HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0000396_App B Updated Groundwater Modeling_20160219Produced by: Ron Falta, PhD February 12, 2016
Page 1
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\102. Asheville Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Appendices\Appendix
B\Appendix A New_Asheville_Simulations_12_17_15.docx
Figure 1. Simulated 2015 manganese concentration (ug/L) in the top model layer of the
transition zone or alluvium (layer 8).
Produced by: Ron Falta, PhD February 12, 2016
Page 2
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\102. Asheville Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Appendices\Appendix
B\Appendix A New_Asheville_Simulations_12_17_15.docx
Figure 2. Simulated 2015 manganese concentration (ug/L) in the second model layer of the
fractured bedrock (layer 11).
Produced by: Ron Falta, PhD February 12, 2016
Page 3
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\102. Asheville Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Appendices\Appendix
B\Appendix A New_Asheville_Simulations_12_17_15.docx
Figure 3. Simulated 2020 TDS concentration (mg/L) in the second model layer of the fractured
bedrock (layer 11) for the CAP2 case (excavation only).
Produced by: Ron Falta, PhD February 12, 2016
Page 4
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\102. Asheville Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Appendices\Appendix
B\Appendix A New_Asheville_Simulations_12_17_15.docx
Figure 4. Simulated 2030 TDS concentration (mg/L) in the second model layer of the fractured
bedrock (layer 11) for the CAP2 case (excavation only).
Produced by: Ron Falta, PhD February 12, 2016
Page 5
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\102. Asheville Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Appendices\Appendix
B\Appendix A New_Asheville_Simulations_12_17_15.docx
Figure 5. Simulated 2045 TDS concentration (mg/L) in the second model layer of the fractured
bedrock (layer 11) for the CAP2 case (excavation only).
Produced by: Ron Falta, PhD February 12, 2016
Page 6
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\102. Asheville Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Appendices\Appendix
B\Appendix A New_Asheville_Simulations_12_17_15.docx
Figure 6. Simulated 2020 sulfate concentration (mg/L) in the second model layer of the
fractured bedrock (layer 11) for the CAP2 case (excavation only).
Produced by: Ron Falta, PhD February 12, 2016
Page 7
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\102. Asheville Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Appendices\Appendix
B\Appendix A New_Asheville_Simulations_12_17_15.docx
Figure 7. Simulated 2030 sulfate concentration (mg/L) in the second model layer of the
fractured bedrock (layer 11) for the CAP2 case (excavation only).
Produced by: Ron Falta, PhD February 12, 2016
Page 8
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\102. Asheville Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Appendices\Appendix
B\Appendix A New_Asheville_Simulations_12_17_15.docx
Figure 8. Simulated 2045 sulfate concentration (mg/L) in the second model layer of the
fractured bedrock (layer 11) for the CAP2 case (excavation only).
Produced by: Ron Falta, PhD February 12, 2016
Page 9
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\102. Asheville Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Appendices\Appendix
B\Appendix A New_Asheville_Simulations_12_17_15.docx
Figure 9. Simulated 2020 manganese concentration (mg/L) in the second model layer of the
fractured bedrock (layer 11) for the CAP2 case (excavation only).
Produced by: Ron Falta, PhD February 12, 2016
Page 10
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\102. Asheville Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Appendices\Appendix
B\Appendix A New_Asheville_Simulations_12_17_15.docx
Figure 10. Simulated 2030 manganese concentration (mg/L) in the second model layer of the
fractured bedrock (layer 11) for the CAP2 case (excavation only).
Produced by: Ron Falta, PhD February 12, 2016
Page 11
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\102. Asheville Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Appendices\Appendix
B\Appendix A New_Asheville_Simulations_12_17_15.docx
Figure 11. Simulated 2045 manganese concentration (mg/L) in the second model layer of the
fractured bedrock (layer 11) for the CAP2 case (excavation only).
Produced by: Ron Falta, PhD February 12, 2016
Page 12
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\102. Asheville Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Appendices\Appendix
B\Appendix A New_Asheville_Simulations_12_17_15.docx
Figure 12. Hydraulic heads in layer 12 with 10 extraction wells pumping at an average of 0.3
gpm per well.
Produced by: Ron Falta, PhD February 12, 2016
Page 13
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\102. Asheville Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Appendices\Appendix
B\Appendix A New_Asheville_Simulations_12_17_15.docx
Figure 13. Simulated 2020 boron concentration (ug/L) in the top model layer of the bedrock
(layer 12) for the CAP2 case (excavation only, wells are not pumping).
Produced by: Ron Falta, PhD February 12, 2016
Page 14
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\102. Asheville Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Appendices\Appendix
B\Appendix A New_Asheville_Simulations_12_17_15.docx
Figure 14. Simulated 2020 boron concentration (ug/L) in the top model layer of the bedrock
(layer 12) for the CAP4 case (excavation with pumping wells).
Produced by: Ron Falta, PhD February 12, 2016
Page 15
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\102. Asheville Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Appendices\Appendix
B\Appendix A New_Asheville_Simulations_12_17_15.docx
Figure 15. Simulated 2030 boron concentration (ug/L) in the top model layer of the bedrock
(layer 12) for the CAP2 case (excavation only, wells are not pumping).
Produced by: Ron Falta, PhD February 12, 2016
Page 16
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\102. Asheville Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Appendices\Appendix
B\Appendix A New_Asheville_Simulations_12_17_15.docx
Figure 16. Simulated 2030 boron concentration (ug/L) in the top model layer of the bedrock
(layer 12) for the CAP4 case (excavation with pumping wells).
Produced by: Ron Falta, PhD February 12, 2016
Page 17
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\102. Asheville Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Appendices\Appendix
B\Appendix A New_Asheville_Simulations_12_17_15.docx
Figure 17. Simulated 2045 boron concentration (ug/L) in the top model layer of the bedrock
(layer 12) for the CAP2 case (excavation only, wells are not pumping).
Produced by: Ron Falta, PhD February 12, 2016
Page 18
P:\Duke Energy Progress.1026\102. Asheville Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Appendices\Appendix
B\Appendix A New_Asheville_Simulations_12_17_15.docx
Figure 18. Simulated 2045 boron concentration (ug/L) in the top model layer of the bedrock
(layer 12) for the CAP4 case (excavation with pumping wells).