20120730 Ver 1_Year 4 Monitoring Report_2016_20170119

601 North II
Stream Restoration Site
NCDMS Project Number: 95025
Monitoring Contract Number: 003991
Monitoring Year 4
2016
Prepared for:
Resource Environmental Solutions
Pre
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Prepared by:
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
E QUINOX
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28801
Submitted to:
NCDEQ — Division of Mitigation Services
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

601 North II
Stream Restoration Site
2016 Monitoring Report (MY 4)
Table of Contents
1.0 Executive Summary/Project Abstract...................................................................................... 1
2.0 Methodology............................................................................................................................ 3
3.0 References................................................................................................................................4
AppendixA..................................................................................................................................... 5
AppendixB.....................................................................................................................................
6
AppendixC...................................................................................................................................
17
AppendixD...................................................................................................................................
12
AppendixE...................................................................................................................................
46
M

Appendices
Appendix A. Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Figure 1. Vicinity Map and Directions
Table 1. Project Components and Component Summations
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Attributes
Appendix B. Visual Assessment Data
Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Photo Station Photos
Appendix C. Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9. Planted and Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
Appendix D. Stream Survey Data
Cross -Section Plots with Annual Overlays and Photos
Longitudinal Profile with Annual Overlays
Pebble Count Plots with Annual Overlays
Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic
Containment Parameter Distributions)
Table l la. Monitoring Data — Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional
Parameters — Cross -Sections)
Table l lb. Monitoring Data — Stream Reach Data Summary
Appendix E. Hydrologic Data
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Figure 3. Daily Precipitation Data for Monroe, NC

1.0 Executive Summary/Project Abstract
The goals and objectives stated in the 601 North II Restoration Plan (EBX 2013) are as follows:
Project Goals
• Re-establish the capacity to store and transport watershed flows and sediment loads by
restoring stable dimension, pattern, and profile
• Reduce sediment within on-site and downstream receiving waters through the
stabilization of eroding stream banks, introduction of livestock exclusion fencing and
responsible grazing techniques, and restoration of a forested riparian buffer
• Elevate the water table and introduce surface water flood hydrodynamics within the
floodplain by re-establishing characteristic bankfull dimensions and flood frequency
• Remove non -point sources of pollution associated with pesticides, herbicides, fertilizer,
and livestock waste by filtering sheet flow through a restored riparian buffer and installed
Riparian Best Management Practice (RBMP) detention devices
• Improve aquatic habitat by reducing sedimentation, removing in -stream culverts,
enhancing stream bed variability, and introducing shading, woody debris, and detritus
from riparian planting
• Enhance terrestrial wildlife habitat by extending a terrestrial wildlife corridor and refuge
to connect with the existing and adjacent 601 North Site, as well as to the downstream
reaches of Wicker Branch and Lanes Creek
• Improve water quality for two populations of freshwater mussels documented to occur in
Lanes Creek (Savannah Lilliput (Toxolasma pullus) and Carolina creekshell (Villosa
vaughniana), both state listed and Federal Species of Concern
• Expand on and integrate the restoration and enhancement work with the adjacently
positioned, companion 601 North Restoration Site
Project Objectives
• Restoration (Priority 1 and 2) of approximately 3,354 linear feet of perennial stream
channel (3,169 linear feet of credited stream) to reconnect the floodplain and restore
stable channel dimension, pattern, and profile
• Enhancement (Level I) of approximately 225 linear feet of perennial stream channel by
stream bank grading, and slight adjustments to either stream pattern or dimension
• Enhancement (Level II) of approximately 615 linear feet of perennial stream channel by
restoring a minimum 50 foot planted buffer
• Removal of an existing culvert on Wicker Branch
• Installation of Riparian Best Management Practice (RBMP) detention devices, and
livestock exclusion fencing to prohibit grazing on the floodplain and hoof shear on
stream banks
Re -vegetating floodplains adjacent to streams
Providing a permanent conservation easement on approximately 12.3 acres of riparian
buffer along approximately 4,194 feet of restored and enhanced stream channels
601 North II Stream Restoration Site 1 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

The following presents the results from data collection performed during the Year 4 monitoring
period (MY4). Data was collected between January and September of 2016.
Visual assessment of the easement indicates that herbaceous vegetation has become well
established throughout the project. Areas of low stem densities (n = 3) and poor growth rates
(n = 1) were noted during MY4 in Reaches 1, 2, and 4 (Figure 2). During MY4, a previously
identified easement encroachment was observed on Reach 4, between station 0+00 and 1+50 on
the LDB. This area consists of clearing a walking path along the fence line using mowing and
the application of herbicides.). During MY4 only one continued encroachment occurred on the
LDB of Reach from between STA 0+00 and 1+50, where the edge of the easement was sprayed
and mowed to clear a walking path along the fence line. Vegetation within all areas of
encroachment identified during previous monitoring years has begun to become re-established.
Additional boundary marking and signage were installed in the vicinity of the original
encroachment in April 2014. Areas of encroachment that have occurred since then will receive
supplemental boundary markers in the vicinity of the encroachment and RES will continue
efforts to coordinate with the adjacent landowners to avoid future encroachments. Supplemental
planting of the easement occurred during January 2015 in areas that had experienced plant
mortality. The replanted areas included areas of encroachment, poor growth rate, and low stem
densities. Invasive exotic vegetation, consisting of Chinese Privet (Lingustrum sinense) and
Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), was noted in seven locations totaling 0.39 acres, or
3% of the easement area (Figure 2 and Table 6).
The MY4 vegetation plot data was collected during June 2016. All monitoring plots met the
year 5 success criteria of 260 stems per acre. Stem densities ranged from 283 to 647 stems per
acre with an annual mean of 418 stems per acre, a 1% increase in stem density between MY3
and MY4 (Table 9). The increase occurred due to locating a stem reported as missing during
MY3. A total of 10 plant species were documented within the vegetation monitoring plots.
When volunteer stems are included, densities ranged from 405 to 1,012 stems per acre with a
mean of 607 stems per acre across all plots.
Visual assessment of the entire project indicates that the stream is remaining stable with few
problem areas noted. One small area of degradation on Reach 1 at approximately Station 3+30,
first observed during MY2, is stabilizing. Another small area of degradation totaling 15 feet was
noted on Reach 2 at Station 13+75. On Reach 2 bank erosion is occurring at the following
locations: 26 feet beginning at STA 11+25, 10 feet near Station 12+50, 8 feet near Station
19+50, and 13 feet near Station 22+30 (Figure 2). Beaver dams were removed in early 2016,
however remnants of the dams still exist at STA 10+25, STA 11+25, and STA 13+00. (Figure 2).
Field visits were conducted March 15th and 16th to collect stream morphological data. Stream
longitudinal profiles, in general, have remained stable from MY3 to MY4 (Appendix D). There
was a drop in the total number of pools in Reach 5 due to a compound pool scouring out at
Station 5+25 and becoming one long pool. Water surface slopes at riffles on Reach 2 between
Station 8+60 and Station 10+00 and between Station 12+70 and 12+75 on Reach 2 were
flattened due to effects from the remnant beaver dams. However, bedform in these areas have
remained mostly stable, with the exception of the pool 10+00, which has filled in slightly with
fine sediment. Excluding these areas, no other significant areas of instability in the stream
601 North II Stream Restoration Site 2 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

channel were identified. MY4 cross-section data showed little change between MY3 and MY4
(Appendix D), with the exception of cross-sections 5 and 6 in Reach 1 and Reach 2 respectively.
Scour along both banks led to an increased bankfull width at cross-section 5, while scour along
the right descending bank led to an increased bankfull width at cross-section 6.
Bankfull events were documented on both Reach 2 and Reach 5 during site visits in January
2016 (Table 12). Another bankfull event was recorded on the Reach 2 crest gauge during a
March site visit. These represent the seventh bankfull event recorded on Reach 2 and the sixth
bankfull event recorded on Reach 5 since construction.
Summary information and data related to the occurrence of items such as easement
encroachment and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements
can be found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and
supporting information formerly found in these reports can be found in the restoration plan on
NCDMS's website. All raw data supporting tables and figures in the appendices are available
from NCDMS upon request.
2.0 Methodology
Visual assessment of the stream was performed at the beginning and end of the monitoring year.
Permanent photo station photos were collected during the initial visual assessment during leaf -
off conditions to ensure visibility of in -channel structures and stream banks. Additional photos
of vegetation or stream problem areas were documented with photographs throughout the project
area.
Geomorphic measurements were taken using standard guidance (Rosgen 1996; USACE 2003)
during low flow conditions using a Nikon NPR 332 Total Station. Three-dimensional
coordinates associated with cross-section and profile data were collected in the field and geo-
referenced (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Morphological data was limited to 10 cross-
sections. Survey data was imported into CAD, ArcGIS, and Excel for data processing and
analysis. Channel substrate was characterized using a Wolman Pebble Count outlined in the
Harrelson et al. (1994) and processed using Microsoft Excel.
Vegetation success is being monitored using 12 permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation
monitoring follows the CVS-EEP Level 1 Protocol for MY1 and will follow Level 2 Protocol for
monitoring years 2-5 for Recording Vegetation, version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and includes
analysis of composition and density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data
entry tool. In the field, the four corners of each plot were permanently marked with rebar and
photos of each plot are taken from the origin each monitoring year.
Precipitation data was reported from the NCCRONOS station number 315771 two miles South
East of Monroe, NC. Two crest gauges were installed—one on the mainstem Reach 2 at XS -10,
and the other on Reach 5 at XS -3. During quarterly visits to the site, the height of the corkline
was recorded and cross-referenced with known bankfull elevations at each crest gauge.
601 North II Stream Restoration Site 3 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

3.0 References
Harrelson, Cheryl, C. Rawlins and J. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An
Illustrated Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Rocky Mountain Forest and
Range Experiment Station. USDA Forest Service. Fort Collins, Colorado
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for
Recording Vegetation. Version 4.2. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Department of Biology.
EBX (Environmental Banc and Exchange). 2013. 601 North II Restoration Site Baseline
Monitoring Document and As -Build Baseline Report. NCEEP Project No.
95025/Contract No. 003991. Raleigh.
Rosgen, D.L. 1996. Applied River Morphology. Wildland Hydrology Books, Pagosa Springs,
Colorado.
USACE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 2003. Stream Mitigation Guidelines. U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources -Division of Water Quality. Wilmington District.
601 North II Stream Restoration Site 4 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
J --t
-4
Driving Directions: F ra rn Mon roe drive 5owh on Hvq. 601.
Turn rimillTr nn "nUsnuq Ci mle, F31 tha "whem inrercw.,ntion
viiih Hwy. 641. Site. is url 10 and is azuiisswd by a ffdi rri
r, path Io Led on Lhe west side of McManus Circle just
befure the road ends. %?0
Thp. 9LIt)iF-.Ct project. site is An enyironmentsl n3siloration qite
ol Lhe NCDEQ DIVIS and is enwrnpassW by a retarded
conservation easement. but is bordered by land tinder
pdwtp ownership, Aow.i3 ing the -rite may require
ti d YH i sing .areas neH i u i a lung iltu ea 5rrierii bu undary arid FLM N
Lhorcl'ofe access by Llne general public is noL porinil.Led.
,cess by authorized personel of state and federal mil6tqw, agn
agencies or the ir d esitweefcantracAors involved i n the -A
development, uversiy lit: and aikmrardship uf this res-tw Effull
site Is pormil.l.rd wilhirp Lho tornis and Limorrimos of Lh eir
defined role. Any intended site vis.itation or activity by any
person: Oklt5ide ofthese PrevlQU51V 5anctioned roles and
@LiiwRius iecluirbis prior cuoiUirimlion with LAMS.
5*1
Mwerl" n S�?
At
7
�p
------
(ZLO
J
K
gar —
=trearn=
:Roads
7Y Mit.e:nfie I MtF!.�
Wirter Bodies
_1 Cuunta Boundary
Figure 1
601 North 11 Mitigation Site P . rolec-. 311:9
pres AV Project Vicinity Map
EQUINOX a 0.2, 1D. 5 1 L
601 North II Stream Restoration Site A-] Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
'Includes 169 feet of hydrologic connectivity through a linear wetland persisting in the location of the relic channel.
2Does not include the restored portion of Wicker Branch located outside of the conservation easement (Station 11+63-12+25).
3Does not include the restored portion of Wicker Branch located outside of the conservation easement (Station 25+85-27+08).
601 North II Stream Restoration Site A-2 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
601 North II Stream Restoration Site — Project No. 95025
Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian Wetland
Non -riparian
Buffer
Nitrogen
—
Phosphorous
Wetland
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Type R RE
............:::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::..........................................................................................................................................................::
..............................................................................................................................................................
Totals 3,169 396
Project Components
Stationing /Location
Existing
Approach
Restoration -or- Restoration
Restoration Footage
Mitigation
Reach ID
Footage
Equivalent
Ratio
Wicker Branch
(Reach 1)
00+00-06+60
�
630'
P]
Restoration
660
1:01
Wicker Branch
06+60-24+35
1,356
Pl,P2
Restoration
17132
1:01
(Reach 2)
Wicker Branch
24+35-27+08
414
P2
Restoration
1503
1:01
(Reach 3)
UT to Wicker
00+00-02+25
218
E1
Restoration Equivalent
225
01:01.5
02+25-08+40
608
Ell
Restoration Equivalent
615
01:02.5
Branch (Reach 4)
UT to Wicker
Branch (Reach 5)
08+40 14+86
534
Pi
Restoration
646
1:01
Component Summation
Stream Riparian Wetland Non -riparian Wetland
Buffer
Upland
Restoration Level
(linearfeet) (acres) (acres)
(square feet)
(acres)
............
. .... .......
on-
....... .............
...........................................................................
Riverine
.......
Restoration
3,169
12.3
Enhancement I
225
EnhancementII
615
BMP Dements
Element
Location
Purpose/Function
Notes
on-site storm water from adjacent agricultural fields. Remove suspended solids, help
Target at base ofdminages
VeinaTreat
See as -built plans
infiltration ofwater and remove excess nutrients prior to entering stream Will reduce livestock
coming from adjacent agricultural
Pools (12)
Pools
waste in on-site streams
fields.
Farm
Crossing
See as -built plans
Two off-site farm crossings located above the restored streams will be improved at their existing
hnproveme
location and incorporated into the restoration design.
nts
Cattle
Along the western
Exclusion
site boundary
Will eliminate hoofshear on banks and livestockwaste into on-site streams
To be installed in 2013
Fencing
'Includes 169 feet of hydrologic connectivity through a linear wetland persisting in the location of the relic channel.
2Does not include the restored portion of Wicker Branch located outside of the conservation easement (Station 11+63-12+25).
3Does not include the restored portion of Wicker Branch located outside of the conservation easement (Station 25+85-27+08).
601 North II Stream Restoration Site A-2 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
601 North II Stream Restoration Site — Project No. 95025
Activity Report
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or Delivery
Final Mitigation Plan
N/A
Oct -12
Final Design (90 percent)
N/A
Nov -12
Construction
N/A
Apr -13
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area
N/A
February -April 2013
Permanent seed mix applied to reach/segments
N/A
Apr -13
Bare Root Seedling Installation
N/A
Apr -13
Installation of permanent cross-sections and vegetation plots
N/A
May -13
Baseline Monitoring Report
Jun -13
Jun -13
Year 1 Vegetation Monitoring
Dec -13
Dec -13
Year 1 Stream Monitoring
Nov -13
Dec -13
Beaver Dam Removal
-
M ar-14
Additional Boundary Marking/Signage
-
Apr -14
Year 2 Vegetation Monitoring
Sep -14
Nov -14
Year 2 Stream Monitoring
Jun -14
Nov -14
Supplemental Planting
-
Jan -15
Year 3 Vegetation Monitoring
Sep -15
Nov -15
Year 3 Stream Monitoring
May -15
Nov -15
Beaver Dam Removal
-
Mar -16
Year 4 Vegetation Monitoring
Jun -16
Oct -16
Year Stream Monitoring
Mar -16
Oct -16
Year 5 Vegetation Monitoring
Year 5 Stream Monitoring
*N/A- Activities and reporting history for these items are not applicable to this restoration project
601 North II Stream Restoration Site A-3 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
Table 3. Project Contacts
601 North II Stream Restoration Site — Project No. 95025
Resource Environmental Solutions
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Prime Contractor
Raleigh NC 27605
Phone: [phone]
Contact: Brian Hockett
Atkins North America, hic.
1616 East Millbrook Road, Suite 310
Designer
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
Contact: Jens Geratz or Michael Gloden
Wright Contracting
PO Box 545
Construction Contractor
Siler City, NC 27344
[phone]
Contact: Stephen James
KBS Earthworks
5616 Cable Church Road
Planting Contractor
Julian, NC 27283
[phone]
Contact: Keneth Strader
Kee Mapping and Surveying
PO Box 2566
As -built Surveys
Ashville, NC 28802
Contact: Phillip Kee
Evergreen Seed
Fuquay Varina, NC
Beetling Mix Source
[phone]
Contact: Wistar Taylor
Arbor Gen Super Tree Nursery
Nursery Stock Suppliers
[phone]
Contact: Polly Creech
Atkins North America, Inc.
1616 East Millbrook Road, Suite 310
Monitoring Performers (MYO) - 2013
Raleigh, NC 27609
[phone]
Contact: Jim Cooper
Equinox Environmental Consultation and Design, Inc.
Monitoring Performers (MYl-MY4)
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
2013-2016
Asheville, NC
Stream Monitoring POC
Drew Alderman [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Drew Alderman [phone]
601 North II Stream Restoration Site A-4 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix A
Project Vicinity Map and Background Tables
601 North II Stream Restoration Site A-5 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
601 North H Stream Restoration Site —Project No. 95025
Project Information
Project Name
601 North II Stream Restoration Site
County
Union County
Project Area (acres)
12.3
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude)
34.897274,-90.473416
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province
Piedmont
River Basin
Yadkin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -digit
3040105
USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit
3040105081010
DWQ Sub -basin
3/72014
Project Drainage Area (acres)
453
Project Drainage Area Percent Impervious Area
'1%
CGIA Land Use Classification
Cultivated, Managed Herbaceous Cover, Mixed Hardwood
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Wicker Branch Wicker Branch Wicker Branch UT to Wicker Branch
(Reach 1) (Reach 2) (Reach 3) (Reach 4)
UT to Wicker Branch
(Reach 5)
Length of reach (linear feet)
630 1,356 414 826
534
Valley classification
VIH Vill VIH VIII
VIII
Drainage area (acres)
169 286 365 85
88
NCDWQ stream identification score
23.5 35 35 23
23
NCDWQ Water Quality Classification
WS -V WS -V WS -V WS -V
WS -V
Morphological Description (stream type)
16 El/C] G4 B4
B4
Evolutionary trend
E -G -F E -G -C -E E -G E -G -B
E -G -B
Underlying mapped soils
Cid channery silt Cid channery silt loam Cid channery silt loam Badin channery silty clay loam
(BdB2), Cid channery silt loam
loam CmB
( ) (CmB) (CmB) (CmB)
Badin channery silty clay loam (BdB2),
Cid chaunery silt loam (CmB)
Drainage class
Moderately well Moderately well BdB2: Well drained, CmB:
drained 11 oderately well drained drained Moderately well drained
BdB2: Well drained, CmB: Moderately
well drained
Soil Hydric status
Not hydric Not hydric Not hydric Not hydric
Not hydric
Valley Slope
0.0095 o,0098 0.0165 0.013
0.0124
FEMA classification
Project streams are not located within a FEMA regulated area
Native vegetation community
N/A (cultivated
laud)
N/A (cultivated
land)
Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest
N/A
(cultivated
land)
N/A (cultivated land)
Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation
0%
0%
60% (Chinese privet)
0%
0%
Wetland Summary Information
ParametersWetland
Size of Weiland (acres)
Wetland Type
1
0.05
Palustrine emergent
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.............................................................................................................................................
...................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................
:::.........................................................................................................:::
.....................................................................................................................................:
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
_.._.......... _..._.._.._.._...
Mapped Soil Series Cid channery silt loam (CmB)
Drainage class M oderately well drained
Soil Hydric Status Not hydric
Source of Hydrology Groundwater
Hydrologic Impairment NA
Native vegetation community N/A (cultivated land)
Percent composition exotic invasive vegetation 0%
Regulatory Considerations
Regulation
Applicable? Resolved?
Documentation
Waters of the United States — Section 404
Yes Yes
JD Notification / N WP27
Waters ofthe United States—Section 401
Yea Yes
401 Water Quality Certification
Endangered Species Act
Yes Yes CE Documentation (Mitigation Plan, Appendix B)
Historic Preservation Act
No NA CE Documentation(Mitigation Plan, AppendixB)
Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/ Coastal Area
Management Act (LAMA) No NA
NA
FEMA Floodplain Compliance
No NA FEMA Floodplain Checklist(Mitigation Plan, Appendix
B)
Essential Fisheries Habitat
No NA
NA
601 North II Stream Restoration Site A-5 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Figure 2. Integrated Current Condition Plan View
UT to Wicker Branch
Reach 4
UT to Wicker Branch
Reach 5
/�
I
— •— • Easement Boundary
As -Built Centerline
As -Built Top of Bank
Structures
Cross Section
Long Pro Start
�t Photo Point
• Crest Gauge
z� Control Points
Contour (4 Ft.)
Wicker Branch
Reach 2
Year 4 Conditions
Vegetation Plot Success
- Criteria Met
Criteria Not met
Vegetation Problem Areas
Encroachment
:.:::::•:::� Low Stem Density
Poor Growth RateNigor
Stream Problem Areas
Aggradation
Degradation
Bank Erosion
Relic Beaver Dam
0
x Stressed Structure
12, 0
_ XS -6 Wicker Branch
N. XS -7
°/ o
�'` Reach 3
Wicker Branch° _ _ _ - —
oo ooCD CDx
Reach 1 �
PP -5/ Q
'� XS, -Ar-
-8 `L
250
tip
10
0
0
1,000
= Feet
Prepared for Project: 601 North II Notes: 1) Base Map Data Provided by Akins North America, INC. Prepared by
Current Condition Plan View 2) 2012 World Imagery Photo
Year 4 Monitoring
Union CounM North Carolina
res Sheet 1 of 1 —1�`��
Date Project Number EQUINOX
September 2016 NCDMS # 95925

Appendix B Visual Assessment Data
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 North II Stream Restoration Site B-2 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
601 North II / Project No. 95025 - Wicker Branch Reach 1
Assessed Len th 660 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
P
ass Intended
nt
Total
Number in
As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intend
de
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aeeradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2 Degradation - Evidence of downeutting
1
25
96%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
22
22
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean BankfullDepth >_1.6).
19
19
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
19
19
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
21
21
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
21
21
100%
2.Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhangingto the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
1 0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
8
8
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
8
8
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
8
8
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
8
8
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining— Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio> 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
8
8
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
601 North II Stream Restoration Site
Project No. 95025
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
B-3
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
601 North II / Project No. 95025 - Wicker Branch Reach 2
Assessed Length 1,775 feet
Number
Footage
Adjusted %
Number
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
with
with
for
Major Channel
Channel
Metric
Stable,
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Category
Sub Category
Performing
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
1. Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2. Deeradation - Evidence of downwtting
1
15
99%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
33
33
100%
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
32
33
97%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
33
33
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend(Run).
33
33
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
33
33
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
4
58
97%
1
8
91%
and/or scour and erosion.
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
4
58
97%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
13
13
100%
Structures
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
13
13
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
13
13
100%
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
3. Bank Protection
exceed 15%.
13
13
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth: M can
F4Habi1.t
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
13
13
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
601 North II Stream Restoration Site
Project No. 95025
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
B-4
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
601 North II / Project No. 95025 - Unnamed Tributary - Wicker Branch Reach 3
Assessed Len th 273 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
P
nt
ass Intended
Total
Number in
As-built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
de
as Intend
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Aeeradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2 Det radation - Evidence of downeutting
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
5
5
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean BankfullDepth >_1.6).
5
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
5
5
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
5
5
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
5
5
100%
2.Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simp ly from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhangingto the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
1 0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or l0�'
2
2
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
2
2
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining— Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio> 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
2
2
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
601 North II Stream Restoration Site
Project No. 95025
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
B-5
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
601 North II / Project No. 95025 - Unnamed Tributary - Wicker Branch Reach 5
Assessed Len th 646 feet
Number
Footage
Adjusted%
Number
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
with
with
for
Major Channel
Channel
Metric
Stable'
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Category
Sub Category
Performing
As -built
Segments
Footage
as Intended
Woody
Woody
Woody
as Intended
Vegetation
Vegetation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
0
0
100%
1. Vertical Stability
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
2 Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
18
18
100%
1. Doth Sufficient (Mac Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
19
19
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
2. Lendh appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
19
19
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
19
19
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
19
19
100%
2. Bank
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
1. Scoured/Eroding
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
1 0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
9
9
100%
Structures
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
9
9
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
8
9
89%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
9
9
100%
exceed 15%.
Pool forming structures maintaining— Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwad0ogs providing some cover at
9
9
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
601 North II Stream Restoration Site
Project No. 95025
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
B-6
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
N/A - Item does not apply.
601 North II Stream Restoration Site
Project No. 95025
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
B-7
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
601 North II / Project No. 95025
Planted Acreage 12.3
% of
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Number of
Combined
Planted
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
N/A
0
0.00
0%
2. Low Stem Density Areas
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on MY3,
N/A
3
0.88
o
7/o
4, or 5 stem count criteria.
Totals
3
0.88
7%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
given the monitoring year.
N/A
1
1.08
o
9 /o
Cumulative Totals
4
1.96
16%
Easement Acreage 12.3
Of
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Number of
Combed
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acrea ge
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
Cross Hatch
7
0.39
3%
(Red - Dense/Yellow - Present)
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map scale).
N/A
1
0.03
0%
N/A - Item does not apply.
601 North II Stream Restoration Site
Project No. 95025
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
B-7
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
601 North II — Permanent Photo Station 1
Looking Downstream
601 North II — Permanent Photo Station 2
Looking Downstream
601 North II Stream Restoration Site B-8 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
601 North II — Permanent Photo Station 2
Looking Upstream
601 North II — Permanent Photo Station 3
Looking Upstream
601 North II Stream Restoration Site B-9 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
601 North II — Permanent Photo Station 4
Looking Downstream
601 North II — Permanent Photo Station 5
Looking Downstream
601 North II Stream Restoration Site B-10 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

601 North II — Permanent Photo Station 5
Looking Upstream
601 North II — Permanent Photo Station 6
Looking Downstream
601 North II Stream Restoration Site B-11 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

601 North II -Permanent Photo Station 6
Looking Upstream
601 North II Stream Restoration Site B-12 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Problem Area Photos
Project Reach 2 — Beaver Dam (removed) 10+25 Looking Upstream
Project Reach 2 — Beaver Dam (removed) 11+00 Looking Upstream
601 North II Stream Restoration Site B-13 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

r

Rf(
-
t'
'd4 a
` • r - -
�1
J

Project Reach 4 — Encroachment 0+00 Left Descending Bank
Project Reach 5 — Stressed Structure 13+25 Looking Downstream
601 North II Stream Restoration Site B-16 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
601 North II / Project No. 95925
Vegetation
Plot ID
Vegetation
Survival
Threshold
Met?
Tract Mean
1
Yes
92%
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
5
Yes
6
Yes
7
Yes
8
Yes
9
Yes
10
Yes
11
Yes
12
No
601 North II Stream Restoration Site C-1 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
601 North II -Vegetation Monitoring Plot I
June 14, 2016
601 North II -Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
June 14, 2016
601 North II Stream Restoration Site C-2 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
601 North II -Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
June 14, 2016
601 North II -Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
June 14, 2016
601 North II Stream Restoration Site C-3 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
601 North II -Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
June 14, 2016
601 North II -Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6
June 14, 2016
601 North II Stream Restoration Site C-4 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
601 North II -Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7
June 14, 2016
601 North II -Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8
June 14, 2016
601 North II Stream Restoration Site C-5 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
601 North II -Vegetation Monitoring Plot 9
June 14, 2016
601 North II -Vegetation Monitoring Plot 10
June 14, 2016
601 North II Stream Restoration Site C-6 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
601 North II -Vegetation Monitoring Plot 11
June 14, 2016
601 North II -Vegetation Monitoring Plot 12
June 14, 2016
601 North II Stream Restoration Site C-7 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
601 North II Stream Restoration Site C-8 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
601 NII Stream Restoration Site
Report Prepared By
Owen Carson
Date Prepared
6/16/2016 1529
database name
601_ N_ II_MY4_2016.mdb
database location
Z.\ES\NRI&M\EBXMonitoring\601_N II\601N-II-MY4-2016\Data\Veg
computer name
FIELD -PC
file size
46780416
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT ------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and
project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes
live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live
stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total
stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and
missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers
combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY -------------------------------------
Project Code
95925
project Name
601 North II Stream Restoration Site
Description
Stream Restoration Site
River Basin
Yadkin -Pee Dee
le ngth(ft)
4,248
stream -to -edge width (ft)
350
area (sq m)
47,348.22
Required Plots (calculated)
12
Sampled Plots
12
601 North II Stream Restoration Site C-8 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 North II Stream Restoration Site C-9 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Assessment Data
1PnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
Table 9 Con't. Planted Total Stem Count (Annual Means)
601NII Stream Restoration Site
Table 9. Planted Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot)
601 NII Stream Restoration Site
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
MY4 (2016)
PnoLS P -all T
MY3 (2015) MY2 (2014)
PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T
MYI (2013)
PnoLS P -all T
MYO (2013)
PnoLS P -all T
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
29
29 32
28
Current Plot Data (MY4 2016)
29
29
29
31
31 31
51
51 51
Campsis radicans
Trumpet Creeper
Vine
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
Plot 1
PnoLS P -all T
Plot 2
PnoLS P -all T
Plot 3
PnoLS P -all T
Plot 4
PnoLS P -all T
Plot 5
PnoLS P -all T
Plot 6
PnoLS P -all T
Plot 7
PnoLS P -all T
Plot 8
PnoLS P -all T
Plot 9
PnoLS P -all T
Plot 10
PnoLS P -all T
Plot 11
PnoLS P -all T
Plot 12
PnoLS P -all T
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
1
1
1
3 3
3
2 2 3
1 1 1
4 4 4
4 4
4
I
2 2
2
3 3
3
3 3
4
4
41
5
2 2
2
Campsis radicans
Trumpet Creeper
Vine
8
8 8
7
7
7
11
11 11
19
19 19
Diospyros virginiana
Common Persimmon
Tree
5
Celtis laevigata
Sugarberry
Tree
Tree
11
11 16
11
11 13
10
10
12
9
9 9
10
10 10
Liquidambar styraci ua
Sweetgum
Tree
29
1
8
Celtis occidentalis
Common Hackberry
Tree
Nyssa sylvatica
Blackgum
Tree
1
1 1
1
1 1
1
1
1
3
3 3
7
1
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
21
21 21
21
21 25
Cercis canadensis
Eastern Redbud
Tree
22
22 22
19
19 19
Platanus occidentalis var. occidentalis Sycamore, Plane -tree
1 1 1
2 2 2
2 2 2
2
1
1
1 1 1
1
1 1
1
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Tree
23
23 24
Diospyros virginiana
Common Persimmon
Tree
23
23
31
31 31
44
44 44
Quercus phellos
Wwillow Oak
Tree
18
18 19
17
17 17
18
5
18
19
19 19
27
27 27
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
1
1
1
9
l
1 1 1
13 13
14
2 2
2
2 2 2
1 1
3
2 2
3
1 1
1
1
1
1
2 2
2
Liquidambar styracii lua
Sweetgum
Tree
Tree
8
2
2
2
3
Common Elderberry
5
2
15
2
Nyssa sylvatica
Blackgum
Tree
Stem count
124
124 180
123
123,132
1211
121,137
1391
139 139
191
191 193
size (ares)
12
12
1 1
1
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
1
1
1
4 4
4
2 2 2
0.30
5 5 5
0.30
5 5 5
2 2
2
101
151
10
10 12
101
2 2
2
Platanus occidentalis var. occidentalis Sycamore, Plane -tree
Tree
1
1
1
9
1 1 1
1
41816071
4151
415 445
408;
408
462
1
469
469
644
651
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Tree
3
3
3
1 1
1
3 3 4
6 6 6
4 4 4
4 4
4
1 1
1
1 1
1
Quercus phellos
Wwillow Oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
2 2 2
5 5
5
21 2 2
2 2
2
2 2
2
4
4
4
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Tree
1
1
1
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1
1
4 4 4
2 2
2
1 1
1
Quercus velutina
Black Oak
Tree
1
1
1
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Tree
3
5
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
I Shrub
1
Stem count
10
10
10
81 81
10
111 HI 13
11 11 12
16 16 16
16 16
16
13 131 15
8 8
13
8 8
24
8 8
12
8
8
25
7 7
14
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
Species count
81
81
81
31
31
57
71
71
41
41
51
51
51
51
51
51
51
41
4
5
5
51
61
41 41
91
51
51
7
21
21
41
41
41
6
Stems per ACRE 1
4051
40514051
3241
32414051
4451
44515261
4451
44514861
6471
64716471
6471
64716471
5261
5261
607
324
324
526
3241 32419711
3241
32414861
3241
32411,0121'-2
283
567
1PnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
'PnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
Color Key
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Recruit Stems
601 North II Stream Restoration Site C-10 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table 9 Con't. Planted Total Stem Count (Annual Means)
601NII Stream Restoration Site
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
MY4 (2016)
PnoLS P -all T
MY3 (2015) MY2 (2014)
PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T
MYI (2013)
PnoLS P -all T
MYO (2013)
PnoLS P -all T
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
29
29 32
28
28 28
29
29
29
31
31 31
51
51 51
Campsis radicans
Trumpet Creeper
Vine
1
Celtis laevigata
Sugarberry
Tree
2
Celtis occidentalis
Common Hackberry
Tree
I
Cercis canadensis
Eastern Redbud
Tree
7
7 7
8
8 8
7
7
7
11
11 11
19
19 19
Diospyros virginiana
Common Persimmon
Tree
5
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
11
11 16
11
11 13
10
10
12
9
9 9
10
10 10
Liquidambar styraci ua
Sweetgum
Tree
29
1
8
Nyssa sylvatica
Blackgum
Tree
1
1 1
1
1 1
1
1
1
3
3 3
7
7 7
Platanus occidentalis
American Sycamore
Tree
21
21 21
21
21 25
21
21
21
22
22 22
19
19 19
Platanus occidentalis var. occidentalis Sycamore, Plane -tree
Tree
2
2 4
2
2 2
2
2
5
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Tree
23
23 24
23
23 23
23
23
23
31
31 31
44
44 44
Quercus phellos
Wwillow Oak
Tree
18
18 19
17
17 17
18
18
18
19
19 19
27
27 27
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Tree
11
11 11
11
11 11
9
9
9
13
13 13
14
14 14
Quercus velutina
Black Oak
Tree
1
1 1
1
1 1
1
1
1
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Tree
8
2
2
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
1
Stem count
124
124 180
123
123,132
1211
121,137
1391
139 139
191
191 193
size (ares)
12
12
12
12
12
size (ACRES)
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
Species count
101
101
151
10
10 12
101
101
13
8
8
8
81
81
9
Stems perACREJ
4181
41816071
4151
415 445
408;
408
462
4691
469
469
644
651
'PnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
Color Key
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
Recruit Stems
601 North II Stream Restoration Site C-10 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix C
Vegetation Assessment Data
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 North II Stream Restoration Site C-11 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data

601 North II
Cross Section 1 -Riffle
Station 1+34
620
619
618
y 617
w_
d
O
616
W
615
614
613 ; I i I I I I I I I i I I N
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70
Station (feet)
MYO 4/24/2013 -MYI 11/20/2013 -MY2 6/18/2014 -MY3 5/5/15 +MY4 3/15/16 - - - - BKF
Upstream
Downstream
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-1 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

601 North II
Cross Section 2-Pool
Station 12+77
608
607
606
605
d
w
0 604
R
i
d
W
603 Xv
602..iol-7
601
600
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70
Station (feet)
MYO 4/24/2013 -MY1 11/20/2013 -MY2 6/18/2014-MY3 5/5/15 -MY4 3/15/16 --
Upstream -
Upstream
Downstream
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-2 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

601 North II
Cross Section 3 Riffle
Station 12+93
608
607
606
605
d
d
w
0 604
'C
a
d
W
603
602
601
600 1 I I I I I I I I I I I i
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70
Station (feet)
--- MYO 4/24/2013 ---- MY1 11/20/2013 - MY2 6/16/2014 - MY3 5/5/15 - MY 4 3/15/16 - - - - BKF
Upstream
601 North I1 Stream Restoration Site
Project No. 95025
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Downstream
D-3 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 North II
Cross Section 4 -Riffle
Station 2+57
609
608
607
606
d
c 605
R
i
d
W 604
603
602
601 I I —I I I I I I i I I I I I
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65
Station (feet)
— MYO 4/24/2013 — MYl 11/21/2013 — MY2 6/18/2014 — MY3 5/5/15 — MY4 3/15/16 — — 6K F
Upstream
0+70
Downstream
601 North I1 Stream Restoration Site D-4 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

601 North II
Cross Section 5 -Pool
Station 2+70
609'
608
607
606
d
w
605
v
W
604
603
602
601 I I 1 I I I I
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70
Station (feet)
MYO 4/24/2013 - MY1 11/21/2013 -MY2 6/18/2014-MY3 5/5/15 -MY4 3/15/16 - - - - BKF
Upstream
Downstream
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-5 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

601 North II
Cross Section 6 -Riffle
Station 12+65
600
599
598
_ 597
v
c�
0 596
v
W
595
594
593
592 1 I I I I I I I I I I I
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70
Station (feet)
MYO 4/24/2013 - MY1 11/21/2013 -MY2 6/19/2014 MY3 5/6/15 -MY4 3/16/16 - - - - BKF
Upstream
Downstream
601 North I1 Stream Restoration Site D-6 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

601 North II
Cross Section 7 -Pool
Station 12+82
600
599
598
597
w
596
a
d
W
595
594
593
592 ; I I I I I I I I I I I I
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65
Station (feet)
F— MYO 4/24/2013 MYl 11/21/2014 — MY2 6/19/2014 — MY3 5/6/15 — MY4 3/16/16 - - - - BKF
Upstream
601 North I1 Stream Restoration Site
Project No. 95025
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
0+70
Downstream
D-7 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Oe
I'
r
NYk� E
"r t
"r t

601 North II
Cross Section 9 -Riffle
Station 20+37
595
594
593
592
d
w
b591
v
W
590
589
588
587 a I I I I I I I I I I
0+00 0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50 0+55 0+60 0+65 0+70
Station (feet)
MYO 4/24/2013 - MY1 11/21/2013 -MY2 6/19/2014-MY3 5/7/15 -MY4 3/16/16 - - - - BKF
Upstream
Downstream
601 North I1 Stream Restoration Site D-9 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

592
591
590
589
d
0 588
R
i
d
W
587
586
585
584
0+00
601 North II
Cross Section 10 -Riffle
Station 24+83
0+05 0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45 0+50
Station (feet)
- MY1 11/22/2013 - MY2 6/19/2014 - MY3 5/7/15 - MY4 3/16/16 - - - - BJ
Upstream
Downstream
601 North I1 Stream Restoration Site D-10 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-11 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
607
606
605
604
0
603
W
602
601
600
599
jx
00
Stream Survey Data
601 North II Wicker Branch
Reach 1
Longitudinal Profile
Staioning 1+00 to 6+60
IxSO �xOO 2xsO �xOO "xsO 9x %19 00 SAO "'Ito %19
Station (feet)
TW - MYO TW - MY1 11/21/13 TW - MY2 6/18/2014 TW - MY3 5/5/2015 t TW - MY4 3/15/2016 ® Structure - MYO • BKF------- WS
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-12 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Average Bankful Slope
.
S4 -R
"-'
XS5-P
-------•
.
AL
------------
IxSO �xOO 2xsO �xOO "xsO 9x %19 00 SAO "'Ito %19
Station (feet)
TW - MYO TW - MY1 11/21/13 TW - MY2 6/18/2014 TW - MY3 5/5/2015 t TW - MY4 3/15/2016 ® Structure - MYO • BKF------- WS
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-12 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
607
606
605
604
603
602
601
600
599
598
597
596
s~
595
594
W
593
592
591
590
589
588
587
586
585
584
Stream Survey Data
601 North II Reach 2/3
Longitudinal Profile
Reach 2 - Stationing 6+60 to 24+35
Reach 3 - Stationing 24+35 to 25+08
ax 8x 12 y I6 lip -?a 2?
60 �� 6� x60 X60 X60 x60 x60 x60
Station (feet)
TW-MYO TW - MYI 11/21/2013 TW - MY2 6/19/2014 TW - MY3 5/6/2015 TW - MY4 3/16/2016 4 Structure - MYO • BKF------- WS
2y
X60
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-13 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Reach 2 Reach
3
I
Ren
•
nant Beaver Dam
X
6-R
I
"Odw
1
-------
Remnant Beaver Da
In
•
Average Bankfull
Slope
I
1
I
_
XS9-R
I
I
-
•
----------
•- -
1
•
-------
1
S10 -R
A
V W,/
I
•
XS8-P
I
I
ax 8x 12 y I6 lip -?a 2?
60 �� 6� x60 X60 X60 x60 x60 x60
Station (feet)
TW-MYO TW - MYI 11/21/2013 TW - MY2 6/19/2014 TW - MY3 5/6/2015 TW - MY4 3/16/2016 4 Structure - MYO • BKF------- WS
2y
X60
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-13 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
609
608
607
606
605
4.
604
0
W 603
602
601
600
599
`Px
,to
Stream Survey Data
601 North II UT -Wicker Branch
Reach 5
Longitudinal Profile
Stationing 8+86 to 14+84
jrx`r0 !�x`r0
Station (feet)
�— TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW- W1 11/21/13 TW - MY2 6/18/2014 TW - MY3 5/5/2015 t TW - MY4 3/15/2016 © Structure - MYO • BKF -- --- -- WS
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-14 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
x
A__-__-___
Average Bankfull Slope
- ---------- A A
XS2-P
VIi A --- A - 40
VIA
VV
-- ----- A ---------------
\�P64
VV
------ -------
jrx`r0 !�x`r0
Station (feet)
�— TW - MYO 5/10/2011 TW- W1 11/21/13 TW - MY2 6/18/2014 TW - MY3 5/5/2015 t TW - MY4 3/15/2016 © Structure - MYO • BKF -- --- -- WS
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-14 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D Stream Survey Data
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-15 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601N II
Cross Section 1 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY4
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
56
52.8%
53%
0.062 - 0.125
1
0.9%
54%
0.125-0.25
2
1.9%
56%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
56%
0.5 - 1.0
1
0.9%
57%
1 -2
15
14.2%
71%
2 - 4
5
4.7%
75%
4-8
9
8.5%
84%
8-16
1
0.9%
85%
16-32
4
3.8%
89%
32-64
5
4.7%
93%
64-128
3
2.8%
96%
128-256
2
1.9%
98%
256-512
0
0.0%
98%
512-1024
0
0.0%
98%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
98%
2048-4096
2
1.9%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
106
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
0.062
D84
8.1
D95
78
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-16 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601NII Cross -Section 1 —Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601NII Cross -Section 1 —Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
n
'
v
N
a
c
z
`u
c
2F
30%
20%
10%
Ld L A
0%
OrOv 1�y Otiy tib b $ tiro 'zV 01 �ti4 �0 ytiti OtiA OAO 006 0�
p 0 O tih pay ph yb' 3ti �° 1ti� ryyb 1yti ryat pia 0ea
Particle Size Groups
c
0�6 Oti h ' ti0
■ MY1 % by Size Group
o
60%
■ MY3 % by Size Group
50%
■MY4 % by Size Group
40%
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-17 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
100%
90%
80%
n
70%
�—MYl Cumulative %
0
MY2 Cumulative
60%
>
tMY3 Cumulative %
50
f MY4 Cumulative %
`y
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Obti yti5 pti5 Oh ' O
O 'Y O ply Oy
OOrO Oti
y'ti y'a' p 9' �rO '�1' 6�` 1'1'`6 'L0 y��' O'1'�` OG$ Oo'6 0�
$ tib �'� � e111ti 1`L pa�b Oeaa
1 'L
Particle Size Groups
601NII Cross -Section 1 —Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
n
'
v
N
a
c
z
`u
c
2F
30%
20%
10%
Ld L A
0%
OrOv 1�y Otiy tib b $ tiro 'zV 01 �ti4 �0 ytiti OtiA OAO 006 0�
p 0 O tih pay ph yb' 3ti �° 1ti� ryyb 1yti ryat pia 0ea
Particle Size Groups
c
0�6 Oti h ' ti0
■ MY1 % by Size Group
o
60%
■ MY3 % by Size Group
50%
■MY4 % by Size Group
40%
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-17 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601N II
Cross Section 2 - Pool
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY4
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
76
62.8%
63%
0.062 - 0.125
6
5.0%
68%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
68%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
68%
0.5 - 1.0
0
0.0%
68%
1 -2
8
6.6%
74%
2 - 4
9
7.4%
82%
4-8
11
9.1%
91%
8-16
5
4.1%
95%
16-32
5
4.1%
99%
32-64
1
0.8%
100%
64-128
0
0.0%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
121
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
0.062
D84
5
D95
16
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-18 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601NII Cross -Section 2 — Pool
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601NII Cross -Section 2 — Pool
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
3
MY3 % by Size Group
O
12 60%
VI
a
50%
L
F
y 40%
0
30%
20%
10%
0% g
O O• � O' tis O,Ly' O� 0,y4i .6ti 66` x,10 tiy4f y1,ly 0�'d;L pd$b Oea`
004' Oy y 'L
Particle Size Groups
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-19 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
100%
■
■ MY3 % by Size Group
■ MY4 % by Size Group
90%
80%
n
70%
�—MYl Cumulative %
0
MY2 Cumulative
60%
>
tMY3 Cumulative %
50
f Myo Cumulative %
`y
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Obti ytiy 0tiy Oh ' O
O 'Y O by ply Oy
OOrO Oti
y'ti y'6' p 9' ,5r° '�1' ro0` 1'1'`6 'Lys° y�'1' O'l'd OG$ Oo'6 0�
$ tib �'� � e111ti 1`L pd�d Oeaa
1 'L
Particle Size Groups
601NII Cross -Section 2 — Pool
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
3
MY3 % by Size Group
O
12 60%
VI
a
50%
L
F
y 40%
0
30%
20%
10%
0% g
O O• � O' tis O,Ly' O� 0,y4i .6ti 66` x,10 tiy4f y1,ly 0�'d;L pd$b Oea`
004' Oy y 'L
Particle Size Groups
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-19 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
■
■ MY3 % by Size Group
■ MY4 % by Size Group
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601N II
Cross Section 3 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY4
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
47
43.5%
44%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
44%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
44%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
44%
0.5 - 1.0
0
0.0%
44%
1 -2
10
9.3%
53%
2 - 4
2
1.9%
55%
4 - 8
10
9.3%
64%
8-16
7
6.5%
70%
16-32
7
6.5%
77%
32-64
12
11.1%
88%
64-128
12
11.1%
99%
128-256
1
0.9%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
108
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
1.6
D84
53
D95
94
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-20 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601NII Cross -Section 3 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601NII Cross -Section 3 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
3
■ MY3 % by Size Group
O
12 60%
V
■ MY3 % by Size Group
I
a
50
■ MY4 % by Size Group
L
F
y 40%
0
30%
20%
10%
0% g
Obti 1ti5 Otis Oy ti� �; d d 0 1E' '6 66` 'y'1� 'YhtO y'1OD'd CJ" Oy�O 0c
OO• O' tis O,Ly' O� 0 ,y4i .6ti 66` x,10 tiy4f y1,ly 0�'d;L pe Oea`
004' Oy y 'L
Particle Size Groups
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-21 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
100%
90%
80%
n
70%
—MYI Cumulative %
0
0.
--w— MY2 Cumulative %
60%
>
tMY3 Cumulative %
50%
f MY4 Cumulative %
`y
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Obti yti5 0tiy Oh ' O
O � 'Y O ti� ply Oy
OOrO Oti
y'ti y'6' p 9' ,5r° '�1' ro0` 1'1'`6 'Lys° y�'1' O'l'd OGq' Oo'6 �
110
$ tib �'� � 'Lti� ryyb ytitih p'Ld~ pd�d Oe
1 'L
Particle Size Groups
601NII Cross -Section 3 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
3
■ MY3 % by Size Group
O
12 60%
V
■ MY3 % by Size Group
I
a
50
■ MY4 % by Size Group
L
F
y 40%
0
30%
20%
10%
0% g
Obti 1ti5 Otis Oy ti� �; d d 0 1E' '6 66` 'y'1� 'YhtO y'1OD'd CJ" Oy�O 0c
OO• O' tis O,Ly' O� 0 ,y4i .6ti 66` x,10 tiy4f y1,ly 0�'d;L pe Oea`
004' Oy y 'L
Particle Size Groups
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-21 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601N II
Cross Section 4 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY4
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
43
39.8%
40%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
40%
0.125-0.25
1
0.9%
41%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
41%
0.5 - 1.0
1
0.9%
42%
1 -2
4
3.7%
45%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
45%
4 - 8
9
8.3%
54%
8-16
23
21.3%
75%
16-32
6
5.6%
81%
32-64
7
6.5%
87%
64-128
14
13.0%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
108
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
6.9
D84
51
D95
89
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-22 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601NII Cross -Section 4 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601NII Cross -Section 4 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
3
MY3 % by Size Group
O
12 60%
VI
a
50%
L
F
y 40%
0
30%
20%
10%
0% "1 A
1� ,61' 6d 'rp 'Y0 y'11' OD'd CJ" 'co oc
'b ,y4i .6ti 66` x,10 tiy4f y1,ly 0�'d;L pd$b Oea`
004' Oy y 'L
Particle Size Groups
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-23 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
100%
--------- III -
■ MY4 % by Size Group
90%
80%
70%
—MYI Cumulative %
0
60%
>
tMY3 Cumulative %
50
f Myo Cumulative %
`y
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Obti ytiy 0tiy Oh ' O
O � 'Y O by ply Oy
OOrO Oti
y'ti y'6' p 9' ,5r° '�1' ro0` 1'1'`6 'Lys° y�'1' O'l'd OGq' dOo'6 0�
$ tib �'� � 'Lti� ryyb ytitih p'Ld~ pd�Oeaa
1 'L
Particle Size Groups
601NII Cross -Section 4 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
3
MY3 % by Size Group
O
12 60%
VI
a
50%
L
F
y 40%
0
30%
20%
10%
0% "1 A
1� ,61' 6d 'rp 'Y0 y'11' OD'd CJ" 'co oc
'b ,y4i .6ti 66` x,10 tiy4f y1,ly 0�'d;L pd$b Oea`
004' Oy y 'L
Particle Size Groups
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-23 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
■
■ MY3 % by Size Group
■ MY4 % by Size Group
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601N II
Cross Section 5 - Pool
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY4
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
90
87.4%
87%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
87%
0.125-0.25
1
1.0%
88%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
88%
0.5 - 1.0
0
0.0%
88%
1 -2
4
3.9%
92%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
92%
4 - 8
4
3.9%
96%
8-16
3
2.9%
99%
16-32
1
1.0%
100%
32-64
0
0.0%
100%
64-128
0
0.0%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
103
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
0.062
D84
0.062
D95
7.2
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-24 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601NII Cross -Section 5 — Pool
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601NII Cross -Section 5 — Pool
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
3
MY3 % by Size Group
O
12 60%
VI
a
50%
L
F
y 40%
0
30%
20%
10%
0%
061' 1't5 0tiy Oh ,y0 �; L ; b P 0 tib 3- bb 'rp ry0 y11' p'Lt` CJ" 'co oc
O O• O' 15 O,Ly' O� 0 ,y4i .6ti bb �'t0 tiy4f y11;1 01'a;L pb$b 411
004' Oy y 'y
Particle Size Groups
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-25 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
100%
■
■ MY3 % by Size Group
90%
80%
n
70%
—MYI Cumulative %
0
MY2 Cumulative
60%
>
tMY3 Cumulative %
50
f Myo Cumulative %
`y
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
061' yp p't, Oh ' O
O � 'Y O 16 p�6 Oy
OOrO Oti
y'ti a' p 9' ,56 '�'L 6P 1�'b 'Ly�o y�'ti OD'd OGq' Oo'6 0�
$ tib �'� � 'Ltib ryyb ytitih p'Lb~ pabb Oeaa
1 'L
Particle Size Groups
601NII Cross -Section 5 — Pool
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
3
MY3 % by Size Group
O
12 60%
VI
a
50%
L
F
y 40%
0
30%
20%
10%
0%
061' 1't5 0tiy Oh ,y0 �; L ; b P 0 tib 3- bb 'rp ry0 y11' p'Lt` CJ" 'co oc
O O• O' 15 O,Ly' O� 0 ,y4i .6ti bb �'t0 tiy4f y11;1 01'a;L pb$b 411
004' Oy y 'y
Particle Size Groups
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-25 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
■
■ MY3 % by Size Group
■ MY4 % by Size Group
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601N II
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY4
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
34
30.1%
30%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
30%
0.125-0.25
1
0.9%
31%
0.25-0.5
1
0.9%
32%
0.5 - 1.0
2
1.8%
34%
1 -2
15
13.3%
47%
2 - 4
9
8.0%
55%
4 - 8
14
12.4%
67%
8-16
8
7.1%
74%
16-32
12
10.6%
85%
32-64
12
10.6%
96%
64-128
2
1.8%
97%
128-256
2
1.8%
99%
256-512
1
0.9%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
113
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
2.6
D84
30
D95
62
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-26 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601NII Cross -Section 6 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601NII Cross -Section 6 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
3
■ MY3 % by Size Group
O
12 60%
V
■ MY3 % by Size Group
I
a
50%
■ MY4 % by Size Group
L
F
y 40%
0
30%
20%
10%
0% g
061' 1.y5 0ti6 Oh tit) ti y'd P 0 tib ,61' 6t` 'r'1� 'YhtO y'11' OD'd CJ" 'co oc
O
O O. ' 15 O,Ly' O� 0 ,y4i .6ti bb �.t0 tiy4f y11;1 01'd;L pd$b Oea`
004' Oy y 'L
Particle Size Groups
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-27 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
100%
90%
80%
n
70%
—MYI Cumulative %
0
--w- MY2 Cumulative %
60%
>
tMY3 Cumulative %
50
f Myo Cumulative %
`y
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
061' tiyb 0tiy Oh ' O
O 'Y O 16 p�6 Oy
OOrO Oti
y'ti y'6' p 9' ,5r° '�1' ro0` 1'1'`6 'Lys° y�'1' O'l'd OG$ Oo'6 0�
$ tib �'� 'Ltib ryyb ytitih 1`L pdbd Oeaa
1 'L
Particle Size Groups
601NII Cross -Section 6 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
3
■ MY3 % by Size Group
O
12 60%
V
■ MY3 % by Size Group
I
a
50%
■ MY4 % by Size Group
L
F
y 40%
0
30%
20%
10%
0% g
061' 1.y5 0ti6 Oh tit) ti y'd P 0 tib ,61' 6t` 'r'1� 'YhtO y'11' OD'd CJ" 'co oc
O
O O. ' 15 O,Ly' O� 0 ,y4i .6ti bb �.t0 tiy4f y11;1 01'd;L pd$b Oea`
004' Oy y 'L
Particle Size Groups
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-27 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601N II
Cross Section 7 - Pool
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY4
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
44
37.0%
37%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
37%
0.125-0.25
3
2.5%
39%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
39%
0.5 - 1.0
3
2.5%
42%
1 -2
10
8.4%
50%
2 - 4
7
5.9%
56%
4 - 8
9
7.6%
64%
8-16
9
7.6%
71%
16-32
15
12.6%
84%
32-64
16
13.4%
97%
64-128
2
1.7%
99%
128-256
1
0.8%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
119
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
1.9
D84
32
D95
55
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-28 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601NII Cross -Section 7 — Pool
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601NII Cross -Section 7 — Pool
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
3
■ MY3 % by Size Group
O
12 60%
V
■ MY3 % by Size Group
I
a
50%
■ MY4 % by Size Group
L
F
y 40%
0
30%
20%
10%
M a
0
0% g
Obti 'vtiy p'l'y Oy ti� �.' L �; d d 0 tib ,61' 60` 'r'1� 'YhtO y'11' OD'd CJ" Oy�O oc
O O• � O' tis O,Ly' O� , ,y4i .6ti 66` x,10 tiy4f y1,ly 0�'d;L pd$b Oea`
004' Oy y 'L
Particle Size Groups
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-29 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
100%
90%
80%
70%
n
—MYI Cumulative %
0
60%
>
tMY3 Cumulative %
50%
f MY4 Cumulative %
`y
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Obti ytiy 0tiy Oh ' O
O 'Y O by ply Oy
OOrO Oti
y'ti y'6' p 9' ,5r° '�1' ro0` 1'1'`6 'Lys° y�'1' O'l'd OG$ Oo'6 0�
$ tib �'� � e111ti 1`L pd�d Oeaa
1 'L
Particle Size Groups
601NII Cross -Section 7 — Pool
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
3
■ MY3 % by Size Group
O
12 60%
V
■ MY3 % by Size Group
I
a
50%
■ MY4 % by Size Group
L
F
y 40%
0
30%
20%
10%
M a
0
0% g
Obti 'vtiy p'l'y Oy ti� �.' L �; d d 0 tib ,61' 60` 'r'1� 'YhtO y'11' OD'd CJ" Oy�O oc
O O• � O' tis O,Ly' O� , ,y4i .6ti 66` x,10 tiy4f y1,ly 0�'d;L pd$b Oea`
004' Oy y 'L
Particle Size Groups
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-29 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601N II
Cross Section 8 - Pool
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY4
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
57
46.0%
46%
0.062 - 0.125
4
3.2%
49%
0.125-0.25
3
2.4%
52%
0.25-0.5
5
4.0%
56%
0.5 - 1.0
16
12.9%
69%
1 -2
11
8.9%
77%
2 - 4
4
3.2%
81%
4 - 8
18
14.5%
95%
8-16
6
4.8%
100%
16-32
0
0.0%
100%
32-64
0
0.0%
100%
64-128
0
0.0%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
124
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
0.16
D84
4.7
D95
7.9
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-30 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601NII Cross -Section 8 — Pool
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601NII Cross -Section 8 — Pool
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
3
■ MY3 % by Size Group
O
12 60% roup
V
■ MY3 % by Size Group
a
50%
■ MY4 % by Size Group
L
F
y 40%
0
30%
20%
10%
0% g
061' 1.y5 0lot
tiyOco oc
O O. O' 15 O,Ly' O� 0 ,y4i .6ti bb �.t0 tiy4f y11;1 01'd;L pd$b Oea`
004' Oy y 'L
Particle Size Groups
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-31 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
100%
90%
80%
1
70%
n
—MYI Cumulative %
0
60%
>
tMY3 Cumulative %
50
f Myo Cumulative %
`y
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
O � 'Y O 16 p�6 Oy
OOrO Oti
hO'l'd OGq' Oo'6 0�
$ tib �'� � 'Ltib ryyb ytitip'Ld~ pdbd Oeaa
1 'L
Particle Size Groups
601NII Cross -Section 8 — Pool
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
3
■ MY3 % by Size Group
O
12 60% roup
V
■ MY3 % by Size Group
a
50%
■ MY4 % by Size Group
L
F
y 40%
0
30%
20%
10%
0% g
061' 1.y5 0lot
tiyOco oc
O O. O' 15 O,Ly' O� 0 ,y4i .6ti bb �.t0 tiy4f y11;1 01'd;L pd$b Oea`
004' Oy y 'L
Particle Size Groups
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-31 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
1
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601N II
Cross Section 9 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY4
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
49
46.2%
46%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
46%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
46%
0.25-0.5
3
2.8%
49%
0.5 - 1.0
3
2.8%
52%
1 -2
14
13.2%
65%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
65%
4 - 8
5
4.7%
70%
8-16
3
2.8%
73%
16-32
3
2.8%
75%
32-64
14
13.2%
89%
64-128
12
11.3%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
106
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
0.63
D84
48
D95
85
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-32 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601NII Cross -Section 9 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601NII Cross -Section 9 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
3
■ MY3 % by Size Group
O
12 60%
V
■ MY3 % by Size Group
I
a
50%
■ MY4 % by Size Group
L
F
y 40%
0
30%
20%
10%
0%
Obti 'vtiy p'l'y Oy ti� �; d d 0 1r° '61' 60` 1'1$ 'Yh�O `�11' O'l'd ell oc
O O• � O' tis O,Ly' O� 0,y4i .6ti 66` x,10 tiy4f y1,ly 0�'d;L pd$b Oea`
004' Oy y 'L
Particle Size Groups
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-33 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
100%
90%
80%
n
70%
—MYI Cumulative %
0
60%
>
tMY3 Cumulative %
50
f Myo Cumulative %
`y
OF
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Obti ytiy 0tiy Oh ' O
O � 'Y O by ply Oy
OOrO Oti
y'ti y'6' p 9' ,5r° '�1' ro0` 1'1'`6 'Lys° y�'1' O'l'd OG,
$ tib �'� � 'Lti� ryyb ytitih p'Ld~ pd�d Oeaa
1 'L
Particle Size Groups
601NII Cross -Section 9 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
3
■ MY3 % by Size Group
O
12 60%
V
■ MY3 % by Size Group
I
a
50%
■ MY4 % by Size Group
L
F
y 40%
0
30%
20%
10%
0%
Obti 'vtiy p'l'y Oy ti� �; d d 0 1r° '61' 60` 1'1$ 'Yh�O `�11' O'l'd ell oc
O O• � O' tis O,Ly' O� 0,y4i .6ti 66` x,10 tiy4f y1,ly 0�'d;L pd$b Oea`
004' Oy y 'L
Particle Size Groups
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-33 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601N II
Cross Section 10 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY4
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
30
26.5%
27%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
27%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
27%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
27%
0.5 - 1.0
1
0.9%
27%
1 -2
20
17.7%
45%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
45%
4 - 8
1
0.9%
46%
8-16
11
9.7%
56%
16-32
7
6.2%
62%
32-64
14
12.4%
74%
64-128
23
20.4%
95%
128-256
6
5.3%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
113
100%
1 100%
Summary Data
D50
11
D84
83
D95
130
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-34 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601NII Cross -Section 10 —Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601NII Cross -Section 10 —Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
3
■ MY3 % by Size Group
O
12 60%
V
■ MY3 % by Size Group
I
a
50%
■ MY4 % by Size Group
L
F
y 40%
0
30%
20%
10%
0% Sul E 111111g
Obti 'vtiy p
0
0 O ti O by O,Ly 05 'b by 3ti °d 'Yry� 'Lyre y'y��. p'Ldy pd$d Oeat
04' Oy y L
Particle Size Groups
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-35 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
100%
90%
80%
n
70%
—MYI Cumulative %
0
60%
>
tMY3 Cumulative %
50
f Myo Cumulative %
`y
c
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Obti ytiy 0tiy Oh ' O
O 'Y O by pjy Oy
OOrO Oti
y'ti y'6' p 9'
$ tib �'� 'Lti� ryyb ytitih p'Ld~ pd�d Oeaa
1 'L
Particle Size Groups
601NII Cross -Section 10 —Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
3
■ MY3 % by Size Group
O
12 60%
V
■ MY3 % by Size Group
I
a
50%
■ MY4 % by Size Group
L
F
y 40%
0
30%
20%
10%
0% Sul E 111111g
Obti 'vtiy p
0
0 O ti O by O,Ly 05 'b by 3ti °d 'Yry� 'Lyre y'y��. p'Ldy pd$d Oeat
04' Oy y L
Particle Size Groups
601 North II Stream Restoration Site D-35 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-36 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
601 North II Stream Restoration Site - EEP Contract No. 003991- Segment/Reach: Wicker Branch Reach l (Sta 0+00 - 6+60)
Parameter
Re Tonal Curve
Pre-Existin2 Condition
Reference Reach Data
UT to Rays
Fork
Desi n
Monitorin2 Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SDS n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD n
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Ba Width t
--- --- 6.8
--- 11.7 --- --- --- I
---
8.2
---
---
--- 1
---
6.0
---
---
11.4
---
---
---
I
Floodprone Wit t
___ 15.6 --- ___ 1
___
105.0
---
--- 1
25
30
35
---
59.7
---
---
---
1
Bankfull Mean Det t
--- --- 1.0
___ 0.5 --- --- --- I
---
0.8
---
---
--- I
---
0.9
---
---
0.7
---
---
---
I
Bankfull Max Depth ft
---
--- 0.8 --- --- I
---
2.2
---
---
--- I
---
1.2
---
---
1.3
---
---
---
I
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ft
--- --- 8.8
--- 5.5 --- --- --- I
---
6.3
---
---
--- I
---
5.5
---
---
7.9
---
---
--
---
I
Width/Depth
Wit Det Ratio
---
--- 24.9 --- --- 1
---
10.6
---
---
--- I
---
6.5
---
---
16.6
---
---
---
--
I
Entrenchment
Entrenc ment Ratio
---
--- 1.3 --- --- I
---
12.8
---
---
--- 1
4.2
5.0
5.8
---
5.2
---
---
---
I
Bank Height Ratio
--- 2.6 --- --- I
---
1.0
---
--- 1
--- 1
1.0
---
---
1.0
---
---
---
I
50 mm
___ <2.0 --- -__ 1
___
6.5
---
--- 1
16
24
32
---
28.7
1 ---
I --- I
---
I
Profile
Riffle Length ft
The existing stream channel did not display
riffle -pool sequencing due to historic dredging
and straightening.
3.3
7.5
---
15.5
--- ---
5.0
8.0
15.0
4.2
12.3
11.5
33.3
6.0
22
Riffle Slope ft/ft
0.007 0.042 ___ 0.085 --- --- 0.008 0.023 0.040 0.001 0.017 0.017 0.043 0.013
22
Pool Length ft
9.0 13.0 --- 19.0 --- --- 9.0 13.0 19.0 4.7 10.8 10.4 20.0 4.2
20
Pool Max depth ft
0.8 1.3 --- 1.9 --- --- --- 2.0 --- 1.4 1.9 1.9 2.2 0.2
20
Pool Spacing ft
14.0 21.0 --- 32.0 --- --- 14.0 30.0 65.0 18.4 30.7 26.9 57.8 10.0
19
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
The existing stream channel did not display plan
form geometry due to historic dredging and
straightening
12.0
19.0
---
23.0
--- ---
12.0
19.0
26.0
13.4
20.1
20.2
29.7
4.0
21
Radius of Curvature ft
10.0 16.0 --- 39.0 --- --- 12.0 18.0 39.0 14.4 17.9 16.4 27.7 3.9
23
Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft
1.2 2.0 --- 4.8 ------ 1.9 2.9 6.5 1.3 1.6 1.4 2.4 0.3
23
Meander Wavelength ft
31.4 45.3 --- 61.4 --- --- 36.0 53.0 73.0 13.7 51.5 51.8 87.9 15.3
21
Meander Width Ratio
1.5 2.3 --- 2.8 --- --- 2.0 3.1 4.4 1.2 4.5 4.5 7.7 1.3
21
Substrate bed and transport parameters
4d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / di / dis mm
<2 <2 <2 1 <2 1 <2 <2 <2
6.3 10.6 17.3
157.9 1113.9176.0
1 123.0
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
---
0.5
0.4
Max part size mm mobilized at bankfull
---
74.6
77.5
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
---
1.6
1.0
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area SM
0.3
0.19
Impervious Surface estimate %
<1
<1
Ros en Classification
F6
E4
E4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
--- ---
HEC -RAS: 2.8 1.3-3.9
HEC -RAS: 3.5
3.3-4.1
3.5
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
---
--- 34.7
19.6
Valley length ft
610
240
Channel Thalweg length ft
630
284
707
660
Sinuosity ft
1.0
1.2
1.2
1
1.1
BF slope ft/ft
0.009
0.016
0.008
0.009
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E%
100 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
--- I
--- I ---
I ---
I --- I
---
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-36 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-37 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table 10 cont'd. Baseline Stream Data Summary
601 North II Stream Restoration Site - EEP Contract No. 003991- Segment/Reach: Wicker Branch Reach 2 (6+60-24+35)
Parameter
Re ional Curve
Pre-Existin Condition
Reference Reach Data
UT to Rays
Fork
Desi n
Monitorin Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SD n
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD n
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width ft
--- --- 8.4
10.8 12.0 12.0 13.1 1.6 2
---
8.2
---
---
--- 1
---
8.0
---
11.5
11.6
11.6
11.6
0.1
2
Flood rove Width ft
30.3 78.3 78.3 126.2 67.8 2
---
105.0
---
---
--- 1
35.0
47.5
60.0
69.2
69.5
69.5
69.7
0.4
2
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
--- --- 1.2
0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.1 2
---
0.8
---
---
--- 1
---
1.3
---
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
0.0
2
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 0.1 2
---
2.2
---
---
--- 1
---
1.7
---
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.8
0.1
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Areaft
--- --- 12.5
10.5 11.1 11.1 11.7 0.8 2
---
6.3
---
---
--- 1
---
10.5
---
12.1
12.6
12.6
13.0
0.6
2
Width/Depth Ratio
11.0 12.9 12.9 14.7 2.6 2
---
10.6
---
---
--- 1
---
6.1
---
10.4
10.6
10.6
10.8
0.3
2
Entrenchment Ratio
2.3 7.0 7.0 11.7 6.6 2
---
12.8
---
---
--- 1
4.3
5.9
7.5
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
0.0
2
'Bank Height Ratio
1.3 1.6 1.6 1.8 0.4 2
---
1.0
---
---
--- 1
---
1.0
---
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
2
d50 (mm)
23.0 1
--
17.3
---
---
--- 1
16.0
24.0
32.0
19.3
21.4
21.4
23.5
3.0
2
Profile
Riffle Length ft
The existing stream channel did not display
riffle -pool sequencing due to historic dredging
and straightening.
3.3
7.5
---
15.5
--- ---
5.0
15.0
25.0
6.3
17.3
18.1
38.7
7.5
33
Riffle Slope ft/ft
0.0073 0.0422 --- 0.085 --- --- 0.005 0.016 0.03 0.001 0.017 0.013 0.062 0.013
33
Pool Length ft
9.0 13.0 --- 19.0 --- --- 5.0 22.0 40.0 6.1 24.2 23.7 62.0 11.9
33
Pool Max depth ft
0.8 1.3 --- 1.9 --- --- --- 2.8 --- 1.7 2.9 2.8 3.8 0.4
33
Pool Spacing ft
14.0 21.0 --- 32.0 --- --- 30.0 52.0 80.0 25.5 53.6 53.2 103.3 19.5
32
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
The existing stream channel did not display
plan form geometry due to historic dredging
and straightening
12.0
19.0
---
23.0
--- ---
16.0
33.0
50.0
18.3
31.1
30.6
49.5
8.8
24
Radius of Curvature ft
10.0 16.0 --- 39.0 --- --- 21.0 38.0 67.0 28.3 40.2 37.8 61.8 10.1
28
Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft
1.2 2.0 --- 4.8 --- --- 2.6 4.8 8.4 2.4 3.5 3.3 5.3 0.9
28
Meander Wavelength ft
31.4 45.3 --- 61.4 --- --- 61.0 104.0 148.0 13.7 114.4 113.3 226.5 46.9
24
Meander Width Ratio
1.5 2.3 --- 2.8 --- --- 1.9 3.7 5.7 1.2 9.9 9.8 19.5 4.0
24
Substrate bed and transport parameters
4d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / di / dis mm
2.9 9.2 23.0 1 75.8 1 92.4 1100.0168.
6.3 110.6
117.3
157.9 1113.176.0
1123.0
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
0.5
0.7
0.5
Max part size mm mobilized at bankfull
88.0
116.9
91.3
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
2.3
3.2
1.8
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area SM
0.5
0.19
Impervious Surface estimate %
<1
<1
Ros en Classification
E1/C1
E4
E4
E4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
---
---
HEC -RAS: 2.7 1.2-5.2
HEC -RAS: 4.3
3.3-5.1
4.0 (XS6)
- 4.1 XS9
Bankfull Discharge cfs
---
---
50.1
48.5
Valley length ft
1400
240
1550
Channel Thalweg length ft
1356
284
1653
1775
Sinuosity ft
1.0
1.2
1.2
1.2
BF slope ft/ft
0.009
0.016
0.009
0.007
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E%
7 0 0 1 48 10 35
---
I --- I
--- I
--- I ---
I ---
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-37 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-38 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table 10 cont'd. Baseline Stream Data Summary
601 North II Stream Restoration Site - EEP Contract No. 003991- Segment/Reach: Wicker Branch Reach 3 (24+35-27+08)
Parameter
Reizional Curve
Pre-Existina Condition
F Reference Reach Data UT to Ras
Design
Monitoring Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SD n
Min
Mean
Med
Max SD
n
Min
Mean
Max
Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width ft
--- --- 9.3
--- 10.0 --- --- --- 1
---
8.2
---
--- ---
1
---
10.0
---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
Floodprone Width ft
--- 11.9 --- --- --- 1
---
105.0
---
--- ---
1
40.0
55.0
70.0
--- --- --- --- --- ---
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
--- --- 1.3
--- 1.4 --- --- --- 1
---
0.8
---
--- ---
1
---
1.4
---
--- ___ ___ ___ ___ ___
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
--- 1.9 --- --- I --- 1
---
2.2
---
--- ---
1
---
1.8
---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
--- --- 14.6
--- 14.1 --- --- --- 1
---
6.3
---
--- ---
1
---
14.1
---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
Width/Depth Ratio
--- 7.0 --- --- --- 1
---
10.6
---
--- ---
1
---
7.1
---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
Entrenchment Ratio
--- 1.2 --- --- --- 1
---
12.8
---
--- ---
1
4.0
5.5
7.0
--- --- --- --- ---
'Bank Height Ratio
--- 2.0 --- --- --- 1
---
1.0
---
--- ---
1
---
1.0
---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
d50 mm
--- 8.0 --- --- --- 1
---
17.3
---
--- ---
1
16.0
24.0
32.0
--- --- --- --- --- ---
Profile
Riffle Length ft
The existing stream channel did not display riffle-
pool sequencing due to historic dredging and
straightening.
3.3
7.5
---
15.5 ---
---
10.0
20.0
30.0
--- --- --- --- --- ---
Riffle Slope ft/ft
0.007 0.0422 --- 0.0854 --- --- 0.009 0.016 0.03
--- --- --- --- --- ---
Pool Length ft
9.0 13.0 --- 19.0 --- --- 5.0 24.0 50.0
--- --- --- --- --- ---
Pool Max depth ft
0.8 1.3 --- 1.9 --- --- --- 3.0 ---
--- --- --- --- --- ---
Pool Spacing ft
14.0 21.0 --- 32.0 --- --- 30.0 61.0 95.0
--- --- --- --- --- ---
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
The existing stream channel did not display plan
form geometry due to historic dredging and straightening1.2
12.0
19.0
---
23.0 ---
---
23.0
41.0
57.0
--- --- --- --- --- ---
Radius of Curvature ft
10.0 16.0 --- 39.0 --- --- 30.0 37.0 40.0
--- --- --- --- --- ---
Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft
2.0 --- 4.8 --- --- 3.0 3.7 4.0
--- --- --- --- --- ---
Meander Wavelength ft
31.4 45.3 --- 61.4 --- --- 112.0 127.0 142.0
--- --- --- --- ---
Meander Width Ratio
1.5 2.3 --- 2.8 --- --- 2.3 4.1 5.7
--- --- --- --- --- ---
Substrate, bed, and transport parameters
4d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / di / dis mm
2.0 5.2 8.0 20.3 1 29.7 34.0 1 45.0
6.3 1 10.6117.31
57.9 1113.9
176.0 1123.0
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
0.75
0.73
Max part size mm mobilized at bankfull
123
120
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m'
3.7
3.6
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area SM
0.6
0.19
Impervious Surface estimate %
<1
<1
Ros en Classification
G4
E4
E4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
---
---
HEC -RAS: 3.6 2.4-4.8
---
HEC -RAS: 4.0
3.2-4.7
---
Bankfull Discharge cfs
---
---
59.4
69.2
Valley length ft
360
240
235
Channel Thalweg length ft
414
284
470
273
Sinuosity ft
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
BF slope ft/ft
0.009
0.016
0.008
---
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E%
0 0 0 1 0 1 0 100
1 ---
I ---I
--- I
--- I --- I
---
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-38 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-39 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table 10 cont'd. Baseline Stream Data Summary
601 North II Stream Restoration Site - EEP Contract No. 003991- Segment/Reach: UT to Wicker Branch Reach 5 (8+40-14+86)
Parameter
Re ional Curve
Pre-Existin2 Condition 7
Reference Reach Data UT to Ras
Desi2n
Monitorin2 Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle
LL UL Eq.
Min Mean Med Max SD n
Min
Mean
Med Max SD n
Min
Mean
Max
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width ft
--- --- 5.1
--- 8.6 --- --- --- 1
---
8.2
--- --- --- ---
---
6.0
---
---
11.0
---
---
---
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
--- 12.4 --- --- --- 1
---
105.0
--- --- --- ---
20.0
25.0
30.0
---
65.5
---
---
---
I
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
--- --- 0.8
--- 0.6 --- --- --- 1
---
0.8
--- --- --- ---
---
0.9
---
---
0.8
---
---
---
I
'Bankfull Max Depth ft
--- 1 0.9 --- --- --- 1
---
2.2
--- --- --- ---
---
1.2
---
---
1.3
---
---
---
1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
--- --- 5.6
--- 5.4 --- --- --- 1
---
6.3
--- --- --- ---
---
5.5
---
---
8.5
---
---
---
I
Width/Depth Ratio
--- 13.7 --- --- --- 1
---
10.6
--- --- --- ---
---
6.5
---
---
14.1
---
---
---
I
Entrenchment Ratio
--- 1.4 --- --- --- 1
---
12.8
--- --- --- ---
3.3
4.1
5.0
---
6.0
---
---
---
1
'Bank Height Ratio
--- 2.3 --- --- --- 1
---
1.0
--- --- --- ---
1.0
---
1.0
---
---
---
I
d50 mm
--- 49.4 --- --- --- 1
---
17.3
--- --- --- ---
16.0
24.0
32.0
---
25.7
---
---
---
1
Profile*
Riffle Length ft
The existing stream channel did not display riffle-
pool sequencing due to historic dredging and
straightening.
3.3
7.5
--- 15.5 --- ---
5.0
10.0
15.0
5.1
12.8
12.4
23.2
4.5
16
Riffle Slope ft/ft
0.0073 0.0422 --- 0.0854 --- --- 0.010 0.025 0.060 0.001 0.016 0.016 0.035 0.010
16
Pool Length ft
9.0 13.0 --- 19.0 --- --- 4.0 12.0 27.0 3.2 12.4 12.3 29.5 6.3
18
Pool Max depth (ft)
0.8 1.3 --- 1.9 --- --- --- 2.0 --- 1.6 2.2 2.3 2.6 0.3
18
Pool Spacing ft
14.0 21.0 --- 32.0 --- --- 20.0 30.0 45.0 14.5 30.2 31.7 42.2 6.9
17
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
The existing stream channel did not display plan
form geometry due to historic dredging and
straightening
12.0
19.0
--- 23.0 --- ---
13.0
20.0
28.0
15.7
24.3
25.6
29.8
4.7
18
Radius of Curvature ft
10.0 16.0 --- 39.0 --- --- 12.0 17.0 30.0 12.3 19.9 18.8 31.4 5.8
19
Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft
1.2 2.0 --- 4.8 --- --- 2.0 2.8 5.0 1.1 1.8 1.7 2.9 0.5
19
Meander Wavelength ft
31.4 45.3 --- 61.4 --- --- 46.0 55.0 81.0 23.3 54.3 52.3 88.5 15.6
18
Meander Width Ratio
1.5 2.3 --- 2.8 --- --- 2.1 3.3 4.6 2.1 4.9 4.8 8.0 1.4
18
Substrate, bed, and transport parameters
4d16 / d35 / d50 / d84 / d95 / di / dis mm
10.6 23.6 49.4 1 75.3 1 82.7 86.0 78.0
6.3 10.
17.3
57.9 1113.9 76.0 123.0
Reach Shear Stress (competency) lb/f2
0.50
0.6
0.6
Max part size mm mobilized at bankfull
91.0
107.0
107.0
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m
2.1
2.6
1.4
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area SM
0.2
0.19
Impervious Surface estimate %
<1
<1
Ros en Classification
134
E4
E4
C4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
---
---
---
HEC -RAS: 3.0 2.0-4.0
HEC -RAS: 4.4
3.8-5.1
3.9
Bankfull Discharge cfs
---
---
22.7
23.1
Valley length ft
530
240
Channel Thalweg length ft
534
284
646
646
Sinuosity ft
1.0
1.2
1
1.2
1.2
BF slope ft/ft
0.012
0.016
0.011
0.011
BEHI VL% / L% / M% / H% / VH% / E%
34 25 17 1 24 0 0
---
---
---1 --- --- ---
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-39 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
N/A - Item does not apply.
1MY1 data updated to show corrected bankfull width, W/D ratio, and entrenchment ratio calculations.
2 Data updated to show corrected calculations.
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-40 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table Ila.
Baseline Morphology & Hydraulic Monitoring Summary
601 North II / Project No. 95025
Cross -Section 1 (Riffle)
UT to Wicker (Reach 4)
Cross -Section 2 (Pool)
Ur to Wicker (Reach 5)
Cross -Section 3 (Riffle)
UT to Wicker (Reach 5)
Cross -Section 41 (Riffle)
Wicker (Reach 1)
Cross -Section 51 (Pool)
Wicker (Reach 1)
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 Base
MYl MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 Base
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
616.5
616.5
616.5
616.5
616.5
604.0
604.0
604.0
604.0
604.0
603.9
603.9 603.9
603.9
603.9
604.5
604.5
604.5
604.5
604.5
604.4
604.4
604.4
604.4
604.4
Bankfull Width (ft)
8.9
8.3
8.0
8.6
7.9
17.6
15.4
17.1
18.6
17.6
11.0
10.8 10.8
11.9
11.7
11.4
12.5
12.3
11.0
11.2
14.2
15.4
15.5
16.1
20.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
23.1
>23
>23
>23
>23
64.1
>100
>100
>100
>100
65.5
>100 >100
>100
>100
59.7
>100
>100
>100
>100
1 65.6
>100
>100
>100
>100
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.9 0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.9
1.7
1.8
2.1
2.2
2.2
1.3
1.3 1.3
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area ftZ
4.2
4.1
3.9
3.9
4.0
12.8
13.6
16.4
16.7
16.0
8.5
8.5 9.5
9.1
8.6
7.9
7.2
8.2
7.5
8.4
11.5
6.1
9.4
11.8
14.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
18.5
16.9
16.4
19.0
15.6
24.5
17.5
17.8
20.8
19.2
14.1
14.6 12.3
15.6
14.6
16.6
21.7
18.1
16.1
14.9
17.6
19.3
19.9
21.9
28.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.6
1 >2.8
>2.9
1 >2.7
>2.9
3.6
>6.5
>5.9
>5.4
>5.7
6.0
>9 >9.2
>8.4
>8.6
5.2
>8
1 >8.1
>9.1
>8.9
4.6
>6.5
>6.5
>6.2 1
>5.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
-
0.062
0.062
1.1
0.062
-
0.062
0.062
1 0.062 10.0621
-
4.9 6.9
1 40 1
1.6
-
0.06
1 0.062
0.062
6.9
-
0.062
0.062
0.062
0.062
Cross -Section 6 (Riffle)
Wicker (Reach 2)
Cross -Section 7 (Pool)
Wicker (Reach 2)
Cross -Section 8 (Pool)
Wicker (Reach 2)
Cross -Section 9 (Riffle)
Wicker (Reach 2)
Cross -Section 10 (Riffle)
Wicker (Reach 3)
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 Base
MYl MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
Base
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4
MY5 Base
MYl
MY2
1V y3z
MY4 MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used
596.2
596.2
596.2
596.2
596.2
596.1
596.1
596.1
591.6
591.6
591.3
591.3 591.3
591.3
591.3
591.0
591.0
591.0
591.0
591.0
-
587.8
587.8
587.8
587.8
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.5
11.9
11.8
11.9
12.7
12.8
12.8
12.9
12.9
12.7
12.7
13.3 13.4
13.6
14.1
11.6
11.5
11.3
11.1
11.6
-
12.0
11.8
12.4
12.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
69.2
>90
>90
>90
>90
69.5
>125
>125
>125
>125
69.5
>200 >200
>200
>200
69.7
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
>200
1 >200
>200
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.0
1.1
0.9
1.1
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.2
1.6
1.7 1.8
1.7
1.8
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
_
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.7
1.9
1.6
1.8
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.3
2.9
3.1 3.2
3.2
3.3
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.8
-
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area(ft)
12.1
12.0
12.9
11.2
13.6
23.2
24.2
25.5
25.2
27.6
19.9
22.9 23.5
22.9
25.7
13.0
12.3
12.4
11.7
12.5
-
14.4
14.0
13.5
13.3
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
10.8
11.8
10.8
12.7
11.8
7.0
6.8
6.5
6.6
5.8
8.1
7.8 7.6
8.1
7.8
10.4
10.7
10.2
10.6
10.8
-
9.9
9.9
11.3
11.9
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
6.0
>7.5
>7.6
>7.5
>7.1
5.4
>9.8
>9.7
>9.7
>9.9
5.5
>15 >14.9
>14.7
>14.2
6.0
>17.5
>17.8
>17.9
>17.2
-
>16.7
>17
>16.2
>15.9
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0 1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
-
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
-
0.062 1
1511
2.6
-
0.062 1
1.7
1.2
1.9
-
0.062 0.062
0.062
0.16
-
0.06
1.4
0.062
0.63
24
24
6.7
11
N/A - Item does not apply.
1MY1 data updated to show corrected bankfull width, W/D ratio, and entrenchment ratio calculations.
2 Data updated to show corrected calculations.
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-40 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru=Run /P = Pool /G=Glide/S=Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
'No water present at time of survey; MYl and MY2 profile values based on bedform only.
^Mean bankfull width, W/D ratio, entrenchment ratio updated to reflect accurate calculations.
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-41 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table l lb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
601 North II - Wicker Branch Reach 1 630 feet)
Parameter
Baseline
My- it, "
My- 21
MY -3
MY -4
MY -5
Dimension & Substrate -Riffle
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean Med I Max
SD I
n
Min IMean
Med Max
I SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft)
-
11.4
-
1
12.5
-
1
-
12.3
- -
-
1
- 11.0
- -
1
11.0
-
-
1
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
59.7
1
>100
-
1
-
>100
- -
-
I
- >100
- -
1
-
>100
-
-
1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
-
0.7
1
0.6
-
1
-
0.8
- -
-
I
- 0.7
- -
1
-
0.7
-
1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
-
1.3
1
1.1
-
1
-
1.2
- -
-
1
- 1.2
-
1
-
1.2
-
1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
-
7.9
1
7.2
-
1
-
8.2
- -
-
1
- 7.5
-
1
-
7.5
1
Width/Depth Ratio
-
16.6
1
21.7
-
1
-
18.1
- -
-
1
- 16.1
-
1
-
16.1
-
-
1
Entrenchment Ratio
-
5.2
1
>8
-
1
-
>8.1
-
-
1
- >6.2
-
1
-
>9.1
-
1
Bank Height Ratio
-
1.0
-
1
-
1.0
-
-
1
-
1.0
-
-
1
- 1.0
-
1
-
1.0
-
1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
4.2
12.3
11.5 33.3
6.0
22.0
3.3
6.9
6.3 11.0
2.1
18
1.9
7.8
7.3 12.9
3.3
19
4.8 8.5
7.6 15.5
3.1
19
4.7
8.7
8.8 17.4
3.2
19
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.001 0.017 0.017 0.043
0.0
22
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
0.000 0.016
0.015 0.035
0.010
19
0.000
0.019
0.016 0.059 0.015
19
Pool Length (ft)
4.7
10.8
10.4 20.0
4.2
20
7.3
14.1
12.0 37.6
6.8
19
6.9
12.3
12.0 19.0
3.5
20
8.0 13.5
14.5 17.4
2.9
21
7.4
13.5
13.4 18.7
3.6
20
Pool MaxDepth (ft)
1.4
1.9
1.9 2.2
0.2
20
1.1
1.6
1.6 2.0
0.3
19
1.3
1.7
1.7 2.2
0.2
21
1.7 2.2
2.2 2.5
0.2
21
1.5
1.9
1.8 2.3
0.2
20
Pool Spacing (ft)
13.4
30.7
26.9 57.8
10.0
19
16.4
27.7
26.9 41.8
7.0
19
8.9
26.0
25.8 38.0
7.2
20
7.7 26.2
25.4 34.3
6.1
20
16.6
27.3
28.6 36.3
5.8
19
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
13.4
20.1
20.2 29.7
4.00
21
Radius of Curvature (ft)
14.4
17.9
16.4 27.7
3.90
23
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
1.30
1.60
1.40 2.40
0.3
23
Meander Wavelength (ft)
13.7
51.5
51.8 87.9
15.30
21
Meander Width Ratio
1.2
4.5
4.5 7.7
1.30
21
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
660
557
562
562
558
Sinuosity (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
-
-
-
0.0090
0.0089
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0090
0.0094
0.0093
0.0083
0.0083
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S%
-
I -
- -
- 1
124%110%152%114%10%
1
128%18%
146%118%1
1% 1
130% 1 7%
53% 1 9%
1 0% 1
1 31%
1 7% 1
51% 1 11% 1
0%
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru=Run /P = Pool /G=Glide/S=Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
'No water present at time of survey; MYl and MY2 profile values based on bedform only.
^Mean bankfull width, W/D ratio, entrenchment ratio updated to reflect accurate calculations.
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-41 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= aide /S=Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
'No water present at time of survey; MY1 and MY2 profile values based on bedform only.
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-42 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table I lb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
601 North II - Wicker Branch Reach 2 1356 feet
Parameter
Baseline
My- It
MY -2'
MY -3
MY -4
MY- 5
Dimension & Substrate -Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean Med Max
SD
n Min can Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft)
11.5
11.6
11.6
11.6
0.1
2
11.5
11.7
11.7 11.9
0.28
2
11.3
11.6
11.6 11.8
0.4
2
11.1
11.5
11.5 11.9
0.6
2
11.6
12.2
12.2 12.7
0.8
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
69.2
69.5
69.5
69.7
0.4
2
90
145
145 200
77.8
2
90
145
145 200
77.8
2
90.0
145.0
145.0 200.0 77.8
2
90.0
145.0
145.0 200.0
77.8
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.1
0.04
2
1.1
1.1
1.1 1.1
0
2
0.9
1.0
1.0 1.1
0.1
2
1.1
1.1
1.1 1.1
0.0
2
Bankf ill Max Depth (ft)
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.8
0.1
2
1.7
1.7
1.7 1.7
0.02
2
1.8
1.9
1.9 1.9
0.07
2
1.6
1.7
1.7 1.7
0.1
2
1.8
1.8
1.8 1.8
0.0
2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
12.1
12.6
12.6
13.0
1 0.6
2
12.0
12.2
12.2 1 12.3
0.21
2
12.4
12.7
12.7 12.9
0.35
2
11.2
11.5
11.5 11.7
0.4
2
12.5
13.1
13.1 13.6
0.8
2
Width/Depth Ratio
10.4
10.6
10.6
10.8
0.3
2
10.7
11.3
11.3 11.8
0.78
2
10.2
10.5
10.5 10.8
0.42
2
10.6
11.7
11.7 12.7
1.5
2
10.8
11.3
11.3 11.8
0.7
2
Entrenchment Ratio
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
0
2
7.5
12.5
12.5 17.5
7.07
2
7.6
12.7
12.7 17.8
7.2
2
7.5
12.7
12.7 17.9
7.4
2
7.1
12.2
12.2 17.2
7.1
2
Bank Height Ratio
19.3
21.4
21.4
23.5
3
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0
2
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
0.0
2
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
6.3
17.3
18.1
38.7
7.5
33
8.1
17.1
15.7 32.9
7.0
31
6.8
16.1
15.2 30.7
6.8
31
4.4
15.2
14.1 36.6
7.6
31
2.2
16.7
16.3 34.5
8.1
31
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.001
0.017
0.013
0.062
0.013
33
-
-
- -
-
-
-
-
- -
-
-
0.008
0.019
0.016 0.050 0.01
31
0.000 0.026 0.016 0.110 0.028
31
Pool Length (ft)
6.1
24.2
23.7
62.0
11.9
33
12.6
29.2
26.2 57.3
11.3
33
13.7
29.4
25.4 65.0
11.7
33
17.5
32.7
29.1 66.2
11.2
33
15.4
27.3
24.1 55.5
9.6
34
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.7
2.9
2.8
3.8
0.4
33
1.4
2.8
2.8 3.8
0.5
33
1.7
3.0
3.0 3.7
0.4
33
2.1
3.2
3.3 3.9
0.4
33
1.9
2.9
3.0 3.5
0.4
34
Pool Spacing (ft)
25.5
53.6
53.2
103.3
19.5
33
24.4
54.0
52.2 112.6
18.3
32
20.1
53.1
48.1 113.5
20.0
32
14.6
53.4
48.1 114.2
19.8
32
24.7
52.3
51.3 113.4
19.1
34
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
18.3
31.1
30.6
49.5
8.8
24
Radius of Curvature (ft)
28.3
40.2
37.8
61.8
10.1
28
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
2.40
3.50
3.30
5.30
0.9
28
Meander Wavelength (ft)
13.7
114.4
113.3
226.5
46.9
24
Meander Width Ratio
1.2
9.9
9.8
19.5
4.0
24
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
E4
E4
E4
E5
E5
Channel Thatweg Length (ft)
1,775
1,777
1,779
1,775
1,774
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
-
-
-
0.0072
0.0067
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0070
0.0071
0.0070
0.0071
0.0071
Ri% /Ru% /P% /G% /S%
-
I -
I -
31%
2%
57% 9%
1 0% 1
1
28%
1 3%
1 55% 1 13% 1
0%
1
27%
1 3%
61% 1 9% 1
1% 1
29%
1 5%
52% 1 12% 1
1%
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= aide /S=Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
'No water present at time of survey; MY1 and MY2 profile values based on bedform only.
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-42 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G=Glide/S=Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
'No water present at time of survey; MYI, MY2, and MY3 profile values based on bedform only.
2Reach 3 cross-section was added during MYI; no data available for MYO
3 Data updated to show corrected calculations.
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-43 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table llb. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
601 North II- Wicker Branch Reach 3 414 feet
Parameter Baseline
MY -11
MY - 21
MY -3 1,2
MY -4 MY - 5
Dimension & Substrate - Riffle Min Mean Med Max SD
n Min Mean
Med Max
SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Min Mean
Med Max SD
n Min Mean
Med Max SD n Min Mean Med Max SD n
Bankfull Width (ft) - -
- 12.0
- -
1 - 11.8 - 1
- 12.4
- -
1 - 12.6
1
Floodprone Width (ft) - - -
- >200
- -
1 - >200 - 1
- >200
- -
1 - >200
- 1
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) - -
- 1.2
- -
1 - 1.2 - - I
- 1.1
- -
1 - 1.1
- 1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft) - -
- 1.7
- -
1 - 1.7 - 1
- 1.6
-
1 - 1.6
- 1
Bankf ill Cross -Sectional Area (ft) - -
- 14.4
- -
I - 14.0 - - 1
- 13.5
-
1 - 13.3
- 1
Width/Depth Ratio - -
- 9.9
- -
1 - 9.9 - - I
- 11.3
-
1 - 11.9
- 1
Entrenchment Ratio - - -
- >16.7
- -
- 1 - >17 - - 1
- >16.2
-
1 - >15.9
- 1
Bank Height Ratio - -
- 1.0
- -
- 1 - 1.0 - - - 1
- 1.0
-
1 - 1.0
- - 1
Profile
Riffle Length (ft) - -
- 27.6
- -
1 - 31.7 - - 1
- 25.6
-
1 24.9
- 1
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) - -
- -
- - - - - -
- -
- - 0.011
- 1
Pool Length (ft) - -
- 29.0
1 - 25.7 - - 1
- 29.0
-
1 - 28.1
- I
Pool Max Depth (ft) - -
- 2.7
1 - 3.0 - - 1
- 3.1
-
1 - 2.5
- 1
Pool Spacing (ft) - -
- -
0 - - - - 0
- -
0 - -
- -
Patte rn
Channel Belt Width (ft) - -
Radius of Curvature (ft) - -
Rc: Bankfull Width (ft/ft) - -
Meander Wavelength (ft) - -
Meander Width Ratio - -
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
E4
E4
E4
E4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
80
79
81
81
Sinuosity (ft)
1.17
1.18
1.17
1.17
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft) -
NA
N/A
N/A
0.0067
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft) -
0.0073
0.0070
0.0100
0.0071
Ri% / Ru% / P% / G% / S% - - - - -1
144%1-
46% 10% 11
151% 1 - 41% 1 8% 1
42% 1 -
48% 1 9% 11
142%1-
47% 1 11% 1
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G=Glide/S=Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
'No water present at time of survey; MYI, MY2, and MY3 profile values based on bedform only.
2Reach 3 cross-section was added during MYI; no data available for MYO
3 Data updated to show corrected calculations.
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-43 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
Stream Survey Data
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-44 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table I 1b. Monitoring 1. Data Summary
601 Branch
Substrate -Riffle
WidthDimension&
Bankfull a�aaaoa�aaa©a�aaaoa�aaaoa�aaao������
a®aaaoa®aaa©a®aaaoa®aaaoa®aaao������
FloodproneBankfull
-•.• a�aaaoa�aaa©a�aaaoa�aaaoa�aaao������
Max .• a�aaaoa�aaa©a�aaaoa�aaaoaaaao������
Cross-SectionalBankfull a�aaaoa®aaa©a®aaaoa�aaaoa�aaao������
•.••a�aaaoa�aaa©a�aaaoa�aaaoa�aaao������
Entrenchment ••a®aaaoa�aaa©a�aaaoa®aaaoa�aaao������
:••a�aaa©a�aaa©a�aaaoa�aaaoa�aaao������
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa������
• •'- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa������
••• aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa������
Pool Max .• aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa������
••• aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa������
Channel Belt Width (ft)
MeanderMeander
Width Ratio
AdditionalReach
Sinuosity (ft)
• ' ' • ' ' ' aaaaa�aaaaa�aaaaa�aaaaa�aaaaa�������
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru= Run /P= Pool /G= Glide /S=Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
Stream Survey Data
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-44 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix D
Stream Survey Data
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
'No water present at time of survey; MY1 and MY2 profile values based on bedform only.
'MY1 data misreported, numbers updated to reflect accurate riffle length calculations
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-45 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table 11b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
601 North II -UT to Wicker Branch Reach 5 (534 feet
Parameter
Baseline
My -11' "
My - 21
NIY - 3
NIY - 4
MY - 5
Dimension & Substrate -Riffle
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n
Min Mean Med Max SD
n Min Mean Med Max SD
n Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n Min can Med INlax SD n
Bankfull Width (ft)
-
11.0
-
11.1
-
1 10.8
- - -
1 -
11.9
-
1
-
11.7
-
I
Floodprone Width (ft)
-
65.5
-
>100
-
I >100
- - -
I -
>100
I
-
>100
-
I
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
-
0.8
-
0.8
-
1 0.9
- - -
1 -
0.8
1
-
0.8
-
I
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
-
1.3
1.3
-
1 1.3
- - -
1 -
1.4
1
-
1.3
-
1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
-
8.5
-
8.5
-
1 9.5
- - -
1 -
9.1
1
-
8.6
-
1
Width/Depth Ratio
-
14.1
14.6
-
1 12.3
- - -
1 -
15.6
-
-
1
-
14.6
-
1
Entrenchment Ratio
-
6.0
>9
-
I >9.2
- - -
I -
>8.4
I
-
>8.6
-
1
Bank Height Ratio
-
1.0
1.0
Profile
Riffle Length (ft)
5.1
12.8
12.4 23.2
4.5
16
3.1
9.7
9.3 18.5 3.9
17 3.2 7.7
6.9 14.5 3.5
17 2.2
9.0
8.3 14.8
3.1
17
4.9
10.1
10.9 16.9
4.0
17
Riffle Slope (ft/ft) 0.001 0.016 0.016 0.035 0.010
16
-
-
- - -
- - -
- - -
- 0.001
0.018
0.014 0.053
0.013
17
0.003
0.021
0.016 0.057 0.014
17
Pool Length (ft)
3.2
12.4
12.3 29.5
6.3
18
6.0
16.0
14.5 38.3 7.3
19 7.4 17.0
15.8 28.8 5.7
19 8.6
16.7
16.3 37.6
6.9
18
5.5
15.4
14.6 36.8
6.5
18
Pool Max Depth (ft)
1.6
2.2
2.3 2.6
0.3
18
1.5
2.0
2.0 2.6 0.3
19 1.8 2.2
2.2 2.7 0.3
19 1.9
2.3
2.4 2.6
0.2
18
1.8
2.3
2.3 2.8
0.3
18
Pool Spacing (ft)
14.5
30.2
31.7 42.2
6.9
17
10.8
28.7
30.8 42.0 8.8
19 10.5 29.1
30.4 48.7 9.9
19 13.9
30.7
30.8 54.3
7.9
18
21.7
31.7
32.3 39.8
5.1
18
Pattern
Channel Belt Width (ft)
15.7
24.3
25.6 29.8
4.7
18
Radius of Curvature (ft)
12.3
19.9
18.8 31.4
5.8
19
Re: Bankfull Width (ft/ft)
1.10
1.80
1.70 2.90
0.5
19
Meander Wavelength (ft)
23.3
54.3
52.3 88.5
15.6
18
Meander Width Ratio
2.1
4.9
4.8 8.0
1.4
18
Additional Reach Parameters
Rosgen Classification
C4
C4
C4
C4
C4
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
646
600
591
589
595
Sinuosity (ft)
1.2
1.25
1.27
1.25
1.28
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
-
-
-
0.0103
0.0108
Bankfull Slope (ft/ft)
0.0110
0.0114
0.0113
0.0102
0.0112
Ri°/u / Ru% / P°/a / G°/u / S%
-
1
1
130%15%
56% 8% 1 - 1
124%15% 158%114%1
0°/u 1
128%
1 3%
56% 1 13%
1 0% 1
31%
1 5%
51% 1 11% 1
2%
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle/Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step
*Percentages based on riffle and pool pebble counts.
'No water present at time of survey; MY1 and MY2 profile values based on bedform only.
'MY1 data misreported, numbers updated to reflect accurate riffle length calculations
601 North II Stream Restoration Site Equinox
Project No. 95025 D-45 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data

Appendix E
I Based on precipitation data, suggested date is 7/22/2014
2 Based on precipitation data, suggested date is 1/13/2015
3 Based on precipitation data, suggested date is 4/16/2015
4 Based on precipitation data, suggested date is 9/30/2015
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events- Reach 2
601 North II / Project No. 95025
Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence Method
Feet Above Bankfull Photo #
Elevation (if available)
November - 2013
Unknown Wrack Lines
September - 2014
Unknown' Crest Gauge
1.5
February - 2015
Unknown Crest Gauge
0.7
May - 2015
Unknown3 Crest Gauge
0.4
November - 2015
Unknown Crest Gauge
1.0
January - 2016
Unknown Crest Gauge
1.1
March - 2016
Unknown Crest Gauge
0.5
I Based on precipitation data, suggested date is 7/22/2014
2 Based on precipitation data, suggested date is 1/13/2015
3 Based on precipitation data, suggested date is 4/16/2015
4 Based on precipitation data, suggested date is 9/30/2015
I Based on precipitation data, suggested date is 7/22/2014
2 Based on precipitation data, suggested date is 1/13/2015
3 Based on precipitation data, suggested date is 4/16/2015
601 North II Stream Restoration Site E-1 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Year
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Table 12. Verification ofBankfull Events - Reach 5
601 North II / Project No. 95925
Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence Method
Feet Above Bankfidl Photo #
Evevation (if available)
Novemeber - 2013
Unknown Wrack Lines
September - 2014
Unknown' Crest Gauge
1.2
February - 2015
Unknown Crest Gauge
0.2
May - 2015
Unknown Crest Gauge
0.1
November - 2015
Unknown Wrack Lines
January - 2016
Unknown Crest Gauge
0.1
I Based on precipitation data, suggested date is 7/22/2014
2 Based on precipitation data, suggested date is 1/13/2015
3 Based on precipitation data, suggested date is 4/16/2015
601 North II Stream Restoration Site E-1 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Year
Monitoring Year 4 of 5

Appendix E
Figure 3. Photo Verification of Bankfull Events
Bankfull Photo Verification
Reach 2 Crest Gauge
Bankfull Photo Verification
Reach 5 Crest Gauge
601 North II Stream Restoration Site E-2
Project No. 95025
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
Bankfull Photo Verification
Reach 2 Crest Gauge
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Year

Appendix E
Figure 4. Daily Precipitation Totals for Monroe, North Carolina- NCCRONOS Station No. 315771
Ino-
Im ,
Figure 5. Monthly Precipitation Data Compared to 30' and 701h Percentiles for Union County
®IIm. Wiz Illsnut ----21tr P"r Ids Ur 'Cane% -- Pnr Pra.Wi Ur.ar Cw Ip —- Ilnvr Cuu.[} a.a:aaQK&wr
601 North II Stream Restoration Site E-3 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Year
Monitoring Year 4 of 5
I
I
I
Ga�mvrlRg Sram+l
I
�
I
I
I
3
I
\ rf
�
1
\ A
]
4
I
I
1
i
'
I
I
I
NDeDaw
6-0
I
I
I
I
I I
Jan -16 F046 friar -16 Apr -15
May -16 Jun -15 As -16 Aug -16 SV46
O@t-16 Nov -16 Dac46
®IIm. Wiz Illsnut ----21tr P"r Ids Ur 'Cane% -- Pnr Pra.Wi Ur.ar Cw Ip —- Ilnvr Cuu.[} a.a:aaQK&wr
601 North II Stream Restoration Site E-3 Equinox
Project No. 95025 Annual Monitoring Year
Monitoring Year 4 of 5