20140547 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_2016_20170119

Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
FINAL
Project Name: 601 East Stream Restoration
NCDMS Contract No.:004925
NCDMS Project No.: 95756
Union County, NC
Data Collected: January 2016 — September 2016
Date Submitted: October 2016
Submitted to:
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services
DEQ -DMS, 1652 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699-1652

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Prepared for:
res
302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110
Raleigh, North Carolina 27605
Prepared by:
EQUINOX
balance through proper planning
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28801

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Contents
1.0 Project Summary............................................................................................................................... l
2.0 Methods.............................................................................................................................................4
3.0 References.........................................................................................................................................5
Appendix A General Tables and Figures...................................................................................................... 7
Appendix B Visual Assessment Data.........................................................................................................19
Appendix C Vegetation Plot Data............................................................................................................... 41
Appendix D Stream Geomorphology Data................................................................................................. 53
AppendixE Hydrologic Data....................................................................................................................103

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
1.1. Goals and Objectives
The project goals address stressors identified in the TLW and include the following:
• Reduce water quality stressors originating in and around the project area affecting the project
reaches and downstream watercourses, which include population of the Savannah Lilliput
(Toxolasma pullus) and the Carolina Creekshell (Vilosa vaughiana), both listed species of
concern. Specifically involving:
o Reducing turbidity and sediment loading
o Input reductions of nutrients and crop protection chemicals
o Improving thermoregulation
• Improving aquatic habitat quality and diversity within project reaches
• Improving recruitment of instream fine organic matter (FOM) in the near term and both FOM and
large wood in the long term
• Improving terrestrial habitat diversity and quality in the vicinity of project reaches
• Establishing habitat continuity between the reach headwaters and Lanes Creek
• Improving flood flow attenuation and floodplain interaction
The project goals will be addressed through the following project objectives:
• Restore or enhance reach pattern, dimension, and profile
• Stabilize eroding stream banks
• Install stream structures to maintain grade and improve bed form complexity
• Implement BMP detention devices on lateral agricultural drainages
• Install diverse native riparian buffer
• Removal of invasive exotic plant species
• Secure a protective conservation easement and establish fencing as needed
1.2. Success Criteria
The success criteria for the 601 East Stream Restoration Site follows accepted and approved success
criteria presented in the USACE Stream Mitigation Guidelines and subsequent NCDMS and agency
guidance. Specific success criteria components are presented below.
1.2.1. Stream Restoration
Dimension — The dimension parameters of the restored channel should remain stable throughout
the monitoring period. Cross sectional overlays should show modest changes from year to year.
The channel should not show a trend towards widening or increases in cross sectional area. Riffle
depths should maintain a low bank height ratio (<1.2).
Pattern and Profile — The longitudinal profile should not indicate any significant aggradation or
degradation over any substantial continuous lengths of channel. The bedform should develop or be
maintained during the monitoring period and be consistent with reference and designed reaches.
Variation within bedform parameters is acceptable as long as they are within design distributions.
Pattern parameters should show little change over the monitoring period.
Substrate — The substrate should maintain or progress towards the design distribution. Particle size
distribution within riffles should coarsen throughout the monitoring period.
601 East Stream Restoration Project 1 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Sediment Transport — The success of parameters described above should be demonstrated by the
lack of any significant aggradation or deposition within the channel. Point bars and inner berms
should not encroach excessively into the channel. Mid -channel bars should not be present.
1.2.2. Surface Water Hydrology
Two bankfull storm events must be recorded during the standard 7 -year monitoring period. For the
monitoring to be completed, these events must occur in separate monitoring years.
1.2.3. Vegetation
Vegetation success is based on the criteria established in the Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Monitoring Requirements and Performance Standards for Stream and/or Wetland Mitigation dated
November 7, 2011. Density of preferred species must be at a minimum 320 stems/acre at the end of the
three years of monitoring and 260 stems/acre after five years. At year 7, density must be no less than 210
seven year-old planted stems/acre. Level II of the CVS protocol, which includes natural stems and
planted stems, will be followed beginning in monitoring year 2 and for subsequent years until the project
closeout year. Invasive exotic plant species were observed before construction and treated at the end of
construction. Additional treatments will be conducted where deemed necessary if regeneration of these
invasive species is observed.
1.3. Project Setting and Background
The 601 East Stream Restoration Site is located in Union County, approximately 13 miles south of
Monroe, NC (Figure 1). The site encompasses 12.8 acres of formerly agricultural land and includes
portions of Tanyard Branch, a tributary of Lanes Creek. The Site is located within the Yadkin River
Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 14 -digit Hydrologic Unit 03040105081010 and the
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) sub -basin 03-04-14. The drainage area of
Tanyard Branch at the downstream end of the site is 0.56 square mile (354 acres). Land use within the
watershed is predominately agriculture with the remaining land use composed of low density residential
and forested areas.
1.4. Project Performance
Monitoring Year 2 (MY2) data was collected from March to September 2016. Monitoring activities
included visual assessment of all reaches and the surrounding easement, 20 permanent photo stations, 10
permanent vegetation monitoring plots, three temporary vegetation plots, 18 cross-sections, nine pebble
counts, and nine bankpin arrays.
Summary information and data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver activity or encroachment
and statistics related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in the tables
and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in
these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the
Mitigation Plan (formerly Restoration Plan) documents available on the NCDMS website
(http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/eep). All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is
available from DMS upon request.
1.4.1. Vegetation
Visual assessment of the easement (Appendix B — Table 6; Figure 2) indicates that with the exception of a
few bare areas, totaling 0.13 acre, vegetation is becoming well established throughout the easement
(Figure 2 and Table 6). Small bare areas are typical of a newly constructed mitigation site and usually
become vegetated after a couple of growing seasons. These areas will be monitored in subsequent site
601 East Stream Restoration Project 2 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

visits. During MY1, small bare areas were noted, coinciding with ditches from outside the easement that
had migrated into the easement. These areas have since become vegetated and have not caused increased
sedimentation or instability within the easement, so no action was taken during MY2. This areas will be
monitored in the future to make sure they remain stabilized. At the downstream portion of Reach 2, a
large monoculture plot of cattails within the wetland below XS -12, was noted. The invasive exotic plant,
Parrot Feather (Microphyllum aquaticum), was also noted in pools from STA 26+00 to STA 27+50.
Additionally, a 0.16 acre area of honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) and privet (Lingustrum sinense) were
noted at the upper end of Reach 2. Invasive populations have remained stable at the site. While no
treatments were performed during MY2, treatment of these areas will be scheduled as needed in coming
monitoring years. Easement encroachment was noted on Reaches 3 and 4 where it appears a tractor had
turned into the easement while planting adjacent fields. A complete replanting of the site occurred in
April 2016, which included all of the encroachment areas. Efficacy of the replanting and area of the
encroachment will be monitored in future site visits. RES is currently coordinating with the landowners
and will be installing additional signage marking the easement boundary during 2017. Fencing or another
type of deterrent will be added as necessary to keep tractors from driving through the easement.
Monitoring of permanent vegetation monitoring plots (n = 10) was completed during June 2016.
Summary tables and photographs associated with MY2 monitoring are located in Appendix C. In April
2016 the entire site was replanted with bare root seedlings, due to large swaths of planted stem mortality
throughout the site. MY2 monitoring data collected after the supplemental planting indicated that nine of
the ten vegetation monitoring plots are on track to meet the MY3 interim success criteria of 320 stems per
acre (Table 7 and 9). Stem densities ranged from 283 to 1,012 stems per acre with a mean of 720 stems
per acre across all plots. When volunteer stems are included, the annual mean increases to 1,012 stems
per acre. A total of 15 species were documented within the monitoring plots. Three additional temporary
random plots were set up to monitor the effects of the re -planting, one on Reach 1 (Plot 1), Reach 2 (Plot
2), and Reach 3 (Plot 3). In each temporary plot, all of the woody stems located within the plot were
counted to determine stem densities. Temporary plot 1 had 18 stems, temporary plot 2 had 20 stems, and
temporary plot 3 had 24 stems which led to 900, 1,000, and 1,200 stems/ acre respectively in each plot.
1.4.2. Stream Geomorphology
Visual assessment of the stream was performed to document signs of instability, such as eroding banks,
structural instability, or excessive sedimentation. Only a few stream problem areas were noted during
visual assessment (Table 5 and Figure 2). Structures are intact and performing as designed. The project
approach on the ephemeral channel at the upstream end of the project—Reach Awas to install a series
of energy dissipating structures to provide vertical stability and sediment settling capacity within the
reach. Two small areas of degradation were noted on reach 1. These areas are associated with small
headcuts that formed within riffles located at STA 9+25 and 10+00. The headcuts have remained stable
between MY and MY2 and have not migrated upstream or caused the riffle to cut down any further.
Visual assessment of this reach indicates that the structures are performing as designed, reducing
downcutting and capturing sediment from the upstream contributing area. No indications of new incision
were observed during the assessment.
Geomorphic data for MY2 was collected during April 2016. Summary tables and cross-section plots
related to stream morphology are located in Appendix D. Cross-sectional overlays showed modest
dimensional change between MY1 and MY2 data collection efforts (Appendix B; Table 11 a). Cross-
sections 7, 11, and 15 showed a decrease in bankfull width due to the formation of an inner berm on either
the right descending bank (RDB), left descending bank (LDB), or both banks, ultimately decreasing the
bankfull cross-sectional area. Cross-section 16 showed a 0.8 foot increase in bankfull width due to minor
601 East Stream Restoration Project 3 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

bank scour on both the RDB and LDB. This increase in bankfull width led to an increase in bankfull
cross-sectional area as well.
Substrate monitoring was performed during MY2. Pebble count D50 fell in the silt/clay to coarse gravel
range for Reach 1, silt/clay to fine gravel for Reach 2, very fine gravel to medium gravel for Reach 3, and
fine gravel for Reach 4. The channel substrate will be monitored in future years for shifts in particle size
distributions.
The bank pin arrays indicate that no erosion is taking place in the pools with the exception of the
upstream end of XS -1. Field data indicated that there was localized erosion around the upstream pin at
XS -1, at a rate of 0.04 foot/year (Table 12).
1.4.3. Stream Hydrology
During MY2 bankfull events were documented on both the Reach 2 and Reach 3 crest gauges (Table 13;
Figures 3 and 4).
Summary information/data related to the performance of various project and monitoring elements can be
found in the tables and figures in the report appendices. Narrative background and supporting
information formerly found in these reports can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly
Mitigation Plan) and in the Mitigation Plan (formerly Restoration Plan) documents available on NCDMS'
website. All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices is available from NCDMS upon
request.
2.0 METHODS
Visual assessments of the project were performed at the beginning and end of the monitoring year.
Permanent photo station photos were collected during the initial visual assessment during leaf -off
conditions. Additional photos of vegetation or stream problem areas were documented with photographs
throughout the project area.
Geomorphic measurements were taken during low flow conditions using a Nikon NPR 332 Total Station.
Three-dimensional coordinates associated with cross-section and profile data were collected in the field
and geo-referenced (NAD83 State Plane feet FIPS 3200). Morphological data was limited to 18 cross-
sections. Survey data was imported into CAD, ArcGIS, and Excel for data processing and analysis.
Channel substrate was characterized using a Wolman Pebble Count as outlined in Harrelson et al. (1994)
and processed using Microsoft Excel.
Vegetation success is being monitored using 10 permanent monitoring plots. Vegetation monitoring
followed CVS-EEP Level 1 Protocol for MY and is following Level 2 Protocol Version 4.2 for
monitoring years 2-7 (Lee et al. 2008). Level 2 Protocol includes analysis of species composition and
density of planted species. Data is processed using the CVS data entry tool. In the field, the four corners
of each plot were permanently marked with rebar and photos of each plot taken from the origin each
monitoring year.
Precipitation data was reported from the NCCRONOS station number 315771 in Monroe, NC. Two crest
gauges were installed on the mainstem channel, one upstream of Lansford Road in Reach 2 and another
downstream of Lansford Road in Reach 3. During quarterly visits to the site, the height of the cork -line
was recorded and cross-referenced with known bankfull elevations at each crest gauge.
601 East Stream Restoration Project 4 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

3.0 REFERENCES
Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC. 2015. 601 East Stream Restoration, Baseline Monitoring
Document and As -Built Baseline Report Final, Union County, North Carolina. NCEEP Project No.
95756
Harrelson, Cheryl, C. Rawlins and J. Potyondy. 1994. Stream Channel Reference Sites: An Illustrated
Guide to Field Technique. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM -245. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment
Station. USDA Forest Service. Fort Collins, Colorado
Lee, M.T.,R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording
Vegetation. Version 4.2. http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm; accessed November 2008.
601 East Stream Restoration Project 5 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 6 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Appendix A
General Tables and Figures
601 East Stream Restoration Project 7 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 8 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

(,Driving Directions: From Monroe drive south on Hwy.
601. Tum left on Landsford Road. Site is loacted on the�1 t-41
} left and right .25 miles down and accessed from a
arkhi area on the south side of Landsford Road.
p g
The subject project site is an environmental restoration site i w , rA, _ �� r
of the NCDMS and encompassed by a recorded
conservation easement, but is bordered by land with
private ownership. Accessing the site may require
traversing areas near or along the casement bounday and
therefore access to the general public is not permitted. �+
Access by authorized person( of state and federal
1 agencies or their designee/contractors involved in the the
development, oversight, and stweardship of the restoration
site is permitted within the terms and timeframes of their
defined role. Any intended site visitation or activity by any
person outside these previously sectioned roles and
activities requires prior coordination with NCDMS.iA
�
I
( 601 East Mitigation Site / I
EL
F3 M
I .
;�
r i 650 \ •` / f 1r���.
3 / h
w•l'4.-.-..,' '� � `__' �- I'r I 115 � f F\��� / � j� _ - _
rL. Streams
Roadse ('
Q Mitigation Sites
Water Bodies
Figure 1
„�� 601 East Mitigation Site
Project Vicinity Map
res
EQUIN0X
o 0.25 os 1
(utiles
601 East Stream Restoration Project 9 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 10 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

. 9
� - f
Rca,ki —/•—
- f
- \
Reach 4
�'v / I• - �'\ Reach1
Reach A
\ \ �• ��
\ L •�
Y:
0
rn
a
�.
- - 9 Notes:
Crest Gauge - ! sheet Boundary Vegetation Plots 1) This is not a survey and should Prepared for: Prepared by:
Figure 2. Current Condition Plan View ,— • — Criteria Met not be construed as such.
Overview -' -- -- Thalweg Easement
601 East Stream Restoration Site Top of Bank Criteria Unmet ?
Union County, North Carolina
Ads
NCDMS Contract No. 004925 Log vane re EQUINOX
NCDMS Project No.: 95756 0 70140 280 420 560
September 2016 Feet

Figure 2. Current Condition Plan View
Sheet 1 of 2
601 East Stream Restoration Site
Union County, North Carolina
NCDMS Contract No. 004925
NCDMS Project No.: 95756
September 2016
Crest Gauge
�z Photo Point
Bankpin Array
Cross -Section
Thalweg
�i Top of Bank
BMP
• j Easement
Vegetation Plots
Criteria Met
Criteria Not Met
Notes:
1) This is not a survey and should not be
construed as such.
0 75 150 300
Feet
Prepared for:
fires
Prepared by:
EQUINOX

Reach 3
0
Reach 4
x
r
XS -14 °
00000,/00�
♦ yt ^ �
a % L X ♦ �
Cb
XS 15
2 R ,
. XS -18
XS -17
Figure 2. Current Condition Plan View
Sheet 2 of 2
601 East Stream Restoration Site
Union County, North Carolina
NCDMS Contract No. 004925
NCDMS Project No.: 95756
September 2016
Crest Gauge
Photo Point
Bankpin Array
Cross -Section
Log Vane
Thalweg
�i Top of Bank
jEasement
h
Vegetation Plots
Criteria Met
Criteria Not Met
Notes:
1) This is not a survey and should not be
construed as such.
0 55 110 220
Feet
Prepared for:
fires
Prepared by:
_a:zrw,6,"*
EQUINOX

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 14 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East Stream Restoration Project 15 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
Table l: Project Components and Mitigation Credits
601 East Stream Restoration Site
Mitigation Credits
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Stream
Riparian Wetland Non-riparian Welland Buffer
Nutrient Offset
Nutrient Offset
Type R
RE
R
RE R
RE
Totals 3671
43
Project Components
Mitigation
Project Component -
Restoration -or- Restoration
or- Reach ID
Stationing�L.ocation
Existing Footage/Acreage Approach (PI, PH etc.)
Equivalent
Restoration Footage or Acreage
Ratio
Credits
Reach A Ephemeral
5+45-7+60
215 Buffer establishment and BMP
215
1 :5
43
sediment import reduction
Reach la
7+60-11+10
336 Pi R
350
1: 1
350
Intermittent
Reach lb
11+10— 11+95
85 Enhancement El
85
1 :1.5
57
Intermittent
Reach lc Perennial
11+95 — 13+47
136 Enhancement EI
155
1 :1.5
103
Reach I d Perennial
13+97 — 22+00
790 Pi R
803
1 : 1
803
Reach 2a
Perennial
22+00-22+45
40 Enhancement El
45
1:1.5
30
Reach 26
Perennial 1
22+75-24+02
125 Enhancement El
127
1:1.5
85
Reach 2c Perennial
24+02 —31+32
669 P 1 R
730
1 : 1
730
80' active channel
Reach 3a Perennial
42+92 — 46+61
112' relic channel P l R
369
1 : 1
369
Reach 3b Perennial
47+21 — 53+70
502' relic channel P l R
649
1 : 1
649
Reach 4 Perennial
53+70 —58+65
470' relic channel P3 R
495
1 : 1
495
Component Summation
Stream
Non-riparian Welland Buffer
Restoration Level
Riparian Wetland (acres)
Upland (acres)
Mitigation
Credits
(Imear fes)
(acres) (square feet)
Riverine Non-Riverme
Restoration
3396
3396
Enhancement
Enhancement 1
412
275
Enhancement 11
Creation
Ponervation/Other 1
215
1 1 1
1
43
HQ Preservation
BMP Elements
Element
Location Purpose/Function
Notes
Ephemeral Channel
FB, LS, 5, FS
Slowing the water down for settling and filtering excess sediment
Sediment expected from future
degradation upstream
5+45-7+60
BMP Elements
BR = Bioretention cell; SF = Sand Filter;
SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP
= Wet Detention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond; FS= Filter Strip; S= Grassed Swale; LS = Level Spread; N1= Natural Infiltration
Area; FB = Forested Buffer
601 East Stream Restoration Project 15 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
601 East Stream Restoration Site
601 East Stream Restoration Site
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan
May 2013
Jan 2014
Final Design — Construction Plans
Sept 2013
Jan 2014
Construction
-
Dec 2014
Containerized, bare root and B&B plantings
-
Jan 2015
Mitigation Plan / As -built (Year 0 Monitoring
— baseline) Feb 2015
Feb 2015
Year 1 Monitoring
Nov 2015
Nov 2015
Supplemental Planting (Entire Site)
-
Apr 2016
Year 2 Monitoring
Sept 2016
Oct 2016
Year 3 Monitoring
Construction contractor POC
Andrew Din m tte 919 663-0810
Year 4 Monitoring
Green Resource - Raleigh, NC
Year 5 Monitoring
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arbor Gen - Blenheim SC
Table 3. Project Contact Table
601 East Stream Restoration Site
Designer
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C. (WCE)
4805 Green Road, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27616
Primary project design POC
Becky Ward 919 870-0526
Construction Contractor
Wright Contracting
P.O. Box 545, Siler City, NC 27344
Construction contractor POC
Joseph Wright [phone]
Planting Contractor
H & J Forest Services
1416 Ocean Boulevard, Holly Ridge, NC 28445
Planting contractor POC
[phone]
Construction Survey Contractor
Turner Land Survey, PLLC
3719 Benson Drive, Raleigh, NC 27629
Survey contractor POC
Elizabeth Turner [phone]
Seeding Contractor
Wright Contracting
P.O. Box 545, Siler City, NC 27344
Construction contractor POC
Andrew Din m tte 919 663-0810
Seed Mix Sources
Green Resource - Raleigh, NC
As Purchased by EBX 919 829-9909 x213
Nursery Stock Suppliers
Arbor Gen - Blenheim SC
[phone]
NC Forest Service Nursery - Goldsboro, NC
[phone]
[Baseline] Monitoring Performers
Ward Consulting Engineers, P.C.
4805 Green Road, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC 27616
Stream Monitoring POC
Rachael Zi ler - WCE - 919 870-0526
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Chris Sheats - The Cantena Group - 919 732-1300
Monitoring Performers (MYl-MY2)
Equinox
2015-2016
37 Haywood Street, Suite 100
Asheville, NC 28801
Stream Monitoring POC
Drew Alderman 828 253-6856
Vegetation Monitoring POC
Drew Alderman 828 253-6856
601 East Stream Restoration Project 16 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
601 Fast Stream Restoration Site
Project Information
Project Name 1601 East Stream Restoration Site
County Union Count
Project Area acres 12.78
Project Coordinates latitude and longitude) 34° 50' 21.62" N, 80° 25' 32.26"N
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Piedmont
River Basin Yadkin River Basin
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8 -Digit USGS Hydrologic Unit 14 -digit 3040105081010
DWQ Sub -basin 3/4/2014
Project Drainage Area acres 361.33
Project drainage Area Percentage of InTervious Area 2%
CGIA Land Use Classification 2.01.01.07 Annual Row Crop Rotation
Reach Summary Information
Parameters
Reach 1
Reach 2
Reach 3
Reach 4
Length of reach
1,418; 1,393 IF Restored
906; 902 LF Restored
1,080; 1,018 LF Restored
Relic Channel, 495 IF Restored
Valley Classification
II
II
VIII
VIII
Drainage area acres
109
135
333
359
NCDWQ stream
Intermittent: 19.5
33.5
33.5
33.5
identification score
Perennial: 33.5
NCDWQ Water Quality
13-17-40-(1)
13-17-40-(1)
13-17-40-(1)
13-1740-(1)
Clas s ification
Morphological
Ci4/B4/C4b
C4/E4/DA
C4/64
G4
Description (streamt e)
Evolutionary trend
(reference channel
G
C/DA
G
G
evolution model used)
Intermittent: Tatum gravelly silty
Underlying mapped soils
Cid channery silt loam, Tatum
Chewacla silt loam
Chewacla silt loam
Perrenial: Cid channery silt loam
gravelly silt loam
Drainage class
Well Drained
Moderately Well Drained
Somewhat Poorly Drained
Somewhat Poorly Drained
Soil Hydric status
Non Hydric
Non Hydric
Non Hydric
Non Hydric
Slope
2%
0.84%
0.67%
1.25%
FEMA classification
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Agriculture along upstream
Canopy species include Willow
Red Maple, Sweetgum, Eastem
Canopy species include Red
Canopy species include Red
Native vegetation
The remaining stream buffer
Maple, Hackberry, Willow Oak,
Maple, Hackberry, Willow oak,
within this reach is composed of
Wetland A is composed of
and Sweetgum. The presence of
and Sweetgum. The presence of
community
Willow Oak, Red Maple, River
Cattails, spike rush arrow -arum,
Chinese privet outcompete any
Chinese privet outcompete any
Birch, Black Willow, Elderberry,
and duckweed.
shrub and herb layer.
shrub and herb layer.
and Blackberry.
Percent composition of
5% of Japanese stilt grass, 80%
o
0 /0
0
50 /o of Parrot feather
o
80 /o Chinese privet
exotic invasive vegetation
Chinese privet, and kudzu
601 East Stream Restoration Project 17 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Table 4 cont. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
601 East Stream Restoration Site
Wetland Summary Information
Parameters
Wetland 1
Size of Wetland acres
0.43 ac
Wetland Type (non-
Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh
riparian, riparian riverine,
Mapped Soil Series
Cid channery Silt Loam
Moderately Well Drained to Somewhat Poorly
Drainage class
Drained
Soil Hydric Status
Non-Hydric
Tanyard Branch headwaters, groundwater, and
Source of Hydrology
adjacent runoff
Wetland A formed from accumulating sediments
Hydrologic Impairment
filling the channel resulting in a braided channel
systemthrough the wetland.
Herbaceous-Vegetation is domninated by
herbaceous vegetation such as Cattail (Typha
latifolia ), Bulrush (Scirpus cyperinus), Common
Native vegetation
Rush (Juncus effuses). Some tree species such as
community
Black Willow (Salix nigra), and Red Maple
(Acer rubrum) are present in the wetland
margins.
95%-The invasive Parrot Feather
Percent composition of
(Miriophyllum aquaticum) is dominant
exotic invasive vegetation
throughout the wetland where there is standing
water.
Re g ulato ry Considerations
Regulation
Applicable?
Resolved?
Supporting
Documentation
Waters of the United
SAW 2013-
States-Section 404
Yes
00265; EEP IMS
#95756
Waters of the United
Yes
DWR# 14-0547
States — Section 401
Endangered Species Act
No
Yes
ERTR
Historic Preservation Act
No
Yes
ERTR
Coastal Zone
Management Act
(CZMA)/Costal Area
No
N/A
Management Act
(LAMA)
FEMA Floodplain
No
N/A
Compliance
FEssentialFisheries Habitat
No
N/A
601 East Stream Restoration Project 18 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Appendix B
Visual Assessment Data
601 East Stream Restoration Project 19 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring
Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 20 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring
Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Table 5. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 1
Assessed Len th 1,393 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
ass Int
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2. Degradation -Evidence of downcutting.
2
32
98%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
32
32
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Deoth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
33
33
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
up stream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
33
33
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
33
33
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
33
33
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured / Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
1
15
99%
0
0
97%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse.
Q
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
1
15
99%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
N/A
N/A
N/A
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or amts.
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pool forming structures maintaining- Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
N/A
NA
N
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
601 East Stream Restoration Project 21 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Table 5 contd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 2
Assessed Len th 902 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable'
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2 Dcuadation - Evidence of downcutting.
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
16
16
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
17
17
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
17
17
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
17
17
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
17
17
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhangingto the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
N/A
N/A
N/A
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pool forming structures maintaining - Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
N/A
N;'A
N/A
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
601 East Stream Restoration Project 22 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Table 5 contd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 3
Assessed Len th 1,018 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
ass Int
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted%
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Degradation -Evidence of downcutting.
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
18
18
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankfull Depth >_ 1.6).
18
18
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
up stream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
18
18
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
18
18
100%
4. Thalweg Position
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
18
18
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured / Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping calving, or collapse.
Q
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
N/A
N/A
N/A
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or amts.
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
N/A
N/A
N/A
Pool forming structures maintaining- Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
N/A
NA
N
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
601 East Stream Restoration Project 23 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Table 5 cont'd. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 4
Assessed Len th 495 feet
Major Channel
Category
Channel
Sub -Category
Metric
Number
Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Total
Number in
As -built
Number of
Unstable
Segments
Amount of
Unstable
Footage
% Stable,
Performing
as Intended
Number
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Footage
with
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
Adjusted %
for
Stabilizing
Woody
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
1. Awadation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly
deflect flow laterally (not to include point bars).
0
0
100%
2 Deuadation - Evidence of downcutting.
0
0
100%
(Riffle and Run Units)
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate.
9
9
100%
3. Meander Pool
1. Death Sufficient (Max Pool Depth: Mean Bankf dl Depth >_ 1.6).
9
9
100%
Condition
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstream riffle).
9
9
100%
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run).
9
9
100%
4. Thalweg Position
r2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander bend (Glide).
9
I
9
100%
r
2. Bank
1. Scoured / Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth
and/or scour and erosion.
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
sustainable and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse.
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Totals
0
0
100%
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
2
2
100%
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill
2
2
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
2
2
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does NOT
exceed 15%.
2
2
100%
Pool forming structures maintaining- Max Pool Depth: Mean
4. Habitat
Bankfull Depth Ratio > 1.6. Rootwads/logs providing some cover at
2
2
100%
base -flow.
N/A - Item does not apply.
601 East Stream Restoration Project 24 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

N/A - Item does not apply.
601 East Stream Restoration Project 25 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
601 East Stream Restoration Site
Planted Acreage 12.8
Easement Acreage 12.8
% of
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Planted
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
Very limited cover of both woody and herbaceous material.
Stipple (Brown)
7
0.13
1%
Woody stem densities clearly below target levels based on
2. Low Stem Density Areas
N/A
0
0.00
0%
MY3, 4, or 5 stem count criteria.
Totals
7
0.13
1%
Areas with woody stems of a size class that are obviously small
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
N/A
0
0.00
u
0%
given the monitoringyear.
Cumulative Totals
7
0.13
1%
of
Number of
Combined
Vegetation Category
Definitions
CCPV Depiction
Easement
Polygons
Acreage
Acreage
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map
Cross Hatch
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
scale).
(Red - Dense/Yellow - Present)
12
0.73
o
6/0
Areas or points (if too small to render as polygons at map
5. Easement Encroachment Areas
Stipple (Black/ White)
5
0.08
1%
scale).
N/A - Item does not apply.
601 East Stream Restoration Project 25 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Reach 1 — Permanent Photo Station 1
Top of Project — Looking Downstream
Project Reach 1 — Permanent Photo Station 2
Cross Section 1— Looking Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 26 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Reach 1 — Permanent Photo Station 3
Cross Section 2 — Looking Downstream
Project Reach 1 — Permanent Photo Station 4
Cross Section 3 — Looking Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 27 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Reach 1 — Permanent Photo Station 5
Cross Section 4 — Looking Downstream
Project Reach 1 — Permanent Photo Station 6
Cross Section 5 — Looking Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 28 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Reach 1 — Permanent Photo Station 7
Cross Section 6 — Looking Downstream
Project Reach 1— Permanent Photo Station 8
Cross Section 7 — Looking Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 29 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Reach 1 — Permanent Photo Station 9
Cross Section 8 — Looking Downstream
Project Reach 2 — Permanent Photo Station 10
Cross Section 9 — Looking Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 30 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Reach 2 — Permanent Photo Station 11
Cross Section 10 —Looking Downstream
Project Reach 2 — Permanent Photo Station 12
Cross Section 11 — Looking Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 31 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Reach 2 — Permanent Photo Station 13
Cross Section 12 — Looking Downstream
Project Reach 3 — Permanent Photo Station 14
Cross Section 13 — Looking Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 32 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Reach 3 — Permanent Photo Station 15
Cross Section 14 — Looking Downstream
Project Reach 3 — Permanent Photo Station 16
Cross Section 15 — Looking Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 33 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Reach 3— Permanent Photo Station 17
Cross Section 16 — Looking Downstream
Project Reach 4— Permanent Photo Station 18
Cross Section 17 — Looking Downstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 34 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Reach 4 — Permanent Photo Station 19
Cross Section 18 — Looking Downstream
Project Reach 4— Permanent Photo Station 20
Bottom of Project — Looking Upstream
601 East Stream Restoration Project 35 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Problem Area Photos
Project Reach 1 — Bare Area 8+25 Left Descending Bank
Project Reach 1 — Headcut/Degradation 9+25
601 East Stream Restoration Project 36 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Reach 1 — Bank Erosion 9+50 Left Descending Bank
Project Reach 1 — Ditch / Bare Area 14+00 Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 37 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Reach 2 — Bare Area 24+50 Right Descending Bank
Project Reach 2 — 26+25 Parrot Feather within Pool
601 East Stream Restoration Project 38 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Reach 2 — Cattail monoculture along Left Descending Bank
Project Reach 3 Easement Encroachment 45+50
601 East Stream Restoration Project 39 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Reach 3 — Easement Encroachment 47+50 Left Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 40 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Appendix C
Vegetation Plot Data
601 East Stream Restoration Project 41 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 42 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
601 East Stream Restoration Site
Vegetation
Plot ID
Vegetation
Survival
Threshold
Met?
Tract Mean
1
Yes
90%
2
Yes
3
Yes
4
Yes
5
Yes
6
Yes
7
No
8
Yes
9
Yes
10
Yes
601 East Stream Restoration Project 43 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
601 East Stream Restoration Site
Report Prepared By
Drew Alderman
Date Prepared
6/20/2016 15:01
database name
Equinox-2016-A-601East V2.mdb
database location
Z:\ES\NRI&M\EBXMonitoring\601_East\MY2-2016\Data\Veg
computer name
FIELD -PC
file size
45551616
DESCRIPTION
OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT ------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and
project data.
Proj, planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes
live stakes.
Proj, total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live
stakes, all planted stems, and all natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing,
etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor by Spp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total
stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and
missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers
combined) for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY -------------------------------------
Project Code 1
project Name 601 East
Description
River Basin Yadkin -Pee Dee
le ngth(ft)
stream -to -edge width (ft)
area (sq m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots 10
601 East Stream Restoration Project 44 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

tPnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
601 East Stream Restoration Project 45 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
Table 9. Planted Total Stem Counts (Species by Plot with Annual Means)
601 East Stream Restoration Site
Current Plot Data (MY2 2016)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
Plot 1
PnoL P -all
T
Plot 2
PnoL P -all
T
Plot 3
PnoL P -all T
Plot 4
PnoL P -all
T
Plot 5
PnoL P -all
Plot 6 Plot 7
T PnoL P -all T PnoL P -all T
Plot 8
PnoL P -all
T
Plot 9
PnoL P -all
T
Plot 10
PnoL P -all T
MY2 (2016)
PnoL P -all T
M (2015)
PnoL P -all T
MYO (2015)
PnoLS P -all T
Acer negundo
Boxelder
Tree
24
7
31
Asimina triloba
Pawpaw
Tree
1 1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
Betula nigra
River Birch
Tree
6
6
6
1
1
1
6
6
6
4 4
4
5 5
5
1 1
1
2
2
2
8
8
8
33
33
33
14
14
14
24
24
24
Ce halanthus occidentalis
Common Buttonbush
Shrub
1 1
1
2 2
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
4
4
4
6
6
6
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green Ash
Tree
3
3
3
3 3
3
3 3
4
7
7
7
9
9
9
2
2
2
27
27
28
3
3
3
3
3
3
Liquidambar styracii lua
Sweetgum
Tree
10
5
1
16
Liriodendron tulipifera var. tulipifera Tulip -tree, Yellow Poplar, Whitewood Tree
1
1
1
1
1
2
3 3
3
3
3
3
2 2
2
1 1
1
9
9
9
20
20
21
16
16
16
30
30
30
N ssa s lvatica
Blackgum
Tree
2 2
2
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
18
18
18
Platanus occidentalis var. occidentalis Sycamore, Plane -tree
Tree
9
9
9
14
14
14
11 11
11
3
3
3
5 5
5
1 1
1
7
7
7
1
1
1
8
8
8
59
59
59
47
47
47
58
58
58
Populus deltoides var. deltoides
Eastern Cottonwood
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
3
3
1
8
8
Quercus
Oak
Tree
9
9
9
12
12
12
Quercus michauxii
Swamp Chestnut Oak
Tree
6
6
6
1 1
1
1 1
1
2 2
2
1 1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
14
14
14
10
10
10
20
20
20
Quercus nigra
Water Oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus phellos
Willow Oak
Tree
3
3
3
2 2
2
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
8
8
8
5
5
5
26
26
26
Quercus rubra
Northern Red Oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus stellata
Post Oak
Tree
1 1
1
1
1
1
Quercus velutina
Black Oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
Rhus copallinum var. copallinum
Flameleaf Sumac
shrub
8
1
9
Salix nigra
Black Willow
Tree
5
7
4
1
1
2
1
6
13
5
5
Ulmus rubra
Slippery Ehn
Tree
1
1
Stem count
21
21
55
24
24
37
15 21
31
16
16
16
19 19
19
13 13
18
7 7
8
18
18
18
20
20
21
25
25
27
178
184
250
116
123
123
200
207
207
size (ares)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
10
size (ACRES)
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.25
0.25
0.25
Species count
61
61
81
61
61
81
31
51
61
51
51
5
71 71
7
6
61
7
61 6
7
5
51
51
5
51
51
7
7
9
151
151
19
13
141
14
11
11
11
Stems per ACRE 0 y
85012,2261
9711
9711
1,4971
'0471
8501
1,2551
#411
6471
6471
7691 7691
7691
5261
5261
728M
2931
324
7281
7281
7281
8091
850M
1,0121
1,093WM
7451
1,0121
4691
4981
4981
800
8281
828
tPnoLS: No livestakes included in tally; P -all: All planted stems included in tally; T: Total stems including recruitment.
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
601 East Stream Restoration Project 45 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 46 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 1
June 13, 2016
601 East - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 2
June 13, 2016
601 East Stream Restoration Project 47 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 3
June 13, 2016
601 East - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 4
June 13, 2016
601 East Stream Restoration Project 48 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 5
June 13, 2016
601 East - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 6
June 13, 2016
601 East Stream Restoration Project 49 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 7
June 13, 2016
601 East - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 8
June 13, 2016
601 East Stream Restoration Project 50 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East - Vegetation Monitoring Plot 9
June 13, 2016
601 East -Vegetation Monitoring Plot 10
June 13, 2016
601 East Stream Restoration Project 51 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 52 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Appendix D
Stream Geomorphology Data
601 East Stream Restoration Project 53 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 54 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East Stream Restoration Project 55 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 1 (1,393 feet)
Parameter G-go Regional Curve
Pre- Existing Condi ions
Reference Reach(es) Data
Desi
As-butt / Baseline
Dimension and Substrate -Ri®e LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean
Med Max SD
n Min
Mean
Med Max SD n
Min
Med
Max
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
7
21
60
7.42
9.88
11.61
10
8.82
11.45
10.77 15.13
2.23
8
Floodprone Width (11)
8
60
101
18.51
26.43
33.59
22
28
35
40.00
74.38
69.00 154.00
35.32
8
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.2
0.5
0.9
0.68
0.79
0.97
0.72
0.50
0.81
0.77 1.20
0.26
8
Bankfirll Max Depth (ft)
0.7
1
1.4
128
1.78
2.16
1.2
0.87
1.53
1.54 2.07
0.49
8
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
8
1
1.4
0.97
1.39
1.82
7.2
4.45
9.27
8.85 14.07
3.48
8
Width/Depth Ratio
1.1
27
47
8.14
12.95
16.82
13.9
8.56 1
15.45
14.89 25.33
5.40
8
Entrenchment Ratio
0.4
2.4
9.5
2.02
2.4
3.24 1
2.2
2.8
3.5
3.30
6.90
5.62 16.40
4.19
8
Bank Height Ratio
1
0.34
1 2
0.97
1.39
1.82
1
0.93
0.98
1.00 1 1.00
0.03
8
d50 (mm)
Riffle Length (ft)
2.7
24.9
107.3
5.97
11.26
26.78
14
23
90
10.04
22.09
18.54 95.26
14.52
32
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0.0007
1.7
40
0.015
0.031
0.05
0.021
0.036
0.046
0.015
0.034
0.032 0.064
0.012
32
Pool Length (11)
9.03
16.89
56.86
13.6
20.13
31.74
14
22
29
13.38
24.28
21.23 65.67
11.47
33
Pool Max depth (ft)
I
2.4
3.9
1.4
1.83
2.2
2.2
1.16
2.19
2.17 3.15
0.38
33
Pool Spacing (f)
15.5
50
128
235
36.2
57.4
24
36.7
58
31.42
44.63
40.18 116.51
16.87
32
Pool Volume (ft')
Channel Beltwidth(ft)
10
19.6
25
13
17.33
20
13
18
21
13
18 21
Radius of Cmsvature (ft)
14.5
84
118
16
33.
53
16
32.1
52
16
32.1 52
Re: Bankfull width (ft/ft)
1.7
4.6
11.5
4.35
6.04
8.9
4.3
6.1
8.9
4.3
6.1 8.9
Meander Wavelength (ft)
36
96
740
43
59.67
88
43
61
89
43
61 89
Meander Width Ratio
0.5
0.94
1.7
1.32
1.76
2.03
1.3
1.8
2.1
1.3
1.8 2.1
Substrate, bed and transport parameten
RN//Ru%/P%/G%/S%
45.5%
53.6%
0.0% 26.8%
17.2%
47.9% 1 8.1% 1 0.0%
44.3% 1
155.7% 1 1
0.0%
SC%/Sa%/G%/C%/B%Be%
4.1%
27.3%
67.6%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95/dN/d '(nam
2.71
6.72
10.56
24.89
38.23
Reach Shear Stress (competency) 4/Y
Max part size (mm) Mobilized at bankfu0
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mr
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.166
0.144
Impervious coverestimate (%)
Ros en Classification
64/B4/C4b
B4/C4
B4/C4b
B4/C4b
Bankfull Velocity (fps
3.2
3.2
Bankfull Discharge (cfs)
24
Valley length (ft)
1,425
378
Channel Thalweg length (ft)
1,479
440
1,438
1,438
Sinuosity (ft)
1.04
1.16
1.17
1.17
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (11/11)
0.0196
0.017
0.017
BE slope (fi/ft)
0.017
0.017
Bankfull Floo Iain Area (acres)
Pro ortion over wide (%)
Entenchment Class (ER Range)
Incision Class (BHR Range
BEHI VL%/L%/M%IH%NH%/E
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
601 East Stream Restoration Project 55 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East Stream Restoration Project 56 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data
601 East Stream R-turatin, Sit, - Reach 2 (902 feet)
Pre- Existing Conditions
Reference
Reachns) Data
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle mmmmemm®maemmmma®m®mmmmma
BankfullWidth mmmmomm®mmm®m®mmm®m®mmmm©
Floodprnne Width mmmmm®mmmm®i•mmmmmm®
m
, m
, ,
v
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft) mmmm®®mmmmm®m®mmmmmmm®®mo
mmm-®mmomm®mm®mmm®mmmm®mo
mmmm®mmmmmmmmmmmm®mmm®mmo
Bank Height Ridi. mmmmm®mmmm®mm®mmmom
mm
mo
mmmmmmmmmm®mm®mm®®®®mm®®®
mmmm®®m®mm®mm®mm®®®®®®®®i•
mmmm®mm®mmm®mmmmm®mmm®mmm
Peel Masr depth (ft) mmmmm®m®mm®®m®mmm®mmmmmmm
mmmmmmm®mmmmmmmmmi•mm®®mmi■
Erm
Channel Bcliwidib (ft) mmmm®®m®mm®®m®mm®m®®mm®mm
mmmm®®mmmmm®m®mm®mm®mmmmm
mmmm®®mmmm®mm®mm®mm®mmmmm
mmmmmmm®mmmom®mmmmmmmmmmm
Meander Width mmmmmmm®mm®®m®mm®®m®m®mmm
m
ice'
d16/d35/d5O/d84/d95/dF/d?' (train
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m`i�
Additional Reach P.—.t—
...
�7
Range)Enternharent Class (ER
Incision Class (BHR Range)
�
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
601 East Stream Restoration Project 56 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East Stream Restoration Project 57 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data
East Stream RestorationSits - Reach 3 (1,018 feet)
Pre- Existing Conditions
Dimension601
mmmmemmmmaemmmmaem®emmmma
,, Substrate - RiffleFlondpoon.
mmmmm®mmmmm®m®mmmmmmmmm®©
Width (11)
mmmmmmm®mmm®mmmmmmmmm®mmo
.,. mmm®m®mmmmmmm®mmm®mm®®®mo
W—.pthmmmmm®mmmm®®mmmmmmm®m®®mo
•.mmmmm®mommmmmmmmmmmm®®®®v
••mmmm®®m®mm®®m®mmmomm®®®®0
mmmmmm—mmmmmm—mmmmmmmmmmm
mmmm®mm®mmmmm®mm®®mm®®®®®
mmmm®®m®mmm®m®mmmm®m®®®®®
• mmmmmmm®mmm®mmmm®®mmmm®mm
• mmmmm®m®mm®®m®mmm®mm®mmmm
Pool Spacing (ft) mmmmommmmmmmmommmm®mm®mmm
mmmm®®mmmm®®m®mm®mm®m®®mm
mmmm®®m®mmm®mmmm®m®®m®®mm
R, Bankfull width mmmm®®m®mm®mmmmmm®®mm®®mm
Meander --length (ft) mmmm®®mmmmmmmmmmm®mmm®®mm
Meander Width Ratio mmmm®®m®mm®®m®mm®®m®m®®mm
m
mmmm�mmmm
: ,
mmmm
Reach Shear Strem (competency) Ible
Additional Reach Pstratneters, m
Area �
m■
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
Bankfull Floodplain Are, (acres)
601 East Stream Restoration Project 57 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East Stream Restoration Project 58 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
Table 10. Baseline Stream Data Summary
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 4 (495 feet)
Parameter Gauge Regional Curve
Pre- Existing Conditions
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
As -built / Baseline
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean
Med Max
SD n Min
Mean
Med Max SD n
Min
Med
Max
Min Mean Med Max
SD
n
Bankfull Width (ft)
5.2
11.6
20
7.42
9.88
11.61
16
14.93 15.92 15.92 16.91
1.40
2
Floodprone Width (ft)
16
20
25
18.51
26.43
33.59
30
35
40
30.39 36.19 36.19 42.00
8.21
2
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.76
0.9
1.1
0.68
0.79
0.97
0.98
0.98 1.37 1.37 1.76
0.55
2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.33
1.28
1.78
2.16
1.8
1.49 2.11 2.11 2.72
0.87
2
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ftz
12.3
15
16
0.97
1.39
1.82
15.7
14.70 22.25 22.25 29.81
10.68.
2
Width/DepthRatio
7
12.9
18
8.14
12.95
16.82
16.3
9.60 12.38 12.38 15.16
3.93
2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.4
1.7
2.2
2.02
2.4
3.24
1.9
2.2
2.5
2.04 2.26 2.26 2.48
0.32
2
Bank Height Ratio
3.3
3.5
4.2
0.97
1.39
1.82
1
1.00 1.10 1.10 1.20
0.14
2
d50 (mm)
Profile,
Riffle Length (ft)
0.79
10.58
23.7
5.97
11.26
26.78
15
23
103
15.84 20.829 18.18 28.96 14.7764
9
Riffle Slope (ft/ft)
0
0.02
0.06
0.015
0.031
0.05
0.021
0.036
0.03
0.018 0.0274 0.0298 0.0382
0.0068
9
Pool Length (ft)
7.83
20.7
64.91
13.6
20.13
31.74
14
22
42
1 30.82 35.01 35.78 38.85
3.1243
9
Pool Max depth (ft)
2
2.5
3.2
1.4
1.83
2.2
2.2
1.997 2.8154 2.753 3.392
0.3909
9
Pool Spacing (ft)
12
29
55
23.5
36.2
57.4
38
59
93
49.77 56.111 54.805 69.26
6.2441
8
3Pool Volume (ft')
Pattern
Channel Bekwidth (ft)
12
32
82
13
17.33
20
21
28
32
21 28 32
Radius of Curvature (ft)
18
34.9
61
16
33
53
26
52
84
26 52 84
Re: Bankfull width (ft/ft)
1.6
3
5.3
4.35
6.04
8.9
162
3.25
5.25
162 3.25 1 5.25
Meander Wavelength (ft)
30
56
113
43
59.67
88
69
97
142
69 97 142
Meander Width Ratio
1.1
2.8
7.2
1.32
1.76
2.03
1.32
1.76
2.03
1.32 1.76 1 2.03
Substrate, bed and transport parameters
Ri%/Ru%/P%/G%/S%
19.9%
80.1%
0.0% 26.8%
17.2%
1 47.9% 1 8.1% 1 0.0%
39.1%1 165.6%10.0%
SC %/Sa%/G%/C%/B% Be%
d16/d35/d50/d84/d95/d?/&P (mm)
Reach Shear Stress (competency) Ib/f'
Max part size (mm) Mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m'
Additional Reach Parameters
Drainage Area (SM)
0.56
0.144
Impervious cover estimate (%)
Rosgen Classification
G4
B4/C4
B4
B4
Bankfull Velocity (fps)
4
3.27
3.27
Banldull Discharge (cfs)
55
Valley length (ft)
378
Channel Thalweg len (ft)
440
465
465
Sinuosity (ft)
1.04
1.16
1.13
1.13
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0114
0.0114
BF slope (ft/ft)
0.0114
0.0114
Bankftdl Floodplain Area (acres)
Proportion over wide (%)
Entenchment Class (ER Range)
Incision Class (BHR Range)
BEHI VL%/L%/M%/H%/VH%/E
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
601 East Stream Restoration Project 58 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

-Information Unavailble
*data updated to show corrected calculations
601 East Stream Restoration Project 59 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
Table 11a. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross-Sections)
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 1
Cross-Section 1
Pool
Cross-Section 2
Riffle
Cross-Section 3
Pool
Cross-Section 4
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base
MYl* MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6
MY7 Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 W4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Record Elevation (datum) Used
544.82
544.82
544.82
540.40
540.40 540.40
537.87
537.87 537.87
533.69
533.69
533.69
Bankfull Width (ft)
13.6
15.1
15.1
15.1
14.7 15.2
9.4
9.5 9.3
8.8
9.1
9.4
Floodprone Width (ft) 45.0
145.0 >45.0
77.0
>77.0 177.0
154.0 >154.0 >154.0
75.0
>75
>75.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.6
0.5 0.5
0.9
0.9 0.9
0.5
0.5
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth(1t)
2.1
2.2
2.2
1.2
1.2 1.2
1.8
1.7 1.8
0.9
0.9
1.1
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
14.1
13.7
1 14.3
9.0
8.0 8.0
8.7
8.5 8.8
4.5
4.8
5.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.2
16.6
15.9
25.3
27.0 28.9
10.2
10.7 1 9.8
17.5
17.1
15.3
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
10.3
>3.0
>3.0
9.3
>5.2 >5.1
14.9
114.6 116.6 1
15.918.3
1 18.0
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0 t 1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
8.3 0.062
22.0
17.0
Cross-Section 5
Pool
Cross-Section 6
Rifle
Cross-Section 7
Pool
Cross-Section 8
Rife
Dimension
Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base
MVI MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY6 MY7 Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6
MY7 Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Record Elevation (datum) Used 530.49 530.49 530.49
528.11 528.11 528.11
525.02 525.02 525.02
522.48 522.48 522.48
Bankfull Width (ft)
129
12,1
12.0
11.3
11.3 11.3
10.3
11.4 10.3
10.1
8.8
9.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
61.0
161.0 >61.0
80.0
>80.0 >80.0
63.0
163 >63.0
40.0
>40
>40.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.6
0.6 0.6
1.2
1.0 1.0
0.6
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Mae Depth 00
2.0
1.8
1.8
1.3
1.3 1.4
2.0
2.0 2.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft2)
12.8
11.0
1 11.2 1 1
6.6
6.6 7.2
12.3
11.2 10.4
6.2
5.6
5.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
13.0
13.2
12.9
19.3
19.5 1 17.9
8.6
11.5 10.3 1
16.6
13.9
14.7
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
17.4
>5.1
>5.1
9.7
1 >7.1 17.1 1 1 1 1
1 10.7
1 >5.5 1 16.1
10.9
1 >4.5
>4.3
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio 1
0.9
LO
1.0
1.0
1 1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1 1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
26.0 2.6
0.062
0.062
-Information Unavailble
*data updated to show corrected calculations
601 East Stream Restoration Project 59 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Information Unavailable
Table l la cont'd. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 2
Cross -Section 9
Riffle
Cross -Section 14 Cross -Section 15
Pool Pool
Cross -Section 10
Pool
Cross -Section 11
Riffle
Dimension
Base
Cross -Section 12
Pool
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6
MY7 Base
MYl MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Record Elevation (datum) Used 517.50 517.50 517.50
516.22 516.22 516.22 515.16 515.16 515.16
513.68 513.68 513.68
Bankfull Width (ft)
24.2
24.3
24.4
19.2
19.7 19.7 15.5
15.8
14.1
20.0
20.6
20.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
62.0
162
>62.0
132.0
>132 >132.0 73.0
>73
>73.0
168.0
1168 >168.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.3
1.2 1.2 0.6
0.5
0.6
1.1
1.0
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth(ft)
1.5
1.4
1.4
2.5
2.6 2.6 1.5
1.3
1.5
2.5
2.4
2.6
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
17.7
16.5
17.5
25.3
24.4 23.1 9.4
8.6
8.3
21.3
21.4
23.1
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
33.1
35.6
34.2
14.6W16.O16.8
25.5
28.9
23.8
18.8
19.9
18.4
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
5.8
>2.6
>2.5
11.7
7.1
>4.6
>5.2
7.0
>8.1
>8.2Bankfull
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
LO
1.0
LO
0.9
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0d50
(mm)
-
0.062
5.8
-
0.062
0.062
-
-
-
Information Unavailable
- Information Unavailable
601 East Stream Restoration Project 60 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
Table Ila cont'd. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 3
Cross -Section 13
Riffle
Cross -Section 14 Cross -Section 15
Pool Pool
Cross -Section 16
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6
MY7 Base MYl MY2 MY3 MY4
MY5 MY6 MY7 Base MYl MY2 MY3 NIY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Base
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY5 MY6 MY7 MY5
Record Elevation (datum) Used 497.88 497.88 497.88
495.50 495.50 495.50
494.42 494.42 494.42
493.73 493.73 493.73
Bankfull Width (ft)
15.9
16.9
17.5
17.6 18.4 17.9
19.6 21.1 20.5
17.7
17.5
18.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
75.0
175.0 175.0
350.0 >350.0 >350.0
350.0 >350.0 >350.0
150.0 >150.0 150.0
Bmkfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.8
0.7
1.6 1.5 1.6
1.8 1.6 1.5
0.8
0.7
0.8
Badcfall Max Depth(ft)
1.6
1.7
1.8
3.4 3.1 3.4
3.4 3.3 3.3
L6
1.6
1.7
Bankfull Cross Sectional Area (ft')
12.8
13.6
12.2
28.2 28.0 28.7
36.1 34.4 31.5 1 1
14.1
12.9
14.8
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
19.6
21.0
25.0
11.0 1 12.0 1 11.2
10.6 13.0 13.3
22.4 1
23.8
1 22.5
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
8.8
>4.4
>4.3
1 12.8 1 >19.1 1 119.6 1
1 5.6 116.6 >17.1
7.9
>8.5
>8.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
:#
d50 (mm)
-
20.0
9.1
- - -
- - -
-
31.0
3.3
- Information Unavailable
601 East Stream Restoration Project 60 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Table Ila cont'd. Monitoring Data -Dimensional Morphology Summary
(Dimensional Parameters - Cross -Sections)
601 East Stream Restoration Site - Reach 4
Cross -Section 17
Pool
Cross -Section 18
Riffle
Dimension
Base
MY1 MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7 Base
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Record Elevation (datum) Used 489.11
489.11 489.11 490.01
490.01
490.01
Bankfull Width (ft)
16.9
17.2 17.2 14.9
14.6
14.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
42.0
>42.0 >42.0 30.4
>31.0
>31.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.8
1 1.7 1.7 1.0
1.0
1 1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.7
2.9 2.9 1.5
1.6
1.7
Bankf ill Cross Sectional Area (ft 2)
29.8
29.1 28.7 14.7
14.5
14.0
Bankfull Width/Depth Ratio
9.6
10.2 10.3 15.2
14.6
14.2
Bankfull Entrenchment Ratio
2.5
>2.4 >2.4 2.0
>2.1
>2.2
Bankfull Bank Height Ratio
1.2
1.1 1.1 1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 (mm)
-
- - -
47.0
1 4.2
- Information Unavailable
601 East Stream Restoration Project 61 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 62 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G= Glide / S = Step
i Based on riffle andpool dimensions.
Based solely on riffle dimensions
Table 11b.Monitoring 1 Data Summary
.lReach 1 (1393 feet)
• 1•
®�mmmom�mmmom�mmmom�mmmo®�mmma®�mmmo®�m�mo®�mmmo
m®m®®om®mm®om®m®m®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
®mm®m©mmmmm©®mm®®©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
.;;.... ,, ,
mmm®o
.,...:.
mmmm
, ,
mm
l
:, 1
mo
•, l
mm
:, ,
mommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmm®m©mmmmm©mmmmm©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
..-. m®®®mom®®®mom®®mmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
....
®mm®mo®m®mm©m®®®
Bankfull mmmm®om®mmm0mmmm®o
-'::
l
©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmm®m©mmmmm©mmm®m©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
..............................
Width/Depth,mmm®mo®mmmmommmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
."�:,•.,mm®®m©m®®mm©mmmmm©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
•.,mmmm®©mmmmm©®mm®m©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmm
l
®mmmm
l
ammmm
l
ammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
l,
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
®mmmm®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
'•.;'-'-.
®m®m®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
•".:
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
.....-:®®®®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
_ mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mm®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��mmmmm
m®®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
- mammaammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
.;.' - ma®maammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
-
ma
lmaammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mammaammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mammasmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
_ mammaammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
..:.-,•.®am®aammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mammaammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
- -
mammasmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Additional Reach Parameters
••
®a®maammm�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Rosgen Classification
Additional Reach Parameters
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
mamaammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru = Run / P = Pool / G= Glide / S = Step
i Based on riffle andpool dimensions.
Based solely on riffle dimensions
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S—Step
Based on riffle and pool dimensions
Based solely on riffle dimensions
601 East Stream Restoration Project 63 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
Table 11b I I 1. Monitoring 1 Data Summary
I(902 feet)
• 1•
®�mmmom�mmmom�mmmom�mmmo®�mmma®�mmmo®�m�mo®�mmmo
®mm®m©mmmmm©®mm®®©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
.,...:.
mmmm
l
®mmmmm©mmmmm©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmm®m©mmmmm©mmmmm©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
....
®mm®mo®m®mm©m®®®
l
©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmm®m©mmmmm©mmm®m©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
."�:,•.,mm®®m©m®®mm©mmmmm©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
•.,mmmm®©mmmmm©®mm®m©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmm
l
®mmmm
l
ammmm
l
ammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
®mmmm®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
•".:
®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
•"•...
mm®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm��mmmmm
m®®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
-
ma
lmaammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mammasmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mammaammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
- -
mammasmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
••
®a®maammm�mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Additional Reach Parameters
ma�aammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri= Riffle /Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S—Step
Based on riffle and pool dimensions
Based solely on riffle dimensions
601 East Stream Restoration Project 63 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

—Table
Table t t , Monitoring 1. Data Summary
.I(495 feet)
I lb i , i 1. Data Summary
,I(1018 feet)
Dimension& Substrate -Riffle m��mam�mmmam��mmom�mmma®�mmmo®�mmmom�m�mam�m®ma
' mmmm®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Dimension&
m��mom�mmmom�mmmom�mmma®�mmmom�mmmo®�mmmom�mmmo
.odpro' mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
-•-•mmmmmmmmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
m®®m®mm®®®mm®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
..-.' ®®®®mmmmmmmmm®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
- ' • m®®mmmmmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
,;;; , :.
m®
, , , ,mom®®
,mmm®®
Entrenchment om®®®mmm®mmmmm®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
, ,
m©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
....
m®®mmmmmmmmmmmmmm©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Bank Height •m®®®mmm®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
...•
m®®m®mmmmmmm®mmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
:
1,
,
©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Bankfull oss-Sectional Area (ft2)
CrBank
mm®m®mm®®mmm®®®mm©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
••'-'� mmmm®©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
•,,..-�' mmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
•,,..: mmmmm®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
•.,m®®m®mmmmmm©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Channel mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Radius,' mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Height om®®®®mmmmm
mm®®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
,
m®m®®®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
' mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
-••.®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmAdditional
'
Reach ParametersRosgen
mmmm®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
ClassificationChannel
Thalweg Length (ft)Sinuosity
mmm
- �: �
••„-':'
, „
, l :
, , , ,.
, ,
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�immm
m®®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmC���
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Pool Depth
m®m®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
.,,.:
mm®®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Chann
-Re:
Radius
Bankfull Width (ft/ft),
mm®®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmm
'
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm�mmmm
MeanderWidth Ratio
®m®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Additional Reach
., . Classification
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
Sinuosity (ft)
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmimmmm
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri=Riffle /Ru=Run/P=Pool/G=Glide/S=Step
' Based on riffle and pool dimensions
' Based solely on riffle dimensions
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru= Run / P = Pool / G= Glide / S= Step
' Based on riffle and pool dimensions
1 Based solely on riffle dimensions
601 East Stream Restoration Project 64 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
Table t t , Monitoring 1. Data Summary
.I(495 feet)
Dimension& Substrate -Riffle m��mam�mmmam��mmom�mmma®�mmmo®�mmmom�m�mam�m®ma
' mmmm®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
.odpro' mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
-•-•mmmmmmmmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
..-.' ®®®®mmmmmmmmm®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
- ' • m®®mmmmmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
, : -, � • . ,mmm®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Entrenchment om®®®mmm®mmmmm®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Bank Height •m®®®mmm®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
:
1,
ommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
••'-'� mmmm®©mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
•,,..-�' mmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
•,,..: mmmmm®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Channel mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Radius,' mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
mm®®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
' mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
-••.®mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmAdditional
Reach ParametersRosgen
ClassificationChannel
Thalweg Length (ft)Sinuosity
(III
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
N/A - Information does not apply.
Ri = Riffle / Ru= Run / P = Pool / G= Glide / S= Step
' Based on riffle and pool dimensions
1 Based solely on riffle dimensions
601 East Stream Restoration Project 64 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Table 9. 601 East Stream Restoration Site
Bank Pin Arrays
Cross Section #
Length of Exposed Pin (mm)
Upstream
At Cross Section
Downstream
Rate
mm/
Rate
ft/
1
35.6
0
0
11.9
0.04
3
OB
0B
OB
0
0.00
5
OB
0B
OB
0
0.00
7
OB
0B
OB
0
0.00
10
0B
0B
OB
0
0.00
12
OB
OB
OB
0
0.00
14
OB
0B
0B
0
0.00
15
OB
0B
0B
0
0.00
17
0
0
0
0
0.00
OB" Buried Bankpin
601 East Stream Restoration Project 65 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Name: 601 East XS Number: 1 Station: 8+32
Reach Name: Reach 1 XS Twe: Pool
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 66 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
549
548
547
546
1------------
545
------------------------------------------------------
------ -----
c 544
543
b 542
541
540
539
0+00
0+05
MYo
0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25
Station (feet)
-MY1 - MY2 ----- BKl
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
13.6
15.1
15.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
45.0
45.0
45.0
Bankfull Mcan Depth (ft)
1.0
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.1
2.2
2.2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft )
14.1
13.7
14.3 -
Width/Depth Ratio
13.2
16.6
15.9
Entrenchment Ratio
10.3
3.0
3.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 66 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Name: 601 East XS Number: 2 Station: 10+95
Reach Name: Reach 1 XS Twe: Riffle
.+'
�f itlFU
545
v atm`
544
543
542
541
c 540
------------------- -----------------------
-
-
539
b 538
537
536
535
0+00
0+05
MYO
0+10 0+15 0+20
Station (feet)
-MY1 -MY2 ----- BKC
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
15.1
14.7
15.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
77.0
77.0
77.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
0.5
0.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.2
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (112)1
9.0
8.0
8.0
Width/Depth Ratio
25.3
27.0
28.9
Entrenchment Ratio
9.3
5.2
5.1
Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1.0 1
1.0 1-
.+'
�f itlFU
v atm`
Left Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 67 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Name: 601 East XS Number: 3 Station: 12+20
Reach Name: Reach 1 XS Tvue: Pool
Left Descending Bank Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 68 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
543
542
541
540
539
0 538 ----------------------
----
---------------
----------------------- --- - -----------
537
b 536
535
534
533
0+00
0+05
MYO
0+10 0+15 0+20
Station (feet)
MY 1 -MY2 - - - - - BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
9.4
9.5
9.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
154.0
154.0
154.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.9
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.8
1.7
1.8
Bankf ill Cross -Sectional Area (ft) 1
8.7
8.5
8.8
Width/Depth Ratio 1
10.2
10.7
9.8
Entrenchment Ratio
14.9
14.6
16.6
Bank HeiJit Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 -
Left Descending Bank Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 68 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Name: 601 East XS Number: 4 Station: 14+68
Reach Name: Reach 1 XS Type: Riffle
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 69 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
539
538
537
536
535
c 534
____
_
533
b 532
531
530
529
0+00
0+05
MYo
0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25
Station (feet)
-MY1 - MY2 ----- BK1
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MYl
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
8.8
9.1
9.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
75.0
75.0
75.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.5
0.5
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
0.9
0.9
1.1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft) 1
4.5
4.8
5.8
Width0epth Ratio
17.5
17.1
15.3
Entrenchment Ratio
15.9
8.3
8.0
Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 69 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Name: 601 East XS Number: 5 Station: 16+23
Reach Name: Reach 1 XS Type: Pool
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 70 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
535
534
533
532
531 -
------------ -------------------
---------
c 530
529
b 528
527
526
525
0+00
0+05
MYO
0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25
Station (feet)
-MY1 -MY2 ----- BKC
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
12.9
12.1
12.0
Floodprone Width (ft)
61.0
61.0
61.0 -
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
0.9
0.9
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.0
1.8
1.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
12.8
11.0
1 12
Width/Depth Ratio
13.0
13.2
12.9
Entrenchment Ratio
17.4
5.1
5.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 70 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Name: 601 East XS Number: 6 Station: 17+66
Reach Name: Reach 1 XS Type: Riffle
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 71 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
533
532
531
530
529
----------
---
c 528
527
b 526
525
524
523
0+00
0+05
MYO
0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25
Station (feet)
-MY1 -MY2 ----- BKC
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
11.3
11.3
11.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
80.0
80.0
80.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.3
1.3
1.4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
6.6
6.6
7.2
Width/Depth Ratio
19.3
19.5
17.9
Entrenchment Ratio
9.7
7.1
7.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 71 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Name: 601 East XS Number: 7 Station: 19+30
Reach Name: Reach 1 XS Type: Pool
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 72 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
530
529
528
527
526
c 525
524
b 523
522
521
520
0+00
0+05
MYO
0+10 0+15 0+20
Station (feet)
-MY1 -MY2 ----- BKC
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
10.3
11.4
10.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
63.0
63.0
63.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.2
1.0
1.0
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.0
2.0
2.1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
12.3
11.2
10.4
Width/Depth Ratio
8.6
11.5
10.3
Entrenchment Ratio
10.7
5.5
6.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 -
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 72 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Name: 601 East XS Number: 8 Station: 20+59
Reach Name: Reach 1 XS Type: Riffle
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 73 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
527
526
525
524
523
c 522
521
b 520
519
518
517
0+00
0+05
MYO
0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25
Station (feet)
-MY1 -MY2 ----- BKC
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
10.1
8.8
9.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
40.0
40.0
40.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
0.6
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.0
1.0
1.0
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft) 1
6.2
5.6
5.8
Width/Depth Ratio
16.6
13.9
14.7
Entrenchment Ratio
10.9
4.5
4.3
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
LO
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 73 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Name: 601 East XS Number: 9 Station: 24+25
Reach Name: Reach 2 XS Type: Riffle
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 74 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
522
521
520
519
518-----------
------------------------------------------------
----------------------- -
c 517
516
b 515
514
513
512
0+00
0+05
0+10
MY0
0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30
Station (feet)
-MY1 -MY2 ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
24.2
24.3
24.4
Floodprone Width (ft)
62.0
62.0
62.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.7
0.7
0.7
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.5
1.4
1.4 -
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft )
17.7
16.5
17.5
Width/Depth Ratio
33.1
35.6
34.2
Entrenchment Ratio
5.8
2.6
2.5
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 74 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Name: 601 East XS Number: 10 Station: 26+16
Reach Name: Reach 2 XS Twe: Pool
Left Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
521
t
b
a t�
520
1
519
518
517
---
— -------------------------------------------------------
c516
515
b 514
513
512
511
0+00
0+05
0+10
MYo
0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30
Station (feet)
—MY1 —MY2 ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
19.2
19.7
19.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
132.0
132.0
132.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.3
1.2
1.2
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.5
2.6
2.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft) 1
25.3
24.4
23.1
Width/Depth Ratio
14.6
16.0
16.8
Entrenchment Ratio
11.7
6.7
6.7
Bank Height Ratiol
1.0 1
1.0 1
1.0 1 1 1-
Left Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
t
b
a t�
1
Left Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
Right Descending Bank
75 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report
b
Right Descending Bank
75 Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

Project Name: 601 East XS Number: 11 Station: 27+15
Reach Name: Reach 2 XS Twe: Riffle
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 76 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
520
519
518
517
516
--------------
---------------------------------------
------------------
-514
c515
514
b 513
512
511
510
0+00
0+05
MYo
0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25
Station (feet)
-MY1 - MY2 ----- BKl
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
15.5
15.8
14.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
73.0
73.0
73.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
0.5
0.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.5
1.3
1.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft )
9.4
8.6
8.3
Width/Depth Ratio
25.5
28.9
23.8
Entrenchment Ratio
7.1
4.6
5.2
Bank Height Ratio
0.9
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 76 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Name: 601 East XS Number: 12 Station: 29+67
Reach Name: Reach 2 XS Type: Pool
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 77 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
518
517
516
515
514 ----
-------------------------------------------------------
----- - ---------------
c 513
512
b 511
510
509
508
0+00
0+05
0+10
MYo
0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30
Station (feet)
-MY1 - MY2 ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MY0
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
20.0
20.6
20.6
Floodprone Width (ft)
168.0
168.0
168.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.1
1.0
1.1
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.5
2.4
2.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft )
21.3
21.4
23.1
Width/Depth Ratio
18.8
19.9
18.4
Entrenchment Ratio
7.0
8.1
8.2
Bank Height Ratio
0.9
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 77 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Name: 601 East XS Number: 13 Station: 44+45
Reach Name: Reach 3 XS Twe: Riffle
�.1
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
,ygr�
601 East Stream Restoration Project 78 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
503
502
501
500
499
c 498
497
-----------------------------------------
-----------------------------
b 496
495
494
493
0+00
0+05
MYo
0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25
Station (feet)
-MY1 -MY2 ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
15.9
16.9
17.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
75.0
75.0
75.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.8
0.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
1.6
1.7
1.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft )
12.8
13.6
12.2
Width/Depth Ratio
19.6
21.0
25.0
Entrenchment Ratio
8.8
4.4
4.3
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 -
�.1
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
,ygr�
601 East Stream Restoration Project 78 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Name: 601 East XS Number: 14 Station: 48+78
Reach Name: Reach 3 XS Type: Pool
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 79 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
499
498
497
d
496
--------------
495
c 494
493
b 492
491
490
489
0+00
0+05
MYO
0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25
Station (feet)
-MY1 -MY2 ----- BKC
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
17.5
18.4
17.9
Floodprone Width (ft)
350.0
350.0
350.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.6
1.5
1.6
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.4
3.1
3.4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft )
28.2
28.0
28.7
Width/Depth Ratio
11.0
12.0
11.2
Entrenchment Ratio
12.8
19.1
19.6
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0 -
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 79 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Name: 601 East XS Number: 15 Station: 50+93
Reach Name: Reach 3 XS Type: Pool
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 80 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
498
497
496
495
-----------------------------------------------------
----- 0 It ---------------
- 494
c 493
492
b 491
490
489
488
0+00
0+05
0+10
MYo
0+15 0+20 0+25 0+30
Station (feet)
-MY1 -MY2 ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
19.6
21.1
20.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
350.0
350.0
350.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.8
1.6
1.5
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
3.4
3.3
3.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft )
36.1
34.4
31.5
Width/Depth Ratio
10.6
13.0
13.3
Entrenchment Ratio
5.6
16.6
17.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
LO
1.0 -
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 80 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Name: 601 East XS Number: 16 Station: 52+29
Reach Name: Reach 3 XS Type: Riffle
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 81 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
499
498
497
496
495
c494
----------------------------------
------------------
-------- ------------------
493
b 492
491
490
489
0+00
0+05
MYo
0+10 0+15 0+20 0+25
Station (feet)
-MY1 - MY2 ----- BKl
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (fl)
17.7
17.5
18.3
Floodprone Width (ft)
150.0
150.0
150.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.7
0.8
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.6
1.6
1.7 -
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
14.1
12.9
14.8 -
Width0epth Ratio
22.4
23.8
22.5
Entrenchment Ratio
7.9
8.5
8.2
Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 81 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Name: 601 East XS Number: 17 Station: 56+42
Reach Name: Reach 4 XS Type: Pool
500
498
y 496
w_ 494
a 492
490
488
b
486
484
482
0+00
0+05 0+10
0+15
MYO
0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45
Station (feet)
-MY1 -MY2 ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
16.9
17.2
17.2
Floodprone Width (ft)
42.0
42.0
42.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.8
1.7
1.7
Bankfull Max Depth (ft)
2.7
2.9
2.9
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
29.8
29.1
28.7
Width0epth Ratio
9.6
10.2
10.3
Entrenchment Ratio
2.5
2.4
2.4
Bank Height Ratio
1.2
1.1
1.1
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 82 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Project Name: 601 East XS Number: 18 Station: 56+42
Reach Name: Reach 4 XS Type: Riffle
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 83 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
498
496
y 494
d
492
c 490
488
v
Fri 486
484
482
0+00
0+05 0+10
0+15
MYO
0+20 0+25 0+30 0+35 0+40 0+45
Station (feet)
-MY1 -MY2 ----- BKF
CHANNEL DIMENSIONS SUMMARY
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY6 MY7
Bankful Width (ft)
14.9
14.6
14.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
30.4
31.0
31.0
Bankfull Mean Depth (ft)
1.0
1.0
1.0
Bankfull MaxDepth (ft)
1.5
1.6
1.7 -
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area (ft)
14.7
14.5
14.0
Width/Depth Ratio
15.2
14.6
14.2
Entrenchment Ratio
2.1
2.1
2.2
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
Left Descending Bank
Right Descending Bank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 83 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 2 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY2
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
67
60.9%
61%
0.062 - 0.125
7
6.4%
67%
0.125-0.25
4
3.6%
71%
0.25-0.5
3
2.7%
74%
0.5 - 1.0
6
5.5%
79%
1 -2
5
4.5%
84%
2 - 4
2
1.8%
85%
4 - 8
1
0.9%
86%
8-16
7
6.4%
93%
16-32
4
3.6%
96%
32-64
3
2.7%
99%
64-128
1
0.9%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
110
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.062
D84
2.3
D95
24
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
84
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East Cross -Section 2 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601 East Cross -Section 2 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
lochs
90%
90%
r
80%
ga%
70%
0
v
60%
I
y
a
70%
a
0
r
`a
m`
6a%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
T
50%
■ MY2 %6y Size Group
40%
20%
— MY1 Cumulative %
10%
3[7%
035
L L
ti
�
p 0' pe0• p h p, c�: py'
4i ,5h° •3,L' � �rd hytiy yprya',yp ry dp �+�ut
Particle Size Groups
fMY2 Cumulative %
20%
10%
0%
p. p. h• h.
py4�,
$,
oc
Particle Size Groups
601 East Cross -Section 2 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
601 East Stream Restoration Project 85 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
lochs
90%
80%
70%
0
v
60%
y
a
a
50%
r
`a
40%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
30%
■ MY2 %6y Size Group
20%
10%
035
L L
ti
�
p 0' pe0• p h p, c�: py'
4i ,5h° •3,L' � �rd hytiy yprya',yp ry dp �+�ut
Particle Size Groups
601 East Stream Restoration Project 85 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 4 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY2
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
14
12.5%
13%
0.062 - 0.125
3
2.7%
15%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
15%
0.25-0.5
2
1.8%
17%
0.5 - 1.0
1
0.9%
18%
1 -2
4
3.6%
21%
2 - 4
5
4.5%
26%
4 - 8
7
6.3%
32%
8-16
18
16.1%
48%
16-32
27
24.1%
72%
32-64
27
24.1%
96%
64-128
4
3.6%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
112
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
17
D84
42
D95
61
601 East Stream Restoration Project 86 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East Cross -Section 4 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601 East Cross -Section 4 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
'o
60%
50%
r
`a
0
70%
6G%
■ MY1 % by Size Group
50%
■ MY2 % by Size Group
■
40%
30%
10%
0%—,-
—�MY1 Cumulative %
■
fMY2 Cumulative %
20%
10%
0%
p. p, h• h.
Oy�y,
�;Y Sh 4ti 4p .�$ ,tih'o y's1' Otib pP`6 �° oc
$, 10. Dry pO caK
,yp'L ryp� 0
Particle Size Groups
601 East Cross -Section 4 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
601 East Stream Restoration Project 87 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
100%
90%
80%
70%
'o
60%
50%
r
`a
40%
c
■ MY1 % by Size Group
30%
20%
■ MY2 % by Size Group
10%
0%—,-
Obti IpOtih Oy ' O y' L 'y'D` p 0 ' r° O°'6 oc.
O p. p. 'Lh, Otih/ ph 3yh, 3,ti 1,tO ryhd h1ry1 O r e eeai
OOrO Oti 1 ti
Particle Size Groups
601 East Stream Restoration Project 87 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 6 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY2
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
35
31.5%
32%
0.062 - 0.125
3
2.7%
34%
0.125-0.25
2
1.8%
36%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
36%
0.5 - 1.0
1
0.9%
37%
1 -2
12
10.8%
48%
2 - 4
7
6.3%
54%
4 - 8
11
9.9%
64%
8-16
15
13.5%
77%
16-32
5
4.5%
82%
32-64
9
8.1%
90%
64-128
11
9.9%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
111
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
2.6
D84
36
D95
77
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
88
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East Cross -Section 6 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601 East Cross -Section 6 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
'o
60%
50%
r
`a
2
�6G%
70%
■ MY1 % by Size Group
50%
F
`m
20%
s
40%
30%
a
�
- Myl Cumulative %
fMY2 Cumulative %
0%-L.-,-
Obti 1tih Otih p? y9 N",'y'�` p '�F' '''L yb 1,t`b 'LhrO hTO'l�` Ob`b O'0 oc.
'Lh, "I';,
/ ph 3'� yh, 3� 1,tiO ryhd h1ry1 p'1by �$b eeai
OOrO Oti 1 ti
Particle Size Groups
20%
10%
0%
p. p. h• h.
Oy4�,
oc
$,
Particle Size Groups
601 East Cross -Section 6 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
601 East Stream Restoration Project 89 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
100%
90%
80%
70%
'o
60%
50%
r
`a
40%
c
■ MY1 % by Size Group
30%
■ MY2 % by Size Group
20%
10%
0%-L.-,-
Obti 1tih Otih p? y9 N",'y'�` p '�F' '''L yb 1,t`b 'LhrO hTO'l�` Ob`b O'0 oc.
'Lh, "I';,
/ ph 3'� yh, 3� 1,tiO ryhd h1ry1 p'1by �$b eeai
OOrO Oti 1 ti
Particle Size Groups
601 East Stream Restoration Project 89 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 8 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY2
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
86
76.1%
76%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
76%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
76%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
76%
0.5 - 1.0
1
0.9%
77%
1 -2
0
0.0%
77%
2 - 4
0
0.0%
77%
4 - 8
0
0.0%
77%
8-16
5
4.4%
81%
16-32
8
7.1%
88%
32-64
7
6.2%
95%
64-128
6
5.3%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
113
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.062
D84
22
D95
66
601 East Stream Restoration Project 90 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East Cross -Section 8 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601 East Cross -Section 8 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
'
90%
80%
0
60%
v
y
a
2
�6G%
70%
50%
a
r
`a 40%
T
50%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
■ MY2 %6y Size Group
40%
30%
20%
10%
— MY1 Cumulative %
fMY2 Cumulative %
20%
]A%
U%
p. p. h• h.
oc
$,
Particle Size Groups
601 East Cross -Section 8 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
601 East Stream Restoration Project 91 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
lochs
90%
so%
70%
0
60%
v
y
a
50%
a
r
`a 40%
30%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
■ MY2 %6y Size Group
20%
10%
035
yp pCY D`A ej° QLi'
htiti� yory� �° ryo c4 �2j
Particle Size Groups
601 East Stream Restoration Project 91 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 9 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY2
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
9
7.6%
8%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
8%
0.125-0.25
2
1.7%
9%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
9%
0.5 - 1.0
4
3.4%
13%
1 -2
35
29.4%
42%
2 - 4
5
4.2%
46%
4 - 8
9
7.6%
54%
8-16
21
17.6%
71%
16-32
11
9.2%
81%
32-64
3
2.5%
83%
64-128
19
16.0%
99%
128-256
1
0.8%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
119
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
5.8
D84
68
D95
110
601 East Stream Restoration Project 92 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East Cross -Section 9 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601 East Cross -Section 9 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
100%
90%
80%
90%
0
47
70%
6G%
.
T
50%
80%
70%
40%
3[7%
0
� MY1 Cumulative %
v
60%
fMY2 Cumulative %
y
a
a
2f}%
10%
r
`a
40%
or
U%
p. p. h• h.
$h 4ti 4p .�$ ,tihp y'si' ptid p� �° oc
, S
Particle Size Groups
601 East Cross -Section 9 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
601 East Stream Restoration Project 93 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
100%
90%
80%
70%
0
v
60%
y
a
a
50%
r
`a
40%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
30%
■ MY2 %6y Size Group
20%
10%
L
L
I
35
p�h p�: py.
�• �G. �,ti' � �� �rd hy��. ypry�•yp ry�4p �+�t
Particle Size Groups
601 East Stream Restoration Project 93 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 11 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY2
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
%
Cumulative
0-0.062
88
81.5%
81%
0.062 - 0.125
3
2.8%
84%
0.125-0.25
0
0.0%
84%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
84%
0.5 - 1.0
0
0.0%
84%
1 -2
4
3.7%
88%
2-4
3
2.8%
91%
4-8
0
0.0%
91%
8-16
2
1.9%
93%
16-32
3
2.8%
95%
32-64
5
4.6%
100%
64-128
0
0.0%
100%
128-256
0
0.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
108
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
0.062
D84
0.12
D95
30
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
94
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East Cross -Section 11 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601 East Cross -Section 11 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
80%
0
60%
0
2
70%
50%
a
r
`a 40%
a
T
50%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
■ MY2 %6y Size Group
40%
30%
20%
10%
— MYl Cumulative %
fMY2 Cumulative %
0%
Particle Size Groups
20%
10%
U%
p. p. h• h.
O' Ory' O.yryy, O'Y p'
4ti 4p .�$ ,tihp y's1' ptib p� �° o
Sh c
$, 1�. 3ti �� �„y Dry p0 caK
'Y '1. hti ,yp'L ryp 0
Particle Size Groups
601 East Cross -Section 11 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
601 East Stream Restoration Project 95 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
lochs
90%
80%
70%
0
60%
v
y
a
50%
a
r
`a 40%
30%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
■ MY2 %6y Size Group
20%
10%
0%
Particle Size Groups
601 East Stream Restoration Project 95 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 13 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY2
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
20
17.5%
18%
0.062 - 0.125
2
1.8%
19%
0.125-0.25
3
2.6%
22%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
22%
0.5 - 1.0
1
0.9%
23%
1 -2
16
14.0%
37%
2 - 4
5
4.4%
41%
4 - 8
6
5.3%
46%
8-16
22
19.3%
66%
16-32
16
14.0%
80%
32-64
9
7.9%
88%
64-128
12
10.5%
98%
128-256
1
0.9%
99%
256-512
1
0.9%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
114
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
9.1
D84
47
D95
100
601 East Stream Restoration Project 96 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East Cross -Section 13 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601 East Cross -Section 13 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
90%
90%
70%
80%
0
p
60%
50%
c
r`
40%
■ MY1 % by Size Group
70%
2
�6G%
30%
.T
■ MY2 % by Size Group
20%
50%
30%
0%
O�'L tiy0 Q11.0 05 ,YO 'L b 4 ,yro ,�'L Gb ti$ h6 titi ,tib 0 Oro c
p. p.h h• ti ti b O, yh, �ti bp1 ryO;L huh ryti0 ��0�' app eato
O Obti htih O'L O' 1 'L h1 hp'L vpP 0
O' O
Particle Size Groups
`m
40%
— MY1 Cumulative %
30%
fMY2 Cumulative %
20%
10%
0%
Q,
p. h• h.
py�y,
�;Y Sh 4ti 4p .�$ ,tih'o y's1' Otib pP`5 �° oc
$, 1�.
Particle Size Groups
601 East Cross -Section 13 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
601 East Stream Restoration Project 97 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
100%
90%
80%
70%
a
0
p
60%
50%
c
`a
40%
■ MY1 % by Size Group
30%
■ MY2 % by Size Group
20%
30%
0%
O�'L tiy0 Q11.0 05 ,YO 'L b 4 ,yro ,�'L Gb ti$ h6 titi ,tib 0 Oro c
p. p.h h• ti ti b O, yh, �ti bp1 ryO;L huh ryti0 ��0�' app eato
O Obti htih O'L O' 1 'L h1 hp'L vpP 0
O' O
Particle Size Groups
601 East Stream Restoration Project 97 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 16 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY2
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
20
20.0%
20%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
20%
0.125-0.25
4
4.0%
24%
0.25-0.5
0
0.0%
24%
0.5 - 1.0
8
8.0%
32%
1 -2
13
13.0%
45%
2 - 4
7
7.0%
52%
4 - 8
8
8.0%
60%
8-16
9
9.0%
69%
16-32
15
15.0%
84%
32-64
11
11.0%
95%
64-128
3
3.0%
98%
128-256
2
2.0%
100%
256-512
0
0.0%
100%
512-1024
0
0.0%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
100
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
3.3
D84
32
D95
64
601 East Stream Restoration Project
NCDMS Project No. 95756
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
98
Equinox
Annual Monitoring Report

601 East Cross -Section 16 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601 East Cross -Section 16 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
100%
90%
90%
80%
70%
80%
0
60%
r
a
r
`a
50%
40%
70%
0
m`
6a%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
T
■ MY2 %6y Size Group
50%
20%
10%
40%
— Wl Cumulative %
035
Particle Size Groups
3[7%
fMY2 Cumulative %
2f}%
10%
r
0%
p. p. h• h.
$, Dry p0 caK
,yp'L ryp 0
Particle Size Groups
601 East Cross -Section 16 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
601 East Stream Restoration Project 99 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
100%
90%
80%
70%
0
60%
v
y
a
a
r
`a
50%
40%
30%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
■ MY2 %6y Size Group
20%
10%
035
Particle Size Groups
601 East Stream Restoration Project 99 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East
Cross Section 18 - Riffle
Monitoring Year - 2016; MY2
Bed Surface Material
Particle Size Class mm
Number
%
Individual
Cumulative
0-0.062
28
25.2%
25%
0.062 - 0.125
0
0.0%
25%
0.125-0.25
2
1.8%
27%
0.25-0.5
2
1.8%
29%
0.5 - 1.0
5
4.5%
33%
1 -2
13
11.7%
45%
2 - 4
4
3.6%
49%
4 - 8
17
15.3%
64%
8-16
5
4.5%
68%
16-32
8
7.2%
76%
32-64
9
8.1%
84%
64-128
11
9.9%
94%
128-256
6
5.4%
99%
256-512
0
0.0%
99%
512-1024
1
0.9%
100%
1024-2048
0
0.0%
100%
2048-4096
0
0.0%
100%
Bedrock
0
0.0%
100%
Total
111
100%
100%
Summary Data
D50
4.2
D84
66
D95
140
601 East Stream Restoration Project 100 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

601 East Cross -Section 18 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Cumulative
601 East Cross -Section 18 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
100%
100%
90%
90%
80%
2
�6G%
70%
0
60%
50%
J,
a
r
`a
50%
40%
40%
3[7%
�
30%
— Myl cumulative %
■ MY1 %by Size Group
fMY2 Cumulative %
20%
10%
■ MY2 %6y Size Group
20%
10%
U%
p. p. h• h.
$h 4ti 4p .�$ ,tihp y's1' ptib p� �° oc
S
, Dry p0 caK
,yp'L ryp 0
Particle Size Groups
601 East Cross -Section 18 — Riffle
Pebble Count Percent Individual
601 East Stream Restoration Project 101 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
100%
90%
80%
70%
0
60%
v
y
a
a
r
`a
50%
40%
30%
■ MY1 %by Size Group
■ MY2 %6y Size Group
20%
10%
035
Particle Size Groups
601 East Stream Restoration Project 101 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

This Page Intentionally Left Blank
601 East Stream Restoration Project 102 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Appendix E
Hydrologic Data
601 East Stream Restoration Project 103 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

'Suspected bankfull date 9/30/2015
Photo Verification of Bankfull Events
Reach 2 Crest Gauge
f7
Photo Verification of Bankfull Events
Reach 3 Crest Gauge
601 East Stream Restoration Project 104 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
Table 13. Verification ofBankfull Events
601 East Stream Restoration Site
Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
Feet Above Bankfull
Photo #Elevation (if available)
Reach 2
November -2015
Unknown'
Crest Gauge/ Wrack Lines
Unknown
March - 2016
Unknown
Crest Gauge
1.4
Figure 3
Reach 3
March - 2016
Unknown Crest gauge
0.2
Figure 4
'Suspected bankfull date 9/30/2015
Photo Verification of Bankfull Events
Reach 2 Crest Gauge
f7
Photo Verification of Bankfull Events
Reach 3 Crest Gauge
601 East Stream Restoration Project 104 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7

Figure 3. Daily Precipitation Totals for Monroe, NC (CRONOS Station 315771 Monroe 2 SE)
3.00
2.50
2.00
d
v
c
C
p 1.50
0
R
Z 1.00
u
s..
W
A 0.50
A
0.00 Li
7 ¢ �n o 0 o
FILFure 4. 1Vlonthly PrecIDItatlon Data Uomnared to 30`" and 70"` Percentiles for Union Uoun
601 East Stream Restoration Project 105 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7
7.0
Growing Season
I
I
I
I
I
60
I
I
I
I
I
I
I /
I
6.0
.-.
\
\ I
=
4.0
'(j
+ter 1 ■
L
1 ■■ �y +
I
____-
2.0
■■
I
I ■i ,
I
I
I
I
I
1.0
I
�
1
r
I
I
I
I
I
0.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
Jan46 Feb46 Mar46 Apr -16 May -16 Jun46 Jul -16 Aug -16 Sep46
Qct -16 Nov -16 Dec46
o 10onroe Monthly Rainfall ----30th Percentile unkon county — — loth Permutle Onion County
— — Union County Average Rainfall
601 East Stream Restoration Project 105 Equinox
NCDMS Project No. 95756 Annual Monitoring Report
Monitoring Year 2 of 7