HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0029611_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20150422 N PD&
A7A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
April 22, 2015
RECEIVEDIDENRIDWR
Yadkin County Board of Education APR 2 7 2015
Attn: Dr. Todd Martin, Superintendent
121 Washington Street Water Quality
Yadkinville, NC 27055 Permitting Section
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspections
Yadkin County Board of Education Wastewater Treatment Plants
Yadkin County
Dear Dr. Martin:
Ron Boone of the Winston Salem Regional Office (WSRO) of the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (DWR or the Division) conducted compliance evaluation inspections at the following facilities on
April 16th, 2015:
Facility Name NPDES Permit#
Courtney Elementary School NC0029599
East Bend Elementary School NC0029611
Forbush Elementary School NC0029602
Forbush High School NC0071773
Starmount High School NC0070459
The assistance and cooperation of Mark Matthews and Mitch Long, Operators in Responsible
Charge (ORC), was greatly appreciated. Inspection reports are attached for your records and the inspection
findings are summarized below.
The following table shows important details about each plant:
Latitude & Receiving Stream
Facility Name Plant Type Longitude Receiving Stream Classification
Courtney ES Sand Filter 36.067886, Harmon Creek WS-IV
80.602172
36.213194,
East Bend ES Sand Filter 80.509137 Logan Creek C
36.125681,
Forbush ES Activated Sludge 80.498595 Logan Creek WS-IV
Forbush HS Activated Sludge 36.142803, Forbush Creek WS-IV
80.559088
Starmount HS Activated Sludge 36. South South Deep Creek WS-III
80.769535
450 West Hanes Mill Road,Suite#3UU,Winston-Salem,Noah Carolina 27105
Phone:336-776-98001 Internet:www.ncdenr,gov
An Equal Opportunity\Affirmative Action Employer-Made in part by recycled paper
s •
SITE REVIEWS
Mr. Boone reviewed the plants with Mr. Matthews and Mr Long. For the most part, all plants were in
good condition and well maintained. The effluents were clear and there was no foam at the discharge points.
The deficiencies that Mr. Boone did note are detailed below:
1. Several alarms at the plants did not function when tested. The school board needs to test all alarms
and make sure they are operational.
2. The filter beds at Courtney and East Bend schools had a significant amount of algal and vegetative
growth.This should be kept to a minimum by regularly raking the beds.
DOCUMENTATION REVIEWS
There were no problems noted with Mr. Matthews documentation for all five plants. Mr. Matthews
had all the required documentation and it meets requirements.
There were no other discrepancies noted. Please keep up the good work in ensuring the plants are
properly operated and maintained and meeting all the terms and conditions of the permits. Please remember
that violations of the permit are subject to enforcement actions not to exceed $25,000 per day, per violation.
If you have any questions regarding the inspection or this letter, please do not hesitate to contact
Mr. Boone or me at 336-776-9800. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
•
W. Corey Basinger
Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations
Division of Water Resources
Attachments:
1. BIMS Inspection Reports (x5—one for each plant)
CC: Central Files
NPDES Unit
WSRO/SWP Files
Yadkin County Board of Education
Attn: Mark Matthews, Operator in Responsible Charge
121 Washington Street
Yadkinville, NC 27055
United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved.
EPA Washington,D.C.20460 OMB No.2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A:National Data System Coding(i.e.,PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 hi I 2 LI 3 I NC0029599 111 12 I 15/04/16 117 18r. 19 pi 201
21111111 1111111111111111111111111 11111111111 p6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved
671 1 70I LJ L
I 71 I I 72 12 I 731 1 174 751 1 1 1 1 1 1 180
Section B:Facility Data
L_.l
Name and Location of Facility Inspected(For Industrial Users discharging to POTW,also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 10:00AM 15/04/16 14/01/01
Courtney Elementary School WWTP
2529 Courtney-Huntsville Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
11:00AM 15/04/16 18/12/31
Yadkinville NC 27055
Name(s)of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data
• 111
Mark C Matthews/ORC/336-679-3138/
Name,Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Mark Matthews,121 Washington St Yadkinville NC 2705577251/336-699-4481/
No
Section C:Areas Evaluated During Inspection(Check only those areas evaluated)
qi Permit Flow Measurement w Operations&Maintenance • Records/Reports
di Self-Monitoring Program 1111 Facility Site Review el Effluent/Receiving Waters Laboratory
Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s)and Signature(s)of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Ron Boone WSRO WQ//336-776-9690/
Signatuurree of
Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3(Rev 9-94)Previous ns are obsolete.
Page# 1
•
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1 •
31 NC0029599 111 121 15/04/16 ( 17 18 i.pj
Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Page# 2
• Permit: NC0029599 Owner-Facility: Courtney Elementary School OMIT P
Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new ❑ 0 II 0
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? • 0 0 0
#Are there any special conditions for the permit? 0 • 0 0
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • 0 0 0
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? • 0 0 0
Is all required information readily available, complete and current? • 0 0 0
Are all records maintained for 3 years(lab. reg. required 5 years)? U 0 0 0
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? • 0 0 0
Is the chain-of-custody complete? • 0 0 0
Dates,times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration •
Dates of analysis •
Name of person performing analyses U
Transported COCs •
Are DMRs complete:do they include all permit parameters? • 0 0 0
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? 0 0 U 0
(If the facility is=or>5 MGD permitted flow)Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator 0 0 • 0
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current? • 0 0 0
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? • 0 0 0
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? • 0 0 0
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? • 0 0 0
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? 0 0 • 0
Comment: None
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? • 0 0 0
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters)performed by a certified lab? • 0 0 0
Page# 3
Permit NC0029599 Owner-Facility: Courtney Elementary School WWTP
Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
#Is the facility using a contract lab? • 0 0 0
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 0 0 •
Celsius)?
Incubator(Fecal Coliform)set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/-0.2 degrees? 0 0 0 •
Incubator(BOD)set to 20.0 degrees Celsius+/-1.0 degrees? 0 0 0 •
Comment: None
Flow Measurement-Influent Yes No NA NE
#Is flow meter used for reporting? • 0 0 0
Is flow meter calibrated annually? 0 0 0 •
Is the flow meter operational? • 0 0 0
(If units are separated)Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? 0 0 • 0
Comment: Using well water meter readings.
Septic Tank Yes No NA NE
(If pumps are used)Is an audible and visual alarm operational? 0 • 0 0
Is septic tank pumped on a schedule? • 0 0 0
Are pumps or syphons operating properly? • 0 0 0
Are high and low water alarms operating properly? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Sand Filters(Low rate) Yes No NA NE
(If pumps are used)Is an audible and visible alarm Present and operational? 0 • 0 0
Is the distribution box level and watertight? 0 0 0 •
Is sand filter free of ponding? • 0 0 0
Is the sand filter effluent re-circulated at a valid ratio? • 0 0 0
#Is the sand filter surface free of algae or excessive vegetation? 0 • 0 0
#Is the sand filter effluent re-circulated at a valid ratio?(Approximately 3 to 1) • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Disinfection - UV Yes No NA NE
Are extra UV bulbs available on site? 0 0 0 0
Are UV bulbs clean? 0 0 0 0
Page# 4
• Permit NC0029599 Owner-Facility: Courtney Elementary School WWTP
inspection Date: 04/18/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Disinfection- UV Yes No NA NE
Is UV intensity adequate? • 0 0 0
Is transmittance at or above designed level? • 0 0 0
Is there a backup system on site? • 0 0 0
Is effluent clear and free of solids? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? • 0 0 0
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? • 0 0 0
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? 0 0 • 0
Comment: None
Operations&Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? • 0 0 0
Does the facility analyze process control parameters,for ex: MLSS, MCRT,Settleable • 0 0 0
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge,and other that are applicable?
Comment: None
Page# 5
• United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved.
EPA Washington,D.C.20460 OMB No.2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A:National Data System Coding(i.e.,PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 Iti 2 l5 I 3 I N00029811 111 12 1 15/04/16 117 18 LI 19 12_1 201 I
211 I I I 1 1 I I I I N IIHIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1 r6
Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved----
67 1 L
1 701 1 71 Li 72 1 ti 1 731 I 174 751 1 1 1 1 1 1 180
J Section B:Facility Data L�
Name and Location of Facility Inspected(For Industrial Users discharging to POTW,also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 11:00AM 15/04/16 14/01/01
East Bend Elementary School WWfP
Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
NC Hwy 67E
12:00PM 15/04/16 18/12/31
East Bend NC 27018
Name(s)of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data
///
Mark C Matthews/ORC/336-679-3138/
Name,Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Mark Matthews,121 Washington St Yadkinville NC 270557725/1336-699-4481/
No
Section C:Areas Evaluated During Inspection(Check only those areas evaluated)
up Permit II Flow Measurement • Operations&Maintenance up Records/Reports
so Self-Monitoring Program II Sludge Handling Disposal • Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
di Laboratory
Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s)and Signature(s)of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Ron Boone WSRO WQ//336-776-9690/
Signature of Management QA Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3(Rev 9-94)Previous ed are obsolete.
Page# 1
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1 •
31 NC0029611 I11 121 15/04/16 117 18 1„I
Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Math additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Page# 2
•
Permit: NC0029611 Owner-Facility: East Bend Elementary School VVVVfP
Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new 0 0 • 0
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? • 0 0 0
#Are there any special conditions for the permit? 0 I 0 0
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • 0 0 0
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? • 0 0 0
Is all required information readily available,complete and current? • 0 0 0
Are all records maintained for 3 years(lab. reg. required 5 years)? • 0 0 0
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? • 0 0 0
Is the chain-of-custody complete? • 0 0 0
Dates,times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling •
Results of analysis and calibration •
Dates of analysis •
Name of person performing analyses •
Transported COCs •
Are DMRs complete:do they include all permit parameters? • 0 0 0
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? 0 0 • 0
(If the facility is=or>5 MGD permitted flow).Do they operate 2417 with a certified operator 0 0 • ❑
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current? • 0 0 0
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? • 0 0 0
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? • 0 0 0
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? • 0 0 0
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? 0 0 • 0
Comment: None
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? • 0 0 0
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters)performed by a certified lab? • 0 0 0
Page# 3
Permit: NC0029611 Owner-Facility: East Bend Elementary School wWfP
Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
#Is the facility using a contract lab? • ❑ 0 0
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees • 0 0 0
Celsius)?
Incubator(Fecal Coliform)set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/-0.2 degrees? 0 0 0 •
Incubator(BOD)set to 20.0 degrees Celsius+/-1.0 degrees? 0 ❑ 0 •
Comment: None
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? 0 0 MI 0
Is sample collected below all treatment units? • ❑ 0 0
Is proper volume collected? • 0 0 0
Is the tubing clean? 0 0 I 0
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 0 0 III
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit(frequency,sampling type • 0 0 0
representative)?
Comment: None
Flow Measurement-Influent Yes No NA NE
#Is flow meter used for reporting? • 0 0 0
Is flow meter calibrated annually? 0 0 • 0
Is the flow meter operational? • 0 0 0
(If units are separated)Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? 0 ❑ • 0
Comment: Use well water meter.
Septic Tank Yes No NA NE
(If pumps are used)Is an audible and visual alarm operational? 0 II 0 0
Is septic tank pumped on a schedule? • 0 0 0
Are pumps or syphons operating properly? • 0 0 0
Are high and low water alarms operating properly? • 0 0 0
Comment: There are several alarms at this plant, some of which did not work during the inspection.
They all need to be repaired.
Sand Filters (Low rate) Yes No NA NE
(If pumps are used)Is an audible and visible alarm Present and operational? 0 U 0 0
Page# 4
• Permit NC0029611 • Owner-Facility: East Bend Elementary School VWVTP
Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Sand Filters(Low ratel Yes No NA NE
Is the distribution box level and watertight? 0 0 0 •
Is sand filter free of ponding? • 0 0 0
Is the sand filter effluent re-circulated at a valid ratio? • 0 0 0
#Is the sand filter surface free of algae or excessive vegetation? 0 • 0 0
#Is the sand filter effluent re-circulated at a valid ratio?(Approximately 3 to 1) • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Disinfection - UV Yes No NA NE
Are extra UV bulbs available on site? • 0 0 0
Are UV bulbs clean? • ❑ 0 0
Is UV intensity adequate? • 0 0 0
Is transmittance at or above designed level? • 0 0 0
Is there a backup system on site? • 0 0 0
Is effluent clear and free of solids? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? • 0 0 0
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? • 0 0 0
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? 0 0 U 0
Comment: None
Operations& Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? • 0 0 0
Does the facility analyze process control parameters,for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable • 0 0 0
Solids,pH, DO, Sludge Judge,and other that are applicable?
Comment: None
Page# 5
United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved.
EPA Washington,D.C.20460 OMB No.2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A:National Data System Coding(i.e.,PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 (ti ( 2H
I 31 NC0oz96o2 111 12 I 15/04/16 117 18 L i 19 12_1 201 I
211IIIII1llllllll ( IIIllllllllllllll1111111111 166
Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA — Reserved --
671 I 70LJ I 71 Li 72 (Lti J 7311 1 I74 75J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l80
Section B:Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected(For Industrial Users discharging to POTW,also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 12:00PM 15/04/16 14/01/01
Forbush Elementary School WWTP
1400 Bloomtown Rd Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
East Bend NC 27018 01:OOPM 15/04/16 18/12/31
Name(s)of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data
///
Mark C Matthews/ORC/336-679-3138/
Name,Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Mark Matthews,121 Washington StYadkinville NC 270557725//336-699-4481/
No
Section C:Areas Evaluated During Inspection(Check only those areas evaluated)
* Permit pi Flow Measurement Operations&Maintenance w Records/Reports
FM Self-Monitoring Program r Sludge Handling Disposal II Facility Site Review IN Effluent/Receiving Waters
W Laboratory
Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s)and Signature(s)of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Ron Boone WSRO WQ//336-776-9690/
Signature of Management Q tReviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3(Rev 9-94)Previous edit] are obsolete.
Page# 1
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1 •
31 NC0029602 111 121 15/04/18 117 18 L.Qi
Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Page# 2
Permit NC0029602 Owner-Facility: Forbush Elementary School VVVVTP
Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new 0 0 • 0
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? • 0 0 0
#Are there any special conditions for the permit? 0 • 0 0
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • 0 0 0
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? • 0 0 0
Is all required information readily available,complete and current? • 0 0 0
Are all records maintained for 3 years(lab. reg. required 5 years)? • 0 0 0
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? • 0 0 0
Is the chain-of-custody complete? • 0 0 0
Dates,times and location of sampling •
Name of individual performing the sampling •
Results of analysis and calibration •
Dates of analysis U
Name of person performing analyses •
Transported COCs •
Are DMRs complete:do they include all permit parameters? • 0 0 0
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? 0 0 • 0
(If the facility is=or>5 MGD permitted flow)Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator 0 0 • 0
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current? • 0 0 0
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? • 0 0 0
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? • 0 0 0
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? • 0 0 0
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? 0 0 • 0
Comment: None
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? • 0 0 0
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters)performed by a certified lab? • 0 0 0
Page# 3
Permit NC0029602 Owner-Facility: Forbush Elementary School VWVTP •
Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
#Is the facility using a contract lab? • 0 0 0
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 0 0 •
Celsius)?
Incubator(Fecal Coliform)set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/-0.2 degrees? 0 0 0 U
Incubator(BOD)set to 20.0 degrees Celsius+/-1.0 degrees? 0 0 0 •
Comment: None
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? 0 0 • 0
Is sample collected below all treatment units? • 0 0 0
Is proper volume collected? • 0 0 0
Is the tubing clean? 0 0 • 0
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 0 0 II
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit(frequency,sampling type • 0 0 0
representative)?
Comment: None
Flow Measurement-Influent Yes No NA NE
#Is flow meter used for reporting? • 0 0 0
Is flow meter calibrated annually? 0 II 0 0
Is the flow meter operational? • 0 0 0
(If units are separated)Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? ❑ 0 • 0
Comment: Use well water flow meter.
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual •
b.Mechanical 0
Are the bars adequately screening debris? • 0 0 0
Is the screen free of excessive debris? • 0 0 0
Is disposal of screening in compliance? • 0 0 0
Is the unit in good condition? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Page# 4
•
Permit NC0029602 Owner-Facility: Forbush Elementary School VWVfP
Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Equalization Basins Yes No NA NE
Is the basin aerated? • 0 0 0
Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment? U 0 0 0
Is the basin free of excessive grease? • 0 0 0
Are all pumps present? • 0 0 0
Are all pumps operable? • 0 0 0
Are float controls operable? U 0 0 0
Are audible and visual alarms operable? 0 U 0 0
#Is basin size/volume adequate? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation Ext.Air
Type of aeration system Diffused
Is the basin free of dead spots? • 0 0 0
Are surface aerators and mixers operational? 0 0 • 0
Are the diffusers operational? • 0 0 0
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? • 0 0 0
Does the foam cover less than 25%of the basin's surface? • 0 0 0
Is the DO level acceptable? 0 0 0 •
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I) 0 0 0 II
Comment: None
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? • 0 0 0
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? 0 0 U ❑
Are weirs level? • 0 0 0
Is the site free of weir blockage? • 0 0 0
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? • 0 0 0
Is scum removal adequate? • 0 0 0
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? • 0 0 0
Is the drive unit operational? 0 0 • 0
Page# 5
Permit NC0029602 Owner-Facility: Forbush Elementary School VWVTP
Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the return rate acceptable(low turbulence)? • 0 0 0
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? • 0 0 0
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable?(Approximately%4 of the sidewall depth) 0 0 0 •
Comment: None
Disinfection- UV Yes No NA NE
Are extra UV bulbs available on site? U 0 0 0
Are UV bulbs clean? • 0 0 0
Is UV intensity adequate? • 0 0 0
Is transmittance at or above designed level? 0 0 0 IN
Is there a backup system on site? • 0 0 0
Is effluent clear and free of solids? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? • 0 0 0
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? U 0 0 0
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? 0 0 • 0
Comment: None
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
Is the capacity adequate? • 0 0 0
Is the mixing adequate? • 0 0 0
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? • 0 0 0
#Is the.odor acceptable? • 0 0 0
#Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? 0 0 0 •
Comment: None
Operations& Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? • 0 0 0
Does the facility analyze process control parameters,for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable • 0 0 0
Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: None
Page# 6
•
United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved.
EPA Washington,D.C.20460 OMB No.2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A:National Data System Coding(i.e.,PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 u 2 Li I 3 I N00071773 111 12 1 15/04/16 117 18 I,. 19 20 I I
211 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 I I I I I I I I l I I I l 1 1 I 1 1 1� s� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 166
Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved I
67I 1 70 Ii 71 L I 72LJ u � 731 1 174 7511 1 1 1 1 1 1 180
Section B:Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected(For Industrial Users discharging to POTW,also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 01:OOPM 15/04/16 14/02/01
Forbush High School WWTP
1525 Fallon Rd Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
East Bend NC 27018 02:OOPM 15/04/16 18/12/31
Name(s)of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data
111
Mark C Matthews/ORC/336-679-3138/
Name,Address of Responsible OfficialTitle/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Mark Matthews,121 Washington StYadkinville NC 270557725//336-699-4481/
No
Section C:Areas Evaluated During Inspection(Check only those areas evaluated)
up Permit II Flow Measurement • Operations&Maintenance Records/Reports
FN Self-Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal • Facility Site Review lb Effluent/Receiving Waters
di Laboratory
Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s)and Signature(s)of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Ron Boone WSRO WQ//336-776.9690/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
EPA Form 3560-3(Rev 9-94)Previous edition are obsolete.
Page# 1
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1
31 NC0071773 I11 121 15/04/18 117 18 I r.
Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Please refer to the attached inspection summary letter.
Page# 2
• Permit: NC0071773 Owner-Facility: Forbush High School WVVfP
Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new 0 0 • 0
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? • 0 0 0
#Are there any special conditions for the permit? 0 • 0 0
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • 0 0 0
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? U 0 0 0
Is all required information readily available,complete and current? • 0 0 0
Are all records maintained for 3 years(lab. reg.required 5 years)? U 0 0 0
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? U 0 0 0
Is the chain-of-custody complete? • 0 0 0
Dates,times and location of sampling •
Name of individual performing the sampling •
Results of analysis and calibration •
Dates of analysis •
Name of person performing analyses •
Transported COCs •
Are DMRs complete:do they include all permit parameters? • 0 0 0
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? 0 0 • 0
(If the facility is=or>5 MGD permitted flow)Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator 0 0 U 0
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current? • 0 0 0
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? • 0 0 0
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? • 0 0 0
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? • 0 0 0
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? 0 0 • 0
Comment: None
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? • 0 ❑ 0
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters)performed by a certified lab? • 0 0 0
Page# 3
Permit NC0071773 Owner-Facility: Forbush High School VWVfP
Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
#Is the facility using a contract lab? • 0 0 0
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 0 0 •
Celsius)?
Incubator(Fecal Coliform)set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/-0.2 degrees? 0 0 0 •
Incubator(BOD)set to 20.0 degrees Celsius+/-1.0 degrees? 0 0 0 •
Comment: None
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? 0 0 • 0
Is sample collected below all treatment units? • 0 0 0
Is proper volume collected? • 0 0 0
Is the tubing clean? 0 0 II 0
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 0 0 II
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit(frequency,sampling type • 0 0 0
representative)?
Comment: None
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual •
b.Mechanical ❑
Are the bars adequately screening debris? • 0 0 0
Is the screen free of excessive debris? • 0 0 0
Is disposal of screening in compliance? • 0 0 0
Is the unit in good condition? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Equalization Basins Yes No NA NE
Is the basin aerated? • 0 0 0
Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment? • 0 0 0
Is the basin free of excessive grease? • 0 0 0
Are all pumps present? • 0 0 0
Are all pumps operable? • 0 0 0
Page# 4
• Permit NC0071773 Owner-Facility: Forbush High School VVVVTP
Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Equalization Basins Yes No NA NE
Are float controls operable? • ❑ 0 0
Are audible and visual alarms operable? 0 • 0 0
#Is basin size/volume adequate? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation Ext.Air
Type of aeration system Diffused
Is the basin free of dead spots? • 0 0 0
Are surface aerators and mixers operational? • • 0 0 0
Are the diffusers operational? • 0 0 0
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? • 0 0 0
Does the foam cover less than 25%of the basin's surface? • 0 0 0
Is the DO level acceptable? 0 0 0 •
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I) 0 0 0 •
Comment: None
Flow Measurement-Effluent Yes No NA NE
#Is flow meter used for reporting? • 0 0 0
Is flow meter calibrated annually? • 0 0 0
Is the flow meter operational? • 0 0 0
(If units are separated)Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? • 0 0 0
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? 0 0 U 0
Are weirs level? • 0 0 0
Is the site free of weir blockage? • 0 0 0
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? • 0 0 0
Is scum removal adequate? • 0 0 0
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? • 0 0 0
Is the drive unit operational? 0 0 U ❑
Page# 5
Permit NC0071773 Owner-Facility: Forbush High School WWTP
Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the return rate acceptable(low turbulence)? • 0 0 0
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? • 0 0 0
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable?(Approximately%of the sidewall depth) 0 0 0 •
Comment: None
Disinfection- UV Yes No NA NE
Are extra UV bulbs available on site? • 0 0 0
Are UV bulbs clean? • 0 0 0
Is UV intensity adequate? • 0 0 0
Is transmittance at or above designed level? 0 0 0 U
Is there a backup system on site? • 0 0 0
Is effluent clear and free of solids? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? • 0 0 0
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? • 0 0 0
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? 0 0 • 0
Comment: None
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
Is the capacity adequate? • 0 0 0
Is the mixing adequate? • 0 0 0
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? • 0 0 0
#Is the odor acceptable? • 0 0 0
#Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? 0 0 0 •
Comment: None
Operations& Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? • 0 0 0
Does the facility analyze process control parameters,for ex: MLSS, MCRT,Settleable • 0 0 0
Solids,pH, DO,Sludge Judge,and other that are applicable?
Comment: None
Page# 6
United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved.
EPA Washington,D.C.20460 OMB No.2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A:National Data System Coding(i.e.,PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1 N 2 LI 3 I NC0070459 111 121 15/04/18 j17 18I I 19 Ls I 2011
21111111111111111111111111111111111111111111166
Inspection Work Days Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA Reserved —
671 1 70 u 71 J
L
I I 72 1 L ti 1 731 1 174 751 1 1 1 1 1 1 180
Section B:Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected(For Industrial Users discharging to POTW,also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
02:OOPM 15/04/16 14/01/01
Starmount High School WVVrP
Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date
2516 Longtown Rd
Boonville NC 27011 03:OOPM 15/04/16 18/12/31
Name(s)of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data
///
Mark C Matthews/ORC/336-679-3138/
Name,Address of Responsible Official/Tide/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Mark Matthews,121 Washington St Yadkinville NC 27055772511336-699-4481/
No
Section C:Areas Evaluated During Inspection(Check only those areas evaluated)
op Permit II Flow Measurement • Operations&Maintenance I Records/Reports
144 Self-Monitoring Program 111 Sludge Handling Disposal III Facility Site Review • Effluent/Receiving Waters
di Laboratory
Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s)and Signature(s)of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Ron Boone WSRO WQ//336-776-9690/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
^r
EPA Form 3560-3(Rev 9-94)Previous editi are obsolete.
Page# 1
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1
31 NC0070459 111 121 15/04/16 I 1 18 Lc
Section D:Summary of Finding/Comments(Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
Please refer to that attached inspection summary letter.
Page# 2
•
Permit: NC0070459 Owner-Facility: Starmount High School WWTP
Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new 0 0 • 0
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit? • 0 0 0
#Are there any special conditions for the permit? 0 • 0 0
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? • 0 0 0
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit? • 0 0 0
Is all required information readily available,complete and current? • ❑ 0 0
Are all records maintained for 3 years(lab. reg. required 5 years)? • 0 0 0
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? • 0 0 0
Is the chain-of-custody complete? • 0 0 0
Dates,times and location of sampling •
Name of individual performing the sampling •
Results of analysis and calibration •
Dates of analysis •
Name of person performing analyses •
Transported COCs •
Are DMRs complete:do they include all permit parameters? • 0 0 0
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? 0 0 • 0
(If the facility is=or>5 MGD permitted flow)Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator 0 0 • 0
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current? • 0 0 0
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? • 0 0 0
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? • 0 0 0
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? • 0 0 0
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? 0 ❑ • 0
Comment: None
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory? • 0 0 0
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters)performed by a certified lab? U 0 0 0
Page# 3
•
Permit NC0070459 Owner-Facility: Starmount High School VVVVTP •
Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Laboratory Yes No NA NE
#Is the facility using a contract lab? • 0 0 0
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 0 0 III
Celsius)?
Incubator(Fecal Coliform)set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/-0.2 degrees? 0 0 0 U
Incubator(BOD)set to 20.0 degrees Celsius+/-1.0 degrees? 0 0 0 II
Comment: None
Effluent Sampling Yes No NA NE
Is composite sampling flow proportional? 0 0 • 0
Is sample collected below all treatment units? • 0 0 0
Is proper volume collected? • 0 0 0
Is the tubing clean? 0 0 IN 0
#Is proper temperature set for sample storage(kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees 0 0 0 MI
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit(frequency,sampling type U 0 0 0
representative)?
Comment: None
Flow Measurement- Influent Yes No NA NE
#Is flow meter used for reporting? • 0 0 0
Is flow meter calibrated annually? 0 • 0 0
Is the flow meter operational? • 0 0 0
(If units are separated)Does the chart recorder match the flow meter'? 0 ❑ • 0
Comment: Using well water meter readings.
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Type of bar screen
a.Manual U
b.Mechanical ❑
Are the bars adequately screening debris? • 0 0 ❑
Is the screen free of excessive debris? • 0 0 0
Is disposal of screening in compliance? • 0 0 0
Is the unit in good condition? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Page# 4
• Permit NC0070459 Owner-Facility: Starmount High School VVVVTP
Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Bar Screens Yes No NA NE
Equalization Basins Yes No NA NE
Is the basin aerated? • 0 0 0
Is the basin free of bypass lines or structures to the natural environment? • 0 0 0
Is the basin free of excessive grease? • 0 0 0
Are all pumps present? • 0 0 0
Are all pumps operable? • 0 0 0
Are float controls operable? • 0 0 0
Are audible and visual alarms operable? 0 • 0 0
#Is basin size/volume adequate? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE
Mode of operation Ext.Air
Type of aeration system Diffused
Is the basin free of dead spots? • 0 0 0
Are surface aerators and mixers operational? 0 0 • 0
Are the diffusers operational? • 0 0 0
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? • 0 0 0
Does the foam cover less than 25%of the basin's surface? • 0 0 0
Is the DO level acceptable? 0 0 0 •
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I) 0 0 0 •
Comment: None
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? • 0 0 0
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? 0 0 • 0
Are weirs level? • 0 0 0
Is the site free of weir blockage? • 0 0 0
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? • 0 0 0
Is scum removal adequate? • ❑ 0 0
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? • 0 0 0
Is the drive unit operational? 0 0 • 0
Page# 5
Permit NC0070459 Owner-Facility: Starmount High School WWTP
Inspection Date: 04/16/2015Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE
Is the return rate acceptable(low turbulence)? • 0 0 0
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? • 0 0 0
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable?(Approximately 1/4 of the sidewall depth) 0 0 0 •
Comment: None
Pumps-RAS-WAS Yes No NA NE
Are pumps in place? • 0 0 0
Are pumps operational? • 0 0 0
Are there adequate spare parts and supplies on site? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Disinfection- UV Yes No NA NE
Are extra UV bulbs available on site? • 0 0 0
Are UV bulbs clean? • 0 0 0
Is UV intensity adequate? • 0 0 0
Is transmittance at or above designed level? 0 0 0 II
Is there a backup system on site? • 0 0 0
Is effluent clear and free of solids? • 0 0 0
Comment: None
Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? • 0 0 0
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? • 0 0 ❑
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? 0 0 I 0
Comment: None
Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE
Is the capacity adequate? • ❑ 0 0
Is the mixing adequate? • 0 0 0
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? • 0 0 0
#Is the odor acceptable? U 0 0 0
#Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? 0 0 0 •
Comment: None
Page# 6
•
•
Permit: NC0070459 Owner-FacNily: StammountHigh School WWTP
Inspection Date: 04/16/2015 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations&Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? • 0 0 0
Does the facility analyze process control parameters,for ex: MLSS, MCRT,Settleable • 0 0 0
Solids,pH, DO, Sludge Judge,and other that are applicable?
Comment: None
Page* 7