20021924 Ver 1_Monitoring Report_20170119

FINAL
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
YEAR 7 (2016)
MCINTYRE CREEK RESTORATION SITE
AT HORNETS NEST PARK
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(DMS Project No. 243, Contract No. 004499)
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
Raleigh, North Carolina
November 2016

FINAL
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
YEAR 7 (2016)
MCINTYRE CREEK RESTORATION SITE
AT HORNETS NEST PARK
MECKLENBURG COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
(DMS Project No. 243, Contract No. 004499)
Submitted to:
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
Raleigh, North Carolina
Prepared by:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
Design Firm:
KCI Associates of North Carolina, P.A.
Landmark Center I, Suite 200
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Ah
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
November 2016

Table of Contents
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................1
2.0 METHODOLOGY................................................................................................................................
3
2.1 Vegetation Assessment......................................................................................................................
3
2.2 Stream Assessment............................................................................................................................
3
2.3 Wetland Assessment..........................................................................................................................
4
3.0 REFERENCES......................................................................................................................................
5
Appendices
APPENDIX A. PROJECT VICINITY MAP AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
APPENDIX B. VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figures 2 and 2A -2B. Current Conditions Plan View
Tables 5A -5C. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Tables
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Fixed -Station Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Temporary Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
APPENDIX C. VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7. Year 7 (2016) Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
APPENDIX D. STREAM SURVEY DATA
Cross-section Plots
Table 8a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 8b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment
Parameter Distributions)
Table 9a. Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters —
Cross-sections)
Table 9b. Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
APPENDIX E. HYDROLOGY DATA
Table 10. Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure 3. Annual Climatic Data vs. 30 -year Historic Data
Table 11. Years 1-5 Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Table of Contents

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) has completed restoration of 5178 linear
feet of stream at the McIntyre Creek Restoration Site (hereafter referred to as the "Site") to assist in fulfilling
stream and wetland mitigation goals in the area.
The goals and objectives of this project focus on improving local water quality, habitat, and stream stability.
These goals were accomplished by the following.
1. Restoring stable channel morphology capable of moving flows and sediments provided by the
watershed.
2. Improving water quality by reducing soil and riparian vegetation loss resulting from lateral erosion
and bed degradation.
3. Improving aquatic habitat with bed variability and the use of in -stream structures.
4. Stabilizing tributaries draining into McIntyre Creek.
5. Providing educational opportunities through Mecklenburg County.
6. Improving the natural aesthetics of Hornets Nest Park.
7. Enhancing vegetation to provide habitat/food sources, shade the stream, filter overland runoff, and
remove soil particles and other nutrients from stormwater.
8. Protecting a Site identified in a watershed listed as impaired for elevated levels of copper and
turbidity (NCDWQ 2010).
The Site is located in Hornets Nest Park on the northern side of the City of Charlotte in Mecklenburg
County. The Site is located in United States Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03050101170020
(North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] Subbasin 03-08-34) of the Catawba River Basin and
will service USGS 8 -digit Cataloging Unit (CU) 03050101. The Site is located in NCDMS Targeted Local
Watershed within the Long Creek watershed targeted for restoration. Waters in the Site drain
approximately 2.5 miles into Long Creek (NCDWQ No. 11-120-[2.5]), which is listed as impaired for
elevated levels of copper and turbidity negatively affecting aquatic life (NCDWQ 2010).
Prior to construction, the Site contained a degraded stream channel with a disturbed riparian buffer located
within Hornets Nest Park. Site streams were characterized by eroding banks, channel widening, high
sediment inputs from construction occurring in the upstream watershed and onsite bank erosion, and
channel incision as indicated by bank -height -ratios ranging from 1.4 to 1.9. Surrounding land uses include
commercial and residential areas with narrow riparian corridors adjacent to streams. At least 50 percent of
the contributing watershed had been cleared and developed.
Project construction was completed between March 2007 -May 2008 and repairs were completed between
August 2009 -January 2010. Additional repairs to stabilize banks and structures were completed on
Monitoring Reach 1 were completed in March 2016. The project restored 5178 linear feet of stream using
Priority I restoration by constructing a new meandering channel within the McIntyre Creek floodplain,
incorporating in -stream structures, installing grade control structures at the confluence with two tributaries,
and planting native forest species. Site activities provide 5129 Stream Mitigation Units (49 linear feet of
the restored channel is located within a utility easement and therefore was not included in the available
mitigation credit). The Site is protected by a permanent conservation easement held by the State of North
Carolina.
Success criteria for stream restoration will be assessed using measurements of stream dimension, pattern,
and profile; site photographs; visual assessments; and vegetation sampling. Cross-section measurements
should show little or no change from the as -built cross-sections. If changes occur, evaluations will be
completed to determine whether changes are minor adjustments trending towards a more stable channel or
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina page 1

if changes indicate movement towards an unstable condition. Annual measurements should indicate stable
bed form features with little change from the as -built survey. Pools are expected to maintain depth with
lower water surface slope and riffles are expected to remain shallower with steeper water surface slopes.
Substrate measurements should indicate maintenance of distributions from the design phase and baseline
measurements. In addition, there should be an absence of any significant aggradation or degradation of the
stream channel. During years 6 and 7, monitoring activities will include measurement of the 4 existing
cross-sections as well as the establishment and measurement of 3 additional riffle cross-sections (2 in
Monitoring Reach 1 and 1 in Monitoring Reach 2). Profile will not be measured during these years as 5
years of data have already been collected. Vegetation sampling during years 6 and 7 will include the
establishment and measurement of 4 temporary 100 square meter plots along the disturbed portions of
Monitoring Reach 1. Data will include counts and speciation of planted species and volunteers. A visual
assessment of stream and vegetation conditions will also be completed along with all previously reported
photo points.
During years 1 (2010) through 5 (2014), bank erosion was in scattered areas across the site, with those at
the bottom of the project (Monitoring Reach 1) being the most concerning in that they represented active
mass wasting. As a result, DMS repaired these areas in Monitoring Reach 1 early in 2016. The areas in
Monitoring Reaches 2 and 3 were less concerning in that they are dominated by surficial scour (8 and 5%,
respectively during year 6, and 9 and 6%, respectively during year 7 (Tables 5B -5C, Appendix B)) as
opposed to mass wasting. Additionally, these features developed earlier in the project, yet have not
advanced significantly in recent years. The bank erosion percentages within these reaches have either
remained the same or improved slightly compared to prior years. Erosion was also observed in pool cross-
sections 1 and 4 earlier in the projects history; however, these cross-sections have not demonstrated any
appreciable change even when exposed to multiple storm flows. The watershed is extremely flashy due to
the extensive amount of impervious surface in the contributing watershed and floods quickly even during
modest rain events. Therefore, given the lack of change within the last 3 years, the repairs focused on the
bottom reach (Monitoring Reach 1) thereby avoiding unnecessary disturbance of sections that appear to
have equilibrated.
Success criteria for stream restoration will include documentation of two bankfull channel events during
the monitoring period. In the event that less than two bankfull events occur during the first five years,
monitoring will continue until the second event is documented. In addition, bankfull events must occur
during separate monitoring years. A crest gauge is located within the Site to assist with documentation of
bankfull events (Figures 2-2A, Appendix B). One bankf ill event was documented during the year 7 (2016)
monitoring season making a total of six bankfull events documented within the seven-year monitoring
period. Additionally, precipitation data indicates that four geomorphologically relevant flow events
occurred onsite during the year 7 (2016) monitoring season for a total of at least fourteen such flows
occurring over the seven year monitoring period.
Vegetation success criteria dictate that an average density of 320 stems per acre must be surviving in the
first three monitoring years. Subsequently, 290 stems per acre must be surviving in year 4 and 260 stems
per acre in year 5. Stem counts will be based on an average of the evaluated vegetation plots. Based on
the number of stems counted, average densities were measured at 477 planted stems per acre (excluding
livestakes) surviving in year 5 (2014); therefore, the site has met its vegetation success criteria. Four
temporary vegetation plots were established along Monitoring Reach 1 to assess the areas requiring
supplemental planting after the repair. Counts and speciation of all stems within these plots was performed.
Year 7 (2016) results indicate an average of 1427 stems per acre with 4 to 6 species per plot, including
natural recruits, within this reach.
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina page 2

Vegetation areas of concern within the Site include several patches of multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora),
Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), and kudzu (Pueraria
lobata). These are depicted on Figures 2A -2B (Appendix B). Invasive species treatments have occurred
in late October 2013, early 2014, October 2015, December 2015, and September 2016. The most recent
treatments appear to be successful with significantly less invasive species populations observed during year
7 (2016) than previous monitoring years (Table 6, Appendix B).
Two groundwater gauges (Gauges 2 and 3) were installed within the Site within wetland areas created as
the result of stream restoration activities. An additional gauge (Gauge 1) was placed just outside of
delineated wetland areas created as the result of stream restoration activities. These gauges were monitored
during years 1 through 5, and all delineated wetlands are meeting success criteria. Groundwater hydrology
data is included in Appendix E.
Beaver activity observed on the Site during previous monitoring years has lessened due to proactive
measurements taken by DMS. Some signs of recent beaver activity were observed throughout the Site
during monitoring year 7 (2016), however no dams were observed during monitoring activities. Proactive
measures to control beaver will continue as necessary.
Summary information and data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and
statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in tables and
figures within this report's appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found
in these reports can be found in the mitigation and restoration plan documents available on DMSs website.
All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from DMS upon request.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
2.1 Vegetation Assessment
Ten vegetation plots were established and marked after construction with four foot metal U -bar post
demarking the corners with a ten foot, three-quarter inch PVC at the origin. The plots are 10 meters square
and are located randomly within the Site. These plots were surveyed during monitoring years 1 (2010)
through 5 (2014) using the CVS -DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008)
(http:Hcvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm). During year 6 (2015), 4 temporary 100 square meter plots were
established and measured along the disturbed portions of Monitoring Reach 1. Plot data for years 6-7
(2015-2016) included counts and speciation of planted species and volunteers; results are included in
Appendix C. The taxonomic standard for vegetation used for this document was Flora of the Carolinas,
Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas (Weakley 2007).
2.2 Stream Assessment
Annual stream monitoring will be conducted following procedures established in the USDA Forest Service
Manual, Stream Channel Reference Sites (Harrelson et. al 1994) and methodologies utilized in the Rosgen
stream assessment and classification system (Rosgen 1994 and 1996). Four permanent cross-sections, two
riffle and two pool, were established during year 1 (20 10) and were measured each year thereafter. During
year 6 (2015), 3 additional cross-sections were established and measured in years 6-7 (2015-2016). Cross-
sections will be used to evaluate stream dimension; locations are depicted on Figures 2 and 2A -2B
(Appendix B). Cross-sections are permanently monumented with 4 -foot metal garden posts at each end
point. Cross-sections will be surveyed to provide a detailed measurement of the stream and banks including
points on the adjacent floodplain, top of bank, bankfull, breaks in slope, edge of water, and thalweg. Data
will be used to calculate width -depth ratios, entrenchment ratios, and bank height ratios for each cross-
section. In addition, photographs will be taken at each permanent cross-section location annually.
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina page 3

Three approximately 1000 -linear foot monitoring reaches were established during year 1 (2010) and will
be used to evaluate stream pattern and longitudinal profile; locations are depicted on Figures 2 and 2A-213
(Appendix B). Measurements of channel pattern included belt -width, meander length, and radius of
curvature (only in year one). Subsequently, data was used to calculated meander -width ratios. Longitudinal
profile measurements will include average water surface slopes and facet slopes and pool -to -pool spacing.
Stream profile will not be measured during years 6 (2015) and 7 (2016). Ten permanent photo points were
established throughout the restoration reach; locations are depicted on Figures 2 and 2A-213 (Appendix B)
and plots are included in Appendix B. In addition, visual stream morphology stability assessments will be
completed in each of the three monitoring reaches annually to assess the channel bed, banks, and in -stream
structures.
2.3 Wetland Assessment
Three groundwater monitoring gauges were installed at the Site in February 2011 and have been maintained
and monitored throughout years 1 (2010) through 5 (2014) growing seasons. Two gauges (Gauges 2 and
3) are located within delineated wetlands created by stream restoration activities and one gauge (Gauge 1)
is located within a marginal area not in the delineated wetlands to assist with making a determination in
marginal areas. Graphs of years 1 through 5 groundwater hydrology and precipitation are included in
Appendix E.
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina page 4

3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, Michael T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS -DMS Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Version 4.2. (online). Available: http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2004. Climatography of the United States
No. 20; Monthly Station Climate Summaries, 1971-2000. National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service, National
Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2010. Final North Carolina 2010 Integrated Report
Category 4 and 5 (303(d) List EPA Approved August 31, 2010) (online). Available:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=8ffobb29-62c2-4b3 3-810c-
2eee5afa75e9&groupId=38364 [December 1, 2010]. North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2007. Catawba River Basin Restoration
Priorities. Available: http://www.nceep.net/services/restplans/RBRPCatawba2007.pdf [June
2010]. North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Mitigation Services.
Raleigh, North Carolina.
Weakley, Alan S. 2007. Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, Georgia, and Surrounding Areas (online).
Available: http://www.herbarium.unc.edu/WeakleysFIora.pdf [February 1, 2008]. University of
North Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel
Hill, North Carolina.
Weather Underground. 2016. Station at Charlotte Douglas International Airport (KCLT) in Charlotte,
North Carolina. (online). Available:
http://www.wunderj round.com/history/ainport/KCLT/2016/04/04/CustomHisto ,rte [April 4,
2016].
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina page 5

APPENDIX A
PROJECT VICINITY MAP AND BACKGROUND TABLES
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
[phone]
Am. En~nl81, Inc.
own. by
FIGURE
VICINITY MAP
Directions to Site (from Charlotte): f
MCINTYRE CREEK RESTORATION SITE
�• ,�
Date:
-> Take Interstate 77 North
-
AT HORNETS NEST PARK
. y
N
Project:
12-004.03
-> Take Exit 16 onto Sunset Road
traveling west
-> Travel -•0.5 mile and take right
on Beatties Ford Road
-> Travel -•1 mile to Hornets Nest
,
Park entrance on the left
Latitude/Longitude at Entrance to
Hornets Nest Park:
35.319972, -80.865133=
{
Entrance to
Hornets
Nest Park
htyre
Creek
e
tPly-
,e`
X
LU
;`
01
1y
°y��D,:
S4nsetRoad
a4 Oakdale
C6
—
-
Cep'as4-3i,
v
'Northern Edge-
- of the
City of Charlotte
0
1,250 2,500
5,000 7,500
-�.
Feet
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
[phone]
Am. En~nl81, Inc.
own. by
FIGURE
VICINITY MAP
CLF/KRJ
MCINTYRE CREEK RESTORATION SITE
A
Date:
Mar 2016
-
AT HORNETS NEST PARK
I
Project:
12-004.03
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
McIntyre Creek Restoration Site at Hornets Nest Park (DMS Project Number 243)
*Site activities restored 5178 linear feet of stream; however, 49 linear feet is located within a utility easement and is not included in the SMU calculation.
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices
Miti ation Credits
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Type
Restoration
Restoration Equivalent
Restoration
Restoration Equivalent
Totals
5129*
--
--
0.57
Projects Com onents
Restoration
Project
Existing Linear
Restoration/
Station
Priority
Linear
Mitigation
Component/
Footage/
Restoration
Comment
Range
Approach
Footage/
Ratio
Reach ID
Acreage
Equivalent
Acreage
Priority I stream restoration along the entire project,
McIntyre
5000
I
Restoration
5178 *
1:1
installation of in -stream structures, stabilizing the
Creek
confluence of two incoming tributaries, and planting
with native forest vegetation.
Wetland
-
0
--
Creation
1.71
3:1
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream (linear footage)
Riparian Wetland (acres)
Restoration
5178
--
Creation
--
1.71
Totals
5178
1.71
Mitigation Units
5129 SMUs*
0.57
*Site activities restored 5178 linear feet of stream; however, 49 linear feet is located within a utility easement and is not included in the SMU calculation.
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
McIntyre Creek Restoration Site at Hornets Nest Park (DMS Project Number 243)
Elapsed Time Since Grading Complete: 8 years
Elapsed Time Since Planting Complete: 8 years
Number of Reporting Years: 7
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion
or Delivery
Restoration Plan
--
December 2002
Construction Plans
--
March 2005
Site Construction and Planting
--
May 2008
As -built Construction Drawings
--
February 2008
Remediation Construction
--
January 2010
As -built Remediation Construction Drawings
--
November 2009
As -built Record Drawings
--
February 2010
Baseline Monitoring Document
July 2010
December 2010
Year 1 (20 10) Monitoring Document
December 2010
December 2010
Year 2 (2011) Monitoring Document
November 2011
December 2011
Year 3 (2012) Monitoring Document
November 2012
November 2012
Beaver Management
--
Ongoing
Invasive Species Management
--
October 2013
Year 4 (2013) Monitoring Document
November 2013
December 2013
Invasive Species Management
--
April 2014
Year 5 (2014) Monitoring Document
November 2014
December 2014
Invasive Species Management
--
October 2015
Invasive Species Management
--
December 2015
Remediation Construction
--
March 2016
Year 6 (2015) Monitoring Document
March 2016
April 2016
Invasive Species Management
--
September 2016
Year 7 (2016) Monitoring Document
October 2016
November 2016
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 3. Project Contacts Table
McIntvre Creek Restoration Site at Hornets Nest Park (DMS Proiect Number 243)
Designer
KCI Associates of North Carolina, P.A.
Landmark Center I, Suite 220
4601 Six Forks Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Gary Mryncza 919-783-9214
Construction and Planting Contractor
United Construction, Inc.
6000 Old Pineville Road
Charlotte, NC 28217
704-679-9229
As -built Surveyor
CSC of NC PC
4455 Morris Park Drive, Suite F
Charlotte, NC 28227
Mohammad Zamani 704-573-0112
Baseline Data Collection and
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Monitoring Performers
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis 919-215-1693
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
McIntyre Creek Restoration Site at Hornets Nest Park (DMS Proiect Number 243)
Project Information
Project Name
McIntyre Creek Restoration Site
Project County
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Project Area
17 acres
Project Coordinates
35.319972, -80.865133
Project Watershed Su mary Information
Physiographic Region
Piedmont
Ecoregion
Southern Outer Piedmont
Project River Basin
Catawba
USGS 8 -digit HUC
03050101
USGS 14 -digit HUC
03050101170020
NCDWQ Subbasin
03-08-34
Project Drainage Area
2.55 square miles
Project Drainage Area Impervious Surface
>50%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Urban High
Reach Summary
Information
Restored length
5178 linear feet
Drainage Area
2.55 square miles
NCDWQ Index Number
11-120-3-(1)
NCDWQ Classification
C
Valley Type/Morphological Description
VIII/E5
Dominant Soil Series
Monacan
Drainage Class
Moderately well -somewhat poorly
Soil Hydric Status
Contains 5% hydric Wehadkee soils
Slope
0.0033
FEMA Classification
100 -Year Floodzone
Native Vegetation Community
Bottomland Hardwood Forest
Percent Composition of Exotic Invasives
5.9%
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable
Waters of the U.S. —Sections 404 and 401
Yes -Received Appropriate Permits
Endangered Species Act
No
Historic Preservation Act
No
CZMA/CAMA
No
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes -Received a No Rise Certification
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

APPENDIX B
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figures 2 and 2A -2B. Current Conditions Plan View
Tables 5A -5C. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Tables
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Fixed -Station Photos
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Temporary Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

Legend
Conservation Easement
Wetlands
Cross-sections
Monitoring Reaches
Stream Fixed -Station Photo Points
Groundwater Gauges
* Crest Gauge
Structures
Streams
Temporary Vegetation Plots (MY6-7)
r
CVS Plots (MY1-5)
gk.
V a, - A
• k{,
n
`41 e 4' A meg. x
r
7 17
NP
'.�
Aerial Photography Source: CGIA 2015 Orthoimagery " T-
0
0 250 500 1,000 1,500 16
Feet,
Feature Latitude Longitude
plot 1 origin 35.31901 -80.87667
plot 2 origin 35.31859 -80.87602
plot 3 origin 35.31784 -80.87533
plot4 origin 35.31792 -80.87444
plot origin 35.31851 -80.87234
-plot 6origin 35.31847 -80.87068
plot origin 35.31824 -80.86931
plot 8origin 35.31837 -80.86792
plot 9 origin 35.31873 -80.86621
plot 10 origin 35.31895 -80.86570
xsect 2 right bank 35.31820 -80.87568
xsect 2 left bank 35.31816 -80.87581
xsect 1 left bank 35.31922 -80.87688
xsect 1 right bank 35.31929 -80.87679
xsect 3 right bank 35.31859 -80.86774
xsect 3 left bank 35.31849 -80.86773
xsect 4 left bank 35.31893 -80.86579
xsect 4 right bank 35.31901 -80.86584
r
F� a
nom! Eck' ,t.
x
NC 911 Board, N{CCGIA,
p
A5lom Fnvimbrinrbenlal, Inc.
Prepared for:
NC Department of
Environmental
Quality
Division of
Mitigation
Services
Project:
MCINTYRE
CREEK
RESTORATION
SITE
@ HORNETS
NEST PARK
Mecklenburg
County, NC
Title
CURRENT
CONDITIONS
PLAN
VIEW
Drawn by:
Photo Point
Bearing
Latitude
Longitude
OCT 2016
1
154
35.32065
-80.87796
Project No.:
2
140
35.32022
-80.87791
3
324
35.31867
-80.87613
4
188
35.31823
-80.87550
5
6
135
35.31823
-80.87550
78 35.31802
-80.87389
7
90
35.31835
-80.87224
4.
8
120
35.31841
-80.86887
90
35.31839
-80.86747
9
10
-260
35.31927
-80.86491
Feature Latitude Longitude
plot 1 origin 35.31901 -80.87667
plot 2 origin 35.31859 -80.87602
plot 3 origin 35.31784 -80.87533
plot4 origin 35.31792 -80.87444
plot origin 35.31851 -80.87234
-plot 6origin 35.31847 -80.87068
plot origin 35.31824 -80.86931
plot 8origin 35.31837 -80.86792
plot 9 origin 35.31873 -80.86621
plot 10 origin 35.31895 -80.86570
xsect 2 right bank 35.31820 -80.87568
xsect 2 left bank 35.31816 -80.87581
xsect 1 left bank 35.31922 -80.87688
xsect 1 right bank 35.31929 -80.87679
xsect 3 right bank 35.31859 -80.86774
xsect 3 left bank 35.31849 -80.86773
xsect 4 left bank 35.31893 -80.86579
xsect 4 right bank 35.31901 -80.86584
r
F� a
nom! Eck' ,t.
x
NC 911 Board, N{CCGIA,
p
A5lom Fnvimbrinrbenlal, Inc.
Prepared for:
NC Department of
Environmental
Quality
Division of
Mitigation
Services
Project:
MCINTYRE
CREEK
RESTORATION
SITE
@ HORNETS
NEST PARK
Mecklenburg
County, NC
Title
CURRENT
CONDITIONS
PLAN
VIEW
Drawn by:
CLF/KRJ
Date:
OCT 2016
Scale:
1:3600
Project No.:
12-004.03
FIGURE
2

Legend
Conservation Easement
Streams
Wetlands
Cross-sections
Monitoring Reaches
Approx. Stationing
Structures
Crest Gauge
Groundwater Gauges
Stream Fixed -Station Photo Points
Vegetation Areas of Concern
Rosa multiflora
Kudzu
_ Ligustrum sinense
Lonicera japonica
Stream Areas of Concern
0 Bank Erosion
O Bank Slumping
A Reduced Structure Integrity
0 Temporary Vegetation Plots (MY6-7)
0 CVS Plots (MY1-5)
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Prepared for:
NC Department of
Environmental
Quality
Division of
Mitigation
Services
71 Project:
MCINTYRE
CREEK
RESTORATION
SITE
@ HORNETS
NEST PARK
Mecklenburg
County, NC
Title
O
CURRENT
CONDITIONS
L0
PLAN
VIEW
5 9..
g 1
"
Drawn by:
CLF/KRJ
Date:
NOV 2016
Scale:
-
1:1800
Project No.:
Y.
12-004.03
7 11M
`
FIGURE
r_4
19k LIL
2A

Legend
Conservation Easement f a "' x a
Streams
Wetlands
Cross-sections + r
Monitoring Reaches
Approx. Stationing"' 3
Structures Axiom Envrronrnenysl' Inc'
Groundwater Gauges Allr
`
� Stream Fixed-Station Photo Points 1 Prepared for:
Vegetation Areas of Concern y NC Department of
Rosa multiflora
� ��jj,, Environmental
96- Kudzu ,,]Y .i I� ' ` ''P` Quality
_ Ligustrum sinense
Lonicera japonica Division Of
.
Stream Areas of Concern Mitigation _ �` ' 1 ., ' Services
Bank Erosion * -
Q Bank Slumping
Reduced Structure Integrity �,: ,� r ' w Project:
CVS Plots (MY1 5) MCINTYRE
a-� L" ; 1 j.
CREEK
[ }r �. i. 4 •� RESTORATION
SITE
@ HORNETS
" �+ NEST PARK
ilil ALI ti Mecklenburg
z3 } '1;7 County, NC
10
WZ Title:
ai
k =
t3
9
. - ..-
30
CURRENT
M a 4._2L CONDITIONS
a
11 '
1 � 16 [;� PLAN
18 1z s I N „, VIEW
• Drawn by:
Date:
h NOV 2016
cale.
,.-A'_.
b r'
1:1800
'1
Project No.:
12-004.03
y t
ol
FIGURE
Aerial Photography Source: CGIA 2015 Orthoimagery '
2 B
0 125 250 500 750 - `c
Feet`
'
Kil
(. 11la

Table 5A. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
McIntyre Creek Restoration Site at Hornets Nest Park (DMS Project Number 243)
Reach ID Reach 1
Assessed Lenqth 1152
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateciory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Foota a
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
17
17
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
17
17
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
17
17
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
17
17100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
17
17
100%
�]
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
7
7
o
100/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
7
7
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
7
7
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
7
7
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
7
7
100%

Table 5B. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
McIntyre Creek Restoration Site at Hornets Nest Park (DMS Project Number 243)
Reach ID Reach 2
Assessed Lenqth 1113
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateqory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Seciments
Foota a
as Intended
Ve etation
Ve etation
Veetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
17
18
94%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth :Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
18
18
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
17
18
94%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
18
18
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
18
18
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
3
105
95%
0
0
95%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
2
75
97%
1
10
97%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
1
55
98%
1
20
98%
Totals
6
235
89%
2
30
91%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
7
$
°
88%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
7
$
88%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
7
8
88%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
7
8
88%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
7
8
88%

Table 5C. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
McIntyre Creek Restoration Site at Hornets Nest Park (DMS Project Number 243)
Reach ID Reach 3
Assessed Lenqth 1172
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateqory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Foota a
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
16
17
94%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
16
16
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
15
16
94%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
16
16100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
17
17
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
3
110
95%
2
35
97%
Banks undercutloverhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
1
65
97%
1
25
98%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Totals
4
175
93%
3
60
95%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
4
6
o
67/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
6
6
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
6
6
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4
6
67%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
6
6
100%

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
McIntyre Creek Restoration Site (DMS Project 243)
Planted Acreage' 17
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Pol ons
Combined
Acrea a
% of Planted
Acreae
1. Bare Areas
NA
None
NA
0
0.00
0.0%
2. Low Stem Density Areas
NA
NA
NA
0
0.00
0.0%
Total
0
0.00
0.0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
NA
NA
NA
0
0.00
0.0%
Cumulative Total
0
0.00
0.0%
Easement Acreaae2 17
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage, crossings or any
elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
= The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment, the associat
acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are those with t
potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes that are slightly longer (e.g. 1
decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can be mapped, if in the judgement of the obsen
their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors by DMS such as species present, th
coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium
the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch li.
designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are four
particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry 1
situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed
a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the executive summary.
Mapping
CCPV
Number of
Combined
% of Easement
Ve etation Cateaory
Definitions
Threshold
De iction
Pol ons
Acrea a
Acrea e
Yellow,
4. Invasive Areas of Concern°
Several small patches ofkudzu (Pueraria lobata), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora), Chinese privet (Ligustrum
20 SF
orange,
18
0.69
4.1%
sinense ), and Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica ).
purple, and
green
5. Easement Encroachment Areas'
NA
NA
NA
0
0.00
0.0%
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage, crossings or any
elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
= The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of encroachment, the associat
acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are those with t
potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes that are slightly longer (e.g. 1
decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can be mapped, if in the judgement of the obsen
their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the integration of risk factors by DMS such as species present, th
coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the projects history will warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium
the herb layer will not likley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the potential impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch li.
designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics are of particular interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are four
particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry 1
situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed
a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the narrative section of the executive summary.

McIntyre Creek
Stream Fixed -Station Photographs
Taken October 2016
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

McIntyre Creek
Stream Fixed -Station Photographs
Taken October 2016
(continued)
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

McIntyre Creek
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photographs
Taken October 2016
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

McIntyre Creek
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photographs
Taken October 2016
(continued)
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park
DMS Project Number 243
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
November 2016
Appendices

McIntyre Creek
Temporary Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photographs
Taken October 2016
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

APPENDIX C
VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7. Year 7 (2016) Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 7. Year 7 (2016) Total Planted and Natural Recruit Stems by
Plot and Species
McIntyre Creek (DMS Project #243)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
Temporary Plot
1 4m x 25m
Temporary Plot 2
2m x 50m
Temporary Plot 3
2m x 50m
Temporary Plot 4
4m x 25m
MY7 (2016)
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green ash
Tree
20
29
5
7
61
Betula nigra
River birch
Tree
1
3
1
0
5
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
Tree
13
25
9
2
49
Quercus rubra
Northern red oak
Tree
0
0
0
0
0
Ulmus Americana
Slippery elm
Tree
4
9
2
1
16
Liriodendron tulipifera
Tulip poplar
Tree
2
1
0
2
5
Acer negundo
Box elder
Tree
0
0
2
0
2
Nyssa. Sp.
Gum
Tree
0
1
0
0
1
Celtis laevigata
Hackberry
Tree
0
0
0
1
1
Corunus amomum
Silky dogwood
Tree
0
0
1
0
1
Stem
Count
Size
(Ares)
Size
(Acres)
Species
count
Stems
per acre
40
68
20
13
141
1
1
1
1
4
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.10
6
5
6
4
8
1618.7
2751.9
809.4
526.1
1426.5
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

APPENDIX D
STREAM SURVEY DATA
Cross-section Plots
Tables 8a -b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables 9a -b. Monitoring Data
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
McIntyre Creek
XS ID
XS - 1, Pool
Feature
Pool
Date:
10/24/2016
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.5
110.7
1.8
110.4
2.6
109.9
3.2
105.9
4.2
105.2
6.0
104.3
8.6
104.4
10.4
104.6
11.7
104.8
12.8
105.2
13.7
105.8
14.6
106.5
17.3
109.4
20.5
109.9
24.7
110.2
26.5
110.2
MY -06 3/30/16
104
103
MY -07 10/24/ 16
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
109.2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
53.9
Bankfull Width:
14.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
4.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
3.7
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type I C/E
Catawba River Basin, McIntyre Creek, XS - 1, Pool
115
114 ---------------------------------------------------------
---- Bankfull
113
112
• Flood Prone Area
MY -006/12/10
d
110
--o--MY-01 12/10/10
���� ��---------------------
���������
0 109
MY -02 10/10/11
108
107106
MY -03 8/1/12
W
N
MY -043/24/13
MY -OS 2/27/14
105
MY -06 3/30/16
104
103
MY -07 10/24/ 16
0 10 20 30
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Elevation
Catawba
108.04
1.26
108.05
2.90
Watershed:
Date:
McIntyre Creek
Field Crew:
R*4 •-�
6.39
107.47
XS ID
2.1
XS - 2, Riffle3
5.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
13.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
v. r
Feature
Riffle
•b �_ qfh ham,.
c
Station SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 107.2
Banldull Cross -Sectional Area: 24.5
Bankfull Width: 11.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 110.0
Flood Prone Width: 150.0
Elevation
0.00
108.04
1.26
108.05
2.90
108.35
Date:
10/24/2016
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation: 107.2
Banldull Cross -Sectional Area: 24.5
Bankfull Width: 11.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation: 110.0
Flood Prone Width: 150.0
Elevation
0.00
108.04
1.26
108.05
2.90
108.35
4.36
108.29
5.32
108.07
6.39
107.47
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.1
W / D Ratio:
5.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
13.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
6.99 106.95
7.55 105.70
8.45 104.91
10.20 104.45
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.1
W / D Ratio:
5.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
13.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Catawba River Basin, McIntyre Creek, XS - 2, Riffle
111
110
_ 109
Bankfull
108 Flood Prone Area
� 107 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -� MY -00 6/10/2010
--$-MY-01 12110/10
W 106 t MY -02 ]0/]0/11
105 MY -03 8/1/12
MY -04 3/24/13
104 MY D5 2/27/14
0 10 20 MY -063/30/16 30
StationStation(feet)MY-07 10/24/16

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
McIntyre Creek
XS ID
XS - 3, Riffle
Feature
Riffle
Date:
10/24/2016
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
99.14
4.56
99.31
7.25
99.17
8.93
98.40
10.32
97.31
11.88
96.29
12.59
95.38
14.40
95.33
17.16
95.05
18.16
94.81
19.47
94.82
21.00
95.06
22.34
95.14
23.23
95.65
24.70
95.88
25.6
97.17
26.3
98.17
28.9
98.78
31.0
99.69
34.2
99.88
36.5
99.76
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
97.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
33.1
Bankfull Width:
16.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
100.4
Flood Prone Width:
150.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.8
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.1
W / D Ratio:
7.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
9.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
101
100
99
E
98
s;
0
97
ti
W
96
95
94
Stream Type I E
Catawba River Basin, McIntyre Creek, XS - 3, Riffle
---------------- ---------------------
0 10 20
Station (feet)
----Bankfull
-------- ----Flood Prone Area
MY -00 6/10/10
--*-- MY -01 12/10/10
t MY -02 10/10/11
MY -03 8/1/12
MY -04 3/24/13
MY -05 2/27/14
30 MY -06 3/30/16 40
MY-071o/a4/16
Note: Right bank cross section fixed point was removed during construction and reestablished for Year 6 monitoring.

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
McIntyre Creek
XS ID
XS - 4, Pool
Feature
Pool
Date:
10/24/2016
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.5
97.51
3.9
97.37
6.2
97.23
7.4
96.46
8.0
94.72
9.3
94.28
10.9
93.51
12.9
92.27
15.6
90.99
17.9
90.22
20.0
90.06
22.1
90.88
24.1
92.54
26.1
94.34
28.1
96.37
30.1
97.00
33.7
97.44
-----
-------- ---------------------
Bankfull
96
Flood Prone Area
m
95
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
96.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
85.4
Bankfull Width:
21.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
6.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
4.0
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type m E
Catawba River Basin, McIntyre Creek, XS - 4, Pool
99
98
97
-----
-------- ---------------------
Bankfull
96
Flood Prone Area
m
95
MY -006/10/10
94
MY
-0112/10/10
d93
MY -0210/10/11
W
MY -03 8/1/12
MY -04 3/24/13
92
91
MY -05 2/27/14
90
MY -06 3/30/16
89
MY -07 10/24/16
0
10 20
30 40
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Elevation
Catawba
105.52
3.00
Watershed:
4.83
McIntyre Creek
Date:
10/24/2016
XS ID
Perkinson, Jernigan
XS - 5, Riffle
102.40
°.•i
Feature
10.51
Riffle
12.27
+y
13.77
101.55
14.88
101.89
F.
102.04
17.54
104.45
19.34
104.74
20.1
105.14
21.4
105.36
23.4
105.5
r
Stream Type E
Catawba River Basin, McIntyre Creek, XS - 5, Riffle
108
--------------------------------��----------------
107
106
w
105
Bankfull
Flood Prone Area
104
___________
MY -063/30/16
ti
MY -07 10/24/16
W 103
102
101
0
10 20
30
Station (feet)
* Note: Cross Section was established after repairs conducted at the Site.
Station
Elevation
0.50
105.52
3.00
105.42
4.83
105.22
Date:
10/24/2016
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.50
105.52
3.00
105.42
4.83
105.22
6.34
105.03
7.32
104.60
8.19
102.40
8.90
101.87
10.51
101.70
12.27
101.61
13.77
101.55
14.88
101.89
16.24
102.04
17.54
104.45
19.34
104.74
20.1
105.14
21.4
105.36
23.4
105.5
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
104.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
24.0
Bankfull Width:
10.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
107.4
Flood Prone Width:
150.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.4
W / D Ratio:
4.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
14.7
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
McIntyre Creek
XS ID
XS - 6, Riffle
Feature
Riffle
Date:
10/24/2016
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.50
105.42
4.09
105.29
6.52
105.38
8.76
103.64
9.75
102.63
10.93
102.31
11.67
101.60
12.72
100.76
14.57
100.35
16.61
100.24
18.64
100.51
19.89
100.46
21.17
100.48
22.17
101.04
22.8
101.81
23.9
102.54
25.7
102.8
27.5
103.2
29.2
103.7
32.7
104.3
35.6
104.7
38.1
105.3
40.4
105.4
SUMMARY DATA
109
Bankfull Elevation:
104.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
64.3
Bankfull Width:
27.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
109.0
Flood Prone Width:
150.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
4.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.4
W / D Ratio:
11.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
5.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type I E
Catawba River Basin, McIntyre Creek, XS - 6, Riffle
110
109
108
107
E106
Bankfull
���. Flood Prone Area
MY -063/30/16
MY -0710/24/16
105-------------�---------------------�
104
103
W 102
101
100
99
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
* Note: Cross Section was established after repairs conducted at the Site.

River Basin:
Catawba
Watershed:
McIntyre Creek
XS ID
XS - 7, Riffle
Feature
Riffle
Date:
10/24/2016
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.50
105.05
2.88
105.02
4.21
104.55
5.38
104.09
6.47
103.65
7.21
102.51
9.34
101.29
11.62
101.05
12.92
100.92
15.51
101.28
16.67
101.72
19.12
103.20
20.32
103.89
21.43
104.62
22.8
104.81
25.8
104.82
SUMMARY DATA
Catawba River Basin, McIntyre Creek, XS - 7, Riffle
Bankfull Elevation:
104.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
38.9
Bankfull Width:
17.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
108.1
Flood Prone Width:
150.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
3.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
2.3
W / D Ratio:
7.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
8.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type I E
109
Catawba River Basin, McIntyre Creek, XS - 7, Riffle
108 --------------------------------------------------------
107
106
w
d
Bankfull
���. Flood Prone Area
MY -063/30/16
MY -07 10/24/16
105
-----
� ---------------------------� ���_
104
W103
102
101
100
0
10 20 30
Station (feet)
* Note: Cross Section was established after repairs conducted at the Site.

Table 8a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
McIntyre Creek at Hornets Nest Park (DMS Project Number 243)
Parameter Gauge Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring
Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Onlv LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med Max SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max SD
Min
Max Med
Min
Mean
Med
Max SD
BF Width(ft)
17.0
23.8
13.1
18.7
22.9
16.7
17.6
Floodprone Width (11)
100
300
78
100
300
150
150
BF Mean Depth (ft)
2.5
2.7
1.6
2.3
2.8
1.5
2.0
BF Max Depth (ft)
3.1
3.7
2.8
3.3
4.0
2.9
3.2
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft')
42.1
58.6
21.3
42.0
70.0
26.4
32.9
Width/Depth Ratio
6.9
9.7
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.5
11.7
Entrenchment Ratio
4.5
17.5
5.9
5.0
16.0
8.5
9.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.3
1.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
----
---- I
I
I ----
10.1
1 32.1
1 32.8 1
91.7
Riffle slope (ft/ft)i i
1 o
1 1 0.006
0.0050
0.0110
0.0025
0.0065
0.0000 0.0012 0.0042 0.0313
Pool length (ft)
7.0
18.0
12.0
37.0
4.3
17.3
15.6 1
59.6
Pool Max depth ft)l I 1
4.1
1 1 1 4.1 1
1
1 3.2
1
1
2.9
1 3.4 1
1 5.0
1
1 1
5.3
Pool spacing (ft)
----
I I I ---- I
1 11.0
1
1
1 45.0 1
46.0
1 115.0 1
1 48.0
1 77.0
1 76.0 1
169.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
34
1 1 1 58 1
1
38
1
1
95
1 115 1
1 19
45
1 41 1
107
Radius of Curvature (ft)
60.3
148.1
10.3
25.6
37
70
24
49
40
246
Rc:Bankfull width (ft)ft)
2.6
(3
0.8
2
2
4
L4
2.8
2.3
14.3
Meander Wavelength (ft)l I I 1
1 4.1
7 1
1 60
1
71 1
1 90
1 230 1
1 88
132
128 1
220
Meander Width ratiol I I 1
1 13
2 - 1
1 4.6
1
1
1 5.4 1
1 5
1 10 1
1 Ll
2.6
2.4
6.2
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress (competenev) lbs/ft'
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacitvl W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E5 -type
E5 -type
E5 -type
E -type
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
4.0-4.5
4.2-4.4
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
180-280
Valley Length (ft)
240
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
300
5178
5178
Sinuosity
1.1 - 1.22
1.25
1.4
1.4
Water Surface Slone (fUft)
0.0021 - 0.0027
0.0044
0.0021-0.0025
0.0035
BF slope M/ftl
-----
-----
------
Bankfull Floodplain Area (acres) I
-----
-----
-----
------
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
-----
-----
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
34 - 39 BEI II
Biolgiral or Oth.,l
Table 8b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
McIntyre Creek at Hornets Nest Park (DMS Project Number 243)

Table 9a. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Mclntvre Creek at Hornets Nest Park (DMS Proiect Number 2431
* Note: Cross Sections were established after repairs conducted at the Site.
Table 9b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
McIntvre Creek at Hornets Nest Park (DMS Proiect Number 243)
Parameter
Cross Section 5*
Cross Section 6*
Cross Section 1
Cross Section 7*
Parameter
Riffle
Riffle
Cross Section 2
Riffle
1
MY -3
Cross Section 3
MY -4
Dimension MYO MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6
MY7
MYO MY]_ MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6
Cross Section 4
MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS MY6
MY7
BF Width (ft)
Parameter
10.2
27.3
27.2
16.9
Pool
Floodprone Width (ft)(approx)
150.0
150.0
150.0
150.0
150.0
Riffle
BF Mean Depth (ft)
2.3
2.4
2.6
2.4
2.3
Riffle
BF Max Depth (ft)
2.9
2.9
4.4
4.4
3.7
3.6
Pool
23.7
24.0
71.8
Dimension
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5
MY6
MY7
BF Width (ft)
15.5
15.5
13.7
13.1
13.5
14.7
15.0
14.5
17.6
17.0
11.1
10.9 10.9
11.2
11.6
11.5
16.7
17.0
15.9
16.1 15.2
14.7
15.4
16.0
20.0
19.6
19.4
19.4
18.6
20.3
22.0
21.2
Floodprone Width (ft) (approx)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
150.0
150.0
150.0
150.0 150.0
150.0
150.0
150.0
150.0
150.0
150.0
150.0 150.0
150.0
150.0
150.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
BF Mean Depth (ft)
3.1
3.0
3.3
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.2
3.7
1.5
1.5
2.1
2.1 2.0
1.9
2.1
2.1
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.1 2.1
2.3
2.2
2.1
2.8
3.0
3.2
3.6
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.0
BF Max Depth (ft)
5.3
5.2
4.1
4.8
4.8
5.2
4.0
4.9
2.9
2.8
2.6
2.7 2.7
2.5
2.8
2.8
3.2
3.0
3.2
3.1 3.0
3.0
3.1
2.8
5.0
5.3
6.1
6.3
6.0
6.3
6.7
6.4
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
48.1
47.0
45.2
46.2
47.6
50.1
47.6
53.9
26.4
25.2
23.8
22.4 21.9
20.9
24.0
24.5
32.9
33.8
33.5
33.8 32.6
33.6
34.1
33.1
55.4
58.5
61.3
70.0
66.5
76.1
90.6
85.4
Width/Depth Ratio
NA
N
I NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
11.7
11.4
5.2
5.3 5.5
6.0
5.6
5.4
8.5
1 8.6
7.5
7.7 1 7.1
6.5
7.0
7.7
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Entrenchment Ratio
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
8.5
8.8
13.5
13.8 13.7
13.4
12.9
13.0
9.0
8.8
9.4
9.3 9.9
1O. 2
9.7
9.4
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
6.3
0.1
0.2
NA
NA
NA
---
---
13.6
8.7
4.4
0.2 0.3
0.6
---
---
15.6
11.7
0.4
1.8 0.7
0.4
---
---
3.1
0.4
0.3
NA
1 0.3
0.6
---
---
* Note: Cross Sections were established after repairs conducted at the Site.
Table 9b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
McIntvre Creek at Hornets Nest Park (DMS Proiect Number 243)
Parameter
Cross Section 5*
Cross Section 6*
Cross Section 7*
Parameter
Riffle
Riffle
MY -2
Riffle
1
MY -3
MY -4
Dimension MYO MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6
MY7
MYO MY]_ MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6
MY7 MYO
MYI MY2 MY3 MY4 MYS MY6
MY7
BF Width (ft)
10.4
10.2
27.3
27.2
16.9
17.0
Floodprone Width (ft)(approx)
150.0
150.0
150.0
150.0
150.0
150.0
BF Mean Depth (ft)
2.3
2.4
2.6
2.4
2.3
2.3
BF Max Depth (ft)
2.9
2.9
4.4
4.4
3.7
3.6
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
23.7
24.0
71.8
64.3
38.9
38.9
Width/Depth Ratio
4.6
4.3
10.4
11.5
7.4
7.5
Entrenchment Ratio
14.4
14.7
5.5
5.5
8.9
8.8
Bank Heigh[ Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
50 (mm)
--- I
---
Med
Max
--
---
* Note: Cross Sections were established after repairs conducted at the Site.
Table 9b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
McIntvre Creek at Hornets Nest Park (DMS Proiect Number 243)
Parameter
Baseline
MY -1
MY -2
MY -3
MY -4
MY -5
MY -6
MY -7
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
BF Width (ft
16.7
17.6
17.0
17
11.1
15.9
10.9
16.1
10.9
15.2
11.2
14.7
10.4
16.3
15.4
27.3
6.7
10.2
16.4
16.0
27.2
6.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
BF Mean Depth (ft)
1.5
2.0
1.5
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.0
2.1
1.9
2.3
2.1
2.3
2.3
2.6
0.2
2.1
2.3
2.3
2.4
0.2
BF Max Depth (ft)
2.9
3.2
2.8
3.0
2.6
3.2
2.7
3.1
2.7
3.0
2.5
3.0
2.8
3.4
3.1
4.4
0.7
2.8
3.3
2.9
4.4
0.7
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
26.4
32.9
25.2
33.8
23.8
33.5
22.4
33.8
21.9
32.6
20.9
33.6
23.7
38.5
34.1
71.8
19.7
24.0
37.0
33.1
64.3
16.5
Width/Depth Ratio
8.5
11.7
8.6
11.4
5.2
7.5
5.3
7.7
5.5
7.1
6.0
6.5
4.5
7.0
7.0
10.5
2.3
4.3
7.2
7.4
11.3
2.7
Entrenchment Ratio
8.5
9.0
8.8
8.8
9.4
13.5
9.3
13.8
9.9
13.7
10.2
13.4
5.5
10.3
10.3
14.4
3.5
5.5
10.3
10.3
14.7
3.6
Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1
1 1
1.0 1
1 1.0
1 1
1 1.0 1
1 1.0
1.0 1
1.0
1
1 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Profile - Reach I
Riffle length (ft)
10.1
32.1
32.8
91.7
10.9
25.9
24.5
50.5
7.4
27
21.1
76.8
15
41.2
33.8
99.3
25.7
12.1
33.8
34.4
75.9
15.1
14.6
36.3
32
91.8
20.4
Riffle slope (ft/ft) 0.0000
0.0012
0.0042
0.0313
0.0000
0.0047
0.0008
0.0296
0.0000
0.0023
0.0007
0.0126
0.0000
0.0034
0.0001
0.0221
0.01
0.0000
0.0040
0.0006
0.0201
0.0068
0.0000
0.0048
0.0008
0.0211
0.0076
Pool length (ft)
4.3
17.3
15.6
59.6
6.4
19.6
19.3
35.8
10.4
20.7
20.3
35.9
4.3
17.9
18.5
29.0
6.7
4.6
17.3
16.0
32.1
7.1
9.5
24.6
19.9
95.2
19.4
Pool Max depth (ft)
5.0
5.3
5.2
5.3
4.1
6.1
4.8
6.3
4.8
6.0
5.2
6.3
Pool spacing (ft)
48.0
77.0
76.0
169.0
48.0
77.0
76.0
169.0
48.0
77.0
76.0
169.0
48.0
77.0
76.0
169.0
48.0
77.0
76.0
169.0
48.0
77.0
76.0
169.0
Profile - Reach 2
Riffle length (ft)
10.1
32.1
32.8
91.7
11.9
30.1
30.1
4.7
24.7
22.4
61.2
5.9
28
19.4
102.5
25.2
9.1
37.6
32.7
81.7
22.9
7.7
31.3
31.5
65.9
17.5
Riffle slope (ft/ft) 0.0000
0.0012
0.0042
0.0313
0.0000
0.0100
0.0001
0.0000
0.0014
0.0010
0.0046
0.0000
0.0012
0.0005
0.0050
0.00
0.0000
0.0014
0.0008
0.0076
0.0020
0.0000
0.0005
0.0000
0.0032
0.0009
Pool length (ft)
4.3
17.3
15.6
59.6
4.0
14.7
9.5
M43.3
2.5
10.7
9.9
22.2
4.2
14.6
13.1
32.1
8.7
3.6
17.1
18.8
43.7
9.9
6.3
20.0
17.3
50.9
13.3
Pool Max depth (ft)
5.0
5.3
5.2
4.1
61
4.1
6.14.8
6.0
5.2
6.3
Pool spacing ft)
48.0
77.0
76.0
169.0
48.0
77.0
76.0
48.0
77.0
76.0
169.0
48.0
77.0
76.0
169.0-[-1
48.0
77.0
76.0
169.07
48.0
77.0
76.0
169.0
Profile - Reach 3
Riffle length (ft)
10.1
32.1
32.8
91.7
9.7
34.6
34.7
63.7
7.5
28
27
61.1
5.5
27.3
28.6
48.4
11.7
6.6
30.2
29.4
64.4
14.2
8.6
36.8
39.7
65.3
16.1
Riffle slope (ft/ft
0.0000
0.0012
0.0042
0.0313
0.0010
0.0027
0.0011
0.0150
0.0000
0.0007
0.0003
0.0041
0.0000
0.0022
0.0008
0.0089
0.00
0.0000
0.0021
0.0012
0.0124
0.0029
0.0000
0.0022
0.0013
0.0078
0.0027
Pool length (ft
4.3
17.3
15.6
59.6
4.5
12.2
12.1
21.2
1.3
15.5
11.5
42.2
5.1
15.9
15.6
33.7
8.0
6.7
17.3
13.9
41.7
9.7
5.3
16.6
14.2
38.9
8.8
Pool Max depth (ft)
5.0
5.3
5.2
5.3
4.1
6.1
4.1
6.1
4.8
6.0
5.2
6.3
Pool spacing (ft)
48.0
77.0
76.0
169.0
48.0
77.0
76.0
169.0
48.0
77.0
76.0
169.0
48.0
77.0
76.0
169.0
48.0
77.0
76.0
169.0
48.0
77.0
76.0
169.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
19
45
41
107
Radius of Curvature (ft)
24
49
40
246
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
1.4
2.8
2.3
14.3
Meander Wavelength (ft)
88
132
128
220
Meander Width ratio
1.1
2.6
2.4
6.2
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E -type
E -type
E -type
E -type
E -type
E -type
E -type
E -type
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
5178
5178
5178
5178
5178
5178
5178
5178
Sinuositv
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0035
0.0020 - 0.0042
0.0002 - 0.0041
0.0026 - 0.0043
0.0025 - 0.0046
0.0021 - 0.0045
-------
-------
slope
------
------
------
------
------
------
------
Ri%/RU%P%G%/S%
45
14
25
IS
41
17
22
20
38
21
24
17
45
13
26
16
45
12
27
16
43
11
32
14
SC%/SA%/G%/C%B%BE%
dl6/d35/d5O/d84/d95
NA
0.18
0.3
7
15 NA
NA
0.2
9
25
NA
NA
0.2 9
9
24
NA
NA 1
0.1
8
21
of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other

APPENDIX E
HYDROLOGY DATA
Table 10. Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure 3. Annual Climatic Data vs. 30 -year Historic Data
Table 11. Years 1-5 Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 10. Verification of Bankfull Events
McInvtre Creek Restoration Site (DMS Proiect Number 243)
Date of Data
Date of
Method
Photo (if
Collection
Occurrence
available)
Total of 2.14 inches* of rain reported to fall over 2 days (July 11 -
September 23, 2010
July 12, 2010
12, 2010), in addition to large wrack/debris piles and evidence of
1-2
overbank flows within the adjacent floodplain.
Total of 1.1 inches* of rain reported to fall over 2 days (August
September 23, 2010
August 19, 2010
18-19, 2010) after a total of 4.43 inches* of rain the preceding 4
3
weeks, in addition to laid back vegetation and evidence of recent
standing water within the floodplain.
October 18, 2010
September 29,
Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 4.04 inches* of
---
2010
rain reported to fall over 6 days (September 25-30, 2010).
October 21, 2011
August 5, 2011
Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 2.50 inches* of
4
rain reported to fall on August 5, 2011.
August 6, 2012
May 8, 2012
Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 2.77 inches* of
rain reported to fall on May 8-9, 2012.
August 6, 2012
May 16, 2012
Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 2.71 inches* of
rain reported to fall on May 13-16, 2012.
Debris, wrack, and laid back vegetation observed on the
February 21, 2013
January 17, 2013
floodplain after a total of 2.38 inches* of rain reported to fall on
5-6
January 17, 2013.
November 18, 2013
April 28, 2013
Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 2.73 inches* of
--
rain reported to fall on April 27-29, 2013.
November 18, 2013
May 6, 2013
Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 2.13 inches* of
--
rain reported to fall on May 5-6, 2013.
Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 2.52 inches* of
November 18, 2013
June 3, 2013
rain reported to fall on June 2-3, 2013 with an additional 3.10 on
--
June 4-13, 2013.
Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 4.23 inches* of
November 18, 2013
July 4, 2013
rain reported to fall on July 4-11, 2013 with numerous small rain
--
events (0.1-0.9 inches) in the proceeding and following days.
Wrack and laid back vegetation observed on the floodplain after
May 7, 2014
April 19, 2014
a total of 2.80 inches* of rain reported to fall on April 18-19.
--
2014.
November 10, 2014
May 15, 2014
Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 2.11 inches* of
--
rain reported to fall on May 15, 2014
Wrack and laid back vegetation observed on the floodplain after
November 3, 2014
August 1, 2014
a total of 3.84 inches* of rain reported to fall July 31 -August 1,
--
2014
Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 2.65 inches* of
March 29, 2016
April 19, 2015
rain reported to fall on April 19, 2015 after 2.00 inches were
--
reported during the previous week.
* Reported at KCLT Weather Station at the Charlotte Airport (Weatherunderground 2016).
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 10. Verification of Bankfull Events (continued)
McInytre Creek Restoration Site (DMS Project Number 243)
Date of Data
Photo (if
Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
available)
Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 2.60 inches* of
March 29, 2016
November 2, 2015
rain reported to fall on November 2, 2015 after 2.00 inches were
--
reported during the previous week.
March 29, 2016
December 30, 2015
Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 3.25 inches* of
rain reported to fall over 2 days (December 29-30, 2015).
Overbank event likely occurred after a total of 3.89 inches* of
October 17, 2016
September 26, 2016
rain reported to fall on September 26, 2016.
Sediment and laid-back vegetation observed after a total of 2.12
October 17, 2016
October 8, 2016
inches* of rain reported to fall on October 8, 2016.
7
* Reported at KCLT Weather Station at the Charlotte Airport (Weatherunderground 2016).
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

Photo 6: Evidence of overbank
including wrack and laid back
vegetation in the floodplain.
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

12
10
pc
a,
.c
u
c
�6
0
.Q
u 4
d
L
a
7
M
Month
30th %*
70th %*
2010**
2011**
2012**
2013**
2014**
2015**
2016**
Jan
2.79
4.76
4.88
1.36
2.29
4.28
2.9
2.80
2.28
Feb
2.27
4.28
3.79
3.44
1.30
3.46
4.01
3.02
4.5
Mar
2.84
5.28
4.37
4.52
3.89
3.44
4.48
2.19
0.85
Apr
1 1.85
3.57
1.44
3.32
1.67
4.56
7.39
6.14
2.03
May
2.34
4.41
3.37
4.73
5.92
3.00
4.05
0.32
5.63
June
2.02
4.16
2.89
3.10
1.02
7.31
2.85
2.73
2.67
July
2.38
4.58
2.48
3.53
3.98
7.46
4.38
1.21
1.55
Aug
2.29
4.51
4.75
5.18
3.11
1.80
3.74
3.84
1.88
Sept
2
4.68
4.18
5.55
4.82
3.06
3.99
2.75
5.44
Oct
1.77
4.52
1.13
3.04
1.21
0.48
1.35
5.57
2.78
Nov
2.3
4.01
1.38
3.34
0.65
3.63
3.79
9.56
0
Dec
2.09
3.81
1.74
3.41
3.84
7.14
2.57
8.70
0
*Charlotte Douglas International Airport 30 -year historic data (NOAA 2004)
**Charlotte Douglas International Airport rainfall data (Weatherunderground 2016)
Figure 3. Annual Climatic Data vs. 30 -year Historic Data
c L L >, a) >- on +-. > u
-fO LL Q Q °�' z o
X2010** 02011** 02012** X12013** X2014** _ 2015** 6-X2016** 30th %* 70th %*
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 11. Years 1-5 Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary
McInytre Creek Restoration Site (DMS Project Number 243)
* Note that gauges were installed in 2011 and no data is available for baseline, or year 1 (2010)
monitoring periods.
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
Gauge
(Percentage)
Year 1 (2010)*
Year 2 (2011)*
Year 3 (2012)
Year 4 (2013)
Year 5 (2014)
1
--
No/7 day
No/8 day
Yes/23 day
No/ 16 days
(3.0%)
(3.4%)
(10.0%)
(6.8%)
2
--
Yes/38 day
Yes/23 day
Yes/34 day
Yes/72 Days
(16.3%)
(10 %)
(15.2%)
(30.6%)
3
--
Yes/41 day
No/22 day
Yes/36 day
Yes/63 Days
(17.6%)
(9.4%)
(16.1%)
(26.8%)
* Note that gauges were installed in 2011 and no data is available for baseline, or year 1 (2010)
monitoring periods.
McIntyre Creek (final) at Hornets Nest Park Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 7 of 7 (2016)
DMS Project Number 243 November 2016
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Appendices