20140194 Ver 1_Year 1 Monitoring Report_2016_20170119

YEAR 1 MONITORING REPORT
ROSES CREEK STREAM MITIGATION SITE
Burke County, North Carolina
NC DMS Project # 96309
Prepared for:
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS)
217 West Jones St., Suite 3000A
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Construction Completed: May 2016
Morphology Data Collected: November 22, 2016
Vegetation Data Collected: October 5, 2016
Submitted: December 2016

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY..................................................................................................... 2
1.1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES........................................................................................................ 2
1.2 SUCCESS CRITERIA................................................................................................................. 3
1.3 BACKGROUND SUMMARY...................................................................................................... 3
1.4 VEGETATION.......................................................................................................................... 3
1.5 STREAM STABILITY................................................................................................................ 3
2.0 METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................4
3.0 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................4
APPENDIX A. PROJECT VICINITY MAP AND BACKGROUND TABLES ............................................ 6
APPENDIX B. VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA................................................................................
13
APPENDIX C. VEGETATION PLOT DATA....................................................................................
31
APPENDIX D. STREAM SURVEY DATA.......................................................................................
32
APPENDIX E. HYDROLOGIC DATA.............................................................................................
53
APPENDIX F. WARRANTY PLOTS...............................................................................................
60
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE PAGE
Figure1. Vicinity Map.................................................................................................................. 7
Figure 2.0 — 2.8. Current Condition Plan View...................................................................... 14
Figures 3.1 - 3.17. Vegetation Plot Photos............................................................................ 28
Figures 4.1 — 4.12. Cross Section Plots............................................................................... 33
Figures 5.1 - 5.4. Crest Gauge Photos................................................................................... 53
Figures 6.1 - 6.3. Flow Gauge Plots....................................................................56
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE PAGE
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits ..................................................... 8
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History ..............................................................
9
Table 3. Project Contacts Table...................................................................................
10
Table 4. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment ............................................
23
Table 5. Vegetation Condition Assessment...................................................................
25
Table 6. Vegetation Plot Mitigation Success Summary .................................................
31
Table 7. Baseline Stream Data Summary.....................................................................
45
Table 8. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary ..................................
49
Table 9. Verification of Bankfull Events.........................................................................53
Table 10. Tributary Water Level Gauge Data............................................................55
ERZ ICA Page

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
The following report summarizes the vegetation establishment and stream stability for Year 1
monitoring for the Roses Creek Site (hereafter referred to as the "Site") in Burke County, North
Carolina.
1.1 Goals and Objectives
Primary goals for the Site, as detailed in the Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan
(ICA Engineering 2015) include:
1. Reducing water quality stressors and providing/enhancing flood attenuation.
2. Restoring and enhancing aquatic, semi -aquatic and riparian habitat.
3. Restoring and enhancing habitat connectivity with adjacent natural habitats.
The following objectives accomplish the goals listed above:
1. Reducing water quality stressors and providing/enhancing flood attenuation through:
a. Restoring the existing degraded, straightened and incised/entrenched streams as
primarily a Priority 1 restoration where bankfull and larger flows can access the
floodplain allowing nutrients, sedimentation, trash and debris from upstream
runoff to settle from floodwaters to the extent practical. Restoring a stable
dimension, pattern, and profile will ensure the channel will transport and
attenuate watershed flows and sediment loads without aggrading or degrading.
b. Restore channel banks by relocating the channel, excavating bankfull benches,
placing in -stream structures to reduce shearing forces on outside meander
bends, and planting native vegetative species to provide soil stability, thus
reducing stream bank stressors.
c. Reducing point source (i.e. cattle and equipment crossings) and non -point source
(i.e. stormwater runoff through pastures) pollution associated with on-site
agricultural operations (hay production and cattle) by exclusionary fencing from
the stream and riparian buffer and by eliminating all stream crossings from the
easement.
d. Plant a vegetative buffer on stream banks and adjacent floodplains to treat
nutrient enriched surface runoff from adjacent pastureland associated with on-
site agricultural operations.
e. Restoring riparian buffers adjacent to the streams that are currently maintained
for hay production that will attenuate floodwaters, in turn reducing stressors from
upstream impacts.
2. Restoring and enhancing aquatic, semi -aquatic and riparian habitat through:
a. Restoration of a sinuous gravel bed channel that promotes a stable bed form,
and accommodates benthic macroinvertebrate and fish propagation.
Additionally, woody materials such as log structures, overhanging planted
vegetation and toe wood/brush toe in submerged water will provide a diversity of
shading, bed form and foraging opportunities for aquatic organisms.
b. Restoring native vegetation to the stream channel banks and the adjacent
riparian corridor, that is currently grass dominated, will diversify flora and create a
protected habitat corridor, which will provide an abundance of available foraging
and cover habitat for a multitude of amphibians, reptiles, mammals and birds.
3. Restoring and enhancing habitat connectivity with adjacent natural habitats through:
a. Planting the riparian buffer with native vegetation.
ERZ ICA Page

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
b. Protection of the restored community will ensure a protected wildlife corridor
between the Site and the upstream and downstream mature riparian buffers and
upland habitats.
c. Converting approximately 15 acres from existing agricultural land to riparian
buffer protected by permanent conservation easement.
1.2 Success Criteria
Monitoring of restoration efforts will be performed until success criteria are fulfilled. Monitoring
includes stream channel/hydraulics and vegetation. In general, the restoration success criteria,
and required remediation actions, are based on the Stream Mitigation Guidelines (USACE et al.
2003) and the Ecosystem Enhancement Program Monitoring Requirements and Performance
Standards for stream and/or Wetland Mitigation (NCEEP 2011). Project success criteria are
further detailed in the Baseline Monitoring Document & As -Built Baseline Report (HDRIICA
2016).
1.3 Background Summary
The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services (DMS)
contracted HDRJICA to restore 4,746 linear feet of Roses Creek and three of its unnamed
tributaries within the Site to assist in fulfilling stream mitigation needs in the watershed. The
Site is located approximately 12 miles northwest of downtown Morganton in Burke County, NC.
The Site contains Roses Creek and three unnamed headwater tributaries of Roses Creek (UT
1, UT 2 and UT 3). The Site is located within the 03050101060030 14 -digit Hydrologic Unit,
which is also a DMS Targeted Hydrologic Unit for Cataloging Unit 03050101 of the Catawba
River Basin. Roses Creek is classified as a Water Supply Watershed (WS -III), as it is part of
the headwaters that feed Lake Rhodhiss. The Site is comprised of one property owned by
Robert B. Sisk and Martha M. Sisk (PIN # 1767479652) (known as the Sisk Farm). Additional
information concerning project history is presented in Table 2.
1.4 Vegetation
Bare root plantings within vegetation plots are surviving well across the site. Vegetation plots
are averaging 703.5 planted stems per acre, exceeding Year 3 monitoring success criteria of
320 stems per acre or greater. While vegetation plots are also exceeding success criteria
individually, with average planted stem counts per plot ranging from 550 to 950 stems per acre,
the stems do not appear to be healthy, and the majority of plots average a vigor of two or less.
Due to the low vigor and visual assessment of vegetation throughout the site, HDRJICA
surveyed ten, 30 foot radius warranty plots throughout the Site to determine the survivability of
stems outside of vegetation plots. Warranty plots exhibited low survivability rates and the Site is
scheduled to receive supplemental planting in the winter of 2017. Warranty plot locations are
shown in Appendix F.
1.5 Stream Stability
Roses Creek and its tributaries appear to be in stable and functioning condition. Cross Section
dimensions remain consistent with baseline surveys. Cross Sections 7 and 8 have decreased
slightly in depth and area. Both cross sections are located on UT 1, which currently has
vegetation in the channel. It is likely that in -channel vegetation has trapped sediment,
F)l ICA Page 3

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
contributing to reduced channel area. It is expected that when flows increase over the winter,
the sediment will flush out.
Two small holes were noted on-site where backfill from construction has settled. HDRJICA will
monitor these areas to ensure that they do not increase in size.
Woody vegetation is not well established along the stream banks; however, there are currently
no signs of stream bank erosion. The live stakes along the stream banks are scheduled to be
supplemented in the winter of 2017.
Bank pins were examined during morphological surveys and were not exposed.
A pebble count was conducted on site indicating that particle size has increased since baseline
from and average of 46.44 to 61.39 mm.
The site has not experienced an overbank flow during the monitoring period. It is required that
the site experiences at least two bankfull flows during the course of the seven year monitoring
period. Crest gauge records can be found in Appendix E.
It should be noted that the site has been in drought or near -drought conditions since
construction was completed. An overview of the site's drought status according to the NC
Drought Management Advisory Council can be found in Appendix E.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
Year 1 monitoring surveys were completed using a Total Station. Each cross section was
marked with a rebar monument at their beginning and ending points. The rebar has been
located vertically and horizontally in NAD 83 -State Plane. Surveying these monuments
throughout the Site ensured proper orientation. The survey data was imported into MicroStation
for verification. RIVERMorph and the Ohio Department of Natural Resources' "The Reference
Reach Spreadsheet Version 4.3L" were used to analyze cross section data. Tables and figures
were created using Microsoft Excel. A pebble count was conducted and analyzed in
RIVERMorph.
Vegetation monitoring was completed using CVS level II methods, for 17, 100 square meter
vegetation plots (Lee et al. 2006). The taxonomic standard for vegetation used for this
document was Flora of the Southern and Mid -Atlantic States (Weakley 2011).
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, Michael T., R. K. Peet, S. D. Roberts, and T. R. Wentworth. 2006. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation, Version 4.0 (http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm).
ERZ ICA Page

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
Mecklenburg, Dan. 2006. The Reference Reach Spreadsheet Version 4.31L. 2006. Ohio
Department of Natural Resources. Division of Soil and Water.
(http://www.d nr.state.oh.us/tabid/9188/defauIt.aspx)
Weakley, Alan S. 2011. Flora of the Southern and Mid -Atlantic States (online). Available:
http://www.herbarium.unc.edu/FloraArchives/WeakleVFlora 2011-May-nay.pdf [May 15,
2011]. University of North Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical Garden,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
ERZ ICA Page

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
ERZ ICA Page

K>
ao
N o
N m
No
O 3
�iw
„o
o
3
mpc3_0.
CD -o�n
UD 0 O
o�
CD
o CD
O O
O 3 N
m �
� n m
CD
N 3 O
CD _ x
.
C
Q O U1
O CD O_ z O
o CL
�0o��
o6 C O
<D CD X. CO
.Z1 3a
Z1 0 N fl) O
O fl N O U)
G
3. CO N
ZF 6
O� = ,'<
CD
CL
a � \
Q•
O
O
O
O
N
0
O
Omr
®z
7"I N
C
m
,1 O
CD
CD
ChD
l
1
r�
Ind ZIO Z31
_Y
not �....- .
le
�D
S.'m m� = an
oCl� y m m m m 0 Z N
mi =� n ¢r d m 3 nQ
m = n o ��.
-m o <
3 m �
K a x o ma
o m a'a
O m m d m n m m
a N-= N= C O O M
m25=3= -m m m o
29
=0n� 3 nm m f'm
m CDo
Cn� nn� y m 2 z =
.� 3
S � n m
0 dam`°=yd
m o n y c m
N O y? 0ID
0 N m (n N
•�-•. n nm ti. n0
FD CD M
N m O m o Q y N
n m m m
CD OCT CD
y== N y O
N N= 0 0= 0
ID
n m �
v
o a 0 5
ID
V
O
CD
0
e --h
'a)'^
V'
CD
3
CD
1--l'
r•
cD
C F
CL 1
m5.0cn
�nma,
� c-
vo
3 ,0ti
-
CD
v CD 3
0
3 C $y
�n�.
m 0 m o
M- 3
�z-rn
(D
o3 �I
sDv

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Roses Creek, Burke County
DMS Project No. 96309
Credit Summary
Stream Riparian
Non- Buffer Nitrogen Phosphorous
SMU Wetland
riparian Nutrient Nutrient Offset
WMU
Wetland Offset
Type R
RE R
RE
R
RE
Totals 5,009
Enhancement II 679
Project Components
Project
Stationing/
Existing
Approach
Restoration
Restoration
Mitigation
SMU
Component
Location
Footage/(PI,
PII,
or
Footage or
Ratio
or Reach ID
Acreage
etc.
Restoration
Equivalent
Acreage
Roses
10+00-
3,643
PI
Restoration
3,181
1:1
3,121
Creek
41+81
Roses
41+81-
38
-
Ell
38
2.5:1
15
Creek
42+19
UT 1
10+00-
267
PI
Restoration
289
1:1
289
12+54;
16+11-
16+46
UT 1
12+54-
641
-
Ell
641
2.5:1
256
16+11;
16+46-
19+30
UT 2
10+00-
610
PI
Restoration
707
1:1
707
17+07
UT 3
10+00-
558
PI
Restoration
621
1:1
621
16+21
Total
NA
5,757
PI
Restoration/
5,477
1-2.5:1
5,009
Ell
* Stream Mitigation Units decreased by 60 to account for break in easement at the stream crossing
on Sisk Farm Road
Component Summation
Restoration Stream
Level linear
fee!J
Riparian Wetland (acres)
Non -Riparian
Buffer
(square feet)
Upland
acres
Wetland
acres
Riverine Non-Rivenne
Restoration 4,798
Enhancement II 679
ERZ ICA Page

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Completion
or Delivery
Mitigation Plan
September 2015
September 2015
Final Design — Construction Plans
September 2015
March 2016
Construction
February 25, 2016
May 18, 2016
Temporary S&E Mix Applied to Entire Project Area
---
May 18, 2016
Permanent Seed Mix Applied to Entire Project Area
---
May 18, 2016
Bare Root, Containerized, and B&B plantings for
Entire Project Area
---
May 27, 2016
Mitigation Plan/As-built Year 0 Monitoring -Baseline)
May 2016
July 2016
Year 1 Monitoring
November 2016
December 2016
Year 2 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Year 6 Monitoring
Year 7 Monitoring
ERZ ICA Page

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Designer
ICA Engineering
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Primary project design POC
Chris Smith [phone]
Construction Contractor
Land Mechanic Designs, Inc.
126 Circle G Lane
Construction Contractor POC
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Lloyd Glover 919 639-6132
Planting Contractor
Land Mechanic Designs, Inc.
126 Circle G Lane
Planting Contractor POC
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Lloyd Glover 919 639-6132
Seeding Contractor
Land Mechanic Designs, Inc.
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Seeding Contractor POC
Lloyd Glover 919 639-6132
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resources — Triangle Office
Nursery Stock Suppliers
1) Dykes and Son Nursery, McMinnville, TN
2 Foggy Mountain Nurser live stakes
HDRJICA Engineering Inc.
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Monitoring Performers
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Ben Furr 919 851-6066
HDRJICA Engineering Inc.
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Stream Monitoring POC
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Ben Furr 919 851-6066
HDRJICA Engineering Inc.
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Ben Furr [phone]
ERZ ICA Page

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
Table 4. Project Information
ERZ ICA Page
Project Information
Project Name
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
County
Burke
Project Area acres
17.3
Project Coordinates (latitude and 35.850953,-81.819541
longitude)
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont / Mountain
River Basin
Catawba
USGS Hydrologic Unit
03050101
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
03050101060030
8 -digit
NCDWQ Sub -basin
03-08-31
Project Drainage Area
acres
Roses: 3,309, UT 1: 35, UT 2: 47, UT 3: 10
Project Drainage Area Percentage
<1%
of Impervious Area
CGIA Land Use Classification
Agricultural/Pasture
Ecore ion
Northern Inner Piedmont
Geological Unit
I Zab : Alligator Back Formation; Gneiss
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Roses Creek
UT 1
UT 2
UT 3
Length of reach
3,681 existing
900 existing
610 existing
558 existing
linear feet
Valley Classification
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
Drainage Area
3,309
35
47
13
acres
NCDWQ Stream
56
30
33.5
34
Identification Score
NCDWQ Water
WS -III; Tr
WS -III; Tr
WS -III; Tr
WS -III; Tr
Quality Classification
Morphological
Description (stream
E4, 134, and F4
135,F5
B5
135,G5
type)
Evolutionary Trend
Simon Is
Could maintain
Stages:
a B type
Premodified »
channel in
Constructed »
majority of
G » B/E
G » B
Degradation
reach
and Widening
Or
F»B
ERZ ICA Page

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
Regulatory Considerations (cont.)
Coastal Zone Management (CZMA)/ No
Coastal Area Management Act
CAMA)
N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance Yes
Yes*
CLOMR/LOMR
Essential Fisheries Habitat No
N/A
N/A
*The CLOMR was approved before construction. The LOMR has been supported by the local
floodplain administrator and is currently being reviewed by FEMA.
ERZ ICA Page

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
ERZ ICA Page

a -
ON
0
en1.0ON
V
W
0
W
V
�J
J
0
C4
181
Rd.
\� o PISGAHNA77ONAL "'.oso .., 1263
1 N FOREST
? Creek
Tasck State
h
' h � amkery 125E
\ Y,ycc 1240
Table Rock
F 1240 \
1240 `� 181
12 7 1eek 1240 Rd',
4� � 1240
VICINITY MAP
YEAR 1 CONDITIONS
BANK/BED CONDITION
MINOR
EROSION
HOLE
VEGETATION PROBLEM AREAS
THIN GRASS
VEGETATION PLOT CONDITION.
ElulCRITERIA MET
DCRITERIA UNME
NOTE:
650/650 - REPRESENTS TOTA
STEMS PER ACRE /PLANTED
STEMS PER ACRE
BEGINS
STA 10+00.00
�f.YE'
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW (CCPV)
ROSES CREEK
7;
LOCATION: BURKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
LAT: 35051'01" N LONG: -81049'11" W
TYPE OF WORK: CCPV PLANS - YEAR 1
BEGIN UT 1
ROSES CREEK
.REEK i` STA 20+50.52
END UT 2
;j STA 17 +10.07
END ROSES CREE
0,
0
0
DESIGN
Ln
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
& STATIONING
----------
THALWEG
Prepared in the Office of
BANKFULL
- -
EPHEMERAL POOL
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
X
FENCE
XSX3«. 1
CROSS-SECTION
ASBUILT
LOCATION
FM
FLOW METER
50 25 0 50 100
CREST GAUGE
®
PHOTO POINT
C5
& DIRECTION
C5
EXISTING
C5
WETLANDS
STREAM LENGTH
= 3,219.20 FT
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
FT
5 x 20 VEG PLOT
i
BRUSH TOE
ROCK L -VANE
=
BANKFULL AREA (FT2) =
ROCK
BANKFULL AREA (FT2) =
CROSS VANE
BANKFULL AREA (FT2) =
ROCK STEP
BANKFULL AREA IF) =
STRUCTURE w/
UT 1
BOULDERS
950.69
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE w/
10 5 0 10 20
CLASS B RIP RAP
30.5
2.72
14.0
ROCK /LOG
5.0
0.58
13.0
CROSS VANE
9
FLOODPLAIN
5.5
0.63
13.1
INTERCEPTOR
GRAPHIC SCALES
DESIGN
DATA
PROJECT LENGTH
Prepared in the Office of
PROPOSED DESIGN
ASBUILT
50 25 0 50 100
ROSES CREEK
DESIGN STREAM TYPE
C4
UT 1
DESIGN STREAM TYPE =
C5
UT 2
DESIGN STREAM TYPE =
C5
UT 3
DESIGN STREAM TYPE =
C5
ROSES CREEK
STREAM LENGTH
= 3,219.20 FT
STREAM LENGTH
3,222.56
FT
'
5121 Kingdom Way,
100
Rdl NCC 2%60%
Raleigh,
PLANS
=
BANKFULL AREA (FT2) =
66.4
BANKFULL AREA (FT2) =
2.1
BANKFULL AREA (FT2) =
2.1
BANKFULL AREA IF) =
2.6
UT 1
_ 930.38 FT
950.69
FT
Un
NC License No F-0258
10 5 0 10 20
CROSS-SECTIONED
BANKFULL WIDTH (FT) =
MAX DEPTH (FT) =
WIDTH /DEPTH RATIO =
30.5
2.72
14.0
CROSS-SECTIONED
BANKFULL WIDTH (FT) =
MAX DEPTH (FT) =
WIDTH /DEPTH RATIO =
5.0
0.58
13.0
CROSS-SECTIONED
BANKFULL WIDTH (FT) =
MAX DEPTH (FT) =
WIDTH /DEPTH RATIO
5.0
0.58
13.0
CROSS-SECTIONED
BANKFULL WIDTH (FT) =
MAX DEPTH (FT) =
WIDTH /DEPTH RATIO =
5.5
0.63
13.1
UT 2
UT 3
= 707.59 FT
621.03 FT
710.07
627.80
FT
FT
PROFILE
(HORIZONTAL)
DRAINAGE AREA (MIF) =
5.17
DRAINAGE AREA (MIF) =
0.06
DRAINAGE AREA (MIF)
0.07
DRAINAGE AREA (MIP) =
0.02
20 10 0 20 40
BANKFULL SLOPE(FT/FT) =
0.0062
BANKFULL SLOPE(FT/FT) =
0.0021
BANKFULL SLOPE(FT/FT) =
0.0021
BANKFULL SLOPE(FT/M =
0.0021
CHRISTOPHER L. SMITH
PROJECT MANAGER
PROFILE (VERTICAL)

MSEEHSHEELINE T 71
rn
VP2
550,550
I �
I
2
I
I "�
I
I�
� I L
0
w
O\
� O
q
BEGIN ROSES CREEK
STA 10+00.00
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW
VC A 1) '1
E E-
cn
�E
�.
..
ROSES CREEK
1 STA 11 + 00.90
f
' END UT 1
STA 19 + 50.69
\\ VP3
600/600
4
0
Rei
CCPV
O
O
v
--E-
t
,REEK
db-
3
0
CONTROL POINT
RBC "KEE" (505)
0
N: 776804.78'
E: 1163861.97'
DTHIN
ELEV:1238.0'
Ln
PLOT CONDITIONS
0
Rei
CCPV
O
O
v
--E-
t
,REEK
db-
3
0
PROBLEM AREAS
0
CROSS-SECTION
DTHIN
GRASS
Ln
PLOT CONDITIONS
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
l
& STATIONING
------------
THALWEG
BANKFULL
EPHEMERAL POOL
E
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
a
FENCE
X
VI
-E - E
FLOODPLAIN
INTERCEPTOR
LEGEND
PHOTO POINT
& DIRECTION
V /8
850850
G
YEAR 1 CONDITIONS
VEGETATION
PROBLEM AREAS
CROSS-SECTION
DTHIN
GRASS
VEGETATION
PLOT CONDITIONS
5 x 20 VEG PLOT
CRITERIA MET
CRITERIA UNMET
NOTE:
650/650 - REPRESENTS TOTAL
STEMS PER ACRE /PLANTED
STEMS PER ACRE
XS -1
CREST
CROSS-SECTION
LOCATION
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
5 x 20 VEG PLOT
ROCK STEP
BRUSH TOE
N
n
I ­a
w z
O 0
CL Q
CL V
Z
V� 0
00 Z
LU
NN >
0 Lu Z
D
0
V
LU
w
N m
W
J
V "'
N N N
V Z
= g
o
Ln
N
DATE: 11-30-16
CCPV
YEAR 1
SHEET
2
EEP# 96309
CREST
GAUGE
ROCK L -VANE
ROCK
CROSS VANE
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE w/
BOULDERS
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE w/
CLASS B RIP RAP
a
FLOODPLAIN
8$
INTERCEPTOR
N
n
I ­a
w z
O 0
CL Q
CL V
Z
V� 0
00 Z
LU
NN >
0 Lu Z
D
0
V
LU
w
N m
W
J
V "'
N N N
V Z
= g
o
Ln
N
DATE: 11-30-16
CCPV
YEAR 1
SHEET
2
EEP# 96309

3
LEGEND
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW (CC
MATCHLINE
2
SEE SHEET 8
7—
E E
+
r
U-
0 CREST y mZ
�r m
(V GAUGE „ 950950 =?J
850850, —i
,-
Q VP5_ `'---� - -
70WOO � ----- ------ — -
G
FLOODPLAIN y \
\ INTERCEPTOR
o
CREST
PHOTO POINT
+
& DIRECTION
Ln
r
ROCK
CROSS VANE
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
XS -1
__
& STATIONING
CROSS-SECTION
BOULDERS
LOCATION
•------------
THALWEG
N
CLASS B RIP RAP
BANKFULL
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
a
INTERCEPTOR
=
—
EPHEMERAL POOL
CL o
5 x 20 VEG PLOT
E
CONSERVATION
N
EASEMENT
DATE; 11-30-16
CCPV
z
BRUSH TOE
YEAR 1
FENCE
SHEET
3ROSES CREEK
� STA 20+51.69
END UT 2
STA 17+10.07
YEAR 1 CONDITIONS
BANK13ED CONDITION
HOLE
VEGETATION PROBLEM AREAS
OTHIN GRASS
VEGETATION PLOT CONDITIONS
CRITERIA MET
CRITERIA UNMET
NOTE:
6500650 - REPRESENTS TOTAL
STEMS PER ACRE /PLANTED
STEMS PER ACRE
CONTROL POINT
RBC "KEE" (5031
N: 776233.40'
E: 1164358.71'
ELEV: 1228.8'
�I
V
n
ML
~ Z
W_ J
Q O
CL U
Y Z =
w
w — �
U;� O
Z
N Q
w
N N F
oLu j
O
U
W
Lu Y
H
N m
CREST
GAUGE
ROCK L -VANE
0
ROCK
CROSS VANE
W
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE w/
Q
BOULDERS
ROCK STEP
U Ln
N
N
STRUCTURE w/
N
CLASS B RIP RAP
g
FLOODPLAIN
a
INTERCEPTOR
3ROSES CREEK
� STA 20+51.69
END UT 2
STA 17+10.07
YEAR 1 CONDITIONS
BANK13ED CONDITION
HOLE
VEGETATION PROBLEM AREAS
OTHIN GRASS
VEGETATION PLOT CONDITIONS
CRITERIA MET
CRITERIA UNMET
NOTE:
6500650 - REPRESENTS TOTAL
STEMS PER ACRE /PLANTED
STEMS PER ACRE
CONTROL POINT
RBC "KEE" (5031
N: 776233.40'
E: 1164358.71'
ELEV: 1228.8'
�I
V
n
ML
~ Z
W_ J
Q O
CL U
Y Z =
w
w — �
U;� O
Z
N Q
w
N N F
oLu j
O
U
W
Lu Y
H
N m
0
W
Q
U Ln
N
N
N
V
Z
g
=
CL o
N
DATE; 11-30-16
CCPV
z
YEAR 1
SHEET
3
EEP# 96309

CONTROL POINT CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW (CC
E: 1164568.34'
ELEV: 1229.8'
YEAR 1 CONDITIONS
VEGETATION PLOT CONDITIONS
i CRITERIA MET
CRITERIA UNMET
NOTE:
650/650 - REPRESENTS TOTAL
STEMS PER ACRE /PLANTED
STEMS PER ACRE
1 r'd.-r'\ 1r1
O
PHOTO POINT
0
& DIRECTION
XS -1
CROSS-SECTION
Lo
LOCATION
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
& STATIONING
•------------
THALWEG
BRUSH TOE
BANKFULL
EPHEMERAL POOL
E
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
FENCE
X
�I
V
N
r1
a
U Z
W_ J
O 0
'oe Q
1 u
Z
Lu
U� O
Lu
NOO
�W Z
O
U
w w
m
0
Ln
W
J
V "'
N N N
V Z
= g
o
Ln
N
DATE: 11_30-16
CCPV
YEAR 1
SHEET
4
EEP# 96309
PHOTO POINT
& DIRECTION
XS -1
CROSS-SECTION
LOCATION
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
5 x 20 VEG PLOT
�o
STRUCTURE w/
BRUSH TOE
BOULDERS
�I
V
N
r1
a
U Z
W_ J
O 0
'oe Q
1 u
Z
Lu
U� O
Lu
NOO
�W Z
O
U
w w
m
0
Ln
W
J
V "'
N N N
V Z
= g
o
Ln
N
DATE: 11_30-16
CCPV
YEAR 1
SHEET
4
EEP# 96309
CREST
GAUGE
ROCK L -VANE
ROCK
CROSS VANE
ROCK STEP
�o
STRUCTURE w/
BOULDERS
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE w/
CLASS B RIP RAP
FLOODPLAIN
INTERCEPTOR
�I
V
N
r1
a
U Z
W_ J
O 0
'oe Q
1 u
Z
Lu
U� O
Lu
NOO
�W Z
O
U
w w
m
0
Ln
W
J
V "'
N N N
V Z
= g
o
Ln
N
DATE: 11_30-16
CCPV
YEAR 1
SHEET
4
EEP# 96309

YEAR 1 CONDITIONS
BANKBED CONDITION
MINOR
EROSION
VEGETATION PLOT CONDITIONS
CRITERIA MET
CRITERIA UNMET
NOTE:
650/650 - REPRESENTS TOTAL
STEMS PER ACRE /PLANTED
STEMS PER ACRE
LEGEND
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW
VCAD l
CONTROL POINT
RBC -KEE" 514
N: 776112.06'
E: 1165366.13'
ELEV: 1223.7'
CC
C
E�
E E E
O ROSES CREEK
O STA 34 + 65.21
X END UT 3
�O STA 16+27.80
- - ----\ IVP14
75M50
0
o 600/600
(j,
°w 1
o 'CREST
GAUGE
I41, _
oc/
X0 �M
0
O
0
FM
FLOW
A
ROCK L -VANE
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
& STATIONING
•------------
THALWEG
BANKFULL
-
EPHEMERAL POOL
E
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
y
FENCE
CREST
GAUGE
1,
9
E
�I
eq
P4z
Ln
Q
V
a
U
Z
OO02 0
°" v
Y Z =
Lu OLU
i-
o
NOz
w }
N N F
0LuZ
Z)
�O
Lu Y
t
m
L-
w
J
V '
N N N
u g
= a
a O
N
DATE: 11-30-16
CCPV
YEAR 1
SHEET
5
EEP# 96309
FM
FLOW
A
ROCK L -VANE
METER
XS -1
ROCK
CROSS-SECTION
CROSS VANE
LOCATION
ROCK STEP
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
STRUCTURE w/
BOULDERS
ROCK STEP
5 x 20 VEG PLOT
�
STRUCTURE w/
CLASS B RIP RAP
FLOODPLAIN
BRUSH TOES
INTERCEPTOR
PHOTO POINT
ROCK /LOG
O
& DIRECTION
CROSS VANE
1,
9
E
�I
eq
P4z
Ln
Q
V
a
U
Z
OO02 0
°" v
Y Z =
Lu OLU
i-
o
NOz
w }
N N F
0LuZ
Z)
�O
Lu Y
t
m
L-
w
J
V '
N N N
u g
= a
a O
N
DATE: 11-30-16
CCPV
YEAR 1
SHEET
5
EEP# 96309

-.ifti
E----
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW (CCPV
YEAR 1
F
m
r
YEAR 1 CONDITIONS
BANKBED CONDITION
HOLE
VEGETATION PLOT CONDITIONS
Iu CRITERIA MET
CRITERIA UNMET
NOTE:
650/650 - REPRESENTS TOTAL
STEMS PER ACRE /PLANTED
STEMS PER ACRE
I
3
lro
Xo
o�/
i
—W A W
END ROSES CREEK
STA 42+22.56
e
O
LEGEND
+
Lo
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
ROCK L -VANE
& STATIONING
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
-------------
THALWEG
ROCK
BANKFULL
O 5 x 20 VEG PLOT
CROSS VANE
EPHEMERAL POOL
ROCK STEP
BRUSH TOE
STRUCTURE w/
E
CONSERVATION
BOULDERS
EASEMENT
PHOTO POINT
ROCK STEP
FENCE
& DIRECTION
STRUCTURE w/
CLASS B RIP RAP
XS -1
CROSS-SECTION
CREST
a
Q
FLOODPLAIN
INTERCEPTOR
LOCATION
GAUGE
ISI
V
N
n
U Z
W_ J
OO
w W
V
Z
0
V)
0 z
N N
0 LuZ
D
O
g v
W W
� Y
N �
CG
W
J
V "'
t', N N
V Z
= g
CL O
L!
Ln
N
DATE: 11-30-16
CCPV
YEAR 1
SHEET
6
EEP# 96309

,3
9
O
. r—
ONTROL POINT
RBC "KEE" 509
N: 777730.62'
E: 1164336.81'
ELEV: 1286.2'
t_r
3
CONTROL POINT
RBC "KEE" (5081
N: 777608.60'
E: 1164092.39'
ELEV: 1267.9'
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW (CC
�I
---- ---
VEGETATION
PROBLEM AREAS
THIN GRASS
CREST I
E
L6 -
�
GAUGE i VP1Lu
650900
X
FLOW
W
N
XS -1
c
------------
THALWEG
�` --- -
BANKFULL
W
FM
-'
,�•
----
E
W
Q)
FM
EASEMENT
U
g
=
a
n- o
Lli
PHOTO POINT
Nh
J
w
>s
& DIRECTION
O
_
a o
CREST
x
to
N
3
Wo
3
ROCK STEP
ccpv
STRUCTURE w/
CLASS B RIP RAP
3
YEAR 1
FLOODPLAIN
o
SHEET
3 3
NO z
7
CONTROL POINT
EEP# 96309
NN
o Lu z
RBC "KEE" 507
0
N: 777247.89'
E: 1163857.23'
a w
Lu
ELEV: 1249.6'
D
N in
YEAR 1 CONDITIONS
VEGETATION
PROBLEM AREAS
THIN GRASS
VEGETATION
PLOT CONDITIONS
L6 -
CRITERIA MET
CRITERIA UNMET
NOTE:
650/650 - REPRESENTS TOTAL
STEMS PER ACRE /PLANTED
STEMS PER ACRE
0 LEGEND
0
CROSS-SECTION
LOCATION
Lo
L6 -
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
X
FLOW
& STATIONING
METER
XS -1
c
------------
THALWEG
BANKFULL
EPHEMERAL POOL
E
CONSERVATION
FM
EASEMENT
FENCE
CROSS-SECTION
LOCATION
L6 -
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
FLOW
METER
0
L6 -
Lu
J
Q
U '
N
N
N
U
g
=
a
n- o
PHOTO POINT
& DIRECTION
CREST
GAUGE
DATE: 11-30-16
ROCK STEP
ccpv
STRUCTURE w/
CLASS B RIP RAP
YEAR 1
FLOODPLAIN
SHEET
INTERCEPTOR
7
EEP# 96309

II
lz
W
FLOODPLAIN I
INTERCEPTOR x; j
BEGIN UT 2
STA 10 + 00.00
0
0
roll
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW (CC
3
SISK FARM RD
E E
1
lb
3
41
—g—
.da
CONTROL POINT
RBC "KEE" 517
N: 776741.35'
E: 1164591.65'
ELEV: 1238.7'
YEAR 1 CONDITIONS
VEGETATION PROBLEM AREAS
ITHIN GRASS
VEGETATION PLOT CONDITIONS
CRITERIA MET
CRITERIA UNMET
NOTE:
650/650 - REPRESENTS TOTAL
STEMS PER ACRE /PLANTED
STEMS PER ACRE
It 41.
vP67
809809
Flow Direction
: � _
VP7
650/650
3 ----------,!
3—
X
o
LEGEND
to +
O
PHOTO POINT
& DIRECTION
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
X
FENCE
& STATIONING
XS -1
CROSS-SECTION
CREST
GAUGE
------------
THALWEG
LOCATION
BRUSH TOE
BANKFULL
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
EPHEMERAL POOL
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE w/
E
CONSERVATION
5 x 20 VEG PLOT
CLASS B RIP RAP
EASEMENT
FLOODPLAIN
FM
FLOW
INTERCEPTOR
METER
V
u
J
0 0
a�
Z
Lu
U� O
V) Z
NV
0 L Z
Z)
O
u
Lu Lu
� Y
H �
N co
00
0 -
Ln
W
J
V"'
N N N
u Z
= g
� o
Ln
N
DATE: 11-30-16
CCPV
YEAR 1
SHEET
8
EEP#96309

0
M
W
BEGIN UT 3
p STA 10+00.00
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW (CCPV
r
r
x1 UT 3
YEAR 1 CONDITIONS
VEGETATION PLOT CONDITIONS
CRITERIA MET
CRITERIA UNMET
NOTE:
650/650 - REPRESENTS TOTAL
STEMS PER ACRE /PLANTED
STEMS PER ACRE
U)
m
m
—I
C31
g
LEGEND
_
Flow Direction
-
m
-�
Cn
m
m
YEAR 1 CONDITIONS
VEGETATION PLOT CONDITIONS
CRITERIA MET
CRITERIA UNMET
NOTE:
650/650 - REPRESENTS TOTAL
STEMS PER ACRE /PLANTED
STEMS PER ACRE
U)
m
m
—I
C31
g
LEGEND
Ln
r
______ ___
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
�XS-1
CROSS-SECTION
& STATIONING
LOCATION
•------------
THALWEG
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
BANKFULL
EPHEMERAL POOL
EXISTING
/
WETLANDS
E
CONSERVATION
_.-
EASEMENT
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE w/
X
FENCE
CLASS B RIP RAP
®
PHOTO POINT
a
FLOODPLAIN
INTERCEPTOR
& DIRECTION
I IV
in
u
00
a
a
U
Z
w0
W
u O� W
NO Z
w
N N
12 Z
D
O
< U
< w
Lu Y
V)co
O
i(1 -
w
J
Q
U
N N N
g
= a
CL o
DATE: 11-30-16
CCPV
YEAR 1
SHEET
9
EEP# 96309

T
W
a
N
CD
N
N
W
N
.-
9
m
so
w
�
oo
o.
A
n
S
d
Q
N
CD
C
dn
c
CD'
m
to
O
N
A
x
W
03G1
N
N
O
W
N
c
N
A
z
(') W
3
N
;0
N
(n n
3
G
o
c
a
'
o
0
_ T
0
v
'
_.
cG
G
o
`0
:0
(D
V
l
N
l
W
-o p 0o
0
d W
N
N
N
HT
°
o
m x
m
c
n
c
F
N
n
Z0.
N
S
A
0 4
o'
o
H
o
a
B
ni M
om'
n
n
ma
m
o m
oFi
M
n
O
.°.
F,�.
3
A
o
o- ?.
m
d
Q
-
a
m
m
'm
3
o
m �'
d ?
y
0O
t
3 x57
wm
x
0
3
m
3 m
?
o
"
'm
d
Cl)
m x
o
m
m '"
m
a
°�'
DCD'
CL
0m
mo
r 00
0.
o
m
0
CD
g9
N
N x
m
m
o
m
m
O_
CD
3U)0
mm
n
m
won
a
m
o
i N N
M
� � O
N
O
rt
Z
3a
D
3 s
tC CD
N
N
c0
c0
co
co
c0
J
J
OD
OD
J
d
N
y �
N
3 m
s
N
3
� �
A
CL
CL
D c
c0
c0
c0
c0
c0
�
w
Df
N
J
J
OD
OD
J
C A d
.r 7
cn C r
0
0
0
0
0
0
� N 3
3
a
fD s_ m
N N M
D
0 3
0
0
0
0
0
0
E c
en a =
CD 0
m
ga,a
O
O
O
O
O
p
O
O
p
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
ry C N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
3 d
a
o
0
0
o
a
o
o
�
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
�� c
C. 0 W
m
N

T
Yj
N
CD
N
W
W
N
.-
9
m
so
w
�
oo
o.
A
n
S
d
Q
N
CD
C
dn
c
CD'
m
to
O
N
A
x
W
03G1
N
N
O
W
N
c
N
A
z
(') W
N
N
(n n
3
G
o
c
a
'
o
o
_ T
_.
cG
G
o
o
`0
:0
(D
-0
l
N
l
W
a p 0o
0
d W0w
N
N
N
HT
0
o
m x
m
c
n
c
F
N
n
Z0.
N
S
cn
�7m
o N
m
HT
a
D
<'o
vg�
m c c
gym'
n
n
ma
o- a
n
6
m
om
F n
o
v
d
o
<
m
m
as
M
v
N
a
CD
N0.3
o
m
Q
a
m°
-
m y
3 x
o
m
_
El
M CCD
m
m
O
m
o0
cl
cD CD
0)
m
o
c
m
G
om
f ;2
o
o
m
y
m
o
m�
; f°
�
s
W
_
r00
ID •a
�^
G S
m
�o
p
�
� N
� y
v
CD
=L
_
o c
3
W
W
N
N
o s
D
N
N
N
N
N
N
D
y y
3 s
N
N
3
_m
Q
m
a
N
�
•*
D c
W
W
N
N
Z
S S c
N
N
N
N
N
�
w
Df
N
D
C N d
=
.r 7
cn C r
0
0
0
0
0
0
N3
3
c
fD s_ m
N N M
D
0 3
0
0
v
o
o
E c
to a =
CD 0
m
ga,a
O
O
O
O
O
p
O
O
p
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
ry N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
3 d
a
o
0
0
o
a
o
o
�
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
�� c
CL m m
m
N

T
Yj
a
N
CD
N
W
N
.-
9
m
so
w
�
oo
o.
A
n
S
d
Q
N
CD
C
dn
c
CD'
m
to
O
N
A
x
W
03G1
N
N
O
W
N
c
N
A
z
(') W
N
N
(n n
3
O
G
o
c
a
'
o
o
_ T
O
0
v
'
_.
cG
G
o
o
`0
:0
m
V
l
N
l
W
a p 0o
0
m W0w
N
N
N
HT
0
o
m x
m
c
n
c
F
N
n
Z0.
Ncn
S
o N
m
HT
<'o
m c
<
3
aoF,6
m
0
o m
0
F n
o
v
d
o
<
m
m
as
m
o
G>
v
N
�
a
my
m
Q
a
m°
o
p
o
m�
C
a'.
-
_d
o
3 x
o
?
m
0
m
_
El
M CD
d s
n
N
n
y£
o
m
A
m
O
cD CD
om
o
m
m
o
m
g
m
G0)
r0OZ
o
y
_
m _
m
U2 0
c
a
=
a =
a
V "n
V G
�
� N
s
v
CD
o c
3
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
3 s
CC CD
D
N
(/)
N
N
N
y N
CD
3 s
N
N
3
_m
Q
m
a
N
�
D c
N 3 1
0
w
Df
N
=
.r 7
cn C r
0
0
0
0
0
0
N3
3
c
fD s_ m
N O M
D
0 3
0
0
v
o
o
E c
ea a =
CD 0
m
ga,a
O
O
O
O
O
p
O
O
p
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
ry O N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
3 d
a
o
0
0
o
a
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
CD c
CL m m
m
N

T
W
a
N
CD
N
Ul
W
N
+
m
m
W
(c
m
J
C
a
O'
3
0
(D
(D
C
0
a)
CD
to
N
O
Q
A
2
W
WO
N
N
+
O
W
3
N
c
+
va
A
T
n w
3
N
,'p
N
n C
y 0
= S
CL
d
N
m
c
F
^
m
(7 j
r
ID
_
A
N
3 C
0
c ?�
07 (D
c
a
o
CD
v
3
G
c
O,y-,r
a
3
O
O
_
;w
3
t7
0
�7
(D
°o_
Co
(n
2
G)
m
(n
c
W
'O O W
m
d W
a
N
N
m
N
o
IV
O
Q N
N
O
r
O
X
SD D
Z
O
m
C
C
N
Z
O SD
J J
N
J
C
�
N
J
d
OEr J
_
9I CC.
fD
O O
C1
O'
_,
m
w
a
N
N
J
Ip
O- Dl
(D
O
N
...
6
m
o
�°.
o
o
a
m w
o. 3
J
O
5
:E.
N
(D
o
° L.:
J
me'-
v
LT
O
J
O
O
O. J
m
3�
7 J—'^
V/
`D 0 0
o
co
cm CD
3
m
>
>
N
N
ov
of
m
m=
<o
m
s
m
°'
O. n O
r S-1
IV
W
N A X
dLa
3 S
O
ID
o
�
�
rt
a,
_
3=
<
N
5
N
N N
O.
�
aCI
'
N
-I
m
N
� 7
C C
(yD
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
3��
CD 0
N 0 O
m c D
3
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
w
Eir
CD m O
v
0
0
0
0
0
00
0
00
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
0� y
3
0
o
0
a
0
o
0
o
0
e
o
0
a
0
o
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
a
m
C
a (n 0
w
0

T
Yj
^`V
W
CD
N
a)
m
CD
CD
m
m
0 w
D N
m
o D
CD
2.1
m
o W
m
s m
F
m
N
D
O
N O
0 o
a
<
�
o
0
N D
<
CD
O
CD
= m
w o
3
N
O
a
A
0CD
0
CL
m
S O
CD o
N fl
o
o a
3 j
m
N
OO
m
c
o
3 O
O
co o_
m
CD °
mo
M.
v N'
mCm
N
d
0
N
m
O
w
�
CL
m
N
O
<
o
c
N
m
N
w
m
n
CD
o
a
X
O
m �
D
D O
O
<. O 3
z
A O
m
00
CD
n
3
O N
N
m
2 N
N
N
3
N -
CD N
O_
3
C.
nx
c
3
F
n
c
N � m
m O
<
3 ;-
z
0
O
°z
v
�. _0.m
D
m o
m
CD
o O N
3 3
-qO
j
0
O
d
0
N
O
d
N=
CD n
O
m
z
3
m
z
o
D
0
0
m
N
n
O
3
c
U
Z
O
m
m
D
pa
A
D
q
m
D,
m
0
O
v_
d
_
O
Z
a
M
3
m
o
o
D
o
a
n
m
m
m

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
Figures 3.1 - 3.17. Vegetation Plot Photos
3.1 Vegetation Plot 1
3.3 Vegetation Plot 3
3.2 Vegetation Plot 2
3.4 Vegetation Plot 4
3.5 Vegetation Plot 5
ERZ ICA
3.6 Vegetation Plot 6
Page 28

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
3.7 Vegetation Plot 7
3.8 Vegetation Plot 8
3.9 Vegetation Plot 9
3.10 Vegetation Plot 10
3.11 Vegetation Plot 11
ICA
3.12 Vegetation Plot 12
Page 29
rN `XU
3.7 Vegetation Plot 7
3.8 Vegetation Plot 8
3.9 Vegetation Plot 9
3.10 Vegetation Plot 10
3.11 Vegetation Plot 11
ICA
3.12 Vegetation Plot 12
Page 29

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
3.13 Vegetation Plot 13
3.14 Vegetation Plot 14
3.15 Vegetation Plot 15
3.16 Vegetation Plot 16
3.17 Vegetation Plot 17
ERZ ICA Page

Table 6.
EEP Project Code 96309. Project Name: Roses Creek
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
lm)l I Hca
Page 31
Current Plot Data (MY1 2016)
Scientific Name
Common Name
common buttonbush
Species count
00000000000000000©0
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
lm)l I Hca
Page 31

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
ERZ ICA Page

River Basin
Catawba
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 I MY6
Watershed
03050101060030
XS ID
XS 1
Bankfull Width ft
Drainage Area Acres
3,309
Date
11/22/2016
508.32
Field Crew
Bill Wollman, Alex DeGironimo
2.00
Cross Section 1
Dimension and substrate
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 I MY6
MY7
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width ft
33.80
31.20
Floodprone Width ft
508.32
508.32
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.00
2.18
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.81
2.88
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
67.70
67.97
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.90
14.31
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
15.04
16.29
FEZ ICA
Page 33

River Basin Catawba
Watershed 03050101060030
XS ID XS
Drainage Area Acres 3,309
Date 11/22/2016
Field Crew Bill Wollman, Alex DeGironimo
XS -2 Pool
^ f
�r Baseline -5/1]/2016 -– Bankfull-5/1]/2016—fi—h1V1-11/22/2016;
1238.0
I
123].0
1236.0
= 1235.0
d 1234.0
�+
1233.0
1232.0
1231.0
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 ]0.0 50.0
DISW nce (k)
Cross Section 2 (Pool)
Dimension and substrate
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Based on fixed -baseline bankfull eTe-G—trd"1111F_
Bankfull Width ft
38.53
35.95
Floodprone Width ft
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
1.73
1.79
Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.47
3.78
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
66.48
64.24
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
F)� ICA
Page 34

River Basin Catawba
Watershed 03050101060030
XS ID XS 3
Drainage Area Acres 3,309
Date 11/22/2016
Field Crew Bill Wollman, Alex DeGironimo
XS -3 Pool
12140 Baseline -5l1 ]I2016 -- B -U.11-5/17/2016 — W1-11/22/2016
1223.0 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
1322.0
C
y1221.0
-
W32200
1219.0
1218.0
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 60.0 7.0
DiatHnce ({1) 0 [
Cross Section 3 (Pool)
Dimension and substrate
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width ft
32.44
35.57
Floodprone Width ft
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.19
2.45
Bankfull Max Depth ft
4.10
4.40
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
71.10
87.13
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
FEZ INCA
Page 35

River Basin Catawba
Watershed 03050101060030
XS ID XS 4
Drainage Area Acres 3,309
Date 11/22/2016
Field Crew Bill Wollman, Alex
DeGironimo
XS -4 Riffle
�Bas1--5/1712016 —— Bankfull-5/1712016
1222.0
MY1-11/26/2016
_
1221.5
1221.0 —— — — — — — — — — — — — ——
y 129.5 -
w
12:9,0
_
1218.5
1218 0
121).5
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 60.0
Distance (/t)
50.0 60.0 70.0
Cross Section 4 (Riffle)
Dimension and substrate
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Based on fixed baseline
bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width (ft)
31.11
31.42
Floodprone Width ft
696.00
696.00
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.19
2.11
Bankfull Max Depth ft
2.89
2.96
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
68.21
66.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.21 1
14.89
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
22.37
22.15
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.00
1.00
1=)Z ICA
Page 36

River Basin Catawba
Watershed 03050101060030
XS ID XS 5
Drainage Area Acres 3,309
Date 11/22/2016
Field Crew Bill Wollman, Alex DeGironimo
XS -5 Riffle
-Baseline-5/1]/2016 - - 13ankfdl-5/17/2016 -<r MY1-11122/2016
1217.5
1217.0
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
1216.5
1216.0
C
� 1215.5
y 1215.0
w
I
1214.5
al
1214.0
1213.5
1213.0
10.0 30.0 40.0 60.0 80.0
,y}A
'G45J
0.0 20.0 50.0 70.0
Distance (ft)
Cross Section 5 (Riffle)
Dimension and substrate
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width ft
32.56
33.03
Floodprone Width ft
563.60
563.60
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.13
2.23
Bankfull Max Depth ft
3.16
3.22
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
69.41
73.79
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
15.29
14.81
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
17.31
17.06
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.00
1.00
FEZ ICA
Page 37

River Basin Catawba
Watershed 03050101060030
XS ID XS 6
Drainage Area Acres 3,309
Date 11/22/2016
Field Crew Bill Wollman, Alex DeGironimo
XS -6 Pool
--�--9ase11ne-511712016 -- Bankfu11-5/1112016 —MY1 - 1112212016
-
1217.0
121-
----- - - - - --
-
r.
M-
9 1214.0
w
1213.0
1212.0
'fc
s
1211.0
00 10.0 20.0 30.0 400 50.0 60.0 IDA
Distance 00
80.0
Cross Section 6 (Pool)
Dimension and substrate
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Based on fixed baseline Bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width ft
31.02
31.30
Floodprone Width ft
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
2.37
2.23
Bankfull Max Depth ft
4.07
3.98
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
73.63
69.77
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
FEZ ICA
Page 38

River Basin
Catawba
Watershed
03050101060030
XS ID
XS 7
Drainage Area Acres
38.40
Date
11/22/2016
Field Crew
I Bill Wollman, Alex DeGironimo
XS -7 Riffle
Baseline -5/25/2016
1266:0
1265.5
C 1365.0
.2
W 1264.5
-- BankN11-5252016-ar-MY1-11/22/2016
1264.4
1263.5
0.0 5.0 10.0
15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0
Distance (it)
4Y
1
Cross Section 7 (Riffle)
Dimension and substrate
Base MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Based on
fixed baseline Bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width ft
5.12 4.46
Floodprone Width ft
91.80 91.80
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.45 0.41
Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.78 0.59
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
2.30 1.82
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
11.38 10.88
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
17.93 20.58
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.00 1.00
FEZ ICA
Page 39

River Basin Catawba
Watershed 03050101060030
XS ID XS 8
Drainage Area Acres 38.40
Date 11122/2016
Field Crew Bill Wollman, Alex DeGironimo
XS -8 Pool
_
Baseline -5/17/2016 –– Bankfull-5117/2016 —lr MY1-1122/2016
126x.0
1263.8
1263.6
1263.4
1263.2
S
63.0
> 1262.8
W 1262.6
1262.4
1262.2
1262.0
1261.8
0.0 5.0 10.025 d 30.0
sfllstance lR) 0
3M
Cross Section 8 (Pool)
Dimension and substrate
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width ft
6.24
6.00
Floodprone Width ft
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.58
0.47
Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.96
0.73
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
3.64
2.83
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
FEZ ICA
Page 40

River Basin
Catawba
Watershed
03050101060030
XS ID
XS 9
Drainage Area Acres 44.80
Date
11/22/2016
Field Crew
Bill Wollman, Alex DeGironimo
124LO
1240.8
12-
12-
1-2
240.61240.412401
m uao.D
1239.8
1239.6
1239.4
1x39.2
0.0
XS -9 Pool
—Baseline -5/17/2016 –– 13-Vl-5/17/2016 —MY1,11/22/2016
5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 250 300 35.0 4D.0 45.0 _
Distance (ft)
FEZ I ICA
Page 41
Cross Section 9 (Pool)
Dimension and substrate
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width ft
5.56
5.70
Floodprone Width ft
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.37
0.48
Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.86
0.86
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
2.07
2.72
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Heiqht Ratio
1.00
1.00
FEZ I ICA
Page 41

River Basin
Catawba
Watershed
03050101060030
XS ID
XS 10
Drainage Area Acres
44.80
Date
11/22/2016
Field Crew
Bill Wollman, Alex DeGironimo
ti—Baseline-.5/17/2016
1237.4
.3-
XS-10 Riffle
-— B.Wd-5/17/2016 MY1 - 11/2212016
-7.0
C
1236.8
m
1236.4
1236.7
0.0 i0 10.0i.
., 20.0 ]5.2 30.0 350
s Distance (ft)
Cross Section 10 (Riffle)
Dimension andF(ft)
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width
6.7
7.1
Floodprone Wid
93.36
93.36
Bankfull Mean DDepth0.4
0.38
Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.77
0.74
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
2.79 1
2.69
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.75
18.68
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
13.93
13.14
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.00
1.00
FEZ ICA
Page 42

River Basin Catawba
Watershed 03050101060030
XS ID XS 11
Drainage Area Acres 12.80
Date 11/22/2016
Field Crew Bill Wollman, Alex DeGironimo
XS -11 Riffle
Baseline -5/172016 -- Bankfu11-5/17/2016 -WW1-11/2212016
1222.5
qq,ti,
,.,'kq
11
� 1221.5
f�
W 1221.0
1220.5
122000.0 50 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 00.0 65.0
Distance )R)
50.0
Cross Section 11 (Riffle)
Dimension and substrate
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 I MY5 MY6 MY7
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevatio
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.00
7.28
Floodprone Width ft
175.41
175.41
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.36
0.21
Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.69
0.46
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
2.19
1 1.51
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.67
34.67
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
29.24
24.09
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.00
1.00
FEZ ICA
Page 43

River Basin
Catawba
Watershed
03050101060030
XS ID
XS 12
Drainage Area Acres
12.80
Date
11/2212016
Field Crew
Bill Wollman, Alex DeGironimo
—Baseline-5/1712016
XS-12 Pool
-- B.Wd-5117/2016 —MY1-112212016
1221.0
1220.8
1220.4
r 1220.2
y 1220.0
w un,
--- --
4+
1219.6
1219.0
0.0 5.0 10.0
15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 '35.0 40.0
Dist— (ft)
Cross Section 12 (Pool)
Dimension and substrate
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Based on fixed baseline bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.85
8.34
Floodprone Width ft
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
0.4
0.46
Bankfull Max Depth ft
0.9
0.87
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area W
3.61
3.85
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
FEZ ICA
Page 44

T
V
N
0
3
C
d
m
3
D
J
m
o'
W
fD
-
�3An
m
J
�
Mcnm
-0N
m
v x
rn
y
W
o
y
6
a
a
�r
N
m
W
m
Dr
o a•NNo
W
m
^�
v
.'vm
Nov
T
c
d
fn
v
n
n
3
m
Jm_
W'
m
A
v
3 J
0
$
J DW1
�"
0A y
N
O
a 3
y?
w
n
m
m
H
N
c T
3
2
91
N
O
N
tU
a, p
p
p N
3
�.
F
O J
o
co
.J..
__ p
CO
pO
N
N]
co
N=
J
n
m
2
A
w o
c
o
°i
D
a
CO'm
`2
m
m
Z
°'
to x
r N
r
n 0.
3
y
o
y
m m
N 3
v
y
v a°
a
o:
>•
3
s
c o:
m
n
3,
m o
m
m0
0
m n
a
Q 3
y
m "
v
m m
rtc
>• >•
n -„
°: o
[n
y 'x,
Q 3
m
>•
m >:
°'
>•
3 v
v m
>•
>•
>•
>• q
\
Nc
s
rn
M
w 3
N
�
O
J
d
M
a
c
O
O 3
fD
A V
W
.Z1 tOn
O N D)
CD V N
D (D
ID
O
N (OO
A
t00 Q1
O O
W Uf
V
O
O
W
O
O J
CD
7�
O
O
0
W
O
O
p
UD
V w
O W
0
� O m
C O;
T C N
0 o
3 x m
m
� m
O AOV
H6rl
OwiOWU�
O
W
W
W�
m� O
V
O
J t00
W
O
V
N W
N
O
OJ J
Ut
0
0
(p A
A
A
N V
W�
W
(aD
N O
N Ut
O
O
W O
V N
O x
N
N N
Ut O
0 0
O O
N N
O W
0 0
O O
N
W
0
O
W
O
0
W W
O O
0 0
W W
O O
0 0
W W
O O
0 0
W
O J
0

T
V
N
b
a
�
m\
(til
Q
x
�
o_ N-
J
e A
m
J
N O
o 'ZL
A a
W
°i
c
p
m
c
n
m
O
UCJ7
m o
n
<
J J
d
mN
m.
3
m
2
d
m
?
m
m
m
J
d
3
.m.
m
m
m
vl
C
J
_
(^
m d
3
o h
m ry
m
3 3
o•
Q JC
d
m
S d
(n
d a
N
O 0
3
w
o '
Q3
W
n
Dp
i
o
co�
m
ry
m
m
J
a
J
N
O
g
3
J d
m
J
o
a
n
D
O
°o
m x
o N
oom
rn
J
m
J
m
o
3 m
P.
m m
m
c
n
W F
N
D O
m
m
m ��
w
mF
LOom
ymj
O
m 5
o
N
O
J
m
c
m
v
m
zA
W
m�
3
a
rn o
m
�
m
3
ro
m
m
0
J
m
a
d
n
�
w
o
cn
S
W
J
W
o
C -I
J
O y
3 N W
CD m
O N N
A (7 m
N N fD
N
m
N
-�
0)
J m
m T.
Ncn
tD tD
O
O
J
J J
J J
J J
N
?
4J 4J
w
IV A
m
O 0 N
6%
Ui(7
I
O
O O
N
N
N N
tD tD
N N
tD N
N N
O O
O
O^
J J
K m
fD m
d
d d
d a
a s
t0
fD �
O
N j' .me
O
N
O
A A
W
A N m
N
N
O N
T
W
O v
N
A
A
`G W 3
O
N
m
P
O
O O
P
N
N N
O
_
N O
O
O
O
ONOO
O
O O
D)
V
O)
01 W
W
W V
O
O
O O]
W
O
f0
NPH"
J
0
0 0
0 0
O
N
O
A
m N
N
O
W V
A
A O
0
0
N O
O
N 3
A W
t�0 N
O
O
`I
W OWO
O W
(AP O
m
N S
D O
t0
�0
v
N 0
0 0
N
N
W
N
N
W O
c0 O
N
0
0 0
0 O
O O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O J

T
V
N
b
a
CD
V
a
c
v
o
n
N
A
o'
A
3
A
m_
m x
m
y
m
-0
3 m
z W
ti
W
c
r
W
N
d
O a'
N N
e
.3n.
91
N
V
m
c
3
3
m
0
c
01
m
N
c m
0
-p
3
-n
m
v
2
o`
°
m
3 3
3
o
O
m A
A
n
o
C)
o
A
m
N
0
a)
0
N
nm
nyon
W
m
O
Fc
_m
m
z
n an
m
mv
fy
o
WgNNn
0
o
mo-_
o m
y
my
o
3
°3p
.
c
o
0
A
0 �A
i0l
apo
m
S2W
o
o°
MD.
3 m
°'
5 9�
3
>•
c n
m
m
m -ecc
f...
3�°
°
m�
Q m
S�
Q 3
m�
v
3�
m 3
°'
r.
s
z�
s
3 m
d m
d
0
C
O
O
O y
m
A
�a
0
v
m
c
m
a
N
y
J
W
O O
O
O
O »
N
c A -4
O
N N W
W
O N N
n0(1
S
S S
n C)
S S
ssO
;
O �
O
O� O
6cn
O O
O
N
V
O
N
N N
N N
N
O
O
O
m N
Vt O
O j
0
CD
3
x m
M
•
V j 9
O
4
V y
N
(AT N
O N
O
O
(n
0
N C
O W
N
O
' j
O
O
N�
W O
Ut N?
d
,4 n
O
A
W
A
J
O�
0 0
O
NN
A
O
m 3 C
O
O
J OI
V
O A
_ _
O J
O
ON
p
d>
OON
O
OO
O+
w
N
ONO
0_�pOOOO
W W
W NO
J
O
A N
(O J
N N
O
D
V m
'� �
A
O
A N
tV0 J
N N
O j
O N
O) �
D
N
a
Ot
ip
O O
O
Oo
J J
?
N w
�I N
O n
O
O
O N
w
N
J
V O
A N
N O
O N
O) 3
Rt
O x
3
O
O
tit Q
m
O
O O
O O
O O
O N
V IV
V O
A
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
W A
0 0
0 0
A W
0 0
0 0
W
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0

T
Yj
8
a
n
H
m
o'
m
3
d
C
^
W
ry
J
A
J
0
co
O
Z1 d
J
mm
m
m x
p rn
a
a
m
mm
m
-0
m
3 v
o a.
zwti
N
a
w
c
0
v
U)
3
N
m n
No
.0
o
m
m
r'
oo=
o'
n
3
C'
s
m
m
2
m
m}
3 3
w
oNiw
o
o
�.
m A
Ao0
0
n
m
A
3
m
0-
OO N
pD
a 3
N
to A�
GWi
dZ
N
mS
of
N^_
OT'om
m
om
mA
m
<npm
o2
O
J
o_
J
yZ
oO
O
.
o
-0O
0
Zm1
EB
d2
'
d0
m
m
D
m
m
N
m
Or
r
T.3
A
mo'>>yoc
Awmj
3 o
a
N
D 0
mJ
m
o
c
N
W
N N
O
O y
m
A
a
o
vc
J
m
m
'��
y
6
W
3
N O
O
O
O »
m
N
A
n
O
W / W
D N
O N y
C'm
nOnnC)
S
S S
S S
ssv
N 3
O
p
A A
N
O
O
N
J
d d
J J
N N
J J
?}
O
O
W
f0 N
N
A
O A
N
O
J m
N N
N V%
N O
N N
O
O
J
N N
N
N (�
N
cD
W
W
N
N W
A J
O O
N
O� W
O O
O j
n x
^•. iA
n 3 •�
O
N
N N
N
N N
N N
�3v
NN
vi
(n
O
m
3 C
N
N V
O N
O
N
(T N
N N
N
A
O
O
O W
N
O
10
o
O
W N
O
O
J N
O) N
O O
v
O
o
O
A
N
O O
O
J
N
m
w m
N OON'
O
O
A
tp N
m A
O J
N
m
N O
O J
0
N A
N O
W
O
IV 01
-' D1
W N
O N
D
N
W O
J
_
m W
N O
O J
PMP
m m
y
O
O
A
W
W tNp
' W
O
O
A
t0 N
N
m
d
J
w
0
0 p
N N
O
O
.-mw-
o
p,
<O (OO
m A
O O
3'
N
O O
O Q
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O N
A N
O O
A
N
o
0 o
0 o
o o
o p

Mir
%J
401
�
�
�
[
[
7
cn
(
\
�
CL
a
7
E
a
;
»
i
§
=
rQ
/
;
7
/
m
7
.
03
}
0
\
E
\
�
7
cn
%
_Co7
CL
o :
k
©0
[ID
co
\
%
J
& ;
E
'
o
Eh
\
2
\
\
k
(
0
=
§
«
e
2
\ /
f
(
� / /
0
k
CO
m
\
\
(
k
(
0
Co §
!
;
e
§ §
(a
CDI3\/2=\\
%
:
E
D
(§
f/
0
m
{
k
m
Er!
A
$
/
»
z
\
\
)
/
0
2
(\
\
\
\
\
[
(ƒ
/
0 § (
%
%
\
\
§
)
§
0
§
�
:
¥
| ° Z
)
\
m
)
( \
2
00
t
\
\
§/
\
/§
\\k
[;
f
o
o
f
o:
[
7
cn
(
\
CL
7
E
a
§
rQ
/
;
7
/
7
.
}
0
E
�
cn
%
CL
o :
cr
=
co
\
o
'
o
f
§
«
e
co
f
(
� / /
k
CO
m
\
\
\
k
(
0
Co §
!
;
EP
%
:
}
(§
0
,
R
{
_r
m
2
]
z
\
\
CID
cD
»
2
(\
\ I
0 § (
%
%
\
0
§
�
:
¥
| ° Z
)
\
m
)
( \
2
00
t
M
<
[;
f
o
o
f
o:
0
)
aLn
$
4
m
¥
¥)
% �\
4
f
—
@
m
w
a
m=
IN)
m —
_
)
CL
rQ
/
/
.
}
0
E
cn
o :
o
'
o
f
f
(
� / /
(
LO
Cl)
0 § (
\
0
�
¥
| ° Z
)
\
)
( \
<
f
f
%
)
aLn
/
0 \
a
=
\ ƒ
cn
0
f
f
f
+
+
+
}
/
/
§
\
\\
\(
§j
\§(
\/
\\
-4
Co§\
CID
ro
m�
¥)
6
2@
a
\
)E/
f
f
o :
�

T
N
a
T
Q)
CQ
CD
cyl0
v
m
3
W.
O
7
W
U)
Q
O
3
W
C1
x
(p
7
x
G
W
m
W
c
a
91
7
F
n
W
m
O
E
N
C
W?
CD
<
I;L
A
O
=
d
nO
(D
p
0
N
X
7
N
E -
Q
CD
Av
v
N
a
a<
N
3
S
3
S M
v
a
V
N
O
O
fn co
co
O
w
0
O
OVo
m
O
_
N C
O
O
O
O
O
Ja
O_
O
0o
Qo
ao
N
0
A
�
O
O
W {
O
O
O
NW
Ci
Q.
=
O
N Q
N
= N
VJ
C O O
n
Z n
Zl 0
W
0
7
O
0 N
V
N
O N O
N �
C7 N O
<
A
CD
F N
C O
N ^*.
y
A y
T O <
-<v
m
m
'm
o
3
+
+
v
.9
v
W
O
O
W W
W
CA
N
O
A
Cn
00
ACDry
N
C7
N
O
O
p
O) {
N
W
W
V
N
<
n
N
C
N
N
N
�
1D
O
W
O
7
co
O
t
{

T
Yj
a
CD
cn
g
3
3
O
7
W
N
fD
CL
O
3
W
X
(D
3
CL
W
c
a
co
W
—
9)
(7
W
m
co
3
ou
QW�
:D
CD
nCD
0
3
ID
ID
91
X
7
(D
Dm
S
3-
N
"O
"6
c
v
v
v
fD
w
a
V
N
O
O
A
Ul
W
O
N
O
O
O]
W
w
Ul
y
O
W
V
O
V
WO
W
(D
'a
S
O
O
-�
CO
O
N
O
CD
A
A
O
W
A
N
m
7
W
Cn
W
00
a
x
�
n
CD
n =
N
N
C O C
n
N
A
O
<
w
=.
O
O N 5.0
N N
CD N O
N
c0
n
n m
A
N fD
A
CD P Vl
N
F a
n O
� O
<
O 1D
7
N
7
d
4
V
T
d
Gt
N
O
O
01
W
3
O
V
V
-P-
V
y
fD
C)
O
CO
V
N
O
CD
ID
N
n
N
O
O
V
O
O
A
W
N
COO
<
O
N
N
cn
�
n
w
O
7
O
A
0
O
O_
O
O)
V

ir
%J
A)
�
�
�
T
k
7
2
v
2
\
�
E
;
i
CT
_
CT
§
(
«
e
E
[
\
(\
\
i
[
0
_ §
/
[
ƒ
,
/
}
C
k
x
s
�
( [
2r
2
°
\
\ (
m
cr
$
{
»
»
2
$ k
—
ƒ
§
E
k§§»
2
k[
S
@
k
0
¥
/
C
C
)
<
f
}
0
C
N)/
w
cn
\ /
{
[ 2 §
/
\ \
M
2
\
3
)
n\k
( CD
<
&
CD
f
~
}
I
i
\
(3)
k
§
4
£
§
<
1
111
1-4
101
(
®
ow
\
}
C
<
j
(
j0
a
�
\
f
f

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
Appendix E. Hydrologic Data
Table 9. Verification of Bankfull Events
Figures 5.1 - 5.4 Crest Gauge Photos
5.1 Crest Gauge Roses Creek Lower (10/5/2016) 5.2 Crest Gauge UT 1 (10/5/2016)
F)� ICA Page 53
Crest Gauge
Height
Info
Gauge
Gauge
Crest
Bankfull
above
Reading
Elevation
Elevation
Elevation
11
Bankfuft
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
Date
Site
Sta.
Photo
Roses
Creek
10/5/2016
1
Lower
0.00
1212.11
N/A
1213.93
N/A
5.1
10/5/2016
2
UT 1
0.00
1267.45
N/A
1267.95
N/A
5.2
10/5/2016
3
UT 2
0.35
1227.81
1228.16
1228.19
N/A
5.3
10/5/2016
4
UT 3
0.25
1216.94
1217.19
1217.36
N/A
5.4
Roses
Creek
11/22/2016
1
Lower
0.00
1212.11
N/A
1213.93
N/A
5.5
11/22/2016
2
UT 1
0.00
1267.45
N/A
1267.95
N/A
5.6
11/22/2016
3
UT 2
0.00
1227.81
N/A
1228.19
N/A
5.7
11/22/2016
4
UT 3
0.35
1216.94
1217.29
1217.36
N/A
5.8
Figures 5.1 - 5.4 Crest Gauge Photos
5.1 Crest Gauge Roses Creek Lower (10/5/2016) 5.2 Crest Gauge UT 1 (10/5/2016)
F)� ICA Page 53

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
5.3 Crest Gauge UT 2 (10/5/2016)
5.4 Crest Gauge UT 3 (10/5/2016)
5.5 Crest Gauge Roses Creek (11/22/2016)
dlm
� 4
an a� az a� as ss fi �
ov �e oa ty�.
5.7 Crest Gauge UT 2 (11/22/2016)
5.6 Crest Gauge UT 1 (11/22/2016)
5.8 Crest Gauge UT 3 (11/22/2016)
ERZ ICA Page

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
Table 10. Burke County Drought Status
Month
Drought Status
June
Abnormally Dr
July
Abnormally Dr
August
Abnormally Dr
September
Moderate Drought
October
Moderate Drought
November
Severe Drought
Source: NC Drought Management Advisory Council
ERZ ICA Page

Figure 6.1 UT 1 Water Level
8/8/2016
UT 1 Water Surface
8/28/2016
Time
9/17/2016
10/7/2016 10/27/2016 11/16/2016

Figure 6.2 UT 2 Water Level
UT 2 Water Surface
1.0
0.9
0.8 -
0.7
0.6
-
r 0.5
a
m
O
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
-i
6/9/2016 6/29/2016 7/19/2016 8/8/2016 8/28/2016 9/17/2016 10/7/2016 10/27/2016
Time

Figure 6.3 UT 3 Water Level
UT 3 Water Surface
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
C
r 0.5
m
W 0.4
0.3
0.2
-
jw
0.1
0.0
6/9/2016 6/29/2016 7/19/2016 8/8/2016 8/28/2016 9/17/2016 10/7/2016 10/27/2016
Distance (ft)

DMS IMS No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, North Carolina
YEAR ONE MONITORING REPORT
December 2016
Appendix F. Warranty Plots
ERZ ICA Page 60

VEGETATION MORTALITY MAP
END ROSES CREEK
T 2 + 22.56
BEGIN UT 1
STA 10+00.00
o�
FENCE C� C\ O
F.O N w
/ �c ou..
10 X00 z
c�a
z
�
c 4aRl1THERFVDE0..... R,W BEGIN UT 2
m —
ELECTft�G MEMBERSHIP . L
ow wW,
S ` \ow- PER O �RPORAiION. f-ow-owow� 1ud�
\ow EHHEAo P_aw—w , I\ STA 10+00.00
ow_ow __
ROSES CREEK \ o� W
I O
STA 34 + 65.21
w
,1 w, ,
�, g kp0 END UT 3 p
3 ROSES CREEK �0 STA 16+27.80 O
1
s B e STA 11 +00.90 a
X
0� 1I END UT I< o / 8/ ;z
4 s STA 19 + 50.69 g I= �$ 8 o
$� o o %=__-== 5 + 00 v
0 8 i N B Q M l W z
a
$ 7 to cp Lu O H
Qcv) Lu 0
g 8 X00 0.� F% g 'N�
y I'��� % __ O Lu z
1p a W
Lu
CREEKLn
o
` X00 � -�_ + o
0 0
In
o a
BEGIN UT 3 kn
STA 10+00.00 u z
END UT 2 ��V��°°��LEGEND o g
y STA 17 +10.07 oti�
i yB
V ,^
BEGIN ROSES CREEK 's� CRITERIA MET
STA 10+00.00
E
a DATE: 11-14-76
CRITERIA UNMET
m VEGETATION
MORTALITY
0
v' MAP
VEGETATION MORTALITY CRITERIA SHEET
s
85% SURVIVAL (578 STEMS/AC) 2
Ne
EEP# 963090