NC0003468_Comments on Draft Permit_20160831

Y.^
KE
ENERGY,
August 29, 2016
Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D
Division of Water Resources
Harry K. Sideds
Senior Vice Presideni
Environmental, Health & Safety
526 S. Church Street
Mail Code: EC3XF
Charlotte, NC 28202
[phone]
o:
RECEIVEDINCDEQIDWR
AUG 31 2016
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Water aSection
Permitting
Subject: Comments on the DRAFT NPDES Permit for Dan River Combined Cycle Station
Permit No.: NC0003468
Rockingham County
Dear Dr. Chernikov:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC submits the following comments on the draft National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System Permit for Dan River Combined Cycle Station; issued for public comment by the
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality ("NCDEQ") on July 26, 2016. Duke Energy
appreciates NCDEQ's efforts to develop the Draft Permit, which addresses novel issues associated with
surface impoundment decommissioning. Duke Energy continues to work toward closing Dan River's
surface impoundments, and finalizing this wastewater permit is a critical step to advance that process by
authorizing decanting and dewatering. The company further agrees with the conclusion stated in the
draft permit that discharges from the facility's outfalls will not cause contravention of the state water
quality standards in the receiving waters. In addition to these general comments, Duke Energy offers
the following comments and requests for modification and/or clarification on specific provisions of the
Draft Permit:
1. On page 1 of 21, the Cover page indicates discharges are authorized to the "Dan River in the
Roanoke Rover basin". Please include "Railroad Branch" as a designated receiving water as
permitted seeps are released to Railroad Branch upstream of its confluence with the Dan
River.
2. On Page 2 of 21, Item #2, please list "Railroad Branch" in addition to the Dan River as a
receiving water and show it on the map.
3. On page 3 of 21, the total mercury limit imposed was derived in association with incorrect data.
A typographical error was made in the submittal of EPA Form 2C data for mercury. The
submittal made on July 2016 incorrectly listed the mercury concentrations released from outfall
001 as 0.478 ug/I (parts per billion or 478 ng/1). The correct value for the mercury sample from
outfall 001 is 4.86 ng/I (parts per trillion). The laboratory sample sheet with this result is

Page 12
provided as Attachment 1 to this document. Duke regrets not identifying this typographical
error in the original submittal. Duke requests re-evaluation of the RPA analysis and removal of
this limit from outfall 001 if the analysis shows no potential for surface water standard
contravention as expected.
4. Duke requests a footnote associated with TSS limit for outfall 001 that allows for a monthly
average 49 mg/1 TSS with documentation that TSS above 29 mg/1 is caused by the TSS of the
intake water. During periods of heavy river flow after a rain, the intake water can have turbidity
in excess of 1000 NTU. A similar footnote already exists in the current permit for outfall 002.
5. On page 3 of 21, Duke requests removal of Footnote # 3 as it was related only to the operation
of the former coal fired generation.
6. On page 4 of 21, the statement "Chlorination of the cooling water discharged through outfall
001 is not allowed under this permit" is inconsistent with the permit limit for TRC in outfall 001
found on page 3 of 21. Duke requests this statement on page 4 be removed. It appears that
this condition may have been related to once through cooling water with coal fired generation.
In that case, the condition would no longer be applicable.
7. On page 4 of 21 Section A. (2) Effluent limits for internal outfall 001A, Duke requests the
removal of the pH limit -for this internal outfall. The proposed pH limits should be removed
from internal wastestreams. Installing systems to adjust pH at locations besides the final outfall
are costs and efforts that are not necessary. EPA has allowed for dilution and comingling as a
treatment for pH of internal wastestreams prior to final discharge points. A reference document
supporting this position is attached. (Attachment # 2).
8. Page 5 of 21 Section A. (3.), the effluent limit Table indicates the Measurement Frequency for
Chronic Toxicity is monthly, however the footnote for this item indicates the samples are to be
taken in March, June, September and December. Duke requests that the frequency in the
Table be changed to "Quarterly" as it is in the current permit for the site.
9. On page 5 of 21, the mercury limit is expressed as an annual average. Duke requests
clarification by the addition of a footnote as to how compliance with this term is judged.
Please clarify if this limit is evaluated as an annual calendar average or an average of the first 52
weekly samples. Duke requests that it be judged as the average of the first 52 samples taken
after issuance of the permit.
10. Page 6 of 21 Section A. (4.), the effluent limit Table indicates the Measurement Frequency for
Chronic Toxicity is monthly, however the footnote for this item indicates the samples are to be
taken in March, June, September and December. Duke requests that the frequency in the
Table be changed to "Quarterly" as it is in the current permit for the site.

Page 13
11. Duke requests that the sample location for the effluent limits in Section A. (4.) for turbidity be
clarified to require sampling of the "effluent' and sampling "upstream".
12. On page 7 of 21 Section A. (5.), Duke requests the removal of the pH limit for this internal
outfall. The proposed pH limits should be removed from internal wastestreams. Installing
systems to adjust pH at locations besides the final outfall are costs and efforts that are not
necessary. EPA has allowed for dilution and comingling as a treatment for pH of internal
wastestreams. A reference document supporting this position is attached. (Attachment # 2).
13. On page 7 of 21, Section A. (5.), the yard sump overflow no longer consists of flows from coal
yard runoff or miscellaneous sumps associated with the coal fired generation. Any flows from
yard sump 002A would consist of stormwater only. Therefore, the Total Suspended Solids limit
and the Oil and Grease limit are not applicable to this point. Duke requests these limits be
removed.
14. Comments relative to conditions A. (6.), A. (7.) and A. (8.) Seep Discharges. Duke requests the
removal of limits for Total Aluminum. As was requested in our comments on the Sutton
NPDES permit in 2015, there is no properly adopted state water quality standard for aluminum
in North Carolina Waters. The presence of naturally occurring aluminum in North Carolina
waters is abundant. Duke staff previously reviewed and provided analysis of DEQ's sampling
data for aluminum since 1997 found on EPA STORET. Duke found 30,976 records of analysis of
total aluminum in North Carolina surface waters. Of those tests, 27,776 (89.6%) of the samples
were in excess of the proposed effluent limit imposed in the permit of 87 ug/I. The average of
those ambient surface water samples was 723 ug/l. It appears to us that the limit was derived
from a reference to aluminum in the EPA National recommended criteria table. However, the
recommended criteria are not calibrated to the circumstances present here and are not meant
to be used directly for regulatory permitting purposes. NCDEQ concurred with this request for
the Sutton NPDES permit as shown in the attached December 2015 cover letter for Sutton.
(Attachment #3)
15. Seep outfall 102 flows into outfall 103 prior to entering Railroad Branch. Duke requests that
seep outfall 102 be removed and listed as a contributing flow to outfall 103 as both channels
have been properly designated as effluent channels.
16. Duke requests that only the daily maximum limit be effective for outfall 103 on the effective
date of the permit and that a compliance schedule be included for the newly imposed lead
monthly average limit. Duke requests the compliance schedule be tied to the excavation of
the ash basin timeframes plus one year of additional time to attain compliance with the newly
incorporated permit limit.
17. On page 10 of 21, Section A.(8.) Duke requests additional clarification that collected
stormwater and groundwater from the basement of the coal fired powerhouse building be a
contributing flow as that water will be directed to outfall 104.. Upon implosion of the

Page 14
powerhouse, the basement will 'be filled with miscellaneous materials as part of the closure.
Collected stormwater and groundwater from within the basement will be collected in a sump
and pumped as needed to outfall 104. This flow will not always be in direct response to a rain
event. Groundwater from a French drain system around the foundation of the former
powerhouse will be directed to the sump as well prior to release to outfall 104. Duke requests
inclusion of this flow in the list of contributing flows to outfall 104 in either the final permit or
NPDES permit fact sheet.
18. Page 11 of 21 Section A. (11.), indicates the Measurement Frequency for Chronic Toxicity is
monthly, however the footnote on page 6 of 21 notes for this item indicates the samples are to
betaken in March, June, September and December. Duke requests that the frequency in the
Table be changed to "Quarterly" as it is in the current permit for the site.
19. On page of 13 of 21, Duke requests that the requirement imposed in Section A. (13.) be
removed as there is no longer any wastewater directed to the ash basin.
Duke Energy welcomes any further discussion on our comments or the Draft Permit. If you have any
questions, please contact Shannon Langley at 919.546.2439 or at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Harry Sideris
Duke Energy
Senior Vice President Environment, Health & Safety
Attachments
cc: Mr. Rick Bolich —Dan River Public Hearing officer
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, NC 27608

Page 16
Attachment 1
RECEIVEDINCDEQIDWR
AUG 31 2016
Water Q Sept n
Permlwng
Outfall 001 Form 2C laboratory sample results
report
August 29, 2016 comment Fetter on Dan River
DRAFT NPDES permit

t1*5 DUKE
UE Analytical Laboratory
13339 Hagers Ferry Road
Huntersville, NC 28078-7929
McGuire Nuclear Complex - MG03A2
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Order Summary Report
Order Number: J14100654
Project Name: NPDES FORM 2C VENDOR
Customer Name(s): Dana Newcomb, Penny Stafford
Customer Address: 900 S. Edgewood Rd
Mail Code: Dan River Steam Station
Eden, NC 27288
Lab Contact: Mary Ann Ogle Phone: [phone]
�� Mary Ann Ogle
Re ort Authorized B i /�5 2014.12.04 11:49:59
P y ` " NFA°��Y�-05'00' Date:
(Signature)
Mary Ann Ogle
Program Comments:
Please contact the Program Manager (Mary Ann Ogle) with any questions regarding this report.
Data Flags & Calculations:
12/4/2014
Analytical Lab
Pagel of 88
Any analytical tests or individual analytes within a test flagged with a Qualifier indicate a deviation from the method quality
system or quality control requirement. The qualifier description is found at the end of the Certificate of Analysis (sample results)
under the qualifiers heading. All results are reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted. Subcontracted data
included on the Duke Certificate of Analysis is to be used as information only. Certified vendor results can be found in the
subcontracted lab final report. Duke Energy Analytical Laboratory subcontracts analyses to other vendor laboratories that have
been qualified by Duke Energy to perform these analyses except where noted.
Data Package:
This data package includes analytical results that are applicable only to the samples described in this narrative. An estimation of
the uncertainty of measurement for the results in the report is available upon request. This report shall not be reproduced, except
in full, without the written consent of the Analytical Laboratory. Please contact the Analytical laboratory with any questions. The
order of individual sections within this report is as follows:
Job Summary Report, Sample Identification, Technical Validation of Data Package, Analytical Laboratory Certificate of Analysis,
Analytical Laboratory QC Reports, Sub -contracted Laboratory Results, Customer Specific Data Sheets, Reports &
Documentation, Customer Database Entries, Test Case Narratives, Chain of Custody (COC)
Certification:
The Analytical Laboratory holds the following State Certifications : North Carolina (DENR) Certificate #248, South Carolina
(DHEC) Laboratory ID # 99005 Contact the Analytical Laboratory for definitive information about the certification status of
specific methods.

Sample ID's & Descriptions:
Sample ID
Plant/Station
Collection
Date and Time
Collected By
Sample Description
2014031087
DANRIVER
14 -Nov -14 11:25 AM
Michael Kilpatrick
OUTFALL 001
2014031088
DANRIVER
14 -Nov -14 12:15 PM
Michael Kilpatrick
OUTFALL 001 dup
2014031090
DANRIVER
14 -Nov -14 11:15 AM
Michael Kilpatrick
OUTFALL 002
2014031091
DANRIVER
14 -Nov -14 11:18 AM
Michael Kilpatrick
OUTFALL 002 dup
2014031092
DANRIVER
14 -Nov -14 11:17 AM
Michael Kilpatrick
OUTFALL 002 blank
2014031093
DANRIVER
14 -Nov -14
Michael Kilpatrick
TRIP BLANK
6 Total Samples
Analytical Lab
Page 2 of 88

Technical Validation Review
Checklist:
COC and .pdf report are in agreement with sample totals 0 Yes ❑ No
and analyses (compliance programs and procedures).
All Results are less than the laboratory reporting limits. ❑ Yes ❑� No
All laboratory QA/QC requirements are acceptable.
0 Yes ❑ No
Report Sections Included:
❑d Job Summary Report
❑� Sample Identification
❑� Technical Validation of Data Package
❑� Analytical Laboratory Certificate of Analysis
❑ Analytical Laboratory QC Report
Analytical Lab
Page 3 of 88
❑d Sub -contracted Laboratory Results
❑ Customer Specific Data Sheets, Reports, & Documentation
❑ Customer Database Entries
❑� Chain of Custody
❑� Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) Sent Separately
Reviewed By: Mary Ann Ogle Date: 12/4/2014

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J14100664
Analytical Lab
Page 4 of 88
Site: OUTFALL 001 Sample #: 2014031087
Collection Date: 14 -Nov -14 11:25 AM Matrix: NPDES
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL
DF Method
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (BOD) - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
BOD Complete
Vendor Method
FECAL COLIFORM - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Vendor Method
COLOR OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Vendor Method
TOTAL CYANIDE - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Total Cyanide Complete
Vendor Method
MERCURY IN WATER - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Vendor Method
SURFACTANTS (METHYL BLUE ACTIVE SUBSTANCE) - (Analysis Performed by
Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Vendor Method
PCBS - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
PCB Complete
Vendor Method
RADIOLOGICAL - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Radium tot Complete
Vendor Method
Radium 226 Complete
Vendor Method
Alpha Complete
Vendor Method
Beta Complete
Vendor Method
Tritium Complete
Vendor Method
SULFIDE - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Vendor Method
Sulfite by SM4500-SO3D - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Vendor Method
SEMIVOLATILES - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Vendor Method
Total Phenol by EPA 420.4 - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Vendor Method
VOLATILES - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Volatiles Complete
Vendor Method
Analysis Date/Time Analyst
V SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V_SH EALY
V SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V_SH EALY
V_SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V_SHEALY

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J14100654
Analytical Lab
Page 5 of 88
Site: OUTFALL 001 dup Sample #: 2014031088
Collection Date: 14 -Nov -14 12:15 PM Matrix: NPDES
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
MERCURY IN WATER - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V SHEALY

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J14100654
Analytical Lab
Page 6 of 88
Site: OUTFALL 002 Sample #: 2014031090
Collection Date: 14 -Nov -14 11:15 AM Matrix: NPDES
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
Method
BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (BOD) - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
BOD Complete
Vendor Method
FECAL COLIFORM - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Vendor Method
COLOR OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Vendor Method
TOTAL CYANIDE - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Total Cyanide Complete
Vendor Method
MERCURY IN WATER - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Vendor Method
SURFACTANTS (METHYL BLUE ACTIVE SUBSTANCE) - (Analysis Performed by Shealy
Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Vendor Method
PCBS - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
PCB Complete
Vendor Method
RADIOLOGICAL - (Analysis Performed bV Shealy Labs)
Radium 226 Complete
Vendor Method
Beta Complete
Vendor Method
Radium tot Complete
Vendor Method
Alpha Complete
Vendor Method
Tritium Complete
Vendor Method
SULFIDE - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Vendor Method
Sulfite by SM4500-SO3D - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Vendor Method
SEMIVOLATILES - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Vendor Method
Total Phenol by EPA 420.4 - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Vendor Method
VOLATILES - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Volatiles Complete
Vendor Method
Analysis Date/Time Analyst
V_SHEALY
V_SH EALY
V_SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V_SHEALY
V SHEALY
V SHEALY
V SHEALY

Analytical Lab
Certificate of Laboratory Analysis Page 7 of 88
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J14100664
Site: OUTFALL 002 dup Sample #: 2014031091
Collection Date: 14 -Nov -14 11:18 AM Matrix: NPDES
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
MERCURY IN WATER - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_SHEALY

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J14100664
Site: OUTFALL 002 blank Sample #: 2014031092
Collection Date: 14 -Nov -14 11:17 AM Matrix: NPDES
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
MERCURY IN WATER - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Analytical Lab
Page 8 of 88
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V SHEALY

Certificate of Laboratory Analysis
This report shall not be reproduced, except in full.
Order # J14100664
Site: TRIP BLANK
Collection Date: 14 -Nov -14
Analyte Result Units Qualifiers RDL DF
MERCURY IN WATER - (Analysis Performed by Shealy Labs)
Vendor Parameter Complete
Sample #: 2014031093
Matrix: NPDES
Analytical Lab
Page 9 of 88
Method Analysis Date/Time Analyst
Vendor Method V_SHEALY

PI Manual Editor
namlmao5125
Thursday, Dec 4 2014
PI Manual Editor
PI Server DRVex I Dan River steam station
User lO ma05125
Password
Conned
Connected
Page 1 of 1
Analytical Lab
Page 10 of 88
1 - Select a PI Server
2 - Etriar LAKI In P6W"ore aA® wrinece to LivOv
Point List DRDM I DR DMR Points 3 - Select a Point List
Status slue 1 7 written to PI
4 - Select value from drop down or type value in
yellow lexlbox, check the record, then click
Send To PI
Number Or visit, 15-
Ej
Point List
❑ Server
Point
Descriptor
Eng Units
Snapshot
Timestamp el Value
0 drvpi
DRODMDSA
Downstream 3000 FT Total Arsenic
ug/I
110
12/4/2014 11:40:24 AM
0 drvpi
DRODMDSS
Downstream 3000 FT Total Selenium
ug/I
<1.0
12/4/2014 11:40:24 AN
Q drvpi
DRODMYDPHI
Outfall 001 pH
SU
Pt Created
12/9/2014 11:40:24 AN
Q drvpi
DRODMCCWIRN
Outfall 001 Total Iron
mg/I
0386
12/4/2014 11:40:24 AM -
0 drvpi
IQR0QMTRC
Outfall 001 Total Residual Chlorine
ug/I
Pt Created
12/4/2014 11:40:24
Q drvpi
DRODMTSSI
Outfall 001 Total Suspended Solids
mg/I
<50
11/11/2014 11:25:24 A 1.7
Q drvpi
DRODMYDOAGIA
Outfall 001A Oil&Grease
mg/I
<50
12/9/2014 11:40:24
© drvpi
DRODMTSSIA
Outfall 001A Total Suspended Solids
mg/1
<50
12/9/2014 11:40:24 AM
�] drvpi
DROOMTOXA
Outfall 002 Acute Toxicity
Pt Created
12/9/2014 11:40:24 AN
Q drvpiDRODMTOXC
Outfall 002 Chronic Toxicity
Pass
12/4/2014 11:40:24 AM
drvpi
DRODMOAG
Outfall 002 Oil &Grease
mg/I
<5.0
12/9/2019 11:90:29 AM _ _
C] drvpi
DRODMSUL
Outfall 002 Sulfate
mg/I
36
12/9/2019 11:40:24 AM
Q drvpi
DRODMARS
Outfall 002 Total Arsenic
ug/I
133
12/9/2014 11:40:24 AM
Q drvpi
D ODMCOP
Outfall 002 Total Copper
mg/I
<0.005
s
drvpi
DRODMIRN
Outfall 002 Total Iron
mg/I
0.099
12/4/2014 11:40:24 AM
Q drvpi
DRODMNIT
Outfall 002 Total Nitrogen
mg/I
022
12/4/2014 11:40:24 AM
drvpi
DRODMPHO
Outfall 002 Total Phosphorous
mg/I
0 013
12/4/2014 11:40:24 AM _
Q drvpi
DRODMSEL
Outfall 002 Total Selenium
ugn
2.76
12/4/2019 11:40:24 AM
(] drvpi
DRODMTSS
Ouffall 002 Total Suspended Solids
mgll
<5.0
12/4/2014 11:40:24
drvpi
DRODMYDOAG
Outfall 002A Oil &Grease
mg/I
Pt Created
12/4/2014 11:40:24 AN
] drvpi
DRODMYDIRN
Outfall 002A Total Iron
mg/I
0.746
12/9/2019 11:40:24 AM
drvpi
DRODMYOTSS
Outfall 002A Total Suspended Solids
mg/I
6.358458E-30
12/4/2019 11:40:24 AM
Q drvpi
DRODMUSS
Upstream 2500 FT Total Selenium
ugA
<1.0
12/9/2019 11:40:24 AM _ _
I] drvpi
IDRODMUSA
Upstream 3000 FT Total Arsenic
ugA
<1.0
12/4/2014 11:40:24 AN
Count: 24
http://139.46.105.27/PIManua]Editor/Main.aspx 12/4/2014

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Report of Analysis
Duke Energy
13339 Hagers Ferry Rd
Bldg 7405
Huntersville, NC 28078
Attention: Mary Ann Ogle
Project Name: Dan River - VOC
Lot Number:PK11053
Date Completed:11/14/2014
;��e /fi 4"eI
Grant Wilton
Project Manager
titFP 191 A C C0,90Q
m
ftw c
u
U f �
This report shall not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
The following non -paginated documents are considered part of this report: Chain of Custody Record and Sample Receipt Checklist.
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 1 .of 8
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
SC DHEC No: 32010 NELAC No: E87653 NC DENR No: 329 NC Field Parameters No: 5639
Case Narrative
Duke Energy
Lot Number: PKII053
Project Name: Dan River - VOC
Project Number:
This Report of Analysis contains the analytical result(s) for the sample(s) listed on the Sample Summary following this Case Narrative. The sample
receiving date is documented in the header information associated with each sample.
All results listed in this report relate only to the samples that are contained within this report.
Sample receipt, sample analysis, and data review have been performed in accordance with the most current approved NELAC standards, the
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. ("Shealy") Quality Assurance Management Plan (QAMP), standard operating procedures (SOPs), and Shealy
policies. Any exceptions to the NELAC standards, the QAMP, SOPS or policies are qualified on the results page or discussed below.
If you have any questions regarding this report please contact the Shealy Project Manager listed on the cover page.
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 2 of 8
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Sample Summary
Duke Energy
Lot Number: PK11053
Project Name: Dan River - VOC
Project Number:
Sample Number Sample ID Matrix Date Sampled Date Received
001 001 Aqueous 11/11/2014 1209 11/11/2014
002 002 Aqueous 11/11/2014 1115 11/11/2014
(2 samples)
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc Page: 3 of 8
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Executive Summary
Duke Energy
Lot Number: PKII053
Project Name: Dan River - VOC
Project Number:
Sample Sample ID Matrix Parameter Method Result Q Units Page
001 001 Aqueous Chloroform 624 4.3 ug/L 6
(1 detection)
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 4 Of 8
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

Volatile Organic Compounds by GUMS
Client: Duke Energy Laboratory ID: PK11053-001
Description: 001 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/11/2014 1209 Project Name: Dan River - VOC
Date Received: 11/11/2014 Project Number:
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 5030B 8260B 1 11/12/2014 0107 PMM2 60639
CAS
Analytical
Parameter Number
Method Result Q
PQL Units Run
Acrolein 107-02-8
8260B ND
5.0 ug/L 1
Acrylonitrile 107-13-1
82608 ND
5.0 ug/L 1
Run 1 Acceptance
Surrogate Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 101 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 95 70-130
Toluene -d8 96 70-130
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 5 of 8
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Client: Duke Energy Laboratory ID: PK11053-001
Description: 001 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11111/2014 1209 Project Name: Dan River - VOC
Date Received: 11/11/2014 Project Number:
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 624 624 1 11/12/20141918 PMM2 60734
Parameter
CAS
Number
Analytical
Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Benzene
71-43-2
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Bromodichloromethane
75-27-4
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Bromoform
75-25-2
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
74-83-9
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Chloroethane
75-00-3
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
2-Chloroethylvinylether
110-75-8
624
ND
5.0
ug/L
1
Chloroform
67-66-3
624
4.3
2.0
ug/L
1
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
74-87-3
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Dibromochloromethane
124-48-1
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Dichlorodifluoromethane
75-71-8
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
156-60-5
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-02-6
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Methylene chloride
75-09-2
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Toluene
108-88-3
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
71-55-6
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
79-00-5
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Trichlorofluoromethane
75-69-4
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Surrogate
Run 1 Acceptance
Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 99 70-130
Toluene -d8 89 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 88 70-130
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of cntena
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 6 Of 8
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1

Volatile Organic Compounds by GUMS
Client: Duke Energy Laboratory ID: PK11053-002
Description: 002 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/11/2014 1115 Project Name: Dan River - VOC
Date Received: 11/11/2014 Project, Number:
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 5030B 8260B 1 11/12/2014 0129 PMM2 60639
CAS Analytical
Parameter Number Method Result Q PQL Units Run
Acrolein 107-02-8 8260B ND 5.0 ug/L 1
Acrylonitrile 107-13-1 8260B ND 5.0 ug/L 1
Run 1 Acceptance
Surrogate Q % Recovery Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 100 70-130
Bromofluorobenzene 93 70-130
Toluene -d8 95 70-130
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of cnteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 7 of 8
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v21

Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS
Client: Duke Energy Laboratory ID: PK11053-002
Description: 002 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/11/2014 1115 Project Name: Dan River - VOC
Date Received: 11/11/2014 Project Number:
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 624 624 1 11/12/20141940 PMM2 60734
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a' W'
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 8 of 8
1'06 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2 1
CAS
Analytical
Surrogate
Q % Recovery
Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q •
PQL
Units
Run
Benzene
71-43-2
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Bromodichloromethane
75-27-4
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Bromoform
75-25-2
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
74-83-9
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Carbon tetrachloride
56-23-5
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Chloroethane
75-00-3
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
2-Chloroethylvinylether
110-75-8
624
ND
5.0
ug/L
1
Chloroform
67-66-3
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
74-87-3
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Dibromochloro methane
124-48-1
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Dichlorodifluoromethane
75-71-8
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-60-5
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-02-6
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Ethylbenzene
100-41-4
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Methylene chloride
75-09-2
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
79-34-5
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Toluene
108-88-3
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
71-55-6
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
79-00-5
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Trichlorofluoromethane
75-69-4
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
Vinyl chloride
75-01-4
624
ND
2.0
ug/L
1
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a' W'
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 8 of 8
1'06 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2 1
Run 1
Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery
Limits
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4
97
70-130
Toluene -d8
88•
70-130
Bromofluorobenzene
86
70-130
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a' W'
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 8 of 8
1'06 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2 1

QC Summary
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PKI 1053
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - MB
Sample ID: PQ60639-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 60639 Prep Method: 5030B
Analvtical Method: 8260B
Parameter Result Q Dil PQL Units Analysis Date
Acrolein ND 1 5.0 ug/L 11/11/20142319
Acrylonitrile ND 1 5.0 ug/L 11/11/20142319
Acceptance
Surrogate Q % Rec Limit
Bromofluorobenzene 93 70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 97 70-130
Toluene -d8 95 70-130
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W'
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PKI 1053
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - LCS
Sample ID: PQ60639-002 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 60639 Prep Method: 5030B
Analvtical Method: 8260B
Bromofluorobenzene 91 70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 95 70-130
Toluene -d8 99 70-130
PQL = Practical quantdaLon limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11053
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v21
Spike
Amount
Result
% Rec
Parameter
(ug/L)
(ug/L) Q Dil
% Rec Limit Analysis Date
Acrolein
500
520 1
104 26-134 11/11/20142215
Acrylonitrile
100
100 1
105 70-130 11/11/20142215
Surrogate
Q % Rec
Acceptance
Limit
Bromofluorobenzene 91 70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 95 70-130
Toluene -d8 99 70-130
PQL = Practical quantdaLon limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11053
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v21

Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - MB
Sample ID: PQ60734-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 60734 Prep Method: 624
Analvtical Method: 624
Parameter
Result
Q Dil
PQL
Units
Analysis Date
Benzene
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
Bromodichloromethane
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
Bromoform
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/2014 1857
Carbon tetrachloride
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/2014 1857
Chlorobenzene
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
Chloroethane
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
2-Chloroethylvinylether
ND
1
5.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
Chloroform
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/2014 1857
Dibromochloromethane
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
1,2-Dichloroethane
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
1,1-Dichloroethane
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
1,1-Dichloroethene
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
1,2-Dichloropropane
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
Ethylbenzene
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
Methylene chloride
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/2014 1857
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
Tetrachloroethene
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
Toluene
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
Trichloroethene
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
Trichlorofluoromethane
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/20141857
Vinyl chloride
ND
1
2.0
ug/L
11/12/2014 1857
Acceptance
Surrogate Q % Rec Limit
Bromofluorobenzene 88 70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 99 70-130
Toluene -d8 90 70-130
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11053
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab corn Level 1 Report v2.1

Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - LCS
Sample ID: PQ60734-002
Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 60734
Prep Method:
624
Analytical Method: 624
Spike
Amount
Result
% Rec
Parameter
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
Q Dil
% Rec
Limit
Analysis Date
Benzene
20
21
1
104
37-151
11/12/2014 1814
Bromodichloromethane
20
19
1
96
35-155
11/12/20141814
Bromoform
20
18
1
90
45-169
11/12/20141814
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
20
21
1
106
1-242
11/12/2014 1814
Carbon tetrachloride
20
21
1
107
70-140
11/12/2014 1814
Chlorobenzene
20
20
1
100
37-160
11/12/20141814
Chloroethane
20
22
1
111
14-230
11/12/2014 1814
2-Chloroethylvinylether
20
20
1
100
1-305
11/12/20141814
Chloroform
20
20
1
102
51-138
11/12/20141814
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
20
23
1
115
1-273
11/12/2014 1814
Dibromochloromethane
20
19
1
94
53-149
11/12/20141814
Dichlorodifluoromethane
20
25
1
123
10-158
11/12/20141814
1,2-Dichloroethane
20
23
1
114
49-155
11/12/20141814
1,1-Dichloroethane
20
22
1
111
59-155
11/12/20141814
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethene
20
21
1
104
54-156
11/12/20141814
1,1-Dichloroethene
20
21
1
103
1-234
11/12/20141814
1,2-Dichloropropane
20
21
1
104
1-210
11/12/20141814
trans- l,3-Dichloro propene
20
21
1
107
17-183
11/12/20141814
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
20
20
1
102
1-227
11/12/20141814
Ethylbenzene
20
20
1
102
37-162
11/12/20141814
Methylene chloride
20
20
1
102
1-221
11/12/2014 1814
1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane
20
20
1
99
46-157
11/12/20141814
Tetrachloroethene
20
19
1
96
70-130
11/12/20141814
Toluene
20
20
1
101
47-150
11/12/20141814
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
20
21
1
103
52-162
11/12/20141814
1,1,2 -Trichloroethane
20
19
1
94
52-150
11/12/20141814
Trichloroethene
20
19
1
97
71-157
11/12/20141814
Trichlorofluoromethane
20
24
1
118
17-181
11/12/20141814
Vinyl chloride
20
25
1
124
1-251
11/12/2014 1814
Acceptance
Surrogate Q % Rec Limit
Bromofluorobenzene 89 70-130
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 92 70-130
Toluene -d8 86 70-130
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W'
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PKI 1053
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2 1

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
D*p44t w it :o • o o'.o o'o n s:a e e 1 A 1 ''
fq
j.
-m-0 Mood
XV$'
JopWlnropt
IF! �'t aha vow
cc
�j4L L
��
' 4
I'R j , i punoiewnl PsnaeD K"IRVI
�i. � i ; , ; , i uneotd :lueyodury'wuro�a+rj
w; I
I ^ x x sq x K ; ja
16
1'
w L
lopAft
d
¢.
LL
m
o a .a a
l4�I�ol9UKNa>otayQUClC aNldmoo 91 lMtvllhp
aE% s I I I
FT
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab com
Level 1 Report v2.1
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab com
Level 1 Report v2.1

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
SMaly Enviroamcnukl Senses, Lni,
Dacusnent.Yumber: F-AD{116
Re iston Yumbcc 16
Sample Receipt Checklist (SRC}
Pagc 1 of 1
RaAno a Dr tc: (0l�+I d
Eticcfive Dntc: I VOW14 .
Client: 1��.��a�c Gaoler Inspected byJrhite;�`tx�J����\� Lot
Hearts of receipt: �SIESI El Client ®UPS ❑ HedEx L] AirbB] �] orne Exp El Other
Yes No 1. A'ere custody seals resent an the cooler?
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1
Yes No
NA
2. If custody seals were resent, were they intact and onbrolon r
Cooler ID/Original temperature upon wceipill7erived (corrected) temperature upon receipt:
fz� rz.�=C /Z n f3. "G I DC I l °C
Method; Temperature Blank ❑ Against Bottles IR Gun ID: ", YR Cron Correction Factor. � • N
Method of coolant: %Vet Ice ❑ Blue Ice ❑ Dr • ice None
Yes j] No ❑ NA
I If temperature of any cooler exceeded 6.0eC, was Project Manager notified?
PM notified by SRC, phone, note (circle one), other.
(For coolers received vitt coinmerciatl courier, PMs arc to be notified
immediately.)
Yes [� Na ❑ NA
4, Is the coimne tial courier's packing slip attached to this form?
Yes ❑ Nu ❑
S. Were proper custodyroeedures (relit uishedhcceived) followW?
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
Sa A"= sam les relinquished by clienr to commercial courier?
Yes No ❑
6. Ware sample IN listed on the (FOC?
Yes No
7. Were sam le TDs listed on all sample containers?
Yes Nn ❑
S. Was collection date & time listed on the COC?
Yes No ❑
9. Was collection date & time listed cin all sate le cotttaimas?
Yes Nn ❑
10. Did all container label information JD. date, rime a= with the COC''
Yes No ❑
11. Were test; to be formed listed on the COC?
Ycv No ®
12. Did All samples al•rive. in the proper containers for each test?
Yes No ❑
B. Did all containers arrive in good condition (unbroken, lids on, ctc.)?
Yes No Q
14. Was ad uare sample volume available?
Yes Nv ❑
15, Were all samples received within 1h the holding tinge or 48 hours, whichever
comes first'
Yes ❑ No ®''
16. Were an stun les containers missing:'
Yes ® No
-WA
17. Were there any excess samples not listed on COC?
Yes ❑ No ❑
18. Were bubbles resent >" ca -size" ('A"or 6mm in diameter) in any VOA vials?
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
19.'ttVere. all metalsl0&G/HLNllntrtricrlt sam les received .ata 11 of�2^
Yeh No �j NA ❑
20. Werc all cyanide and/or sulfide sa les received ata H 5127
Yoe No [j NA ❑
?1. Were all applicable NMITKNIcyanide/phenol (<0.2mg/L) samples free of
residual cl>,lnrine?
Yes ® No ❑ NA
22. Were collection rem atoms documented on the COC for NC samples?
Ycs ❑ No ❑ NA
23. Wert. client remarks/requests (i,e. requested dilutions, lf,SI SD designations,
etc,.,) correct/ transcribed from the CUC into the comment section in MIS?
Yes ❑ No
24. Was the quote number used taken from the container label?
Sample Preservation (Must be compleW for any esrnple(s) incorrectly preserved or with headspace.)
Saniple(s) were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted
accordingly in sa le receivin , with (HzSO4,HNO�,HC1,Na0H) using SR #
Sam le(y,) were received with bubbles >6 mm ill dian-ver,
Salm la(s) went: received with TPC >0,2 mg/L. (If 021 is No)
SC Drinking Water Project Samples) pH .verified to be, > 2 by Date:
Sam le(s were not received ata H of t2 and weir, adjusted accordin i usinar SRO
Sate le labels Verified b
`"^ Date:
Cnttrratr�nF.c-
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Report of Analysis
Duke Energy
13339 Hagers Ferry Rd
Bldg 7405
Huntersville, NC 28078
Attention: Mary Ann Ogle
Project Name: Dan River
Project Number:J14100654
Lot Number: PK11055
Date Completed: 11/24/2014
�V�
Grant Wilton
Project Manager
�o,k AccoR�4
K � _
This report shall not be reproduced, except in its entirety, without the written approval of Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
The following non -paginated documents are considered part of this report: Chain of Custody Record and Sample Receipt Checklist.
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 1 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
SC DHEC No: 32010 NELAC No: E87653 NC DENR No: 329 NC Field Parameters No: 5639
Case Narrative
Duke Energy
Lot Number: PK11055
This Report of Analysis contains the analytical result(s) for the sample(s) listed on the Sample Summary following this Case Narrative. The sample
receiving date is documented in the header information associated with each sample.
All results listed in this report relate only to the samples that are contained within this report.
Sample receipt, sample analysis, and data review have been performed in accordance with the most current approved NELAC standards, the
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. ("Shealy") Quality Assurance Management Plan (QAMP), standard operating procedures (SOPs), and Shealy
policies. Any exceptions to the NELAC standards, the QAMP, SOPS or policies are qualified on the results page or discussed below.
If you have any questions regarding this report please contact the Shealy Project Manager listed on the cover page
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 2 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] vwwa.shealylab.com Level 1 Report V2.1

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Sample Summary
Duke Energy
Lot Number: PK11055
Sample Number
Sample ID
Matrix
Date Sampled
Date Received
001
001
Aqueous
11/11/20141125
11/11/2014
002
001
Aqueous
11/11/20141209
11/11/2014
003
001 DUP
Aqueous
11/11/20141215
11/11/2014
004 002
005 FIELD BLANK
Aqueous 11/11/20141115 11/11/2014
Aqueous 11/11/20141117 11/11/2014
006 002 DUP Aqueous 11/11/2014 0118 11/11/2014
007 TRIP BLANK Aqueous 11/11/2014 11/11/2014
(7 samples)
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 3 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

(9 detections)
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 4 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] vwwd.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1
SHEALY
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Executive Summary
Duke Energy
Lot Number: PK11055
Sample Sample ID
Matrix
Parameter Method
Result Q
Units
Page
001
001
Aqueous
MBAS (calculated as LAS, MW 340) SM 5540C-
0.063
mg MBAS/L
5
001
001
Aqueous
Platinum -Cobalt Color SM 21206-
20
color units
5
001
001
Aqueous
TSS SM 2540D-
1.7
mg/L
5
002
001
Aqueous
Phenolics 420.4
0.0058
mg/L
8
002
001
Aqueous
Fecal Coliform (MPN) Colilert-18 ATP
11
MPN/100mL
8
002
001
Aqueous
Mercury (CVAFS) 1631E
4.86
ng/L
9
003
001 DUP
Aqueous
Mercury (CVAFS) 1631E
4.69
ng/L
10
004
002
Aqueous
Platinum -Cobalt Color SM 212013-
20
color units
11
004
002
Aqueous
Fecal Coliform (MPN) Colilert-18 ATP
5
MPN/100mL
11
(9 detections)
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 4 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] vwwd.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

Inorganic non-metals
Client: Duke Energy Laboratory ID: PK11055-001
Description: 001 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/11/2014 1125
Date Received: 11/11/2014
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date
Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(BOD, 5 day) SM 521OB-2011
1
11/17/2014 0852
ANG
11/12/2014 0903
9482
1
(MBAS (calcul) SM 5540C-2011
1
11/12/2014 2017
HMA
11/12/2014 2017
SM 5540C-20
1
(Platinum -Cob) SM 212OB-2011
1
11/11/2014 1812
AMM1
11/11/2014 1812
20
1
(Sulfide) SM 4500-S2 F-2011
1
11/17/2014 1641
AMM1
ND
61061
1
(Sulfite) SM 4500-SO3 B-2011
1
11/11/2014 1941
TAF
2.0
mg/L
1
(TSS) SM 254OD-2011
1
11/13/2014 1038
AMM1
mg/L
60771
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
NO = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 5 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax[phone] www.shealylab com Level 1 Report v2 1
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
BOD, 5 day
SM 521OB-20
ND
2.0
mg/L
1
MBAS (calculated as LAS, MW 340)
SM 5540C-20
0.063
0.050
mg MBAS/L
1
Platinum -Cobalt Color
SM 212OB-20
20
5.0
color units
1
Sulfide
18496-25-8 SM 4500-S2
ND
1.0
mg/L
1
Sulfite
SM 4500-SO3
ND H
2.0
mg/L
1
TSS
SM 2540D-20
1.7
1.0
mg/L
1
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
NO = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 5 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax[phone] www.shealylab com Level 1 Report v2 1

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GUMS
Client: Duke Energy Laboratory ID: PK11055-001
Description: 001 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/11/2014 1125
Date Received: 11/11/2014
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 625 625 1 11/15/2014 0751 DRB1 11/12/2014 1500 60697
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and a MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 6 Of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
4 -Chloro -3 -methyl phenol
59-50-7
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
2 -Chlorophenol
95-57-8
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
2,4 -Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
4,6-Dinitro-2-m ethyl phenol
534-52-1
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
625
ND
50
ug/L
1
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
Phenol
108-95-2
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
2,4,6 -Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
Run 1 Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery Limits
2-Fluorobiphenyl
74 37-129
2-Fluorophenol
78 24-127
Nitrobenzene -d5
80 38-127
Phenol -d5
78 28-128
Terphenyl-d14
64 10-148
2,4, 6-Tribromophenol
81 41-144
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and a MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 6 Of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1

PCBs by GC
Client: Duke Energy Laboratory ID: PK11055-001
Description: 001 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/1112014 1125
Date Received: 11/11/2014
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 608 608 1 11/17/20141133 PMS 11/12/20141718 60714
Parameter
CAS Analytical
Number Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Aroclor 1016
12674-11-2 608
ND
0.25
ug/L
1
Aroclor 1221
11104-28-2 608
ND
0.25
ug/L
1
Aroclor 1232
11141-16-5 608
ND
0.25
ug/L
1
Aroclor 1242
53469-21-9 608
ND
0.25
ug/L
1
Aroclor 1248
12672-29-6 608
ND
0.25
ug/L
1
Aroclor 1254
11097-69-1 608
ND
0.25
ug/L
1
Aroclor 1260
11096-82-5 608
ND
0.25
ug/L
1
Run 1 Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery Limits
Decachlorobiphenyl
40 20-131
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
89 26-132
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 7 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] vwvw.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

Inorganic non-metals
Client: Duke Energy Laboratory ID: PK11055-002
Description: 001 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/11/2014 1209
Date Received: 11/11/2014
Run Prep Method Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date
Analyst
Prep Date Batch
1 10-204-00-1-X (Cyanide - To) SM 4500 -CN E-
1 11/17/2014 1708
BLB
11/17/2014 1255 61037
1 (Phenolics) 420.4
1 11/18/2014 1601
MJI
11/18/2014 1349 61117
1 (Fecal Colifo) Colilert-18 ATP
1 11/12/2014 1310
HMA
11/11/2014 1645
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 8 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Cyanide - Total
57-12-5 SM 4500 -CN
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
Phenolics
420.4
0.0058
0.0050
mg/L
1
Fecal Coliform (MPN)
Colilert-18
11
1
MPN/100mL
1
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 8 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1

Mercury (CVAFS)
Client: Duke Energy Laboratory ID: PK11055-002
Description: 001 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/11/2014 1209
Date Received: 11/11/2014
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 1631 E 1 11/12/20142029 BNW 11/11/20142200 60641
CAS Analytical
Parameter Number Method Result Q PQL Units Run
Mercury (CVAFS) 7439-97-6 1631 E. 4.86 0.500 ng/L 1
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 9 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1

Mercury (CVAFS)
Client: Duke Energy Laboratory ID: PK11055-003
Description: 001 DUP Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/11/2014 1215
Date Received: 11/11/2014
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 1631 E 1 11/12/20142033 BNW 11/11/20142200 60641
CAS Analytical
Parameter Number Method Result Q PQL Units Run
Mercury (CVAFS) 7439-97-6 1631 E 4.69 0.500 ng/L 1
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 10 Of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v21

Inorganic non-metals
Client: Duke Energy Laboratory ID: PK11055-004
Description: 002 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:1 1/11/2014 1115
Date Received: 11/11/2014
Run Prep Method
Analytical Method
Dilution Analysis Date
Analyst
Prep Date
Batch
1
(BOD, 5 day) SM 52108-2011
1
11/17/2014 0852
ANG
11/12/2014 0903
9482
1 10-204-00-1-X
(Cyanide - To) SM 4500 -CN E-
1
11/19/2014 1744
BLB
11/19/2014 1450
61248
1
(MBAS (calcul) SM 5540C-2011
1
11/12/2014 2017
HMA
11/12/2014 2017
mg/L
1
(Phenolics) 420.4
1
11/18/2014 1604
MJI
11/18/2014 1349
61117
1
(Platinum -Cob) SM 212OB-2011
1
11/11/2014 1812
AMM1
11/11/2014 1812
mg/L
1
(Sulfide) SM 4500-S2 F-2011
1
11/17/2014 1641
AMM1
5.0
61061
1
(Sulfite) SM 4500-SO3 B-2011
1
11/11/2014 1941
TAF
1.0
mg/L
1
(Fecal Colifo) Colilert-18 ATP
1
11/12/2014 1310
HMA
11/11/2014 1645
mg/L
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless Flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 11 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
BOD, 5 day
SM 521OB-20
ND
2.0
mg/L
1
Cyanide - Total
57-12-5
SM 4500 -CN
ND
0.010
mg/L
1
MBAS (calculated as LAS, MW 340)
SM 5540C-20
ND
0.050
mg MBAS/L
1
Phenolics
420.4
ND
0.0050
mg/L
1
Platinum -Cobalt Color
SM 21208-20
20
5.0
color units
1
Sulfide
18496-25-8
SM 4500-S2
ND
1.0
mg/L
1
Sulfite
SM 4500-SO3
ND H
2.0
mg/L
1
Fecal Coliform (MPN)
Colilert-18
5
1
MPN/100mL
1
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless Flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 11 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GUMS
Client: Duke Energy Laboratory ID: PK11055-004
Description: 002 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/11/2014 1115
Date Received: 11/11/2014
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 625 625 1 11/15/2014 0817 DRB1 11/12/2014 1500 60697
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 12 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1
CAS
Analytical
Parameter
Number
Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
4 -Chloro -3 -methyl phenol
59-50-7
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
2 -Chlorophenol
95-57-8
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
2,4 -Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
4,6-Dinitro-2-m ethyl phenol
534-52-1
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
625
ND
50
ug/L
1
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
Phenol
108-95-2
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
2,4,6 -Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
625
ND
10
ug/L
1
Run 1 Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery Limits
2-Fluorobiphenyl
90 37-129
2-Fluorophenol
96 24-127
Nitrobenzene -d5
98 38-127
Phenol -d5
93 28-128
Terphenyl-d14
88 10-148
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
89 41-144
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 12 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1

PCBs by GC
Client: Duke Energy Laboratory ID: PK11055-004
Description: 002 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/11/2014 1115
Date Received: 11/11/2014
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 608 608 1 11/17/20141145 PMS 11/12/20141718 60714
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported an a dry weight basis unless Flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 13 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1
CAS Analytical
Parameter
Number Method
Result Q
PQL
Units
Run
Aroclor 1016
12674-11-2 608
ND
0.25
ug/L
1
Aroclor 1221
11104-28-2 608
ND
0.25
ug/L
1
Aroclor 1232
11141-16-5 608
ND
0.25
ug/L
1
Aroclor 1242
53469-21-9 608
ND
0.25
ug/L
1
Aroclor 1248
12672-29-6 608
ND
0.25
ug/L
1
Aroclor 1254
11097-69-1 608
ND
0.25
ug/L
1
Aroclor 1260
11096-82-5 608
ND
0.25
ug/L
1
Run 1 Acceptance
Surrogate
Q % Recovery Limits
Decachlorobiphenyl
63 20-131
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
93 26-132
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported an a dry weight basis unless Flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 13 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1

Mercury (CVAFS)
Client: Duke Energy Laboratory ID: PK11055-004
Description: 002 Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/11/2014 1115
Date Received: 11/11/2014
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 1631 E 1 11/12/20142038 BNW 11/11/20142200 60641
CAS Analytical
Parameter Number Method Result Q PQL Units Run
Mercury (CVAFS) 7439-97-6 1631 E ND 0.500 ng/L 1
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 14 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2 1

Mercury (CVAFS)
Client: Duke Energy Laboratory ID: PK11055-005
Description: FIELD BLANK Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/11/2014 1117
Date Received: 11/11/2014
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 1631E 1 11/12/20142043 BNW 11/11/20142200 60641
CAS Analytical
Parameter Number Method Result Q PQL Units Run
Mercury(CVAFS) 7439-97-6 1631E ND 0.500 ng/L 1
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless Flagged with a °W'
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 15 Of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

Mercury (CVAFS)
Client: Duke Energy Laboratory ID: PK11055-006
Description: 002 DUP Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/11/2014 0118
Date Received: 11/11/2014
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 1631E 1 11/12/20142047 BNW 11/11/20142200 60641
CAS Analytical
Parameter Number Method Result Q PQL Units Run
Mercury(CVAFS) 7439-97-6 1631E ND 0.500 ng/L 1
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 16 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v21

Mercury (CVAFS)
Client: Duke Energy Laboratory ID: PK11055-007
Description: TRIP BLANK Matrix: Aqueous
Date Sampled:11/11/2014
Date Received: 11/11/2014
Run Prep Method Analytical Method Dilution Analysis Date Analyst Prep Date Batch
1 1631E 1 11112/20142052 BNW 11/11/20142200 60641
CAS Analytical
Parameter Number Method Result Q PQL Units Run
Mercury (CVAFS) 7439-97-6 1631E ND 0.500 ng/L 1
PQL = Practical quantitation limit B = Detected in the method blank E = Quantitation of compound exceeded the calibration range H = Out of holding time
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and 2 MDL P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page: 17 of 17
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

QC Summary
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

Inorganic non-metals - MB
Sample ID: PQ60771-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 60771
Analytical Method: SM 2540D-2011
Parameter Result Q Dil PQL Units Analysis Date
TSS ND 1 1.0 mg/L 11/13/20141038
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and> MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1

Inorganic non-metals - LCS
Sample ID: PQ60771-002 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 60771
Analytical Method: SM 2540D-2011
Spike
Amount Result % Rec
Parameter (mg/L) (mg/L) Q Dil % Rec Limit Analysis Date
TSS 250 250 1 101 90-110 11/13/20141038
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and 2: MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab com Level 1 Report v21

Inorganic non-metals - MB
Sample ID: PQ61037-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 61037 Prep Method: 10-204-00-1-X
Analytical Method: SM 4500 -CN E-2011 Prep Date: 11/17/2014 1255
Parameter Result Q Dil PQL Units Analysis Date
Cyanide - Total ND 1 0.010 mg/L 11/17/2014 1655
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and 2t MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless Flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1

Inorganic non-metals - LCS
Sample ID: PQ61037-002 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 61037 Prep Method: 10-204-00-1-X
Analytical Method: SM 4500 -CN E-2011 Prep Date: 11/17/2014 1255
Spike
Amount Result % Rec
Parameter (mg/L) (mg/L) Q Dil % Rec Limit Analysis Date
Cyanide - Total 0.10 0.10 1 102 90-110 11/17/2014 1655
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and : MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless Flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] wvvw.shealylab.com Level 1 Reponv2.1

Inorganic non-metals - MS
Sample ID: PK11055-002MS Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 61037 Prep Method: 10-204-00-1-X
Analytical Method: SM 4500 -CN E-2011 Prep Date: 11/17/2014 1255
Sample Spike
Amount Amount Result % Rec
Parameter (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) Q Dil % Rec Limit Analysis Date
Cyanide - Total ND 0.10 0.10 1 104 90-110 11/17/2014 1708
PQL = Practical quantitation limit
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless Flagged with a °W°
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report V2.1

Inorganic non-metals - MSD
Sample ID: PK11055-002MD Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 61037 Prep Method: 10-204-00-1-X
Analytical Method: SM 4500 -CN E-2011 Prep Date: 11/17/2014 1255
Sample Spike
Amount Amount Result % Rec % RPD
Parameter (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) Q Dil % Rec % RPD Limit Limit Analysis Date
Cyanide - Total ND 0.10 0.10 1 104 0.18 90-110 20 11/17/2014 1708
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2 1

Inorganic non-metals - MB
Sample ID: PQ61061-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 61061
Analvtical Method: SM 4500-S2 F-2011
Parameter Result Q Dil PQL Units Analysis Date
Sulfide ND 1 1.0 mg/L 11/17/20141641
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

Inorganic non-metals - LCS
Sample ID: PQ61061-002 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 61061
Analytical Method: SM 4500-S2 F-2011
Spike
Amount Result % Rec
Parameter (mg/L) (mg/L) Q Dil % Rec Limit Analysis Date
Sulfide 10 9.4 1 94 80-120 11/17/20141641
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v21

Inorganic non-metals - MS
Sample ID: PK11055-001 MS Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 61061
Analytical Method: SM 4500-S2 F-2011
Sample Spike
Amount Amount Result % Rec
Parameter (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) Q Dil % Rec Limit Analysis Date
Sulfide ND 10 9.7 1 97 70-130 11/17/20141641
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1

Inorganic non-metals - MSD
Sample ID: PK11055-001MD Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 61061
Analytical Method: SM 4500-S2 F-2011
Sample Spike
Amount Amount Result % Rec % RPD
Parameter (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) Q Dil % Rec % RPD Limit Limit Analysis Date
Sulfide ND 10 10 1 100 3.0 70-130 20 11/17/20141641
PQL = Practical quantitation limit
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a °W'
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1

Inorganic non-metals - MB
Sample ID: PQ61117-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 61117 Prep Method: 9065
Analytical Method: 420.4 Prep Date: 11/18/2014 1349
Parameter Result Q Dil PQL Units Analysis Date
Phenolics ND 1 0.0050 mg/L 11/18/20141557
PQL = Practical quantitation limit
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
J = Estimated result < PQL and MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
g [phone] Fax [phone] vvww.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1

Inorganic non-metals - LCS
Sample ID: PQ61117-002 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 61117 Prep Method: 9065
Analytical Method: 420.4 Prep Date: 11/18/2014 1349
Spike
Amount Result % Rec
Parameter (mg/L) (mg/L) Q Dil % Rec Limit Analysis Date
Phenolics 0.50 0.45 1 91 90-110 11/18/20141558
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1

Inorganic non-metals - MS
Sample ID: PK11055-002MS
Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 61117
Prep Method: 9065
Analytical Method: 420.4
Prep Date: 11/18/2014 1349
Sample
Spike
Amount
Amount
Result % Rec
Parameter
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
(mg/L) Q Dil % Rec Limit Analysis Date
Phenolics
0.0058
0.50
0.48 1 95 90-110 11/18/20141602
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and : MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab com Level 1 Report v2.1

Inorganic non-metals - MSD
Sample ID: PK11055-002MD
Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 61117
Prep Method: 9065
Analytical Method: 420.4
Prep Date: 11/18/2014 1349
Sample
Spike
Amount
Amount
Result % Rec % RPD
Parameter
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
(mg/L) Q Dil % Rec % RPD Limit Limit Analysis Date
Phenolics
0.0058
0.50
0.46 1 91 3.8 90-110 20 11/18/20141603
PQL = Practical quantitation limit
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40%
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and MDL
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
N = Recovery is out of criteria
+ = RPD is out of criteria
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] vwuw.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1

Inorganic non-metals - MB
Sample ID: PQ61248-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 61248 Prep Method: 10-204-00-1-X
Analytical Method: SM 4500 -CN E-2011 Prep Date: 11/19/2014 1450
Parameter Result Q Dil PQL Units Analysis Date
Cyanide - Total ND 1 0.010 mg/L 11/19/2014 1744
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless Flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level i Report v21

Inorganic non-metals - LCS
Sample ID: PQ61248-002 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 61248 Prep Method: 10-204-00-1-X
Analytical Method: SM 4500 -CN E-2011 Prep Date: 11/19/2014 1450
Spike
Amount Result % Rec
Parameter (mg/L) (mg/L) Q Dil % Rec Limit Analysis Date
Cyanide - Total 0.10 0.093 1 93 90-110 11/19/2014 1744
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and 2: MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
g [phone] Fax [phone] vvww.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2l

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - MB
Sample ID: PQ60697-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 60697 Prep Method: 625
Analytical Method: 625 Prep Date: 11/12/2014 1500
Parameter
Result
Q Dil
PQL
Units
Analysis Date
2,4,6 -Trichlorophenol
ND
1
10
ug/L
11/15/2014 0003
2,4-Dichlorophenol
ND
1
10
ug/L
11/15/2014 0003
2,4 -Dimethylphenol
ND
1
10
ug/L
11/15/2014 0003
2,4-Dinitrophenol
ND
1
50
ug/L
11/15/2014 0003
2 -Chlorophenol
ND
1
10
ug/L
11/15/2014 0003
2-Nitrophenol
ND
1
10
ug/L
11/15/2014 0003
4,6-Dinitro-2-m ethyl phenol
ND
1
10
ug/L
11/15/2014 0003
4 -Chloro -3 -methyl phenol
ND
1
10
ug/L
11/15/2014 0003
4-Nitrophenol
ND
1
10
ug/L
11/15/2014 0003
Pentachlorophenol
ND
1
10
ug/L
11/15/2014 0003
Phenol
ND
1
10
ug/L
11/15/2014 0003
Surrogate
Q % Rec
Acceptance
Limit
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
74
41-144
2-Fluorobiphenyl
83
37-129
2-Fluorophenol
83
24-127
Nitrobenzene -d5
88
38-127
Phenol -d5
86
28-128
Terphenyl-d14
88
10-148
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1

Semivolatile Organic Compbunds by GUMS - LCS
Sample ID: P060697-002
78
41-144
Matrix: Aqueous
72
37-129
Batch: 60697
78
24-127
Prep Method:
625
38-127
Phenol -d5
Analytical Method: 625
28-128
Terphenyl-d14
Prep Date: 11/12/2014 1500
10-148
Spike
Amount
Result
% Rec
Parameter
(ug/L)
(ug/L)
Q Dil
% Rec
Limit
Analysis Date
2,4,6 -Trichlorophenol
20
15
1
75
37-144
11/15/2014 0029
2,4-Dichlorophenol
20
15
1
74
39-135
11/15/2014 0029
2,4 -Dimethylphenol
20
15
1
77
32-119
11/15/2014 0029
2,4-Dinitrophenol
100
74
1
74
0-191
11/15/2014 0029
2 -Chlorophenol
20
15
1
77
23-134
11/15/2014 0029
2-Nitrophenol
40
28
1
70
29-182
11/15/2014 0029
4,6-Dinitro-2-m ethyl phenol
100
72
1
72
0-181
11/15/2014 0029
4 -Chloro -3 -methyl phenol
20
16
1
79
22-147
11/15/2014 0029
4-Nitrophenol
100
89
1
89
0-132
11/15/2014 0029
Pentachlorophenol
100
62
1
62
14-176
11/15/2014 0029
Phenol
20
16
1
81
5-112
11/15/2014 0029
Surrogate Q /° Rec Acceptance
° LimiU
2,4,6-Tribromophenol
78
41-144
2-Fluorobiphenyl
72
37-129
2-Fluorophenol
78
24-127
Nitrobenzene -d5
89
38-127
Phenol -d5
81
28-128
Terphenyl-d14
76
10-148
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and a MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

PCBs by GC - MB
Sample ID: PQ60714-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 60714 Prep Method: 608
Analytical Method: 608 Prep Date: 11/12/2014 1718
Parameter
Result
Q Dil
PQL
Units
Analysis Date
Aroclor 1016
ND
1
0.25
ug/L
11/17/2014 1211
Aroclor 1221
ND
1
0.25
ug/L
11/17/2014 1211
Aroclor 1232
ND
1
0.25
ug/L
11/17/2014 1211
Aroclor 1242
ND
1
0.25
ug/L
11/17/2014 1211
Aroclor 1248
ND
1
0.25
ug/L
11/17/2014 1211
Aroclor 1254
ND
1
0.25
ug/L
11/17/2014 1211
Aroclor 1260
ND
1
0.25
ug/L
11/17/2014 1211
Surrogate
Acceptance
Q % Rec Limit
Decachlorobiphenyl 72 20-131
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 91 26-132
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless Flagged with a "W°
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax[phone] wvvw.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

PCBs by GC - LCS
Sample ID: PQ60714-002
Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 60714
Prep Method: 608
Analytical Method: 608
Prep Date: 11/12/2014 1718
Spike
Amount
Result
% Rec
Parameter
(ug/L)
(ug/L) Q
Dil % Rec
Limit Analysis Date
Aroclor 1016
2.5
2.7
1 108
50-130 11/17/2014 1046
Aroclor 1260
2.5
2.7
1 110
50-130 11/17/2014 1046
Surrogate
Q % Rec
Acceptance
Limit
Decachlorobiphenyl 67 20-131
Tetrachloro-m-xylene 97 26-132
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.sheatylab.com Level 1 Report v2,1

Mercury (CVAFS) - MB
Sample ID: PQ60641-001 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 60641 Prep Method: 1631E
Analytical Method: 1631E Prep Date: 11/11/2014 2200
Parameter Result Q Dil PQL Units Analysis Date
Mercury (CVAFS) ND 1 0.500 ng/L 11/12/2014 1927
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and> MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W°
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Reportv2.1

Mercury (CVAFS) - LCS
Sample ID: PQ60641-002 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 60641 Prep Method: 1631E
Analytical Method: 1631E Prep Date: 11/11/2014 2200
Spike
Amount Result % Rec
Parameter (ng/L) (ng/L) Q Dil % Rec Limit Analysis Date
Mercury (CVAFS) 5.00 4.6 1 92 75-125 11/12/2014 1931
PQL = Practical quantitation limit
P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and > MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a "W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

Mercury (CVAFS) - LCSD
Sample ID: PQ60641-003 Matrix: Aqueous
Batch: 60641 Prep Method: 1631E
Analytical Method: 1631E Prep Date: 11/11/2014 2200
Spike
Amount Result % Rec % RPD
Parameter (ng/L) (ng/L) Q Dil % Rec % RPD Limit Limit Analysis Date
Mercury (CVAFS) 5.00 4.64 1 93 0.87 75-125 24 11/12/2014 1936
PQL = Practical quantitation limit P = The RPD between two GC columns exceeds 40% N = Recovery is out of criteria
ND = Not detected at or above the PQL J = Estimated result < PQL and MDL + = RPD is out of criteria
Where applicable, all soil sample analysis are reported on a dry weight basis unless flagged with a °W"
Note: Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round -off errors in calculated results
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. QC Data for Lot Number: PK11055
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v21

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
�UNt�07 S{�IeIL ® tl`� tl �' � •O'O-O �OtA � e u;o el o p«j ��j/'�
• 0 1 t-+
y� t If
�� �� �L7L8l1 Irj�l r�r:r•� - ,moi ;
__ Q f2f Vag �p/ra ♦ ] � I I
v tWNAOV 1 i r
19Dd �i � I Inl
ww roduma a .014 e
I
!iwp
��— r ¢
pilgn i 3 it I I pwrwaaw,gPA+reaPt
ODOM
1
�� r I r sss� r ' _ i •� I j
44
I t
W• �" { ci+ gnaw4d PPJL i
Cr I,LO
B k
I 3 .e,�drs t r 3 1 5 I i
r02r. Pn'Pe2J
Q� i t v Ait0 iC g X 1 X K K - !
4 I i
s I I I � i I •I
F
( t I
12(
u, �� :• _, Yam' �• :r°�� s � t �
AJ
- ! ' ` f
t g
PazUd�A
y, •� S,
1 !mff
: �C � _� I � � ,tie �e�.uwryosa>�aaeao werouoovu.wvctiroa
f
I
iii
� y
i
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com
Level 1 Report v2.1

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
shagyEnvsrcmtt,enlatSer Ica, Inc.
M=ac+a 1.5a 6w. F -F i-009
pmdan Number, S
Field Services Compositor Data Sheet
Page 1 of 1
Rephrcco LXvc: 051II 4
WMdvc L1atc: Wf14n4
Field'TGchniuian:
Compositor ID Nmber:
I130bE (circle ox►e)
IME {Con>csite Tim
Site Flow Start:
Site FlowEnd'
TIME =1-9999 minutes c LOW= 1-9999 clow pulses
INTERVAL BETWEEN SAMPLES
Composite Dater5tart Time:
Composite iDatoTnd Time;
TUBING LENGTH
ClieEt Name:
Location: �I
Ov ice' igp� f
f)^w IL` -*c -b-0 k ,J
Programa Step
Setting
I130bE (circle ox►e)
IME {Con>csite Tim
FLAWCo
( mposite Flog)
i
TIME =1-9999 minutes c LOW= 1-9999 clow pulses
INTERVAL BETWEEN SAMPLES
--------------------------------------- -- -= - - - - - ----------- -- -- — ----------
TUBING LENGTH
OF TURING
iE*
V kT'
[GIRDLE: VINYL OR TLONl
' `�`�:'J"
VTIIQYL OR TEFLON '
f
TUBING DIAIdETER
[CIRCLE 1f4” OR 318")
r„
OR 3. R
L14" OR 316"
CALIBRATED SAMPLE VOLLYME
N17WER OF SAMPLES
l. -V
Confirm that Ice is in Cornpositvr YeS 1 i1 No
Comments:
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2 1

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Shealy fnvironmeoral SrMocs, !roe. 1'117. l of 1
D:taurnent Number: F -F% -M Rr nC4 Date: 474-01'14
Rav9sknNumber:0 Field Instrument Records Effective Date: MQ2114
Date: / df J Analyst: fft- COM 0v �At
Clicnt: I vVA gt"y OP -00,
TRC (SM4500-C1 G-2011)
TRC Mater ID; 12 /0,43 DPD Pillow Standard ID: JA -
i
DPD Buffer Standard TD:
:CRC Standard ID:
,
Dissolved Oxygen (SI%14500-0 G-2011)
DO 14eter ID. t
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1
PR (,SN145001E1+-$-2011) ;
pH Meter ID: qsT- -
Standard
deter
pasrttatg
Standard 1D;4
Cancentratton
Reading (Stj
(PT)
Comments
f% y
(SU)
N111st be lvitilin
�n
Check Standard
�
Buffer
� � i
7.00
—7.6 3
TRC (SM4500-C1 G-2011)
TRC Mater ID; 12 /0,43 DPD Pillow Standard ID: JA -
i
DPD Buffer Standard TD:
:CRC Standard ID:
,
Dissolved Oxygen (SI%14500-0 G-2011)
DO 14eter ID. t
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

�u)
�(
(D
m
m �
d
M
0 <
CD
0 0
o�
CD
,d
CN
N N
o�
a
d
U)
to
N
ShcalpTimimnmraieay Servicer, InG
Dooiinat tiwnb=-. F -Fs -m4
Revision Nwnboc t
Fage 1 of 1
Relilacea PA : 09rV03
Effective Date: 02MM
Field Data Information Sheet for Sampling of 1669 Low Level Mercury for 1631E Analysis
(Complete 1 form per dischareeloutfail)
Collection Date: 11 I �I`i
Site Arrival (24hr): Site departure (24 hr):
YField Blank (F13) Procedure: PPT
ctr D 5
Facility Name: i , Chi, (UcU I
NPOES Permit t#:
FB Mercury Free Reagent Water (MFRW) Batch M'Ls
Environmental Program Area: CW SDWA RCRA
Teflon Tubing (TT) Batch #:
Length: ft
Sampling Technique:
Pump and Tubing (PPT) Direct Manual Surface Grab (aNISG)
Silicon PumpTubing(5PT)Batc�,#:
Length: ft
If PPT technique used the peristaltic pump JD is: 15Cp model 150 portable pump
1 t Amber Container Batch #:
Field Personnel: "Clean" Hands Samplers Printed Name- � �
Volume of MFRW Purged Through TT:
Volume of Sample Purged Through TT:
Copier 1D., C?
ml,
mL
Field Personnel: "Mean" Hands Sampler's Signature: �¢
Field Personnel: "Dirty" Hands Sampler's Printed Name:
Field Personnel: "Dirt Hands sampler's Signature:
Air -Temperature: "F
Glove Brand/source/Lot#: U
Weather Conditions;
'
Apparel Brand/source/Lot #:&&A
Clean Surface Brand/Source: (.' 1
Remarks:
SOP #: 5 -FS -0.02 (1669), Revision #: 7 S -IM -012 1631E), Revision t#: • 1U
Sample Detail
Sample ID
a
Sample
Type
Time
Sampled
(24hr)
Number
of vials
collected
Vial Batch #
TB NiFRW Batch #
Remarks
11
Z-
7-160 1 WFAJA
k -A C. - Ira
,.
t�!fy'
�'�.` � f �%J "�
��
"�-
�.
• •
U.� H�- i� b
_ �`1. lea ���
Sample Types: FB = Field Blank F80 = Field Blank Duplicate S =Sample DS 7 Duplicate Sample MS =Matrix Spike MSD =Matrix Spike Duplicate TB -Trip Blank
V)
m
171z
O
rn
z
m
n
Cn
z
C7

SHEALY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Shealy Envirartmentt Services, Inc.
Document Number. F -AD -416
Revision Nupftr. 16
PQNIof1
Rcplaccx Date: ()7115114
Efieedw Dam: 11'07114
Sample Receipt Checklist {SRC)
Client: Cooler Inspected byldate.-'S c /'\\\\ Lot
Mcans of receipt:
2^1SP'SI l3 Client El UPS ❑ FedEx ❑ AirhorneEzp ❑ Other
Yes ❑` I No L4
I I. Were custody seals pEcscnt on the cooler?
Yes ❑' I Nu ❑
I NA In 12. Tf custody serds were present, were they intact and tuabroken?
Cooler 1D/Original temperature upon receiptll?erived (corrected) temperature upon receipt:
fL fZ--�°C /3 `i 1'x.3 °C ! ! 'C t ! aC
Method; T4mporature Blank ❑ Against prattles JR Gun ID: #+4 IR Gun Correction Factor, 'al �*
Method of coolant: [ Wet Ice ❑ Blue Tce ❑ Dry Ice ❑ None
Ycs ❑ No ❑
3. N temperature of any conler exceeded 60C, was Projcct .Mmager notified?
NA PM notified by SRC; phone, note (circle one), othor; .
(For coolers received Aa commercial courier, PM is am to he notified
im trtediately.
Yes ❑ No ❑
NA d, Is the commercial courier's packing slip attached to this form?
Ycs .No
5, Were propercustody procedures. foIlowed?
Yes ❑I No []
NAET Sa Wort sam lcs rchn uished by client w commercial courier?
Yes 01'No ❑
6. Were sample IDs listed on the CW.?
Ytz 01 No
7, Were sam le IDs listed on all sample containers?
Yes No
S. Was collection dato & time listed on the COC.?
Yea No ❑
9. Was collection date & tune lisLed on all sam le containers?
'fias—ErrNo ❑I
1 10. Did all container label information (ID, date, tithe) agree with the COC?
Yew 01. No ❑
11. Were tests to be erfonned listed on the COC?
Yes 2r , No ❑
12. Did all samples arrive in the proper containers for each test?
Ycs • No ❑
13. Did all containers arrive in ood condition (unbroken, lids on, etc.)?
Yes ?.Vo ❑
14. Was adequate sample volume available?
Ycs No ❑
15, Were all samples received within 'r$ the holding time or 48 hours,, whichever
comes first?
Yes ❑ No '
1 f. Were any sam les containers Wssing?
Yes ❑ No
17. Were there any uxccss samples not listed on COC?
Yes (_] No
NA ❑ 18. Wen; bubbles present >" en-size"'fa'or 6mtn in diameter) in any VIDA vials?
Yes ❑ Ni) ❑
NA 0 19, Were all nietalslO&G/HEM/nutrient snarl 1c s rescued ata PH of C2?
Yes No [3
NA ❑ 20, Were all cyanide rind/or sulfide samples received ata pH 712.7
Yes Nu E]
i�A ® 21, Were all applicable Nh3frMicyanidclphenol (<O:zmg/L) samples free of
residual chlorine?
Yes ❑ ; No ❑
NA 22. Were collection temperatures documented on the COC for NC Sana les?
Yes ❑ No IDNA
Were client remarkslrequests (Le. requested dilutions, MSMSD designations,
etc., . correctly transcribed from the COC into the comment section in LIAM
Yes ®, No 2r 24. Was the quote number used taken From the container label?
Sample -Preservation (NZuSt lac completed for any sample(s) incorrectly preserved or with bradtpacc.)
Sample(s) were received incorrectly preserved and were adjusted
accordiggl y in sample receiving with IS04,HN00(:I,Na0H) using SR #
Sa 1 's
were received with bubbles >6 mm in dione.ter.
Sam le(s) Weree received with TRC A.2 rng L (If #21 is No)
SC Drinking Water Project Sample(s) pH verified to be > 2 by Date:
Sant le(s) were not received ata pH of C2 acid were adjusted accordin-in using SR#
Sant le Iabels Verified by:,.. Date: \
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive West Columbia, SC 29172 [phone] Fax [phone] www.shealylab.com Level 1 Report v2.1

® Laboratories LLC
a member of The GEL Group INC
Analytical Lab
Page 72 of 88 f h
PO Box 30712 Charleston, SC 29417
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407
P 843.556.8171 F 843.766.1178
www.gel.com
December 03, 2014
Mr. Grant Wilton
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
106 Vantage Point Drive
Cayce, South Carolina 29172
Re: Routine Analysis - Wilton
Work Order: 361264
Dear Mr. Wilton:
GEL Laboratories, LLC (GEL) appreciates the opportunity to provide the enclosed analytical results for the
sample(s) we received on November 14, 2014. This original data report has been prepared and reviewed in
accordance with GEL's standard operating procedures.
Our policy is to provide high quality, personalized analytical services to enable you to meet your analytical needs
on time every time. We trust that you will find everything in order and to your satisfaction. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 4289.
Sincerely,
Julie Robinson
Project Manager
Chain of Custody: 44328
Enclosures

Analytical Lab
Page 73 of 88
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - [phone] - www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis Report
for
SESI001 Shealy Environmental Services, Inc
Client SDG: 361264 GEL Work Order: 361264
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
* A quality control analyte recovery is outside of specified acceptance criteria
** Analyte is a Tracer compound
** Analyte is a surrogate compound
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the Certificate of Analysis.
The designation ND, if present, appears in the result column when the analyte concentration is not detected above
the limit as defined in'the 'U' qualifier above.
This data report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with GEL Laboratories LLC
standard operating procedures. Please direct any questions to your Project Manager, Julie Robinson.
Reviewed by
Page 2 of 11

GEL LABORATORIES LLC Page 74 of 88
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - [phone] - www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company :
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
Address :
106 Vantage Point Drive
Time Batch Method
Cayce, South Carolina 29172
Contact:
Mr. Grant Wilton
Project:
Routine Analysis - Wilton
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
001
361264001
Waste Water
11-NOV-14 11:25
14-NOV-14
Client
Report Date: December 3, 2014
Project: SESI00109
Client ID: SES1001
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty
MDC
RL
Units DF Analyst Date
Time Batch Method
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Gross AB, liquid "As Received"
Alpha U -2.52 +/-1.90
4.93
5.00
pCi/L JXH3 11/24/14
1318 1436810 1
Beta 9.91 +/-3.33
4.85
5.00
pCi/L
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Total Radium U -00181 +/-0.333
0.692
1.00
pCi/L CXP3 11/24/14
1608 1435428 2
Rad Radium -226
Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid "As Received"
Radium -226 0.905 +/-0.470
0.592
1.00
pCi/L JAOC 11/20/14
0415 1436791 3
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
Analyst Comments
1 EPA 900.0/SW846 9310
2 EPA 900.1 Modified
3 EPA 903.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
Result Nominal Recovery%
Acceptable Limits
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As
Received"
89.9
(25%-125%)
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96 -sigma).
Page 3 of 11

Anaical Lab
GEL LABORATORIES LLC Page 75 of 88
2040 Savage Road Charleston SC 29407 - [phone] - www.gel.com
Certificate of Analysis
Company :
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc.
Address :
106 Vantage Point Drive
Time Batch Method
Cayce, South Carolina 29172
Contact:
Mr. Grant Wilton
Project:
Routine Analysis - Wilton
Client Sample ID:
Sample ID:
Matrix:
Collect Date:
Receive Date:
Collector:
002
361264002
Waste Water
11-NOV-14 11:15
14-NOV-14
Client
Report Date: December 3, 2014
Project: SESI00109
Client ID: SESI001
Parameter Qualifier Result Uncertainty
MDC
RL
Units DF Analyst Date
Time Batch Method
Rad Gas Flow Proportional Counting
GFPC, Gross AB, liquid "As Received"
Alpha U 1.74 +/-2.76
490
5.00
pCi/L JXH3 11/24/14
1318 1436810 1
Beta U 2.44 +/-2.53
4.15
5.00
pCi/L
GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As Received"
Total Radium U 00181 +/-0301
0.635
1.00
pCi/L CXP3 11/24/14
1607 1435428 2
Rad Radium -226
Lucas Cell, Ra226, liquid "As Received"
Radium -226 1.75 +/-0.580
0602
1.00
pCi/L JAOC 11/20/14
0415 1436791 3
The following Analytical Methods were performed:
Method Description
Analyst Comments
I EPA 900.0/SW846 9310
2 EPA 900.1 Modified
3 EPA 903.1 Modified
Surrogate/Tracer Recovery Test
Result Nominal Recovery%
Acceptable Limits
Barium Carrier GFPC, Total Alpha Radium, Liquid "As
Received"
84.5
(25%-125%)
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96 -sigma).
Page 4 of 11

Analytical Lab
GEL LABORATORIES LLC Page 76 of 88
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - [phone] - www.gel.com
QC Summary Report Date: December 3, 2014
Shealy Environmental Services, Inc. Page 1 of 3
106 Vantage Point Drive
Cayce, South Carolina
Contact: Mr. Grant Wilton
Workorder: 361264
Parmname NOM Sample Qual QC Units RPD% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
Rad Gas Flow
Batch 1435428
QC 1203207972 360966001 DUP
Total Radium
U
-0.0249
U
0.013
pCi/L
N/A
N/A CXP3
11/24/14 16:09
Uncertainty
+/-0.254
+/-0.242
QC1203207974
LCS
Total Radium
413
450
pCi/L
109
(75%-1250/.)
11/24/14 16:54
Uncertainty
+/-8.56
QC 1203207971
MB
Total Radium
U
-0.0926
pCi/L
11/24/14 16:09
Uncertainty
+/-0.199
QC1203207973
360966001
MS
Total Radium
1660 U
-0.0249
1700
pCi/L
103
(75%-1250/o)
11/24/14 16:09
Uncertainty
+/-0.254
+/-34.7
Batch 1436810
QC 1203211566
360966001
DUP
Alpha
U
-0.218
U
0.897
pCi/L
N/A
N/A JXH3
11/24/1413:19
Uncertainty
+/-2.20
+/-2.42
Beta
U
2.51
U
2.73
pCi/L
N/A
N/A
Uncertainty
+/-2.20
+/-2.91
QC1203211569
LCS
Alpha
122
134
pCi/L
110
(75%-1250/o)
11/24/1413:21
Uncertainty
+/-12.5
Beta
477
550
pCi/L
115
(75%-125%)
Uncertainty
+/-18.9
QC 1203211565
MB
Alpha
U
-0.705
pCi/L
11/24/1413:21
Uncertainty
+/-1.51
Beta
U
2.39
pCi/L
Uncertainty
+/-2.62
QC1203211567
360966001
MS
Alpha
486 U
-0.218
560
pCi/L
115
(75%-1250/o)
11/24/1413:18
Uncertainty
+/-2.20
+/-55.6
Beta
1910 U
2.51
2150
pCi/L
113
(75%-125%)
Uncertainty
+/-2.20
+/-76.5
QC1203211568
360966001
MSD
Alpha
486 U
-0.218
505
pCi/L
10.3
104
(0%-20%)
11/24/1413:18
Uncertainty
+/-2.20
+/-50.5
Beta
1910 U
2.51
1890
pCi/L
12.8
99.1
(0%-20%)
Uncertainty
+/-2.20
+/-69.7
Rad Ra -226
Batch 1436791
QC1203211496
361264001
DUP
Radium -226
0.905
0.676
pCi/L
28.9
(0%-100%) JAOC
11/20/1404:15
Uncertainty
+/-0.470
+/-0.448
Page 5 of 11

Analytical Lab
Page 77 of 88
GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - [phone] - www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 361264
Page 2 of 3
Parmname
NOM
Sample Qual QC
Units RPD%
REC% Range Anlst Date Time
Rad Ra -226
Batch 1436791
QC1203211498 LCS
Radium -226
24.7
26.1
pCi/L
105 (75%-1250/o) JAOC 11/20/14 04:45
Uncertainty
+/-2.26
QC 1203211495 MB
Radium -226
U 0.619
pCi/L
11/20/14 04:15
Uncertainty
+/-0.429
QC1203211497 361264001 MS
Radium -226
124
0.905 141
pCi/L
113 (75%-125%) 11/20/14 04:45
Uncertainty
+/-0.470 +/-10.5
Notes:
Counting Uncertainty is calculated at the 95% confidence level (1.96 -sigma).
The Qualifiers in this report are defined as follows:
** Analyte is a Tracer compound
< Result is less than value reported
> Result is greater than value reported
BD Results are either below the MDC or tracer recovery is low
FA Failed analysis.
H Analytical holding time was exceeded
J Value is estimated
K Analyte present. Reported value may be biased high. Actual value is expected to be lower.
L Analyte present. Reported value may be biased low. Actual value is expected to be higher.
M M if above MDC and less than LLD
M REMP Result > MDC/CL and < RDL
N/A RPD or %Recovery limits do not apply.
NI See case narrative
ND Analyte concentration is not detected above the detection limit
NJ Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
Q One or more quality control criteria have not been met. Refer to the applicable narrative or DER.
R Sample results are rejected
U Analyte was analyzed for, but not detected above the MDL, MDA, or LOD.
UI Gamma Spectroscopy --Uncertain identification
UJ Gamma Spectroscopy --Uncertain identification
UL Not considered detected. The associated number is the reported concentration, which may be inaccurate due to a low bias.
X Consult Case Narrative, Data Summary package, or Project Manager concerning this qualifier
Y Other specific qualifiers were required to properly define the results. Consult case narrative.
^ RPD of sample and duplicate evaluated using +/-RL. Concentrations are <5X the RL. Qualifier Not Applicable for Radiochemistry.
Page 6 of 11

GEL LABORATORIES LLC
2040 Savage Road Charleston, SC 29407 - [phone] - www.gel.com
QC Summary
Workorder: 361264
Analytical Lab
Page 78 of 88
Page 3 of 3
Parmname NOM Sample Oual OC Units RPD% REC% Range Anlst Date Time
Preparation or preservation holding time was exceeded
N/A indicates that spike recovery limits do not apply when sample concentration exceeds spike conc. by a factor of 4 or more or %RPD not applicable.
The Relative Percent Difference (RPD) obtained from the sample duplicate (DUP) is evaluated against the acceptance criteria when the sample is greater than
five times (5X) the contract required detection limit (RL). In cases where either the sample or duplicate value is less than 5X the RL, a control limit of+/- the
RL is used to evaluate the DUP result.
* Indicates that a Quality Control parameter was not within specifications.
For PS, PSD, and SDILT results, the values listed are the measured amounts, not final concentrations.
Where the analytical method has been performed under NELAP certification, the analysis has met all of the
requirements of the NELAC standard unless qualified on the QC Summary.
Page 7 of 11

Analytical Lab
There are no "Data Exception Reports" associated with this analytical re .79 of 88
Page 8 of 11

b
cra
`O FEACD
SH LY
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
y Chain of Custody Record6 Vantage Point Drive • West Columbia, SC 29172
y lephone No. 803-791-9700 Fax No. 803-791-9111
- - -- ----- -- - — - ------ ------ I ---- www.shealy-lab.com _
Number 4 4 3 2 8
Client
Report t onfact
Telep one No. / E-mail
903-1V e� 3<.5'V
Quote No.
Address
Sampler's Signature
X
Analysis (Attach list if more space is needed)
I
Page of
City
State
Zip Code
N
1
i
®^ //D 5y
Printed Name
Project Name
Laboratory Lot Number
Project No.
P.O. No.
m
e g
Matrix
No of Containers
by Preservative Type
Sample iD/Description
(Containers for each sample may be combined on one line.)
Date
Time
Remarks / Cooler LD.
D� I
ii ti ►
oz.s
,c
,c
><
�I ��1
alf
TAT
Tum Around Time R!5uu red (Prior lab approval requI d for expedite TAT.)
❑ Standard FTsh (Specify)
Sample Disposal
❑ Return to Client ❑ Disposal by Lab
Possible Hazard Identification
❑ Non -Hazard ❑ Flammable ❑ Skin Irritant ❑ Poison ❑ Unknown
QC Requirements (Specify)
1. Relinquished by
Date
Time
1. Receiv d by
Date
Time
2. Relinquished by
Date
Time
2. Rec
D to
Time n g c
3. Relinquished by
Date
Time
3. ceiv d by
Date
Time °c
C
4. Relinquished by
Date
Time
4. Laboratory received by
Date
Time 0
Note: All samples are retained for four weeks from receipt
unless other arrangements are made.
LAB USE ONLY
Received on ice (Circle) Yes No ice Pack
Receipt Temp. 'C
DISTRIBUTION: WHITE & YELLOW-Refum to laboratory with Sample(s), PINK-FreldlClient Copy Document Number. F -AD -133 Effective Date: o8 -o1-2014

I
Laboratories LLC
SAMPLE RECEIPT
is
& REVIEW FORM
Analytical Lab
Page 81 of 88
Client:<—+&no I ISDG/AR/COC/WorkOrdcr:"1
Receive By: Date Received:
Suspect�d Aa I rmation
'If Net Counts > 100cpm on samples not marked "radioactive", contact the Radiation Safety Group for further
rd
investigation. .I;
COC/Samples marked as radioactive?[Maximum
Net Counts Observed" (Observed Counts - Area Background Counts):
Classifie Radioactive 1I or III by RSO?
jf yes, Were swipes taken of sdnple contatiners < action levels?
COC/Sa pies marked containing PCBs?
'ii
Package, COC, and/or Samples marked as
;�'
Controlled Samples, by the GEL Safety Group.
beryllium or asbestos containing?
yf y s, samples are to be segregeatcd as Safety and opened
Shipped `s a DOT Hazardous?
rd Class Shipped: ;jj UNN:
Sampleslidentifted as Foreign Soil?
Sample Receipt Criteria
,z°
Comments/Qualifiers (Required for Non -Conforming Items)
I
Shipping containers received intact
anti
�! Circle Applicable:
Scals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe)
j
Samples requiring cold preservation
Prescr tion Meth�v' Ice bags Blot: ice Dryice None 011ier (describe)
in Celsius
2
�a emperatures are recorded
within (0:5 6 deg. C)?"
4
2a
!
Da� ly check performed and passed on
Temperature Device Serial N;
Secondary Temperature Device Sena f Applicable
IR temperature gun?
j
Chain of custody documents included
3
with shipment?
4
Sample containers intact and sealed?
Circle Applicable:
Seals broken Damaged container Leaking container Other (describe)
Samples requiring chemical
Sample ID's, containers affected and observed pH:
5
preservation at proper pH?
+/
`►
1 pre civ
OA vials free of headspace (de
VOA
sample ID's and containers affected:
6
as ,< 6mm bubble)?
(Ifyes, immediately deliver fo Volatiles laboratory)
7 Jj
AY�e Encore containers present?
8
Samples received within holding time.
/
iD's and tests affected: I
Stimple ID's on COC match ID's on
Sample ID's and containers affected:
9
bo
Vttles?
j
Date & time on COC match date &
Sample ID's affected: i
10
time on bottles?
Number of containers received match
Sample ID's effected:
11
number indicated on COC?
Ate sample containers identifiable as
12
P
GL provided?
COC form is properly signed in
13
Jrelinquished/received sections?
t
Circle Applicable:
f
F Ex Ai FedEx Ground UPS Field Services Courier Other
j 60
14
Carrier and tracking number,
I
tLJG
j
t
i
Continents (Use Continuation Form if needed):
i 1
i
� _ I 1 l'.1 FIJI cO. AAA
Page 10 of 11 PM (or PMA) review: initials 5_ -t !Date / t • Page _(_ of t - • •_ _.
i —

List of current GEL Certifications as of 03 December 2014
State
Certification
Alaska
UST -110
Arkansas
88-0651
CLIA
42D0904046
California NELAP
01151 CA
Colorado
SC00012
Connecticut
PH -0169
Delaware
SC000122013-10
DoD ELAP/ ISO 17025 A2LA
2567.01
Florida NELAP
E87156
Foreign Soils Permit
P330 -12-00283,P330-12-00284
Georgia
SC00012
Georgia SDWA
967
Hawaii
SC000122013-10
Idaho Chemistry
SC00012
Idaho Radiochemistry
SC00012
Illinois NELAP
200029
Indiana
C—SC-01
Kansas NELAP
E-10332
Kentucky
90129
Louisiana NELAP
03046 (AI33904)
Louisiana SDWA
LA130005
Maryland
270
Massachusetts
M—SC012
Michigan
9976
Mississippi
SC000122013-10
Nebraska
NE—OS-26-13
Nevada
SC000122014-1
New Hampshire NELAP
2054
New Jersey NELAP
SC002
New Mexico
SC00012
New York NELAP
11501
North Carolina
233
North Carolina SDWA
45709
Oklahoma
9904
Pennsylvania NELAP
68-00485
Plant Material Permit
PDEP-12-00260
South Carolina Chemistry
10120001
South Carolina GVL
23611001
South Carolina Radiochemi
10120002
Tennessee
TN 02934
Texas NELAP
T104704235-14-9
Utah NELAP
SC000122014-16
Vermont
VT87156
Virginia NELAP
460202
Washington
C780-12
Wisconsin
999887790
Page 11 of 11
Analytical Lab
Page 82 of 88

Method Blank Sample Evaluation
Parameter
Result
MDL
Analysis
Date
Flag
Parameter
0.65
0.6-1.0
Analysis Date
Flag
111 /17/2014
(mg/L
(mg/L.)
BOD
<0.20
0.18
11/17/2014
Seed Control Factor Evaluation
Parameter
Result
Acceptable
Limit
Analysis
Date
Flag
BOD
0.65
0.6-1.0
11/17/2014
167.5-228.5
Glucose Glutamic Acid Sample Evaluation
Amount Recovered
Parameter
Acceptable
Analysis
I
Flag
(mg/L)
Limit
Date
BOD 200.84
167.5-228.5
111 /17/2014
Lot #
PKI 1055
Analytical Lab
Page 83 of 88

Sterility Control
Parameter Result
PQL
Analysis Flag
(MPN/100mL)
(MPN/100mL)
Date
Fecal Coliform (MPN) ND
1
11/11/2014
Analytical Lab
Page 84 of 88
Lot #
PK11055

Analytical Lab
Page 85 of 88
MB Evaluation
Result
Result
Amount
Analysis
Parameter
Parameter
PQL (mg/L)
(mg/L
Flag
Analysis
m /L
Parameter
Date
Recovered
MBAS
ND
0.0500
11/12/2014
(mg/L)
Lot #
PK11055
ICV Evaluation
Result
Amount
Parameter
PQL (mg/L)
True Value
(mg/L
Control
Analysis
Parameter
0.0500
Recovered
o Recovery
/o
Flag
(mg/L)
Limit
Date
ed
MBAS
1.0
1.034
103 90-110
11/12/2014
ICB Evaluation
Result
Analysis
Parameter
PQL (mg/L)
Flag
(mg/L
Date
MBAS ND
0.0500
11/12/2014
CCV Evaluation
True Value Amount o Control Analysis
Parameter (mg/L) Recovered /o Recovery Limit Date Flag
MBAS 1.00 1.071 107 90-110 11/12/2014
CCB Evaluation
Parameter Result PQL (mg/L) Analysis Flag
(mg/L Date
MBAS ND 0.0500 1 11/12/2014

Analytical Lab
Page 86 of 88
ICB Evaluation
Result Analysis
Parameter
PQL (mg/L) Flag
(mg/L) Date
Sulfite
ND 1 1.000 11/11/2014
Lot #
PKI 1055
ICV Evaluation
True
Amount° Control
Analysis
Parameter
Value
Recovered Recovery Limit Flag
/o
Control
Date
m /L
m /L
Sulfite
10
9 90 90-110 11/11/2014
LCS Evaluation
True
Amount
Control
Analysis
Parameter
Value
Recovered
% Recovery
Limit
Flag
Date
m /L
m /L
%
Sulfite
10
9
90
90-110
11/11/2014
MS Evaluation
True
Amount°
Control
Analysis
Parameter
Value
Recovered
/° Recovery
Limit
Flag
Date
m /L
m /L
Sulfite
10
9
90
90-110
9/11/2014
MSD Evaluation
True
Amount°
Control
Parameter
Value
Recovered
/° Recovery
Limit
Analysis
Flag
Date
m /L
m /L
Sulfite
10
9
90
90-110
9/11/2014

ICB Evaluation
Analysis
Parameter Result (C.U.)
PQL (C.U.)
Flag
Date
True Color ND
5
11/11/2014
ICV Evaluation
Parameter
True Color
True Value
(C.U.)
30
Recorded I Acceptance I Analysis
Value (C.U.) I Range (C.U.) I Date
30 1 25-35 1 11/11/2014
Flag
Lot #
PK11055
Analytical Lab
Page 88 of 88

fi
Page 17
RECEIVEDINCDEQIDWR
Attachment 2 AUG 312016
Water Quality
Permitting Section
Reference document on internal pH limits
related to ELG's
August 29, 2016 comment letter on Dan River
DRAFT NPDES permit

SENT BY: ENV APFA I P.S P ; 2-22-95 ^r : 36PM ; 5847-9 917688218;#1 2
•.
UNITED STATES lENVIR®t+PA9€NTAL. PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 204$0
Mrs Louis Canziani
New fork State
Department of Environmental
Conservation
Room 6126
Two world Trade Center-
New
enter..New York, NY 10047
Dear Mr. Canzi ani a
This 1s to confirm our recent conversation regarding
effluent limitations guidelines for the steam electric power
industry (40 CFR Park 423),
In my letter of June 22, 1984 to Ms. Ursula Basch of
your office, I summarized the applicability of the steam
electric regulation pH limitat-ion as applicable to low volume
waste streams when such wastewaters are commingled with
(once -through) cooling waters. The interpretation that I
provided was pot in accord with prior information and Instruc-
tions provided to EPA and State permitting authorities on
this subject,
The pH limitation per Part 423 applies at the "end -of -
pipe" discharge to surface graters when the wastewater discharge
contains low volume wastewater that is commingled' with once®
through cooling water. However, the intent of Part 423 is
also that the total suspended solids and oil and grease
limitations applicable..t.o low volume waste streams by applied
to the 1 ow *vol ume Waste component of such a -combi ned di scharge
prior to commingling of the individual waste streams.
I apologize for any confusion in permit development or
delays in permit issuance that may have occurred in this
matter. If you have any further questions, please contact me
at [phone].
Sincerely,
Dennis Ruddy'
Project Officer
Industrial Technology Division

UNITED STATES ENYIRONME-NTAE. " I.OTECTION AGENCY
2 2
Ms. Ursula Sasch
New York State
Departr.ent of Environmental
Conservation
Poon 6126
2 World Trade Centpr
New York, New York 10047
near FIs. Basch:
This is in response to- your giipstions during cu—1
discussion on June 2.1 r6cgarding the ?ffluent limitations
guidelines for the steam electric industry (40 CFR Part 423).
T e-Pfl limitation to low volume waste streams
is int ded_to re•gui-r-e `that low volume waste streams he
treated, as necessary, to comply with the pH limitation prior
to discharge. Furthermore, the basis for compliance with the
pH limitation is not buffering or dilution provided by cooling
waters or other waste streams which are commingled with low
volume wastes.
I trust that this information is responsive to your
questions. Please call me if you have any further questions.
(202-382-7165)
Sincerely,
Dennis Ruddy
Project Officer.
Effluent Guidelines Division

•v A 4
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
�c REGION III
§TH AND WALNUT STREETS
s PHILADELPHIA. PENNSYLVANIA 19105
In reply ref er to
�3F.N21 J. . LONG
March 10, 1976 ®•4E,,�,
11-976 N
_--
�•
Mr. James Long
Poorer Plant Services Section
Philadelphia Electric Company
2301 Market Street
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101
Dear Mr. Longi
This is in response to your second progress report submitted February 10,
1976 for the Chestdr Generating Station (PA 0011614), in which you propose to d:
charge boiler blowdown, zeolite softener regenerates, and evaporator blovdown tc
:rp the receiving stream without pH neutralization. Please be advised that
;�...
4007R Part 423.32(b)(1) requires the pH of all discharges frog power p3ants
(except once. -through cooling water) to be is the. range of 6 - 9. Econestles
s Were considered prior to the development of -the final guideline limitations,
therefore the expense you have cited as being associated with neutralizing these
effluent streams is not a valid argument against_ treatment.
A policy decision was made during the -EPA -PEA meeting in Washington, D.C.
..r that may influence your situation with respect to neutralizing these effluent
' streams. It was decided that waste -streams could be combined with cooling water
for the so a neu a as Ong as the n t was
R the 2111 range of 6 - 9. This —glo-MMy"is not d-ncon _s."„*- with guideline re re-
agents. Is-sgou ®noted ha�s�er, tkiat pollutant parameters other. than pH wil:
�e�iiaaited and monitor s or toFi-C com'binie3oa'o part cu ar waste source
Cates ory with cool, water.
I trust this will enable. You to complete your treatment plans. If there
are any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at 215 597-3689.
Si erelp yours
A'
Bruce P.Smith
Delmarva -D.C. Section

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
4 lrvin_g Place, thew York, N.Y. 90003
September 21, 1984
Mr. Dennis Ruddy (WH --552)
Project Offices
Effluent Guidelines Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street-S.W..
Washington D.C. 20460
Ree pH Limits on Power Plant
Internal Waste Streams
Dear Mr, Ruddy:
:. -Enclosed"..for your-=infor>�iatiora is a ':copy of. Con Edison o -s
comments to* NYSDEC concerning proposed pH -limits' and monitoring
requirements specified in the draft renewal permit for Con
Edison's Waterside Station. These comments expand upon Con
Edison's position concerning pH limits on internal waste streams,
as expressed during our August 10 meeting and detailed in previ-
ous correspondence, (in particular, see p.5, paragraph 2,
section 3 (a) (5) , section 3 (b) and section 3 (c) for new/expanded
arguments).
If you have any questions, please contact me at (2 12)
460-2522. We look forward to further discussions with you
concerning this issue.
Very truly
yours,
Barry H. Cohen
Senior Environmental Engineer
Water & Waste Management
/gP
Attachment
cc: Mr. J. William Jordan (EN -336)
Chief
NPDES Technical Support Branch
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street S.W.
Washington J.C. 20460
1

l
?. pH Requirements (See of J.uent ? immtatzor.s and u�^�tcrir_g
Recui r e€._ents , p.2):
DEC Frcueses to maintain the current rY. l_miteticr, (range of
E.0-9.05 for 'Discharge 002 and de'_Pte the current 5.0-9.0 pF
1im-.tat-loz? for Discharge 00'. DFC also rropcses tc add. DII
tat; ons (6.0-9.0) `cr i:�teT ; a1 waste streams 001a.
(boi ler blow6o---m) , 001b (i- Gterside ';o. 1 deirixleralizer
receneratior wastes) , OC'Ic (door and equipment drainage)
a-Uld 00?c^. (Waterside Fc,. 2 Ci£.mineralizer rerer•el'at ion wastes) .
in addition, DEC has ;proposed to delete pH mon9 tcrir g
require-ner.t:s at D schar e 001, 4ett4se the vF >Tcr,9 torirg
�:reauencv fo-r Disn.nrge 602 frcm twice u;eekl,y to weekl_7 and
add vii mcnitorii g , recutrem.erts fr_r waste streF-ms 00?a
(weekly gr.—b), 001b ar_d 002a (g�ac before each batch
discharge) and 001c (twice month117) . SEC pr,�pcses 'that all
nevirevi sed. effluent l hila.-taticr,s and ti+oL`_'! for rg rec irements
take P.£--5'E'ct: i ,-ediatel upon the effi**ectil e date of the
renewal permit .

Cor_ Edison's position with regard to DEC's proposed ph
requirements is su=_arized below:
o Effluent 14rx:itations and/or t:oni torirg recuiremer_ts for pR
in internal waste streams 001a, 001b, 001c, 002a or an,,,
;
other internal waste stream cannot legally be i=posed in
the final pe�r_i.t.
o There is no environmental just; ficati-on for a pH lir= on
internal waste streams. Effluer_t limits on interna' waste
streams are redundant and unnecessary since the cur:ert pH
'Lir_-it of 6.0-9.0 at the point cif discharge to the public
receiving water provides adequate protection of water
Cuality. Furthermore, a pi'_ limit of 6.0--9.0 has been
deemed acceptable by DEC at the point of discharge.
o The costs to achieve a pF limit of 6.0-9.0 or, internal
waste streams u:culd be wholly disproportionate to any
limited effluent reducticr andJ environmental ber i -fits to
be derived.
o Even if it were eventually determined that pF limits mr4,
1 ega11-7 be imvosed. - for waste strea411s.,001a, 001b, 001c and
002a (whic!� i=or the reasons set forth in these -comments
cannot 1cwfulltr be the case) , in order to achie•re
cor.sister_c- with the limit of 6.0-9.0 at Discharge 001,
such limitations must be less stringent than a rouge of
6.0-9.0 (applied at the point of d.i Echzrge) , in order to
take full" r in -to account pH adjustrrer_t uvTzthin the
discharge turnels9 and
c A comp' fiance schedule to n pet pF limits on i.nterr:al waste
streams need not be provided i.f sr.c'h limits are r_ct
ultixrateIr imposed. Even if i.t were e%.ert_uall,,
dete=ized that pH s__mits cr. ,rrerr_al. '•Tastesrrea.ms may
Legal?,T be imposed, a reasonable ccmplia.nce schedule must
be Prov- to install equipu:ent recessar;r to ac;:i.e%7
such. ZiMitat:ions before then become effective.
The support fcr this position is as follows:
(a) Effluent Limitaticr's and/or llcr-Ltoring Recuiremerts for nil
in Tr.Wziste Streams C017a, , . C mac, 702a or Any
Other 1.nterr_et1 Waste Stream Cannct ? egall-. be Imposed -
(1) The Clear. ;,:iter Act :.-alts the authority under Section.
402 to controlling the additi or of pollutants tc,
na494- gab 1 e waters through. pcint source discharges
(Sections 301 and 4 ti W and def :.r_itions specified i,n
Section 502, paragraphs (1),(7),(11),(12) and -(16)).
Based C -r r?^ose Sections, e -f ::pnt lilxlitcti c s cal: on! y
be appz ilea at the point the effluent enters the
receiving eaters, except by the consent df the
ne=,i ttee. .Therefore, the point c_ discharge into

navigable waters fcr Discharges 001 and 002 (ar.d 003)
a; the Stab cn. is at the confluence of the end of the
discharge tur_r_els and the East River.
(2) ZPA's N'PDES (Deco-, so? idated) Regulations (40 CFR 1.22)
,essentially track the s.Lthority specified under Sectior.
402 and require effluent 's imita-r-icns to be set at: the
point of discharge to navigable waters. Section
122.45(a) states that all permit effluent limitaticv-s
shall be established for "each outfall cr discharge
po,.nt cf the permitted £acil_it-r" AVicept as otherwise
provided ;n Section 1.22.45(i).+ Section 122.45(i)(1)
states that 1_r~its on internal waste streams ma; be
imposed in e::cepticnal cases and crly if limitations at
the] outfall are impractical. or} infeasible. Secticr.
12-2.450.) (2) states that 14—mits on internal waste
streev.s may be iirpcsed c7.11,7 when the Fact Sheet under
Section 46 CFP- 124.56 sets `orth the e_.cepticr_al
circumstar_ces which make such 1imitc?tions necessar,r,
such as when the final discharge -point is inaccessible,
the wastes are so diluted as to make monitor -ng
impracticable or theinterference of pollutants at the
point of discharge '*would make detection or- analysis
impracticable. Both Sections 122.45•, and 124.56 are
applicable to State prograys.
Based on these regulations, there car, be no exceptional
circumstance justirication for imposition of PH limits
and/ or aoritoring requirements or internal waste
streams unless the Final. discharge point is
inaccessible for sampling. Yor1itoring (detection ar_6
analysis) for pF (unlike pollutants measured in terms
Of mass or concer_tratior, such as heavy metals) is ret
impractical at the point of cischeree due to diluticr_
or interference. Based cn the distincticn bet -ween the
nature -and monitoring of pF and other pc? lutants, Cori
Edison has accepted ir.te=ai limits on other pel'_utants
ir_ some cases "even thcrgh we bQl'_eve that suc;: limits
carrot leze.1 ,- be _rrpcsed based cr. the Clean Water Act
and State En' irormer.tel Conser,xation. Law) since in
these cases we recognize the ir,practi.cali.`y c
dete..�.:iring compliance with Pfflu.ert limitations to
such pci lutar-its at the final discharge ( see Section 2.
of these con.^erts) • Such=rrpractica'_a.ty, h.owe-:er, does
.ot app? t- tc pF.
:lith regard to rhe quest --or. of samp?'^g roints, pH
sam.pl.es i or Piscl-.erges 001 �3r' 00-2 are cL:r_' ntly taker.
in rhe discharge plume oft the deck rather than
directly in the discharge tunnels, since Fh- Ical
access to the ti -,mels is current!- unavailable i.e. the
d4 scharge tunnels te=inat.e under the FDR Drive, about
60 feet from the end of the dock. Powever, Cor. Edison
will create samrling access points in the Di sch7rge 001

and 002 -discharge tun,iels by ?une 1, 1985, or by the
beginnirrg of the 1985 chlorination season, at Waterside,
whichever iG later, as part of our cblcrine compliance
prrgrav ( see ccmments ccr..cernin.g pro -posed ch? crime
recuir erer.ts , Section: 4(c)). T'here-'ore , there is no
'.ustification For internal waste strear PF limit's based
or. Section_ 122.45. _
(3) Title 8, Article 17 of the New York State Environmental
Conservaticr_ Law (EC? ) requires permits for the
discharge of pollutants frons any outlet or point source
to the waters of the stare (Section 17-0803) . The ECL
dear? y, limits DEC's authorit-7 to controlling
Pollutants at the point such effluents enter the
receivit.c waters (Sections 17-0803, 17-0£09 and the
definitions specified IU 17-0105, Paragraphs
(2),(11),(15) and (16)). This limitation is reinforced
by the SPDES regulations implementing the ECL (6 FYCRR
Parts 750-757), Although we be? ieVe that the ECL
'Limits DEC's authority to =impose effluent limits at the
final. discharge, Con Edison has accepted anal will
cot?tirue to accept internal waste strewn limits for
pollutants other than pR where we belieti--e cc-mr? lance
monitoring at the final discharge point is impractical,
the limitaticns are reasonable and not more stringert
than required by appropriate regulations. This is
clearly not the case for pH.
(4) EPA Pest Practicable Technology (PPT) regulations limit
the pF of all discharges from steam electric power
plants, except once thrcugh cooling G=ates-, to a ra.r°ge
of 6.0-9.0 (40 CFR 423.12(b) (1) ; emphasis -cde6) .
EPR.'- current Erf'luent Limitation Guidelines fcr pH (47
FR 52303, November 1.9, 1982) are identical to tisose
ccntained ir. the initia?? prormigatec? Cu eelires
aural -shed it the Federal Pegisrer or October S, 19^174
(39 PP, 36186) . 1r, both the or. gi.ral and revised
Guidel.ir:es, no pp, limitati ccs are explicitly places. cr.
an,,r inter -,al wF-sre streams. Pased on the cefiniti. s
specified in the Clear, ?dater Act, t1be EPA imitation cf
6.0-9.0 would apply or, at the cutlets of the
discharge tunnels to the East Rit,Ar and not to and
i-terr.al waste strew.
PST letter dated May 3, 11"F4 ( at_tacrrent to ExI-L- -- f- 1)
s
con Edison fcrrna11 reauested that the U.S.
En-�Tirc enr tal Protection AgP.rcv (EP::) clarit'v. its PT
a:?d, internal waste stream. ? egg G ic-ris as they apply to
PH. At a meeting held on August 10, 198L, between Con
Edison and EPR., the Aaerca. stated that it would
about one- north to rev;.e=� the ria' er.zMv.g ecord and
it fcr�r. Con Edison and DEC of its de Ler-minati.on.
� e N Y_ ,..L... -­#- f'"P f PC! December er 13 , 1-983, DEIC states

that internal waste stream macnitcring is proposed for
specific low volume wastewaters since compliar_cP with
appli cahle ? imr Cations cannot be determined at the
final ischarge. For the following reasons, this
explanation rices not: satisfy Federal (40 Cl'R 11-4.56)
and State (6 NYCRR 753.3) re-Ulations, which require
that Pact Sheets set forth the- _? egal ar:d technical
basis of proposed limitations:
(a) The Fact Sheet does not specifically address the
rationale for the proposed pH limits. dr fact, it
cannot be determir.ed from the Fact Sheet to which
waste streams and pollutants the e-.1 pl, ar at ion
pro -Tided in the Fact Sheet applies;
(b) The Fact Sheet Zoes not :pecify whether the
proposed pH limits are based on EPA's Guidelines
for Steam Electric Pc-,4er Plants or DEC's Best
Professional Judger:ent (BPJ) determination of Best
Practicable Technolog,7 (EPT) or Best Converntional
Technology= (BCT), or anv other basis;
1. l'f the proposed limit is bused on EPA's
Guidelines, it does rot specif;T whether DEC
interprets the 6.0-9.0 HOT pH- limir to apply to
internal waste streams (are- if so, the reasons
for that intepretatior) or to final discharzes t
2. If the proposed limit is based or. BPJ, it Ices
not address the factors specified in Section 304
of the Clear. Water Act or 40 Com. 125.3 (See
Paragraph 3.(d) of these couments);
(c) The Fact Sheet does not speci`, which sections of
the C,ear_ Water Act 0r_d State Envircrimental
Cor. ser -ration law. provide DEC with the authordt-, to
impose i..terr_al waste stre<rin limits for pF. N c r
does :t sp_ecifaj the sections of EPA and ^EC
regt*latior_S which authrri.ze such 1 r°its s and
(d) The 1 act Sheet does not specif:T iVhich of the
ee>cepticnal circumstar.ceF specified in 40 CFR
122.45 ( i) , i r Gr�97, it relied or.tC re. -ch the s? a.ted
ccrtclusior. that comp' inrce with the 6.0-9.0 p}-
1.:c:,tati.on cannot be determined by monitoring at
the final discharge.
(b) Ehere is Yo Lnyircnme.r:tal Justification for pF limits c -r.
�Pters r Streeirs
The current pH limitation of 6.0-9.0 at Discharges 001 and
CO2 affords adequate protection cf public receiz=irL- water
cualit-T. A F/H� iiL it of 6.0--9.0 at yyt--he__pcinyt of�a discharge
4d'7fe deemed acce-Z. `able btT HII 1Peg on l �., (and DEC b -v its

Section. 401 Certification) in the initial discharge permit
issued by Region IT on November 30, 1974, as well as by DEC
(and Region II ir. its o�-%,,ecapacity) it the rer_ewal
permit issued by DEC on jul,' 1, 19$0, Bcth the initial and
renewal permits were based or, EPA's Ef:luent Guidelines
promulgated cn October 8, 1974 and were to ha -e included any
more stringent water euality-based--requi.reTr.-erts. Since
applicable Effluent Guidelines fqr pH have not changed sir_ce
initial permit issuance and DEC has nct shown that a final
discharge pF within the rar:ge of 6.0-9,0 has caused or will
cause any adverse envircnmer_tal impacts, there is no basis
for imposition of more stringent pt! limitations in the
renewal permit. In addition, b� proposing to maintain the
current 6.0-9.0 pH limitation for Discharge 002, DEC has
deemed that range acceptable at the point of discharge.
Furthermore, irstallaticr. of a waste neutra.lw ation sns ez,,
which would be required to meet the proposed limits, would
result in the addition of significar. t amounts of
neutralizing chemicals (acid/caustic), thereb•s increasing
the amount of pollutants discharged.
(c) The Cost To Achie,,re Internal haste Stream pH Limits Ts
Wholly Disproportionate To The EtF .Iuert Reduction Benefits
is : e verlvec
The Waterside Statist. has two demineralization systems,
which are hcused in separate buildings. in order to achieve
the proposed pH limits for demineralizer regeneration waste
streams (001b and 002a),. installation of two waste
neutralization systems would be required due to the physical
layout of the facilit-7 and the relativel-u- large number of
regenerations performed (See SPDES Applicatior. Update for
more detailed ir:formation ccr_cerr..ing reger.eratior_ waste
streams) . Each s17stem would consist of 1-2 large
neutralization tanks, pumps , acid and caustic infect .cr,
s,,stem- s, instrurentation and controls and an elaborate
piping system. Con E'disor. ccnservati4.7eiaY estimates the
total capital cost of these s --stems to be $3-5 million, a
reasonable estimate taking into account the nature of the
facili ty (primaril-,, ste r, sendout) , age of the -facility, its
ph=ysical layout and space limitations, and Lhe relarively
large r_ -umber of reger_eretiors (due to steam sen6out) . '''hese
costs would increase substantially if a. FF litrit o.: 6.0-9.0
is imposed fcr boiler blewdo,h—_ (001a; and 002-a in current
permit) , which tunica' ' 1,, has a pE of 10-10, 5 . In additicr, ,
substar.5t_zl operating casts (labor and chemicals), -wculd be
incurred. Tbese capital ar.d cperaatlr.g costs- would
ultimate? -T be borne by, Con Edi son's steam and electric
ratepayers. r
As stated above, Con Edson_ believes that there is r:o
Pr_wironrrental Justification for a pH limit of 6.0-9.0 on
internal waste streams. Such limits would result in little,
if envirormer_tal benef its , which are wholly

disproportionate -to the costs that would be borne by Can
Edison and' its ratepa-ers . As specified abo4.=e , such
reeuiremer.k:s would, in fact, --result in the discharge of
increased atrount of pollutants.
if It TJere Eventually To Be Detervined That pF Linits ;day
ie ally Be Itrucsed For Irternai -Waste Streans Such
Limitations MusV be Less Stringent t ar_ -
The existing pN li.mitc of 6.0-9.0 for Discharges 001 and 002
reflect Best Practicable Control Technology Currently
A-Tailable (EPT) as defined by EPA (40 CFR 423.12(b)(l)). By
limiting the pN of internal waste streams to that same
range, DEC is, ir_ effect, proposing a 14 -mit more stringer..t
than BPT. Section 301(b)(2)(E) of the Clean Water Act
provides for more stringent limits than BPT for rH and other
ccm?entional pollutants b;= application_ of . the Best
Conventional Pollutant Control Technelog-T (ECT). EPA has
deferred promulgation of ECT limitations for power- plants
pending promulgation of a revised BCT methodology.
Therefore, any BCT limits imposed. in a power plant permit
must be developed on a case-by-case basis, pursuant to
Sector. 402(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act and Article 17,
Title 8 of the wtete Enviropmental Conservation 1.avT.
The proposed internal waste stream limitation of 6.0-9.0
gust accordingly be based on a case.-bv-case determination of
ECT by DEC. LPA regulations (40 CFR 125 .3 (c) ) alloy: the
imposition of technology based 1 imitations to the extent
FPA-prot:ulgated effluent guidelines are inapplicable. Ir
these cases, the permit issuing authority (DEC) is required
to apply the appropriate factors speclt.—Pd ir. eectic . 304(b)
of the C" ear Water Act . Fer de%: eT cpme.,t of BCT
limitatior,.s, the -factors specified ipe Section 304(b)(4) (11)
must be applied. These factors include "the reasonableness
of the relationship bett7een the ccsts of attaining a
reduction in effluent and the effluent redL.cLion ber_efits
deri-ved, and the comparison of the cost and level of:
reduction of such poll utar.t from publicly ow -red treatment
works to the cost and level of reduction of such Pollutants
frcm a class of categor4T of industrial source" are "the age
n_ equipment and facilities involved, the prccess emplcyed,
the engineering aspects of the application of various tl-pes
of ccntrcl techniques, prccess changes, non -water quality,
environmental im-oacts (including energ-r requirements) ."
Case-by-case limits frust also consider+ the aprxcpriate
techr_cl og,y for the -applicant's industrial cate ory and any
ur_i cue factcrs relating to the facili fi;, (40 CFR
125.3(c)(2)). These factors must be considered regardless
of the permit issuing authority 1140 CF1? 125.3 (c)).
On November 18, 1982, EPA prcposed to revise 40 CFF 124.56
Pre- 40 CFF 125.3 to e:j:plic-i t! y speci.f7 thp statutory and
rt i,or rnr; nr5 that rz;st be considered in setting

case-by-case, nest Professional Judgement (BPJ) limits and --
the information that must be included in the Fact Sheet (47
FR 520-121).- The preanble to the proposed regulati ens state -s'
that "Section_ 1245.210(c)(2) alre,-dtr requires permit writers to
consider - t�statutory factors" in issuing EPv Permits, 8'o
these changes simply clarify ars ea�is ting requirement." (47
FR 52080). The proposed regulaticnsT therefore, would ma'ke
explicit what is already required, namely the application of
the statutory factors and any ,other factors considered it
the determination of BPJ limits anal_ the inclus i or. in- the
Fact Sheet of any analysis o` the appl_cation of these
factors and identification of an-,.- guidance or other
documents relied upon ir. setting the limits.
DEC has net provided Con Edison with any documentation cf
its ccr_sideratior. of the factors specified in Secticr_
304(b)(4)(B) and 40 CFR 125.3(c)(2) dr. its development of
the proposed LCT limits foxr PH. Therefore, DEC ca.rnot at
this time impose BCT limitatiors more stringent than E -PT.
Evers if it should ultimately be determined that. DEC may
impose pN limits on internal waste streams, which for the
reasons set forth herein_ we submit it carrot lawfull�� do,
them such limitatiox-s must be less stringent Char_ 6.0-07.0 sc
as not to be in conflict with a 6.0-9.0 limitation at the
point of discharge. Otherwise, the interval limitations
would be more stringent that EPT and must be lustifi.ed
taking into account the tactors specified abcve.
(e) Even If It Were Eventual.l-T To Be •DetermirPd `that R Limits
T -at Legal -177 Be im osed For Tn.terra �: -ste Strea-mr, , A
Reasonable Compliance Schedule dust be Provided
li it were to eventually be determired that pH limits may
legally be imposed on internal waste streams and such
limitations were imposed, a reasonable schedule of
comp lance 'would need to be provided in order to perm.;t
procuremert. and installation_ cf n_ecessar_- equipment vefcre
such limits become effecti-,Tp.
DEC's proposed compliance deadline (ef_`ect:.ve date of the
xenetti�a2 permit) is both zrbit_:~ar;T are impossible tc achieve.
Alt:houch DEC has nct provided its rationale fcr the proposed
Compliance deadline, we presume that :.t was based cm the BCT
deadilne ct July 1, ? ;'c4 sn_ ecifiee. in Sect icr. 301(b) (.2} (r)
of the Cle�in Fater Act. uc<<:ever, since DEC's proposed
'_ia�its carrion legpil- be imposed unser discussed
FCT as
previously, t::e July 1, 1984 deadline e.ces nct apply.
if the. proposed unreascr_able and irupracticable ccr-pliance
deadline w-er,- to be eventually imposed, Con.. Edison, would
unfairly be put in the ur_teTzble pcs _tion of immediately
trici ati.r_g the pe --mit. For purposes of framing the issues
Tor ccr_5i donation it a heating, any permit issued b -T DEC

containing pH limits on internal waste streams should
contain a realistic compliance schedule, to be subsequently
agreed uperr, which would encompass time periods necessar;T
for the procurement and installation of necessary equipment.
(f) Mtonit_oring Requirements
Monitoring requirements for pH cannot legally be imposed for
internal waste steams for the reasons stated herein. If it
were eventuallly to be determined that pH monitoring
reouirements ma -r legally be imposed on internal wastes
streams, monircri;,g reauirements for those waste streams
should not be required pr_cr to a realistic compliance
deadline etientuall,7 agreed uper. (see paragraph (e) abo4-e) ,
since the limitations would not be effective until that
time. We car -not currently compiv with the proposed
requirement of taking gra.b sarpies before each batch
discharge of demineralizer reger_eratior, wastes (001b and
002a) , since there' is no provision for holding up these
wastes prior to discharge. Even if neutralization s;Tstems
are installed, this proposed requirement may be
impracticable, i y the syster.s are designed for
semi -continuous operation in +which, when the e'f'fluent is
within the set pH range, discharge may occur many times over
a regeneratier cycle.
In summar-,7, effluent limitatior_s and monitoring requirements
nor ph should not be imposed for internal waste streams for the
reasons specified above. The only pH limits that mall be imposed
are the current BPT permit limitations of 6.0-9.0 at Discharges
001 and 002 ( and 003) . This approach would be cons is ter_t with
that recommended by DEC in its Division of Nater Guidance
memorandum No. 04-1;-33- ("BPJ .•.ethodologie-- - Guidance for the
Application of Pest Professional Judgement (BP.) in Deitermining
SPDE'S Ccneitior_s," dated April 1983), Uihi ch states (Section
VIII.E.).
"T:ith rpaard to conventional pcliutants, the Departrzent
will generally consider BPT ar_ acceptable level of
control, unless effluent guidelines or -Vater quality
r_eceGs_tate more stringent control."
Since effluent- g-uidelines mandate a pH
?irrit cf
6.0-9.0 at
the
Point cf discharge_ and water cu4'.it17
has not
been shceNT
to
necessitate ar_,- m_cre stringent limits,
the currerx limits
are
a.pprcpri ate and should be ma'_rta_n.ed.
DEC irav
-not impose a
particular techrclogv fcr meetine SPT -'ES
l im'_ts .
Therefore,
Cor
E'discr_ should be free to meet these limitations by the method
of
our choice.
r
Ever. if DEC could leges llzj impose pH ? imitat oris for internal
waste streams at this
"Iac 1i ty, a compliance schedule -would be
required to achieve such limitations. In addition,
not'vithstardirg the legal arguments against impositicr, of pi?

m
t
requirements for internal
waste
streams, DEC must
provide the
legal and
technical
basis,
including any
supporting
dccumertaticn,
rfcr any
such
recuir•nmer_ts prior
to their
es tab1ishr-en. t
in a. f inal pe=i
t .
If such rz tio.Iale is el7Pntua l-
provided, Cor.
Edison must
be given
a 4ea•scr.able corcrtunit;r for
eval.uati.cr_ and
submission
of cc=.ents
.
'
a
9
m

Attachment 3
Page 8
RECEIVEDINC'DEOIDWR
AUG 312016
Water Quaiittyy
Permitting Seln
DEQ cover letter for issued permit for Sutton
Plant, December 2015
August 29, 2016 comment letter on Dan River
DRAFT NPDES permit
0

Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
December 3, 2015
Mr. Harry Sideris, Senior Vice President
Environmental, Health and Safety
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Mail Code EC13K
P.O. Box 1006
Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1006
Dear Mr. Sideris:
PAT MCCRORY
col'M7ra,-
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secrelay
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Subject: Issuance of NPDES
Major Modification
Permit NC0004961
L.V. Sutton Energy Complex
New Hanover County
Facility Class I
Director
The Division of Water Resources is forwarding herewith the Final NPDES permit for
Riverbend Steam Station. This permit renewal is issued pursuant to the
requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of
Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended).
A public hearing was held on August 6,'2015 in Wilmington seeking comments on
the Draft permit. This Final permit incorporates recommendations of the DWR
Hearing Officer and EPA as well as other changes:
1) The limits for Oil and Grease and TSS were added to Outfall 001.
2) The monitoring frequency for all parameters in the effluent was increased to
Weekly (Outfall 001 - normal operation), with an exception of Whole Effluent
Toxicity.
3) The transfer of wastewater from Old Ash Pond to New Ash Pond and Outfall 001
was authorized.
4) The requirements to minimize fish migration up the Effluent Channel were
modified (Outfall 008).
5) The Total Aluminum limits were removed from Outfall 001, Outfall 002, and
Outfall 004 since North Carolina does not have Al standard and approximately
89% of the surface water samples in the state exceeds the EPA recommended
criteria of 87 µg/L.
6) The requirement to limit drawdown rate to 1 foot/week (unless approved by
DEQ) were added to Outfall 001, Outfall 002, and Outfall 004.
7) The groundwater was added to the list of the waste stream's discharged through
Outfall 001.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources
1617 Mail service Center I Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
919 707 9000

8) The following requirement was added to Outfall 002, Outfall 004, and Outfall
008: The facility shall submit EPA Form 2C as soon as practicable, but no later
than 180 days from the effective date of this permit.
9) The Technology Based Effluent Limits for Total Arsenic, Total Selenium, and
Total Mercury were eliminated (Outfall 001, Outfall 002, and Outfall 004) to
meet the updated requirement in 40 CFR 423.
If any parts, measurement frequencies, or sampling requirements contained in this
permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon
written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must
be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 1SOB of the North Carolina
General Statutes, and filed with the office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such a demand is made, this
permit shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division
of Water Resources. The Division may require modification or revocation and reissuance
of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits
which may be required by the Division of Water Resources, the Division of Land
Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act, or any other federal or local governmental
permit.
If you have any questions on this permit, please contact Sergei Chernikov at 919-807-
6386.
SincerelADirector,
wivision
n, P.G.
of Water Resources
Hardcopy: Central Files,
NPDES Files
Wilmington Regional Office, Water Quality
NPDES files
E -copy: US EPA, Region IV
Aquatic Toxicology Unit