Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0020290_ETS Project (10588)_20150222RECEIVEDIDENRIDWR May 22, 2015 Ms. Ruth 011is MAY 2 6 2015 Water Quality Lab & Operations, Inc. Water Quality PO Box 1167 Permitting Section Banner Elk, NC 28604 RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 10588 Dear Ms. 011is: Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Burnsville WWTP received by Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. May 04 through May 08, 2015. Parameter Test Procedure EPA Method Number Code Final Result Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) THP6C Larval Survival and Growth, EPA -821-R-02-013 ChV > 24% Test Method 1000.0 Note: ChV =Chronic Value. A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no detectable impairment of survival or growth and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of survival or growth. If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the ChV value >24% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR -1) for the collection date May 04, 2015 using the parameter code THP6C. Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT -5) by June 30, 2015. If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Jim umner Laboratory Director This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis. North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600 South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001 * ! PO Box 7565 Asheville, NC 28802 Phone: (828) 350-9364 Fax: (828) 350-9368 E-mail: Jim@etsnclab.com Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. RECEIVEDIDENRIDWR May 22, 2015 Ms. Ruth 011is MAY 2 6 2015 Water Quality Lab & Operations, Inc. Water Quality PO Box 1167 Permitting Section Banner Elk, NC 28604 RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 10588 Dear Ms. 011is: Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Burnsville WWTP received by Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. May 04 through May 08, 2015. Parameter Test Procedure EPA Method Number Code Final Result Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) THP6C Larval Survival and Growth, EPA -821-R-02-013 ChV > 24% Test Method 1000.0 Note: ChV =Chronic Value. A numeric value representing the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no detectable impairment of survival or growth and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of survival or growth. If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter the ChV value >24% on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR -1) for the collection date May 04, 2015 using the parameter code THP6C. Additionally, please sign and submit the original DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT -5) by June 30, 2015. If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Jim umner Laboratory Director This report should not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis. North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600 South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001 i • • e ETS 'S Environmental Testing Solutions Inc PO Box 7565 Asheville, NC 28802 Phone: (828) 350-9364 Fax: (828)350-9368 E-mail: Jim@etsnclab.com Date: May 22, 2015 Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Fathead Minnow Multi -Concentration Test Facility: Burnsville WWTP NPDES #: NC- 0020290 Pipe #: 001 County: Yancey Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Soluti s Inc. Comments: Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge: Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: Pro'ea: 10588 Samples: 150504.01. 150506.34, 150508.24 Mail Original To: North Carolina Department of Environmen{and Natural Resource.- DWQ/ Environmental Sciences Branch 1621 Mai] Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 Start date: I End date: Start time: End time: 05-05-15 1 05-12-15 1135 1039 Survival (%) 100.0 Average wt(mg) Replicate number Average wt / 0.614 surviving (mg) 1 2 3 4 Control[Surviving number of larvae 10 1 10 10 1 10 Organisms loriginal number of larvae 10 1 10 10 1 0 0.573 wei ttori nal (mg/larvae) 0.526 0.600 0.652 0.679 %Effluent ISurviving number of larvae 10 10 10 10 1.5 % loriginal number of larvae 10 1 10 10 10 10 Wei tori 'nal (m arvae) 1 0.614 1 0.584 1 0.675 1 0.651 Start date: I End date: Start time: End time: 05-05-15 1 05-12-15 1135 1039 Survival (%) 100.0 Average wt(mg) 0.614 Average wt / 0.614 surviving (mg) F -24'/D. Survival (%) 100.0 Average wt (mg) 1 0.631 % Effluent I Surviving number of larvae 10 10 1 10 9 24% F -24'/D. 3.0 EK Original number of larvae 10 10 1 10 10 Survival (%) 978 Wei tori ' ( ae) Weight/original (m ae) 0.569 0.578 0.568 0.577 Average wt (mg) 0.573 %Effluent ISurviving number oflarvae 10 10 10 10 LtitialI Final 6.0 % Original number of larvae 10 10 10 10 Survival weightlori (mg/larvae) 0.594 0.637 0.576 0.576 Ave-agewt(mg) 0.596 %Effluent ISurviving numberoflarvae 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 -1r/Dl Original number of larvae 1 10 1 10 1 1010 1 Survival wri t/ori inal (m arvae) 1 0.609 1 0.649 1 0.606 0.612 1 Average wt (mg) 0.619 Test Organisms Outside su pliers A uatox, Inc. Hatch date: OS -04-15 Hatch time: 1 1600-1700 %Effluent I Surviving number o£larvae 10 1 10 10 1 10 24% 24% F -24'/D. Original number of larvae 10 1 10 1 10 10 Survival 12% 2.410 -0.153 Wei tori ' ( ae) 0.602 1 0.556 1 0.458 0.583 Average wt (mg) 1 0.550 Water Quality Data Day 0 Day 1 I Day 2 1 Day 3 Day 4 1 Day 5 D LtitialI Final initial I Final I Initial I Final I Initial I Final Initial I Final I Initial I Final initial I Final Control pH (SU): DO (mg/L): Temp. (°C): High Concen pH (SU): DO (mg/L): Temp. (°C): 7.40 7.15 7.32 1 6.92 7.29 6.94 1 7.27 1 7.03 1 7.25 1 6.94 1 7.27 7.00 7.22 6.96 7.9 7.7 8.0 1 7.6 7.9 7.2 1 8.0 7.3 1 8.0 1 7.2 1 7.9 7.8 8.0 7.8 24.7 24.5 24.8 1 24.6 24.7 24.4 1 24.7 24.5 1 24.8 1 24.6 1 24.7 24.8 24.8 24.5 ration E PEjP2E50 6.98 7.22 6.80 7.25 7.08 715 6.90 7.12 6.93 7.11 6.91 7.5 8.0 6.5 8.0 7.4 8.0 7.2 7.9 7.9 8.1 7.7 24.8.7. 24.5 24.7 1 24.5 1 24.9 24.5 1 24.7 1 24.5 L 24.8 1 24.7 1 25.0 1 24.3 Sample Information Collection start date: Grab: Composite duration: Alkalinity (mg/L CaCO3): Hardness (mg/L CaCO3): Conductivity (pmhos/cm): Total residual chlorine (mg/L): Sample Temp. at Receipt (°C): Analyses Normal: Hom. Var. NOEL: LOEC: ChV: Method: Overall Analysis: Result: PASS LOEC: >24% NOEC: 24% ChV: >24% Survival Growth Yes Yes Yes Yes 24% 24% >24% >24% >24% >24% Visualln Dunnett's Survival Growth %Effluent Critical Calculated Critical Calculated 1.5% 2.410 -0.541 3.0% 2.410 1.332 6.0% 2.410 0.597 12% 2.410 -0.153 24% 2.410 2.083 DWQform A T-5 (8/03) :FT,S Environmental Testing Solutions, lnc. Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test (EPA -821-R-02-013 Method 1000.0) Species: Pimephales promelas Client: Burnsville WWTP NPDES #: NC 0020290 Project #: _ l 0z t$ County: Yancey Outfall #: 001 Chronic Limit: 6.0% Dilution preparation information: Comments: Dilution prep (%) 1 5 3.0 6.0 12 24 Effluent volume (mL) 15 30 60 120 240 Diluent volume (mL) 985 970 940 880 760 Total volume (mL) 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 Page 1 of 5 Test organism information: Test information: Organism age: l $ . S& T6 1o,, SS fio 0 ub Randomizing template: e� Date and times organisms were born between: Time Anal st Incubator number and shelf location: �- Organism source: ATOX Batch Pp: oS Artemia CHM number: CHM836 Drying information for weight determination: Transfer bowl information: pH= 1-S1 S.0 Temperature = %l•iPC Date / Time in oven: 0S•+z•%S Initial oven temperature: L V L Average transfer volume: 0.1749 mL Date / Time out of oven: OS i3 +S Final oven temperature: Total drying time: -L`� FbJttS Daily feeding and renewal information: +3oa 1-bod Day Date Morning feeding Afternoon feeding Test initiation, renewal, or termination Sample number used SSW batch used Time Anal st Time Analyst Time Analyst 0 05--15 7 24 7. t•{S 11 IS oSpA-ok o+21-6 A �• is 1 05-0606-15 OCoa +`-100 035 -ststA.ok ok-1i-tsA 2 05-07-15 p OU IS 0S C)f - 3 43+21 -Is 3 05-08-15 6Cm %SOsm.- `V 0'i•2.1-ISg 4 05-09-15 US t 03S ISO50 •2 0-1--n-isg 5 05-10-15 U�'SO �3'�O t 014 aw 6 7 05-11-15 OS -12-15 of ,ll l0'j� (SOS 04- -L`I I os -n- fS Control information: Acceptance criteria Summaq of test endpoints: % Mortality: 01, s 20% 7 -day LC50 > Z`�'�• Average weight per initial larvae: 6.6%4 ISM C Z� Average weight per surviving larvae: O-bN >_ 0.25,0arvae LOEC Z ?, ChV IC25 7 24 7. SOP AT20 — Exhibit AT20.3, revision 11-01-14 •K :ETS Environmental T"tlnq 5nludms. lnc. Species: Pimeph ales promelas Client: Burnsville WWTP Survival and Grnwth Data Page 2 of 5 Date: 05-05-15 Day CONTROL 1.5% 3.0% A B C D E I F G H I J K L 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1p 10 r4 to to to rp t0 /0 10 /0 2 !o ro tp �C) r0 rp t0 (0 10 to 10 io 3 lU 10 (p 1p 1p rp 1p rp 10 to ►p 1p 4 rp rp rp t0 1p 1p �p rp tp 5 ----- 10 1D r0 ro ro to to 6 �� l0 t0 rD t0 lD r p 1p tD �p rp ! p 7 /p to to 10 to rp r p 10 r0 10 16 A = Pan weight (mg) codV� �A Analyst: Anal st: 15,3 15.11 lb•3D 15.93. l7 �y•92 'I '1 �tD.29 13017 116N I6•16 15-T1 1y91 11 -bo Date: Oti-?o �ls B = Pan + Lary a weight (mg) Analyst: ZD�� L1.1� 22.42 ?2.62 21.(aly ZZ.13 zo.�Z ZZ l� $5 Z1.1oS 20.05' 22.01 Date: C = Larvae weight (mg) = B - A Hand calculated. 5,Zb b.00 1•_52 Io,1a1 b•�� &� le,1S b.S� S.bq 5."18 S.b$ 5.1`1 Analyst: tom---' Weight per initial number of larvae (mg) = C / Initial number of larvae Hand calculated.��v0 p0 Analyst o o o• ooa o• o p u p' S p o p Average weight per initial Percent number of larvae (mg) reduction C) • b I'A Q • bZ�} - Z -1 7• 1 • 513 1,.1 from control Comment codes: c = clear, d = dead, fg = fungus, k = killed, m = missing, sk = sick, sm = unusually small, Ig = unusually large, d&r = decanted and returned, w = wounded. SOP AT20 — Exhibit AT20.3, revision I 1-01-14 • • EnvM°nnretalT°sWg Sdutbns.Inc Species: Pimephales promelas Client: Burnsville WWTP Survival and Growth Data Page 3 of 5 Date: 05-05-15 Day 6.0% 12% 24% M N 1 O P Q R S T U V 1 W X 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1 to (o 1p 10 10 t0 t0 to t0 to to /0 2 10 10 10 l0 1D 10 10 tp 1p /0 10 10 3 t0 10 10 10 10 10 10 1p 10 1Q 10 1Q 4 Ip 10 10 10 10 10 /0 /0 !p 10 10 10 5 10 1p t0 10 l0 10 l0 10 10 (0 (0 t0 6 �O 10 1p ►0 ro 10 1p tp 1p co t0 10 7 10 10 10 10 /0 10 /0 1p A = Pan weight (mg) Tray color codec N—I U Analyst: 1tt�J 15•x2 IS.y 13.4�j 134 g(r51t@.oq I(i.lf{ 15.3 IS•59 600 t619 1(0."6 Date: B = Pan + Larvae weight (mg) Analyst: J{ri Date: D6•�j•�S 2D.910 183 A.20 Iq.22 0.34 72.S3 all 21.43 1.1.1 21. DO 21.11? 22.1$ C =Larvae weight (mg) = B — A Hand calculated. 5 qti V.31 5_110 S.lb (.,pq (..4q 6 0 4.1'L (,. S. S6 q.Sd 5.13 Analyst: Weight per initial number of larvae (mg) = C / Initial number of larvae Hand calculated.yah' �� y�`D y^� J%yah �o .o adv yaSb aS� %4.5Analyst: b• p' O' O' O' �' O• O' O' O O' or Average weight per initial Percent number of larvae (mg) reduction 0, SNO aa. 67. O tg 1.57 from control0•�b Comment codes: c = clear, d = dead, fg = fungus, k = killed, m = missing, sk = sick, sm = unusually small, Ig = unusually large, d&r = decanted and returned, w = wounded. Comments: SOP AT20 — Exhibit AT20.3, revision 11-01-14 � Pimephales promelas Chronic Whole Effluent Tonicity Test .N111111111111111 EPA -821-R-02-013, Method 1000.0 Quality Control Verification of Data Entry, Calculations, and Statistical Analyses Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Client: Burnsville WWTP Test dates: May 05-12,2015 Project number: 10588 Coseeotnaw (%) Anak.M Wlkl aonberd 11todnmberd1arvw laevw A-Pwwtlaht (mv a-Pu+Lwow welSht (ow larvwwetaht(mV -A-■ Welaht/Se"Wi, aubrdkrvw(mV Meso welaht/ Sorrlrlasaaatbrd Isnw(s Caealekwdvsrladw �-+Mewsv�►r♦ amew erl-.wl(%) Wel4N/Ia1lWnmber dlwrae (�) Meo wrvhal (%) Mao weld to Is". (no Cael6de.1d varktb (%) Ps trMwtlw nom twhal (%) Control A 10 10 15.31 20.57 5.26 0.526 0.614 11.0 0.526 100.0 0.614 11.0 Not applicable B 10 10 15.17 21.17 6.00 0.600 p,60p C 10 10 16.30 22.82 6.52 0.652 0.652 0.679 D 10 10 15.83 22.62 6.79 0.679 15% E 10 10 14.92 21.06 6.14 0.614 0.631 6.4 0.614 100.0 0.631 6.4 2.7 F 10 10 16.29 22.13 5.84 0.584 0.584 C 10 10 13.97 20.72 6.75 0.675 0.675 0.651 H 10 10 15.91 22.42 6.51 0.651 3.0% 1 10 10 15.16 20.85 5.69 0.569 0.589 5.9 0.569 97.8 0.573 0.9 6.7 3 10 10 15.87 21.65 5.78 0.579 0.578 K 10 10 14.97 20.65 5.68 0.568 0.568 0.577 L 10 9 16.30 22.07 5.77 0.641 6.0% M 10 10 15.02 20.96 5.94 0.594 0.596 4.8 0.594 100.0 0.5% 4.8 3.0 N 10 10 15.46 21.83 6.37 0.637 0.637 O 10 10 13.44 19.20 5.76 0.576 0.576 0.576 P 10 10 13.46 19.22 5.76 0.576 12% 10 10 14.65 20.74 6.09 0.609 0.619 3.3 0.609 100.0 0.619 3.3 -0.8 R 10 10 16.04 22.53 6.490.649 0.649 S 10 10 16.04 22.10 6.06 p, 0606 0.612 T 10 10 16.31 21.43 6.12 0.612 24% U 10 10 15.59 21.61 6.02 0.602 0.550 1 11.6 0.602 100.0 0.550 11.6 10.5 V 10 10 16.24 21.80 5.56 0.556 0.556 W 10 10 16.89 21.47 4.59 0.458 0.458 X 10 10 16.35 22.18 5.83 0.583 0.583 Outfall 001: MSD - Minimum Significant Difference Dunnett's MSD value: 0.0746 PMSD - Percent Minimum Significant Difference PMSD: 12.1 PMSD is a measure of teat precision. The PMSD is the minimum percent difference between the control and treatment that can be declared statistically significant in a whole effluent toxicity test. Lower PMSD bound determined by USEPA (10th percentile) - 12%. Upper PMSD bound determined by USEPA (90th percentile) = 301%. Lower and upper PMSD bounds were determined from the 10th and 90th percentile, respectively, of PMSD data from EPA's WET Interlaboratory Variability Study (USEPA, 2001 a; USEPA, 2001 b). USEPA. 200la, 2001 b. Final Report: Interlaborstory Variability Study of EPA Short-term Chronic and Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Methods, Volumes 1 and 2 -Appendix. EPA -821-B-01-004 and EPA -821-B-01-005. US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. File: btwnsville_050515pp.xls Entered by:Symner Reviewed by: iVjf/_ • • • • • 3 ETS Environmental T"Wq Solutions, Inc. Auxiliary Tests Statistic Critical Larval Fish Growth and Survival Tat -7 Day Growth Start Date: 5/5/2015 -0.73 Test ID: PpFRCR Sample ID: Burnsville WWTP End Date: 5/12/2015 Min Lab ID: ETS-Envir. Testing Sol. Sample Type: DMR -Discharge Monitoring Report Sample Date: Critical MSD Protocol: FWCHR-EPA-821-R-02-013 Test Species: PP-Pimephales promelas Comments: 0.6143 1.0000 0.6143 0.5260 0.6790 Conc-% 1 2 3 4 0.6226 D -Control 0.5260 0.6000 0.6520 0.6790 0.6310 0.5840 1.5 0.6140 0.5840 0.6750 0.6510 2.410 0.0746 3 0.5690 0.5780 0.5680 0.5770 0.9328 0.5730 6 0.5940 0.6370 0.5760 0.5760 1.332 2.410 12 0.6090 0.6490 0.6060 0.6120 0.5958 0.9699 24 0.6020 0.5560 0.4580 0.5830 4 0.597 Auxiliary Tests Statistic Critical Skew Transform: Untransformed Shapiro-Wilk's Test indicates normal distribution (p > 0.01) 0.92981 1 -Tailed -0.73 laotonle Cone-% Mean N-M"n Mean Min Max CV% N tStst Critical MSD Mean N -Mean D -Control 0.6143 1.0000 0.6143 0.5260 0.6790 10.965 4 0.6226 1.0000 1.5 0.6310 1.0273 0.6310 0.5840 0.6750 6.362 4 -0.541 2.410 0.0746 0.6226 1.0000 3 0.5730 0.9328 0.5730 0.5680 0.5780 0.912 4 1.332 2.410 0.0746 0.5959 0.9571 6 0.5958 0.9699 0.5958 0.5760 0.6370 4.831 4 0.597 2.410 0.0746 0.5959 0.9571 12 0.6190 1.0077 0.6190 0.6060 0.6490 3.255 4 -0.153 2.410 0.0746 0.5959 0.9571 24 0.5498 0.8950 0.5498 0.4580 0.6020 11.644 4 2.083 2.410 0.0746 0.5498 0.8830 Auxiliary Tests Statistic Critical Skew Kurt Shapiro-Wilk's Test indicates normal distribution (p > 0.01) 0.92981 0.884 -0.73 0.89558 Bartletra Test indicates equal variances (p = 0.02) 13.8018 15.0863 Hypothesis Test (1 -fail, 0.05) NOEC LOEC ChV TU MSDu MSDp MSB MSE F-Prob dr Dunnetrs Test 24 >24 4.16667 0.07463 0.12149 0.0038 0.00192 0.13057 5.18 Treatments vs D -Control Linear Interpolation (200 Resamples) Point % SD 95%CL(Exp) Skew IC05 13.150 IC10 21.242 IC15 >24 1.0 IC20 >24 0.9 IC25 >24 IC40 >24 0.8 IC50 >24 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 z 0.5 E M 0.4 90.3 0.2 0.1 ! 0.6 C 0.5 ffi 0.4 IX 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 ilyl* - 0 10 20 30 Dose % Dose -Response Plot 1 -tail, 0.05 level 01 significance File: bumsville_0505I5ppx13 Entered by: !. S er Reviewed by: -T • 0 Envlmnm nt Testl g Solutions. Inc. Species: Pimephales promelas Client: Burnsville WWTP Daily Chemic Page 4 of 5 Date: 05-05-15 Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final *Temperatures performed at the time of test initiation., renewal or termination by the analyst identified in the Daily Renewal Information table located on Page I Alkalinity, hardness and total residual chlorine performed by the analyst identified on the bench sheet specific for each analysis and transcribed to this bench sheet by: A—. SOP AT20 — Exhibit AT20.3, revision 11-01-14 Day (Analyst identified for each day, performed pH, D.O. and conductivity measurements only.) 0 1 2 Analyst LU Concentration Parameter CONTROL pH (S.U.) 12- 1,24 (�,q DO (m L) p QI Conductivity mhos/cm) *Alkalinity (mg CaCO3R-) *Hardness (mg CaC031L) *Temperature (°C) 't •d •'1 —L`� • S .� . J� .b "1 �1 Z`l . `� x (S.U.) 2q1 1.5% DO (m L) ,� •� 5.0 Conductivity (mhos/cm) Lo IIS� �T1 *Temperature (°C) IAA 1- b 'LAA �.�. S 1-1•">r 1'�.l0 H (S.U.) -4.3; .cam} •2 (p.A3 3.0% DO (m q _ •'� 6•0 (p } Conductivity (mhos/cm) 1100 ilA *Temperature (°C) -L 'Z� . -1.`�.c1 S %,• 1� -b H (S.U.) -4, Lis'� 2 lo. 2 .2 V•6�1 6..0% DO (m ) 1.9 ,O Conductivity (mhos/cm) 1- *Tem erature (°C) �-`� • i.'�•b Z`i•9 i.'�• S - • 'Ly•3 H (S.U.) �, 22 qq.2Zto •'�9 12% DO (m ) Q c7 dp 8.0 tP Conductivity mhos/cm) I -12 112 - � *Temperature (°C) —Lk •k ZS • 0 1-a•1 •�• Z�1.3 x (&U.) DO (m L) O 6•0 (ps 24% Conductivity (mhos/cm) Q -I Z ,q 2 *Temperature (°C) "L '�y.'1 1S •O 1`�•s Z �, .S H (S.U.) .16 DO (m ) 19.0 100% Conductivity ( mhos/cm) 31g 3�8 *Alkalinity (mg CaCO3/L) .� Z yb *Hardness (m CaCO3/L) 3 p O (oJ *TR chlorine (mg/L) Q . t0 G t 10 *Temperature (°C) -H-It Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final *Temperatures performed at the time of test initiation., renewal or termination by the analyst identified in the Daily Renewal Information table located on Page I Alkalinity, hardness and total residual chlorine performed by the analyst identified on the bench sheet specific for each analysis and transcribed to this bench sheet by: A—. SOP AT20 — Exhibit AT20.3, revision 11-01-14 JETS Envimonmental Tertin Soolution,,Inc. Species: Pimephales promelas Client: Burnsville WWTP Page 5 of 5 Date: 05-05-15 t, lU un,c U1 toNt illuauun, rcncwal or termmauon oy the analyst Identltied in the Daily Renewal Information table located on Page 1. Alkalinity, hardness and total residual chlorine performed by the analyst identified on the bench sheet specific for each analysis and transcribed to this bench sheet by. -- SOP AT20 — Exhibit AT20.3, revision 1 1-01-14 • � 351 Depot Street }' Asheville, NC 28801 Phone: (828) 350-9364 JIMR — ' Fax: (828) 350-9368 Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain -of -Custody Form Facility: Water Quality NPDES #: NCO020290 Pipe #: 001 County: Yancey Burnsville WWTP Purchase order: Species: Pimephales promelas Effluent dilution: 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12, 24% Test type: Chronic Definitive Parameter code: THP6C Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector) Composite sample: Sample location: Eft, &L4 - Start date: S�3�is✓ Time: 9: IS.4^ Volume collected for testing: �"l f�iL.'�erS End date: $/9/t s Time: 304r Number of containers filled for testing: 0AL Number of samples per hour: 11 Method of transport to laboratory: Co, e; tr Chilled during collection? YCS Comments: If chilled, specify temperature: $ C Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space. Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be < 6.0eC upon receipt at the laboratory. Sample custody: Samnle cniiected hv- (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel) t-t'k 3z� g: 30.4 Relinauished bv: 16rk- ` zoo Relinquished by: Print signWue Due nd tme Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ETS personnel) Relinquished to ETS by: 16SO'LOS N 00 Pm sisft Due and tnn Custody seals intact?: Yea No Na used Samples received in good condition?: Yes No Tracking number. 0 (r - Comments: Received st F.TC h- •-•• .,q.�au�c ue am ueae Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (OC): Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS: (DPD Presence/Absence Indicator, MDL = 0.10 mg/L) Paso Atsw Project number: I Sample number: (q)"•V f s 13W •-•• .,q.�au�c ue am ueae Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (OC): Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS: (DPD Presence/Absence Indicator, MDL = 0.10 mg/L) Paso Atsw Project number: I Sample number: (q)"•V f 351 Depot Street t Asheville, NC 28801 n: Phone: (828) 350-9364 - - Fax: (828) 350-9368 Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain-of-Custodv Form Facility: Water Quality NPDES #: NCO020290 Pipe #: 001 County: Yancey Burnsville WWTP Purchase order: Species: Pimephalespromelas Effluent dilution: 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12, 24% Test type: Chronic Definitive Parameter code: THP6C Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector) Composite sample: Start date: /r Time: /0 W 4.% End date: SWIr Time: 16: 10 4r Number of samples per hour: If Chilled during collection? keg If chilled, specify temperature: ',° '- Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Sample location: 9if1ytr4•+ Volume collected for testing: 10 1 Number of containers filled for testing: Owt Method of transport to laboratory: (,c,N ;t j Comments: Completely fill the sample container with no air space. Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be < 6.08C upon receipt at the laboratory. Sample custody: Sample collected by: (to be completed by sample collector and tacility personnel) 1 QIei.��r I u�lw-0 v I Riot Relinquished by: sipuuve Dam and time Riot Relinquished by: signature Due end time Rent Signs.... Due and time Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ETS personnel) Relinquished to ETS by: b J N � JJ -33 Rim I signuute Due and time Custody seals intact?: = = Ya No Na used Samples received in good condition?: = = Ya No Tracking number: Comments: lt� Received by: 5n sites Die ad time Received by: Ptv4 Spa " Dam and time Received at ETS by: LZ �" 123-3 mgnuute Due and time Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS CC): Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS: d (DPD Presence/Absence Indicator, MDL = 0.10 mg/L) P-- nmm Project number: /15e6 Sample number: !W40, 3'/ low Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. Whole Effluent Tozi Chain-of-Custodv Form 351 Depot Street Asheville, NC 28801 Phone: (828) 350-9364 Fax: (828) 350-9368 Facility: Water Quality NPDES #: NCO020290 Pipe #: 001 County: Yancey Burnsville WWTP Purchase order: Species: Pimephales promelas Effluent dilution: 1.5,3.0,6.0,12,24% Test type: Chronic Definitive Parameter code: THP6C Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector) Composite sampI : Start date: s ��� Time: 30 End date: u� i► (S' Time: !TD 3 0 Number of samples per hour: '1 Chi If c Sample location: FART e., f Volume collected for testing: 1 pip Number of containers filled for testing: pl t Method of transport to laboratory: [,' „r�, w lled during collection? k Q3 Comments: billed, specify temperature: ff' Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space. Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be < 6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory. Sample custody: Sample collected by: (to be completed by sample collector and tacility personnel) I Cor Kl4S-&C--J .34 Prot sign— Relinquished by: Date and time Prim signatae Relinquished by: Date atd time Prim signaeue Date and time Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ETS personnel) Relinquished to ETS by: 0 Prot $igoauue Dae etd finte Custody seals intact?: = = Ya No Na and Samples received in good condition?: = Ya No Tracking number: [`y {' Comments: Received by: Print sigoanae Due and time Received by: Print SW— Dae and time Received at ETS by: b4— Due and din Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS (°C): Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS: r-7 r7l (DPD Presence/Absense Indicator, MDL = 0.10 mg/L) Pmoo' '�"t Project number:106(rl/Sample number: ��14� • Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 1.4 1.2 U Y 1.0 00 N 0.8 N U ?, 0.6 ev .o 0.4 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 Pimephales promelas Chronic Reference Toxicant Control Chart Organism Source: Aquatox, Inc. USEPA Control Limits (± 2 Standard Deviations) USEPA Warning and Control Limits (75th and 90th Percentile CVs) ................................................. ........................................................................................................ Laboratory Warning and Control Limits (10th and 25th Percentile CVs) o3'�Syop'��d�lds'�lcf�1d'"�'Scb'��6i�1�1cf��1Cl�"" 1'1�1'1ti�SyZ�,p�� p111,dLA�,di.��pA����15 Test date ---�— 7 -day IC25 = 25% inhibition concentration. An estimation of the concentration of potassium chloride that would cause a 25% reduction in Pimephales growth for the test population. — — Central Tendency (mean IC25) — — - Warning Limits (mean IC25 ± SA.10 or SA.75) Graphs generated from 1100clatodemispnedsheet. ......... Control Limits (mean IC25± 5 , S or 2 Standard Deviations Exulspreadsheet• ! J.Sumner A.25 A.90� ) Reviewed bv: