NC0000396_J15060029F_Speciation_20150823

+ DUKE Analytical Laboratory
ENERGY
13339 Hagers Ferry Road
Huntersville, NC 28078-7929
McGuire Nuclear Complex - MG03A2
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Order Summary Report
Order Number: J15060029
Project Name: ASHEVILLE - AB GW ASSESSMENT SPECIATION
Customer Name(s): Todd Plating, Kathy Webb, John Toepfer, Tim Hunsucker
Customer Address: 200 CP and L Drive
Arden, NC 28704
Lab Contact: Peggy Kendall Phone:
peggy.kendall@duke
Report Authorized By: -energy.com Date;
(Signature) 2015.06.23 11:34:46
Peggy Kendall -04'00'
Program Comments:
Please contact the Program Manager (Peggy Kendall) with any questions regarding this report.
Data Flags & Calculations:
6/23/2015
Page 1 of 38
Any analytical tests or individual analytes within a test flagged with a Qualifier indicate a deviation from the method quality
system or quality control requirement. The qualifier description is found at the end of the Certificate of Analysis (sample results)
under the qualifiers heading. All results are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted. Subcontracted data
included on the Duke Certificate of Analysis is to be used as information only. Certified vendor results can be found in the
subcontracted lab final report. Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory subcontracts analyses to other vendor laboratories that have
been qualified by Duke Energy to perform these analyses except where noted.
Data Package:
This data package includes analytical results that are applicable only to the samples described in this narrative. An estimation of
the uncertainty of measurement for the results in the report is available upon request. This report shall not be reproduced, except
in full, without the written consent of the Analytical Laboratory. Please contact the Analytical laboratory with any questions. The
order of individual sections within this report is as follows:
Job Summary Report, Sample Identification, Technical Validation of Data Package, Analytical Laboratory Certificate of Analysis,
Analytical Laboratory QC Reports, Sub -contracted Laboratory Results, Customer Specific Data Sheets, Reports &
Documentation, Customer Database Entries, Test Case Narratives, Chain of Custody (COC)
Certification:
The Analytical Laboratory holds the following State Certifications : North Carolina (DENR) Certificate #248, South Carolina
(DHEC) Laboratory ID # 99005. Contact the Analytical Laboratory for definitive information about the certification status of
specific methods.

Sample ID's & Descriptions:
Collection
Sample ID Plant/Station Date and Time
Collected By
Sample Description
2015016803
ASHEVILLE
28 -May -15 9:21 AM
Synterra
MW-05BR
2015016804
ASHEVILLE
28 -May -15 11:11 AM
Synterra
CB-09SL
2015016805
ASHEVILLE
28 -May -15 1:32 PM
Synterra
CB-09BR
2015016806
ASHEVILLE
28 -May -15 10:42 AM
Synterra
MW -16A
2015016807
ASHEVILLE
28 -May -15 2:15 PM
Synterra
MW-18BR
2015016808
ASHEVILLE
28 -May -15 9:24 AM
Synterra
GW -01 D
2015016809
ASHEVILLE
28 -May -15 12:31 PM
Synterra
MW-16BR
2015016810
ASHEVILLE
28 -May -15 1:36 PM
Synterra
MW -18D
8 Total Samples
Page 2 of 38

Technical Validation Review
Checklist:
COC and .pdf report are in agreement with sample totals Yes No
and analyses (compliance programs and procedures).
All Results are less than the laboratory reporting limits. ❑ Yes F./] No
All laboratory QA/QC requirements are acceptable.❑ Yes ❑ No
Report Sections Included:
U Job Summary Report
❑ Sample Identification
n Technical Validation of Data Package
❑ Analytical Laboratory Certificate of Analysis
❑ Analytical Laboratory QC Report
Page 3 of 38
Sub -contracted Laboratory Results
❑ Customer Specific Data Sheets, Reports, & Documentation
❑ Customer Database Entries
66 Chain of Custody
[I/0] Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) Sent Separately
Reviewed By: Peggy Kendall Date: 6/23/2015

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 4 of 38
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060029
Site: MW-05BR
Collection Date: 28 -May -15 9:21 AM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015016803
Matrix: GW—WW
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060029
Site: CB-09SL
Collection Date: 28 -May -15 11:11 AM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015016804
Matrix: GW—WW
Page 5 of 38
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 6 of 38
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060029
Site: CB-09BR
Collection Date: 28 -May -15 1:32 PM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015016805
Matrix: GW—WW
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060029
Site: MW -16A
Collection Date: 28 -May -15 10:42 AM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015016806
Matrix: GW—WW
Page 7 of 38
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 8 of 38
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060029
Site: MW-18BR
Collection Date: 28 -May -15 2:15 PM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015016807
Matrix: GW—WW
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 9 of 38
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060029
Site: GW -01D
Collection Date: 28 -May -15 9:24 AM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015016808
Matrix: GW—WW
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060029
Site: MW-16BR
Collection Date: 28 -May -15 12:31 PM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015016809
Matrix: GW—WW
Page 10 of 38
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 11 of 38
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J15060029
Site: MW -18D
Collection Date: 28 -May -15 1:36 PM
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Speciation of an Element - (Analysis Performed by Brooks Rand Labs LLC)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2015016810
Matrix: GW—WW
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_BRAND

Page 12 of 38
BRO�©KS
RAND
LABS
MEANINGFUL METALS DATA
June 19, 2015
Peggy Kendall
Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory
Mail Code MGO3A2 (Building 7405)
13339 Hagers Ferry Rd.
Huntersville, NC 28078
980-875-5848
Project: Duke Asheville Plant (LIMS# J15060029)
Mr. Perkins,
Attached is the report associated with eight (8) aqueous samples submitted for hexavalent
chromium, selenium speciation, arsenic speciation, iron speciation, and manganese speciation
analyses on May 28, 2015. The samples were received in a sealed cooler at 0.0°C on May 29,
2015. Hexavalent chromium analysis was performed by ion chromatography inductively
coupled plasma dynamic reaction cell mass spectrometry (IC -ICP -DRC -MS). Selenium
speciation and arsenic speciation analyses were performed via ion chromatography inductively
coupled plasma collision reaction cell mass spectrometry (IC -ICP -CRC -MS). All samples
requesting iron speciation analysis were analyzed by spectrophotometry. Mn(II) analysis was
performed via IC -ICP -CRC -MS. Mn(IV) analysis were performed via digestion and subsequent
analysis by inductively coupled plasma triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (ICP-QQQ-MS).
Any issues associated with the analyses are addressed in the following report.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
it L7�--
Jeremy Maute
Project Manager
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
3958 6th Ave NW • Seattle, WA 98107 • T: 206-632-6206 • F: 206-632-6017 • www.brooksrand.com • [e-mail]

Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Report prepared for:
Peggy Kendall
Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory
Mail Code MGO3A2 (Building 7405)
13339 Hagers Ferry Rd.
Huntersville, NC 28078
Project: Duke Asheville Plant (LIMS# J15060029)
June 19, 2015
1. Sample Reception
Page 13 of 38
Eight (8) aqueous samples were submitted for hexavalent chromium, selenium speciation,
arsenic speciation, iron speciation, and manganese speciation analyses on May 28, 2015. All
samples were received in acceptable condition on May 29, 2015 in a sealed container at
0.0°C.
All samples were received in a laminar flow clean hood, void of trace metals contamination
and ultra -violet radiation, and were designated discrete sample identifiers. Sample fractions
requesting hexavalent chromium, selenium speciation, arsenic speciation, and iron speciation
analyses were field filtered by the client. Two containers were submitted for each client
sample requesting manganese speciation, one field filtered fraction and one unfiltered
fraction. An aliquot of each sample submitted for hexavalent chromium analysis was
decanted into a clean polypropylene tube. All hexavalent chromium sample fractions were
stored in a secure refrigerator maintained at a temperature of 4°C, until the analyses could be
performed.
An aliquot of each sample requiring selenium speciation evaluation was decanted into a
polypropylene centrifuge tube and each filtrate was stored in a secure, monitored cryofreezer
(maintained at a temperature of -80°C) until selenium speciation analysis could be
performed.
An aliquot of each sample submitted for arsenic speciation analysis was decanted into a
polypropylene centrifuge tube; all filtrates and original bottles were then stored in a secure,
monitored refrigerator (maintained at a temperature of <6°C) until the analyses could be
performed.
The sample fractions requesting iron speciation analysis were stored in a secure, monitored
refrigerator (maintained at a temperature of <6°C) until the analyses could be performed.

Page 14 of 38
An aliquot of each filtered sample submitted for manganese speciation analysis was decanted
into a polypropylene centrifuge tube for Mn(II) analysis. These fractions were stored in a
secure, monitored refrigerator (maintained at a temperature of <6°C) until the analyses could
be performed. Subsequently, the original bottles (filtered and unfiltered fractions) intended
for Mn speciation were preserved to pH < 2 with concentrated HNO3 and then stored in a
secure polyethylene container, known to be free from trace metals contamination, until the
digestion could be performed.
2. Sample Preparation
All sample preparation is performed in laminar flow clean hoods known to be free from trace
metals contamination. All applied water for dilutions and sample preservatives are
monitored for contamination to account for any biases associated with the sample results.
Hexavalent Chromium Anal
vsis by IC -ICP -DRC -MS Prior to analysis, an aliquot of each
sample was filtered with a syringe filter (0.45µm) and injected directly into a sealed
autosampler vial. No further sample preparation was performed as any chemical alteration of
a sample may shift the equilibrium of the system, resulting in changes in speciation ratios.
Selenium Speciation Analvsis by IC -ICP -CRC -MS Prior to analysis, an aliquot of each
sample was filtered with a syringe filter (0.45µm) and injected directly into a sealed
autosampler vial. No further sample preparation was performed as any chemical alteration of
a sample may shift the equilibrium of the system, resulting in changes in speciation ratios.
Arsenic Speciation Analysis by IC -ICP -CRC -MS An aliquot of each sample was filtered
directly into a sealed autosampler vial. No further sample preparation was performed as a
buffered EDTA solution was provided by Brooks Rand Labs for field -preservation of the
submitted samples.
Iron Speciation Analysis by Spectrophotometry No sample preparation was required as a de-
gassed HCL solution was provided by Brooks Rand Labs for field -preservation of the
submitted samples.
Manganese Mn(LI) Analysis by IC -ICP -CRC -MS An aliquot of each sample was filtered
(0.45µm) directly into an autosampler vial for Mn(II) analysis. No additional sample
preparation was performed as any chemical alteration of the samples may shift the
equilibrium of the system resulting in changes in speciation ratios.
Manganese Mn(IV) Analysis by ICP-QQQ-MS Each filtered and unfiltered sample submitted
for Mn speciation analysis was preserved with 1% HNO3 (v/v) upon sample receipt. Each
sample fraction was then further digested on a hotblock apparatus with aliquots of 50%
HNO3 (v/v) and 50% HCl (v/v), in accordance with the digestion procedure specified in EPA
Method 200.8. All resulting sample digests were analyzed for total manganese via
inductively coupled plasma triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (ICP-QQQ-MS).

Page 15 of 38
3. Sample Analysis
All sample analysis is preceded by a minimum of a five -point calibration curve spanning the
entire concentration range of interest. Calibration curves are performed at the beginning of
each analytical day. All calibration curves, associated with each species of interest, are
standardized by linear regression resulting in a response factor. All sample results are
instrument blank corrected to account for any operational biases associated with the
analytical platform.
Prior to sample analysis, all calibration curves are verified using second source standards
which are identified as initial calibration verification standards (ICV).
Ongoing instrument performance is identified by the analysis of continuing calibration
verification standards (CCV) and continuing calibration blanks (CCB) at a minimum interval
of every ten analytical runs.
Hexavalent Chromium Analysis by IC -ICP -DRC -MS Each sample for hexavalent chromium
analysis was analyzed by ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma dynamic reaction
cell mass spectrometry (IC -ICP -DRC -MS) on June 5, 2015. An aliquot of each sample is
injected onto an anion exchange column and mobilized by a basic (pH > 7) gradient. The
eluting chromium species are then introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where
energy -transfer processes cause desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are
extracted from the plasma through a differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel
through a pressurized chamber (DRC) containing a reaction gas which preferentially reacts
with interfering ions of the same target mass to charge ratios (m/z). A solid-state detector
detects ions transmitted through the mass analyzer and the resulting current is processed by a
data handling system.
Retention times for each eluting species are compared to known standards for species
identification.
Selenium Speciation Analysis by IC -ICP -CRC -MS Each sample for selenium speciation
analysis was analyzed by ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma collision reaction
cell mass spectrometry (IC -ICP -CRC -MS) on June 3, 2015. An aliquot of each sample is
injected onto an anion exchange column and mobilized by a basic (pH > 7) gradient. The
eluting selenium species are then introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where
energy -transfer processes cause desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are
extracted from the plasma through a differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel
through a pressurized chamber (CRC) containing a reaction gas which preferentially reacts
with interfering ions of the same target mass to charge ratios (m/z). A solid-state detector
detects ions transmitted through the mass analyzer and the resulting current is processed by a
data handling system.
Retention times for each eluting species are compared to known standards for species
identification.

Page 16 of 38
Arsenic Speciation Analysis by IC -ICP -CRC -MS Each sample was analyzed for arsenic
speciation via ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma collision reaction cell mass
spectrometry (IC -ICP -CRC -MS) on June 4, 2015. Aliquots of each sample are injected onto
an anion exchange column and eluted isocratically. The eluting arsenic species are then
introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where energy -transfer processes cause
desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are extracted from the plasma through a
differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel through a pressurized chamber (CRC)
containing a specific collision gas. Polyatomic interferences, due to their inherently larger
size, collide more frequently with the collision gas and therefore may be separated from the
analyte of interest via kinetic energy discrimination (KED). A solid-state detector detects
ions transmitted through the mass analyzer on the basis of their mass -to -charge ratio (m/z),
and the resulting current is processed by a data handling system.
Retention times for each eluting species are compared to known standards for species
identification.
Iron Speciation Analysis by Spectrophotometry All sample fractions submitted for iron
speciation were analyzed for Fe(II) quantification on May 29, 2015. All sample fractions
submitted for iron speciation were analyzed for Fe(III) quantification on June 18, 2015. The
samples were analyzed for iron speciation in accordance with the scientifically accepted
method outlined by:
Stookey, L.L., (1970). "Ferrozine - A new spectrophotometric reagent for iron",
Anal.Chem., 42:779-81.
Manganese Mn(II) Analysis by IC -ICP -CRC -MS All samples for Mn(II) analysis were
analyzed by ion chromatography inductively coupled plasma collision reaction cell mass
spectrometry (IC -ICP -CRC -MS) on June 5, 2015. Aliquots of each sample are injected onto
an anion exchange column and mobilized by an acidic (pH < 7) gradient. An ion pairing
agent provides a dynamic ion exchange mechanism for the cationic manganese species on the
chromatographic column. The differences in the affinity of manganese species towards the
ion pair agent and the column results in separation. The eluting selenium species are then
introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where energy -transfer processes cause
desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are extracted from the plasma through a
differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel through a pressurized chamber (CRC)
containing a reaction gas which preferentially reacts with interfering ions of the same target
mass to charge ratios (m/z). A solid-state detector detects ions transmitted through the mass
analyzer and the resulting current is processed by a data handling system.
Retention times for each eluting species are compared to known standards for species
identification.

Page 17 of 38
Manganese Mn(IV) Analysis by ICP-QQq-MS All samples submitted for Mn speciation
quantitation were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma triple quadrupole mass
spectrometry (ICP-QQQ-MS) on June 5-6, 2015. Aliquots of each sample digest are
introduced into a radio frequency (RF) plasma where energy -transfer processes cause
desolvation, atomization, and ionization. The ions are extracted from the plasma through a
differentially -pumped vacuum interface and travel through an initial quadrupole (Q 1), which
filters the target masses prior to their entrance into a second chamber. The second chamber
contains specific reactive gasses or collision gasses that preferentially react either with
interfering ions of the same target mass to charge ratios (m/z) or with the target analyte,
producing an entirely different mass to charge ratio (m/z) which can then be differentiated
from the initial interferences. The ions then exit the collision/reaction cell into and additional
quadrupole (Q2). A solid-state detector detects ions transmitted through the mass analyzer,
on the basis of their mass -to -charge ratio (m/z), and the resulting current is processed by a
data handling system.
4. Analytical Issues
No significant analytical issues were encountered. All quality control parameters associated
with the samples were within acceptance limits.
Preparation blanks were not analyzed for Fe(II) analysis. The preparation blanks were
analyzed or Fe(III) analysis. All preparation blanks yielded non -detect results for total iron,
demonstrating the absence of iron contamination due to the containers, the preservative
employed, and the equipment used to collect the samples.
Two client samples (MW -16A and MW -18D) yielded Mn(II) results greater than the value
of the associated high calibration standard. A linear range verification standard was analyzed
at 2000 µg/L. The Mn(II) recovery for the linear range verification standard was acceptable,
at 100.1%, demonstrating that the linear range of the analytical platform extended to 2000
µg/L for Mn(II). All reported Mn(ll) results were less than 2000 µg/L with the dilutions at
the instrument factored in, and thus were within the linear range demonstrated by the linear
range verification standard. No corrective actions were necessary.
For the Mn(II) analytical run the client sample, identified as MW -18D, was analyzed as the
matrix quality control sample. The matrix spike sample and matrix spike duplicate sample
(MS/MSD) spike recoveries for Mn(II) were below the lower control limit of 75%, at -
494.8% and -541.0%, respectively. The native Mn(II) concentration in the quality control
sample was significantly greater than the spiking level. Acceptable spike recoveries are often
not realized when the ambient level analyte concentration is greater than the spiking level.
No qualification of data was necessary.
Mn(IV) is quantified by analyzing the water samples for total Mn and dissolved Mn. Mn(IV)
is operationally defined as the difference between the filtered and unfiltered total Mn
concentrations, since it is thermodynamically favored to be in the form of a precipitate.

Page 18 of 38
For the Mn(IV) analysis the total and dissolved Mn results for the client sample, identified as
MW -18D, were greater than the value of the associated high calibration standard. A linear
range verification standard was analyzed at 500.0 µg/L. The Mn recovery for the linear
range verification standard was acceptable, at 100.4%, demonstrating that the linear range of
the analytical platform extended to 500.0 µg/L for Mn. All results were within the linear
range demonstrated by the linear range verification standard. No corrective actions were
necessary.
The estimated method detection limit (eMDL) for hexavalent chromium is generated from
replicate analyses of the lowest standard in the calibration curve.
The eMDL values for selenite, selenate, and selenocyanate are generated from replicate
analyses of the lowest standard in the calibration curve. Not all selenium species are present
in preparation blanks; therefore, eMDL calculations based on preparation blanks are
artificially biased low.
The eMDL values for methylseleninic acid and selenomethionine are calculated from the
average eMDL of selenite, selenate, and selenocyanate. The calibration does not contain
methylseleninic acid or selenomethionine due to impurities in these standards which would
bias the results for other selenium species.
The eMDL values for arsenite, arsenate, and dimethylarsinic acid are generated using the
standard deviation of replicate analyses of the lowest standard in the calibration curve. The
eMDL for monomethylarsonic acid is calculated from the average eMDL of the three arsenic
species contained in the calibration (i.e., arsenite, arsenate, and dimethylarsinic acid); the
calibration and CCVs do not contain monomethylarsonic acid due to impurities in this
standard which would bias the results for other arsenic species.
The eMDL values for both Fe(II) and total recoverable iron were set at 1/3 the value of the
associated reporting limit since the standard deviations associated with the replicate analyses
of the lowest standard in the calibration curves were zero.
The eMDL for Mn(II) has been generated from replicate analyses of the lowest standard in
the calibration curve.
The eMDL values for Mn(IV) been calculated using the standard deviation of the method
blanks prepared and analyzed concurrently with the submitted samples.

Page 19 of 38
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
it L7S�--
Jeremy Maute
Project Manager
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC

Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Asheville Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060029
Date: June 19, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Sample Results (1)
Page 20 of 38
Unknown Se
Sample ID Cr(VI) Se(IV) Se(VI) SeCN McSe(IV) SeMe Species (n)
MW-05BR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
CB-09SL
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
CB-09BR
0.014
ND (< 0.12)
ND (< 0.16)
ND (< 0.072)
ND (< 0.12)
ND (< 0.12)
0 (0)
MW -16A
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
MW-18BR
NR
ND (< 0.12)
0.72
ND (< 0.072)
ND (< 0.12)
ND (< 0.12)
0 (0)
GW -01D
0.046
ND (< 0.12)
ND (< 0.16)
ND (< 0.072)
ND (< 0.12)
ND (< 0.12)
0 (0)
MW-16BR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
MW -18D
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
All results reflect the applied dilution and are reported in pg/L
NR = Analysis not requested
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
SeCN = Selenocyanate
McSe(IV) = Methylseleninic acid
SeMe = Selenomethionine
Unknown Se Species = Total concentration of all unknown Se species observed by IC -ICP -MS
n = number of unknown Se species observed

Page 21 of 38
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Asheville Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060029
Date: June 19, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Sample Results (2)
Unknown As
Sample ID As(III) As(V) MMAs DMAs Species
GW -01D ND (< 0.018) ND (< 0.11) ND (< 0.054) ND (< 0.038) ND (< 0.054)
All results reflect the applied dilution and are reported in pg/L
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
MMAs = monomethylarsonic acid
DMAs = dimethylarsinic acid
Unknown As Species = Total concentration of all unknown As species observed by IC -ICP -MS

Page 22 of 38
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Asheville Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060029
Date: June 19, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Samale Results (3
Sample ID
Fe(II)
Fe(III)*
Mn (II)
Mn(IV)**
MW-05BR
25100
4010
266
0.807
CB-09SL
14.6
17.2
80.0
5.07
CB-09BR
70.0
57.3
71.3
8.67
MW -16A
108
55.7
2260
ND (< 0.098)
MW-18BR
67.1
39.7
368
ND (< 0.098)
GW -01 D
46.7
112
274
0.318
MW-16BR
41700
16000
860
ND (< 0.098)
MW -18D
5540
1730
3290
212
All results reflect the applied dilution and are reported in lag/L
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
*Fe(III) defined as the difference between total recoverable Fe and Fe(II)
**Mn(IV) operationally defined as the difference between total and dissolved Mn

Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Asheville Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060029
Date: June 19, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (1)
Page 23 of 38
Analvte Woo PBW1 PBW2 PBW3 PBW4 Mean StdDev eMDL* eMDL 5x RL 5x eMDL 50x RL 50x
Cr(VI)
0.002
0.005
0.001
0.005
0.003
0.002
0.001 0.007
0.050 -
-
Se(IV)
-0.05
-0.05
-0.05
-0.05
-0.05
0.00
0.002 -
- 0.12
0.50
Se(VI)
-0.05
-0.05
-0.05
-0.05
-0.05
0.00
0.003 -
- 0.16
0.50
SeCN
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001 -
- 0.072
0.46
McSe(lV)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.002 -
- 0.12
0.49
SeMe
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.002 -
- 0.12
0.49
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
*Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations
Quality Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (2)
Analyte (Pg/L)
PBW1
PBW2
PBW3
PBW4
Mean
StdDev
eMDL*
eMDL 10x
RL 10x
As(III)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.002
0.018
0.20
As(V)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.011
0.11
0.20
MMAs
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.005
0.054
0.20
DMAs
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.004
0.038
0.21
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
*Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations

Page 24 of 38
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Asheville Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060029
Date:
June 19, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks
Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (3)
Analyte (fag/L) PBW1* PBW2* PBW3* PBW4* Mean
StdDev
eMDL**
eMDL 1x RL 1x
eMDL 100x
RL 100x
Fe(I1)
6.7
6.7 20
670
2000
Total Fe 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0
6.7
6.7 20
670
2000
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
*Preparation blanks for Fe(II) were not analyzed. See narrative.
**Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations
Quality Control Summary - Preparation Blank Summary (3)
Analyte (lag/L) PBW1 PBW2 PBW3 PBW4 Mean
StdDev
eMDL*
eMDL 10x RL 10x
eMDL 25x
RL 25x
Mn (11) 0.24 0.05 0.02 0.72 0.10
0.32
0.086
0.86 5.0
-
-
Total Mn 0.057 0.005 0.064 0.004 0.042
0.033
0.000
- -
0.098
1.0
Diss Mn 0.000 -0.003 0.042 0.023 0.013
0.021
0.000
- -
0.063
1.0
eMDL = Estimated Method Detection Limit; RL = Reporting Limit
*Please see narrative regarding eMDL calculations

Page 25 of 38
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Asheville Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060029
Date: June 19, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Certified Reference Materials (1
Analyte (Ng/L)
CRM
True Value
Result
Recovery
Cr(VI)
LCS
2.002
1.781
89.0
Se(IV)
LCS
10.00
9.967
99.7
Se(VI)
LCS
10.00
10.28
102.8
SeCN
LCS
8.92
8.896
99.7
McSe(IV)
LCS
6.47
6.560
101.4
SeMe
LCS
9.32
9.431
101.2
Quality Control Summary
- Certified Reference Materials (2)
Analyte (pg/L)
CRM
True Value
Result
Recovery
As(III)
LCS
5.00
5.824
116.5
As(V)
LCS
5.00
5.244
104.9
MMAs
LCS
5.07
5.657
111.5
DMAs
LCS
3.63
3.700
102.1
Quality Control Summary
- Certified Reference Materials (3)
Analyte (pg/L)
CRM
True Value
Result
Recovery
Fe(II)
ICV
500.0
458.2
91.6
Total Fe
LCS
500.0
495.7
99.1
Mn (II)
LCS
1.00
1.053
105.3
Total Mn
TMDA-70.2
312
295.2
94.6
Diss Mn
TMDA-70.2
312
308.1
98.7

Page 26 of 38
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Asheville Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060029
Date: June 19, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Matrix Duplicates (1)
Analyte (pg/L)
Sample ID
Rep 1
Rep 2
Mean
RPD
Cr(VI)
Batch QC
0.059
0.060
0.059
0.9
Se(IV)
Batch QC
ND (< 0.12)
ND (< 0.12)
NC
NC
Se(VI)
Batch QC
ND (< 0.16)
ND (< 0.16)
NC
NC
SeCN
Batch QC
ND (< 0.072)
ND (< 0.072)
NC
NC
McSe(IV)
Batch QC
ND (< 0.12)
ND (< 0.12)
NC
NC
SeMe
Batch QC
ND (< 0.12)
ND (< 0.12)
NC
NC
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
NC = Value was not calculated due to one or more concentrations below the eMDL
Quality Control Summary - Matrix Duplicates (2)
Analyte (pg/L)
Sample ID
Rep 1
Rep 2
Mean
RPD
As(III)
GW -01D
ND (< 0.018)
ND (< 0.018)
NC
NC
As(V)
GW -01D
ND (< 0.11)
ND (< 0.11)
NC
NC
MMAs
GW -01D
ND (< 0.054)
ND (< 0.054)
NC
NC
DMAs
GW -01D
ND (< 0.038)
ND (< 0.038)
NC
NC
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
NC = Value was not calculated due to one or more concentrations below the eMDL

Page 27 of 38
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Asheville Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060029
Date: June 19, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Quality Control Summary - Matrix Duplicates (3
Analyte (pg/L)
Sample ID
Rep 1
Rep 2
Mean
RPD
Fe(II)
MW -18D
5545
5837
5691
5.1
Total Fe
Batch QC
177.4
177.4
177.4
0.0
Mn (II)
MW -18D
3291
3258
3274
1.0
Total Mn
MW -18D
2834
2689
2762
5.3
Diss Mn
MW -18D
2622
2632
2627
0.3
ND = Not detected at the applied dilution
NC = Value was not calculated due to one or more concentrations below the eMDL

Page 28 of 38
Speciation Results for Duke Energy
Project Name: Duke Asheville Plant
Contact: Peggy Kendall
LIMS# J15060029
Date: June 19, 2015
Report Generated by: Jeremy Maute
Brooks Rand Labs, LLC
Qualitv Control Summary - Matrix Spike/ Matrix Spike Duplicate (1
Analyte (lag/L)
Sample ID
Spike Conc
MS Result
Recovery
Spike Conc
MSD Result
Recovery
RPD
Cr(VI)
Batch QC
5.000
4.824
95.3
5.000
5.180
102.4
7.1
Se(IV)
Batch QC
251.0
221.2
88.1
251.0
219.1
87.3
1.0
Se(VI)
Batch QC
250.0
209.3
83.7
250.0
208.5
83.4
0.4
SeCN
Batch QC
228.8
199.6
87.2
228.8
200.1
87.5
0.3
Quality Control Summary
- Matrix Spike/
Matrix Spike Duplicate
(2)
Analyte (lag/L)
Sample ID
Spike Conc
MS Result
Recovery
Spike Conc
MSD Result
Recovery
RPD
As(I11)
GW -01 D
20.00
21.09
105.5
20.00
21.05
105.3
0.2
As(V)
GW -01 D
20.00
21.07
105.4
20.00
20.99
104.9
0.4
DMAs
GW -01D
20.98
22.06
105.2
20.98
22.04
105.0
0.1
Quality Control Summary
- Matrix Spike/
Matrix Spike Duplicate
(3)
Analyte (lag/L)
Sample ID
Spike Conc
MS Result
Recovery
Spike Conc
MSD Result
Recovery
RPD
Fe(I1)
MW -18D
50000
63620
115.9
50000
62740
114.1
1.4
Total Fe
Batch QC
500.0
650.3
94.6
500.0
659.4
96.4
1.4
Mn (II)
MW -18D
50.00
3027
-494.8*
50.00
3004
-541.0*
0.8
Total Mn
MW -18D
1000
3633
87.1
1000
3544
78.2
2.5
Diss Mn
MW -18D
1000
3549
92.2
1000
3568
94.1
0.6
*Ambient analyte concentration greater than spiking level. See case narrative

"11
0
m
ry
G
cd
n
U
W
-C: w
o
,
O 7C
age 29 of
M CC00
n w
000
C
O
I ! I
0M0
�
Com.. J
v
'J v:
P
70 -0 -0 -0
Ln
:C
N
w- y= w
C
V
r
- E O x
C
c
c
iLn
v
y
y
N O 3
E E
E E
T
U
U F
3
ro
v v v
C)
v v
v
v
?,
corn cn U) U) co
cn co
to
CO
to
oei
a
N U N c c 0
N U
c
c
y
0
v��
.�
u
w
O C cCd ca
i
C
O
0
o
v
It
�Iq'I
P
I
v —
v
N
cn _
a z N 0 0 0
H Z 0
0
0
ai
ai
vv
p=z z z
p= z
z
z
E
E
w ami
w
C
Z �
Z
m
0
0
F
0
M
c
o
c
a
�
c
CK)
=�
c+7
^
c
ro
mro
C�
J
f
�
T
I
V.)Ise
C
C
a
v
m
f
z
G
w
cC
7
v
1
ty
_r
l v
7o
70
(DE
L
Z�'
N
z
Q
z
z
-Z
U
Qm
QZ
u
s�
C
z
z
C 0
CT>
__ U
\
.v
o
o
v
w
Y
•
a� N
a� aD
s
m
ry
G
cd
n
U
W

E
c
I9
Pa e 30 of
c
M ,.r
M x
cc c`°
C O O
c
u
en
'a -a '0: 'a -a
'0 -a -a m -o
O
E
N N a), N a)
O CL
4-- L�- w r!
w
a o
co m m a r- a)
m m LD
o
t
C a M
G>
I
I
C
C
E Q
Q
aur s n
°J
E E
E E
t a D
C
3trv;
�
L) L) U v
c a
v U L) 0
d
a c- D-
c GY1 " v
O
v
p— Q Q
(n CO (n co
Q CL
CO � Cn (n CO CO
i
yr'
u
u
u cya y
y
C-
Q Li 2 2 (A
Q LL N
cccc
s L
••
v
Q
i
Z
ab
o v
o
G
z
m
a
•a " y
r"F1°
ai OO
�:
au
I I
O
`,j
Q=
N': c c c
Q ZI NI C c
c
=N O O o
_ ca
BIZ Z Z
p Z Z
Z
E
E
r-;
W
0 N I
w l D I
N
I
cu
cM
C
tJ3
C
C
J
U
�
N
Q
oo
N
r
!
(/
c
J
•J
`7
`�
Z2
a
v
z
.1
.�
J
U
m
LLI u
QQ
a
v
od
2
2
aui
Z
v
v
Z
8
c
0
m
r
E

� O
8
O
{
00
y w
N
Page
31 of 38
00�
�
C O 0
O C
u
N 00
u
v
p
-gigaoav
L
P4 w
v
N °
w=
w
w
v
w
Q
eto
E L
E
�
o E
Eo E
�
G CA c y0
C
cd
v
V
V
_
H CL
Cl)�G/�i
V/
CIL
�/!
cl
CO
V/
�(u
CL
v/ L
CL
coV/
cl
,,d�
VI
�'/^�
V/
�,��i
CL
VI
10)
V
u C%
[d
v N tV
w
C
N
LL
C
C
N U
Q
w�
W
IL
C
C
w�
YI
may/
z �
cl
2 0.
z
00�
cd
o0
c
c
goy
H
N
ai M
'
v
C
a>
M
W
MMp MMW�
W
P
U
U
cu
Q
m
O
,u
I
N
N
Z
Z
W
Z
Z
2
E
E
0
0)
Z
D
Z
j
cu
m
Q
I
J;
J
.ti
�J
S
cq
Q
a E
V
Q
y
'00
C
G
_
a
V0ci
d
`�
c
d�
5=
W
1
u
o
—nz LINC
C J
64
Z��z�
4
`
�-
r
o
y
GCS
�i
z
zuu
i
1
.7
.7
7
a+
�+
c7
ALJ
.°�U�
awaaa
cn
of cc

g
M
M 00
00 C�
A N00
r 7 N^
N
.c° °�
a u.
1
O C O
U
;g U
C O v
u O c,40
�'
ti iu o g
go nL M
C O
C
®
U
p
3232v-owv
0
c�
m
am
s.=
m
w21=
v
vi c
c�
P
4
ge 32 of 38
0M00
G
t
O Y Ln
N 'N
ry
J.+
Qi
CC
E C
a)
C
C E
O
O
X�
o y
v
U
of
N
U
N
N
a�
=
a)
U
N
U
N
U
y
O
CL
U O
11
U)
U)
U)
Co
U)
`
a
(n
OL
CL
v
ce
.5 .c C c
aF
..
Q
V
U
V)
Q U
U
Qi
O p
L-1
i.iCR
00
o o
�
U
o
y
�
C
O
�,
a
P7
W .� W
cr
a�
CC
v
o
U
o
V
""
o �•
c
_
co
N
Z
m
C
c
c
Q Z
m
c
c
_z
M
z
z
r
a
z
z
W0
1
cm
:
W
o
0
0
Pi
—rF
1
1
O�
v
�
u
ct
E
O
Q
Ft
.a
0
0
i
7
�i
�
Q
N
Zd
c
p
O—
R
M—
n
n e
a,
C'
p
p-1
�
N
Cj
T
M
M
o
co
p
d�
a
t
v y
CA
r
u
(�
v
CD
OIt.
1
d
v
O
v
;;•°'c
ii
�
a
3
- zd
Zb
z
z�
'D
� o
�ZJm
QQ
coz
�va
z:z
� (D
s,g
:V
Lz,w0.^
a 2
1
1
a: x
E

00
gy
00
00 O,
'It Y en
��
n
[
.0
S
W
w
0 C v
Ll
. C
u o a z
'o w as
cCa w , aUi ®
u O g
��
U
0
U
a
.�
32
m
a��
.m
'O
m
a;
:2
m
0
m m�
a w a
N
i
�'
:2
'C
m
'C
m
r-
m
D
ai
Pa
J
O
fl
e 33 of 38
O U .0
ai a
+�
E E
E E
Q)
U Q)
CIS
O m C
M
�
u
y ° n
{yam
rte+
♦�
v!
L
CO)
(n
CO)
ui
cn
�
(DN
�
v
ucs
v N °' a
Z C
H
Q
U
m
LL
c
c
m
fA
w
Q
U
m
LL
c
c
m
fA
O
O
y v G
•o- �
a""O G
°' � o $ � a A a �
u
00 0
" O CO
Cc, v°
•p
8
•U
Q T O ~ u O F
y
N
N
u o
`.]'. -S
E
E
1�
Q
Q
—10
U
.10
=
co
y
c
c
Q
?
c
c
c
o
o
w0
ym
mmzzz
E
E
R;
Z
mZZ
Zcu
0
N
N
0
U
6
•�
u
f
�
C
0
v
li
7
1
Ic
c W
c
V
x
u.
41.1
CN
v
�
C
al
a s
Ir
0
y
GO
N 1
cl
d `�
�
> = W
i0
c
C
z V
u
U)c c y
Im
z
z �i
•7
QZ
�C1J
Ga u y 7 a+ �.+
2 'o o
,�
...
y
•7 y N
y
� � a
I
U GO
awwaa�
v�I
F
M

ZN�
Person:
4{ 1
ect Nom_
letllet Numbev
Number:
nnlc ID
i-��.-o58►�e
AAt,J-o5-Rl
/ 1 c-.. -de rte,, . co.n%
1217608
g�ottie ID Date and
V 156(100 A
18804 Northcreek Parkway PhoncPg4"M00
Bothell, WA 98411 Fax [phone]
erem lblaute
BRL Pro ect Mana er:
submitting of samples the client agrees to all terms and conditions set forth
By
in the quotation provided by the BRL project manager. If you are not familiar
with the term and conditions associated with your Project, please contact your
$RL re rescntative as soon as possible 425 483-3300.
rMethoEdof,Saalc
sted 'fum Around Time:
Dclivcumber:
No"nation Of Sample ],teception: Yee
A Methods Comments
Matrix
Volum
Preservative
llniti Requested
Analytes an
field filtered
-
EDTA - 7 _
-.. _.,..__._._�As
Spec _�__._
Cr{VI)
...._____.. ...-
field filtered_
NH40H/NH4SO4_
-----
- - —_ ----- �_^.
Fe Spec
field filtered______
Degassed HCI
-e --
�p�_._-•�-^ _
Mn Spec __
___ tieHd Itered
_None
No
__.._^..__.....�
-pec - _
_ unfiltered_
None
__ _
__ _n
S
field filterede
None
_. _ _.._.^
_Spec
As Spa
field filtered
EDTA -1
_._
�_-
field filtered
NFL40HINH4SO4
Spec
r
ZS J
Degassed —HCl_..._Fe
Mn Spec
fieldd filtered
NHone one _
i3,i,?,�� ---_..
Mn Spec _
unfiltered -- ---_
Se Spe .._.�
field filtered
__. _
` C Date✓Time: i r
telinquished by: (sign) print) �-- -�
(print} -' s �, ��'Y� Date/Time: '� mP
3e�ived by: (sign)
DetelTime;_
Relinquished by: (sign) (print)
(ry t) DateMme:
Received by: (sign)
Please account far each saris ilc bottle as a seperate line item for verification purposes.
G wastewater (WW), saii (Si,), sediment (SD), tissue (t'S), product (1'), other (C))
Matrix: Air, Freshwater (F O, seawater (5W}, grr>untiwatsr (W},
0.6 C._
llc:v 1.1 (April 2005)

Matrix: Air, Nreahwater seawater (Sn groundwater (GW), Wastewater (7m, wil (Sl ), sediment (Sl)), tissue (1'S), product (1'), other (0)
Rev 1.1 (April 2005)

Relinquished by: (sign} �.n(perint)
t'Fiec�eived by: (sign) ,-��'�'�+/� DatelTime: t ®�Od
Ret'ilquished by: (sigh)
(print) DatelTime: _
Date/Time:
Received by: (sign) (print) --
Please account -for each sample bottle as a seperate line iters for verification,purposes.
'Matrix: Air, Freshwater ]- , scawatcr (:1w), groundwater ((',n wastewater , soil (, L), sediment (SO), tissue US}, product (P), other (0)
ro
nev 1.1 (April 20,05)
Page 36 of 38
18804 Northcreck Parkway Phone [phone]Q0
Bothell, WA 98011 Fax [phone]:
BRL Project MRna r: leremV Mante
Com n .Name:
;1Q•-
By submitting of samples the client a8rees to all terms and ccinditians set forth
Contaet 1'ercnn:
%.
2b
in the quotation provided by the BRL project manager. If you are'not familiar
Address:
v
t
with the term and conditions associated with your project, please contact your.
4MI41 tj
_ �'
BRL re resentative as soon as nsible 42 483-3300::
]'hone Number.
%(4q-. kA'1.ti - 't
Re uested Turn Around Time:
Fax Dumber.
^t5 - 4
- �l1
Method of Sam le Delivery.
EaYA Address:
Project Name:
'r'�1R�
'♦✓
+� � '
���! �'`'
Courier TrackingNumber.
Confirmation• of.;

trl-y Nom,
:t P
ate!
Number:
0
a
Page 37 f 8
18804 Northcreek Parkway Phone (4 4$33300
Fax [phone].$
Bothell, WA 98011
BRL Nr©-ect Manager .
erem Maute
By submitting of samples the client agr`ee�s to all terms and conditions set.forth
`et in the notation rovided by the BRL project manager. If you ate not familiar
t 20 quotation p lease contact our
with the term and conditions associated with your pxoject, p Y
nl� it Ise b [. BRL;r resentadve ;as soon as pOs6ble 425 483-3300.,
Re nested Tum Around Time,
Method of Sam to De-- :
(i1, , �"{uEi�+R•• � Courier Tkackin Number: �t
MSI AN C;onfirmatiiin of Sample Reception: yes � N6
tt • d
12176013
Comments
Matrix Volume Preservative Initials Requested Analytes and Methods
Bottle ID Date and Tune As Spec field filtered . .
Ll t�O�{ S �5 �. ;12s EGTA - 7 -- -- — -- .. field filtered_
NH4pHgV Ii4SQ4 Crt1/l
field filtered'
De assed .HC1 Fe Spec _ d _-- ed
�i3�1S Mn Spec field flitered
None.
WWI _ _ - — - Mn Spec � unfiltered
Nanefield filtered
-----
None Se Spec
field filters
EDTA - — f {j Wired
Cr(V� l} -- -
_ ^INH4SO4 field filtered^
Degassed HCl JFe SSS-- `-
g one _ Mn Si�ec - — field filtered _
N unflltered
Mn S
None . perm
iy�te/lime: 15 Comments;
ped by. (sigh) rint} j a
y { S. DatelTirne: '�• ''� A�jo'� Q' b
{+(� Tern
by: (sign) (print) _ Comments:
oatelTime:-,---
Relinquished by: (sign) (print)
DatelTime:
Redeived by:. (sign
tint}
Please account for each sample bottle as a seperate line item for verifieatiun p p:sedimcnr (SO), tissue (('*Product (P), other (0)
(1Wj gnwiidwatcr (CVS, wastc:watcr (5 }'
Nfatrix: Air, Freshwater (FV10, seawater ,
Rev 1.t (April 2005)

.
,TIS0U,�C
Page38 3
Phone (42�i 4633-33QU
18804 Northcreek Parkway
Pax [phone]
:N
Bothell, WA 98411
kgsJeremy
BRL Project Man er: Maute
terms and conditions set Forth
�m zl Name:
^
By submitting of samples the client agrees to all
in the provided by the BRL project manager. If you are• not familiar
ontact Person:
V¢ r
t
quotation
with the term and conditions associated with your protect, please contact your
ddress:
$LUVt i1
�C (
BRL representative as soon as possible 425 483-3300:
hone Number:
4 �'
Rec uested Turn Around Time:
ax 1+lumbet.
�S JU
- it (
Method of sa le Delivery:
:mail Address:
-r V)zN t�
Olt 'R' �
V►1 �"°'
Courier Traciciri Number �{
Confirmation of Sample Reception: yes � lr� .
'ro ect Name:
"roi ect Number:4
gU Num ber:
.1217606
Initials Requested Analytes and ivlethods Comments
Bottle YD Date and Time Matra
volume Preservative'
AS Spe�,______ field filtered
;ample ID
i
S
- �
Cr(VI) _ _ r field filtered
NH field filters(-�--
�e Spec
OW
�pekassed HCl
Mn Spec field filtered
one _
Mn Spec unf@ r
38'
_
None field.filtered
- Se 'pec �.�_.�.
..�....��
Spec _ field filtered _
Y
EDTA -1 Cr VI field AlWed w
NH4OHINH4SO4 _ _ _ __ — S field filtered
Spec Fe
__•_
q assed NCI
-- - Mn Spec — field fl1tered
____ -- -
None_--�-_
Mn Spec unfiltered
-
None - - Se Spec field—filter7ed
-
None___ -------
- -l--- -_ -------- --
{ } DatelTrne: h ►5 fkJl�-1 . Lommen�s..
(print) tZa
3eiinquished by, (sign) C . C_
t p ®d
deceived. by: (sign) (print)
DatelTime: Tem : ('� .
Comments:
(print)
Date/Time:_____
Relinquished by: -(sign) Temp:
Date/Time:
Reoeived.by: (sign) (pant)
Please account for each sample bottle as a seperate line item for veater (tiori,, oilp(Sl.) sediment (Sq), tissue (1's), product (P), other (0)
\iairix: Air, Freshwater Q,W), sea.,I (SW), groundwater (GW), wastewater (WW}, • ,
Raw 1.1 (April M)