20120102 Ver 1_Year 3 Monitoring Report_2016_20170119

MONITORING YEAR 3
ANNUAL REPORT
Final
BYRDS CREEK MITIGATION SITE
Person County, NC
NCDEQ Contract 003987
DMS Project Number 95020
Data Collection Period: March 2016 -August 2016
Draft Submission Date: September 26, 2016
Final Submission Date: October 19, 2016
PREPARED FOR:
INC Department of Environment Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652

PREPARED BY:
W
WILDLANDS
E N G I N E E R I N G
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Raleigh, NC 27609
Jason Lorch
[e-mail]
Phone: [phone]

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Wildlands Engineering (Wildlands) completed a full delivery project for the North Carolina Division of
Mitigation Services (DMS) to restore and enhance a total of 7,328 linear feet (LF) of stream in Person
County, North Carolina. The project streams consist of Byrds Creek, a third order stream, as well as three
unnamed first and second order tributaries to Byrds Creek (South Branch, Southeast Branch, and West
Branch). The project provides 5,371 stream mitigation units (SMU's). At the downstream limits of the
project, the drainage area is 2,957 acres (4.62 square miles).
The Byrds Creek Mitigation Site, hereafter referred to as the Site, is approximately 1.8 miles south of
Hurdle Mills, NC off of Wolfe Road in southwestern Person County (Figure 1). The Site is located in the
Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998). The Site is within the South
Flat River watershed, North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) Subbasin 03-04-01 of the
Neuse River Basin and United States Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC)
03020201010020. Land use within the watershed is rural and is dominated by forestry, agriculture, and
livestock operations; with approximately 60% of the watershed used for agriculture and 40% forested.
The Site is located in an active cattle pasture surrounded by wooded lots, small agricultural operations,
and rural residential areas. Prior to construction activities, the streams on the Site were heavily
impacted by cattle, which led to stream bank erosion and instability.
The following project goals were established to address the effects from watershed and project site
stressors:
• Reduce nutrient loads within the watershed and to downstream waters;
• Stabilize eroding stream banks greatly reducing, if not eliminating, sediment loads;
• Restore riffle/pool sequencing resulting in decreased water temperatures and increased
dissolved oxygen concentrations;
• Establish in -stream structures to improve habitat diversity and trap detritus;
• Restore native vegetation and riparian buffers; and
• Protect the restored land in perpetuity through a conservation easement.
These goals were achieved by restoring 3,096 LF of perennial and intermittent stream channel and
enhancing 4,232 LF of perennial stream channel. Restoration and enhancement construction and
planting efforts were completed in December 2013. A conservation easement is in place on 24.4 acres of
riparian corridor and stream resources to protect them in perpetuity.
Monitoring Year 3 (MY -3) monitoring and site visits were completed between the months of March and
August 2016 to assess the conditions of the Site. All streams within the Site are stable and functioning as
designed. Repair work was performed on sections of Byrds Creek Reach 3 during the spring of 2016. The
Site's overall average planted stem density of 520 stems per acre is greater than the interim success
criteria of 320 stems per acre density required for MY -3. Hydrologic monitoring gages documented
bankfull events for all streams on the Site. All streams have met the Monitoring Year 5 (MY -5) hydrology
success criteria.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report — FINAL

BYRDS CREEK MITIGATION SITE
Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report
1 r_ULMOIX4161ZI 1:104 &i
Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW.......................................................................................................1-1
General Tables and Figures
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives.....................................................................................................1-1
Project Vicinity Map
1.2 Monitoring Year 3 Data Assessment..........................................................................................1-2
Project Component/Asset Map
1.2.1 Vegetative Assessment......................................................................................................1-2
Project Components and Mitigation Credits
1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern.............................................................................................1-3
Project Activity and Reporting History
1.2.3 Stream Assessment............................................................................................................1-3
Project Contacts Table
1.2.4 Stream Areas of Concern...................................................................................................1-3
Project Information and Attributes
1.2.5 Hydrology Assessment.......................................................................................................1-4
Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
1.2.6 Maintenance Plan..............................................................................................................1-4
Longitudinal Profile Plots
1.3 Monitoring Year 3 Summary......................................................................................................1-4
Cross Section Plots
Section 2: METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................2-1
Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Section 3: REFERENCES...................................................................................................................3-1
Hydrology Summary Data
APPENDICES
Appendix 1
General Tables and Figures
Figure 1
Project Vicinity Map
Figure 2
Project Component/Asset Map
Table 1
Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2
Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3
Project Contacts Table
Table 4
Project Information and Attributes
Appendix 2 Visual Assessment Data
Figure 3 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5a -i Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Stream Photographs
Vegetation Photographs
Appendix 3
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7
Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8
CVS Vegetation Table — Metadata
Table 9
Planted and Total Stem Counts
Appendix 4
Morphological Summary Data and Plots
Table 10a -c
Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 11
Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters — Cross Section)
Table 12a -f
Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Cross Section Plots
Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Appendix 5
Hydrology Summary Data
Table 13
Verification of Bankfull Events
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report — FINAL ii

Section 1: PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Byrds Creek Mitigation Site, hereafter referred to as the Site, is located in southwestern Person
County within the Neuse River Basin (USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020201). The project site is located south
of Hurdle Mills off of Wolfe Road. The Site is located in the Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont
Physiographic Province (USGS, 1998). The Multi -Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium (MRLC,
2001) classified approximately 57% of the land in the project watershed as managed herbaceous cover
or agricultural, 42% is classified as forested/scrubland, and the remaining 1% is open water. The
drainage area for the Byrds Creek Site is 2,957 acres (4.62 square miles).
The project stream reaches consist of Byrds Creek reach 2 (BC2), Byrds Creek reach 3 (130), South
branch (SB1), Southeast branch reach 1 (SE1), and Southeast branch reach 2 (SE2) which are stream
restoration and/or enhancement level I approach and Byrds Creek reach 1 (BC1), Byrds Creek reach 4
(BC4), and West branch (W131) which are enhancement level II approach. Mitigation work within the Site
included restoring and enhancing 7,328 linear feet of perennial and intermittent stream channel. The
stream areas were also planted with native vegetation to improve habitat and protect water quality. The
project provides 5,371 stream mitigation units (SMU's). The final mitigation plan was submitted and
accepted by DMS in January of 2013. Construction activities were completed by North State
Environmental in September 2013. Planting and seeding activities were completed by Bruton Natural
Systems, Inc. in December 2013. Baseline monitoring (MY -0) was conducted between October 2013 and
January of 2014. Annual monitoring will be conducted for five years with the close-out anticipated to
commence in 2019 given the success criteria are met. Appendix 1 provides more detailed project
activity, history, contact information, and watershed/site background information for this project. Three
separate conservation easements have been recorded and are in place along the riparian corridors and
stream resources to protect them in perpetuity. Directions and a map of the Site are provided in Figure
1 and project components are illustrated for the Site in Figure 2.
1.1 Project Goals and Objectives
Prior to construction activities, the streams on the Byrds Creek Site were heavily impacted by cattle,
which led to stream bank erosion and instability. Related degradation included declining aquatic habitat,
loss of forest, degraded riparian buffers, and water quality problems related to increased sediment and
nutrient loadings. Tables 10a, 10b, and 10c in Appendix 4 present the pre -restoration conditions in
detail.
The Site was designed to meet the over -arching goals as described in the mitigation plan (Wildlands,
2013). The project is intended to provide numerous ecological benefits within the Neuse River Basin.
While many of these benefits are limited to the Site, others, such as pollutant removal and improved
aquatic and terrestrial habitat, have more far-reaching effects. The following project specific goals
established in the mitigation plan include:
• Reduce nutrient loads within the watershed and to downstream waters;
• Stabilize eroding stream banks greatly reducing sediment loads;
• Restore riffle/pool sequencing resulting in decreased water temperatures and increased
dissolved oxygen concentrations;
• Establish in -stream structures to improve habitat diversity and trap detritus;
• Restore native vegetation and riparian buffers; and
• Protect the restored land in perpetuity through a conservation easement.
The design features of this project were developed to achieve multiple project objectives. The stream
restoration elements were designed to frequently flood the reconnected floodplain. This design
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report — FINAL 1-1

approach provides more frequent dissipation of energy from higher flows (bankfull and above) to
improve channel stability; provide water quality treatment through detention, settling, and biological
removal of pollutants; and restore a more natural hydrologic regime. The project objectives defined in
the mitigation plan (Wildlands, 2013) are as follows:
• On-site nutrient inputs will be decreased by removing cattle from streams and filtering on-site
runoff through buffer zones. Off-site nutrient input will be absorbed on-site by filtering flood
flows through restored floodplain areas, where flood flow will spread through native vegetation.
Vegetation is expected to uptake excess nutrients.
• Stream bank erosion which contributes sediment load to the creek will be greatly reduced in the
project area. Eroding stream banks will be stabilized using bioengineering, natural channel
design techniques, and grading to reduce bank angles and bank height. Storm flow containing
grit and fine sediment will be filtered through restored floodplain areas, where flow will spread
through native vegetation. Spreading flood flows will also reduce velocity and allow sediment to
settle out. Sediment transport capacity of restored reaches will be improved so that capacity
balances more closely to load. Sediment load reduction will be monitored through assessing
bank stability with cross section and profile surveys and visual assessment through photo
documentation which serves as an accepted surrogate for direct turbidity measurements.
• Restored riffle/pool sequences will promote aeration of water and create deep water zones,
helping to lower water temperature. Establishment and maintenance of riparian buffers will
create long-term shading of the channel flow to minimize thermal heating. Lower water
temperatures will help maintain dissolved oxygen concentrations.
• In -stream structures will be constructed to improve habitat diversity and trap detritus. Wood
habitat structures will be included in the stream as part of the restoration design. Such
structures may include log drops and rock structures that incorporate woody debris.
• Adjacent buffer and riparian habitats will be restored with native vegetation as part of the
project. Native vegetation will provide cover and food for terrestrial creatures. Native plant
species will be planted and invasive species will be treated. Eroding and unstable areas will also
be stabilized with vegetation as part of this project.
• The restored land will be protected in perpetuity through a conservation easement.
The design streams were restored to the appropriate type based on the surrounding landscape, climate,
and natural vegetation communities but also with strong consideration to existing watershed conditions
and trajectory. The designs were developed to correct incision and lack of pattern caused by
channelization, bank instability caused by erosion and livestock access, lack of vegetation in riparian
zones, and lack of riparian and aquatic habitat.
1.2 Monitoring Year 3 Data Assessment
Annual monitoring and quarterly site visits were conducted during MY -3 to assess the condition of the
project. The stream success criteria for the Site follows the approved success criteria presented in the
Byrds Creek Mitigation Plan (Wildlands, 2013).
1.2.1 Vegetative Assessment
A total of 14 vegetation plots were established within the project easement area during the baseline
monitoring. The majority of the plots were established as standard 10 meter by 10 meter plot with one
plot established as a 5 meter by 20 meter plot. The final vegetative success criteria will be the survival of
260 planted stems per acre in the riparian corridor along restored and enhanced reaches at the end of
year five of the monitoring period. The interim measure of vegetative success for the Site will be the
survival of at least 320 planted stems per acre at the end of MY -3.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report — FINAL 1-2

The MY -3 vegetative survey was completed in June 2016. The 2016 annual vegetation monitoring
resulted in an average planted stem density of 520 stems per acre, which is greater than the interim
requirement of 320 stems per acre. Twelve of 14 vegetation plots met success criteria during MY -3.
However, when volunteers are included in the total stem count, all 14 plots met interim success criteria.
The MY -3 planted stem density is approximately 30% less than the baseline density recorded (734 stems
per acre) in January 2014. There is an average of 12 stems per plot and all plots are on track to meet the
success criteria required for MY -5 (Table 9, Appendix 3). Refer to Appendix 2 for vegetation plot
photographs and the vegetation condition assessment table and Appendix 3 for vegetation data tables.
1.2.2 Vegetation Areas of Concern
Vegetation plots 3 and 7 did not meet the interim success criteria in MY -3 for planted stems but did
meet when volunteer stems were included. Plot 3 had a planted stem density of 283 stems per acre,
however when counting volunteers, it increases to 405 stems per acre. Plot 7 had a planted stem
density of 283 stems per acre, when counting volunteers, it increases to 364 stems per acre. Both plots
met the MY -3 interim success criteria when counting volunteers. No corrective action is needed at this
time, but these areas will continue to be monitored.
1.2.3 Stream Assessment
Morphological surveys for MY -3 were conducted in March 2016. All streams within the Site are stable
with little to no erosion and have met the success criteria for MY -3. Refer to Appendix 2 for the visual
assessment table, integrated current condition plan view (CCPV) map (Figure 3), and reference
photographs. Refer to Appendix 4 for the morphological data and plots.
While there have been some minor post -construction adjustments within the restored channels; the
cross sections show little to no change in the bankfull area, maximum depth ratio, or width -to -depth
ratio. Surveyed riffle cross sections fell within the parameters defined for channels of the appropriate
Rosgen stream type. The surveyed longitudinal profile data for BC2, BC3, SBI, SE1, SE2a and SE2b
illustrates that the bedform features are maintaining lateral and vertical stability. The riffles are
remaining steeper and shallower than the pools, while the pools are remaining deeper than the riffles
and maintaining flat water surface slopes. The longitudinal profiles show that the bank height ratios
remain very near to 1.0 for the restoration reaches.
Bank scour was observed along portions of Byrds Creek Reach 3 below the culvert crossing at the end of
MY -1 and MY -2. These areas were repaired at the beginning of MY -3 following the cross-sectional
survey. Cross sections seven and eight show some minor bank scour that has occurred on Byrds Creek
Reach 3. Scour in the cross sections has stabilized between MY -2 and MY -3. The cross-sectional areas
and bankfull widths on cross sections seven and eight still fall within the appropriate Rosgen stream
type parameters. These areas will be monitored for any active scour during subsequent monitoring
years.
Pattern data will be collected in MY -5 only if there are indicators from the profile or dimensions that
significant geomorphic adjustments have occurred. No changes were observed during MY -3 that
indicate a change in the radius of curvature or channel belt width.
1.2.4 Stream Areas of Concern
During March of MY -3, existing areas of localized instability were repaired along Byrds Creek between
stations 35+00 and 48+00. Banks were reconstructed with geolifts and live whips to minimize the effects
of bank stress during high flow events. Additionally, permanent seed, live stakes and herbaceous plugs
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report — FINAL 1-3

were installed following the repair activities. These areas appear to be stable with strong support from
vegetation. Wildlands will continue to monitor these areas and take corrective action as needed.
Beaver activity was observed in June of MY -3 on Reach 3 of Byrds Creek and Reach 2b of Southeast
Branch. Following dam observation, five small dams were removed in June. The dams caused hydrologic
change but did not cause any structural, bed, or bank problems on the Site. An USDA wildlife
management specialist was hired to trap beavers and remove dams as they are rebuilt. Beaver presence
will continue to be monitored in subsequent years.
1.2.5 Hydrology Assessment
At the end of the five year monitoring period, two or more bankfull events must have occurred in
separate years within the restoration reaches. Bankfull events were recorded on all three gaged streams
during the MY -3 data collection. Byrds Creek and South Branch have each had bankfull events during
MY -1, MY -2, and MY -3. Therefore, they have met the hydrology success criteria for the Site. Southeast
Branch recorded bankfull events during MY -2 and MY -3, also meeting hydrology success criteria. Refer
to Appendix 5 for hydrologic data.
1.2.6 Maintenance Plan
No maintenance is required at this time.
1.3 Monitoring Year 3 Summary
All streams within the Site are stable and functioning as designed. The average planted stem density for
the Site is 520 stems per acre and is on track to meeting the MY -5 success criteria. Bankfull events were
documented with the gages located on all three streams during MY -3. The MY -5 stream hydrology
success criteria has been met on Byrds Creek, South Branch, and Southeast Branch. Beaver activity has
been observed but no issues were documented as a result during MY -3.
Summary information and data related to the performance of the project and monitoring elements can
be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Mitigation Plan documents available on
DMS's website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from DMS
upon request.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report — FINAL 1-4

Section 2: METHODOLOGY
Geomorphic data was collected following the standards outlined in The Stream Channel Reference Site:
An Illustrated Guide to Field Techniques (Harrelson et al., 1994) and in the Stream Restoration: A Natural
Channel Design Handbook (Doll et al., 2003). Longitudinal and cross sectional data were collected using
a total station and were georeferenced. All CCPV mapping was recorded using a Trimble handheld GPS
with sub -meter accuracy and processed using Pathfinder and ArcView. Crest gages were installed in
surveyed riffle cross sections and monitored quarterly. Hydrology attainment installation and
monitoring methods are in accordance with the USACE (2003) standards. Vegetation monitoring
protocols followed the Carolina Vegetation Survey -DMS Level 2 Protocol (Lee et al., 2008). Reporting
follows the DMS Monitoring Report Template and Guidance Version 1.3 (DMS, 2010).
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report — FINAL 2-1

Section 3: REFERENCES
Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.A., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. 2003. Stream
Restoration A Natural Channel Design Handbook.
Harrelson, C.C., Rawlins, C.L., Potyondy, J.P. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated Guide
to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 61 p.
Lee, M.T., Peet, R.K., S.D., Wentworth, T.R. 2008. CVS -DMS Protocol for Recording Vegetation Version
4.2. Retrieved from http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/protocol/cvs-eep-protocol-v4.2-lev1-5.Pdf.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). 2010. Monitoring Report Template and Guidance.
Version 1.3. Raleigh, NC.
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169-199.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Pagosa Springs, CO: Wildland Hydrology Books.
Rosgen, D.L. 1997. A Geomorphological Approach to Restoration of Incised Rivers. Proceedings of the
Conference on Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision. Center For
Computational Hydroscience and Bioengineering, Oxford Campus, University of Mississippi, Pages
12-22.
United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. USACE, NCDEQ-
DWR, USEPA, NCWRC.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 1998. North Carolina Geology.
http://www.geology.enr.state.nc.us/usgs/carolina.htm.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2013. Byrds Creek Mitigation Site Mitigation Plan. DMS, Raleigh, NC.
Wildlands Engineering, Inc. 2014. Byrds Creek Mitigation Site Baseline Monitoring Document and As -
Built Baseline Report. DMS, Raleigh, NC.
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Monitoring Year 3 Annual Report — FINAL 3-1

APPENDIX 1. General Tables and Figures

Acs
I �
�r
0
t
q f
03010`104061030
i
41 JRd�d l r'�'r
Directions:
The Site is located in southwestern Person County,
southwest of Roxboro. From Roxboro take
Route 157 south 9.8 miles. Turn right on Charlie
Monk Road. Travel 1.0 miles and turn left on Wolfe
Road. Travel 0.4 miles to the end of Wolfe Road.
The project site is located south and east of the end of
Wolfe Road and is bound by Route 157 to the west
and Walnut Grove Church Road to the east.
The site is within the Neuse River Basin
(HUC 03020201).
03010104062020
■ l d4 '
+� Roxboro
S 1
WILDLANDS
ENGINEERING, rk�
I /-/lig/
)104061
0301010406107`
t?jv-Qpl'�j s.
010010
�4
Il* _-
Timberlake
VJVLV IV IVULV ■
{ s}
d
03020 01010030
s �
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site of the
NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) and is
encompassed by a recorded conservation easement,
but is bordered by land under private ownership. Accessing the
site may require traversing areas near or along the easement
boundary and therefore access by the general public is not
permitted. Access by authorized personnel of state and
federal agencies or their designees/contractors involved in
the development, oversight,and stewardship of the restoration
site is permitted within the terms and time frames of their defined
roles. Any intended site visitation or activity by any person
outside of these previously sanctioned roles and activites
requires prior coordination with DMS.
Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
0 1 2 Miles DMS Project No. 95020
1 I I I I Monitoring Year 3- 2016
Person County, NC

— Stream Restoration
Stream Enhancement I
Stream Enhancement 11
Easement Area
'
fit
4.
10 1
Ilk
j
slow
• 1
1
1 •
Culverted Stream Crossing •
i
i.• ♦�414- i • r.
♦ Y
Culverted Stream Crossing
IP
L • i 1
.., � Culverted Stream Crossing
L A l � 1. 1 .l �.
WILDLA NDS
ENGINEERING
J
'r
Figure 2 Project Component/ Asset Map
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
250 500 Feet DMS Project No. 95020
1 I I I I Monitoring Year 3- 2016
Person County, NC

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Mitigation
Credits =
� -9
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -Riparian Wetland
Buffer Nitrogen
Nutrient Offset
Phosphorous
Nutrient Offset
Type
R
RE
R
RE
R RE
Totals
5,371
0
N/A
N/A
N/A N/A
N/A N/A
N/A
Reach ID
As -Built
Stationing /
Location (LF)
Existing Footage
LF Acreage Ac
(LIF)/ g ( )
Approach
Restoration or Restoration
Equivalent
q
Restoration Footage (LF) /
Acreage Ac
g ( )
Mitigation
Ratio
Credits (SMU/
WMU )
Streams
BC1
10+00-16+43
643
N/A
Enhancement Level II
643
2.5:1
257
BC2
16+43-32+89
1,630
N/A
Enhancement Level
1,646
1.5:1
1,097
BC3
32+89-34+05
34+64-47+55
1,368
Priority 1
Restoration
1,407
1:1
1,407
BC4
47+55-55+51
796
N/A
Enhancement Level II
796
2.5:1
318
SB1
60+00-66+48
67+08-70+69
976
Priority 1
Restoration
1,009
1:1
1,009
SEI
80+00-84+85
916
Priority 1
Restoration
485
1:1
485
SE2a
85+88-91+24
524
N/A
Enhancement Level
536
1.5:1
357
SE2b
91+24-93+19
50
Priority 1
Restoration
195
1:1
195
WB1
100+00-106+11
611
N/A
Enhancement Level 11
611
2.5:1
244
Restoration Level
Stream
(linear feet)
Component Summation
Riparian Wetland Non -Riparian Wetland Buffer (square
(acres) (acres) feet)
M
Upland
(acres)
Restoration
NEENEENNEEM
3,096
Riverine
-
Non-Riverine
- -
-
-
Enhancement
-
- -
-
-
Enhancementl
Enhancement 11
Creation
;82
;;2,050
Preservation
-
- -
-
High Quality Preservation

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.95020
Monitoring Year 3- 2016
Activity or Report
Date Collection
Complete
Completion
or Scheduled Delivery
Mitigation Plan
January 2013
January 2013
Final Design - Construction Plans
June 2013
June 2013
Construction September 2013
September 2013
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project areal September 2013
September 2013
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments September 2013
September 2013
Bare root and live stake plantings for reach/segments December 2013
December 2013
Baseline Monitoring Document (Year 0)
October 2013
January 2014
Year 1 Monitoring September 2014
December 2014
Year 2 Monitoring
October 2015
December 2015
Year 3 Monitoring
August 2016
December 2016
Year 4 Monitoring
2017
December 2017
Year 5 Monitoring
2018
December 2018
'Seed and mulch is added as each section of construction is completed.
Table 3. Project Contact Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Designer
312 West Millbrook Road, Suite 225
Jeff Keaton, PE
Raleigh, NC 27609
919.851.9986
North State Environmental
Construction Contractor
2889 Lowery Street
Winston Salem, NC 27101
Bruton Natural Systems, Inc
Planting Contractor
P.O. Box 1197
Fremont, NC 27830
North State Environmental
Seeding Contractor
2889 Lowery Street
Winston Salem, NC 27101
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource, LLC
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Bare Roots
ArborGlen, Inc
Live Stakes
Foggy Mountain Nursery
Monitoring Performers
Wildlands Engineering, Inc.
Stream and Vegetation Monitoring, POC
Jason Lorch
919.851.9986, ext. 107

Table 4. Project Information and Attributes
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No.95020
Monitoring Year 3 -2016
Project Name
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
County
Person County
Project Area (acres)
24.4
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
36. 14.744' N, 79. 79. 2.636' W
Physiographic Province
Carolina Slate Belt of the Piedmont Physiographic Province
River Basin
Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
03020201
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
03020201010020
DWQ Sub -basin
03-04-01
Project Drainiage Area (acres)
2,957 ac
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area
<1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
57% managed herbaceous cover/agricultural, 42%forested/scrubland, 1% open water
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
BC1 BC2
BO BC4 SRI SEI
SE2a
SE2b
WB1
Length of reach (linear feet) - Post -Restoration
643 1,646
1,407 796 1,009 485
536
195
611
Drainage area (acres)
2,635 2,637
2,703 2,957 164 56
62
62
255
NCDWQ stream identification score
51.75 25.75
46.25
46.75
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
WS -III, NSW
Morphological Desription (stream type)
P
P
P
P
I
P
P
P
P
Evolutionary trend (Simon's Model) - Pre- Restoration
IV/v
IV
IV/v
IV
III
IV/v
III/IV
III/IV
IV/v
Underlying mapped soils
Chewada / Georgeville Loam
Drainage class
--- ---
--- ---
Soil Hydric status
--- ---
--- ------ ---
---
---
---
--
---
FEMA classification
--- ---
--- --- ---
Native vegetation community
Piedmont bottomland forest
Percent composition exotic invasive vegetation -Post-
Restoration
0.8%
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable? Resolved?
Supporting Documentation
Waters of the United States - Section 404
Waters of the United States - Section 401
X X
X X
USACE Nationwide Permit No.27 and DWQ401 Water Quality Certification No. 3885
Division of Land Quality (Dam Safety)
N/A N/A
N/A
Endangered Species Act
X X
Byrds Creek Mitigation Plan; no critical habitat for listed species exists within the project area (Pedestrian Survey)
Historic Preservation Act
X X
No historic resources were found to be impacted (letter from SHPO)
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA)
N/A N/A
N/A
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
N/A N/A
N/A
Essential Fisheries Habitat
N/A N/A
N/A

APPENDIX 2. Visual Assessment Data

Figure 3 Integrated Current Condition Plan View
W I L D L A N D Byrds Creek Stream Restoration Site
0 125 250 375 500 Feet DMS Project No. 95020
EF+1GlNEERING I I I I I 1
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
rk 1� Person County, NC

Table Sa. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Byrds Creek Reach 1 (643 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Bed
Condition
n/a
Length Appropriate
n/a
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
n/a
n/a
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
n/a
n/a
n/a
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table Sb. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Byrds Creek Reach 2 (1,646 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
10
10
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
9
9
100%
1. Bed
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
9
9
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
9
9
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
9
9
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
2
2
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
1
1
100%
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
1
1
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
2
2
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
1
1
100%
baseflow

Table 5c. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Byrds Creek Reach 3 (1,407 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
11
11
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
11
11
100%
1. Bed
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
11
11
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
11
11
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
11
11
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
5
5
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
3
3
100%
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
3
3
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
3
3
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
1
1
100%
baseflow

Table Sd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Byrds Creek Reach 4 (796 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of %Stable
Unstable Performing,as
Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0
0 100%
Degradation
0
0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Bed
Condition
n/a
Length Appropriate
n/a
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
n/a
n/a
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
Structures
sills or arms
n/a
n/a
n/a
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table 5e. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
South Branch Reach 1 (1,009 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
17 17
100%
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
14 14
1. Bed
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
14 14
tion.—I
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
14 14
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
14 14
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
Structures
sills or arms
n/a
n/a
n/a
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth>_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table Sf. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Southeast Reach 1 (485 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
12
12
n/a
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
7
7
1. Bed
Condition
n/a
Length Appropriate
7
7
n/a
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
7
7
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
7
7
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
11
11
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
11
11
100%
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
11
11
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
11
11
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table Sg. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Southeast Reach 2a (536 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of %Stable,
Unstable Unstable Performing as
Segments Footage Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0 100%
Degradation
0 0 100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
12
12
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
8
8
100%
1. Bed
Condition
100%
Length Appropriate
8
8
100%
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
8
8
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
8
8
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
9
9
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
6
6
100%
3. Engineered
2a. PipingStructures
lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
6
6
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
9
9
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
—Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
3
3
100%
baseflow

Table Sh. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Southeast Reach 2b (195 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Numberwith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footagewith
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0
100%
Degradation
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
4
4
100%
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
3
3
100%
1. Bed
Condition
Length Appropriate
3
3
100%
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
3
3
100%
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
3
3
100%
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
Banks undercut/overhanging to the
2. Bank
extent that mass wasting appears likely.
2. Undercut
Does NOT include undercuts that are
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
modest, appear sustainable and are
providing habitat
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
3
3
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
3
3
100%
3. Engineered
2a. PipingStructures
lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
3
3
100%
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
3
3
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table Si. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
West Branch Reach 1 (611 LF)
Major Channel
Category
Channel Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Total Number
in As -Built
Number of Amount of
Unstable Unstable
Segments Footage
%Stable,
Performing as
Intended
Number with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjust %for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Vertical Stability
Aggradation
0 0
100%
Degradation
0 0
100%
(Riffle and Run units)
2. Riffle Condition
Texture/Substrate
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Meander Pool
Depth Sufficient
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Bed
Condition
Length Appropriate
n/a
n/a
n/a
4. Thalweg Position
Thalweg centering at upstream of
meander bend (Run)
n/a
n/a
n/a
Thalweg centering at downstream of
meander bend (Glide)
n/a
n/a
n/a
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
1. Scoured/Eroded
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting
2. Undercut
simply from poor growth and/or scour
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
and erosion
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, caving, or collapse
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
TOTALS
0
0
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no
dislodged boulders or logs
n/a
n/a
n/a
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting
maintenance of grade across the sill
n/a
n/a
n/a
3. Engineered
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow
underneath sills or arms
n/a
n/a
n/a
Structures
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures
extent of influence does not exceed 15%
n/a
n/a
n/a
Pool forming structures maintaining
4. Habitat
Max Pool Depth : Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6
Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
n/a
n/a
n/a
baseflow

Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment Table
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Planted Acreage 38
Easement Acreage 38
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping
Number
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
%of
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none 0 0 0%
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Threshold
of
Planted
Acreage
(Ac)
Polygons
Acreage
Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material
0.1
0
0
0.0%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3, 4, or 5 stem count
Low Stem Density Areas
0.1
0
0.0
0.0%
criteria.
Total
0
0.0
0.0%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small given the monitoring
Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
0.25 Ac
0
0
0.0%
year.
Cumulative Total
0
0.0
0%
Easement Acreage 38
Vegetation Category
Definitions
Mapping Number %of
Combined
Threshold of Planted
Acreage
(SF) Polygons Acreage
Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
1,000 0 0 0.0%
Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas of points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
none 0 0 0%

Stream Photographs

PHOTO POINT 1— looking upstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 1— looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 2 — looking upstream (03/03/2016) 1 PHOTO POINT 2 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 3 — looking upstream (03/03/2016) 1 PHOTO POINT 3 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)

PHOTO POINT 4 — looking upstream (03/03/2016) 1 PHOTO POINT 4 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 5 — looking upstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINTS— looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 6 — looking upstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 6 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)

PHOTO POINT 7 — looking upstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 7 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 8 — looking upstream (03/03/2016) 1 PHOTO POINT 8 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 9 — looking upstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 9 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)

PHOTO POINT 10 — looking upstream (03/03/2016) 1 PHOTO POINT 10 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 11— looking upstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 11— looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 12 — looking upstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 12 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)

PHOTO POINT 13 — looking upstream (03/03/2016) 1 PHOTO POINT 13 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 14— looking upstream (03/03/2016) 1 PHOTO POINT 14— looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 15 — looking upstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 15 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)

PHOTO POINT 16 — looking upstream (03/03/2016) 1 PHOTO POINT 16 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 19 — looking upstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 19 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 20 — looking upstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 20 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)

PHOTO POINT 21— looking upstream (03/03/2016) 1 PHOTO POINT 21— looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 22 —looking upstream (03/03/2016) 1 PHOTO POINT 22 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 23 — looking upstream (03/03/2016) 1 PHOTO POINT 23 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)

PHOTO POINT 24 — looking upstream (03/03/2016) 1 PHOTO POINT 24 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 25 — looking upstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 25 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)
I i14
PHOTO POINT 26 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)

PHOTO POINT 27 — looking upstream (03/03/2016) 1 PHOTO POINT 27 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 28 — looking upstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 28 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 29 — looking upstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 29 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)

PHOTO POINT 30 — looking upstream (03/03/2016) 1 PHOTO POINT 30 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 31— looking upstream (03/03/2016) 1 PHOTO POINT 31— looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 32 — looking upstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 32 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)

PHOTO POINT 33 — looking upstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 33 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 34 — looking upstream (03/03/2016) PHOTO POINT 34 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)
PHOTO POINT 35 — looking upstream (03/03/2016) PHOTO POINT 35 — looking downstream (03/03/2016)

Vegetation Photographs

^. �
�_
'a
�,�'� t
h '.
I','�
s� aa, .d.'.���' � i; .': tae i�5z - '_
_,�
��
'�A
��
�r
�+
�
Yo
_,�
Yo
`,,
,. `a.
s
,` .
�^
_
}
�t
�
_,�
��:
�Y�.c.
��
}
_ � -
'.
� I _
iy

VEG PLOT 7 (06/13/2016) 1 VEG PLOT 8 (06/13/2016)
VEG PLOT 9 (06/13/2016) 1 VEG PLOT 10 (06/13/2016)
VEG PLOT 11 (06/13/2016)
VEG PLOT 12 (06/13/2016)

APPENDIX 3. Vegetation Plot Data

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Plot
MY3 Success Criteria
Met (Y/N)
Tract Mean
1
Y
86%
2
Y
3
N
4
Y
5
Y
6
Y
7
N
8
Y
9
Y
10
Y
11
Y
12
Y
13
Y
14
Y
* When counting volunteers all vegetation plots met MY3 criteria.

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Table - Metadata
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Database name
Byrds Creek MY3 cvs-eep-entrytool-v2.3.1.mdb
Database location
F:\Projects\005-02128 Byrds Creek\Monitoring\Year 3\Vegetation Assessment
Computer name
KENTON
File size
55648256
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
1A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code
95020
project Name
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
Description
Stream Mitigation Site
River Basin
Neuse
Sampled Plots
14

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY3 2016)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95020-01-0001
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0002
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0003
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0004
Pnol-S P -all T
1 95020-01-0005
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0006
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
1
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1
1
1
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
3
3
3
7
7
10
5
5
5
13
13
13
1
1
1
4
4
4
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
2
20
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
2
4
4
19
3
3
3
1
1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
6
4
4
4
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
Inorthern red oak
I Tree
1 1
1 1
1
1 1
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1
Stem count
11 1
11
11
1S
15
33
7
7
10
14 1
14
34
13
13
13
15
1S
15
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count
7
7
7
6
6
6
3
3
5
2
2
3
6
6
6
8
8
8
Stems per ACRE 445.2
445.2
445.21
607
607
1 1335
283.3
1 283.3
404.7
566.6
566.6
1376
S26.11
S26.11
526.1
607 1
607 1
607
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY3 2016)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95020-01-0007
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0008
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0009
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0010 1
Pnol-S P -all T
95020-01-0011
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0012
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
1
2
1
1
1
5
5
5
12
12
12
5
5
5
2
2
2
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
2
2
3
1
1
1
4
4
4
2
2
2
1
1
5
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Quercus rubra
Inorthern red oak
I Tree
1
1
2 1
2
1 2
1 1
1 1
1
1 1
1 1
1
1 1
Stem count
7 1
7
9
12 1
12
12
14
14
14
18 1
18
18
13
13
17
12
12
12
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count
6
6
6
8
8
8
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
7
7
7
Stems per ACRE 283.3
283.31
364.2
485.6 1
485.61
485.6
566.6
1 566.61
566.6
728.4
728.4
728.4
526.11
526.11
688
485.61
485.61
485.6
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems
Current Plot Data (MY3 2016)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
95020-01-0013
PnoLS P -all T
95020-01-0014
PnoLS P -all T
MY3 (2016)
PnoLS P -all T
MY2 (2015)
PnoLS P -all T
MY1 (2014)
PnoLS P -all T
MYO (2014)
Pri P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
3
4
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
4
4
4
2
2
2
18
18
18
24
24
24
29
29
29
41
41
41
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
12
12
12
Cephalanthus occidentalis
common buttonbush
Shrub
11
Cercis canadensis
eastern redbud
Tree
7
7 1
7
8 1
8
8
8 1
8
8
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
4
1 4
4
6
6
6
69
69
73
75
75
83
73
73
73
72
72
72
Liquidambar styraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
22
102
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
1
2
2
20
23
23
63
25
25
81
40
40
40
49
49
49
Platanus occidentalis
lAmerican sycamore
I Tree
4
4
4
27
27
27
30
30
70
31
31
31
32
32
1 32
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
11
11
11
11
11
11
13
13
13
19
19
19
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
3
3
3
1 1
1 1
1
17 1
17 1
17
22 1
22
1 26
20 1
20
1 20
13
13
13
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
1
1
7
7
7
8
8
14
9
9
9
16
16
16
Stem count
17
17
17
12
12
33
180
180
250
204
204
431
226
226
226
254
254
254
size (ares)
1
1
14
14
14
114
size (ACRES)
0.02
1
0.02
0.35
0.35
0.35
1
0.35
Species count
6
1 6 1
6
1 5
5
6
1 9
9
11
9
9
11
9
9
9 1
8
8
1 8
Stems per ACRE
688
1 688 1
688
1485.6
485.6 1
1335
1520.3 1520.31722.71589.7
1589.7
1 1246
653.3 1
653.31
653.31734
7
734.21
734.2
Color Coding for Table
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Volunteer species included in total
PnoLS: Number of Planted stems excluding live stakes
P -all: Number of planted stems including live stakes,
T: Total Stems

APPENDIX 4. Morphological Summary Data and Plots

Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Byrds Creek
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
'Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project -specific drainage area -discharge curve.
3Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length/channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.
ConditionData
DesignM
As-Built/BaselAne
Parameter
Gage
Creek
Reach 2
Byrds Creek
Reach 3
Spencer Creek1
Downstream
UT Cane Creek
UT Richland Creek
Upstream
z
UT Rocky Branch
Byrds Creek
Reach 2
Byrds Creek
Reach 3
Byrds Creek
Reach 2
Byrds Creek
Reach 3
Min Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max Min
Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
N/A
19.0 26.1
27.4 35.9
10.7
11.2
11.5
12.3
8.8
10.4
12.2 33.2
38.3
25.0
28.9 42.7
20.4 36.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
145 231 116 124 60.0 114+ 31.0 27.6 31.4 72.0 156 160 95 350 150+ 150+
150+ 150+
Bankfull Mean Depth
2.2 3.4 1.9 2.3 1.6 1.8 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.3 1.6 1.9 1.8 1.6 2.1
1.0 1.4
Bankfull Max Depth
3.8 4.4 2.6 3.4 2.1 2.6 1.2 1.6 1.1 1.3 1.8 2.8 3.2 2.8 2.9 3.4
2.1 3.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz
58.4 64.5 62.5 66.7 17.8 19.7 8.9 12.2 7.8 8.5 16.3 59.8 61.5 45.3 56.2 88.7
28.8 37.4
Width/Depth Ratio
5.6 11.7 9.3 19.3 5.8 7.1 12.3 14.4 10.0 12.8 9.1 18.0 24.5 13.8 14.8 22.2
14.5 36.5
Entrenchment Ratio
5.5 12.1 3.2 5.5 5.5 10.2 >2.5 2.5 4.0 6.0 4.1 4.8 3.8 1 14.0 3.5+ 5.2+
4.7+ 7.4+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0 --- 1.4 2.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
D50 (mm)
0.41
22.6
12.5 26.4
29.3 45.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
13 59
12 57
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0074
0.018811 0.0704
0.0210 0.0450
0.0606 0.0892 0.0029
0.0052
0.0076 0.0134
0.0036 0.0097
0.0022 0.0190
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
34 179
46 129
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
---
=0.00430.0133
---
---
---
---
---
1.21 2.58
0.97 2.43
PoolSpacing(ft)
Pool Volume (ft),
Pattern
54
27
73
N/A
26 81 102
1 211
60 141
84 278
73 129
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A
N/A
38
41
102
N/A
N/A
---
52 116
26 57
31 62
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A
N/A
11
15
23
38
N/A
N/A
---
50 80
19 79
44 84
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
---
1.0
1.3
2.0
3.1
N/A
N/A
2.0 3.2
0.7 1.9
2.2 2.3
Meander Length (ft)
N/A
N/A
46
48
45
81
N/A
N/A
---
177 263
279 603
190 255
Meander Width Ratio
---
--
3.6
3.7
3.9
6.6
N/A
N/A
--
2.1 4.6
0.9 1.3
1.5 1.7
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
N/A
SC/0.19/0.41/116/
232/>2048
SC/0.41/22.6/
143.4/2048/>2048
SC/SC/SC/55/
128/362
SC/SC/SC/107.3/
362/>2048
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B %/Be
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d 100
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ft
--- --- --- 0.69 1.71 N/A
0.23 0.31
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W/mz
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
N/A
I
4.12
4.22
0.96
0.29
0.28
1.10
4.12
4.22
4.12
4.22
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
1% <1% --- --- --- -- 1% <1% 1%
<1%
Rosgen Classification
C5/E5 C4/E4 E4 CQE4 CQE4 E4b C4 C4 C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
2.7 1 3.0 2.5 1 2.5 4.9 1 5.4 3.8 3.5 4.1 5.5 3.0 3.3 4.6 3.6
7.3
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
--- --- 97 40 29.1 32.0 85.0 200 210 200
210
Q-NFF regression
--- --- MENOMINEE
--- --- IMMEMEMEMIMME
--- --- ommommom
--- -- --- --- -- --
Q-USGS extrapolation
Q -Mannings
Valley Length ft
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,630 1,368 --- --- --- --- 1,630 1,402 1,646
1,407
Sinuosity
1.18 1.01 1.30 1.40 1.00 1.10 --- 1.11 1.18
1.06
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)z
--- --- --- --- --- 0.0039 0.0016
0.0043
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
i -- --- --- -- -- -- -- 0.0046 0.0013
0.0042
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
'Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project -specific drainage area -discharge curve.
3Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length/channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.

Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
South Branch and Southeast Branch
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
'Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project -specific drainage area -discharge curve.
3Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length/channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.
Pre -Restoration
Condition ll�
__,,�Reference
Reach Data
=
11 Desillm
As-Built/Baseline
-0
Parameter
Gage
South Branch
Reach 1
Southeast Branch
Reach 1
Spencer Creek
Upstream
UT Richland Creek'
Downstream
UT Cane Creek
UT Richland Creek
Upstream Z UT Rocky Branch
2 South Branch
Reach 1
Southeast Branch South Branch
Reach 1 Reach 1
Southeast Branch
Reach 1
Min Max
Min I Max
Min I Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min I Max
Min I Max
Min I Max
Min I Max
Min I Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
N/A
7.4 7.9
7.7
8.7
13.3
1
15.2
11.5
12.3
8.8
10.4
12.2
10.0
8.0
9.3
19.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
96.0 98.0 9.5 229.0 >50 31.0 27.6
31.4 72.0 70.0 1 375.0 30 T 100 >100
>75
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.0 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.1 13 0.8 1.0 0.8
0.9 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.7
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth
2.3 2.4 1.0 1.9 1.8 2.1 1.2 1.6 1.1
1.3 1.8 1.3 1.0 1.4
1.5
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
8.0 8.7 6.2 10.6 16.5 17.5 8.9 12.2 7.8
8.5 16.3 9.6 5.7 6.5
9.6
Width/Depth Ratio
6.2 7.8 9.6 7.3 10.1 13.9 12.3 14.4 10.0
12.8 9.1 10.4 11.2 13.4
37.7
Entrenchment Ratio
12.4 13.1 1.2 26.3 >2.5 >2.5 2.5
4.0 6.0 7.0 1 37.5 3.8 1 12.5 >2.2
>2.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0 3.7 1.0 1.4 1 2.1 --- 1.4
2.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
D90 (mm)
1.0
0.09
56.1
28.5
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
8 46
10 28
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0176 0.0349
0.0247 0.049
0.0188 0.0704
0.0183
0.0355
0.0188 0.0704
0.0210
0.0450
0.0606 0.0892
0.0052 0.0199
0.0220 0.0410
0.0021 0.0178
0.0023 0.0527
Pool Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
20 64
7 45
Pool Max Depth (ft)
N/A
--- ---
--- ---
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
0.4 2.2
0.9 2.3
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (ft3)
Pattern
30 62
35 90
13 47
33
93
27
73
N/A
26 81
34 85
21 53
36 116
26 S8
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A
N/A
24 52
NA
102
N/A
N/A
25 48
16 39
14 35
10 27
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A
N/A
5.4 22.1
NA
23
38
N/A
N/A
20 35
18 26
17 32
14 30
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
---
0.6 2.5
NA
2.0
3.1
N/A
N/A
2.0 3.5
2.3 3.3
1.8 3.4
1.3 2.9
Meander Length (ft)
N/A
N/A
54 196
NA
45
81
N/A
N/A
76 120
47 93
78 127
65 74
Meander Width Ratio
--
--
2.8 6
NA
3.9
6.6
N/A
N/A
7.6 12.0
5.9 11.6
8.4 13.6
6.3 7.1
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
N/A
SC/SC/1.0/45/
107.33/180
SC/SC/0.09/26.23
/50.61/180
___
___
MMINIMMEMI
SC/SC/SC/103.6/
256/362
SC/SC/SC/68.1/
180/362
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ftZ
--- --- a zs o.9s 0.94 1.3a 0.23
0.43
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
N/A
0.25
0.09
0.50
0.97
0.29
0.28
1.10
0.25
0.09
0.25
0.09
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
<1% 1% --- --- --- --- --- <1% 1% <1%
1%
Rosgen Classification
E5 E6/G6 E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 E4b E4 E4 C3
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
3.7 2.8 --- 4.2 4.S 3.8 3.S 4.1 5.5 3.1 3.5 4.6
2.1
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
--- --- --- 68.9 78.6 40 29.1 32.0 85.0 30 20 30
20
Q-NFF regression
--- --
--- --
--- ---
--- --- --- ----- ---
Q-USGS extrapolation
Q-Mannings
Valley Length ft
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
976 916 --- -- --- --- --- 971 792 1,009
485
Sinuosity
1.03 1.31 1.40 1.10 1.40 1.00 1.10 --- 1.13 1.06
1.18
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- 0.0068 0.0161 0.0070
0.0138
BankfullSlope (ft/ft)
-- I --- --- --- -- --- -- 0.0075 0.0182 0.0068
0.0136
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
'UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
'Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project -specific drainage area -discharge curve.
3Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length/channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.

Table 10c. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Southeast Branch
6
Pre -Restoration
Condition
Reference
Reach Data
4L
Design
a&
As-Built/Baseline
11 a
IMA
Parameter
Gage
Branch
Reach 2
Spencer Creek
Upstream
UT Richland Creek1
Downstream
UT Cane Creek
UT Richland Creek
UpstreamZ
UT Rocky Branch
Z Southeast Branch
Reach 2a
Southeast Branch
Reach 2b
Southeast Branch
Reach 2a
Southeast Branch
Reach 2b
Min
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min
Max
Min Max
Min Max
Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
N/A
7.2
7.4
8.7
13.3
15.2
11.5
12.3
8.8
10.4
12.2
11.7
15.0
9.0
10.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
8.0 9.8 229.0 >50 31.0 27.6 31.4 72.0 114.7 120.1 140.0 F 310.0
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.3 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.3 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.9 1.3 0.7 0.9 0.7
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth
1.6 1.9 1.9 1.8 2.1 1.2 1.6 1.1 1.3 1.8 0.9 1.0 1.0
1.2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftz
8.9 9.4 10.6 16.5 17.5 8.9 12.2 7.8 8.5 16.3 10.2 10.5 6.5
6.8
Width/Depth Ratio
5.8 7.3 7.3 10.1 13.9 12.3 14.4 10.0 12.8 9.1 13.5 21.3 12.5
16.5
Entrenchment Ratio1.6
6.2 26.3 >2.5 >2.5 2.5 4.0 6.0 7.7 10.3 15.6 34.4
>2.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.5 2.1 1.0 1.4 2.1 --- 1.4 2.1 1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
1350 (mm)
0.04
37.2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
---
---
---
---
---
---
---
4 20
11 36
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
N/A
0.0047
0.0147
0.0188 0.0704
0.0183
0.0355
0.0188
0.0704
0.0210
0.0450
0.0606 0.0892
0.0122
0.0367
0.0202
0.0145 0.0454
0.0119 0.0606
Pool Length (ft)
--- --- --- --- -- -- --- 21 53
27 45
Pool Max Depth (ft)
--- --- --- -- --- --- --- --- --- 1.3 2.6
0.89 2.23
Pool Spacing (ft)
17 122 13 47 33 93 27 73 N/A 26 1 81 27 1 55 43 1 49 25 54
34 73
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
N/A
24 52
NA
102
N/A
N/A
N/A
27
3 22
12 22
Radius of Curvature (ft)
N/A
5.4 22.1
NA
23
38
N/A
N/A
N/A
22
30
7 58
21 25
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
N/A
---
0.6 2.5
NA
2.0
3.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.4
3.3
0.7 5.5
N/A
Meander Length (ft)
N/A
54 196
NA
45
81
N/A
N/A
N/A
82.0
43 80
88 1 88
Meander Width Ratio
---
2.8 6
NA
3.9
6.6
N/A
N/A
N/A
3.0
4.1 7.5
N/A
Substrate, Bed and Transport Parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
N/A
SC/0.02/0.04/0.05/33.2
/79.6
---
---
---
---
SC/SC/SC/70.9/
256/362
SC/5C/SC/70.9/
256/362
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d3S/d5O/d84/d95/d100
Reach Shear Stress (Competency) Ib/ft'
---
0.93
1.14
0.93 1 1.14
0,47
N/A
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (Capacity) W/mZ
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
N/A
0.09
0.50
0.97
0.29
0.28
1.10
0.09
0.10
0.09
0.10
Watershed Impervious Cover Estimate (%)
1% --- --- --- --- 1% 1% 1%
1%
Rosgen Classification
E6/G6 E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 C4/E4 E4b C4 C4 C4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
2.9 3.4 -- 4.2
4.5 3.8 3.5
4.1 5.5 3.0 3.3 3.1 4.4
N/A
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
--- --- 68.9
78.6 40 29.1
32.0 85.0 30 20 30
regression
---
---
--
---
ON/AQ-NFF
Q-USGS extrapolation
Q -Mannings
Va ey Lengt--
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
524 --- --- -- --- --- 533 180 536
Sinuosity
1.17 1.40 1.10 1.40 1.00 1.10 --- 1.21 1.11
1.23
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- 0.0101 0.0144
0.0160
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
-- -- -- -- -- --- i 0.0122 0.0146
0.0168
( --- ): Data was not provided
N/A: Not Applicable
UT Cane Creek reference reach data only utilized for pattern and a reference point in the project specific regional curve.
'Data only utilized as a reference point on the the project -specific drainage area -discharge curve.
3Existing condition sinuosity based on valley length/channel length given no flow and therefore no water sureface shots at time of survey.

Table 11. Morphology and Hydraulic Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Section)
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
* Data for cross sections 6, 8, & 12 were updated during MY2 for previous monitoring years. Cross sections 6 and 22 had an error in the spreadsheet that was corrected. The spreadsheet was not calculating bankfull width correctly which affected
cross-sectional area, and width to depth ratio. Bankfull eclevation was corrected on cross section 8 after careful evaluation. It was determined that during the baseline survey, bankfull was called at a higher elevation than it should have been.
Byrds Creek- Reach 2
Dimension and Substrate
Base
Cross
MY3
Section
MY2 I
I (Riffle)
MY3 MY4
MYS
Base
Cross
MY3
Section
MY2 I
2 (Pool)
MY3
MY4 MYS Base
Cross
MY3
Section
MY2 I
3 (Riffle)
MY3
MY4
MYS Base
Cross
MY1
Section
MY2
4 (Riffle) -A
MY3 MY4 MYS
based on fixed bankfull elevation
574.4
574.6
574.2
572.6
Bankfull Width (ft)
36.4
36.6
35.3
35.6
42.2
42.1
42.6
40.3
28.9
24.7
22.9
22.1
42.7
36.0
36.9
32.8
Floodprone Width (ft)
>150
>150
>150
>150
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.9
1.9
1.9
2.0
1.9
2.1
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.9
2.7
2.7
2.7
4.6
4.5
4.3
4.3
3.4
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
59.8
51.1
50.6
50.6
80.3
79.9
79.6
79.3
56.2
51.6
46.5
45.9
88.7
78.3
83.9
73.4
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
22.2
26.2
24.6
25.0
22.1
22.2
22.8
20.5
14.8
11.8
11.3
10.6
20.6
16.6
16.2
14.6
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
4.5+
4.1+
4.2+
4.2+
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5.2+
6.1+
6.6+
6.8+
3.4+
4.2+
4.1+
4.6+
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.01
1.0
d50 (mm)
12.5
28.7
18.0
19.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
26.4
42.9
28.1 1
37.9
22.6
32.0 1
36.4 1
29.8
Dimension and Substrate
Base
Byrds Creek- Reach 2
Cross Section 5 (Pool)
MY3 MY2 MY3 MY4
MYS
Base
Cross
MY3
Section
MY2
6 (Pool)
MY3
MY4 MYS Base
Byrds Creek- Reach 3
Cross Section 7 (Riffle)
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4720.5
Cross
Section
8 (Riffle)
MY3 MY4 MYS
based on fixed bankfull elevation
572.0
569.0
568.7
0
Bankfull Width (ft)
34.8
34.3
35.3
32.2
26.2
25.4
25.9
29.6
20.4
22.6
23.4
21.219.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>150
>150
>150
>150>150
W23.2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.4
2.3
2.5
2.2
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.31.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.7
4.3
4.5
4.1
3.2
3.0
3.1
2.9
2.1
2.2
2.4
2.12.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
84.3
80.2
86.7
71.4
47.5
45.8
47.8
40.3
28.8
31.0
31.0
26.623.2
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
14.3
14.7
14.4
14.5
14.4
14.1
14.1
21.7
14.4
16.5
17.7
16.8
1 15.1
13.3
13.4
16.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/AN/A
N/A
N/A I
N/A
7.4+
6.6+
6.4+
7.1+ 1
1
8.5+
8.5+
8.2+
7.7
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
29.3
41.3
37.2
52.1
45.0
49.1
66.2
70.2
Dimension and Substrate
Base
Byrds Creek- Reach 3
Cross Section 9 (Pool)
MY1 MY2 I MY3 MY4
MYS
Base
Cross
MY1 I
Section
MY2 I
r (Riffle)
MY3
South Branch- Reach 1
Cross
MY4 I MYS Base MY3 I
Section
MY2 I
11 (Pool)
MY3
MY4
MYS Base
Southeast Branch- Reach 1
cross section 12 (Riffle)
MY1 MY2 I MY3 MY4 MYS
based on fixed bankfull elevation
565.5
571.4
571.3
580.3
Bankfull Width (ft)
34.2
33.6
33.7
32.6
9.3
8.8
9.0
9.0
10.2
9.7
9.2
8.8
10.4
9.1
8.2
8.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>100
>100
>100
>100
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
>75
>75
>75
>75
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.0
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.1
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.9
3.8
3.7
3.7
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.9
1.5
0.9
1.3
1.3
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft)
69.6
66.5
69.3
66.5
6.5
6.4
5.5
5.5
11.6
10.1
9.1
9.3
6.7
4.7
5.6
6.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
16.8
17.0
16.3
16.0 1
13.4
12.2
14.8
14.8
8.9
9.2
9.4
8.3
16.3
17.6
12.0
12.0
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
N/A
N/A
N/A I
N/A 1
10. +1
11.4+
11.1+
11.1+
1 N/A
N/A I
N/A
N/A
7.2+
1 8.3+
9.1+
8.8+
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
56.1
9.4
30.9
29.3
N/A
N/A
N/A I
N/A
28.5
37.0
68.0
52.3
Dimension and Substrate
based on fixed bankfull elevation
Bankfull Width (ft)
Floodprone Width (ft)
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft )
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
d50 (mm)
Base
12.5
N/A
1.2
2.5
15.3
10.1
N/A
1.0
N/A
Southeast Branch- Reach 1
Cross Section 13 (Pool)
MY3 I MY2 I MY3 MY4
579.5
8.6 8.7 9.5
N/A N/A N/A
1.1 1.1 1.1
2.3 2.0 2.0
9.4 9.5 10.3
7.9 8.0 8.8 1
N/A N/A N/A
1.0 1.0 1.0
I N/A N/A I N/A I I
MYS
I
Base
16.7
N/A
1.7
3.5
28.0
10.0
N/A
1.0
N/A I
Cross
MY1
14.8
N/A
1.5
3.2
22.0
10.0
N/A
1.0
N/A I
Section 14 (Pool)
MY2 I MY3
572.7
13.0 12.2
N/A N/A
1.8 1.7
3.1 3.0
23.1 20.5
7.3 7.2
N/A N/A
1.0 1 1.0
N/A I N/A I
Southeast Branch- Reach 2
Cross
MY4 I MYS Base MYl I
10.6 9.7
>100 >100
0.6 0.6
1.2 1.0
6.8 5.8
16.5 16.4
1 9.4+ 1 10.3+
1 1 1.0 1 1.0 1
1 1 37.2 1 13.5 1
Section 15 (Riffle)
MY2 I MY3 I
572.6
9.3 9.0
>100 >100
0.5 0.7
1.0 1.3
4.9 5.9
17.6 13.8
10.8+ 11.1+
1.0 1 1.0
45.0 1 43.8
MY4
MYS
* Data for cross sections 6, 8, & 12 were updated during MY2 for previous monitoring years. Cross sections 6 and 22 had an error in the spreadsheet that was corrected. The spreadsheet was not calculating bankfull width correctly which affected
cross-sectional area, and width to depth ratio. Bankfull eclevation was corrected on cross section 8 after careful evaluation. It was determined that during the baseline survey, bankfull was called at a higher elevation than it should have been.

Table 12a. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Byrds Creek- Reach 2
As-Built/Baseline
Min
Max
Min
MY -1
Max
Min
Max
Min
MY -4 J
Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
28.9
42.7
24.7
36.6
22.9
36.9
22.1
35.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.6
2.1
1.4
2.2
1.4
2.3
1.4
2.2
Bankfull Max Depth
2.9
3.4
2.7
3.2
2.7
3.3
2.7
3.1
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ftp)
56.2
88.7
51.1
78.3
46.5
83.9
45.9
73.4
Width/Depth Ratio
14.8
22.2
11.8
26.2
11.3
24.6
10.6
25.0
Entrenchment Ratio
3.4+
5.2+
4.1+
6.1+
4.1+
6.6+
4.2+
6.8+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
12.5
26.4
28.7
42.9
18.0
36.4
19.0
37.9
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
13
59
12
59
18
59
12
59
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0036
0.0097
0.0019
0.0147
0.0003
0.0110
0.0009
0.0138
Pool Length (ft)
34
179
34
182
59
183
70
185
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.7
4.6
4.3
4.5
4.2
5.8
3.6
4.8
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (fe)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
84
26
19
0.7
279
0.9
278
57
79
1.9
603
1.3
80
214
81
225
85
211
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)l
1,646
1,646
1,646
1,646
Sinuosity (ft)l
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0016
0.0018
0.0019
0.0017
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
0.0013
0.2/0.6/5.6/55/128/362
0.0018
0.3/1.2/2.9/75.9/122.5/256
0.0020
0.21/1.0/3.7/80.3/168.1/362
0.0016
0.34/1.24/2.4/85.0/163.3/362.0
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%

Table 12b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Bvrds Creek- Reach 3
Parameter
As-Built/Baseline
Min
Max
Min
MY -1
Max
�
Min
MY -2
Max
Min
MY -3
��V MY -4 p=;
Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
17.6
20.4
17.6
22.6
18.3
23.4
19.5
21.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
>150
Bankfull Mean Depth
1.2
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.2
1.3
Bankfull Max Depth
2.1
2.3
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.4
2.1
2.1
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft)
20.5
28.8
23.4
31.0
24.9
31.0
23.2
26.6
Width/Depth Ratio
14.4
15.1
13.3
16.5
13.4
17.7
16.3
16.8
Entrenchment Ratio
7.4+
8.5+
6.6+
8.5+
6.4+
8.2+
7.1+
7.7+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
29.3
45.0
41.3
49.1
37.2
66.2
52.1
70.2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
12
57
26
43
18
44
28
44
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0022
0.0190
0.0065
0.0311
0.0018
0.0304
0.0054
0.0304
Pool Length (ft)
46
129
33
134
32
132
31
134
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.2
3.9
3.0
3.8
2.9
4.3
3.4
4.6
Pool Spacing (ft)
73
129
82
190
92
199
60
180
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
31
44
2.2
190
1.5
62
84
2.3
255
1.7
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,407
1,407
1,407
1,407
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0043
0.0045
0.0052
0.0047
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0042
0.0047
0.0047
0.0044
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d10
0.1/0.6/16/107.3/362/>2048
0.2/9.1/29/82.6/180/362
0.2/1.68/32.0/112.6/430.5/2048
0.5/4.73/23.4/105.6/256.0/2048
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
20%
4%

Table 12c. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
South Branch- Reach 1
Parameter
As-Built/Baseline
Min
Max
Min
MY -1
Max
Min
Max
Min
Y
Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
9.3
8.8
9.0
9.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ft)
6.5
6.4
5.5
5.5
Width/Depth Ratio
13.4
12.2
14.8
14.8
Entrenchment Ratio
10.7+
11.4+
11.1+
11.1+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
56.1
9.4
30.9
29.3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)8
46
10
39
13
37
10
38
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0021
0.0178
0.0022
0.0431
0.0029
0.0298
0.0023
0.0409
Pool Length (ft)
20
64
22
65
21
67
21
69
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.0
1.9
2.8
2.5
Pool Spacing (ft)
Pool Volume (f?)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
Additional Reach Parameters
36
14
17
1.8
78
8.4
116
35
32
3.4
127
13.6
22
87
32
117
35
133
Rosgen Classification
C3
C3
C3
C3
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1,009
1,009
1,009
1,009
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0070
0.0065
0.0078
0.0092
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d 100
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0.0068
SC/SC/SC/103.6/256/362
0.0062
SC/0.2/5.3/71.7/141.1/180
0%
0.0070
SC/0.09/0.3/75.9/143.4/256
0%
0.0072
SC/SC/0.6/99.5/180/512
0%

Table 12d. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Southeast Branch- Reach 1
Parameter
As-Built/Baseline
Min
Max
Min
MY -1
Max
Min
Max
Min
MY -4
Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.4
9.1
8.2
8.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
>75
>75
>75
>75
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth
1.5
0.9
1.3
1.3
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (W)
6.7
4.7
5.6
6.0
Width/Depth Ratio
16.3
17.6
12.0
12.0
Entrenchment Ratio
7.2+
8.3+
9.1+
8.8+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
28.5
37.0
68.0
52.3
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
10
28
10
28
11
29
12
32
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0023
0.0527
0.0100
0.0390
0.0039
1
0.0630
0.0035
1
0.0612
Pool Length (ft)
7
45
10
54
19
48
19
47
Pool Max Depth (ft)
2.5
2.3
2.6
2.8
Pool Spacing (ft)
26
58
18
78
22
56
21
72
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
10
14
1.3
65
6.3
27
30
2.9
74
7.1
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
485
485
485
485
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0138
0.0140
0.0133
0.0143
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0136
0.0141
0.0126
0.0161
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
SC/0.2/8/68.1/180/362
SC/0.1/4/67.2/151.8/362
SC/SC/0.3/86.7/180.0/512.0
SC/SC/4/101.2/170.1/256
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%

Table 12e. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Southeast Branch -Reach 2a
As-Built/Baseline
Min
Max
Min
MY -1
Max
Min
Max
Min
Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
9.7
9.3
9.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.3
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (ftp)
6.8
5.8
4.9
5.9
Width/Depth Ratio
16.5
16.4
17.6
13.8
Entrenchment Ratio
9.4+
10.3+
10.8+
11.1+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
37.2
13.5
45.0
43.8
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
4
20
4
26
3
28
4
27
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0145
0.0454
0.0017
0.0845
0.0026
0.0750
0.0010
0.0834
Pool Length (ft)
21
53
9
44
16
49
10
48
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.5
3.2
3.4
2.9
Pool Spacing (ft)
25
54
16
88
21
66
17
55
Pool Volume (ft')
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
3
7
0.7
43
4.1
22
58
5.5
80
7.5
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
536
536
536
536
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0144
0.0134
0.0137
0.0137
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0146
0.0135
0.0148
0.0122
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
SC/0.1/17.1/70.9/256/362
SC/0.1/18/78.1/143.4/362
SC/0.13/24.7/128.0/214.7/256
SC/0.16/6.3/82.6/180/512
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%

Table 12f. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Southeast Branch -Reach 2b
Parameter
As-Built/Baseline
Min
Max
Min
MY -1
Max
Min
Max
Min
MY -4
Max Min Max Min Max
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
Bankfull Width (ft)
10.6
9.7
9.3
9.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
>100
>100
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.3
Bankfull Cross-sectional Area (W)
6.8
5.8
4.9
5.9
Width/Depth Ratio
16.5
16.4
17.6
13.8
Entrenchment Ratio
9.4+
10.3+
10.8+
11.1+
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
D50 (mm)
37.2
13.5
45.0
43.8
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
11
36
14
36
12
31
12
41
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0119
0.0606
0.0017
0.0520
0.0073
1
0.0580
0.0021
1
0.0494
Pool Length (ft)
27
45
27
44
28
45
28
46
Pool Max Depth (ft)
3.5
3.2
2.7
2.7
Pool Spacing (ft)
34
73
33
60
29
55
43
58
Pool Volume (ft)
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
Radius of Curvature (ft)
Rc:Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
Meander Wave Length (ft)
Meander Width Ratio
12
21
88
N/A
1
N/A
22
25
88
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
195
195
195
195
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (ft/ft)
0.0160
0.0085
0.0092
0.0124
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0168
0.0092
0.0081
0.0122
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%/Be%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95/d100
SC/0.1/17.1/70.9/256/362
SC/0.1/18/78.1/143.4/362
SC/0.13/24.7/128.0/214.7/256
SC/0.16/6.3/82.6/180/512
%of Reach with Eroding Banks
0%
0%
0%

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3- 2016
Byrds Creek Reach 2
585
583
581
579
577
ti
X
X X
575
573
u,
H
x
571
------------------------------v------------------------
569
c
O
567
v
w
565
563
561
559
557
555
1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000 3100 3200 3300
Station (feet)
+TW (MYO-9/2013) t TW (MYI-4/2014) + TW (MY2-3/2015) +2016)TW (MY3-3/2016)------- W5 (MY3-3/2016) ♦ BKF/TOB (MY3-3/2016) • STRUCTURES (MY3-3/
ti
X
X X
V
�
X
u,
H
x

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3- 2016
Byrds Creek Reach 3

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3- 2016
South Branch Reach 1
585
580
575
x
x
r �i
v
570
0
v
565
560
555
6000 6100 6200 6300
6400 6500 6600 6700
6800 6900 7000 7100
Station (feet)
t TW (MYO-9/2013) t TW (MYl-4/2014)
TW (MY2-3/2015) t TW (MY3-3/2016)-------
WS (MY3-3/2016) ♦ BKF/TOB (MY3-3/2016)
x
x
r �i

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3- 2016
Southeast Reach 1

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3- 2016
Southeast Reach 2a
x x
585
580
575
v
570
c
0
v
u
565
560
555
550
8550 8600
8650
8700 8750
8800 8850 8900 8950 9000
9050 9100 9150
Station (feet)
TW (MYO-9/2013)
- TW (MY1-4/2014)
TW (MY2-3/2015)
TW (MY3-3/2016)------- WS (MY3-3/2016) ♦ BKF/TOB (MY3-3/2016)
• STRUCTURES (MY3-3/2016)
x x

Longitudinal Profile Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3- 2016
Southeast Reach 2b
572
570
568
m----------------------------
v
566
0
v
w
A
------------------- -------------------------------------------
'
564
562
560
558
9100 9150 9200 9250 9300 9350
Station (feet)
TW (MYO-9/2013) TW (MY1-4/2014) TW (MY2-3/2015) � TW (MY3-3/2016)------- WS (MY3-3/2016) ♦ BKF/TOB (MY3-3/2016) • STRUCTURES (MY3-3/2016)

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Cross Section 1-Byrds Creek Reach 2
16+62 Riffle
x -section area (ft.sq.)
578
width (ft)
1.4
mean depth (ft)
2.7
max depth (ft)
36.2
wetted parimeter(ft)
576
hyd radi (ft)
25.0
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
4.2
entrenchment ratio
574
low bank height ratio
000
P.A OW
g�f
c
0
m 572
w
570
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) MYl (3/2014) t MY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) —Bankfull — Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
50.6
x -section area (ft.sq.)
35.6
width (ft)
1.4
mean depth (ft)
2.7
max depth (ft)
36.2
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.4
hyd radi (ft)
25.0
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
4.2
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 3/2016
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Cross Section 2-Byrds Creek Reach 2
19+69 Pool
x -section area (ft.sq.)
578
width (ft)
2.0
mean depth (ft)
4.3
max depth (ft)
42.3
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.9
hyd radi (ft)
20.5
width -depth ratio
576
574
c
0
m 572
v
570
00
4
1
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) —MY1 (3/2014) tMY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
79.3
x -section area (ft.sq.)
40.3
width (ft)
2.0
mean depth (ft)
4.3
max depth (ft)
42.3
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.9
hyd radi (ft)
20.5
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 3/2016
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Cross Section 3-Byrds Creek Reach 2
20+85 Riffle
x -section area (ft.sq.)
578
width (ft)
2.1
mean depth (ft)
576
max depth (ft)
23.9
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.9
hyd radi (ft)
10.6
width -depth ratio
574
W flood prone area (ft)
6.8
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
o
m 572
>
v
570
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO(9/2013)MY1(3/2014) tMY2(3/2015) +MY3(3/2016) —Bankfull—FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
45.9
x -section area (ft.sq.)
22.1
width (ft)
2.1
mean depth (ft)
3.1
max depth (ft)
23.9
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.9
hyd radi (ft)
10.6
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
6.8
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 3/2016
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Cross Section 4-Byrds Creek Reach 2
Bankfull Dimensions
73.4
x -section area (ft.sq.)
32.8
width (ft)
2.2
mean depth (ft)
3.1
max depth (ft)
34.3
wetted parimeter(ft)
2.1
hyd radi (ft)
14.6
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
4.6
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
�q
n�Il�ur■�
INN
NUNN
on 0
MMML!;;&X!UU1 0
ME
21
MEMEMMUNNEMEMEMEME
MEMO
MEN
11 1111
1111
Bankfull Dimensions
73.4
x -section area (ft.sq.)
32.8
width (ft)
2.2
mean depth (ft)
3.1
max depth (ft)
34.3
wetted parimeter(ft)
2.1
hyd radi (ft)
14.6
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
4.6
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 3/2016
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Cross Section 5-Byrds Creek Reach 2
Bankfull Dimensions
71.4
x -section area (ft.sq.)
32.2
width (ft)
2.2
mean depth (ft)
4.1
max depth (ft)
34.3
wetted parimeter(ft)
2.1
hyd radi (ft)
14.5
width -depth ratio
III
Ili
19111AF11i
Hill
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
1111111111111
Bankfull Dimensions
71.4
x -section area (ft.sq.)
32.2
width (ft)
2.2
mean depth (ft)
4.1
max depth (ft)
34.3
wetted parimeter(ft)
2.1
hyd radi (ft)
14.5
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 3/2016
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Cross Section 6-Byrds Creek Reach 3
36+84 Pool
x -section area (ft.sq.)
574
width (ft)
1.4
mean depth (ft)
2.9
max depth (ft)
30.6
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.3
hyd radi (ft)
21.7
width -depth ratio
572
570
c
0
m 568
v
w
566
564
0 SO 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) —MY1 (3/2014) tMY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
40.3
x -section area (ft.sq.)
29.6
width (ft)
1.4
mean depth (ft)
2.9
max depth (ft)
30.6
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.3
hyd radi (ft)
21.7
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 3/2016
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Cross Section 7- Byrds Creek Reach 3
Bankfull Dimensions
26.6
x -section area (ft.sq.)
21.2
width (ft)
1.3
mean depth (ft)
2.1
max depth (ft)
22.3
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.2
hyd radi (ft)
16.8
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
7.1
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
fibii iffm
I
I I I I I ,N::
i k -19
MONSON
No
Bankfull Dimensions
26.6
x -section area (ft.sq.)
21.2
width (ft)
1.3
mean depth (ft)
2.1
max depth (ft)
22.3
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.2
hyd radi (ft)
16.8
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
7.1
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 3/2016
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Cross Section 8- Byrds Creek Reach 3
46+25 Riffle
x -section area (ft.sq.)
569
width (ft)
1.2
mean depth (ft)
2.1
max depth (ft)
20.3
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.1
hyd radi (ft)
16.3
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
7.7
entrenchment ratio
1.3
low bank height ratio
567 AN
c 565
0
_w
w 563
561
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Width (ft)
tMYO(9/2013)MY1(3/2014) tMY2(3/2015) +MY3(3/2016) —Bankfull—FloodproneArea
Bankfull Dimensions
23.2
x -section area (ft.sq.)
19.5
width (ft)
1.2
mean depth (ft)
2.1
max depth (ft)
20.3
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.1
hyd radi (ft)
16.3
width -depth ratio
150.0
W flood prone area (ft)
7.7
entrenchment ratio
1.3
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 3/2016
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Cross Section 9- Byrds Creek Reach 3
47+03 Pool
x -section area (ft.sq.)
570
width (ft)
2.0
mean depth (ft)
3.7
max depth (ft)
34.0
wetted parimeter(ft)
2.0
hyd radi (ft)
16.0
width -depth ratio
568
00
566.010
c
0
m 564
v
w
562
560
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) —MY1 (3/2014) tMY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
66.5
x -section area (ft.sq.)
32.6
width (ft)
2.0
mean depth (ft)
3.7
max depth (ft)
34.0
wetted parimeter(ft)
2.0
hyd radi (ft)
16.0
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 3/2016
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Cross Section 10 -South Branch Reach 1
65+41 Riffle
x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.8
width (ft)
0.6
mean depth (ft)
1.6
max depth (ft)
10.6
wetted parimeter(ft)
0.6
hyd radi (ft)
15.9
width -depth ratio
100.0
W flood prone area (ft)
10.2
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
573
c
0
m 571
w
569
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) —e—MY1 (4/2014) tMY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) —Bankfull —Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
6.0
x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.8
width (ft)
0.6
mean depth (ft)
1.6
max depth (ft)
10.6
wetted parimeter(ft)
0.6
hyd radi (ft)
15.9
width -depth ratio
100.0
W flood prone area (ft)
10.2
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 3/2016
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Cross Section 11- South Branch Reach 1
65+54 Pool
x -section area (ft.sq.)
574
width (ft)
1.1
mean depth (ft)
1.9
max depth (ft)
10.0
wetted parimeter(ft)
0.9
hyd radi (ft)
8.3
width -depth ratio
572
0
w 570
XTi
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) —MY1 (4/2014) tMY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
9.3
x -section area (ft.sq.)
8.8
width (ft)
1.1
mean depth (ft)
1.9
max depth (ft)
10.0
wetted parimeter(ft)
0.9
hyd radi (ft)
8.3
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 3/2016
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Cross Section 12 - Southeast Reach 1
82+39 Riffle
582
8.5
width (ft)
0.7
mean depth (ft)
1.3
max depth (ft)
9.1
wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7
hyd radi (ft)
12.0
width -depth ratio
75.0
W flood prone area (ft)
8.8
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
0
580
v
w
578
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
—t—MYO (9/2013) t MYl (4/2014) t MY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) —Bankfull —Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
6.0
x -section area (ft.sq.)
8.5
width (ft)
0.7
mean depth (ft)
1.3
max depth (ft)
9.1
wetted parimeter (ft)
0.7
hyd radi (ft)
12.0
width -depth ratio
75.0
W flood prone area (ft)
8.8
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 3/2016
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Cross Section 13 - Southeast Reach 1
82+54 Pool
582
9.5
width (ft)
1.1
mean depth (ft)
2.0
max depth (ft)
10.8
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.0
hyd radi (ft)
8.8
width -depth ratio
w 580
0
0
92
v
578
576
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) —MY1 (4/2014) tMY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) —Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
10.3
x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.5
width (ft)
1.1
mean depth (ft)
2.0
max depth (ft)
10.8
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.0
hyd radi (ft)
8.8
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 3/2016
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Cross Section 14 - Southeast Reach 2
88+10 Pool
576
12.2
width (ft)
1.7
mean depth (ft)
3.0
max depth (ft)
14.5
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.4
hyd radi (ft)
7.2
width -depth ratio
574
c
° 572
v
570
568
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
tMYO (9/2013) MY1 (4/2014) tMY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) -Bankfull
Bankfull Dimensions
20.5
x -section area (ft.sq.)
12.2
width (ft)
1.7
mean depth (ft)
3.0
max depth (ft)
14.5
wetted parimeter(ft)
1.4
hyd radi (ft)
7.2
width -depth ratio
Survey Date: 3/2016
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Cross Section Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Cross Section 15 - Southeast Reach 2
88+35 Riffle
x -section area (ft.sq.)
576
width (ft)
0.7
mean depth (ft)
1.3
max depth (ft)
9.6
wetted parimeter (ft)
0.6
hyd radi (ft)
13.8
width -depth ratio
100.0
W flood prone area (ft)
11.1
entrenchment ratio
1.0
574
0-4c
0
w 572
sr
570
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Width (ft)
+MYO (9/2013) t MYl (4/2014) t MY2 (3/2015) +MY3 (3/2016) —Bankfull —Floodprone Area
Bankfull Dimensions
5.9
x -section area (ft.sq.)
9.0
width (ft)
0.7
mean depth (ft)
1.3
max depth (ft)
9.6
wetted parimeter (ft)
0.6
hyd radi (ft)
13.8
width -depth ratio
100.0
W flood prone area (ft)
11.1
entrenchment ratio
1.0
low bank height ratio
Survey Date: 3/2016
Field Crew: Wildlands Engineering
View Downstream

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Byrds Creek R2, Reachwide
100
90
80
70
60
3 50
E
? 40
y 30
d 20
10
0 4--
0.01
Byrds Creek R2, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--H M-2/2033 ry.v. 0412014 1112 --Ili, --6-M-3/2015
Reachwide
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
each Summary
Particle
Class
D5o =
2.4
D�4 =
85.0
D95 =
Class
Percent
362.0
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Percentage
Cumulative
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
1
4
5
5
5
Very fine
0.062
0.125
1
2
3
3
8
Fine
0.125
0.250
1
4
5
5
13
60
Medium
0.25
0.50
1
6
7
7
20
N
Coarse
0.5
1.0
3
8
11
11
31
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
6
7
13
13
44
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
3
8
11
11
55
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
10
2
2
2
57
Fine
4.0
5.6
4
4
4
61
•MYP92/1013
Fine
5.6
8.0
2
2
2
63
Medium
8.0
11.0
2
2
2
65
Medium
11.0
16.0
1
1
2
2
67
Coarse
16.0
22.6
2
2
2
69
Coarse
22.6
32
1
1
1
70
Very Coarse
32
45
3
3
3
73
Very Coarse
45
64
6
6
6
79
Small
64
90
6
6
6
85
Small
90
128
5
5
5
90
Large
128
180
7
7
7
97
Large
180
256
2
2
2
99
••.
Small
256
362
1
1
1
100
No.o.............�
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
...o
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Totall
50
1 50 1
100 1
100 1
100
100
90
80
70
60
3 50
E
? 40
y 30
d 20
10
0 4--
0.01
Byrds Creek R2, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--H M-2/2033 ry.v. 0412014 1112 --Ili, --6-M-3/2015
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D26 =
0.34
D35 =
1.24
D5o =
2.4
D�4 =
85.0
D95 =
163.3
Dioo =
362.0
100
90
80
70
60
3 50
E
? 40
y 30
d 20
10
0 4--
0.01
Byrds Creek R2, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--H M-2/2033 ry.v. 0412014 1112 --Ili, --6-M-3/2015
Byrds Creek R2, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
w
�
d
60
a
N
50
m
40
u
3
30
20
10
c
0
OOra'LOytih o.10 p5 1 ti ,yW
P yco 1b 'yA' 'yt° to 3ti bh VC` oi0 $ y10 ryy0 ,�yti yyti 1o.�,A X00 bo�6
•MYP92/1013
Particle Class Size (mm)
•MY1-04/1014 MY2-03/2015 •M-3/2016

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 1
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 1
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 i I I I I i�r� ' ' ♦' ' ' ' ' ^I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I I 1 1111
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--d 0-02/2013 M11.4/1014 -1 1112 5 MY3 03/2016
Cross Section 1
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100-
1.00
Summary
Particle
Class
19.0
D84 =
90.0
Class
Percent
D100 =
512.0
Count
90
min
max
Percentage Cumulative
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
3
3
3
Very fine
0.062
0.125
3
3
6
70
Fine
0.125
0.250
3
3
9
Medium
0.25
0.50
5
5
14
d
a
Coarse
0.5
1.0
2
2
16
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
2
2
18
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
3
3
21
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
22
Fine
4.0
5.6
3
3
25
Fine
5.6
8.0
4
4
29
Medium
8.0
11.0
7
7
36
Medium
11.0
16.0
11
11
47
;:
Coarse
16.0
22.6
6
6
53
Coarse
22.6
32
6
6
59
Very Coarse
32
45
6
6
65
;:.
Very Coarse
45
64
8
8
73
Small
64
90
11
11
84
Small
90
128
9
9
93
Large
128
180
4
4
97
La rge
180
256
1
1
98
••p
Small
256
362
1
1
99
Small
362
512
1
1
100
! .
Medium
512
1024
100
:..."'.333."'........:
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 1
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 i I I I I i�r� ' ' ♦' ' ' ' ' ^I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I I 1 1111
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--d 0-02/2013 M11.4/1014 -1 1112 5 MY3 03/2016
Cross Section 1
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi=
1.00
Di5 =
10.51
D50 =
19.0
D84 =
90.0
D95 =
151.8
D100 =
512.0
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 1
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 i I I I I i�r� ' ' ♦' ' ' ' ' ^I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I I 1 1111
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--d 0-02/2013 M11.4/1014 -1 1112 5 MY3 03/2016
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 1
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
a
60
d
a
N
50
u
40
m
v
30
20
_
10
0
°tiyh ° yh °y y
ti ti� a y� titi ti° �ti� �ti bh °O �° tiyro tiw° yy°°ti ytiti y°y°°a� �9°
•MY0.02/2013
Particle Class Size (mm)
1-01/2011 11Y2 03/2015 0-3/2016

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 3
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 3
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--d 0-02/2013 M11.4/1014 -1 1112 5 MY3 03/2016
Cross Section 3
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100-
2.18
Summary
Particle
Class
37.9
D84 =
85.3
Class
Percent
D100 =
256.0
Count
90
min
max
Percentage Cumulative
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
80
0
Very fine
0.062
0.125
1
1
1
70
Fine
0.125
0.250
1
1
2
Medium
0.25
0.50
3
3
5
d
a
Coarse
0.5
1.0
5
5
10
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
5
5
15
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
4
4
19
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
20
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
21
Fine
5.6
8.0
2
2
23
_
Medium
8.0
11.0
1
1
24
ti°tiyh ° yh °y y
Medium
11.0
16.0
4
4
28
;:
Coarse
16.0
22.6
7
7
35
Coarse
22.6
32
8
8
43
Very Coarse
32
45
14
14
57
;:.
Very Coarse
45
64
11
11
68
Small
64
90
19
19
87
Small
90
128
8
8
95
Large
128
180
3
3
98
La rge
180
256
2
2
100
••p
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
!..;
Medium
512
1024
100
:..."'.333."'........:
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 3
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--d 0-02/2013 M11.4/1014 -1 1112 5 MY3 03/2016
Cross Section 3
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi=
2.18
Di5 =
22.60
D50 =
37.9
D84 =
85.3
D95 =
128.0
D100 =
256.0
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 3
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--d 0-02/2013 M11.4/1014 -1 1112 5 MY3 03/2016
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 3
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
a
60
d
a
N
50
u
40
m
v
30
20
10
_
0
ti°tiyh ° yh °y y
ti ti� a y� titi ti� �ti� �ti bh °O �° tiyro tiw° yy°°ti ytiti y°y°°a� �9°
•MY0.02/2013
Particle Class Size (mm)
1-01/2011 11Y2 03/2015 0-3/2016

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 4
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 4
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 -- T I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--8--02/2013 M11.4/1014 -1 1112 5 MY303/2016
Cross Section 4
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100-
0.45
Summary
Particle
Class
29.8
D84 =
96.6
Class
Percent
D100 =
362.0
Count
90
min
max
Percentage Cumulative
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
2
2
2
Very fine
0.062
0.125
2
2
4
70
Fine
0.125
0.250
6
6
10
Medium
0.25
0.50
7
7
17
d
a
Coarse
0.5
1.0
10
10
27
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
6
6
33
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
3
3
36
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
37
Fine
4.0
5.6
_
37
Fine
5.6
8.0
37
Medium
8.0
11.0
1
1
38
....
Medium
11.0
16.0
3
3
41
;:
Coarse
16.0
22.6
5
5
46
:;
Coarse
22.6
32
5
5
51
Very Coarse
32
45
5
5
56
;:;
Very Coarse
45
64
17
17
73
Small
64
90
9
9
82
Small
90
128
10
10
92
Large
128
180
4
4
96
Large
180
256
3
3
99
••:
:
Small
256
362
1
1
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
:..............
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 4
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 -- T I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--8--02/2013 M11.4/1014 -1 1112 5 MY303/2016
Cross Section 4
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi=
0.45
Di5 =
2.50
D50 =
29.8
D84 =
96.6
D95 =
165.3
D100 =
362.0
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 4
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 -- T I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--8--02/2013 M11.4/1014 -1 1112 5 MY303/2016
Byrds Creek R2, Cross Section 4
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
a
60
d
a
N
50
u
40
m
v
30
20
_
10
0
-2/2013
Particle Class Size (mm)
1-01/2011 11Y2 03/2015 0-3/2016

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Byrds Creek R3, Reachwide
Byrds Creek R3, Reachwide
Reachwide
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
each Summary
Particle
Class
D50 =
23.4
D80. =
105.6
D95 =
Class
Percent
>2048
Silt/clay
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Percentage
Cumulative
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
2
1
3
3
3
r
Very fine
0.062
0.125
gp
3
Fine
0.125
0.250
2
2
4
4
7
Medium
0.25
0.50
3
6
9
9
16
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
10
11
11
27
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
4
5
5
32
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
2
2
2
34
................Very
Fine
2.8
4.0
U= 40
34
::
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
2
2
36
Fine
5.6
8.0
2
1
3
3
39
a 20
Medium
8.0
11.0
2
2
2
41
Medium
11.0
16.0
1
1
1
42
Coarse
16.0
22.6
2
5
7
7
49
Coarse
22.6
32
6
4
10
10
59
Very Coarse
32
45
3
6
9
9
68
Very Coarse
45
64
2
4
6
6
74
Small
64
90
5
5
5
79
Small
90
128
9
2
11
11
90
Large
128
180
4
4
4
94
Large
180
256
1
1
1
95
••;
Small
256
362
c
0
�'L ,t5 tis 05 1 ti ,ti'b P y�o 0 ,�1 ,y(o ,L�o ,�'L o �b �O % p y0 �ti titi 1ti "I
00 oy o ti ti ti 3 ti h 10 yo �o
Particle Class Size (mm)
•MYO-02/2013 MY1-04/2014 •MY2-03/2015 •M-3/2016
95
Small
362
512
3
3
3
98
Medium
512
1024
98
.......... ..:
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
98
Bedrock
2048
>2048
2
2
2
100
Totall
50
1 50 1
100 1
100 1
100
Byrds Creek R3, Reachwide
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16 =
0.50
D35 =
4.73
D50 =
23.4
D80. =
105.6
D95 =
256.0
Di00 =
>2048
Byrds Creek R3, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
100
90
Silt/clay
avel
r
gp
a ro
a 70
j 60
5 50
E
U= 40
?117
w 30
a 20
10
0
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
�MYO-02/2013 MY1-04/2014 � MY2-03/2015 --6-M13-03/2016
Byrds Creek R3, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
c 70
w
60
`w
a 50
N
40
u
m 30
3
20
10
c
0
�'L ,t5 tis 05 1 ti ,ti'b P y�o 0 ,�1 ,y(o ,L�o ,�'L o �b �O % p y0 �ti titi 1ti "I
00 oy o ti ti ti 3 ti h 10 yo �o
Particle Class Size (mm)
•MYO-02/2013 MY1-04/2014 •MY2-03/2015 •M-3/2016

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 7
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
0 +--
0.01
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 7
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0.1
--4- -02/2013
10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MY1.4/2011 -1112- MY3 03/2016
Cross Section 7
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100-
1.12
Summary
Particle
Class
52.1
D84 =
134.4
Class
Percent
D100 =
1024.0
Count
90
min
max
Percentage Cumulative
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
4
4
4
Very fine
0.062
0.125
1
1
5
70
Fine
0.125
0.250
2
2
7
Medium
0.25
0.50
4
4
11
d
a
Coarse
0.5
1.0
4
4
15
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
6
6
21
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
4
4
25
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
2
2
27
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
28
Fine
5.6
8.0
2
2
30
Medium
8.0
11.0
3
3
33
:;
Medium
11.0
16.0
5
5
38
Coarse
16.0
22.6
1
1
39
Coarse
22.6
32
3
3
42
Very Coarse
32
45
3
3
45
;:.
Very Coarse
45
64
12
12
1 57
Small
64
90
12
12
69
Small
90
128
14
14
83
Large
128
180
7
7
90
Large
180
256
4
4
94
:
••:
Small
256
362
2
2
96
Small
362
512
3
3
99
Medium
512
1024
1
1
100
:..........::::
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
0 +--
0.01
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 7
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0.1
--4- -02/2013
10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MY1.4/2011 -1112- MY3 03/2016
Cross Section 7
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi=
1.12
Di5 =
12.78
D50 =
52.1
D84 =
134.4
D95 =
304.4
D100 =
1024.0
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
0 +--
0.01
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 7
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0.1
--4- -02/2013
10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
MY1.4/2011 -1112- MY3 03/2016
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 7
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
a
60
d
a
N
50
u
40
m
v
30
20
_
10
0
•MY0.02/2013
Particle Class Size (mm)
1-01/2011 11Y2 03/2015 0-3/2016

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 8
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 8
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 i I I I I � Iry 1
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--d 0-02/2013 M11.4/1014 -1 1112 5 MY3 03/2016
Cross Section 8
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100-
14.12
Summary
Particle
Class
70.2
D84 =
167.3
Class
Percent
D100 =
>2048
Count
90
min
max
Percentage Cumulative
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
4
4
4
Very fine
0.062
0.125
2
2
6
70
Fine
0.125
0.250
1
1
7
Medium
0.25
0.50
7
d
a
Coarse
0.5
1.0
N
7
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
7
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
1
1
8
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
9
Fine
4.0
5.6
2
2
11
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
12
Medium
8.0
11.0
2
2
14
Medium
11.0
16.0
3
3
17
Coarse
Lb.0
22.6
4
4
21
Coarse
1 22.6
32
7
7
28
Very Coarse
32
45
9
9
37
Very Coarse
45
64
10
10
47
Small
64
90
11
11
58
Small
90
128
15
15
73
Large
128
180
14
14
87
Large
180
256
6
6
93
:
••:
Small
256
362
2
2
95
Small
362
512
1
1
96
Medium
512
1024
1
1
97
:.............:
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
1
1
98
Bedrock
2048
>2048
2
2
100
Total
100
100
100
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 8
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 i I I I I � Iry 1
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--d 0-02/2013 M11.4/1014 -1 1112 5 MY3 03/2016
Cross Section 8
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi=
14.12
Di5 =
41.72
D50 =
70.2
D84 =
167.3
D95 =
362.0
D100 =
>2048
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 8
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 i I I I I � Iry 1
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--d 0-02/2013 M11.4/1014 -1 1112 5 MY3 03/2016
Byrds Creek R3, Cross Section 8
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
a
60
d
a
N
50
u
40
m
v
30
20
10
r
0
°°°ti°tiyh ° yh °y y
ti ti� a 1110 1.titi ti� �ti� �ti bh �O �° tiyw tiw° yye +n, ytiti y°yo-
-2/2013
Particle Class Size (mm)
1-01/2011 11Y2 03/2015 0-3/2016

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
South Branch, Reachwide
Reachwide
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
each Summary
Particle
Class
D50 =
0.6
D80. =
99.5
D95 =
Class
Percent
512.0
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Percentage
Cumulative
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
10
30
40
40
40
bble
Very fine
0.062
0.125
2
2
2
42
Fine
0.125
0.250
1
1
2
2
44
a 70
Medium
0.25
0.50
1
3
4
4
48
N
Coarse
0.5
1.0
2
4
6
6
54
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
2
4
6
6
60
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
2
2
2
62
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
1
1
1
63
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
2
3
3
66
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
1
67
Medium
8.0
11.0
2
1
3
3
70
Medium
11.0
16.0
1
a
1
1
71
Coarse
1 16.0
22.6 1
3
3
3
74
Coarse
22.6
32
1
1
1
75
10
Very Coarse
32
45
2
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
2
277
Very Coarse
45
64 1
2
2
2
79
Small
64
90
3
3
3
82
Small
90
128
7
7
7
89
Large
128
180
6
6
6
95
Large
180
256
1
1
1
96
••;
Small
256
362
96
Small
362
512
4
4
4
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16=
Silt/Clay
D35 =
Silt/Clay
D50 =
0.6
D80. =
99.5
D95 =
180.0
D100 =
512.0
South Branch, Reachwide
South Branch, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Individual Class Percent
100
100
90
Silt/clay
Sand
avel
80
bble
r
gp
70
w
a ro
L
a 70
w
a
N
50
j 60
u0
40
-23 50
m
30
E
20
40
T
T
10
o
30
00 oti o
.09
•MYO-02/2013
Particle Class Size (mm)
MY1-04/2014 •MY2-03/2015 •M-3/2016
20
a
10
0
0.01
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
� MYO-02/2013 MY1-04/2014 � MY2-03/2015 -.112-
South Branch, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
w
L
60
w
a
N
50
u0
40
m
30
20
T
T
10
o
00 oti o
oti ti $O y0
ti ti 3 h do ,yo �o
•MYO-02/2013
Particle Class Size (mm)
MY1-04/2014 •MY2-03/2015 •M-3/2016

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
South Branch, Cross Section 10
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
South Branch, Cross Section 30
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 i I I I I I I I I i I I I I 1 1111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I I 1 1111
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--d 0-02/2013 M11.4/1014 -11112- MY3 03/2016
Cross Section 10
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100-
Silt/Clay
Summary
Particle
Class
29.3
D84 =
128.0
Class
Percent
D100 =
512.0
Count
90
min
max
Percentage Cumulative
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
16
16
16
Very fine
0.062
0.125
16
70
Fine
0.125
0.250
a
16
Medium
0.25
0.50
1
1
17
d
a
Coarse
0.5
1.0
2
2
19
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
3
3
22
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
3
3
25
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
2
2
27
Fine
4.0
5.6
2
2
29
Fine
5.6
8.0
4
4
33
Medium
8.0
11.0
4
4
37
Medium
11.0
16.0
2
2
39
;:
Coarse
16.0
22.6
5
5
44
Coarse
22.6
32
8
8
52
Very Coarse
32
45
3
3
55
;:.
Very Coarse
45
64
8
8
63
Small
64
90
11
11
74
Small
90
128
10
10
84
Large
128
180
10
10
94
Large
180
256
4
4
98
•;
Small
256
362
98
Small
362
512
2
2
100
• � E
Medium
512
1024
100
:.............:
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
South Branch, Cross Section 30
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 i I I I I I I I I i I I I I 1 1111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I I 1 1111
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--d 0-02/2013 M11.4/1014 -11112- MY3 03/2016
Cross Section 10
Channel materials (mm)
D16=
Silt/Clay
Di5 =
9.38
D50 =
29.3
D84 =
128.0
D95 =
196.6
D100 =
512.0
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
South Branch, Cross Section 30
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 i I I I I I I I I i I I I I 1 1111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I I 1 1111
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--d 0-02/2013 M11.4/1014 -11112- MY3 03/2016
South Branch, Cross Section 10
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
a
60
d
a
N
50
u
40
m
v
30
20
_
10
0
°°°ti°tiyh ° yh °y y ti ti� a y� titi tie �ti� �ti bh °O �° tiyro tiw° yy°°ti ytiti y°.y
•MY0.02/2013
Particle Class Size (mm)
1-01/2011 MY2-03/2015 0-3/2016

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Southeast RI, Reachwide
Reachwide
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
each Summary
Particle
Class
D50 =
4.0
D80. =
101.2
D95 =
Class
Percent
256.0
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Percentage
Cumulative
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
9
27
36
36
36
r
Very fine
0.062
0.125
gp
3
3
3
39
Fine
0.125
0.250
2
4
6
6
45
60
Medium
0.25
0.50
w
a
1
1
1
46
N
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
1
1
47
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
47
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
2
2
2
49
U= 40
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
20
1
1
1
50
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
2
3
3
53
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
1
1
54
Medium
8.0
11.0
1
3
4
4
58
Medium
11.0
16.0
1
1
1
59
Coarse
16.0
22.6
1
2
3
3
62
Coarse
22.6
32
1
1
2
2
64
Very Coarse
32
45
4
0.01
4
4
68
Very Coarse
45
64
4
4
4
72
Small
64
90
8
1
9
9
81
Small
90
128
9
9
9
90
Large
128
180
6
6
6
96
Large
180
256
4
4
4 1
100
••;
Small
256
362
100
Small
362
512
100
Medium
512
1024
100
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
50
50
100
100
100
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16=
Silt/Clay
D35 =
Silt/Clay
D50 =
4.0
D80. =
101.2
D95 =
170.1
Di00 =
256.0
Southeast 1111, Reachwide
Southeast 1111, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
Individual Class Percent
100
100
90
Silt/clay
Sand
90
ravel
bble
r
gp
C
70
a ro
w
a 70
L
60
w
a
j 60
N
50
10
50
u
40
E
m
30
U= 40
20
30
c
10
16 d
o
00 oti o
ti ti ti ti 3 h 10 ,yo �o
•MYO-02/2013
Particle Class Size (mm)
MY1-04/2014 •MY2-03/2015 •M-3/2016
20
a
10
0
0.01
0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
�MYO-02/2013 MY1-04/2014 � MY2-03/2015 -.112-
Southeast 1111, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
w
L
60
w
a
N
50
10
u
40
m
30
20
c
10
16 d
o
00 oti o
ti ti ti ti 3 h 10 ,yo �o
•MYO-02/2013
Particle Class Size (mm)
MY1-04/2014 •MY2-03/2015 •M-3/2016

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Southeast R1, Cross Section 12
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
Southeast 111, Cross Section 12
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 i I I I I''^''l' ' ' I i� I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I I 1 1111
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--d 0-02/2013 MY303/2016
Cross Section 12
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100-
8.90
Summary
Particle
Class
52.3
D84 =
124.6
Class
Percent
D100 =
512.0
Count
90
min
max
Percentage Cumulative
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
10
10
10
Very fine
0.062
0.125
10
70
Fine
0.125
0.250
a
10
Medium
0.25
0.50
10
d
a
Coarse
0.5
1.0
N
10
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
1
11
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
2
2
13
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
2
2
15
Fine
4.0
5.6
15
Fine
5.6
8.0
10
15
Medium
8.0
11.0
3
3
18
;:;:::
Medium
11.0
16.0
2
2
20
•MY0.02/2013
Coarse
16.0
22.6
5
5
25
Coarse
22.6
32
9
9
34
Very Coarse
32
45
10
10
44
;:;
Very Coarse
45
64
14
14
58
Small
64
90
14
14
72
Small
90
128
13
13
85
Large
128
180
11
11
96
La rge
180
256
3
3
99
:
Small
256
362
99
HHHH.••:
Small
362
512
1
1
100
;;;
Medium
512
1024
100
:.............:
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
Southeast 111, Cross Section 12
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 i I I I I''^''l' ' ' I i� I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I I 1 1111
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--d 0-02/2013 MY303/2016
Cross Section 12
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi=
8.90
Di5 =
33.11
D50 =
52.3
D84 =
124.6
D95 =
174.5
D100 =
512.0
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
Southeast 111, Cross Section 12
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 i I I I I''^''l' ' ' I i� I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I i I I I I 1 1111
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--d 0-02/2013 MY303/2016
Southeast 111, Cross Section 12
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
a
60
d
a
N
50
u
40
m
v
30
20
�
10
_
0
°°°ti°tiyh ° yh °y y
ti ti� a y� titi tie �ti� �ti bh °O �° tiyro tiw° yy° +n,
•MY0.02/2013
Particle Class Size (mm)
111101/2010 11Y2 03/2015 0-3/2016

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Southeast R2&3, Reachwide
100
90
80
a 70
j 60
50
E
40
30
a 20
10
Southeast R2&3, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
�MYO-02/2013 MY1-04/2014 � MY2-03/2015 -.112-
Reachwide
Diameter (mm)
Particle Count
each Summary
Particle
Class
D50 =
6.3
D80. =
82.6
D95 =
Class
Percent
512.0
min
max
Riffle
Pool
Total
Percentage
Cumulative
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
6
24
30
30
30
Very fine
0.062
0.125
3
3
3
33
Fine
0.125
0.250
1
4
5
5
38
60
Medium
0.25
0.50
w
a
1
1
1
39
N
Coarse
0.5
1.0
1
1
1
40
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
1
2
2
42
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
1
2
3
3
45
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
20
2
2
2
47
Fine
4.0
5.6
1
1
2
2
49
Fine
5.6
8.0
1
2
3
3
52
Medium
8.0
11.0
52
Medium
11.0
16.0
4
4
4
56
Coarse
16.0
22.6
2
2
4
4
60
Coarse
22.6
32
2
1
3
3
63
Very Coarse
32
45
7
1
8
8
71
Very Coarse
45
64
5
2
7
7
78
Small
64
90
6
2
8
8
86
Small
90
128
7
7
7
93
Large
128
180
2
2
2
95
Large
180
256
4
4
4
99
••Small
Small
256
362
99
E.
362
512
1
1
1
100
Medium
512
1024
100
IN
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Totall
50
1 50 1
100 1
100 1
100
100
90
80
a 70
j 60
50
E
40
30
a 20
10
Southeast R2&3, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
�MYO-02/2013 MY1-04/2014 � MY2-03/2015 -.112-
Reachwide
Channel materials (mm)
D16=
Silt/Clay
D35 =
0.16
D50 =
6.3
D80. =
82.6
D95 =
180.0
Di00 =
512.0
100
90
80
a 70
j 60
50
E
40
30
a 20
10
Southeast R2&3, Reachwide
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
�MYO-02/2013 MY1-04/2014 � MY2-03/2015 -.112-
Southeast R2&3, Reachwide
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
70
w
L
60
w
a
N
50
u0
40
m
3
30
20
T
T
10
0
00 oti o
ph
ti ti ti ti 3 h 10 ,yo �o
•MYO-02/2013
Particle Class Size (mm)
MY1-04/2014 •MY2-03/2015 •M-3/2016

Reachwide and Cross Section Pebble Count Plots
Byrds Creek Mitigation Project
DMS Project No. 95020
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Southeast R2&3, Cross Section 15
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
Southeast R2&3, Cross Section 15
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 1
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--d 0-02/2013 M11.4/1014 .1213/1615 MY303/2016
Cross Section 15
Diameter (mm)
Riffle 100-
8.00
Summary
Particle
Class
43.8
D84 =
120.3
Class
Percent
D100 =
1024.0
Count
90
min
max
Percentage Cumulative
Silt/Clay
0.000
0.062
6
6
6
Very fine
0.062
0.125
6
70
Fine
0.125
0.250
a
6
Medium
0.25
0.50
1
1
7
d
a
Coarse
0.5
1.0
N
7
Very Coarse
1.0
2.0
1
1
8
Very Fine
2.0
2.8
2
2
10
Very Fine
2.8
4.0
2
2
12
Fine
4.0
5.6
2
2
14
Fine
5.6
8.0
2
2
16
Medium
8.0
11.0
3
3
19
Medium
11.0
16.0
7
7
26
•MY0.02/2013
Coarse
Lb.0
22.6
3
3
29
Coarse
1 22.6
32
9
9
38
Very Coarse
32
45
13
13
51
Very Coarse
45
64
7
7
58
Small
64
90
12
12
70
Small
90
128
17
17
87
Large
128
180
7
7
94
Large
180
256
2
2
96
:
••:
Small
256
362
96
Small
362
512
3
3
99
Medium
512
1024
1
1
100
:.............:
Large/Very Large
1024
2048
100
Bedrock
2048
>2048
100
Total
100
100
100
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
Southeast R2&3, Cross Section 15
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 1
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--d 0-02/2013 M11.4/1014 .1213/1615 MY303/2016
Cross Section 15
Channel materials (mm)
D1fi=
8.00
Di5 =
28.50
D50 =
43.8
D84 =
120.3
D95 =
214.7
D100 =
1024.0
100
90
80
70
60
50
E
i? 40
30
a 20
10
Southeast R2&3, Cross Section 15
Pebble Count Particle Distribution
0 1
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Particle Class Size (mm)
--d 0-02/2013 M11.4/1014 .1213/1615 MY303/2016
Southeast R2&3, Cross Section 15
Individual Class Percent
100
90
80
C
70
a
60
d
a
N
50
u
40
m
v
30
20
10
0
•MY0.02/2013
Particle Class Size (mm)
1-01/2011 11Y2 03/2015 0-3/2016

APPENDIX 5. Hydrology Summary Data and Plots

Table 13. Verification of Bankfull Events
Byrds Creek Mitigation Site (DMS Project No. 95020)
Monitoring Year 3 - 2016
Date of Data Approximate Date of
Reach
Collection Occurrence
Method
3/1/2016 2/16/2016
Byrds Creek
8/15/2016 8/5/2016
Crest Gage /
3/1/2016 2/16/2016
South Branch
Pressure
8/15/2016 8/5/2016
Transducer
Southeast
3/1/2016 2/16/2016
Branch
8/15/2016 8/5/2016