20120396 Ver 1_Year 0 Monitoring Report_2016_20170127

As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project
DMS Project Number: 94709
DEQ Contract Number: 6500
USACE Action ID: SAW -2011-02257
DWR Project Number: 12-0396
SCO# 09-08-56701
Surry County, North Carolina
Data Collected: June -July, 2016
Data Submitted: August 1, 2016
Revised: September 29, 2016
Submitted to:
7k�l
NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
CLearWaLer
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Prepared by:
WILD LAN
1--r-2 2
NGINEERING
167-B Haywood Road
Asheville, NC 28806

Table of Contents
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY..........................................................................................1
1.1 Project Goals.......................................................................................................1
1.2 Project Performance Standards........................................................................1
1.3 Project Setting and Background....................................................................... 2
1.4 Project Components and Approach................................................................. 2
1.5 Project Performance.......................................................................................... 4
2.0 METHODOLOGY..................................................................................................5
3.0 REFERENCES........................................................................................................7
Appendix A. Figures and Background Tables
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Table 1: Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2: Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3: Project Contacts
Table 4 a -b: Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2: Current Condition Plan View (CCPV)
Photo Point Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5: Vegetation Plot Results (All Stems)
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Cross -Sections with Annual Overlays
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Table 6 a -b: Baseline Stream Summary Data
Table 7 a -b: Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters — Cross -Sections)
Appendix E. As -Built Plan Sheets
I

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
The NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) restored, enhanced, and preserved
approximately 19,677 linear feet (LF) of Moores Fork and thirteen previously unnamed
tributaries (UTs), provided livestock fencing and alternative water sources to keep
livestock out of the streams, removed invasive plant species across the project, and
established native riparian buffers. The restoration project was developed to fulfill
stream mitigation requirements accepted by the DMS for the Upper Yadkin River Basin
(HUC 03040101). The Moores Fork Stream Restoration Project will net 11,736 stream
mitigation credits through a combination of restoration, enhancement I and II, and
preservation. This report documents the results of the As -Built Baseline monitoring
efforts (MYO).
1.1 Project Goals
The project goals identified in the Mitigation Plan (Confluence, 2012) include:
• Improve water quality in Moores Fork and the UTs through reductions in
sediment and nutrient inputs from local sources;
• Create conditions for dynamic equilibrium of water and sediment movement
between the supply reaches and project reaches;
• Promote floodwater attenuation and secondary functions associated with more
frequent and extensive floodwater contact times;
• Improve in -stream habitat by increasing the diversity of bedform features;
• Enhance and protect native riparian vegetation communities; and
• Reduce fecal, nutrient, and sediment loads to project streams by promoting and
implementing livestock best management practices.
1.2 Project Performance Standards
The performance of the project will be evaluated in accordance with the geomorphic,
visual, hydrology, and vegetation components outlined in the Stream Mitigation
Guidelines (USACE 2003). The following are specific performance standards from the
approved Mitigation Plan (Confluence, 2012).
Performance Standards
Parameter
Metrics/Success Criteria
a. Bank height ratio for reaches where BHR is corrected through design and
construction shall not exceed 1.2.
b. Entrenchment ratio for reaches where ER is corrected through design and
Channel Stability
construction shall be no less than 2.2.
c. The stream project shall remain stable and all other performance standards
shall be met through two separate bankfull events, occurring in separate
years, during the monitoring years 1 through 7.
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 1 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

a. Density of 320 live, planted stems/acre at year 3; 260 live, planted
Riparian Buffer Vegetation stems/acre at year 5; 210 live planted stems/acre at year 7.
b. Planted vegetation must average 8 feet in height at year 7.
1.3 Project Setting and Background
The site is located in the Piedmont physiographic province (NCGS 2004). The Piedmont
is characterized by gently rolling, well rounded hills and long low ridges. Moores Fork is
a tributary to Stewarts Creek in the Upper Yadkin River Basin (HUC 03040101). The
site is located approximately 0.25 mile north of NC 89 on Horton Road. The project site
is located on both sides of Horton Road. Latitude and longitude for the site are
36.506671 N and -80.704115 W, respectively. A site location map is included in
Appendix A as Figure 1.
Agriculture is the primary land use in the watershed (36% agriculture land cover).
Degraded buffers and livestock operations were identified as major stressors to water
quality within the watershed. The site assessment phase of the project identified other
stressors as well, including elevated water temperatures, excessive nutrient inputs,
channel incision, bank erosion, and sediment deposition. Dairy and farming operations
on the site have deforested riparian buffers and allowed direct livestock access to the
stream, leading to elevated temperatures and nutrients. Channel straightening and
dredging throughout much of the project has also contributed to channel degradation.
1.4 Project Components and Approach
Stream restoration was accomplished using a natural channel design approach to restore
appropriate channel dimension, pattern, and profile (Table 1; Figure 2). These improved
conditions will promote water and sediment transport equilibrium between the stream and
its watershed, reconnect the stream to its floodplain, and promote healthy in -stream and
riparian habitats. The project goals were addressed through the following project
objectives:
• Restoration of the dimension, pattern, profile of approximately 1,875 LF of
Moores Fork Reach 2 and 243 LF of the Pond Tributary;
• Restoration of the dimension and profile (Enhancement I) of the channel for
approximately 2,885 LF of Moores Fork Reach 3, 900 LF of Silage Reach 1,
2,448 LF of Silage Reach 2, 350 LF of Barn Reach 1 and 112 LF of Corn Reach
2;
• Limited channel work coupled with livestock exclusion, gully stabilization,
invasive species control and buffer planting (Enhancement II) on approximately
761 LF of Moores Fork Reach 1, 167 LF of Cow Tributary 1, 767 LF of Cow
Tributary 2, 3,084 LF of Barn Reach 2, 1,340 LF of Corn Reach 1, and 466 LF of
UT 1;
• Livestock exclusion fencing and other best management practice installations;
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 2 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

• Invasive plant species control measures across the entire project wherever
necessary; and
• Preservation of approximately 4,279 LF of relatively un -impacted forested
streams (UTs 2, 3,6,7,8,9, 10) in a permanent conservation easement.
The target stream type for Moores Fork was a moderately sinuous, moderate width -depth
ratio C4, which was appropriate for the relatively flat and wide alluvial valley. Reach 2
of Moores Fork was constructed mainly off-line to position the channel in the low point
of the valley and provide much improved floodplain access on both banks. Reach 3 was
constructed largely within the existing channel with modest pattern shifts where existing
pattern was unstable. In -stream structures were incorporated in Reach 3 to promote
sediment transport equilibrium, riffle and pool formation, and enhanced bank stability.
The overall approach can be described as a hybrid Rosgen Priority 2/3 restoration.
Due to the slope and confined valley, Reach 1 of the Silage Tributary was designed as a
step -pool, B4 stream type. Because of the highly confined nature of the Silage Tributary
and the desire to preserve mature upland trees, addressing eroding banks and incised
conditions through bank sloping was not practical. The design solution was to create a
new step pool profile within the original channel and stabilize the upper banks with
facsinces, a bioengineering technique that involves placing dormant woody cuttings in
shallow, contour -line trenches.
Reach 2 of the Silage Tributary, the Corn Reach, and the Barn Reach were similar in
terms of morphology; each was a relatively steep alluvial channel with significant
incision and bank erosion problems with little length to transition to a stable profile end
point. The design approaches for these streams was also similar. The channels were
left in their current alignments, banks were graded to stable slopes, bankfull benches
were constructed, and in -stream structures were used to promote bed and bank stability.
Reference cross-sections on stable reaches of the Corn and Barn Reaches were used to
size the design cross-sections for these streams.
The target stream type for the Pond Tributary was a moderately sinuous, moderate
width -depth ratio C4. The project reach begins at the outlet of the culvert where flow
drops approximately two feet to a small plunge pool at the existing thalweg. The design
profile started at this existing thalweg elevation, taking advantage of the energy
dissipating effects of the pool, and then abandoned the badly trampled channel for a new
alignment across the floodplain to the east. The downstream end of the profile included
a 1.5 -foot high transition to the Moores Fork thalweg, which was constructed using a
grade control structure.
The project also included filling and stabilizing gullies at the headwaters of the Silage
Tributary, the Cow 1 and Cow 2 Tributaries, UTI and two runoff conveyances entering
Moores Fork Reach 3. The proposed gully stabilization included upland measures
such as temporary silt fences, swales and vegetation to divert and/or redirect runoff
away from gullies. Check dams made from riprap, woody brush, recycled crushed
concrete, decay resistant logs, and other on-site materials were used to reduce erosive
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 3 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

stresses in the gullies and promote healing. Stabilized areas were planted with native
species at densities specified for buffer areas.
The final design was completed in June of 2013. Construction activities and as -built
surveys were completed in December of 2014. Planting of the site took place in March
of 2015. A large flood event with an estimated return interval of 50 to 100 years
occurred at the site on April 18-19, 2015, causing damage to the main stem of Moores
Fork. This damage was repaired in March and April 2016, and a second as -built survey
was performed on the repaired areas in April 2016. The baseline monitoring efforts
began in June of 2016 and monitoring year one efforts are scheduled for the end of
October 2016. More detailed information related to the project activity, history, and
contacts can be found in Appendix A Tables 1 and 2.
Monitoring will consist of collecting morphological, vegetative, and hydrological data to
assess the project success based on the restoration goals and objectives on an annual basis
for seven years or until the success criteria is met. The success of the project will be
assessed using measurements of the stream channel's dimension, substrate composition
permanent photographs, vegetation, surface water hydrology, and visual assessments.
Monitoring requirements include:
1.5 Project Performance
The Moores Fork as -built data showed some deviation from the design values,
particularly for cross-sectional area and bankfull width in Reach 3 where the majority of
the repair work was conducted in early 2016. Observations of the repair areas over the
past three months indicate the site is on a trajectory toward increased stability and
improved function as compared to pre -repair conditions. One cross-section (XSM7) that
was originally intended to serve as a riffle is actually more representative of a run feature
and will be treated as such going forward. Data from this cross-section have been
omitted from the riffle parameters reported herein. Pebble count data from Moores Fork
indicate a modest coarsening of the substrate, which is consistent with observations of
bed materials following the major flood event in April 2015.
As -built data from both reaches of the Silage Tributary also show some deviations from
the design values. On a small channel such as this, slight differences in bankfull
dimensions translate to what appear to be significant differences in parameters such as
bankfull cross-sectional area and width -to -depth ratio. These being enhancement reaches
where targeted (as opposed to reach -wide) bank sloping, benching and in -stream
structures were used, matching the precise design values was less critical than, for
example, on a new off-line restoration reach. In Reach 1, the fascines on the upper slopes
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 4 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016
Monitoring Requirements
Parameter
Monitoring Feat"'
Moores RI Pond Trib. Moores
Quantity Length By Reach (ft)
R2 Moores R3 Silage RI Silage R2 UT1 Cow 1 Cowl Barn 1 Barn 2
Frequency
Rife XS
2
4 1
3
Years 1, 2, 3, 5, 7
Dimension
Pool XS
l
2 1
2
Years 1, 2, 3, 5, 7
Substrate
100 Pebble Count
2
4 I
3
Annual
Hydrology
Crest Gauge
I
1
Semi -Amoral
Vegetation i
Ve talion Plots
4
3 1
2 1 1
Annual
Visual Assessment
Pro'ect Site
Y
Y Y
Y Y Y
Semi-Amwal
Reference Photos Permanent Photo Pointsl
2 2
12
19 1 8
8 2 2 4 2 2
Annual
1.5 Project Performance
The Moores Fork as -built data showed some deviation from the design values,
particularly for cross-sectional area and bankfull width in Reach 3 where the majority of
the repair work was conducted in early 2016. Observations of the repair areas over the
past three months indicate the site is on a trajectory toward increased stability and
improved function as compared to pre -repair conditions. One cross-section (XSM7) that
was originally intended to serve as a riffle is actually more representative of a run feature
and will be treated as such going forward. Data from this cross-section have been
omitted from the riffle parameters reported herein. Pebble count data from Moores Fork
indicate a modest coarsening of the substrate, which is consistent with observations of
bed materials following the major flood event in April 2015.
As -built data from both reaches of the Silage Tributary also show some deviations from
the design values. On a small channel such as this, slight differences in bankfull
dimensions translate to what appear to be significant differences in parameters such as
bankfull cross-sectional area and width -to -depth ratio. These being enhancement reaches
where targeted (as opposed to reach -wide) bank sloping, benching and in -stream
structures were used, matching the precise design values was less critical than, for
example, on a new off-line restoration reach. In Reach 1, the fascines on the upper slopes
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 4 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

are robust on the left side and less robust on the right side. We believe that the primary
cause of this was drought conditions which began after the left bank fascines were
installed, just as right bank installations were beginning. Another contributing factor may
be stormwater runoff originating from a pasture on the right terrace. There do not appear
to be significant stability issues at this time, however.
The MYO vegetation plot data indicate that the project is on track to meet the interim
criterion for survival and growth of 320 stems per acre at the end of the year three
monitoring period. Ten of the 12 vegetation plots have stem densities of 320 or more
stems per acre and the mean stem density for planted stems is 497 stems per acre.
Vegetation plots 2 and 3, each with a density of 280 stems per acre, did not meet the
interim success criteria. The site includes a diverse assemblage of nine species of native
trees. Herbicide treatments of exotic invasive plants were conducted during the initial
construction phase, with a focus on the buffers along the Barn, Corn and Silage
Tributaries. Recent observations indicate that the extent of invasive plants has been
greatly reduced but that buffer areas, including those along Moores Fork, will need to be
treated for exotic invasive plants again in the future.
Summary data related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be
found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and
supporting information can be found in the mitigation plan document. All raw data
presented in the appendices are available upon request.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
The stream monitoring methodologies utilized in 2015 are based on standard guidance
and procedures documents (Rosgen 1996 and USACE 2003).
• Cross-section data were collected throughout four reaches using a total station
survey. Sixteen cross-sections were surveyed. Cross-sections were permanently
marked with capped rebar and PVC conduit.
• Sixty-seven permanent photo points were established throughout the project to
visually monitor stream stability and vegetation.
• Wolman pebble counts were conducted at ten representative riffle cross-sections
to evaluate particle size distribution over time. A minimum of 100 particles were
selected at random and measured (Harrelson 1994).
• Vegetation monitoring included documenting species composition and survival of
planted stems within twelve randomly located vegetation plots. Each 0.025 acre
vegetation plot was permanently marked with rebar and PVC conduit at all four
corners.
• Two crest gauges were installed and will be checked during semi-annual visits to
determine if a bankfull event has occurred. The crest gauges were installed and
surveyed at riffles on Moores Fork and Silage Tributary.
• Visual assessments will be performed on all stream and buffer restoration areas on
a semi-annual basis. Problem areas will be noted, including channel instability
(lateral and/or vertical instability, structure failure/instability and/or piping,
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 5 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

headcuts), vegetation health (low stem density, vegetation mortality, invasive
species or encroachment), beaver activity, and livestock access. Areas of concern
will be mapped, photographed, and described in future monitoring reports.
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 6 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

3.0 REFERENCES
Confluence Engineering, PC. 2012. Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Plan. NCEEP,
Raleigh, NC.
Harrelson, Cheryl, C. Rawlins and J. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Rocky
Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. USDA Forest Service. Fort
Collins, Colorado.
NCCRONOS (North Carolina Climate Retrieval and Observations Network of the
Southeast Database). 2016. State Climate Office of North Carolina. Version
2.7.2. MT Airy 2 W. Station ID No. 315890. Accessed July 2016.
NCGS (North Carolina Geological Survey). 2004. Physiography of North Carolina.
Map compiled by the Division of Land Resources. Raleigh.
Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology. Pagosa Springs,
Colorado.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, and North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality.
Wilmington, North Carolina.
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 7 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix A
Figures and Background Tables

Moores Fork Stream Mitigation/ DMS Project No. 94709
9 Rd
r�
e ,p
�a11
11-11
)0
C16 r ch
Ad
one
e
VV
Project Boundary
4y1A
_ `6
0
Rq
FofV Rq
QtttshY
The Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project is located
northwest of Mt. Airy in Surry County, North Carolina. To
access the site from Asheville, take 1-40 East toward
Statesville to Exit 1528. Merge onto 1-77 North toward Elkin.
Travel approximately 49 miles to Exit 100 (North Carolina 89)
toward Galax and Mt. Airy. Turn right onto North Carolina 89
(West Pine Street) and travel approximately 2 miles. Turn left
onto Pine Ridge Road and continue 0.2 mile to a left turn onto
Horton Road. The project site is located on both sides of
Horton Road. Latitude and longitude for the site are 36.506671
N and -80.704115 W respectively.
"I 11K fit C6tRC'_
@� Rd
10 It,
89
��'g�m
{i ed 0 a
wa" �d
San
Laurel g
yq Pine S, Mt Airy
52
Mt. Airy
W
�v �C"
�f)
t�
N
0.
i
M a
�lQ\0 Pwry T.
17
Legend aYf \`,.
whits @
r-------, t p 0 0.5 1 2
�_ _ Project Boundary µay 601, 71Wiles
Drawn by: KAY 7.26.16; CEC Project# 645 qtr 4��a ^
4YIL°L.e4 £N On Lear ater
Surry County, (� W Site Vicinity
North Carolina NCDEQ
Division of Mitigation Services 167-B Haywood Road 32 Clayton Street
1652 Mail Service Center Asheville, NC 28806 Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Figure 1
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
+64-1.
fir{
y�
�y
4
L
0
9'�r
Y01
,
4'
3
�y
c,
103
ear
'fes
Rd
yq Pine S, Mt Airy
52
Mt. Airy
W
�v �C"
�f)
t�
N
0.
i
M a
�lQ\0 Pwry T.
17
Legend aYf \`,.
whits @
r-------, t p 0 0.5 1 2
�_ _ Project Boundary µay 601, 71Wiles
Drawn by: KAY 7.26.16; CEC Project# 645 qtr 4��a ^
4YIL°L.e4 £N On Lear ater
Surry County, (� W Site Vicinity
North Carolina NCDEQ
Division of Mitigation Services 167-B Haywood Road 32 Clayton Street
1652 Mail Service Center Asheville, NC 28806 Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Figure 1
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
+64-1.
fir{
y�
�y
0
9'�r
,
3
103
yq Pine S, Mt Airy
52
Mt. Airy
W
�v �C"
�f)
t�
N
0.
i
M a
�lQ\0 Pwry T.
17
Legend aYf \`,.
whits @
r-------, t p 0 0.5 1 2
�_ _ Project Boundary µay 601, 71Wiles
Drawn by: KAY 7.26.16; CEC Project# 645 qtr 4��a ^
4YIL°L.e4 £N On Lear ater
Surry County, (� W Site Vicinity
North Carolina NCDEQ
Division of Mitigation Services 167-B Haywood Road 32 Clayton Street
1652 Mail Service Center Asheville, NC 28806 Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Figure 1
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
+64-1.
k
�a

Appendix A
Figures and Background Tables
N/A - Not Applicable
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 A-2 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation/ DMS Project No. 94709
Miti ation Credit Summaries
Type
Restoration
Enhancement I
F..nhauement
Preservation
Total
2,118
5,879
1 2,883
856
Project Components
Project Component or
Reach ID
Stationing
Pre -project
Footage or
Acreage
Restoration
Footage or Restoration
Acreage Level
Restoration or
Rest Equiv.
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation Notes
Credits
Moores Reach 1
STA 989-1750
761
761 N/A
Ell
2.5:1
304
Moores Reach 2
STA 1750-3625
1,636
1,875 P2
R
1:1
1,875
Moores Reach 3
STA 3640-6525
2,856
2,885 P2/3
EI
1:1
2,885
Silage Reach
STA 1000-1900
900
900 PI
EI
1:1
900
Silage Reach
STA 1900-4348
2,448
2,448 P3
EI
1.5:1
1,632
Cow Tnb 1
STA 1219-1386
167
167 1 P4
Ell
1.5:1
111
Cow Tnb 2
STA 1331-2098
767
767 P4
EB
1.5:1
511
Pond Tnb
STA 1000-1243
194
243 P2
R
1:1
243
Barn Reach 1
STA 1000-1350
300
350 P3
EI
1:1
350
BamReach 2
STA 1350-3746; STA
4069-4757
3,134
3,084 N/A
Ell
2.5:1
1,234 -
Com Reach 1
STA 1000-2340
1,350
1,340 N/A
Ell
2.5:1
536
Com Reachl
STA 2350-2462
112
112 P3
El
1:1
112
UTI
STA 1000-1466
466
466 N/A
EII
2.5:1
186
Preservation Reaches
UTs2,3,6,7,8,9,10
4,279
4,279 N/A
P
5:1
856
Length and Area Summations
Restoration Level
Stream (Linear Feet)
Riparian Wetland (acres) Non -riparian
Wetland (acres)
Buffer (Square feet)
Upland (acres)
Riverine
Non-Rivenne
Restoration
2,118
Enhancement
Enhancement I
6,695
Enhancement II
6,585
Creation
Preservation
4,279
fligh Quality Preservation
BMP Element
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
N/A - Not Applicable
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 A-2 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix A
Figures and Background Tables
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation// DMS Pro'ect No. 94709
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation/ DMS Project No. 94709
Data Collection
Activity or Deliverable Complete
Completion or
Delivery
M' ' tion Plan Dec -11
Nov -12
Final Desi — Construction Plans
Jun -13
Construction (Repairs)
Dec -14 (Apr- 16
Temporary S&E Mix Apphed
Dec -14 (Apr- 16)
Permanent Seed Mix Applied
Dec -14 (Apr- 16)
Containerized, bare root and B&B plantings for reach/se nts
Feb -15 (Apr -16)
Baseline Monitoring Document Year 0 Monitoring - Baseline) Jun -16
Aug- 16
Year 1 Monitoring
Turner Land Surveying PLLC
Year 2 Monitoring
PO Box 41023
Year 3 Monitoring
Raleigh, NC 27629
Year 4 Monitoring
David Turner 919-623-5095
Year 5 Monkoring
Keller Environmental, LLC
N/A - Not Avnlicable
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation/ DMS Project No. 94709
Designer
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
167-B Haywood Road
Asheville, NC 28806
Primary project design POC
Andrew Bick 828-606-0306
Construction Contractor
Carolina Environmental Contracting, Inc.
150 Pine Ridge Road
Mount Airy, NC 27030
Construction contractor POC
Wayne Taylor 336-341-6489
Survey Contractor
Turner Land Surveying PLLC
PO Box 41023
Raleigh, NC 27629
Survey Contractor POC
David Turner 919-623-5095
Planting Contractor
Keller Environmental, LLC
7921 Haymarket Lane
Raleigh, NC 27615
Planting Contractor POC
Jay Keller 919-749-8259
Seeding Contractor
Carolina Environmental Contracting, Inc.
150 Pine Ridge Road
Mount Airy, NC 27030
Seeding Contractor POC
Wayne Taylor 336-341-6489
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resources 336-855-6363
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Foggy Mountain Nursery 336-384-5323
Monitoring Performers
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
167-B Haywood Road
Asheville, NC 28806
C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Andrew Bick 828-606-0306
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Andrew Bick 828-606-0306
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 A-3 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix A
Figures and Background Tables
Table 4a. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation// DMS Project No. 94709
County Surry
Project Area (acres) —140
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude) 36.506671 N, 80.704115 W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Yadkin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit 03040101
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit 03040101100010
DWR Sub -basin Pee Dee River Subbasin 03-07-02
Project Drainage Area (acres) 1,527 ac (239 mi)
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area <5%
CGIA Land Use Classification Cropland and Pasture, Confined Animal Operations
Reach Summary Information
Reach 1/2 Reach 3 Silage Trib Cow Trib 1 Cow Trib 2
Parameters
Moores Fork
Moores Fork
riparian non-riverine
riparian non-riverine
Length of Reach Post Construction (LF)
2,636
2,885
3,348
167
767
Valley classification (Rosgen)
VIII
VIII
II/IV
II
II
Drainage area (acres)
1,193
1,527
156
4
16
NCDWQ stream identification score
35
34.5
23.5
20
23.5
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
WS -IV
WS -IV
WS -IV
WS -IV
WS -IV
Morphological Description (Rosgen stream type)
C4
C4
G4/C4
G5
G5
Evolutionary trend
C -F
C -F
G -F
G
G
Underlying mapped soils
CsA, FsE
CsA, FsE
FeD2
FeD2
FeD2
Drainage class
well drained
well drained
well drained
well drained
well drained
Soil Hydric status
not hydric
not hydric
not hydric
not hydric
not hydric
Slope
0.008
0.006
0.030
0.056
0.038
FEMA classification
Not in SFHA
Not in SFHA
Not in SFHA
Not in SFHA
Not in SFHA
Native vegetation community
Felsic Mesic Forest
Felsic Mesic Forest
Felsic Mesic Forest
Felsic Mesic Forest
Felsic Mesic Forest
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
0
0
0
0
0
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland 1
Wetland 2
Wetland 3
Wetland 4
Size of Wetland (acres)
0.49
0.04
0.08
0.15
Wetland Type
riparian non-riverine
riparian non-riverine
riparian non-riverine
riparian non-riverine
Mapped Soil Series
FsE
FsE
CsA
FsE & CsA
Drainage class
well drained
well drained
well drained
well drained
Soil Hydric Status
not hydric
not hydric
not hydric
not hydric
Source of Hydrology
UT9 & UT10
UT8
Toe seep
Toe seep
Hydrologic Impairment
none
none
none
none
Native vegetation community
Dist. Small Stream/
Narrow FP Forest
Dist. Small Stream/
Narrow FP Forest
Dist. Small Stream/
Narrow FP Forest
Dist. Small Stream/
Narrow FP Forest
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
0
0
0
0
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved? Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section 404
Y
Y
02257
Waters of
the United States — Section 401
Y
Y
NCDWR # 12-0396
Endangered Species Act
Y
Y
CE Approved 12/21/11
Historic Preservation Act
N
N/A
-
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA)
N
N/A
-
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N
N/A
-
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N
N/A
-
N/A Not -applicable
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 A-4 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix A
Figures and Background Tables
Table 4b. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation/ DMS Project No. 94709
County Surry
Project Area (acres) —140
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude) 36.506671 N, 80.704115 W
Project Watershed Summa Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Yadkin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit 03040101
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit 03040101100010
DWR Sub -basin Pee Dee River Subbasin 03-07-02
Project Drainage Area (acres) 1,527 ac (2.39 mit)
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area <5%
CGIA Land Use Classification Cropland and Pasture, Confined Animal Operations
Reach Summary Information
Pond Trib I Barn Reach I Corn Reach I UT1
Parameters
Length of Reach Post Construction (LF)
243
3,434
1,452
466
Valley classification (Rosgen)
VIII
IV
IV
IV
Drainage area (acres)
27
184
30
6
NCDWQ stream identification score
20
36.5
21
23
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
WS -IV
WS -IV
WS -N
WS -IV
Morphological Description (Rosgen stream type)
134/5
G4
G4
B4
Evolutionary trend
B -C -F
G -F
G -F
-
Underlying mapped soils
CsA
FeD2, FsE
CsA, FsE
FeD2
Drainage class
well drained
well drained
well drained
well drained
Soil Hydric status
not hydric
not hydric
not hydric
not hydric
Sloe
0.029
0.025
0.057
0.040+/ -
FEMA classification
Not in SFHA
Not in SFHA
Not in SFHA
Not in SFHA
Native vegetation community
Felsic Mesic Forest Felsic Mesic Forest
Felsic Mesic Forest
Felsic Mesic Forest
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
0
0
0
0
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland 5
Wetland 6
Size of Wetland (acres)
0.03
0.06
Wetland Type
riparian non-riverine
riparian non-riverine
Mapped Soil Series
FeD2
FsE & FeD2
Drainage class
well drained
well drained
Soil Hydric Status
not hydric
not hydric
Source of Hydrology
Toe Seep
Toe Seep
Hydrologic Impairment
none
none
Native vegetation community
Dist. Small Stream/
Narrow FP Forest
Dist. Small Stream/
Narrow FP Forest
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
0
0
N/A Not -applicable
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 A-5 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

Moores Fork Stream Mitigation/DMS Project No. 94709
Legend
Stream Restoration
Stream Preservation
Stream Enhancement Level I
Stream Enhancement Level II
Conservation Easement
Wetland
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
Drawn by: KAY 9.6.16; CEC Project# 644;
Aerial Photograph (NCCGIA) 2015
Surry County,
North Carolina
EN GI NEE RI N C,
NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation Services 167-B Haywood Road
1652 Mail Service Center Asheville, NC 28806
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
CLear aLer Integrated Current Condition Plan View
DMS Project No. 94709
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Figure 2

Moores Fork Stream Mitigation/DMS Project No. 94709
Legend
Photo Point
o Crest Gauge
-® Cross -Section
- - -- - Top of Bank
Stream Restoration
Stream Preservation
Stream Enhancement Level I
Stream Enhancement Level II
- Conservation Easement
Wetland
Vegetation Plot - Criteria Met
Vegetation Plot - Criteria Not Met
Structures
® Constructed Riffle
Brushmat
0 Geolift
Debris Plug
0 Bridge
------ Gully Stabilization
—,,,—­ Facines
Root Wad J -Hook
Rock Vane Log Vane
Step
Stone Tog
0 125 250 500
i
Feet
Drawn by: KAY 9.6.16; CEC Project# 644;
Aerial Photograph (NCCGIA) 2015
J�
r F
i
Corn Reach 1
Moores Reach 3
PP34
Moores Reach 2 A
Corn Reach 2
O
O
PP20 VP5 = PP22 --
-
0-2e,' PP21 560/560-- �\PP23
' VP6 =
Moores Reach 1 r 1��?x c \ \ ` �+/, /+ 48+00!i 840/840�X9
___ �P25
PP35 i� _ /. O°o - @l�" ?7� o 1 PP24, ���' n�iPP7 1 ;a % \ +
- + cn cn o80/480 0+00 �� + p. ;P19p o ° o \� VP7-
PP36 O �` O to
+ o
- - \ PP4 �' PP180x0 O + c �, \560/560
o to \ �� Pond Tributary ��x °
O �� PP16
PP3 + 11+00 �'PP17 O
.� °
j O
O O �' PP % i `�6,x PP2612+00
Surry County,
North Carolina
,. %ZWILDLANDS
ENGINEERING
NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation Services 167-B Haywood Road
1652 Mail Service Center Asheville, NC 28806
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Integrated Current Condition Plan View
C��arae� DMS Project No. 94709
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Figure 2 Sheet 1

Structures
® Constructed Riffle
Brushmat
Geolift
Debris Plug
Bridge
---• Gully Stabilization
Facines
�PP1
Root Wad
Rock Vane
Step
Stone Toe
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation/DMS Project 94709
J -Hook
Log Vane
Moores Reach 1
Legend
0 Photo Point
G) Crest Gauge
Cross -Section
--------- Top of Bank
Stream Restoration
Stream Preservation
Stream Enhancement Level I
Stream Enhancement Level 11
— Conservation Easement
Wetland
Vegetation Plot - Criteria Met
Vegetation Plot - Criteria Not Met
Drawn by: KAY 9.6.16; CEC Project# 644;
Aerial Photograph (NCCGIA) 2015
Surry County,
North Carolina
PP2
UT6
Moores Reach 2
/ PP7
VP1 = 480/480
10+00
PP4
O + �,� 11+0
0
PP3
0 0
c .00n 6
Pond Tributary
+ VP2 = 280/280
0 PP5 i ;\
0
0 PP8"
PP9
0
Corn
Reach 2
PP35' k\
ppi
PP17 x00
i 0
VP4 = j 35+00
680/680 I PP15
PP13
31+00 PP14! 34+00
------------
+ w
30+00 o w
o +
i I M2 0
_ VP3 = 280/280;
N \
29+00
a�
PP11 >�
4 PP12�
+ N
OF
0 0
o +
0
o
Barn Reach 2
r WILDLANDS CLearWaLer
EN0lNEERt N0
1
NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation Services 167-B Haywood Road 32 Clayton Street
1652 Mail Service Center Asheville, NC 28806 Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Moores Reach 3
9
x00
i�
110
1100
PP20 VP5 =
60/560
!�
------ PP21
x00 0 -- '`""Cr
v
\, f r o +
O A 0
A PP19 c 0
+ 0
0
0
UT8
N
V
0 125 250 500
-U1T7 Feet
1.
Integrated Current Condition Plan View
DMS Project No. 94709
Figure 2 Sheet 2

Moores Fork Stream Mitigation/DMS Project 94709
Moores Reach
0
VP5 = PP22
PP20 'e- PP21 560/560 / _ �� PP23
T
'VP6 = 840/840
c
x+48+00 PP
!� Opo 'lj c
v�
�_
P P 19 �XOO c
0
0
0
Legend
Photo Point
o Crest Gauge
Cross -Section
Top of Bank
Stream Restoration
Stream Preservation
Stream Enhancement Level I
Stream Enhancement Level 11
Conservation Easement
Wetland
Vegetation Plot - Criteria Met
.: Vegetation Plot - Criteria No Met
Drawn by: KAY 9.616; CEC Project# 644;
Aerial Photograph (NCCGIA) 2015
PP25
cn \ +
o
,o
Surry County,
North Carolina
J1-
VP7 = 560/560 3
PP26 S+ _- --
st +
Ln x00 0 00
0
0
PP33B
pP32
Structures
Root Wad R0°k
PP33A
PP33
®Constructed Riffle
Rock vane rag vane
Brushmat
c
`
—
Geolift
step
PP30
6'j
+
o
C
+
Debris Plug
stone Toe
60+00 x00
0
0
= Bridge
r
RP29
�.
------ Gully Stabilization
C,
59+00
— Facines
\
\472858+00
M? �'
x00
w i LN aON s
E CLearWaLer
ENGINEEE G
RIN
rk� W
NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation Services 167-B Haywood Road 32 Clayton Street
1652 Mail Service Center Asheville, NC 28806 Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
N
0 125 250 500
Feet
Integrated Current Condition Plan View
DMS Project No. 94709
Figure 2 Sheet 3

R w r- I &"%
ir'mvkw w0'% r-%
i n w --F r% 0%

Moores Fork Stream Mitiaation/DMS Project 94709
Legend Structures
® Constructed Riffle
C.) Photo Point 0 Brushmat
o Crest Gauge Geolift
Debris Plug
T -T- Cross -Section Bridge O VP12 = 480/480
0
----- Gully Stabilization
--------- Top of Bank
——Facines G
0
Stream Restoration
Root wad J Haak PP46`0
Stream Preservation
Rock Vane, f ', Log Vane PP45
Stream Enhancement Level I
Step
Stream Enhancement Level 11
Stone Tae
Conservation Easement
Wetland
Cow Tributary 2
O
PP44
N
0 125 250 500
Feet
W I L D L A N D S f -I r'Waker Integrated Current Condition
f
Surry County, ! ENGINEERING Plan View (� �7 (�
North Carolina NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation Services 167-B Haywood Road 32 Clayton Street DMS Project No. 94 / 07
1652 Mail Service Center Asheville, NC 28806 Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 Figure 2 Sheet 5
Cow Tributary 1
PP43 `•�
Vegetation Plot - Criteria Met
N�A
PP40
Vegetation Plot - Criteria Not Met
o
W PP41
O
Drawn by: KAY 9.6.16; Project# 644;
PP50 Sj.
o
'� I �Vxo
PP42
Aerial Photograph (NCCGIA) 2015x
-
_ PP47 Vc�_ �X0 00
`. PP49_a si28+00 0
/ PP 4 8
0
PP51 i
x0
J?�, o
PP52
x0
PP53
`
s
xo0
VP9 = j�
�x
640/640
x00
PP54���
o
x
j OO
+
x0O
Silage Reach 2
PP56
0
PP55
00
+
0
PP57 + o
0
i6, 0
X
0
O
PP58; .
� sx
O
r €rte O
14+00
UT1
STrz
1
x`13+00
o�
0
PP67
12+00
Silage Reach 1
PP59
11+00
PP60 10+00
PP66
N
0 125 250 500
Feet
W I L D L A N D S f -I r'Waker Integrated Current Condition
f
Surry County, ! ENGINEERING Plan View (� �7 (�
North Carolina NCDEQ - Division of Mitigation Services 167-B Haywood Road 32 Clayton Street DMS Project No. 94 / 07
1652 Mail Service Center Asheville, NC 28806 Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 Figure 2 Sheet 5

R w r- I &"%
ir'mvkw w0'% r-%
i n w --F r% 0%

* ._
;.� -,.
L^
r •�
.'.fir vkr+J.s,�x'�� �ws..,��. ,'v, +w
Ay�rr.
_
r
"0.',
4S
`
Al
d,
4x t X Ib�'4
_
Y
-NNW,
0 �6 r 1'5 2'0
-
Photo
Point 3 — MooresDownstream
•�
.. �- v;
: � ,fir •
v
FIT
,c
/
F
T
i[
♦
��✓
� � �'�
,t � � *�
.'rte � � Y F
sem.
�y i

�
fJfi1 bry ,y� f I.rY Fy( ,ri' AA
"ifo 71,4
jz
10
"' ire � �„�) �,,� -+5�'” � S • A" s • � � k F - ,,� '�
R'VOW, 70

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 9 — Moores Reach 2, Downstream
Photo Point 10 —Moores Reach 2, Downstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-10 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 11 — Moores Reach 2, Downstream
Photo Point 12 — Barn Reach 2, Upstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-11 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 15 — Moores Reach 2, Downstream
"4-0 1=1;,;j
Photo Point 16 — Moores Reach 2, Upstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-13 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 17 — Moores Reach 3, Downstream
Photo Point 18 — Moores Reach 3, Downstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-14 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 19 — Moores Reach 3, Downstream
Photo Point 20 — Moores Reach 3, Downstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-15 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 21 — Moores Reach 3, Downstream
Photo Point 22 — Moores Reach 3, Downstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-16 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 23 — Moores Reach 3, Downstream
Photo Point 24 — Moores Reach 3, Downstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-17 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 25 — Moores Reach 3, Downstream
Photo Point 26 — Moores Reach 3, Downstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-18 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 27 — Moores Reach 3, Downstream
Photo Point 28 — Moores Reach 3, Downstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-19 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

htt-

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 31 — Moores Reach 3, Downstream
Photo Point 32 — Moores Reach 3, Downstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-21 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 33 —Moores Reach 3, Downstream
Photo Point 33a — Moores Reach 3, Upstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-22 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 33b — Moores Reach 3, Downstream
Photo Point 34 — Corn Reach 1, Downslope
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-23 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 35 — Corn Reach 2, Downstream
Photo Point 36 — Corn Reach 2, Upstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-24 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

�y
n�
r � "

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 39 — Silage Reach 2, Upstream
Photo Point 40 — Silage Reach 2, Downstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-26 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 41 — Silage Reach 2, Downstream
A
g
f 1
r
- -
a,
E
- v
Photo Point 42 — Silage Reach 2, Downstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-27 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 45 — Cow Tributary 2, Downstream
Photo Point 46 — Cow Tributary 2, Upstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-29 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 49 — Cow Tributary 1, Upstream
Photo Point 50 — Cow Tributary 1, Upstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-31 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 51 — Silage Reach 2, Downstream
Photo Point 52 — Silage Reach 2, Upstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-32 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

��� „p. .r","I • , �
y j y 4
�K, A, I
Le h v id x r3 y
Al ✓lp
� d � & � � 7� � � � yM#�I 5i •f 4 � � } '` � mitis �" - b
r ,�q � �; A � � � FSI � c';~f i•+. r� -
t 4px
+�
71
1641

7
� Y
I
fy
'A
4m 4oll
�' �� .
,. . �
...
»�, ,qy►�"�, ,'��i yam,
7
� Y
I
fy
'A
�' �� .
,. . �
...
»�, ,qy►�"�, ,'��i yam,

r•.
r� -
r, i�i..e � - r•
OL
Photo Point 58
— Silage
Reach
1, Upstream
ation Project/94709
B-35
ing Report
Ri

- r
Awl -40 J,
016 �-

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 61 — Barn Reach 1, Downslope
Photo Point 62 — Barn Reach 1, Downstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-37
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 0 of 7
Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

'�� � pie `k` 'l �' ��lpr � >'•X _ _
u
t >K
A
h - h
-
_ Y.,•�" a �'� ii it3 z'y' - '.
_.
y

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 65 — Barn Reach 2, Downslope
Photo Point 66 — Silage Reach 1, Upslope
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-39 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Photo Point 67 — UTI, Downstream
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 B-40 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 5. Vegetation Plot Results (All Stems)
Current Data (MYO 2016)
Annual Means
Common
Plot 1
Plot 2
Plot 3
Plot 4
Plot 5
Plot 6
Plot 7
Plot 8
Plot 9
Plot 10
Plot 11
Plot 12
MYO (2016)
Name Type
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P
T
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green ash Tree
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
8
2
2
0
0
2 2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
14
14
Diosypyros occidentalis Persimmon Tree
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0 0
0
0
0
0
3
3
1
1
6
6
14
14
briodendron tulip fera Tulip poplar Tree
0
0
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
1
1
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
Nessa sylvatica Black gum Tree
0 1
0
0 1
0
0 1
0
0 1
0
0 1
0
2
2
4 1 4
3 1
3
2
1 2
3
3
5
5
0
1 0
19
19
Platanus occidentalis American sycamore Tree
0
0
0
0
1
1
4
4
9
9
4
4
7 7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
26
26
Quercus lyrata Overcup oak Tree
7
7
4
4
0
0
2
2
0
0
3
3
0 0
4
4
6
6
0
0
0
0
3
3
29
29
Quercus montana Chestnut oak Tree
0
0
1
1
3
3
0
0
0
0
10
10
1 1
0
0
2
2
0
0
5
5
0
0
22
22
Quercus nigra Water oak Tree
3
3
l
l
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0 0
1
1
5
5
2
2
0
0
0
0
14
14
Quercus phellos Willow oak Tree
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 1
2
2 1
2
0
0
0 1 0
0 1
0
1
1
0
0
2
2
0
0
7
7
Plot area (acres)
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.30
Species countl
3 1
3
4
4
3
3
5
5
4
4
6
6
4 4
3
3
5
5
3
3
4
4
4
4
9
9
Stem Countl
12 1
12
7
7
7
7
17
17
14
14
21
21
14 14
8
8
16
16
8
8
13
13
12
12
149
149
Stems perAcrel
480 1
480
280
280
280
280
680
680
560
560
840
840
560 560
320
320
640
640
320
320
520
520
480
480
497
497
Meets Success Criteria
Fails to Meet Interim Success Criteria
Type = Tree, Shrub, Livestake
P= Planted
T =Total Planted and Volunteer
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 C-1 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
Monitoring Year 0 — June 1, 2016
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 C-2 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
Monitoring Year 0 — June 1, 2016
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 C-3 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6
Monitoring Year 0 — June 1, 2016
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 C-4 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8
Monitoring Year 0 — June 2, 2016
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 C-5 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix C
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 9
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 10
Monitoring Year 0 — June 2, 2016
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 C-6 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 11
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 12
Monitoring Year 0 — June 2, 2016
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 C-7 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data

Appendix D
Cross -Section M1 — Downstream
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section M1— Upstream
Cross -Section M1- Riffle, Moores Fork Reach 2
Station 27+16
1155
1153
1151
o_
w 1149
1147
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width )ft)
—6--MYO (6/16/2016) 6ankfull FI dpraneprsa
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-1 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section M2 — Downstream
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section M2 — Upstream
Cross -Section M2 - Riffle, Moores Fork Reach 2
Station 29+94
1155
1153
1151
to 1149
i
1147
1145
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
width (ft)
+MYO(6/16/2016) 6ankfull Floodprone Area
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-2 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section M3 — Downstream
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section M3 — Upstream
Cross -Section M3 - Pool, Moores Fork Reach 2
Station 31+07
1152
1150
$ 1148
2
v 1146
1144
1142
6 10 24 30 46 SO 60 70 80 90
Width (it)
tMYO(6/16/2016)—Bankfull
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-3 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section M4 — Downstream
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section M4 — Upstream
Cross -Section M4 -Riffle, Moores Fork Reach 3
Station 39+92
1148
1146
1144
td 1142
i
1140
1138
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
--*.—MYO(6/16/2016) 8ankfull Floodprone Area
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-4 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section M5 — Downstream
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section M5 — Upstream
Cross -Section M5 - Riffle, Moores Fork Reach 3
Station 45+02
1147
1145
1143
0 1141
Ya
a
w
1139
1137
1135
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
width (ft)
--s.—MYO (6/16/2016)—Bank-full Floodprone Area
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-5 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section M6 — Downstream
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section M6 — Upstream
Cross -Section M6 - Pool, Meares Fork Reach 3
Station 47+34
1142
1140
1138
r
td 1136
a
1134
1132
0 10 20 30 40 50 50 70 80 90
Width (ft)
—0--MYO (6/16/2016) eankfull
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-6 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section M7 — Downstream
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section M7 Upstream
Cross -Section M7 - Run, Moores Fork Reach 3
Station 52+16
1142
1140
1138
1136
a
w
1134
1132
1130
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Width (ft)
--t.—MYO(6/16/2016) Bankfull —Flood prone Area
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-7 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section M8 — Downstream
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section M8 — Upstream
Cross -Section M8 - Riffle, Moores Fork Reach 3
Station 56+02
1138
1132
—
113fl
—
1128
— -• •
1126
0 10 20 30 40 5a 60 70 36
Width (ft)
I —MYO16/16j2016)—sankfull—FlnadproneArea
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-8 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section M9 — Downstream
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section M9 — Upstream
Cross -Section M9 - Pool, Moores Fork Reach 3
Station 57+38
1135
1133
1131
v
N 1129
a
1127
1125
0 10 20 30 40 50 50 70 so 90
W idth (ft)
+MYO (6/16/2016) 6anktull
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-9
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 0 of 7
Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section STI — Downstream
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section ST1 — Upstream
Cross -Section ST1- Riffle, Silage Reach 1
Station 13+46
1250
1245
1240
o_
to
a
w
1235
1230
O 10 20 30 40 50
Width (fq
+MYO(6/16/2016) 6ankfull Flaodprane Area
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-10 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section ST2 — Downstream
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section ST2 — Upstream
Cross -Section ST2 - Pool, Silage Reach 1
Station 13+81
1244
1242
1240
1238
r
1236
a
w
1234
1232
1230
0 10 20 30 40
width (ft)
—4—MYO (6/16/2016) —Ban kf.II
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-11 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section ST3 — Downstream
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section ST3 — Upstream
Crass -Section ST3 -Riffle, Silage Reach 2
Station 25+48
115e
1195
1194
o_
Vd
1153
1192
0 5 10 15 20 25
width (n)
--s.—MYO (6/16/2016) Bankfu II Flaad pr©ne Area
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-12 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section ST4 — Downstream
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section ST4 — Upstream
Cross -Section ST4 -Pool, Silage Reach 2
Station 25+70
1196
1194
o_
.td
a
w 1192
1190
0 5 10 15 20 25
width jftj
�MYO (5/16/2016) -flan kf.II
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-13 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section ST5 — Downstream
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section ST5 — Upstream
Cross -Section ST5 -Pool, Silage Reach 2
Station 28+55
1159
1187
a
v 1185
1183
[] 5 10 15 20 25
width (ft)
—6--MYO (6/16/20 16) —Ban kf.II
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-14
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 0 of 7
Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section ST6 — Downstream
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section ST6 — Upstream
Cross -Section ST6- Riffle, Silage Reach 2
Station 32+44
1177
>r�
1176
Q
w
1175
5 10 15 20 -5
Width (ft)
�MYO(3=16) Bankfull Floodprone Area
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-15 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Cross -Section ST7 — Downstream
Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section ST7 — Upstream
Cross -Section STT Riffle, Silage Reach
Station 36+85
1171
1169
1167
Yn
v
w
1165
1153
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Width (ft)
+MYO (5/16/2016) Bankfull FI.Ap.w Area
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-16 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
So ary Data
D50 25
D84 58
D95 90
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork
Pebble Count Cumulative Percent
Grass -section M1 -Riffle
120%
Moores Fork Mitigation / 94709
Cross Section M1 - Riffle
Moores Reach 2
100%
20.0%
Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Total
Individual Cumulative
silt/clay
<0.062
0.0%
0%
very fine sand
0.62-0.125
0.0%
00/0
fine sand
0.125-0.25
3
3.0%
3%
medium sand
0.25-0.5
0.0%
3%
coarse sand
0.5-1.0
2
2.0%
5%
very coarse sand
1.0-2.0
0
� OSL
0.0%
5%
very fine gravel
2.0-4.0
2
2.0%
7%
fine gravel
4.0-5.7
5
5.0%
12%
fine gravel
5.7-8.0
2
2.0%
14%
medium gravel
8.0-11.3
9
9.0%
23%
medium gravel
11.3-16.0
8
8.0%
31%
coarse gravel
16.0-22.6
15
15.0%
46%
coarse gravel
22.6-32.0
12
12.0%
58%
very coarse gravel
32-45
12
12.0%
70%
very coarse gravel
45-64
20
20.0%
90%
small cobble
64-90
5
5.0%
95%
medium cobble
90-128
5
5.0%
100%
large cobble
128-180
0.0%
100%
very large cobble
180-256
0.0%
100%
small boulder
256-362
0.0%
100%
small boulder
362-512
0.0%
100%
medium boulder
512-1024
0.0%
100%
large boulder
1024-2048
0.0%
100%
bedrock
>2048
0.0%
100%
Total
10011
100.0%
100%
So ary Data
D50 25
D84 58
D95 90
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork
Pebble Count Cumulative Percent
Grass -section M1 -Riffle
120%
100%
20.0%
C
s aux
i 154%
d
.` sax
c
10A%
a
d
40%
m
}
20%
0.0%
.-
0
� OSL
.
rr IC lV
S
V
C H �r3 i7 M
x m
Q Q Q O Q
Panicle Size (mm)
MYG 612116 ]
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross-section M1 -Riffle
z&AM
20.0%
i 154%
10A%
a
5.0%
0.0%
.-
��aa11
Q Q Q O Q
C° 1f N O
N
4
Particle Size (mm)
T
r MY0 612x16
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-17 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
So ary Data
D50 11
D84 38
D95 110
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork
Pebble Count Cumulative Percent
Grass -section 672 - Riffle
120%
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation / 94709
Cross Section M2 - Riffle
Moores Reach 2
100%
Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Total
Individual Cumulative
silt/clay
<0.062
d
sax
0.0%
0%
very fine sand
0.62-0.125
0.0%
00/0
fine sand
0.125-0.25
8
8.0%
8%
medium sand
0.25-0.5
0.0%
8%
coarse sand
0.5-1.0
4
4.0%
12%
very coarse sand
1.0-2.0
2
2.0%
14%
very fine gravel
2.0-4.0
10
10.0%
24%
fine gravel
4.0-5.7
7
7.0%
31%
fine gravel
5.7-8.0
1
1.0%
32%
medium gravel
8.0-11.3
18
18.0%
50%
medium gravel
11.3-16.0
8
8.0%
58%
coarse gravel
16.0-22.6
13
13.0%
71%
coarse gravel
22.6-32.0
11
11.0%
82%
very coarse gravel
32-45
4
4.0%
86%
very coarse gravel
45-64
3
3.0%
89%
small cobble
64-90
3
3.0%
92%
medium cobble
90-128
6
6.0%
98%
large cobble
128-180
0.0%
98%
very large cobble
180-256
0.0%
98%
small boulder
256-362
[j 4
0.0%
98%
small boulder
362-512
1
1.0%
99%
medium boulder
512-1024
1
1.0%
100%
large boulder
1024-2048
0.0%
100%
bedrock
>2048
0.0%
100%
Total 1
100
100.0%
100%
So ary Data
D50 11
D84 38
D95 110
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork
Pebble Count Cumulative Percent
Grass -section 672 - Riffle
120%
100%
16.0%
C
s aux
-
d
sax
a" 40%
m
a
a 12J3%
} 20%
v
100%
U 0%
N 0 0 O O O
�'t r 6 (i
n
SO N Gb
SV
N
0V
C N Ln
T N
a Panicle Size (mrn)
O
-MY0612116 ,
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Gross -section M'2 - Riffle
20.0%
13.01
16.0%
14.0%
a
a 12J3%
v
100%
8.0%
d 6.0%
--
4.0%
2.0%
0.0%
.
pNp 91 0 O O 0 W fL N Wp
[j 4
o Panicle Size {mrnl
T
• MY0 612116 I
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-18 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Summary Data
D50 18
D84 41
D95 58
1207.
100'
r 90w
f
S
saw
C
u
a
40%
d
}
210%
U 0%
w o v '0
iC lV
N
Y�
d r N a
Particle Size (mm)
---MY0 812116
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork
Pebble Count- Cumulative Percent
Grass -section M4 - Riffle
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross-section M4 -Riffle
19.0%
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation / 94709
Cross Section M4 - Rifle
Moores Reach 3
16.07
Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Total
% %
Individual Cumulative
sik/clay
<0.062
0.0%
0%
very fine sand
0.62-0.125
0.0%
0%
fine sand
0.125-0.25
3
3.0%
3%
medium sand
0.25-0.5
J7_
0.00/0
3%
coarse sand
0.5-1.0
2
2.0%
5%
very coarse sand
1.0-2.0
1
1.0%
6%
very fine gravel
2.0-4.0
2
2.0%
8%
fine gravel
4.0-5.7
6
6.0% 1
14%
fine gravel
5.7-8.0
1
1.0%
15%
medium gravel
8.0-11.3
15
15.0%
30%
medium gravel
11.3-16.0
13
13.0%
43%
coarse gravel
16.0-22.6
17
17.0%
60%
coarse gravel
22.6-32.0
17
17.0%
77%
very coarse gravel
32-45
10
10.0%
87%
very coarse gravel
45-64
11
11.0%
98%
small cobble
64-90
2
2.0%
100%
medium cobble
90-128
0.00/0
100%
large cobble
128-180
0.00/0
100%
very large cobble
180-256
0.00/0
100%
small boulder
256-362
0.00/0
100%
small boulder
362-512
0.0%
100%
medium boulder
512-1024
0.0%
100%
large boulder
1024-2048
0.0%
100%
bedrock
>2048
0.0%
100%
Total
100
100.0%
100%
Summary Data
D50 18
D84 41
D95 58
1207.
100'
r 90w
f
S
saw
C
u
a
40%
d
}
210%
U 0%
w o v '0
iC lV
N
Y�
d r N a
Particle Size (mm)
---MY0 812116
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork
Pebble Count- Cumulative Percent
Grass -section M4 - Riffle
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross-section M4 -Riffle
19.0%
16.07
14-0%
a 1z-0%
8-0%4.0%
J7_
2.0%
- -
-
-
0.0%o o wy}
C a OP IC N N �9 C]
O R Yn ri y p N
mNm
O
Particle Size (mml T
s MYO 67206
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-19 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
So ary Data
D50 28
D84 62
D95 150
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Cumulative Percent
Cross-section M5 - Riffle
120%
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation / 94709
Cross Section M5 - Riffle
Moores Reach 3
-
100%
Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Total
Individual Cumulative
silt/clay
<0.062
-
0.0%
0%
very fine sand
0.62-0.125
--
0.0%
00/0
fine sand
0.125-0.25
8
8.0%
8%
medium sand
0.25-0.5
0.0%
8%
coarse sand
0.5-1.0
7
7.0%
15%
very coarse sand
1.0-2.0
1
1.0% 1
16%
very fine gravel
2.0-4.0
2
2.0%
18%
fine gravel
4.0-5.7
1
1.0%
19%
fine gravel
5.7-8.0
1
1.0%
20%
medium gravel
8.0-11.3
5
5.0%
25%
medium gravel
11.3-16.0
6
6.0%
31%
coarse gravel
16.0-22.6
8
8.0%
39%
coarse gravel
22.6-32.0
17
17.0%
56%
very coarse gravel
32-45
11
11.0%
67%
very coarse gravel
45-64
19
19.0%
86%
small cobble
64-90
5
5.0%
91%
medium cobble
90-128
3
3.0%
94%
large cobble
128-180
2
2.0%
96%
very large cobble
180-256
2
2.0%
98%
small boulder
256-362
1
1.0%
99%
small boulder
362-512
0.0%
99%
medium boulder
512-1024
0.0%
99%
large boulder
1024-2048
1
1.0%
100%
bedrock
>2048
0.0%
100%
Total
100
100.0%
100%
So ary Data
D50 28
D84 62
D95 150
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Cumulative Percent
Cross-section M5 - Riffle
120%
-
100%
16.0%
-
C
s so%
14.0% -
-
-
a
a 12J3%
d
.` sax
c
--
g
10.0%
d
40%
m
8.0%
ae
} 20%
-
-
G.0%
U 0%
QV
rt G O D' 4 ej
r 0 n lu lV
SO N Gb
T N
Parric[e Size (mm)
O
-MY0612116
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Crass -section M5 - Riffle
20.0%
-
13.0'F
16.0%
14.0% -
-
-
a
a 12J3%
--
g
10.0%
8.0%
ae
G.0%
-
4.0%
2.0%
0.0%
.
N N O O a O Q (° fC N O
4 W � �
fl % d N
yrvyyy
Y
N O
s' Particle Slze lmm)
■ MYo 612116
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-20 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Summary Data
D50 13
D84 28
D95 51
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
120
100
s
80%
d
ii 60%
u
m` 40%
a
d
20%
3
E
3
V 0%
V O C N w; M N a OOi o00 m16
sIV
16 N M
Particle Size (mm)
-nitro snits
20.0
18.0%
16.0%
m 14.0
12.0%
�o
10.0%
d
8.0%
°
6.0%
4.0%
2.0%
0.0%
N N O O O O O V OD t0 N W
Gq' W tD N O N N O
C O O O T M V O O N
v O N N M le O 0 (D V
17
N M NO
� N
Particle Size (mm)
■ MYO 6n116
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork
Pebble Count -Cumulative Percent
Cross-section M7 -Run
Moores Fork
Pebble Count -Percent Individual
Cross-section M7 -Run
D-21 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation / 94709
Cross Section M7 - Run
Moores Reach 3
Material
Particle Size Class (mm)
Total
%
Individual Cumulative
sik/cla
<0.062
0.00/0
00/0
very fine sand
0.62-0.125
0.00/0
00/0
fine sand
0.125-0.25
22
22.0%
22%
medium sand
0.25-0.5
0.0%
22%
coarse sand
0.5-1.0
1
1.00/0
23%
very coarse sand
1.0-2.0
0.00/0
23%
very lime gravel
2.0-4.0
1
1.00/0
24%
fine gravel
4.0-5.7
1
1.00/0
25%
fine gravel
5.7-8.0
3
3.0%
28%
medium gravel
8.0-11.3
16
16.0%
44%
medium gravel
11.3-16.0
16
16.0%
60%
coarse gravel
16.0-22.6
20
20.0%
80%
coarse gravel
22.6-32.0
6
6.0%
86%
very coarse gravel
32-45
8
8.0%
94%
very coarse gravel
45-64
3
3.0%
97%
small cobble
64-90
3
1 3.0%
100%
medium cobble
90-128
0.00/0
100%
large cobble
128-180
0.0%
100%
very large cobble
180-256
0.0%
100%
smallboulder
256-362
0.0%
100%
small boulder
362-512
0.00/.
100%
medium boulder
512-1024
0.0%
100%
large boulder
1024-2048
0.0%
100%
bedrock
>2048
0.0%
100%
Total
100
100.0%
100%
Summary Data
D50 13
D84 28
D95 51
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
120
100
s
80%
d
ii 60%
u
m` 40%
a
d
20%
3
E
3
V 0%
V O C N w; M N a OOi o00 m16
sIV
16 N M
Particle Size (mm)
-nitro snits
20.0
18.0%
16.0%
m 14.0
12.0%
�o
10.0%
d
8.0%
°
6.0%
4.0%
2.0%
0.0%
N N O O O O O V OD t0 N W
Gq' W tD N O N N O
C O O O T M V O O N
v O N N M le O 0 (D V
17
N M NO
� N
Particle Size (mm)
■ MYO 6n116
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork
Pebble Count -Cumulative Percent
Cross-section M7 -Run
Moores Fork
Pebble Count -Percent Individual
Cross-section M7 -Run
D-21 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Smnmary Data
D50 21
D84 54
D95 82
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork
Pet We Count - Cumulative Percent
Gross -section M8 - Riffle
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation/ 94709
Cross Section M8 - Riffle
Moores Reach
MAM
100%
Material
Particle Size Class (nun)
Total
% %
Individual Cumulative
silt/clay
<0.062
0.0%
0%
very fine sand
0.62-0.125
haw
0.0%
0%
fine sand
0.125-0.25
2
2.0%
2%
medium sand
0.25-0.5
0.0%
2%
coarse sand
0.5-1.0
2
2.0%
4%
very coarse sand
1.0-2.0
1
1.0%
5%
very fine gravel
2.0-4.0
3
3.0%
8%
fine gravel
4.0-5.7
8
8.0%
16%
fine gravel
5.7-8.0
5
5.0%
21%
medium gravel
8.0-11.3
13
13.0%
34%
medium gavel
11.3-16.0
4
4.0%
38%
coarse gravel
16.0-22.6
15
15.0%
53%
coarse gravel
22.6-32.0
18
18.0%
71%
very coarse gravel
32-45
7
7.0%
78%
very coarse gravel
45-64
12
12.0%
90%
small cobble
64-90
7
7.0%
97%
medium cobble
90-128
2
2.0%
99%
large cobble
128-180
1
1.0%
100%
very large cobble
180-256
0.0%
100%
small boulder
256-362
0.0%
100%
small boulder
362-512
0.0%
100%
medium boulder
512-1024
0.0%
100%
large boulder
1024-2048
0.0%
100%
bedrock
>2048
0.0%
100%
Total
100
100.0%
100%
Smnmary Data
D50 21
D84 54
D95 82
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork
Pet We Count - Cumulative Percent
Gross -section M8 - Riffle
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Gross -section 148 - Riffle
20.0%
120%
MAM
100%
c
�
d
80%
14AR
C
haw
12A%
es
•-
-
m
m
40%
20%
-
-
U
0%
c.ox
0
a
v o v o 9* N vg
It CP N
V
N
C N N Q} W
6
Particle Size (mm)
-MY0 612116
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Gross -section 148 - Riffle
20.0%
MAM
16.0%
14AR
12A%
es
•-
40.054
-
c.ox
4.0%
-
-
2.0%
-
o.oy«
N N 0 4 � O 4 Q � � N 00
% r ui zv qi}
a `'
N O
o Particle Size (mmI
T
•MY0612116
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-22 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Smnmary Data
D50 16
D84 35
D95 61
Ixot4
100%
� apx
`m
60%
C
m
a
40%
m
30%
U 0%
o. o rv- 'moo` w
Q a g Q
6 Particle Size (MM)
1- --Myo6wls
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork
Pebble Count -Cum Lilative Percent
Cross-section STS - Riffle
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross-section STI - Riffle
20.0%
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation/ 94709
Cross Section ST1 - Riffle
Silage Reach 1
tsAm
Material
Particle Size Class (nun)
Total
Individual Cumulative
silt/clay
<0.062
0.0%
0%
very fine sand
0.62-0.125
0.0%
0%
fine sand
0.125-0.25
9
9.0%
9%
medium sand
0.25-0.5
0.0%
9%
coarse sand
0.5-1.0
2
2.0%
11%
very coarse sand
1.0-2.0
1
1.0%
12%
very fine gravel
2.0-4.0
6
6.0%
18%
fine gravel
4.0-5.7
7
7.0%
25%
fine gravel
5.7-8.0
4
4.0%
29%
medium gravel
8.0-11.3
14
14.0% 1
43%
medium gavel
11.3-16.0
6
6.0%
49%
coarse gravel
16.0-22.6
17
17.0%
66%
coarse gravel
22.6-32.0
16
16.0%
82%
very coarse gravel
32-45
7
7.0%
89%
very coarse gravel
45-64
7
7.0%
96%
small cobble
64-90
2
2.0%
98%
medium cobble
90-128
0.0%
98%
lar e cobble
128-180
0.0%
98%
very large cobble
180-256
2
2.0%
100%
small boulder
256-362
0.0%
100%
small boulder
362-512
0.0%
100%
medium boulder
512-1024
0.0%
100%
large boulder
1024-2048
0.0%
100%
bedrock
>2048
0.0%
100%
Total
100
100.0%
100%
Smnmary Data
D50 16
D84 35
D95 61
Ixot4
100%
� apx
`m
60%
C
m
a
40%
m
30%
U 0%
o. o rv- 'moo` w
Q a g Q
6 Particle Size (MM)
1- --Myo6wls
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork
Pebble Count -Cum Lilative Percent
Cross-section STS - Riffle
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross-section STI - Riffle
20.0%
tsAm
16.0%
54AR
12,054
es
-
40.654
-
�
4.01A
-
2.0%
-
0.0%
(0 N w
N O
Panicle Size {MMI
r
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-23 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Smnmary Data
D50 9.8
D84 37
D95 64
Ix0t4
100%
� apx
`m
60%
C
m
a
40%
m
20%
U 0%
a o o v o * N vg
o �YIt CP w NT +
OV H
OV � a ne vi �? 'a! V
6 Particle Sire (mm)
-MY0 61V16
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Cumulative Percent
Crass -section ST3 - Rife
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross-section ST3 - Riffle
20.0%
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation/ 94709
Cross Section ST3 - Riffle
Sita a Reach 2
MAM
Material
Particle Size Class (nun)
Total
% %
Individual Cumulative
silt/clay
<0.062
0.0%
0%
very fine sand
0.62-0.125
0.0%
0%
fine sand
0.125-0.25
22
22.0%
22%
medium sand
0.25-0.5
2
2.0%
24%
coarse sand
0.5-1.0
�
0.0%
24%
very coarse sand
1.0-2.0
1
1.0%
25%
very fine gravel
2.0-4.0
6
6.0%
31%
fine gravel
4.0-5.7
3
3.0%
34%
fine gravel
5.7-8.0
1
1.0%
35%
medium gravel
8.0-11.3
23
23.0%
58%
medium gravel
11.3-16.0
1
1.0%
59%
coarse gravel
16.0-22.6
12
12.0%
71%
coarse gravel
22.6-32.0
9
9.0%
80%
very coarse gravel
32-45
9
9.0%
89%
very coarse gravel
45-64
6
6.0%
95%
small cobble
64-90
2
2.0%
97%
medium cobble
90-128
2
2.0%
99%
large cobble
128-180
0.0%
99%
very large cobble
180-256
1
1.0%
100%
small boulder
256-362
0.0%
100%
small boulder
362-512
0.0%
100%
medium boulder
512-1024
0.0%
100%
large boulder
1024-2048
0.0%
100%
bedrock
1 >2048 1
0.0%
100%
Total
I 1
100
100.0%
100%
Smnmary Data
D50 9.8
D84 37
D95 64
Ix0t4
100%
� apx
`m
60%
C
m
a
40%
m
20%
U 0%
a o o v o * N vg
o �YIt CP w NT +
OV H
OV � a ne vi �? 'a! V
6 Particle Sire (mm)
-MY0 61V16
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Cumulative Percent
Crass -section ST3 - Rife
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross-section ST3 - Riffle
20.0%
MAM
16.0%
54AR
12A%
es
-
40.654
-
�
4.01A
-
2.0%
-
o.oy«
N 00
N O
Panicle Size (mrA
r
• MYO W M6 `
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-24 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Smnmary Data
D50 6
D84 31
D95 72
IXot�
100%
� alf%
d
60%
C
m
a
40%
m
30%
U 0%
0. rq-�o`
6 Panicle Size (mm)
-MY0 612116
Stream Survey Data
Moores Pork
Pebble Count -Cum ulative Percent
Cross-section ST6 - Riffle
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross-section ST6 - Riffle
20.0%
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation/ 94709
Cross Section ST6 - Riffle
Sita a Reach 2
MAM
Material
Particle Size Class (nun)
Total
Individual Cumulative
silt/clay
<0.062
0.0%
0%
very fine sand
0.62-0.125
3
3.0%
3%
fine sand
0.125-0.25
14
14.0%
17%
medium sand
0.25-0.5
0.0%
17%
coarse sand
0.5-1.0
6
6.0%
23%
very coarse sand
1.0-2.0
5
5.0%
28%
very fine gravel
2.0-4.0
14
14.0%
42%
fine gravel
4.0-5.7
8
8.0%
50%
fine gravel
5.7-8.0
3
3.0%
53%
medium gravel
8.0-11.3
11
11.0%
64%
medium gravel
11.3-16.0
8
8.0%
72%
coarse gravel
16.0-22.6
2
2.0%
74%
coarse gravel
22.6-32.0
11
11.0%
85%
very coarse gravel
32-45
6
6.0%
91%
very coarse gravel
45-64
3
3.0%
94%
small cobble
64-90
3
3.0%
97%
medium cobble
90-128
1
1.0%
98%
large cobble
128-180
0.0%
98%
very large cobble
180-256
0.0%
98%
small boulder
256-362
1
1.0%
99%
small boulder
362-512
1
1.0%
100%
medium boulder
512-1024
0.0%
100%
large boulder
1024-2048
0.0%
100%
bedrock
>2048
0.0%
100%
Total
100
100.0%
100%
Smnmary Data
D50 6
D84 31
D95 72
IXot�
100%
� alf%
d
60%
C
m
a
40%
m
30%
U 0%
0. rq-�o`
6 Panicle Size (mm)
-MY0 612116
Stream Survey Data
Moores Pork
Pebble Count -Cum ulative Percent
Cross-section ST6 - Riffle
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross-section ST6 - Riffle
20.0%
MAM
16.0%
14AR
12.0%
es
-
-
�
4.01A
-
2.0%
-
0.0%
N w
N O
Panicle Size {rnrnI
r
O MYO W M6 `
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-25 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Smnmary Data
D50 14
D84 28
D95 48
Ix0t4
100%
� apx
`m
60%
C
m
a
40%
m
20%
U 0%
o. o % w
Q a g W
6 Panicle Site (mm)
-Hyo 6wls
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork
Pebble Count -Cum ulative Percent
Gross -section STT - Riffle
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross-section STT - Riffle
20.0%
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation/ 94709
Cross Section ST7 - Riffle
Sita a Reach 2
MAM
Material
Particle Size Class (nun)
Total
Individual Cumulative
silt/clay
<0.062
0.0%
0%
very fine sand
0.62-0.125
0.0%
0%
fine sand
0.125-0.25
2
2.0%
2%
medium sand
0.25-0.5
0.0%
2%
coarse sand
0.5-1.0
5
5.0%
7%
very coarse sand
1.0-2.0
3
3.0%
10%
very fine gravel
2.0-4.0
5
5.0%
15%
fine gravel
4.0-5.7
6
6.0%
21%
fine gravel
5.7-8.0
3
3.0%
24%
medium gravel
8.0-11.3
18
18.0%
42%
medium gavel
11.3-16.0
13
13.0%
55%
coarse gravel
16.0-22.6
18
18.0%
73%
coarse gravel
22.6-32.0
16
16.0%
89%
very coarse gravel
32-45
5
5.0%
94%
very coarse gravel
45-64
5
5.0%
99%
small cobble
64-90
1
1.0%
100%
medium cobble
90-128
qq N m
0.0%
1000
lar e cobble
128-180
0.0%
100%
very large cobble
180-256
0.0%
100%
small boulder
256-362
0.0%
100%
small boulder
362-512
0.0%
100%
medium boulder
512-1024
0.0%
100%
large boulder
1024-2048
0.0%
100%
bedrock
>2048
0.0%
100%
Total
100
100.0%
100%
Smnmary Data
D50 14
D84 28
D95 48
Ix0t4
100%
� apx
`m
60%
C
m
a
40%
m
20%
U 0%
o. o % w
Q a g W
6 Panicle Site (mm)
-Hyo 6wls
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork
Pebble Count -Cum ulative Percent
Gross -section STT - Riffle
Moores Fork
Pebble Count - Percent Individual
Cross-section STT - Riffle
20.0%
MAM
16.0%
54AR
12A% ,..
n
40.654
4.0%
-
z:0%
-
o.oy«
qq N m
V
r N O
o Particle Site (mm) r
a MY0 612116 1
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-26 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
(--): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-27 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Revised September 29, 2016
Table 6a. Baseline Stream Data Summa
/Moores Fork DMS Project No. 94709
PRE -RESTORATION CONDITION
REFERENCE
REACH DATA
DESIGN
AS-BUILT/BASELINE
Parameter
Gage
Moores Fork Reaches�1/2Mooresrk
Reach 3
Silage Trib Reach 1
Silage Trib Reach 2
Mill Branch
Moores
Fork Reaches
1/2
Moores Fork Reach 3
Silage Trib Reach 1
Silage Trib Reach 2 Moores Fork Reaches
1/2
Moores Fork Reach 3
Silage Trib Reach 1
Silage Trib
Rech 2
Min
MaxMax
Min
Max
"lin I Max
Min Max
Min
I Max
Min
I
Max
Min I Max
Min T Max
Min IMax
Min Max
Min
I
Max
Min
Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfall Width (ft)
27.3
30.6
24.9
34.2
6.7
6.9
18.2
27.2 33.6
36.5
37.0
8.8
12.5
31.8 1 33.2
30.2 52.2
4.2
10.6
14.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
109.0
137.7
104.0
1 125.0
11
16.0
100.0
72.1 72.5
145
124
19
28
145
124
9.4
23
30
Banldull Mean Depth
1.7
2.6
2.3
1 2.9
0.8
1.2
1.7
1.9 2.2
2.2
2.3
0.6
1.00
2.1 2.2
1.9 2.6
0.7
0.6
0.8
Bankfu0 Max De th
3.0
3.4
4.0
1.2
1.7
2.3
2.4 2.7
3.5
3.6
0.8
1.50
3.3 3.5
3.3 4.1
1.2
1.3
1.5
_
N/A
46.9
78.2
73.3
1 77.6
5.6
8.4
31.6
50.8 72.4
82.1
85.3
5.1
13.1
67.2 74.1
72.5 101.1
2.8
6.9
9.3
Width/Depth Ratio
12.0
15.9
8.4
15.1
5.7
8.0
10.5
14.5 15.6
16.2
16.0
15.1
11.9
14.9 15
12.5 26.9
6.4
16.2
22.7
Entrenchment Ratio
4.0
4.5
3.7
4.2
1.6
2.3
5.5
2.7
5.0
4.0
2.2
2.2
4.4 4.6
2.5 4.1
4.5
1.3
2.6
Bank Height Ratio
1.2
1.4
1.2
1 1.9
1.0
1.6
3.1
1.0 1.1
1.0
LO
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
LO
1.0
D50(mm)
29
30
4
23
20
29
30
4
23
1 11 25
13 28
16
6
14
Riffle Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
50
70
10
195
---
16 63
32 178
26.0 199.0
--
13.12
55.95
Riffle Sloe (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
0.0059
1 0.0180
0.0038
0.02
---
0.0492 0.0514
0.0045 0.0158
0.0027 0.0180
---
0.0017
0.0554
Pool Length (ft)
N/A
---
---
------
---
42
1 140
40
112
---
15 35
63 170
81.0 139.0
---
10
19
Pool Max Depth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
5.0
5.5
---
---
3.0 6.0
4.3 8.5
1.2
1.4
2.4
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
130
270
78
1
334
20 1 23
15 75
118 295
106 325
13.3
1
171.5
21
79
Pattern
Channel Behwidth (ft
52
16143
208
---
---
86
55
165
53
267
---
---
7 84
8 59
7
36
8
59
Radius of Curvature (ft)
65.8
102.7
41
1 94
---
---
19.6
25.8
53
124
58
74
---
---
25 58
13 24
9
25
13
24
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
2.4
3.4
1.7
2.8
---
---
0.7
0.9
2.0
6.0
1.7
4.0
---
---
0.8 1.8
0.4 0.8
2.1
6.0
1.2
2.3
Meander Length (ft)
N/A
N/A
---
---
N/A
N/A
N/A
---
---
123 210
63 158
61
100
63
158
Meander Width Ratio
1.9
5.3
1.7
6.1
---
---
3.2
1.9
5.7
1.7
8.6
---
---
3.9 6.6
2.1 5.2
14.5
23.8
5.9
14.9
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G°/ /S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%B %/Be
d50/d84/65
N/A
28/67/89 and 29/43/56
---
---
--
40/89/133
---
---
---
---
25/58/90 and 11/38/110
/58; 28/62/150; 13/28/51; 21/
16/35/61
9.8/37/64 and 6/31/72
Max part size (mm) mobilized at banldull
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
1.9
2.39
0.070
0.24
5
1.90
2.34
0.070
0.24
1.90
2.34
0.070
0.24
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<5%
<5%
<5%
<5%
---
<5%
<5%
<5%
<5%
<5%
<5%
<5%
<5%
Ros en Classification
C4
C4
G4/B4
E4
C4
C4
C4
B4
E4
C4
C4
B4
E4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
4.1
5.3
4.6
1 5.2
5.4
1
6.6
6.3
5.0 1 5.5
5.0
4.9
4.5
4.5
4.4 4.6
4.2 5.1
5.0
4.5
5.1
BankfullDischarge (cfs)
193.9
1
411.4
380.1
1 358.4
30.2
1
55.1
197.5
N/A
250-260
260
24
60
297.6 340.8
348.4 468.7
13.8
31.2
1
44.3
Q-USGS NC HRl (2 -yr)
N/A
237-278
278
29
63
385
237-278
278
29
63
237-278
278
29
63
Valley Len (ft)
2227
2234
1079
1200
4730
2227
2234
1079
1200
2227
2234
1079
1200
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2393
2847
1198
1441
327
1
2578
1
2825
1198
1441
2,628
1 2,856
1,198
1 1,441
Sinuosity
1.07
1.27
1.11
1.20
1.26
1
1.16
1
1.26
1.11
1.20
1.21
.3
1.11
1 1.20
Water Surface ,lore z
0.0077
0.0067
0.0357
0.0294
0.0101
1
0.0076
1
0.0064
0.0357
0.0294
0.005541
0.005511
0.0389
0.02758
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
--
---
---
---
---
I
---
I
---
--
---
0.005265
0.006112
0.0404
0.02740
(--): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-27 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-28 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Revised September 29, 2016
Table 6b. Baseline Stream Data Summary/Moores Fork DMS Project No. 94709
PRE -RESTORATION CONDITION
REFERENCE REACH DATA
DESIGN
AS-BUILT/BASELINE
Parameter
Gage
Barn
Corn
Pond
Barn Trib Pres Rch
Corn Trib Pres Rch
Barn (Reach 1)
Corn
Pond
Barn (Reach 1)
Corn (Reach 2)
Pond
Min
Min Max
Min I Max
Min I Max
Min Max
Min I Max
Min
I
Max
Min
Max
Min
I
Max
Min
I Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
1.6
4.6
16.3
7.0
4.1
6.0
6.6
8.0
---
---
---
Floodprone Width (ft)
4.0
7.8
50.0
9.9
13.7
19
20
25
---
---
---
BankfA Mean Depth
0.6
0.5
1.5
0.7
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.7
---
---
---
Bankfull Max Depth
0.8
0.7
2.6
1.1
0.5
0.8
0.6
1.0
---
---
---
f3ankfifll Cross-sectional Area (ft2)
N/A
0.9
2.4
24.4
4.6
1.5
3.2
2.9
5.5
---
---
---
Width/Depth Ratio
2.9
8.9
10.9
10.6
11.2
11.3
15.1
11.6
Entrenchment Ratiol
1 2.5
1.7
3.1
1.4
3.3
3.2
3.0
3.1
Bank Height Ratio
7.6
3.8
1.1
1.6
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
46
46
Riffle Len (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
5
31
---
12.0
8.4
27.3
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.02
0.0538
0.0498
0.0136
0.0241
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
8 13
---
1 I
30
--
17.5
32.9
27.8
37.9
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
2.6
3.6
0.7
1.4
Pool Spacing (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
8 10
--
15
54
6.11
F 77.7
9
56
22
43
Pool Volume 3
___
___
___
___
___
___
__-
___
Patte rn
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
13
26
20
22
24
24
Radius of Curvature (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
12
30
12
29
15
21
Re.Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
Meander Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
71
85
49
1
61
66
78
Meander Width Ratio
---
---
---
---
--
---
---
---
---
---
---
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be
d50/d84/d95
N/A
Max part size (nun) mobilized at bankfufl
Stream Power (Capacity) z
. . . .
. .
. . .
. . . . .
.
. .
.
. .
. . .
.
. .
. .
.
. .
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.01
0.05
0.04
0.08
0.05
0.01
0.05
0.040
0.01
0.05
0.040
Watershed InTervious Cover Estimate (%)
<5%
<5%
<5%
<S%
<5%
<5%
<5%
<5%
<5%
<5%
<5%
Rosgen Classification
G4
G4
C4b (trampled)
B4
E4b
E4b
B4
C4b
E4b
B4
C4b
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
2.70
5.01
7.4
3.84
2.7
3.31
4.7
3.93
---
---
---
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
2.5
12.0
181.4
17.7
4.0
11
---
19
---
---
---
Q-USGS NC HRl (2 -yr)
8
---
20
---
---
8
--
20
Q -Mannings
N/A
11
---
19
---
---
I 1
---
19
11
---
19
Valley Length (ft)
622
84
187
622
---
330
84
187
330
84
187
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
250
97
194
84
28
350
97
243
350
112
243
Sinuosity
0.40
1.15
1.04
0.14
---
1.06
1.15
1.30
1.06
1.3
1.3
Watel,urface ';]one z
0.0206
0.0567
0.029
0.0211
0.0243
0.0206
0.0567
0.0176
0.0478
0.1124
0.0425
0.0118
Ban" Slope (ft/ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.0463
0.1005
0.0478
0.0129
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-28 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-29 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Revised September 29, 2016
Table 7a. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Section) Moores Fork DMS Project No. 94709 - Moores Fork
Cross -Section I (Riffle)
Cross -Section 2 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 3 (Pool)
I
Cross -Section 4 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 5 (Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate
Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY51 MY6 MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation
1150.4
1148.7
1148.4
1142.3
1139.5
Bankfull Width (ft)
33.2
31.8
33.2
52.2
30.2
Floodprone Width (ft) 145.0
145.0
---
124.0
124.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.2
2.1
2.7
1.9
2.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.3 1 1
1 11
3.5
5.2
3.3
3.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ftz)
74.1
67.2
89.6 1
101.1
72.5
Bankfull Wide th Ratio
14.9
15.0
12.3
26.9
12.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.4.
4.6
---
2.4
4.1
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
---
0.8
1.0
Cross -Section 6 (Pool)
I
Cross -Section 7 (Run)
Cross -Section 8 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 9 (Pool)
Dimension and Substrate
Base MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
IA'lY6 MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation
1138.6
1134.9
1132.4
1132.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
37.4
49.5
34.6
30.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
---
124.0
124.0
---
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.8
2.4
2.6
4.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
5.1 1
1
1 3.5 1
1 1
1 1 4.1
1 6.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (fe) 104.7
1
118.1
91.5
1 1 1
122.0
Bankfull Width/De tb Ratio
13.3
20.8
13.1
7.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
---
2.5
3.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
---
1.0
1.0
--
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-29 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-30 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Revised September 29, 2016
Table 7b. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Section) Moores Fork/DMS Project No. 94709 - Silage Tributary
Cross -Section 1 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 2 (Pool)
Cross -Section 3 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 4 (Pool)
Dimension and Substrate
Base MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY61 MY7 Base MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY61 MY7 Base MY1 MY12 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation
1234.6
1233.4
1193.4
1193.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
4.2
5.1
14.6
9.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
9.4
---
22.5
---
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.6
0.6
1.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.3
2.4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
2.8
3.2
9.3
13.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
6.4
8.0
22.7
7.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.2
---
1.5
---
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
---
1.0
Cross -Section 5 (Pool)
Cross -Section 6 (Riffle)
Cross -Section 7 (Riffle)
Dimension and Substrate
Base MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY61 MY7 Base MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7
based on fixed bankfull elevation
1185.1
1175.4
1164.7
Bankfull Width (ft)
5.9
10.6
1 11.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
---
28.0
29.6
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
0.7
0.8
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.4
1.3
1.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
7.0
6.9
8.7
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
5.0
16.2
14.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
---
2.6
2.6
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
---
1.0
1.0
Moores Fork Stream Mitigation Project/94709 D-30 Monitoring Year 0 of 7
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Submitted August 1, 2016
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report Revised September 29, 2016

Appendix E
As -Built Plan Sheet

SITE
1G
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE
DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION,
IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS
CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR
ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE
OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE,
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 6th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014.
\\IIIIIII///
•\\�,� CARo` /",
?®� FRSs
SEAL
�l
DAVID S. TURNER,iP.L.S. #L-4551 : x L-4551 ® :
AS -BUILT SURVEY OF
MOORES FORK RESTORATION PROJECT
t
f
l
1
l
4� /MOORES FORK
SURRY COUNTY, NC
SCO PROJECT #090656701
EEP PROJECT ID #94709
\ ( I
\
\
\
\
f J\
f
MOORES FORK
NOT TO SCALE
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
2. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88 (GEOIDI2).
3. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID
COORDINATES NAD83 (NSRS 2011) DATUM.
4. CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING VRS RTK GPS AND
CONFIRMED DURING AS -BUILT SURVEY. AS -BUILT CONTROL
POINTS ARE LISTED ON SHEET 2.
5. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR
CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30
MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
6. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE
CONSTRUCTED STREAM AND GRADING RELATED TO THE
MOORES FORK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
PROJECT.
7. INFORMATION SHOWN OUTSIDE THE AS -BUILT LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE WAS TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
& DESIGN DATA PROVIDED BY THE DESIGNER AND NOT
VERIFIED BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC.
UT10
UT9
I
REFERENCES:
OWNER:
NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
217 WEST JONES ST., SUITE 3000A
RALEIGH, NC 27603
[phone]
EEP PROJ. MANAGER: JULIE CAHILL
CONTRACTOR:
CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL
CONTRACTING, INC.
MOUNT AIRY, NC
[phone]
DESIGNER:
CONFLUENCE ENGINEERING, PC
ASHEVILLE, NC
[phone]
SHEET
1 -
TITLE, VICINITY MAP, & SHEET INDEX
MOORESSHEETINDEX
•- 00 TO 21 :
_j
Jo
AND CONTROL POINTS•-
•- ` 11 • 01
SHEET
4 -
MOORES FORK STA. 32+00 TO 43+00
MOORES •- 00 •0
SHEET
6 -
MOORES FORK STA. 54+00 TO 65+25
z
BART - i l 14+00 •r ,i
SHEET
• -
ARN TRIB
CORN TRIB01 TO 24+60 -
SHEET
10
- SILAGE TRIB STA. 10+00 TO 19+50
SHEET
11
- SILAGE - TO 0
SHEET
12
- SILAGE TRIB STA. 30+50 TO 37+50
SHEET
13
- COW TRIBS
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
2. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88 (GEOIDI2).
3. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID
COORDINATES NAD83 (NSRS 2011) DATUM.
4. CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING VRS RTK GPS AND
CONFIRMED DURING AS -BUILT SURVEY. AS -BUILT CONTROL
POINTS ARE LISTED ON SHEET 2.
5. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR
CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30
MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
6. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE
CONSTRUCTED STREAM AND GRADING RELATED TO THE
MOORES FORK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
PROJECT.
7. INFORMATION SHOWN OUTSIDE THE AS -BUILT LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE WAS TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
& DESIGN DATA PROVIDED BY THE DESIGNER AND NOT
VERIFIED BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC.
UT10
UT9
I
REFERENCES:
OWNER:
NORTH CAROLINA ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
217 WEST JONES ST., SUITE 3000A
RALEIGH, NC 27603
[phone]
EEP PROJ. MANAGER: JULIE CAHILL
CONTRACTOR:
CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL
CONTRACTING, INC.
MOUNT AIRY, NC
[phone]
DESIGNER:
CONFLUENCE ENGINEERING, PC
ASHEVILLE, NC
[phone]
V
_j
Jo
LO
e
ti
CD
VE
z
0
g®
Z
(D _
W�,
� �w
D
ai p
t `Z
®
4)
°�
z
w
J
®N~
0
o o
0
W
zm
=d.
z
r'
Z
M
w
~
C
t
z�
O_„
w
t
F—
z
J
U
O
U
W
=
X
o
W
®
z
0
CIC
Z
a.
�-
z
W®r
W
_®o
�
06
00
w
o
® Z
Q
F F-
F- o
U
cW
w
W
W ®
�
a
%_
� ®
W
i�
W
O
\J
U.
W
C�
J
W
F_
0
0
<Z
D
DATE:
09/05/2014
SURVEYED BY:
MW13 DST
DRAWN BY:
DST/EGT
REVIEWED BY:
DSTIEGT
PROJECT: TLS -14-003
FILE: MOORES FORK
94709 AB TLS F.dwg
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
SHEET
1 of 13

\
Scje CS`
� `CF �
1,*00
STA. 9+89
z BEGIN REACH 1
w
uj 0
w
QIw
O
Q I
uI
w
Cn
Z 0
om
U Iw
z
J
wl
wm
w I
I
I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE
DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION,
IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS
CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR
ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE
OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE,
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 6th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014.
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
2. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88 (GEOID12).
3. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID
COORDINATES N AD832011 NSRS DATUM.
( )
U
4. CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING VRS RTK GPS AND
CONFIRMED DURING AS BUILT SURVEY. AS -BUILT CONTROL
POINTS ARE LISTED ON SHEET 2.
5. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, A
O , S LES, OR
CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30
MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
6. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE
CONSTRUCTED STREAM AND GRADING RELATED TO THE
MOORES FORK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
PROJECT.
7. INFORMATION SHOWN OUTSIDE THE AS -BUILT LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE WAS TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
& DESIGN DATA PROVIDED BY THE DESIGNER AND NOT
VERIFIED BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC.
CONSERVATION �w
EASEMENT BY
OTHERS
SCE`
LEVEE
\
CS �
BREACH SCE`
.EVES �CE�
EACH
ARB122
1158
STA. 18+34.56
ROCK VANE -
1154.20
fi
-
/G STA. 17+50 %�
BEGIN REACH 2 �
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION-,
AS -BUILT LEVEE REMOVED
Q SURVEY ON LEFT BANK
LIMITS �;�• ® �
O
x
\®
On 2
m
DEBRIS REMOVED
MOORES FORK
(STA.10+00 TO 17+27
NOT SURVEYED -
NO GRADING OR
CHANNEL WORK)
AS -BUILT
CA
CONTROL
4z 9 �SK
U
L
DAVID S. TURNER,O.L.S. #L-4551
L-4551 -
�moo-
Easting(X)
'.9L®. SUR`I��
Description
16
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
2. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88 (GEOID12).
3. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID
COORDINATES N AD832011 NSRS DATUM.
( )
U
4. CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING VRS RTK GPS AND
CONFIRMED DURING AS BUILT SURVEY. AS -BUILT CONTROL
POINTS ARE LISTED ON SHEET 2.
5. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, A
O , S LES, OR
CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30
MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
6. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE
CONSTRUCTED STREAM AND GRADING RELATED TO THE
MOORES FORK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
PROJECT.
7. INFORMATION SHOWN OUTSIDE THE AS -BUILT LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE WAS TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
& DESIGN DATA PROVIDED BY THE DESIGNER AND NOT
VERIFIED BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC.
CONSERVATION �w
EASEMENT BY
OTHERS
SCE`
LEVEE
\
CS �
BREACH SCE`
.EVES �CE�
EACH
ARB122
1158
STA. 18+34.56
ROCK VANE -
1154.20
fi
-
/G STA. 17+50 %�
BEGIN REACH 2 �
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION-,
AS -BUILT LEVEE REMOVED
Q SURVEY ON LEFT BANK
LIMITS �;�• ® �
O
x
\®
On 2
m
DEBRIS REMOVED
MOORES FORK
(STA.10+00 TO 17+27
NOT SURVEYED -
NO GRADING OR
CHANNEL WORK)
AS -BUILT
SURVEY
CONTROL
POINTS:
U
........ ...... __.____._...._._...._.........._.._.__.___....... _...... ......__.__.__......_._..__._......__.___...._.�
PT#
Northing(Y)
Easting(X)
Elev(Z)
Description
16
1007396.46
1496285.36
1176.24
EX. CE
MONUMENT DISC #75
17
1007489.75
1496615.30
1183.63
EX. CE
MONUMENT DISC #76
18
1009149.48
1494015.29
1170.51
HUB &
TACK
19
1008842.98
1493619.70
1164.51
REBAR
W/CAP
20
1009091.50
1493304.62
1162.49
HUB &
TACK
21
1009229.58
1493174.68
1183.64
EX. CONTROL REBAR
22
1009165.78
1492846.19
1166.51
REBAR
W/CAP
24
1006302.87
1494209.58
1251.77
HUB &
TACK
25
1006152.66
1494180.54
1263.83
HUB &
TACK
26
1006075.99
1494008.49
1269.12
REBAR
W/CAP
2 8
1009231.64
1494364.60
1 1 1 .
6 89
HUB &TACK
29
1009341.49
1494656.74
1150.66
REBAR
W/CAP
31
1009 18.99
2
149 .58
5298
1143. 7
3
H UB &
TACK
AC
32
1009088.51
1495628.39
1135.03
EX. CE
MONUMENT DISC #24
34
1009468.91
1495954.38
1135.69
EX. CE
MONUMENT DISC #26
36
1006028.04
1494076.52
1259.19
NAIL
AL
�z_....._..:
U
37
1006313.07
1494126.98
1239.79
NAIL
_._.._ aU Y........
00
39
1008603.20
1493648.81
1150.59
NAIL
rw
,.. m..
40
1008673.96
1493419.07
1150.04
NAIL
42
1008878.57
1493201.10
1156.57
NAIL
N
46
1009234.56
1494907.20
1139.76
NAIL
4 7
1009253.45
1495116.01
1140.18
NAIL
, r r
4d
1008999.08
1495464.07
1135.47
NAIL
=
51
1009072.06
1495737.40
1134.02
NAIL
___._......._ ....._
52
1009277.17
1495761.14
1130.90
NAIL
t
53
1009325.00
1495882.17
1131.34
NAIL
__.__.,._._._._. _ ..__._......._.___........_.._........_;...
55
1007285.73
1496189.87
1173.52
NAIL
A L
�-,_ _..__._...
-- -, ......__ .�%_..
LO
56
1007279.50
1496031.98
1183.31
NAIL
1
57
1007270.27
1495867.31
1192.07
NAIL
po
58
1007176.21
1495709.16
1192.45
NAIL
1LO
59
1007043.11
1495517.02
1203.36
NAIL
60
1006878.75
1495227.08
1221.17
NAIL
.__._..,_...................._.._._.._......__.._....._.-__....,....-_
61
1006804.24
1495046.72
1227.41
NAIL
_....._._.....Tr___--...._,._�....__.._....1148
62
1006795.23
1494939.89
1238.67
NAIL
63
1006692.19
1494761.47
1239.69
NAIL
64
1006476.73
1494666.66
1246.61
NAIL
z
D
65
1006240.08
1494595.20
1260.47
NAIL
1
_...._.__._ ......;
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED JULY 2014
40' 0' 40' 80'
SCALE: 1 "=40' (22x34)
1 "=80' (1 1 x 17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1'
AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
MOORES FORK
STA 17+27 TO 21 +00
PROFILE SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'(22x34)
1"=80'(11x17)
VERTICAL: 1"=4'(22x34)
1"=8'(11x17)
I LI vl/L. I \Llvll/ v LV
UPSTREAM TO HERE
1\\,/U i vvr°v cx
BRUSH
nAA Tp�cc
LCV CIV U.
-.-a-•-®-THALWEG
- - - - - - -TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
----------------- BANK/TERRACE TOE
Com- - CONSERVATION EASEMENT
------------------------- AS -BUILT SURVEY LIMITS
--v-- --- EX. OVERHEAD WIRE
GEOLIFT ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE
BRUSH
MATTRESS o
O ROCK
CONSTRUCTED J -HOOK
RIFFLE
"aBEDROCK
tremaetraaa ra ROCK
........... F F 4P34a Riia PSa
RIP RAP VANE
ROOTWAD ROCK
CLUSTER CROSS
VANE
- _---_ LOG VANE
0 CONTROL POINT L" -�=OR SILL
W
Z c 40
1160
_- ....................___...,_..__._......:..,:.-..._.___.......__......._._...._....__.,_..._..._.__................._._._._........_........,.._.._...._..._..........__..._...,...___.._.�......._.._____,_._._.............:_.__.__._..:....._______..._...._.__.._.__.._....._.._._._..._.-_......._._............_.____.......___...._......
�
U
........ ...... __.____._...._._...._.........._.._.__.___....... _...... ......__.__.__......_._..__._......__.___...._.�
1160
J
I
�
�
ti
04
00
v o
w
1158
�
�
i...
�
�
�-
..... .. ... ..... _ ......_ _. -
1158
v 5
I
`
z wo
s `z
m�
F
1
££
1156
Z
�Z
1
3
J
£
1156
N ....._._
NO
e�...___
_�-
Y
LnU U
.
�
U
Z
m
z
r'
z
O
M
w
1154
�z_....._..:
U
_
__
- m o ,_._..._._._-____..___..__.__......_
w
+Q......_._..___.
w
cpm
m
_._.._ aU Y........
00
_..__..._.._..
U....__._....._...._._. _.._.___.
r0
__ _. _{_. _.-._-.- .--...___.._...__-__._.._
_ .. ..
�
1154
-._._....
rw
,.. m..
c?_._...._�...,
;�-
s7?.._.__.,.�
m
.._..._,_......_........._.__._.__.,.,._
_.._ ,._
0
_.___.w_.______.....w.mo-(CPOQ�_.._____....__.__.._c......
s
1152
N
M
�-
M
M
m w
W
+c�
CYAJ
m
1152
o 0
N_.._...__..._..
, r r
Lo
�,
U
m
Q.
W
=
®
o
®
0
___._......._ ....._
N. N
r1`5
__...._._..__
N
V_
N
M
t
o
1150
y.. ._..�-.
.. ...
,.._._. __.
__.__.,._._._._. _ ..__._......._.___........_.._........_;...
__...._ .�
.� f........r.................r,..._._.....:,..__-._,.__..._..,,_.......,..a-
I
� ..
...._ln.� •...ai...
In
�-,_ _..__._...
-- -, ......__ .�%_..
LO
1150
L
1
oc,
r Lr7 o
to Q N
po
W
Ll.!
I
woo
1LO
a_
a.
O
®w
LL
�/ �
_....__..............__..
U)
0
.__._..,_...................._.._._.._......__.._....._.-__....,....-_
w
U.
...��
_....._._.....Tr___--...._,._�....__.._....1148
1148
`I"
E
W
C0
G
0
1146
Q
E
__............_.__......._..t_.....__..._._....._._.d..d,_._.._____..----_.._.
z
D
....................................
........................_.._.._...
.:.._ ... ..........
1
_...._.__._ ......;
1146
17+50
09/05/2014
18+00
18+50
19+00
SURVEYED BY:
MWB/DST
19+50
20+00
20+50 21+00
U
J
LO
c
ti
04
00
v o
w
WC
C5 W
N W
v 5
D
z wo
s `z
m�
®
�
M 10LIJ
Z
�Z
1
J
QNB
0
0-
Z
m
z
r'
z
M
w
pi&:spa
w
g
z
J
V
U
W
=
®
o
®
0
z
V_
N
o
z
F_
_o
®
O �
O
+
L
oc,
po
W
Ll.!
woo
a_
a.
O
®w
LL
�/ �
UJ
U)
0
w
U.
p
`I"
W
C0
G
0
0
Q
z
D
DATE:
09/05/2014
SURVEYED BY:
MWB/DST
DRAWN BY:
DST/EGT
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -14-003
FILE: MOORES FORK
94709 AB TLS_F.dwg
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
SHEET
2 of 13

% PON® TRI6��� @ \
(SEE SHEET 7
FOR DETAILS)
o
g CIA -
1156 115 �Z
k &a,
C
zz
STA. 22+14.56 cp
'�s•ROCK J—HOOK C�
" OP ®� ®®�\. 1150.49 ,$ \
TLS
#42�®® `� � � \CF
NAIL Q AS–BUILT
_ h n
COI SURVEY
LI ITS \c
J � f
I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE
DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION,
IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS
CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR
ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE
OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE,
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 61h DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014.
CARO
Fess/p,� ?,y'
sEAL . =
DAVID S. TURNER,O.L.S. #L-4551 L-4551 ®:
SUP�����
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88 (GEOID12).
3. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES NAD83 (NSRS
2011) DATUM.
4. CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING VRS RTK GPS AND CONFIRMED DURING AS -BUILT
SURVEY. AS -BUILT CONTROL POINTS ARE LISTED ON SHEET 2.
5. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT
COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30 MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
6. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE CONSTRUCTED STREAM
AND GRADING RELATED TO THE MOORES FORK STREAM AND WETLAND
RESTORATION PROJECT.
7. INFORMATION SHOWN OUTSIDE THE AS -BUILT LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE WAS
TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING CONDITIONS & DESIGN DATA PROVIDED BY THE
DESIGNER AND NOT VERIFIED BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC.
ffEI
o,
..
......__....._.__..___».___.-
1154
___-._..___ f PROFILE SCALE .................
AS—BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
HORIZONTAL: 1"_40,(22x34) (
33
_. .____.� _..___ _ _.__ �.______._�__.____._._�_ _._ _____ ___n __ __.__.____._ _ �_ _w__ _._.__ _ _. ______.._ MOORES FORK _ _ __ _ 11152
1152 -- ---- -� __ _ ______ - o.a ...._ Q__........__.__ ____.. _ 1 80 (11x17)
rn '� E r € VER )
f
i
VERTICAL: 34
C
E ,___�.. ____.�___._____...._.._._-.___.._____-.��..�...__.._.__.______.__.._ .. _ . _ __._.____..__. _______mm�.� _ ___._.__.__ _�..__._____._».____..____.__.._._._..�._____.»._.__.___..__._.._�_....._..__�..._._._. _ ___._____. STA 21 00 TO 32 00 g —
wr �w , ... � �______.__..____..............___ _._ __..._._._._._..__... T ...__.___.__.� .____. ___. -8 (11x17)
i
�m
f
£
M— rn
i
1150: _ ,�,__..._ �,_. __.�,�;..._..__ _. __...._ _ .__...__._....–._ _ __...._..�__._._._._.,__.___..–.�._.___._...�.__»...__w_.�____–._–___.._......–._._..___– _.____.__.–...�_�:___._.�._� �:._0,_...._ � _,..._ __. �� _.�._...___.__._____.–.._.._.–,__–._..–.–..�._..._� __.._.–.__ _____. _ _.__�__.___–___� ....._.�....,__.__,....–_...–.�__.......–..._..__–.._.,–___�_.__._____._._–..__.�...__-�------- ,—� 1150
q
I
{
In
F
5_ O� p�
3O O Os
E
I
;
to 04
O 00r u') to
O ) 1^E
O OO CuLN(/�� � 1148 N E
�
; rI.l
1148
� C6 o
00 F€co _ U . ?%
.._.AIXN
to
rn
ro toN U 4Loto
LL
LL'
1146 -�-�-------1--------- �-----�------ ,t � �. �___� ,_.,.......¢.._.. �.._�._�...___� � �.. _ _..__...._ _._,_�,,,_____. _:_.__.. ______�_.��..__..�....___..�__. �..._.�m-.__�__ _.n�_ _..�� �_._ _.._ _£__ � __ __._.__...__. _ � � � � t� �� --'�-�--- --� 1146
On N � O � � �t � N Mpr) �, m t� U U � Ory �
CC
04 ......:, r ........... ......._._.... _.N._ _ .... , _. _._
._.......-,r,.,......_,__.._.�,..______..__....._._____...___._...__._..�_.-..._.__._._...._..__._r.... __............._._._».__.._.___.__.._.._...__;......�_....__.____....._.__._.__;. �.._r-„_.. _......_..,�,,,,,.. ....Fp ......ACl.... �....._.......¢.._.._..._....___.... ..._.� _..._...,. (.O �.. OQ �- r'`'1U
c.... r �Y M O els
I I � `- r- tf)c0 Md N r O., M Lq
N MON n
.s- �t�
f f � t
1144 � -�'..�---_.___.�:._...�._..__._.�_�.__�.�...�.__.�._.,____.....�____.____�.__.______._.–...._____..__�___.__.._.._____.___�_–.__...,�_._.___.__,___.._..,._._� �_.___.__.�::.�............._...__...�._._..�r- �n�.____.z-_._�____......._..__.____._�_.»__.�.�..................._.._.�.__.___mr__...__�:z._._.__–.___��_......_....__._;__._�,.:.:..__ _�._.� , _.�...._� � , �. ,�, .. tom- ,�.- --�-�---- ,r� 1144
I. ...... ._....... ; ; .
r
r
f r r
P� £
s s i J.0 L ,^ i
i
d-
d-
I
—
rrii
1142_.._ 1142
V £ f t
i E
3
F � F t I
5 }i
i . _..L.
i
1
1140 --- � -. �._..-.___,.-.__..._...._�.__..�_..___.._......_..._.____.__.-.µ_______.__......_.E._._._.._..__�_._____��_.. �__..___..�__..__..._._.____._____m__.�.__._._____..__.__.._.._...____._._._._�__,,..__...___._ _.____._�.._ �__..________w__.____�_...,__�_.____._____..__...,_._.,.._._�_.__.___.._..____..__�...___.__._.,�______..._____.__.-�_..,.__._.__..�,.._,_._._. m _ 1140
MOORES FORK
�_E
d
ffi
le
m
G
a
b
9
yid
THALWEG
TLS# 19RBC d
rnN1;FRVATI0N
CONSTRUCTED'
RIFFLE
0
LEGENDS ®®®THALWEG
TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
---------------- BANK/TERRACE TOE
CE — CONSERVATION EASEMENT
----------------„----•---- AS–BUILT SURVEY LIMITS
_0W ------EX. OVERHEAD WIRE
GEOLIFT ROCK STEP
BRUSH STRUCTURE
MATTRESS o
O ROCK
RIMMCONSTRUCTED J–HOOK
RIFFLE0/
BEDROCK
1 ” `
_ ..,fi¢..�F�� ROCK
RIP RAP VANE
ROOTWAD ROCK
7:N CLUSTER CROSS
VANE
�LOG VANE
0 CONTROL POINT OR SILL
7R UNE
� � µ
Vn-
\ EX. WETLAND/
\L
A
\Z
BARN TRI B
(SEE SHEET 7-8
FOR DETAILS)
II 11 �
1101MIS
"It's
0
d
g
d
o �
4t
Q.
/G
AS—BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED JULY 2014
40' 0' 40' 80'
SCALE: 1 "=40' (22x34)
1`80' (1 1 x 17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1 '
21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+00 24+50 25+00 25+50 26+00 26+50 27+00 27+50 28+00 28+50 29+00 29+50 30+00 30+50 31+00 31+50 32+00
�j � � ..r � '� a
j' b w
-� �' n, "`* ,i off® %;
C)
�
✓
LO
ac,.
9
E.
N
w0)
EX. WETLANDS
iR.
z
v 0
v�v
g"giRC
I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE
DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION,
IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS
CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR
ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE
OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE,
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 61h DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014.
CARO
Fess/p,� ?,y'
sEAL . =
DAVID S. TURNER,O.L.S. #L-4551 L-4551 ®:
SUP�����
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88 (GEOID12).
3. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES NAD83 (NSRS
2011) DATUM.
4. CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING VRS RTK GPS AND CONFIRMED DURING AS -BUILT
SURVEY. AS -BUILT CONTROL POINTS ARE LISTED ON SHEET 2.
5. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT
COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30 MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
6. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE CONSTRUCTED STREAM
AND GRADING RELATED TO THE MOORES FORK STREAM AND WETLAND
RESTORATION PROJECT.
7. INFORMATION SHOWN OUTSIDE THE AS -BUILT LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE WAS
TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING CONDITIONS & DESIGN DATA PROVIDED BY THE
DESIGNER AND NOT VERIFIED BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC.
ffEI
o,
..
......__....._.__..___».___.-
1154
___-._..___ f PROFILE SCALE .................
AS—BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
HORIZONTAL: 1"_40,(22x34) (
33
_. .____.� _..___ _ _.__ �.______._�__.____._._�_ _._ _____ ___n __ __.__.____._ _ �_ _w__ _._.__ _ _. ______.._ MOORES FORK _ _ __ _ 11152
1152 -- ---- -� __ _ ______ - o.a ...._ Q__........__.__ ____.. _ 1 80 (11x17)
rn '� E r € VER )
f
i
VERTICAL: 34
C
E ,___�.. ____.�___._____...._.._._-.___.._____-.��..�...__.._.__.______.__.._ .. _ . _ __._.____..__. _______mm�.� _ ___._.__.__ _�..__._____._».____..____.__.._._._..�._____.»._.__.___..__._.._�_....._..__�..._._._. _ ___._____. STA 21 00 TO 32 00 g —
wr �w , ... � �______.__..____..............___ _._ __..._._._._._..__... T ...__.___.__.� .____. ___. -8 (11x17)
i
�m
f
£
M— rn
i
1150: _ ,�,__..._ �,_. __.�,�;..._..__ _. __...._ _ .__...__._....–._ _ __...._..�__._._._._.,__.___..–.�._.___._...�.__»...__w_.�____–._–___.._......–._._..___– _.____.__.–...�_�:___._.�._� �:._0,_...._ � _,..._ __. �� _.�._...___.__._____.–.._.._.–,__–._..–.–..�._..._� __.._.–.__ _____. _ _.__�__.___–___� ....._.�....,__.__,....–_...–.�__.......–..._..__–.._.,–___�_.__._____._._–..__.�...__-�------- ,—� 1150
q
I
{
In
F
5_ O� p�
3O O Os
E
I
;
to 04
O 00r u') to
O ) 1^E
O OO CuLN(/�� � 1148 N E
�
; rI.l
1148
� C6 o
00 F€co _ U . ?%
.._.AIXN
to
rn
ro toN U 4Loto
LL
LL'
1146 -�-�-------1--------- �-----�------ ,t � �. �___� ,_.,.......¢.._.. �.._�._�...___� � �.. _ _..__...._ _._,_�,,,_____. _:_.__.. ______�_.��..__..�....___..�__. �..._.�m-.__�__ _.n�_ _..�� �_._ _.._ _£__ � __ __._.__...__. _ � � � � t� �� --'�-�--- --� 1146
On N � O � � �t � N Mpr) �, m t� U U � Ory �
CC
04 ......:, r ........... ......._._.... _.N._ _ .... , _. _._
._.......-,r,.,......_,__.._.�,..______..__....._._____...___._...__._..�_.-..._.__._._...._..__._r.... __............._._._».__.._.___.__.._.._...__;......�_....__.____....._.__._.__;. �.._r-„_.. _......_..,�,,,,,.. ....Fp ......ACl.... �....._.......¢.._.._..._....___.... ..._.� _..._...,. (.O �.. OQ �- r'`'1U
c.... r �Y M O els
I I � `- r- tf)c0 Md N r O., M Lq
N MON n
.s- �t�
f f � t
1144 � -�'..�---_.___.�:._...�._..__._.�_�.__�.�...�.__.�._.,____.....�____.____�.__.______._.–...._____..__�___.__.._.._____.___�_–.__...,�_._.___.__,___.._..,._._� �_.___.__.�::.�............._...__...�._._..�r- �n�.____.z-_._�____......._..__.____._�_.»__.�.�..................._.._.�.__.___mr__...__�:z._._.__–.___��_......_....__._;__._�,.:.:..__ _�._.� , _.�...._� � , �. ,�, .. tom- ,�.- --�-�---- ,r� 1144
I. ...... ._....... ; ; .
r
r
f r r
P� £
s s i J.0 L ,^ i
i
d-
d-
I
—
rrii
1142_.._ 1142
V £ f t
i E
3
F � F t I
5 }i
i . _..L.
i
1
1140 --- � -. �._..-.___,.-.__..._...._�.__..�_..___.._......_..._.____.__.-.µ_______.__......_.E._._._.._..__�_._____��_.. �__..___..�__..__..._._.____._____m__.�.__._._____..__.__.._.._...____._._._._�__,,..__...___._ _.____._�.._ �__..________w__.____�_...,__�_.____._____..__...,_._.,.._._�_.__.___.._..____..__�...___.__._.,�______..._____.__.-�_..,.__._.__..�,.._,_._._. m _ 1140
MOORES FORK
�_E
d
ffi
le
m
G
a
b
9
yid
THALWEG
TLS# 19RBC d
rnN1;FRVATI0N
CONSTRUCTED'
RIFFLE
0
LEGENDS ®®®THALWEG
TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
---------------- BANK/TERRACE TOE
CE — CONSERVATION EASEMENT
----------------„----•---- AS–BUILT SURVEY LIMITS
_0W ------EX. OVERHEAD WIRE
GEOLIFT ROCK STEP
BRUSH STRUCTURE
MATTRESS o
O ROCK
RIMMCONSTRUCTED J–HOOK
RIFFLE0/
BEDROCK
1 ” `
_ ..,fi¢..�F�� ROCK
RIP RAP VANE
ROOTWAD ROCK
7:N CLUSTER CROSS
VANE
�LOG VANE
0 CONTROL POINT OR SILL
7R UNE
� � µ
Vn-
\ EX. WETLAND/
\L
A
\Z
BARN TRI B
(SEE SHEET 7-8
FOR DETAILS)
II 11 �
1101MIS
"It's
0
d
g
d
o �
4t
Q.
/G
AS—BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED JULY 2014
40' 0' 40' 80'
SCALE: 1 "=40' (22x34)
1`80' (1 1 x 17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1 '
21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+00 24+50 25+00 25+50 26+00 26+50 27+00 27+50 28+00 28+50 29+00 29+50 30+00 30+50 31+00 31+50 32+00
C)
Fj
LO
9
N
w0)
z
v 0
v�v
(D Z_
�
UJw
: W
N v
U ��
Z 0
t EZ
�_.0
4? @ i�
®
Z
r Z
J
L N
00
ti
o
_i
a
W
zm
�a
�
z
r'
Z
M
Q
W
Q
t�:
O
x
NWN
1.1.
F_
z
J
U
O
W
C)O
H
®
0
z
c)
CL
O
Z
0
+
��
COI
cr)
Z
0 it
®
Z
Q
�--
U
���
vJ
U) W
W
) a
LLJ
0
w N
LL
I L
a.
O®
CLw
LI_
W
u�
0
W
u.
O
W
O
W
G
0
0
a
z
D
O
DATE:
09/05/2014
SURVEYED BY:
MWB/DST
DRAWN BY:
DST/EGT
EVIEWED BY:
rDST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -14-003
FILE: MOORES FORK
47 AB TLS F.dw
9 9 0_ _ _ g
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
SHEET
3 of 13

o
\ RR tiR
TLSB118
B118 n R4
R '
t
'per:0
.41'
- r /'\
I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LANDI �'
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY `�\ m,. '
THAT THE DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER N Z
MY SUPERVISION, IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE I
acn ' g�
,
REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND ca CIO e '�
THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE
AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. \ CONSERVATION m '
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND EASEMENT BY
SEAL THIS 6th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014. \ OTHERS I
\\\RRR111111111% GE m ! r !
CARO `®, w mi- <, If
SEAL �< = �,/ - 114
.p =fo�L-4551 �:
�® STA. 36+25 a
DAVID S. TURNER,O.L.S. #L-4551 y 0 SURv� ``�`
o ���. C� BEGIN REACH 3
1146
1144
1142
1140
1138
1.136
1134
o, %
L • 15
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88 (GEOID12).
3. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES NAD83
(NSRS 2011) DATUM.
4. CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING VRS RTK GPS AND CONFIRMED DURING AS -BUILT
SURVEY. AS -BUILT CONTROL POINTS ARE LISTED ON SHEET 2.
5. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT
COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30 MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
6. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE CONSTRUCTED STREAM
AND GRADING RELATED TO THE MOORES FORK STREAM AND WETLAND
RESTORATION PROJECT.
7. INFORMATION SHOWN OUTSIDE THE AS -BUILT LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE WAS
TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING CONDITIONS & DESIGN DATA PROVIDED BY THE
DESIGNER AND NOT VERIFIED BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC.
ll�-•
a
W
o® EX.
30"CMP
_
.:��EX. BRIDGE
4
O <j }
b
e
11<1 <FI
3£ 1 E
e
EXGRAVEL
DRIVE
3
R
S' t
o Rt "
EX. WETLAND o� 4R>R
l
R
R
m
CORN TRIB — CE — CE
(SEE SHEET 9
FOR DETAILS)
LOG VANE
1140.05
J I rN. TV 1 l/T. %_j 1_1
ROCK J—HOOK
1139.00
CE
CE — f%C
MOORES FORK
LEGEND:
—•—•—•—•—THALWEG
- — — — — — -TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
--•----------- BANK/TERRACE TOE
CE— — CONSERVATION EASEMENT
®------------- --------- AS -BUILT SURVEY LIMITS
- - -
0w------- EX. OVERHEAD WIRE
GEOLIFT ROCK STEP
4r STRUCTURE
BRUSH
MATTRESS o
a ROCK
CONSTRUCTED J -HOOK
_. RIFFLE 0/
44R$44f 444ff4A44R$44
a$4,bfb$�bb$$bbf$4444 BEDROCK
Y844$$b;ff.b•#44$34.4$f
s4&4ob$44$$f $$d4b$s4-b ROCK
umm
RIP RAP VANE
ROOTWAD ROCK
CLUSTER CROSS
VANE
ACONTROL POINT =OR
a
TLS WA
� ® - --- ----
.f
—1
14 '
AS—BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED JULY 2014
40' 0' 40' 80'
SCALE: 1 `40' (22x34)
1`80' (1 1 x 17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL — 1'
_ ..._........... ..._........._..............
_ ._......... _ _._.._...._,._..._ . _...__ ................._.. _............. .................... _.._..................... _ _.._._..................... ., .. ,
r
r
t
F. €
r
F }
€
i
}
€ s F
. (
_.___.._..___.__.._ _....._..___,.___...:...,.._._ >_._»:___ ...._._;r__._-_..__...,_ ..__.._._.__...._ .___.__ ._ ..w.........,.__ _____._______......_ ___ _.� .--___�_......._._ __-__._..._.._._-•._"__._.__._._._.__._._......_ _ PROFILE SCALE
,� r — AS BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE HORIZONTAL: 1n=40'(22x34)
W
N € 07
F
O {
' • r — .. ... _._..............................._,._.._..._..__..,. .__...`__.._..____ .._ ...,_..—._......,...._.__..._,..........,.__........_.,_.._..__...._..._..._-._...._.._._.,_............................ .... .......-§......_........_.,._......_... __.._...__..._....__.,._...__. __6 _..,.,...._....,.._...__......._._..._.._.............,.'
......_ � �, MOORES FORK — t � � € 3
U 1, c� '� � � � � } . � - 1 80 11x17 } }.
}
s i
€
�yF
,^ W{
Y J
d- VERTICAL: 1-=4'(22x34)
�
1 � U ii
STA 32+00 TO 43+00 - 1 -8 11x17
F p`) rrj • pr's M I O O O ' O n U 4";' [r + F I € ` ._..._ _._.._ ... _..___ ._ ._......_.._._....-. ....._........_.___..._ _ ._..,.,..___-__ _. ` .n ._.._....
_...
.......... ........ _ _
y. W ... _ ..__.,.... __.._...._ _ Rte- - -
r
E
f N i
N�
O i €
� r i
£ F
d- N U
_
i N d M O€ 3 f + LL 00 ..........00
-.
{ F
3
( i !
d- � s
i
z
r{ .. ...... ._... .._..nada.« .., i--
} .. V V .....5_ .,.. .� �. .}.. ....x _ } } 1 J V'1,{, O s ( LL_
I O �_..... €.
€
U"
s € E
I � � i i
d-
( { I i_� __. __._._.._._ _.__..._,,._.._._.. _ _ U_ _ __.o-,__.__—.______.__,_.,._.__._._._b.w,_ ._..____.....
..:..... _._._,__.,,M........,._,,, __ _ C� �
.y.«�.�__,_..,,...._—,..r{.................�..........-..,e.,,.......m-----._...,._......_.�._.......,-..,,,...,.....,....�...«......._.,....«...,..._......,_......,,�..,,....._.__...«........___,_..,..,_,.,...,..�...- '— �..,.,.,...,.......,.....,._..q.,.,......,,.,-iOsn=„,...,,,..,...,,,,ems,... ., �,,..,.. }...............,.. ........ •..,... ,.... .�n+t .. r.... .,.._. e./'A � � F V V ? V• € LL
r
f
d� U + LL
3 I dr d M M P,a M N d' N; CJ - U L� {-L� j U N
.._ ...._._.._ .._ _. _.. _.. ...._...-"-._ .._K.!,. .. ...._.. ... ._A Ems ......... ......_ s i
l M r7 P •— M pp M O d �� Q0 M N O 00- U etU Q U
�— � r� 00 O O N O 00 �. .' � M WL0 __......__.__ I.__ _ _ ,_, _..... .........._,_,• _,
,�,�,.._._____._.__.�.___a.,.___,. �...._..,..,.....�_,._ ............._.,_.__,..�...—._, 4Q..-_•__..,,_..,...,._,___.._.,_..__.z�--.........,.._____»..,._..._.. m., ..,_.._.�- .... M ---.•..,,per �••� i t0 Ode-- V'� � t�3 �” f3 }
3 r r 0n0 cb M t r h� I )cL� �p N � € pp 0 , 00 0 N .5 _ ,._
f ;
r
I
N
r _. w.w. _.- ...... .. ..... .. __._._...._._ ...._.. _.. ....... ................. ....... __...._._ ... ...... ... .. ... .. ... .. .. _. ........ ..... .. _. ... ._.,. .____,.._.._.. ..._.__. _,.3.._ .. __,_. _..,. _.._..._ ,.,. ....___ __ __ .. ,__,. ,___ ..__. w ... .. w_. ,. ..
.. ....... .......... .................._____,..._.......__.,_......._..........._....._...... .. _. _.._._ _ .. __. ........._ ...__,_... _._. ,r ..... .......... .____.._..__ .,.__ _. -_ , r OQ n
b .. _.... _. _. .._..,....__ ....._..._..._.._._....-.........€.._.._....._....._ ...._..,._. i..._ ._ ....� iY} r`2 �r� r') r Psi c0 M.,�.. _,�_ r M M
L(� C� r i
r
j
F
{
I M
---------------
s, � 4
ws�!1
£ j
}
{ } I
}
r
} _ _
_.._.._,__.,.�.,..,.».............__:..,..»..,,,.,,».,.....M.«.w...........«._...�....,......,...—. `..—..;.µ....�..._........__�.«________.__ �.........,_�............._...�.,....,,.._,,..,..,»,..—«._.�.....,..�.»,.�.m......,.,'_�,,.__,».,,..,.�,......,—,._,,..m.,�.�,....,......,.. F-_—&,._,._-,,...:,_m,—,_.;,�...�....»......,.,.»,�.,..._.w.' - F .. .. .g,.....,____._....�...:,,._ ,. ,...,�.._.... ..__1,..,a., ...�:..._y..,... .�,,.. ..,».»..._,..».µ..w...w.w....�....w.,,..._...,..._.,.».�.,.,y.,,.._...._._..7........�.e„�,._........—....,_.._..,...¥._........�..._..,.....,.,_.._„�.,...,,_«.»..,µ.»...,,...,...�
F���.,,....»n,..,..,...,...........................,.....,..»,....W...,....�........»..._..._........,...M....»...».m,... } � E,»...,,.....,,_..,,......,.,,,,.,,...,»,....,...,,,, �.».�..,......,_....._..........w._..w_._,.,m—_,—...w �..._.,,._.mµ.._.,d,....._._,_.�__,_,...�...,,.,.�..»..,...,..,..�....�,._,,...,,,,.,»•...�,�,,.,.,m.._,...,,..,�,,.,...»,...�.,»....,...,.........:,.....w..,,»,.,.,,,....,....._,.,—. , �..., � E F' £ f
1146
1144
1142
1140
1138
1136
1134
t _... ' , ._ ._ _ ... _ . ............ _ .. __._..... . _....._..... ....... _.--..._-.._...._... _ ..._ _...............__.._..... _.__.:.._......__
3
1132 - . - .. .._._.._......._,_..__M _..._._.__...__.._..._..___.___...._.__.. _...,_....... _._....___.____...._�.....__._.-._.�._._._._._L.._.._.__._._._._.._......_....... _... _ _ _____ _ _. _ 1132
32+00
32+50
33+00
33+50
34+00
34+50
35+00
35+50
.=1
36+50
37+00
37+50
38+00
38+50
39+00
39+50
40+00
40+50
41+00
41+50
42+00
42+50
43+00
0
_jLO
_jo
9
N
o
8 o
as
>
m
N
Z mm
♦^
i Z
0 Lu
__w
Z
5
-� 04
� O
cI-
C)
Q
Z
�d.
�
m
�
Z
�
CF)
z
M
LI
Q
c
p
co
w
"
b
s
z
J
0
U
W=_
O
r
O
Q
Z
O
Z
0 r
®
I`
O
+000
M
�
0
0c®
Q
/�
�
U /
w
W Ix
D
®
L.L
a_
®'
O
®w
LL
W
w
cn
0
LL
NW
w
p
t)
O
W
0
0Q
z
D
0
DATE:
09/05/2014
SURVEYED BY:MWB/DST
DRAWN BY:
DSTlEGT
REVIEWED BY:
DS T/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -14-003
FILE: MOORES FORK
94709 AB TLS F.dwg
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
SHEET
4 of 13

I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE
DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION,
IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS
CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR
ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE
OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE,
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 6th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014.
®��� CAIS®tLlCMJ`®,���i
a11AAM_&l
SEAL
DAVID S. TURNER, L.S. #L-4551 ®�O/' L -4551_C ob
N
M
AS—BUILT Q�'RIP -
✓ G� SURVEY RAF, -
LIMITS�ER
♦
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
2. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88 (GEOIDI2).
3. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID
COORDINATES NAD83 (NSRS 2011) DATUM.
4. CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING VRS RTK GPS AND
CONFIRMED DURING AS -BUILT SURVEY. AS -BUILT CONTROL
POINTS ARE LISTED ON SHEET 2.
5. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR
CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30
MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
6. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE
CONSTRUCTED STREANJ AND GRADING RELATED TO THE
MOORES FORK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
PROJECT.
7. INFORMATION SHOWN OUTSIDE THE AS -BUILT LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE WAS TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
& DESIGN DATA PROVIDED BY THE DESIGNER AND NOT
VERIFIED BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC.
-------TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
�. -------------- BANK/TERRACE TOE
CE — CONSERVATION EASEMENT
UT�-R-------$-------------® AS -BUILT SURVEY LIMITS
O-- EX. OVERHEAD WIRE
GEOLIFT,SP ROCK STEP
'4 STRUCTURE
BRUSH
MATTRESS o
ROCK
CONSTRUCTED J—HOOK
RIFFLE
Tkki aAik•R+ri4k4 HS.ik4
4di44&&dP&LAF44Awk?9v
BEDROCK ROCK
RIP RAP VANE
0/
ROOTWAD ROCK
CLUSTER CROSS
VANE
0 CONTROL POINT' ORGSILLNE
TLSi3 --
AS—BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED JULY 2014
40' 0' 40' 80'
SCALE: 1`40' (22x34)
1`80' (1 1 x 17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL — 1'
1
Gp �
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT BY
OTHERS
♦roo-,
�= Chi � � ♦ �
1142. 1142
S
_..._.._..._._ ... ..... , __.._..«____._..____...._.__..__...,_._..«._._.___._.__«.._._..._....__._.---.._...___...�__...___.i
.... _........ __W ......... __..... ...... ..... _... .......... ___....... w..........._.___...._.__.........._.._�_._,_............ PROFILE SCALE .........._�
__....._.
.__._....... AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE HORIZONTAL; 1 4a(22x34)«...«..
£
1140... 1 „=80' 11x17 1140
E MOORES FORK
*,
t -
z
Q
VERTICAL: -4 34
M F
W
............. .............. ..... ............................ ._.__._ _•«__, _. __._,..._.,__.____ .__.._.. __..,,......«,,......,..__—...-_,_..._,._.........__.._..«.._......_..._....«..,.,_........_..,.._....._.......,_........,_«........_......_.._«._....___...... _...._._..._._____.. ..._..._....__,_«..._.....__W.... __-S,. ,._.___,.,....__._..,,..,_..,...._._....,_.,_5'""`"".,,..,...._......_._.__....._.._..,_.._....__.b_.....«_,.«.,._—.._.._,._..._......,._.._, ......,_...,_ ..,_...._..,,......,.....,,,... i......,..._...... ............ ...........>......«_....„,..........«.._..«...._....,—..,._....,_....... ._..._.__... �._..._......._..........._.—__,....._...,,..___..,.......... W......`"__..... _... :;,,, , _._,_..._,,.. ,. c.....,....,.. _...„.........,._,,...._,. ,,.._........ ...._..... ......._._.._._....,..... _._... _._....._........
_._...�...—......., .._«,..__ •.__._.—._•_
_ rSTA 43+00 TO 54+00 1"=8'(11x17) 3.
>
� cn
c I z ;
I
1138 � � � � Q ...—.—.�__..�...—.«..—,�_. +..,�._«.—.�.��_—..�_m________._.� __.__��..�.._._____ ___�...._�_.______.____.__.�__._...,,______..__..�,«____¢__.__—_.... _..._._,.�.—..__. �_....__�___.�.__.______.—.._w_._,�__ �_«._.�____.__.«_. ___.�. _. ___. ««. _._._....__.«___.. _«_ = ;
— c + M ; __. — ..__. � p E _____._.__._.__._. _ _. ____......_... _.__ «.. _. 11138
£
6, N _.._..co ... _.
r7 r7 It U tL _.I... _....__..._.. . ZU O _ .... _._ _
• r _=Q........._.._Q ...._ ..... O U U{ U U V- LL O ( (-)0
M 6 I
___ ... __ ,__,_. Q.,,.,,_, ._.....____ ___ _ __.�_ .__.,__.__ __._._ _._. _ __ �._ __« _._ . _____
1136 r`� °� co u u ,� N __ _ _ +.«_..___ «_ .«_._.Y_ �_ rY _ .Y __Y _ µ. . _. µ -- -- 1136
L� L� Y
co o �
� M � to 1
M t � Y
0-
r W F LL
r ! �y
O L.L 1 ` ii
i
00 £ � i .0 _
Q m �. U.... U ._._ d CJU U +� « p•} _ 000 O O O O U _ ..
M _ U(� U U U�CL'r 4 O Y ?
r r M Oi iD �,� N} [ d UQ € LL la-
O N
r : �
N nn O�� M �� p Y
r � i
t
r M r
O r :.
_„_ r
CO Y
1134 � �-- �- ---r -r'1; rpTL0 L6
r-------' � .___.«__!��.__...�_«.__..M_«_�_ _.... �ci...___.__...�;.,___..___.. � _....__ Q..._ _ � _p I _«__.. __ .r, �_ .___.__«__�......_..___�__.«_.«.«_..._......._.__:__._.__�...�.......__._«._____£..__«._ .�-u c.� v +� +o �, fl c� , © .0 a � 1134
r; r P') U C} OQf OW m WUi W W �O UU NQ 1
r r£ r r r �— r r r M M d M i 7 N 01 CO N N r `� L� U Lnm m m m m WCL' t O O 00 i 3
_._ . r ........ «3.. ...tom....__ .. . �__
- _ .,.__.._..,... _,« __ . _ « .. . ; «. __, .........>*7........ �k -_ � . _ �� .�7__.i`� .._ _� ._� __ 'd _........,_.,.._._ .._._.. .. __ .._. «._ «. _ _.,. _ Q �- N m CL's ._ _
��.f� _...-....__«.«
r r r r �. ` �' 7 ' ':� {`I� `-,. ' Ln M N tiL1 W Q +
L�1
M r� r7 W �
U
• � r r
ct' W
r7 i r7 U
r
r r vi
O
W
r
...,_«.r.,...,.,._....._,...,_..«._,,.µ,««._..................«,,, ,........ . _ _ ...._.pry t..s--_.....«._..__......_....__.._..__, .,...,....._...__.._......«.....«._._._.,,._,,,. ._.. .._ _.._._ .., .._._,,.,,...__.,_._._...... __ __„_._..,«,.._,..,,.......««..,pc�.._�.«_.._ .....,, .t`7 .pp D© DO � �f3Cl[? �- O `�
1132 r r r r N r �- h mm i Q 1132
r r r N M O M r r r 'r M N N N N {� N (V N N 07 0 Lr
__.._...___..«..___.........____.__._. _,.__........_..,___... _... ... _._ .... _. _____._..._.
_ , _ ... _ .._.._......_._._....... _......_ .._... _ ._ rM, ,... N.........,......Q) _ _...... ...._ ......._ II.._..._._.,
_« _ . _ __ _.____. _.__.,._...___,,.._.__,.._.._ . __.,_._._......_.... __. _..__ .......... ................. .. .... .. ... ....... .. .. ........... _
, � ..... ,_. .__«_ _...� _« ._�.«. as �,,, rn � � ,
N i
r r �
s W
r r r
r r
er
r
r r
r r r m
€ r
i a 1 i € ! i r `— R7 r r i'7 pry r r r r �— r iQ N ( m i
1130: � �- : .-.�- ___.� ._«_, ..—..__.,,.�...,—.«�,__.__.._..�._,.�_�,.m...._._., «_«_«_,.__ .._.�___µ.«__....�__. .�..__.�..«_._«........ .......... �___.._..�....�._....__..«.�«..... ._..._� .—..«.�.._. _._.,.�,�....«____..._. _«._____.__m««________ _._._._«....._.«___._r_ ��__ .._� �-.. Qc?_ «.._�.— �-....�;.....«� . .--; 1130
s M
O
it i r �
r r r O O
i r
I y occ Pr
o I
g � F �y�
r r
M W Q
F r
r r
s i : y
£ F S
£ t � � i
r E
r
r c�
(f E �
££
�
r 0)
�..._...._1128 M
£
1128
i{
£ I
r
{
1126 2 �E:
, -__—___
i
1126
43+00 43+50 44+00 44+50 45+00 45+50 46+00 46+50 47+00 47+50 48+00 48+50 49+00 49+50 50+00 50+50 51+00 51+50 52+00 52+50 53+00 53+50 54+00
J
J
LO
o
ti
N
w
a)0®
Z
4 e
Wo
CO M W
N '� w
0
Z c 0
®
Uw
m ® W
Z
Z
5
J
C-4
0
LI..I
zm
d-
z
r'
Z
D
M
W
y -«
Nw
W
z
U�
W
0
=
®
O
Z
O
L
O
Z
0�
®
Q
0)
M
CO
�
05®
Z�
F. F_F-
(-)L�
U
I
U) w
W 0
0 ai
www
(L
OSOW
0
W
O
Cn
OC
W
G
0
0
F_Q
5
z
0
G
DATE:
09/05/2014
SURVEYED BY:
MWB/DST
DRAWN BY:
DST/EGT
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -14-003
FILE: MOORES FORK
94709 AB TLS F.dw 9
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
SHEET
5 of 13

� Q
I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE �`
DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION,®a CONSERVATION
EASEMENT BY
IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS
OTHERS
CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR
ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE R�
OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, &
�O
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 6th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014. J
NO WORK
173 ON LEFT
�I S_ - �� BANK
3
DAVID S. TURNER, P.L.S. #L-4551 = :� L-4551 ®: 2�
$ b°�
/ & .iau4Ri3
® .biR344 P4R.
��2 byJ A4<'4 ib
R L
suo
m11110 B ROC
a
/®,3 �C/♦ �� 4414
THALWEG a ��
• ®�� TL 2CEt,3
ON24
a3+rb b?R y 3
� 1 2
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
2. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88 (GEOID12).
3. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID
COORDINATES NAD83 (NSRS 2011) DATUM.
4. CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING VRS RTK GPS AND
CONFIRMED DURING AS -BUILT SURVEY. AS -BUILT CONTROL
POINTS ARE LISTED ON SHEET 2.
5. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR
CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30
MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
6. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE
CONSTRUCTED STREAM AND GRADING RELATED TO THE
MOORES FORK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
PROJECT.
7. INFORMATION SHOWN OUTSIDE THE AS -BUILT LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE WAS TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
& DESIGN DATA PROVIDED BY THE DESIGNER AND NOT
VERIFIED BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC.
60+00
y.F 3
FLOW
61+0_0
U. FARM. -RAT
cc
RI
.�
RA
26
6 '^e
BANK'
TOE , TL 53
TOP OF NAI L
BANK
AS—BUILT a
8
SURVEY
LIMITS STA. 62+72.92
ROCK CROSS VANE
1124.34
BRUSH
MATTRESS
TLS 1
,U)
4(
ROOTWADS STA. 65+25
GORES FORK
® �� Y � EX.
STA. 57+12.65x.�x.= •.. m.#
ROCK J—HOOK
1128.70 �a.- gx4 Ymxh°
�.... �..
LEGEND:.. • —THALWEG
— — — — — -- —TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
-------•-----°- BANK/TERRACE TOE
CE — CONSERVATION EASEMENT
-m----------------------- AS—BUILT SURVEY LIMITS
____0W-------- EX. OVERHEAD WIRE
000IOMWft GEOLIFT ROCK STEP
BRUSH STRUCTURE
MATTRESS <)O ROCK
CONSTRUCTED J—HOOK
RIFFLE
a.a iiRRi-ra�R 4�aaa.. ¢�4>*�;:
�iiR°`" RR� BEDROCK 44RRiRRaiaR44.aR44:ix4 ROCK
4aeei R4..�ia4Riz�4Rab4R4
RIP RAP VANE
ROOTWAD ROCK
CLUSTER CROSS
VANE
0
CONTROL POINT `-` - OR
OG SILL
ANE
L
� .n END REACH 3
END CONSTRUCTION
CU
O
00-
AS—BUILT
na
AS—BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED JULY 2014
40' 0' 40' 80'
SCALE: 1 ”=40' (22x34)
1`80' (1 1 x 17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1'
_.___._.._.............._._..»_.»_.._»...__...».....__.._._..._.....__..__...w_..».. _..._ _._. _._._. _.. _.
34 , ». ___ _.___. _».-. _._-._. ___s_...__..»_.__._...__...___.____...__-._._.__...._.._...._.__...........».._.___....__..... _. ;.._ ».... _...E..._ _.... 5__ 5. _ 134
F
f
3 {
£{ 3
£ � 33 (
3
{
i s
� _.._-__..»_._»......�_._ AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE - � PROFILE SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1"=40'(22x34) £
£
U
3
3
# e
1132s s {
; o� -..,_ . _. _._...-___ _.. _.._ ,_..__ ... __. _ _ _.__. ».__ -._. __.................._..._...._..._ . ».- _.,.._.. ._ y..- MOORES FORK—._�..._ __._ 1=sa(11x17) 1132
oa?_.., µ___.. ____� __ _ _ _____ E VERTICAL: 1"-4'(22x34) _..._. _
W n £ 1` �_ _._. _ _..._.._ �._ __.______ __ ..._._ .._ _. _ _- _ 4+� 5+2 ___ � __._____ __._._ � �...._�� ____ _ � � - .�_ 1"=8'(11x17)
TA OT06 5
S 5
0o�
o6 ui
.._y r
...._r..-..._...Ir�.._...-
Q{�
r..._.......» ._. ............
...»,.
.,.. »..«...... ,.,....3�' ..........,,.,....W,.........._.._..._...W.. ._...
.. .»_...».....�..,...»....3f,
.....,...,...,,.,, ..... .....................r .T _,-»r»-�
..,........»».«_.......r_,...»»..,»».,.R.+....._,fY�Y'JY _f ..r_...
�-......r.....,.,,.i9{.},...,........ __..........._..
,...........,..... �
..�...........,..__.,�.. .,...,,,..„....»... ...,,....»,.......,. ._..�\y1q/y. .,............,..... .
..�.._...`......,...,Y,„!
.,.,,....., ,V....i.
....
....,,..,..,.. Lam.N
.. .,,
..�
r_ .._,.,.,.,�,..,...�..... _....._w....._»....,_,,.,.. ... -_-+s#
-.._,........»..._.,__.............._..., »...._,...................
. .,_......w.... __ ___._.....�§f€
..... ... _..
.._
_ .�t
- _ _..,..... .._ .._ ... 3E
...............»O�t_yYC�i
._._..»...... ip
.............._.. „..................-..
_. __._....__ _ ...—......._.........._...................-........
.......»..,.,.qsiItI;y[j'
...._,,.
......... ...._._._.............1130, _._ ._ » ._. ...».... .„__.,_
w r NN
N N
�07 _..._,_._....».-.........__-..._-.»_..,.__.__.£#�d
.-
......._.,.
.. _.__.._.__....... _..
-
111238 1128 r _..._.._. _.. _.._.. ..__..... .......
iN 00 ci O t
�(i00 p �Op 000 N N ___..._._.... E
�/ W_nDN M ' N N �_N � N _.,.._.. __......N _ _....._....V._.f1 p........W\L/ _N. ' I� . 3 6 �
.__.... _ _.....»........_._... _ - _.. _ _
No �p_0w1126. mo. _. _.._ . .. 1126
u +
N r 0) CON CO m mC0 m Npr
JcN �
� Y1 N •
LO
1124' N _ _ ... ..... pp E i N
_...._ .t.CO 1124»�. 0
d- er �F
cN
N
#
r#
r r r i t r iN r r N d
£
i r
aC�4. N -�---� � ... M. � . N
r
re
N r
r r
r r N CO
(fl r
r N
r r
r 17
1122£ �}} I £ _ r r r rri �i r LO N -rig ro cv M 1122
Cl
r N
Ni -1
N N N N
� N
N O
r
f
{
`� _ ,.._ ».., i N .. ,., N ECJ... 1--
i �_.._ _ € i r N r r
� i
i
1120i3 £ E i f �_ .' f
.... ; 1
i
* N rr
_
1120
#
€ a
3 { { i i
#
f }}
£ f
3
S 1
l 3
e
1118 . .. _..._.£ . _ .». .. 1118
0+1rou 00+uu 00+ou an*uu 00*ou ar+uu ar+0u 00"t -W Das+au 5y+uu
otl'+ ou
0u+0u
01 +uu
OL+uu
034-V V
03 -*'0u
vf+tau
65+00 65+25
V
t
Lp
OL
9
az,
n_
V
v
c00
Bim,
An
®
Z
a� v
v U
—
G (7
Z
W
C W
zc�
i E z
/3
�
@LLI
•
co
QW
w
I =5-r
TLS 1
,U)
4(
ROOTWADS STA. 65+25
GORES FORK
® �� Y � EX.
STA. 57+12.65x.�x.= •.. m.#
ROCK J—HOOK
1128.70 �a.- gx4 Ymxh°
�.... �..
LEGEND:.. • —THALWEG
— — — — — -- —TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
-------•-----°- BANK/TERRACE TOE
CE — CONSERVATION EASEMENT
-m----------------------- AS—BUILT SURVEY LIMITS
____0W-------- EX. OVERHEAD WIRE
000IOMWft GEOLIFT ROCK STEP
BRUSH STRUCTURE
MATTRESS <)O ROCK
CONSTRUCTED J—HOOK
RIFFLE
a.a iiRRi-ra�R 4�aaa.. ¢�4>*�;:
�iiR°`" RR� BEDROCK 44RRiRRaiaR44.aR44:ix4 ROCK
4aeei R4..�ia4Riz�4Rab4R4
RIP RAP VANE
ROOTWAD ROCK
CLUSTER CROSS
VANE
0
CONTROL POINT `-` - OR
OG SILL
ANE
L
� .n END REACH 3
END CONSTRUCTION
CU
O
00-
AS—BUILT
na
AS—BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED JULY 2014
40' 0' 40' 80'
SCALE: 1 ”=40' (22x34)
1`80' (1 1 x 17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1'
_.___._.._.............._._..»_.»_.._»...__...».....__.._._..._.....__..__...w_..».. _..._ _._. _._._. _.. _.
34 , ». ___ _.___. _».-. _._-._. ___s_...__..»_.__._...__...___.____...__-._._.__...._.._...._.__...........».._.___....__..... _. ;.._ ».... _...E..._ _.... 5__ 5. _ 134
F
f
3 {
£{ 3
£ � 33 (
3
{
i s
� _.._-__..»_._»......�_._ AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE - � PROFILE SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1"=40'(22x34) £
£
U
3
3
# e
1132s s {
; o� -..,_ . _. _._...-___ _.. _.._ ,_..__ ... __. _ _ _.__. ».__ -._. __.................._..._...._..._ . ».- _.,.._.. ._ y..- MOORES FORK—._�..._ __._ 1=sa(11x17) 1132
oa?_.., µ___.. ____� __ _ _ _____ E VERTICAL: 1"-4'(22x34) _..._. _
W n £ 1` �_ _._. _ _..._.._ �._ __.______ __ ..._._ .._ _. _ _- _ 4+� 5+2 ___ � __._____ __._._ � �...._�� ____ _ � � - .�_ 1"=8'(11x17)
TA OT06 5
S 5
0o�
o6 ui
.._y r
...._r..-..._...Ir�.._...-
Q{�
r..._.......» ._. ............
...»,.
.,.. »..«...... ,.,....3�' ..........,,.,....W,.........._.._..._...W.. ._...
.. .»_...».....�..,...»....3f,
.....,...,...,,.,, ..... .....................r .T _,-»r»-�
..,........»».«_.......r_,...»»..,»».,.R.+....._,fY�Y'JY _f ..r_...
�-......r.....,.,,.i9{.},...,........ __..........._..
,...........,..... �
..�...........,..__.,�.. .,...,,,..„....»... ...,,....»,.......,. ._..�\y1q/y. .,............,..... .
..�.._...`......,...,Y,„!
.,.,,....., ,V....i.
....
....,,..,..,.. Lam.N
.. .,,
..�
r_ .._,.,.,.,�,..,...�..... _....._w....._»....,_,,.,.. ... -_-+s#
-.._,........»..._.,__.............._..., »...._,...................
. .,_......w.... __ ___._.....�§f€
..... ... _..
.._
_ .�t
- _ _..,..... .._ .._ ... 3E
...............»O�t_yYC�i
._._..»...... ip
.............._.. „..................-..
_. __._....__ _ ...—......._.........._...................-........
.......»..,.,.qsiItI;y[j'
...._,,.
......... ...._._._.............1130, _._ ._ » ._. ...».... .„__.,_
w r NN
N N
�07 _..._,_._....».-.........__-..._-.»_..,.__.__.£#�d
.-
......._.,.
.. _.__.._.__....... _..
-
111238 1128 r _..._.._. _.. _.._.. ..__..... .......
iN 00 ci O t
�(i00 p �Op 000 N N ___..._._.... E
�/ W_nDN M ' N N �_N � N _.,.._.. __......N _ _....._....V._.f1 p........W\L/ _N. ' I� . 3 6 �
.__.... _ _.....»........_._... _ - _.. _ _
No �p_0w1126. mo. _. _.._ . .. 1126
u +
N r 0) CON CO m mC0 m Npr
JcN �
� Y1 N •
LO
1124' N _ _ ... ..... pp E i N
_...._ .t.CO 1124»�. 0
d- er �F
cN
N
#
r#
r r r i t r iN r r N d
£
i r
aC�4. N -�---� � ... M. � . N
r
re
N r
r r
r r N CO
(fl r
r N
r r
r 17
1122£ �}} I £ _ r r r rri �i r LO N -rig ro cv M 1122
Cl
r N
Ni -1
N N N N
� N
N O
r
f
{
`� _ ,.._ ».., i N .. ,., N ECJ... 1--
i �_.._ _ € i r N r r
� i
i
1120i3 £ E i f �_ .' f
.... ; 1
i
* N rr
_
1120
#
€ a
3 { { i i
#
f }}
£ f
3
S 1
l 3
e
1118 . .. _..._.£ . _ .». .. 1118
0+1rou 00+uu 00+ou an*uu 00*ou ar+uu ar+0u 00"t -W Das+au 5y+uu
otl'+ ou
0u+0u
01 +uu
OL+uu
034-V V
03 -*'0u
vf+tau
65+00 65+25
V
Lp
OL
9
n_
V
v
c00
Z
a� v
v U
—
G (7
Z
W
C W
zc�
i E z
®Cc
�
@LLI
QW
w
I =5-r
N ~
O
J
¢
W
z
� d-
/(C)
W��
z
z
Lw
r
®
1yi
C
_.
0
w
z
M
U
yo
N..
U
W
=
L
N
Q
z
co
CL
O
Z
O r
®
�.®O
+
�d'
O
O
L�
®®
z
®O
`—
(� U
U) W
W
o
cl)
i/
L.L
LL
a.
®
®
W
LL
W
w
p
W
LL
w
O
U)
p
�w
I..L
a
0
z
D
O
DATE:
09/05/2014
SURVEYED BY:
MWB/DST
DRAWN BY:
DST/EGT
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -14-003
FILE: MOORES FORK
94709 AB TLS F.dw 9
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
SHEET
6 of 13

1, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE
DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION,
IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS
CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR
ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE
OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE,
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 6th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014.
\\ \0%%Ill l l f )R//,�,,//"
. F� s'®SEAL
®. -�
L-4551
DAVID S. TURNER, P .S. #L-4551 '%,-�G?®. ��R��`v�Z
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88 (GEOIDI2).
3. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES NAD83 (NSRS 2011)
DATUM.
4. CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING VRS RTK GPS AND CONFIRMED DURING AS -BUILT SURVEY.
AS -BUILT CONTROL POINTS ARE LISTED ON SHEET 2.
5. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT COMPLY
WITH G.S. 47-30 MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
6. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE CONSTRUCTED STREAM AND
GRADING RELATED TO THE MOORES FORK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION PROJECT.
7. INFORMATION SHOWN OUTSIDE THE AS -BUILT LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE WAS TAKEN FROM
THE EXISTING CONDITIONS & DESIGN DATA PROVIDED BY THE DESIGNER AND NOT VERIFIED
BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC.
EX. 24"CMP
NAD83
NAVD88
ERTY
LEGEND:
®••®•®THALWEG
— — — — — — —TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
_-----------_ BANK/TERRACE TOE
—CE — CONSERVATION EASEMENT
-------------------------AS-BUILT SURVEY LIMITS
BRUSH ROCK STEP
MATTRESS STRUCTURE
CONSTRUCTED
RIFFLE ROOTWAD
LOG VANE/SILL CLUSTER
BEDROCK
a+.a<aaaaa+oma+
RIP RAP GEOLIFT
° WOODY DEBRIS Q CONTROL POINT
AS—BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED JULY 2014
40' 0' 40' 80'
SCALE: 1 "=40' (22x34)
1 "-80' (1 1 x 17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1'
OPS_ s
m
AS—BUILT
CONSERVATION SURVEY LIMITS*'.,­-,"""
IMITS ©
EASEMENT BY �o ¢m��w��
OTHERS —! ®� ° •
CS
TLS#20 h
H&T
0
CE BRUSH
° MATTRESS
�!
LOG
SILL ! p !
®® FLOW /
h
NES,
ROCK
CONSTRU TED STEP,
RIFFLE 15 °
THALWEG
! !
00
! !
AS-BUILT
.i LONGITUDINAL
.., PROFILE
• 1/ TRIB
A10+00 O 12+44
PROFILE SCALE
=0122x3
HORIZONTAL. 1 "=40'(22x34) -4 4
1 "=80'(1 1 xl 7
=80e(11x17
r
VERTICAL: 10=4(22x34)
m =4 22x
1"=J'(1 1x17)}
1162
1160
1158
1156
1154
1152
1150
1148
d �`
� '> � ➢ n qti
115
10'
°
J
J
LO
!1
ti
�� Q
3
e
. _ _ .._ ,.
EX. WETLAND,
®-- MOORES
_ _.. ___-.___,_._.___......__
FORK
...... ............_._._...._.
_.
'0 10+50
POND TRIB
11+00
11+50
12+00
12+
1162
1160
1158
1156
1154
1152
1150
1148
50
0
QTLS26
$g8o RBe /
STA. 10+00 3D/
BEGIN REACH 1 30-3D THALWEG
�n
w . TOP OF FLOW ROO W S LOG CID
�BANK
1? RIP STA. 13+50
X COQ RAP EGIN REACH 2 t
TLS 3 " 4
a (VAI L
10
•
BANK
TOE TLS $ J �°
TOP OF #37 r'�
�� TERRACE NAIL
AS—BUILT ®�
3� ,2s
SURVEY LIMITS
CHECK
---- ° TLS 25 30 DAMS
as CONSERVATION H&I'
�EASEMENT BY�-3D—
e¢
OTHERS H&T
as
BARN TRIB
1262
1260
1258
1256
1254
1252
1250
1248
1246
1244
1242
1240
1238
1236
1234
1232
1230
€
�... _____-..._. ____.__._«_._«.E:.._.._.._.._«... ._....... ..___........ ______
-- - .. --
141,
I— r�lc7nco "h V) I I
tiF O NYui vpY I {
.... . _ ..:_....._.. _.... ._........... _............. ..... -___.-___._._
LO
N
0004 0004 QON I
AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE -------------------
- ' BARN TRI B
� _ �� ._.�_ .____._.....__.__. _ STA 10+00 TO 14+00 --_...__...._._
_
.. ......... I NNr
IOn €rY
YV O
_I___._....._... _
n0004
-X77, (y -- -- _.. _._. PROFILE SCALE CALE
-o tn
et O N HORIZONTAL: 1"=40'(22x34)
W ...._.. .......
1"=0(11x17)
..__...._.._ _-- ;EI _....«.___-_._._.._..-...__._-.__...._...-...._..._
...____..___..__.....__.3
4
_-__-
VE
RTICAL`O ~N:1"=4'(22x34)
ncn1 -8 (11x17)NN
...... __._............ . x. .. ____. _....................................._..
OON +U O _ -
;
N W
€ r S Y 3 E jam.- ...... ..,.._._._._._.. ___._______..._._
TT -
f V+
€ U
+ I
i E
V
€
V
N
€
..._.._.___.._._.__ . O00 tWlN� �.N � M —(fir
op � E
I __..... ._--__.._._..
€ E
bj
An
W
�,
00.Y.N o
__ .
r �- �, co co
N.._I�.....1_.__.,..�Or___.._=_..OY
00
.._...... ._....... _...
___._....___-______
10-)— ..._. N N OGaC01.11-1.1-11111_._ ...._. _
E
N i
N I� W
N d 04 I, �t1 M o6 �tf g s
t } r N N rr r N O pry W
_ _... !')... __.._..
r •- I N � + Ui"') . to O € `
€
N
r aqi
t.() Cc� W� E
04
CAN
F N I r�r d'WM
E-
V
rf• �
f € M
F
N�_r. M_.POOH '
_.___.__,._..__..._..._.__....._...... .___ ___..__._.«.___...._ ..._ __..__.__..... __ ___ _.__.___._«..____......._. ,....
. __._._._ _..___._«._....._.
1 I i r04
M Lo
N00
._ _. .IM.. r`i ..
€
€ N
N
F ,y M V
{} f r
1 r
€
E
I N. N .
F ' E
i
I I I
f r
£ F
N
i € €
I
£
€ £
E
1228 ? -_ ..__ _ _.«_...._._ ._.— -._,_ — _..«____.-_.-......... ............. -----—I--- ._................... ... ......._.._...
10+00
10+50
11+00
11+50
12+00
BARN TRIB
12+50
13+00
13+50
1262
1260
1258
1256
1254
1252
1250
1248
1246
1244
1242
1240
1238
1236
1234
1232
1230
l ' ,
J
J
LO
ti
. _ _ .._ ,.
_ _.. ___-.___,_._.___......__
0) v o
v�v
...... ............_._._...._.
_.
€
Ix
E� MM 4
J
p
E
i, Z
�
COCD
�w
I
U �5
>
I
r
r
i:....
_...._..__
-..
cam.....__ ._...... ..... .............. ..............
........._....
€
.... .... ..
W ?
O
Z
cZ
� OC
� I �
M
..Jp®~
00
s
O�Oq OW
U
... ..
. ly-
+ W �
O ��
N
W
_...«._
..:.......
_ - O r_Y..N .
r`?. -i _...._.
n
cD
z
r U c)
Li
�
U
f -
+
to
's
€ N O r
N
r
__lam
€ i)
._...,.., _
w
.-.._,,.
,r..,,....
U
...,.__....
r U
r
fY
_, ._
LO
N
'r
tn
p.
OO
r
r
`-
to
to ri Ih M
P7
N
�
N 00
r,
N
.......
r
r r
_.��..
to
♦..V
C)
o
U
.
__..._..__,._..._.._._.......__.....__.._...y_............_._-_•__._._......
..
.,
... ...........
_F}J
O
Z
O
r
.......................
._.,.�. r.... _,,.,,,
___.__.______.........___..._..-
+0,-
......... ;.__.._._._.._.._.......__._._.__........
®
... _..._._..._.;,_.______._........_..._................_..__.._.___......_...._._._..,
01)
............
... _.____.._-.....___......_._._?...
,._...__......... ....v.).�.............p.........._.......:
LO
00
0*)
5
O
O
0 z
Z
, A
Y J
www
D
W®
O
i
r
'0 10+50
POND TRIB
11+00
11+50
12+00
12+
1162
1160
1158
1156
1154
1152
1150
1148
50
0
QTLS26
$g8o RBe /
STA. 10+00 3D/
BEGIN REACH 1 30-3D THALWEG
�n
w . TOP OF FLOW ROO W S LOG CID
�BANK
1? RIP STA. 13+50
X COQ RAP EGIN REACH 2 t
TLS 3 " 4
a (VAI L
10
•
BANK
TOE TLS $ J �°
TOP OF #37 r'�
�� TERRACE NAIL
AS—BUILT ®�
3� ,2s
SURVEY LIMITS
CHECK
---- ° TLS 25 30 DAMS
as CONSERVATION H&I'
�EASEMENT BY�-3D—
e¢
OTHERS H&T
as
BARN TRIB
1262
1260
1258
1256
1254
1252
1250
1248
1246
1244
1242
1240
1238
1236
1234
1232
1230
€
�... _____-..._. ____.__._«_._«.E:.._.._.._.._«... ._....... ..___........ ______
-- - .. --
141,
I— r�lc7nco "h V) I I
tiF O NYui vpY I {
.... . _ ..:_....._.. _.... ._........... _............. ..... -___.-___._._
LO
N
0004 0004 QON I
AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE -------------------
- ' BARN TRI B
� _ �� ._.�_ .____._.....__.__. _ STA 10+00 TO 14+00 --_...__...._._
_
.. ......... I NNr
IOn €rY
YV O
_I___._....._... _
n0004
-X77, (y -- -- _.. _._. PROFILE SCALE CALE
-o tn
et O N HORIZONTAL: 1"=40'(22x34)
W ...._.. .......
1"=0(11x17)
..__...._.._ _-- ;EI _....«.___-_._._.._..-...__._-.__...._...-...._..._
...____..___..__.....__.3
4
_-__-
VE
RTICAL`O ~N:1"=4'(22x34)
ncn1 -8 (11x17)NN
...... __._............ . x. .. ____. _....................................._..
OON +U O _ -
;
N W
€ r S Y 3 E jam.- ...... ..,.._._._._._.. ___._______..._._
TT -
f V+
€ U
+ I
i E
V
€
V
N
€
..._.._.___.._._.__ . O00 tWlN� �.N � M —(fir
op � E
I __..... ._--__.._._..
€ E
bj
An
W
�,
00.Y.N o
__ .
r �- �, co co
N.._I�.....1_.__.,..�Or___.._=_..OY
00
.._...... ._....... _...
___._....___-______
10-)— ..._. N N OGaC01.11-1.1-11111_._ ...._. _
E
N i
N I� W
N d 04 I, �t1 M o6 �tf g s
t } r N N rr r N O pry W
_ _... !')... __.._..
r •- I N � + Ui"') . to O € `
€
N
r aqi
t.() Cc� W� E
04
CAN
F N I r�r d'WM
E-
V
rf• �
f € M
F
N�_r. M_.POOH '
_.___.__,._..__..._..._.__....._...... .___ ___..__._.«.___...._ ..._ __..__.__..... __ ___ _.__.___._«..____......._. ,....
. __._._._ _..___._«._....._.
1 I i r04
M Lo
N00
._ _. .IM.. r`i ..
€
€ N
N
F ,y M V
{} f r
1 r
€
E
I N. N .
F ' E
i
I I I
f r
£ F
N
i € €
I
£
€ £
E
1228 ? -_ ..__ _ _.«_...._._ ._.— -._,_ — _..«____.-_.-......... ............. -----—I--- ._................... ... ......._.._...
10+00
10+50
11+00
11+50
12+00
BARN TRIB
12+50
13+00
13+50
1262
1260
1258
1256
1254
1252
1250
1248
1246
1244
1242
1240
1238
1236
1234
1232
1230
l ' ,
J
J
LO
ti
N
ao
z
0) v o
v�v
i, Z
COCD
�w
U �5
®
�
0LLI
Z
cZ
� OC
� I �
..Jp®~
0d.
Q
W
in
z
M
w
p.
_z
J
C)
o
U
r
®
O
Z
O
O
Z
+0,-
®
p
01)
r
LO
00
0*)
O
O
0 z
Z
0
www
D
W®
O
®
�0W
Z
OW
w U)
Q
o
CD
LL
w
(
F—
W
0
Z
0
O
o
Q
E-
Z
SD
L
DATE:
09/05/2014
SURVEYED BY:
MWB/DST
DRAWN BY:
DST/EGT
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -14-003
FILE: MOORES FORK
94709 AB TLS_F.dwg
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
SHEET
7 of 13

.mss
-th, ®♦ ��
0
O ♦♦ `� ti
AO0� + �tn
-
�.
18+00 FLOC BARN TRIS
1A�`"(NOT SURVEYED- 25+00 2
4K " NO GRADING OR STREAM W
r CHANNEL WORK)
\ EX. WETLANDS ®� 19+00 2Fa+ ._
21+00 24+ � . ®® ®® 28+00 V �
CO 29+0o
EX.``: WETLAND
CONSERVATIO
EASEMENT BY \
OTHERS
\3�\-
- 30 30 33 30 30 33 33303C)333033-\�ry
4O\
�
m
CA)mcF\OAF
O+o
��gTio UT5 37+00
\FgSFM Im
m
x
6'
geanvN ---��--_
CgaVN ��
UT6 ,
2+00
35+09,
32+00 ON EASEMEl3�`
®,^ n 40+00 E/CONSER�f3�� a
®
.AL
_ m
x® 3 f " PROPER L�3�J
B
00 *400
00 MOORES
�cl� - Q FORK g
XOO
BARN TRIB,,---,
NOT SURVEYED- ,o A EX. WETLAND ,,\<'. .
NO GRADING OR STREAM �'� g y'
CHANNEL WORK) ��cF `���� \
so
CONSERVATION EASEMENT33 —30— Y.
CONSERVATION \ `�'s <, ® 46+®®
EASEMENT BY
/ OTHERS
AS -BUILT
SURVEY LIMITS
CA-
-3h.00000
A-
I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE
DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION,
IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS
CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR
ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE
OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE,
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 6th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014.
CIA11111111;
,Ck • . • R®`/ '%
'S62 r-.
- -
DAVID S. TURNER,P.L.S. #L-4551 :y L-4551
',.yj�' ..SURA• . ��,``�
S.
®
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88 (GEOID12).
3. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES NAD83 (NSRS
2011) DATUM.
4. CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING VRS RTK GPS AND CONFIRMED DURING AS -BUILT
SURVEY. AS -BUILT CONTROL POINTS ARE LISTED ON SHEET 2.
5. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT
COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30 MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
6. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE CONSTRUCTED STREAM
AND GRADING RELATED TO THE MOORES FORK STREAM AND WETLAND
RESTORATION PROJECT.
7. INFORMATION SHOWN OUTSIDE THE AS -BUILT LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE WAS
TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING CONDITIONS & DESIGN DATA PROVIDED BY THE
DESIGNER AND NOT VERIFIED BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC.
LEGEND:
.... — . — EX. THALWEG
— — — — —TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
---------- BANK/TERRACE TOE
CE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
--------------------AS-BUILT SURVEY LIMITS
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED JULY 2014
50' 0' 50' 100'
SCALE: 1 "=50' (22x34)
1 "=100' (1 1 x17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1'
Cl
ti
�n
V
N
q o
z
CF).�
0
Z
0-)
W
CO W
z
u)
=Z
®
4LULU
Z
�Z
o 04
ti
0
W
zm
= d.
z
D
w
F_
z
O
NWN
61.
Z
J
U
�
W
U
=
O
Z
O
iy
+
CL
ml-
Z
p
®�
O
�
O
�
0)�
o(Do
F-
0
�-
W p
W
m
v®w
W (-)
w
0
Z
LL
Q
U)
m
W
W
O
OQ
Z
D
DATE:
09/05/2014
SURVEYED BY:
MWB/DST
DRAWN BY:
DST/EGT
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -14-003
FILE: MOORES FORK
94709 AB TLS_F.dwg
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
SHEET
8 of 13

0
AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
CORN TRIB
STA 23+50 TO 24+60
PROFILE SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1"=40'(22x34)
1 "=80'(11 x17)
VERTICAL: 1"=4'(22x34)
1 "=8'(11x17)
1150 °
1148
1146
1144
1142
1140
1138
1136
23+50
24+00
f
1150
1148
1146
I
1144
1142 t
1140
i�
1138
1136 '
24+50 ,
—•—•®•—*—THALWEG
i
OF BANK/TERRACE
®------------ BANK/TERRACE TOE
CE —CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
�--w--m--- -------------AS—BUILT
SURVEY LIMITS
jf,
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE
J
RIFFLE
ROOTWAD
- LOG VANE/SILL
CLUSTER
A ,.T fA j- BEDROCK
R IP RAP
liffilff"ft GEOLIFT
0
AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
CORN TRIB
STA 23+50 TO 24+60
PROFILE SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1"=40'(22x34)
1 "=80'(11 x17)
VERTICAL: 1"=4'(22x34)
1 "=8'(11x17)
1150 °
1148
1146
1144
1142
1140
1138
1136
23+50
24+00
f
1150
1148
1146
I
1144
1142 t
1140
i�
1138
1136 '
24+50 ,
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
2. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88 (GEOID12).
3. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID
COORDINATES NAD83 (NSRS 2011) DATUM.
4. CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING VRS RTK GPS AND
CONFIRMED DURING AS -BUILT SURVEY. AS -BUILT CONTROL
POINTS ARE LISTED ON SHEET 2.
5. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR
CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30
MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
6. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE
CONSTRUCTED STREAM AND GRADING RELATED TO THE
MOORES FORK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
PROJECT.
7. INFORMATION SHOWN OUTSIDE THE AS -BUILT LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE WAS TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
& DESIGN DATA PROVIDED BY THE DESIGNER AND NOT
VERIFIED BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC.
LEGEND:
—•—•®•—*—THALWEG
i
OF BANK/TERRACE
®------------ BANK/TERRACE TOE
CE —CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
�--w--m--- -------------AS—BUILT
SURVEY LIMITS
jf,
ROCK STEP
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
2. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88 (GEOID12).
3. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID
COORDINATES NAD83 (NSRS 2011) DATUM.
4. CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING VRS RTK GPS AND
CONFIRMED DURING AS -BUILT SURVEY. AS -BUILT CONTROL
POINTS ARE LISTED ON SHEET 2.
5. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR
CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30
MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
6. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE
CONSTRUCTED STREAM AND GRADING RELATED TO THE
MOORES FORK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
PROJECT.
7. INFORMATION SHOWN OUTSIDE THE AS -BUILT LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE WAS TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
& DESIGN DATA PROVIDED BY THE DESIGNER AND NOT
VERIFIED BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC.
LEGEND:
—•—•®•—*—THALWEG
— — — — — — —TOP
OF BANK/TERRACE
®------------ BANK/TERRACE TOE
CE —CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
�--w--m--- -------------AS—BUILT
SURVEY LIMITS
BRUSH
MATTRESS
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE
CONSTRUCTED
RIFFLE
ROOTWAD
- LOG VANE/SILL
CLUSTER
A ,.T fA j- BEDROCK
R IP RAP
liffilff"ft GEOLIFT
WOODY DEBRIS
0 CONTROL POINT
AS—BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
` SURVEYED JULY 2014
r
f 40' 0' 40' 80'
OVERHEAD
\ WIRE SCALE: 1 "-40' (22x34)
^°^^^ 1 "=80' (1 1 x 17)
'�+® CONTOUR INTERVAL = l'
\ 0
00
FLOW \c
\c�\ CORN TRIB m ®\.A AS—BUILT i
\ (REACH 1 SURVEY
\ STA. 10+00 TO 23+50 ^ 19*0 � \ \\ " �� LI M ITS
C�\ NOT SURVEYED—
NO GRADING OR STREAM
v CHANNEL WORK)
I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE
DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION,
IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS
CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR
ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE
OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE,
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 6th DAY OF NOVEMBER , 2014.
CARO
® F si0,-
_ SEAL
DAVID S. TURNER, kL.S. #L-4551 9 L-4551 0.
SUR \`
\\
J
\c�
--'/'00
21+00
�22*00 EX.Sg
�\ 30"CMP��
\cF� 23+00 ,tp
EX. GRAVEL`
DRIVE
f.
—�CE� STA. 23+50 A
CONSERVATION -�-- �__� ��_mm_-�---�---- BEG. REACH 2 L C
,_. ��,
T
EASEMENT BY t� _. _ ___ _�� ._�..�_ _�-- __ __-_ _ _ ,
OTHERS 141 � _�_ .. - .M_ 4 - -° gy^�{ cc,
ow
ow
OW
F A &x > 0
lb C4s-
iYl
N
NK
OE,
MOORES
FORK
V
J
to
O
ti
n
V
cm
00
v o
z
a'
w cu z
W
U) W
N-�
z 5
ma
`z
m�
®
� DC
Z
c z
0 N ~
0
0
J
w
zm
U) 0-
�
z
och
z
w
�
�71
O
.s
4
uj
z
J
U
<
W
U
0
z
qqt
N
Z
O
I---
O
0
C)
U
®
z
'
~
F— O
U
W �
F-
W®®�
�0w
W
0
z
o�
LL
O
C0
U
W
O
aa
Z
D
DATE:
09/05/2014
SURVEYED BY:
MW13 DST
DRAWN BY:
DST/EGT
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -14-003
FILE: MOORES FORK
94709 AB TLS F.dwg
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
SHEET
9 Of 13

I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE / G
DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION,
IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS AS -BUILT TLS# 63 CE
CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR SURVEY NAIL
ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE CONSERVATION / LIMITS _
OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, EASEMENTBY 06 -OTHERS
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 6th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014.
_-CE NAIL#62
® SS
ow CES
°I _ SEAL O E
yv® C
- -r L-4551 �• _ � � GEOLIFT '. _ •:� ��
DAVID S. TURNER, P.L.S. #L-4551 �2 moo. %# TOP OF
,� /:�§M
%�L®•suR`I�� GSC 1 NO WORK ON� �� ���_ �� BANK 2`
���►��,�v� S -T / TLS 64 % 0 RIGHT BANK'S
Al 09� ,� TLS
�61 �
SILAGE x
GENERAL NOTES: L�®�' c�cC� TRIB o0 ;F�a \\
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS �` .�`�� CHECK
E ®'
OTHERWISE NOTED. ,a� ®� � � ;� DAM
®
2. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88 (GEOID12). ��Q� �CE� BANK
3. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE . gyp' �d';�, `gyp i TOE 19 0
GRID COORDINATES NAD83 (NSRS 2011) DATUM. 1 �® ,' G� /c4-0 °" 0-,
4. CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING VRS RTK GPS AND O��
CONFIRMED DURING AS -BUILT SURVEY. AS -BUILT
CONTROL POINTS ARE LISTED ON SHEET 2. / ��
��
5. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR �" � -p9�. � -
CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S.
_� � ` r
47-30 MAPPING REQUIREMENTS./ ,�" G� � ROCK UT1
6. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW e'` / pq� STEP G�Z v (SEE
THE CONSTRUCTED STREAM AND GRADING
RELATED TO THE MOORES FORK STREAM ANDS+ / w� / SHEET i 3)
WETLAND RESTORATION PROJECT. r / TLS#65
7. INFORMATION SHOWN OUTSIDE THE AS -BUILT G� 0° NAIL a FASCINES
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE WAS TAKEN FROM THE
EXISTING CONDITIONS & DESIGN DATA PROVIDED THALWEG �� c1l;/ �`^
BY THE DESIGNER AND NOT VERIFIED BY TURNER O vJ
LAND SURVEYING, PLLC. /
�� �o�oa� + CE
co
/ 00
RIOGHTORK ON
BAN
G `
C T. BEGSNAREAC �0
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY: v
CHECK
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC U
UJ/
�® DAM SURVEYED JULY 2014 {
l
Y. `1°p 40' 0' 40' 80' / k
Gl
SCALE: 1 =40 (22x34) /
CHECK �O �s;o 1 "=80' (1 1 x 17) c�' w
DAM �� 010 CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1 U
ti4y 4�`a G
LEGEND:
®•®•®.®•®THALWEG
- — — — — — -TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
-------------
BANK/TERRACE TOE
CE —
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
-----9-------------------AS-BUILT SURVEY LIMITS
BRUSH ROCK STEP
MATTRESS it
STRUCTURE
CONSTRUCTED
RIFFLE ROOTWAD
LOG VANE/SILL CLUSTER
NifiFkk•Ak
BEDROCK GEMOft
GEOLIFT
RIP RAP
I WOODY DEBRIS Q CONTROL POINT
1254 - _._------ ....__.__. _........ __............ ............ ____....._n_...._,.....__.._.......__...__ .,..,.._.._...._._._._"__""__._"..__.".._....._............. 1254
OZI—� w s
OwON rn
O
_.....__...
.
_..._..._,._..._............_..._ 11252
1252 .
:
€O. N
E
d ..._._.....4250 ..._._._.....»
_ 1250
n1 00
1248 _.........
rn..,.._.,__.»____..,____........._._ _. _ : 1248
�r L6
-N
N
1246 ,- 00 , f,�..__._......_.:._.............__�__.....___».__...._...».._.....__.�.__.......,__ 1246
d O 00 (bO Y €
N c0 c'6 c no o
1244 ......... ...._........__......r .__��V.. .. o �N _ o.._'- -___.._..:......_.,........_...,...,....._.,. _ -< 1244
q 0-) r E
1242 ____._.._..,....
N
d' r
_.._....... .................... ..... pr? .._.....
N �N N � 0,�,
Lq
W �-
i
N
N
O
O
r
1240 9 N r r 1240
d-
d-
3 �
1238 _.... ....___,_ ...____ _.._.__.. _..._. _._____-____."_.._.__..__.._.. __._._............... _.........._ 1238
10+00 10+50 11+00 11+50 12+00
1242
1240
1238
1236
1234
1232
1230
1228
1226
1224
1222
1220
1218
1216
1214
.,......... ...__w.............._.._._. ».._ _.,._......_.. __...._ ........,_.....,..._....... ...:..__._._.,...-«_„_.__.._ _. ....._.......,.«_.._.-,._... ..___._...«_ _..__..._...__. .... .......... _.. .._.,_.«_.«._..............__,.,.___._.__.._...._... _.__ .,,,_...._._...._.._. _. «__... ............ ............._....._..,_..._'_.___....___..___.._._....._...._.._.___...._...._..,._.._,.. _.__._.._,._..._ ___._...�,... _....__. __,.... __...,__._._..._.....__."_....."_______„.....,.._._......._.._..__.. ,"........_._.___
__ _. _ .._. _._._,......._..._ __ . __.. _._. _._... �.._ ._._ r
(^ _..._ _
E
P
2
ii � 1
€ l �` 00 I .... _...._....._. ._......... _ _ __._._ _.._ ___..___._...._.__.. __._.__..._ __._ __... _.___.___.,_...._.__.....
+Ur) rnY
€ E
F `^
Y J
f s a
+C
N
O
NON €
£
i
h7 �— ;
I
. I u^
06 u'
._.._.....,.,..__._...."",
:_.�
y
r
i AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILN E ..__....,,,...,.,..�...,..,,€ € I F„
SILAGE TRIB
,......_..,_..,,..,...._ ,,,.,,_...,, .."...._.m,....
U W i
_ ....._.___._ __.. O+p 9+5
.:... o'O_ _ � � STA 1 0 TO 1 0 --�-�
NrdI.C)
,^ i
LL J
f
_»E
tC) M
+''^^N
E---------.........._......_._,.:»._........_.._._._.._....._ �.,_._.....__._..... N _. M � ......._ ..... �.__..._. _ f,._...�N ......� O N l� gyp.. .... .» » . €
�y
V l� r
O r J �:: t
N
4
m
E
4—
V t
`— 3 7 t� r7 pY ON ~ —
PROFILE SCALE
A
i_._ _
c� F
N M I`7
€
r N r� No I HORIZONTAL. 1"=40'(22x34)
I
Y
N.___.__._...' __.__.�.,�._ __.._ ... �� € .. �—_ ._.—....�,.._ _ 1"=80'(1 1x17\
E
IN N.
NO w
� O N z
�LVERTICAL:
1"=4'(22x34)
.. ...._. fl-�(x)N
f
CD N O U Y i
1. I .. ...E:. ..... E
i 4 N NN 00 .� �� 0��. ( 1
r
w I
i £ ,
mo0
�
� € NN N
ON N �N''^^NO -€
f N
13 W_
N N In d' 3. M 'F”" I. i
I
# N
N
i
i
N
_.....,_.� ..__.__.�,_...._.w__.... � �--__.......
_._.N N..__µ_,
i
N
i
i O I
N € N M I
€ ( N O
N 1LO Nu)
£
fi N �17 ,
, em. # OZ
_.
_........ ._.. f O _... .. _._.
N I 00 O N
£.._,.„,...,...._,..,_.«._..._,_._......,.....__,..__.,.w.:.._._.._.,,:.�_.__.i..._.,.,�_, _,..,,.__._.�.,.._..___.,_..___.__,...,_.»..___.._.__..__.,..w........._,...,:...,_,„..._...__.,......�e.,_.__....«.µ.«._.__,_,_»..-,..._._,._,_.«_� ._._«.....,,�..�,.._.w:w_........... N__m_ ....�_y,�_._. N.,__!n._._;__.,_ •-J�___i_.._�..._..,_.,..___..,._..__-..__-_�.-.._.._,1,v.1 ._�.____._..._.._._._
cq
N N rp
i
N
N
OiN
^ I...
N
Lq 00Ns
cp
r 1 F
�^ M�0MM QQ
..._-___._.__._--__._..._______......_._........_.............__-_._._...._......-"�.... ...... 0. _.. .. .
__......NNLN
LO
-€$
fS?. _Q2.Z
r—
d I N ~ {— €
ri
I _ N Cr XLLJ
x
3 I €
.., N
I £
1242
1240
1238
1236
1234
1232
1230
1228
1226
1224
1222
1220
1218
1216
1214
._.._. _._.___,_._.__._ . .... _. __. ___._._........ _. _. _..._._.._..__ . ____......__....._......_.__._...__.._._. , ,_.._....... _�.»�.__ w.... ___..._..._�.. __,__ _-1___---__-__-1__-_ 1212
1212
12+00 12+50 13+00 13+50 14+00 14+50 15+00 15+50 16+00 16+50 17+00 17+50 18+00 18+50 19+00 19+50
0
LO
9
N
00
0
z
w o
... v
vw
oa cia Z
w
CD W
-v w
;.N
uj
E Z
®
o, w
z
;__
J
0 N ~
0
I,, -
C)
Lu
= CL
z
m
z
r'
z
a
F—
w
a
C
0
w
z
J
0
O
w
U
=
C)
0
z
Ltd
m
CL
r
Z
O
0,—
F-
o
�coIi
Q
�'t
®_
r
®O
Z
H O
''^^
®0
CL
Ix
a
W
W
0
�n
V
LL
Q
J
U)
W
�n
V
0
0
Q
5
6
f�
DATE:
09/05/2014
S RVEYED BY: U MWB/DST
DRAWN BY:
DSTJEGT
REVIEWED BY:
DSTJEGT
PROJECT: TLS -14-003
FILE: MOORES FORK
94709 AB TLS_F.dwg
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
SHEET
10 of 13

36,
12cE, DEBRIS PLUG-�7 ���� %
1Q� CE
, �_
0 ���-� -"CE-_ CONSERVATIO
TLS 61 , 1, -�--- EASEMENT E
`-cE OTHER
NA �2I AS -BUILT
1$ ®�CES
12 SURVEY
�� LIMITS 12�� _ar®� �cE---
72 11 -s
O . y I TOP OF x-121
CO11
® � ,���2I TERRACE 121
®ko® , — • � '21+ , 121 1212 �8
Z , � TOP OF_ -----TERRACE___ Vo ()R
��'• - 121 / BANK --TOE - �2 p�
�. � BANK o qV
- ® ". - 121 / Z '' TOE 1 12
� -
OBI q 'i yr e ® —, ✓P`
J... THALWEG
4z
CONSTRUCTED -®- -__ _
STA. 22+25 RIFFLE
BEG. REACH 2
CE— , --- SILAGE TRIB
1 --cE
-CE
/
--CE -__
CE I _
CE , _
CE -__
I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND GENERAL NOTES: —CE--_
&SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY 1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE - CE,
THAT THE DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER NOTED. —C
2 THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88 (GE0I13I2)
l
I
0
' MY SUPERVISION, IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE 3. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID LEGEND: —_________
REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND COORDINATES NAD83 (NSRS 201 1) DATUM. • ® • ® ° ® • ®THALWEG -----cE.! * 4 1
' THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE 4. CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING VRS RTK GPS AND - — — — — -TOP OF BANK/TERRACE � I ® °
AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. CONFIRMED DURING AS -BUILT SURVEY. AS -BUILT CONTROL -- BANK/TERRACE TOE �cE� ° '
/ WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND POINTS ARE LISTED ON SHEET 2. CE — CONSERVATION EASEMENT `-_ V .��
SEAL THIS 6th DAY OF NOVEMBER , 2014. 5. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR AS -BUILT SURVEY LIMITS AS -BUILT SURVEY BY: CES
CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30 TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC �� I
\\���,i�ii�i�i BRUSH � I
��// MAPPING REQUIREMENTS. ROCK STEP
CAR MATTRESS STRUCTURE SURVEYED JULY 2014 cE� l
\\\\ ////
SSB. al®,y%�� 6. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE �_ j
� ®FE ®,y� 'y % CONSTRUCTED STREAM AND GRADING RELATED TO THE RIOFFLERUCTED 40 0 40 80 �CE�
� ` _ _ , �I SEAL r-. _ MOORES FORK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION -=��-- - LOG VANE/SILL ROOTWAD
:r L-4551 �: _ PROJECT.
DAVID S. TURNER, ® - 9 0. � 7. INFORMATION SHOWN OUTSIDE THE AS -BUILT LIMITS OF °-..a;F,;:t°dd4� '
P.L.S. L-4551 ti iL-11°-3zx A-¢¢ BEDROCK SCALE: 1 =40 (22x34)
"-f O I. SUF�`I� ��� DISTURBANCE WAS TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING CONDITIONS
%G®p 8 �����`� & DESIGN DATA PROVIDED BY THE DESIGNER AND NOT � RIP RAP GEOLIFT 1"=80' (1 1 x 17)
'111,1111"O VERIFIED BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC. WOODY DEBRIS A CONTROL POINT CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1
�._ __.
1212 _....._._._..... ,_ _ 4 € r 1212
} I £
V I Z 0 Z € ! £
i i £
— {{ } f i i i s 's f
V
i €
I
I
V !
Z
U €
1210 �, z, x � z �.___.CO �...« F M« « „. „ _ 1 I I - 1210
[��:c� - �I €
£� w
X 1 ` — V I { LL 6 i t _ . .... .--.1.1-----__. _._._ _ .. .. _., »...._. » _._.-..-_. .__.... __- _` »..._.._................ ».._».-._.._. _.» _._
N .............._ .
i Lu—
— V) I €
V !
I F- £
X
co€
O
X Z i
rn + I
C 1—. U I
1208 w © °�? to en woU _ _„ _z . _..„ ___ __ _.� - -_ -_ _ 1208
i £
3
X I� €
N co O
£
N
- E
N07U � £
co i
4 :
x, I
t F
1-1W r X 00 £ I 3
U
4 € 4
N w �z z � : i i € AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE :
4 £
E
9
Z 1
N N
Z
O U
I
1206 �- _ � o � � _ �.... ...... _z . _�. �.. �._ .__. __ « _ _�.._ « . __.._.�__ „ _ _, __ _ . _._�._.. __ ._ _ .« _ _ _ _ _.. __ ._ _ ..._�._. __�_._ _..:�_ � -...� _.-«- 1206
11N
_ ILAGE TRIB
S
i j
3
r
X
I 3
i
I
{ N €
I r Oy 0 �p �p M ........�.. ........._.. w....»...._ ._.......X I i s
STA 19+50 TO 30+50 I
M E
t
N .-
i
N- N /� r
€
1204 ____.-_ _.,.__._ r . 0 -N1.1-1-111.1-11111.... af _. «_m.. -__- ._ „ __.._-._, . ____.- «_ «_«_ _ _ __,„___ _ - I «. _ -_ 1204
LO Lo
s I r N O O GO N U l� N I I
1-1.7.5 ._gt..___.»..._. _ ._._».. _{.»-.._« _..__... ._......_.__. .. ».._„_..«._.._._..._..._ _ ........... ..._.- ...--_. ._ _..�.,,_.-_...._.. ..._.. _ »..-_., ._....-......._.».........»_.....__.,..-_._.».....„....._�......,....._-.»..»,i.....-.....__.::......._»._. ............_.-_...... .-
...... ... - .. _._...._. _._._. __.......... _..._ ....---- _......... ,«..»_......... ........-- __._..-.._.-.._.__»_.. ._....-..... --
O I
N
N i
N LL 4
N
I f
d PR FILE SCALE
r� O
1202 �- �-�--- �- €� � � � ---�-----�--„---�---- 4 � �� 1202
r r
I F _ r ON 0 N wo N I ± HORIZONTAL: 1 "=40'(22u34) I __ _ _ . _.._._ -_..._»._ __ __«._.__..._.»_.
__.._«_._..__....-....._..___»...._...............-........._.„___..__....__-..__--_.„....._...._--_ ._-.._ ..».._ ..... _ cU.... .. ».__..._..____.._.»_-._..___....»._...._..._.. _.........._...,._....._. .. »._._.........__.»....._ _ _,»« . 17 __
__ __. _ _.._..__._.._._�._. - . ___.._. __a_._.___._.__.__..._..__..._. 4-._.. R. Q N _............._ _._._.._.__ .._ ___ .». ._._. ........._. 1 80(11X )
r N NOEr N U- r w ? _£.». I VERTICAL: 1 "=4'(22x34) I ..
11 i
,«__«__«_„_:«-,««....._„ _, ....«.«_««____.««___«..,,_,.« _._«_,„„„«._,_„__._.......»«__„««_.._».,._„._.,.,.,.._,_._..,.._......_...«.«„«___„._«_..„ -„.�«�«_«..„_..„„_,_._.»............ „_.- „.... ...„.... .,.,_.., _..„„......,.._..._ »_.....„,...__.,..,._.._1 _»_ �. _._-_«_..__«__«m«....,.._„««_,.,.„--__.-.»-.._._._,,_«._.____.._„.„„..�.__,«_,.. _«......:„__„ __ �-
1200 r + N N r NU v r� «� m 1 -8 (11x17) - 1200
r
0
0
r
€ i : j f}
(( 3
f r
E'
4 E E s• LL i
N w
i
U
L� Ln I
r
N i
i
I-«____.� O,. Lam_:.. L]C .___,.,„ ........._,..SP....,µ.;:._„ _ «.„ „,«_.„._,.,°.„ « _ «„ _ « _. __ _ -
1198 _. _.. _-„__._ :..__�_ _. „«__.„„.«„. cn, ____ _ __ __.__� w ._„. « - _ _ „ __. .._.__ ___.__ _.._«_ -. «- __._„ _.„_._ _ _� __«_„_ «_ 1198
”' :
- _ _- .«__ r O O p) to N U i �[ _ 1
}
w
r O �/ O I
r ry� �,
T r }
4 r .... .. r 01 00_ – 11.11 USU... ��.. ct -
f CV + ¢......
I r 1 z { g _
_.
„„„„.„.«:.,„«.._...,.„...,._«,,..,...„_,,.,,,«,„„,„,......«....,.r-«..»..„..._..,,......„.,..«««—.—...„„«,.---.a„..«–,._«�«.....�..„�.......„.-_....,,._....._,., �«�«,„«.«._«„....„.w.,.«..«....„......:.,..«.,.«....a--,–�.« .............,,,,«„,.«......,,.«...„,„,,..,,„.,„.«.,,.„. ..._..... _,».„...„....:....,...:.. .-.._,_.,..,,,.,.,...... _„. .«_«.« _,_,__.,._. _,.;,,,.......,"' .._�. .. „f_, , U ..._,CQ__.,..,_.,____..._.,.,„.„..„.,,.,,,,.««„«......,..,,._,_O __..,��«,_,«„.,. .....,._.,..........,,.,,.,,«««.«.«_.....«,,..,�...M.,.......,_.. _.... «««««�«.,,.. ,„„.„ .„«..
1196._.__...._...... _.�__._.„ _ ��_______ - 1196
S
I ; CO d NU-. N €
i
1 �'
i [ I
I
r
�I d
N U
i i r
€ 3 N U _ ............ .. ..... . _. _._ ............_.....----._...- - - _ -- ... - __._._...._._.._. _ ..
f_ ,_ .. _ _ __ _ ., _ __»_..____. ___ _.- __..... ......... . _. _.,_.....,..» ..___._.,_..._.,_ .._.......,......_- .. ___ ..__. _. _ _ _ _ ___ .,_.__. _. _ _.» _ __ _ .._... __ O CL' Cir N_ . _. . _ _. ....-
,,
r O O c� 00 d r LL- IL i
4
E'
a
• � o
N U
� h
i
__..,_.. _ __.__; _ - _11
„_ _ _:__.___ _ _» „,_ _ . „ _ _ __.___, _ .._„ __ ___, ___µ__ ,_____.,,,_._.__,,,,-_,_,___..,„___„.„„._,.,.,_,. .,„ �.„,.. oQ.,. _._,rM.. U . ,..._«_....,.r+, .,,. _,. _a,_,„__� _ __ , ,.,,,_ __._ _,_, ,., ,„,_„. k- N , 4 � 1194
1194 { { { u� ,r, NU £ r-
4 } r r OO O LnO tf)�' U- N t d. �' (/j 'v)0 U 1 4 I
: r
TT £ t
£
N U
V�
F i
r rn U I^ Z
r of r
I I i r t3) O (� In t j ....� ...� s ..... U... .. _.._... __ ... © Ln Ydj p0 � � 4
I .._ OM O; NU +LL- +0001 aow, H € i
11.92 - - �_ -.__._ . _.- -_ _. ____. _�__„ .__._ _ __ _ _ _ } 4 _
_-_.�_�„ f �..._.„ ,14 1192
s I r� O N M NUU�� fD C7 N�� Z -i «
i
1* ..........
_ _........ _ _......... .._..._......._........__......»_.,,....,.._..,._,.___..;,..»__„_....._.....,,,.._._»,__._«�_...__.,_.___..»_.....__......_..__.___.........___._........_.......»..........-._._._.»._«».......,._.._..,.-___.,_.......__._......_.._�.–_....«.–_...._..–.._...,.._.._._.._.___»_._.__.._._._..._.._.....«..._._,».._..____.._.__.._.
.... », ,_ .».... .. _ ... _ «_ ,_._.... _...... _ ._. _ .. _..._.......... .. .........._... _ ... . __ ... ..... 1 . .. ... .. .. . ... .. . .... ... .. .. .... .. .. .. __ .. ... ..., ,
.._,. < _ _», » .. »b. . -_ __» ....»_.,_.......«.._..,._......._...._..._...,_...»»._.»..,_...._...,...,....._-.„....,..»...,»_..,..,._.._._......»._»_»»..,.».»»..»a._,.:.-.....»........»...»..._.. .. »,,._.._............. ... _.,.._._ ,.,.„........._...._.«,..«....._......._.,,.»,...._._...__........»»,»_.-........_„... .....,.«...„...... „.._......., ,......«,_,.....,........._..i...,......»_.... ... ........... ...... ..... .. .... _... .... .y
” I € . - r £ c� N 00._... 0. 0 ........ U U U..[Y.. . I ....N tii — C�3 Z `i C� 00 (� € I
W
r: d d r
{
� Z O
I U O.
r
cfl
cfl
(( V/
I r
r
V
F------1
£ r O N O–'
1190-'------««_......«„„__�,.�.�_.-...._.«.�.._..:�«.. �«««.�.„.«..._�..___,�..__..__._«_««_..«,«�.�«..„._...�..__�..,��___.._..__�__�_..«_._«._„«�«.�,„.�.„,_�...«..«.«.«.«„.�„..„.„...„._.«„«..._._«�,«««._�.«....�«._._�_._�.._«_..«.„_««.�„_„.«_„„„�__.m�_.«..__„-,._............:.........«__._-_.�_._.._„___�___��.._ �_.__�,_..�, �.:.._._.r _.,_ _, as Oma. � — (D � Nz � -� ---�- 1190
r d) O� - 0 tnd .4 — z_ +C� I
4 Y J ��
w
%
r r/ x I _. ..._.. ..._._ ...._..._. ._, _.. _ , ......_...._.._._._.»_....__ - _ _. . .
i £ } s 1 �r — � V/V/ - llllll • a.... .....W .. NM E f - .... .... ( .._4_...
FFF £ s £ € } E s € ( : r l_r C� X 1 : s E { 3 i4
I w n
V !
�.
X
I
O i
1188 ! „______ __„_ _«__ .« _._.____ _.««_ �...�« „ _„_ +. _ _ _- ___ __» ..____._ __� _.„_. - . �_._.- ___-. - _. � -----____ _ __-_„ ..._ �___.__,_..__ _,--_ _..._ «_.. �« --. �.—_____- - 4__ «.�. «.___.�.� .«„...�..„--_______„_. �__..__. _._.__.}_ _ __._____„.___..„__ �.,_..aca , �., ..„ .._._a© _._. � w . � � � -� - 1188
W
W
'M
4 i M
_ _ .._..__._._»___..._.._....__».. ___..._..«....._...«._._«.._,__.«.... _-___......_.__.._.._.__. . _„_._.__.. _ ..-_______.__._.__._..__....._._____...._..___._ _... ____ »__ _ «_.._ .. _._
_ . _...__,..».._._._....... _......... __...__ .._......_._...... _ .. _ _ _. .. .. _. _ _ ...... ._ _.. _....... ._ _..... .... ... - .. ..................»...... .
. . . ....... .... .... ...... ...... ... . .. { ,_ �,.. ,. ...._t_ .
}
r
n
3 r � S
i i Ln
6
r
{ y
1186 � � � - E -.«--..-�.-ta.�„_--_--„--._-�--..«_�..�._-.__. _«„«.-.�-�-�.--I-- __-,-_-.-..- _,..�«.�„_�««�«..__.«_.�.«� � ;w.».__.��_..........� � � .� __r_. r �._._._..._..„«.„„�«�.._„„.._«m«_.«..„._ I 1186
4 i :
r
cfl N N
I
i
I
O
O
r i
j € E r o 00 7� «i O Lci cfl I I 0 i I_ .
Ln .*
f
/� r V
I
s _ •-
u J
O
L7 (0 0
1184 - -�� - - ««_ „,_._ _ _«..._„___„„.._. __.«. .�_._ _ _.« _.._._._....„.� ... _. r r 90_ _ __. N 3 1184
r
:
I ,-
� r r
E. M
M 1 W
W V
i O 00
r 00
..._...»._._._.. ... I is _ ..... _... ..... .... ... .. ..............t-. ... _ .__. _._._... ._,._.. ..... _.. .. .... ....... ........
i
I
r
rnrn i
Y!...
�y�
1182 �- .�„„.«tfi I:
._«„. _,.._._..,««.„.«-._. «.,,_...... _ � .. ,�., «3 «..� ,� ra 00 r” 5. oa . ,..»_..._._...„...._ .._.__� ._.__.«_. , � _.�, .00 � 1182
( r7 V
t r /.��
r N 17
W V/
4 f : , M TT
j W V/
} { r
r C�
I 00
i
r
I-11-11 00 N
Lo I
: VlJ M
{ : ii 3 4 r'i —
�y
V
} _. �L _ e
1180 «._---- __«..._�..____„«____ - _,_ __«„_ __- _. ._„m„ -µ __ - _ __ �___. _ _. _«_- _ «_.... �« ._ . __._«�,_ - ___ ___ ____ _ - _«.„.-.. __.„. _... 1180
_ ._ ___ _ w
�...
I.
£ I
6
-i
s
00 O
O
} I
r
M
r r r W
' i t,
e
4
3 : 3 ...r
:
f
I
r
1
_..__.,_.__ _„__. „. _ _„„. __ _... _...._..__3...._
117___,___.„_.„„„._..�.�««_._„«...„..�_..„,««,.. ;.�,.««_..�.�.«„__ _,..,.-_� __ e.«-..� _.... «-_______ .....__._._._.....„....„N„....._.„._._.«».„._.««-«____.._.__........_.......,.._....__........„.....»..«_._„__.„.„„...__........._;...»...._«........_....,„_.____«_«._..»._......»_„,_._...,_._.„_.�._______.__._._.„____.._......._._._-.�_.„.„._..__..„.._.__;._.........«___�__.._._.__._._.__„�.«__.___.._._.__ __�«««....„„_.._______..„_�«.«_««__.�._...._....___:___._._._««.«.._«_„.__..._....__.___.._____.__.__._..._-._..__._..____w___«.�.„.„__„.._..__.....__:._._..„...__....._..»._.«.___«_. --•. 1178
8
19+50 20+00 20+50 21+00 21+50 22+00 22+50 23+00 23+50 24+00 24+50 25+00 25+50 26+00 26+50 27+00 27+50 28+00 28+50 29+00 29+50 30+00 30+50
C)
-jo
LO
NT
ti
1')
V
N
O
Z
V O
60
}-
I c C7
5, Z
Llc)
?-
r- (O W
N
'D w
z =U)
N 0
E
a'Z Ill
A? (8)W
®
°�
z
<>
_ Ir
I5
0O�'-
w
I --
O
W
c (.
N
Q
H
In
Z
�/
Ldp
T-
®
z
m
w
®
y„%
O
„
L
9
gt, 1-
W
w
3
F-
z
U
.<
W
=
�)
�2
O
0
z
LO
W
C4,r)
z
O
O
I—
I. OO
®
I`
Lr)
lO
4t
+
O
g
0)
®p
0
�--
Z
Q
�
D
U
V O
W
W
Cn
W
M
www
a.
0-
R
�e 0
O-
w
1
C VJ
w
III
0
1'
V
LL
VJ
0
>
0
�Z
2
D
O
2
DATE:
09/05/2014
SURVEYED BY:
MWB/DST
RAWN BY:
rDST/EGT
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -14-003
FILE: MOORES FORK
34709 AB TLS F.dwg
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
___j
SHEET
11 of 13

\ COW TRIS 2 "o
\ (SEE SHEET 13)
\ LOG
��\ STEP -
CE CE
BRUSH
MATTRESS
� ,� �► �.� tip- -�•�
MA
I
THALWE
CE
—cE—
E�
/G
9c,V SCE_
\ CONSERVATION /GE
EASEMENT BY
ca oroo OTHERS '
�J cq
Off° —
CE — TLS17
$$ Q \ TLS16 CE CE CE "MON76
' ® CE ON75 --CE
CE
k0 �- —
>>
1.7 STA. 37+50
BEG. REACH 3
DESIGN FOLLOWS
( w
118 R C 00 EX. THALWEG D/S
SILAGE TRfB
CE --
I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE
DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION,
IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS
CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR
ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE
OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE,
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 6th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014.
\�\\killllli,,,�,
CARO
avow,ck
R� _
DAVID S. TURNER, P.Lt. #L-4551 L-4551
suo "
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED.
2. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88 GEOID12 .
3. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID
COORDINATES NAD R
83 (NSRS 2011) DATUM.
4. CONTROL ESTABLISHED S ABLiSHED USING VRS RTK GPS AND
CONFIRMED DURING AS -Es ILT SURVEY. -
U SU E AS BUILT CONTROL
POINTS ARE LISTED ON SHEET 2.
5. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR
CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30
MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
6. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE
CONSTRUCTED STREAM ANDRA I
G D NG RELATED TO THE
MOORS FORK O RK
STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION
O ON
PROJECT.
7. INFORMATION SHOWN OUTSIDE THE AS -BUILT LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE C WAS TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING S G CONDITIONS
& DESIGN DATA PROVIDED BY THE DESIGNER AND NOT
VERIFIED BY TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC.
N B 3 OF 37+50)FLOW
'
OF-�, _1 -
PT'\'\
55
I
� as
�a
TOP OF
BANK
1180
1178
1176
1174
1172
1470
1168
1166
1164
1162
1160
� W
®° ROCK �• �°°�� \ " �' v
STEPS � •.�®= ��% � °
BAN K
TOE
TERRACE
TOE � � ®SYC MURE RROOTWAD .
I—
AS—BUILT CLUSTER,, ,
LIMITS SURVEY
GE c� —GE P
`'r Com— —GE ^E CE-- —�E CE— Q�
PROPERTY LINE/CONSERVATION EASEMENT ^
LEGEND:
®•®•—•—•—THALWEG
— — — — — — —TOP
OF BANK/TERRACE
--------------- BANK/TERRACE
TOE
CE — CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
-------------------------AS—BUILT
SURVEY LIMITS
BRUSH
MATTRESS
ROCK STEP
STRUCTURE
CONSTRUCTED
RIFFLE
ROOTWAD
-- LOG VANE/SILL
CLUSTER
SA 4xd'•,;n4xdkk
%ksdkkadkakd "`"a4 BEDROCK
RIP RAP
WAWMW GEOLIFT
- WOODY DEBRIS
0 CONTROL POINT
AS—BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED JULY 2014
40' 0' 40' 80'
SCALE: 1 "=40' (22x34)
1 "=80' (1 1 x17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1
£ �W� [ i 1 €
t
t
� O W I
r of _. ,...,,.___'_ '
0) ��o Q N t mor ___... _____._ _ AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
__
..........__.__ .._........._..___..._..._._...__._.-_.___..._._-_._._....._._:... _ _.._.__...._____. _,_._____: ____._______. _ _. ___._. _:.__._.__......____._______.--_._._......_...........
r � + ,� _.-��a__..__ _ I SILAGE TRIB
r�
..............._ T ._..�.. �� �...N_.......__..._. CO STA 30+50 TO 37+50
rr r r N_._._._._.. �.N .,.....".."_
C�3 (
€ r r r r r CD 10 I
_ _
_.._____...__._ .___.._. __.._....___..____._._..__..._..-(._.._..___.._._.____...._..__ M_.__-- -...___.__...._... ___ __......_.___._......____._.._.........._._..._____....___._.._.__._......__..__.___.____.—.._
¢ .. ..... _ ... ..... ... .. {ti...._._c�J.cL1......_.....� _ _.._... _ .. ...._..N ............. ... Qp.r7....... _ ...._.__._._ ..._...__.....__...._......__._..�._. __.. - - - - .—.. — 1
y.. _..,... _......_. r r O ` yy1 f {�/� (^ _� _ ..�(+�_V.1 - ? — 33 f j1 i
W
Jam. ___... ....... _
_..
Lo
N
J
r �' v _ v......._.._. v __.......___� .,.. _._. __ . PROFILE SCALE ___......... _.___._..._._-....
r
r
r
d
£ � 3
r ° r � A: 1"=40'(22x34)
i
,nrn ,�� � �- i- -_ HORIZONT L �
__ N_. ___Q_...__.___..µ_ Ncn-;..__.....__.____ ___ .__ .w_ _. 1"=80'(11x17)
€ {-; nNc,4
3
VERTICAL: 2x34
r r7 r
' N m �Y •
( )
r, � ai
__..._..____._.._. _P, _-.. _N.. _..... . ...... _..._..___.._ __._._._..m.-....._....._._..._...____ _.....__..._._.._...._._..._._.._..__
_. _._...�. rrr � t,,, .N..._ �,...... �. o _ _. __ __--_. --_ � W +___.______ .. +�_ .. ,�.- ... , �c.jcc�.{ .._ W 1"=8'(11x17) -..I
i i r r� ISO Nap r;� �i �� d O �j N.w__ _ i
I rr r
r
r
£
co..�p _......
I i Op r 0 t() r0 rY� �(n� `
__ r- ap-... , ........__tf�._ -
_........_,_._...__.____..._. —_. _. __.__._._-..... . ______.,____..__._.....__. - £ i`� r p cca cc) rn Nim N i-u(to Cp } {
I
r
� cyy 0i (0, N
Ln 0—
rn
r
ao
I r £ cv.
� r
a0
r U '
£ r
0 Cn
t t cocfl O r0 w
(0 F (�
f I I I
01
---�t.
J r
Ycol
V
c}
.f d +�r+0FLn
r 1
3
r
f
F
r
r r
_
r
N
_. -._----
0
�.„„.__............... ....-.-.moi._.........,.,.,....-m-_-.-i--,...•.,.,«........ _ _-._-0........,,._...,_,., ,_.,,�,,,..., � ..,.,�...........___._'�''-'-`r----..-.+_ � .,,.,,.,,-�r.-._-^.,.._,...._.......,,,............,........ ..,.--,.....,�._-.-.-.___-____ t......T..;-Ie._,.._.�,.•.. r�,
� t
E
£ [ r
1180
1178
1176
1174
1172
1170
1168
1166
1164
1162
1160
.__.__ ___._. 1158
30+50
31+00
31+50
32+00
32+50
33+00
33+50
34+00
34+50
35+00
35+50
36+50
37+00
37+50
U
cq
CD
r'oE
Z
U
6U
—
1 Crn
�z
�
W
W
/N
N-�
ct)��z
z =®
a'
®
2 @Dw
Cc 40 W
Z
Q>
�Z
J
L r
® N
0
Ww
z
a
m
z
Q�
P'
M
a
�
Lu
a
�
fa
c
z
>'
,y
O._w
F_
z
J
0
<
w
U
=
0
0
z
LO
M
z
O
0
F
Oa)
O
�LO �
®
0)
00
O
C
O'
0
® Z
(��W
vJ
m
0
fro a.
0-
®
W
F—
0)
0
fw
V
LL
U)
—w
U)
0
}
0
a
z
0
DATE:
09/05/2014
SURVEYED BY:
MWB D T
i S
DRAWN BY:
DST/SGT
EVIEWED BY:
rDST/EGT
PROJECT:
TLS -14-003
FILE: MOORES FORK
94709 AB TLS_F.dwg
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
SHEET
12 of 13

COV\' TRIB 1
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT BY
OTHERS CE-'��N�
CE
—CE—
AS -BUILT
SURVEY
FLOW LIMITS DEBRIS PLUG
I 12+00 Of
Q
11+0 0 t °
ROCK STEP
`�Q
A()+00EL= 1188.9 2
Lu CHECK DAM '3+/® e
V
COW TRIB 1 ROCK STEP
I EL=1 189.98
°
°N j
°Z `9
�CE CE CE
j
�C11- 00
DEBRIS PLUG 70x iCE-CE CE
p0 CHECK DAM
�\ CHECKS DAM > DEBRIS PLUG
W
ROCK STEP
EL= 1 187.70
�99
`SILAGE
g .oP" TRIB
A
7— CE
m
fi
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT BY CE—
OTHERS
CE
X#
COW TRIB 2
UT1
CE
FLOW
Im-
CE
UT1
13x04
.
11 +00 . x
CE
AS -BUILT
SURVEY
LI M ITS
SILAGE TRIB
CE CE m
CE CE � .
.0
x0'
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT BY
OTHERS
CE CE --� �_
CE CE CE CE �—
--_
CE�
FLOW lcE�
�cE�
CHECK DAM
CHECK DAM
O\
CE
I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE
DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION,
IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS
CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR
ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE
OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE,
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 6th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2014.
— SEAL —
D VID S. TURNER, P. .S. #L-4551 L-4551
IS.I I -T
wo
ROCK STEP
ROCK STEP EL=1 180.88
EL= 1 184.17
JO CE
Op
18+00 �\
LOG STEP
14+00 J EL=1 182.77
19+ 1
6 �
COW TRIB 2 20+®0
ELLOG STEP20+)0
LOG
ROCK STEP
EL=1 170.17
��
SURVEY -LIMITS
CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE CE-
�� $° SILAGE
TRIB
GENERAL NOTES:
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2. THE VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88 (GEOID12).
3. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS IS NCGS STATE PLANE GRID
COORDINATES NAD83 (NSRS 2011) DATUM.
4. CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING VRS RTK GPS AND CONFIRMED
DURING AS -BUILT SURVEY. AS -BUILT CONTROL POINTS ARE
LISTED ON SHEET 2.
5. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR
CONVEYANCES AND DOES NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30 MAPPING
REQUIREMENTS.
6. THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE
CONSTRUCTED STREAM AND GRADING RELATED TO THE MOORES
FORK STREAM AND WETLAND RESTORATION PROJECT.
7. INFORMATION SHOWN OUTSIDE THE AS -BUILT LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE WAS TAKEN FROM THE EXISTING CONDITIONS &
DESIGN DATA PROVIDED BY THE DESIGNER AND NOT VERIFIED BY
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC.
LEGEND:
— " — • — - —THALWEG
— — — — — — —TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
— — — — — — — — — — — — — BANK/TERRACE TOE
_CE — CONSERVATION EASEMENT
-------------------------AS—BUILT SURVEY LIMITS
BRUSH ROCK STEP
MATTRESS STRUCTURE
CONSTRUCTED
RIFFLE ROOTWAD
LOG VANE/SILL CLUSTER
nP�.44�dPaa.#
BEDROCK INNOWN
RIP RAP GEOLIFT
WOODY DEBRIS 0 CONTROL POINT
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED JULY 2014
40' 0' 40' 80'
SCALE: 1 `40' (22x34)
1`80' (1 1 x17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL — l'
U
�
LO
o
13-�
r�
N
CD
E
Z
0) U
�z
\
to
Io- (50)w
cv -0
C-)caD
go
s E
��
"� U
®
caz
Z
Q
; 15
.J
p®~
c ti
o
w
Z
=�0-
W
o
z
ci
�
w
Q
#5k
C
z
-
u_..
w
z
J
U
W
=
0
z
oC
z
D
0qr__
Q
COQ
Z
F— C~O
ti
Q
0000
0)
N
O
c>
O:m
r
1—
U)���
W
W
W
00
00
®w
®
0
U
LL
U)
W
w
0
0
a
I-
Z
DATE:
09/05/2014
SURVEYED BY:
MWB/DST
DRAWN BY:
DST/EGT
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -14-003
FILE: MOORES FORK
94709 AB TLS_F.dwg
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
SHEET
13 of 13