20140194 Ver 1_Year 0 Monitoring Report_2016_20170119

BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT &
AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
ROSES CREEK STREAM MITIGATION SITE
Burke County, North Carolina
NCDMS Project # 96309
Prepared for:
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones St., Suite 3000A
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Data Collected: May 9 — May 20, 2016
Submitted: September 12, 2016
_+y
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones St., Suite 3000A
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Data Collected: May 9 — May 20, 2016
Submitted: September 12, 2016

Prepared by:
F)l ICA
Design Firm:
HDRIICA Engineering Inc.
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
919.851.6066
919.851.6846 (fax)
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DOCUMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN, ROSES CREEK
STREAM MITIGATION BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE
REPORT, WERE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION.
SIGNED SEALED, AND DATED THIS
;•a. SEAL
• 035636 •
c'�'tt 1 N'���' •���
�Ni PHEarI;•�`�
t11l
1 3 1'
DAY O F 2016.
Chris Smith, PE

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services
(DMS) contracted HDRJICA to restore 4,746 linear feet of Roses Creek and three of its
unnamed tributaries within the Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site (hereafter referred to
as the "Site") to assist in fulfilling stream mitigation needs in the watershed. The Site is
located approximately 12 miles northwest of downtown Morganton in Burke County, NC.
The Site contains Roses Creek and three unnamed headwater tributaries of Roses
Creek (UT 1, UT 2 and UT 3). The Site is located within the 03050101060030 14 -digit
Hydrologic Unit, which is also an DMS Targeted Hydrologic Unit for Cataloging Unit
03050101 of the Catawba River Basin. Roses Creek is classified as a Water Supply
Watershed (WS -III), as it is part of the headwaters that feed Lake Rhodhiss. According
to NCDENR 2012 Water Quality Classification, Roses Creek is designated trout water;
however, NC Wildlife Resource Commission indicated there are no trout resources at
this location in response to the Categorical Exclusion notification (D. Besler, personal
communication, April 16, 2014).
The Site is comprised of one property owned by Robert B. Sisk and Martha M. Sisk
(PIN # 1767479652) (known as the Sisk Farm). The Natural Heritage Program (NHP)
has not identified elemental occurrences or Significant Natural Heritage Areas within
one mile of the Site. The Site is surrounded by the Pisgah National Forest. Based on a
review of records from the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NCSHPO),
there are no properties listed on the National Register within one mile of the Site. The
Sisk Farm is included on the NCSHPO's Study List for NC (Site ID BK0090). NCSHPO
determined the project as proposed will not have an effect on any historic structures (R.
Bartos, personal communication, April 25, 2014). NCSHPO requested that a
comprehensive archaeological survey be conducted on the Site by an experienced
archaeologist. The archeological survey concluded that the Site did not meet the
requirements to be considered eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (URS,
Phase I Archeological Survey for the Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site, August 8,
2014).
Primary goals for the Site, as detailed in the Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Mitigation Plan (HDRIICA 2015) include:
1. Reducing water quality stressors and providing/enhancing flood attenuation.
2. Restoring and enhancing aquatic, semi -aquatic and riparian habitat.
3. Restoring and enhancing habitat connectivity with adjacent natural habitats.
The following objectives accomplish the goals listed above:
1. Reducing water quality stressors and providing/enhancing flood attenuation
through:
a. Restoring the existing degraded, straightened and incised/entrenched
streams as primarily a Priority 1 restoration where bankfull and larger
FN ICA Page i

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
flows can access the floodplain allowing nutrients, sedimentation, trash
and debris from upstream runoff to settle from floodwaters to the extent
practical. Restoring a stable dimension, pattern, and profile will ensure
the channel will transport and attenuate watershed flows and sediment
loads without aggrading or degrading.
b. Restore channel banks by relocating the channel, excavating bankfull
benches, placing in -stream structures to reduce shearing forces on
outside meander bends, and planting native vegetative species to provide
soil stability, thus reducing stream bank stressors.
c. Reducing point source (i.e. cattle and equipment crossings) and non -point
source (i.e. stormwater runoff through pastures) pollution associated with
on-site agricultural operations (hay production and cattle) by exclusionary
fencing from the stream and riparian buffer and by eliminating all stream
crossings from the easement.
d. Plant a vegetative buffer on stream banks and adjacent floodplains to treat
nutrient enriched surface runoff from adjacent pastureland associated with
on-site agricultural operations.
e. Restoring riparian buffers adjacent to the streams that are currently
maintained for hay production that will attenuate floodwaters, in turn
reducing stressors from upstream impacts.
2. Restoring and enhancing aquatic, semi -aquatic and riparian habitat through:
a. Restoration of a sinuous gravel bed channel that promotes a stable bed
form, and accommodates benthic macroinvertebrate and fish propagation.
Additionally, woody materials such as log structures, overhanging planted
vegetation and toe wood/brush toe in submerged water will provide a
diversity of shading, bed form and foraging opportunities for aquatic
organisms.
b. Restoring native vegetation to the stream channel banks and the adjacent
riparian corridor, that is currently grass dominated, will diversify flora and
create a protected habitat corridor, which will provide an abundance of
available foraging and cover habitat for a multitude of amphibians, reptiles,
mammals and birds.
3. Restoring and enhancing habitat connectivity with adjacent natural habitats
through:
a. Planting the riparian buffer with native vegetation.
b. Protection of the restored community will ensure a protected wildlife
corridor between the Site and the upstream and downstream mature
riparian buffers and upland habitats.
c. Converting approximately 15 acres from existing agricultural land to
riparian buffer protected by permanent conservation easement.
Monitoring Components and Duration
FNICA Page ii

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
The first year monitoring report will be submitted in December 2016. Monitoring will
continue for seven years or until agreed upon success criteria is achieved, with a report
submitted at the beginning of December for each monitoring year. Annual monitoring
includes surveys of morphological conditions for the restored stream, representative
surveys of vegetation, data collection of static groundwater levels throughout the Site,
and an annual monitoring report that compiles and analyzes data to determine success
levels.
FN I ICA Page iii

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
EXECUTIVESUMMARY...........................................................................................................I
1.0 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND AND ATTRIBUTES ............................................. 1
1.1 LOCATION AND SETTING........................................................................................................ 1
1.2 PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES......................................................................................... 1
1.3 PROJECT STRUCTURE, RESTORATION TYPE AND APPROACH .................................................. 2
1.3.1 Project Structure...................................................................................................... 2
1.3.2 Restoration Type and Approach.............................................................................
2
1.3.3 Roses Creek Restoration and Enhancement................................................................ 3
1.3.4 UT 1 Restoration and Enhancement........................................................................... 4
1.3.5 UT 2 Restoration.........................................................................................................
5
1.3.6 UT 3 Restoration.........................................................................................................
6
1.4 PROJECT HISTORY, CONTACTS AND ATTRIBUTE DATA.......................................................... 7
2.0 SUCCESS CRITERIA........................................................................................................... 7
2.1 STREAMS................................................................................................................................ 7
2. 1.1 Stream Dimension.......................................................................................................
8
2.1.2 Stream Pattern and Profile.......................................................................................... 8
2.1.3 Substrate and Sediment Transport .............................................................................. 8
2.1.4 Hydraulics................................................................................................................... 8
2.2 VEGETATION.......................................................................................................................... 8
2.2.1 Noxious Species.......................................................................................................... 9
3.0 MONITORING PLAN GUIDELINES...............................................................................
10
3.1 STREAM MONITORING STANDARDS.....................................................................................
10
3.2 VEGETATION MONITORING STANDARDS..............................................................................
12
3.3 DIGITAL PHOTOS..................................................................................................................
12
3.4 WATERSHED........................................................................................................................
12
4.0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLANS...........................................................13
5.0 AS -BUILT STATE...............................................................................................................
14
5.1 AS-BUILT/RECORD DRAWINGS............................................................................................
14
5.2 MORPHOLOGIC STATE OF THE CHANNEL.............................................................................
14
5.3 VERIFICATION OF PLANTINGS..............................................................................................
14
6.0 REFERENCES.....................................................................................................................15
FN I ICA Page iv

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
APPENDICES
Appendix A. General Tables and Figures
Appendix B. Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Appendix C. Vegetation Data
Appendix D. Record Drawings
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Information
Table 5. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 6. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary (Dimensional Parameters -
Cross Section)
Table 7. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
FN ICA Page v

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
1.0 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND AND ATTRIBUTES
1.1 Location and Setting
The Site is located approximately 12 miles northwest of downtown Morganton in Burke
County, NC. (Figure 1)
Directions from Raleigh, NC:
From Raleigh or eastern NC: Travel on 1-40 west to exit 103 (US-64/Burkemont
Avenue) and turn right, go 0.7 miles; turn left onto Flemming Drive, go 1.1 miles;
continue onto Sanford Drive, go 1.2 miles; turn left onto NC -181 N/N Green Street, go
8.0 miles; turn left onto Fish Hatchery Road, go 2.4 miles; turn right onto Old Table
Rock Mountain Road (National Forest Rd), go 0.4 miles; stay right onto Sisk Farm
Road. The Site is approximately 0.3 miles at the end of Sisk Farm Road.
The Site is located within Targeted Local Watershed Catalogue Unit (CU) 03050101.
The Site is located in the Inner Piedmont Physiographic Province of North Carolina.
1.2 Project Goals and Objectives
Primary goals for the Site, as detailed in the Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Mitigation Plan (HDRIICA 2015) include:
1. Reducing water quality stressors and providing/enhancing flood attenuation.
2. Restoring and enhancing aquatic, semi -aquatic and riparian habitat.
3. Restoring and enhancing habitat connectivity with adjacent natural habitats.
The following objectives accomplish the goals listed above:
1. Reducing water quality stressors and providing/enhancing flood attenuation
through:
a. Restoring the existing degraded, straightened and incised/entrenched
streams as primarily a Priority 1 restoration where bankfull and larger
flows can access the floodplain allowing nutrients, sedimentation, trash
and debris from upstream runoff to settle from floodwaters to the extent
practical. Restoring a stable dimension, pattern, and profile will ensure
the channel will transport and attenuate watershed flows and sediment
loads without aggrading or degrading.
b. Restore channel banks by relocating the channel, excavating bankfull
benches, placing in -stream structures to reduce shearing forces on
outside meander bends, and planting native vegetative species to provide
soil stability, thus reducing stream bank stressors.
c. Reducing point source (i.e. cattle and equipment crossings) and non -point
source (i.e. stormwater runoff through pastures) pollution associated with
on-site agricultural operations (hay production and cattle) by exclusionary
ERZ ICA 1

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
fencing from the stream and riparian buffer and by eliminating all stream
crossings from the easement.
d. Plant a vegetative buffer on stream banks and adjacent floodplains to treat
nutrient enriched surface runoff from adjacent pastureland associated with
on-site agricultural operations.
e. Restoring riparian buffers adjacent to the streams that are currently
maintained for hay production that will attenuate floodwaters, in turn
reducing stressors from upstream impacts.
2. Restoring and enhancing aquatic, semi -aquatic and riparian habitat through:
a. Restoration of a sinuous gravel bed channel that promotes a stable bed
form, and accommodates benthic macroinvertebrate and fish propagation.
Additionally, woody materials such as log structures, overhanging planted
vegetation and toe wood/brush toe in submerged water will provide a
diversity of shading, bed form and foraging opportunities for aquatic
organisms.
b. Restoring native vegetation to the stream channel banks and the adjacent
riparian corridor, that is currently grass dominated, will diversify flora and
create a protected habitat corridor, which will provide an abundance of
available foraging and cover habitat for a multitude of amphibians, reptiles,
mammals and birds.
3. Restoring and enhancing habitat connectivity with adjacent natural habitats
through:
a. Planting the riparian buffer with native vegetation.
b. Protection of the restored community will ensure a protected wildlife
corridor between the Site and the upstream and downstream mature
riparian buffers and upland habitats.
c. Converting approximately 15 acres from existing agricultural land to
riparian buffer protected by permanent conservation easement.
1.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach
1.3.1 Project Structure
3,181 linear feet of Roses Creek, 297 linear feet of Unnamed Tributary 1, 707 linear feet
of Unnamed Tributary 2, and 621 linear feet of Unnamed Tributary 3 were restored at
the Site. Table 1 provides a summary of project components and mitigation credits
(Appendix A). The location of each Site component is depicted in Figure 2 (Appendix A).
1.3.2 Restoration Type and Approach
The proposed mitigation included the following:
• Roses Creek — Restoring dimension, pattern, profile and riparian buffer and cattle
exclusion (fencing) to 3,681 existing feet (3,181 restored feet) of Roses Creek.
ERZ ICA 2

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
• Roses Creek — Enhancement II through providing riparian buffer and cattle
exclusion (fencing) of 38 existing linear feet.
• UT 1 — Restoring dimension, pattern, profile and riparian buffer and cattle
exclusion (fencing) to 267 existing feet (297 restored feet) of UT 1.
• UT 1 — Enhancement I through providing an appropriate dimension and restoring
the profile and riparian buffer of 633 existing linear feet.
• UT 2 — Restoring dimension, pattern, profile and riparian buffer and cattle
exclusion (fencing) to 610 existing feet (707 restored feet) of UT 2 through the
pasture.
• UT 3 — Restoring dimension, pattern, profile and riparian buffer and cattle
exclusion (fencing) to 558 existing feet (621 restored feet) of UT 3.
1.3.3 Roses Creek Restoration and Enhancement
Roses Creek experienced bank failure leading to the deposition of sediment (from
channel inverts and banks) and nutrient (from cattle) loading to on-site and downstream
receiving waters.
The mitigated portions of Roses Creek included restoring bank height ratios to 1.0
through Priority I restoration; meandering the channel away from existing terrace slopes
and back to the low point of the valley; providing bankfull benches as restored channels
tie to the existing channel at the upstream and downstream extents of the Site; restoring
a more natural and stable plan form and spacing of riffle -pool sequences; installation of
wood and rock structures for grade control and habitat improvement; restoration of a
vegetated riparian buffer; and removal of agricultural operations from the channel and
riparian buffer through fencing. The proposed channel was designed as a moderate
width to depth ratio, C type channel that conveys a bankfull discharge of approximately
300 cfs.
Restoration limits all agricultural operations crossing Roses Creek to the existing road
crossing on Sisk Farm Road. The road crossing is not contained within the
conservation easement.
Exclusionary fencing was installed along the easement boundary to exclude cattle and
clearly demarcate the easement boundary for the landowners. A riparian buffer
populated with native vegetative species was planted within the proposed conservation
easement. HDRJICA had all trees 12 inches and greater within the buffer surveyed.
The survey was used during the stream channel design to ensure that mature tree
disturbance is limited to the greatest practical extent possible during construction. Any
portion of the existing buffer that was removed to facilitate restoration of Roses Creek
was replanted with native vegetation.
ERZ ICA 3

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
Several sections of the existing channel were not completely filled during construction.
These abandoned pockets of channel serve as ephemeral floodplain pools that may
experience periodic wetting for substantial periods throughout the year. These
ephemeral pools provide semi -aquatic habitat for flora and fauna within the proposed
conservation easement while also acting as BMP's by collecting storm water runoff from
the adjacent agricultural operation and detention of overbank flows from the restored
stream channel.
The downstream 38 linear feet of Roses Creek received Enhancement II. This portion
of Roses Creek is stable and received no physical modifications of the stream channel.
Roses Creek was enhanced by installing exclusionary fencing to remove cattle from the
stream channel and the adjacent riparian buffer. The buffer inside of the easement area
was be restored by planting native vegetation.
1.3.4 UT 1 Restoration and Enhancement
Stream channel restoration of pattern, profile, dimension and riparian buffer was
constructed for approximately 289 linear feet of UT 1. Prior to construction UT 1 had
been straightened and channelized immediately downstream of a soil road culverted
crossing. This soil road crossing is outside of the proposed easement area.
Restoration activities on UT 1 included restoring 254 linear feet of UT 1 to an
abandoned portion of the historic channel that is immediately east of the existing
channelized reach. UT 1 was only restored through the noticeable historic channel and
ties back to the existing channel at its downstream extent.
An additional 35 linear feet of UT 1 was restored near the middle of UT 1 within the
proposed easement where an existing and dilapidated pipe culvert was located. The
dilapidated culvert and road crossing was removed from the proposed easement area.
UT 1 was day -lighted within the limits of the culvert's footprint in an effort to restore a
stable and more nature channel section and profile. Both sections of channel
modification are Priority 1 restorations which allow out of bank flows access to the
historic floodplain.
The riparian buffer was restored by planting native vegetative species within the
proposed conservation easement and exclusionary fencing has permanently removed
agricultural operations (i.e. cattle and equipment access) from the channel and riparian
buffer. Additionally, a power line easement that was previously crossing the proposed
upstream restoration reach of UT 1 was relocated to a location north of the conservation
easement. It is noted that there are no crossings or easements bisecting UT 1 within
the proposed conservation easement.
ERZ ICA 4

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
The abandoned section of existing channel adjacent to the restored portion of UT 1 was
not completely filled during construction. The abandoned pocket of channel serves as
an ephemeral floodplain pool that may experience periodic wetting for substantial
periods through the year. This ephemeral pool provides semi -aquatic habitat for flora
and fauna within the proposed conservation easement while also acting as BMP's by
collecting storm water runoff from the adjacent agricultural operation, and detention of
overbank flows from the restored stream channel.
Enhancement II was proposed for the large majority of UT 1 within the Site.
Investigations into channel stress have revealed that hoof shear on the invert and side
slopes was the primary impediment to stability, therefore Enhancement II activities
concentrated on removal of cattle from the channel and its adjacent buffer. Additionally,
planting of deep rooting vegetative species along the channel banks promote soil
stability and deposition of seed along the side slopes, which stabilize areas that have
experienced degradation from hoof shear.
No crossings are located on UT 1 within the proposed conservation easement, ensuring
stability of UT 1 to its confluence with Roses Creek within the proposed conservation
easement.
The currently denuded and regularly maintained riparian buffer was restored by planting
native vegetation within the proposed conservation easement. Restoration of the
riparian buffer promotes terrestrial, aquatic and semiaquatic foraging, propagation, and
cover habitat. Additionally, the restored buffer connects UT 1's riparian corridor with
Roses Creek's restored wooded riparian buffer; and enhances the floodplains ability to
uptake nutrients and settle other pollutants from high flow events.
1.3.5 UT 2 Restoration
Stream channel restoration of pattern, profile, dimension and riparian buffer was
constructed for approximately 707 linear feet of UT 2. UT 2 was restored through the
pasture within the Site, beginning at the upstream agricultural crossing and ending at its
convergence with Roses Creek. The existing channel was modified and relocated from
its natural valley position to a point at which it flowed adjacent to the existing soil road.
Bankfull flows were entrenched in the existing channel and are abandoned from the
historic floodplain causing high stress on the channel banks. The channel was restored
back to the low point of the valley and moved away (to the west) from the soil road
through Priority 1 restoration. An aerial power line previously paralleled UT 2 and Sisk
Farm Road. Several sections of the power line were located directly above the channel,
with the power line's easement affecting UT 2's riparian buffer. HDRJICA coordinated
with the landowners and Rutherford Electric Membership Corporation to relocate the
power line to the east of Sisk Farm Road in an effort to remove potential effects of the
ERZ ICA 5

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
power line and it associated maintenance easement from the proposed conservation
easement.
The proposed channel was designed as a moderate width to depth ratio C type channel
through a relatively steep valley (0.026 ft/ft). The pond located upstream of the
proposed conservation easement has modified natural flows through UT 2's reach.
Short pool to pool spacing (averaging near 3 bankfull widths) and grade control
structures are utilized throughout the restored channel in an attempt to dissipate energy
(through pools) and maintain a relatively low bankfull slope of 0.002 ft/ft between drops.
The low bankfull slope (and subsequent low stream power) is required in an attempt to
reduce bed scour because the channel's substrate is dominated by fine particles
(predominantly sand).
Several impervious channel plugs were installed in the abandoned portion of UT 2,
creating several linear ephemeral pools that parallel Sisk Farm Road. The ephemeral
pools may experience periodic wetting for substantial periods through the year. These
ephemeral pools provide semi -aquatic habitat for flora and fauna within the
conservation easement while also acting as BMP's by collecting storm water runoff from
the adjacent agricultural operation, runoff from the adjacent Sisk Farm Road and
detention of overbank flows from the restored stream channel.
It is noted that there are no crossings bisecting UT 2 within the conservation easement.
The existing culvert immediately upstream of the conservation easement was replaced.
1.3.6 UT 3 Restoration
UT 3 is a headwater, spring fed channel that was moved from its natural valley position
to the toe of slope of the adjacent hill slope along the adjacent pasture. Stream channel
restoration of pattern, profile, dimension and riparian buffer was constructed for
approximately 621 linear feet of UT 3. UT 3 was restored away from its current location
adjacent to the hill slope, to the low point of its natural valley, which was previously
utilized as pasture. The upstream most 120 feet of restored channel flows from the
channel's origins within a hill slope adjacent to the pasture. The valley slope of the
upstream most 120 feet of channel is relatively steep at approximately 0. 12 ft/ft. Pool to
pool spacing was set to a short distance (approaching every 2.5 bankfull widths) and
meander geometry limited in this portion of the reach in an attempt to dissipate flows
through bedform (i.e. pools) rather than planform. The remaining 500 feet of restored
channel flows through the floodplain of Roses Creek. Roses Creek's floodplain displays
a distinctly lower valley slope than the upstream most 120 feet of restored stream
channel. The meander geometry of UT 3 is much more sinuous through the lower
reach due to the lower valley slope, allowing energy to predominantly dissipate through
planform.
ERZ ICA 6

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
The proposed channel was designed as a moderate width to depth ratio C type channel
that conveys a bankfull discharge of approximately 2.6 cfs.
All agricultural operations including grazing cattle are fenced out of the tributary.
Access to the existing at -grade soil channel crossing has been removed. Several
impervious channel plugs were installed in the abandoned portions of UT 3, creating
several linear ephemeral pools. The ephemeral pools may experience periodic wetting
for substantial periods through the year. These ephemeral pools provide semi -aquatic
habitat for flora and fauna within the proposed conservation easement.
1.4 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data
HDRJICA provided engineering, design, and construction oversight services for the Site.
Construction began in February 2016 and finished in May of 2016. Site planting
finalized on May 27, 2016. Baseline monitoring field data collection occurred in May of
2016.
Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and
background information are summarized in Tables 2-4 (Appendix A).
2.0 SUCCESS CRITERIA
The performance standards shall be consistent with the requirements described in
Federal rule for compensatory mitigation project sites as described in the Federal
Register Title 33 Navigation and Navigable Waters Volume 3 Chapter 2 Section § 332.5
paragraphs (a) and (b).
Monitoring reports will be completed for 7 years or until agreed upon success criteria
are achieved and will be provided to the DMS for review by December 1St of each year.
Monitoring standards are determined using the 2003 USACE Wilmington District Stream
Mitigation Guidelines, 2011 NCEEP Monitoring Requirements and Performance
Standards for Stream and/or Wetland Mitigation and WRAP Technical Note 00-02
(Sprecher 2000).
2.1 Streams
Monitoring the restored stream reaches will be for geometric activity. Annual fall/winter
monitoring will include development of channel cross-sections on riffles and pools in
addition to visual observation of channel stability.
ERZ ICA 7

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
2.1.1 Stream Dimension
General maintenance of a stable cross-section and hydrologic access to the floodplain
features over the course of the monitoring period will generally represent success in
dimensional stability. Some changes in dimension (such as lowering of bankfull width)
should be expected. Key parameters such as cross-sectional area and the channel's
width to depth ratio should demonstrate modes of overall stability. Riffle sections
should generally maintain a Bank Height Ratio of 1.0 — 1.2, with some variation in this
ratio naturally occurring. Pool sections naturally adjust based on recent flows and time
between flows; therefore, more variation on pool section geometry is expected.
2.1.2 Stream Pattern and Profile
Pattern features should show little adjustment over the seven year monitoring period.
The profile should not demonstrate significant trends towards degradation or
aggradation over a significant portion of a reach. Bank height ratios of 1.0 — 1.2 should
generally characterize the profile. If over one third of the profile exhibits a bank height
ratio exceeding 1.2 then additional investigations will be completed to assess the
channel stability. Additionally, bed form composition may vary.
2.1.3 Substrate and Sediment Transport
There should be an absence of any significant trend in the aggradational or depositional
potential of the channel. Substrate measurements should indicate the progression
towards or the maintenance of the known distributions from the design phase.
2.1.4 Hydraulics
A minimum of two bankfull events must be documented within the seven year
monitoring period. The two bankfull events shall occur within separate years.
2.2 Vegetation
Vegetation success at the Site will be measured by survivability over a 7 -year
monitoring period. Vegetation survival must be at a minimum 320 stems per acre after
Year 3, 260 stems per acre after Year 5, and 210 stems per acre after Year 7. Planted
vegetation must average 8 feet in height in each plot at year 7 since the Site is located
in a designated Mountain County.
If the above performance standards for vegetation are met by year 5, then monitoring of
vegetation on the Site may be terminated provided written approval is provided by the
USACE in consultation with the IRT.
ERZ ICA 8

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
Should the performance criteria outlined above not be met during the monitoring period,
HDRJICA will provide DMS with their remediation proposal, detailing corrective actions
and/or maintenance actions proposed and an implementation schedule for said actions,
planned to meet the criteria. Upon review and approval of said corrective measures by
DMS, HDRJICA will implement the necessary corrective measures.
It is noted that plant species count may change after Year 1 surveys as plants may have
been misidentified during baseline surveys due to a lack of leaf -out.
2.2.1 Noxious Species
Noxious species will be identified and controlled so that none become dominant or alter
the desired community structure of the proposed Site. If noxious plants are identified as
a problem in the proposed Site, HDRJICA will develop a species-specific control plan for
approval by DMS prior to implementation.
Through coordination with DMS during the 7 -year monitoring period, HDRJICA, where
necessary, will remove, treat, or otherwise manage undesirable plant or animal species,
including physical removal, use of herbicides, live trapping, confining wires, or nets.
All vegetation removal from the Site shall be done by mechanical means only, unless
DMS has first authorized the use of herbicides or algaecides for the control of plants in
or immediately adjacent to the affected areas.
ERZ ICA 9

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
3.0 MONITORING PLAN GUIDELINES
3.1 Stream Monitoring Standards
3.1.1 As-builts and Baseline Conditions
As -built surveys shall be conducted upon completion of channel construction to
document baseline conditions. As -built surveys will include all measurements typically
documented during subsequent channel geomorphological surveys. A longitudinal
profile of the thalweg, water surface, bankfull, and top of bank, will be collected during
the as -built survey of the constructed channel to compare with future geomorphological
data, if necessary. Longitudinal profiles will not be required during routine channel
stability monitoring (years 1 through 7) unless the monitoring efforts demonstrate
channel bank or bed instability, in which case additional longitudinal profiles may be
required along channel reaches of concern to track changes in the channel and
demonstrate stability.
3.1.2 Channel Cross-sections
Roses Creek will have a minimum of 3 riffle cross-sections and 3 pool cross-sections.
Per the 2003 Stream Mitigation Guidelines very narrow streams generally require two
cross-sections per 1,000 feet. UT 1, UT 2 and UT 3 are all considered very narrow.
Channel cross-sections shall be monitored for 7 years, with monitoring events occurring
in years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. If supplemental monitoring is conducted, results may be
considered towards meeting performance standards.
Cross-sectional measurements will at a minimum include bankfull width, bankfull cross-
sectional area, bankfull mean depth, bankfull max depth, flood prone width, width/depth
ratio, bank height ration and entrenchment ratio.
A pebble count on Roses Creek will be completed at one of the riffle cross sections that
are to be monitored.
Bank pin arrays will be installed on the outside bend of each meander in which a cross-
section is located on Roses Creek. Pins will be a minimum of 3 feet in length at
intervals of 2 foot in depth on the facing of the channel bank. Pins will be installed at
the monumented cross-section in the upstream third of the meander bend and in the
downstream third of the meander bend. Pins will be installed flush with the face of the
stream bank. The length of exposed pin from the bank will be measured each
monitoring year and reported. The pin will be will be hammered flush with the bank
following measurement of the pin exposure length. Lateral exposure will be included in
each monitoring report.
ERZ ICA 10

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
3.1.3 Stream Gauges
Crest gauges were installed at the bottom of restoration on UT 1, the confluence of UT
2 and Roses Creek, the confluence of UT 3 and Roses Creek, and at the bottom of
Roses Creek. Crest gauges will be monitored regularly to track large flow events that
affect the site. Additionally, flow gauges were installed on UT 1, UT 2, and UT 3 to
confirm that restored channels are perennial streams. Monitoring feature locations are
documented in the monitoring Plan sheets located in Appendix D.
3.1.4 Visual Monitoring
Visual monitoring of all sections of the project shall be conducted in each of the required
seven years of monitoring to identify areas of concern in both the vegetated buffer and
restored stream channel. Visual monitoring of all sections of the stream project will be
conducted twice per monitoring year. Generally, one visual monitoring event will be
completed in conjunction with other stream channel stability monitoring (e.g., cross-
sections, bank pins, etc.). At least 5 months shall separate each visual monitoring
event.
Within the stream channel, visual monitoring shall be conducted along the entire length
of the channel to identify and document excessive lateral movement of the channel,
bank instability, instability/failure of in -stream structures, structure piping, headcuts,
beaver activity, excessive live stake mortality, invasive species, aggradation/excessive
sediment deposition, or other potential problems with the channel. Visual monitoring of
streams shall be conducted only by individuals that have been properly trained to
assess the stability of streams and condition of in -stream structures. If visual monitoring
reveals substantial adjustments to the channel pattern and if there are substantial
deviations in channel dimension and profile then the channel pattern will be surveyed.
Within the vegetated buffer, visual monitoring will be conducted by walking throughout
the entire Site to identify and document areas of low stem density or poor plant vigor,
invasive species, beaver activity, herbivory, encroachments, indicators of livestock
access, or other areas of concern.
The results of the visual assessment will be included in a plan view of the channel
identifying the location of each feature of concern, along with a written assessment and
photographic documentation of the feature. Once a feature of concern has been
identified, that same feature shall be reassessed on all subsequent visual assessments.
Photographs should be taken from the same location year-to-year to document
progression of the problem. The monitoring reports shall identify all features of concern
and recommended courses of action, which may include continued monitoring, repair or
other remedial action.
EN ICA 11

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
3.2 Vegetation Monitoring Standards
Seventeen (17) permanent plots (totaling greater than 2 percent of planted area within
the Site) have been be established within the proposed restoration corridor. Vegetation
will be monitored using the Carolina Vegetation Survey (CVS) protocols.
Vegetation plots will be monitored for 7 years, with monitoring events occurring in years
1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. If supplemental monitoring occurs, results may be considered towards
meeting performance standards. Year 1 monitoring will occur at least 180 days,
occurring between March 1 and November 30, following the completion of initial
vegetation planting.
Individual plot data for planted species must be provided. Plot data shall not be
averaged over the entire site to obtain a single figure for stem density. Enumeration of
the density of planted species: density = number of living, planted stems per acre.
Stems are defined as individual plants, where plants with multiple shoots are treated as
a single stem. Live stakes planted on the stream banks will not count toward meeting
the stem density requirements.
Volunteer plants growing within plots may be considered on a case-by-case basis in
determining whether a project has met the overall goal of re-establishing the vegetated
buffer; however, volunteer plants will be counted separately from planted vegetation in
the monitoring reports.
Monitoring events will also be used as a time to evaluate the presence of invasive
species which will be noted in the monitoring report.
3.3 Digital Photos
Permanent photo stations established at each of the 12 cross-sections and at every
vegetation plot provide photographic documentation of the Site. Photos of the stream
will be taken annually when vegetation leaf out is minimal. Vegetation photos will be
taken on the same day that vegetative cover surveys take place. All digital photo
records will indicate location, date and monitoring year.
3.4 Watershed
Any changes to the project watershed will be monitored and recorded. In the event that
a change to the watershed might introduce new sediment or changes in water flow to
the Site, such as a new development upstream, it will be closely monitored and
analyzed. Any significant effects to the Site's streams will be documented so that action
can be taken, if necessary. Additionally, rare or significant hydrologic and weather
events will be recorded in detail so that changes to the Site's streams can be
documented.
ERZ ICA 12

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
4.0 MAINTENANCE AND CONTINGENCY PLANS
If, during the course of annual monitoring it is determined the Site's ability to achieve
site performance standards are jeopardized, DMS will notify the USACE of the need to
develop a Plan of Corrective Action. In-house technical staff or engineering and
consulting services may prepare the Plan of Corrective Action. Once the Plan of
Corrective Action is prepared and finalized DMS will:
1. Notify the USACE as required by the Nationwide 27 permit general conditions.
2. Revise performance standards, maintenance requirements, and monitoring
requirements as necessary and/or required by the USACE.
3. Obtain other permits as necessary.
4. Implement the Corrective Action Plan.
5. Provide the USACE a Record Drawing of Corrective Actions. This document
shall depict the extent and nature of the work performed.
ERZ ICA 13

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
5.0 AS -BUILT STATE
This section documents the as-built/baseline condition. Appendices B & C include
Tables 5, 6, and 7 which detail specific geomorphic and vegetative data in relation to
the as -built conditions. As-built/baseline drawings are included in Appendix D.
5.1 As-built/Record Drawings
As-built/Record Drawings are attached in Appendix D.
5.2 Morphologic State of the Channel
Upon completion of grading and structure installation, a baseline survey was performed
for the entire restored length of stream and included 12 cross-sections. Baseline
morphologic data is summarized in Table 5 and Table 6 in Appendix B. Plots of the
profiles are shown in Figures B.1-13.3 in Appendix B. Cross-section plots and photos
can also be found in Appendix B. Cross-section photos were taken facing the
downstream direction.
5.3 Verification of Plantings
An initial evaluation of planted stems was performed per guidelines established in CVS -
DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) to verify planting
methods were successful and to determine species composition and density. Baseline
vegetation plot data can be found in Table 7 in Appendix C. Plot photos are also located
in Appendix C. Initial stem count measurements indicate an average of 945 planted
stems per acre (excluding live stakes) across the Site. In addition, each individual plot
met success criteria based on planted stems alone. A Final Planting List can be found in
Appendix C.
EN ICA 14

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
6.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M. T., Peet, R. K., Roberts, S. D. & Wentworth, T. R. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegeation. Version 4.2.
HDRJICA Engineering. Mitigation Plan Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site. Burke
County, North Carolina. September 29, 2015.
NCDMS. 2011. Ecosystem Enhancement Program Monitoring Requirements and
Performance Standards for stream and/or Wetland Mitigation.
Sprecher, S. W. (2000). "Installing Monitoring Wells/Piezometers in Wetlands," ERDC
TN -WRAP -00-02, U.S. Army Research and Development Center, Vicksburg,
MS.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), United States Environmental
Protection Agency (USEPA), North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
(NCWRC), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and North Carolina
Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. State
of North Carolina.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map - 1974. State of
North Carolina.
USGS, 1984. Morganton North Quadrangle, North Carolina, 7.5 Minute Series
(Topographic). Washington, D. C.
ERZ ICA 15

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
APPENDIX A
General Tables and Figures
ERZ ICA

U)
0 }, 0O
N
o M 0 0 0 0
m U wm a eco w w w
o • O
J
h
r.
3
a �
R p LL
i

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Roses Creek (DMS Project ID No. 96309)
Roses Creek, Burke County
DMS Project No. 96309
Credit Summary
Stream Riparian
Non-
Buffer
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Nutrient
Nutrient Offset
SMU Wetland
riparian
WMU
Wetland
4,798
Offset
Type R
RE R
RE
R
RE
Totals 5,009
Project
Components
Project
Stationing/
Existing
Approach
Restoration
Restoration
Mitigatio
SMU
PI PII
etc.
or
Restoration
Footage or
Component
Location
Footage/
n Ratio
or Reach ID
Acreage
Acreage
Equivalent
Roses
10+00-
3,643
PI
Restoration
3,181
1:1
3,121
Creek
41+81
Roses
41+81-
38
-
Ell
38
2.5:1
15
Creek
42+19
UT 1
10+00-
267
PI
Restoration
289
1:1
289
12+54;
16+11-
16+46
UT 1
12+54-
641
-
Ell
641
2.5:1
256
16+11;
16+46-
19+30
UT 2
10+00-
610
PI
Restoration
707
1:1
707
17+07
UT 3
10+00-
558
PI
Restoration
621
1:1
621
16+21
Total
NA
5,757
PI
Restoration/
5,477
1-2.5:1
5,009
Ell
* Stream Mitigation Units decreased by 60 to account for break in easement at the stream crossing
on Sisk Farm Road
FEZ ICA
Component Summation
Restoration
Level
Stream
linear
feet
Riparian Wetland
acres
Non -Riparian
Buffer Upland
(square feet) acres
Wetland
acres
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration
4,798
Enhancement
11
679
FEZ ICA

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Roses Creek (DMS Project ID No. 96309)
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Completion
or Delivery
Mitigation Plan
September 2015
September 2015
Final Design — Construction Plans
September 2015
March 2016
Construction
February 25, 2016
May 18, 2016
Temporary S&E Mix Applied to Entire Project Area
---
May 18, 2016
Permanent Seed Mix Applied to Entire Project Area
---
May 18, 2016
Bare Root, Containerized, and B&B plantings for
Entire Project Area
---
May 27, 2016
Mitigation Plan/As-built Year 0 Monitoring -Baseline)
May 2016
July 2016
Year 1 Monitoring
Year 2 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Year 6 Monitoring
Year 7 Monitoring
FEZ ICA

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Roses Creek (DMS Project ID No. 96309)
Designer
ICA Engineering
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Primary project design POC
Chris Smith [phone]
Construction Contractor
Land Mechanic Designs, Inc.
126 Circle G Lane
Construction Contractor POC
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Lloyd Glover 919 639-6132
Planting Contractor
Land Mechanic Designs, Inc.
126 Circle G Lane
Planting Contractor POC
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Lloyd Glover 919 639-6132
Seeding Contractor
Land Mechanic Designs, Inc.
126 Circle G Lane
Willow Spring, NC 27592
Seeding Contractor POC
Lloyd Glover [phone]
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resources — Triangle Office
Nursery Stock Suppliers
1) Dykes and Son Nursery, McMinnville, TN
2) Foggy Mountain Nursery (live stakes)
HDRJICA Engineering Inc.
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Monitoring Performers
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Ben Furr [phone]
HDRJICA Engineering Inc.
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Stream Monitoring POC
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Ben Furr 919 851-6066
HDRJICA Engineering Inc.
5121 Kingdom Way, Suite 100
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Ben Furr 919 851-6066
FEZ ICA

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
Table 4. Project Information
Roses Creek (DMS Project ID No. 96309)
FEZ ICA
Project Information
Project Name
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
County
Burke
Project Area (acres)
17.3
Project Coordinates (latitude and 35.850953,-81.819541
longitude)
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont / Mountain
River Basin
Catawba
USGS Hydrologic Unit
03050101
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
03050101060030
8 -digit
NCDWQ Sub -basin
03-08-31
Project Drainage Area (acres)
Roses: 3,309, UT 1: 35, UT 2: 47, UT 3: 10
Project Drainage Area Percentage
<1%
of Impervious Area
CGIA Land Use Classification
Agricultural/Pasture
Ecoregion
Northern Inner Piedmont
Geological Unit
Zab : Alligator Back Formation; Gneiss
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Roses Creek
UT 1
UT 2
UT 3
Length of reach
3,681 existing
900 existing
610 existing
558 existing
linear feet
Valley Classification
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
Drainage Area
3,309
35
47
13
acres
NCDWQ Stream
56
30
33.5
34
Identification Score
NCDWQ Water
WS -III; Tr
WS -III; Tr
WS -III; Tr
WS -III; Tr
Quality Classification
Morphological
Description (stream
E4, 134, and F4
B5, F5
B5
B5, G5
type)
Evolutionary Trend
Simon's
Could maintain
Stages:
a B type
Premodified »
channel in
Constructed »
majority of
G » B/E
G » B
Degradation
reach
and Widening
Or
F»B
FEZ ICA

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
Reach Summary Information (cont.)
Parameters
Roses Creek
UT 1
UT 2
UT 3
Underlying Mapped
0.04
Unison fine
Unison fine
Colvard sandy
Soils
CvA
sandy loam,
sandy loam,
loam.
Well Drained
Fontaflora-Ostin
Banister loam,
Colvard sandy
Fontaflora-Ostin
Groundwater/ Overbank
Flows
Complex
Fontaflora-Ostin
loam.
Complex,
Native Vegetation Community
Complex
Fontaflora-Ostin
Rhodhiss sandy
0%
Regulatory
Considerations
Complex
loam
Drainage Class
Well drained
Well drained
Well drained
Well drained
Soil Hydric Status
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sloe
0.0068
0.0350
0.0260
0.0268
FEMA Classification
Limited Detailed
NA
NA
NA
Native Vegetation
Piedmont/
Piedmont/
Piedmont/
Piedmont/
Community
Mountain
Mountain
Mountain
Mountain
Bottomland
Bottomland
Bottomland
Bottomland
Forest
Forest
Forest
Forest
Percent Composition
of Exotic Invasive
<5%
<5%
<5%
<5%
Vegetation
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland 1
Wetland 2
Size of Wetland acres
0.06
0.04
Wetland Type (non -riparian, riparian
riverine or riparian non-riverine
Riparian Non-Riverine
Riparian Non-Riverine
Mapped Soil Series
CvA
UnB
Drainage Class
Well Drained
Well Drained
Soil Hydric Status
Non -Hydric
Non -Hydric
Source of Hydrology
Groundwater/ Overbank
Flows
Groundwater/ Overbank
Flows
Hydrologic Impairment
Existing Cattle Pasture
Existing Cattle Pasture
Native Vegetation Community
Percent Composition of Exotic
Invasive Vegetation
25% (Microstegium
vimineum
0%
Regulatory
Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section
404
Yes
To Be
Permitted
Mitigation Plan
Waters of the United States — Section
401
Yes
To Be
Permitted
Mitigation Plan
Endangered Species Act
No
Yes
Categorical Exclusion
Historic Preservation Act
No
Yes
NCSHPO/Archeological
Survey
FEZ ICA

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
Re ulato Considerations cont.
Coastal Zone Management (CZMA)/
Coastal Area Management Act
CAMA
No N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes Yes*
CLOMR/LOMR
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No N/A
N/A
*The CLOMR was approved before construction. The LOMR has been supported by the local
floodplain administrator and is currently being reviewed by FEMA.
ERZ ICA

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
APPENDIX B
Morphological Summary Data and Plots
FN ICA

1240.0
Figure B.2 Roses Creek - Longitudinal Profile Cont.
1238.0
+Baseline Thalweg - 5/25/2016 Baseline Bankfull - 5/25/2016
1232.0
1236.0
$ 1234.0
c
1232.0
1228.0
co
1230.0
W
1228.0
v 1226.0
1224.0
1226.0
1224.0
AL
ca
1222.0
10+00.00
Figure B.1 Roses Creek - Longitudinal Profile
-^b-Baseline Thalweg - 5/25/2016 Baseline Bankfull - 5/25/2016
11+00.00 12+00.00 13+00.00 14+00.00 15+00.00 16+00.00 17+00.00 18+00.00 19+00.00 20+00.00
Sta. (ft)
Figure B.2 Roses Creek - Longitudinal Profile Cont.
+Baseline Thalweg - 5/25/2016 Baseline Bankfull - 5/25/2016
1232.0
1230.0
1228.0
v 1226.0
1224.0
AL
ca
1222.0
W
1220.0
1218.0
1216.0
20+00.00 21+00.00
22+00.00 23+00.00 24+00.00 25+00.00 26+00.00 27+00.00 28+00.00 29+00.00 30+00.00
Sta. (ft)

LU 1
Figure B.3 Roses Creek - Longitudinal Profile Cont.
t Baseline Thalweg - 5/25/2016 Baseline Bankfull - 5/25/2016
1223.0
1221.0
1219.0
268.0
1217.0
$
c
1215.0
264.0
1213.0
W
1211.0
260.0
1209.0
1207.0
10+00.00
11+00.00 12+00.00
30+00.00
31+00.00 32+00.00 33+00.00 34+00.00 35+00.00 36+00.00 37+00.00 38+00.00 39+00.00 40+00.00 41+00.00 42+00.00
Sta. (ft)
LU 1
Figure B.4 UT 1- Longitudinal Profile
s Baseline Thalweg - 6/1/2016 Baseline Bankfull - 6/1/2016
270.0
268.0
266.0
264.0
262.0
260.0
258.0
10+00.00
11+00.00 12+00.00
Sta. (ft)

1241.0
1240.0
1239.0
1238.0
C
1237.0
m
v 1236.0
W
1235.0
1234.0
1233.0
10+00.00 11+00.00
Figure B.5 UT 2 - Longitudinal Profile
—s— Baseline Thalweg - 6/1/2016 Baseline Bankfull - 6/1/2016
AL
12+00.00
Sta. (ft)
13+00.00
Figure B.6 UT 3 - Longitudinal Profile
4 Baseline Thalweg - 6/1/2016 Baseline Bankfull - 6/1/2016
1226.0
1225.0
1224.0
1223.0
c
0
1222.0
v
W
1221.0
1220.0
1219.0
10+00.00
11+00.00 12+00.00
Sta. (ft)

Z
Q
(D
Y -SX
m41�N- M O ��; O) O O
M O (V N O In
Ln �
1
1
O
O
C
�
1
1
1
16
m
-
O
'O
i5
1
O.
N
1
1
CD
_
O
1
1
1
N
O
L
2
YO
Y
C
O
(p
N
�
G
r
CO)
1
1
U
Y
M
@
m
0C
"O
O
—
7
U
X
1
1
f0
CO
m
O
m
Q
1
1
�
m
U'
1
T1
1
1
(06
m
p
Y
7
Y
Y
d
N
,. .. (U) uolle m .. .. .,
m41�N- M O ��; O) O O
M O (V N O In
Ln �
Z
O
O
C
16
m
-
O
'O
i5
CL
O.
N
CD
_
O
N
O
L
2
YO
Y
C
O
(p
N
N
g
p
t
U
Y
M
@
m
0C
"O
O
—
7
U
C
f0
CO
m
O
m
LU
�
m
w
C
(06
m
p
Y
7
Y
Y
d
N
V
m
ca
m
m
m 9
m
i m
Y
�
yp w
(6
m
7C
N O
t6 N
C �
m
O
C
E
0

�
(
. f
.tj
2" .
>�
?. �
<\
�5 \ �
\\� /�
�\�7*� � .
2� 26/
§� 6 f y�
:\\� `
�\.»�f�� .���
�.
.
`= �
/�� 2\
\�
.
�-
�\
. 2 ` � �
, f f� ,
. . .
,�;��
��m
�!}\�}% �
¢t��
��
� , J
�
�
\� � \ %� �
® »

ru
}
u
s
4i�F
i
O
O 2
—_
N
❑❑
N
N
¢
L
aaci
L
a_
3
C
m
m
m❑
N
L 2
Y
C
p
u
s
U
a
0
4i�F
i
O
O 2
—_
N
❑❑
N
N
¢
L
aaci
L
a_
3
C
m
m
m❑
N
L 2
Y
C
p
m
0
—_
7
Y
U
m
m
C m
O
cc
m
C
c C
m
2
U
m�
m
m
m m
Y
m
c
m
m
U
a
0

1■1■■I■I

iu��,
m 7f
\
)/.§©,
9� .

2S
�
-� �
0 co 0
a 6
�) 7 CO) / \ \ E \
k k) \ y
] 00o
] A 7 f CO
C:
co§) j {
{ \ co] /
/ 2
§

m
rCL
m
�
�
a
X �
G
T
�
s
1
lal
uoiaenai3
I
VI I
m
�
�
a
X �
G
T
�
s
lal
uoiaenai3

m
i
f
i
f
i
s
a
f
0 6 -SX
O
O
O
N
�e
75
1
O 1
1
m
c
x
IL 1
c
m
m
9
o
OO
N
C
a
X �
—
D
G
m
O
O
Y
in
T
LL
N
m
N
m
U
C
m
O
O
O
N
m
c
x
c
m
m
Y
OO
N
C
Q
—
D
m
O
O
Y
in
LL
N
m
N
m
U
C
m
c
m
m

., t.�
/� % . . �

m
a
a
0
S
0 m
1
Z
m
O
N
a
\
o?
K
Q
i
i
Iul uonenai3
II-
a
a
0
S
0 m
1
Z
m
O
N
a
\
o?
K
Q
i
i
Iul uonenai3
a
a
0

CO U) Z n
C Ta
C W
Z N w
❑ ° U Z
�1 J
U
W
O m Q
CL m
m
❑ N �
U chm
N Q
o ~
W
7
U
O
❑
0
_Z
w
0
F -
Z
0
2
W
Z
W
U)
In
.0..
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
C')
0 0
N N
0 0
N N
0
N
0
N
r
N m
O O
O
W
N=
M
O O
M=
V O
M O
N
c
m
�r
mo
mmmo
°'oN�v
00
v
o
v
m
00
Q
C
N
O
O
w O
r=
M=1�
M
m
N
O
Cr
.0010 OOO
r
N
N
O M
O
O
r
d
�.Oj o7
r
N N
O
O
M
s{
0
0 0
M
0 0
m
T
U
O
a O)
w N
00
0
0
O
O
O
y
O
O
O
10
Y q
G
O O
O O
O
N
V
O
U)
o
oM�co�
N O o
In — o
N N
C
C
�1 C
O
o
a
O
M M
O
VJ e `
Z
W C
N
m
a r
N
c N
W fO
O N
c
M
O
O
I�
O N
M
t0
V
m
O
d7 N
O
0
U
N O
O
O
N O
O n
M
N M
0
N
M 0 0:
� �
o
d
E
o
o
O
F16
N
U
A
0
W
v
a
m
'o
Q
w
ui
M
co
(O
x x
0
0 o
E
x�
x x
x�
x
x x
x °-
E K
-
g
o o
m m
x x
x x
d�
m
m w
2 t
.-
E
L
L y
N
L
N✓
K
a m
Y
V
0
Q w
0 L
'�
0 o
a`� a
Q
m a
d a>
_
K m
�o c
� 2:,E
m E
E m
o
"
2 9
= d
c
m m
o m
K
a
o
2
_� `o
= N
2 O
C X
A 0
r
L O
J N
J%
N N
0
m
3»
U
`
r
c
n d
'O p
N d
Q
O
y t0
O U
N L
i N
d 3
C t0
N U
O1 E
m C
d W
0 y
2
m
d U
.W
N
O
C Y
O
p
0 0
0 v
C
O x>
>l6
'O
O
E
U
N E
N U
d G
0
Nt0
C t0
o=
y 2
o
3
N
c m
d'
0
a N
0
y C
m
C
`m m
m
W O
v o
.[]
o 'C
`�
> N
y—
w
L
h-
N
—
O
r U
10
O O
m
m
LL
Y
Y m
y
y
w
W
a
N
in
U
0 m
m v
m
m
�•
o
U2
w
E a
o
�°,
y o
0 K
m Y
m
c
o
N
0
0
0
d
0 o
c g
v
co
2\'
U
���
o
e
aN
c
E R
N
m
Z
c
0°
m
v
`-`az
o
yo
(n
E
m
—
o
o
w
c`m
tRnO
....
y
E
m
U
x
d
b
m
c
m
x
d
A
D L
N >+
R
E
N
0
--
=
m
m
'O
M
IL
U
3
N
L
l6
c
r -
o
C
O
a
c
Z)
c
O
E
o
m
n
_
v
y
Q

M lnZo
�
c Aa
O c W
Z 0 0
°) UZ
w Y
J
W
Ocam Q
a m
Y J_
� N �
U m
aa) Q
p H
Z
w
C)
U
Q
0
Q
U
E
cl
C0
N
a
c
X
U1
N
d
c
0 0
o 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
W
ui
cq
I(]
W
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
60
66
V r
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
m M
CV
M N
N
M M
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
OI
OMI
r
OMI O
0 0
0 0
O
m N
N O
O
O
m O
O
N
cp N
O O
O
ON N
0 0
0 0
M m
N
O) O
M
m O
^
fop V
0
0
M
O
W
N
N
O
N
O
C
W
0
00 0
m�
p p
p 00
D7
N
O
O
O
�
O
O
M
p0
p
M
O
O O
0
M
O O
to O
'O p
O
O
N
O_ V
O O
O O
W O
O
m
2
In 60
O O
N
O
O
p
0 0
0 0
O
O
U
N
001 M
0
0
p
O
N N
N N
O
m A K
C
O O
O
O O
M O
O
OJ
�
th
tp V
r
O O
t0 O
E
C U.
d m
w
d
a N
O
N
t0
M
M
O
O
O O
O M
O
O r
O
U
M
M
M
M
o
�?�
0
jpN
O
Y
8I d
rn
a
s
a
a a
a a
rL
.�
O V
M (O
N M
D)
M N
a
N
N
C
N
C
N
C
N N
C C
N N
C C
r
O
c0
O
LL
O O
O (00
O N
V% Y )
x
W cc
o W
O O
N
cp
O
E
E
E
to to
t0 to
O
N
Qj Qj
m m
O
d 0
a` V
U
U
U
U U
U U
uIU �
m o
M N r
F
h 7
N
c
d
E
0
0
0
d
d
ui
o
Co
Fes-
�
U
m
Wu
c
O
'pI
m
c
m
�
a
W
co
o
ri
t
O
O O
E
t
L
d
D_ m=
E—
(n
VI
o O
y y
w U
U
d
d o
W
r
d
p p
Q
E oI
a
r d
E oda
.t. .L.
c d
u m
m a
a_
s
'a
.t.
c s
d a
o e
K °m
a
^�,
N
m
Q
d�
E�+
o
r y
d d
c
m
o m
a K
3
K o
2
g 0
d
= d
`Y O
C x
N
to D
s
E d
d
J N
J x
0
M C
d>>
m
>
U
d
N
`
¢ «
:_
N a
d
'«�
d U
d u
i ui
d 3
c E
M t
y d
m C
y W
o
S i
S'
a N
O
Y
0 0
ad 'u
c
o Te
N
3
.d.
a
v
0 E—
�
i E—
o
U
�
N
c��
2
S m
0
W
m a
O
Y c
h 2i
c m
W
d
w
E
L
m
:Q m
a`I d
C d
m
o
a v
y
e r
E O
n
`°
m
v
y 0
c .2
tat
Fs-
d
O
O
r U
O
`°
U o
d m
._
W
N
E m
m
o
o
U
N V
p'
N
d
6
Y
C7
vI
-d d
E m
�+
w
'o_
.2
m E
m
C
c
m
d
O
LL°
E
a E
C
a
d
m
E
v
v
o
o
U)
N
E
d v
a
d
d
z
U
Y
z
c
A o
C\
N
a d
y m`
m
E
y
E
m—
c
a
c°
oo
`
'°
s
3
ma
a
"'
m
m
W
o
>U
m
c
-Mos
d
m
f0 d
E
x
N LI
s
d
=
W
a
m
.O
a
a m
N
m
O
ti
_
N
C
d
E
O
E
o
m
3
a
'o
a
a
rn
a
Q
U
E
cl

M U) Z n
C Ta
C W
Z N w
❑ ° U Z
�1 J
U
W
O m Q
CL m
m
❑ N �
U chm
N Q
o ~
W
7
U
O
❑
W
Z
W
U)
In
Q
_U
E
r)
c
0 0
o 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
c i M
N N
0 0
0 0
v v
N N
0
0
c+i
N
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
N o
O
v
n N
n
r
N
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
<p 00
N O
S
W
�
�
f0 M
O O
N l0
V �
M S
N •-
ynj
V
c0
O O
M N
N
m
U
o
0
n
n p?mo
a
Q
o m
O O
N 10
7 �
M O
� O
N
O
91
c
o a
r
N n
a nn
rn�
v o
roo
r N
M M
m
�
co moo
c.i �a�
ryon�na
vocio�
C
'
C
@
O
o
1 0
cR
0 0
0
M
O
O
O
n�
O
O
O
O
O
M
O
O O
(O N
M
O
to O
N S
n f0
(O
n
0 0
O O
0 0
0) N
N
d
o
IA
C7 N
O O
12
N �2
O
n
o
O
O O
O O
O
O
V
W O
O
Q
NO
O
o
r
M
O 0
N N
0 n
N N
o n
00
7 d d
O
N
O
0
0 0
0
N
E
GC
' C>
C m T
d
V 10
IA o
M O
N O
O'
m
M
T V
n0
C)
O
O 00
(D O
G LL
d y
N U
0
V N
C)
M
O
O M
O n
M
r J
y
N 0
y n
N
K
o
0
p
❑ SO'r
N Y
C
N
()
N y
'a
C
@d
O
N
N
N
�����
N N
N N
O
n
N
O
C C
O O
o w
Y H
x
W e
V
W F1
(O
of !�
NO
C
O
C�
�O �O
O
N N y
p
U
L
L
L
L L
L L
�p Ip
O
C` O
d U �
1
U
U
U
U ()(-)u
m VO) N
~
N �
W
c
o
0
0
y
�
o
cp
m
r
�
>
3
U
m
d
a
c
O
�
�
W
c
o
0
0
LO
o'
WEr
m
O
0m❑@
¢c
a
Ndd
dd
C
p@
'p LLDLL:
2o
X
N
£ d
x
d dO
X
g
U c
N
L
LL¢>
W
2>
m
76
mN
x@
O
a0 0
Ndd
0(O
c @
0_
n
d
U
oz
_D
O
W
o
U
frm
m
�U
m
O
p
o
mm
p
E
�
s
ai
a t
NL)
N
cc—
V)O
v
d
O
O
U
C
d
a
m
cJ
L
m
N
m LL
a
W
>
U
y
E
L
3
=
O
d
@
O d
N d
ry
W
V
m
C
U)
p
L
d
C
dFJ
4
c
C
d
00
Q
_U
E
r)

M U) Z n
C Ta
C W
Z N w
❑ ° U
�1 J
U
W
O m Q
CL m
m
❑ N �
U m
V)
N Q
o ~
W
7
U
O
❑
W
Z
W
U)
In
c—
o 0
0 o
rn
❑
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
v
Ci O
c0
N
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
O O
O
O O
O
E
X
0 7
c0 T
O n
0
M
c0
M
M O
O
d
O�
M 0
O
N S
M O
N S
u7
C
Ci
m cnp
N p
O
N n
M
N
V
O
O
O
O
❑
N
O
O
N
r
�j
1� M
N N
r I�
LLJ N
O
O
j
O
O
O
O
O
O
Cm
GG
c>
O
N
G LL
N O
r J
(n
N 0
y O
m
K
o
0
0 N
O O �
N Y
U
N
N
N M
N
N
C
N
C
N
C
N N
C C
N N
C C
O
O
N N
N
G
( 65cp Y N
X 'cc
W
N
O
O
O
C` O
yU Of
M Oq
M
N w 7
w
o
0
0
y
N
O
E
M
Cl?
O
cfl
>
3
U
m
N
d
O
�
W
�
�
O
O
x z
x z
0
0 o
E
x x
x x
x
E
w x
o o
w
x x
x x
r
a o
m o
r
>i—ym'°
❑gXN°
❑Glm0
¢.mm2NCo
.
mN
a�
m adC°
m>m a>g
NNo
o
._cm°
o
xLLV°o.
wLL0-16.
xm
N
Vd
Oo
X
O l0
m
Um>
Nm`
mo'
QNNa
am
S
?
�%Lo
>wm
;E
ti'mrn°
od
Ogo
es
o
E>
>
U
ro
c0
0o
oN..
-LLNCoa°
wm
n
a
e
o o
HU3m
ac0
o
c
U
ii
E
m
m
od
2 E
4m
o
o
yV
E
°_aL
Non
E
m
CL
n
m
q
c
o
c
N`
Ea
N
d
ad'�
wm
mE
ro
c
-
s
3
m
y
N LL
C
w
>
U
U)
C
w
m
m
a
En
K
o
c
m
ti
c
_
m
o
E
o
v
❑
a
a
m
¢

M U) z �'
o) C Tn
W
Z xo
0 �' (0-
u1
Y J
N m m (n
O N Q
d �� m
U) H
U
0 � �
U �?
co
Q) Q
o
12� z
LU
U
O
0
'c
o _
U }
Cn
N
O
ca
U ti
i m
d
d
E
R .F.
R }
a g
R
c
O_
0
LO
m }
pE in LL
O J
T
O O
O
N mCi
EM N
E Y
N Y d
c
Nm NaM
N O }
N 0 U
C N a y
0 o Cn
N
U N
O N
m U }
a`
x
r
c
m }
rn �
O
0
L
Q N
O n
� m
cz
fC
d
L
H
}
-M2 H M
N
N CSO 00 N O r Cl O w O w 00
V' N m n M N
CO
LO
}
V
d �
u�
C M
O }
U
N
N
N
U �
}
�:Hffl
2
N
Or
O n
M
COO
N
M
O
N
m
M
M
N
2
M
O M
O
O
O
V
p
N
d'
r
O
O
O
O
O
}
O
COO
CO
m
O
CO
O
p
w
7
N
LO
O
O
O
N
co
M
V
N
M
O
co O
N
N
CO
Cf)
V
m
cn
N
V
N
m
CMO
N
M(D
O
r
Cn
co
O
a_
CNj
O
Cl)
C
O
M
}
C�O
O
O
C
V
�
O
O
O
$
$
d
O
O
O
L L
L
L
NL
co
W
N
;0
L
L
L
N
N
V
N
N
a
C
L
d
N
N
C
L
}
-M2 H M
N
N CSO 00 N O r Cl O w O w 00
V' N m n M N
CO
LO
}
V
d �
u�
C M
O }
U
N
N
N
U �
�:Hffl
�liffl
:5
M
2
M
O M
O
O
O
V
p
N
d'
r
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
COO
CO
m
O
CO
O
p
w
7
N
O
O
O
N
co
M
V
N
M
O
co O
N
N
CO
Cf)
m
cn
N
V
N
m
CMO
N
M(D
O
r
Cn
co
CNj
O
$
C�O
O
O
C
O
O
O
$
$
O
O
O
L L
L
L
NL
co
W
cu
Of
;0
L
L
L
N
N
N
a
C
L
d
N
N
C
L
l
N
N
C
L
CC
❑❑
X
Q
N
E
_
T)
-y
—
C
C
0
X
Q
(0
❑
E
d
❑❑
C
X
Q
(CI
E
s)
_
@
N
C
O
w
Y
O
(6
N
l0
C
O
L
O
S
Y
7
O
Y
O
m
CU
CCI
C
O
Y
O
Y
CL
.L-�
C
c
Ci
C
m °
w
Y
fn
C
m
CO
°
w
Y
U)
>
C
m
m
m
°
O
Y
Cn
>
m
ll.l
m
Il.l
lJ.l
-
m
m
m
N
O
w
Y
Y
d
=
LL
C
N
m
m
y•^7
O
Y
w
7
Y
C
l.L
C
m
m
m
y
O
w
Y
O
7
Y
m
U
N
VO-.
C
m
d
m
U
N
C
N
d
m
U
N
C
N
m
m
in
ca
CO
to
m
m
w
Y
m
w
Y
m
m
L
w
Y
m
m
a
d
m
y
m
m
w
m
X
m
c
°
c
O
m
m

2
z
E
O
e
z
O
5
2
z
/
U)
<
co
\
§
0
\
\
Cl)
2
J
2
)
§
\
CD0
a .
7
e
m
9
M
9
g
£
2
=
o
o
r
§
k
C
{
/ � LL
LO
�
Cc
f t
Ems°/§
(�)
o
/
j } (
k
_
0
\
y
�
_
cu
{
f
0
/ci
)
-
k
]
\
.0
/
/
A
E
k
\
)
\
§
C
2
2
2\j
$co
0
LL
m
m
§)
2
§
co
%
]
]
E
2
�
2
/
/
0

M U) z Q'
�
C Tn
W
Z c6 o
0 �' U W
N Z_
Y J
N c6 CO0
O O Q
d m
U) C/) H
U
0 � �
U �?
co
Q) Q
O H
12� W
U
O
0
Z
E
O
H
Z
O
2
W
Z
J
W
U
Q
m
}
N
}
w
�
0
O
M
}
.O
d
U
N
y
O
N
U
}
g
c
0
y
0
U
ti
or--
d
v
n
or
m
o
cts
rr-
N
U
m
f0
M
O
O
N06
d
R
a
R
C
O
C
LO
N i
LL
}
p O
R
Y
a°
N
N
o U O
o
M
}
NR'
C
N H
O O =
d
y
�
U
N
y
OL
N
m
U
�
'a
T
S
C
R
}
O
O
L
Q
O
00
cl
M
O
CO
O
0
N
O
@
p]
U0
to
O
cq
O
N
!9
n
L
cD
4$
IR
L
L
L
L
N
(0
(0
CL
m
Cl.
o
d
Q
w
m>
C
C
X
(6
Q
E
L
N
2
Y
O
N
O
C
C
Y
m
OY
U
fn
'O
�
O
m
O
C
m
�
m
N
O
Y
7
Y
m
U
m
c
C
R
=
m
m
In
w
m
c
m
m
0
.N
G
d

2
z
E
O
e
z
O
5
/
/
U)
<
co
\
§
0
\
\
k
CO
)
2
)
§
\°
LO
£
2
/]
A
A\
%
CO
6
y
w
E
a
{
LO
\
\ j
.2 C-4
Ef0
§
E m
f
=2§R
o
Cl)
k }
CO
/
§
\
_
cu
{
f
f
}
§
/
a
2
$
2
a
§
]
-
k
]
\
.0
, \
\
/
(\
{
/
A
k
k
)
\
k
§
C
2
2
G}
j
co
0
m
§
)
2
§
co
%
]
]
E
2
�
2
/
E
0

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
APPENDIX C
Vegetation Data
FN ICA

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
Vegetation Plot #1 Baseline
Vegetation Plot #2 Baseline
FN ICA

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
Vegetation Plot #3 Baseline
Vegetation Plot #4 Baseline
FN ICA

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
Vegetation Plot #5 Baseline
Vegetation Plot #6 Baseline
FN ICA

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
Vegetation Plot #7 Baseline
Vegetation Plot #8 Baseline
FN ICA

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
Vegetation Plot #9 Baseline
Vegetation Plot #10 Baseline
ERZ ICA

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
Vegetation Plot #11 Baseline
Vegetation Plot #12 Baseline
FN ICA

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
Vegetation Plot #13 Baseline
Vegetation Plot #14 Baseline
FN ICA

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
Vegetation Plot #15 Baseline
Vegetation Plot #16 Baseline
FN ICA

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
Vegetation Plot #17 Baseline
FN ICA

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
Table 7. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Roses Creek (DMS Project ID No. 96309)
FN ICA

c
ra
a!
3
C
C
Q
s
3
41
O
a Y
L
L u
a)
a)
CL
C
3
O
u
E
a,
N
m
0
i
f0
a)
C
R
a
a!
ra
H
74,
-1
N
d'
1--i
r�
Ln
O
l0
O
N
CD
p
O
O
�
O
r-1
N
lzt
r-1
I-
Ln
O
lO
O
LL
_N
N
-
O
O
�
O
�
CL
O
N
-1
N
d
r�
Ln
rn
J
N
O
O
0
a
Ln
r -i
zt
Lr)
N
M
O
Q0
O
N
O
O
O
r-1
O
H
Ln
�
zt
Ln
N
m
O
L9
O
O
O
O
O
�
a
o
N
Ln
r-1
t
Ln
N
M
O
L.0
O
N
LO
O
O
0)
O
rI
a
Ln
N
N
r-1
r -I
Ln
l0
N
l0
r -I
N
r -I
�
O
o
Ln
N
N
r-1
-1
Ln
l0
N
LL
r -I
N
NO
c -I
O
�
a
o
Ln
Ln
N
N
-1
Ln
l0
N
M
J
-1
N
r I
O
a
a
r-1
r1
m
N
Ln
m
N
-1
00
00
0
Ln
r
O
O1
o
o
F-
?)
M
fV
Ln
m
N
-1
00
00
O
ri
LL
=
r I
ci
N
O
O
Ol
N
d
O
ri
m
N
Ln
M
N
ri
00
00
O
rn
J
rI
O
..
C1
r
CL
N
N
l0
r-
r1
r1
01
l0
O
0
d
r1
Ln
O
O
a
o
H
++N
N
lO
r-
ri
r -I
m
lO
O
a!
LL
_
e-{
r 1
N
O
Ln
Ol
3
�
d
U
O
V)
N
N
l0
.-1
01
l0
O
M
J
r 1
Lr)
L0
O
al
0)
O
a
M
m
N
l0
00
N
d'
L0
O
M
N
O
O
�
o
�-
M
M
N
L.0
00
rV
Zt
1.0
O
LL
_N
N
-j
O
O
rq
�
O
�
d,
a
O
Ln
M
m
N
l0
00
N
cP'
l0
O
M
J
N
O
w
O
N
01
O
r -I
a
c -I
M
Zt
Ln
l0
l0
O
LnOM
O
tNrN4'
CI'
Ln
l0
L.0
ONLn
r1
O
O
O
�
a
O
V)
r 1
m
Zt
Ln
Q0
N
r
O
N
w
O
I
O
c-
01
r-
a
10-
N
N
N
r-1
" jr
Ln
-I
-1
00
00
O
�-1
O
r -I
�
O
O
�
O
N
N
N
rl
't
Ln
--
c1
00
00
O
5
—
-1
N
O
r1
O
CL
o
m
N
N
N
r-1
d'
Ln
-1
-1
00
00
O
O
M
N
Nm
W
J
Cl
O
a
+' +' LU
H
Ou Ou Q
U
E
al
N aJ Q
.V
'V
-0
-0
(A N
N
O
a1
7
a1
�
a1
41
N
aJ
N
N
N
aJ
N
N a)
•�
a1
w
w
w
w
N
w
0)
w
a)
w
E
NcL
N
O
v
o
co
O
Z
O
rB
c
CC
4-
p
O
v
VL
N
N
aJ
C
v
L
C
u
Y
cD
_0(z
C
O
O
M
O
ca
v
u
1?
O
O
rci
u
U
O
Y
c
+�
L
E
o
y,
L
v
E
v
>-'
u
v
Q
v
m
,�
O
u
v
Ou
L
iO
(n
-0U.0
.�
Q
�
Q
v
+aro
E
Ou
ru
dJ
E
V)m
Z
ro
f6
.-_
V
U
.-
J
Q
+�
X
ro
`~
O
Ln
v
co
O
co
+'
v
c
m
c}
�_
=
m=
u
41
7
t
L
v
O
L
C
v
O
U
u
U_
L
b0
NL
a!
V
bA
+
±'
E
.�
Q
L
O
c
Q
co
ra
co
ro
v
N
a0
ro
rS5
r6
N
7
N
C
C
C
U
U
U
C
73
X
O
+�
N
N
a)
X
73
E
m
U
U
U
L L
LL
J
O_
V
V
U
V)

00
1.0
rn
o
Ln
�
rn
0
o
?�
oo
IZtrn
o
LL
_
-i
N
O
m
5
O
�
a
o
Ln
co
-I
t
"D
rn
o
M
-i
Ln
O
Q1
=
a
m
cY
—1
m
m
Ln
o
Ln
o
CD
?�
M
IZT-1
m
m
d
Ln
o
LL
=
N
O
O
s
�
O
0-
ck
o
0
N
m
�1--i
M
m
Ln
O
tD
o
rn
c
a
M
rl
M
N
n
N
00
l0
0
O
r -I
m
O
?�
m1
--i
m
N
n
N
co
�D
O
N
0
m
�
O
a
�
O
Ln
M
00
lD
0
M
-
O
tD
O
Ol
01
O
a
Ln
lD
m
ItT
O
�o
O
M
N
o
rl
O
O
�
Ln
�
�D
m
'tO
l0
0
LL
_
N
N
0
p
O
a
�
O
N
Ln
-i
lD
m
ct
o
�D
O
cn
-10
N
lD
O
O
cn
rl
a
c1
N
N
cn
00
Ln
O
N
O
r -I
al
O
�
-i
d'
N
N
m
00
Ln
O
N
O
i
Opl
C;
a
�
O
Ln
-i
't
N
N
m
00
Ln
o
M
J
-1
O
tD
O
Ol
01
O
a
N
N
lD
N
d'
O
l0
O
ri
N
o
ri
O
O
�
O
�-
d'
N
N
l0
N
o
l0
0
LL_
N
O
p
5
O
-i
a
�
O
N
�
N
N
L.D
N
�'
O
l0
O
N
lD
O
O
a
N
N
N
Ln
-i
ri
M
l0
r-
o
O
O
T -q
00
O
N
N
N
Ln
-i
-i
M
lD
I-
O
-{
N
LL-10
000
�
O
a
�
O
cn
N
N
N
Ln
c -i
i -i
M
l0
r-
o
tD
O
00
01
O
a
Ln
M
-o
O
l0
O
N
O
�
O
~
O
Ln
m
lD
o
N
I'D
o
O
_
a
N
0
O
o
a%
-i
Ln
cr
m
lD
o
lD
o
O
N
o
M
Ln
p
01
O
C
a
G!
4' ++ W
C Lnn C R
Lu m V
H
u u Q
V
E
Gl
N G! Q
O v
N w N
G!
v
D
N
D
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Ln
v
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
0)
N
N
H N
N
v
v)
Ln
H
H
H
H
-W
Y
O
v
41
v
E
:D
3:
O
u
m
s
t:4
o
Ln
Z
o
Z
M
m
CAO
O
O
�'
+-
m
O
O
U
Ln
cCJE
s
v
s
vT
41
41
U
4
N
v
c
U
mL
O
O
O
to
v
U
o
O
EC
C
Y
C
4L -'L
L
OU
�
m
NL
ca
N
d0
+
Q
Q
Gl
O
a
N
01
4!
M
E
+'
C
tB
U
m
L
rn
m
v
c
v
v
-
Z
co
co
V
+�
O
}
m
=
v
'L
o
u
v
r
L
O
L
a0
C
v
U
_U
L
LIP
N
aj
s
v
s
v
m O
cn
'�
ca
ro
�n
Ln
Ln
V)
"nLiA
m
n a
m
mn
7
7
c
a�
-a
c
u
v
u
c
N
v
C
—
+-+
sc
Q
i
i
X
X
m
L
L
L
C
RS
M-
' L
(i5
73
m
U
U
U
LL
LL
J
O_
r�Y
V
r
V
r7Y
V
l�

l0
Ln
N
'T
m
'T
N
m
N
c -I
00
n
I\
LD
m
00
N
Ln
I-
1--I
Ln
lD
N
rl
m
lD
Ln
N
M
ch
N
M
N
—i
00
I�
r�
lD
m
00
N
Ln
I-
�—I
Ln
lD
N
N
r
m
r -I
O
Vf
lD
Ln
N
zt
m
lzt
N
m
N
00
I-
r-
LD
m
00
J
N
Ln
I-
rH
Ln
lD
N
rl
'i
O
m
c
�
a
m
N
N
�r
Ln
Ln
0
0
n
[01
00
o
F-
0
9
m
N
N
�t
Ln
l0
Ln
O
_
rI
N
O
rl
O
co
a
o
cn
m
N
N
cr
Ln
lD
Ln
o
O
M
(0
N
J
00
cn
O
C
a
a)
+� +� Lu
O L^L
O J=Q-
u
3 - W 3 U
u :M u ° Q
al
N a! Q
al
aJ
7
aJ
7
N
a1
aJ
a1
aJ
a1
aJ
a1
aJ
V1 a1
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
El
N
N
�+
Y
_0
O
a)
a)
-C
a)
E
73
?
v
O
u
co
-0
M
O
Ln
Z
C
O
2
1
Ln
O
+�
�+–
O
O
v
3
CC
-0
v
`^
v
Y
Y
O
41
Oc
U
�
C
v
w
i
N
v
C
U
('6
m
O
C
C
O
V
-Q
O
ra
O
f0
M
v
U
•i
Q
p
o
§
u
E
C
�
yi
C
+'
E
i
Y
i
Z
j
)
2
U
O
pU
Y
V
L
f6
N
-0
dA
a-+
Q
Vi
Q
al
O
a
N
�
4C!
ro
M
G
+
C
tB
U_
ra
i
m
v
C
v
._
Z
(O
f0
O
w=
p
,O
:3
N
N
O
u
+�
�
C
C
}
�_
m
co
—
m
v
.L
U
v
�
i
O
C
C
O
U
v
_U
i
aJ
'V
0A
s
+�
v
-
E
.0
a1
Q
i
O
C
Q
(D
a
E
O
Lncato
n
n
0
Ln
0A
ra
0-
V)
V)
73
:3
C
D
C
a)
-0
c
v
u
v
u
v
u
c
v
c
75T<
a
i
Xp+
'i
a)
V)
C
fII
m
(O
C
C
CO
U
U
U
Ll
LL
J
CL
�C(
V
V)

DMS Project ID No. 96309
Roses Creek Stream Mitigation Site
Burke County, NC
BASELINE MONITORING DOCUMENT & AS -BUILT BASELINE REPORT
APPENDIX D
Record Drawings
ERZ ICA

C
O
0
I
-C
U)
n
I
L
U
In
a�
0
LO
U
c
3
0
L
0
L
0
0
a�
CC
0
L
/
E
O
N
L
/
In
0
L
0
L
I
c
L
0
I
N
U0
m
I
O
a
OI
Ul
00�s
W
W
ti
I
( 181
It
�\ I
0 PISGAHNA77ONAL ����_ 1263
� � FOREST °h � -
ere
\ 1261 ,I
�
%Tabkrock5tate\ -1258
1240 �.-
` Table Rock
1240 \
y - 1 0 1240 '`� 181
I
-
/meek
--SIL G 1240 Rd`
4��y % 1240 1256 12 7
VICINITY MAP
RECORD DRA WINGS
ROSES CREEK
LOCATION: B URKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
LAT: 35051`01" N LONG: -81049) 11" W
TYPE OF WORK: STREAM RESTORATION
(CLEARING, GRUBBING, GRADING, EROSION
CONTROL AND PLANTING)
BEGIN UT 1 _
STA 10+00.00
III�� iJ
BEGIN ROSES GREE
STA 10+00.0JV'
79
` 1F .80_
/ f .
_ an E'er
,5045\
\`�// RECORD DRAWINGS
\ �J tk CAR /� j This record drawing has been prepared in part,
• • • . / based upon information furnished by others.
`��►O Es$/O ;�� While this information is believed to be reliable,
•• the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and
E thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this
6record drawing or for any errors or omissions
which may have been incorporated into it as a
••�3 �6•� Z:result. Those relying on this record document are
��'�j • �G �. advised to obtain independent verification of its
�j/t��O• , 1 N f; . ga►���� accuracy before applying for any purpose.
'HER L`,���`
STA 42 + 22.56
O
In
DATA
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
l
& STATIONING
----------
THALWEG
BANKFULL
- - - - - - -
EPHEMERAL POOL
e
- --
CONSERVATION
10
EASEMENT
�
FENCE
111
D/. UT' 1
PROPOSED DESIGN
{
i
19+5
9 {;
REVISION
6XS-1 •
CROSS-SECTION
BEGIN ROSES GREE
STA 10+00.0JV'
79
` 1F .80_
/ f .
_ an E'er
,5045\
\`�// RECORD DRAWINGS
\ �J tk CAR /� j This record drawing has been prepared in part,
• • • . / based upon information furnished by others.
`��►O Es$/O ;�� While this information is believed to be reliable,
•• the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and
E thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this
6record drawing or for any errors or omissions
which may have been incorporated into it as a
••�3 �6•� Z:result. Those relying on this record document are
��'�j • �G �. advised to obtain independent verification of its
�j/t��O• , 1 N f; . ga►���� accuracy before applying for any purpose.
'HER L`,���`
STA 42 + 22.56
O
In
DATA
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
l
& STATIONING
----------
THALWEG
BANKFULL
- - - - - - -
EPHEMERAL POOL
e
- --
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
- X-
FENCE
LOD
LIMITS OF
PROPOSED DESIGN
DISTURBANCE
CONSTRUCTION
50 25 0 50 100
REVISION
6XS-1 •
CROSS-SECTION
LOCATION
GAUGE
EXISTING
STREAM LENGTH
WETLANDS
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
- -- - ---�
5 x 20 VEG PLOT
BRUSH TOE
ROCK L -VANE
ROCK
CROSS VANE
= 3,219.20 FT
ROCK STEP
FT
STRUCTURE w/
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ �
OWN
BOULDERS
C4
ROCK STEP
C5
STRUCTURE vv/
C5
CLASS B RIP RAP
C5
ROCK /LOG
= 930.38 FT
CROSS VANE
FT
Raleigh, NC 27607
FLOODPLAIN
BANKFULL AREA (FT) =
INTERCEPTOR
GRAPHIC SCALES
DESIGN
DATA
PROJECT LENGTH
Prepared in the Office of
PROPOSED DESIGN
ASBUILT
50 25 0 50 100
ROSES CREEK
UT 1
UT 2
UT 3
STREAM LENGTH
STREAM LENGTH
5121 Kingdom Way,
ICASuite
- -- - ---�
-
ROSES CREEK
= 3,219.20 FT
3,222.56
FT
100
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ �
OWN
DESIGN STREAM TYPE =
C4
DESIGN STREAM TYPE =
C5
DESIGN STREAM TYPE =
C5
DESIGN STREAM TYPE =
C5
UT 1
= 930.38 FT
950.69
FT
Raleigh, NC 27607
PLANS
BANKFULL AREA (FT) =
66.4
BANKFULL AREA (FT) =
CROSS-SECTIONED
2.1
BANKFULL AREA (FT) =
CROSS-SECTIONED
2.1
BANKFULL AREA (W) =
2.6
UT 2
= 707.59 H
710.07
FT
Engineering "cense No: F-0258
10 5 0 10 20
CROSS-SECTIONED
CROSS-SECTIONED
BANKFULL WIDTH (Fr) =
MAX DEPTH (FT) =
WIDTH /DEPTH RATIO =
30.5
2.72
14.0
BANKFULL WIDTH (FT) =
MAX DEPTH (FT) =
WIDTH /DEPTH RATIO =
5.0
0.58
13.0
BANKFULL WIDTH (FT) =
MAX DEPTH (FT) =
WIDTH /DEPTH RATIO =
5.0
0.58
13.0
8ANKFULL WIDTH (FT) =
MAX DEPTH (Fr) =
WIDTH /DEPTH RATIO =
5.5
0.63
13.1
UT 3
= 621.03 FT
627.80
FT
PROFILE
_
(HORIZONTAL)
DRAINAGE AREA (MF) =
5.17
DRAINAGE AREA (MR) =
0.06
DRAINAGE AREA (MF) =
0.07
DRAINAGE AREA (MF) =
0.02
INDEX OF SHEETS
20 10 0 20 40
BANKFULL SLOPE(FDM =
0.0062
BANKFULL SLOPE(FEfT) =
0.0021
BANKFULL SLOPE(FTif17 =
0.0021
BANKFULL SLOPE(FWO =
0.0021
TITLE SHEET .................... ,,..1
CHRISTOPHER L. SMITH
RECORD DRAWING OVERVIEW MAP ..... 2
RECORD DRAWING
PLAN SIZEETS....................................................3 - 10
PROJECT MANAGER
- - - ---
PROFILE (VERTICAL)

S6Z�
RECORD DRAWINGS OVERVIEW MAP
oW11111o
RECORD DRAWINGS
C �► R p
1/y
0
�,s record drawing has been prepared in part,
sed upon information furnished by others.
•
�� +�' •
Jode this information is believed to be reliable,
t% Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and
a
thZ is not responsible for the accuracy of this
\=
• 0 �.
i '• •
r ee�,�erd drawing or for any errors or omissions
h may have been incorporated into it as a
��eeccuult. Those relying on this record document are
,�
i
kG �•
�bdvised to obtain independent verification of its
PHE� ;���
��accurary before applying for any purpose.
--------
EPHEMERAL POOL
,z4a=
CONSERVATION
1 ti 0ezi m�'
—oeZt s zi��
S
9Zt N �
og
Un
�5ti ��azSCzt- RECORD DRAWING PLAN SHEETS SEE SHEETS 3 THRU 10
3 O
�o
ONw
,0 OO u —
uovzz
aZ
Ln
C
.m
L
d
C
W
H
U Q
LU Z
I_
0 J
ce
CL CeQ
heZLU
V
w0
U~ 0
w0 Z
to t—
CeUj Z
O
W
Uj he
W W
V! D
m
O
N
W
J
U o
(n rn
_U Z
2 S
CL o
OD
0
0
DATE: 07-18-16
RECORD
DRAWINGS
OVERVIEW
AMP
SHEET
2
EEP# 963090
LEGEND
o
0
LO
r
-
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
I
I
& STATIONING
------------
THALWEG
BANKFULL
--------
EPHEMERAL POOL
_E
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
X—
— FENCE
LOD
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
XS -1
CROSS-SECTION
LOCATION
GAUGE
CONSTRUCTION
REVISION
EXISTING
WETLANDS
,
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
5 x 20 VEG PLOT
BRUSH TOE
ROCK L -VANE
ROCK
CROSS VANE
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE w/
BOULDERS
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE w/
CLASS B RIP RAP
ROCK /LOG
CROSS VANE
:�$
FLOODPLAIN
'��s�
INTERCEPTOR
3 O
�o
ONw
,0 OO u —
uovzz
aZ
Ln
C
.m
L
d
C
W
H
U Q
LU Z
I_
0 J
ce
CL CeQ
heZLU
V
w0
U~ 0
w0 Z
to t—
CeUj Z
O
W
Uj he
W W
V! D
m
O
N
W
J
U o
(n rn
_U Z
2 S
CL o
OD
0
0
DATE: 07-18-16
RECORD
DRAWINGS
OVERVIEW
AMP
SHEET
2
EEP# 963090

m
i
a
U
N
N
0
rr
0
0
L
O
O
a
rr
i
0
S_
E
A
L
Y)
N
Q)
L
010
L
L
0
3
i
N
i
C9
O
U
o�
N/
MATCHLIN ET 81
SEE SHE
r0 VP2 c
0
O � '�o>_
'3
0
U_
O
CO
Q �
10
24
2;
!O
h \ O
4
A�
n
BEGIN ROS
STA 110 + 00.
N
O
I
—CREEK
RECORD DRAWINGS
LOD _
cn
N 01O�
X00 to -
__
R
ROSES CREEK
STA
11+00.90
END UT 1
STA 19+50.69
a0l
VP3
OA
4
00 ' CONTROL POINT
RBC -KEE" 505
N: 776804.78.
E: 1163861.97'
ELEV: 1238.0'
X0
RECORD DRAWING PROJECT OVERVIEW MAP SEE SHEET 2
RECORD DRAWING PLAN SHEETS SEE SHEETS 3 THRU 10
FLOODPLAIN'
INTERCEPTOR
00 -
F\o'N
0 1235
OOH
DO7
I r /► r \ s F1
0
0
\\%IIIII/////
RECORD DRAWINGS
DISTURBANCE
//�
This record drawing has been prepared in part,
�1 ��CARO,
• • / /
/I
+ $1O/'/ '
based upon information furnished by others.
While this information is believed to be reliable,
& STATIONING
• �S ��
tD �( ' i
the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and
thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this
��
' E A •
record drawing or for any errors or omissions
'O
'
which may have been incorporated into it as a
• --
�
%%accuracy
result. Those relying on this record document are
advised to obtain independent verification of its
to
C*�• p ,/+�-•
APG I
before applying for any purpose.
0
S�oPMEa�
llilll
FLOODPLAIN'
INTERCEPTOR
00 -
F\o'N
0 1235
OOH
DO7
I r /► r \ s F1
0
0
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
CONSTRUCTION
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
XS -1
& STATIONING
•------------
THALWEG
BANKFULL
s - — - — - —
-- EPHEMERAL POOL
E
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
X
FENCE
1235
3 coo
�a
I~ O N rl.
�
O1-4 OU-. vz „
VP4 z z
\X
0
S G� W
LOD
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
CONSTRUCTION
REVISION
XS -1
CROSS-SECTION
LOCATION
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
5 x 20 VEG PLOT
BRUSH TOE
U Z
W J
00
v
heZ
Uj
u� o
w0 Z
V)
neLU
ix z
O
W
LU
L�
ym
W
J
VLn
N N
V Z
= g
L o
�.L
N
DATE: 07-18-16
RECORD
DRAWINGS
SHEET
3
EEP# 96309
GAUGE
ROCK L -VANE
ROCK
CROSS VANE
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE w,'
BOULDERS
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE W/
CLASS B RIP RAP
:�:�
FLOODPLAIN
INTERCEPTOR
U Z
W J
00
v
heZ
Uj
u� o
w0 Z
V)
neLU
ix z
O
W
LU
L�
ym
W
J
VLn
N N
V Z
= g
L o
�.L
N
DATE: 07-18-16
RECORD
DRAWINGS
SHEET
3
EEP# 96309

C
m
L
N
a
U
N
0)
N
0
D:
C
C
4
O
Drr
RECORD DRAWINGS ��
CARO //�� RECORD DRAWINGS
• • ''+ ' • • This record drawing has been prepared in part,
��`Q • •��► SS%O ' •�,'/�, based upon information furnished by others.
11 .' While this information is believed to be reliable,
j
te• • '' the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and
• S E L thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this
3 record drawing or for any errors or omissions
MAT C H LI N E U T 2 ( which may have been incorporated into it as a
• result. Those relying on this record document are
SSHEET 9
• advised to obtain independent verification of its
�' �/,/G' • � accuracy before applying for any purpose.
/ �•••• 1
_ . �L-L S'TAd..r_
3
(707OSES CREEP
20 + 51.!
aoi UT 2
STA 17+10.07
0
LIMITS OF
0
GAUGE
DISTURBANCE
tn
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
1
& STATIONING
------------
THALWEG
BANKFULL
— - — - — - —
-- EPHEMERAL POOL
E
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
—X
FENCE
LOD
LIMITS OF
GAUGE
DISTURBANCE
CONSTRUCTION
ROCK L -VANE
REVISION
XS -1
CROSS-SECTION
ROCK
LOCATION
CROSS VANE
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
ROCK STEP
,er-�
STRUCTURE w/
BOULDERS
5 x 20 VEG PLOT
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE w/
CLASS B RIP RAP
BRUSH TOE
$
FLOODPLAIN
INTERCEPTOR
1�
a01
j..`
E-rT64358.71'
ELEV: 1228.8'
mz
mm
i�
m°
mU'
Crn
m
3 C)Cq
�o
O cq
,cooU'o
zZ
.. t'
�z
.i
d
._
W
a
U Z
W_ J
O
CL V
YZ =
WOUj
H
CIC
cJ oo�� Z
WO
N N
OOC LU Z
O
\ W
� N
u g
C -Q
T 4 /fi DATE: 07-18-16
T RECORD
DRAW_ ! NG
----- P- _ N SI EET
SHEET
RECORD DRAWING PROJECT OVERVIEW MAP SEE SHEET 2 4
RECORD DRAWING PLAN SHEETS SEE SHEETS 3 THRU 10
EEP# 96309

ori I ✓—
Nt0NTROL POINT
y " RBC (501)
N N: 775 A'
E: 1164568.34
ELEV: 1229.8'
3
0
E
4
N
N
M
U
L
ai
s
�T3 0
F
C9
'C':))j RECORD DRAWING PROJECT OVERVIEW MAP SEE SHEET 2
9a, RECORD DRAWING PLAN SHEETS SEE SHEETS 3 THRU 10
-
I
'0CF
CONTROL POINT
E: 1164687.44'
ELEV: 1226.1'
mt
nr-A"% A--knr% r%n ♦IAi1► Ii•d►
T1* ce7:77 0A1."1IN, 14&i
This record drawing has been prepared in part,
based upon information furnished by others.
While this information is believed to be reliable,
the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and
thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this
record drawing or for any errors or omissions
which may have been incorporated into it as a
result. Those relying on this record document are
advised to obtain independent verification of its
accuracy before applying for any purpose.
401 (101
- ----- - , x:(707
(707 CIO,
------------ QOM
0
LIMITS OF
0
DISTURBANCE
CONSTRUCTION
tn
r
REVISION
`XS -1
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
II
& STATIONING
------------
THALWEG
BANKFULL
— - — - — - —
- EPHEMERAL POOL
E
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
FENCE
X
LOD
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
CONSTRUCTION
REVISION
`XS -1
CROSS-SECTION
,611'�
LOCATION
F-1
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
5 x 20 VEG PLOT
STRUCTURE w/
BRUSH TOE
CLASS B RIP RAP
3 coo
� Zo
N r�
b 8 U
caz
„z
x`n•v�
a
Ln z
C
L
d
d
C
Of
W
t- a
;o
CQ
°- V
heZ
Uj
VO O
t� z
cw O
adLU Z
i 0
LU LU
N w
m
0
LU
J
V
N N
_V Z
2 S
C
V
N
DATE: 07_18-16
RECORD
DRAWING
PLAN SHEET
SHEET
5
EEP# 96309
GAUGE
ROCK L -VANE
ROCK
CROSS VANE
ROCK STEP
,611'�
STRUCTURE w/
BOULDERS
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE w/
CLASS B RIP RAP
FLOODPLAIN
INTERCEPTOR
3 coo
� Zo
N r�
b 8 U
caz
„z
x`n•v�
a
Ln z
C
L
d
d
C
Of
W
t- a
;o
CQ
°- V
heZ
Uj
VO O
t� z
cw O
adLU Z
i 0
LU LU
N w
m
0
LU
J
V
N N
_V Z
2 S
C
V
N
DATE: 07_18-16
RECORD
DRAWING
PLAN SHEET
SHEET
5
EEP# 96309

C
pl
CD
m
r
N
O_
L
U
N
Ln
N
0
D:
M
S
3
O
L
0
L
0
0
0
L
E
A
N
L
N
N
N
L
0)
0
L
L
0
3
RECORD DRAWINGS
RECORD DRAWINGS
/ This record drawing has been prepared in part,
ZZ�CONTROL POINT be
based upon information believed
by others.
1 While this information is believedd to be reliable,
RBC "KEE" 514 the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and
thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this
12 2 5
N: 776112.06' record drawing or for any errors or omissions
E• 1165366.13' which may have been incorporated into it as a
ELfV• 1223.7' result. Those relying on this record document are
• advised to obtain independent verification of its
accuracy before applying for any purpose.
'E' LOD
OD
- �-
f L0
k E _ LOD
LOD
LOD LOQ ROStS CREEK
STA 34+65.21
X END UT 3
�O
601 STA 16+27.80
---- t
VP12
cy
tp
s
r,
'%y, ,
%�
S� yVo
VP14
0
0
IvoWzz�
"GAUGE
(301 1001
CA,?
C,y ; .�.. ESs1p • �y
sy�cS' s� •; S 3JI L•
ccj.� r0pNE
'QFC 'ii����►R
N �L
00A -�
V0°
!1
`OO .
DOSS
- r '
00 1��
n'x�
RECORD DRAWING PROJECT OVERVIEW MAP SEE SHEET 2
RECORD DRAWING PLAN SHEETS SEE SHEETS 3 THRU 10
�o
+C) w
00U
z
z �. A
bo d
Z;a
4 az
eL
d
C
M
W
�z
Lu
02
CL
Z
W 0 ~
2o
WO}Z
'3 yF—
°a
O
W
H W
N
a0
�Pf
W
J
V N
N y
U Z
= g
CL 0
V
N
DATE: 07-18-16
RECORD
DRAWING
PLAN SHEET
SHEET
6
EEP# 96309
LEGEND
ROCK L -VANE
+
LOD
LIMITS OF
Ln
DISTURBANCE
________
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
CONSTRUCTION
ROCK
CROSS VANE
& STATIONING
REVISION
•------------
THALWEG XS-1ROCK
. CROSS-SECTION
STEP
STRUCTURE w/
BANKFULL
LOCATION
BOULDERS
ROCK STEP
— - — - — - —
-- EPHEMERAL POOL
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
STRUCTURE w/
CLASS B RIP RAP
E
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
®R'Fi
FLOODPLAIN
5 x 20 VEG PLOT
INTERCEPTOR
X
FENCE
ROCK /LOG
GAUGE
BRUSH TOE
CROSS VANE
CA,?
C,y ; .�.. ESs1p • �y
sy�cS' s� •; S 3JI L•
ccj.� r0pNE
'QFC 'ii����►R
N �L
00A -�
V0°
!1
`OO .
DOSS
- r '
00 1��
n'x�
RECORD DRAWING PROJECT OVERVIEW MAP SEE SHEET 2
RECORD DRAWING PLAN SHEETS SEE SHEETS 3 THRU 10
�o
+C) w
00U
z
z �. A
bo d
Z;a
4 az
eL
d
C
M
W
�z
Lu
02
CL
Z
W 0 ~
2o
WO}Z
'3 yF—
°a
O
W
H W
N
a0
�Pf
W
J
V N
N y
U Z
= g
CL 0
V
N
DATE: 07-18-16
RECORD
DRAWING
PLAN SHEET
SHEET
6
EEP# 96309

r
B
i
L
N
a
Y
L
U
V,
0
0
/
N
rn
3
0
0
0
/
0
/
E
A
N
L
N
N
01
O
.:
0
3
N
cD
/
CMD
0
9¢
lU
RECORD DRAWINGS
RECORD DRAWINGS
This record drawing has been prepared in part,
U based upon information furnished by others.
While this information is believed to be reliable,
the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and
thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this
record drawing or for any errors or omissions
which may have been incorporated into it as a
result. Those relying on this record document are
advised to obtain independent verification of its
accuracy before applying for any purpose.
122
--ee-
0,/
- s
1111
N 4.
v ww
LOD 2 �` Es io �'y'�� b z z
VPs :� l2 = .�s
�2 xZ b04)
03563 N
=44/1 / X00 = % ,\ �.`g`��� �_
EW
w XS -5
d
N
AZ`
oaf
W
VP17
GAUGECO
X
UP15 � 1 - / �� 007 121 l
CP
\ o°
(301h
�y
RECORD DRAWING PROJECT OVERVIEW MAP SEE SHEET 2
RECORD DRAWING PLAN SHEETS SEE SHEETS 3 THRU 10
SEI ROSES j
+22.56��Zti
097,1
U z
LU J
0
le Z
LU LU
°�
u� O
H0 Z
W
C41 H FT—
ce qj
oC Z
0
W
OC Y
N m
LU
J
V�
N H
V Z
= g
CL O
tL-
V
N
DATE: 07_18-16
RECORD
DRAWING
PLAN SHEET
SHEET
7
EEP# 96309
LEGEND
LOD
LIMITS OF
GAUGE
oc
DISTURBANCE
CONSTRUCTION
ROCK L -VANE
REVISION
I________
l
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS :XS -1
CROSS-SECTION
ROCK
& STATIONING
LOCATION
CROSS VANE
------------
THALWEG
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
ROCK STEP
BANKFULL
STRUCTURE w/
BOULDERS
— - — - — -
— - EPHEMERAL POOL
5 x 20 VEG PLOT
ROCK STEP
CONSERVATION
STRUCTURE w/
E
EASEMENT
CLASS B RIP RAP
BRUSH TOE
F15
FLOODPLAIN
X
FENCE
§S
F$
INTERCEPTOR
U z
LU J
0
le Z
LU LU
°�
u� O
H0 Z
W
C41 H FT—
ce qj
oC Z
0
W
OC Y
N m
LU
J
V�
N H
V Z
= g
CL O
tL-
V
N
DATE: 07_18-16
RECORD
DRAWING
PLAN SHEET
SHEET
7
EEP# 96309

'4
07
co Q01 T
le ,
RECORD DRAWINGS
�
L
Ln
RECORD DRAWINGS
This record drawing has been prepared in part,
based upon information furnished by others.
While this information 6 believed to be reliable,
the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and
thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this
record drawing or for any errors or omissions
which may have been incorporated into it as a
result. Those relying on this record document are
advised to obtain independent verification of its
accuracy before applying for any purpose.
C:) OD
�o
' OgU o
^\ d
a
~� N z
�-
L
GAUGELO O, - - - d
� D LOD _
(70 VP1 � LU
QOM a07 iLLJ
W
4p� DO ----
(3 1co
(301
too�°----- `-------�-----�, oo LOD LOD
------------ ti W
LOD
Q,
LD
0- ---
Or -
NTROL� 1NT s��l
R C KEE 50 CONT 01
POINT
j : , 777730. 2' RBC "KW 508
E: 1164336:81' N:'77760 60'
ELEV: 1286.2' E: 1164092.19'
ELEV: 1267.
RECORD DRAWING PROJECT OVERVIEW MAP SEE SHEET 2
RECORD DRAWING PLAN SHEETS SEE SHEETS 3 THRU 10
LOD LOD ?
OO VP2 = WO 0
k
lS ° � O
I
I
O
N
CONTROL POINT
RBC "KEE" (50A
N: 777247.89'
E: 1163857.23'
ELEV: 1249.6'
O
LtUtNU
O
+
CONSTRUCTION
`n
Ln
REVISION
-------] _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
XS -1
CROSS-SECTION
& STATIONING
LOCATION
------------
THALWEG
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
BANKFULL
--— - —- —
-- EPHEMERAL POOL
GAUGE
E
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE w/
X
FENCE
CLASS B RIP RAP
LOD
LIMITS OF$
FLOODPLAIN
DISTURBANCE
INTERCEPTOR
0
0
W
J
V�
N N
U g
= a
CL o
t�
N
DATE 07-18-16
RECORD
DRAWING
PLAN SHEET
SHEET
8
EEP# 96309

m
L
N
a
L
U
N
N
N
0
i
rn
0
L
O
L
O
0
O
L
E
4
L
L
0 O
L
d
0
3
RECORD DRAWINGS
RECORD DRAWINGS
/ This record drawing has been prepared in part,
`��,� `' /l%
CA based upon information furnished by others.
I Il �' ��` • • • R // While this information is believed to be reliable,
BARN ? / ` /
Q • ` ` / /� the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and
1�041 ` • s 3/. y thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this
L _ _ __ _ _ _ / i / C" '� record drawing or for any errors or omissions
which may have been incorporated into it as a
_A result. Those relying on this record document are
SIL 0 1 +� • 035636
• advised to obtain independent verification of its
- ? d e • f y • accuracy before applying for any purpose.
Nt
OpNER 'k,'
�;, � IlIltltl
Q� I
M
.. V -.-i._ --y - 1 - _-_.. _ _ _ _ 1 --- - -- i-
�--,__M'
__ --�-- -- --7- �� - - p
-SIS FARM _._,---- ---�--_ --._.__--- - - - R
GRAVEL
ROADBED
. _ R D
-
_ �
� ------
n i
LOD - — -
'N.
LO-
2� - -
U)
VP6
FLOODPa -_ -_ {� ~ a►-
INTERC OR
�41j
44/
'Ci F1
GIN 2
ST 0+00.00
N
0
Q' 0
jm� A-
01
-
o 0
v
i'
G,
y� L�
RECORD DRAWING PROJECT OVERVIEW MAP SEE SHEET 2
RECORD DRAWING PLAN SHEETS SEE SHEETS 3 THRU 10
UT 2
rt/
W
w Dlrectton
FLO DPLAIN
INTE CEPTOR VP7
-3 -
CONTROL POINT O
RBC "KEE" 517 O s�
:7771.5'
E: 1164591.65' �h
ELEV: 1238.7'
0
LIMITS OF
O
DISTURBANCE
CONSTRUCTION
to
REVISION
XS -1
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
& STATIONING
•------------
THALWEG
BANKFULL
— - — - — - —
- EPHEMERAL POOL
E
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
—X----
FENCE
LOD
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
CONSTRUCTION
REVISION
XS -1
CROSS-SECTION
LOCATION
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
5 x 20 VEG PLOT
Z�
Tc
z0
z GAUGE
3 0�
�O N
p N
0'�ZF�
z
bo Cu
0 d
Zr)
Ln
d
C
C
W
U z
W J
00
ILZ
LU
U� O
,„ O Z
W` `
V) y FT
Z
O
W
oC Y
N CO
N
W
J
V
V1 to
V Z
s
QtL 0
d
(O
DATE: 07_18-16
RECORD
DRAWING
PLAN SHEET
SHEET
9
EEP# 96309
BRUSH TOE
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE w/
CLASS B RIP RAP
FLOODPLAIN
INTERCEPTOR
3 0�
�O N
p N
0'�ZF�
z
bo Cu
0 d
Zr)
Ln
d
C
C
W
U z
W J
00
ILZ
LU
U� O
,„ O Z
W` `
V) y FT
Z
O
W
oC Y
N CO
N
W
J
V
V1 to
V Z
s
QtL 0
d
(O
DATE: 07_18-16
RECORD
DRAWING
PLAN SHEET
SHEET
9
EEP# 96309

0
m
U
N
N
I/1
0
Ir
/
CD3
4
L
U
0
O
U
Ul
D:
0
E
/
E
4
N
L
N
EP
0
0
0
3
N
LD/
m
ii
0
DU i
RECORD DRAWINGS
RECORD DRAWINGS
���� This record drawing has been prepared in part,
CA R /,� based upon information furnished by others.
• . • • • • • / // While this information is believed to be reliable,
`• • / the Engineer cannot assure its accuracy, and
O• Sr •� j thus is not responsible for the accuracy of this
• til! record drawing or for any errors or omissions
Swhich may have been incorporated into it as a
_ result. Those relying on this record document are
•
035 5 5 • .� advised to obtain independent verification of its
Ln N oo��••• j S/ 3t*faccuracy before applying for any purpose.
• e •
///"/ OpHER,``' 1�1�
flil4
0 00o
w
7b O4 z z
/fIE- Wv
X UT 3
C
VP13 C7 d
_ . aOl
m C
v
C5 D
7 ' T
o
BEGIN UT 3110
aai
STA 10+00.0 i �� t of
-�-�
Cn
L
m
ZYZ
RECORD DRAWING PROJECT OVERVIEW MAP SEE SHEET 2
RECORD DRAWING PLAN SHEETS SEE SHEETS 3 THRU 10
0
O
LO
r
ASBUILT ALIGNMENTS
l & STATIONING
------------ THALWEG
BANKFULL
— - — - — - — - EPHEMERAL POOL
E CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
-X--- FENCE
LOD --- LIMITS OF
EXISTING
DISTURBANCE
WETLANDS
CONSTRUCTION
- REVISION
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE w/
-1 _ CROSS-SECTION
CLASS B RIP RAP
_XS
LOCATION
FLOODPLAIN
--�
INTERCEPTOR
10 x 10 VEG PLOT
U
LU
°°
CL V
Z
UjO
U;� O
to O Z
LU
N y
0° Z
O
W
CeY
m
0
W
J
U�
N
U Z
= CL
g
QCL O
d
uO
N
DATE: 07-18-16
RECORD
DRAWING
PLAN SHEET
SHEET
10
EEP# 96309