The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20170117 Ver 1_15-11-0014 PA B-5758 No Archaeological Survey Req Form Br 0013 on SR 1102 Addor Rd Moore County_20170126Project Tracking No.: 15-11-0014 O�� NO ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REQUIRED FORM � � . y. - '. r.�,� p'a ��.,. ' •' � 4' This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not ��'', ��tl '��:�� :�?;: ; _- �� ,� a.�r valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You must consult separately with the F- 0� ��._�"��' H i s t o ri c A r c h i t e c t u r e a n d L a n d s c a p e s G r o u p. �'�M1 �� '��' PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: WBS No: F.A. No: B-5758 45714.1.1 Federal Permit Required? County: Moore Document: Attachment G Funding: � State ❑ Federal � Yes ❑ No Permit Type: nwp3 Project Description: NCDOT proposes to replace Bridge No. 0013 on SR 1102 (Addor Road) over Aberdeen Creek in Moore County. While state-funded, a federal permit is required from the USACE, therefore, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act applies. This is a Low Impact Division project, and, as such, has a minimal footprint, little new impacts, and an offsite detour. Design was available at the time of review and establishes a clear Area of Potential Effects (APE) that can be described as less than 700 feet in length and generally conforming to the existing transportation facility footprint in the 60 ft ROW. A very small amount of fill work may lay outside of the existing ROW close to the bridge, though no new ROW is expected. For purposes of this review, the APE width is a maximum of 75 feet in close proximity to the crossing. The majority of the APE may be considered disturbed by the existing roadway, bridge and associated soil disruption, or otherwise having wet soils. For this improvement to an existing facility, the submitter provided detailed design mapping which will be attached to this form. SUMMARY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES REVIEW Brief description of review activities, results of review, and conclusions: Specific design mapping was available and compared to aerial and topgraphic mapping. The project area along SR 1102 passes through a largely undeveloped, wooded landscape with wet soils associated with Aberdeen Creek at Bridge 0013. Utilities above and below ground are present in the immediate vicinity. The only soil type present is Bibb loam, a low, frequently flooded soil that is often considered as having a low probability for archaeological sites due to wetness. Virtual drive by viewing was accomplished using Google Maps. No cemeteries were noted during the virtual viewing or on the USGS mapping at the project locations. The entire project falls within a swamp designation on the USGS map (Pinebluffl, which generally have a poor probability for most archaeological site types. The Office of State Archaeology was visited to review archaeological mapping and to reference any known archaeological surveys. There are no archaeological surveys covering the APE or major studies in the local vicinity. There are no recorded archaeological sites near the project area, though several sites were depicted south of this bridge location on the very different and elevated landforms about a mile to the southeast. For this undertaking, the proposed bridge replacement of the existing transportation facility Bridge No. 0013, little new soil disturbance will occur with the exception of wark beside the bridge. The area is shown as a swamp. As much of the existing APE has been modified for the current roadway, bridge, drainage and "No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEYREQUIRED "form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualifaed in the 2015 Programmatic AgreeuaenE. 1 of 4 Project Tracking No.: 15-11-0014 utilities, expectations are low for encountering new archaeological sites, especially any that may be intact and significant. As a result of this review, we conclude that the likelihood of encountering intact, NRHP-eligible resources are slim based on the limited new footprint of the undertaking at the same preexisting location, and previous bridge construction disturbances. The project should be considered compliant with Section 106. No archaeological survey is recommended for this undertaking as currently proposed. Brief Explanation of why the available information provides a reliable basis for reasonably predicting that there are no unidentified historic properties in the APE: The scale and nature of the project is limited to replacement of an existing bridge with a new structure at the same location. An offsite detour will be used. The APE of the project overlays the current transportation facility and is heavily disturbed by the original roadway and bridge construction. New impacts will be limited to work adjacent to the bridge. Review of background archaeological information, examination of mapping and virtual drive-by suggests low probability for the presence of significant, intact archaeological resources within the APE. The APE contains frequently flood soils. Based on the minimal changes to the footprint of construction, wetness and the degree of existing disturbances, it is unlikely that intact, signiiicant, NRHP-eligible archaeological resources would be encountered or impacted by the project. No archaeological survey is recommended. Therefore, this federally permitted undertaking should be considered compliant with Section 106. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: � Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info ❑ Photocopy of County Survey Notes FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST 1��1111:7�:11�CI]1IIIe)�Yll:�j�1%:i�ICIIi1/:i�/� LOGIST ❑ Photos ❑Correspondence Other: 6/16/2016 Date "No ARCHAEOLOGY SURVEYREQUIRED "form for the Amended Minor Transportation Projects as Qualdfaed in the 201 S Programmatic AgreeuaenE. 2 of 4 Project Tracking No.: 15-11-0014 � � �„� � � -� , � r�' _ � ��` -=� � � — -- - , , - -�-- - �,� +� �' �� < ` l 8':' . F�, K - � ��__: � ' � �� ;: -� � {j,; ,a�,�►~ _ M , � �� - � `... j ,�, , - - � . , a a - =R"� y /,.j� � . '� ,_ �\\ . �' ' ! 4 . '� �2�' � ` - _ ,� � /� , �� f; a S,�c71A`(�� •. � _ l J � f�,,, ,� w� i� e.�k . . . ` + A � �; I'�� a+ � �� +� '�aa. � : e. .. ...t � � ., a� � '�..� � : � � �, �� ; n! 'ar�r ry r �� .E� ,r N °'y , �'tr�. r � �`r-' i r' ''� ;-a��_� I � �,`� ,p �13: / ,_�' j�`�� 4��; .. - - - ' ,,, _`;��' � _si : �w � .� k .. ;�.�,��.� �r �� 'fP�f � I � .( „`` I` .. _ � ; C �, �"�� _ ' � . . � � �� h � �,.. ��_,. . � . , • Y i"� rl_ ,� �,I �� 7._. - ..... _�. .r'� , � ? f I ' �� ssr � ' - ` �� 8 � "` I�'�41 �1��1�1��14 0 ,� ��, � �. �. � � � ..� - � f S ��r k � , � ,v _ -'�� -� 4 - �._ �� . , ' , �w• I � "',.,�,� ; � � ,�`,.� � �Il°o ��o �� --� � �� (� ,.:� , -. . . � . : ... .. . . � �/ ♦ ��F � , t • 3 �•�" � __ —ry.�_ \ J/ �:yy. � ' . �,� ,/ — / e ! � �`�. MOORE ��v'-- "� ��,,.. .� �� _- . •_ . • • � �, __ / ' � . y I/� ' _ x , �� i ' . - \ , _ � ��, ., . ,�� iJ - , , � � . � ��' - ' •'�o r 9pn `;// ' �- _'} t�-��v� _ �}, 1 q� � •` a"� , � � 1.� r •�'f N °� y` .� �.� - J- � ,_ `� + � � �"�_ ' � � . - � fGt., o�,' { �' �i �y o�',/ . � ' � '-`' - "��"i';�-�� \ �. . �edC II '` �' �: / ' -J_ � �,h; ` � J � - _- ,. r Y r r ` �- � - `�-i' �,E�ti �.,� - _ __ . . r . � (� � � � � .. 0Q� .t �, «—r�-, . � � ` •� , . a 1 . 1 ,� � � i .- _ i� ��+/ '� �. /. 1 _ �� ,,;` � ��]�� r�]'-r �` - �� _i: "� . ' `I � ir'� ' 4 • {�. ��i �_ , � ,`' `,. ' � � / - . ./v� `--�:*� ,. _ . -' * '�r� �/ n ..�4}� �' � Y � �� ,�.-,�: -�� i p", /�� ,. , - Pt .-1' . . _ _ - � 1 � � � 1 I � o O $ , � r� / � � �� F' ��` J '� . �� *�� ' ''�� // e ji.� � � �� .1 - �� 4 � � � �� _ � � a-� ',�,� :, / r - � � � . ,� r _ '�� ;* i` � f ':J i "�� J '�-.�' l ;i �"�i,', . �'1�� `; . } "'��r, �� ' �f - f' t"`�'` �+'� , �` .� `�� - � � ; :�: .� f �`�`-� � , ` � � _ _ � .� .. . ,� � _ . � - � � ;.,-�k '� , ' - 4' � `�,�' - �-. `�,� � ,- - -' ` �,� __ j � . � . _ . . � '., ,, �s ,�,,`��k ; �- �' . I �-- � �` �'�'� � � � � � ��J'+��-,, � �� 1�� '` � -- � 0 1,250 2,500 5,000 Feet \` �) �� ty �-t�.�� e , , • _.. f . r' 4, � � '✓-' � � hiq -.. , � ' E .� \�� . - �,- � , :b � , � f� q 9'. C� _ .; .. -� �- Cppyright 60 2013 Nahonzl Geographic Society i cubed Esri, HERE DeLorrr�e, Mapmylndia. O , �� RIC '"" • eek N -� - -. OpenStreetMap contnbutors, and the GIS user communaTy Conteni may not reflect National Geographic s� ,:�-IC , _ �. � i - "��:current map policy SourcesTNational'Geogtaphic'Esri, Detorme, HERE UN�P�,WCMC. USGSt NASA,'ESA� � ��,(f � � py;� � �� ME�Ti NRCAN.�GE$CO. NOAA i`ncrement P Corp ' � � H�F(E Figure 1. Vicinity of PA # 15-ll-0014, on USGS topographic mapping (Pine Bluff), showing Bridge No. 0013 location along SR 1102 (Addor Road) over Aberdeen Creek in Moore County. Note swamp designation. "No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED "form,for khe Amended Minor Tr-anspor�tation Prqjecis as Qualafied in the Z015 Programniah'c Agreement. 3 of 4 Project Tracking No.: 15-11-0014 Figure 2. Aerial map of PA 15-ll-0014, Br. No. 0013 project along SR 1102 over Aberdeen Creek in Moore County. "No ARCHAEOLOGYSURVEYREQUIRED "form,for� the Amended Minor Tr-anspor�tation Prqjecis as Qualafied in the Z015 Programniah'c Agreement. 4 of 4 •� � • � See Sheet �-A For I ndex of Sheets See Sheet �-B For Conventi onal symbols See Sheet �-C For Survey Control Sheet _ TO SR 1103 THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO � J� �� J��`�_�� -� J� JI�� J� !� ;._1�� LOCA TI01�: BRIDGE 1�0.13 O VER ABERDEEI� CREEI� 01� SR 1102 (ADDOR ROAD) TYPE OF WORI�: GRADI11tG, DRAI1�lAGE, PA T�I11tG � STR UCTURE THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III. SR 1101 ��,�� ,�� ][�� T�°Il° �T�]G ]��lE$ ]E8 % W a��(��[JI�I°ll°I�N DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED Prepared In the Office of: HYDRAULICS E1VGI11tEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGI� DATA PROJECT LEI�GTH 1025 Wade Avenue E P I Te1999� 89-99605 ADT = 1,200 LENGTH OF ROADWAY PROJECT B-5758 = 0.115 MI Fax919-789-9591 20 � 0 O �O �O C O N S T R U CIT I 0 N License: C-2197 0� �� %'� LENGTH OF STRUCTURE PROJECT B-5758 = 0.011 MI �� ga 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS Q �Oo PLANS TOTAL LENGTH OF PROJECT B-5758 = 0.126 MI � �� P.E. SIGNATURE: w� � 20 10 0 20 40 RIGHT OF WAY DATE: BEN CRAWFORD, PE a � V = 6 O M P H PROJECT ENGINEER ROAD WAY DESIG11l � � * E111GI11tEER �� Q PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) TTST = DUAL � o �� l G°3 p��'Q l0 5 0 l0 2o FUNC CLASS = LETTIIIIG DATE: MATTHEW COPPLE, PE M I N O R C O L L E CTO R PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUBREGIONAL TIER p�E� SIGNATURE: /