Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
NC0026441_Nutrient Reopener Condition_20161209
December 9, 2016 Tom Belnick, Supervisor Division of Water Resources WQ Permitting Section NDPES Unit 5I2 N. Salisbury Street (91h Floor Archdale Bldg) Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 RE: NPDES Permit No. NC0026441 Nutrient Reopener Condition Town of Siler City, North Carolina Dear Mr. Belnick: As previously discussed, Mountaire Farms is locating a new poultry processing facility in the Town of Siler City. The Town has been in discussions with Mountaire Farms regarding the wastewater effluent from the facility and is considering acceptance of flow with nutrient concentrations above typical domestic wastewater concentrations. In accordance with the terms of NPDES Permit No. NCO026441 we are providing the attached report prepared by McGill Associates, P.A. to address Part I Permit Condition A. (3). We trust that the information provided in this report meets the intent of the required notification, however, if any additional information is needed please don't hesitate to contact me at 919-742- 4731 or David Honeycutt, P.E.. with McGill Associates at 910-295-3159. We appreciate your consideration of this information. The Town is eager to address any concerns.and we look forward to working with you and your staff to promptly fulfill necessary requirements of the permit. Sincerely, Bryan Thompson Town Manager Enclosures Cc: Jeff Poupart, NCDEQ Water Resources Terry Green, Public Works Director 0a V 17 Chris McCorquodale, WWTP Operator �/ D Mike Apke, P.E. McGill Associates I David Honeycutt, P.E. McGill Associates DEC 1':� ZO,16 MOUNTAIRE FARMS INDUSTRIAL PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATABILITY EVALUATION TOWN OF SILER CITY CHATHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA s - _� 034999 David Honeycutt, P.E. E McGill - A S S O C I A T E S Engineering • Planning • Finance 5 Regional Circle, Suite A Pinehurst, North Carolina 28374 Firm License No.: C-0459 Ph: 910-295-3159 N6vember 2016 16.04035 TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Current Situation Proposed Discharge Conclusion Appendices NPDES Permit Existing Equipment Information BioWin Model Summary - Current Conditions BioWin Model Summary,— Future Situation with Mountaire Process Wastewater A Background The Town of Siler City operates a 4.0 million gallon per day (mgd) wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) that is permitted to discharge treated effluent to Loves Creek upstream of the Rocky River under National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Number NC0026441. Flows to the plant over the most recent 12 months have averaged 1.87 mgd. The current treatment system was most recently upgraded in 1994 and includes influent screening, grit removal, flow equalization, dual train oxidation ditches, dual flocculating clarifiers, tertiary filters, and chlorine disinfection. In addition to current flows, the Town proposes to accept industrial wastewater from the Mountaire Farms Poultry Processing Plant to be located on East 3rd Street in Siler City. The Town's NDPES Permit requires that notification be submitted to the NPDES Permitting Unit when the Town is considering acceptance of nutrient load above typical domestic levels. The notification is required to include proposed discharge flow, composition, and treatability in the Siler City WWTP. This document is intended to address these requirements and provide an analysis of the treatability of this waste stream in the existing WWTP. Current Situation The biological treatment process for the Siler City WWTP includes dual train oxidation ditches with each basin having a volume of 2.015 million gallons. At the permitted capacity of 4.0 mgd, these tanks provide approximately 24.2 hours of hydraulic detention time. The tanks are aerated by a j et aeration system with multi -stage centrifugal blowers. Original equipment information from MTS Systems is included in the appendix. Effluent from the oxidation ditches flows to dual flocculating clarifiers, each with a diameter of 90 feet. Chemical feed equipment is present and operational to add aluminum sulfate for phosphorus removal and lime for pH stabilization. After clarification, the flow is filtered prior to chlorine disinfection, de -chlorination, and discharge to Loves Creek. Solids are aerobically digested and removed as liquid sludge after thickening. See attached Figure 1 Process Flow Schematic for overall plant configuration. The current NPDES permit limits are as shown in Table 1. As Noted, the Town is currently limited for Total Phosphorus (TP) but is required to only monitor Total Nitrogen (TN). In 1994, when the facility was most recently upgraded it was receiving significant poultry processing loads and was designed for treatment of wastewater with higher than typical domestic strength. The WWTP design addressed removal of TP and ammonia but was not intended for significant removal of TN. Mountaire Farms Industrial Process Wastewater Treatability Evaluation Siler City WWTP November 2016 Page 1 Town of Siler City CHLORINE TERTIARY CONTACT AND FILTERS POST-AERATION TO LOVES CREEK TO SLUDGE DIGESTION AND DISPOSAL 4 1 FLOW EQUALIZATION i i WAS_ TANKS (2.0 MG IN SERVICE) I I LIME I FEED I , I I I I I CLARIFIER, CLARIFIER, j 90' DIAM. 90' DIAM. u)I ALUM FEED I I I I I INFLUENT SCREEN GRIT REMOVAL INFLUENT I PUMP STATION I OXIDATION OXIDATION I DITCH DITCH I (2.015 MG) (2.015 MG) I I I I I I I I I I I ------------ SLUDGE LINES WASTEWATER LINES ❑ SPLITTER/JUNCTION BOX McGM JOB NO,: 10.04035 WASTEWATER TREATABILITY EVALUATION DATE: NOVEMBER2016 SHEET DESIGNED BY: DLH CADD BY: MRJ LIQUID TRAIN PROCESS FLOW Y DESIGN REVIEW:_ A S S O C I A T E S TOWN OF SILER CITCONST. REVIEW: _ SCHEMATIC FSG. ENGINEER ING•PLA N NTNG-FINANCE 11.14035 G013 Pro Flaw SR 10N.ILCIRCLESUMAPINENURST.NCW74 R9d9100E 3159 FlWUWSE#M59 CHATHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Schematladw0 Table 1: Existing Siler Citv WWTP NPDES Permit Limits Parameter Monthly Average Weekly Average Flow (mgd) 4.0 1.87 BOD (mg/1) April -October 5.0 7.5 BOD (mg/1) November — March 10.0 15.0 TSS (mg/1) 30 45 NH3 (mg/1) April -October 1.0 3.0 NH3 (mg/1) November - March 2.0 6.0 TP (mg/1) April -October 0.5 (quarterly average) TP (mg/1) November - March 2.0 (quarterly average) TN (mg/l) Monitor Only Although the WWTP has previously handled significant industrial loading, including poultry processing wastewater, current flows and loadings have been reduced. The current influent BOD, TSS, and TKN concentrations are below typical municipal wastewater strengths. Table 2 provides a summary of existing influent water quality from the plant's Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMR) dated October 2015 — September 2016. Table 2: Existing Siler Citv WWTP Influent Water Ouality (Oct. 2015 -Sept. 2016) Parameter Average Maximum Minimum Flow (mgd) 1.87 6.17 1.15 BOD (mg/1) 136 278 44 TSS (mg/1) 186.5 658 32 TKN (mg/1) 25.97 30 18.7 Ammonia (mg/1) 16.2 18.8 11.7 TP (mg/1) 3.08 3.37 2.51 Notes: 1. Influent TKN and TP are based on three samples as collected for the facility pretreatment program. 2. Influent ammonia is not sampled. Values are estimated at 62.5% of TKN The treatment system is currently performing very well due to several factors including, flows of less than 50% of design capacity, and influent strength below design parameters. Based on the operation and maintenance information from the equipment manufacturer's design, the WWTP was originally designed for an average daily flow of 4.0 mgd, influent BOD of 350 mg/1 and influent ammonia of 45 mg/l. Effluent BOD and ammonia were designed to meet 5 mg/l and 1 mg/l respectively. A summary of the average effluent quality for the past 12 months is provided in Table 3. Mountaire Farms Industrial Process Wastewater Treatability Evaluation Siler City WWTP November 2016 Page 3 Town of Siler City Table 3: Existing Siler City WWTP Effluent Water Quality (Oct. 2015 -Sept. 2016) Parameter Average 90th Percentile Flow (mgd) 1.87 2.72 BOD (mg/1) 2.0 4.36 TSS (mg/l) 1.5 1.25 TN (mg/1) 11.8 24.6 Ammonia (mg/1) 0.3 0.25 TP (mg/1) 0.2 0.36 Analysis assumes '/z detection level for all non -detect samples. TSS and Ammonia are mostly non -detect which causes the 90th percentile to be lower than the average. TP levels in the WWTP's effluent are typically very low with all but one sample below 0.5 mg/l and numerous samples below detection level. The plant utilizes alum addition to chemically remove the phosphorus in the flocculating clarifiers. The graph below shows the trend for effluent TP. Nitrogen is more variable but the plant has averaged approximately 55% removal over the past 12 months. The WWTP only samples influent TKN and TP on a quarterly basis so influent data is relatively limited for these parameters. The WWTP was not designed to remove TN and does not include a designated anoxic zone for denitrification. Due to the long detention time in the oxidation ditch and aeration patterns that focus the air in portions of the tank, simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) is occurring in the process. The nitrogen removal seen in the existing conditions is likely the result of a combination of the SND process and nitrogen removed in the waste sludge. fSiler City WWTP Effluent Phosphorus (10/2015 through 9/2016) LI t N c -I N \ N \ N \ ci \ Q ('!) .--I N c -I N \ N \ c-1 ul \ \ \ \ \ \ CO \ M -- H v -i H c -I N N -q �--i N ro Ln m l0 w I,, l OO M Sample Date Mountaire Farms Industrial Process Wastewater Treatability Evaluation Siler City WWTP November 2016 Page 4 Town of Siler City Siler City WWTP Effluent Nitrogen (10/2015 through 9/2016) 35 30 a O \ 25 on z 20 15 LU 10 5 - - - 0 _.. . Ln (n N LD O d' oo rl to o0 N I, ci C' 00 N l0 O M f\ .--1 M W N M M \ r1 \ ci M ci N .-i N \ N \ N \ ri \ ri M ci N r-1 N \ N \ .--1 O \ d \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ M \ d' \ In \ \ \ \ \ \ 00 \ M -- C) O i--1 ci ci N N ci r-1 N M M Ln lD LD !" 1, 00 Ql ci ci ci a -I c -I Sample Date Existing Conditions Biowin Model A WWTP modeling software, Biowin, was also utilized to analyze the treatment facilities. The model was setup to represent the physical configuration of the plant including tank volumes, average influent flow, chemical feed systems, clarifier sizes, and return sludge flows. The model utilizes 10 reactor tanks to represent the varying conditions found in the oxidation ditch process and distribution of aeration. To maintain mixing in the oxidation ditch flow around the ditch is approximately 1 ft/s and is represented as recirculation through the zones at 930 mgd. Operating data indicates typical MLSS concentrations are between 7,000-8,000 mg/1. At these high MLSS concentrations, sludge age is estimated to be approximately 150 days. As expected at these underloaded conditions the plant is providing complete nitrification and typical effluent BOD's are very low. At current average daily flows, the clarifier overflow rate is approximately 146 gpd/square foot and solids loading is approximately 1.07 lbs/square foot / hour. Per Metcalf and Eddy 4th Edition these values are in the lower range of typical design values. Although BioWin does not include components specific to jet aeration, model parameters for diffused air are setup to represent the aeration characteristics of the jet aeration system including the design Oxygen Transfer Efficiency (OTE) of approximately 28%. An Aluminum Sulfate feed is incorporated to represent the chemical phosphorus removal. Default kinetic parameters were utilized with the exception of the Ordinary Heterotrophic Organisms (OHO) DO Half Saturation Switch which was increased to 0.4 mg/l to account for the SND process typical of oxidation ditches. Utilizing these conditions the model readily shows the high levels of BOD, TSS, and TP removal and complete nitrification of influent ammonia. The TN predicted in the effluent is approximately 12 mg/l at steady state which is consistent with the average TN for the facility. Note that the filters were not included in the model as the effluent TSS from the clarifier is low under Mountaire Farms Industrial Process Wastewater Treatability Evaluation Siler City WWTP November 2016 Page 5 Town of Siler City steady state loading conditions and filtration is insignificant to the model. A summary of the BioWin modeling results are included in the appendix. Proposed Discharge Mountaire Farms proposes to construct a poultry processing facility on 3rd Street in Siler City at the location previously operated by Townsend. The facility will employ over 500 people and current projections are to begin production in January 2018. Mountaire intends to purchase water from the Town of Siler City -and discharge domestic and poultry processing wastewater to the Town's collection system. Preliminary information submitted by Mountaire indicates that a pretreatment system consisting of primary and secondary dissolved air flotation (DAF) units will be constructed on the poultry processing facility site. The primary DAF will include a polymer conditioning step while the second DAF will include addition of a metal salt (Ferric Chloride) coagulant to improve removal of BOD, TSS, and fats, oils and grease (FOG) present in the raw wastewater stream. This treatment process will also precipitate a significant portion of TP from the soluble form for its subsequent removal. Mountaire has agreed that it can meet the flow characteristics listed below as potential permit limits for discharge to the Siler City collection system. A formal application for a pretreatment permit or authorization to construct the pretreatment system have not been received by Siler City at this time. Should the final parameters vary significantly from these preliminary values, impacts of those changes should be reviewed. Actual discharge characteristics are anticipated to be below these levels; however, the preliminary limits have been used for this analysis as a conservative approach. Table 4 below provides a summary of the current influent flow characteristics, projected Mountaire flow characteristics, and a mass balance based combined influent stream. Table 4: WWTP Influent Characteristics- Anticipated Combined Waste Stream The additional BOD and TKN loading will increase demands on the plant aeration system. The existing system was designed for higher than typical domestic strength wastewater as poultry processing was occurring in Siler City when the plant upgrade was completed in 1994. Manufacturer's information indicates a design BOD of 350 mg/1 and ammonia of 45 mg/l were accounted for in the design. Due to the low current loadings and the design of the WWTP the combined waste stream is well below the design parameters at approximately 64% of flow and, on Mountaire Farms Industrial Process Wastewater Treatability Evaluation Siler City WWTP November 2016 Page 6 Town of Siler City WWTP INFLUENT FLOW BOD NH3 TSS TKN TP MGD mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/l Current Influent Flow Characteristics 1.87 136 16.2 186.5 25.97 3.08 Mountaire Flow Characteristics 0.7 450 60 150 125 3 Combined Influent Stream 2.57 221.5 28.1 176.6 52.9 3.1 WWTP Design Parameters 4.0 350.0 45.0 Percent Design Capacity w/ Mountaire 64% 63% 63% The additional BOD and TKN loading will increase demands on the plant aeration system. The existing system was designed for higher than typical domestic strength wastewater as poultry processing was occurring in Siler City when the plant upgrade was completed in 1994. Manufacturer's information indicates a design BOD of 350 mg/1 and ammonia of 45 mg/l were accounted for in the design. Due to the low current loadings and the design of the WWTP the combined waste stream is well below the design parameters at approximately 64% of flow and, on Mountaire Farms Industrial Process Wastewater Treatability Evaluation Siler City WWTP November 2016 Page 6 Town of Siler City a concentration basis, 63% of BOD and Ammonia. Calculations included in the appendix concur with this information and indicate the facility has adequate aeration equipment to meet oxygen demands and maintain DO levels of 2.0 mg/l in the oxidation ditches. As noted previously the Siler City WWTP is currently underloaded and operating at a very high Solids Retention Time (SRT). The additional loading on the biological process will reduce the SRT and result in a higher percent of volatile solids and active biomass in the treatment system. These changes to the influent stream were modeled utilizing BioWin software to evaluate the impacts and predict effluent quality. A MLSS concentration of 4,000 mg/l was set in the model per design conditions. Higher MLSS concentrations, as are currently being used, were reviewed but had minimal impact on effluent quality due to the high SRT of 48 days at 4,000 mg/l MLSS. The model indicates that the plant can achieve removal of the BOD, TSS, and TP under these loadings as it was designed. The WWTP will continue to provide complete nitrification with effluent ammonia concentrations projected to be well under 1 mg/1. Similar to operation under the current situation, SND will continue to occur in the oxidation ditch and result in some nitrogen removal. The anticipated WWTP effluent TN concentration is approximately 30 mg/l. Alkalinity is consumed at a high rate for nitrification of ammonia and can cause a decrease in pH if insufficient alkalinity is present in the wastewater stream. The existing facilities include a lime silo, slurry mixing tank and feed system to maintain sufficient alkalinity for a stable pH. Table 5 summarizes the anticipated effluent quality of the Siler City WWTP upon acceptance of the additional domestic and process wastewater from the Mountaire Farms plant. Table 5e Siler Citv WWTP Anticipated Effluent Qualitv with Mountaire Farms Parameter NPDES Permit Monthly Average Anticipated Effluent Flow (mgd) 4.0 2.57 BOD (mg/1) April -October 5.0 <5.0 BOD (mg/1) November — March 10.0 <5.0 TSS (mg/1) 30 <5.0 NH3 (mg/1) April -October 1.0 <1.0 NH3 (mg/1) November - March 2.0 <1.0 TP (mg/1) April -October 0.5 (quarterly average) <0.5 TP (mg/1) November - March 2.0 (quarterly average) <0.5 TN (mg/1) Monitor Only 3 0 mg/l As previously noted, the WWTP has two circular flocculating clarifiers with 90 ft diameters. The total effective settling area for the two clarifiers is 12,723 SF giving an overflow rate of 314 gpd/SF at the 4.0 mgd design flow and 202 gpd/SF at the future flow with current average flows and Mountaire flow combined. Solids loading rate under this scenario is approximately 0.7 lbs/SF/hr. Mountaire Farms Industrial Process Wastewater Treatability Evaluation Siler City WWTP November 2016 Page 7 Town of Siler City These loadings are .well within typical recommended rates and the existing clarifiers should therefore provide good performance up to plant design flow. Conclusions The existing Siler City WWTP average flow for the past year has been approximately 1.87 mgd which is less than 50% of the design capacity for the facility. The Town is considering acceptance of additional wastewater from the Mountaire Farms processing plant of approximately 0.7 mgd, which would increase total average daily flow to the Siler City WWTP to 2.57 mgd. The treatability of this waste stream has been reviewed to evaluate impacts to the current WWTP and determined that the plant should be capable of meeting current NPDES Permit limits with this additional loading. Mountaire Farms Industrial Process Wastewater Treatability Evaluation Siler City WWTP November 2016 Page 8 Town of Siler City APPENDICES Permit NCO026441 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES NPDES PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM DES In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, the Town of Siler City is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the Town of Siler City WWTP 370 Waste Treatment Plant Road Chatham County to receiving waters designated as Loves Creek within the Cape Fear River Basin, in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof. This permit shall become effective June 1, 2014. This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight May 31, 2019. Signed this day April 30, 2014. Original Signed by Tom Belnick Thomas A. Reeder, Director Division of Water Resources By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission Permit NCO026441 SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked. As of this permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions included herein. The Town of Siler City is hereby authorized to: 1. Continue discharging 4.0 MGD of treated process and domestic wastewater from a treatment facility consisting of • Automatic and manual bar screens © Grit collection unit a Influent pump station • Influent Equalization Basin (Zone 2) • Dual oxidation ditches with surface jet aeration • Flow Splitter Box o Alum feed station o Lime feed station • Dual secondary clarifiers • Dual Aerobic digesters • Return Activated Sludge • Sludge Transfer Station • Dissolved Air Flotation Unit (Used as needed) • Sludge Thickener Basin • Influent equalization or Sludge Storage Basins (Zone 3 A & B used as needed) • Four (4) tertiary filters • Filter Backwash Basin • Gaseous Chlorine Disinfection • Chlorine contact chamber • Gaseous Sulfur dioxide Dechlorination • Step -Aeration This facility is located at the Siler City WWTP at 370 Waste Treatment Plant Road near Siler City in Chatham County. 2. Discharge from said wastewater treatment works through Outfall 001 into Loves Creek (see attached map), a stream classified as C waters within the Cape Fear River Basin. Page 2 of 10 Permit NCO026441 Part I A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS a. During the period beginning with the effective date and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge treated wastewater through Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored' by the Permittee as specified below: Footnotes: 1. No later than March 1, 2015, begin submitting discharge monitoring reports electronically using NC DWR's eDMR application system. See Condition A. (7). 2. Instream monitoring shall be performed in accordance with Condition A. (2). 3. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15 % of the respective influent value (i.e., 85% removal is required). 4. TRC limits and monitoring requirements apply only if chlorine or chlorine derivatives are used for disinfection. The Permittee shall report all effluent TRC values reported by a NC -certified laboratory [including field -certified]. Effluent values below 50 µg/L will be treated as zero for compliance purposes. 5. Compliance with the Total Phosphorus limits shall be based on a calendar -quarter average of weekly samples. 6. Total Cadmium limits become effective December 1, 2015. Monitoring shall begin on the effective date. See Condition A. (6). Page 3 of 10 EFFLUENT LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS PARAMETERS Monthly Weekly Daily Measurement Sample Sample Average Average Maximum Frequency Type__ Location Flow 4.0 MGD Continuous Recording went or Effluent BOD, 5 day, 20°C3 5.0 mg/L 7.5 mg/L Daily Composite Influent and (April 1 thru October 31) Effluent BOD, 5 day, 20°C 3 10.0 mg/L 15.0 mg/L Daily Composite Influent and (November 1 thru March 31) Effluent Total Suspended Solids3 30.0 mg/L 45.0 mg/L Daily Composite 1 d fluentfflue NH3 as N 1.0 mg/L 3.0 mg/L Daily Composite Effluent (April 1 thru October 31) NH3 as N 2.0 mg/L 6.0 mg/L Daily Composite Effluent (November 1 thru March 31) Fecal Coliform (geometric mean) 200/ 100 ml 400/ 100 ml Daily Grab Effluent Total Residual Chlorine (TRC)4 17 µg/L Daily Grab Effluent Temperature (°C) Daily Grab Effluent Dissolved Oxygen Daily average > 6.0 mg/L Daily Grab Effluent pH > 6.0 and < 9.0 standard units Daily Grab Effluent Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN) Weekly Calculated Effluent NO3-N + NO2-N (mg/L) Weekly Composite Effluent TKN (mg/L) Weekly Composite Effluent Total Phosphorus' -(April 1 thru September 30) 0.5 mg/L (quarterly average) Weekly Composite Effluent Total Phosphorus (October 1 through March 31) 2.0 mg/L (quarterly average) Weekly Composite Effluent Total Cadmium 6 2.1 µg/ L 15.5 µg/ L Monthly Composite Effluent Total Copper Quarterly' Composite Effluent Total Zinc Quarterly' Composite Effluent Chloride Quarterly Composite Effluent Chronic Toxicity8 Quarterly Composite Effluent Effluent Pollutant Scan Monitor and Report Footnote 9 Footnote 9 Effluent Footnotes: 1. No later than March 1, 2015, begin submitting discharge monitoring reports electronically using NC DWR's eDMR application system. See Condition A. (7). 2. Instream monitoring shall be performed in accordance with Condition A. (2). 3. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Solids concentrations shall not exceed 15 % of the respective influent value (i.e., 85% removal is required). 4. TRC limits and monitoring requirements apply only if chlorine or chlorine derivatives are used for disinfection. The Permittee shall report all effluent TRC values reported by a NC -certified laboratory [including field -certified]. Effluent values below 50 µg/L will be treated as zero for compliance purposes. 5. Compliance with the Total Phosphorus limits shall be based on a calendar -quarter average of weekly samples. 6. Total Cadmium limits become effective December 1, 2015. Monitoring shall begin on the effective date. See Condition A. (6). Page 3 of 10 Permit NCO026441 Footnotes A.(1) Continued: 7. Sample Quarterly in conjunction with Chronic Toxicity Test. 8. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) at 90 %; quarterly during March, June, September, December [see Condition A. (8)]. 9. The permittee shall perform three Effluent Pollutant Scans during the term of this permit [see Condition A. (9)]. b. Effluent shall contain no floating solids or foam visible in other than trace amounts. A. (2) INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Parameter Sample Type Location 1 Measurement Frequency z Dissolved Oxygen Grab LCU, LCD, RRU, RRD 3/Week (June— September), 1/Week (October -May) Temperature Grab LCU, LCD, RRU, RRD 3/Week (June— September), l/Week (October -May) Total Phosphorus Grab LCU, LCD, RRU, RRD Monthly TKN Grab- LCU, LCD, RRU, RRD Monthly NO, -N + NO, -N Grab LCU, LCD, RRU, RRD Monthly Footnotes: 1. LCU - Loves Creek, upstream of the discharge; LCD - Loves Creek, downstream of the discharge and above the confluence with the Rocky River; RRU — Rocky River, upstream of the confluence with Loves Creek; RRD — Rocky River, downstream of the confluence with Loves Creek. 2. All monitoring is required to be performed at the above-mentioned monitoring locations. Instream Monitoring may be performed by the Upper Cape Fear River Basin Association as outlined in the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the association and the permittee. If so, the data is to be collected and submitted to DWR in accordance to the terms of the MOA. Should membership in this association terminate for any reason, the permittee shall immediately notify the Division's NPDES Unit in writing and resume responsibility to monitor and report the above parameters as specified in this permit. A. (3) NUTRIENT REOPENER In the event that Permittee proposes to accept future industrial process wastewater that is expected to contain concentrations of Total Nitrogen (TN) and/ or Total Phosphorus (TP) greater than typical domestic wastewater concentration (i.e. greater than 40.0 mg/ L TN or greater than 5.0 mg/ L TP), the Permittee shall notify the NPDES Complex Permitting Unit of the Division at 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 and the Raleigh Regional Office at 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609 within 30 days of knowledge that the town is considering accepting new industrial process wastewater containing excess nutrients. The notification shall contain information regarding the proposed discharge flow, composition and treatability in the Siler City WWTP. Changes in effluent characteristics may require a permit modification, so notification should be at least 180 days prior to the start of the proposed discharge. Based on information provided by the Town regarding a potential new industrial process wastewater with high nutrient concentration, and pursuant to N.C. General Statute Section 143-215.1 and the implementing rules found in Title 15A of the North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H, specifically, 15A NCAC 2H.0I 12(b) (1) and 2H.01 14(a), and Part II, Sections B-12 and B-13 of this permit, the Director of DWR may then reopen this permit to require supplemental nutrient limits for Total Nitrogen and/ or Total Phosphorus in accordance with the current Basin Plan for the Cape Fear River Basin. Page 4of10 Permit NCO026441 A. (4) NUTRIENT WATER QUALITY MODELING REOPENER Pursuant to N.C. General Statutes Section 143-215.1 and the implementing rules found in the North Carolina Administrative Code at 15A NCAC 2H.0112 (b) (1) and 2H.0114 (a) and Part II sections B-12 and B-13 of this permit, the Director of DWR may reopen this permit to require supplemental nutrient monitoring of the discharge. The purpose of the additional monitoring will be to support water quality modeling efforts within the Cape Fear River Basin and shall be consistent with a monitoring plan developed jointly by the Division and affected stakeholders. In addition, the results of water quality modeling may require that limits for total nitrogen and total phosphorus be imposed or modified in this permit upon renewal. A. (5) MERCURY M11XIMIZATION PLAN (MMP) The permittee shall develop and implement a mercury minimization plan (MMP) during this permit term. The MMP shall be developed by December 1, 2014, and shall be available for inspection on-site. A sample MMP was developed through a stakeholder review process and has been placed on the Division website for guidance (http://portal.nedenr.org/web/Wq/swp/ps/npdes, under Model Mercury Minimization Plan): The MMP should place emphasis on identification of mercury contributors and goals for reduction. Results shall be summarized and submitted with the next permit renewal. A. (6) COMPLIANCE SCHEDULE FOR TOTAL CADMIUM LIMITS The effluent limits for Total Cadmium shall become effective on December 1, 2015. Monitoring shall begin on the permit effective date. Effluent limits and monitoring may be deleted in the future upon written notification of the Division, if the Permittee provides updated effluent data that shows no reasonable potential to exceed applicable State water quality standards. Specifically, if 12 monthly data points for cadmium are all less than 2.0 µg/ L, then the Permittee may petition the Division for removal of Total Cadmium limits and monitoring from the permit. A. (7) ELECTRONIC REPORTING OF DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS Proposed federal regulations require electronic submittal of all discharge monitoring reports (DMRs) and specify that, if a state does not establish a system to receive such submittals, then permittees must submit DMRs electronically to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Division anticipates that these regulations will be adopted and is beginning implementation in late 2013. NOTE: This special condition supplements or supersedes the following sections within Part II of this permit (Standard Conditions for NPDES Permits): • Section B. (11.) Signatory Requirements • Section D. (2.) Reporting • Section D. (6.) Records Retention • Section E. (5.) Monitoring Reports Page 5 of 10 Permit NCO026441 1. Reporting [Supersedes Section D. (2.) and Section E. (5.) (a)1 Beginning no later than March 1, 2015, the permittee shall begin reporting discharge monitoring data electronically using the NC DWR's Electronic Discharge Monitoring Report (eDMR) internet application, unless a temporary waiver from eDMR requirements has been granted. Monitoring results obtained during the previous month(s) shall be summarized for each month and submitted electronically using eDMR. The eDMR system allows permitted facilities to enter monitoring data and submit DMRs electronically using the internet. Until such time that the state's eDMR application is compliant with EPA's Cross -Media Electronic Reporting Regulation (CROMERR), permittees will be required to submit all discharge monitoring data to the state electronically using eDMR and will be required to complete the eDMR submission by printing, signing, and submitting one signed original and a copy of the computer printed eDMR to the following address: NC DENR / DWR / Information Processing Unit ATTENTION: Central Files / eDMR 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 If a permittee is unable to use the eDMR system due to a demonstrated hardship or due to the facility being physically located in an area where less than 10 percent of the households have broadband access, then a temporary waiver from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements may be granted and discharge monitoring data may be submitted on paper DMR forms (MR 1, 1. 1, 2, 3) or alternative forms approved by the Director. Duplicate signed copies shall be submitted to the mailing address above. Requests for temporary waivers from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements must be submitted in writing to the Division for written approval at least sixty (60) days prior to the date the facility would be required under this permit to begin using eDMR. Temporary waivers shall be valid for twelve (12) months and shall thereupon expire. At such time, DMRs shall be submitted electronically to the Division unless the permittee re -applies for and is granted a new temporary waiver by the Division. Information -on eDMR and application for a temporary waiver from the NPDES electronic reporting requirements is found on the following web page: http://portal.nedenr. orWweb/wq/admin/bo g/ipu/edmr. Regardless of the submission method, the first DMR is due on the last day of the month following the issuance of the permit or in the case of a new facility, on the last day of the month following the commencement of discharge. 2. Signatory Requirements [Supplements Section B. (11.) (b) and supersedes Section B. (11.) (d)1 All eDMRs submitted to the permit issuing authority shall be signed by a person described in Part II, Section B. (I 1.)(a) or by a duly authorized representative of that person as described in Part II, Section B. (11.)(b). A person, and not a position, must be delegated signatory authority for eDMR reporting purposes. For eDMR submissions, the person signing and submitting the DMR must obtain an eDMR user account and login credentials to access the eDMR system. For more information on North Carolina's eDMR system, registering for eDMR and obtaining an eDMR user account, please visit the following web page: http://portal.nedenr.or. web/wq/admin/boyTpu/edrnr. Page 6 of 10 Permit NC0026441 Certification. Any person submitting an electronic DMR using the state's eDMR system shall make the following certification [40 CFR 122.22]. NO OTHER STATEMENTS OF CERTIFICATION WILL BE ACCEPTED: U cert, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations." 3. Records Retention [Supplements Section D. (6.)] The permittee shall retain records of all Discharge Monitoring Reports, including eDMR submissions. These records or copies shall be maintained for a period of at least 3 years from the date of the report. This period may be extended by request of the Director at any time [40 CFR 122.41]. Page 7 of 10 Permit NCO026441 A. (8) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (Quarterly) The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to at an effluent concentration of 90%. The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, _quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised December 2010, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised- December 2010) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of March, June, September and December. These months signify the first month of each three month toxicity testing quarter assigned to the facility. Effluent sampling for this testing must be obtained during representative effluent discharge and shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes. If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -December 2010) or subsequent versions. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR -1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT -3 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Resources Environmental Sciences Section 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made. Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Section at the address cited above. Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required during the following month. Assessment of toxicity compliance is based on the toxicity testing quarter, which is the three month time interval that begins on the first day of the month in which toxicity testing is required by this permit and continues until the final day of the third month. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Resources indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. If the Permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently than required by this permit, the results of such monitoring shall be included in the calculation & reporting of the data submitted on the DMR & all AT Form submitted. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring. Page 8 of 10 Permit NCO026441 A. (9) EFFLUENT POLLUTANT SCAN The Permittee shall perform a total of three (3) Effluent Pollutant Scans for all parameters listed below. One scan must be performed in each of the following years: 2016, 2017, and 2018. Analytical methods shall be in accordance with 40 CFR Part 136 and shall be sufficiently sensitive to determine whether parameters are present in concentrations greater than applicable standards and criteria. Samples should be collected with one quarterly toxicity test each year, and must represent seasonal variation [i.e., do not sample in the same quarter every year]. Unless otherwise indicated, metals shall be analyzed as "total recoverable." Ammonia (as N) Trans- l,2-dichloroethylene Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether Chlorine (total residual, TRC) 1,1-dichloroethylene Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether Dissolved oxygen 1,2-dichloropropane Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate Nitrate/Nitrite 1,3-dichloropropylene 4-bromophenyl phenyl ether Kjeldahl nitrogen Ethylbenzene Butyl benzyl phthalate Oil and grease Methyl bromide 2-chloronaphthalene Phosphorus Methyl chloride 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether Total dissolved solids Methylene chloride Chrysene Hardness 1,1,2,2 -tetrachloroethane Di -n -butyl phthalate Antimony Tetrachloroethylene Di-n-octyl phthalate Arsenic Toluene Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene Beryllium 1,1,1 -trichloroethane 1,2 -dichlorobenzene Cadmium 1,1,2 -trichloroethane 1,3 -dichlorobenzene • Chromium Trichloroethylene 1,4 -dichlorobenzene Copper Vinyl chloride 3,3-dichlorobenzidine Lead Acid -extractable compounds: Diethyl phthalate Mercury (EPA Method 1631E) P -chloro -m -cresol Dimethyl phthalate Nickel 2 -chlorophenol 2,4-dinitrotoluene Selenium 2,4-dichlorophenol 2,6-dinitrotoluene Silver 2,4 -dimethylphenol 1,2-diphenylhydrazine Thallium 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol Fluoranthene Zinc 2,4-dinitrophenol Fluorene Cyanide 2-nitrophenol Hexachlorobenzene Total phenolic compounds 4-nitrophenol Hexachlorobutadiene Volatile organic compounds: Pentachlorophenol Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene Acrolein Phenol Hexachloroethane Acrylonitrile 2,4,6 -trichlorophenol Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene Benzene Base -neutral compounds: Isophorone Bromoform Acenaphthene , Naphthalene Carbon tetrachloride Acenaphthylene Nitrobenzene Chlorobenzene Anthracene N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine Chlorodibromomethane Benzidine N-nitrosodimethylamine Chloroethane Benzo(a)anthracene N-nitrosodiphenylamine 2-chloroethylvinyl ether Benzo(a)pyrene Phenanthrene Chloroform ' 3,4 benzofluoranthene Pyrene Dichlorobromomethane Benzo(ghi)perylene 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene 1,1-dichloroethane Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1,2-dichloroethane Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane Reporting. Test results shall be reported on DWR Form -A MR-PPA1 (or in a form approved by the Director) by December 31" of each designated sampling year. The report shall be submitted to the following address: NC DENR / DWR / Central Files, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617. Page 9 of 10 Permit NCO026441 Additional Toxicity Testing Requirements for Municipal Permit Renewal. Please note that Municipal facilities that are subject to the Effluent Pollutant Scan requirements listed above are also subject to additional toxicity testing requirements specified in Federal Regulation 40 CFR 122.210)(5). The US EPA requires four (4) toxicity tests for a test organism other than the test species currently required in this permit. The multiple species tests should be conducted either quarterly for a 12 -month period prior to submittal of the permit renewal application, or four tests performed at least annually in the four and one half year period prior to the application. These tests shall be performed for acute or chronic toxicity, whichever is specified in this permit. The multiple species toxicity test results shall be filed with the Aquatic Toxicology Branch at the following address: North Carolina Division of Water Resources Water Sciences Section/Aquatic Toxicology Branch 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Contact the Division's Aquatic Toxicology Branch at 919-743-8401 for guidance on conducting the additional toxicity tests and reporting requirements. Results should also be summarized in Part E (Toxicity Testing Data) of EPA Municipal Application Form 2A, when submitting the permit renewal application to the NPDES Permitting Unit. M Page 10 of 10 m JET AERATION AND MIXING SYSTEM SUBMITTAL DATA FOR TOWN OF SILER CITY, NORTH CAROLINA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION SRF NO. CS370427-04 SPECIFICATION SECTION 12 -OXIDATION DITCHES- -SLUDGE HOLDING TANKS- -FLASH MIXING TANK- MTS#M91-143 NNE 2, 1992 ENGINEER: HOBBS, UPCHURCH & ASSOCIATES, 290 S.W. BROAD STREET SOUTHERN PINES, NC 28388 CONTRACTOR: STATE UTILITY CONTRACTORS, INC. MONROE, NC MTS REPRESENTATIVE: COMBS & ASSOCIATES, INC. P. 0. BOX 32185 CHARLOTTE, NC 28232-2185 (704) 3764450 I I Waa ".5RIJUKRuglowl 9 I. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION 11. MATERIAL SPECIFICATION III .DRAWINGS AND DETAILS OXIDATION DITCH The Mass Transfer Systems, Inc. Jet Aeration System is designed to provide oxygen transfer and mixing for the specified application described in the following design parameters located in this section. The aeration equipment supplied for each oxidation ditch consists of three (3) MT2JM-30 jet aeration manifolds. Refer to Scope of Supply provided in this section for additional information about material being supplied by MTS for this project. Each jet aeration manifold system recirculates the liquid contents of the oxidation ditch. The liquid is recirculated through each jet aeration manifold using a recirculation pump. As the liquid enters the jet aeration manifold it pressurizes, and is then dispersed into the jet aeration nozzles which consist of a primary (inner) and secondary (outer) jet nozzle. As the liquid passes through the primary nozzle it comes in contact with the low pressure air that is passing through the secondary jet nozzle. The result is a fine bubble stream discharged horizontally across the bottom of the basin or tank at equally spaced intervals. This provides oxygen transfer and mixing throughout the oxidation ditches. Refer to MTS Design Parameters provided in this section for additional design criteria. SILER CITY, NORTH CAROLINA DESIGN PARAMETERS - OXIDATION DITCHES Process Domestic Wastewater - Oxidation Ditch Number of B asins 2 Basin Dimensions (ft.) Overall Length 200 Channel Width 40 S.W.D. 20 Basin Volume (Mil. Gallons) 2.2 Design Flow Rate (m.g.d.) 4.0 Design Influent BODS (mg/1) 350 Design Effluent BODS (mg/1) 5 Design Influent NH3.-N (mg/1) 45 Design Effluent NH3-N (mg/1) 1 lb 02/lb BOD Removed 1.3 lb 02/lb NH3-N Removed 4.6 Alpha 0.70 Beta 0.95 Residual D.O. (mg/1) 2.0 Theta . 1.024 Temp.(OC) 20 Elevation (ft.) 600 SRT (days) 17 F/M 0.085 Design MLSS Concentration (mg/1) 4000 Influent Alkalinity (mg/1) 105 Stoichiometric Alkalinity Required (mg/1) 321 Net Alkalinity Requirement (mg/1)1 112 1 Assumes 40-50 mg/1 in effluent and denitrification regain SIZER CITY, NORTH CAROLINA MTS DESIGN SUMMARY - OXIDATION DITCHES Actual Oxygen Required (lbs/d) 10,857 per Basin 21,714 Total Standard Oxygen Required (lbs/hr) per Basin 866 Total 1732 MTS let Aerators Required Basin 3@MT27M-30 Jet Manifolds per Total 6@MT2JM-30 let Manifolds Airflow Required (SCFM) 869/11851 per Aerator ' 2923 per Basin 5846 Total Approximate Compressor Discharge Pressure (psig)(2) 9.0 Oxygen Absorption Efficiency M 28.6 Liquid Recirculation Required (gpm) per Aerator 5490 per Pump 5490 per Basin 16,470 Total Power Required (BHP) Compressors(3) 315 Pumps (4) 200 Total 515 Oxygen Transfer Efficiency (lbs Std. 02/BHP-hr) 3.4 Power Density (BHP/MG) 117 Horizontal Bulk Fluid Velocity (ft/sec) 1.2 (1) 2 headers @ 869 SCFM, 1 header @ 1185 SCFM (2) Assumes 1.0 psig loss -compressor inlet to basin edge (3) Assumes 900F, 600 ft. elevation (4) Assumes 2 ft. losses from pump suction to aerator, 75% efficiency W PE OF SUPPLY Wedge style anchor studs required for installation of all pipe support brackets supplied by MTS are included in MTS Scope of Supply. OXIDATION DITCHES ITEM QUANTITY DESCRIPTION 1 6 MT2TM-30 Jet aeration manifold - 150# style flanged connections 2 6 8" air supply riser pipe with 150# style plain ends for field wraps 3 6 6" air supply riser pipe with 150# style plain ends for field wraps 4 4 8" horizontal air pipe one end flanged, one end plain for field wraps 5 4 6" horizontal air pipe one end flanged, one end plain for field wraps 6 18 16" pipe support bracket with field installed style base plate and rubber clamp liner (18" length) 7 24 12" pipe support bracket with field installed style base plate and rubber clamp liner (18" length) 8 16 8" pipe support bracket with field installed style base plate and rubber clamp liner (length 8") 9 16 6" pipe support bracket with field installed style base plate and rubber clamp liner (length 18") - All necessary gaskets and hardware required to assemble jet aeration equipment will be included in MTS Scope of Supply. Hardware and gaskets required to assemble flange connections at equipment interface are specifically excluded. Wedge style anchor studs required for installation of all pipe support brackets supplied by MTS are included in MTS Scope of Supply. II MATERIAL SPECIFICATION OXIDATION DITCHES JET AERATION MANIFOLDS The jet aeration manifolds will be fabricated from machine filament wound fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) using an isophthalic resin. Units will be fabricated in accordance with ANSI/ASTM Specification D-2996-088 and the National Bureau of Standards .Specification PS 15-69. Each jet aeration nozzle consists of an inner (liquid) nozzle and an outer (air/liquid) nozzle. Each nozzle will be fabricated in accordance with the National Bureau of Standards Specification PS 15-69. Each jet nozzle will have a nexus liner for added abrasion protection. AIR PIPING All air supply piping will be fabricated- from machine filament wound fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) using an isophthalic resin. Units will be fabricated in accordance with ANSI/ASTM Specification D-2996-088 and the National Bureau, of Standards Specification PS 15-69. PIPE SUPPORT BRACKETS All pipe support brackets will be constructed from Type 304 stainless steel. All welds will be continuous full penetration welds. All sharp edges and burrs will be removed. Pipe support brackets will require field installation of support base plates. This will provide field adjustment to insure good alignment. GASKET MATERIAL All gasket material and pipe. support clamp liners will be 1/8" thick Neoprene rubber. Gasket material will be field installed between all flange connections and pipe support bracket pipe clamps. HARDWARE - All cap screws, hex nuts, lock washers and flat washers supplied by MTS will be Type 304 stainless steel conforming to ASTM A193 Grade B8 and/or AISI 304 specifications. All cap screw heads and hex nuts will be standard finish type, ANCHORSTUDS All anchor studs supplied by MTS will be (wedge style) Type 304 stainless steel conforming to GSA specification FFS-325 2.4.1 and are tested in accordance with ASTM E488 specifications. See installation data 'sheet provided in this section for further, details. Siler City WWTP Current Conditions BioWin user and configuration data Project details Project name: Siler City Oxidation Ditch Project ref.: 16.04035 Plant name: Siler City WWTP User name: David Honeycutt Saved: 11/29/2016 Steady state solution SRT: 158.11 days Temperature: 15.0°C Flowsheet BOD Influent 4 -_ Lime Addition Reactor1 Reactor2 Reactorl0 Reactor9 Wit{ Alum Addition Clarifier RAS WAS Waste Sludge ReactoO Reactor4 Reactor5 Reactor6 Reactor? Reactor6 Effluent Configuration information for all Bioreactor units 4 File Z.\Voll\Projects\2016\16.04035-Siler City WastewaterTreatability Evaluation\Misc\Siler City WWTP\Oxidation Ditch ModelS.l model clarifier -Current Conditlons.bwc 1 Physical data Element name Volume [Mil. Gal] Area [ft2] Depth [ft] Reactor 1 0.4380 3194.3310 18.330 Reactor 0.3800 2771.3374 18.330 Reactor 0.3800 2771.3374 18.330 Reactor 4 0.3800 2771.3374 18.330 Reactor 5 0.4380 3194.3310 18.330 Reactor 6 0.4380 3194.3310 18.330 Reactor 0.3800 2771.3374 18.330 Reactor 0.3800 2771.3374 18.330 Reactor 0.3800 2771.3374 18.330 Reactor 10 0.4380 3194.3310 18.330 Operating data Average (flowltime weighted as required) Element name Average Air flow rate [ft3/min (20C, 1 atm)] Reactor 2 118.0 Reactor 7 325.0 Reactor 1 118.0 Reactor 10 118.0 Reactor 5 325.0 Reactor 6 325.0 Configuration information for all BOD Influent units Operating data Average (flowltime weighted as required) Element name BOD Influent 1.87 Flow Total Carbonaceous BOD mgBOD/L 136.00 Volatile suspended solids mg/L 140.00 File Z:\Voll\Projects\2016\16.04035 -Siler City Wastewater Treatability Evaluation\Misc\Siler City WWiP\Oxldation Ditch Model5.1 model clarifier -Current Conditions.bwc 2 Total suspended solids mg/L 186.50 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen mgN/L 25.97 Total P mgP/L 3.08 Nitrate N mgN/L 0 pH 7.30 14.000 10 Alkalinity mmol/L 2.00 Calcium mg/L 80.00 Magnesium mg/L 15.00 Dissolved 02 mg/L 0 Configuration information for all Model clarifier units Physical data Element name Volume[Mil. Gal] Area[ft2] Depth[ft] Number of layers Top feed layer Feed Layers Clarifier 1.3321 1.272E+4 14.000 10 6 1 Operating data Average (flow/time weighted as required) Element name Split method Average Split specification Clarifier Ratio 2.00 Element name Average Temperature Reactive Clarifier Uses global setting No Configuration information for all Metal addition units Operating data Average (flow/time weighted as required) File Z:\Voll\Projects\2016\16.04035-Siler City Wastewater Treatability Evaluation\Misc\Siler City WWrP\Oxidation Ditch Model5.1 model clarifier -Current Condltlons.bwc 3 Element name Alum Addition Metal mg/L 57700.10 Other Cations (strong bases) meq/L 5.00 Other Anions (strong acids) meq/L 6434.90 Total CO2 mmoUL 7.00 Flow (gpd) 50 Configuration information for all Splitter units Operating data Average (flowltime weighted as required) Element name Splif method Average Split specification spside Flowrate [Main] 930 WAS splitter Flowrate [Side] 0.017 Configuration information for Lime Feed Operating data Average (flowltime weighted as required) Element name Lime Addition Calcium mg/L 120000.00 Flow(gpd) 1500 File Z:\Voll\Projects\2016\16.04035 -Siler City Wastewater Treatability Evaluation\Misc\Siler City WWTP\Oxidation Ditch Model5.1 model clarifier -Current Conditions.bwc 4 BioWin Album REACTOR PARAMETERS SUMMARY File Z:\Voll\Projects\2016\16.04035 -Slier City Wastewater Treatability Evaluation\Misc\Siler City WWTP\Oxidation Ditch Model5.1 model clarifier -Current Conditlons.bwc 5 Element Ammoni Nitrate N Total P Dissolve Volatile Total Flow OTE [%] SOTE Air flow S a N [mgN/L] [mgP/L] d 02 suspend suspend [mgd] [%] rate [mgN/L] [mg/L] ed solids ed solids [ff3/min [mg/L] [mg/L] (20C, 1 atm)] Reactor 0.29 11.13 219.36 1.96 2926.74 7063.15 935.56 13.33 28.33 118.00 1 Reactor 0.29 11.13 219.36 1.95 2926.73 7063.13 935.56 13.34 28.33 118.00 2 Reactor 0.28 11.13 219.36 1.90 2926.71 7063.11 935.56 100.00 100.00 0 3 Reactor 0.28 11.13 219.36 1.85 2926.69 7063.09 935.56 100.00 100.00 0 4 Reactor 0.28 11.14 219.36 1.92 2926.67 7063.07 935.56 13.38 28.33 325.00 5 Reactor 0.27 11.14 219.36 2.00 2926.65 7063.05 935.56 13.26 28.33 325.00 6 Reactor 0.27 11.14 219.36 2.09 2926.63 7063.03 935.56 13.12 28.33 325.00 7 Reactor 0.27 11.14 219.36 2.03 2926.61 7063.01 935.56 100.00 100.00 0 8 Reactor 0.26 11.15 219.36 1.98 2926.59 7063.00 935.56 100.00 100.00 0 9 Reactor 0.26 11.15 219.36 1.97 2926.57 7062.97 935.56 13.30 28.33 118.00 10 Effluent 0.26 11.15 0.09 1.97 1.06 2.55 1.85 ----- ----- ---- File Z:\Voll\Projects\2016\16.04035 -Slier City Wastewater Treatability Evaluation\Misc\Siler City WWTP\Oxidation Ditch Model5.1 model clarifier -Current Conditlons.bwc 5 Siler City WWTP with Proposed Mountaire Farms Process Wastewater BioWin User and Configuration data Project details Project name: Siler City Oxidation Ditch Project ref.: 16.04035 Plant name: Siler City WWTP User name: David Honeycutt Saved: 11/29/2016 Steady state solution SRT: 48.85 days Temperature: 10.0°C Flowsheet BOD Influent Reactor/ Reactor2 Reactor3 Reactor4 Reactors ar Lime Feed d Reactor10 Reactor Reactor Reactor7 Reactor 7Ltl•iy}Cn� .*.Y �°d.G Alum Feed Clarifier Effluent RAS WAS Waste Sludge i Configuration information for all Bioreactor units Physical data File Z.\Voll\Projects\2016\16.04035 -Siler City Wastewater Treatability Evaluation\M1sc\Si1er City WWTP\Oxidation Ditch Mode15.1 model clarifier -with Mountaire.bwc 1 Element name Volume [Mil. Gal] Area [ft2] 'Depth [ft] Reactor 1 0.4380 3194.3310 18.330 Reactor 2 0.3800 2771.3374 18.330 Reactor 3 0.3800 2771.3374 18.330 Reactor 4 0.3800 2771.3374 18.330 Reactor 0.4380 3194.3310 18.330 Reactor 0.4380 3194.3310 18.330 Reactor 0.3800 2771.3374 18.330 Reactor 0.3800 2771.3374 18.330 Reactor 0.3800 2771.3374 18.330 Reactor 10 0.4380 3194.3310 18.330 Operating data Average (flow/time weighted as required) Element name Average Air flow rate [ft3/min (20C, 1 atm)] Reactor 1 249.0 Reactor 2 249.0 Reactor 5 684.0 Reactor 6 684.0 Reactor 7 684.0 Reactor 10 249.0 Total 2799 Configuration information for all BOD Influent units Operating data Average Element name BOD Influent Flow 2.57 Total Carbonaceous BOD mgBOD/L 221.50 Volatile suspended solids mg/L 140.00 Total suspended solids mg/L 176.60 D File Z:\Voll\Projects\2016\16.04035 -Siler City Wastewater Treatability Evaluation\Misc\Siler City WWTP\Oxidation Ditch ModelS.1 model clarifier -with Mountaire.bwc 2 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen mgN/L • 52.90 Total P mgP/L 3.10 Nitrate N mgN/L 0 pH 7.30 Alkalinity mmol/L 2.00 Calcium mg/L 80.00 Magnesium mg/L 15.00 Dissolved 02 mg/L 0 Configuration information for all Model clarifier units Physical data Operating data Average (flow/time weighted as required) Element name Split method Average Split specification Clarifier Ratio 1.50 Element name- Average Temperature Reactive Clarifier Uses global setting No Configuration information for all Splitter units Operating data Average (flow/time weighted as required) Element name Split method Average Split specification spside Flowrate [Main] 930 File Z:\Voll\Projects\2016\16.04035- Siler City Wastewater Treatability Evaluation\Misc\Siler City WW7P\0xidation Ditch ModelS.1 model clarifier -with Mountaire.bwc 3 Element name Volume[Mil. Gal] Area[ft2] Depth[ft] Number of layers Top feed layer Feed Layers Clarifier 1.3321 1.272E+4 14.000 10 6 1 Operating data Average (flow/time weighted as required) Element name Split method Average Split specification Clarifier Ratio 1.50 Element name- Average Temperature Reactive Clarifier Uses global setting No Configuration information for all Splitter units Operating data Average (flow/time weighted as required) Element name Split method Average Split specification spside Flowrate [Main] 930 File Z:\Voll\Projects\2016\16.04035- Siler City Wastewater Treatability Evaluation\Misc\Siler City WW7P\0xidation Ditch ModelS.1 model clarifier -with Mountaire.bwc 3 WAS splitter Flowrate [Side] 0.0495 Configuration information for Lime Feed Operating data Average (flow/time weighted as required) Element name Lime Feed Calcium mg/L 120000.00 Flow (mgd) 0.004 REACTOR PARAMETERS SUMMARY Element Ammonia Nitrate N Total P Dissolved Volatile Total Flow OTE SOTE Air flow s N [mgN/L] [mgP/L] 02 [mg/L] suspend suspended [mgd] [%] j%] rate [mgN/L] ed solids solids [U/min [mg/Ll [mg/L1 (20C, 1 atm)] Reactor 0.48 27.61 93.87 1.69 2463. 4010.66 936.31 13.69 28.33 249.00 1 83 Reactor 0.47 27.61 93.87 1.68 2463. 4010.65 936.31 13.70 28.33 249.00 2 82 Reactor 0.46 27.62 93.87 1.57 2463. 4010.64 936.31 100.00 100.00 0 3 81 Reactor 0.45 27.63 93.87 1.45 2463. 4010.63 936.31 100.00 100.00 0 4 80 Reactor 0.44 27.63 93.87 1.62 2463. 4010.61 936.31 13.79 28.33 684.00 5 78 Reactor 0.43 27.64 93.87• 1.79 2463. 4010.59 936.31 13.55 28.33 684.00 6 76 Reactor 0.42 27.65 93.87 1.97 2463. 4010.57 936.31 13.30 28.33 684.00 7 74 Reactor 0.41 27.66 93.87 1.85 2463. 4010.56 936.31 100.00 100.00 0 8 72 Reactor 0.40 27.67 93.87 1.74 2463. 4010.54 936.31 100.00 100.00 0 9 70 Reactor 0.40 27.67 93.87 1.72 2463. 4010.51 936.31 ! 13.64 28.33 249.00 10 67 Effluent 0.40 27.67 0.09 1.72 2.03 3.30 2.52 ---- ----- ---- File Z.\Voll\Projects\2016\16.04035 -Siler City Wastewater Treatability Evaluation\Misc\Siler City WWTP\Oxidation Ditch ModelS.l model clarifier -with Mountaire.bwc 4