20120773 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_2016_20170119

Jacob's Landing
Stream Restoration Monitoring Report
DMS Project # 95024
DMS Contract # 003984
Monitoring Year 03
Submitted to:
NCDEQ-DMS, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Construction Completed: January 2014
Data Collection: 2016
Submitted: December 2016

Design and Monitoring Firm
CIASSOCIl
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Project Manager: Tim Morris
Email: [e-mail]
Project No: 20110675
Jacob's Landing Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 2016— MY03

Table of Contents
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY/PROJECT ABSTRACT................................................1
2.0 METHODOLOGY.......................................................................................................2
3.0 REFERENCES..............................................................................................................2
Appendix A — Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure1. Vicinity Map...................................................................................................................4
Figure2. Site Asset Map................................................................................................................5
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits...................................................................6
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History..........................................................................7
Table 3. Project Contacts Table....................................................................................................7
Table 4. Project Attribute Table....................................................................................................8
Appendix B — Visual Assessment Data
CurrentCondition Plan View....................................................................................................................10
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment..........................................................12
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment..................................................................................14
StreamStation Photos...............................................................................................................................15
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos...........................................................................................................23
ProblemArea Photos................................................................................................................................ 21
Appendix C — Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment...............................................................................27
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata.......................................................................................28
Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species...............................................29
Appendix D — Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section Plots...................................................................................................................................32
LongitudinalProfile Plots.........................................................................................................................43
PebbleCount Plots....................................................................................................................................45
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary Table...........................................................................53
Table 1 la. Cross -Section Morphology Data Table..........................................................................57
Table l lb. Stream Reach Morphology Data Table...........................................................................58
Appendix E — Hydrologic Data
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events......................................................................................64
StreamHydrographs.................................................................................................................................65
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates ofNorth Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 i 2016— MY03

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / PROJECT ABSTRACT
The Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site is a full -delivery project that was developed for the North Carolina
Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). Construction was completed in November 2013. The site includes the
restoration of 4,484 linear feet of restoration and 109 linear feet of enhancement on four tributaries to Irish
Buffalo Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin. The project is located west of China Grove and north of
Kannapolis off of Saw Road in Rowan County (Figure 1, Appendix A). This project will expand aquatic and
terrestrial habitat in the Rocky River Watershed (03040105). The project is within the 03040105020040 Irish
Buffalo Creek Local Watershed Unit (14 -digit HUC) (NCDENR, EEP 2009). In DMS' most recent publication of
excluded and Targeted Local Watersheds/Hydrologic Units, the 03040105020040 14 -digit HUC has been
identified as a Targeted Local Watershed. The project is located in the Piedmont Physiographic Province and the
project streams initiate as headwater systems out of moderately -sloped, forested hills before reaching the
floodplain of Irish Buffalo Creek. The site's 0.72 -square mile watershed is mostly pasture and mixed hardwoods
with small pockets of rural residential development. Prior to construction the site was actively used for timber and
cattle production for over five generations.
The project goals and objectives are listed below.
Project Goals
• Restore a diverse riparian corridor that connects forested stream systems upstream and downstream of the
prof ect.
• Reduce the sediment supply entering Irish Buffalo Creek.
Project Objectives
• Restore stable channel planforms to streams that have been straightened and modified.
• Reshape and stabilize eroding stream banks.
• Plant the site with native trees to help reestablish a diverse riparian corridor.
• Install exclusion fencing and alternative watering options to keep livestock out of the project streams.
Vegetation success is based on the criteria established in the USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines (2003). This
document states that vegetation monitoring results should have the following planted stem density minimums in
the corresponding monitoring years: 320 stems/acre through Year Three, 288 stems/acre in Year Four, and 260
stems/acre in Year Five. The third -year vegetation monitoring was based on the Level 2 CVS-EEP vegetation
monitoring protocol. The site's average density for this monitoring period is 411 planted stems/acre, with none of
the plots having live stakes planted in them. Nine of the thirteen plots had greater than 320 planted stems/acre.
There are four monitoring plots that have calculated planted stem densities less than 320 stems/acre; (Plots 1, 3, 4,
and 6). This is not seen as problematic given the high potential for desirable volunteers to become established in
the plots and across the site. Like natural vegetative communities, some areas will have slightly higher densities
than others, but the data from the vegetation monitoring plots reveal that the site has an adequate average stem
density. To ensure continued vegetative success, some parts of the site received supplemental planting in early
2015. Including volunteers, the monitoring plots averaged 1,161 total stems/acre. The overall vegetation
assessment found the site to be on track to meeting the vegetative success criterion.
Third -year monitoring found the Jacob's Landing Site to be stable, with only minor changes from the as -built
conditions. Two small areas of bank erosion that were reported on T1 in last year's report were repaired with soil
lifts in the beginning of 2016. The monitoring components were installed in February/March 2014. Two
automatic recording gauges have been installed along T1 and T2. Both stream gauges recorded several bankfull
events during 2016. The monitoring plan for each tributary is as follows: T1 has a 1,500 foot longitudinal profile,
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 1 2016— MY03

3 riffle cross-sections, and 1 pool cross-section; T2 has a 1,500 foot longitudinal profile, 5 riffle cross-sections
and 2 pool cross-sections; T1A and T2A are being monitored visually since they are short reaches and small
channels. Pebble counts were conducted at all eleven cross-sections. Ten permanent photo reference points have
been established with a total of twenty-two photos to be taken annually. The third year of monitoring found the
site to be functioning and T2 shows little change from the baseline conditions with the exception of two areas of
aggradation near the end of the reach. T1 shows areas of aggradation throughout the upper three quarters of the
reach. This is likely due to the high volume of sediment moving through the reach and the yearly fluctuations that
this creates. It is not seen as an indicator of instability in the reach, but will be monitored to ensure it does not
become a problem for the site.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and statistics related
to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables and figures in the report
appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the
Baseline Monitoring Report and in the Mitigation Plan documents available on the DMS' website. All raw data
supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from DMS upon request.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
The survey data were collected with a total station instrument on June 10, 16, 17, and December 8, 2016.
Some of the cross-sections have shown minor settling in the floodplain. The bankfull elevations at these cross-
sections have not been changed to reflect this. For calculating cross-sectional morphologic data the cross-section
width has been limited to a width that appropriately reflects the top of bank location so as not to inaccurately
skew data.
The CVS-EEP protocol, Level 2 (http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm) was used to collect vegetation data from
the site. The vegetation monitoring was completed on June 31, 2016.
3.0 REFERENCES
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation,
Version 4.2(http:Hcvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm)
NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2009. Lower Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin
Priorities 2009. Raleigh, NC.
http://www.nceep.net/services/resiplans/Yadkin Pee_Dee _RBRP_2009_Final.pdf
USACE. 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDENR-DWQ, USEPA, NCWRC.
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 2 2016— MY03

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 3 2016— MY03

KANNAPOLIS
DELL
DAVIDSON
29
I
136
ROWAN
Division
of
moo' Mitigation
CABARRUS % STAND Services
m -
FIGURE 1. PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP N
0.75 1.5 JACOB'S LANDING STREAM RESTORATION SITE
DMS PROJECT # 95024, ROWAN COUNTY, NC
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 4 2016- MY03
I
=rI
i
1
ecj 1
- C'r�
`
l
tis
152 -
- I- F,'
`Q Qa
as
CHINA GR VE
i
1b3; _ I
�To
C-1
reach the site from Raleigh: proceed west on 1-40
���
for approximately 62 miles. Then travel on 1-85 south
ANDIS
toward High PointlCharlotte for approximately 50
miles. Take Exit 68 toward China Grove on US -29
ry ;
south. Turn right on NC -152 on East Church Street for'
-
L
approximately 5 miles and then turn left onto Saw
1 --
Road. The site will be approximately 0.5 -mile ahead
-
on the right.
The subject project site is an environmental restoration
-- -
site of the NCDENR Division of Mitgation Services
(DMS) and is encompassed bya recorded conservation
easement, but is bordered by land under private
ownership. Accessing the site may require
1.
traversing areas near or along the easement boundary
and therefore access by the general public is not
permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state
and federal agencies or their designeesicontractors
involved in the development, oversight and
--
-
stewardship of the restoration site is permitted within
-
- -
the terms and timeframes of their defined roles. Any
�7
intended site visitation or activity by any person
-
outside of these previously sanctioned roles and
?
activities requires prior coordination with DMS.
- -
DAVIE
KANNAPOLIS
DELL
DAVIDSON
29
I
136
ROWAN
Division
of
moo' Mitigation
CABARRUS % STAND Services
m -
FIGURE 1. PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP N
0.75 1.5 JACOB'S LANDING STREAM RESTORATION SITE
DMS PROJECT # 95024, ROWAN COUNTY, NC
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 4 2016- MY03

Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 5 2016— MY03

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Miti
ation Credits
Riparian
Non-
Nitrogen
Stream
Wetland
riparian
Buffer
Nutrient
Wetland
Offset
Type
R
EII
Length
4,484
109
Credits
4,484
44
.
TOTAL
4,528
CREDITS
Project
Components
Project
Design
Existing
Restoration -or-
Restoration
Component
Stationing/
Footage
Approach
Restoration
Footage
Mitigation
-or-
Location
(PI, PH etc.)
Equivalent
Ratio
Reach ID
T1
10+00 — 13+03
326
P2
Restoration
303
1:1
T1
13+52 —14+61
158
-
Enhancement II
109*
1:2.5
T1
14+61 —23+54
846
P2
Restoration
893
1:1
T1A
40+00 —41+78
294
P2
Restoration
178
1:1
T2
50+00 —77+45
2,935
P2
Restoration
2,645*
1:1
T2A
100+00 —104+65
465
P2
Restoration
465
1:1
Component Summation
Restoration
Stream
Mitigation Units (SMU)
Level
(linear feet)
Total Restoration
4,484
4,484
Total
Enhancement II
109
44
TOTAL SMU
4,528
*Mitigation units have been calculated to exclude the easement exceptions and water utility easements.
Though not formal BMPs, several small water quality detention structures were installed throughout the project to improve
water quality from the surrounding drainage area.
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 6 2016— MY03

Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Activity or Report
Data Collection
Complete
Actual Completion
or Delivery
Mitigation Plan
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Sept 12
Final Design - Construction Plans
Dec 12
Construction
Contact: Mr. Tim Morris
Nov 13
Planting
Jan 14
Baseline Monitoring/Report
Feb/March 14
April 14
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov 14
Nov 14
Supplemental Planting
Contact: Mr. Stephen James
March 15
Year 2 Monitoring
August 15
Dec 15
Bank erosion repair
1280 Maudis Road
Jan 16
Year 3 Monitoring
June 16
Dec 16
Table 3. Project Contacts
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Design Firm
KCI Associates of North Carolina
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Tim Morris
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Construction Contractor
Wright Contracting, LLC
160 Walker Road
Lawndale, NC 28090
Contact: Mr. Stephen James
Phone: [phone]
Planting Contractor
Forestree Management Co.
1280 Maudis Road
Bailey, NC 27807
Contact: Mr. Tony Cortez
Phone: [phone]
Monitoring Performers
MY -00 - MY -03
KCI Associates of North Carolina
4505 Falls of Neuse Road
Suite 400
Raleigh, NC 27609
Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 7 2016— MY03

Table 4. Project Information
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Project Name
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site
County
Rowan County
Project Area (acres)
13.9 acres
Project Coordinates (lat. and long.)
35.552956 N, 80.653116 W
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03040105
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit 03040105020040
DWQ Sub -basin
13-17-09
Project Drainage Area
459 acres/0.72 square miles
Project Drainage Area Percentage
2.3% / 6 acres
of Impervious Area
CGIA Land Use Classification
4.8% Cultivated, 60.1% Managed Herbaceous Cover, and 35.1% Mixed Upland Hardwoods.
Reach Summary Information (Post -Restoration)
Parameters
T1
T1A
T2
T2A
Length of reach (linear feet)
1,305
178
2,645
465
Valley classification
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
Drainage area (acres)
258.6 acres
136.9 acres
200.6 acres
35.7 acres
NCDWQ Water Quality
Class C, WSIII
Class C, WSIII
Class C, WSIII
Class C, WSIII
Classification
Morphological Description (stream
C4
134c/C4
C4
134c/C4
type)
Evolutionary trend
Stage II
Stage II
Stage II
Stage II
(Constructed)
(Constructed)
(Constructed)
(Constructed)
Mapped Soil Series
Chewacla loam
Chewacla loam
Pacolet sandy loam
Pacolet sandy loam
and Chewacla loam
Drainage class
Poorly drained
Well drained
Poor to Well drained
Well drained
Soil Hydric status
Non hydric
Non hydric
Non hydric
Non hydric
Sloe
0-2%
0-2%
0-2%
0-2%
FEMA classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Native vegetation community
Piedmont Alluvial
Piedmont Alluvial
Piedmont Alluvial
Mesic Mixed
Forest
Forest
Forest
Hardwood Forest
Percent composition of exotic
0%
0%
0%
0%
invasive vegetation
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section
Yes
Yes, received 404 permit.
N/A
404
Waters of the United States — Section
Yes
Yes, received 401 permit.
N/A
401
Endangered Species Act
No
N/A
N/A
Historic Preservation Act
No
N/A
N/A
Coastal Zone Management Act*
N/A
(CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management
No
N/A
Act (CAMA)
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
Yes
Floodplain development permit obtained
N/A
through Rowan County
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No
N/A
N/A
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 8 2016— MY03

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 9 2016— MY03

s
NC GRID I� i
NAD'83
p.
-80' -40' 0' 80' 160'
r
50 FEET
EASEMENT
GRAPHIC SCALE EXCEPTION
�VP10
/ XS1 S
C 3
,
PP10 ytQ
50 FEET ?: rb-
EASEMENT
x VP7 XS11 EXCEPTION"
(GAUGE 2)
�+ t
1�+ ►►"1cp
ND
:PROFILE T2 100 .e
77+00 # ,`
WATER QUALITY `' V
STRUCTURE
VP1 -
x
T
PP2 XS2
'�-
x-
g PP3
+ Ql w XS4 .t
1O s, VP11 ( GAUGE 1) PP4 8
END 1
PROFILE T1

LEGEND
CONSERVATION EASEMENT15 ai. Gam° A ,� Y..• �,.: 1„y� t, b, t -
STREAM BED AGGRADATION
s
-• • +
(
1
VEG •T ACHIEVING DENSITY • +.. 1rr� r il' j •. a .alt ,i
i.
VEG PLOT BELOW DENSITY CRITERION
-80' -40' 0' 80' 160' } �
068 445 VEG PLOT• ' STEM DENSITY
GRAPHIC SCALE
'
GAUGE*0 PHOTO POINT (PP)
`St
2016 REPAIRS- . -
.MAGE SOURCE: NC 2014 STATEWIDE ORTHOIMAGERY
a=
BEGIN
REACH T2A
x `x 1110+00
WATER QUALITY
STRUCTURE
BEGIN I •�/ � a ,. �.. .k T � .
—x PROFILE T2 +� t
VP1VP5
PP5 VP2 XS6
dl
0, PP8
51000
BEGIN
50 FEET
REACH T2 $ XS5 t& VP3 EASEMENT
%05 EXCEPTION /
P t r1p + t
ti XS7 b � %°P
---n -
* VP4 �I • atb
WATER QUALITY �_ / $+� 8
STRUCTURE 6 x
r
PID Xsll
f
50 FEET ' ;�` $ + (GAUGE 2 � � VP8 �
EXCEPTION PP7 XS8+
EASEMENT�; �x
VP7
�w'•
PP10 w END
XS10 8 / PROFILE T2
fi }

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project# 95024
Assessed Len th 2,389 Reach - Tl
Number
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
%Stable,
Channel
Channel
Performing
Numberin
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Category
Sub -Category
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
I. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to
significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include
point bars)
1
962
60%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
) Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser
substrate
21
21
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean
Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
16
16
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance
between tail of upstream riffle and head of
16
16
100%
downstrem riffle)
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend
(Run)
11
11
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander
(Glide)
10
10
100`%
2. Banti
1. Scoured/Eroding0
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from
poor growth and/or scour and erosion
0
I00°/
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass
2. Undercut
wasting appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts
that are modest, appear sustainable and are
0
0
o
100 /o
providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged
boulders or logs.
6
6
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of
ade across the sill.
6
6
o
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath
sills or arms.
0
0
N/A
Bank erosion within the structures extent of
3. Bank Protection
influence does not exceed 15%. (See guidance for
6
6
100%
this table in EEP monitoring dance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool
4. Habitat
Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6
0
0
N/A
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 12 2016 — M103

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Assessed Length 2,084 Reach - T2
Number Stable,
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Major Channel
Channel Sub-
Performing as
Total Number
Unstable
Unstable
Performing as
Category
Category
Metric
Intended
in As-built
Segments
Footage
Intended
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to
significantly deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars)
2
243
88%
2. Degradation -Evidence of downcutting
0
1 0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
13
23
57%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull
Depth> 1.6)
8
26
31%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between
tail of upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
8
26
31%
4.Thalweg Position`
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
N/A
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
N/A
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor
growth and/or scour and erosion
0
0
100
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting
2. Undercut
appears likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
modest, appear sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
JBank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
1 0
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or
logs.
15
15
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade
across the sill.
15
15
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or
arms.
1
1
100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does
3. Bank Protection
not exceed 15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP
6
6
100%
monitoring guidance document)
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth:
4. Habitat
Mean Bankfull Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing
0
0
N/A
some cover at base-flow.
'Due to this reach's small size and the scale of the pattern, the exact position of the thalweg in relation
to the meanders and morphological features is inconsistent and not practical to evaluate
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 13 2016 — M103

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
IJacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
PlantedAcrea a 12.83 EasementAcrea a 13.9
CCPV
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping Threshold
Depiction
Polygons
Acreage
%ofPlanted Acreage
Very limited cover of both woody
Pattern and
1. Bare Areas
0.1 acre
0
0.00
o
0.0%
and herbaceous material.
Color
stem densities clearly below
2.Woody
Low Stem Density
Pattern and
target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5
0.1 acre
0
0.00
0.0%
A
Areas
Color
stem count criteria.
Total
0
0.00
0.0%
Areas with woody stems of a size
3. Areas of Poor
Pattern and
class that are obviously small given
0.25 acre
0
0.00
0.0%
Growth Rates or Vigor
Color
the monitoring year.
Cumulative Total
0
0.00
0.0%
4. Invasive Areas of Areas or points (if too small to
Pattern and
1,000 SF
0
0.00
0.0%
Concern render as polygons at ma scale).
Color
5. Easement
Areas or points (if too small to
Pattern and
Encroachment Areas
render as polygons at map scale).
none
I Color
0
0.00
0.0%
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 14 2016 — M103

Stream Station Photos
Photo Point In: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point In: MY -03 — 11/15/16
Photo Point Id: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point Id: MY -03 — 11/15/16
Photo Point 1 Tributary: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 1 Tributary: MY -03 — 11/15/16
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 15 2016- MY03

Photo Point 2u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 2u: MY -03 — 11/15/16
Photo Point 2d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 2d: MY -03 — 11/15/16
Photo Point 3u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 3u: MY -03 — 11/15/16
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 16 2016- MY03

Photo Point 3d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 3d: MY -03 — 11/15/16
Photo Point 4u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 4u: MY -03 — 11/15/16
Photo Point 4d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 4d: MY -03 — 11/15/16
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 17 2016- MY03

Photo Point 5u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 5u: MY -03 — 11/15/16
Photo Point 5d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 5d: MY -03 —11/15/16
Photo Point 6u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 6u: MY -03 — 11/15/16
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 18 2016- MY03

Photo Point 6d: MY -00 3/11/14
Photo Point 6d: MY -03 11/15/16
Photo Point 7u: MY -00 3/11/14
Photo Point 7u: MY -03 — 11/15/16
Photo Point 7d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 7d: MY -03 — 11/15/16
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 19 2016- MY03

Photo Point 8u: MY -00 3/11/14
Photo Point 8u: MY -03 11/15/16
Photo Point 8d: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 8d: MY -03 — 11/15/16
Photo Point 9u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 9u: MY -03 — 11/15/16
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 20 2016- MY03

Photo Point 9d: MY -00 3/11/14
Photo Point 9d: MY -03 11/15/16
Photo Point 9 Tributary: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 9 Tributary: MY -03 — 11/15/16
Photo Point 10u: MY -00 — 3/11/14
Photo Point 10u: MY -03 — 11/15/16
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 21 2016- MY03

Photo Point l Od: MY -00 3/11/14
Photo Point l Od: MY -03 — 11/15/16
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 22 2016- MY03

Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Plot 1 Photo: 8/31/16 MY03
Plot 3 Photo: 8/31/16 — MY03
Plot 5 Photo: 8/31/16 — MY03
Plot 2 Photo: 8/31/16 MY03
Plot 4 Photo: 8/31/16 — MY03
Plot 6 Photo: 8/31/16 — MY03
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 23 2016- MY03

Plot 7 Photo: 8/31/16 — MY03
Plot 9 Photo: 8/31/16 — MY03
Plot 11 Photo: 8/31/16 — MY03
Plot 8 Photo: 8/31/16 — MY03
Plot 10 Photo: 8/31/16 — MY03
Plot 12 Photo: 8/31/16 — MY03
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 24 2016- MY03

Plot 13 Photo: 8/31/16 — MY03
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 25 2016- MY03

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 26 2016— MY03

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Vegetation Plot ID Vegetation Survival Threshold Met?
Monitoring Year 03
Planted Stem Density
(stems/acre)
Monitoring Year 03
Total Stem Density
(stems/acre)
I No
202
890
2 Yes
405
526
3 No
283
526
4 No
243
1,376
5 Yes
405
526
6 No
162
688
7 Yes
607
3,804
8 Yes
445
890
9 Yes
445
1,012
10 Yes
486
607
11 Yes
647
2,104
12 Yes
486
850
13 Yes
526
1,295
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 27 2016— MY03

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site DMS Project # 95024
Report Prepared By
Randall Jones
Date Prepared
9/2/2016 13:59
database name
KCI-2014-L.mdb
database location
M:\2011\20110675 -Jacobs Landin \Monitorin \Ve etaton CVS Database
computer name
12-3ZV4FP1
file size
162001152
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS
IN THIS DOCUMENT-----
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and
project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This
excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes
live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems,
missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of
total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead
and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural
volunteers combined) for each lot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY —
Pro'ect Code 95024
project Name Jacob's Landing
Description Stream Restoration Site
River Basin Yadkin -Pee Dee
length(ft) 4593
areas m 0.72
Re iredPlots (calculated) 13
SampledPlots 13
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 28 2016- MY03

Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
DMS Project Code 95024.
Project Name: Jacob's Landing
Current Plot Data (MY3 2016)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
95024-01-0001
95024-01-0002
95024-01-0003
95024-01-0004
95024-01-0005
95024-01-0006
95024-01-0007
95024-01-0008
Pnol-S,
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S,
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S,
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Pnol-S
P -all
T
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
1
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
8
8
8
2
2
2
4
4
4
1
1
1
10
10
11
3
3
3
Callicarpa americana
American
beautyberry
Shrub
Diospyros virginiana
common
persimmon
Tree
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1
Juniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
1
1
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
17
1
5
25
3
11
75
8
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
1
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
2
2
2
Quercus palustris
pin oak
Tree
7
7
7
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
8
8
8
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
3
3
3
1
1
1
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
1
1
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
Unknown
Shrub or
Tree
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
5
5
22
10
10
13
7
7
13
6
6
34
10
10
13
4
4
17
15
15
94
11
11
22
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
2
2
3
2
2
5
3
3
5
3
3
7
2
2
3
3
3
6
4
4
8
2
2
6
202
202
890
405
405
526
283
283
526
1 243
243
1376
405
405
526
162
162
688
607
607
3804
445
445
890
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates ofNorth Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 29 2016— MY03

Table 9. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species
DMS Project Code 95024. Project Name: Jacob's Landing
Current Plot Data (MY3 2016)
Annual
Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95024-01-0009
95024-01-0010
95024-01-0011
95024-01-0012
95024-01-0013
MY3 (2016)
MY2 (2015)
MY1(2014)
MYO (2014)
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
PnoLS
P -all
T
Acer negundo
boxelder
Tree
1
1
3
6
6
3
Baccharis
baccharis
Shrub
1
1
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
2
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
3
3
3
7
7
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
41
41
42
43
43
45
44
44
44
44
44
44
Callicarpa americana
American
beautyberry
Shrub
3
3
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
9
9
9
9
9
11
11
12
Diospyros virginiana
common
persimmon
Tree
3
1
1
Fraxinus
pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
3
4
4
4
2
2
2
9
9
11
9
9
9
1
1
1
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1
3
Juniperus virginiana
eastern redcedar
Tree
2
4
Liquidambar
styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
8
2
31
8
12
206
171
272
Liriodendron
tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
4
1 1
1
1 9
3
3
10
11
11
17
Nyssa biflora
swamp tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
Pinus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
1
Platanus occidentalis
American
sycamore
Tree
3
2
12
12
17
16
16
19
21
21
32
3
3
3
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
11
11
11
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
2
2
2
4
4
4
3
3
4
1
1
1
Quercus palustris
pin oak
Tree
7
7
7
5
5
5
5
5
5
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
7
7
7
6
6
6
9
9
9
9
9
9
43
43
43
46
46
46
41
41
41
54
54
54
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
1
5
5
5
6
6
6
5
5
5
Salix nigra
black willow
Tree
1
3
Sambucus
canadensis
Common
Elderberry
Shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
3
1
1
1
Ulmus americana
American elm
Tree
1
1
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
1
1
1
6
6
6
133
133
133
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
11
11
25
12
12
15
16
16
52
12
12
21
13
13
32
132
132
373
144
144
344
149
149
444
246
246
246
1
1
1
1
1
13
13
13
13
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
1 0.32
0.32
0.32
1 0.32
3
3
83
3
5
4
4
9
4
4
6
4
4
7
11
11
21
11
11
17
11
11
14
6
6
6
445
445
1012
486
486
607
647
647
2104
486
486
850
526
526
1295
411
411
1161
448
448
1071
464
464
1382
1 766
766
766
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates ofNorth Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 30 2016— MY03

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 31 2016— MY03

Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Jacob's Landin
XS -1, Riffle (T1)
802
800
798
1
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -1, Riffle (T1)
2.4
River Basin:
Watershed:
XS ID
Drainage
6/10/2016
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and R. Jones
17.9
795.9
21.2
796.0
24.1
795.8
25.2
795.6
26.0
795.7
26.5
794.9
27.1
794.7
27.7
794.7
28.3
794.8
28.7
794.9
28.9
795.0
30.5
795.2
31.9
0
33.6
796.1
34.5
796.3
36.1
796.2
40.2
795.9
42.8
796
Gy
--------------- ------------
---•Bankfull
- - - • Flood Prone Area
As -Built, 2/25/14
49.8
796.6
54.7
798.4
794
792
0 10 20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
MY -01, 10/27/14
MY -02, 8/11/15
t MKY-0, 6/10/16
60
64.1
799.8
64.8
799.9
64.9
799.9
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
800.7
2.4
800.4
Area (s mi):
0.37
Date:
6/10/2016
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and R. Jones
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
800.7
2.4
800.4
4.8
800.0
8.9
798.3
13.4
796.6
17.9
795.9
21.2
796.0
24.1
795.8
25.2
795.6
26.0
795.7
26.5
794.9
27.1
794.7
27.7
794.7
28.3
794.8
28.7
794.9
28.9
795.0
30.5
795.2
31.9
795.8
33.6
796.1
34.5
796.3
36.1
796.2
40.2
795.9
42.8
796.0
46.2
796.1
49.8
796.6
54.7
798.4
60.1
799.9
64.1
799.8
64.8
799.9
64.9
799.9
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
795.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
4.7
Bankfull Width (ft):
8.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
796.9
Flood Prone Width (ft):
38.0
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft :
1.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.6
W / D Ratio:
15.0
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
794.4
2.6
794.1
Watershed:
792.4
Jacob's Landing
Date:
24.1
6/10/2016
XS ID
T. Seelinger and R. Jones
XS -2, Riffle (Tl)
792.3
.. j.
792.0
Drainage
791.4
41.3
791.4
42.2
791.1
42.7
791.1
43.0
€ '-TO-u
p r
;
791.1
44.6
791.1
45.0
..
45.8
791.8
46.4
792.0
48.9
792.4
50.2
792.5
55.6
792.5
61.5
792.7
69.8
792.8
74.9
793.5
77.7
794.3
77.9
794.8
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -2, Riffle (Tl)
796
794
--------------------------------------------------------------
--
0
792
- --
----Bankruv
w
- - - - Flood Prone Area
As -Built, 2/25/14
MY -01,10/27/14
MY -02, 8/11/15
790
7 MY -03, 6/10/16
0 10
20 30
40 50 60
80
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
794.4
2.6
794.1
Area (s mi):
792.4
0.37
Date:
24.1
6/10/2016
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and R. Jones
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
794.4
2.6
794.1
10.9
792.4
17.5
792.2
24.1
792.2
32.6
792.1
37.4
792.3
40.0
792.0
40.9
791.4
41.3
791.4
42.2
791.1
42.7
791.1
43.0
791.1
43.8
791.1
44.6
791.1
45.0
791.3
45.8
791.8
46.4
792.0
48.9
792.4
50.2
792.5
55.6
792.5
61.5
792.7
69.8
792.8
74.9
793.5
77.7
794.3
77.9
794.8
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
792.4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ftz):
7.7
Bankfull Width (ft):
11.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
793.7
Flood Prone Width (ft):
70.8
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.7
W / D Ratio:
17.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.1
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Jacob's Landin
XS -3, Pool (Tl)
794
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -3, Pool (Tl)
1.7
River Basin:
Watershed:
XS ID
Drainage
6/10/2016
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and R. Jones
18.8
791.6
25.8
791.6
30.2
791.5
34.2
791.2
36.2
791.2
37.1
791.1
38.1
790.5
39.4
790.6
40.3
790.5
41.5
790.4
42.0
790.3
42.5
790.3
43.0
790.3
43.8
790.3
44.2
790.4
44.5
790.8
46.0
791.3
792
o---------
ti
W
790
791.5
---------- -----------------
-- - -Bankfull
52.7
791.9
56.1
792.8
60.0
793.9
62.2
788
62.3
As -Built, 2/25/14
MY -01, 10/27/14
MY -02,8/11/15
MY -03, 6/10/16
0 10
20 30 40 50
Station (feet)
60
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
794.2
1.7
793.8
Area (s mi):
0.37
Date:
6/10/2016
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and R. Jones
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
794.2
1.7
793.8
5.5
792.6
10.6
791.3
15.0
791.3
18.8
791.6
25.8
791.6
30.2
791.5
34.2
791.2
36.2
791.2
37.1
791.1
38.1
790.5
39.4
790.6
40.3
790.5
41.5
790.4
42.0
790.3
42.5
790.3
43.0
790.3
43.8
790.3
44.2
790.4
44.5
790.8
46.0
791.3
46.9
791.5
49.1
791.7
52.7
791.9
56.1
792.8
60.0
793.9
62.2
794.0
62.3
794.3
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
791.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
6.5
Bankfull Width (ft):
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
12.3
-
Flood Prone Width ft):
-
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.5
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
792.4
1.6
Watershed:
4.9
Jacob's Landin
8.4
XS ID
T. Seelinger and R. Jones
XS -4, Riffle T1)
790.3
18.8
Drainage Area (s
mi):
0.37
26.8
789.9
Date:
789.6
6/10/2016
789.6
29.6
789.4
29.9
789.0
30.7
788.9
31.2
788.9
31.9
yf.
32.5
788.8
32.6
788.8
33.6
789.1
34.2
789.6
35.0
789.8
36.1
789.9
37.7
790.3
...
790.4
42.3
790.5
44.1
790.5
47.6
790.3
52.8
790.3
59.0
790.4
62.8
791.3
67.6
793.1
67.8
793.6
a
Yadkin -Pee Dee
River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -4, Riffle (Tl)
795
793
5
791
0
ti--------- ---
--
_ _ -
---- -- -----------------
Rj
� � � - Bankfull
789
- - - - Flood Prone Area
As -Built, 2/25/14
MY -01, 10/27/14
MY -02, 8/11/15
787
+ MY -03, 6/10/16
0 10
20
30 40 50 0
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
792.4
1.6
792.1
4.9
790.8
8.4
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and R. Jones
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
792.4
1.6
792.1
4.9
790.8
8.4
790.1
11.1
790.3
14.3
790.3
18.8
790.2
24.3
790.0
26.8
789.9
28.1
789.6
28.9
789.6
29.6
789.4
29.9
789.0
30.7
788.9
31.2
788.9
31.9
788.8
32.5
788.8
32.6
788.8
33.6
789.1
34.2
789.6
35.0
789.8
36.1
789.9
37.7
790.3
39.5
790.4
42.3
790.5
44.1
790.5
47.6
790.3
52.8
790.3
59.0
790.4
62.8
791.3
67.6
793.1
67.8
793.6
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
789.9
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
5.1
Bankfull Width (ft):
8.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
791.0
Flood Prone Width (ft):
57.3
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.6
W / D Ratio:
15.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
6.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
818.6
0.0
Watershed:
Area (s mi):
Jacob's Landin
Date:
6/16/2016
XS ID
� T. Seelinger and R. Jones
XS -5, Riffle (T1
813.4
13.9
Drainage
16.2
y
K
812.7
17.8
812.5
18.0
812.3
18.5
812.1
18.7
812.2
19.4
812.1
20.1
812.1
21.1
812.0
21.7
812.2
22.1
812.3
22.2
812.4
23.1
812.7
24.0
813.1
25.0
813.2
25.6
813.5
27.1
813.6
28.7
813.5
30.4
813.6
31.7
814.1
32.8
814.7
34.2
815.6
35.7
816.1
37.7
816.6
39.7
817.4
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -5, Riffle (Tl)
821
818
w
° 815
c�--------- - ------------------------------------------
W
-----------
- - - - Bankfull
----------------
l--------------- - -----------
----Flood Prone Area
813
As -Built, 2/24/14
MY -01, 10/28/14
MY -02, 8/11/15
810
0 MY -03, 6/16/16
0
10 20 30
40
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
818.6
0.0
817.9
Area (s mi):
� 0.37
Date:
6/16/2016
Field Crew:
� T. Seelinger and R. Jones
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
818.6
0.0
817.9
1.7
817.3
3.8
815.9
8.5
813.7
11.3
813.4
13.9
813.4
16.2
812.8
17.3
812.7
17.8
812.5
18.0
812.3
18.5
812.1
18.7
812.2
19.4
812.1
20.1
812.1
21.1
812.0
21.7
812.2
22.1
812.3
22.2
812.4
23.1
812.7
24.0
813.1
25.0
813.2
25.6
813.5
27.1
813.6
28.7
813.5
30.4
813.6
31.7
814.1
32.8
814.7
34.2
815.6
35.7
816.1
37.7
816.6
39.7
817.4
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
813.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
8.1
Bankfull Width (ft):
11.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
814.7
Flood Prone Width (ft):
26.3
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.7
W / D Ratio:
15.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.3
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed:
Jacob's Landing
XS ID
XS -6, Riffle (T1)
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.37
Date:
6/16/2016
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and R. Jones
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
812.4
4.4
811.8
7.8
811.4
11.8
810.6
15.4
810.0
18.3
809.8
19.9
809.7
20.8
809.4
21.4
809.0
23.0
808.9
23.6
808.9
24.1
808.7
24.7
808.5
25.2
808.4
25.8
808.5
26.3
808.4
26.3
808.5
27.0
808.7
27.9
808.9
29.0
809.0
29.6
809.2
31.9
809.9
34.2
810.2
39.0
810.4
42.0
811.1
45.1
812.0
46.8
812.9
46.8
813.9
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
809.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft 2):
6.4
Bankfull Width (ft):
10.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
810.7
Flood Prone Width (ft):
28.4
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.1
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.6
W / D Ratio:
16.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
815
813
E
811
0
809
41W
807
805
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -6, Riffle (Tl)
-------------------------------------- ----------------------
Bankfull
Flood Prone Area
As -Built, 2/24/14
MY -01, 10/28/14
MY -02, 8/11/15
+ MY -03, 6/16/16
10 20 30 40
Station (feet)

River Basin:
Yadkin -Pee Dee
Watershed:
Jacob's Landing
XS ID
XS -7, Pool (T1)
Drainage Area (sq mi):
0.37
Date:
6/16/2016
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and R. Jones
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
810.7
0.1
809.9
2.3
809.6
3.7
808.3
6.6
807.2
7.9
806.9
10.6
806.8
11.9
806.6
12.7
806.0
14.1
805.7
14.8
805.6
15.6
804.8
17.1
804.4
18.2
804.4
19.1
804.5
20.3
804.7
21.0
805.2
21.6
805.3
21.4
805.9
22.6
806.0
24.5
806.4
26.5
806.7
30.3
806.7
34.2
806.7
36.3
806.8
39.3
808.0
41.2
808.8
42.7
809.2
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
806.4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft 2):
13.5
Bankfull Width (ft):
12.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
-
Flood Prone Width (ft):
-
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
2.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.1
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
Bank Height Ratio:

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
805.4
0.0
Watershed:
Area (s mi):
Jacob's Landin
Date:
6/16/2016
XS ID
T. Seelinger and R. Jones
XS -8, Riffle (T1
801.7
15.6
Drainage
17.7
800.7
19.1
800.1
20.0
800.1
20.4
799.9
21.0
799.7
20.3
799.7
21.5
799.7
21.7
799.8
22.3
799.9
24.2
800.4
27.1
801.5
r,
801.3
32.2
801.3
35.1
802.5
38.3
804.2
41.1
804.9
.�
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -8, Riffle (Tl)
808
806
c 804
-----:nt-------------------------------------------
0
------
802
----Bankfull
fil
- - - - Flood Prone Area
As -Built, 2/24/14
800
MY -01, 10/28/14
MY -02,8/11/15
798
4 MY -03, 6/16/2016
0 10
20 30
40
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
805.4
0.0
804.9
Area (s mi):
0.37
Date:
6/16/2016
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and R. Jones
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
805.4
0.0
804.9
2.3
804.5
4.7
803.7
10.0
801.9
14.7
801.7
15.6
801.5
17.7
800.7
19.1
800.1
20.0
800.1
20.4
799.9
21.0
799.7
20.3
799.7
21.5
799.7
21.7
799.8
22.3
799.9
24.2
800.4
27.1
801.5
30.7
801.3
32.2
801.3
35.1
802.5
38.3
804.2
41.1
804.9
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
801.4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
10.4
Bankfull Width (ft):
11.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
803.0
Flood Prone Width (ft):
29.5
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.9
W / D Ratio:
11.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.7
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
801.55
2.8
Watershed:
Area (s mi):
Jacob's Landin
Date:
12/8/2016
XS ID
T. Seelinger and R. Jones
XS -9, Riffle (TI)
797.95
18.5
Drainage
19.6
797.06
20.5
796.74
21.5
796.79
22.7
796.72
23.5
796.77
24.7
797.13
26.1
797.43
28.6
798.33
29.9
798.25
34.5
798.04
39.9
798.23
45.8
798.34
50.8
799.57
52.4
799.85
52.6
800.28
.. ;.. .
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -9, Riffle (Tl)
805
- - - - Bankfull
Flood Prone Area
803
As -Built, 2/24/14
MY -01, 10/29/14
801
MY -02, 8/11/15
+ MY -03,12/8/16
0
799 ------- --------------------------------------------------
----
W
797
795
0 10
20
30 40 50
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
801.55
2.8
800.94
Area (s mi):
0.37
Date:
12/8/2016
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and R. Jones
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
801.55
2.8
800.94
6.5
799.37
8.8
798.37
13.2
798.06
16.4
797.95
18.5
797.50
19.6
797.06
20.5
796.74
21.5
796.79
22.7
796.72
23.5
796.77
24.7
797.13
26.1
797.43
28.6
798.33
29.9
798.25
34.5
798.04
39.9
798.23
45.8
798.34
50.8
799.57
52.4
799.85
52.6
800.28
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
797.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
6.3
Bankfull Width (ft):
9.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
798.8
Flood Prone Width (ft):
39.9
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.6
W / D Ratio:
15.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.1
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
797.69
Watershed:
796.39
Jacob's Landin
0.37
XS ID
12/8/2016
XS -10, Pool (T1)
T. Seelinger and R. Jones
Drainage
795.68
23.2
795.73
24.4
795.71
24.7
795.37
25.7
794.97
27.0
794.55
27.9
794.43
>c
794.55
30.5
794.87
31.2
795.17
31.7
795.91
32.5
796.40
33.4
796.50
39.4
796.80
45.2
796.83
r
797.11
56.7
798.15
.5
799.19
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -10, Pool (Tl)
800
798
w
s
0
W 796
- - BankfullAs-Built,
2/24/14
MY -01, 10/29/14
MY -02, 8/11/15
794
t MY -03,12/8/15
0 10
20 30 40 50 60
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
797.69
1.6
796.39
Area (s mi):
0.37
Date:
12/8/2016
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and R. Jones
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
797.69
1.6
796.39
6.5
796.40
16.2
796.54
18.4
796.22
22.0
795.68
23.2
795.73
24.4
795.71
24.7
795.37
25.7
794.97
27.0
794.55
27.9
794.43
29.4
794.55
30.5
794.87
31.2
795.17
31.7
795.91
32.5
796.40
33.4
796.50
39.4
796.80
45.2
796.83
50.3
797.11
56.7
798.15
59.0
799.19
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
796.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
20.4
Bankfull Width (ft):
16.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
-
Flood Prone Width (ft):
-
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
2.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.3
W / D Ratio:
-
Entrenchment Ratio:
-
Bank Height Ratio:
-

River Basin:
Elevation (ft)
Yadkin -Pee Dee
794.20
6.6
Watershed:
Area (s mi):
Jacob's Landing
Date:
12/8/2016
XS ID
T. Seelinger and R. Jones
XS -11, Riffle (T1)
792.87
19.9
792.49
21.0
792.19
21.6
j, '
Drainage
792.19
✓'
792.54
24.1
792.54
25.2
792.98
27.2
793.52
29.6
793.60
31.7
793.38
38.4
793.36
46.0
793.62
53.7
795.31
55.6
795.95
55.8
796.40
Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin, Jacob's Landing, XS -11, Riffle (Tl)
798
796it
----------------------------------------------------------
----
794
0
Bankfull
W
- - - - Flood Prone Area
792
As -Built, 2/24/14
MY -01, 10/29/14
MY -02,8/11/15
790
1 MY -03, 12/8/16
0 10
20 30
40 60
Station (feet)
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
794.20
6.6
793.93
Area (s mi):
0.37
Date:
12/8/2016
Field Crew:
T. Seelinger and R. Jones
Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
0.0
794.20
6.6
793.93
12.2
793.80
14.1
793.68
16.4
793.47
18.1
792.87
19.9
792.49
21.0
792.19
21.6
792.26
22.5
792.19
23.3
792.54
24.1
792.54
25.2
792.98
27.2
793.52
29.6
793.60
31.7
793.38
38.4
793.36
46.0
793.62
53.7
795.31
55.6
795.95
55.8
796.40
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation (ft):
793.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft):
8.0
Bankfull Width (ft):
10.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation (ft):
794.8
Flood Prone Width ft):
51.2
Max Depth at Bankfull (ft):
1.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull (ft):
0.7
W / D Ratio:
14.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.7
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

800
798
796
794
792
° 790
°
W
788
786
784
782
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site
Longitudinal Profile
T 1 MY -03
—\
— — — SBS _ -0.0067x + 804.24
--�
SWS = -0.007x + 803.89 _
—\
780
1050
1150 1250 1350 1450 1550 1650 1750 1850 1950 2050 2150
Station (ft)
As -Built, 2/20/14 MY -01, 10/27/14 MY -02, 8/10/15 —6— MY -03, 6/10/16 ■ Bankfull — — - Water Surface ® Cross-sections
2250 2350

812
810
808
806
804
802
0
0
800
W
798
796
794
792
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site
Longitudinal Profile
T2 MY -03
`-1
1
�--
SBBKF = -O.Olx + 866.13
Sws = -0.0104x + 868.36
■
vn
790
5560
5660 5760 5860 5960 6060 6160 6260 6360 6460 6560 6660 6760 6860 6960 7060 7160 7260 7360
Station (ft)
As -Built, 2/19/14 MY -01, 10/29/14 MY -02, 8/12/15 s MY -03, 6/17/16 Bankfull — — - Water Surface 0 Structures ♦ Cross-sections

Cross -Section 1 Riffle - MY -03
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs
aXS 1 Riffleng
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 8
Very Fine .062-.125 S 2
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N 8
Coarse
.50-1
D
31
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 13
Very Fine
2 - 4
20
80%
0
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G 1
Fine 5.7-8 R 1
- As Built
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
1
F
L
+MY -01 (2014)
—AMY-o2(zols)
Medium 11.3- 16 V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
1
C 40%
w
e
—AMY -03 (2016)
Coarse 22.6-32 L
Very Coarse
32-45
S
20%
0%
0.01
0.1
1 to 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 4
Small 64-90 C 3
Small 90-128 O4
Large 128-180 B 3
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.42
0.73
1.1
2.2
8
110
Size Distribution
mean 1.8
dispersion 4.9
skewness 0.20
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
8%
54%
28%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
100
Note:

Cross-Section 2 Riffle - MY-03
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs
aXS 2 Rigfleng
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 2
Very Fine .062-.125 S 4
Fine .125-.25 A 6
Medium .25-.50 N 22
Coarse
.50-1
D
25
4
Very Coarse 1 -2 S 8
Very Fine
2 - 4
12
80%
5�
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G 1
0 As Built
Fine 5.7-8 R 2
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
1
H
L
+MY-01 (2014)
—�MY_02(2015)
Medium 11.3 -16 V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
a 40%
w
e
20%
—AMY-o3 (2016)
Coarse 22.6-32 L
VeryCoarse
32-45
S
0%
0.01
0.1
1 to 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64
Small 64-90 C 1
Small 90-128 O 10
Large 128- 180 B 5
Large 180-256 L 1
Small
256-362
B
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
(mm)
0.28mean
0.51
0.78
1.7
90
140
Size Distribution
5.0
dispersion 59.1
skewness 0.51
—momiwood/det
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
artificial
2%
65%
16%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

Cross -Section 3 Pool - MY -03
R
100%
go%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs Landing
XS 3 Pool
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N
Coarse .50-1 D 10
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S 70
Very Fine
2 - 4
20
a
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G
Fine 5.7-8 R
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
>;
N
d
40%
---- MY -01 (2014)
—� MY -02 (2015)
Medium 11.3 - 16 V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
w
a
—rte MY -03 (2016)
Coarse 22.6-32 L
Coarse
32-45
S
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
–Very
Very Coarse 45-64
Small 64-90 C
Small 90-128 O
Large 128-180 B
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 1.1
D35 1.3
D50 1.5
D65 1.7
D84 2.3
D95 3.4
Size Distribution
mean 1.6
dispersion 1.4
skewness 0.04
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
0%
80%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

Cross -Section 4 Riffle - MY -03
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs
aRS 4 Riffleng
Particle Millimeter S Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 5
Very Fine .062-.125 S ism
Fine .125-.25 A 2
Medium .25-.50 N 3
Coarse
.50-1
D
5
R
80%
Very Coarse 1-2 S 1 1
Very Fine
2 - 4
10
a
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G 3
Fine 5.7-8 R 1
Medium
8- 11.3
A
5
N
d
40%
— As Built
tMY-01(2014)
Medium 11.3- 16 V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
3
°
W
a
MY -02(2015)
—A-- MY -03 (2016)
Coarse 22.6-32 L 5
Coarse
32-45
S
9
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
—Very
Very Coarse 45-64 17
Small 64-90 C 7
Small 90-128 O 9
Large 128- 180 B 5
Large 180-256 L 1
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 1.1
D35 3.8
D50 27
D65 49
D84 85
D95 140
Size Distribution
mean 9.7
dispersion 13.8
skewness -0.32
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
5%
21%
52%
220%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 101
Note:

Cross -Section 5 Riffle - MY -03
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs
aXS 5 Rifeng
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 8
Very Fine .062-.125 S 1
Fine .125-.25 A I
Medium .25-.50 N 11
Coarse
.50-1
D
12
so%
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S 3
Very Fine
2 - 4
16
60%
- As Built
Fine 4-5.7 G 4
Fine 5.7-8 R 2
Medium
8- 11.3
A
i4+
°
MY -01 (2014)
MY -02 (2015)
Medium 11.3 - 16 V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
1
Gz,
a
40 /°
20%
t MY -03 (2016)
Coarse 22.6-32 L 1
Very Coarse
32-45
S
6
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
Very Coarse 45-64 5
Small 64-90 C 9
Small 90-128 O 13
Large 128-180 B 8
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 0.37
D35 1.7
D50 3.7
D65 44
D84 100
D95 150
Size Distribution
mean 6.1
dispersion 18.5
skewness 0.14
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
8%
28%
35%
30%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 101
Note:

Cross -Section 6 Riffle -MY-03
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs
aRS 6 Riffleng
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 6
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A 4
Medium .25-.50 N 8
Coarse
.50-1
D
12
100%
Very Coarse 1-2 S 1 1
Very Fine
2 - 4
7
R
a
80%
Fine 4-5.7 G 1
Fine
5.7-8
R
2
�
F
640%
60%
- As Built
(2014)
T MY -02 (2015)
Medium 8 - 11.3 A 1-oi
Medium 11.3- 16 V 2
Coarse
16-22.6
E
3
w
0
—AMY -03 (201
Coarse 22.6-32 L 4
32-45
S
4
20°i°
0%
0.01
0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
—VeryCoarse
Very Coarse 45-64 10
Small 64-90 C 4
Small 90-128 O 14
Large 128-180 B 6
Large 180-256 L 1
Small
256-362
B
Size
D16
D35
D50
D65
D84
D95
mm)
0.42
1.4
6.9
45
100
140
Size Distribution
mean 6.5
dispersion 15.5
skewness -0.02
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay 6%
sand 35%
gravel 34%
cobble 25%
boulder 0%
bedrock 0%
hardpan 0%
wood/det 0%
artificial 0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:

Cross -Section 7 Pool -MY-03
100%
80%
Particle Size Distribution
JacobsXS 7 Pooling
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 12
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A 4
Medium .25-.50 N 43
Coarse .50-1 D 3
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S
Very Fine
2 - 4
1
a
v
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G
Fine 5.7-8 R 2
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
4
F
,.
t MY -01 (2014)
—�MY_02(2015)
Medium 11.3- 16 V 3
Coarse
16-22.6
E
4
w
0
40%
—AMY -03 (2016)
Coarse 22.6-32 L 4
Coarse
32-45
S
1
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
–Very
Very Coarse 45-64 7
Small 64-90 C 2
Small 90-128 O 2
Large 128-180 B
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 0.2
D35 0.32
D50 0.41
D65 0.6
D84 25
D95 62
Size Distribution
mean 2.2
dispersion 31.5
skewness 0.51
e
Small 362-512 L
:wood/det
13%
54%
28%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0% 0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 92
Note:

Cross -Section 8 Riffle -MY-03
100%
Particle Size Distribution
daXSb8L�antdeng
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 4
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A 3
Medium .25-.50 N 5
Coarse
.50-1
D
6
80%
Coarse 1-2 S 1 1
—Very
Very Fine
2 - 4
8
a
v
60%
- As Built
Fine 4-5.7 G
Fine 5.7-8 R 1
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
�
MY -01 (2014)
MY -02 (2015)
Medium 11.3 - 16 V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
w"
0
40%
—AMY -03 (2016)
Coarse 22.6-32
32-45
S
4
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
—VeryCoarse
Very Coarse 45-64 7
Small 64-90 C 14
Small 90-128 O 23
Large 128-180 B 11
Large 180-256 L 1
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 0.79
D35 3.4
D50 61
D65 90
D84 120
D95 160
Size Distribution
mean 9.7
dispersion 39.6
skewness -0.54
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
4%
25%
22%
49%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
Total 100
Note:
L 2

Cross -Section 9 Riffle - MY -03
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs
9 fliffleng
Particle Millimeter S Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 3
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N 6
Coarse
.50-1
D
12
R
80%
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S
Very Fine
2-4
3
a
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G 1
Fine 5.7-8 R 1
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
40%
T As Built
+MY -01 (2014)
Medium 11.3- 16 V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
5
w
a
—f—MY-02(2015)
—AMY -03 (2016)
Coarse 22.6-32 L 4
Coarse
32-45
S
17
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
—Very
Very Coarse 45-64 8
Small 64-90 C 8
Small 90-128 O 22
Large 128- 180 B 10
Large 180-256 L 2
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 0.76
D35 32
D50 44
D65 84
D84 120
D95 160
Size Distribution
mean 9.5
dispersion 30.3
skewness -0.45
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
3%
18%
38%
41%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK 1
Total 102
Note:

Cross-Section 10 Pool - MY-03
100%
Particle Size Distribution
Jacobs
aXS 10 P oing
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 17
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N 2
Coarse
.50-1
D
16
R
80%
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S 16
Very Fine
2-4
2
a
Fine 4-5.7 G 3
Fine 5.7-8 R60%
Medium
8 - 11.3
A
F
d
40%
AMY-01(2014)
—AMY-02(2015)
Medium 11.3- 16 V
Coarse
16-22.6
E
1
w
a
—AMY-03(2016)
Coarse 22.6-32 L 1
Coarse
32-45
S
6
20%
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
—Very
Very Coarse 45-64 4
Small 64-90 C 9
Small 90-128 O 11
Large 128-180 B 10
Large 180-256 L 2
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 0.062
D35 1
D50 1.9
D65 49
D84 110
D95 160
Size Distribution
mean 2.6
dispersion 44.3
skewness 0.08
T
e
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
17%
34%
17%
32%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK 1
Total 100
Note:

Cross -Section 11 Riffle - MY -03
100%
Particle Size Distribution
JaXS 11LRi fle g
Particle Millimeter Count
Silt/Clay < 0.062 S/C 1
Very Fine .062-.125 S
Fine .125-.25 A
Medium .25-.50 N 13
Coarse
.50-1
D
22
R
80%
Very Coarse 1 - 2 S 16
Very Fine
2 - 4
12
a
60%
Fine 4-5.7 G 2
Fine 5.7-8 R 1
Medium
8- 11.3
A
q
d
40%
T As Built
—�iviY_o1 �zo1a)
Medium 11.3- 16 V 1
Coarse
16-22.6
E
°
T MY -02 (2015)
—•AMY -03(2016)
Coarse 22.6-32 L 1
32-45
S
20°i°
0%
0.01 0.1
1 10 100
Particle Size - Millimeters
1000 10000
—VeryCoarse
Very Coarse 45-64 1
Small 64-90 C 2
Small 90-128 O 20
Large 128- 180B 8
Large 180-256 L
Small
256-362
B
Size (mm)
D16 0.53
D35 0.97
D50 1.8
D65 4.9
D84 110
D95 150
Size Distribution
mean 7.6
dispersion 32.3
skewness 0.41
Type
Small 362-512 L
silt/clay
sand
gravel
cobble
boulder
bedrock
hardpan
wood/det
artificial
1%
51%
18%
30%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Medium 512-1024 D
Lrg- Very Lrg 1024-2048 R
Bedrock >2048 BDRK
100
Note:

Table 10a. Tl Baseline Stream Data Summary
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean Med
Max
n Min
Mean Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min
Mean
Max
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.5
9.1
4 6.9
1
11.5
12.2
10.1
11.0
12.1
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
1
26
4 23
1
25
70
40
56
71
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
1.8
4 1.1
1
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.8
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.1
2.8
4 1.6
1
1.5
1.6
1.2
1.3
1.4
3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area ftz
8.6
12.1
4 7.4
1
11.2
12.6
7.9
8.8
10.0
3
Width/Depth Ratio
3.7
9.6
4 6.4
1
12.0
12.0
12.9
13.8
14.6
3
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
3.3
4 3.4
1
2.2
4.9
3.7
5.1
5.9
3
Bank Height Ratio
1.6
2.2
4 1.0
1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
13
26
2 14
26
38
2
25
50
25
38
50
Radius of Curvature (ft)
6
30
2 12
19
25
2
20
45
20
33
45
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
0.7
4.6
2 1.7
2.7
3.6
2
2.0
4.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
Meander Wavelength (ft)
75
110
2 43
73
102
2
65
125
65
95
125
Meander Width Ratio
1.4
4.0 1
2 2
3.8
5.5
2
1.9 1
3.5
1.9
3.0
3.5
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
11
22
32
21
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.007
0.043
2 0.011
0.025
2
0.007
0.012
0.001
0.013
0.026
21
Pool Length (ft)
16
23
12
30
6
18
38
23
Pool Spacing (ft)
I 1
1
28
57
20
75
30
56
79
23
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
0%/24%/76%/0%/0%/0%
0%/25%/52%/23%/0%/0%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95(mm)
1/5/7/10/17/25
5/15/22/38/94/143
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
1,330
1,305
1,305
Drainage Area (SM)
0.40
0.16
0.40
0.40
Rosgen Classification
G4
E4
C4
C4
Sinuosity
1.07-1.15
1.18
1.09-1.12
1.09-1.12
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.009-0.014
0.0070
0.007-0.010
0.007
Jacob's Landing Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 56 2016- MY03

Table 10b. T1A Baseline Stream Data Summary
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)
7.7
1
6.9
1
8.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
15
1
23
1
19
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
1
1.1
1
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1 1
1
1.6
1
1
1
1.2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area(ft)
6.4
1
7.4
1
6.2
Width/Depth Ratio
9.3
1
6.4
1
12.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.9
1
3.4
1
2.2
Bank Height Ratio
2.2
1
1.0
1
NWI
1
1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
20
75
1
14
26
38
2
19
24
Radius of Curvature (ft)
8
24
1
12
19
25
2
10
25
Rc:Bankf ill width (ft/ft)
1
3.1
1
1.7
2.7
3.6
2
1.2
2.9
Meander Wavelength (ft)
25
50
1
43
73
102
2
50
55
Meander Width Ratio
2.6
1 1 1
9.7 1
1
2
1 3.8
1 1
5.5 1
2 1
2.2
2.8
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.013
0.019
I
0.011
0.025
2
0.010 0.012
Pool Length (ft)
16
23
7
14
Pool Spacing (ft)
28
57
22
34
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC% / Sa% G% C% B% / Be%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
294
178
178
Drainage Area (SM)
0.21
0.40
0.21
0.21
Rosgen Classification
E4
134c
B4c/C4
B4c/C4
Sinuosity
2.10
1.20
1.11
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)l
0.023
0.013
0.017
Jacob's Landing Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 57 2016- MY03

Table 10c. T2 Baseline Stream Sumr
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration
Parameter
Dimension - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft
Floodprone Width (ft
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft
Bankfull Max Depth (ft
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft2
Width/Depth Rati(
Entrenchment Rati(
Bank Height Rati(
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft
Radius of Curvature (ft
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft
Meander Wavelength (ft
Meander Width Rati(
Profile
Riffle Length (ft
Riffle Slope (ft/ft
Pool Length (ft
Pool Spacing (ft
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be/
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft
Drainaae Area (SM
Rosgen C
Water Surface
DMS Project # 95024
As -built
Min
Mean
Max
n
10.4
Pre -Existing Condition
12.0
5
Reference Reach(es) Data
32
42
Design
Min
Mean Med Max
n
Min
Mean Med
Max
n
Min
Max
8.8
12.3
4
6.9
12.9
15.2
1
10.4
11.6
17
20
4
23
1.0
5
1
23
50
1.0
1.0
4
1.1
45
1
0.9
1.0
1.3
1 1.8
1 4
1.6
1 1
2.2
I 1
1.4
1.5
9.2
11.7
4
7.4
14 22 36 33
0.004
1
9.1
11.1
8.4
12.9
4
6.4
42
59
1
12.0
12.0
1.4
2.3
4
3.4
6% / 58%/ 32% / 3% / 0%
16/30/44/65/109/144
1
2.2
4.3
1.5
1 1 4.7
4
1.0
1
Moog
1
1.0
1.0
C4
1.16-1.31
10
60
2
14
26
38
2
25
50
8
35
2
12
19
25
2
20
45
0.9
3.9
2
1.7
2.7
3.6
2
2.0
4.0
65
130
2
43
73
102
2
60
130
1.1
6.8
2
2
3.8
5.5
2
2.2
4.8
6%/25%/68%/1%/0%/0%
1/2/3/6/12/24
2,935
0.31
E4, F4
1.09-1.45
0.007-0.010
0.16
E4
1.18
0.0007
0.025 2
23 2
57 2
0.006 0.017
8 35
30 95
2,641
0.31
C4
1.16-1.31
0.009-0.0100
Jacob's Landing Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 58 2016- MY03
As -built
Min
Mean
Max
n
10.4
10.9
12.0
5
27
32
42
5
0.8
0.8
0.9
5
1.2
1.3
1.4
5
8.8
9.2
9.7
5
11.8
12.9
15.2
5
2.6
3.2
4.2
5
1.0
1.0
1.0
5
25 38 50
20
33
45
2.0
3.0
4.0
60
95
130
2.2
4.0
4.8
14 22 36 33
0.004
0.016
0.041
33
7
18
35
31
42
59
107
31
0% /
6% / 58%/ 32% / 3% / 0%
16/30/44/65/109/144
2,641
0.31
C4
1.16-1.31
0.009
Jacob's Landing Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 58 2016- MY03

Table 10d. T2A Baseline Stream Data Summar
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Parameter
Pre -Existing Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As -built
Dimension - Riffle
Min
Mean Med
Max
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
n
Min
Max
Min Mean Max n
Bankfull Width (ft)
6.6
1
6.9
1
6.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
11
1
23
1
14
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
1
1.1
1
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.1
1 1
1
1.6
1
1
1
0.9
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area(ft)
3.4
1
7.4
1
3.5
Width/Depth Ratio
12.8
1
6.4
1
12.0
Entrenchment Ratio
1.7
1
3.4
1
2.2
Bank Height Ratio
6.3
1
1
1.0
1
1.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
8
15
1
14
26
382
8
15
Radius of Curvature (ft)
10
12
1
12
19
25
2
10
25
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
1.5
1.8
l
1.7
2.7
3.6
2
1.5
3.8
Meander Wavelength (ft)
50
63
1
43
73
102
2
50
63
Meander Width Ratio
1.2
2.3
1
2
3.8
5.5
2
1.2
2.3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.010
0.017
1
0.011
0.025
2
0.010 0.012
Pool Length (ft)
16
23
2
4
15
Pool Spacing (ft)
28
57
2
22
42
Substrate and Transport Parameters
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 (mm)
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel length (ft)
465
465
465
Drainage Area (SM)
0.06
0.40
0.06
0.06
Rosgen Classification
G4
B4c
B4c/C4
B4c/C4
Sinuosity
1.16
1.20
1.13
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.019
0.013
1
0.014
Jacob's Landing Site KCl Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 59 2016- MY03

Table 11. Cross -Section Morphology Data Tables
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Pi
Dimension and Substrate
Based on fixed baseline el
Bankfull Width
>odprone Width
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankf ill Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft 2)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankf ill Bank Height Ratio
d50 (mm)
Based on fixed baseline elevation
Bankfull Width
)odnrone Width
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft 2)
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
d50 (mm)
Base
10.8
40.0
0.8
1.3
8.5
13.7
3.7
1.0
2.1
Base
10.6
29.0
0.8
1.3
8.8
12.8
2.7
1.0
49
# 95024
Cross -Section 1 (T1 -Riffle)
Station 12+29
Base
MY
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
11.8
12.1 8.4
12.1
41.2
40.7 38.0 1
71.0
0.8
0.7 0.6
0.8
1.4
1.4 1.1
1.4
9.0
8.7 4.7
10.0
15.5
16.8 15.0 1
14.6
3.5
3.4 4.5
5.9
1.0
1.0 1.0 1
1.0
1.4
27 1.1 1
28
Cross -Section 6 (T2 -Riffle)
Station 56+18
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
12.5
10.5 10.2
13.3
31.9
31.0 28.4
-
0.7
0.8 0.6
1.0
1.4
1.4 1.1
1.9
8.8
7.9 6.4
13.8
18.6
13.8 16.3
-
2.5
3.0 2.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft 2)
1.0
1.0 1.0
9.7
60
45 6.9
15.2
Cross -Section 11 (T2 -Riffle)
Station 72+48
Based on fixed baseline elevation
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3 I MY4 MY5 MY+
Bankfull Width (ft)
12.0
11.7
11.5
10.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>50
>50
>50
>50
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft 2)
9.5
9.6
9.7
8.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
15.2
14.3
13.7
14.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.2
4.5
4.5
4.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
1 16
3.1
14
1.8
Cross -Section 2 (T1 -Riffle)
Station 17+79
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
24.1
12.8 11.7
15.5
70.6
72.4 70.8 1
-
0.5
0.8 0.7
12
1.4
1.5 1.3
2.8
12.5
10.3 7.7 1
18.1
46.5
15.9 17.8
-
2.9
5.7 6.1 1 1-
2.8
1.0
1.0 1.0
LO
12
11 0.78
66
Cross -Section 7 (T2 -Pool)
Station 60+09
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
13.5
14.3 12.6
10.7
-
- -
30.0
1.2
1.0 1.1
0.9
2.0
2.0 2.0
1.3
16.5
13.9 13.5
9.7
-
- -
11.8
-
- -
2.8
-
- -
LO
-
100 61
66
Cross -Section 3 (T1 -Pool)
Station 19+25
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
15.3
13.9 12.3
10.1
-
-
58.0
1.1
1.2 0.5
0.8
2.9
2.7 1.0
1.2
17.2
17.3 6.5
7.9
-
- -
12.9
-
-
5.7
-
-
1.0
40
100 61
35
Cross -Section 8 (T2 -Riffle)
Station 63+84
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY +
Base
11.4
12.5 11.0
10.8
30.0
31.1 29.5
42.0
1.0
1.0 0.9
0.9
1.8
2.0 1.7
1.2
11.8
12.8 10.4
9.2
11.0
12.2 11.6
12.7
2.6
2.5 2.7 1 1
3.9
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
40
100 61
41
Cross -Section 4 ( T1 -Riffle)
Station 21+36
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4
MY5 MY+
Base
11.9
9.2 8.9
43.1
10.4
59.8
58.8 57.3
1
27.0
0.7
0.7 0.6
1.8
0.9
1.3
1.3 1.1 1
17.8
1.3
8.6
6.3 5.1
3.9 4.1 11
9.0
16.7
13.4 15.5
1
12.0
5.0
6.4 6.4
2.6
1.0
1.0 1 1.0
1.0
44
56 1 27
47
Cross -Section 9 (T2 -Riffle)
Station 66+63
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
Base
11.8
11.1 9.8
12.5
43.1
42.7 39.9 1
-
0.7
0.7 0.6
1.2
1.3
1.2 1.0
1.8
8.0
7.6 6.3
14.5
17.8
16.2 15.2 1
-
3.6
3.9 4.1 11
1.0
1.0 1.0
37
29 44
Cross -Section 5 (T2 -Riffle)
Station 52+53
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
11.7 10.8 11.2
27.4 26.8 26.3
0.9 0.9 0.7
1.6 1.5 1.3
10.5 10.0 8.1
13.0 11.8 15.5
2.3 2.5 2.3
1.0 1.0 1 1.0
63 61 1 3.7
Cross -Section 10 (T2 -Pool)
Station 68+61
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY+
16.5 21.2 20.7
1.0 0.8 1.3
2.1 2.2 2.0
17.2 17.1 17.2
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 60 2016- MY03

Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates ofNorth Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 61 2016- MY03
Table 11b. Stream Reach Morphology Data Tables
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Reach: T1 (2,389 ft.)
Parameter
MY01 (2014)
MY02 (2015)
MY03 (2016)
MY04 (2017)
MY05 (2018)
Dimension
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.8
15.9
11.9 24.1
7.0
3
9.2
11.3
12.1 12.8
1.9
3
8.4
9.7
8.9 11.7
1.8
3
Floodprone Width (ft)
41.2
57.2
59.8 70.6
14.9
3
40.7
57.3
58.8 72.4
15.9
3
38
55
57 71
16.5
3
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
0.7
0.7 0.8
0.1
3
0.7
0.7
0.7 0.8
0.1
3
0.6
0.6
0.6 0.7
0.1
3
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.4
1.4 1.4
0.1
3
1.3
1.4
1.4 1.5
0.1
3
1.1
1.2
1.1 1.3
0.1
3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft 2)
8.6
10.0
9.0 12.5
2.1
3
6.3
8.4
8.7 10.3
2.0
3
4.7
5.8
5.1 7.7
1.6
3
Width/Depth Ratio
15.5
26.2
16.7 46.5
17.6
3
13.4
15.4
15.9 16.8
1.7
3
15.0
16.1
15.5 17.8
1.5
3
Entrenchment Ratio
2.9
3.8
3.5 5.0
1.1
3
3.4
5.1
5.7 6.4
1.6
3
4.5
5.7
6.1 6.4
1.0
3
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0
3
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0
3
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0
3
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
25.0
38.0
50.0
Radius of Curvature (ft)
20.0
33.0
45.0
Rad. of Curv.: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
2.0
3.0
4.0
Meander Wavelength (ft)
65.0
95.0
125.0
Meander Width Ratio
1.9
3.0
3.5
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
3.0
34.0
32.0 85.0
16.1
21.0
10.9
31.1
31.9 44.6
10.1
21
4.3
27.5
28.9 66.5
14.6
22
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.01
0.02
0.01 0.05
0.01
20
0.006
0.01
0.01 0.03
0.007
21
0.0002
0.01
0.01 0.04
0.009
22
Pool Length (ft)
4.0
13.0
10.0 27.0
7.4
14.0
4.0
9.7
8.7 21.5
4.4
17
5.3
11.3
11.0 22.8
5.1
18
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.9
2.9
2.9
1
2.7
2.7
2.7
1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1
Pool Spacing (ft)
41.0
1 83.0
j 62.0 1 233.0 1
60.4
1 13.0
1 36.9
1 74.5
1 56.2 1 231.1
51.6
1 16
16.1
1 71.6
67.6 1 196.6
1 45.7
j 17
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,305
1,305
1,305
Sinuosity
1.09-1.12
1.09-1.12
1.09-1.12
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0068
0.0066
0.0070
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0068
0.0064
0.0067
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
29%/22%/36%/14%/0%/0%
l l %/22%/35%/32%/0%/0%
4%/55%/29%/12%/0%/0%
d16/05/d50 / d84 / d95
7/10/14/49/88
7/11/24/104/128
1/2/8/14/46/98
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
1%
0%
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates ofNorth Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 61 2016- MY03

Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 62 2016- MY03
Table Ile. Stream Reach Morphology Data Tables
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95024
Reach: T2 (2,084 ft.)
Parameter
MY01 (2014)
MY02 (2015)
MY03 (2016)
MY04 (2017)
MY05 (2018)
Dimension
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean Med Max SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.4
11.8
11.7 12.5
0.4
5
10.5
11.3
11.1 12.5
0.8
5
9.8
10.6 10.8 11.2 0.6
5
Floodprone Width (ft)
27.4
36.9
31.9 52.3
10.5
5
26.8
36.7
31.1 51.9
10.4
5
26.3
35.1 29.5 51.2 10.4
5
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.8
0.8 1.0
0.2
5
0.7
0.8
0.8 1.0
0.1
5
0.6
0.7 0.7 0.9 0.1
5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.5
1.5 1.8
0.2
5
1.2
1.5
1.5 2.0
0.3
5
1.0
1.3 1.3 1.7 0.2
5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
8.0
9.7
9.6 11.8
1.5
5
7.6
9.6
9.7 12.8
2.1
5
6.3
7.8 8.0 10.4 1.7
5
Width/Depth Ratio
11.0
15.0
14.3 18.6
3.2
5
11.8
13.5
13.7 16.2
1.7
5
11.6
14.6 14.6 16.3 1.8
5
Entrenchment Ratio
2.3
3.1
2.6 4.5
0.9
5
2.5
3.3
3.0 4.5
0.9
5
2.3
3.3 3.3 4.7 1.0
5
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0
5
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0
5
1.0
1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
5
Pattern
Channel BeltwidthO ft
25.0
38.0
50.0
Radius of Curvature (ft)
20.0
33.0
45.0
Rad. of Curv.: Bankf ill Width (ft/ft)
2.0
3.0
4.0
Meander Wavelength (ft)
60.0
95.0
130.0
'
Meander Width Ratio
2.2
4.0
4.8
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
5.0
14.0
17.0 24.0
5.9
15
7.8
32.4
30.4 61.6
11.5
27
6.2
23.1 21.6 46.8 8.9
32
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.007
0.02
0.02 0.05
0.01
14
0.001
0.02
0.02 0.03
0.006
27
0.002
0.02 0.02 0.04 0.007
32
Pool Length (ft)
4.1
15.8
14.7 26.9
6.5
29
5
13
12 28
6
25
3.5
13.3 11.8 29.5 5.8
30
Pool MaxDepth (ft)
2.0
2.111r
2.1
2
2.0
2.1
2.2
2
2.0
2.0 2.0
2
Pool Spacing (ft)
31.8
61.8
54.4 160.9
29.0
28
42.7
69.5
59.9 173.7
34.2
24
41.9
60.1 55.9 127.6 18.5
29
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
2,641
2641
2641
Sinuosity
1.16-1.31
1.16-1.31
1.16-1.31
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0106
0.0107
0.0104
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0109
0.0106
0.0100
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
SC% / Sa% / G% / C% / B% / Be%
29%/22%/36%/14%/0%/0%
6%/10%/460/o/38%/0%/0%
7%/35%/27%/30%/0%/0%
d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95
12/21/32/46/83/127
14/26/38/105/134
0.4/6/17/45/98/140
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 62 2016- MY03

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
Jacob's Landing Site KCI Associates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 63 2016— MY03

Photo 1. Bankfull indicators T1, 12/17/2015 Photo 2. Bankfull indicators T2, 12/17/2015
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 64 2016- MY03
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Jacob's Landing Stream Restoration Site DMS Project # 95024
Date of Data
Collection
Date of
Occurrence
Method
Photo Number
4/19/2015
4/19/2015
On-site automatic gauge
N/A
10/3/2015
10/3/2015
On-site automatic gauge
N/A
11/9/2015
11/9/2015
On-site automatic gauge
N/A
Unkown
12/17/2015
Wracklines and flattened vegetation observed at bankfull
1 - 2
12/23/2015
12/23/2015
On-site automatic gauge
N/A
12/30/2015
12/30/2015
On-site automatic gauge
N/A
2/23/2016
2/23/2016
On-site automatic gauge T1 only)
N/A
5/16/2016
5/16/2016
On-site automatic gauge T1 only)
N/A
5/25/2016
5/25/2016
On-site automatic gauge T1 only)
N/A
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
On-site automatic gauge T1 only)
N/A
10/8/2016
10/8/2016
On-site automatic gauge (T1 only)
N/A
Photo 1. Bankfull indicators T1, 12/17/2015 Photo 2. Bankfull indicators T2, 12/17/2015
Jacob's Landing Site KCIAssociates of North Carolina
DMS Project # 95024 64 2016- MY03

791
0 790
0
Jacob's Landing Restoration Site
Stage Hydrograph
Stream Gauge 1
2.5
2.0
1.5
789
788
J A
N
to CA Q\ Q\ Q\ D\ Q1 D\ O� Q\ Q\ Q\ Q\ Q\ Q\ D\ aN C� Q1 Q1
Date
Rainfall Stage Bankfull
1.0
0.5
0.0

794
0 793
0
Jacob's Landing Restoration Site
Stage Hydrograph
Stream Gauge 2
2.5
2.0
1.5
792
791
J A
N
to c..n Q\ Q\ Q\ D\<71
Q1
Date
Rainfall Stage Bankfull
1.0
0.5
0.0