HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0006220_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20161020WaterRewurces
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
October 20, 2016
Mr. John Erickson, Water Treatment Plant Manager
City of Kannapolis
Post Office Box 1199
Kannapolis, NC 28082-1199
Dear Mr. Erickson:
PAT MCCRORY
Governor .
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
RECEIVED/NCDEQ/DWR
OCT 2 5 2016
Water Quali�
Permitting Secfion
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Kannapolis WTP
NPDES Permit NC0006220
Rowan County, NC
On October 19, 2016, Roberto Scheller of this Office conducted an inspection at the subject
facility. This inspection was conducted as a Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) to insure
compliance with permit requirements and conditions. At the time of inspection facility appeared
to be well maintained and operated. We wish to thank you and the operating staff for assistance
regarding this, inspection.
The enclosed report should be self-explanatory; however, should you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to contact myself of Roberto Scheller at (704) 235-2204 or
roberto.scheller@ncdenr.gov.
Sincerely,
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
Enclosure: Inspection Report
cc: ' Gerald Faulkner/ORC/email: gfaulkner@kannapolisnc.gov
Wastewater Branch
MSC 1617 — Central files basement
File
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources I Water Quality Regional Operations
Mooresville Regional Officel 610 East Center Avenue, Suite 3011 Mooresville, Nortli Carolina 28115
704 663 1699
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Form Approved.
EPA Washington, D.C. 20460
OMB No. 2040-0057
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Approval expires 8-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type
1- IN' 1 2 15 I 3 I NC0006220 111 12 16/10/19 17 181 r. i 19 I G i 201 I
211111111111111111111111111111111111.11111111 t66
I
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 QA —Reserved–
67 70 I, I 71 itI I 72 i N I 73 ILLJ I 174 7511LL�.1 1 1 1 1 180
I� L�
Section B: FacilityData
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
Entry Time/Date
Permit Effective Date
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
09:58AM 16/10/19
13/12/01
Kannapolis WrP
ExitTime/Date
permit Expiration Date
1303 Pump Sta Rd
10:32AM 16/10/19
18/10/31
Kannapolis NC 28081 j
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)gitles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
Other Facility Data
Gerald R Faulkner/ORCf704-932-3905/
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Wilmer Melton,PO Box 1199 Kannapolis NC 280811199/Public Works Director//
No
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated)
Permit Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters
Laboratory
- Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
Roberto S eller MRO WQ//252-946-6481/
Signature of Management Q A Reviewet Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
W. Corey Basinger MRO WQ//704-235-2194/ -
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete�
/ q q. i>ow
w•
Page# 1
NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1
3�NCoaos220 12 16/10/19 17 18 I C I
I
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
-Permit NC0006220
inspection Date: 10/19/2016
Owner - Facility: Kannapolis WTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit
Yes No NA NE
(If the present permit expires in 6 months.or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
❑
•❑
E
❑
application?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the facility as described in the permit?
0
❑
❑
❑
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
- M
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Current Dermit was issued on December 1, 2013 and expires at midnight on October 31
2018.
Record Keeping
Yes No NA NE
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
M
❑
❑
❑
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
M
- ❑
❑
❑
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
- M
❑
'❑
❑
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
'Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing,analyses
Transported CDCs
Are DMRs complete: -do they include all permit parameters?
E
" ❑
❑
❑
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
❑
❑
0.11
(if the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator
❑
❑
0
❑
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
E
0
❑
❑
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
❑
❑
❑
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site?
❑
❑
❑
Facility has copy of, previous year's Annual Report on file for review?
❑
❑
M
❑
Comment:
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NAM.
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? A ❑ T1 ' ❑.
Page# - 3
Permit: NC0006220 Owner -Facility: KannapoliswrP
Inspection Date: 10/19/2016 Inspection Type: compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance Yes No NA NE
Does the, facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable 0 El El 11Solids, pH, D0, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment:
Secondary Clarifier
Yes No NA NE
Is the clarifier free of.black and odorous wastewater?
0
❑
❑
.❑
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular. clarifier?
0
❑
❑
❑ '
Are weirs level?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of weir blockage?
M
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
'M
' ❑
❑
El
Is scum removal adequate?
-0
❑
❑
❑
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the drive unit operational?
❑
❑
❑
[�
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc?
El
❑
❑
❑
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately %a of the sidewali depth)
0
❑
❑
❑
Comment: Sludge is pumped to lagoon for storage.
Lagoons
Yes No NA NE
Type of lagoons?
Facultative
# Has the sludge blanket in the lagoon (s) been measured periodically in multiple
❑
# Number of lagoons in operation at time of visit?
1
locations? -
Are lagoons operated in?
# If excessive algae is present, has barley straw been used to help control the growth? -
❑
.❑ :,•M
❑
# Is a re -circulation line present?
❑
❑
0,11
Is lagoon free of excessive floating materials?.
❑
❑
'❑
# Are baffles between ponds or effluent baffles adjustable?
❑
❑
0
❑
Are dike slopes clear of woody vegetation?
M
❑
❑
❑
Are weeds controlled around the edge of the lagoon?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are dikes free of seepage?
0
❑
❑
❑
Are dikes free of erosion? -
0
El
El
El
Are dikes free of burrowing animals?
M
❑1 ❑
❑
# Has the sludge blanket in the lagoon (s) been measured periodically in multiple
❑
❑ ❑
0
locations? -
# If excessive algae is present, has barley straw been used to help control the growth? -
❑
.❑ :,•M
❑
Is the lagoon surface free of weeds?
❑
❑ M
❑
Page#
4
Permit: NC0006220 Owner - Facility: Kannapolis WTP
Inspection Date: 10/19/2016 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Lagoons Yes No NA NE
Is the lagoon free of short circuiting? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment: Alum sludge is held in lagoon until clean out and disposal.
De -chlorination
Type of system ?
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Comment: Calcium thiosulfate is used for dechlorination.
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Laboratory
Are field parameters performed by certified personnel or laboratory?
Are all other parameters(excluding field parameters) performed by a certified lab?
# Is the facility using a contract lab?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees
Celsius)?
Incubator (Fecal Coliform) set to 44.5 degrees Celsius+/- 0.2 degrees?
Incubator (BOD) set to 20.0 degrees Celsius +/-1.0 degrees?
Yes No NA NE
Liquid
❑ ❑ M ❑
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ 11
❑ ❑ M ❑
Yes No NA NE
M ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
M ❑ ❑ ❑
M -❑ 11'E1
❑ ❑ E ❑
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Comment: On site field analvses is conducted_ under Lab Cert #5387. Pace Analytical Services. Inc.
and Environment 1 are used as contract labs.
Flow Measurement - Influent
Yes No NA NE
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
0
❑
❑
❑
Is the flow meter operational?
0
❑
❑
❑
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
❑
❑
0
❑
Comment:
Page# . 5