20120383 Ver 1_Year 0 Monitoring Report_2016_20170119

Middle South Muddy
As -Built Baseline Monitoring Report
FINAL
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site
NCDMS Contract No. 6783
NCDMS Project No. 93875
McDowell County, North Carolina
Data Collected: May 18th, 2015 - May 4th, 2016
Date Submitted: July 11, 2016
Submitted to:
NCDEQ-Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh N C 27699-1652

Page Intentionally Left Blank

Prepared by:
EQUINOX
bolonce through proper planning
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28801

Page Intentionally Left Blank

Executive Summary
The Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site (Site) is located in the Catawba River Basin
(NCDWQ sub -basin 03-08-30 and RUC 03050101040020) approximately 9.5 miles southeast of Marion,
NC in southeast McDowell County at latitude 35.5635° N and 81.9249° W. The Site is comprised of
two tracts, the Middle South Muddy Creek Tract which encompasses approximately 5.87 acres of
predominately agricultural and forested land, and the 41.05 acre Haney Tract that is predominately
forested. The Middle South Muddy Creek Tract consists of three streams, Iva Branch, Sprouse Branch,
and South Muddy Creek. The Haney Tract consists of approximately 9,796 linear feet of stream. The
tract is comprised of South Muddy Creek and approximately thirteen tributaries, including Jackson
Branch and Moores Branch.
The Site generated a total of 4,073 stream mitigation units through the use of Priority I and II Restoration,
Enhancement I and II, and Preservation. The goal of the project was to address the stressors identified in
the Targeted Local Watershed Plan (TLWP) such as improving water quality, aquatic and terrestrial
habitat, flood flow attenuation, and precluding land disturbing activities. The goals were addressed by
restoring stable channel morphology and sediment transport capacity, improving stream bed form and
habitat, improving channel and stream bank stabilization, constructing a floodplain bench that is
accessible at the proposed bankfull discharge, providing riparian buffer restoration and cattle exclusion
fencing, and constructing a barricade on the existing dirt road network located on the Haney Preservation
Tract.
Historic land use at the Site consisted primarily of pastureland for cattle, hay production, and some
forested land. Grazing livestock have historically had access to most on-site stream reaches and adjacent
terraces. Additional land use practices included maintenance and removal of riparian vegetation,
relocating, dredging and straightening of on-site streams have contributed to unstable channel
characteristics and degraded water quality. The Haney Preservation Tract has been the location of
continuous mining for the last 50 years. Mining operations may have been commercial at one time, but
recently consisted of a club of individual prospectors mining for gold lag deposits in the floodplain.
The Site was delineated into five components totaling 11,997 linear feet. The Site was then delineated
into eight separate reaches South Muddy Creek (931 feet), Lower South Muddy Creek (177 feet), Upper
and Lower Iva Branch (471 feet), Upper Sprouse Branch (24 feet), Middle and Lower Sprouse Branch
(598 feet), and the Haney Tract (9,796 feet). South Muddy Creek received Priority II Restoration and
Enhancement I, Upper and Lower Iva Branch received Priority I Restoration, Upper Sprouse Branch
received Enhancement II, Middle and Lower Sprouse Branch received Priority II Restoration, and the
Haney Tract is Preservation. The installation of brush, rock, and wood structures were utilized
throughout the restored reaches to provide bed and bank stability as well as aquatic habitat. South Muddy
Creek saw only minor adjustments to the profile which re-established proper riffle -pool sequence. Upper
Sprouse Branch enhancement efforts included the installation of grade control structures in the upper
portion of the reach and livestock exclusion fencing to reduce erosion and instability. Middle and Lower
Sprouse Branch dimension adjustments included an increase in width/depth ratio to reduce stress on
channel banks, and the excavation of a floodplain bench to provide for the conveyance of flood flows.
The valley of Upper Iva Branch was filled to raise the channel and vertically stabilize the stream. The
pattern, profile, and dimension of Lower Iva Branch was adjusted to provide proper pool spacing, riffle -
pool sequence, and reductions of stress along stream banks. A bankfull bench was also constructed to
provide proper conveyance of greater-than-bankfull flows.
ii

A baseline stream and topographic survey was performed between May 18th, 2015 and May 4th, 2016 to
document baseline conditions at the Site. The stream pattern, profile, and dimension very closely
reflected those values outlined in the design.
A vegetation survey of the Site was conducted on March 23, 2016. Results from this initial survey
indicate that the planted stem density ranged from 405 to 526 with the mean density of 486 through all
plots in MYO. A total of seven species were documented across all plots with species diversity in plots
ranging from four to five.
Annual monitoring will begin during late 2016 and will include stream and vegetation monitoring
components as established in this document. Annual monitoring will occur for five years.
iii

Table of Contents
ExecutiveSummary................................................................................................................................
i
1.0 Project Goals, Background, and Attribute....................................................................................1
1.1. Location and Setting.............................................................................................................1
1.2. Project Goals and Objectives................................................................................................1
1.3. Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach...............................................................2
1.4. Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data........................................................................
3
2.0 Success Criteria.............................................................................................................................
3
2.1. Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability.................................................................
3
2.2. Surface Water Hydrology.....................................................................................................
4
2.3. Vegetation.............................................................................................................................4
3.0 Monitoring Plan............................................................................................................................
4
3.1. Stream Channel Stability and Gcomorphology.....................................................................
4
3.2. Stream Hydrology.................................................................................................................
4
3.3. Vegetation.............................................................................................................................5
3.4. Permanent Photo Stations.....................................................................................................
5
3.5. Maintenance and Contingency..............................................................................................
5
4.0 Baseline Conditions......................................................................................................................
6
5.0 References.....................................................................................................................................7
Appendix A General Tables and Figures...............................................................................................
9
Appendix B Morphological Summary Data and Plots.........................................................................19
AppendixC Vegetation Data................................................................................................................
37
Appendix D Permanent Photo Stations................................................................................................
44
AppendixE Record Set........................................................................................................................
68

Page Intentionally Left Blank

1.0 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND, AND ATTRIBUTE
1.1. Location and Setting
The Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site (Site) is located in the Catawba River Basin
(NCDWQ sub -basin 03-08-30 and HUC 03050101040020) approximately 9.5 miles southeast of Marion,
NC in southeast McDowell County at latitude 35.5635° N and 81.9249° W. The Site is comprised of
two tracts, the Middle South Muddy Creek tract which encompasses approximately 5.87 acres of
predominately agricultural and forested land, and the 41.05 acre Haney Preservation Tract which is
predominately forested. The Middle South Muddy Creek Tract consists of three streams, Iva Branch,
Sprouse Branch, and South Muddy Creek. The Haney Tract consists of approximately 9,796 linear feet
of stream. The tract is comprised of South Muddy Creek and approximately thirteen tributaries, including
Jackson Branch and Moores Branch. The Site is located within the Muddy Creek Local Watershed
planning area and the Site's watershed was identified as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in DMS'
2009 Upper Catawba River Basin Restoration Priority report (RBRP).
Historic land use at the Site consisted primarily of agriculture, livestock grazing, and mining operations.
Livestock previously had unrestricted access to the majority of the streams on site, resulting in significant
local disturbance to stream banks (Table 4). Additional land use practices, including the maintenance and
removal of riparian vegetation, and the relocating, dredging, and straightening of on-site streams
contributed to the degraded water quality and unstable channel characteristics on the site.
1.2. Project Goals and Objectives
The following goals are established to guide the restoration process for the project as outlined in the
Final Mitigation Plan:
• Improve local water quality within the restored channel reaches as well as the downstream
watercourses through: (a) the reduction of current channel sediment loads by restoring
appropriately sized channels with stable beds and banks, (b) the reduction of nutrient loads from
adjacent agricultural fields with a restored riparian buffer, and (c) the reduction of water
temperatures provided through shading of the channel by canopy species along with the resultant
increase in oxygen content.
• Improve local aquatic and terrestrial habitat and diversity within the restored channels and their
vicinity through: (a) the restoration of appropriate bed form to provide habitat for fish, amphibian,
and benthic species, (b) the restoration of a suitable riparian buffer corridor in order to provide both
vertical and horizontal structure and connectivity with adjacent upland areas, and (c) the restoration
of understory and canopy species in order to provide forage, cover, and nesting for a variety of
mammals, reptiles, and avian species.
• Preclude land disturbing activities including the construction of additional infrastructure, future
mining activities and agricultural practices including cattle grazing and the application of pesticides
and fertilizer within the riparian buffer area by providing a permanent conservation easement.
The following objectives are proposed for accomplishing the above listed goals as outlined in the
Final Mitigation Plan:
• Provide approximately 4,073 stream mitigation units (SMU's) through Priority I and II restoration
of approximately 1,989 linear feet of stream, enhancement of approximately 196 linear feet of
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 1 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

stream, and preservation of approximately 9,796 linear feet of stream threatened by mining
activities.
• Restore natural stable channel morphology and proper sediment transport capacity.
• Create and/or improve bed form diversity and improve aquatic and benthic macroinvertebrate
habitat.
• Construct a floodplain bench that is accessible at the proposed bankfull discharge.
• Improve channel and stream bank stabilization by integrating in -stream structures and native bank
vegetation.
• Provide approximately 5.87 acres of riparian buffer restoration by establishing a native forested
and herbaceous riparian buffer plant community with a minimum width of 30 feet from the edge
of the restored channels. This new community will be established in conjunction with the
eradication of any existing exotic and/or undesirable plant species.
• Construct barricades on existing dirt road network on Haney Tract to prevent future vehicular
trespassing.
1.3. Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach
1.3.1. Project Structure
Construction of the Site produced a total of 4,073 stream mitigation units, as outline in Table 1 and
depicted in Figure 2. The Site is comprised of eight reaches totaling 11,981 length feet of Restoration or
Restoration Equivalent; South Muddy Creek (916 feet), Lower South Muddy Creek (172 feet), Upper
Sprouse Branch (24 feet), Middle and Lower Sprouse Branch (611 feet), Upper and Lower Iva Branch
(462 feet), and Haney Tract (9,796 feet).
1.3.2. Restoration Type and Approach
South Muddy Creek
South Muddy Creek is divided into two sub -reaches, South Muddy Creek and Lower South Muddy
Creek. South Muddy Creek was constructed as a Priority II restoration of a type C4 stream with moderate
sinuosity and an average slope of 0.3%. Lower South Muddy Creek was constructed as an Enhancement
I of a type C4 stream with moderate sinuosity and an average slope of 0.3%. This channel configuration
provides a stable and natural form in the Type VIII(b) alluvial valley in which the existing stream is
found. Restoration of the channel facilitated proper riffle -pool sequence and reduced bank stress.
Sprouse Branch
Sprouse Branch is divided into three sub -reaches, Upper Sprouse Branch, Middle Sprouse Branch, and
Lower Sprouse Branch. Upper Sprouse Branch was constructed through Enhancement II restoration.
Enhancement efforts include the installation of grade control at the top of the reach to prevent headcut
migration, supplemental planting to stabilize bare banks, and cattle exclusion fencing to reduce erosion
and instability within the reach. Middle and Lower Sprouse Branch was constructed through Priority II
restoration of a type B5 and type 135c stream, with moderate sinuosity and an average channel slope of
2.9% and 1.7% respectively. These channel configurations provide the most stable and natural form for
these slightly entrenched channels flowing through moderately sloped colluvial valleys. The moderately
high gradient of Middle Sprouse Branch warrants installation of rock grade -control structures to stabilize
the vertical profile. As Sprouse Branch intersects the valley of South Muddy Creek, gradient decreases,
resulting in a transition to a 135c stream type. In order to accommodate the steep valley gradient a
terraced profile was constructed. Dimension adjustments included an increase in width/depth ratio to
reduce stress on channel banks and the excavation of a floodplain bench to provide for the conveyance of
flood flows.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 2 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Iva Branch
Iva Branch is divided into two sub -reaches, Upper Iva Branch and Lower Iva Branch, both of which were
constructed as Priority I restoration of type B5 stream with moderate sinuosity and an average slope of
5.6% and 3.2% respectively. The existing incised valley of Upper Iva Branch was filled to raise the
channel to reconnect it with the floodplain. The constructed channel was vertically stabilized through the
installation of rock structures. Lower Iva Branch was adjusted to provide proper pool spacing, riffle -pool
sequence, and reductions of stress along the stream banks. A bankfull bench was constructed to provide
proper conveyance of greater -than bankfull flows. Log and rock structures were installed to control the
vertical alignment and provide aquatic habitat.
Haney Tract
The Haney Tract was put under a permanent conservation easement to preserve approximately 5,836
linear feet of stream channel and approximately 35 acres of riparian buffer (Mitigation Plan, 2012). Due
to historic commercial and recreational mining operations within the floodplain of South Muddy Creek,
the riparian buffer has been degraded over time. Establishment of the conservation easement will protect
stream and adjacent floodplain from future destructive mining activities. The network of dirt roads was
also barricaded in strategic locations to prevent future vehicular access. The Haney Tract surveyed
conservation easement plat reveals additional stream linear feet within the protected easement. Streams
include South Muddy Creek, Moores Branch, Jackson Branch and eleven unamend tributaries. The total
stream length within the conservation easement is 9,796 LF (Figure 2. Asset Map). The project
preservation assets have been updated to reflect this additional stream length.
1.4. Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data
The project was first identified as a Design -Bid -Build mitigation project for the North Carolina
Department of Mitigation Services by Equinox Environmental. Project planning began in 2011 with the
final mitigation plan completed in March of 2012 and the final design and construction plans completed
in September of 2014. Construction and planting of the Site was completed in March of 2016. Project
activities, reporting dates, project contacts, and background information are outlined in Tables 2-4
(Appendix A)
2.0 SUCCESS CRITERIA
2.1. Morphological Parameters and Channel Stability
Restored and enhanced streams should demonstrate morphologic stability to be considered successful.
Stability does not equate to an absence of change, but rather to sustainable rates of change or stable
patterns of variation. Restored streams often demonstrate some level of initial adjustment in the several
months that follow construction and some change/variation subsequent to that is also to be expected. If
some trend is evident, it should be very modest or indicate migration to another stable form.
2.1.1. Dimension
Cross-section measurements should indicate little change from the as -built cross-sections. If changes do
occur, they will be evaluated to determine whether the adjustments are associated with increased stability
or whether they indicate movement towards an unstable condition.
2.1.2. Pattern and Profile
Measurements and calculated values should indicate stability with little deviation from as -built conditions
and established morphological ranges from the restored stream type. Annual measurements should
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 3 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

indicate stable bed -form features with little change from the as -built survey. The pools should maintain
their depth with flatter water surface slopes, while the riffles should remain shallower and steeper.
2.1.3. Substrate
Calculated D5o and D84 values should indicate coarser size class distribution of bed materials in riffles and
finer size class distribution in pools. Generally, it is anticipated that the bed material will coarsen over
time.
2.1.4. Sediment Transport
Depositional features should be consistent with a stable stream that is effectively managing its sediment
load. Point bar and inner berm features, if present, should develop without excessive encroachment of the
channel. Lateral and mid -channel bar features should typically not be present and if so only in isolated
instances. Bar features may be more prevalent in sand bed channels but should be transient in nature and
should occupy no more than 20% of the cross sectional area.
2.2. Surface Water Hydrology
Monitoring of stream surface water stages should indicate recurrence of bankfull flow on average every 1
to 2 years. At a minimum, throughout the monitoring period, the surface water stage should achieve bankfull
or greater elevations at least twice. The bankfull events must occur during separate monitoring years.
2.3. Vegetation
Riparian vegetation monitoring shall be conducted for a minimum of five years to ensure that success
criteria are met per USACE guidelines. Accordingly, success criteria will consist of a minimum survival
of 320 stems per acre by the end of the Year 3 monitoring period and a minimum of 260 stems per acre at
the end of Year 5. If monitoring indicates either that the specified survival rate is not being met or the
development of detrimental conditions (i.e., invasive species, diseased vegetation), appropriate corrective
actions will be developed and implemented
3.0 MONITORING PLAN
3.1. Stream Channel Stability and Geomorphology
A total of 10 cross-sections, including seven riffles and three pools, were installed upon completion of
construction and will be monitored during Monitoring Years 1-5. The total number of cross-sections
include four on South Muddy Creek, three on Sprouse Branch, and three on Iva branch. Additionally, a
total of 2,166 linear feet— approximately 1,088 feet on South Muddy Creek and Lower South Muddy
Creek, approximately 611 feet on Middle and Lower Sprouse Branch, and approximately 462 feet on
Upper and Lower Iva Branch—of longitudinal profile data will be collected during Monitoring Years 1-5.
Data collected from annual monitoring will be compared with the as -built conditions to document the
current state of the channel and any trends in the stream profile occurring throughout the monitoring
period.
3.2. Stream Hydrology
A total of two crest gauges—one on South Muddy Creek and one on Sprouse Branch—were installed on
site. Crest gauges will be monitored semi-annually to document highest stage for the monitoring interval
and verify occurrences of bankfull events. Observations of wrack and depositional features in the
floodplain will be documented with photos when encountered during field visits.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 4 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

3.3. Vegetation
Five vegetation monitoring plots, approximately 0.025 acres individually, were established based on
guidance given in the CYS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008). Data
was collected using the Level I protocol during initial baseline monitoring to document baseline
conditions immediately after construction and planting. Subsequent annual vegetation monitoring will
use the Level II protocol. Annual monitoring will determine planted vegetative success and the overall
trajectory of woody plant restoration and regeneration at the Site. Vegetation monitoring plot corners
were marked with t -posts and PVC conduit.
3.4. Permanent Photo Stations
Permanent photo stations were established at each cross-section to digitally document annual conditions
of the left and right banks. Each vegetation monitoring plot includes a photo station taken diagonally
from the origin towards the opposite plot corner. Additionally, 31 permanent photo stations were
established throughout the project area to provide representative digital documentation of stream features
and vegetation conditions. Permanent photo stations were marked with labeled PVC pipe and red
flagging tape.
3.5. Maintenance and Contingency
NCDMS and Equinox will monitor the Site on a regular basis and shall conduct a physical inspection of
the Site a minimum of once per year throughout the post -construction monitoring period until
performance standards are met. These site inspections may identify site components and features that
require routine maintenance. Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years
following site construction and may include the following:
• Stream - Routine channel maintenance and repair activities may include chinking of in -stream
structures to prevent piping, securing of loose coir matting, and supplemental installations of live
stakes and other target vegetation along the channel. Areas where stormwater and floodplain
flows intercept the channel may also require maintenance to prevent bank failures and head -
cutting.
• Vegetation - Vegetation shall be maintained to ensure the health and vigor of the targeted plant
community. Routine vegetation maintenance and repair activities may include supplemental
planting, pruning, mulching, and fertilizing. Exotic invasive plant species shall be controlled by
mechanical and/or chemical methods. Any vegetation control requiring herbicide application will
be performed in accordance with NC Department of Agriculture (NCDA) rules and regulations.
• Site Boundary - Site boundaries shall be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between
the mitigation site and adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by fence, marker,
bollard, post, tree -blazing, or other means as allowed by site conditions and/or conservation
easement. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced
on an as needed basis.
• Ford Crossings - Ford crossings within the site may be maintained only as allowed by
Conservation Easement or existing easement, deed restrictions, rights of way, or corridor
agreements.
• Road Crossings - Road crossings within the site may be maintained only as allowed by
Conservation Easement or existing easement, deed restrictions, rights of way, or corridor
agreements.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 5 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

• Stormwater Management Device -Storm water management devices will be monitored and
maintained per the protocols and procedures defined by the NC Division of Water Quality Storm
Water Best Management Practices Manual.
4.0 BASELINE CONDITIONS
A baseline stream and topographic survey was completed on May 18" 2015 to document baseline
conditions at the Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site (Site). Additionally, permanent cross-
sections were installed and data collected on February 25, 2016 and May 4, 2016. A vegetation survey
was conducted March 23rd, 2016 to document planted vegetation after construction for future comparison.
Reach summary tables, cross-section summary tables, and cross-section plots related to stream
morphology can be found in Appendix B. Generally the pattern, profile, and dimension were very similar
to those values outlined in the design. The Lower Iva Branch as -built slope (0.032 ft/ft) was slightly
higher than the design slope of 0.026 ft/ft; however the slope falls within the applicable slope ranges for
B5 stream types (0.02-0.039 ft/ft).
Vegetation data, summary tables, and plot photos are located in Appendix C. Results from this initial
survey indicate that the planted stem density ranged from 405 to 526 with the mean density of 486 across
all plots in MYO. A total of seven species were documented across all plots with species diversity in plots
ranging from four to five. At the time of vegetation data collection, herbaceous vegetation had begun to
establish, however some bare areas were noted, which can be expected during the first year of monitoring
after construction. Additionally, good recruitment of woody vegetation is expected within on the lower
end of South Muddy Creek and Iva Branch due to the presence of mature trees within the easement.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 6 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

5.0 REFERENCES
Equinox Environmental. 2008. Muddy Creek Local Watershed Plan. Report prepared for
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality.
September.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality.
Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. 2007.
Lee, Michael T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4.2 (http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm)
Turner Surveying. 2015. As -Built Survey of Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project. Prepared
for N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program.
Wolf Creek Engineering. 2012. Final Mitigation Plan Middle South Muddy Creek Restoration. Prepared
for North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem Enhancement
Program. Final Mitigation Plan, Middle South Muddy Restoration, McDowell County. EEP Project
No: 93875
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 7 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Page Intentionally Left Blank

Appendix A
General Tables and Figures

Driving Directions: From Asheville drive east on 1-40 and take exit 83.
Turn right onto Ashworth Road, after 0.9 miles turn right onto US -221..
Follow US -221 for 4.5 miles then tum left onto Folly Spout Road. After
1.7 miles tum left onto Vein Mountain Road, Follow Vein Mountain Road
for 2.6 miles and then tum right onto Brackett Town Road. The Middle
South Mitigation Site will be on the left after about 1 mile.
The subject projoct site in an environmental restoration site ofthe
\\\
NCDhfS and encompassed by a recorded conservation easement, but is
bordered by land with private ownership. Accessing the site may require
traversing areas near or along the easement boundary and therefore access
to the general public is not permitted. Access by authorized persomtel of
1
state and federal agencies ortheir dcsignee�contractors involved in the
I
development, oversight and stewardship ofthe restoration site is
/C
permitted within the terms and timeframes of their defined role. Any
'.
intended site visitation or activity by any person outside of these
previously sanctioned roles and activities requires prior coordination with
NCD\45
� Ir
Roads (,• 'rac tt wn I
1
Streams
OMitigation Sites +
� `32 t s
Middle South Muddy
Mitigation Site
.��.reio�
Figure
do
1 1 I 1 r
gpdppp�' Vicinity Map
- a�r4lq-
. I0.25 l
Miles
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 10 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

3Cpr�
Middle Sprouse Branch
+� 201+74 - 203+51
Upper Sprouse
Branch
1 Upper Iva Branch 2014-50 - 2o1+2a
3021 t4-305140
If I South Muddy Creels
k,' %
101T00 - 110+91
�Lower Tva Branch
305-40-3306196
,
w 4 J
Lower South Muddy Creek '~ -
110+91 - 112+633
Prepared for
Stream Asset Type
t t Easement
Enhancement I
DMS Enhancement 11
Restoration
Lower Sprouse Branch
203+51 - 208+04
0 100
Source'. Esri, Digital Globe, Geo Eye, I—bed, USDA, USGS, AEX
Figure 2. Asset Map
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site
Project No. 93875
McDowell County, North Carolina
Sheet I of 2
200 400
Feet
Prepared by
EQUINOX
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 11 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

o
52;.oa
1 •tom
1 5©100
149100
t ill
01
Jackson Branch
Prepared for
DMS
Stream Asset T e
Yp r r Easement
r�! Preservation
Haney Iraq Stream Components
LLddle S¢¢th Stream Restoration Site
$ ach \ e Sta4o¢i„g Leaeth Feet SVithi¢
Easement
Figure 2. Asset Map
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site
Project No. 93875
McDowell County, North Carolina
Sheet of
19
79
398
172
552
145
330
914
am
Prepared by
EQUINOX
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 12 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
a
,,.....y .., �.
.1loores Beanch
0+90 -6+67
ICY tract
.Jackson Branch
0+U0-0`93
T7-1
0+00 - 0+19
LT -2
0+00 - 6+79
17 3
6+00 - 3+98
%
LT -4
0+00 - 3+94
LT -5
0+00 - 5+52
L"T-6
0+00 - "2
LT -1
0+00 - 1-190
LT -8
0-60-4-43
0-rn
-'�•" o-•--�
LT -9
a+00-1-45
LT -1D
01-3-30
UT -S UT -7
��.
L-1'-11
0-00-91-23
i+no ��
Total
1+011 LIT -6 -,IU
'
A
,-<
a
LTA
22!IYU
020
-LITS
21i00d c %
n '
% i
5 UT-4�
Sonrh Muddy Crcek ----��
1 +oto
UT -2
i
'3-00
4
Moores Branch
0 100 200 400
v Feet
/Source'. Esrl, 6igitelGlcbe, Geo Eye, Isu
Figure 2. Asset Map
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site
Project No. 93875
McDowell County, North Carolina
Sheet of
19
79
398
172
552
145
330
914
am
Prepared by
EQUINOX
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 12 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Figure 3. Monitoring Features Map
3 0
I y
I ��3�•� I
PP -16
I ,
Pl' 17 #
\S-8 P
�
Middle Sprouse Branch,,
201 +74 - 203+51
r
PP -18
rte`
!Upper Sprouse
/ r
�
�XS-1
�� .-.1 1304• I
�a3� Branch
P-4
/P —
PP-zo
—�I
201+50 - 201+74
XS -10 -R Upper Iva Branch
/ PP
I334fi5 , 302+14 -
305'-X 40
1
1 ' i l P-21
S -2-R
%(
South Muddy Creek
r
�
Lower Iva Branch
101+00 - 110+91
'�
�
'
,..`
305+40 - 306+96
606,00
X S�3-P
+i
i
- -- - --- --- -1,�o
4as*5p
Lower Sprouse Branch
i
203+51 - 208+04
"• 3i77 PP -13
;
_.__. _
..��.•-
PP -11
XS-7-REPP-12
- _
�o�•oQ
XS -5-R
f
%
N1°1' 1 XS6P
rte
_ 1 r -
/ r
-
`
PP -9 /�c�.� s 1,11,1
'
XS
-4- R 2+
o^
Lower South Muddy Creek
110+91-112+63
0 90 180 360
Feet
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye,'i-cubed,
USDA, USGS, AEX,
Prepared for
Middle South. Muddy
PhotoPoim �.__, Thalweg
Hook -Log RunLog Vane
with Hook
Notes:
1) Baseline Data Provided by TurnerLand Surveyin
Prepared by
Stream Restoration. Project
0 CrfttC—ge
Hook Run Lag Sin/
Monitoring Year 0
DMS
McDowell County NC
�
Ccmol Point Contour (1 ft)
h
Log B ffl
Boulder -Arch Baffle
�.
NCDMS Contract No.: 00006783
S"Ctum Vegetation Plots
no
NCDMS Project No.: 93875
I �—
-•-rte CYoss_Section Basement eme,t
Boulder-och Brash Toe
with Log
EQUINOX
May 2016
Sheet 1 of 2
L°�Pro sed
Armored Riffle

Figure 3. Monitoring Features Map
o'
0+-00
f P 0
--•
raCt
i 52+00 PP -31
,✓�
50+00,
i49+000} 1
11 P-28
/
r18+001
1 1 •,+00,.. _ '2-00
�� _.r
4 O �� ..,J
k i f
Branch
.r
ry + '` .' 0+00
Jackson
Jackson
✓ o
,��, '"
lq+p
�0
UT -8 UT -7 .
4+0o �
�1�
���
��� -S • t--�%+C0
PP -27
��•�
'!� 1+
� 't + o ��.•� 0+00
{�4+00
UT -6 0-00
out
Ck�3+00 0
low
a.
`N 'V � nj xQ� •�`
UT -5 , 1
2200
8 �
21+001 + S i i
✓� UT -3
& 1
Al
+ O O I
1 _� •
i 6+00
South Muddy Creek
��
�
5+00 !�.
+00�3
+
i 4+00
q
a
UT -2 UT
r-,-✓
'
13+00
1
� i !
00 q
12 1
t�!
Moores BranchllI PP+25
0 250 500
1,00
+00+.
F et
Source: Esr, EigtalGlobe, Geo Eye, i -cub
Prepared for
Middle South Muddy
PhotoPouLL � PreseNat1°n Streams
Hook -Log Rutz Log Vane
with Hook
Notes:
1) Baseline Data Provided by Turner Land Surveyin
Prepared by
Stream Restoration. Project
�
�t��e �� TopoEBank
Hook Run Log sill:
Monitoring Year 0
DMS
McDowell County NC
�
�
Ccmh�ol Point contour(l ft)
Log s`°
Boulder -Arch Bae
NCDMS Contract No.: 00006783
S"Ctum Vegetation Plats
no
NCDMS Poect No.: 93875
j
_
Cos_Scn EesemelII
Boulder-Arreh Brush Toe
with Lo
EQUINOX
May 2016
_ _j
Sheet 2 of 2
L° �Pro sed
Armored Riffle

Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 15 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
Table 1. Project Mitigation Components and Summation
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -riparian Wetland Buffer
Nitrogen
Phosphorous Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R
RE
Totals
2,114
1,959
Project Components
Project Component -or- Reach ID
Stationing/Location
Existing
Footage/Acreage
Restoration
Footage or
Acreage
Restoration -or-
Restoration
Equivalent
Approach
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
Credits
Footage Excluded
due to Easement
Crossing/ Break
(P I, PH etc.)
South Muddy Creek
101+00— 110+91
931
916
R
PII
1:1
916
75
Lower South Muddy Creek
110+91— 112+63
177
172
R
EI
1.5:1
115
Upper Sprouse Branch
201+50— 201+74
24
24
R
EII
2.5:1
10
-
Middle and Lower Sprouse Branch
201+74— 208+04
598
611
R
PII
1:1
611
19
Upper and Lower Iva Branch
302+14 —306+96
471
462
R
PI
1:1
462
20
Haney Tract
9,796
9,796
RE
Preservation
5:1
1,959
-
Component Summation
Restoration Stream
Riparian Wetland Non -riparian Wetland
Buffer
Upland
Level (linear feet)
(acres) (acres)
(square feet)
(acres)
Riverine Non-Riverine
Restoration 1,989
Enhancement
Enhancement 1 172
Enhancement II 24
Creation
Preservation 9,796
High Quality
Preservation
BMP Hements
Element Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
FB Entire Site
Protect Stream Channel
BMP Elements
BR= Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Detention Pond; DDP =Dry Detention Pond; FS= Filter Strip; S= Grassed Swale; LS= Level Spreader; NI =
Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forested Buffer
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 15 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 16 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site
Activity or Report
Data
Collection
Complete
Completion
or Delivery
Mitigation Plan
Feb - 2012
Mar - 2012
Final Design - Construction Plans
N/A
Nov - 2012
Construction
N/A
Dec - 2015
Permanent Seed Mix
Applied
-
Mar - 2016
Live Stake Plantings
-
Mar - 2016
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0 Monitoring - Baseline)
May - 2016
June -2016
Year 1 Monitoring
Year 2 Monitoring
Year 3 Monitoring
Year 4 Monitoring
Year 5 Monitoring
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 16 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Table 3. Project Contacts
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
217 W Jones Street Suite 3000a
Prime Contractor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Matthew Reid [phone]
Wolf Creek Engineering
12 1/2 Wall Street Suite C
Designer
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
S. Grant Ginn [phone]
River Works, Inc
Construction
6105 Chapel Hill Road
Contractor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Jon Harrell [phone]
River Works, Inc
6105 Chapel Hill Road
Seeding Contractor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Jon Harrell [phone]
River Works, Inc
6105 Chapel Hill Road
Planting Contractor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Jon Harrell [phone]
Turner Land Surveying
3719 Benson Drive
As -built Surveys
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
David Turner [phone]
Green Resource
5204 Highreen Court
Seeding Mix Source
Colfax, North Carolina 27235
[phone]
Foggy Mountain Nursery
797 Helton Creek Road
Live Stakes
Lansing, North Carolina
[phone]
Equinox Environmental
Monitoring
37 Haywood St.
Performers (YO)-
2016
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Drew Alderman [phone]
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 17 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Project Information
Project Name
Middle South Muddy Creek
County
McDowell
Project Area (acres)
5.87
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
35.5635° N, 91.92490 W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Pbysiograpbic Province
Blue Ridge
River Basin
Catawba River
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit 13050101
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit 103050101040020
DWR Sub -basin
03-08-30
Project Drainage Area (acres)
2,893
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
> 1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
2.03.01.01
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
South Muddy Creek
Iva Branch
Sprouse Branch
Length of reach (linear feet)
1,108
471
622
Valley classification (Rosgen)
Valley Type VIIlb
Valley Type H
Valley Type 11
Drainage area (acres)
3,002
27
29
NCDWQ stream identification score
44
31
34
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
C
C
C
Morphological Description (stream type) (Rosgen)
64
G5
G5
Evolutionary trend (Rosgen)
F4
G5
G5
Underlying mapped soils
Iotla, Hayesville Clay
Iotla, Hayesville Clay
Iotla, Hayesville Clay
Drainage class
Poorly drained
Poorly drained
Poorly drained
Soil Hydric status
Non -hydric
Non -hydric
Non -hydric
Slope
0.40%
4.60%
2.20%
FEMA classification
Limited Detail
N/A
N/A
Native vegetation community
Agricultural
Agricultural
Agricultural
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
<1%
<1%
<1%
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
WetlandI
Welland2
Weiland3
Size of Wetland (acres)
-
-
-
Wetland Type (non -riparian, riparian riverine or riparian non-riverine)
-
-
-
Mapped Soil Series
-
-
-
Drainage class
-
-
-
Soil Hydric Status
-
-
-
Source of Hydrology
-
-
-
Hydrologic Impairment
-
-
-
Native vegetation community
-
-
-
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
-
-
-
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable
Resolved?
Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States—Section 404
Yes
Yes
NW 27
2011-02233
Waters of the United States— Section 401
Yes
Yes
401 Certification
WR# 12-0383
Endangered Species Act
No
N/A
ERTR
Historic Preservation Act
No
N/A
ERTR
Cc as is] Zone Management Act(CZMA)/ Cc as to] Area Management Act(CAMA) No
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
Yes
Case #:
14-04-03678
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 18 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Appendix B
Morphological Summary Data and Plots

- Information unavailable.
Non -Applicable.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 20 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
Table 5. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Middle South Mudd - South Muddy Creek / Lower South Muddy Creek (1,088 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built / Baseline
Dimension&Substrate - Riffle
LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Med Max SD N
Min Mean Max Min Mean Med Max SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
- 30.7
19.4 36.6
30.8
30.7 31.1 31.0 31.6 0.5
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
30.0 65.0
65.0
65.0 84.7 88.0 101.0 18.2
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.8
1.6 1.6
1.7
1.6 1.9 1.9 2.1 0.3
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.0 2.2
2.2
2.3 2.7 2.8 2.9 0.4
3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
51 7
30.2 36.6
52.2
50.5 58.1 59.0 64.9 7.2
3
Width/Deptb Ratio
12.3 14.9
18.1
14.8 16.8 15.9 19.8 2.6
3
Entrenchment Ratio
1.3 2.8
2.1
2.1 2.7 2.8 3.3 0.6
3
Bank Height Ratio
- - - - - - 1.0 - - 1.2 - -
- 1.0
- 1.0 LO 1.0 1.0 0.0
3
d50 (mm)
- - - - - - - 29.0 - - - -
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
- - - - - - 17.7 - - 64.0 - -
- -
- 54.4 109.6 85.4 229.5 68.9
5
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
- - - - - - 0.77 - - 3.60 - -
- -
- 0.001 0.003 0.003 0.005 0.001
5
Pool Length (ft)
- - - - - - 12.0 - - 36.0 - -
- -
- 34.8 50.8 51.3 66.3 12.4
5
Pool Max Depth (ft)
- - - - - - 2.3 - - 2.9 - -
- 3.3
- 3.2 4.6 4.5 1 6.0 0.9
6
Pool Spacing (ft)
- - - - - - 97.5 - - 193.0 - -
154.5 -
220.7 112.6 196.3 187.9T323.2 89.4
5
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
- 100.0 - -
- -
- 63.7 86.4 92.6 103 20.3
3
Radius of Curvature (ft)
32.0 - 514.0 -
61.0
102.1 114.7 120.1 121.8 10.9
3
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft)
- - -
-
3.3 3.7 3.9 3.9 0.4
3
Meander Wavelength (ft)
300.0 -
-
466.5 495.0 497.3 521.1 27.4
3
Meander Width Ratio
4.3
3.2
2.0 2.8 3.0 3.3 0.7
3
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
55%/11%/26%/8%/0%
SC%/Sit /G%/C%/B%/Be%
1%/8%/72%/17%/1%/1%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/dip /di'P(mm)
7.2/20/29/42/69/120/ -/-
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2
- 0.857
-
-
MaxPart Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
- 760
-
-
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/mz
- -
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (mi)
- 3.33
4.7
Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
- -
-
Rosgen Classification
- C4
C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.9
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
143.0
-
Valley Length (ft)
- 550
1,136
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
- 600
1,161
1,163
Sinuosity
- 1.10
1.03
1.03
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
- -
0.003
0.003
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.003
0.002
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
- -
Proportion Over Wide (%)
- -
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
- -
Incision Class (BHR Range)
- -
BEHI
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
- -
Biological or Other
- -
- Information unavailable.
Non -Applicable.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 20 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

- Information unavailable.
Non -Applicable...:
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 21 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
Table 5 Cont'd. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Middle South Mudd - Middle Sprouse Branch 177 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built / Baseline
Dimension & Substrate -Riffle
LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Med Max SD N
Min Mean Max Min Mean Med Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
- 4.8 -
_ _ _ _ _ _ 23.4 - - 24.7 - -
- 4.8 -
-
-
- -
-
-
Floodprone Width (ft)
- - - - - - 43.0 - - 52.0 - -
- 15.0 -
-
-
- -
-
-
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
1.3 1.5
0.3
Bankfull M ax Depth (ft)
_ _ _ _ _ _ 1.8 - - 2.2 - -
- 0.5 -
-
-
- -
-
-
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
0.5
_ _ _ _ _ _ 33.4 - - 34.6 - -
- 1.6 -
-
-
- -
-
-
Width/Depth Ratio
- - - - - - 15.8 - - 18.4 - -
- 14.1 -
-
-
- -
-
-
Entrenchment Ratio
- - - - - - 1.8 - - 2.2 - -
- 3.2 -
-
-
- -
-
-
Bank Height Ratio
- - - - - - 1.4 - - 1.6 - -
- 1.0 -
-
-
- -
-
-
d50 (mm)
-
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
- - - - - - 20.0 - - 40.0 - -
- - -
15.2
20.0
16.1 28.8
7.6
3
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
- - - - - - 1.500 - - 4.300 - -
- - -
0.005 0.007 0.008 0.010 0.002
3
Pool Length (ft)
6.0 42.0
3.7
9.2
8.2 16.5
5.3
4
Pool Max Depth (ft)
- - - - - - 2.3 - - 2.3 - -
- 0.8 -
1.6
2.0
1.8 2.7
0.5
4
Pool Spacing (ft)
- - - - - - 51.0 - - 113-0 - -
15.9 - 22.7
43.0
49.1
44.4 60.1
9.5
3
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
-
-
- - - - - 43.0 - - - -
- - -
7.1
7.9
7.8
8.9
0.9
3
Radius of Curvature (ft)
-
-
- - - - 44.0 - - 103.0 - -
- - -
8.2
15.0
14.0
23.8
6.9
4
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft)
-
-
- - - - - - - - - -
- - -
1.7
3.1
2.9
5.0
1.4
4
Meander Wavelength (ft)
too.0 -
-
20.4
26.3
27.1
30.7
4.5
4
Meander Width Ratio
-
-
- - - - - 1.8 - - - -
- 2.3 -
1.5
1.7
1.6
1.9 1
0.2
3
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri% /Ru%/P%/G%/S%
- -
39%/0%/24%/8%/29%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
1%/10%/48%/41✓/0%/1%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95/di' / di" (mm)
5.2/22/45/75/130/190/ -/-
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ftz
- 1.947
-
-
MaxPart Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
- 91
-
-
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/m2
- -
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (mi')
- 2.77
0.03
Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
- -
-
Rosgen Classification
- B4
B5
B5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
6.1
Bankfull Discharge lets)
210.0
-
Valley Length (ft)
- 380
187
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
- 400
177
177
Sinuosity
- 1.1
1.06
1.01
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
- -
0.031
0.029
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.031
0.029
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
Proportion Over Wide (%)
- -
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
- -
Incision Class (BHR Range)
- -
BEHI
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
- -
Biological or Other I-
-
- Information unavailable.
Non -Applicable...:
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 21 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

- Information unavailable.
Non -Applicable...:
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 22 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
Table 5 Cont'd. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Middle South Mudd - Lower Sprouse Branch 434 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built / Baseline
Dimension & Substrate -Riffle
LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Med Max SD N
Join Mean Max Min Mean Med Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
- 5.3 -
_ _ _ _ _ _ 23.4 - - 24.7 - -
- 5.2 -
5.1
5.3
5.3 5.4
0.2
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
- - - - - - 43.0 - - 52.0 - -
- 15.0 -
14.0
19.0
19.0 24.0
3.5
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
1.3 1.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3 0.3
0.0
2
Bankfull M ax Depth (ft)
_ _ _ _ _ _ 1.8 - - 2.2 - -
- 0.6 -
0.6
0.6
0.6 0.6
0.0
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
2.2
_ _ _ _ _ _ 33.4 - - 34.6 - -
- 1.9 -
1.7
1.7
1.7 1.8
0.0
2
Width/Depth Ratio
- - - - - - 15.8 - - 18.4 - -
- 14.3 -
15.1
15.9
15.9 16.7
1.1
2
Entrenchment Ratio
- - - - - - 1.8 - - 2.2 - -
- 2.9 -
2.6
3.6
3.6 1 4.5
1.3
2
Bank Height Ratio
- - - - - - 1.4 - - 1.6 - -
- 1.0 -
1.0
1.0
1.0 L0
0.0
2
d50 (mm)
- - - - - - - 45.0 - - - -
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
- - - - - - 20.0 - - 40.0 - -
- - -
6.0
16.2
14.2 32.2
9.3
9
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
- - - - - - 1.5 - - 4.3 - -
- - -
0.003 0.011 0.011 0.025 0.007
9
Pool Length (ft)
6.0 42.0
3.4
8.7
9.0 12.1
3.1
11
Pool Max Depth (ft)
- - - - - - 2.3 - - 2.3 - -
- 0.8 -
1.3
1.8
1.8 1 2.3
0.3
11
Pool Spacing (ft)
- - - - - - 51.0 - - 113-0 - -
18.1 - 25.8
19.0
32.9
32.2 55.1
10.5
10
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
-
-
- - - - - 43.0 - - - -
- - -
10.1
10.4
10.4
10.6
0.3
3
Radius of Curvature (ft)
-
-
- - - - 44.0 - - 103.0 - -
- - -
8.8
10.6
10.6
12.5
1.9
4
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft)
-
1.7
2.0
2.0
2.4
0.4
4
Meander Wavelength (ft)
100-0 -
33.2
38.1
38.5
42.9
3.5
5
Meander Width Ratio
-
-
- - - - - 1.8 - - - -
- 3.1 -
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.0
0.0
3
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri% /Ru%/P%/G%/S%
- -
41%/6%/27%/9%/17%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
1%/10%/48%/41✓/0%/1%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95/di' / di" (mm)
5.2/22/45/75/130/190/ -/-
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ftz
- 1.947
-
-
MaxPart Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
- 91
-
-
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/m2
- -
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (miZ)
- 2.77
0.04
Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
- -
-
Rosgen Classification
- B4
B5
B5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
6.1
Bankfull Discharge lets)
210.0
-
Valley Length (ft)
- 380.0
422
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
- 400.0
453
453
Sinuosity
1.1
1.07
1.07
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
- -
0.014
0.017
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
- -
0.014
0.017
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
- -
Proportion Over Wide (%)
- -
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
- -
Incision Class (BHR Range)
- -
BEHI
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
- -
Biological or Other I-
-
- Information unavailable.
Non -Applicable...:
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 22 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

- Information unavailable.
Non -Applicable.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 23 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
Table 5 Cont'd. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Middle South Mudd - Upper Iva Branch 326 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve Pre -Existing Condition Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built/ Baseline
Dimension & Substrate Riffle
LL UL Eq. Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Med Max SD N
Min Mean Max
Min
Mean Med Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
- 4.8 - - - - - - - 23.4 - - 24.7 - -
- 4.8 -
4.6
4.9
4.9 5.3
0.5
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
- - - - - - 43.0 - - 52 - -
- 15.0 -
14.0
15.5
15.5 17.0
2.1
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
- 0.5 - - - - - - - 1.3 - - 1.5 - -
- 0.3 -
0.4
0.4
0.4 0.4
0.0
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
- - - - - - 1.8 - - 2.2 - -
- 0.5 -
0.6
0.6
0.6 0.7
0.1
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
1.8 33.4 34.6
1.6
1.9
2.0
2.0 2.1
0.1
2
Width/Depth Ratio
15.8 18.4
14.1
11.0
12.2
12.2 13.3
1.6
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.8 2.2
3.2
3.0
1 3.1
3.1 3.2
0.1
2
Bank Height Ratio
- - - - - - 1.4 - - 1.6 - -
- 1.0 -
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0.0
2
d50 (mm)
-
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
- - - - - - 20.0 - - 40.0 - -
- - -
26.7
48.8
40.1 90.6
24.6
5
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
- - - - - - 1.50 - - 4.30 - -
- - -
0.001 0.004 0.002 0.009 0.003
5
Pool Length (ft)
6.0 42.0
2.1
2.8
2.7 3.4
0.6
4
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.3 2.3
- 0.8 -
0.5
0.8
0.8 1.2
0.3
4
Pool Spacing (ft)
- - - - - - 51.0 - - 113.0 - -
15.9 - 22.7
47.1
55.5
59.0 60.4
7.3
3
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
- - - - - - - 43.0 - - - -
- - -
11.9
14.8
14.8 17.6
4.0
2
Radius of Curvature (ft)
- - - - - - 44.0 - - 103.0 - -
- - -
7.6
9.4
8.4 13.2
2.6
4
Re: Bankfull Width (ft)
- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - -
1.5
1.9
1.7 2.7
0.5
4
Meander Wavelength (ft)
- - - - - - - 100.0 - - - -
- - -
43.2
48.1
47.7 53.8
5.0
4
Meander Width Ratio
- - - - - - - 1.8 - - - -
- 2.5 -
2.4
3.0
3.0 3.5
0.8
2
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
- -
80%/0%/4%/2%/14%
SC%/Sal//G%/C%/13 /Be%
- 1%/10%/48%/41%/0%/1%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/diP/disP(mm)
- 5.2/22/45/75/130/190/ -/-
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft'
- 1.947
-
-
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
- 91
-
-
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/m'
- -
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (mir)
- 2.77
0.03
Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
- -
-
Rosgm Classification
- B4
B5
B5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
6.1
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
210.0
-
Valley Length (ft)
380
424
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
400
326
326
Sinuosity
- 1.10
1.09
1.10
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
- -
0.058
0.056
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.058
0.056
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
- -
Proportion Over Wide (%
- -
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
- -
Incision Class (BHR Range)
- -
BEHI
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
- -
Biological or Other Ji-
-
- Information unavailable.
Non -Applicable.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 23 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

- Information unavailable.
Non -Applicable.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 24 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
Table 5 Cont'd. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Middle South Mudd - Lower Iva Branch 136 feet
Parameter
Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition Reference Reach Data
Design
As -Built/ Baseline
Dimension & Substrate Riffle
LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SD N Min Mean Med Max SD N
Min Mean Max
Min
Mean Med Max
SD
N
Bankfull Width (ft)
- 5.6 -
- - - - - - 23.4 - - 24.7 - -
- 5.5 -
-
- - -
-
-
Floodprone Width (ft)
- - - - - - 43.0 - - 52 - -
- 15.0 -
-
- - -
-
-
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
- 0.5 -
- - - - - - 1.3 - - 1.5 - -
- 0.4 -
-
- - -
-
-
BankfullMaxDepth(ft)
1.8 2.2
0.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
2.4
33.4 34.6
2.1
Width/Depth Ratio
1 15.8 18.4
1 1 14.4
Entrenchment Ratio
- - - - - - 1.8 - - 2.2 - -
- 2.7 -
-
- - -
-
-
Bank Height Ratio
- - - - - - 1.4 - - 1.6 - -
- 1.0 -
-
- - -
-
-
d50 (mm)
-
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
- - - - - - 20.0 - - 40.0 - -
- - -
9.4
11.8 11.8 14.3
3.5
2
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
- - - - - - 1.50 - - 4.30 - -
- - -
0.010 0.021 0.021 0.033 0.016
2
Pool Length (ft)
6.0 42.0
5.8
9.4 9.4 12.9
3.3
4
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.3 2.3
0.9 -
1.0
1.1 1.1 1.2
0.1
4
Pool Spacing (ft)
- - - - - - 51.0 - - 113.0 - -
19.3 - 27.5
20.8
25.9 20.8 36.1
8.9
3
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
- - - - - - - 43.0 - - - -
8.9
9.6 9.6 10.3
1.0
2
Radius of Curvature (ft)
- - - - - - 44.0 - - 103.0 - -
12.2
12.5 12.5 12.8
0.4
2
Re: Bankfull Width (ft)
- - - - - - - - - - - -
2.2
2.3 2.3 2.3
0.1
2
Meander Wavelength (ft)
- - - - - - - 100.0 - - - -
23.0
27.4 25.5 33.6
5.6
3
Meander Width Ratio
- - - - - - - 1.8 - - - -
- 2.2 -
1.6
1.7 1.7 1.9
0.2
2
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
- -
24%/17%/38%/20%/0%
SC%/Sal//G%/C%/13 /Be%
- 1%/10%/48%/41%/0%/1%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/diP/disP(mm)
- 5.2/22/45/75/130/190/ -/-
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) lb/ft2
- 1.947
-
-
Max Part Size (mm) Mobilized at Bankfull
- 91
-
-
Stream Power (Transport Capacity) W/m'
- -
-
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (mir)
- 2.77
0.046
Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
- -
-
Rosgm Classification
- B4
B5
B5
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
6.1
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
210.0
-
Valley Length (ft)
380.0
151
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
400.0
156
156
Sinuosity
- 1.10
1.02
1.03
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
- -
0.026
0.032
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.026
0.035
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres)
- -
Proportion Over Wide (%
- -
Entrenchment Class (ER Range)
- -
Incision Class (BHR Range)
- -
BEHI
Channel Stability or Habitat M etric
- -
Biological or Other
- -
- Information unavailable.
Non -Applicable.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 24 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

N/A - Item does not apply.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 25 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
Table 6. Baseline Morphology & Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site
Cross -Section 1 (Riffle)
Lower Sprouse Branch
Cross -Section 2 (Riffle)
Lower Sprouse Branch
Cross -Section 3 (Pool)
Lower Sprouse Branch
Cross -Section 4 (Riffle)
South Muddy Creek
Cross -Section 5 (Riffle)
South Muddy Creek
Dimension
Base
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
1,278.1
1,275.8
1,273.7
1,269.4
1,267.9
Bankfull Width (ft)
5.4
5.1
6.1
1 31.6
30.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
14.0
1 1 1
23.0
1 1
32.0
1 1
65.0
101.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.3
1.0
1.6
1.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.6
0.6
1.5
2.3
2.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
1.8
1.7
5.9
50.5
59.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.7
1
15.1
1 1 1
6.3 1
1 1
19.8
15.9
Bankf ill Entrenchment Ratio
2.6
4.5
5.3
2.1
3.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Cross -Section 6 (Pool)
South Muddy Creek
Cross -Section 7 (Riffle)
South Muddy Creek
Cross -Section 8 (Pool)
Upper Iva Branch
Cross -Section 9 (Riffle)
Upper Iva Branch
Cross -Section 10 (Riffle)
Upper Iva Branch
Dimension
Base
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Base
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
1,268.0
1,267.3
1,286.1
1,285.3
1,277.1
Bankfull Width (ft)
35.3
31.0
5.5
4.6
5.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
166.0
1 1
88.0
1 1
17.0
1 1
1 14.0
1 1 1
17.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.4
2.1
1.0
0.4
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
4.0
2.9
1.8
0.7
0.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft2
85.7
64.9
5.7
1.9
2.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.5
1 1
14.8
5.4
11.0
13.3
Bankf ill Entrenchment Ratio
4.7
2.8
3.1
3.0
1
3.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A - Item does not apply.
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 25 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 26 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Project Name: Middle South Muddy XS Number: 1 Station: 203+60
Reach Name: Lower Snrouse Branch XS Tvne: Riffle
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 27 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
1285
1284
1283
1282
1281
0 1280
1279
b 1278
1277
1276
1275
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15
0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45
Station (feet)
' MYO - - - - - BKF
CHANNEL DIMENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
5.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
14.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
1.8
Width/Depth Ratio
16.7
Entrenchment Ratio
2.6
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 27 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Project Name: Middle South Muddy XS Number: 2 Station: 204+72
Reach Name: Lower Sprouse Branch XS Type: Riffle
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 28 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
1282
1281
1280
1279
1278
c 1277
1276
-------------------------- ------------
-------- ---------- - ------------- - ---------- - -------------
b 1275
1274
1273
1272
0+00 0+05 0+10
0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40
Station (feet)
- MYO ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
5.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
23.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
1.7
Width/Depth Ratio
15.1
Entrenchment Ratio
4.5
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 28 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Project Name: Middle South Muddy XS Number: 3 Station: 205+79
Reach Name: Lower Sprouse Branch XS Type: Pool
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 29 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
1280
1279
1278
1277
1276
c 1275
1274
-------------------------- -----------
-- ----- ----- ------ ------------- ------------ -------------
b 1273
1272
1271
1270
0+00 0+05 0+10
0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40
Station (feet)
MYO ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYo MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
6.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
32.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
5.9
Width/Depth Ratio
6.3
Entrenchment Ratio
5.3
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 29 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Project Name: Middle South Muddy
Reach Name: South Muddy Creek
K(.VM 1115!
XS Type: Riffle
Station: 102+79
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 30 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
1278
1276
Z 1274
d
t.
1272
c 1270 ------------------
----- ----- --------------------------
------------------------------ ----- -----
1268
v
F�
1266
1264
1262
0+00
0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30
0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70 0+75 0+80 0+85 0+90
Station (feet)
' MYO ----- BKF
CHANNEL DINIENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
31.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
65.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)1
50.5
Width/Depth Ratio
19.8
Entrenchment Ratio
2.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 30 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Project Name: Middle South Muddy XS Number: 5 Station: 107+45
Reach Name: South Muddy Creek XS Type: Riffle
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
i
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 31 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
1276
1274
Z 1272
d
1270
c 1268
1266
v
F�
1264
1262
1260
0+00
0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30
0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70 0+75 0+80 0+85 0+90
Station (feet)
' MYO ----- BKF
CHANNEL DINIENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
30.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
101.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)1
59.0
Width/Depth Ratio
15.9
Entrenchment Ratio
3.3
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
i
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 31 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Project Name: Middle South Muddy
Reach Name: South Muddy Creek
K(.VM 111��:7
XS Type: Pool
Station: 108+57
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 32 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
1274
1272
d
1270
w
1268
e
0
1266
b 1264
1262
1260
0+00
0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30
0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70 0+75 0+80 0+85 0+90 0+95
Station (feet)
' MYO ----- BKF
CHANNEL DINIENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
35.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
166.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.4
BankfullMax Depth (ft)
4.0
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft )
85.7
Width/Depth Ratio
14.5
Entrenchment Ratio
4.7
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 32 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Project Name: Middle South Muddy XS Number: 7
Reach Name: South Muddv Creek XS Tvne: Riffle
Station: 109+57
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 33 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
1274
1272
v
1270
w
1268
a ----
0
-------------------------
--------- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---------------- -----------
--------------------------------- ----
1266
1266
b 1264
1262
1260
0+00
0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25
0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70 0+75 0+80 0+85 0+90
Station (feet)
- MY0 ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYo
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
31.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
88.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.1
Bankfull Max Depth (11)
2.9
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft )
64.9
Width/Depth Ratio
14.8
Entrenchment Ratio
2.8
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 33 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Project Name: Middle South Muddy XS Number: 8 Station: 302+13
Reach Name: Unner iva Branch XS Tvne: Pool
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 34 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
1292
1291
1290
1289
1288
c 1287
--------------
--------------------------
-----------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
1286
1285
1285
1284
1283
1282
0+00
0+05 0+10
0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35
Station (feet)
' MYO ----- BKF
CHANNEL DINIENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
5.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
17.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)1
5.7
Width/Depth Ratio
5.4
Entrenchment Ratio
3.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 34 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Project Name: Middle South Muddy XS Number: 9 Station: 302+82
Reach Name: Upper Iva Branch XS Type: Riffle
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 35 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
1291
1290
1289
1288
1287
c 1286
---------------------------
-----------
-------------------------------------------------------
� 1255
b 1284
1283
1282
1281
0+00
0+05 0+10
0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35
Station (feet)
' MYO ----- BKF
CHANNEL DINIENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
4.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
14.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)1
1.9
Width/Depth Ratio
11.0
Entrenchment Ratio
3.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 35 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Project Name: Middle South Muddy
Reach Name: Upper Iva Branch
Kf-U[ii'i11,i [11
XS Type: Riffle
Station: 304+20
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 36 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
1283
1282
1281
1280
1279
c 1278
1277
b 1276
1275
1274
1273
0+00
0+05 0+10 0+15
0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45
Station (feet)
' MYO ----- BKF
CHANNEL DEMENS IONS SUMMARY
MYO MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
5.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
17.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.4
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2)1
2.1
Width/Depth Ratio
13.3
Entrenchment Ratio
3.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 36 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

P=Planted, T=Planted & Volunteer
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 39 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5
Table 7. Current Plot Data (MYO 2016)
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site
Current Plot Data (MYO 2016)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
Plot 1
PnoLS P -all T
Plot 2 Plot 3
PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T
Plot 4
PnoLS P -all T
Plot 5
PnoLS P -all T
MYO (2016)
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum var. rubrun
Red maple
Tree
2 2 2
1 1 1
1 1
1
7 7
7
11 11 11
Betula nigra
River birch
Tree
3 3 3
2 2 2
5 5 5
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1 1 1
2 2
2
2 2
2
5 5 5
Cercis canadensis
Eastern redbud
Tree
I 1 1 I 1
I
I
I
1 1 1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green ash
Tree
2 2 2
3 3 3 4 4 4
2 2
2
11 11 11
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4 4 4
7 7 7 1 1 1
6 6
6
2 2
2
201 201 20
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
2 2 2
3 3 3
2 2
2
7 7 7
Stem count
13 13 13
13 13 13 10 10 10
11 11
11
13 13
13
60 60 60
size (ares)
1
1 1
1
1
5
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02 0.02
0.02
0.02
0.12
Species count
51
5
5
51
51
5 41
41
4
41
41
4
41
41
4
71
71
7
Stems per ACRE
526
526
526
5261
526
526 4051
405
405
4451
4451
45
5261
526
526
4861
486
486
P=Planted, T=Planted & Volunteer
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 39 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Table 8. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Site
Vegetation
Vegetation Plot
Survival
Tract Mean
ID
Threshold
Met?
1
Yes
100%
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
5
Yes
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 40 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 41 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 42 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 43 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5

Page Intentionally Left Blank

Appendix D
Permanent Photo Stations

Upper Sprouse Branch — Permanent Photo Station 1
Looking Downstream
Upper Sprouse Branch — Permanent Photo Station 2
Looking Downstream
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 46 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

Lower Sprouse Branch — Permanent Photo Station 3
Looking Downstream at Cross -Section 1
Lower Sprouse Branch — Permanent Photo Station 4
Looking Downstream, Northwest- 292 degrees
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 47 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

Lower Sprouse Branch — Permanent Photo Station 4
Looking Upstream; South 182 degrees
Lower Sprouse Branch — Permanent Photo Station 5
Looking Downstream at Cross -Section 2
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 48 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

Lower Sprouse Branch — Permanent Photo Station 6
Looking Downstream at Cross -Section 3
Lower Sprouse Branch — Permanent Photo Station 7
Looking Upstream from Crossing
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 49 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'
XS ,F�4
1
All -'
VA -
Lower Sprouse Branch — Permanent Photo Station 6
Looking Downstream at Cross -Section 3
Lower Sprouse Branch — Permanent Photo Station 7
Looking Upstream from Crossing
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 49 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

Lower Sprouse Branch — Permanent Photo Station 8
Station 101+50 - Looking Upstream at Confluence with South Muddy
South Muddy Creek — Permanent Photo Station 8
Station 101+50 - Looking Downstream
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 50 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

South Muddy Creek — Permanent Photo Station 8
Station 101+50 - Looking Upstream
South Muddy Creek — Permanent Photo Station 9
Station 102+75 - Looking Downstream at Cross -Section 4
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 51 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

South Muddy Creek — Permanent Photo Station 10
Station 104+75 - Looking Upstream from Bridge
South Muddy Creek — Permanent Photo Station 10
Station 104+75 - Looking Downstream from Bridge
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 52 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

South Muddy Creek — Permanent Photo Station 11
Station 107+45 - Looking Downstream at Cross -Section 5
South Muddy Creek — Permanent Photo Station 12
Station 108+58- Looking Downstream at Cross -Section 6
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 53 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

South Muddy Creek — Permanent Photo Station 13
Station 109+58 - Looking Downstream at Cross -Section 7
Lower South Muddy Creek — Permanent Photo Station 14
Station 111+20 - Looking Upstream
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 54 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

Lower Iva Branch — Permanent Photo Station 14
Station 111+20 - Looking Upstream from Confluence
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 55 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

Lower South Muddy Creek — Permanent Photo Station 15
Station 112+62 - Looking Upstream
Upper Iva Branch — Permanent Photo Station 16
Station 300+50 - Looking Downstream
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 56 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

Upper Iva Branch — Permanent Photo Station 18
Station 300+50 - Looking Downstream at Cross -Section 9
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 57 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

Upper Iva Branch — Permanent Photo Station 19
Station 303+75 - Looking Upstream
Upper Iva Branch — Permanent Photo Station 20
Station 300+50 - Looking Downstream at Cross -Section 10
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 58 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

Lower Iva Branch — Permanent Photo Station 22
Station 305+85 - Looking Upstream from Crossing
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 59 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'
1-4
z
-.. •- s. _-
yi
J
Upper Iva Branch — Permanent Photo Station 21
Station 305+10 - Looking Upstream
Lower Iva Branch — Permanent Photo Station 22
Station 305+85 - Looking Upstream from Crossing
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 59 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

Haney Tract — Permanent Photo Station 23
Looking Upstream South Muddy Creek
Haney Tract — Permanent Photo Station 24
Looking Upstream South Muddy Creek
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 60 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

Haney Tract — Permanent Photo Station 25
Looking Downstream Tributary to South Muddy Creek
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 61 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

Haney Tract — Permanent Photo Station 26
Looking Upstream South Muddy Creek
Haney Tract — Permanent Photo Station 26
Looking Downstream South Muddy Creek
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 62 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

1•
L �
7.
-. ,- �f
r
MIA
s
.�, 9
r,
�R• c Y '�° aye.,' �'�r�?�� �w l� tib R y � ' �i��e'�.'° �.
� '-�� � ifs � �*,'S�1�lCr a t3•!��$���z��aA4"�
z -
7-7
j
a ,.

Haney Tract — Permanent Photo Station 27
Looking Downstream South Muddy Creek
Haney Tract — Permanent Photo Station 28
Looking Upstream South Muddy Creek
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 64 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

Haney Tract — Permanent Photo Station 28
Looking Downstream South Muddy Creek
Haney Tract — Permanent Photo Station 28
Looking Upstream Tributary to South Muddy Creek
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 65 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

Haney Tract — Permanent Photo Station 29
Looking Upstream South Muddy Creek
Haney Tract — Permanent Photo Station 30
Looking Downstream Tributary to South Muddy Creek
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 66 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

Haney Tract — Permanent Photo Station 31
Looking Upstream Tributary to South Muddy Creek
Middle South Muddy Stream Restoration Project 67 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 93875 Baseline Monitoring Document
Monitoring Year 0 of 5'

Page Intentionally Left Blank

Appendix E
Record Set

I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT
THE DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY
SUPERVISION, IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF
WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND THAT THE PHYSICAL
DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS
EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL
SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 16th DAY OF
OCTOBER, 2015.
CAR04 /,
� toSEAL/59�
DAVID S. TURNER, P.L.S. # -4551 -r- L-4551 0:
SUR. .
AS -BUILT SURVEY OF
MIDDLE SOUTH MUDDY STREAM
RESTORATION PROJECT
McDOWELL COUNTY, NC
NCEEP PROJECT# 93875
`'
=�
REFERENCES:
nWNFR-
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF MITIGATION
SERVICES (Formerly ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM)
217 WEST JONES ST., SUITE 3000A
RALEIGH, INC 27603
[phone]
EEP PROJ. MANAGER: PAUL WIESNER
DESIGNER:
WOLF CREEK ENGINEERING
12 1/2 WALL ST., SUITE C
ASHEVILLE, INC 28801
[phone]
CONTRACTOR:
RIVER WORKS, INC
RALEIGH, NC
[phone]
AS -BUILT SURVEY CONTROL POINTS:
O
� u
PT# Northing(Y) Easting(X) Elev(Z) Description
Lo
> O
cE BRANCH
--
OC�C�
1 672158.10 1130953.56 1282.72 gps ex-cpt
__
2 673478.96 1130950.27 1297.86 gps ex-cpt
N
�Zt3��o
3 673452.70 1131296.97 1333.32 gps ex-cpt
Z=�
v
I•I
4 672057.12 1131154.83 1292.76 ex-cpt
I
L
11.3
1
7 672800.62 1130666.80 1274.05 ex-cpt
J
5
ro
�
8 673147.99 1130799.81 1274.65 ex-cpt
w
W
3
13 673382.71 1130944.29 1285.23 ex-cpt
19
W
Of
19 672407.91 1130716.16 1273.52 gps ex-cpt
.,
W
J
Q
F
7
a0
Q
20 672308.95 1130745.51 1274.55 TLS#20 NAIL
z
�
W
I-
< Q
IVA
21 673004.77 1130515.40 1271.32 TLS#21 NAIL
Z
QLU
o
J
l
BRANCH
22 673312.03 1130536.44 1270.22 TLS#22 NAIL
Q
F
�
23 673356.48 1130701.97 1269.09 TLS#23 NAIL
5
U)
Lu
24 673314.66 1131119.75 1300.75 TLS#24 NAIL
25 673537.90 1130640.33 1268.22 TLS#25 NAIL
\
I
z
z
26 673293.08 1130839.46 1278.23 TLS#26 NAIL
J
Q
U
2
Q
27 672794.03 1130562.20 1271.40 TLS#27 NAIL
W
z
SHEET
INDEX
SHEET
1 -
TITLE, VICINITY MAP, & SHEET INDEX
GENERAL NOTES:
SHEET
2 -
SOUTH MUDDY CREEK STA. 101+00 TO
105+00 I
1. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
oo
2. HORIZONTAL DATUM IS NAD83(2011) & VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88.
SHEET
3 -
SOUTH MUDDY CREEK STA. 105+00 TO
110+00
3. CONTROL IS BASED ON EXISTING CONTROL DATA PROVIDED BY THE
c z
G O
Lu o
-) J
DESIGNER AND RECOVERED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION & AS -BUILT SURVEYS.
SHEET
4 -
SOUTH MUDDY CREEK STA. 110+00 TO
113+00
ADDITIONAL CONTROL WAS ESTABLISHED USING TOTAL STATION METHODS
AND CONFIRMED DURING AS -BUILT SURVEY. AS -BUILT CONTROL POINTS ARE
SHEET
5 -
SPROUSE BRANCH 200+00 TO 202+50
I
LISTED ON SHEET 1.
SHEET
6 -
SPROUSE BRANCH 202+50 TO 205+00
(n�z
4. THIS MAP IS NOT FOR RECORDATION, SALES, OR CONVEYANCES AND DOES
>
WCf)
W
NOT COMPLY WITH G.S. 47-30 MAPPING REQUIREMENTS.
SHEET
7 -
SPROUSE BRANCH 205+00 TO 207+50
I
5. THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE POST CONSTRUCTION
Q
F
CONDITIONS OF THE STREAM AND GRADING RELATED TO THE MIDDLE SOUTH
SHEET
8 -
SPROUSE BRANCH 207+50 TO 208+10
MUDDY CREEK STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT AND MAY NOT SHOW ALL
0
m
W
z
UTILITIES, STRUCTURES, & BOUNDARIES.
SHEET
9 -
IVA BRANCH 300+00 TO 302+50
05/18/2015
6. INFORMATION SHOWN OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF AS -BUILT SURVEY WAS
PROVIDED BY THE DESIGNER AND WAS NOT VERIFIED BY TURNER LAND
SHEET
10
- IVA BRANCH 302+50 to 305+00
SURVEYING, PLLC.
7. NO PROPERTY RESEARCH WAS PERFORMED. FOR CONSERVATION
SHEET
11
- IVA BRANCH 305+00 TO 307+20
EASEMENT SEE PLAT RECORDED IN McDOWELL COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS
SHEET
12
-IVA DITCH 400+00 TO 401+22.90
OFFICE PLAT BOOK 21, PAGE 34.
FILE: MSM CREEK 93875
AB_TILS _F.dwg
SHEET
13
- CROSS SECTIONS
AS SHOWN
O
Lo
> O
U
OC�C�
Nm
N
�Zt3��o
5
Z=�
v
3
mL
0-)LLJ
L
11.3
F
W
N
�0
Qr\
M
D
ro
�
3
3
w
W
3
19
W
Of
N
J
W
J
Q
F
7
a0
Q
z
�
W
I-
< Q
Z
QLU
o
J
Q
F
�
z
0
F
U)
Lu
°
0
z
z
J
Q
U
2
Q
0
O
W
z
z
�U
W
MM)
LO
00
oo
^�M
� CL
06
�- z
0
c z
G O
Lu o
-) J
`\\\
O
0
z
O
W
U
(n�z
>
WCf)
W
JW
J
I..L-
Q
F
G
0
m
W
z
DATE:
05/18/2015
SURVEYED BY:
DST/JAP
DRAWN BY:
ROB/DST
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -15-007
FILE: MSM CREEK 93875
AB_TILS _F.dwg
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
SHEET
1 of 13

I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND 21 '
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY
`^
THAT THE DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER `
£SQ
MY SUPERVISION, IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE VN - -- --------------- '-., EXISTING EX
REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND ---------
OVERHEAD GRAVEL
I
THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS
------------------------ .., UTILITY o
ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED -_---- ' � LIMITS OF
HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION AS -BUILT / ^� x
NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 16th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015. (Y� �2�5 /SURVEY L
cf) ; o n I
•``�� �� CARoIi�'%
f -J1272 ` t
:y \
DAVID S. TURNER, P.L.S. L-4551 s L-4551 0: 1 0
G/ �`. EXISTING
D s. t��.` �\ STREAM CONSERVATION ;
EASEMENTrl
;
BY OTHERS O ^-
r--
FENCE 30 N I —
30 30 D 30 30 30 ^ ;1 1
30 /
BRUSH LOG SILL —3� _ D %
z�'
LOG J SOUTH TOE
THALWEG — — _ 3� DN % It I ;
HOOK MUDDY CREEK �� — — — _ a� Nr .� ,
I
— \ o
_- _ "
`
-------------------- ------ — -
EX. � n
c
�
® TRANSP 1271 � � ��_ jBRiDGE � � ch� I
— / I
SPROUSE BRANCH
SEE SHEETS 5-8
AS—BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED JULY 2015
20' 0' 20' 40'
SCALE: 1 "=20' (22x34)
1 "=40' (1 1 x17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1'
NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET 13 FOR CROSS SECTIONS.
1270
1270 0
co
o �0 PROFILE SCALE r� J
�� rn AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE HORIZONTAL: 1"=20'(22x34) o NJN
LEGEND: + r M 1"=40'(11x17) +u co
fy_ooN SOUTH MUDDY CREEK VERTICAL: 1"=2'(22x34) ""D to
— . — . — • — • —THALWEG +zU) --jr N 1"=4'(11x17) CON It 1268
- — — — — — -TOP OF BANK/TERRACE 1268 owzo STA 101+00 TO 105+00 r-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - BANK/TERRACE TOE �07U N o c`\l
CE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT ��? M
X x FENCE c� m n 00 `� Co
-•---...._----........... - .... -............... LIMITS OF AS -BUILT SURVEY N(oo `r N CD (6 n n C o 1266
---y---x-- —EXISTING FENCE 1266 �N 00 W co N c5 6 NN 4 m N o a
N cD cD c0 N p O)
— EX. PROPERTY LINE (0 co N 04 00 m uri
(NOT SURVEYED) N N N M ((0 N N N
N
LOG 0CONTROL o
J HOOK POINT 1264
1264 N
TOE
BRUSH TRANSPLANT co
1262
1262
101+00 +20 +40 +60 +80 102+00 +20 +40 +60 +80 103+00 +20 +40 +60 +80 104+00 +20 +40 +60 +80 105+00
O
U
W0-) DD
> coo 0.g
0N N j
Z 00 `w
w 0 z F ) m0
LLJ r
(D
rnw`v c cm
W �_��
N Lu
�'�
°L 3
m
W 3 w
19
uj
D W
J
J y Z
Q Q
F-
04
z w ul
o a
Z o
Q J
H J
Q�
o�
N
uS W
z
O o
� a
z
z
c:)
0
o a
J m
LO LL w
Q< O
� z
Q�-
�- U
o Cn �
>-4�
o p�cy)
p�
Q p �Z
� �ZW0
p
aW
w =�-o
w pryw
Uw
>- 0Oz
p
C/) F.
� JW
!>— p0�
r p
75
O O
m
LU
z
DATE: 05/18/2015
SURVEYED BY:
DST/JAP
DRAWN BY:
ROB/DST
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -15-007
FILE: MSM CREEK 931175
AB TLS F.dwg
SCALE: AS SHOWN
SHEET
2 of 13

2
I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY
THAT THE DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER
MY SUPERVISION, IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE
REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND AS–BUILT SURVEY BY:
THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED SURVEYED JULY 2015
HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION
NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 16th DAY OF OCTOBER , 2015. 20' 0' 20' 40'
�o�oFEssiati'�v SCALE: 1 "-20' (22x34) £gaidN '
Q�osEL: = 1 =40 (11x17)
L-4551
o _ CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1'
DAVID S. TURN R, P.L. . #L-4551
s
LEGEND:
—•—.—•—•—THALWEG
– — — — — — – TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
- – – – – – – – – – – – - BANK/TERRACE TOE
cE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
......* -
-----------------* FENCE
.........-
.
-----••- LIMITS OF AS -BUILT SURVEY
_-- <-------- -_. -- EXISTING FENCE
— EX. PROPERTY LINE
(NOT SURVEYED)
LOG 0CONTROL
J HOOK POINT
BRUSHTRANSPLANT
TOEor-
\ �
'V' DITCH
7' W/ CLASS B RIPRAP
I
W��—
W„ E
_ SOUTH
MUDDY CREEK
W I PERMANENT STREAM
Z CROSSING (FORD)
I
1-268 LOG J
[ r i HOOK
ja262' !'% 270
+
7267
1269
1267
1269
n ;
DI
TCH
W/ LASS B RIPRAP 127p�
GATE
24"CMP
---f267.114
'-EXISTING
OVERHEAD
UTILITY
0
1268---T
T— r-
co
N
1266N N N(0 (0o
N 04 N O
co
1264
1262
105+00 +20 +40 +60 +80
THALWEG
BANK TOE /
/
LA
TRANSPLANTS
/
1269
i
STOP OF
BANK
RUSH TOE
LOG
SILL
--.-__ '• �J as
'--------------------- FEN E
--- ------ ---_-
------------------------ _
LIMITS OF
AS–BUILT
SURVEY
NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET 13 FOR CROSS SECTIONS.
106+00
+20
AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
SOUTH MUDDY CREEK
STA 105+00 TO 110+00
LOr
O
N
O 00
N �
,— c0
+40 +60
PROFILE SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=20'(22x34)
1"=40'(11x17)
VERTICAL: 1"=2'(22x34)
1 "=4'(11 x17)
to
O
N
0404
of 0)
Nj O
O O N
N N co
N
+80 107+00 +20 +40 +60 +80 108+00 +20
OJ
") - o
DO U) M
+ U)
O O N
� i-
t()
rl co
N 't O O
N d N
0 CO
N N
M
O
N
+40 +60 +80
1268
\2s6 \
�\ F�0
\ LTJ•,.
\
726(8 _
U P-
O N --------------�
o a, n
LO
to d
04 04 O
T
O
1264
04
I
1268
1266
1262
109+00 +20 +40 +60 +80 110+00
LO O
U
LL1tx
� to �' m
N
�CV� i�
73
w
Lu OZF U)EN
Z rn c
LLJ = 0 •—
m
0 LLI C
v
Lu _
U)�
M O 3
m 3
W 3 L
x
Q) z
J
I - 'Lu
F- co
Q Z
F-
2 Z W (10
�
O<
Z o Z
Q J
Q m J
o z
U)
N w
Z
O
o
ui a
z
Z
0 JO
0
5 U
C L
it
Q O
�. z
ry
o �U
MW
++ �)L0
LO O QO00
M
Q c)n'"�
Hz
�zLu
U
�Ow
W
W �w
L.L
0 Opp
� z
0 JW
2 C�
Q
F
U) co
O
w
w
z
DATE: 05/18/2015
�— SURVEYED BY:
DST/JAP
DRAWN BY:
ROB/DST
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -15-007
FILE: MSM CREEK-93875�
AB TLS F.dwg
SCALE: AS SHOWN
SHEET
3 of 13
----------------------
--- ---
1272
,------
D
�m
-----------
CONSERVATION TIONr;
-------------------- EASEMENT
--------- BY OTHERS
--
D
272
- ---- ----
z-{
---------------------
__ _
D N
r
CCE
_�_
N
X
'V' DITCH
7' W/ CLASS B RIPRAP
I
W��—
W„ E
_ SOUTH
MUDDY CREEK
W I PERMANENT STREAM
Z CROSSING (FORD)
I
1-268 LOG J
[ r i HOOK
ja262' !'% 270
+
7267
1269
1267
1269
n ;
DI
TCH
W/ LASS B RIPRAP 127p�
GATE
24"CMP
---f267.114
'-EXISTING
OVERHEAD
UTILITY
0
1268---T
T— r-
co
N
1266N N N(0 (0o
N 04 N O
co
1264
1262
105+00 +20 +40 +60 +80
THALWEG
BANK TOE /
/
LA
TRANSPLANTS
/
1269
i
STOP OF
BANK
RUSH TOE
LOG
SILL
--.-__ '• �J as
'--------------------- FEN E
--- ------ ---_-
------------------------ _
LIMITS OF
AS–BUILT
SURVEY
NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET 13 FOR CROSS SECTIONS.
106+00
+20
AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
SOUTH MUDDY CREEK
STA 105+00 TO 110+00
LOr
O
N
O 00
N �
,— c0
+40 +60
PROFILE SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=20'(22x34)
1"=40'(11x17)
VERTICAL: 1"=2'(22x34)
1 "=4'(11 x17)
to
O
N
0404
of 0)
Nj O
O O N
N N co
N
+80 107+00 +20 +40 +60 +80 108+00 +20
OJ
") - o
DO U) M
+ U)
O O N
� i-
t()
rl co
N 't O O
N d N
0 CO
N N
M
O
N
+40 +60 +80
1268
\2s6 \
�\ F�0
\ LTJ•,.
\
726(8 _
U P-
O N --------------�
o a, n
LO
to d
04 04 O
T
O
1264
04
I
1268
1266
1262
109+00 +20 +40 +60 +80 110+00
LO O
U
LL1tx
� to �' m
N
�CV� i�
73
w
Lu OZF U)EN
Z rn c
LLJ = 0 •—
m
0 LLI C
v
Lu _
U)�
M O 3
m 3
W 3 L
x
Q) z
J
I - 'Lu
F- co
Q Z
F-
2 Z W (10
�
O<
Z o Z
Q J
Q m J
o z
U)
N w
Z
O
o
ui a
z
Z
0 JO
0
5 U
C L
it
Q O
�. z
ry
o �U
MW
++ �)L0
LO O QO00
M
Q c)n'"�
Hz
�zLu
U
�Ow
W
W �w
L.L
0 Opp
� z
0 JW
2 C�
Q
F
U) co
O
w
w
z
DATE: 05/18/2015
�— SURVEYED BY:
DST/JAP
DRAWN BY:
ROB/DST
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -15-007
FILE: MSM CREEK-93875�
AB TLS F.dwg
SCALE: AS SHOWN
SHEET
3 of 13

I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY
THAT THE DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER
MY SUPERVISION, IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE
REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND
THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS
ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED
HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION
NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 16th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015.
` u1
CA"/
p9��.... ROli
✓ � 2�pFESS/p�?y
SEAL��:
DAVM S. TURNER, P. .S. #L-4551 L-4551
SUR,4.-
"fiiSiiiIU,\\\\`\`
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED JULY 2015
20' 0' 20' 40'
SCALE: 1 "=20' (22x34)
1 "=40' (1 1 x 17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1'
LEGEND:
—.—.—•—•—THALWEG
- — — — — — - TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - BANK/TERRACE TOE
CE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
x * FENCE
------•----------------------•-••-----•-••------- LIMITS OF AS -BUILT SURVEY
- ----x - EXISTING FENCE
— EX. PROPERTY LINE
(NOT SURVEYED)
LOG Q CONTROL
J HOOK POINT
ammznBRUSH TRANSPLANT
TOE
NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR NOTES.
2. SEE SHEET 13 FOR CROSS SECTIONS.
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
BY OTHERS
--------------------
-
SOUTH
IVA BRANCH
SEE SHEETS 9-11
1268
1266
•�� �t,17
/LIMITS OF I
AS -BUILT
SURVEY
I
NCE
_ I
E__ I
._CE1 I`
�r¢ _ (CA-
1264 to
N E N N N
c0 N r
N
00 U)
PROFILE SCALE � N
1262AS-BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE HORIZONTAL: 1"=20'(22x34) N N
SOUTH MUDDY CREEK 1"=40'(11x17) N
STA 110+00 TO 112+75.16 VERTICAL: 1 1"=4'(11 x17) x172x34)
)
1260
110+00 +20 +40 +60 +80 111+00 +20 +40
EXISTING
FENCE
w- -
0
0
_._.4-
1268
L0 o
U
LLI � 00
t�CVN jam,
F- Z w_
N OZO�_0
LLJ rd m
U1
_j0
W Qr�,
Lu
wMSO 3
m
W 3 W
W�U z
W 'jw
J a CiL
Z W V)
Z Z
a
LU J
L3 z
U
w
Z
O o
�o
LU
Q
O z
J
O
+
Q
U
M F
r 0
z
z
O
U
o MW
+
o �0�
p()� ce)
F-- z
U)�z�o
Clow
W =�ao
LLJ� �QW�
U
>_ 000
JW
0 cL
Q
0r��
VJ O
m
W
z
DATE: 05/18/2015
�— SURVEYED BY:
DST/JAP
DRAWN BY:
ROB/DST
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -15-007
FILE: MSM CREEK_93875
_AB_TLS _F.dwg
SCALE: AS SHOWN
=o:f:l
c�
Z
Z
Z
(n
cn
U
Z
Z
0
x
N
o
U
U
O
D
1266
r
PO
U
ED
N
O
U1
—Z
N
N
<{
no
�U
N
+
No
N
o
M
z
�W
1264
m
N
O
't c0
O
O
N
N
[O
N
p,j
N
�,.�
c0
irj
N
n
N
N
1262
1260
+60 +80
112+00
+20
+40
+60
+80
L0 o
U
LLI � 00
t�CVN jam,
F- Z w_
N OZO�_0
LLJ rd m
U1
_j0
W Qr�,
Lu
wMSO 3
m
W 3 W
W�U z
W 'jw
J a CiL
Z W V)
Z Z
a
LU J
L3 z
U
w
Z
O o
�o
LU
Q
O z
J
O
+
Q
U
M F
r 0
z
z
O
U
o MW
+
o �0�
p()� ce)
F-- z
U)�z�o
Clow
W =�ao
LLJ� �QW�
U
>_ 000
JW
0 cL
Q
0r��
VJ O
m
W
z
DATE: 05/18/2015
�— SURVEYED BY:
DST/JAP
DRAWN BY:
ROB/DST
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -15-007
FILE: MSM CREEK_93875
_AB_TLS _F.dwg
SCALE: AS SHOWN
=o:f:l

I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY
THAT THE DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER
MY SUPERVISION, IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE
REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND
THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS
ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED
HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION
NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 16th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015.
\ 9-
SEAL
.r L-4551
DAVID S. TURNER, P. .S. #L-4551
OliSiiI
3D -
GATE
FENCE
PE MANENT STREAM
CR SSING (FORD)
\ \ \7
BASE DITCH
W/CLASS "I" RIPRAP
F��ST�c
/I\F +
\� CONSERVATION
\ EASEMENT
BY OTHERS
NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR NOTES.
LEGEND: ` BOULDER
— • — • — • —THALWEG �i ARCH
- — — — — - TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
-----------BANK/TERRACE TOE BOULDER
CE CONSERVATION EASEMENT STEP
X FENCE13
--------------------LIMITS OF AS -BUILT SURVEY LOG SILL
-- x-- - - x-- EXISTING FENCE
EX. PROPERTY LINE BRUSH TOE
(NOT SURVEYED)
CONTROL
TRANSPLANT o
POINT RIPRAP
LIMITS OF
AS—BUILT
SURVEY
----------------------------
AS—BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED MAY & JULY 2015
10' 0' 10' 20'
P% IIIIIIIIIIIIIIE
SCALE: 1 "=10' (22x34)
1 "=20' (1 1 x17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1'
BOULDER
ARCH
201 +73 BEGIN
SPROUSE BRANCH
CONSTRUCTION
lb
OP OF
/TERRAC
TERRACE
Ix TOE
l
� r
� l
EX. SPROUSE \
BRANCH
0
SPROUSE
BRANCH
Cb
LIMITS OF-------"'
AS—BUILT
SURVEY ;
;
TOP OF
BANK i
BANK
\ TOE
THALWEG \ \ BOULDER _
STEP
Ltd
_Ce /
FENCE
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT _CE_�
BY OTHERS -
---------------------------------------------
----
o
U
Lu 00
>c0�OO
ACV N jpz-
z 00 W
w 0zrn �O
Z 0) C
LL1CNI =
m (J
L
wuj ^QIP 73
m�0 3
a_ 3m
W 3 w
x
w
F W
J
C9
J C9
Q
z w
a � �
°z o Z
Q w .�
w J
a
o
ui
W
z
o W
0
w
z
z
0
c:)
a
U
F
c:)
z
N W
o �U
c:)VJ �
o >-0rZ
C)
��rn
c%4 C)
Z)zW0
U Dow
_ �~L
U Dew
Q
00
�
m v^� !�z
LJJ !^^
v!
u JW
C) 0.
r
U
O
m
w
z
DATE: 05/18/2015
SURVEYED BY:
DST/JAP
DRAWN BY:
ROB/DST
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -15-007
FILE: MSM CREEK 93875
AB TLS_F.dwg
SCALE: AS SHOWN
SHEET
5 of 13
PROFILE SCALE
AS
-BUILT
LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
HORIZONTAL: 1"=10'(22x34)
SPROUSE BRANCH
1"=20'(11x17)
VERTICAL: 1"=2'(22x34)
STA 201+60 TO 202+50
1 "=4'(11 x17)
1286
1286
Z
o
U
Li
V,
U
0)
6
rl�
� cj� 00
00oM
inn
1284
o
o 0 w
1284
Z
NU
0 o c00v
NO]—
NM
+z
r
w
U'
X
Li
F
O W
N
00
N
W
N CO
N
00
N
1282
allo
N dMN 0
Co m
00
1282
NO
N N
C4N
N
00 ad C4OC)
04 Cb NO
X
00
N
—
—
N
N N— N
It
0 M
r7 pp
r-
0pp
pp
a0
r' o
N
0O
00 M
0OOO
-t
12801280
0 00
N
-00
0
N 000 00' �
N
of
fl- 04
N
1278
1278
201+60
+70
+80 +90 202+00
+10 +20 +30
+40
+50
o
U
Lu 00
>c0�OO
ACV N jpz-
z 00 W
w 0zrn �O
Z 0) C
LL1CNI =
m (J
L
wuj ^QIP 73
m�0 3
a_ 3m
W 3 w
x
w
F W
J
C9
J C9
Q
z w
a � �
°z o Z
Q w .�
w J
a
o
ui
W
z
o W
0
w
z
z
0
c:)
a
U
F
c:)
z
N W
o �U
c:)VJ �
o >-0rZ
C)
��rn
c%4 C)
Z)zW0
U Dow
_ �~L
U Dew
Q
00
�
m v^� !�z
LJJ !^^
v!
u JW
C) 0.
r
U
O
m
w
z
DATE: 05/18/2015
SURVEYED BY:
DST/JAP
DRAWN BY:
ROB/DST
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -15-007
FILE: MSM CREEK 93875
AB TLS_F.dwg
SCALE: AS SHOWN
SHEET
5 of 13

1282
1276
1274
n
lyW
��
r- 0 OR m m w
a
N
-t�r-
r
1280
�
LO
O O f -N N O �0
N 0] (n� '00 0 Ln
O
W
p O
000
O00
N
to,o
0
r 4� t�
N
N
M
N
M
cr0 O
rr
�
O O O M O
d
00
O N
Oq
MJrN
000
000 0�i 000 000r
M 0
N MN N�r M
00
+70 +80
NN 0)
M �
0
205+00
1278
00
^ �
M
u7
WOO
1276
1274
n
lyW
��
r- 0 OR m m w
a
O
r
N
N
NDW00000 .4 cn
M 00 r O
O..
LO
O O f -N N O �0
N 0] (n� '00 0 Ln
O
W
O
O^
L
N N 0O
�^
th
r
N
to,o
0
r 4� t�
00 r N
-N N
M
U)
M
rr
�000 W
O O O M O
d
N N
Oq
MJrN
000
000 0�i 000 000r
M 0
N MN N�r M
00
+70 +80
NN 0)
M �
0
205+00
N
00
^ �
M
u7
WOO
r
N
N
0) 00
r
N M
0)
N
r
a-
N
N
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1'
O
c O DO
r- co � N
N N
AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
SPROUSE BRANCH
I- STA 202+50 TO 205+00
a
O
r
N
N
M 00 r O
LO
r M r
O
W
O
O^
L
N
th
r
0
r 4� t�
rwM
-N N
N
U)
NN N r
N
O
0
�000 W
�O
d
��
M N
MJrN
000
W
N
+70 +80
M �
205+00
N N
N N
WOO
N
to
N
NCO
a-
ko
0
+ +
MJr
N N
D
00
LO
'
07
O O N
N
W
N M
M
O
N
N
00
DO
c0
(0
M
N�}
N O0
O0
N
c0
DO
Nk
N
00
N
r
N
�co
A
00
�N
N
00
N
04
n't M
NN
r,
M
00
N N N
N^
N
MO)
M
04
N
n
-
04
r
N
rO
r
N
rr
r
Nr
N
f' N
AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
SPROUSE BRANCH
I- STA 202+50 TO 205+00
M
r
N
M
^
N
O
r
N
N
M 00 r O
LO
r M r
O
ui r
N �N
O
O^
L
N
th
r
0
r 4� t�
rwM
-N N
N
NNgm
NN N r
N
O
0
�000 W
�O
d
��
n^
MJrN
000
W
N
+70 +80
OON
205+00
N N
N N
WOO
N
to
N
ko
N N
r
00
LO
'
M
N
O
N
NN
DO
(0
M
N�}
N O0
O0
c0
Nk
N
N
�co
A
�N
N
NN
M
r
N
M
^
N
O
r
N
N
M 00 r O
LO
PROFILE SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1 "=10'(22x34)
1"=20'(11x17)
VERTICAL: 1 "=2'(22x34)
1 "=4'(11 x17)
d
W
r O
O M
M J00
N N M p N W
+ + J O F
Lo
r
NJN ImN 0)
n
N
0� �
(D
0)
M .
0) t0
O
M 00 r O
LO
r M r
L� M
N M r
ui r
N �N
O
O^
L
N
th
r
0
r 4� t�
N O N
-N N
N
NNgm
NN N r
N
O
0
�O
N
��
n^
000
N
+70 +80
+90
205+00
N N
N N
N
N
N
N
1272+70 +80 +90 203+00 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 +80 +90 204+00 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60
202+50 +60
W
W
F-
CO cn
M
O WO
r OM
+J� d
0 0r H
O 0] O
00
r
N
1282
1280
1278
In
N
CO � n
0) Fn(q
+ a
ON O N 1276
O
N J—
co
M 00 r O
LO
1274
Nn
N p .4.
O O r
d:
0
r 4� t�
N
N
N
It
N r
NN N r
N
N
N
1272
+70 +80
+90
205+00
Ln o
U
W Oar, 00
0(V N cm
��
z 00 "W
U� m
Lu �zcy70
)
J)
rn c
uJ =
AWN
v
w ^
_j I _�
m�0 3
� I
� 3
w 3
w
W
U
z
D
W
J
a a
F �
zN
Z Q t� z
aW
LU
a Lo
o
Lu
W
z
O o
� w
> o
w a
a
z
O
CD a
O U
+
CD z
N WF_
0 ryU
W
L0�Lr)
+>-O00
o ���
�z
�ZWo
U �0o�
_~a
U �w
Q
Of0oz
m I—
JW
C)0.
V
O
ED
w
z
DATE:
0 5/1 81201 5
SURVEYED BY:
DSTlJAP
DRAWN BY:
ROB/DST
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -15-007
FILE: MSM CREEK 93875
_AB_TLS _F.dwg
SCALE: AS SHOWN
SHEET
6 of 13

I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA., HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE
DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION,
IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS
CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR
ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE
OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE,
REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 16th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015.
CARO
41
- 61DSEAL'#9�
DAVID S. TURNER, P. S. #L-4551 - _� L-4551:
NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR NOTES.
30 30 0 30 '• 30 -
LEGEND:
COD, BOULDER
- •-- - -'--- THALWEG
ARCH
-- -- — — TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
O
� V
W 07) 00
000
----------�-----BANK/TERRACE TOE
CE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
BOULDER
STEP
FENCE
Lo
---------------------LIMITS OF AS -BUILT SURVEY
LOG SILL
EXISTING FENCE
Lo
+
---EX. PROPERTY LINE
(NOT SURVEYED)
TRANSPLANT / 0\ CONTROL
�,..,_� POINT
BRUSH TOE
RiPRAP
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
BY OTHERS
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED MAY & JULY 2015
10' 0' 10' 20'
SCALE: 1 "=10' (22x34)
1"=20' (1 1 x 17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = l'
LIMITS OF ____-- --- ------- -----
AS -BUILT
SURVEY
-
-------- -------
- --
---------------------------------------
__________________________ _ T
-----------_ CO___________ _______-------__-----ANTRO
EX.t�)
^J
36"CMP ` ^RIPRAP
BRUSH INV 1270.27
TRANSPLANT ��° TOE ■ CO
BOULDER BRUSH N _ -' r ■
�- LOG THALWEG i 0 �-
■� STEP SILL TOP OF TOE LOG Q - ``
-- _ O + BANK SILL 1273 s ` . ui
+ ■ - - -_ BANK -� �' -` _
Cr TOE `- -- /`f`�� - �_ ^ - LI
r - s `.•.� ger✓ may, . "'� �• - + s .y r _ -ted � � _
_ �� 1_ - 1272
7� -� _ -_ ..,_ r� �- __ �_ _r_ LOG
■ ..-- -- ��� _ �- r -� _� f r — -- SILL --- Lij.
127
BOULDER72�� FLOW SPROUSE BOULDER ----_-- 12-73 ■ `� --
LOG STEP _�"`"� BRANCH STEP _._ r r � ■ �
■ '� __.- f ____ — t
TOE BRUSH SILL j 3 6"CMP
--■ - -
\-7 I INV
TOP OF 1270.25 INTERRACE
C� TERRACE TOE
1278
1270
1268
205+00
+10 +20 +30 +40 +50
00
00 J LO
u (�1'i
+
L(7
oON
+60
00
c�
cc J
W
O
� V
W 07) 00
000
N
C�
+
Lo
N
00 L.Lj
1276
Lo
+
LL
LO LN
+
0? c
LLJ 2 t►_
L:l,
N mr
4 2
+
Lu
< a _
m°eQ
� �M1
M1 � M1
O 0 N
1
r- N
U
N CN
1274 N N
oU .—
J
M1
M1 N M1 f� 4 M1 r
00
�+
n Irl
N N N
�
N Lc
r')
V-}
N N M1 rrS
N
I!
N M1 �(7 0 O
N M1
r N
I,
N M1
N N CO rrj
1272
r N
r- N cq r- N
W
��N F—
a_
W
Q
Z_
J
O
L U
r
+ ` r
a
N J r
R
U9
F_
Q Lf)
+ Q a
1270
1268
205+00
+10 +20 +30 +40 +50
00
00 J LO
u (�1'i
+
L(7
oON
+60
00
cc J
�'3 J 00
O
� V
W 07) 00
000
N
+
Lo
C{)
00 L.Lj
Lq
0 N
_
LO LN
+
0? c
LLJ 2 t►_
L:l,
0 O C'4
N
+
Lu
< a _
m°eQ
� �M1
N
O 0 N
1
0 -
O
� V
W 07) 00
000
c
Lo
C{)
00 L.Lj
Lq
w0LnFT)
LO LN
0? c
LLJ 2 t►_
L:l,
o
N
+
Lu
< a _
m°eQ
� �M1
cl-3
O 0 N
LL
U
� J
CO
oU .—
J
Q
M1 N
n Irl
Z
Z
W
Q
Lo
N
N
+
cQ : M1
•-
I,
N M1
O © N
N J�
�a
Lli
r N
(D C)
AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
SPROUSE BRANCH
STA 205+00 TO 207+50
'003Ls
CO M1 M1 CO _ Cp
N rf lf7 M1 N Nt() N ro
N ¢
M1 M1 q�} M? N N M1 N CQ T M1N M1 LnN N N r N C7 NN O 0 QD C7 N
M1 M1 N M1 N N Op 04 Y_ (14 N 00
T N
M1 N N M1 `- r-- CU -ta? M1 M1 F- a)
N N
N M1 N - N M1_ r�- N N
T N T
Nr' N N
N -
PROFILE SCALE
HORIZONTAL: 1"=10'(22x34)
1"=20'(11x17)
VERTICAL: 1"=2'(22x34)
--
to
1=4'Ld
(11x17)
+70 +80 +90 206+00 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 +80 +90 207+00 +10 +20
+30 +40
GAT E-
1278
1276
1274
0') 1272
�LO
+ Uo
r � M1
O co N
N n
1270
1268
+50
O
� V
W 07) 00
000
c
C{)
00 L.Lj
V)
w0LnFT)
0? c
LLJ 2 t►_
aJCO
o
N
Lu
< a _
m°eQ
cl-3
L
w
Lu
cn
w
w
z
oU .—
Lu
00f��
m
co
�
>
tz
�
Z
Z
W
Q
Lo
cp O N
O
z
+
cQ : M1
C
O
0
�a
Lli
4
Q
(D C)
W
��N F—
a_
W
Q
Z_
J
O
L U
r
+ ` r
a
N J r
O
U9
F_
Q Lf)
+ Q a
L0 0 0� cy)Q
CL
c) Z
O
Wu
/" f 1� __3J
V
, 0 IJJ
T Q
CO N
z w
< 0 0 LuV
Z
w W
u) �j LU
D C) ry
O 0
Vr -
u)
U)
m
LL]
2
DATE.
05118/2015
SURVEYED BY:
DST/JAP
D RAW N BY:
ROB/DST
REVIEWED BY:
DSTIEGT
N
PROJECT: TLS -15-007
N N
FILE: MSM CREEK 93875
_AB_TLS _F.dwg
to
00 0 00 c i
act
�
000a
N
N M1
`— �'
h M1 N N N p]
N
, _
r F�
I`+
M1E` (V
N N� Q
Cn
M1
M1 N
N e-
N
,
0
s -r00 N M1'
Q
00
h (]
N M1
N
�N
0 O
0
O
'4
N M1 M1
M1
cq
.— 0) CD
N
NN
+70 +80 +90 206+00 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 +80 +90 207+00 +10 +20
+30 +40
GAT E-
1278
1276
1274
0') 1272
�LO
+ Uo
r � M1
O co N
N n
1270
1268
+50
O
� V
W 07) 00
000
c
f-
00 L.Lj
w0LnFT)
0? c
LLJ 2 t►_
o
�-- +-'
�LtJCV �r -1
Lu
< a _
m°eQ
cl-3
L
w
Lu
cn
w
w
z
J
Lu
Q
m
co
�
>
tz
�
Z
Z
W
Q
Lo
Q
O
z
<
C
O
0
�a
Lli
4
Q
Q
Z_
J
O
L U
r
+ ` r
a
CNI Lu
O
LU
C
Q Lf)
+ Q a
L0 0 0� cy)Q
CL
c) Z
O
Wu
/" f 1� __3J
V
, 0 IJJ
T Q
C
z w
< 0 0 LuV
Z
w W
u) �j LU
D C) ry
O 0
Q
U)
m
LL]
2
DATE.
05118/2015
SURVEYED BY:
DST/JAP
D RAW N BY:
ROB/DST
REVIEWED BY:
DSTIEGT
PROJECT: TLS -15-007
FILE: MSM CREEK 93875
_AB_TLS _F.dwg
SCALE: AS SHOWN
SHEET
7 Of 13

I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY
THAT THE DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER
MY SUPERVISION, IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE
REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND
THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS
ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED
HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION
NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 16th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015.
,/
ASN CARCO/ �'
?�pFESS%pti'1'y':
ao)S' _ : SEA�� /-S�' : _
DAVID S. TURNER, P.L . #L-4551 = :y L-4551 0
2
%9L.0 SUR`I��`��
LEGEND: ` BOULDER
• — • — • — THALWEGi ARCH
- — — — — - TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
-----------BANK/TERRACE TOE BOULDER
CE CONSERVATION EASEMENT STEP
X FENCE
---------------------LIMITS OF AS -BUILT SURVEY LOG SILL
-- - ---- EXISTING FENCE
EX. PROPERTY LINE BRUSH TOE
(NOT SURVEYED)
TRANSPLANT CONTROL
POINT � RIPRAP
AS—BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED MAY & JULY 2015
10' 0' 10' 20'
SCALE: I"=10' (22x34)
1 "=20' (1 1 x17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1'
NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR NOTES.
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
BY OTHERS
I IKAlTS nF
I
1�
1
1
1
1
1
nn+LO
PROFILE SCALE
AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE HORIZONTAL: 1"=10'(22x34)
SPROUSE BRANCH 1"=20'(11x17)
VERTICAL: 1"=2'(22x34)
STA 207+50 TO 208+10 1"=4'(11x17)
1274 1274
1272
1270 M
O
r
N
1268
1266
w
W
cncn
mwtn
coo*
� �
o
O ON
N M
a_
W
cD M
N N
O O
N N
D
N�
N O
O
n
�m mM�
N- O
66NOO
om
NN
N
1264
207+50 +60 +70
a
w
F-
0�
of �
(D N
N w
2
W
N
(00
't
to
01 Do
N N
NNO
O
o6 (D O
Nn
06
1
CL
W
(n
D) N
rnrn
cd o6
ED CD
NN
d
N �
Ib to
00 N
r
+90
to 00
N N
ly
1272
S
U
z
< 1270
0]
W
!n
O
o c" 1268
Ib o
Oz
N W
00
(0o o
ANN Nrry MN1266
'�6 m m
CD (0 m
04 N N
1264
208+00 +10
O
U
W DO
FF52 Q0
OO �w
0CV((N >�
00 ` w
W 0 Ln
Z N
a mt r%
cy)LlJN v
C m
W ^ _j
N ui Myo --
W 3 W
m
w
z
W 4W
>
J
Q a �!.00
�- rr
Z w
a
Z o
Q J
LU J
Q m
0 z
LuZ
O o
Luo
W ¢
z
Z
J
O
O Q
r � U
+
0 O
N W
o U
o ��
+ �Q00
o ��00
�zWo
�0�w
U �<
Z wW
� °QZ
m ��
(n J W
0 LL
w
CLW
O
m
W
z
DATE: 05/18/2015
SURVEYED BY:
DST/JAP
DRAWN BY:
ROB/DST
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -15-007
FILE: MSM CREEK 93875
_AB_TILS _F.dwg
SCALE: AS SHOWN
SHEET
8 of 13

I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DATA SHOWN ON THIS
DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION, IS AN ACCURATE AND
COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND
THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS -BUILT
CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL
SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 16th DAY OF OCTOBER , 2015.
\\\01111
\, „CAR04i''%
?,•oFESSipti Ly
- L-4551
DAVID S. TURNER,F.L.S. #L-4551 o9�p
S U R0�,
.. ,
S. 1
EX. IVA
BRANCH\
C
Cl°
°x
LINE B
rc (F—
LEGEND:
BOULDER
— • — • — • —THALWEG
ARCH
- — — — — - TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
__-------------------
-----------BANK/TERRACE TOE
BOULDER
CE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
STEP
* FENCE
--------------------- LIMITS OF AS -BUILT SURVEY
LOG SILL
---- x— - X— -EXISTING FENCE
EX. PROPERTY LINE
BRUSH TOE
(NOT SURVEYED)
CONTROL
TRANSPLANT POINT
RIPRAP
AS—BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED MAY & JULY 2015
10' 0' 10' 20'
SCALE: 1 "=10' (22x34)
1 "=20' (1 1 x17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1'
NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR NOTES.
CONSERVATION ------
EASEMENT
BY OTHERS
6_
72g;�
__-------------------
O
Ln U
WM� b0
> co � w
0 j

I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY
THAT THE DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER
MY SUPERVISION, IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE
REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND
THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS
ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED
HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION
NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 16th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015. j
L-4551
9 �O.
�.�4�,
%,9L• • .SURv, . �\c
AS—BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED MAY & JULY 2015
10' 0' 10' 20'
SCALE: 1 "=10' (22x34)
1"=20' (11x17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1'
LEGEND:
— • — • — • — THALWEG
- — — — —
-TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
-----------BANK/TERRACE TOE
CE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
X - FENCE
---------------------LIMITS OF AS -BUILT SURVEY
x -x-EXISTING FENCE
—EX. PROPERTY LINE
_37 -
(NOT SURVEYED)
TRANSPLANT
BOULDERCONTROL
cd ARCH O POINT
BOULDER
STEP
LOG SILL
BRUSH TOE
RIPRAP
------------
NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR NOTES.
T_
IVA DITCH o I I --
SEE SHEET 12\` 'LLJ
N o
NWN
co
' W
co
N o /
cp
O
0
NO
1286 cq
00 w
00
N (D cf)
n O a-
7 M (D 0 Ld
d• N n 04 OMD � L
n
1284 ----- ' ro `'of
N N Lnw d CO CO Wp CD
04
00 d� 00 00 N M J 00
00 N N
j O� WCD �t _
ILl --'_. co U)4 '� M N N 04 co
O O N
__._i O 00 Ih m
+ a414 00 00
04 04 rq
1282 m m 00 o
1 0 - c
ED
CD_ I� m
co� 0
00 00
1.280 -- N M N 00 0 N p �"� N N
00 O CD W
ci C14
0000 _— .. N 0000 cn
N r
r 00 00
1278 � °,° N N
..' N 00 0
N r-
04 �
N 00
n 0000
M
00
1276 --�— —I — N -',
r N O ^ N
_. _______ �N N N
PROFILE SCALE
AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE i HORIZONTAL: 1"=10'(22x34)
1274 IVA BRANCH 1"=20(11x17) - -----
STA 302+50 TO 305+00 VERTICAL: 1 xl7) 2x34)
_I 1"=4'(11x17)
1272 —
1271 - � - — —
302+50 +60 +70 +80 +90 303+00 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70 +80 +90 304+00 +10 +20
LIMITS OF
�X. AS—BUILT
jICONTROL SURVEY
D PT. #13
It
��TOP OF
BANK 2�6
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
BY OTHERS
1286
1284
1282
1280
a_
W
cn
uj CD
F-
oma? 1278
+ JtD D d
JWui
mN cn mcq a
D w
LO 00 p d' N cq
fi Lo
— M "' O ON ri 1276
O 7 m.- r
N �'t � N
rl
LO r- 00 "' 00
Orn Dvi to ro
N .- N ^ __ _ � — .. N N N 1274
N �I, ^ N I\ a'
N N N N
rl
N N 1272
N r I\
+ N N
1271
+3p +
40 50 +60 +70 +80 +90 305+00
O
U
> 0
CID—I>'L�u
�CVN j�
Z 00
Lu 0z6��mo
Lu
Ln O7 C
lis W= mow'
a co U�.
�WCV C
W �Q::3
LLJ N m°L 3
W 3 W
am
wO
Z
7)
WLLj
J m
Z W
Q
z o Z
¢ J d
F J
Dz
ui W
z �
O o
Lu
> o
Lu a
z
z
J
U
it
Q a O
z
CDw
o
�U
cOn w
H
O LO
00
L0 ���
0��
N D z
O Z 0=)
OOwJ
��w
U O�w
z ��z
Iy W w '
W W
C)
O
m
w
z
DATE: 05/18/2015
SURVEYED BY:
DST/JAP
DRAWN BY:
ROB/DST
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -15-007
FILE: MSM CREEK -93875
_AB_TLS _F.dwg
SCALE: AS SHOWN
SHEET
10 of 13

I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DATA SHOWN ON THIS -
DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER MY SUPERVISION, IS AN
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT 21
WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND THAT THE PHYSICAL
DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS ARE AS -BUILT F NCE GATE
CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED HEREON..
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION -CE CE CE CE CE C CE-7iNUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 16th DAY OF OCTOBER , 2015.
W
o m CA r
R Z r, _
SEAL _ y_
L-4551 z- TLS#26 "
DAVID S. TURNER, P. .S. #L-4551 -
',
E \
ST ER
X • W \RIP \ RAP � -' .
i
-'. Ar' ----
o
LEGEND:
N
—•—•—•—THALWEG
rn
— — — — —TOP
OF BANK/TERRACE
----------BANK/TERRACE
TOE
CE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
rn—O
I
FENCE
-------------------- LIMITS OF AS -BUILT SURVEY
-
EXISTING FENCE
<r
EX. PROPERTY LINE
Z CO
w
(NOT SURVEYED)
CO p M
TRANSPLANT
BOULDER ACONTROL
+ L6
ARCH POINT
BOULDER
m
STEP
n
LOG SILL
O O N
BRUSH TOE
0 o
RIPRAP
AS -BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED MAY & JULY 2015
10' 0' 10' 20'
SCALE: 1"=10' (22x34)
1 "=20' (1 1 x 17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1'
NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR NOTES.
• j♦
�...• .fid.... t �r
gffn-,., .: as = -
I
1 •
....
17
C-)
is\
=.
I36"CMP z
INV.1267.12
I _a w
\ PERMANENT STRE
I CROSSING (PIPE)
0of
•2,
q.�
GATE
I"' Keyl
THALWEG BANK
1269 \
BANK
TOE W_
39f-------------------
30
_ -- LIMITS OF
AS -BUILT
SURVEY
------
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
BY OTHERS
1274
1266
1264
305+00 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70
00
M
N
m
rn
0
U
a
Lt Uj
O (02
+ U
Inv
rn—O
I
>:M
cD
f� Mz
CO Q
<r
n
Z CO
w
CO p M
ozcy)
+ L6
CO Q
c
Lu
m
n
O O N
co
of
LL,
co Lu
ff)m
� QI _�
r'°CO
N
co
ui LnM
�
m
L6
L6
Lq
mO
N
ED
M
N
V)
+J�
J
a
J
¢1
a
_
W
o
w
a
<
(D O
O
(D
U
o
J
1272
.,
O m N
N
z
307+00
Q
J
o
V)
Z
O
CO)
t
N
N
ul)
N
o
� w,
N
N
N
nj
cD 00
O
N
w
IX
O
LuZ
+-J c6
r
oF—
�U
0
M
m�L0
(D Dw
O
Lo
O
N
0)
N
cD
t
r Z
0
CzULLI
GOoW
m
O
N
d
Oi
z
OLLW
-Z
01
co
p I�
N
a1
f0
(D
1270
N
0)
(O
N
d
N
N N d
n r
N
(�v
N
N
to
O
m
W
L6 to
Z
r
DATE:
05/18/2015
w (D
N
r7 d Co
o
N N
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
+30
+40
~ N
+60
cq
+70
U?N
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
�r-
(0D
N
� N
O
+ 0' N
N O
0)
0
In w'-
pp
O
6
1268
on
N
06
N
O
o
04
N
0]
1266
1264
305+00 +10 +20 +30 +40 +50 +60 +70
00
M
N
m
rn
n
U
a
Lt Uj
O (02
+ U
Inv
rn—O
I
>:M
cD
f� Mz
U
Cn Q
w �_
+ a0
O D O
O O N
M M
Ai
an
r -
OD
00
7 N
N (OD u'))
6
m m
N N
+80 +90 306+00 +10 +20
TLS#2
NAI LA
7D,
SOUTH
MUDDY CREEK
7269,
PROFILE SCALE
AS -BUILT LONGITUDINAL PROFILE HORIZONTAL: 1"=10'(22x34)
IVA BRANCH 1"=20'(11x17)
VERTICAL: 1"=2'(22x34)
STA 305+00 TO 307+20 1"=4'(11x17)
�T
0MM,
00
1274
1272
1270
z
O_
H
U
c N 1268
z
ro
U
O �Z
n w
1266
d'
O
N
1264
+10 +20
x
2
U
LO
Lu
Oc
O
V
00
U
CO Q
0 W 0)
Z CO
w
CO p M
ozcy)
+ L6
CO Q
c
Lu
m
_a
O O N
co
of
LL,
co Lu
ff)m
� QI _�
r'°CO
06W
ui LnM
3
3
m
L6
L6
Lq
mO
N
�
(D
N
N
+J�
J
a
J
¢1
a
_
W
o
w
a
<
(D O
(D
U
o
J
N
.,
O m N
N
z
307+00
Q
J
o
V)
Z
O
CO)
t
N
W
� w,
N
J
0
cD 00
U
_
�
IX
O
LuZ
+-J c6
oF—
�U
0
M
m�L0
(D Dw
O
Lo
O
O 004r
N
/O
L J
OO
t
r Z
0
CzULLI
GOoW
n
co
O
N
=
z
OLLW
-Z
01
co
WF
N
wa)
00 (D
(D
LD
N
0)
(O
N
d
\
/
Q
n r
N
N
N
to
O
m
W
L6 to
Z
DATE:
05/18/2015
w (D
N
N N
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
+30
+40
+50
+60
+70
�T
0MM,
00
1274
1272
1270
z
O_
H
U
c N 1268
z
ro
U
O �Z
n w
1266
d'
O
N
1264
+10 +20
x
U
LO
Lu
Oc
O
V
00
CO Q
0 W 0)
Z CO
w
CO p M
ozcy)
+ L6
c
Lu
m
_a
O O N
c: CU
LL,
co Lu
ff)m
� QI _�
r'°CO
06W
o_
3
3
m
L6
L6
Lq
mO
N
�
(D
N
N
N
J
a
J
¢1
a
W
o
w
a
<
(D
Z
a
o
J
N
.,
+90
N
z
307+00
�T
0MM,
00
1274
1272
1270
z
O_
H
U
c N 1268
z
ro
U
O �Z
n w
1266
d'
O
N
1264
+10 +20
LO
Lu
Oc
O
V
00
Oi
Z CO
w
Lu
ozcy)
c
Lu
m
_a
m�
0-)wCV
O
c: CU
LL,
co Lu
� QI _�
r'°CO
06W
o_
3
3
W
T
3
m
w
M
J
a
J
¢1
a
W
o
w
a
<
-...
Z
a
o
J
.,
w
a
N
z
J
o
V)
Z
O
CO)
t
o
W
a
z
J
0
U
_
�
IX
O
LuZ
oF—
�U
M
m�L0
O
X000
O
Q(/M
it
-
/O
L J
OO
t
r Z
0
CzULLI
GOoW
=i -n
=
z
OLLW
-Z
WF
9
wa)
m
j WQ
0 O.//
\
/
Q
O
m
W
Z
DATE:
05/18/2015
SURVEYED BY:
DST/JAP
DRAWN BY:
ROB/DST
REVIEWED BY:
DST/EGT
PROJECT: TLS -15-007
FILE: MSM CREEK 93875
_AB_TLS _F.dwg
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
SHEET
11 of 13

I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY
THAT THE DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER
MY SUPERVISION, IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE
REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND
THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS
ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED
HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION
NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 16th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015.
CA Roti
SEAL
DA S. -TURNER, P.L.S. #L-4551 = r L-4551 an
s -vy
SURJ
9G.0. ,
LEGEND:
• — • — • — THALWEG
- — — — — - TOP OF BANK/TERRACE
-----------BANK/TERRACE TOE
CE CONSERVATION EASEMENT
* FENCE
----------• LIMITS OF AS -BUILT SURVEY
X ---X— EXISTING FENCE
EX. PROPERTY LINE
(NOT SURVEYED)
RIPRAP APOINTROL
AS—BUILT SURVEY BY:
TURNER LAND SURVEYING, PLLC
SURVEYED MAY & JULY 2015
SCALE: 1"=10' (22x34)
1 "=20' (1 1 x17)
CONTOUR INTERVAL = 1'
NOTES:
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR NOTES.
LIMITS OF
AS—BUILT
SURVEY
EX. FENCE -
O Y. --
O FLOW
t
O - -
PROPERTY LINE
BY OTHERS
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
BY OTHERS
,
I
"V" DITCH W/
CLASS B
RIP RAP
1286
-1288
1290—�— — —
IVA
DITCH
10 "W
1234-f
u u /
I
1%
IVA
BRANCH
SEE SHEET 10
o
LO
WM1
U
00
>cooQ'�,,,,
A CV N
> �
W
0
OZrn
o®
Z 0")
LLJ
C m
o
mtn
LU 0
� EU
i v
Lu
`�'°Co
N
a-
3
3
W
Lu
x
3
w
�
.
U)
J_
W
J
Q
<
Q
H
Z
K
F
Z
aLU
o
J
F
a
in
�
z
N
W
O
m
>
o
W
o
LU
IX
a
z
z
J
O
Q
U
<
x
O
c)
WF_
N
+
�U
10�
19T
�0
L0
rZ
0
00
c)
0
0 Q
+
�ZWo
�OOLU
0
Lu
U)O�W
_
(f�OZ
F_
u)
p
JW
Q
n NO
Q
O
m
LU
z
DATE:
05/18/2015
SURVEYED BY:
DST/JAP
DRAWN BY:
ROB/DST
REVIEWED BY:
DSTlEGT
PROJECT: TLS -15-007
FILE:
MSM CREEK 93875
AB TLS F.dwg
SCALE: AS SHOWN
SHEET
12 of 13 ..]

m
I, DAVID S. TURNER, AS A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, HEREBY CERTIFY
o
1280
THAT THE DATA SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING, WAS OBTAINED UNDER
1280
Li
�
CD
MY SUPERVISION, IS AN ACCURATE AND COMPLETE
w
z
o
z
z
00
m
z
o
z
c�
Z
00
X±
z�
w±
1275
REPRESENTATION OF WHAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN THE FIELD, AND
1275
�'
c�
Cz,
x
THAT THE PHYSICAL DIMENSIONS OR ELEVATIONS SHOWN THUS
=
ro
M
0
o
m
J
Lo
o
0
(D
rn
ARE AS -BUILT CONDITIONS EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE NOTED
ri
o
0)
a)
00
m
+
m
,
V)
M
co
�
^
N
1270
HEREON. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, REGISTRATION
1270 N
z+N
N
N
N
N
r- T
m
r
N
r
r-
r
NUMBER, AND SEAL THIS 16th DAY OF OCTOBER , 2015.
00
r
N r
N
O
_
Lq '0
O
N
N
N
r'
N
N
N
N
04
__
a0 r- N
N
10
1265
l,,//
1265
1101+03.23
XS3
N N N
N N
r1
N
o'/
CI'IAIfi
1260
oFEssiati?y%
1260
0+00
+10
+20
+30
+40
+50
+60
+70
+80
+90 1+00
+10
+20
+30
+40
+50
+60
+70
+80
+90
SEAL S
DAVID S. TURNER, P. .S. #L-4551 = r L-4551 4r:
9�p
0 4
: -71" • �
1284
,
..... q,
1284
O
sl I IS V `\\
F--
1280
1280 z o
M
_
c0
w z+
c8
z
0
N
±
tri
w+
1275
1275 N
0
CZ's
�
o
o
�
�+
c0
�°
ao
A
mLO
Ln
m
1`1vi
N
O
\n
00
m
m
r
^
M
00
O
W
M
r
1270
1270 N
N
r
N
N
O
m W
N
N
m
t0
to
N
N
N
N
O0
d'
0
N
N
�
t
0
�
�
N
N
1265
1265
102+55.63
XS4
N
r rN
O
c0
N
co
N N
N
N
1260
1260
0+00
+10
+20
+30
+40
+50
+60
+70
+80
+90
1+00
+10
+20
+30
+40
+50
+60
+70
+80
+90
1280
1280
0
cx)
1275
7O
z
z
z
O
w
0
WN
wNz1275
U
0w
W
,
O
���
0
~A
A
000
N
M
r
00
c0
<t
J
m
N
of
m
m
rn
to
o
o
M
00
m
1270
1270 N
M
In
I"?
0
N
m
w
+ w
°'
10
r
r
N
NN
NN
O
c14
N
04
NNN
1265
1265
-
dIn
0)
0) 0)
0
CROSS SECTION SCALE
m
0
m
HORIZONTAL: V=10'(22x34)
N
N
N N N
N
1260
V=20'(11x17)
1260
104+47.26 XS5
T
VERTICAL: V=10'(22x34)
1 "=20'(11 x17)
1255
TBL-LEFT TOP OF BANK
TBR -RIGHT TOP OF BANK
1255+50
+60
+70
+g0
+g0
1+00
+10
+20
+30
+40
+50
+60
+7p
+gp
+90
2+00
+10
+20
BBL -LEFT BANK TOE
0+00
+10 +20
+30
+40
BBR-RIGHT BANK TOE
TW -THALWEG
1
GN -GROUND
EGN-EXISTING GROUND
1280
00
EW -EDGE OF WATER
r-
ro
WS -WATER SURFACE
z
z+
°
z0
1275
XING-CROSSING
TOT -TOP OF TERRACE
1275 o
w
z
w z+
z
z
z
z
z
z
0
0�
0+
wN
TT -TERRACE TOE
(DO
CD
0
0
CD
z
cI
�
m
m
z
0
0
LO
1270
t0 r
tp
N
r
M
_j
m
N
m
m
to
N
0
't
�
1270
N
rn c0
.-
N
-
o
M m
±
o
r
r
r
r
N
N
N
N
N
N
1265
1265
N
N
N
N
N
cc0
M d- t
W
N
N
N c0 c0
w (0
tp 6 c0
(D t0 t0
ED
N
N N
N N N
N
1260
NOTES:
1260
105+41.46 XS6
1. SEE SHEET 1 FOR NOTES.
1255
1255
0+00
+10
+20
+30
+40
+50
+60
+70
+80
+90
1+00
+10
+20
+30
+40
+50
+60
+70
+g0
+90
2+00
1280
1280
0
CKD_CO
1275
1275 z
CJ
z
O
N
Z+
Z
~
z
z
z
U
ZN
LU 04
W
w
00
(D
Z
�
0
J
m
� U)
m
z
0
C�
�r
1270
1270
C0
z
+
0o ~
c0
ro
�
co
m
r
In
-
r
0
0
0
It
1
m
0
— w
m —
m
m
o^
to
0
N
N
0
N
O
00
(n
cli
N
°'
N
N
04
1265
1265 N
N
N
N
N
00
cN0 LO
n
N O
N
�-
N
t�0
N
CIDLn c0 In
N N N
N N
•-
1260
1260
107+50.34 XS7
N
1255
1255
0+00
+10
+20 +30
+40
+50
+60
+70
+80
+90
1+00
+10
+20 +30
+40
+50
+60
+70
+80
+90
2+00
+10
+20
1280
1280
N
N
4
+
1275
1275
N
rn
+
Z
CD
WN
w
CDo
(D0
0
0
0
Z
0
z
0
M
1270
1270
m
�
m m
rn
t0
m
0
M
O
r
0
�
W
+
O
m
N
r7
O
p
r
N
0)
1265
Qui
OM;
0;
a)
N
M
O
OBD
t�0
N
N
N
.rN-
1265
N
N
N
N
N
(D
N
0)
O
O
O)
N (r0
N
N
(0m
m
0
t0 N
1260
1260
109+71.58
XS8
N
N
N N
N
N
N
1255
1255+20
0+00
+10
+30
+40
+50
+60
+70
+80
+90
1+00
+10
+20
+30
+40
+50
+60
+70
+80
+90
2+00
O
U
Wmr b0
^m
OcVN j