Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20161076 Ver 1_FINAL Post Contract IRT field meeting memo_2017_20160118§�A&lutio� Meeting Notes MEETING: Post Contract IRT Site Visit Fletcher Stream and Wetland Mitigation Site French Broad 06010105; Henderson County, NC DEQ Contract No. 6997 DMS Project No. 100004 DATE: Tuesday, November 29, 2016, 12:00 to 2:30 LOCATION: 266 Jackson Road, Fletcher, NC Attendees Todd Tugwell — USACE Andrea Hughes — USACE Kim Browning — USACE Steven Kichefski - USACE Mac Haupt— NCDEQ— DWR Jenny Baker — NCDEQ— DWR Paul Wiesner— NCDEQ— DMS Harry Tsomides — NCDEQ— DMS Steve Melton — EW Solutions — Project Manager Grant Ginn — Wolf Creek Engineering — Designer Materials • EW Solutions, LLC Technical Proposal dated 6/16/16 in response to RFP #16-006808 Meeting Notes 1. Introduction to site was given at meeting place off of Jackson Rd. New Corps guidance (Wilmington District Stream and Wetland Compensatory Mitigation Update, North Carolina Interagency Review Team — October 24, 2016) was discussed. One item mentioned specifically was the possibility to increase credits based on expanded buffer widths. 2. A concern was expressed about the low slope on Weston Creek area and that some past sites with low slopes have had issues with transporting sediment properly. Mr. Ginn noted that Weston Creek appears to be a low sediment supply stream and Mr. Melton noted that the majority of the watershed is forested. 3. No credit will be given for the ROW for the transmission line on Fletcher Creek 3. 4. The section of stream where Coates Branch and Fletcher Creek 2 are parallel before the confluence was discussed. Mr. Ginn explained the rationale based on site conditions and J&1Utio� available site history. The IRT concurred and further noted that forcing a confluence to occur upstream would result in a significant reduction in existing stream footage. We discussed Wolf Creek's plan of creating a 3D model of the buried A horizon and excavating to that feature. If EW Solutions request credits in this area during the mitigation plan stage, a restoration (1:1) or creation (3:1) mitigation credit ratio will be requested based on the presence or absence of a buried A horizon and the associated excavation proposed during construction. This area will also be monitored appropriately if credits are requested. The IRT concurred with the proposed restoration of Raccoon Branch 3 and with proposed Enhancement II in Raccoon Branch 2 where the design includes structures to stabilize the bed. However, in areas where no structures are appropriate it was agreed that the enhancement credit ratio would be reduced to 5:1. Also the wetland area in the middle of this reach would be included in the easement but no credit would be allowed for stream enhancement. 6. Raccoon Branch I (preservation), it was discussed that there is a potential to include larger buffers to get additional credits under the new guidance. With normal buffers this preservation reach will be 10:1 7. All stream calls and wetland determinations will be determined by the appropriate agencies. Cold Fletchheer Creek 4 \ EW Soluta� - — wetland Restoration stream Restoration Enhancement (Not Creditable} FV Restoration !� Re-establishment Enhancement II Preservation .,t,to,Creeu Fletcher Creek 2 FletcherC -pk I Raccoon Branch 3 'IRacoonBranch 2 Raccoon Branch 2 (Preservation} Feet Source Esn, DigitalGloLe, Geo Eye, Earthslar e 0 210 540 1,080 USDA, USGS.AEx.GelmaRping.Aerogrid IC User Community Figure A -&a. Conceptual Plan - — Conkaurs (4 ft.) Temperature Regime Option A � AMFletcher Stream and Wetland —Transmission Line _.-I cold Restoration Site Proposed site Cool I_ Q U I I V ©X Henderson Co., NC May 2016 This map is nota survey and is not to be construed as such.