NC0004944_Renewal Application_20160223

a
September 26, 2013
Mr. Charles Weaver
NC DENR/DWQ/Point Source Branch
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RECEIVEDUDEWWR
Subject: Performance Fibers Operations, Inc.
Salisbury Permit Renewal FEB 2 3 2016
NPDES Permit# NC0004944 Water Quality
Rowan County Permitting Section
Performance Fibers Operations, Inc. owns and operates a polyester manufacturing facility
in Salisbury, North Carolina. Process wastewater and stormwater is discharged to North
Second Creek in accordance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Permit Number NC0004944, which expires March 31, 2014. Three copies of
this letter and the attached permit application are being submitted for renewal of the
NPDES Permit. This letter provides an overview of the Performance Fibers Operations,
Inc. Salisbury facility, and Attachment A includes the permit renewal application.
I. Facility Location
The Performance Fibers Operations, Inc. facility is located on the south side of U.S.
Highway 70 approximately 4 miles west of Salisbury, North Carolina, near the
intersection of Highway 70 and State Highway 801. The facility's location is presented
on Figure 1 in Attachment A, which also shows nearby transportation routes and surface
waters.
II. Plant Overview
Performance Fibers Operations, Inc. manufactures polyester in the form of chip and fiber
at its Salisbury,North Carolina, facility. Primary raw materials in these manufacturing
processes include terephthalic acid, ethylene glycol, and fiber finish lubricants(see
Figure 2 in Attachment A). Process wastewater, groundwater, sanitary wastewater,
cooling tower blowdown, and water treatment plant blowdown are treated onsite before
being discharged to North Second Creek.
7401 STATE, SVILLE BLVD I SALISBURY , NC 28147 1 TEL 704 - 636 -6000
www.performancefibers.com

Wastewater treatment consists of coarse solids removal (bar screen), equalization,
biological treatment(activated sludge), and clarification, followed by a series of
polishing ponds, as presented on Figure 3 in Attachment A. Waste biological sludge is
aerobically digested and dewatered. Dewatered solids are disposed of off-site by Waste
Management, Inc. at the local Rowan County Landfill.
The ground water remediation program at the site has been shutdown during a trial period
with EPA approval. Future operation of the pump-and-treat remediation is unlikely but
the final decision as to whether or not to operate the pump-and-treat system has not been
made. When this remediation system is operating the water is treated in the waste
treatment plant. Recovered groundwater from the interior system contains primarily
ethylene glycol and is anaerobically pretreated before being discharged to the
equalization tank for treatment in the WWTP. Recovered groundwater from the
perimeter system contains 1,4-dioxane as the major pollutant and is discharged through
the polishing ponds to Outfall 001 to North Second Creek.
The plant discharges storm water associated with industrial activity through five
stormwater outfalls (A,B,C,D and 5) as presented on Figure 1 in Attachment A.
Stormwater Outfall #5 collects stormwater from the main manufacturing areas of the site,
where spills are more likely or chemicals are stored. Outfall #5 collects stormwater from
a system of diverter weirs that route dry weather spills and the first flush of storm water
runoff to either the WWTP headworks or Number 2 Polishing Pond. As the storm water
volume increases in the diverter system, flow continues to be discharged to either the
WWTP or Number 2 polishing pond with the excess water that overflows the diverter
weirs being discharged directly to North Second Creek. All five storm water outfalls are
monitored according to the NPDES permit and the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.
Information on the storm water outfalls is provided on the EPA Form 2F.
III. Historical Data Review
Outfall 001
Historical daily data from the Discharge Monitoring Reports(DMRs) were reviewed for
the past four and half years (January 1, 2009 through June 30, 2013). Annual DMR data
for the Organic Chemicals, Plastics, and Synthetic Fibers (OCPSF) priority pollutants for
the past 5 years (2009 through 2013) were reviewed. The review indicated that no
OCPSF chemicals were detected and the daily discharge limits were well within permit
limits.
7 4 0 1 STATESVILLE BLVD I SALISBURY , NC 28 1 47 1 TEL 7 0 4 - 6 3 6 -6 0 0 0
www.performancef'ibers.com

Storm Water (Outfalls A,B, C, D, and 5)
Over the course of the period of 2009 -2013, Performance Fibers has collected storm
water samples both annually for analysis of conventional parameters and total toxic
organics (TTO) and semi-annually for conventional parameters. For the TTO analysis,
the only test result that was above detection limits was methylene chloride(75-09-2) in
Outfall 5 in 2010. The result was 3.6 ug/l. Every other annual sample analyzed or
Methylene Chloride was under the detection limit. We do not believe this result indicates
the presence of this substance in the outfall 5. For the conventional parameters, a 2009
stormwater sample at outfall C was 576 mg/L, which exceeded our benchmark of 100
mg/L. The next sample in 2010 was back below benchmark at 39 mg/L.
At outfall A, we had two consecutive samples for phosphorus that exceeded the
benchmark of 2.0 mg/L (2.4 (2nd half of 2012) and 3.1 (1St half of 2013)). We instituted
Tier II response for this exceedance and implemented monthly sampling as required by
our permit until we obtained 3 consecutive samples results below benchmarks (0.55, 0.55
and<0.05 mg/L).
At outfall B, we had one sample for phosphorus that exceeded the benchmark of 2.0
mg/L (2.9 (1St half of 2013)).
At outfall C, we had one sample for phosphorus that exceeded the benchmark of 2.0
mg/L (2.5 (1St half of 2013)). We also had three consecutive samples for pH that was out
of benchmark range (6-9 units) (1St and 2nd halves of 2012 and 1St half of 2013). We
instituted Tier II response for this exceedance and implemented monthly sampling as
required by our permit until we obtained 3 consecutive samples results within
benchmarks (6.1, 6.1 & 6.4 units).
At outfall D,we had two consecutive samples for phosphorus that exceeded the
benchmark of 2.0 mg/L (2.6 (2nd half of 2012) and 2.5 (1St half of 2013)). We instituted a
Tier II response for this exceedance and implemented monthly sampling as required by
our permit until we obtained 3 consecutive samples results below benchmarks (0.5775,
0.78 and< 0.05 mg/L).
At outfall 5, we had one sample for phosphorus that exceeded the benchmark of 2.0 mg/L
(2.1 (1St half of 2013)).
Flow
The average effluent(Outfall 001) flow has decreased from the 2008 permit renewal
period. The decrease has been caused by a reduction in production levels. The average
7401 STATESVILLE BLVD I SALISBURY , NC 28147 1 TEL 704 - 636 -6000
www.performancefibers.com

I Ie?T fl. ril Ila_ l-1t p
daily effluent flow for the past 4.5 years is 0.392 MGD (million gallons per day)
compared to a permit limit of 2.305 MGD.
Chronic Toxicity
The site is required to test the effluent (Outfall 001) for chronic toxicity 4 times per year
using ceriodaphnia dubia as the test organism. The permit requires no observable
inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality at an effluent concentration of 34
percent. There was one failure during the past 5 year cycle, in August 2009, followed by
17 consecutive passing tests.
IV. pH Adjustment
The effluent (Outfall 001) pH is adjusted during periods of high algae bloom in the
polishing ponds using sulfuric acid.
V. Copper Sulfate Addition
Copper sulfate is added to polishing ponds # 3 and #4 to control algae growth during the
warm summer months. This is shown on Figure 3.
VI. Yadkin/Pee Dee River Basin Association
The Salisbury site has been a member in good standing of the Yadkin Pee Dee River
Basin Association for the past 15+ years. The Salisbury site has agreed to membership
for the next 5 year NPDES cycle for the river basin. The DWQ memo verifying the site's
membership and waving the in -stream sampling requirements is attached in Attachment
B.
VII, Sludge Management Plan
Performance Fibers does not have a Sludge Management Plan. Waste biological sludge
is aerobically digested and dewatered. Dewatered solids are disposed of off site by
Waste Management in the local Rowan County Landfill.
VIII. Stormwater Outfall Sampling
The state has always allowed the site to collect Stormwater samples using grab sampling
techniques instead of composite samplers. The outfalls are located remote from the
7 4 0 1 STATESVILLE B L V D S A L I S B U R Y, NC 2 8 1 4 7 1 T E I. 7 0 4- 6 3 6- 6 0 0 0
www.performancefibers.com

manufacturing area where electrical power is not available. The Salisbury plant would
like to continue sampling the stormwater outfalls using grab samples.
IX. Additional Data
The Salisbury site will collect additional wastewater samples for Priority Pollutant
Analysis (PPA), to include with this application. When these additional samples have
been analyzed, we will submit a revision to EPA FORM 2C (Effluent Data) in
Attachment A.
X. Contact
If you have any questions or require additional information or additional analytical data,
please contact Marty Stewart at [phone] or
marty.stewart(a:performance tIbers.com.
Sincerely,
Richard L. Moore
Plant Manager
Enclosures:
Attachment A
— Permit Application
Attachment B
— DWQ Memo — Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin Association
Attachment C
— Analytical Data
7401 STATESVILLE BLVD I SALISBURY, NC 28147 1 TEI. 7 0 4 - 6 3 6 - 6 0 0 0
www.performancefibers.com

Attachment A
NPDES Permit Renewal Application
1l me] aU91

Please print or type in the unshaded areas only
fill-in areas are aced for elite type, i.e., 12 characterslnch . For Approved. OMB No. 2040-0086. Approval expires 5-31-92
FORM U.S.ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY I. EPA I.D. NUMBER
1 ��"/EPA GENERAL INFORMATION F NCD041043811 T,A R
Consolidated Permits Program
GENERAL Read the "General Instructions"before starting.) 1 2 13 14 115
LABEL ITEMS GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
I. EPA I.D. NUMBER If a preprinted label has been provided,
affix it in the designated space. Review the
information carefully; if any of it is
incorrect cross through it and enter the
III. FACILITY NAME correct data in the a propriate fill-in area
below.Also, if any of the preprinted data is
absent (the area to the left of the label
V. FACILITY PLEASE PLACE LABEL IN THIS SPACE space fists the information i tiin a pr should
appear) lease provide it in the proper fill-
MAILING LIST Ir are E.s�below. If the label is complete
and correct you need not complete Items
I, III,V, and VI(except VI-B which must be
completed regardless). Complete all items
VI. FACILITY if no label has been proved. Refer to the
LOCATION instructions for detailed item descriptions
and for the legal authorization under which
this data is collected.
II. POLLUTANT CHARACTERISTICS
INSTRUCTIONS: Complete A through J to determine whether you need to submit any permit application forms to the EPA. If you answer"yes"to any
questions,you must submit this form and the supplemental from listed in the parenthesis following the question.Mark"X"in the box in the third column if
the supplemental form is attached. If you answer"no"to each question,you need not submit any of these forms. You may answer"no"if your activity is
excluded from permit requirements;see Section C of the instructions.See also Section D of the instructions for definitions of bold-faced terms.
SPECIFIC QUESTIONS MARK"X" SPECIFIC SPECIFIC QUESTIONS MARK'X'
FORM,
YES NO ATTACHED YES NO ATTACHED
A. Is this facility a publicly owned treatment works B. Does or will this facility (either existing or
which results in a discharge to waters of the ❑ ® ❑ proposed) include a concentrated animal ❑ ® ❑
U.S.?(FORM 2A) feeding operation or aquatic animal
production facility which results in a discharge
16 17 19 1 to waters of the U.S.?(FORM 28) 19 20 21
C. Is this facility which currently results in ® ❑ ❑ O. Is this proposal facility other than those described El ® ❑
discharges to waters of the U.S. other than in A or B above)which will result in a discharge
those described in A or B above? FORM 2C 22 23 24 to waters of the U.S.? FORM 2D 25 26 27
E. Does or will this facility treat, store, or dispose of F. Do you or will you inject at this facility industrial or
hazardous wastes?(FORM 3) ❑ ® ❑ municipal effluent below the lowermost stratum ❑ ® ❑
containing, within one quarter mile of the well
bore, underground sources of drinking water
28 29 30 (FORM 4) 31 32 33
G. Do you or will you inject at this facility any H. Do you or will you inject at this facility uids for
produced water other fluids which are brought to special processes such as mining of sulfer by the
the surface in connection with conventional oil or ❑ ® ❑ Frasch process,solution mining of minerals,in ❑ ® ❑
natural gas production, inject fluids used for situ combustion of fossil fuel,or recovery of
enhanced recovery of oil or natural gas, or inject geothermal energy?(FORM 4)
fluids for storage of liquid hydrocarbons?
FORM34 35 36 37 38 39
4
I. Is this ility a proposed stationary source J. Is this facility a proposed stationary source
which is one of the 28 industrial categories listed which is NOT one of the 28 industrial categories
in the instructions and which will potentially emit ❑ ® ❑ listed in the instructions and which will potentially ❑ ® ❑
100 tons per year of any air pollutant regulated emit 250 tons per year of any air pollutant
under the Clean Air Act and may affect or be regulated under the Clean Air Act and may affect
located in an attainment area? FORM 5 40 1 41 42 or be located in an attainment are? FORM 5 43 44 45
III. NAME OF FACILITY
c SKIP Performance Fibers Operations, Inc.
1
15 116 29 30 69
IV. FACILITY CONTACT
A.NAME&TITLE last, first, &title B. PHONE area code&no.
2 Stewart, Marty, Regional Environmental Leader 704 642 2197
15 1 16 45 46 48 49 51 52 55
V. FACILITY MAILING ADDRESS
A.STREET OR P.O. BOX
3 7401 Statesville Blvd
15 16 45
B.CITY OR TOWN C.STATE D.ZIP CODE
c Salisbury NC 28147
4
15 16 40 1 41 42 47 51
VI. FACILITY LOCATION
A.STREET,ROUTE NO.OR OTHER SPECIFIC IDENTIFIER
5 7401 Statesville Blvd
15 1 16 45
B.COUNTY NAME
Rowan
46 70
C.CITY OR TOWN D.STATE E.ZIP CODE F.COUNTY CODE
C Salisbury NC 28147 015
15 1 16 40 41 42 47 51 52 54
EPA FORM 3510-1 (5-90) CONTINUED ON REVERSE

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
VII. SIC CODES (4-digit, in order ofpriority)
A. FIRST B.SECOND
c 2821 (specify) ' 2824 (specify)
5 16 17 Polyster Resin s Polyester Fiber
C.THIRD D.FOURTH
P15c (specify) 7 (specify)
7 7
16 171 15 116 19
VIII. OPERATOR INFORMATION
A.NAME B. Is the name listed in Item
c Performance Fibers Operations, Inc VIII-A also the owner?
8 ® YES [:]NO
18 1 19 55
C.STATUS OF OPERATOR Enter the appropriate letter into the answer box;if"Other,"specify.) D. PHONE area code&no.
F=FEDERAL M=PUBLIC(other than federal orstate) 17 (specify) A 704 636 6000
S=STATE O=OTHER(specify)
P=PRIVATE 56 15 16 18 19 21 22 25
E.STREET OR PO BOX
7401 Statesville Blvd
26 55
F.CITY OR TOWN G. STATE H.ZIP CODE IX. INDIAN LAND
c Salisbury NC 28147 Is the facility located on Indian lands?
B --- [:]YES ® NO
15 16 40 42 42 47 51
X. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS
A.NPDES(Discharges to Surface Water D.PSD Air Emissions from Proposed Sources)
s N ' NC 0004944 c P 8
15 1 16 1 17 1 18 30 15 16 1 17 1 18 30
B.UIC(Underground Injection of Fluids E.OTHER(specify) (Specify)
c T c T 8 03325-R44 Title V Air Permit
9 1 U 9
15 1 16 1 17 1 18 30 15 1 16 17 18 30
C. RCRA Hazardous Wastes E.OTHER(specify) (Specify)
9 R ' I NCD 041043811 9 T a
15 16 17 1 18 30 1 15 1 16 1 17 18 30
XI. MAP
Attach to this application a topographic map of the area extending to at least one mile beyond property boundaries. The map must
show the outline of the facility, the location of each of its existing and proposed intake and discharge structures, each of its
hazardous waste treatment, storage, or disposal facilities, and each well where it injects fluids underground. Include all springs,
rivers and other surface water bodies in the map area. See instructions for precise requirements.
XII. NATURE OF BUSINESS (provide a brief description)
Manufacturer of polyester resin and polyester fiber using polymer produced from terephthalic acid and ethylene
glycol,
XIII. CERTIFICATION see instructions
1 certify under penalty of law that i have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this application and
all attachments and that, based on my inquiry of those persons immediately responsible for obtaining the information contained in
the application, i believe that the information is true, accurate and complete. i am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibEof fine and imprisonment.
A. NAME&OFFICIAL TITLE(type orprint) B.SIGNATURE C.DATE SIGNED
Richard Moore, Plant Manager
COMMENTS FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYMilo
C
C
15 16 55
EPA FORM 3510-1(5-90)

Attachment A
NPDES Permit Renewal Application
EPA FORM 2C

EPA I.D.NUMBER(copyfromItem I of Form I) Form Approved.
NCD041043811 OMB No.2040-0086.
Please print or type in the unshaded areas only Approval expires 3-31-98.
FORM U.S.ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER
2C \8'/EPA EXISTING MANUFACTURING,COMMERCIAL,MINING AND SILVICULTURE OPERATIONS
NPDES Consolidated Permits Program
I.OUTFALL LOCATION
For each outfall,list the latitude and longitude of its location to the nearest 15 seconds and the name of the receiving water
A.OUTFALL NUMBER B.LATITUDE C.LONGITUDE
(list) 1.DEG. 2.MIN. 3.SEC. 1.DEG. 2.MIN. 3.SEC. D RECEIVING WATER(name)
001 35 42 40 80 36 10 N. Second Creek
II.FLOWS,SOURCES OF POLLUTION,AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
A. Attach a line drawing showing the water flow through the facility.Indicate sources of intake water,operations contributing wastewater to the effluent,and treatment units
labeled to correspond to the more detailed descriptions in Item B.Construct a water balance on the line drawing by showing average flows between intakes,operations,
treatment units,and outfalls. If a water balance cannot be determined(e.g.,for certain mining activities),provide a pictorial description of the nature and amount of any
sources of water and any collection or treatment measures.
B. For each outfall,provide a description of:(1)All operations contributing wastewater to the effluent, including process wastewater,sanitary wastewater,cooling water,
and storm water runoff; (2)The average flow contributed by each operation, and (3)The treatment received by the wastewater. Continue on additional sheets if
necessary.
1.OUT- 2.OPERATION(S)CONTRIBUTING FLOW 3.TREATMENT
FALL b.AVERAGE FLOW b.LIST CODES FROM
NO.(list) a.OPERATION(list) (include units) a.DESCRIPTION TABLE 2C-1
Sanitary Activated sludge Sedimentation
001 0.041 mgd 1-U 3-A
Finish Activated Sludge/Sedimentation
0.047 mgd 1-U 3-A
Boilers/Chillers Activate Sludge/Sedimentation
0.039 mgd 1-U 3-F:
Bandcasters 0.047 mgd Activated Sludge Sedimentation 1-11
Cooling Towers Activated Sludge/Sedimentation
0.079 mgd 1-U 3-A
Process Activated Sludge/Sedimentation
0.047 mgd 1-U 3-A
Groundwater 0 mgd Activated Sludge/Sedimentation 1-U 3-A
Stormwater Activated Sludge/Sedimentation OR Sedimentation
0.042 mgd Only 1-U 3-A
Wastewater Treatment Slowdown Activated Sludge/Sedimentation
��1 0.044 mgd 1-U 3-A
Tota] Outfall pool Activated Sludge/Sedimentation
0.390 mgd 1-U ?-A
OFFICIAL USE ONLY(effluent guidelines sub-categories)
EPA Form 3510-2C(8-90) PAGE 1 of 4 CONTINUE ON REVERSE

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
C.Except for storm runoff,leaks,or spills,are any of the discharges described in Items II-A or 8 intermittent or seasonal?
❑YES(complete the following table) 91 NO(go to Section 111)
3.FREQUENCY 4.FLOW
a-DAYS PER B.TOTAL VOLUME
2.OPERATION(s) WEEK b.MONTHS a.FLOW RATE(in mgd) (speck with units)
1.OUTFALL CONTRIBUTING FLOW (specify PER YEAR 1.LONG TERM 2.MAXIMUM 1_LONGTERM 2.MAXIMUM C.DURATION
NUMBER(list) (list) average) (.speed average) AVERAGE DAILY AVERAGE DAILY (in days)
NA NA
III.PRODUCTION
A.Does an effluent guideline limitation promulgated by EPA under Section 304 of the Clean Water Act apply to your facility?
W1 YES(complete Item 111-B) ❑NO(go to Section IV)
B.Are the limitations in the applicable effluent guideline expressed in terms of production(or other measure of operation)?
❑YES(complete Item 111-0 W]NO(go to Section 1V)
C. If you answered"yes'to Item III-B,list the quantity which represents an actual measurement of your level of production,expressed in the terms and units used in the
applicable effluent guideline,and indicate the affected outfalls.
1.AVERAGE DAILY PRODUCTION 2.AFFECTED OUTFALLS
a.QUANTITY PER DAY b.UNITS OF MEASURE c.OPERATION,PRODUCT,MATERIAL,ETC. (list outfall numbers)
(specify)
NA
IV.IMPROVEMENTS
A. Are you now required by any Federal, State or local authority to meet any implementation schedule for the construction, upgrading or operations of wastewater
treatment equipment or practices or any other environmental programs which may affect the discharges described in this application?This includes,but is not limited to,
permit conditions,administrative or enforcement orders,enforcement compliance schedule letters,stipulations,court orders,and grant or loan conditions.
❑YES(complete the following table) NO(go to Item IV--B)
1.IDENTIFICATION OF CONDITION, 2.AFFECTED OUTFALLS 3.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 4.FINAL COMPLIANCE DATE
AGREEMENT,ETC
a.NO b.SOURCE OF DISCHARGE a.REQUIRED b.PROJECTED
NA
B. OPTIONAL: You may attach additional sheets describing any additional water pollution control programs (or other environmental projects which may affect your
discharges)you now have underway or which you plan.Indicate whether each program is now underway or planned,and indicate your actual or planned schedules for
construction.
❑MARK"X'IF DESCRIPTION OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL PROGRAMS IS ATTACHED
EPA Form 3510-2C(8-90) PAGE 2 of 4 CONTINUE ON PAGE.<

EPA I.D.NUMBER(copyfromItem I of Form 1)
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2 NCD041043 811
V.INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
A,B,&C See instructions before proceeding—Complete one set of tables for each outfall—Annotate the outfall number in the space provided.
NOTE:Tables V-A,V-B,and V-C are included on separate sheets numbered V-1 through V-9.
D. Use the space below to list any of the pollutants listed in Table 2c-3 of the instructions,which you know or have reason to believe is discharged or may be discharged
from any outfall.For every pollutant you list,briefly describe the reasons you believe it to be present and report any analytical data in your possession.
1.POLLUTANT 2.SOURCE 1.POLLUTANT 2.SOURCE
NONE
VI.POTENTIAL DISCHARGES NOT COVERED BY ANALYSIS
Is any pollutant listed in Item V-C a substance or a component of a substance which you currently use or manufacture as an intermediate or final product or byproduct?
W]YES(list all such pollutants below) ❑NO(go w Item t7-B)
CHLOROFORM
EPA Form 3510-2C(8-90) PAGE 3 of 4 CONTINUE ON REVERSE

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
VII.BIOLOGICAL TOXICITY TESTING DATA
Do you have any knowledge or reason to believe that any biological test for acute or chronic toxicity has been made on any of your discharges or on a receiving water in
relation to your discharge within the last 3 years?
©YES(identify the test(s)and describe their purposes below) ❑NO(g,to Section Vila
Chronic Toxicity testing using Ceriodaphnia dubia is conducted quarterly in accordance with the NPDES Permit.
The criteria for a passing test is no observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality at 34%
effluent. Samples have been collected for toxicity testing during the following months and the results are
listed below:
Feb 2009 Pass
May 2009 Pass
Aug 2009 Fail
Sept2009 Pass
Oct 2009 Pass
Nov 2009 Pass
Feb 2010 Pass
May 2010 Pass
Aug 2010 Pass
Nov 2010 Pass
Feb 2011 Pass
May 2011 Pass
Aug 2011 Pass
Nov 2011 Pass
Feb 2012 Pass
May 2012 Pass
Aug 2012 Pass
Nov 2012 Pass
Feb 2013 Pass
May 2013 Pass
VIII.CONTRACT ANALYSIS INFORMATION
Were any of the analyses reported in Item V performed by a contract laboratory or consulting firm?
®YES(list the name,address,and telephone number of,and pollutants analyzed by, ❑NO(go to Section M
each such laboratory or firm below)
A.NAME B.ADDRESS C.TELEPHONE D.POLLUTANTS ANALYZED
(area code&no.) (list)
Statesville AnalyLlual 122 Court Street (7u4) 872-4691 O&G, TKN, BOD, NH3, Fecal
Statesville, NC 28677 Coliform, Copper, Priority
Pollutants, Total
Phosphorus
Pace Analytical Services 9800 Kincey Ave [phone] Bioassay, 0&G, TKN, BOD,
Suite 100 NH3, Fecal Coliform,
Huntersville, NC 28078 Copper, Priority
Pollutants, Total
Phosphorus
IX.CERTIFICATION
/certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel property gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information,the information submitted is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true,accurate,and complete./am aware that there
are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
A.NAME&OFFICIAL TITLE(type or print) B.PHONE NO.(area code&no.)
Richard L. Moore, Plant Manager (704) 636-6000
C.SIGNATURE D.DATE SIGNED
EPA Form 3510-2C(8-90) PAGE 4 of 4

Attachment A
NPDES Permit Renewal Application
Facility and Outfall Location
(Figure 1)

h �.
SCALE
1 • .f 111 • 1 1 1.
• _ . :1 1 ', .� 111 / • 1 1.1 1

V/
,Nk
\� ���. i -/ , �`• `.. � _..`a, SIJ �`._. , / !/� � '. � I�\ � .
0 X-1
50
9769
y�o
01-1
SW Outfall 5
N. –7
447
Zk
VN
SW Outfall C
7.
j'—v p 4 /A NPDES Outfall 001
rf
SW Outfall B
SW Outfall A
sw Outfall D
I/v 7. lip,
1 j 00 •
��-r'i,.. ,�' .....
ol
RZ5
>, C.
A
N
Facility Information
Facility
-atihidc 35'42'34" Sub-Basiu: 03-07-06 Location
"maitude: 80`34131"
)Iiad#: E16NE, Rowan Mills
;Irc;tui Class. C rPerfc->rnrizi"c4a Fibers.Receiving Stream; North Second Creek C3 C)C314 cP 1414
1 .11 . . . 0-I(IC ?..4f'T-%

Attachment A
NPDES Permit Renewal Application
EPA FORM 2C (Effluent Data)
Outfall 001

PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE IN THE UNSHADED AREAS ONLY.You may report some or all of this information EPA I.D.NUMBER(copyfrom Item 1 of Form 1)
on separate sheets(use the same format)instead of completing these pages. NCD04104 3 811
SEE INSTRUCTIONS.
V.INTAKE AND EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS(continued from page 3 of Form 2-C)
1TFALL NO
PART A-You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table.Complete one table for each outfall.See instructions for additional details.
3.UNITS 4.INTAKE
2.EFFLUENT (specifyifblank) (optional)
b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c.LONG TERM AVRG.VALUE a.LONG TERM
a.MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE (ifavailable) (ifavailable) AVERAGE VALUE
1.POLLUTANT (1) (1) d.NO.OF a.CONCEN- (1) b.NO.OF
CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS (1)CONCENTRATION (2)MASS ANALYSES TRATION b.MASS
CONCENTRATION (2)MASS ANALYSES
a.Biochemical
Oxygen
&OD
Demand 73 42 9.9 378 LB/DAY
b.Chemical Oxygen
Demand(COD)
c.Total Organic Carbon
(TOC)
d.Total Suspended 246 108 31 611
Solids(TSS) LB/DAY
e.Ammonia(as N) 77 77 1.8 87 LB/DAY
VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE
f.Flow 1.189 0.601 0.392 1642 MGD
g.Temperature VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE
(winter) f - - 1 °C
h.Temperature VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE
(summer) - - - 1 °C
MINIMUM MAXIMUM MINIMUM MAXIMUM
i.pH 6.4 8.8 6.4 8.8 700 STANDARD UNITS
PART B- Mark"X"in column 2-a for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present.Mark"X"in column 2-b for each pollutant you believe to be absent.If you mark column 2a for any pollutant which is limited either
directly, or indirectly but expressly, in an effluent limitations guideline, you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant. For other pollutants for which you mark column 2a, you must provide
quantitative data or an explanation of their presence in your discharge.Complete one table for each outfall.See the instructions for additional details and requirements.
2.MARK"X" 3.EFFLUENT 4.UNITS 5.INTAKE(optional)
1.POLLUTANT b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c.LONG TERM AVRG.VALUE a.LONG TERM AVERAGE
AND a b. a.MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE
(
CAS NO. BELIEVED BELIEVED ifavailable) (ifavailable) d.NO.OF a.CONCEN- b.NO.OF
(2)MASS ANALYSES TRATION b.MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS ANALYSES
VALUE
(ifavailable) PRESENT ABSENT (1) (1) (1) (1)
CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION
a.Bromide
(24959-67-9)
b.Chlorine.Total XResidual
c.Color X
d.Fecal Coliform X
240 74 14.4 232 LB/100ML
e.Fluoride �/
(16984-48-8) X
f.Nitrate-Nitrite X(as N)
EPA Form 3510-2C(8-90) PAGE V-1 CONTINUE ON REVERSE

ITEM V-B CONTINUED FROM FRONT
2.MARK"X" 3.EFFLUENT 4.UNITS 5.INTAKE(optional)
1.POLLUTANT b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c.LONGTERM AVRG.VALUE a.LONG TERM
AND a b. a.MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE (ifavailable) (ifavailable) AVERAGE VALUE
CAS NO. BELIEVED BELIEVED (t) (t) (1) d.NO.OF a.CONCEN- b.NO.OF
(ifavailable) PRESENT ABSENT CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS ANALYSES TRATION b.MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS ANALYSES
g.Nitrogen, \ /
Total Organic(as X 2.3 2.3 1.5 21 LB/D
N) / \
h.Oil and
Grease
i.Phosphorus
(as P),Totalu 0.9 0.9 0.5 21 LB/D
(7723-14-0)
j.Radioactivity
(1)Alpha,Total `X
(2)Beta,Total X
(3)Radium, ,x\/`
Total
(4)Radium 226, v
Total
k.Sulfate
(as SO.)
(14808-79-8)
I.Sulfide \/
(as S) x
m.Sulfite
(-SO,)
(14265-45-3)
n.Surfactants X
o.Aluminum,
Total X
(7429-90-5)
p.Barium,Total
(7440-39-3)
q.Boron,Total
(7440-42-8)
r.Cobalt,Total x(74408 4)
s.Iron,Total 0.8 0.8 0.4 19 MG/L
(7439-89-6)
t.Magnesium,
Total X
(7439-95-4)
u.Molybdenum,
Total X
(7439-98-7)
v.Manganese,
Total 0.25 0.25 0.11 19 MG/L
(7439-96-5)
w.Tin,Total
(7440-31-5)
x.Titanium,
Total
(7440-32-6)
EPA Form 3510-2C(8-90) PAGE V-2 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-3

EPA I.D.NUMBER(copy from Item I ojForm 1) OUTFALL NUMBER
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 3 OF FORM 2-C NCD041043811 001
PART C- If you are a primary industry and this outfall contains process wastewater,refer to Table 2c-2 in the instructions to determine which of the GCIMS fractions you must test for.Mark"X"in column 2-a for all such GCIMS
fractions that apply to your industry and for ALL toxic metals,cyanides,and total phenols. If you are not required to mark column 2-a(secondary industries, nonprocess wastewater outfalls, and nonrequired GCIMS
fractions), mark"X"in column 2-b for each pollutant you know or have reason to believe is present.Mark"X"in column 2-c for each pollutant you believe is absent.If you mark column 2a for any pollutant,you must
provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant.If you mark column 2b for any pollutant,you must provide the results of at least one analysis for that pollutant if you know or have reason to believe it will be
discharged in concentrations of 10 ppb or greater.If you mark column 2b for acrolein,acrylonitrile,2,4 dinitrophenol,or 2-methyl-4,6 dinitrophenol,you must provide the results of at least one analysis for each of these
pollutants which you know or have reason to believe that you discharge in concentrations of 100 ppb or greater.Otherwise,for pollutants for which you mark column 2b,you must either submit at least one analysis or
briefly describe the reasons the pollutant is expected to be discharged. Note that there are 7 pages to this part; please review each carefully. Complete one table(all 7 pages)for each outfall.See instructions for
additional details and requirements.
2.MARK"X" 3.EFFLUENT 4.UNITS 5.INTAKE(optional)
1.POLLUTANT b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c.LONG TERM AVRG. a.LONG TERM
AND a. b. C. a.MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE (if available) VALUE(ijavailable) AVERAGE VALUE
CAS NUMBER TESTING BELIEVED BELIEVED (1) (1) (1) d.NO.OF a.CONCEN- (1) b.NO.OF
(ifavailable) REQUIRED PRESENT ABSENT CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS ANALYSES TRATION b.MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS ANALYSES
METALS,CYANIDE,AND TOTAL PHENOLS
1M.Antimony,Total �/
(7440-36-0) X
2M.Arsenic,Total \/
(7440-38-2) X
3M.Beryllium,Total v
(7440-41-7)
4M.Cadmium,Total
(7440-43-9)
5M.Chromium, X\/
Total(7440-47-3)
6M.Copper,Total
(7440-50-8) 0.06 0.06 0.02 17 MG/L
7M.Lead,Total
(7439-92-1)
8M.Mercury,Total �/
(7439-97-6) X
9M.Nickel,Total �/
(7440-02-0) X
10M.Selenium, �/
Total(7782-49-2) X
11 M.Silver,Total v
(7440-22-4)
12M.Thallium, v
Total(7440-28-0)
13M.Zinc,Total v
(7440-66-6)
14M.Cyanide, v
Total(57-12-5)
15M.Phenols, lb/da
Total 3 8 5 y
DIOXIN
2,3,7,8-Tetra- \ / DESCRIBE RESULTS
chlorodibenzo-P- /X\
Dioxin(1764-01-6)
EPA Form 3510-2C(8-90) PAGE V-3 CONTINUE ON REVERSE

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
2.MARK W 3.EFFLUENT 4.UNITS 5.INTAKE(optional)
1.POLLUTANT b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c.LONGTERM AVRG. a.LONG TERM
AND a. b. C. a.MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE (ijavailable) VALUE(ifavailable) AVERAGE VALUE
CAS NUMBER TESTING BELIEVED BELIEVED (1) (1) (1) d.NO.OF a.CONCEN- (1) b.NO.OF
(ifavailable) REQUIRED PRESENT ABSENT CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS ANALYSES TRATION b.MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS ANALYSES
GC/MS FRACTION—VOLATILE COMPOUNDS
1V.Accrolein �/
(107-02-8) x
2V.Acrylonitrile < 5 5 UG/L
(107-13-1)
3V.Benzene v < 8 5 LB/DAY
(71.43-2)
4V.yl)(Chloro- \ /
methn Ether /X\
(542-88-1)
5V.Bromoform �/
(75-25-2) x
6V.Carbon
Tetrachloride x 5 LB/DAY
(56-23-5)
7V.Chlorobenzene
(108-90-7) x�/ < 8 5 LB/DAY
bro om.t di- `
bromomethane X
(124-48-1)
9V.Chloroethane v
(75-00-3) ^ < 8 5 LB/DAY
1OV.lvinyl the
ro-
ethylvinyl Ether
(110-75-8)
11 V.Chloroform
(67-66-3) < 8 5 LB/DAY
Dichloro-
bro
bromomethane
(75-27-4)
13V.Dichloro-
difluoromethane X
(75-71-8)
14V.1,1-Dichloro- xethane(75-34-3)
15V.1,2-Dichloro-
ethane(107-06-2) < 8 5 LB/DAY
16V.1,1-Dichloro-
ethylene(75-35-4)
^ < 8 5 LB/DAY
17V.1,2-Dichloro- v
propane(78-87-5) ^ < 2 5 UG/L
18V.1,3-Dichloro-
\ /
propylene X < 8 5 LB/DAY
(542-75-6)
19V.Ethylbenzene \/ < 8 5 LB/DAY
x
(100-41-4)
20V.Methyl v
Bromide(74-83-9)
21 V.Meth /
Chloride(74-87-3)
< 8 5 LB DAY
EPA Form 3510-2C(8-90) PAGE V4 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-5

CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-4
2.MARK"X" 3.EFFLUENT 4.UNITS 5.INTAKE(optional)
1.POLLUTANT b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE C.LONG TERM AVRG. a.LONG TERM
AND a. b. C. a.MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE (ifavailable) VALUE(ifavailable) AVERAGE VALUE
CAS NUMBER TESTING BELIEVED BELIEVED (1) (1) (1) d.N0.OF a.CONCEN- (1) b.NO.OF
(ifavailable) REQUIRED PRESENT ABSENT CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS ANALYSES TRATION b.MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS ANALYSES
GC/MS FRACTION—VOLATILE COMPOUNDS(continued)
22V.Methylene
Chloride(75-09-2) x ` 8 5 LB/DAY
Tetrachloroethane X
79-345
24V.Tetrachloro- < 8 5 LB/DAY
ethylene(127-18-4)
25V.Toluene < 2 5 UG/L
(108-88-3)
26V.1,2-Trans- ` '
Dichloroethylene X
156-60-5
27V.1,11-Trichloro- xethane(71-55-6)
28V.1,1,2-Trichloro- �/ < 8 5 LB/DAY
ethane(79-00-5) x
29V Trichloro-
ethylene(79-01-6) 8 5 LB/DAY
fluor.Trichloro-
fluoromethane fluoromethane /�(\
75-69-4
31V.Vinyl Chloride
(75-01-4) < 8 5 LB/DAY
x I I I I I I
GC/MS FRACTION—ACID COMPOUNDS
IA.
(95-52-Chlorophenol �/ < 38 5 LB/DAY
2A.2,4-Dichloro- /�\ < 8 5 LB/DAY
phenol(120-83-2)
3A.2,4-Dimethyl- < 38 5 LB/DAY
phenol(105-67-9)
4A.4,6-Dinitro-0-
Cresol(534-52-1) ` 38 5 LB/DAY
5A.2,4-Dinitro- < 38 5 LB/DAY
phenol(51-28-5)
6A.2-Nitrophenol �/ < 38 5 LB/DAY
(88-75-5) x
7A.4-Nitrophenol
(100-02-7) < 38 5 LB/DAY
8A.P-Chloro-M- x\/
Cresol(59-50.7)
9A.Pentachloro-
phenol(87-86-5)
10A.Phenol < 38 5 LB/DAY
(108-95-2)
11A.2,4,6-Trichloro-
phenol(88-05-2) x
EPA Form 3510-2C(8-90) PAGE V-5 CONTINUE ON REVERSE

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
2.MARK"X" 3.EFFLUENT 4.UNITS 5.INTAKE(optional)
1.POLLUTANT b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c.LONG TERM AVRG. a.LONG TERM
AND a. b. C. a.MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE (ifavailable) VALUE(ifavailable) AVERAGE VALUE
CAS NUMBER TESTING BELIEVED BELIEVED (1) (1) (1) d.NO.OF a.CONCEN- (1) b.NO.OF
(ifavailable) REQUIRED PRESENT ABSENT CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS ANALYSES TRATION b.MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS ANALYSES
GC/MS FRACTION—BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS
1B.Acenaphthene �/ < 38 5 LB/DAY
x
(83-32-9)
2B.Acenaphtylene
(208-96-8) < 38 5 LB/DAY
3B.Anthracene
(120.12.7) < 38 5 LB.DAY
4B.Benzidine �/
(92-87-5) x
5B.Benzo(a)
Anthracene < 10
5 MG/L
(56-55-3)
6B.Benzo(a)
Pyrene(50-32-8) < 10 5 MG/L
7B.3,4-Benzo-
fluoranthene < 10
5 MG/L
(205-99-2)
88.Benzo(ghi) �/
Perylene(191-24-2) x
9B.Benzo(k)
Fluoranthene
(207-08-9)
10B.Bis(2-Chloro-
ethoxy)Methane
(111-91-1)
11 B.Bis(2-Chloro-
ethyl)Ether �/
(111-44.4) x
12B.Bis(2-
Chloroisopropyl)
Ether(102-80-1)
13B.Bis(2-Ethyl-
hexyl)Phthalate x(117-81-7)
14B.4-Bromophenyl
Phenyl Ether �/
(101-55-3) x
15B.Butyl Benzyl \/
Phthalate(85-68-7) x
16B.2-Chloro-
naphthalene
(91-58-7)
17B.4-Chloro-
phenyl Phenyl Ether �/
(7005-72-3) x
18B.Chrysene < 10 5 MG/L
(218-01-9)
19B.Dibenzo(a,h)
Anthracene �/
(53-70-3) x
benze a(95- 0-1 x < 8 5 LB/DAY
benzene(95-50-1) /�
21B.1.3-Di-chloro-
benzene(541-73-1) < 8 5 LB/DAY
EPA Form 3510-2C(8-90) PAGE V-6 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-7

CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-6
2.MARK"X" 3.EFFLUENT 4.UNITS 5.INTAKE(optional)
1.POLLUTANT b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c.LONG TERM AVRG. a.LONG TERM
AND a. b. F
a.MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE (ifavailable) VALUE(ifavailable) AVERAGE VALUE
CAS NUMBER TESTING BELIEVED (1) (1) (1) d.NO.OF a.CONCEN- (1) b.NO.OF
(if available) REQUIRED PRESENT CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS ANALYSES TRATION b.MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS ANALYSES
GC/MS FRACTION—BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS(continued)
22B.1,4-Dichloro-
benzene(106-46-7) < 8 5 lb/day
238.3,3-Dichioro-
benzidine(91-94-1)
24B.Diethyl
Phthalate(84-66-2) < 38 5 lb/day
25B.Dimethyl
Phthalate < 38 5 lb/day
(131-11-3)
26B.Di-N-Butyl
Phthalate(84-74-2) < 38 5 lb/day
27B.2,4-Dinitro-
toluene(121-14-2) < 38 5 lb/day
288.2,6-Dinitro- xtoluene(606-20-2)
29B.Di-N-Octyl
Phthalate(117-84-0)
30B.1,2-Diphenyl-
hydrazine(as Azo-
benzene)(122-66-7)
31B.Fluoranthene
(206-44-0) < 38 5 lb/day
32B.Fluorene
(86-73-7) < 38 5 lb/day
33B.Hexachloro-
benzene(118-74-1) 10 5 lb/day
34B.Hexachioro-
butadiene(87-68-3) 38 5 lb/day
Hexachloro-
cyclopentadiene
(77-47-4)
36B Hexachloro-
ethane(67-72-1) < 38 5 lb/day
37B.Indeno
(1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
(193-39-5)
38B.Isophorone
(78-59-1)
39B.Naphthalene
(91-20-3) < 38 5 lb/day
40B.Nitrobenzene
(98-95-3) < 38 5 lb/day
41 B.N-Nitro-
sodimethylamine
(62-75-9)
42B.N-Nitrosodi-
N-Propytamine
(621-647)
EPA Form 3510-2C(8-90) PAGE V-7 CONTINUE ON REVERSE

CONTINUED FROM THE FRONT
2.MARK"X" 3.EFFLUENT 4.UNITS 5.INTAKE(optional)
1.POLLUTANT b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c.LONG TERM AVRG. a.LONG TERM
AND a. b_ C. a.MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE (ifavailable) VALUE(ifavailable) AVERAGE VALUE
CAS NUMBER TESTING BELIEVED BELIEVED (t) (1) (1) d.NO.OF a.CONCEN- (1) b.NO.OF
(ifavailable) REQUIRED PRESENT ABSENT CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS ANALYSES TRATION b.MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS ANALYSES
GC/MS FRACTION—BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS(continued)
43B.N-Nitro-
sodiphenylamine
(86-30-6)
44B.Phenanthrene
(85-01-8) x < 38 5 lb/day
Pyrene
(129-00-0) v < 38 5 lb/day,
(129
468.1,2,4-TO- lb/day
(120-82-1) < 8 5 lb/day
GC/MS FRACTION—PESTICIDES
1P.Aldrin x(309-00-2)
2P.a-BHC v
(319-846)
3P.p-BHC \/
(319-85-7) x
4P.y-BHC v
(58-89-9)
5P.&BHC �/
(319-86-8) x
6P,Chlordane �/
(57-749) x
7P.4,4'-DDT \/
(50-29-3) x
8P.4,4'-DDE v
(72-55-9)
9P.4,4'-DDD v
(72-54-8)
1OP.Dieldrin
(60-57-1)
11 P.a-EnosuNan \�
(115-29-7) x
12P.p-Endosulfan
(115-29-7)
13P.Endosulfan
Sulfate X
(1031-07-8)
14P.Endrin \/
(72-20-8) x
15P.Endrin
Aldehyde
(7421-93-4)
16P.Heptachlor \/
(76-44-8) x
EPA Form 3510-2C(8-90) PAGE V-8 CONTINUE ON PAGE V-9

EPA I.D.NUMBER(copyfromItem I of Form 1) OUTFALL NUMBER
CONTINUED FROM PAGE V-8 NCD0410043811 001
2.MARK"X" 3.EFFLUENT 4.UNITS 5.INTAKE(optional)
1.POLLUTANT b.MAXIMUM 30 DAY VALUE c.LONG TERM AVRG. a.LONGTERM
AND a. b. C. a.MAXIMUM DAILY VALUE (ifavailable) VALUE(ifavailable) AVERAGE VALUE
CAS NUMBER TESTING BELIEVED BELIEVED (1) (1) (1) d.NO.OF a.CONCEN- (1) TANALYSES
OF
(ifavailable) REQUIRED PRESENT ABSENT CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MASS ANALYSES TRATION b.MASS CONCENTRATION (2)MAS
GC/MS FRACTION—PESTICIDES(continued)
17P.Heptachlor ` '
Epoxide X
(1024-57-3)
18P.PCB-1242 v
(53469-21-9)
19P.PCB-1254 \/
(11097-69-1) x
20P.PCB-1221 \/
(11104 x
28-2)
21 P.PCB-1232 \/
(11141-16-5) x
22P.PCB-1248 \�
(12672-29-6) x
23P.PCB-1260 \�
(11096-82-5) x
24P.PCB-1016
(12674-11-2)
25P.Toxaphene \/
(8001-35-2) x
EPA Form 3510-2C(8-90) PAGE V-9

Attachment A
NPDES Permit Renewal Application
EPA FORM 2F (Stormwater)
Outfall A
Outfall B
Outfall C
Outfall D
Outfall 5

EPA ID Number (copy from Item 1 of Form 1) Form Approved. OMB No.2040-0086
Please print or type in the unshaded areas only Approval expires 5-31-92
Form United States Environmental Protection Agency
Washington,DC 20460
2F AN PA Application for Permit to Discharge Storm Water
NPDES V� Dischar es Associated with Industrial Activity
Paperwork Reduction Act Notice
Public reporting burden for this application is estimated to average 28.6 hours per application, including time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,gathering and maintaining the data needed,and completing and reviewing the collection of information.Send
comments regarding the burden estimate,any other aspect of this collection of information,or suggestions for improving this form,including
suggestions which may increase or reduce this burden to:Chief,Information Policy Branch,PM-223,U S.Environmental Protection Agency,401
MR,SW,Washington,DC 20460,or Director,Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,Office of Management and Budget,Washington,DC
20503.
I. Outfall Location
For each outfai!,list the latitude and lon Itude of its location to the nearest 15 seconds and the name of the receivinq water.
A.Outfall Number D.Receiving Water
ist) B.Latitude C.i-on itude name
ll. Improvements
A Are you now required by any Federal, State, or local authority to meet any implementation schedule for the construction, upgrading or
operation of wastewater treatment equipment or practices or any other environmental programs which may affect the discharges described
in this application?This includes, but is not limited to,permit conditions, administrative or,enforcement orders,enforcement compliance
schedule letters,stipulations,court orders,and grant or ioan conditions.
4.Final
1.Identification of Conditions, 2.Affected Outfalls Com fiance Date
Agreements,Etc. number source of discharge 3.Brief Description of Project a.req. b:pro'.
B. You may attach additional sheets describing any additional water pollution (or other environmental projects which may affect your
discharges)you now have under way or which you plan. Indicate whether each program is now under way or planned,and indicate your
actual or planned schedules for construction.
III, Site Drainage Ma
Attach a site map showing topography (or indicating the outline of drainage areas served by the outfall(s) covered in the application if a
topographic map is unavailable)depicting the facility including: each of its intake and discharge structures; the drainage area of each storm
water ouffall;paved areas and buildings within the drainage area of each storm water outfall,each known past or present areas used for outdoor
storage or disposal of significant materials,each existing structural control measure to reduce pollutants in storm water runoff,materials loading
and access areas, areas where pesticides, herbicides, soil conditioners and fertilizers are applied; each of its hazardous waste treatment,
storage or disposal units (including each area not required to have a RCRA permit which is used for accumulating hazardous waste under 40
CFR 262.34); each well where fluids from the facility are injected underground; springs, and other surface water bodies which receive storm
water discharges from the facil'
EPA Form 3510-2F(Rev. 1-92) Page 1 of 3 Continue on Page 2

E e09d uo enuRu000 £w Z egad (ZB-t'Aeti) dZ-OI,9£w,od Vd3
•peseelej leuetew;o tunoum pus edf4 e4;pus'xeel ro I!Ids e4t;o uopsool pus step etewlxoidde otp Bulpnloul'smeA
eeitp 3s91 ap u!Atlllo9;eta m swwtnllod snopnazey jo olxoi W s!llds jo nivel tueog!uBp w tiols14 941 Bu!pmBei uopew)o;ul Bu!tslxe epptad
SIR S Jo s)(e®-1 3 OONNU !S IA
3se3 a Buunp pen�esgo Apoa�!p eJeM 3943 s;u!od eBeure�p eusuo e4;pus'Bupsel�us;o step e4;'pesn po4;ew ma;o uo!;d!iosop a ep!noUd °8
peuBlg etva erntauB!g (tulid to ed94 ep11 l9p!Bo PUB eweN
I[Bgno OLA X4 U0110011008
3Z wxid to x wjod BuutuedtL000s us Jetple u! peypuep! ens (s)llsano ese4t woq sesisIp J949MtW03suou 119 mw pue 'se3rlla8lP
Jetvmt uotsuou;o eoueseid e4i 1o;petsnlene jo petset ueeg enw4 uop9olldde s!4t Aq pejenoors)sllepno e4t 3941 Melo kleued iepun/4!tjeo I y
380,1840310 JOIVMWJOISUON •n
tuo>j s9PoJ Asn Mao 94mm ping 35 1191�n0
fouiuoo�o;eoueuewlgw w edf4 pus elnpeyos e4t Bulpnpul'senleoe�leteM wuojs eyt wettgeeu e4t uo!tduosep s pue:�ouru joMm tuiots
ul stustnllod eonper oq seinseew loAuoo lemton�tsuou pue junta Bupspce W uopduosep B Pus uopBool 843 epina glogno yore jod °0
poildde err sjezllgjo;pus lwouoplpuoo I!os'sspp!gi94'seplagsed 4o!4M ul bauenbei;pue
'aeuuew'uopeoo�l eta pus !9wie sseoos pus Bulpeol sieuegew*unr Jetwm wrogs talM slauetww esgq Aq intuoo ezlwlulw of psAoldwe
seopowd iuewoOmmw sleue;ew wese,d pus teed:lesods!p jo'eBa,ow'tuewpe
tesq;o potw :,ewm wod
ags of ejnsxe Molle of,euuew
s ul pesodslp jo perots'PORM4 us"ene4 woad owLp tasd 94t ul 10 Aaueuno ens 3943 slwuetwtu weoyluB!e;o uogdubsep enpsusu a opPM)Jd '8
peul9Kp Bend Rol eoepng snolaedwl;o eeiq Iwo Peuls.tp VON 1%01 eospnS snopuedwl;o e9iV llew o
of peu!eap(stow BulPlinq PUB assns nwd Bu! n u seas ng ,Iletin e4t�Sq peu!eip were eos}jns istot 94t jo etwwpss ue PUB IIIBano e4t
pe p p }� snoVuedw!;o(atlun epnpuo eels e4t;o etewgse us epinad'Ileano tpee iod y
tuoJd 044 wa;penultuop

EPA ID Continued from Page 2 Number (copy from Item l of Form T)
VIL Discharge Information
A,B,C,&D: See instructions before proceeding.Complete one set of tables for each outfall.Annotate the outfall number in the space provided.
Tables VII- VII-13,and VII-C are included on separate sheets numbered VII-1 and W-2.
E: Potential discharges not covered by analysis-is any toxic pollutant listed in table 2F-2,2F-3 or 2F-4,a substance or a componant of a substance
which you currently use or manufacture as an intermediate or final product or byproduct?
ED Yes ist all such pollutants below No oto SectionDO
VIII. Biological Toxicity-Testing Data
Do you have any knowledge or reason to believe that any biological test for acute or chronic toxicity has been made on any of your discharges or
on a receiving water in relation to your discharge within the last 3 years?
Yes Oist all such pollutants below) No o to Section
IX,Contract Analysis Information
Were any of the analysis reported in item Vil performed by a contract laboratory or consulting firm?
DYes(list the name, address, and telephone number of, and pollutants No (go to Section)Q
A.Name B.Address C.Area Code&Phone No. D.Pollutants Anal ed
X. Certoficat"on
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate
the Information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information, the Information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, true, accurate, and complete. 1 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.
A.Name&Official Title(type or print) B.Area Code and Phone No.
C.Signature D.Date Signed
Page 3 of 3
EPA Form 3510-2F(Rev. 1-92)

EPA ID Number (Dopy from!teem I of Form 1) Form Approved. OMB No.2040.0086
Approval expires "I-2
VII.Discha `e nformat on (Continued e 3 oform 2
Part A- You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table. Complete one table for each outfall. See
inWucdons for additional details.
Maximum Values Average Values Number
Pollutant (include units) onclude units) of
and (arab Sample Grab Sample Storm
CAS Number Takan During Flow-weighted Taken During Flow-vwighted Events
First 20 First 20
(if available) Minutes Composite Minutes Composite Sampled Sources of Pollutants
al and Grease _ NSA '
Blologioal Oxygen
Demand BODS
Chemical Oxygen
Demand COD
Total Suspended
Solids SS
Total
Nitrogen
Total
Phosphorus
H Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum
Part 3- Ust each pollutant that Is limited in an effluent guideline which the facifity Is suboct to or any pollutant listed in the facility's NPOES
permit for its process wastewater(Ifthe facil is operating under an existing NPDES permit).Complete one table for each outfall.See
lotions few Aeld—g- *mants.
Maximum Values Average Values Number
Pollutant (include units) (include units) of
WW Grab Sample Grab Semple Storm
CAS Number Taken During Flow weighted Taken t 2 ng Flow-weighted Events
First 20 First 2D
(if available) Minutes Composite Minutes Composite Sampled Sources of Pollutants
EPA Form 5510-2F (Rev.1-92) Page VII-1 Continue on Reverse

Continued from the Front
Part C- Ust each pollutant shown In Tables 2F-2,2F-%and 2F-4 that you know or have reason to believe is present.See the Instructions for
additional details and requirements.Complete one table for each outfall.
Maximum Values Average Values Number
Pollutant (innoiude units) (include uMta) of
and Grab Sample Grab Sample Storm
CAS Number Taken During FkxN-rwightsd Taken During Flow.,weighted Events
First Za First 20
(if available) Minutes Composite Minutes Compoeft Sampled Sources of Pollutants
Part D- Provide data for the storm evert which resulted in the maximum values for the flow weighted oompoaftft sam le.
1. 2. & 4. 5. 6.
Date of Duration Total rainfall Number of hours between Maximum flow rate during Total flow from
Storm of Storm Event during storm event beginning of storm meas- rain event rain event
ured and and of previous (gallons&minute or
Event On minutes) inches measurable rain evert specWunits (gallons or speoW unHs
f _
i
7. Provide a description of the method of flow measurement or estimate.
EPA Form 3t3it)-2F (Rev.1-92) Page VII-2

EPA ID Number (copy from Nem I of Form 1) Form Approved. OMB No.20400086
Approval expires 5-31-92
VII.Discharce nformat on ntfnued from Me 3 of Form 2
Part A- You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table. Complete one table for each outfall. See
Instruclons for additional details.
Maximum Values Average Values Number
Pollutant (include units) (include units) of
and Grab SampleGrab Sam Storm
CAS Number
Taken First 20 Flow-weighted T First 2200 nD Fkw-"ghted Events
(if available) Minutes Composite Minutes Composite Sampled Sources of Pollutants
Oil and Grease N/A
Biologioal Oxygen
Demand BODS
Chemical Oxygen
Demand COD
Total Suspended
Solids SS
Total
Nitrogen
Total
Phosphorus
H Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum
Part - st each pollutant that s limited n an effluent gu aline i the f subject to or an latent listed in • Iity's N E
permit for Its=wastewater the faciI is operating under an existing NPDES permit).Complete one table for each outfall.See
Maximum Values Average Values Number
Pollutant (include units) (include units) of
and Grab Sample GrabSample Storm
CAS Number Taken During Flow-w* d Taken During Flow-weighted Events
First 20 First 20
(ifavallable) Minutes Composite Minutes Composite Sampled SouroesofPollutants
i
EPA Form 3510-2F (Res.1-92) Page V11-1 Continue on Reverse

Continued from the Front
FC
t each pollutant shown in Tables 2F-2,2FA and 2F.4 that you know or have reason to believe is present See the Instructions for`
ditlonal details and requirements.Complete one table for each outfall.
MaximumValues Average Values Number
(include units) pnoludtr union) of
an (crab Sample Grab Sample Storm
Taken During Taken During
CAS Number first 2D Flow-weighted first 2D Fkyw�rsiphted Events
(If available) Minutes Composite Minutes Composite Sampled Sources of Pollutants
Part D- Provide data for the storm everts which resulted in the maximum values for the flow weighted oomposite nam le..
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Date of Duration Total rainfafl Number of hours between Maximum flow rate during Total flow from
Storm of Storm Event during storm event beginning of storm meas- rain event rain event
ured and end of previous (galk nV!Tilnute or
Event in minutes) an inches measurable rain event speeffy units (gallons or sp units
_ l
7. Provide a description of the method of flow measurement or estimate.
EPA Form SM&ill (Rev.1-92) Page VII-2

EPA ID Number (copy from item 1 of Form 1) Form Approved. OMB No.20440096
Approval expires 5-31412
VII.Discharcie Inficiffmat On (Continued m Dace 3 oform 2
Part A- You must provide the results of at least one analysis for wary pollutant in this table. Complete one table for each outfall. See
Instructions for additional details.
Maximum Values Average Values Number
Pollutant (include units) (include units) of
and Grab Sample Grab Sample Stone
CAS Number Taken During Flow-"g hied Taken During
First 20 g Fret 20 Flow-weighted Events
(if available) Minutes Composite Minutes Composite Sampled Sources of Pollutants
L
and Grease N/A
ogical Oxygen
and OD5
Chemical Oxygen
Demand OD
Total Suspended
Solids SS
Total
Nitrogen
Total
Phosphorus
pH Minimum Maximum _ Minimum Maximum
Part 13- Ust each pollutant thatIs limited in an effluent guideline whi0i the faollity Is subod to or any pollutant listed In ft fadlitys NPOES
peI'm it for its prooess wastewater Of the facil Is operating under an existing NPDES permit).Complete one table for each outfall.See
�Hona for additional details mid ran-
Maximum Values Average Values Number
Pollutant (include units) (include unit) of
and Crab Sample Grab Sample Storm
Taken During CAS Number First 20 Flow-wreighted Take
First 20 How-wwighted Events
(if available) Minutes Composite Minutes Composite Sampledi Sources of Pollutants
EPA Form 3510-2F (Rev.1-92) Page VII-1 Continue on Reverse

Continued from the front
Fadditional
t each pollutant shown In Tables 2F-2,2F-3,and 2F-4 that you know or have mason to believe is present.Sea the instructions for`
details and requirements.Complete one table for each outfall.
Maximum Values Average Values Number
(Induds units) ¢nclude units) of
13rab Sample Grab Sampple Storm
CAS Number Taken During Flow-weighted Taken During Flow-weighted Events
ret
F 20 First 20
(Navailable) Minutes Composite Minutes ODMPPO" pled Souroes of Pollutants
7.
PartD- Provide data for the storm events which resulted in the maximum values for the flow weighted oom site mple..
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Date of Duration Total rainfall Number of hours between Maximum flow rate during Total flow from
Storm of Storm Event during storm event beginning of storm meas- rain event rain event
ured and and of previous (gaiions(minute or
Event in minutes) on inches measurable rain event apeft unite (gallons or specW units
7. Provide a description of the method of flow measurement or estimate.
EPA Form 35104F (Rev.1-92) Page VII-2

EPA ID Number (copy from them I of Form 1) Form Approved. OMB No.2040MM
5 Approval expires 531.82
VII.DIscharce I nformatlon ntmu m 3 of Form 2
Part A- You must provide the results of at least one analysis for every pollutant in this table. Complete one table for each outfall. See
Instructions for additional details.
Maximum Values Average Values Number
Pollutant (include units) (include unite) of
and Grab Sample GrabSample Storm
CAS Number Taken During Flow-weighted Taken Du ng Flow-weighted Events
First 20 First 20
(if amiable) Minutes Composite Minutes Composite Sampled Sources of Pollutants
Oil and Grease N/A
FE3001001cal Oxygen
and BOD5
nkeal Oxygen
and GOD Suspended
Solids SS
Total
Nitrogen
Total
Phosphorus
pH Minimum Maximum I Minimum Imaximum
Part B- Usteach utant Is limited In anuent guideline which the f Subject to or pollutant listed in lWs N E
rmit for its process wastewater if the fall is operating under an existing NPDES permit).Complete one table for each outfall.See
Maximum Values Average Values Number
Pollutant (Include units) pncluds units) of
and Grab Sample Grab Sample Storm
CAS Number Taken During Flow-weighted Taken During � g� Events
First 20 First 20
(If available) Minutes Composite Minutes Composite Sarnpledl Sources of Pollutants
EPA Form 3510-2F (Rev.1-92) Page VII-1 Continue on Reverse

Continued from the Front
Part C- Ust each pollutant shown in Tables 2F-2,2F,3,and 2F-4 that You know or have reason to believe is present See the Instructions fob
additional detalls and requirements.Complete one table for each outfall.
Maximum Values Average Values Number
Pollutant (include units) Qncluds unfEs) of
and Grab Sample Grab Sample Storm
CAS Number Taken During Flow-weighted Taken During Rmwielghted Events
First 2D first 20
Of"fable) Minutes Composite Minutes Composite Sampled Sources of Pollutants
Part D- Provide data for the storm events which resulted in the maximum values for the flow weighted oom site sem le.
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
Date of Duration Total rainfall Number of hours between Maximum flow rats during Total flow from
Storm of Storm Event during storm event beginning of storm meas- rain event rain event
ured and and of previous (galione(minute or
Event On minutes) (in inches measurable rain event speowunim aitons or specW unite
7. Provide a description of the method of flow measurement or estimate.
EPA Form 3510-2F (Plev,1-22) Page VII-2

EPA ID Number (copy from!tem I of Form t) Form Approved. OMB No.2040-oow
Approval expires 5-3192
VII. Dische a mat on ntln m 3 orm 2
Part A- You must provide the results of at Nast one analysis for every pollutant in this table. Complete one table for each outfall. See
Instructions for additional details.
Maximum Values Average Values Number
Pollutant (include units) (include units) of
and Grab Sample (arab Sample Storm
CAS Number Taken During Row-weighted Taken During Row-weighted Event
First 2D First 2l}
(lf avallable) Minutes Composite Minuets Composite Sampled Sources of Pollutant
Oil and Grease N/A t
Biological Oxygen
Demand BODS
Chemical Oxygen
Demand COD
Total Suspended
Solids SS
Total
Nitrogen
Total
Phosphorus -
H Minimum < Maximum *. Minimum ' Maximum f
Pad El- I lot each pollutant that Is limited In an effluent guideline which the facility is sub ect to or any pollutant listed In to facility's NPDES
permit for its process wastewaterSif the fadlit�r is operating under an existing NPDES permit).Complete one table for each outiall.See
cdons;for additional is
ammnd MW
Maximum Values Average Values Number
Pollutant (inolude units) ¢ndude units) of
and Grab Sample Grab Sample Stone
Taken Dura ri
CAS Number First 20 Flow-weighted Te Flnrst 22D 9 Flowvolghted Events
(if available) Minute Composite Minutes Composite Sampled Sources of Pollutants
EPA Form 3510-2F (Rev.1-92) Page VII-1 Continue on Reverse

Continued from the front
Part C- Ust each pollutant shown in Tables 2F-2,2F-3,and 2F-4 that you know or have reason to believe is present.See the Instrucdons for,
additional details and requirements.Complete one table for each outfall.
Maximum Values Average Values Number
Pollutant (Include units) (include units) of
and Grab Sample Storm
Tm4gFlo -weighted TakenDurng elghted EventsCAS Number First�
t 20
(Navailable) Minutes Composite Minutes Compoeits Sampled Sources of Pollutants
n
Part D- Provide data for the storm events which resulted in the maximum values for the flow weighted oomPo8ftft sem le.
1. 2. 3. 4. S. 6.
Date of Duretion Total rainfall Number of hours between Maximum flow rate during Total flow from
Storm of Storm Event during storm event beginning of storm meas- rain event rain event
ured and end of previous (gallonsiminute or
Event On minutes) fn inches measurable rain event specify unite (gallons or specify units
7. Provide a description of the method of flow measurement or estimate.
EPA Form wi6 F (FLv.1-02) Page VII-2

RECEIVEDINCDEQIDVVR
FEB 2 3 2016
Water Quality
Permitting Section
Attachment A
NPDES Permit Renewal Application
Additional Documents for Stormwater Permit Application
Section

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Salisbury, NC Plant
Effective Date: August 2013
Revision: 8
File: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan,rev 8
3.0 Certifications:
Certifications required by the plant's NPDES permit are presented on the following pages. A responsible corporate officer
must certify that, to the best of his knowledge, all parts of this document are true, accurate, and complete, and were
prepared properly by appropriate qualified personnel. In addition,this Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan must include
a certification that storm water discharges have been tested or evaluated for the presence of non-storm water discharges.
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
PROPER PREPARATION CERTIFICATION
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and
evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system,
or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,the information submitted is,to the best
of my knowledge and belief,true,accurate,and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information,including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Revision:
w
Name and Title of Responsible Official:Richard L. Moore—Plant Manager
Signature:
Certification Date: '
7�7
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH
SECTION 313 WATER PRIORITY CHEMICALS REQUIREMENT
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were reviewed and the facility
examined by me or those under my direction or supervision in accordance with the Section 313 water
priority chemicals requirements of the plant's NPDES permit. To the best of my knowledge and belief,this
plan was prepared in accordance with good engineering practices. I am aware that there are significant
penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing
violations.
Revision Number:
Name of Registered Professional Engineer:
Registered State and Number: NA
Signature:
Certification Date:
Page 5

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Salisbury, NC Plant
Effective Date: August 2015
Revision: 7
File: Salisbury Stonuivater Certification
3.0 Certifications:
Certifications required by the plant's NPDES permit are presented on the following pages. y responsible
corporate officer must certify that, to the best of his knowledge, all parts of this document are true,
accurate, and complete, and were prepared properly by appropriate qualified personnel. In addition, this
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan must include a certification that storm water discharges have been
tested or evaluated for the presence of non-stoma water discharges.
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
PROPER PREPARATION CERTIFICATION
JL cei ufy undea-peralty or law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my directic: or
supervision in accordance tiith a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered acid
evaluated the information subnutted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system,
or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,the information submitted is,to the best
of my knowledge and belief,true,accurate,and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information,including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
Revision: 7
Name and Title of Responsible Official: Richard L.Moore-Plant Manager
Signature:
Certification Date: 12-12-12
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH
SECTION 313 WATER PRIORITY CHEMICALS REQUIREMENT
Fc�ertifyunder penalty of law that this document and all attachments were reviewed and the facility examined
by me or those under my direction or supervision in accordance with the Section 313 water priority
chemicals requirements of the plant's NPDES permit To the best of my knowledge and belief.this plan was
prepared in accordance with good engineering practices. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information,including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations.
r
Number:Registered Professional Engineer:
d State and Number: NA
:
Certification Date:

Storm Water Pollution :Prevention Plan. Salisbury, NC Plant
Effective Date: August 2005
Revision: 7
File: Salisbury Stonnwater Certification
NON-STORM WATER DISCHARGE ASSESSMENT AND CERTIFICATION
Outfall Directly
Date of Observed During Name of Person
Test or the Test(identify Method Used to Test or Evaluate Describe Results from Test for the Identify Potential Who Conducted
Evaluation as indicated on the Discharge Presence of Non-Storm water Significant Sources the Test or
site map) Discharge Evaluation
10-21-10 A Dry Weather Observation No Non-Storm Water Found None WWTP ORC
4-25-11 A 15 gpm See SWPPP Inspection
10-24-11 A 2 gpm See SWPPP hrspection
4-23-12 A 2 gpm None
11-1-12 A No Non-Stormwater Found None
10/21/10 B Dry kk1eather'Observation No Nun-Stonn water Found None WWTP URC
4-25-11 B No Non-Storm water Found None
10-24-11 B No Non-Storm water Found None
4-23-12 B No Non-Storm water Found None
11-1-12 B No Non-Stormwater Found None
10/21/10 C Dry Weather Observation No Non-Storm water Found None WWTP ORC
4-25-11 C No Non-Storm water Found None
10-24-11 C No Non-Storm water Found None
4-23-12 C No Non-Storm water Found None
11-1-12 C °` No Non-Storm water Fotmd None
0/21/10 D Dry Weather Observation No Non-Storm water Found None RrWWTTP ORC
4-25-11 D No Non-Storm water Found None
10-24-11 D No Non-Storm water Found None
4-23-12 D No Non-Storm water Found None
11-1-12 D No Non-Stormwater Found None
10/21/10 5 Dry Weather Observation No Non-Storm water Found None WWTP URC
4-25-11 5 No Non-Storm water Found None
10-24-11 5 No Non-Storm water Found None
4-23-12 5 No Non-Storm eater Found None
11-1-12 5 No Non-StormWater Found None
CERTIFICATION
I certify under penahy,of law that the outfalls)covered by this application have been tested and/or evaluated for the presence of unpermitted non-storni water
discharges in accordance with Pari LA.I.a(5)ofthe plant's NPDES permit. Based on my inquiry ofthe person or persons who manage the system,or those persons
directly responsible for gathering the information,no unpenmitted non-storm water is discharged to any storm water drainage system or outfall(s). I am aware that there
are significant penalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fires and imprisonment for knowing violations.
A.Name&Title of Responsible Official:(type or print) B.Area Code and Telephone No.
Richard L.Moore-Plant Manager 704-636-6000
C.Signatura D.Certification Date
12-12-12

p h f:
WILME
Or
rd
C I
PerformanceFibers •erations, Inc.
t; '`
NCO004944
Receiving Stream: North Second Creek
J
Stream Classification: C
River Basin:
1
Yadkin
.1 /' • .1 1 1 1
Sub-Basin
• 1' :1� . �• .1 111
B-Digit HUC 03040102
County: Rowan

LEGEND
FENCE UNE
RAILROAD C.L.
.. . . . . . .. ... ... . lj)O SCALE IN FEET
. . .. .. . . .. . .. . . . .
. .. . .. .. .. . . . .. .. ..
.. . .. ...I .. ... ... . A nX NVORNM
. .. . ... .. .. .. . .. .. . . OWK PRESSURE 185 Ps
. . . . ... ...... ... ... . OFF uw PRESSURE 135 PS
. . . I . .... .. ... . . ..
. ... . . . . . .. .. . .. . . . .
.. . . ... . .. . . . .. L#,s7 NuUM USED
WSSELS
. ...... ..... . ... ....
. . . . . .. . . . . . . .
. . . .. . . .. .. . .. .... FOR "VRMAT*N ON %CMS
. . . . . . ..... .. . .... SEE ME -. TANKS=
. ... ... ...... . .. .­
.. . .. . . .... ... ....
. ... . .. ...... . .. ... .
miiiiiiii oKunows zow
.. . .. . ..... ... ....
STAGING AREA
.. . . .. . . ... . ... .. . .
.. . .. .... . . .. . ....
OULM4 OR AMA DES MAT
. .... ........... ... .
. . .. ..... . .. . .. —
.. . ..I ......... .. . .
.. ... ...... ... . . ..
. ...... . .. . ..... . .. .
..... .. .... ...
. .. .... .... .. ... .
.. ... . . .. .. .. . ....
. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. .
.... ......
*.'.*.*.'.*.'.'9-m
. ...... ... .. . ... . . . .
.. ... .... .. ... ....
. ... ... ...... ... .. ..
.. . . . .. . . .. ... .. .. roug"
............... 1-1 PM M&4
. ... . .. .............
. ... ...... ... ....
.. .. . . . . . . . ... ....
. .. .. .. . . ... . ... ... .
.... .... M" 11 ,
. .... ... . .. .CONSMUMOM
.. . .. . . . .
anxss
. . .. ... . . . .
. ...... ... ..
.... ..... . ... . . ..
.. .. . .. . .. . . . . .. ..
muw"
POW
it
.... ... . ..... ... .
... . .. .. .. . . ... .... %S4
. . . . . . . . . . . . ... ....
. . . . . . . .. . ... ....
. .. . . I. . . . ... ....
. .. . .. . . . ... ....
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . ...
1-4k
. . . .. . . . . . . . WIP muzim
.... .. . .. . .
... . .. . . . . .
ma"
POW
P
SECTION R LAKE MUD"
FM
#2
cwe
LAKE
snroows
2*00 14
-SP VESSEL & TANK IDENTMTION MAP
INK L SM DR"NG NWBR
Cklmm now I
C—PTEMM—w odmw�lc. i
—now# SFE-00-1234003 10

SALISBURY PLANT
B
FDBUILDING K SHOPS &
WAREHOUSE BUILDING STORES TK
H FARM
B BUILDING E
WAREHOUSE R
M
G
WAREHOUSE ILI BLD BUILDING
a CENTRAL CORE T BLDG GLY.
REC.
D TWRS
0 1-5
W
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING H T # 1 F.O
BUILDING H
E 42 F.O.
R
M #3 F.O.
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING 8-10
TWRS
6&7 TWRS
P BUILDING
Fr(ruRE z ! e F to

SALISBURY PLANT
#1 OUTFALL
#1
OUTFALL
B wti� J I
BUILDING
WAREHOUSETK
::.rFARM
B BUILDING "
WAREHOUSE
WAREHOUSE 1.L BLDG?'_+
A CENTRAL CORE T BLDG GLY.
REC.
D TWRS
0 1-5
W
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING H T # 1 F.0
BUILDING H
E #2 F.O.
R
M #3 F.O.
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING 8-10
TWRS
6&7 TWRS
#1 OUTFALL SERVES
P BUILDING
K BUILDING ROOF DRAINS
G BUILDING ROOF DRAINS
S BUILDING ROOF DRAINS
G BUILDING ELEVATOR SHAFT
ROADWAY AND TA PAD DRAINS

{ SALISBURY PLANT
42 OUTFALL
B D
BUILDING 0
K W SHOPS &
WAREHOUSE BUILDING T STORES
H
B BUILDING E
WAREHOUSE R ==-
M
G
WAREHOUSE L BLD BUILDING 42
OUTFA
A CENTRAL CORE T BLDG GLY.
REC.
D TWRS
0 1-5
W
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING H T # 1 F.0
BUILDING H
E #2 F.O.
R
M #3 F.O.
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING 8-10
TWRS
6&7 TWRS
42 OUTFALL SERVES _
P BUILDING
GLYCOL TANK FARM
STORM DRAINS-TANK FARM
OF 10

SALISBURY PLANT
#3 OUTFALL
B D
BUILDING 0
K W SHOPS &
WAREHOUSE BUILDING T STORES TK
H FARM
B BUILDING E
WAREHOUSE R
M
G #3 OUT
WAREHOUSE ILI BLD BUILDING
A CENTRAL CORE T BLDG GLY.
REC.
D TWRS
0 1-5
W
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING H T # 1 F.0
BUILDING H
E #2 F.O.
R
M #3 F.O.
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING 8-10
TWRS
6&7 TWRS
43 OUTFALL SERVES
P BUILDING
RAILROAD TRACK STORM DRAIN _
t- I(r }oF 10

SALISBURY PLANT
#4 OUTFALL
8 FDBUILDING K SHOPS &
WAREHOUSE BUILDING STORES TK
FARM
B BUILDING E
WAREHOUSE R
M
G
WAREHOUSE ILI BLD BUILDING
A CENTRAL CORE T BLDG ''?=
x
fL
D TWRS
0 1-5
W - #4 OUTFAL
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING H T # 1 F.O
BUILDING H
E #2 F.O.
R
M #3 F.O.
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING 8-10
TWRS
6&7 TWRS
#4 OUTFALL SERVES
P BUILDING
GLYCOL RECOVERY UNIT
RAILROAD TRACK STORM DRAIN
FiGux6- -2— SoFlo

SALISBURY PLANT
#5 OUTFALL
8 D
BUILDING 0
K W SHOPS &
WAREHOUSE BUILDING T STORES TK
H FARM'
B BUILDING E
WAREHOUSE R
M
G
WAREHOUSEL BLD BUILDING
A CENTRAL CORE T BLDG GLY.
REC.
D TWRS
0 1-5
W
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING H T # 1 F.O
BUILDING1 H
E #2 F.O.
R
M #3 F.O.
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING
#5 OUTFALL
6&7 TW ===-
}�1_
#5 OUTFALL SERVES
P BUILDING
STORM DRAINS AT SOUTH UNLOADING DOCK
Fr G-u�4 Z oF�o

SALISBURY PLANT
#6 OUTFALL
B D
BUILDING 0
K W SHOPS &
WAREHOUSE BUILDING T STORES TK
H FARM
B BUILDING E
WAREHOUSE R
M
G
WAREHOUSE ILI BLD BUILDING
A CENTRAL CORE
GLY.
REC.
=r. TWRS
-•-.-- z rc _ 1-5
=}f��tiw1•� �l
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING ~" '~~_
(PUMPED ONLY)
=f 1�w Jr�w"-V• �ti
rr ��.L�w'�w�•
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING
WAREHOUSE J BUILDING 8-10 #6 OUTFALL
TWRS
6&7 TWRS
46 OUTFALL SERVES
P BUILDING
T BUILDING ROOF DRAINS
T BUILDING FLOOR DRAINS
H BUILDING ROOF DRAINS
H DOWTHERM AND TA PAD AREA
RAILROAD TRACK STORM DRAINS
ABILITY TO PUMP OIL BASINS
F,Uu� E

SALISBURY PLANT
412 OUTFALL
D
-- -=--==- K W SHOPS &
BUILDING T STORES EAR
H
BU I L D I N G
-=
CENTRAL CORE T BLDG FC
TWRS
1-5
ISI
H T # 1 F.0
BUILDING H
R
RE-
6&7 TWRS
412 OUTFALL
P DING]
@12 OUTFALL SERVES
ROOF DRAINS FILAMENT WAREHOUSE
A BUILDING ROOF DRAINS
ROOF DRAINS BEAMING AREA
FLOOR DRAINS BEAMING AREA
L BUILDING ROOF DRAINS
FLOOR DRAINS L BUILDING
ROOF DRAINS STAPLE WAREHOUSE
FLOOR DRAINS STAPLE WAREHOUSE
ROOF DRAINS J BUILDING
NORTH AND SOUTH PARKING LOT DRAINS

OUTFALLS 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 SERVICE
P BUILDING PARKING LOT
ROADWAY DRAINS ON SOUTH SIDE OF PLANT
F 16,14

7.0 Storm water Management Plan
This portion of the SWPPP describes and identifies materials management practices used to control and minimize
exposure of significant materials to storm water.
7.1 Exposed Materials
This section addresses the technical and economic feasibility of changing the methods of operations and/or
storage practices to eliminate or reduce exposure of materials and processes to storm water. The section
summarizes potential pollutant sources by plant activity (e.g., truck loading and unloading) and presents
alternatives for reducing exposure to storm water for each activity. In particular, this section discusses the
use of covers for material storage and handling areas as a measure of reducing exposure. Specific changes
are identified in Section 7.3 'Best Management Practices." Plant engineering will review the changes
identified in Section 7.0 and accomplish them in a technically and economically feasible manner. No areas
were identified where diversion of storm water would be applicable.
7.1.1 Summary of Potential Pollutant Sources
Potential pollutant sources were identified for each of the following activities:
Loading and Unloading Operations
Outdoor Storage and Process Areas
Dust or Particulate Generating Processes
On-site Waste Disposal Practices
Vehicle Fueling and Maintenance Areas
The potential pollutants associated with each of these activities are summarized in Table 7-1. A
brief discussion of each of these activities follows.
Thirty-six truck loading and unloading areas can be identified at the plant. Raw materials such as
ethylene glycol and terephthalic acid are the most significant items that arrive at the facility by
rail.
Most of the production areas of the facility are located inside. Materials such as chip, staple, and
TA are stored in outdoor silos. Various pieces of production equipment are located outside,
primarily along the east side of the main production building. This equipment includes boilers,
reboilers, pumps and piping. Bulk storage tanks are not included in the summary presented in
Table 7-1. Pipes are sand blasted and coated in an area south of the EO facility.
Dust and particulate generating processes are generally associated with solid material handling
operations such as handling of chip,staple,and TA. The pipe coating area south of the EO facility
is also a particulate generating process.
Wastes are collected in dumpsters around the plant site for disposal. Ultimately, the wastes are
disposed of off-site.
Two vehicle-fueling areas are located on-site in addition to the propane fueling areas for vehicles
such as forklifts. One area for vehicle maintenance is located in and adjacent to the southwest
corner of Building S.

Table 7-1
Summary of Potential Pollutant Sources
Location Potential Pollutant
Truck Loading and Unloading Facilities
Warehouse Along West Side of Main Production Building Staple,Filament
North Side of Building B Filament
Underground Fuel Tank on the Southwest Corner of Main Gasoline
Production Building
Fuel Tank Northeast of Building S Diesel Fuel
Silos North of Main Production Building Chi
Silos South of Main Production Building Chi
South Side of Building J Chi
North,East and South Sides of Building P Chi
Areas Near the Cooling Towers Sodium Hypochlorite,Gengard GN8203,
Gengard GN8300,Hydrex 2254,Flogard
MS6210,Spectrus OX1201,Depositrol
PY5200,Betz Inhibitor AZ8104
South Side of Tank 94 Sodium Hydroxide
Ethylene Oxide Facility-shutdown 1 Q'96 N/A
GRU Facility Glycol
GRUB Unloading Facility Near Southeast Corner of Glycol
Building H
South End of the Large Recreation Pond Fuel Oil
South and East Sides of TA Silos Near the Main Corridor Tere hthalic Acid,Adipic Acid
North Side of Tanks 29,30 and 31 O tis erse AP0520,Steamate-NA2440
Near Tanks 56, 57 and 58 South of GRU Facility "PE"Water 1 percent Ethylene Glycol)
North, West and East Sides of Building S Chemicals Listed in Appendix D
North and South Sides of Tanks 18-21 on the East Side of Dowtherm
Building G
Adjacent to Tanks 22, 105 and 106 at the Northeast Dowtherm,TEG
Corner of Building K
Near the Chemical Tanks at the Process Water Treatment Sodium Hypochlorite,Sodium Hydroxide
Plant
Near the Chemical Tanks at the Wastewater Treatment Betz 1192
Plant
East Side of the Raw Water Pond Betz 1192
Rail Loading and Unloading Facilities
East Side of GRU Facility Ethylene Glycol,Dieth leve Glycol
TA Unloading Building Near the Southeast Corner of Terephthalic Acid
Building S
East Side of Building P Chip,Staple,Dieth leve Glycol
Covered Dock Northeast of Building P Waste Chip,Fiber, Staple,Filament
Outdoor Storage and Process Areas
Pipe Coating Area Sand Blast Material,Epoxy Coatings
Equipment Such as Boilers, Reboilers,Pumps and Piping Dowtherm
along the East Side of the Main Production Building
Drum Storage on East Side of K-17 Finish Waste
Hazardous Waste Drum Storage Paint Waste,OCP Waste,OCC Waste,
Kolene Waste,Acid Waste,Alkaline Waste
Drum Storage Near Southwest Corner of Building S I Perchloroeth lene,Ethyl Alcohol, Solvents

Table 7-1
Summary of Potential Pollutant Sources
Drum Storage South of Building T PCB(capacitors&ballasts
Non-Hazardous Waste Drum Storage Area South of Textile Lubricants,Beaming Finish Waste,
Building P Waste Finish,TA,Glycol,Fuel Oil,K-14 and
K-15 Paste,B-roll Exhaust Sludge,Beam
Cleaning Sludge,Adipic Acid,Cooling Water
Sludge,Salt,Perchloroeth leve,Kolene
Drum Storage on East Side of Building G Hydrochloric Acid,Tetramethylammonium
Hydroxide,Albright TMP, SIPE-40,Ethylene
Glycol,Rezol T-279,Oil,Acetic Acid,Oxa-
hos hoar l kolester,Choline Base
Silos East of the Main Corridor Tere hthalic Acid,Adipic Acid
Silos North and South of the Main Production Building Chi
Dust or Particulate Generating Processes
Silos North of Main Production Building Chi
Silos South of Main Production Building Chi
Silos East of Main Production Building Near Main Terephthalic Acid,Adipic Acid
Corridor
Throughout the Area East of the Main Production Facility Chip
West of the Railroad Tracks
Vehicle Maintenance and Fueling Areas
Southwest Corner of Main Production Building Gasoline,Oil and Grease
Northeast of Building S Diesel Fuel
Southwest Corner of Building S Oil and Grease,Hydraulic Fluid,Antifreeze
7.1.2 Plan to Minimize Exposure of Material to Storm water
Potential changes to the methods of operation and storage practices that have could be employed
to address each of the potential pollutant sources listed in Table 7-1 are discussed below. Specific
BMPs that have been implemented to minimize significant exposure of materials to storm water
are discussed in Section 7.3 "Best Management Practices".
7.1.2.1 Truck and Rail Loading and Unloading
Alternatives for reducing exposure of loading and unloading activities to storm water
include:
* Rolled-curb containment
* Grated trench containment
* Covering loading and unloading areas
* Drip pans at rail tank car loading and unloading facilities
* Cleaning up spills and leaks as required
* Development and implementation of a SPCC plan
* Locating quick-connect fittings within contained areas
The plant's SPCC Plan was updated in 2004 and 2009 to meet more stringent oil spill
containment regulations. This effort included adding secondary containment around all
oil storage tanks. It also provided spill containment in the form of curbing or portable
containments to catch hose drips at the oil truck unloading points. Truck connection
points were relocated to place the quick-connect fittings inside the containment area
whenever possible. Furthermore, these oil truck unloading operations are now attended

and monitored continuously with portable barricades to prevent accidental drive off while
the hose is connected. Procedures, training, and use of designated "trained oil handlers'
is being done to minimize the chance of oil spill. See details in the plant's SPCC Plan.
Contamination from the warehouse on the west side of the main production building
would only result from spilled packaged solid product.
Rolled-curbs have been installed at several truck loading and unloading areas, especially
those near bulk storage tanks. Many loading docks are covered. Installation of rolled
curbing is more practical and economically feasible than construction of covers for many
of the liquid loading and unloading area limitations of location and frequency of use are
considered. Good housekeeping will protect storm water from solid materials spilled
during loading and unloading.
Raw materials such as ethylene glycol (liquid) and terephthalic acid (bulk powder) are
the most significant items that arrive at the facility by rail. Contamination in those areas
can be contained by the plant SIS system and diverted to the Waste Treatment Plant in
the event of a spill.
7.1.2.2 Outdoor Storage and Process Areas
Alternatives for reducing exposure of outdoor storage and process areas to storm water
include:
* Storing materials inside buildings or in covered tanks where possible
* Labeling storage tanks and drums
* Storing materials in designated areas
* Periodic inspection and inventory of stored materials
* Written standard operating procedures for materials storage and
handling
* Secondary containment around liquid storage tanks
* Curbed containment around pumps, process equipment, and materials
storage areas
* Covering drum storage areas
* Cleaning up spills and leaks as required
* Inspection of production areas
* Establishment of an Emergency Response Team and maintenance of
cleanup materials on-site
* Development and implementation of a SPCC plan
* Emphasis on housekeeping in employee training
* Addition of rolled curb at doorways leading to storage areas within the
plant
Several drum storage areas are covered but not curbed. Covering some drum storage
areas is not feasible due to limitations such as overhead piping. Most drum storage areas
are covered. Those requiring additional protection are identified in Section 7.2. All
outside drum storage has secondary containment except the empty drum storage area
where triple-rinsed clean drums are stored. Most drum storage areas are also covered.
7.1.2.3 Dust or Particulate Generating Processes
Alternatives for reducing exposure of dust and particulate generating processes to storm
water include:
* Storing materials inside buildings or in covered silos where possible
* Cleaning up spills as required
* Emphasis on housekeeping in employee training
* Covering particulate generating processes

Emphasis has been placed on housekeeping to prevent and/or reduce contamination of
storm water by spilled chip,staple,TA and other particulates.
7.1.2.4 Waste Disposal Practices
Alternatives for reducing exposure of disposal activities to storm water include the
following:
* Collecting waste in designated areas
* Cleaning up spills around dumpsters as required
* Covering waste containers
* Secondary containment where feasible
All materials are disposed of off-site. Housekeeping around waste collection containers
is being maintained to acceptable levels. Where needed, dumpsters with covers have
replaced those dumpsters,which are not under cover.
Waste oil is disposed of in full compliance with new SPCC plan oil handling regulations.
All oil storage containers have secondary containment and stringent monitoring of waste
oil handling operations by trained oil handlers.
7.1.2.5 Vehicle Fueline and Maintenance Areas
Alternatives for reducing exposure of vehicle fueling and maintenance areas to storm
water include:
* Secondary containment around liquid storage tanks
* Curbed containment
* Rolled-curb containment in doorways
* Covering vehicle fueling and maintenance facilities
* Cleaning up spills and leaks as required
* Development and implementation of a SPCC plan
* Emphasis on housekeeping in employee training
Vehicle fueling areas are contained by curbing, and have been addressed as noted above
to comply with new oil regulations in the plant's SPCC Plan. As noted above,those new
measures include secondary containment around all oil bulk storage tanks, curbed
containments and monitoring of fueling operations. The plant has a recently-updated
SPCC plan in place for reducing the potential of storm water contamination from spills.
7.1.26 Secondary Containment
Secondary containment dikes with periodic inspection by trained operators have been
installed around all oil tanks and all outdoor chemical bulk storage tanks. All secondary
containment connected directly to storm water conveyance systems meets the following
criteria as specified in the permit:
* Drainage must be controlled by manually operated valves which are secured by
a locking mechanism.
* Accumulated storm water must be at least visually observed for color, foam,
outfall staining,visible sheens and dry weather flow before release.
* Accumulated storm water can be released if found to be uncontaminated.
* Records documenting the name of the individual making the observation, a
description of the accumulated storm water, and the date and time of the release
shall be kept for a period of 5 years.

Table 7-6
BMP Implementation Schedule
Continued
Spill Prevention and Maintain the SPCC Plan On-going
Response Procedures
Provide Employee Training in Spill At Initial Hire and Periodically
Prevention and Response(Particularly for Thereafter
Those Involved in Manufacturing,
Maintenance and Utility Activities
Inspections Improve Current Inspection Procedures On-going
Related to Storm water Pollution Prevention
Conduct Semi-Annual Comprehensive Site Semi-Annually
Compliance Evaluations(Including Outfall
Visual Inspection)
Based on Inspection Results,Modify SWPPP As Needed
as Needed
General Visual Site Inspection Routine
Employee Training Incorporate Storm water Pollution Prevention On-going
Awareness and Tools into Current Employee
Training Program
Record Keeping Maintain Records on Spill Events and On-going
Maintenance and Inspection Activities
Sediment and Erosion Maintain Sediment and Erosion Control On-going
Control Measures
Runoff Management Implement Runoff Management Techniques On-going
Where Appropriate
Activity Specific BMPs See 'Best Management Practices" On-going
Site Specific BMWs See'Best Management Practices" On-going

Attachment A
NPDES Permit Renewal Application
Manufacturing Operation Flow Diagram
(Figure 2)

Polyester Manufacturing Operation
Polymer Chip Product to
Production Production Customers
(potential)
Terephthalic
Acid (TA)
Filament Product to
Production Customers
Ethylene
,
Glycol
Polymer ;
Production --♦�
,
Finish
,
Lubricants t-------- Wastewater
------------------------------------------------------------------------- to
---------------------------------------------- Treatment
Raw Material / Product Figure 2
------
Performance Fibers Operations, Inc.
Wastewater Salisbury Plant

Attachment A
NPDES Permit Renewal Application
Waste Treatment Plant Diagram
(Figure 3)

Storm Water(from plant areas) Storm Water
____Outfall#S Weirs 6
Sanitary ________ Direct
Waste Commmutor Chlorine Contact - - O ischarge
Process - Polishing Pond# 1
Waste ❑ Out of Service
Bar Scree
Clarifier 1
(Spare)
Solid Waste
To Landfill Grit Removal
Aeration Basin"A" Polishing Pond#2
Clarifier 2
Cooling Tower ,' Out-of-servic
Blowdown '
Aeration Basin"C"
Equalization Out-of-service Polishing Pond#3
� Copper
Clarifier 3 Sulfate
pWp (primary) i Addition
Pumped Lift
Blowdown Station aeration Basin"B"
Polishing Pond#4
Return Activated Sludge
Acid Metering
(Sulfuric)
,. _._._._._._._._.�
� •` Solids to Sludge Dewatering Aerobic Digester
IF
Landfill Outfall
Anaerobic \ ` ...............
Pretreatment 001
' Interior Groundwate
Recovery System perimeter GW
Anaerobic Recovery System Equalization U ! V Peroxide
Pretreatment '
Figure 3
._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. Salisbury Waste Treatment
Remediation Equipment that is turned off / M. Stewart August 2013
ref: WWTP,Flow Diagram.PPT

Attachment B
DWQ Memo
Renewal of the Yadkin / Pee Dee River Basin Association

AI
RUDER*
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Director Secretary
August 8, 2013
Mr. Richard Moore
Plant Manager
Performance Fibers
7401 Statesville Blvd.
Salisbury, NC 28147
RE: Renewal of the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin Association Memorandum of Agreement
NPDES Permit Modification for In-stream Monitoring
NC0004944— Salisbury Plant
Rowan County
Dear Mr. Moore:
For the past 15 years, members of the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin Association(YPDRBA)have
broadened our collective understanding of the Yadkin/Pee Dee basin through water quality
monitoring. The Division of Water Resources (DWR) greatly appreciates the Association's
continued support of the monitoring and the time and expertise contributed by its members.
By this letter the DWR confirms the waiver of in-stream monitoring requirements within your
individual NPDES permit in exchange for the YPDRBA's monitoring of the basin as specified
within the renewed Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) effective August 1, 2013. The
agreement identifies the stations, parameters, and frequency of monitoring required of the
association in order to maintain the in-stream monitoring waivers for your individual permits.
Influent and effluent monitoring requirements are not affected by this waiver. Should your
membership in the association be terminated, you must notify DWR immediately and the in-
stream monitoring requirements in your permit will be reinstated.
All other terms and conditions in the original permit remain unchanged and in full effect. These
modifications are issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental
Protection Agency.
1617 Mail Service center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
Location:512 N.Salisbury St,Raleigh,North Carolina 27604
Phone:[phone] Fax:[phone]
Internet::www.ncwaterguality.org
An Equal OpportunilyWiirmative Action Employer

Salisbury Plant
August 8, 2013
Page 2 of 2
If you have any questions regarding the MOA or any other coalition matter, please contact Carrie
Ruhlman at [phone] or via email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Thomas A. Reeder
cc: Michael Parker, Mooresville Regional Office ([e-mail])
Carrie Ruhlman, Environmental Sciences Section ([e-mail])
Central Files

Analytical Results
Performance Fibers
7401 Statesville Blvd.
Salisbury NC 28145
Entered 5/9/2013
Reported. 5/29/2013
'or: TTO
Date
'ample ID Parameter Cust ID Result Units
Method Analyzed Analyst
130509-15 TTO Eff See Attached as noted 5/17/13 ENCO
Respectfully submitted,
Dena Myers
NC Cert#440,
NCDW Cert#37755,
EPA NCO0909
11.0. Box 228 • Statesville, North Carolina 28687 • 704/872/4697

1
eco
www.encolabs.com
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Description: TTO Sample 130509-15 Lab Sample ID:C300505-01 Received:05/10/13 12:00
Matrix: Water Sampled:05/09/13 07:03 Work Order:C300505
Project: Misc.Subcontract Sampled By:
Volatile Organic Compounds by GCMS
Analyte ICAS Number] Results flag 21:113 MBL Batch Method Analyzed Notes
1,1,1-Trichloroethane [71-55-6] <0.12 ug/L 1 0.12 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (79.34.5] <0.28 ug/L 1 0.28 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
1,1,2-Trichloroethane (79-00-5] <0.14 ug/L 1 0.14 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
1,1-Dichloroethane [75-34-3] <0.13 ug/L 1 0.13 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
1,1-Dichloroethene [75-35-4) <0.21 ug/L 1 0.21 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
1,2-Dichlorobenzene [95-50-1] <0.19 ug/L 1 0.19 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
1,2-Dichloroethane [107-06-2] <0.21 ug/L 1 0.21 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
1,2-Dichloropmpane (78-87-5) <0.10 ug/L 1 0.10 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
1,3-Dichlorobenzene (541-73-1) <0.15 ug/L 1 0.15 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
1,4-Dichlorobenzene [106-46-7] <0.19 ug/L 1 0.19 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether [110-75-B] <1.1 ug/L 1 1.1 5.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Acrolein [107-02-8) <4.0 ug/L 1 4.0 10 3EI6016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Acrylonitrile [107-13-1) <3.5 ug/L 1 3.5 10 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Benzene [7143-2] <0.15 ug/L 1 0.15 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Bromodlchloromethane [75-274] <0.17 ug/L 1 0.17 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Bromoform [75-25.2] <0.22 ug/L 1 0.22 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Bromomethane [74-83-9] <0.14 ug/L 1 0.14 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Carbon Tetrachloride [56-23.5] <0.17 ug/L 1 0.17 1.0 3EI6016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Chlorobenzene [108.90-7] <0.17 ug/L 1 0.17 1.0 3EI6016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Chloroethane (75.00-3) <0.23 ug/L 1 0.23 1.0 3EI6016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Chloroform (67-66-3] <0.18 ug/L 1 0.18 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Chloromethane [74-87-3) <0.13 ug/L 1 0.13 1.0 3EI6016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
cis-1,3-Dichlompropene [10061-01-5] <0.20 ug/L 1 0.20 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Dibromochloromethane [12448-1) <0.17 ug/L 1 0.17 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Ethylbenzene [100414] <0.13 ug/L 1 0.13 1.0 3EI6016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Methylene Chloride (75-09-2] <0.23 ug/L 1 0.23 1.0 3EI6016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Tetrachloroethene [127-184] <0.17 ug/L 1 0.17 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Toluene (108-88-3] <0.14 ug/L 1 0.14 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
trans-1,2-Dlchloroethene (156-60-5) <0.21 ug/L 1 0.21 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene [10061-02-6] <0.15 ug/L 1 0.15 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Trichloroethene (79-01-6] <0.15 ug/L 1 0.15 1.0 3E16016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Vinyl chloride [75-01-4] <0.32 ug/L 1 0.32 1.0 3EI6016 EPA 624 05/17/13 10:49 REF
Surrogates Results DF Spike L v/ %Rec %Ree Limits Batch Method Analyzed By Notes
4-Bromoflumobenrene 38 1 50.0 76% 51-111 3£16016 EPA 614 05/17/1310:49 REF
Dibromot7wromethane 41 1 50.0 82% 68-117 3E16016 EPA 614 05117113 10.49 REF
ro/uene-d8 41 1 50.0 9396 67-117 3E16016 EPA 614 05/1711310:49 REF
Page 4 of 28

ENCO
www.encolabs.com
Description: TTO Sample 130509-15 Lab Sample 10:C300505-01 Received:05/10/13 12:00
Matrix: Water Sampled:05/09/13 07:03 Work Order:C300505
Project: Misc.Subcontract Sampled By:
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS
Analyte [CAS Number] Results Flan YTIAIA DtDLDL MRL Batch Method Analyzed Notes
1,2,4-Tnchiorobenzene [120-82-1] <1.2 ug/L 1 1.2 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
1,2-Dichlorobenzene [95-50.1] <1.1 ug/L 1 1.1 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
1,3-Dichlorobenzene [541-73-1] <1.1 ug/L 1 1.1 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
1,4-Dichlorobenzene [106-46-7] <1.0 ug/L 1 1.0 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
1-Methylnaphthalene [90.12-0] <1.7 ug/L 1 1.7 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM QL-02
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol [95-95-4] <1.0 ug/L 1 1.0 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol [88-06-2] <1.1 ug/L 1 1.1 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
2,4-Dichlorophenol-[120-83-2] <1.4 ug/L 1 1.4 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
2,4-Dimethylphenol (105-67-9] <1.3 ug/L 1 1.3 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
2,4-Dinitrophenol [51-28.5] <2.6 ug/L 1 2.6 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
2,4-Dinitrotoluene (121-14-2] <2.4 ug/L 1 2.4 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
2,6-Dinitrotoluene [606-20-21 <1.5 ug/L 1 1.5 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
2-Chloronaphthalene [91-58-7] <1.0 ug/L 1 1.0 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
2-Chlorophenol [95.57.8] <1.2 ug/L 1 1.2 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
2-Methyl4,15-dinitrophenol [534-52-1] <2.9 ug/L 1 2.9 30 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
2-Methylnaphthalene [91-57-6] <1.5 ug/L 1 1.5 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
2-Nitrophencl (88-75-5] <1.1 ug/L 1 1.1 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
3,31-Dichlorobenzidlne [91-94-1] <3.3 ug/L 1 3.3 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
4-8romophenyl-phenylether [101-55-3] <1.0 ug/L 1 1.0 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol [59-50-7] <1.5 ug/L 1 1.5 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether [7005-72-3] <1.6 ug/L 1 1.6 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
4-Nitrophenol [100-02-7] <2.0 ug/L 1 2.0 10 3E30034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Acenaphthene [83-32-9] <1.4 ug/L 1 1.4 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Acenaphthylene [208-96-8] <1.2 ug/L 1 1.2 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Anthracene (120-12-7] <1.6 ug/L 1 1.6 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Benzidine [92.87-5] <1.6 ug/L 1 1.6 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
BenzoWanthracene (56.55-33 <1.3 ug/L 1 1.3 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Benzo(a)pyrene [50-32-8] <1.3 ug/L 1 1.3 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Benzo(b)Ouoranthene (205.99-23 <1.0 ug/L 1 1.0 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
8enzo(g,h,i)perylene (191-24-2] <2.4 ug/L 1 2.4 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Benzc(k)fluorant;ene (207-08-9] <1.3 ug/L 1 1.3 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Benzoic acid 165-85-0) <1.0 ug/L 1 1.0 50 3E30034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
8is(2-chloroethoxy)methane (111-91-1] <1.4 ug/L 1 1.4 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Bls(2-chlaroethyl)ether [111-44-4] <1.2 ug/L 1 1.2 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Bis(2-chlorolsopropyl)ether [108-60-13 <1.3 ug/L 1 1.3 10 3E30034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Bis(2-ethy1hexyl)phthalate (117-81-7] <1.7 ug/L 1 1.7 5.0 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Butylbenzylphthalate (85.68-7] <2.0 ug/L 1 2.0 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Chrysene (218-01-9] <2.0 ug/L 1 2.0 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene [53-70-3) <2.3 ug/L 1 2.3 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Diethylphthalate [84.66-2] <2.1 ug/L 1 2.1 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Dimethylphthalate (131-11-3) <1.4 ug/L 1 1.4 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Di-n-butylphthalate [84-74-2] <1-5 ug/L 1 1-5 10 3E30034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Di-n-octylphthalate (117-84-0] <3.1 ug/L 1 3.1 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
DPH(as Azobenzene) [103-33-3] <1.9 ug/L 1 1.9 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Fluoranthene [206-44-0] <2.1 ug/L 1 2.1 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Fluorene [86-73-7] <1.7 ug/L 1 1.7 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Hexachlorobenzene [118-74-1] <1..0 ug/L 1 1.0 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Hexachlorobutadiene (87.68-3] <1.2 ug/L 1 1.2 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene [7747-4] <1.3 ug/L 1 1.3 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Hexachloroethane (67-72-1] <1.1 ug/L 1 1.1 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (193-39-5] <2.2 ug/L 1 2.2 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Page 5 of 28

a
IJV MO)
www.encolabs.com
Description: TTO Sample 130509-15 Lab Sample ID:C300505-01 Received:05/10/13 12:00
Matrix: Water Sampled:05/09/13 07:03 Work Order:C300505
Project: Misc.Subcontract Sampled By:
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS
Analyte KAS Numberl Results Flag units DF MOL MRL batch Method Analy edz A1C Note�
Isophorone [78-59-11 <1.3 ug/L 1 1.3 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Naphthalene [91-20-31 <1.3 ug/L 1 1.3 10 3E10034 EPA.625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Nitrobenzene [98-95-3] <1.2 ug/L 1 1.2 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
N-Nitrosodimethylamine [62-75-9] <1.3 ug/L 1 1.3 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine [621-64-7] <1.5 ug/L 1 1.5 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine <2.1 ug/L 1 2.1 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
[86-30-6/122-39-4]
Pentachlorophenol [87-86-5] <1.8 ug/L 1 1.8 10 3E30034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Phenanthrene (85-01-8) <1.4 ug/L 1 1.4 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Phenol [108-95-21 <1.4 ug/L 1 1.4 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Pyrene [129.00-0] <2.1 ug/L 1 2.1 10 3E10034 EPA 625 05/13/13 23:48 DFM
Surrogates Results DF Spike L vl °/a Rec %Rec Limits Batch Method Analyzed By Notes
1,4,6-TnbmMopheno1 91 1 100 91% 18-157 3E10034 EPA 615 0511311313:48 DFM
2-Fluorob/phenyl 41 1 50.0 8596 15-139 3E10034 EPA 615 0511311313.•48 DFM
1-Ruomphenol 50 1 100 5096 10-104 3E10034 EPA 615 0511311313:48 DFM
Nibobenrene-d5 38 1 50.0 7696 16.140 3E10034 EPA 675 0511311313.48 DFM
Phenol-d5 45 1 100 4596 10-83 3E10034 EPA 615 0511311313:48 DFM
Terphenyldl4 45 1 50.0 89% 13-164 3E10034 EPA 615 0511311313:48 DFM
Page 6 of 28

ce-NCO
www.encolabs.com
Description: TTO Sample 130509-15 Lab Sample ID:C300505-01 Received:05/10/13 12:00
Matrix: Water Sampled:05/09/13 07:03 Work Order:C300505
Project: Misc.Subcontract Sampled By:
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC
Analyte fCA5 Numberl Results Flaa Units DF MDL MRL Batch Method Analyzed Note�
4,4'-DDD [72-54-8} <0.044 ug/L 1 0.044 0.050 3E14030 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
4,4'-DDE [72-55.9] <0.048 ug/L 1 0.048 0.050 3E14030 EPA 60B 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
4,4'-DDT [50-29.3] <0.049 ug/L 1 0.049 0.050 3E14030 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
Aldrin [309-00-21 <0.041 ug/L 1 0.041 0.050 3EI4030 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
alpha-BHC [319-84-6] <0.036 ug/L 1 0.036 0.050 3E14030 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
beta-BHC [319-85-71] <0.036 ug/L 1 0.036 0.050 3E14030 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
Chlordane(n.o.s.) [57-74-9) <0.020 ug/L 1 0.020 1.0 3E14030 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
Chlordane(tech) [12789-03-6] <0.20 ug/L 1 0.20 0.50 3E14030 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 M5Z
delta-BHC [319-86-8] <0.048 ug/L 1 0.048 0.050 3E14030 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
Dieldrin [60-57-1] <0.045 ug/L 1 0.045 0.050 3E14030 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
Endosulfan I [959-98-8] <0.045 ug/L 1 0.045 0.050 3EI4030 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
Endosulfan II [33213-65.9] <0.036 ug/L 1 0.036 0.050 3E14030 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 M5Z
Endosulfan sulfate [1031-07-8] <0.032 ug/L 1 0.032 0.050 3E14030 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
Endrin [72-20-8] <0.041 ug/L 1 0.041 0.050 3E14030 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
Endrin aldehyde [7421.93-41 <0.042 ug/L 1 0.042 0.050 3E14030 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
gamma-BHC [58-89.9] <0.034 ug/L 1 0.034 0.050 3EI4030 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 M5Z
Heptachlor [76.44-8] <0.030 ug/L 1 0.030 0.050 3E14030 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
Heptachlor epoxide [1024-57-31 <0.037 ug/L 1 0.037 0.050 3E14030 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
PCB-101611242 [12674-11-2/53469-21-9] <0.43 ug/L 1 0.43 0.50 3E14031 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
PCB-1221 [11104-28-2] 40.37 ug/L 1 0.37 0.50 3E14031 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
PCB-1232 [11141.16-5] <0.028 ug/L 1 0.028 0.50 3E14031 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
PCB-1248 [12672-29-61 <0.014 ug/L 1 0.014 0.50 3E14031 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 M5Z
PCB-1254 [11097.69-1] <0.015 ug/L 1 0.015 0.50 3E14031 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
PCB-1260 [11096-82-51 <0.45 ug/L 1 0.45 0.50 3E14031 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
Toxaphene [8001-35-2] <0.22 ug/L 1 0.22 1.0 3E14030 EPA 608 05/16/13 12:00 MSZ
Surrogates Results DF Spike L yl °/a Rec %Ree Limits Balch Method Analyzed By Notes
2,4,5,6-TCMX 0.55 1 1.00 6696 44-134 3EI4030 EPA 608 05/16/1312:00 M-w
2,4,5,6-TCMX 0.66 1 1.00 66% 45-151 3E14031 EPA 608 05/16/1312.-00 MSZ
D cachlorobrphenyl 1.1 1 1.00 110% 37-149 3E14030 EPA 608 05/16/131200 MSZ
Decachlmbiphenyl t.t 1 1.00 110% 42-159 3E14031 EPA 506 05/16/1312:00 M5Z
Page 7 of 28

www.encolabs.com
Description: TTO Sample 130509-15 Lab Sample ID:C300505-01 Received:05/10/13 12:00
Matrix: Water Sampled:05/09/13 07:03 Work Order:C300505
Project: Misc.Subcontract Sampled By:
Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods
Analyte rCAS Numberl Results Flaa Unit5 DF MDL MRL Batch Method Analyzed Ay Notes
Antimony [7440-36-0] 1.0 J ug/L 1 1.0 10.0 3E13011 EPA 200.7 05/15/13 13:02 JDH
Arsenic [7440.38-2] <2.8 ug/L 1 2.8 10.0 3E33011 EPA 200.7 05/15/13 13:02 JDH
Beryllium [7440.41-7] <0.10 ug/L 1 0.10 1.00 3E13011 EPA 200.7 05/15/13 13:02 JDH
Cadmium [7440-43-9] <0.360 ug/L 1 0.360 1.00 3E13011 EPA 200.7 05/15/13 13:02 JDH
Chromium [7440-47-3] <1.4 ug/L 1 1.4 10.0 3E13011 EPA 200.7 05/15/13 13:02 JDH
Copper [7440-50.81 12.6 ug/L 1 1.60 10.0 3E33031 EPA 200.7 05/15/13 13:02 JDH
Lead [7439-92-1] <1.9 ug/L 1 1.9 10.0 3E13011 EPA 200.7 05/15/13 13:02 JDH
Nickel [7440-02-0] <1.8 ug/L 1 1.8 10.0 3E33011 EPA 200.7 05/15/13 13:02 JDH
Selenium [7782-49-21 <4.5 ug/L 1 4.5 10.0 3E13011 EPA 200.7 05/15/13 13:02 JDH
Silver [7440-22-4] <1.9 ug/L 1 1.9 10.0 3E13011 EPA 200.7 05/15/13 13:02 JDH
Thallium [7440-28-0] <4.8 ug/L 1 4.8 10.0 3E13011 EPA 200.7 05/15/13 13:02 JDH
Zinc [7440-66-6] <3.8 ug/L 1 3.8 10.0 3E13011 EPA 200.7 05/15/13 13'02 JDH
Page 8 of 28

CIENC0
www.encolabs.com
Description: TTO Sample 130509-15 Lab Sample ID:C300505-01 Received:05/10/13 12:00
Matrix: Water Sampled:05/09/13 07:03 Work Order:C300505
Project: Misc.Subcontract Sampled By:
Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods
Analyte fCAS Numberl Results Flag Units DF MDL MRL Batch Method Analyzed Notes
Mercury [7439-97-6] <0.170 ug/L 0.170 0.200 3EIS014 EPA 7470A 05/15/1317.46 TID
Page 9 of 28

EJVCO
www.encolabs.com
Description: TTO Sample 130509-15 Lab Sample ID:C300505-01 Received:05/10/13 12:00
Matrix: Water Sampled:05/09/13 07:03 Work Order:C300505
Project: Misc.Subcontract Sampled By:
Classical Chemistry Parameters
Analyte FCAS Numberl Results Flag Units DF MDL MRL Batch Method Analyzed Ay Notes
Cyanide(total) [57-12.51 <0.0049 mg/l, 1 0.0049 0.010 3EI4010 EPA 9014 05/14/13 17:25 Ics
Page 10 of 28

EIVCO
www.encolabs.com
Description: TTO Sample 130509-15 Lab Sample ID:C300505-01 Received:05/10/13 12:00
Matrix: Water Sampled:05/09/13 07:03 Work Order:C300505
Project: Misc.Subcontract Sampled By:
Classical Chemistry Parameters
Analyte (CAS Numberl Results Flaa Units DF MDL MRL Batch Method AnalAnalIgO Iy Notes
Phenollcs [ECL-01231 <0.02 mg/L 1 0.02 0.05 3E14017 EPA 420.1 05/15/13 18:35 RMM
This report relates only to the sample as received by the laboratory,and may only be reproduced in full.
Page I I of 28

Envil�onmental Conservation Laboratories, Inc.
102-A Woodwinds Industrial Court
Cary NC,27511
Phone: [phone] FAX: [phone] www.encolabs.com
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
Statesville Analytical, Inc. (ST032)
Attn: Tracy Moore
PO Box 228
Statesville, NC 28687
RE: Laboratory Results for
Project Number: 130509-15, Project Name/Desc: Misc. Subcontract
ENCO Workorder(s): C300505
Dear Tracy Moore,
Enclosed is a copy of your laboratory report for test samples received by our laboratory on
Friday, May 10, 2013.
Unless otherwise noted in an attached project narrative,all samples were received in
acceptable condition and processed in accordance with the referenced methods/procedures.
Results for these procedures apply only to the samples as submitted.
The analytical results contained in this report are in compliance with NELAC standards, except
as noted in the project narrative. This report shall not be reproduced except in full,without
the written approval of the Laboratory.
This report contains only those analyses performed by Environmental Conservation
Laboratories. Unless otherwise noted, all analyses were performed at ENCO Cary. Data from
outside organizations will be reported under separate cover.
If you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Link Thrower l•---~J
Project Manager
Enclosure(s)
The total number of pages in this report,including this page is 28

eco
www.encolabs.com
SAMPLE SUMMARY/LABORATORY CHRONICLE
Client ID: TTO Sample 130509-15 Lab'ID:C300505-01 Sampled;;:05/09/13,07:03 Received: 05/1OL13.12:00
Parameter Hold Date/Time(s) Prep Date/Time(s) Analysis Date/Time(s)
EPA 200.7 11/05/13 05/13/13 10:08 5/15/2013 13:02
EPA 420.1 06/06/13 05/14/13 14:25 5/15/2013 18:35
EPA 608 05/16/13 06/23/13 05/14/13 17:10 5/16/2013 12:00
EPA 608 05/09/14 05/14/14 05/14/13 17:14 5/16/2013 12:00
EPA 624 05/23/13 05/16/13 10:25 5/17/2013 10:49
EPA 625 05/16/13 06/20/13 05/11/13 12:05 5/13/2013 23:48
EPA 7470A 06/06/13 05/15/13 09:37 5/15/2013 17:46
EPA 9014 05/23/13 05/14/13 11:10 5/14/2013 17:25
Page 2 of 28

OE N
SAMPLE DETECTION SUMMARY
Iient xb: TTo Sample 130509-15 Lab ID: C300505-01
Analyte Results Flag MDL PQL Units Method Notes
Antimony-Total 1.0 1 1.0 10.0 ug/L EPA 200.7
Copper-Total 12.6 1.60 10.0 ug/L EPA 200.7
Page 3 of 28

F uco
www.encolabs.com
OUALITY CONTROL
Volatile Organic Compounds by GCMS-Quality Control
Batch 3E16016-EPA 5030B-MS
Blank(3E16016-BLK1) Prepared:05/16/2013 10:25 Analyzed:05/17/2013 00:02
Spike Source. %oREC RPD
AnalyteResult Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.12 1.0 ug/L
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.28 1.0 ug/L
1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.14 1.0 ug/L
1,1-Dichlorcethane <0.13 1.0 ug/L
1,1-Dichloroethene <0.21 1.0 ug/L
1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.19 1.0 ug/L
1,2-Dichloroethane <0.21 1.0 ug/L
1,2-Dichlaropropane <0.10 1.0 ug/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.15 1.0 ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.19 1.0 ug/L
2-Chloroethyl vinyl Ether <1.1 5.0 ug/L
Acrolein . <4.0 10 ug/L
Acrylonitrile <3.5 10 ug/L
Benzene <0.15 1.0 ug/L
Bromodichioromethane <0.17 1.0 ug/L
Bromoform <0.22 1.0 ug/L
Bromomethane <0.14 1.0 ug/L
Carbon Tetrachloride <0.17 1.0 ug/L
Chlorobenzene <0.17 1.0 ug/L
Chloroethane <0,23 1.0 ug/L
Chloroform <0.18 1.0 ug/L
Chloromethane <0.13 1.0 ug/L
cis-1,3-Dichlompropene <0.20 1.0 ug/L
Dibromochloromethane <0.17 1.0 ug/l.
Ethylbenzene <0.13 1.0 ug/L
Methylene Chloride <0.23 1.0 ug/L
Tetrachloroethene <0.17 1.0 ug/L
Toluene <0.14 1.0 ug/L
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.21 1.0 ug/L
trans-1,3-Dichioropropene <0.15 1.0 ug/L
Trichloroethene <0.15 1.0 ug/L
Vinyl chloride <0.32 1.0 ug/L
Surmgate:4-8mmoAuorobenzene 38 WIL 50.0 76 51-112
Surrogate:DIbromoAuoromefhane 41 ug/L 50.0 83 68-117
Surrogate:roluene,d8 42 ug/L 50.0 83 67-117
LCS(3E16016-BSI) Prepared:05/16/2013 10:25 Analyzed:05/17/2013 00:31
Spike Source "oREC RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL Units Level- Result- %oREC Limits RPD - Limit Notes
1,1,1-Tnchloroethane 17 1.0 ug/L 20.0 83 52-162
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 20 1.0 ug/L 20.0 100 46-157
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 16 1.0 ug/L 20.0 82 52-150
1,1-Dichloroethane 21 1.0 ug/L 20.0 106 59-155
1,1-Dichloroethene 24 1.0 ug/L 20.0 120 10-234
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 18 1.0 ug/L 20.0 91 18-190
1,2-Dichlorcethane 15 1.0 ug/L 20.0 77 49-155
1,2-Dichioropropane 20 1.0 ug/L 20.0 99 10-210
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 19 1.0 ug/L 20.0 94 59-156
Page 12 of 28

eco
www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL
Volatile Organic Compounds by GCMS-Quality Control
Batch 3E16016-EPA 50308 MS
LCS(3E16016-9S3)Continued Prepared:05/16/2013 10:25 Analyzed:05/17/2013 00:31
Spike Source %REC RPD
AnalyDe' Result Flag MRL Units - Level:- Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 17 1.0 ug/L 20.0 86 18-190
2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether 34 5.0 ug/L 40.0 86 10-305
Acrolein 17 10 ug/L 40.0 43 10-200
Acrylonitrile 69 10 ug/L 60.0 115 10-200
Benzene 20 1.0 ug/L 20.0 99 37.151
Bromodichloromethane 16 1.0 ug/L 20.0 80 35-155
Bromoform 14 1.0 ug/L 20.0 72 45-169
Bromomethane 25 1.0 ug/L 20.0 126 10-142
Carbon Tetrachlonde 16 1.0 ug/L 20.0 79 17-140
Chlorobenzene 20 1.0 ug/L 20.0 98 37-160
Chloroethane 40 1.0 ug/L 20.0 198 14-230
Chloroform 18 1.0 ug/L 20.0 89 51-138
Chloromethane 21 1.0 ug/L 20.0 105 10-273
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 16 1.0 ug/L 20.0 79 10-227
Dibromochloromethane 16 1.0 ug/L 20.0 78 53-149
Ethylbenzene 17 1.0 ug/L 20.0 84 37-162
Methylene Chloride 22 1.0 ug/L 20.0 110 10-221
Tetrachloroethene 19 1.0 ug/L 20.0 93 64-148
Toluene 18 1.0 ug/L 20.0 89 47.150
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 21 1.0 ug/L 20.0 106 54-156
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 15 11.0 ug/L 20.0 74 17-183
Trichloroethene 16, 1.0 ug/L 20.0 82 71-157
Vinyl chloride 20 1.0 ug/L 20.0 99 10-251
Surrogale:4.8nww#Uorobenzene 36 ug/L 50.0 72 51-112
Surrogate:DlbromoAuommethane 42 1 191 50.0 84 68-117
Surrogate:Toluene-d8 41 ug/L 50.0 83 67-127
Matrix Spike(3E16016-MS1) Prepared:05/16/2013 10:25 Analyzed:05/17/2013 01:01
Source:C305146-01
Spike _ Source %REC RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL `Units Level: Result %REC Limlts. RPD Limit Notes
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 18 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.12 U 92 52-162
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 22 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.28 U 109 46-157
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 21 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.14 U 103 52-150
1,1-Dichloroethane 23 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.13 U 116 59.155
1,1-Dichloroethene 27 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.21 U 135 10-234
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 21 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.19 U 106 18-190
1,2-Dichloroethane 17 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.21 U 87 49-155
1,2-Dichloropropane 23 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.10 U 113 10-210
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 22 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.15 U 108 59-156
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 20 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.19 U 99 18-190
2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether <1.1 5.0 ug/L 40.0 1.1 U 10.305
Acrolein 24 10 ug/L 40.0 4.0 U 61 10-200
Acrylonitrile 70 10 ug/L 60.0 3.5 U 116 10-200
Benzene 23 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.15 U 115 37-151
Bromodichloromethane 18 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.17 U 90 35-155
Bromoform 17 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.22 U 84 45-169
Bromomethane 28 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.14 U 142 10-242
Page 13 of 28

ENCO
www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL
Volatile Organic Compounds by GCMS-Quality Control
Batch 3E16016-EPA 50308 MS
Matrix Spike(3E16016-M51)Continued Prepared:05/16/2013 10:25 Analyzed:05/17/2013 01:01
Source:C305146-01
Spike Source %REC 'RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Carbon Tetrachloride 18 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.17 U 88 70-140
Chlorobenzene 23 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.17 U 114 37-160
Chloroethane 45 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.23 U 227 14-230
Chloroform 20 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.18 U 99 51-138
Chloromethane 25 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.13 U 126 10-273
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 17 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.20 U 86 10-227
Dibromochloromethane 18 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.17 U 88 53-149
Ethylbenzene 20 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.13 U 99 37-162
Methylene Chloride 24 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.23 U 121 10-221
Tetrachloroethene 21 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.17 U 107 64-148
Toluene 22 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.14 U 111 47-150
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 24 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.21 U 121 54-156
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 20 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.15 U 100 17-183
Trichlomethene 20 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.15 U 101 71-157
Vinyl chloride 24 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.32 U 120 10-251
Surmyate.4-8mmo7lumobenzene 37 ug/L 50.0 75 51-111
Surrogate:Dibmmofluoromethane 41 ug/L 50.0 85 68-117
Surrogate Toluene-d8 40 ug/L 50.0 79 67-117
Matrix Spike Dup(3E16016-MSD1) Prepared:05/16/2013 10:25 Analyzed:05/17/2013 01:30
Source:C305146-01
Spike source %REC RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL Units. Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 19 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.12 U 93 52-162 0.8 25
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 20 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.28 U 100 46-157 9 25
1,1,2-Tnchloroethane 19 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.14 U 94 52-150 9 25
1,1-Dichloroethane 24 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.13 U 121 59-155 4 25
1,1-Dichloroethene 27 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.21 U 134 10.234 0.4 25
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 21 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.19 U 103 18-190 3 25
1,2-Dichloroethane 17 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.21 U 84 49-155 3 25
1,2-Dichloropropane 21 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.10 U 105 10-210 7 25
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 21 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.15 U 106 59-156 3 25
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 19 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.19 U 96 18-190 3 25
2-Chloroethyl Vinyl Ether <1.1 5.0 ug/L 40.0 1.1 U 10-305 25.9
Acrolein 17 10 ug/L 40.0 4.0 U 43 10-200 33 36
Acrylonitrile 66 10 ug/L 60.0 3.5 U 109 10-200 6 50
Benzene 23 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.15 U 115 37-151 0.1 25
Bromodichloromethane 19 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.17 U 94 35.155 4 25
Bromoform 16 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.22 U 82 45-169 2 25
Bromomethane 31 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.14 U 154 10-242 8 25
Carbon Tetrachloride 18 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.17 U 88 70-140 0.8 25
Chlorobenzene 22 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.17 U 111 37-160 2 25
Chloroethane 49 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.23 U 243 14-230 7 25
Chloroform 19 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.18 U 97 51-138 2 25
Chloromethane 26 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.13 U 131 10-273 4 25
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 16 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.20 U 81 10-227 6 25
Dibromochloromethane 17 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.17 U 87 53-149 2 25
Page 14 of 28

- ENCO
www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL
Volatile Organic Compounds by GCMS-Quality Control
Batch 3E16016-EPA 50308 MS
Matrix Spike Dup(3E36016-MSD3)Continued Prepared:05/16/2013 10:25 Analyzed:05/17/2013 01:30
Source:C305146-01
Spike Source PAREC RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL'.,' Units Level Result %REC Limits` - .RPD Limit Notes
Ethylbenzene 19 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.13 U 95 37-162 4 25
Methylene Chlonde 24 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.23 U 121 10-221 0.04 25
Tetrachloroethene 20 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.17 U 101 64-148 6 25
Toluene 21 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.14 U 107 47-150 4 25
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 24 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.21 U 120 54-156 0.6 25
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 17 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.15 U 65 17-183 17 25
Trichloroethene 21 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.15 U 103 71-157 2 25
Vinyl chloride 25 1.0 ug/L 20.0 0.32 U 125 10-251 4 25
Surrogate:4-8romoAuorobenzene 37 ug/L 50.0 74 51-111
Surrogate:Dibromo0uommethane 43 ug/L 50.0 95 68-117
Surrogate.Toluene-d8 41 ug/L 50.0 84 67-117
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS-Quality Control
Batch 3E10034-EPA 3510C M5
Blank(3E30034-BLK3) Prepared:05/10/2013 15:10 Analyzed:05/13/2013 17:59
Spike Source %REC RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL units Level Result %REC Limits RPD.' Limit Notes
1,2,4-Trichlombenzene <1.2 10 ug/L
1,2-DlChlorobenzene <1.1 10 ug/L
1,3-Dichlorobenzene <1.1 10 ug/L
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <1.0 10 ug/L
1-Methylnaphthalene <1.7 10 ug/L
2,4,5-Trichlomphenol <1.o 10 ug/L
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol <1.1 10 ug/L
2,4-Dlchlorophenol <1.4 10 ug/L
2,4-Dimethylphenol <1.3 10 ug/L
2,4-Dinitrophenol <2.6 10 ug/L
2,4-Dinitrotoluene <2.4 10 ug/L
2,6-Dinitrotoluene <1.5 10 ug/L
2-Chloronaphthalene <1.0 10 ug/L
2-Chlorophenol <1.2 10 ug/L
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol <2.9 10 ug/L
2-Methylnaphthalene <1.5 10 ug/L
2-Nitrophenol <1.1 10 ug/L
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine <3.3 10 ug/L
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether <1.0 10 ug/L
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol <1.5 10 ug/L
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether <1.6 10 ug/L
4-Nitrophenal <2.0 10 ug/L
Acenaphthene <1.4 10 ug/L
Acenaphthylene <1.2 10 ug/L
Anthracene <1.6 10 ug/L
Benzidine <1.6 10 ug/L
Benzo(a)anthracene <1.3 10 ug/L
Benzo(a)pyrene <1.3 10 ug/L
Benzo(b)fluoranthene <1.0 10 ug/L
Page 15 of 28

VCO
www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS-Quality Control
Batch 3E10034-EPA 3510C MS
Blank(3E10034-BLK1)Continued Prepared:05/10/2013 15:10 Analyzed:05/13/2013 17:59
Spike Source;. %REC RPD
Analyte'_ Result. Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Senzo(g,h,i)perylene <2.4 10 ug/L
Senzo(k)Suoranthene <1.3 10 ug/L
Benzoic acid <1.0 50 ug/L
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane <1.4 10 ug/L
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether <1.2 10 ug/L
Bls(2-chlorcisopropyl)ether <1.3 10 ug/L
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate <1.7 5.0 ug/L
Butylbenzylphthalate <2.0 10 ug/L
Chrysene <2.0 10 ug/L
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene c 2.3 10 ug/L
Diethylphthalate <2.1 10 ug/L
Dlmethylphthalate <1.4 10 ug/L
Dl-n-butylphthalate <1.5 10 ug/L
Di-n-octylphthalate <3.1 10 ug/l.
DPH(as Azobenzene) <1.9 10 ug/L
Fluoranthene <2.1 10 ug/L
Fluorene <1.7 10 ug/L
Hexachlorobenzene <1.0 10 ug/L
Hexachlorobutadiene <1.2 10 ug/L
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene <1.3 10 ug/L
Hexachloroethane <1.1 10 ug/L
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene <2.2 10 ug/L
Isophorone <1.3 10 ug/L
Naphthalene <1.3 10 ug/L
Nitrobenzene <1.2 to ug/L
N-Nitrosodimethylamine <1.3 10 ug/L
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine <1.5 10 ug/L
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine <2.1 10 ug/L
Pentachlorophenol <1.8 10 ug/L
Phenanthrene <1.4 10 ug/L
Phenol <1.4 10 ug/L
Pyrene <2.1 10 ug/L
Surrogate.'2,4,6-Tr7bromopheno1 86 u91L 100 86 18-157
Surrogate:2-Fluorobiphenyl 43 u91L 50.0 85 15-139
Surrogate:2-Fluorophenol 52 u91L 100 52 10-104
Surrogate:Nitrobemmne-d5 41 ug/L 50.0 81 16.140
Surrogate:Phenol-d5 41 ug/L 100 41 10-83
Surrogate.'Terphenyl-d14 49 u91L 50.0 99 23-164
LCS(3E10034-BSI) Prepared:05/10/2013 15:10 Analyzed:05/13/2013 18:28
Spike Source %REC RPD
�Analyte Result Flag MRL Units. Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes. .:
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 41 10 ug/L 50.0 81 44-142
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 38 10 ug/L 50.0 76 32-129
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 37 10 ug/L 50.0 74 10-172
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 37 10 ug/L 50.0 74 20-124
1-Methylnaphthalene 42 10 ug/L 50.0 84 46-80 QL-02
2,4,5-Tnchlorophenol 48 10 ug/L 50.0 95 59-121
Page 16 of 28

NCO
www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS-Quality Control
Balch 3EI0034-EPA 35100 MS
LCS(3E10034-BSI)Continued Prepared:05/10/2013 15:10 Analyzed:05/13/2013 18:28
Spike - Source %REC RPD
Analyte - Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 47 10 ug/L 50.0 94 61-119
2,4-Dichlorophenol 45 10 ug/L 50.0 90 49-118
2,4-Dimethylphenol 39 10 ug/L 50.0 78 42-111
2,4-Dinitrophenol 46 10 ug/L 50.0 92 1-149
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 46 10 ug/L 50.0 92 39.139
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 43 10 ug/L 50.0 86 50-158
2-Chloronaphthalene 44 10 ug/L 50.0 87 60-118
2-Chlorophenol 39 10 ug/L 50.0 78 23-134
2-Methyl-4,6-dlnitrophenol 47 10 ug/L 50.0 94 33-160
2-Methylnaphthalene 42 10 ug/L 50.0 84 33-111
2-Nitrophenol 42 10 ug/L 50.0 85 36-113
3,3'-Dlchlombenzidlne 5o 10 ug/L 50.0 99 10-262
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 46 10 ug/L 50.0 93 53-127
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 44 10 ug/L 50.0 87 25-147
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 45 10 ug/L 50.0 91 25-158
4-Nitrophenol 34 10 ug/L 50.0 68 33-105
Acenaphthene 40 10 ug/L 50.0 81 47-145
Acenaphthylene 44 10 ug/L 50.0 87 33-145
Anthracene 45 10 ug/L 50.0 90 27-133
Benzidine 13 10 ug/L 50.0 26 10-136
Benzo(a)anthracene 46 10 ug/L 50.0 92 33-143
Benzo(a)pyrene 47 10 ug/L 50.0 94 17-163
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 47 10 ug/L 50.0 94 24-159
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 44 10 ug/L 50.0 88 10-219
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 47 10 ug/L 50.0 94 11-162
Benzoic acid 11 3 50 ug/L 50.0 22 10-120
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 41 10 ug/L 50.0 82 33-184
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 39 10 ug/L 50.0 77 12-158
Bis(2-chlomisopropyl)ether 36 10 ug/L 50.0 73 36.166
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 50 5.0 ug/L 50.0 100 10-158
Butylbenzylphthalate 44 10 ug/L 50.0 89 64-152
Chrysene 45 10 ug/L 50.0 89 17-168
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 44 10 ug/L 50.0 87 10-227
Diethylphthalate 46 10 ug/L 50.0 93 62-127
Dimethylphthalate 45 10 ug/L 50.0 91 10-114
Di-n-butylphthalate 46 10 ug/L 50.0 92 10-118
Di-n-octylphthalate 45 10 ug/L 50.0 90 10-146
DPH(as Azobenzene) 43 10 ug/L 50.0 87 69-108
Fluoranthene 46 10 ug/L 50.0 93 26.137
Fluorene 46 10 ug/L 50.0 92 59.121
Hexachlorobenzene 48 10 ug/L 50.0 95 10-152
Hexachlorobutadiene 43 10 ug/L 50.0 85 24-116
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 46 10 ug/L 50.0 91 10.99
Hexachloroethane 38 10 ug/L 50.0 76 12-82
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 44 30 ug/L 50.0 89 10-171
Isophorone 41 10 ug/L 50.0 81 21-196
Naphthalene 40 10 ug/L 50.0 81 21-133
Nitrobenzene 41 10 ug/L 50.0 82 35-180
N-Nitrosodimethylamine 28 10 ug/L 50.0 56 24.94
Page 17 of 28

eco
www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS-Quality Control
Batch 3E10034-EPA 3510C M5
LCS(3E10034-OSI)Continued prepared:05/10/2013 15:10 Analyzed:05/13/2013 18:28
Spike' Source a%REC RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL Units Level Result a/aRE_C Limits RPD Limit Notes
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 40 10 ug/L 50.0 80 10-230
Pentachforophenol 50 10 ug/L 50.0 100 51-135
Phenanthrene 46 10 ug/L 50.0 91 54-120
Phenol 25 to ug/L 50.0 50 19-78
Pyrene 45 10 ug/L 50.0 90 65-134
Sunagate.•2,4,6-Tnbromopheno/ 96 ug/L 100 96 18-157
Surrogate.-2-Fluarobiphenyl 45 ug/[ 50.0 90 15-139
Surrogate:2-Fluorophenol 51 ug/L 100 51 10-104
Surrogate:wrobenzened5 41 ug/L 50.0 82 16-140
Surrogate:Phenol-d5 40 ug/L 100 40 10.83
Surrogate.•Terphenyld14 46 ug/L 50.0 92 23-164
Matrix Spike(3E30034-MSI) Prepared:05/10/2013 15:10 Analyzed:05/14/2013 11:00
Source:C305477-07
Spike Source a/oREC RPD
Analyte;`. Result` -Flag M_RIL Units Level Result a/oREC Limits RPD -Limit Notes
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 34 10 ug/L 50.0 1.2 u 69 44-142
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 32 10 ug/L 50.0 1.1 U 64 32.129
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 31 10 ug/L 50.0 1.1 U 62 10-172
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 31 10 ug/L 50.0 1.0 U 62 20-124
1-Methylnaphthalene 33 10 ug/L 50.0 1.7 U 65 46.80
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 37 10 ug/L 50.0 1.0 U 74 59.121
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 36 10 ug/L 50.0 1.1 U 73 61-119
2,4-Dlchlorophenol 35 10 ug/L 50.0 1.4 U 70 49-118
2,4-Dimethylphenol 31 10 ug/L 50.0 1.3 U 61 42.111
2,4-Dinitrophenol 28 10 ug/L 50.0 2.6 U 56 I1-149
2,4-DinRrotoluene 33 10 ug/L 50.0 2.4 U 67 39-139
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 34 10 ug/L 50.0 1.5 U 68 50-158
2-Chlomnaphthalene 34 10 ug/L 50.0 1.D U 69 60-118
2-Chlorophenol 31 10 ug/L 50.0 1.2 U 63 23-134
2-Methyl4,6-dinitrophenol 32 10 ug/L 50.0 2.9 U 63 33-160
2-Methylnaphthalene 33 10 ug/L 50.0 1.5 U 65 33-111
2-Nitrophenol 34 10 ug/L 50.0 1.1 U 68 36-113
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 46 10 ug/L 50.0 3.3 U 93 10.262
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 39 10 ug/L 50.0 1.0 U 78 53-127
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 31 10 ug/L 50.0 1.5 U 62 25-147
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 36 10 ug/L 50.0 1.6 U 71 25-158
4-Nitrophenol 23 10 ug/L 50.0 2.0 U 47 33-105
Acenaphthene 32 10 ug/L 50.0 1.4 U 63 47-145
Acenaphthylene 34 10 ug/L 50.0 1.2 U 68 33-145
Anthracene 37 10 ug/L 50.0 1.6 U 74 27-133
Benzidine 11 10 ug/L 50.0 1.6 U 22 10-136
Benzo(a)anthracene 38 10 ug/L 50.0 1.3 U 77 33-143
Benzo(a)pyrene 39 30 ug/L 50.0 1.3 U 78 17-163
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 38 10 ug/L 50.0 1.0 U 76 24-159
Benzo(g,h,t)perylene 39 10 ug/L 50.0 2.4 U 79 10-219
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 40 10 ug/L 50.0 1.3 U 80 11-162
Benzoic acid 4.5 1 50 ug/L 50.0 1.0 U 9 10-120 QM-07
Page 18 of 28

clemq !=O
www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS-Quality Control
Batch 3EI0034-EPA 3510C M5
Matrix Spike(3E30034-MS3)Continued Prepared:05/10/2013 15:10 Analyzed:05/14/2013 11:00
Source:0305477-07
Spike Source %REC'.. RPD
Analyte. Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits. :- .RPD Limit Notes:
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 32 10 ug/L 50.0 1.4 U 64 33-184
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 31 10 ug/L 50.0 1.2 U 63 12-158
Bls(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 30 10 ug/L 50.0 1.3 U 59 36-166
Bls(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 41 5.0 ug/L 50.0 1.7 U 82 10.158
Butylbenzylphthalate 41 10 ug/L 50.0 2.0 U B2 10.152
Chrysene 3B 10 ug/L 50.0 2.0 U 76 17-168
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 39 10 ug/L 50.0 2.3 U 78 10-227
Dlethylphthalate 38 10 ug/L 50.0 2.1 U 77 62-127
Dlmethylphthalate 36 30 ug/L 50.0 1.4 U 73 10.114
Di-n-butylphthalate 42 10 ug/L 50.0 1.5 U 83 10-118
Di-n-octylphthalate 40 10 ug/L 50.0 3.1 U 79 10-146
DPH(as Azobenzene) 32 10 ug/L 50.0 1.9 U 64 69-108 QM-07
Fluoranthene 39 10 ug/L 50.0 2.1 U 78 26-137
Fluorene 34 10 ug/L 50.0 1.7 U 67 59-121
Hexachlorobenzene 43 10 ug/L 50.0 1.0 U 86 10-152
Hexachlorobutadlene 36 10 ug/L 50.0 1.2 U 75 24-116
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 36 10 ug/L 50.0 1.3 U 71 10-99
Hexachloroethane 32 10 ug/L 50.0 1.1 U 65 12-82
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 39 10 ug/L 50.0 2.2 U 78 10.171
Isophorone 33 10 ug/L 50.0 1.3 U 66 21-196
Naphthalene 33 10 ug/L 50.0 1.3 U 66 21-133
Nitrobenzene 33 10 ug/L 50.0 1.2 U 65 35-180
N-Nitrasodimethylamine 22 10 ug/L 50.0 1.3 U 43 24-94
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 32 10 ug/L 50.0 1.5 U 63 10-230
Pentachlorophenol 39 10 ug/L 50.0 1.8 U 78 51-135
Phenanthrene 37 10 ug/L 50.0 1.4 U 74 54-120
Phenol 20 10 ug/L 50.0 1.4 U 40 19-78
Pyrene 39 10 ug/L 50.0 2.1 U 77 52-115 -
Sunvgate.2,4,6-Tnbromophenol 70 u9/L 100 70 18-157
Surrogate:2-Fl--biphenyl 37 u9/L 50.0 74 15.139
Surrogate:2-F/uorophenal 41 u9/L 100 47 10-104
Surrogate:M&obenzened5 33 u9/L 50.0 67 16-140
Surrogate:Phenol-d5 31 u9/L 100 31 10-83
Surrogate:Terphenyl-d14 40 u9/L 50.0 80 13-164
Matrix Spike Dup(3E30034-MSD3) Prepared:05/10/2013 15:10 Analyzed:05/13/2013 19:27
Source:C305477-07
Spike - SounDe %gREC RPD
Analyte`. Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD mit Notes
li
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 33 10 ug/L 50.0 1.2 U 65 44-142 5 28.1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 30 10 ug/L 50.0 1.1 U 60 32.129 5 30.9
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 28 10 ug/L 50.0 1.1 U 56 10-172 11 41.7
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 29 10 ug/L 50.0 1.0 U 58 20-124 7 32.1
1-Methylnaphthalene 37 10 ug/L 50.0 1.7 U 74 46-80 13 25
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 46 10 ug/L 50.0 1.0 U 91 59-121 22 25
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 45 10 u9/L 50.0 1.1 U 89 61-119 20 25
2,4-Dichlorophenol 43 10 ug/L 50.0 1.4 U 86 49-118 20 25
Page 19 of 28

CEO)
www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS-Quality Control
Batch 3EI0034-EPA 3510C MS
Matrix Spike Dup(3E10034-MSD3)Continued Prepared:05/10/2013 15:10 Analyzed:05/13/2013 19:27
Source:C305477-07
Spike Source %REC RPD
(Analyte Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits IRPD Limit Notes'
2,4-Dimethylphenol 39 10 ug/L 50.0 13U 79 42-111 25 26
2,4-Dinitmphenol 44 10 ug/L 50.0 2.6 U 88 11-149 45 50
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 44 10 ug/L 50.0 2.4 U 87 39-139 26 25 QM-11
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 43 10 ug/L 50.0 1.5 U 86 50-158 24 29.6
2-Chloronaphthalene 39 10 ug/L 50.0 1.0 U 78 60-118 12 25
2-Chlorophenol 40 10 ug/L 50.0 1.2 U 81 23-134 25 28.7
2-Methyl4,6-dinitrophenoi 45 10 ug/L 50.0 2.9 U 89 33-160 34 25 QM-11
2-Methylnaphthalene 38 10 ug/L 50.0 1.5 U 76 33-111 15 27
2-Nitrophenol 42 10 ug/L 50.0 1.1 U 83 36-113 20 50
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 50 10 ug/L 50.0 3.3 U 100 10.262 7 71.4
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether 44 10 ug/L 50.0 1.0 U 88 53-127 12 25
4-Chloro-3-methylphenal 42 10 ug/L 50.0 1.5 U 85 25-147 30 37.2
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylether 43 10 ug/L 50.0 1.6 U 85 25-158 18 33.4
4-Nitrophenol 32 10 ug/L 50.0 2.0 U 64 33-105 30 27 QM-11
Acenaphthene 37 10 ug/L 50.0 1.4 U 74 47.145 16 27.6
Acenaphthylene 41 10 ug/L 50.0 1.2 U 81 33-145 18 40.2
Anthracene 44 10 ug/L 50.0 1.6 U 89 27-133 18 32
Benzidine 16 10 ug/L 50.0 1.6 U 32 10-136 34 50
Benzo(a)anthracene 45 10 ug/L 50.0 1.3 U 90 33-143 16 27.6
Benzo(a)pyrene 47 10 ug/L 50.0 1.3 U 94 17-163 19 39
Benzo(b)fluoranthene 47 10 ug/L 50.0 1.0 U 94 24-159 20 3B.8
8enzo(g,h,i)perylene 44 10 ug/L 50.0 2.4 U 89 10.219 12 58.9
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 48 10 ug/L 50.0 1.3 U 96 11-162 19 32.3
Benzoic acid 12 3 50 ug/L 50.0 1.0 U 25 10-120 93 41 QM-11
BIs(2-chloroethoxy)methane 40 10 ug/L 50.0 1.4 U 80 33-184 21 34.5
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 39 10 ug/L 50.0 1.2 U 77 12-158 21 55
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 35 10 ug/L 50.0 1.3 U 71 36-166 18 46.3
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 49 5.0 ug/L 50.0 1.7 U 98 10-158 19 41.1
Butylbenzylphthalate 49 10 ug/L 50.0 2.0 U 97 10-152 16 25
Chrysene 45 10 ug/L 50.0 2.0 U 90 17-168 16 48.3
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 45 10 ug/L 50.0 2.3 U 91 10-227 15 70
Diethylphthalate 45 10 ug/L 50.0 2.1 U 89 62-127 15 it QM-11
Dimethylphthalate 44 10 ug/L 50.0 1.4 U 87 10-114 18 26.5
Di-n-butylphthalate 46 10 ug/L 50.0 1.5 U 92 10-118 10 25
Di-n-octylphthalate 46 10 ug/L 50.0 3.1 U 91 10-146 14 31.4
DPH(as Azobenzene) 41 10 ug/L 50.0 1.9 U 82 69-108 24 36
Fluoranthene 47 10 ug/L 50.0 2.1 U 93 26-137 18 32.8
Fluorene 43 10 ug/L 50.0 1.7 U 86 59-121 24 25
Hexachlorobenzene 45 10 ug/L 50.0 1.0 U 91 10-152 6 25
Hexachlorobutadiene 30 10 ug/L 50.0 1.2 U 61 24.116 21 26.3
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 30 10 ug/L 50.0 1.3 U 60 10-99 17 50
Hexachlorcethane 27 10 ug/L 50.0 1.1 U 53 12.82 20 50
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 45 10 ug/L 50.0 2.2 U 89 10-171 13 44.6
Isophorone 40 10 ug/L 50.0 1.3 U 79 21-196 18 63.3
Naphthalene 36 30 ug/L 50.0 1.3 U 72 21-133 8 30.1
Nitrobenzene 41 10 ug/L 50.0 1.2 U 81 35.180 21 39.3
N-Nitrosodimethylamine 29 10 ug/L 50.0 1.3 U 58 24-94 29 36
Page 20 of 28

EJVCO
www.encolabs.com
OUALITY CONTROL
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GCMS-Quality Control
Batch 3E10034-EPA 35100 MS
Matrix Spike Dup(3E10034-MSD3)Continued Prepared:05/10/2013 15:10 Analyzed:05/13/2013 19:27
Source:C30S477-07
Spike Source %REC RPD
Analyte Result Fiag MRL, Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 40 10 ug/L 50.0 1.5 U 79 10-230 23 55.4
Pentachlorophenol
49 10 ug/L 50.0 1.9 U 98 51-135 23 25
Phenanthrene 44 10 ug/L 50.0 1.4 U 88 54-120 17 25
Phenol 26 10 ug/L 50.0 1.4 U 52 19-78 28 25 QM-11
Pyrene 47 10 ug/L 50.0 2.1 U 95 52-115 20 25
Surrogate:2,4,6-Tntromophenol 95 ug/L 100 95 18-157
Surrogate:2-flucrobiphenyt 41 ug/L 50.0 85 15-139
Surrogate.2-P/uorophenol 55 ug/L 100 55 f0-104
Surrogate:Nitrobenzene-d5 43 u91L 50.0 85 16-140
Surrogate:Phenol-d5 43 ug/L 100 43 10-83
Surrogate:Terphenyl-d14 49 ug/L 50.0 98 13-164
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC-Quality Control
Batch 3EI4030-EPA 3510C
Blank(3E14030-BLK1) Prepared:05/14/2013 17:10 Analyzed:05/16/2013 10:14
Spike Source %REC RPD
Analyte_ Result
'Fla MRL units. Level Result,:, °AREC Limits RPD Limit Notes
4,4'-DDD <0.044 0.050 ug/L
4,4'-DDE <0.048 0.050 ug/L
4,4'-DDT <0.049 0.050 ug/L
Aldrin <0.041 0.050 ug/L RECEIVEDINCDEQIDINR
alpha-BHC <0.036 0.050 ug/L
beta-BHC <0.036 0.050 ug/L FEB 2 3 2016
Chlordane(n.o.s.) <0.020 1.0 ug/L
Chlordane(tech) <0.20 0.50 ug/L Water Quality
delta-BHC <0.048 0.050 ug/L Permitting Section
Dieldrin <0.045 0.050 ug/L
Endosulfan I <0.045 0.050 ug/L
Endosulfan II <0.036 0.050 ug/L
Endosulfan sulfate <0.032 0.050 ug/L
Endrin <0.041 0.050 ug/L
Endrin aldehyde <0.042 0.050 ug/L
gamma-BHC <0.034 0.050 ug/L
Heptachlor <0.030 0.050 ug/L
Heptachlor epoxide -0.037 0.050 ug/L
Toxaphene <0.22 1.0 ug/L
Surrogate:2,4,5,6-TCMX 0.60 ug/L 1.00 60 44-134
Surrogate:Decachlbmbipheny/ 0.95 ug/L 1.00 95 37-149
LCS(3E34030-851) Prepared:05/14/2013 17:10 Analyzed:05/16/2013 10:27
Spike Source " %REC ItPq
Analyte Result Flag MRL Units Level Result- °/aREC Limits RPD Limit Notes .
4,4'-DDT 0.83 0.050 ug/L 1.00 83 37.160
Aldrin 0.62 0.050 ug/L 1.00 62 42-122
Dieldrin 0.84 0.050 ug/L 1.00 84 36-146
Page 21 of 28

EJVCO
www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC-Quality Control
Batch 3E14030-EPA 3510C
LCS(3E14030-B51)Continued Prepared:05/14/2013 17:10 Analyzed:05/16/2013 10:27
Spike Source %REC RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Lbrtiit Notes
Endrin 0.84 0.050 ug/L 1.00 84 30-147
gamma-BHC 0.81 0.050 ug/L 1.00 81 19-140
Heptachlor 0.72 0.050 ug/L 1.00 72 45-122 -
Surrogate:1,4,5,6-TCM --- -- 0.59 ug/L 1.00 59 44-134
Surrogate:Decachlorobwhenyl 1.1 ug/L 1.00 JOB 37-149
Matrix Spike(3E14030-MSI) Prepared:05/14/2013 17:10 Analyzed:05/16/2013 10:40
Source:C305643-04
Spike Source %REC RPD
pnalybe' Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes...
4,4'-DDT 0.82 0.050 ug/L 1.00 0.049 U 82 35-160
Aldrin 0.80 0.050 ug/L 1.00 0.041 U 80 42-122
Dieldrin 0.91 0.050 ug/L 1.00 0.045 U 91 36-146
Endrin 0.90 0.050 ug/L 1.00 0.041 U 90 30-147
gamma-BHC 0.87 0.050 ug/L 1.00 0.034 U 87 19-140
Heptachlor 0.85 0.050 ug/L 1.00 0.030 U 85 45-122
SumVate:1,4,56.7LMX 0.66 ug/L 1.00 66 44-134
Surrogate:Derachlorobiphenyl 1.1 ug/L 1.00 107 37-149
Matrix Spike Dup(3E34030-MSDI) Prepared:05/14/2013 17:10 Analyzed:05/16/2013 10:54
Source:0305643-04
Spike Source %REC RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
4,4'-DDT 0.77 0.050 ug/L 1.00 0.049 U 77 35.160 7 25
Aldrin 0.75 0.050 ug/L 1.00 0.041 U 75 42-122 7 25
Dieldnn 0.83 0.050 ug/L 1.00 0.045 U 83 36-146 9 25
Endrin 0.82 0.050 ug/L 1.00 0.041 U 82 30-147 9 25
gamma-BHC 0.80 0.050 ug/L 1.00 0.034 U 80 19-140 8 25
Heptachlor 0.79 0.050 ug/L 1.00 0.030 U 79_ 45-122 7 32
Surrogate:1,4,5,6-TCMX _--- -- 0.61 - - ug/L J.00 6J 44-134
Surrogate:Decachlorobipheny/ 0.96 ug/L 1.00 96 37-149
Batch 3E14031-EPA 3510C
Blank(3E14031-BLKI) Prepared:05/14/2013 17:14 Analyzed:05/16/2013 10:14
Spike Source %REC RPD
Analyte.
Result Flag. MRL Units- Level Result "/°REC Limits RPD Limit_. Notes
PCB-1016/1242 <0.43 0.50 ug/L
PCB-1221 <0.37 0.50 ug/L
PCB-1232 <0.028 0.50 ug/L
PCB-1248 <0.014 0.50 ug/L
PCB-1254 <0.015 0.50 ug/L
PCB-1260 <0.45 0.50 ug/L
Surrogate:1,4,5,6-TCMX a60 ug/L 1.00 60 45-151
Surrogate:Decach/orobiphenyl 0.95 u9/L 1.00 95 41-159
Page 22 of 29

1
es 0
www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL
Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC-Quality Control
Batch 3E14031-EPA 3510C
LCS(3E14031-BSl) Prepared:05/14/2013 17:14 Analyzed:05/16/2013 11:07
Spike Source °/oREC RPD
Analyte Resu_It, . Flag' MRL Units_. :Level Result %REC Links RPD Limit Notes.'
PCB-1016/1242 11 0.50 ug/L 10.0 110 50-114
PCB-1260 11 0.50 ug/L 10.0 111 8-127 --- --
Surrogate.,1,4,5,6-rCMX 0.81 u9/L 1.00 81 45-151
Surrogate:Dwarchlorobiphenyl 1.1 ug/L 1.00 114 41-159
Matrix Spike(3E14031-MSI) Prepared:05/14/2013 17:14 Analyzed:05/16/2013 11:20
Source:C305643-04
Spike 1, Source %REC RPD
Analyte`- Result Flag MRL Units, .'.:Level, Result- %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
PCB-1016/1242 12 0.50 ug/L 10.0 0.43 U 122 53-11q QM-07
PCO-1260 10 0.50 ug/L 10.0 0.45 U 102 8-127 -
Surrogate:1,4,5,6-7CMX 0.89 u9/L 1.00 89 45-151
Surrogate:0ecach/orobiphenyl 0.53 u9/L 1.00 53 42-159
Matrix Spike Dup(3E34031-MSD1) Prepared:05/14/2013 17:14 Analyzed:05/16/2013 11:34
Source:0305543-04
Spike Source %REC RPD
Analyte Result Flag .,MRL Units Level Resuit - "/dREC Limits: RPD Limit Nates
PCB-1016/1242 11 0.50 Ug/L 10.0 0.43 U 108 50-114 13 25
PCB-1260 9.6 0.50 ug/L 10.0 0.45 U 96 B-127 6 25
Surrogate.'1,4,5,6-7CMX 0.78 u9/L 1.00 78 45-1S1
Sunagate:Lecachlombiphenyl 1.1 ug/L 1.00 111 41-159
Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods-Quality Control
Batch 3EI3011-EPA 3005A
Blank(3E13011-BLK1) Prepared:05/13/2013 10:08 Analyzed:05/15/2013 11:50
Spike Source 9!eREC RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limns RPD Limit Notes
Antimony <1.0 10.0 Ug/L
Arsenic 4.0 ) 10.0 ug/L
Beryllium -0.10 1.00 ug/L
Cadmium <0.360 1.00 ug/L
Chromium 1.4 7 10.0 ug/L
Copper <1.60 10.0 ug/L
Lead <1.9 10.0 ug/L
Nickel <1.8 10.0 ug/L
Selenium <4.5 10.0 ug/L
Silver <1.9 10.0 ug/L
Thallium <4.8 10.0 ug/L
Zinc <3-8 10.0 ug/L
LCS(3E13011-BSI) Prepared:05/13/2013 10:08 Analyzed:05/15/2013 12:36
Spike Source °/oREC RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Antimony �.,.. 10.0 ug/L 200 104 85-115
Page 23 of 28

EJVCO
www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL
Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods-Quality Control
Batch 3E13011-EPA 3005A
LCS(3E13011-BSI)Continued Prepared:05/13/2013 10:08 Analyzed:05/15/2013 12:36
Spike Source %REC RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL Units Level Result 9/aREC Limits. RPD Limit Notes
Arsenic 218 8 10.0 ug/L 200 109 BS-115
Beryllium 21.9 1.00 ug/L 20.0 110 B5-115
Cadmium 21.3 1.00 ug/L 20.0 107 85-115
Chromium 215 B 10.0 ug/L 200 107 85-115
Copper 213 10.0 ug/L 200 106 85-115
Lead 216 10.0 ug/L 200 108 85-115
Nickel 213 10.0 ug/L 200 107 85-115
Selenium 209 10.0 ug/L 200 105 85-115
Silver 218 10.0 ug/L 200 109 85-115
Thallium 219 10.0 ug/L 200 110 85-115
Zinc 211 10.0 ug/L 200 106 85.115
Matrix Spike(3E13011-MSI) Prepared:05/13/2013 10:08 Analyzed:05/15/2013 12:42
Source:C305147-02
Spike Source %REC RPD
Analyte - Result Flag MRL Units -_ Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Antimony 207 10.0 ug/L 200 1.0 u 104 70-130
Arsenic 213 B 10.0 ug/L 200 2.8 U 107 70-130
Beryllium 21.2 1.00 ug/L 20.0 0.10 u 106 70-130
Cadmium 21.7 1.00 ug/L 20.0 0.360 U 108 70-130
Chromium 210 B 10.0 ug/L 200 3.0 104 70-130
Copper 214 10.0 ug/L 200 3.53 105 70-130
Lead 209 10.0 ug/L 200 1.9 U 104 70-130
Nickel 214 10.0 ug/L 200 1.8 U 107 70-130
Selenium 211 10.0 ug/L 200 4.5 U 105 70-130
Silver 208 10.0 ug/L 200 1.9 U 104 70.130
Thallium 210 10.0 ug/L 200 4,8 U 105 70-130
Zinc 228 10.0 ug/L 200 13.0 107 70.130
Matrix Spike Dup(3E13011-MSDI) Prepared:05/13/2013 10:08 Analyzed:05/15/2013 12:44
Source:C305147-02
Spike- Source '/DREG RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL =Units Level `Result, %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Antimony 204 10.0 ug/L 200 1.0 U 102 70-130 1 30
Arsenic 203 B 10.0 ug/L 200 2.8 U 101 70-130 5 30
Beryllium 20.8 1.00 ug/L 20.0 0.10 U 104 70-130 2 30
Cadmium 21.2 1.00 ug/L 20.0 0.360 U 106 70-130 2 30
Chromium 205 B 10.0 ug/L 200 3.0 101 70-130 2 30
Copper 210 10.0 ug/L 200 3.53 103 70.130 2 30
Lead 207 10.0 ug/L 200 1.9 U 104 70-130 0.9 30
Nickel 211 10.0 ug/L 200 1.8 U 106 70-130 1 30
Selenium 209 10.0 ug/L 200 4.5 U 104 70-130 1 30
Silver 204 10.0 ug/L 200 1.9 U 102 70-130 2 30
Thallium 211 10.0 ug/L 200 4,8 U 105 70-130 0.3 30
Zinc 224 10.0 ug/L 200 13.0 106 70-130 2 30
Post Spike(3E13011-PSI) Prepared:05/13/2013 10:08 Analyzed:05/15/2013 12:46
Page 24 of 28

C�k
www.encolabs.com
OUALITY CONTROL
Metals by EPA 200 Series Methods-Quality Control
Batch 3E13011-EPA 3005A
Post Spike(3E13011-PS1)Continued Prepared:05/13/2013 10:08 Analyzed:05/15/2013 12:46
Source:C305147-02
Spike Source %REC RPD
Analyte, Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD "Limit Notes
Antimony 0.4 0.01 mg/L 0.400 -0.007 98 80-120
Arsenic 0.4 B 0.01 mg/L 0.400 -0.006 99 80-120
Beryllium 0.04 0.001 mg/L 0.0400 -0.00002 99 80-120
Cadmium 0.040 0.001 mg/L 0.0400 0.00003 100 80-120
Chromium 0.4 8 0.01 mg/L 0.400 0.003 97 80-120
Copper 0.40 0.01 mg/L 0.400 0.004 98 80-120
Lead 0.4 0.01 mg/L 0.400 -0.0004 98 80-120
Nickel 0.4 0.01 mg/l. 0.400 0.00009 100 80-120
Selenium 0.4 0.01 mg/L 0.400 -0.001 98 80.120
Silver 0.4 0.01 mg/L 0.400 0.0004 96 80-120
Thallium 0.4 0.01 m9/L 0.400 0.0005 103 80-120
Zinc 0.4 0.01 m9/L 0.400 0.01 100 80.120
Metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series Methods-Quality Control
Batch 3E15014-EPA 7470A
Blank(3E15014-BLK3) Prepared:05/15/2013 09:37 Analyzed:05/15/2013 17:31
Spike Source %REC RPD
gnalybe Result Flag MRL -.Units> - Level ` Result. *WEC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Mercury <0.170 0.200 ug/L
LCS(3E15014-BSI) Prepared:05/15/2013 09:37 Analyzed:05/15/2013 17:33
Spike Source: %REC RPD
Analyte.` Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Mercury 4.60 0.200 ug/L 5.00 92 80-120
Matrix Spike(3E1S014-MSI) Prepared:05/15/2013 09:37 Analyzed:05/15/2013 17:38
Source:C304823-05
Spike Source %REC RPD
Analyte Result Flag = MRL. Units. Level Result- %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Mercury 0.200 ug/L 5.00 0.170 U 89 75-125
Matrix Spike Dup(3E15014-MSD1) Prepared:05/15/2013 09:37 Analyzed:05/15/2013 17:40
Source:C304823-05
Spike: Source %REC RPD
Analyte - Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Mercury 4.32 0.200 ug/L 5.00 0.170 U 86 75-125 3 25
Post Spike(3E15014-PS1) Prepared:05/15/2013 09:37 Analyzed:05/15/2013 17:42
Source:OD4823-05
Spike . Source %REC RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Mercury 3 61 0.200 ug/L 5.00 -0.0250 73 75-125
Classical Chemistry Parameters-Quality Control
Page 25 of 28

C�k f-
www.encolabs.com
QUALITY CONTROL
Classical Chemistry Parameters-Quality Control
Batch 3E14010-Same
Blank(3E14010-BLK3) Prepared:05/14/2013 11:10 Analyzed:05/14/2013 17:19
Spike Source %REC RPD
pnalybe Result Flag MRL Units `Level Result 9/oREC Limits RPD Limit ' Notes
Cyanide(total) <0.0049 0.010 mg/L
LCS(3E34010-BS3) Prepared:05/14/2013 11:10 Analyzed:05/14/2013 17:15
Spike Source. %REC 'RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL Units Level. Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Cyanide(total) 0.14 0.010 mg/L 0.150 93 85-115
Matrix Spike(3E14010-MSI) Prepared:05/14/2013 11:10 Analyzed:05/14/2013 17:21
Source:0304757-06
Spike Source %REC RPD
Analyte: Result Flag MRL Units Legel: Result -%REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Cyanide(total) 0.14 0.010 mg/L 0.150 0.0049 U 96 85-115
Matrix Spike Dup(3E14010-MSDI) Prepared:05/14/2013 11:10 Analyzed:05/14/2013 17:23
Source:C304757-06
Spike Source %REC RPD
Analyte Result Flag. MRL Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Cyanide(total) 0.15 0.010 mg/L 0.150 0.0049 U 100 85-115 4 20
J
QUALITY CONTROL
Classical Chemistry Parameters-Quality Control
Batch 3E14017-NO PREP
Blank(3E14017-BLK1) Prepared:05/14/2013 14:25 Analyzed:05/15/2013 18:35
Spike Source %REC ``.RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL Units Level Result P/oREC Limits RPD limit Notes
Phenolics <0.02 0.05 ni
LCS(3E14017-BSI) Prepared:05/14/2013 14:25 Analyzed:05/15/2013 18:35
Spike Source- %REC RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL. Units Level Result . %REC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Phenolics 0.54 0.05 ni 0.500 108 78-110
Matrix Spike(3E14017-MSI) Prepared:05/14/2013 14:25 Analyzed:05/15/2013 18:35
Source:A302365-06
Spike Source %REC RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL. Units Level Result %REC Limits RPD _Limit Notes
Phenolics 0.55 0.05 mg/L 0.500 0.02 106 78-110
Matrix Spike Dup(3E34017-MSDI) Prepared:05/14/2013 14:25 Analyzed:05/15/2013 18:35
Source:A302365-06
Spike Source %REC RPD
Analyte Result Flag MRL Units Level Result 0/oREC Limits RPD Limit Notes
Phenolics 0 55 0.05 mg/L 0.500 0.02 104 78-110 1 10
Page 26 of 28

www.encolabs.com
FLAGS/NOTES AND DEFINITIONS
B The analyte was detected in the associated method blank.
D The sample was analyzed at dilution.
The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit(MDL)and the laboratory method
reporting limit(MRL), adjusted for actual sample preparation data and moisture content,where applicable.
E The concentration indicated for this analyte is an estimated value above the calibration range of the
instrument.This value is considered an estimate.
MRL Method Reporting Limit.The MRL is roughly equivalent to the practical quantitation limit(PQL)and is
based on the low point of the calibration curve, when applicable, sample preparation factor,dilution
factor, and,in the case of soil samples, moisture content.
QL-02 The associated laboratory control sample exhibited high bias; since the result is ND,the impact
on data quality is minimal.
QM-07 The spike recovery was outside acceptance limits for the MS and/or MSD. The batch was
accepted based on acceptable LCS recovery.
QM-08 Post-digestion spike did not meet method requirements due to confirmed matrix effects
(dilution test).
QM-11 Precision between duplicate matrix spikes of the same sample was outside acceptance limits.
Page 27 of 28

' L k�O
www.encolabs.com
1
C i ff cv) ct r, he S
Cro
Sample Chain of Custody Forme
,tR z�•,132 Prelog#: C300505
Chel,tStatesville Analytical, Inc IST032) Project#/Reference: Misc Subcontract
1:,-• 1 acy Moorr Required TAT 10
sr,lu iu PG Box 228 ENCO Contact: Link Thrower
�latesvdle tid 28687 102-A Woodwinds Industrial Court
Cary,NC 27511
Statesville, NC 28687
ti:.I rC art Tq PC Box 228
Statesvlllc NC 28687
=umber Date/Time Sampled Sample ID Analyses/Containers
nC 505 J t (}7G�j TTO Sample Analyses 608 PCB TTO ,608 Pest TTO 624 TTO.625 TTO. Sb
As,Be.Cd. Cr,Cu .Cyanide Total 9014,Pb. Hg .
Ni,Phenols 420.1 , Se.Ag .TI.Zn
Containers:2- 1 LA. 1 -250ml-A+H2SO4. 1 -250mLP+HNO3. 1 -2
"
q-1 v bzr6
,r,r nr�+B<1 Cnv Temp. ReD 8y- /l Date?ime:
JuntlrtlOn -_- ArcepraOle _Unacceptable ICV Receive By. Datefnrne
• l �••u r.Inc IPA waC2aures Inlormauon concem..g Inc malenaJs can qe lou^d-1— DO NOT nose Conlamers pr•or l0
1211•I(
w(sr , a a e ca sea t a c a icdl react an DdNVOen the sample and Inc Oroserranaes Oaeed samples m a W211-v..tblalsp artle
Z,},�� _� - -. s •_ � � _ u o n t,ancnns oI masa rnaler a s
1• r•,. , Izaur. sq n. o���r=n)Ar ^x•n .•+.are_d. e.. surna+annar lu oreva^I ore avaae ar o Inal any requ red Ie nacre Wre rs ma nlarnetl d..r ng Ira^sIl until retool.1 Me
^..J-�'Ic.•>isure the am(.re"1:2mpdran.rn OI lne cc.,upon rece,at Ine lap Please do not remove tn's cortlalner Iron Inc cooler Dul pack along wrin Ins
t i i• PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS ONLY!An V012n1id1 rr.L a'qs"Soo or(nese materiels nave nol oven adaresseo For add,Imnal rnlormaeon or assistance D1995a
/r/ `. I.r IN ti�- II 11 Iled dices rnn,e0 sci a w, .mer
•t, r rrlf��I\\ �j1 Ni, "/1 rt .1 II < r aJe I usr dllaCla ftlds edidleiV—n WdIBI
r �U •• s o o a a lbcteu areas mmedralely w In wmc
.r�.. 16o SJ<ONt,/•UD Av v.q s•-� d W dVe cC.•J-: .u^lac 5 dde twsn anectea areas mmcootely wan water
- ;�•-+l_:':''•�.oic s..a,•c.+�-- �r_^.�. ,sr•aneclae eleas�mmco-nvely wqn water
.. ..-... n:...1,... „r•;rx-e..su'lat,v.e�•••c•acea man al edea a as •oraleq wen..aler
tao rs a wan water
., ..,If�..''•-dlgT[lpNr.1�?l!SIT I('r A,qn aia• a.-,d ere aoinatl II cool ac+is n,aae tlusn anectea areas m,--rl-alely v,an water
(.I- s ,aun rinsn antic:tlo areas nnrn adrdlaly w,in water
Page 29 of 28

Attachment C
2012 Through First Half 2013
Chronic Toxicity Testing
Outfall # 001

Performance I'lbers
March 15, 2012
CERTIFIED MAIL
Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
SUBJECT: Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report
NPDES Permit No.: NC 000 4944
Performance Fibers Operations Inc. — Salisbury Plant
Dear Sirs:
The February 2012 test data for Chronic Toxicity (P/F 34%) is enclosed.
Very truly yours,
Richard Moore
Salisbury Plant Manager
Enclosure
cc: S.C. Lamb
Timothy L. Smith
P. n . BOX J I 7 d 0 l S TATI.S V I I I-E B I.V U. I HWY 'n 1Y f ST I 5:11.1.5 B l R Y, \'C. 2 8 1 a -
luU,Ir.prr%urrndn,r/11,ers.c um

Pz nalytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical Ser s,Inc. Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
205 Meadow Road-Suite A 2225 Ri. ,ide Dr. 9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
aceAnalytical Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
www pecelabs.corn
[phone] [phone] [phone]
February 24, 2012
Tim Smith
Davis & Floyd Labs
Performance Fibers
7401 Statesville Blvd.
Salisbury, NC 28145
RE: Project: BIOASSAY 2/7
Pace Project No.: 92111645
Dear Tim Smith:
Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory between February 07,
2012 and February 09, 2012. The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results
reported herein conform to the most current TNI standards and the laboratory's Quality Assurance
Manual, where applicable, unless otherwise noted in the body of the report.
Analyses were performed at the Pace Analytical Services location indicated on the sample analyte
page for analysis unless otherwise footnoted.
Some analyses have been subcontracted outside of the Pace Network. The subcontracted
laboratory report has been attached.
If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Erin Waters
[e-mail]
Project Manager
Enclosures
4�.a4 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 1 of 2
r24' `'
This report shall not be reproduced,except in full,
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
qB �

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail anAc' LC50 Date: 02/16/12
Facility: PERF. FIBERS/ DAVIS & FLOYD NPDES#: NC00 Pipe#: 001 County: ROWAN
Laborato r-forming Te EST, INC. il
Comments: pac.2
X 917
Sig a e o)-f Op rator in Responsee C arge
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor * PASSED: -9.92% Reduction
Work Order: 1202-00445 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -1. 062
Tabular t = 2 .508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = -9. 92
% Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 15 27 18 23 20 21 15 21 27 25 24 26
0.00 21.83
Control Control
Adult (L) ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L
0.00 24 .00
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent %: 346
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
19.514% PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 24125126 22 22127126 20 27 9 31 29 % control orgs X
producing 3rd
brood Check One
Adult (L)ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 100%
1st sample lst sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 02/08/12
Control 7 .48 7.74 7.65 7.58 7 .53 8.06 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 02/06/12 Sample 2: 02/08/12
Treatment 2 7. 74 8. 01 7 . 94 7.81 7.84 8 .01 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
D.O. Hardness(mg/1) 38 ........ ........
Control 7- 'l7 .44
7.87 7 .12 7 .48 7 . 33
Treatment 2 8 . 31 7. 56 7 .52 6.85 8 . 34 7 .58 Spec. Cond. (µmhos) 154 377 378
Chlorine(mg/1) ,,...... <0 . 1 0 . 11
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt (OC) ,,,,,,,, 1 . 0 0. 5
(Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates)
Note: Please
- % a % - % % % % Concentration Complete This
Section Also
% % % - % Mortality
start/end start/end
LC50 = % Method of Determination Control
9596 Con 1 ence Limits Moving Average _ Probit
-- - Spearman Karber _ Other High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4 .41)

Effluent Toxicity Statistical Results - Chronic Pass/Fail is Date: 02/16/12
g4gLf
Facility: PERF. FIBERS/ DAVIS & FLOYD NPDES#: N0000,4 44-- Pipe#: 001 County:ROWAN
Laboratory Performing Test: TRITEST, INC.
Reduction: -9. 92% CONTROL 34% Effluent
# Replicates 12 12
Female Live 12 12
Adult Male 0 0
Adult Dead 0 0
Adult Mortality 0 .00% 0.00%
# Neonates 262 288
Mean # Neonates 21.833 24. 000
Standard Deviation 4 .260 5.641
Coefficient of Variation 19.514%
Fisher' s Exact Test
A = 12 B = 12 a = 12 b = 12
a/A = 1. 00 b/B = 1.00
Success is: survival
Critical b value = 8
12 > 8
The test concludes that the proportion of survival is not
significantly different for the control and the effluent groups.
Test Passes!
SHAPIRO-WILK'S TEST FOR NORMAL DISTRIBUTION OF DATA
ORDERED OBSERVATIONS
i Group Neonates Centered i Group Neonates Centered
1 E 9 -15 . 0000 13 C 23 1. 1667
2 C 15 -6 . 8333 14 E 26 2 .0000
3 C 15 -6 .8333 15 E 26 2 .0000
4 E 20 -4 .0000 16 C 24 2 . 1667
5 C 18 -3 .8333 17 E 27 3 .0000
6 E 22 -2 . 0000 18 E 27 3 .0000
7 E 22 -2 .0000 19 C 25 3 . 1667
8 C 20 -1.8333 20 C 26 4 . 1667
9 C 21 -0 . 8333 21 E 29 5.0000
10 C 21 -0 .8333 22 C 27 5. 1667
11 E 24 0. 0000 23 C 27 5 . 1667
12 E 25 1 . 0000 24 E 31 7 .0000

SHAPIRO-WILK'S TEST FOR NORMAL DISTRIBUTION OF DATA (cont. )
COEFFICIENTS AND DIFFERENCES
i x(n-i-1) x(i) a(i) x(n-i-1) - x(i)
1 7 .0000 -15.0000 0.4493 22.0000
2 5.1667 -6.8333 0.3098 12.0000
3 5. 1667 -6.8333 0.2554 12.0000
4 5.0000 -4.0000 0.2145 9.0000
5 4.1667 -3.8333 0.1807 8.0000
6 3 .1667 -2.0000 0.1512 5.1667
7 3 .0000 -2.0000 0. 1245 5.0000
8 3 .0000 -1.8333 0.0997 4 .8333
9 2.1667 -0.8333 0.0764 3.0000
10 2 .0000 -0.8333 0.0539 2.8333
11 2 .0000 0.0000 0.0321 2 .0000
12 1. 1667 1.0000 0.0107 0.1667
1
W = X 500.7115
549.6667
Calculated W = 0 . 911 Critical W = 0.884
0 . 911 z 0. 884
The reproduction data is normally distributed

evaluated at a 99% confidence interval .
Test Passes !
F test for Homogeneity of Variance
Effluent variance 31 . 8182
F = _ = 1 . 75
Control variance 18 . 1515
Numerator degrees of freedom: 11 Denominator degrees of freedom: 11
Critical F = 5 . 32
1 . 75 s 5 . 32 =► The Test PASSES, the variances of the two group
are significantly the same, homogeneous .

EQUAL VARIANCE t TEST
21 . 8 - 24 . 0
t = = -1 . 062
2 . 041
Degrees of freedom = 22
Critical t = 2 . 508
-1 . 062 < 2 . 508
Test passed. There is not a significant difference in reproduction
between the Control and the effluent evaluated at a 991 confidence intery
Chronic Test PASSES

Ceriodaphnia dubia Chronic Pass/Fail Toxicity Test
Client: le 1'-6tvnpgck, NPDES#: NC q
Days Fed By I Time
Culture Transfer(Date/Time): 2):�At'L / R:L��� Organism Born(Date/Time): Day 0 /•j�- 1 '3'.iJ
Age of Organism: Z- h s t\2vh- Time Fed(Culture): 1 t aocrn Organism source: ,i CZu tc2N Da 1 Q v I Zlba
Dilution Water Batch: NLA- 2 36 Temp Dilution Water: 2'1-1- Temp stock solution Day 2 t3t,,
Start Date: Time: 2i LZ Analyst:_ d� Randomized:�_ Incubator 2: Day 3
1"Transfer Date: z ,o Time: Analyst:_ Da 4 c_
2"d Transfer Date: 2�1:�IL Time: l C.3zcc, Analyst: pe3U y 6,-qC"
Ending Date: ?Jt 12 Time: Analyst: M Reviewed by: Pj;K' Day 5 f It•���,�
--- --------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Day 6 a M
! Control Collection (Start)Date r3�
Day 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
#
Young Produced 1"Sample: -L 2°d Sample: a
g » O a O d v U v
Adult: Live, Dead �- C_ t,1 t_. L, L, L, Sample Type/Duration
Grab Composite Duration
Day 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 Sample o?�{
#Young Produced S e `f t{ ! 2d Sample 3,4
Adult: Live, Dead I I
Day 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Z.`� to Control 1` Sample 2 Sample
#Young Produced i3 g l l 10 l 1 j 2 j Hardness
Adult: Live,Dead V t✓ <_ L- EL L, Ll , m 3g-2
Conductivity
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ;
S/cm 153.`1
#Total Produced Z 23 24ZI IS' 7-\ -Z4� -1 S Chlorine
m L.LI . 6 1
Effluent %
SampleC
CTemp
t7
Day 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 pH 100%
#Young Produced
o a o C� c'� a o
Adult: Live, Dead
PH Start End Start End Start End
Day 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ! Control
#Young Produced le y �S -A Treatment t a.
Adult: Live, Dead
D.O. Start End Start End Start End
Day 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control �I�I ,�T t Z
#Young Produced , s 1 ` 3 ( l� j 3 6_ !S
Adult: Live,Dead L ` t✓ Treatment ,�' SZ ,3q ,SX
Temp. Start End Start End Start End
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
#Total Produced Z`1 �I- 2 2 1--h Z� U) �- 2 Control 2y-� 21-1-5 29,`� 2.9,`t 2y �s.

Tritest, Inc.
Bioassay Chain of /Custody Form
Facility Name: r /','P�a �� F-
Address 'ICU/ j �,��,!t'�. �j f U�P.O Box
Phone # (?Civ 6 6 d rx �-
2 I y`7 Contact
County � t,,/�,�� NPDES permit# QOU pipe: 01
% Effluent Dilution (IWC): �p Test Method: / h rUrt 0 w
Plant Flow: `�, U Nl r 11 .
Sample Collector: print - )V1
signature
Sample Type:
Composite
Date Started a-(, 1 �L- Time: 070 d r PM
Date,Ended �- 7 Time: 076 v AM r PM
Samples per Hr: rr,/S # Hrs:
Grab
Date: Time: AM or PM
Sample Volume: �d ��� Chilled during Collection? Yes r No
Method of Transportation to the Lab: c/ k
Chain of Custody Release
Relinquished y Date Time R ei d By, Date Time
7-1 Zoa -/Z L
du
✓� tt- -1 Z tl S 0
Work Order Number 1�(�d Received By:
Receiving Temperature: Ll G //IC)
For Laboratory Use Only
Residual Chlorine: COMMENTS:
Conductivity:
pH: �0�
#of Bottles
TriTest, Inc.Address. 6701 Conference Dr., Raleigh, NC 27607 Phone:[phone]

Chain of Custody
aceAnalytical
/ www.pacWabs.com
Workorder: 92111645 Workorder Name: BIOASSAY 2/7 Results Requested 2/17/2012
Report J Invoice Tot, "'Requested Analysis
Erin Waters `\
Pace Analytical Charlotte P.O.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100
Huntersville, NC 28078
Phone[phone]
Finail: [e-mail]
"'F'Preserved conTaiters'
t
Item SamplelllIVlatriz LAB USE ONLY
1 DAY 1 21712012 07:00 92111645001 Water
2
3
4LL I
5
- Comments
Transfers R leased W Date/Time :Zeceivsjd B DatelTime
1 12_
a
s
Tuesday. February 07,2012 3:53:59 PM FMT-ALL-C-002rev.00 24March2009 Page 1 n`

Tritest, Inc.
Bioassay Chain of Custody Form
Facility Name: CpC -
Address: P O. Box
��qd. Phone# boy )
a g l Contact
County : �bWt� N NPDES permit# 066494H pipe: _fib
% Effluent Dilution (IWC) ° Test Method: ckt o N'c PIP IO i I LIA!4 3 g d
Plant Flow. 0-&.> .,Lyw<e c4 I) P n. `:3 S
Sample Collector: print m Sin.1-:ta
signature
Sample Type:
Composite
Date Started 10- Time: G"loo AM or PM
Date.Ended _q_ 2 Time: n Tod AM or PM
Samples per Hr: q,z;o ML 5 # Hrs: T
Grab
Date. Time: AM or PM
Sample Volume: ����L S Chilled during Collection? Y ej or No
Method of Transportation to the Lab.
Chain of Custody Release
Relinquished By Date Time Received By Date Time
-12 �b �• -��-
CHU
Work Order Number a 001'00 ys Received By:
Receiving Temperature. (''
For Laboratory Use Only
Residual Chlorine: COMMENTS:
Conductivity: 1 ��
pH: 1
#of Bottles
TriTest,Inc.Address: 6701 Conference Dr.,Raleigh, NC 27607 Phone:[phone]

.Thain of Custody aceAnalytical"
www.pacelab�s.com
Workorder: 92111645 Workorder Name: BIOASSAY 2/7 Results Requested 2/17/2012
Report/Invoice To Subcontract To Reuested Anal sis` .
Erin Waters
Pace Analytical Charlotte P.O.
9800 Kincey Ave. Suite 100 1
Huntersville, NC 28078
Phone[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Preseived'Containers
Collect
Item Sample ID Date[Time Lab'ID 'Matrix 8 LAB USE ONLY
1 DAY 1 2/712012 07:00 92111645001 Water
2 DAY 2 2/9/2012 07:00 92111645002 Water
3
4
5
C7mments;
Transfers Released By Da e/Time Received By Date/Time
2
�' 2-to r1Z yrs
I
I
4
5
Thursday, February 09,2012 4:35:26 PM FMT-ALL-C-002rev.00 24March2009 Page 1 of

Performance ® Fibers
June 25, 2012
CERTIFIED MAIL
Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
SUBJECT: Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report
NPDES Permit No.: NC 000 4944
Performance Fibers Operations Inc. — Salisbury Plant
Dear Sirs:
The May 2012 test data for Chronic Toxicity (P/F 34%) is enclosed.
Very truly yours,
Richard L. Moore
Salisbury Plant Manager
Enclosure
cc: James L. Barfield
Timothy L. Smith
P.O. BOX 4 1 7 4 0 1 S T A T E S V I L L E BLVD. I I I W Y 70 WEST I SA[ I S B U R Y, \( 2 R 1 4 7
rirn,.per Iur+n,r++ic{?bers.cuIII

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and AcutV'LC50 Date: 05/24/12
17
Facility: PERF. FIBERS/ DAVIS & FLOYD NPDES#: NC00 Pipe#: 001 County: ROWAN
Laborat Per ormin Te TRITEST, INC.
-� Comments:
X
Si nat e ot Operator in Responsible Charge
X
Signature o La oratory Supervisor * PASSED: -16.47% Reduction
Work Order: 1205-00674 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Vorth Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = -2.772
Tabular t = 2 .508
:ONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = -16.47
%
# Young Produced 19 21 22 22 22 20 22 23 20 22 15 J27 Mortality Avg.Reprod.
0.00 21.25
Control Control
Adult (L) ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L
0. 00 24.75
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
effluent %: 30
'REATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
13 . 1771r PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 19 29 29 24 28 25 24 21 29 24 22 23 % control orgs X
producing 3rd
brood Check One
Adult (L) ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 91.716
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
,H Test Start Date: 05/09/12
Control 7 .83 7 . 91 7.83 7. 93 8.25 7.26 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 05/07/12 Sample 2 : 05/09/12
reatment 2 7 .96 7. 97 7.63 8.00 8.10 7.79 Sample Type/Duration 2nd
1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
.0. Hardness (mg/1) 44
.......... ..........
.......... ..........
Control 7.71 7 .72 8 .22 8.06 7.42 7. 08
Spec. Cond. (µmhos) 251 549 544
reatment 2 8.38 8 . 08 8 .23 8 .18 8 .01 7. 59
Chlorine(mg/1) <0 .1 <0 . 1
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt (OC) 1. 5 1. 3
Mortality expressed as %, combining replicates)
Note: Please
% % 16 % - - - Concentration Complete This
Section Also
6 16 ° o % ° o s Mortality
a o
start/end start/end
-71
IC50 = - Method of Determination Control
95% Con ids ence Limits Moving Average _ Probit
% -- % Spearman Karber _ Other High
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
-opied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4 .41)

Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute LC50 Date: 05/24/12
Facility: PERF. FIBERS/ DAVIS & FLOYD NPDES#: NC0004994 Pipe#: 001 County: ROWAN
Laboratory Performing Test: TRITEST, INC. Comments:
X
Signat1 11 e o1,, Operatorr in Responsi e C arge
X �IJt * PASSED: -16.47% Reduction
Signature ot Laboratory Supervisor
Work Order: 1205-00674 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL TO: Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Test Results
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Calculated t = -2.772
Tabular t = 2 .508
CONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = -16.47
% Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 19 21 22 22 22 20 22 23 20 22 15 27 0.00 21.25
Control Control
Adult (L) ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 0.00 24 .75
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
Effluent 34%
TREATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 C13t177%CV PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 19 29 29 24 28 25 24 21 29 24 22 23 control producing 3rd
s X
brood Check One
Adult (L) ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 91.7%
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
pH Test Start Date: 05/09/12
Control 7 .83 7 . 91 7 . 83 7. 93 E
7 .26Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 05/07/12 Sample 2 : 05/09/12 2nd
Treatment 2 7 . 96 7. 97 7 .83 8 .00 7 .79 Sample Type/Duration 1st P/F
s s s Grab Comp. Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
Ist sample 1st sample 2nd sample Hardness(mg/1) 44 ........
D.O. .
Control 7.71 7 .72 8.22 8 . 06 a7 -4208 Spec. Cond. (µmhos) 251 549 544
Treatment 2 8.38 8.08 8 .23 8. 18 59 Chlorine(mg/1) <0 . 1 <0.1
LC50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt( C) 1.5 1. 3
(Mortality expressed as combining replicates) Note: Please
o *%6 % - % Concentration Complete This
Section Also
° a % % Mortality
° start/end start/end
LC50 = % Method of Determination Control
95% Con idence Limits Moving Average Probit _ High
% _ Spearman Karber _ Other g
Conc.
pH D.O.
Organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hr.$) :
Copied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4 .41)

Ceriodaphnia dubia Chronic Pass/Fail Toxicity Test
Client:��'C fY+rancsc �Oe f NPDES M NC CSU gD
ays Fed By Time
Culture Transfer(Date/Time): L / I'.2 � Organism Bom(Date/Time): 1 Y 3 M a 0 3c- a`3s
Age of Organism: t, t cam+^n Time Fed(Culture):�c�• Organism source: 12�$(z a 1Dilution Water Batch: V 2'� Temp Dilution Water: -15 3 Temp stock solution 'LS ay 2Start Date: Time: •3 Analyst: Randomized: �' Incubator: 'k� ay 3 C_ t'-�J
151 Transfer Da e: 1. Time: �2-�� ' Analyst: 7�Com------ Day 4 I�
2nd Transfer Date: Time o Analyst: �CS� Day 5
Ending Date:- - - L - Time: i.t Ste,- - Analyst:- - - - -Reviewed by �6� Day 6 1i3c'
- - - - - - - -
Control Collection(Start)Date
Day 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
#Young Produced l:c Sample: 2a4 Sample: Y
0 d
Adult: Live Dead L Sample Type/Duration
Grab Composite Duration
Day 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ! 1° Sample
#Young Produced
2 Sample 1/
Adult: Live,Dead I 1-- '
i
Da 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control 1 Sample 2° San`tple
#Young Produced p t 8 la 5 8 10 t3 I I �( Hardness
(MgQ
Adult: Live,Dead L Conductivity
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Chlorine LU
#Total Produced `1.Z Z2 C ?Z 23 20 z2 u' Z� m Zn
Sample Tem13 -7--79 Effluent% C
Da 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 pH 1.00% �.
#Young Produced
O Q
Adult: Live Deadt✓ L L L L �- �- ! pg Start End Start End Start End
Day 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ! Control
7.67� 1 -74 .CIS LIS i7l-L
#Young Produced q Treatment -� -•7 9-}_ ,g g.UD b
Adult: Live, Dead 1, L L 1. l.� `► �- L- L,
D.O. Start End StartEnd Start End
Day 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control �1 g, g,U(o 7.1t'L 7-->X
#Young Produced 1 '� a
, Adult: Live,Dead � LL L � � LJ C- t_, � Treatment J,� g,o� g,2S 16,116 g,1)� -7,5�
Temp. Start End Start End Start End
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control
' #Total Produced 2c1 2 2g Z 'Z 2 22 23 � � \ ��`' a5-11 �
Treatment 2k,X 1 c `1 25. z�.O 2ti.°L I 2s- 0

Tritest, Inc.
Bioassay Chain of Custody Form
Facility Name:
74 � P.o. Box: � 3 �S
Address:
Phone# : _(7�
Contact
e:
NPDES permit#: � OOU py pip
County : /
�a Test Method:
% Effluent Dilution(IWC): ?✓�2
1A,1 44
Plant Flow.
Sample Collector: Print
Signature
Sample TY�e:
Composite ' } Time: Q(1 or PM
Date Started - or PM
Date Ended - �' 1 'L. Time:
Samples per Hr: ►-{ S # Hrs:
Grab Time: — -- p`M or PM
Date:
/0 F-5 Chilled during Collection?. Yes r No
Sample Volume:
Method of Transation to the Lab: `
port
Chain of Custody Release
Relinquished By Date Time Received PY
Date Time
46
Comments:
For Tritest, Inc Use Only
w5=b0 ?4
Tritest Work Order Number: o
ReceivingTempe'ature: — Received By
Residual Chlorine:
#of Bottles Received:
TnTesL Inc.Address:6701 Conference Dr.,Raleigh.NC 27607 Phone_(919)834-4984

Tritest, Inc.
Bioassay Chain of Custody Form
Facility Narne�:1 �C
Address'
/"�'a_ G'gf�Sll elle �IVL�. P.O. Box:
Phone#: _(_� ie. ��DOD __—x q3 3j
Contact: �`�rti cr.fir� ---
NPDES permit Pipe: l�o
County : OLy� N 3q )d
% Effluent Dilution(IWC):
Test Method: h p(30 c_
Plant Flow:
Sample Collector: Print S
Signature
SamQ_—le TWe_.
Compositeor PM
Date Started
dTime: `7��r PM _
fp_ 12
Date Ended Time: �—
Samples per Hr. y �,T /rtLS # Hrs:
Grab AM or PM
Date: Time: __
Chilled during Collection? Yes or No
Sample Volume:
Method of Transportation to the Lab:
Chain of Custody Release Date Time
Relinquished By
Date Time R ived �
Comments:
For Tritest, Inc. Use Only
Tritest Work order Number: I a�
Receiving Temperature: Received By.
Residual Chlorine:
#of Bottles Received:___7
Tn"Test.Inc.Address:6701 conference Dr.,Raleigh,NC 27607 Phone:[phone]

a
Performance N
September 24, 2012
CERTIFIED MAIL
Environmental Sciences Branch
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
SUBJECT: Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report
NPDES Permit No.: NC 000 4944
Performance Fibers Operations Inc. — Salisbury Plant
Dear Sirs:
The August 2012 test data for Chronic Toxicity (P/F 34%) is enclosed.
Very truly yours,
Richard L. Moore
Salisbury Plant Manager
Enclosure
cc: Timothy L. Smith
P.U. BOX 4 1 7401 SI ,\ IISVII.I I. ft.IVU I I I W Il W L S T I S Iti61i It Y, ]'( 1N1J7
1I'I"I, IIe r/i,11111711,c-/111r r-11111

Pa 'lnalytical Services,Inc. Pace Analytical S, 3s,Inc. Paco Analytical Services,Inc.
205 Meadow Road-Suite A
i aceAnalytical 2226 R,..,,side Or. 9800 KinceyAve. Suite 100
wwwpaoelabsoom Eden,NC 27288 Asheville,NC 28804 Huntersville,NC 28078
[phone] [phone] [phone]
Page 1 of 1
Laboratory Report
Tim Smith Report Date: 08/27/2012
Davis & Floyd Labs Date Received: 08/14/2012
Performance Fibers
7401 Statesville Blvd,
Salisbury, NC 28145
project: Bioassay 8/14
'ace Project No.:92127885
'ample: DAY 1 Lab ID: 92127886001 Collected: 08/14/12 07:00 Matrix: Water
Parameters Results. Units Report Limit Analyzed Qualifiers
:.dubia Pass/Fail Chronic PASS 08/15/12 00:00
7eviewed by:
Pam Cotten
pam.cottenRDpacelabs com
alelgh Certification IDs
3701 Conference Drive Raleigh,NC 27607 North Carolina Bloassay Certification#: 16
North Carolina Wastewater Certification#:67 North Carolina Drinking Water Certification#: 37731

y9',
Effluent Toxicity Report Form - Chronic Pass/Fail and Acute L650 Date: 08/27/12
Facility: PERF. FIBERS/ DAVIS & FLOYD NPDES#: 499*t'7ipe#: 001 County: ROWAN
Laboratory Performing Test ACE ANALYTICAL
Comments:
X
Sign to e O erator in Responsible Charge
X
Signatu of Laboratory Supervisor * PASSED: 6.25% Reduction
fork Order: 9212-7885 Environmental Sciences Branch
MAIL ORIGINAL T0: Div. of Water Quality
N.C. DENR
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Forth Carolina Ceriodaphnia
Chronic Pass/Fail Reproduction Toxicity Test Chronic Test Results
Calculated t = 1.113
Tabular t = 2. 508
ONTROL ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % Reduction = 6.25
% Mortality Avg.Reprod.
# Young Produced 22127127 '25 31 23 26 29 23 24 23 24
0. 00 25 .33
Control Control
Adult (L) ive (D) ead L L L L L L L L L L L L
0.00 23 .75
Treatment 2 Treatment 2
ffluent %: 34%
REATMENT 2 ORGANISMS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control CV
10 . 821% PASS FAIL
# Young Produced 18 20 18 25 26 26 31 19 26 24 27 .25 % control orgs ECheck
producing 3rd
brood EOne
Adult (L) ive (D)ead L L L L L L L L L L L L 100%
1st sample lst sample 2nd sample Complete This For Either Test
Test Start Date: 08/15/12
Control 7 , 71 7 .65 7 .82 7.52 7.58 7.52 Collection (Start) Date
Sample 1: 08/13/12 Sample 2 : 08/15/12
reatment 2 7. 90 8 .09 7. 90 7. 91 7.86 7.66 Sample Type/Duration lat P/F
s s s Grab Comp, Duration D
t e t e t e I S S
a n a n a n Sample 1 X 24 hrs L A A
r d r d r d U M M
t t t Sample 2 X 24 hrs T P P
1st sample 1st sample 2nd sample
.o. Hardness(mg/1) 40 ........ ........
Control 8. 1017.891 "9
. 10 7.897.89 7.07 8.64 8.32
Spec. Cond. (pmhos) 210. 457 468
eatment 2 8.47 8. Z5 9. 07 9.03 9.50 8.58
Chlorine(mg/1) ........ <0 .1 0. 19
,C50/Acute Toxicity Test Sample temp. at receipt(OC) ,,,,,... 3.0 1. 0
4ortality expressed as %, combining replicates)
Note: Please
% % % % % % % % % % Concentration Complete This
Section Also
% % % 96 % % % Mortality
start/end start/end
'C50 = -.Method of Determination Control
95% Con i ence Limits Moving Average ProbitFE
Spearman Karber _ Other High
Conc.
pH D.O.
organism Tested: Ceriodaphnia dubia Duration(hrs) :
'opied from DWQ form AT-1 (3/87) rev. 11/95 (DUBIA ver. 4 .41)

Effluent Toxicity Statistical Results - Chronic Pass/Fail Date: 08/27/12
1vCUOvyfyy
Facility: PERF. FIBERS/ DAVIS & FLOYD NPDES#: 'r Pipe#: 001 County:ROWAN
Laboratory Performing Teat: PACE ANALYTICAL
Reduction; 6 .25V CONTROL 34!k Effluent
Replicatwe 12 12
Female Live 12 12
Adult Male 0 0
Adult Dead 0 0
Adult Mortality 0. 00& 0 . 00%-
# Neonates 304 285
Mean # Neonates 25. 333 23 .750
Standard Deviation 2 .741 4 . 093
Coefficient of Variation 10.821&
Fisher' s Exact Test
A = 12 B = 12 a = 12 b - 12
a/A = 1 . 00 b/B = 1. 00
Success is: aurvival
Critical b Value = 8
12 IN, 9
The test concludes that the proportion of survival is not
significantly different for the control and the effluent groups.
Test Passes!
SHAPIRO-WILK'S TEST FOR NORMAL DISTRIBUTION OF DATA
ORDERED OBSERVATIONS
i Group Neonates Centered i Group Neonates Centered
1 E 18 -5.7500 13 C 26 0.6667
2 E 18 -5.7500 14 E 25 1.2500
3 E 19 -4.7500 15 E 25 1.2500
4 E 20 -3 .7500 16 C 27 1.6667
5 C 22 -3 . 3333 17 C 27 1.6667
6 C 23 -2. 3333 18 E 26 2 .2500
7 C 23 -2 . 3333 19 E 26 2 .2500
6 C 23 -2. 3333 20 E 26 2 .2500
9 C 24 -1.3333 21 E 27 3 .2500
10 C 24 -1. 3333 22 C 29 3 .6667
11 C 25 -0. 3333 23 C 31 5.6667
12 E 24 0.2500 24 E 31 7 .2500

SHAPIRO-WILK'S TEST FOR NORMAL DISTRIBUTION OF DATA (cont. )
COEFFICIENTS AND DIFFERENCES
i x(n-i-1) x(i) a(i) x(n-i-1) - x(i)
1 7 . 2500 -5.7500 0 .4493 13 . 0000
2 5. 6667 -5.7500 0 . 3098 11.4167
3 3 . 6667 -4 .7500 0 .2554 8 .4167
4 3 . 2500 -3 .7500 0 . 2145 7 . 0000
5 2 .2500 -3 .3333 0 . 1807 5 .5833
6 2.2500 -2.3333 0. 1512 4 . 5833
7 2 . 2500 -2.3333 0. 1245 4 . 5833
8 1. 6667 -2.3333 0 .0997 4 . 0000
9 1,6667 -1.3333 0 .0764 3 . 0000
10 1. 2500 -1.3333 0 .0539 2 .5833
11 1,2500 -0.3333 0.0321 1.5833
12 0.6667 0.2500 0 .0107 0 .4167
1
W x 359.9821
266. 9167
Calculated W = 0. 974 Critical W 0.884
0. 974 a 0 .884
The reproduction data is normally distributed
evaluated at a 99* confidence interval .
Test Passes!
F test for Homogeneity of Variance
Effluent variance 16.7500
F = 2 .23
Control variance 7 .5152
Numerator degrees of freedom: 11 Denominator degrees of freedom! 11
Critical F = 5.32
2 .23 s 5. 32 =► The Test PASSES, the variances of the two groups
are significantly the same, homogeneous.

EQUAL VARIANCE t TEST
28.3 - 23. 8
t = ;; 1 . 113
1.422
Degrees of freedom = 22
Critical t = 2 . 508
1. 113 < 2 . 508
'fest passed. There is not a significant difference in reproduction
between the Control and the effluent evaluated at a 99%- confidence interval.
Chronic Test BASSES

Ceriodaphnia dubia Chronic Pass/Fait 1 oxicity i est
Client: rrrVIC_C NPDES#:NC 6�:)CU `iq Days Fed By Time
Culture Transfer(Date/Time}: RNy IL / io csCr Organism Bom(Date/Time): / �1',c Gm- D-,a dpfi Da 0 lt7•S5
Time Fed Culture ,no Or Organism source: 1 a-ISa-1� Da 1
Age of Organism: 23h(� H ��r„� (Culture):�� g '�
Dilution Water: 1k a.b1 Temperature: �S-; Temp. Stock dish: .i� Day 2 pc.Y y
Start Date: 45l151I1 Time:,,I N Analyst: Randomized: ✓ Incubator:_tk Day 3
151 Transfer Date: at r7/I L Timg .,/jf,., Analyst: G Day 4 l0:
2"d Transfer Date' Time: jQ Analyst: Da 5
Ending Date: ZZ Z Time: Analyst: Reviewed by: y �
Day 6 P----- ----------- ----------- ----- --- ----- --------------------------- -------
-------------------------
Control L r a�
Day 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# Young Producedp 0 Q Q 0 p 0 d 0
Adult: Live, Dead L L 1< L L L L Collection (Sta ) ate nd
1 Sample: 13 -- 2 Sample: c5
Day 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
# YoungProduced Sample Type/Duration
y h sly iso ti/S Ac. N
Grab Composite Duration
Adult:Live, Dead L_ i_ L L t_ L L L L l't Sample
Day 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ! 2" Sample
# Young Produced 13
1 LI IL4 I L, 13
Adult: Live, Dead ` L L L L L L L,( Control is Sample 2" Sample
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Hardness q0•Z
# Total Produced Conductivity 2 4S*, u y
a a� as 31 a.� a3 3 a
Chlorine LID O. t
Effluent % 3L+ Sample temp. U
Day 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 pH 100% '6.To a.2
# Young Produced O 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Adult: Live, Dead L L L- L C i✓ L I L L L L
pH Start End Start End Start End
Day 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Control
# Young Produced � L✓ �ISILCS Treatment
b
Adult: Live, Dead L (_ L c L. �- L L l� �, ', 610
D.O. Start End Start End Start End
Day 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 Control
# Young Produced ` Id C, Al f i
Adult: Live,Dead Treatment
l.. L. G �. L. Lr tr I (. t- L
Temp. Start End Start End Start End
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
#Total Produced ao 1 r i Control 1\ ��� �,Z 25_\ zS-3 2S,
---------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------1 Treatment �4-C\ 2'1-�

Document Issued Pace Analytical Services,Inc
JG� Document NameBioassay COC lune 6,2012 6701 Conference Orive
f�;iCe Afia"ical Issuing Authorities- Phone:[phone]
Document No.: Pace Carolinas Quality Office Fax:[phone]
F-RAL-CS-007-Rev.00
Pace Analytical
Bioassay Chain of Custody Form
Facility Name: ��- }T�yJgy1 Gl ! ' l'✓c
Address: Lf 5YA' Cr P.O. Box:
YA Phone No.: -
Contact: 1�
permit X ��
004 _ /43
County: dl,J• cJ NPDES #: � pipe:
IN, q 0 Test Method: l^ i 31/ 'Q
/o Effluent Dilution (IWC): �
Plant Flow: v
Sample Collector: Print
Signature:
Sample Type:
Composite
Date Started -/ -/oL Time: 0 706 AM r RM
Date Ended -/ -/j, Time: 6700 AM r PM
Samples per Hr: CS/�-p m #Hrs: 11!i� —
Grab
Date: Time: AM or PM
Sample Volume: ?D U i'Ll 15 Chilled during Collection? Yes r No
Method of Transportation to the Lab: ` ��/ � '
Chain of Custody Release
Relinquished By Date Time Receiv By D to I We
� o dv L
t,A Ins
At- z 1616
/�-�t.��►� � �r� t a �3.� b� � fin.3�.��
2 �ments:/L�,3 �/�►3te ��! l I y�,s-� I 01
For Pace Analytical Use Only
Pace Workorder number: Received By.
Receiving Temperature:

Document Issued Pace Analytical Services,Inc.
yam— Document Name:Bioassay COC lune 6,2012
6701 Conference Crive
Issuing Authorities: Phone:[phone]
ice A�alyt/cal Fax:[phone]
Document No.: Pace Carolinas Quality O ice
F-RALLS-007-Re,00
Pace Analytical
Bioassay Chain of Custody Form
Facility Name: P_e,-0j11A4!2A
Address �(�� t/ P.O. Box: _ -
Phone No.:�7()�1 ,, O U d
Contact:SA
ti�oo v 19 qi�
pipe:
County:_ /JW rtAj NPDES permit#
�` tr
Effluent Dilution (IWC): d�U Test Method: rd"tC.c Q
Plant Flow: OZ5 al
Sample Collector: Print
Signature.
Sample Type_:
Composite
Time: 7U U AM PM
Date Started - ,�� �. ---
Date Ended (R� Time: G OO M r PM
Samples per Hr: y ro 1-f.
#Hrs:
Grab AM or PM
Date: Time:
Sample Volume: In Chilled during Collection? Yes r No
Method of Transportation to the Lab:
Chain of Custody Release
Relinquished By Date Time Recei d y Da Time
0906 /G
Comments:
Pace
For Pace Analytical Use Only
Workorder number: Received By:
AD—
Receiving Temperature: o

Analytical Results
Performance Fibers _-
7401 Statesville Blvd.
Salisbury NC 28145
Entered 11/6/2012
Reported: 11/26/2012
'or: TOX
;ample ID Parameter Cust ID Result Units Method Date Analyzed Analyst
121106-1 C.dubia Pass/Fail 103 Eff Pass EPA600/4- 11/7/12 ETS
Respectfully submitted,
,O�
Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert#37755,
EPA NCO0909
P.O. Box 228 • Statesville, North Carolina 28687. 704/872/4697

PO Box 7565
Asheville,NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Environmental Testing Solutions,Inc.
November 26, 2012
Ms. Tracy Moore
Statesville Analytical, Inc.
122 Court Street
Statesville, NC 28677-5803
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 8520
Dear Ms. Moore:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Performance Fibers received by
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. November 07 through November 09, 2012.
Parameter Test Procedure EPA Method Final
Code Number Result
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent
TGP3B Toxicity Procedure EPA-821-R-02-013 PASS
(Ceriodaphnia Pass/Fail Toxicity Test)
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter a
P on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
November 06, 2012 using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit a copy of the DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-3) by
December 31, 2012.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Jim gumner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced,except in its entirety,without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions,Inc.
_ The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis.
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37,Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

Analytical Results
Performance Fibers ` —
7401 Statesville Blvd.
Salisbury NC 28145
Entered 2/5/2013 '
Reported: 2/27/2013
:or: Effluent-103
Date
Sample ID Parameter Cust ID Result Units Method Analyzed Analyst
130205-10 C.dubia Pass/Fail Ef -103 Pass EPA600/4-91/002 2/6/13 ETS
Respectfully submitted,
Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA NCOO909
P.O. Box 228 • Statesville, North Carolina 28687 • 7041872/4697

Q
PO Box 7565
Asheville, NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
ET Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Environmental Testing Solutions,Inc.
February 25, 2013
Ms. Tracy Moore
Statesville Analytical, Inc.
122 Court Street
Statesville, NC 28677-5803
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 8731
Dear Ms. Moore:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Performance Fibers received by
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. February 06 through February 08, 2013.
Parameter Test Procedure EPA Method Final
Code Number Result
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent
TGP3B Toxicity Procedure EPA-821-R-02-013 PASS
(Ceriodaphnia Pass/Fail Toxicity Test)
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter a
P on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
February 04, 2013 using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit a copy of the DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-3) by
March 31, 2013.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
J)in Sumner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced,except in its entirety,without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

PO Box 7565
Asheville,NC 28802
TS,
Phone: [phone]
5 Fax: [phone]
- Environrtrental Testing solutions,Inc.
Effluent Aquatic Toxicity Report Form - Phase 11 Chronic Cerlodaphnia dubia Date: February 25,2013
Facility: Statesville Analytical NPDES#: NC-0004944 Pipe#: 001 County: Rowan
Performance Fibers
Laboratory Performing Test: Environmental Testing Solutions,Inc. Comments:
Signature of Operator in Responsible Charge:
Signature of Laboratory Supervisor: 6 Project. 8731
Samples: 130206.12,130208.14
Mail Original To:North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DWQ/Environmental Sciences Branch
1621 Mail Service Center Start dare: Fnd daze: Start time: End time:
Raleigh,NC 27699-1621 02-06-T3 02-13-13 1253 1 0824
Sample Information JR3
le 2 Control
Collection start date: 13 Test Information Sun R-Vl 1 R-12 Sum Renewal I lit �.l2
Grab: Treatment: 34% 34% 34% Control Control Control
Composite duration: Initial pH(SU): 7.70 7.59 7.69 7.54 7.73 7.40
Alkalinity(mg/L CaCO,): 33,32,32 Final pH(SU): 7.64 7.74 7.70 7.49 7.61 7.61
Hardness(mg/L CaC01): 40,40,40 Initial DO(mg/L): 8.I 7.9 8.0 8.0 8.0 7.9
Conductivity(pmhos/cm): 154.155,IS() Final DO(mg/L): 7.9 8.0 8.1 7.9Total residual chlorine(mg/L): Initial Temp.(°C): 25.3 24.8 24.9 24.8Sample Temp at Receipt(°C): Final Temp.(°C): ]25.0 24.9 24.8 24.9 24.9 24.7
Organism Number
Control Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mpn Chronic Test Results
Number of Young Produced 1311 271 301 291 291 281271 31 1 291 31 1 28 311 29.3 Final Control Mortality(%): 0.0
Adult Survival: LLjive,(D)cad I L L I L I L I L I L I L I L I L I L I L I L %Control with 3rd Broods: too
Control Reproduction CV. 5.3
Effluent Percentage 34 i 48 Hour Mortali
Treatment 2 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mcm Control: 0 of 12
Number of Young Produced 29133 35 1 33 131133 1321 31 1 321 35 1 35 1 341 32.8 Iwc. o of 12
Adult Survival: L ive, D ad L L L L Ll L I L I L I L I L I L I L I -12.0 Significant?: No
%Remicuon Final Mortality Significant at: No concentration
Effluent Percentage
Treatment 3 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mcan Reproduction Analyses
Number of Young Produced Reproduction LOEC: >34%
Adult Survival: L ive, Dead Reproduction NOEC: 34%
%Rc�nian Overall Method: Homoscedasuc t
Effluent Percentage� Normal Distribution: Yes
Treatment 4 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mian Method: Shim-Wdk's
Number of Young Produced Statistic: 0.946
Adult Survival: (L)ive,(D)ead Critical Value. 0.884
Roductian
Equal Variances: Yes
Effluent Percentage= Method: F-Test
Treatment 5 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mon Statistic: 1.457
Number of Young Produced Critical Value: 5.320
Adult Survival: L ive, Dead Non-Parametric Analysis(if a licable)
%R�aun..
Method:
Effluent Percentage Effluent% Rank Sum Critical Sum
Treatment 6 Organisms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mmn 34%
Number of Young Produced
Adult Survival: (L)ive, D ad
Rcducdon
Overall Analysis:
Result: PASS LOEC: >34% NOEC: 34% ChV: >34%
DWQ form AT-3(8/91)Rev. 11195

•
• 351 Depot Street
Asheville,NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
y_ Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions,Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain-of-Custody Form
Facility: Statesville Analytical NPDES#: NCO084212 Pipe#: 001 County: Davie
Sparks Road WTP Purchase order:
Davie County
Species: Ceriodaphnia dubia Effluent dilution: 90%
Test type: Pass/Fail Chronic Parameter code: TGP3B
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Grab sample: Sample location: , {—/F9_ Z,4(p8,,1 e4e
Date: 4a' /3 Time: ',AJA Volume collected forTtesting: L
Number of containers filled for testing: j
Method of transport to laboratory:
Comments:
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be<6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody: (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
Sample collected by:
Act WE,e
Prins Signature Date and time
Relinquished by: Received by:
Im"d
� I`3 'moi✓'Z�7 a-7-i 3
Prim Signoture Date and time Pnnt signature Date end u—
Relinquished by: Received by:
�4�t✓. 9-7
Pnnt signnt— Dg d-1 � Pnm sqw— Dete and time
5 1
Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ETS personnel)
Relinquished to ETS by: Received at ETS by:
02-05-9
Kiat sipature Dote and time Pnnt sip'u— Dme and time
Custody seals intact?: = = Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS(°C):
Yes No Not used
Samples received in good condition?:
Yea No Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
(DPD Presence,'Absense Indicator,MDL=0.10 mglL) NCu"t Aim`
Tracking number:6 QI 0 417-63 6009
Project number: JZp Sample number: IZl.� V9
Comments:

Ceriodaphnra dubia
- - ' Chronic Reference Toxicant Control Chart
y Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
1.14 USEPA Control Limits 2 Standard Deviations)
1.12
1.10
1.08 ••••.. ...................... .............................
1.06 •� � - -- -� - - - - - - —
�•� — -- -
•••......................................................................
...................
1.04
1.02
2.5
USEPA Warning and Control Limits (75`h and 90`h Percentile CVs)
2.0
z
...............................................................................................
1.5 — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
1.0 N �
.� 0.5 ..................................................................................
r
1.4
1.3 Laboratory Warning and Control Limits 0O'h and 25`h Percentile CVs)
...............................................................................................
1.2
1.0
0.9 ...............................................................................................
0.8 � 0
`Q 0 `ZA " \V ,t.06 "� oti off' py"\3" ��.��" �S D�.�a ��o' e-,\" ,�oti' ,�,ob' ,.y,o°i"
Test date
--o-- 7-day IC2. = 25% inhibition concentration. An estimation of the concentration of sodium chloride
that would cause a 25% reduction in Ceriodaphnia reproduction for the test population.
— — Central Tendency (mean IC20
Warning Limits (mean IC25 f SA 10 or SA 75)
••••••••• Control Limits (mean IC25 ± SA.251 SA.901 or 2 Standard Deviations)
Graphs generated from associated excel spreadsheet
Excel spreadsheet entered by J Sumner
Reviewed by

Page 1 of I
;ETS
Control Information,North Carolina Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test(EPA-821-R-02-013,
Method 1002.0,NC Modification—December 2010,Version 3.0) Species: Ceriodaphnia dubia
Test grouping information: Project# Control# Date n-L-Olo•1�
6 kAtS Acceptance Criteria:
$ V`la %of Male Adults(-s 20%):
4 l(1 t4* r %Adults having 3 d Broods(z 80%): (f),
3 4% J tftZ 81! %Mortality(<20%):
2ft& Q+{ Q 1 Mean Offspring/Female ��3
1 CONTROL {z 15 offspring/surviving female): '
ora CV(<40.0%): _.37
Test organism source information: Test information:
Organism e: <24-hours old Randomizing template color:
Date and times organisms were born UX•OV•t3 01.10 Tb t•uSIncubator number and shelf
between: location:
•
zC Z
Culture board: Q 1 0%- q•13
Replicate number: z 3 a s s s 9 to 11 12 YWT batch:
Culture board cu number: » 1, 1A r 10 11 t3 K 11, 1'1
Transfer bowl information: pH= ,q SU Temperature= 7 8 °C Selenastrum batch:
Daily renewal in ormation:
Day Date Test initiation,renewal, Control/Dilution water And
feeding,or termination time batch used Softsynthetic)
0 1.01•1 Initiation and Feed
T- `•3-11 >
�O `` V dS
j Feeding t
1
2 Renewal an
Ral I d Feedin
crt•0 8•
3Feeding
n-O'k•G 0iou
4Feeding
O't•10•�3
Gy, Rrnewal 2 and Feeding ,� t
6Feeding
z.•11.13 O -
7 Terrninaion - "'>
DJ-4-4
Daily theme
Parameter Initiation Renewal One r" x
Analyst
H S.U. =l
i
DO m
Conductive ( mhos/cm)
Alkalinety(mg CaCO3/L
Hardness(mg CaCO3/L)
Temperature °C 1 '
Initial Final Initial Final r M
Survival andRZ
reproduction data:
Replicate number
Day I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 - ilk '12
r
2 Adult mortality
l
L= vq D -
5 NumberZ -L.
Young of Broods -L
produced is l 1� ►� Z. 1�►'`, - �{p
Adult mortality
(L=live,D-dead)Number
6 or 7 Young to ods ( Lk
produced lb S 15 Ids l�0 1� ( J t r s<sr .i
Total young produced 3y -21 30 29 Wj I
Final Adult MortalityOg
L=limD=dead)
X for 3'd Broods �C "
Notes: M=Male,AB=Aborted brood observed
SOP AT],2 �,�,
-,.._ ��"-tI'n��.SA'rfi: e•3P'�r4.�' s CS�i`'F:�,',.

r
IETS Page I of I
North Carolina Chronic Pass/Fail Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
(EPA-821-R-02-013 Method 1002.0,NC Modification—December 2010,Version 3.0)
Species: Ceriodanhnia dubia
Paired with Control# q Date 6'L•06-13
Client: SjLLP— ANA�J-neG`- NPDES#: NC 1066qqqq
Facility: AAR&KAIXC FI Count ,%J
IWI I-A-SAUS itj Outfall/Pipe: Q 1
Comments:
Full-strength cnemis Sample information:
Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 1 Sample 2
pH(S.U.) -7-SO 181 Collection start date: •I'S `d,0(0-G
DO(mg/L) Collection end time: 01W
Conductivity 38ZGrab/Composite "rl•ROA
mhos/cm Sao (duration): URPOS1-M
Chlorine Temperature(°C)upon
(m ) O.117 4-0.10receipt:
�•� C
Dilution preparation: Physical characteristics: f'qlP— TAN ecl-A-a fan
Test concentration: sura 1kA
mL Sample:
mL Dilution water: /qt
Total volume(mL):
ET5 project number:
ETS sample number: t1h=6.11— 1 A bQ._ ''
Test concentration chemistry:
Parameter Initiation Renewal One Renewal Two
Analyst 5�6;
H S.U. 7d Q 'l 7ti
DO m
Conductive mhos/cm 231 Z
Temperature(°C) Z5.3 .p
Initial Final Initial Final Iiiihail AFtiiii< 7
Test concentration: 3y 1 Survival and reproduction data
Replicate number
Day 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 i.9
2 Adult mortality L L �_ L �++'* ^•'"�° Y,[n-
=live.D=dead .c+';77-
5
t_
Number '
5 Young ofBraods rel ° x 'r
Lt
produced I IS �� ly
Adult mortalityr�'.k.:'�
=live,D=dead
6 or 7 Number ` ` Li
Young ofBroods L I� (,j 1 (
produced
Totaloun produced
r g p Z5 33 '3S 33
Final Adult Mortality
Notes: M=Male,AB=Aborted brood observed. _ fit` � Fwrti'
Test resubs s "
%Mortal
z
erluk•�
Mead_OMP% �•�`�', � �-� ,
Ruchon from end
t-Stator RS. t .
1-Tailed Grltii�ll
Dr Fail
Passu
���;`� y��•'/�,. yam=+
s$01' ► OSI I2':
fir= ;.

•
i
ET
1�3) Environmental Testing Solutlons,Inc.
Start Date: 2/6/2013 Test ID: CdPFCRNC
Sample ID: Statesville-Performance Fibers
End Date: 2/13/2013 Lab ID: ETS-Envir. Testing Sol. Sample Type: DMR-Discharge Monitoring Report
Sample Date: Protocol: FWCHR-EPA-821-R-02-013 Test Species:
Comments: CD-Ceriodaphnia dubia
D-Control 31.000 27.000 30
D-Control 28.000 31.000 .000 29.000 29.000 28.000 27.000 31.000 29.000 31.000
34 29.000 33.000 35.000 33.000 31.000 33.000 32.000 31.000 32.000 35.000
34 35.000 34.000
D-Control 29.250 1.0000 29.250 27.000 31.000 5.281 12
34 32.750 1.1197 32.750 29.000 35.000 5.694 12 -5.007 2.508 1.753
Shapiro-Wilk's Test indicates normal distribution (p > 0.01) 0.94612
F-Test indicates equal variances 0.884 -0.3333 -0.6315
(p =0.54) 1.45714
5.31963
Homoscedastic t Test indicates no significant differences
1.75338 0.05994 73.5 2.93182 5.2E-05 1, 22
Treatments vs D-Control
Perfnrmanrn n)_nK_i z

Ceriodaphnia dubia Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
EPA-821-R-02-013,Method 1000.0-North Carolina Modification
Quality Control
a S Verification of Data Entry, Calculations,and Statistical Analyses
Environmental Testing Solutions,Inc. Client: Performance Fibers
"rest dates:_ February 06- 13 2017
Project number: 8731
Reveiwed by:
Concentration Day
(%) Number of oun roduced b re licate number Survival Average Coefficient of Percent reduction
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 (%) reproduction variation from control (%)
Control 5 8 9 10 i t 12 (offspring/female) (%)
15 12 15 13 13 14 12 16 14 14 15 16
7 16 15 15 16 16 14 15 15 15 17 13 15 100 29.3 5.3 Not applicable
Total 31 27 30 29 29 28 27 31 29 31 28 31
34% 5 14 15 19 14 14 16 13 16 17 17
21 20
7 15 18 16 19 17 17 19 15 15 18 14 14 100 32.8 5.7
Total 29 33 35 33 31 33 32 31 32 35 35 34 -12.0
Dunnett's MSD value: 1.753 MSD= Minimum Significant Difference
PMSD: 6.0 PMSD= Percent Minimum Significant Difference
PMSD is a measure of test precision. The PMSD is the minimum percent difference between the control and treatment that can be declared
statistically significant in a whole effluent toxicity test.
Lower PMSD bound determined by USEPA(IO h percentile) = 13%.
Upper PMSD bound determined by USEPA(901"percentile)=47%.
Lower and upper PMSD bounds were determined from the I Oth and 90th percentile,respectively,of PMSD data from EPA's WET
Interlaboratory Variability Study(USEPA,2001a;USEPA,2001 b).
USEPA. 2001 a,2001 b.Final Report: Interlaboratory Variability Study of EPA Short-term Chronic and Acute Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Methods,Volumes I and 2
US Environmental Protection Agency,Cincinnati,OH. -Appendix.EPA-821-B-01-004 and EPA-821-B-01-005.
Perfomiance 02-06-13

• 351 Depot Street
• Asheville,NC 28801
� Phone: [phone]
mETS Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions,Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain-of-Custody Form
Facility: Statesville Analytical NPDES#: NC0004944 Pipe#: 001 County: Rowan
Performance Fibers Purchase order:
INVISTA- Salisbury
Species: Ceriodaphnia dubia Effluent dilution: 34%
Test type: Pass/Fail Chronic Parameter code: TGP3B
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector)
Composite sample Sample location:
Start date: ��`1 ' Time: 0-700 0 U Volume collected for testing: /� � m ��
End date: li ' �_ Time: U 7o 0 Number of containers filled for testing:
Number of samples per hour: 3 Method of transport to laboratory: (`o U e/—
Chilled during collection? V e S _ Comments:
If chilled,specify temperature: q ec
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be<6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody: (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
sample collected by:
Elln, .. s-r 3 U u
Prins Sigtettac pate and lime
Ree by:
Relinquished by: f Y�
(
S ,
s
Print Sigtetwe Dale and time Print
,glue att en [ince
Received by:
8gLjnquishedJbyL_ z s i3
�� Pnn{ azure �e an time _
prim Sippetutc Det,en 1i—
Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ETS personnel)
Received at ETS by:
Relinquished to ETS by: d
OL-04,04 3
uci c0146?P5 JPrins Sig�ouue Dnte and time
Pnnt Signetutc Date end time
Custody seals intact?: Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS(°C):
y� No Not used
Samples received in good condition?:
vee No Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
�
�8 ( P==t Absent
DPD Presence/Absense Indicator,MDL=0 10 mg/L)
Tracking number: (30 2
2oka-�
holo y1ZJ 519 Project number: ��� Sample number:
Comments:

•
351 Depot Street
® Asheville,NC 28801
SETS Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing solutions,Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain-of-Custody Form
Facility: Statesville Analytical NPDES#: NC0004944 Pipe#: 001 County: Rowan
Performance Fibers Purchase order:
UMSTA-Salisbury
Species: Ceriodaphnia dubia Effluent dilution: 34%
Test type: Pass/Fail Chronic Parameter code: TGP3B
FS(am�plemation: (to be completed by sample collector)
sample: Sample location:e: 0Q -Z' i 3 Time: G7 U O Volume collected for testing:: 0,_gzr-e /711S
End date: _a -7 —/ Time: 07 U 0 Number of containers filled for testing: i
Number of samples per hour: I Method of transport to laboratory: /' t7(.e�-
Chilled during collection? _�e S Comments:
If chilled,specify temperature: y -,z-
Triple
LTriple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be<6.0°C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody: (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
Sample collected by:
P^nt Signanuc Dem and t--
Relinquished by: Received by:
e 7
Prim �JEsigetwc Dam and Limo Prim
Si; Date and limo
R 'nquished by: A Received by:
t \
"`L'C. `� entl ym7 `� signanuc
Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ETS personnel)
Relinquished to ETS by: Received at ETS by:
r 0�,13
Prins SippeluR Detc and tim. Print
Si�anac Det.end lune
Custody seals intact?: Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS(°C):
Ya No Not used
Samples received in good condition?:
Yrs No Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
Ul (DPD Presence Absense Indicator,MDL=0-10 mg/L) "I Abs=t
Tracking number: V ( (�j
Project number: t3-1-31 Sample number: 17-'O1UO,H
Comments:

r�o� Ceriodaphnia dubia
5-11, f
Chronic Reference Toxicant Control Chart
Environmental Testing Solutions,Inc.
1.14 USEPA Control Limits 2 Standard Deviations)
1.12
1.10
••............................................................. .............................
1.08
1.06 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - —
1.04 ................................ .. ...................
1.02
2.5
USEPA Warning and Control Limits (75`h and 90`h Percentile CVs)
2.0
z ...............................................................................................
— — — — — — — — — — — -
tn
U 1.0
^p 0.5 .............. ........
n
1.4
1.3
Laboratory Warning and Control Limits (10`h and 25th Percentile CVs)
...............................................................................................
1.2
1.1
1.0 - - - - - - - - -- - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.9 ...............................................................................................
0.8 t` .1, Ni. `1 `I `I `ti N1 �ti ♦l X1 �ti �ti �ti �y �Nti �X1,
N1A� 0,.`0' "0"', 0�`' 0a�o- 'N o 0s- *0 �o� 0�.�0 0�o� 0��� ,a0ti ,.oe ,,. o,0 4 o
Test date
♦ 7-day IC25 = 25% inhibition concentration. An estimation of the concentration of sodium chloride
that would cause a 25% reduction in Ceriodaphnia reproduction for the test population.
— — Central Tendency (mean IC25)
— — - Warning Limits (mean IC25 t SA 10 or SA 75)
......... Control Limits (mean IC25 ± SA 251 SA.901 or 2 Standard Deviations)
Graphs generated from associated excel spreadsheet
Excel spreadsheet entered by J Sumner
Reviewed by --i�

I
Analytical Results
Performance Fibers
7401 Statesville Blvd.
Salisbury NC 28145
Entered 5/7/2013
Reported: 6/3/2013
-or:
Date
iample ID Parameter Cust ID Result Units Method Analyzed Analyst
130507-16 C.dubia Pass/Fail Eff Pass EPA600/4-91/002 5/8/13 ETS
Respectfully submitted,
Dena Myers
NC Cert #440,
NCDW Cert #37755,
EPA NCO0909
P.O. Box 228 • Statesville, North Carolina 28687. 704/872/4697

0 PO Box 7565
Asheville,NC 28802
Phone: [phone]
ET SVI Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Environmental Testing Solutions,Inc.
May 28, 2013
Ms. Tracy Moore
Statesville Analytical, Inc.
122 Court Street
Statesville, NC 28677-5803
RE: ETS PROJECT NUMBER: 8945
Dear Ms. Moore:
Enclosed are toxicity test results for samples from the Performance Fibers received by
Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc. May 08 through May 10, 2013.
Parameter Test Procedure EPA Method Final
Code Number Result
North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent
TGP3B Toxicity Procedure EPA-821-R-02-013 PASS
(Ceriodaphnia Pass/Fail Toxicity Test)
If this test was performed as an NPDES requirement or by Administrative Letter, please enter a
P on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the collection date
May 06, 2013 using the parameter code TGP3B.
Additionally, please sign and submit a copy of the DWQ Aquatic Toxicity Form (AT-3) by
June 30, 2013.
If you have any questions concerning these results, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
�i�m/Surnner
Laboratory Director
This report should not be reproduced,except in its entirety, without the written consent of Environmental Testing Solutions, Inc.
The results in this report relate only to the samples submitted for analysis
North Carolina Certificate Numbers: Biological Analyses: 37, Drinking Water: 37786, Wastewater: 600
South Carolina Certificate Number: Clean Water Act: 99053-001

r
r„
fir. •
r k.
Page I of 1
:7 :ET5
{' Control Information,North Carolina Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test(EPA-821-R-02-013,
�-
Method 1002.0,NC Modification–December 2010,Version 3-0) Species: Cetzodanhnia dubia
Test grouping information: Project#I Control#— Date QS• .1
6 Acceptance Criteria.
5AP- A C-C. 9W %of Male Adults 5 201/o):
`. 4 0.M 1Ms %Adults having 3'a Broods 2 80%): (J(f
3 S 16 $g� %Mortality s 20%
2 A
b'� Mean Offspring/Female aa��
1 CONTROL (z 15.offspring/surviving female):
%CV(<40.0%): .11.
Test organism source information: Test information:
Organism e: <24-hours old Randomizingtemplate color: ILd�IL-
Date and times organisms were born OS•OZ•1� 1� 11�L. Incubator number and shelf
between: location: •Z�Z,
Culture board: •t A O •30.13
Replicate number: z 3 a s s 7 s s to n u YWT batch:
Culture board c number: 30 3 1 11 05-U-15
Transfer bowl information: H= SU Tem etature= _L . °C Selerrastrum batch: .M.
Daily renewal in ornration:
Day Date Test initiation,renewal, Control/Dilution waterAnalyst
feeding,or termination time batch used Soft /enthetic
0ds�11 Initiation and Fmgading \ Q S'•Q,�� rj
1 •t7 Feea (7'1Si7 KEI+I
2 '1 Remewe!1 end Feeding
3 .I h Fading
4 Feeding
in
5 0 •t , Renewal 2 and Feedio
bbs'L Oa-O�•�j
6 .1�{•t Feeamg 0 S `(E
7 os- VS-13 min
Teration
D the
Parameter Initiation Renewal One Renewal Two
Analyst
H(S.U.) .1 7.7 7.r8 7.CT
DO m .O 7.11
Conductivitymhos/cm 1ST !S
Alkalin m CaCO3/1. 3
Hardness m CaCO3/L
Temperature C Z -L Z
Initial Final Initial Final Initial Fiaat
Survival and reproduction data:
Re licate number
Day 12 3 4 1 5 1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
2 1 Adult mortality L %-- I.— L— %-- \— \— L— L
=live,D=dead ] d
51 Number
Young of Brood, Z Z
produced 1'Z 1 1%4 is (�. 13 ti Cj 13 13
Adult mortality L L L
I D=dead
6 or 7 xnmber ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 Q 1 1
Young ofBroode (.S 15 l 1 1 (o S l
produced 5 1 l ( I I S S
Total young produced Z.1 2,5 3+ 3b 30 79, 30 37 Z$ Z& 3� 2S.
Final Adult Mortality L
D=d
X for 3 Broods
Notes: M=Male,AB=Aborted brood observed.
SOP AT 12-Exhibit AT12.3,revision 07-01-12

r
XTSPage 1 of 1
North Carolina Chronic Pass/Fail Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
(EPA-821-R-02-013 Method 1002.0,NC Modification—December 2010, Version 3.0)
Species: Ceriodanhnia dubia
Paired with Con&oi# .3 Date OS•03.13
Client: NPDES#: NC py '�
Facility: W County: W N
N l -SALIS Outfall/Pipe: 001
Comments:
Full-strep chemic . Sample information:
Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 M-4
Sample 2
PH(S.U.) Collection start date:7 _Ods 13
DO(mg/L) Collection end time: b O
Conductivity 338 3Z` Grab/Composite Zy.NOWL
mhos/cm (duration): UMppA
Chlorine 40-10 40.10 Temperature(°C)upon
(mom) receipt: 0.4 1
Dilution preparation: Physical characteristics:LmL
concentration: tri
Sam le: i I�1� .lCtQS
Dilution water:l volume(—L): 3
ETS project number: I $q S
ETS sample number: l3 pSQ�.� t 11
Test concentration chemist
Parameter Initiation Renewal Oner79-31
Renewal Tw
Analyst M 1M
R S.U. to 7. 9.7DO. m .0 •9 7.9 11 IqConductivi os/cm Tem erature °C 1s.Z 1 .0 '1!• .d 25.0 � 15.
Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final
Test concentration:y Survival and re roducdon data:
Replicate number
Day 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 5 6 7 1 89 10 11 12
z Adult mortality �^ L
=live,D=dnd
5 Number
Young ofBroods 'L Z t 2 1
produced i3 Vs 1 g 1 A l 1'Z 1�. lS I 11 I S
Adult mortality L L
=Lim D m dead
6 or 7 Numbu 1 `
Young of Broods
produced 11 1 1 L l 1 I'l l 1 L Q I g 1(e 16 I S I Q
Total young produced 3o 7-1 3,1 31 3S 25 31A 33 Z 9
Final Adult Mortality
=live,D=dead
Notes: M=Male,AB=Aborted brood observed.
Test results:
%Mortality:
Mean Offspring/Female: 3 S
%Reduction from control: (7
t-Stat or RS: q
1-Tailed Critical: I?19b
Pass or Fail
SOP AT]2—Exhibit AT]2.2,revision 07-01-12

•
Environmental Testing Solutions,Inc.
Start Date: 5/8/2013 Test ID: CdPFCRNC
End Date: 5/15/2013 Sample ID: Statesville - Performance Fibers
Lab ID: ETS-Envir. Testing Sol, Sample Type: DMR-Discharge Monitoring Report
Sample Date: Protocol: FWCHR-EPA-821-R-02-013 Test Species:
Comments: CD-Ceriodaphnia dubia
lililllii
D-Control 27.000 29.000 31.000 30.000 30.000 29.000 30.000 32.000 28.000 28.000
D-Control 31.000 28.000
34 30.000 27.000 34.000 31.000 35.000 29.000 34.000 33.000 29.000 30.000
34 32.000 34.000
D-Control 29.417 1.0000 29.417 27.000 32.000 5.116 12
34 31.500 1.0708 31.500 27.000 35.000 8.065 12 -2.444 2.508 2.138
Shapiro-Wilk's Test indicates normal distribution (p > 0.01)
F-Test indicates equal variances 0.96228
(p = 0. 0.884 -0.1839 -0.5959
10) 2.8495
5.31963
Homoscedastic t Test indicates no significant differences
Treatments vs D-Control 2.13518 0.07269 26.0417 4.35985 0.02301 1, 22
Performance 05-08-1?

' 351 Depot Street
® Asheville,NC 28801
® Phone: [phone]
-�� �- - -:- Fax: [phone]
Environmental Testing Solutions,Inc.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Chain-of-Custody Form
Facility: Statesville Analytical NPDES#: NCO004944 Pipe#: 001 County: Rowan
Performance Fibers Purchase order:
EWISTA-Salisbury
Species: Ceriodaphnia dubia Effluent dilution: 34%
Test type: Pass/Fail Chronic Parameter code: TGP3B
Sample information: (to be completed by sample collector) r
Composite sample: Sample location: (� �/=!�/ueit�
Start date: —�3 Time: Q ?d 0 Volume collected for testing: JO �-n
End date: �j�j'/j Time: 0 70 D Number of containers filled for testing: l
Number of samples per hour: Method of transport to laboratory: 41'C IrC 4
Chilled during collection? Comments:
If chilled,specify temperature: q `c-
Triple rinse sample container with sample before filling. Completely fill the sample container with no air space.
Pack the sample container completely in ice. The sample must be<6.0'C upon receipt at the laboratory.
Sample custody: (to be completed by sample collector and facility personnel)
Sample collected by:
Pnnt Signal— Date and lime
Relinquished by: Received by:
5— `(3 0V-1,7,-Ltr
Print Signal— Date and it. Pnhl Signazum Dote and time
Relinquisbed b • Received by:
t Iid,titac ( Print signature Dote and time
Sample receipt information: (to be completed by ETS personnel)
Relinquished to ETS by: Received at ETS by:
�Coo2
Print Signature Date end time Print Signal— Date and time
Custody seals intact?: = = = Sample temperature upon receipt at ETS(aC).
Y� Nn Not tz d
Samples received in good condition?: =
yes Ne Total residual chlorine upon receipt at ETS:
gyp, '''�r- (DPD Presence/Absence Indicator,MDL=0.10 mg/L) P`aent At—"
Tracking oumber:�� �7 y �LI.t.J�P /�lJ� 1.�,-L�lo t1
Project number:�' Sample number: W' ' 1
Comments:

I Ceriodaphnia dubia
x . Chronic Reference Toxicant Control Chart
Environmental Testing Solutions,Inc.
1.14 USEPA Control Limits 2 Standard Deviations)
1.12
1.10
1.08 ..................... ................................................
1.06 - - - - - - - — - - - - - - —
......................... ........... ....................... .....
............... ...........
1.04
1.02
2.5
USEPA Warning and Control Limits (75th and 90th Percentile CVs)
2.0
z ...............................................................................................
1.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
1.0
— — — — — — — — — — — — -
•O 0.5 ...............................................................................
1.4
1.3
Laboratory Warning and Control Limits (10th and 25th Percentile CVs)
....................................................................................
1.2
1.1
1.0 _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
0.9 ...............................................................................................
o�.�o oti o� ��� o��o ��o �,o� 05 0$ 05 0�.�0' �.o�' �.��' �o oti' >>.cb ♦ti o� o�o& oyaS o�o� �,01' 040",
05 0'1.
Test date
— 7-day IC25 = 25% inhibition concentration. An estimation of the concentration of sodium chloride
that would cause a 25% reduction in Ceriodaphnia reproduction for the test population.
— Central Tendency (mean IC25)
— — - Warning Limits (mean IC25 f SA.10 or SA.75)
......... Control Limits (mean IC25 ± SA 251 SA.901 or 2 Standard Deviations)
Graphs generated from associated excel spreadsheet.
Excel spreadsheet entered by J Sumner
Reviewed by