium Isotherms for MW –03 SB Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 113. Chromium Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 114. Chromium Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 115. Chromium Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 116. Chromium Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 117. Chromium Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 118. Chromium Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 119. Chromium Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 120. Chromium Isotherms for MW –16 SB Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 121. Chromium Isotherms for MW –16 SB Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 122. Chromium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - A linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 123. Chromium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - B linear S0=0 linear S0>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 124. Chromium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - A linear S0=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 125. Chromium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - B linear S0=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 126. Cobalt Isotherms for AB –09 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 127. Cobalt Isotherms for AB –09 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 10 20 30 40 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 128. Cobalt Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 10 20 30 40 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 129. Cobalt Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 130. Cobalt Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 131. Cobalt Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 0 50 100 150 200 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 132. Cobalt Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 0 50 100 150 200 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 133. Cobalt Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 134. Cobalt Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 135. Cobalt Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 10 20 30 40 50 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 136. Cobalt Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 10 20 30 40 50 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 137. Cobalt Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 0 50 100 150 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 138. Cobalt Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 0 50 100 150 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 139. Cobalt Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 10 20 30 40 50 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 140. Cobalt Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 10 20 30 40 50 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 141. Cobalt Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0 50 100 150 200 250 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 142. Cobalt Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0 50 100 150 200 250 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 143. Cobalt Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 5 10 15 20 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 144. Cobalt Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 5 10 15 20 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 145. Cobalt Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 146. Nickel Isotherms for AB –09 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 147. Nickel Isotherms for AB –09 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10 20 30 40 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 148. Nickel Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10 20 30 40 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 149. Nickel Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 5 10 15 20 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 150. Nickel Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 5 10 15 20 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 151. Nickel Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 152. Nickel Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 153. Nickel Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 154. Nickel Isotherms for MW –03 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 155. Nickel Isotherms for MW –03 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20 40 60 80 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 156. Nickel Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - A (not available)linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20 40 60 80 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 157. Nickel Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - B (not available)linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 158. Nickel Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 159. Nickel Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 20 40 60 80 100 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 160. Nickel Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 20 40 60 80 100 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 161. Nickel Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 162. Nickel Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 163. Nickel Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 0 50 100 150 200 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 164. Nickel Isotherms for MW –16 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 0 50 100 150 200 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 165. Nickel Isotherms for MW –16 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 166. Nickel Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 50 100 150 200 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 167. Nickel Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 168. Nickel Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 169. Nickel Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 170. Selenium Isotherms for AB –09 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 171. Selenium Isotherms for AB –09 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 5 10 15 20 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 172. Selenium Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 5 10 15 20 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 173. Selenium Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - B linear So=0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 174. Selenium Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 175. Selenium Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 50 100 150 200 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 176. Selenium Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 50 100 150 200 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 177. Selenium Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 178. Selenium Isotherms for MW –03 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 179. Selenium Isotherms for MW –03 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 180. Selenium Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 181. Selenium Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 182. Selenium Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 183. Selenium Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 184. Selenium Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 185. Selenium Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 0 2 4 6 8 10 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 186. Selenium Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 0 2 4 6 8 10 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 187. Selenium Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 188. Selenium Isotherms for MW –16 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 189. Selenium Isotherms for MW –16 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 190. Selenium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 191. Selenium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - B linear So=0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 50 100 150 200 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 192. Selenium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 50 100 150 200 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 193. Selenium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 194. Thallium Isotherms for AB –09 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 195. Thallium Isotherms for AB –09 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20 40 60 80 100 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 196. Thallium Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20 40 60 80 100 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 197. Thallium Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 198. Thallium Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 199. Thallium Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 200. Thallium Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 201. Thallium Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - B linear So=0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20 40 60 80 100 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 202. Thallium Isotherms for MW –03 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20 40 60 80 100 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 203. Thallium Isotherms for MW –03 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20 40 60 80 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 204. Thallium Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 20 40 60 80 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 205. Thallium Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 206. Thallium Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 207. Thallium Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 10 20 30 40 50 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 208. Thallium Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 10 20 30 40 50 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 209. Thallium Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 210. Thallium Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 211. Thallium Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 212. Thallium Isotherms for MW –16 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 213. Thallium Isotherms for MW –16 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 214. Thallium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - A linear So=0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 215. Thallium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 216. Thallium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 217. Thallium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 218. Vanadium Isotherms for AB –09 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 219. Vanadium Isotherms for AB –09 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 220. Vanadium Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - A linear So=0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 221. Vanadium Isotherms for ABMW –05 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 222. Vanadium Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 223. Vanadium Isotherms for ABMW –07 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 224. Vanadium Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 225. Vanadium Isotherms for ICB –08 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 226. Vanadium Isotherms for MW –03 SB Trial - A linear So=0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 227. Vanadium Isotherms for MW –03 SB Trial - B linear So=0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 228. Vanadium Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - A linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 229. Vanadium Isotherms for MW –05 SB Trial - B linear So=0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 230. Vanadium Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 231. Vanadium Isotherms for MW –07 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 232. Vanadium Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 233. Vanadium Isotherms for MW –08 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 234. Vanadium Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 235. Vanadium Isotherms for MW –09 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 236. Vanadium Isotherms for MW –16 SB Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 237. Vanadium Isotherms for MW –16 SB Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 238. Vanadium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 239. Vanadium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (6-7) Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 240. Vanadium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - A linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 S ( u g / g ) C (ug/l) Figure 241. Vanadium Isotherms for MW –18 SB (20-22) Trial - B linear So=0 linear So>0 Freundlich