20170064 Ver 1_401 Application_20170117

CLearWater
C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
www.cwenv.com
January 11, 2017
Mr. William Elliott
US Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 PAID
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-263
Ms. Karen Higgins
NC DWR, 401 Permitting & Buffer Unit
512 N. Salisbury Street, 9t' Floor
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
RE: Fletcher Partners (+/- 9 acres)
Buncombe County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Elliott and Ms. Higgins,
The attached Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) and Jurisdictional Determination Request are
being submitted on behalf of Fletcher Partners, Inc. represented by Mr. William Newman. The
project site is located off Sand Hill Road in Buncombe County, North Carolina. Fletcher
Partners, Inc. is seeking a Nationwide Permit 39 for infrastructural development associated with
the construction of a daycare facility for dogs.
A copy of this package has been sent to Ms. Andrea Leslie of the NC Wildlife Resources
Commission and Mr. Byron Hamstead of the US Fish and Wildlife Service for review. A copy of
this application has also been submitted to Mr. Zan Price of the NC Division of Water Resources,
Asheville Regional Office. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 828-698-9800 if you have any
questions or comments.
Sincerely,
/Kaylie. Yankura
Biologist
Copy Furnished:
NC Wildlife Resources Commission — Andrea Leslie
US Fish and Wildlife Service — Byron Hamstead
NC Division of Water Resources, Asheville — Zan Price
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, NC 28801
828-698-9800 Tel
. 1 nt Ri4dlePW.S
Principal

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
SAW — 201 - BEGIN DATE [Received Date]:
Prepare file folder ❑ Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]:
2. Work Type: Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑ Commercial Z
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
Fletcher Partners, Inc. is seeking a Nationwide Permit 39 for infrastructural development associate
with the construction of a daycare facility for dogs.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: Fletcher Partners, Inc./Mr. William Newman
5. Agent / Consultant [PCN Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]: ClearWater Environmental Consultants
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: N/A
7. Project Location - Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
35.539680, -82.637552; Site is located off Sand Hill Road.
8. Project Location - Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form B1a]: 9617-81-1177-00000
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Buncombe
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Candler
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 62a]: UT Hominy Creek
12. Watershed / 8 -Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 62c]: French Broad/06010105
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404
Regulatory Action Type:
❑Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit # 39
❑ Regional General Permit #
❑✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
W1 Section 30 & 404 ❑
Pre -Application Request
Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

CLearWaLer
Department of the Army
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Attn: Scott McLendon, Chief Regulatory Division
PO Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
-and-
NC DWR, Webscape Unit
Attn: Karen Higgins
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
I, the current landowner/managing partner of the property identified below, hereby
authorize C1earWater Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) to act on my behalf as my
agent during the processing of permits to impact Wetlands and Water of the US that are
regulated by the Clean Water Act and the Rivers and Harbors Act.
CEC is authorized to provide supplemental information needed for permit processing at
the request of the USACE or DWR.
Property Owner of Record: > j r-TcqVe ?AefII lt:XS, /W.
Property Owner Address: lov J4QjVgX.5VWILLa TCD
As"vit,L-E, Nr- ZW3
Phone Number: C$28) 2��- 2� J9
Property Location: �iW # q4� Ill }oogAp
Owner/Managing partner Signature: �-
Date: _ _— IZIZI0I fb
32 Clayton Street
Asheville. NC 28801
Phone: [phone]
www.cwenv.com

COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE, NORTH CAROLINA
go Web Property Record Card
9617-81-1177-00000
Date Printed: 1/9/2017
Owner Information
Parcel Information
Total Property Value: 365,900
Land
Status:
Active
Owners: FLETCHER PARTNERS INC
Deed Date:
12/14/2001
ddress: iogi HENDERSONVILLE RD
Deed Book/Page:
2664/ o620
ASHEVILLE NC 28803-1873
Plat Book/Page:
0104/0104
Property Location: 116o SAND HILL RD
Legal Reference:
PLAT
Taxing Districts
Location:
116o SAND HILL RD
2015
Class:
COMM VAC
County: Buncombe County
Neighborhood:
SARDIS RD COMM
City:
Subdivision:
FLETCHER PARTNERS
Fire: ENKA FIRE
Sub Lot:
FUTURE TRACT
chool: _
onservation/Easement:N
0
Flood:
N
Ownership History
Vo Owner History
Assessment History
Year
Acres
Land
Bldgs
Other Impr
Assessed
Desc
Exemptions
Deferred
Taxable
2016
8.40
365,900
0
0
365,900
0
0
365,900
2015
8.40
365,900
0
0
365900
0
0
365,900
2014
8.40
365,900
0
0
365,900
0
0
365,900
2013
8.40
365,900
0
0
365,900
0
0
365,900
2012
8.40
462,000
0
0
462,000
0
0
462,000
2011
8.40
462,000
0
0
462,000
0
0
462,000
2010
8.40
462,000
0
0
462,000
0
0
462,000
2oo9
8.40
462,000
0
0
462,000
0
0
462,000
2008
8.40
462,00010
0
462,000
0
0
462,000
2007
8.40
462,00010
10
462,000
0
10
462,000
Land Data Total Acres: 365,904 Land Value: 365,900
Square Feet
Other Value: o
Improvements
Segment#
Units
Description
1
365,904 Square Feet
SF -COMMERCIAL
Total Building Value: o
http://www.buncom betax. org/Pr opertyC ard.aspx 1/1

O�0 W A rF9OG
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre -Construction Notification PCN Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
® Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 39 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes
® No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Fletcher Partners, Inc.
2b. County:
Buncombe
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Candler
2d. Subdivision name:
n/a
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
n/a
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Fletcher Partners Inc.
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
2664/0620
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
Mr.William Newman
3d. Street address:
1091 Hendersonville Road
3e. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28803-1873
3f. Telephone no.:
n/a
3g. Fax no.:
n/a
3h. Email address:
n/a
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: Owner
4b. Name:
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
1 c. Property size:
4d. Street address:
2. Surface Waters
4e. City, state, zip:
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
4f. Telephone no.:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
4g. Fax no.:
2c. River basin:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Clement Riddle
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
ClearWater Environmental Consultants, Inc.
5c. Street address:
32 Clayton Street
5d. City, state, zip:
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
5e. Telephone no.:
828-698-9800
5f. Fax no.:
n/a
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
9617-81-1177-00000
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.539680 Longitude: -82.637552
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size:
9 AC
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
UT Hominy Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C
2c. River basin:
French Broad
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site is comprised of forest and a maintained field. The forested, southern boundary of the project site
abuts a transmission line corridor and substation. The project site is currently undeveloped. General land use in
the area is primarily commercial and residential.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Approximately 0.02 acres of wetlands within the project boundary.
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
Approximately 1,099 linear feet of stream within the project boundary.
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project is to provide road access to the southeastern portion of a property parcel.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project includes the installation of two culverted stream crossings for the construction of an entrance
road (Figure 3.1 and Figure 3.2). Once access to site is established, the project would eventually involve the
construction of a daycare facility for dogs (approximately 5,000 square feet) and a small parking lot (approximately
6 parking spots) within the southeastern corner of the project boundary (Figure 3.1). All necessary utilities would be
installed along the access/entrance road and placed above the proposed culverts. Typical construction and earth
moving equipment would be utilized throughout the project.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
EI Yes ®No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: ClearWater Environmental
Name (if known):
Other:
4d.
If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b.
If yes, explain.
At this time, development is proposed only within the southeastern portion of the project site. The north/northwestern
portion of the project site is slated for future development; however, no additional impacts are anticipated.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
❑Yes
[:1 Corps
W 1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g•
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ®P ❑ T
Impact #1 —
S1, UT Hominy
® PER
® Corps
70
Culvert
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
S1 ❑ P ®T
Impact #2 —
Culvert Installation
S1, UT Hominy
Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
20
S2 ®P ❑ T
Impact #3 —
Culvert
S2, UT Hominy
Creek
® PER
❑ INT
® Corps
® DWQ
64
S2 ❑ P ®T
Impact #4 —
S2, UT Hominy
® PER
® Corps
12
Culvert Installation
Creek
❑ INT
® DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
❑ PER
❑ Corps
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
166
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4g. Comments: Impact 2, Temporary Diversion Channel measures approximately 120 LF (+l-3 LF in width) and will be located
along the northern margin of the existing pond.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑Tar-Pamlico El Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
El Yes
B1 ❑P❑T
❑ No
El Yes
B2 ❑P❑T
❑ No
El Yes
B3 ❑P❑T
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
t__7:i�
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Stream impacts were avoided to the maximum extent practicable and the proposed stream crossings are the minimum
length necessary to provide access to the site. Culvert installation elsewhere on site would be difficult due to the steep
topography within the eastern portion of project parcel. The current, proposed crossings are located within areas of the
site that would not require extensive grading or land manipulation.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
Sediment and erosion controls will be utilized to prevent sediment from leaving the site. Equipment will be operated
from high-ground during culvert installation. A stream diversion would be utilized so that culvert installation would occur
in the dry. Culverts will be constructed with appropriate headwalls (Figure 3.3).
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑ payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
[I es ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
❑ Yes ® No
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments:
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
<24%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Buncombe County
® Phase II
[:1 NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HOW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ No
Yes ❑
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
F1 Yes ❑ No
tetter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The proposed is in an already developed commercial corridor. This project will not result in additional development which
could impact nearby downstream water quality.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater would be treated by the local municipal facility.
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
FWS County data and the Natural Heritage Program GIS data.
CEC consulted the FWS's "Northern Long -Eared Bat Consultation Areas" map for Buncombe County. The project site is not
located within a watershed containing known occurrences of hibernacula or maternity trees.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
South Atlantic Habitat and Ecosystem IMS. Impact will not occur in a marine system.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
National Register of Historic Places records maintained by the NC State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and available
on SHPO's HPOWEB GIS Service. There are no known occurrences of historical or archaeological resources located within
the immediate vicinity of the project location. The closest resources listed on the National Register are located
approximately 1.38 miles from the site (Asheville School BN1232) and 2.22 miles from the site (Biltmore Estate BN1835).
The project is also located approximately 0.31-1 mile from Part A -C of the Enka Mill Historic District (BN0377). It is the
opinion of CEC that the proposed project would have no negative effect on the integrity of cultural resources.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NC Floodplain Mapping Program, FEMA Map Number
3700961700J, Panel 9617 (Effective January 6, 2010).
R. Clement Riddle
kch&
1.11.17
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
pplicari gent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

I i%-.LkFi i% -.I I ui ` • r J i Ivl
Vida Rd `01
°9woed to 4 W
4
�p1 °4.eU Ra
°' Ma►le bra
C _ �!Cal
C1r
Ctr V 9orne. ��
jt;meharl
G n�School SAT,
And M11
d - �
611y Rd Asbury Rd
;,i °; c DI
Ra 9�ua Crr Rid9c St et Way spa
J
u�fiertc�a H�°
Smokey FArk Hwy - _ R' �a --
23,L - you
�aie r Dr
�- -
x Project Boundary
Srh¢� , 112 < $ara,
001 Rd Sand N N1 Fid t s
ti'res�d 151 Pk, , Ra
Candler Queen Rd kuourua ��9rcr 112
aftflvf!
Candler
We
X o Wick
6 1 ;
c
J c Valley FPOd
_
Pa*
a
S
O D(
w
3c �� � ghuttt ¢a 4`• � r
} W
e 4J
Ben,
yJis� Rd f � I�
N
4
mk,
Legend
0 05 1 2
Project Boundary a R Miles
a
Drawn by; KAY 12T20.16; CEC Project# 319
o�
Buncombe County, Cie r>11 Site Vicinity
North Carolina
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Figure 1

F ICLUI ICI rdl ll ICI J kT/— 0 !-1V)
Hominy Creek
WQ
gym
OF
t
Ar -
Project Boundary
M41071
A►
-V I%F
Legend
0 500 1,000 2,000
L___—___� Project Boundary Feet
wn by: K 12.20.16; CEC t#
CLearWater USGS Topographic Map
Buncombe County, , , , Enka Quad
North Carolina
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Figure 2

SPNOH�L�R0 PROJECT SUMMARY
�Nc NW TOTAL PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT = 134 LF
TOTAL TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT = 32 LF
\ \ XISTING CULVERT
UNNAMED
TRIBUTARY OF
HOMINY CREEK
1 (STREAM)
1
1
1
S1
PROPOSED 70 LF OF PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT (SEE FIGURE 3.3)
WITH 10 LF OF PROPOSED
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AT
EITHER END
1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
PROPOSED 64 LF OF PERMANENT
Preliminary S2 STREAM IMPACT (SEE FIGURE 3.3)
WITH 10 LF OF PROPOSED
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACT AT
Not for Construction UPSTREAM SIDE AND 2 LF AT
DOWNSTREAM SIDE
WGLA Engineering, PLLC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND PLANNERS
NC License No: P-1342
214 N. King Street
Hendersonville, NC 28792
I [phone]
��— wgla.com
Fletcher Partners
Sandhill Road Tract
Buncombe County
North Carolina
Wetland and
Stream Impacts
Figure 3.1
Job #: 16205
Date: 01/05/17
Scale: 1" = 150'

EXISTING 4' CONTOUR
(PER NCDOT LIDAR)
-o
0
0
N
O
UNNAMED
TRIBUTARY OF
1 HOMINY CREEK
(STREAM)
PROPOSED 50 LF OF 36" —
HDPE BURIED 12" BELOW
STREAM BED (SEE FIGURE 3.3
FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS)
PROPOSED 4' CONTOUR
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
Preliminary
Not for Construction
WGLA Engineering, PLLC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND PLANNERS
NC License No: P-1342
214 N. King Street
Hendersonville, NC 28792
r/
` [phone]
wgla.com
< EXISTING WETLAND TYP.
Fletcher Partners
Sandhill Road Tract
Buncombe County
North Carolina
PROPOSED 50 LF OF 36"
HDPE BURIED 12" BELOW
STREAM BED (SEE FIGURE 3.3
FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS)
Wetland and
Stream Impacts
Figure 3.2
Job #: 16205
Date: 01/05/17
Scale: I"= 50'

PROPOSED ASPHALT DRIVE
WITH SHOULDER
PROPOSED HEADW)
ON UPSTREAM SID'
PROPOSED HDPE
12" MINIMUM BELOW STREAM BED
CROSS—SECTION
Not to Scale
apE
µ0x
7•A S`
PROPOSED CONCRETE
HEADWALL ON
UPSTREAM SIDE
STREAM BED
Preliminary
Not for Construction
PROPOSED 20' ASPHALT DRIVE
WITH 2' SHOULDER
Itope MAk
PROPOSED 50 LF HDPE CULVERT BURIED 12"
MINIMUM BELOW STREAM BED
STREAM CROSS—SECTION
Not to Scale
WGLA Engineering, PLLC
CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND PLANNERS
NC License No: P-1342
214 N. King Street
Hendersonville, NC 28792
Lo"_E(828) 687-7177
wgla.com
PROPOSED RIP RAP OUTLET
Fletcher Partners
Sandhill Road Tract
Buncombe County
North Carolina
Stream Crossing
Detail
Figure 3.3
Job #: 16205
Date: 01/05/17
Scale: As Noted

t,.
I IGll.#1 IGI 1 UI LI IGI J ` - /— J nvI
CkD2 1
t CkC2
�Project Boundary
1 ri DrB
t'
t1 I�
CSD \
\ I Ta B \
CSC
1 3 1
;1 Ta B
Legend
Project Boundary
L.- --
$Oils
CkC2; CkD2 - Clifton Clay Loam
CsC; CsD - Clifton Sandy Loam
DrB - Dillard Loam
TaB - Tate Loam
Drawn by: KAY 12.20.16; CEC Project# 319
Buncombe County,
North Carolina
N
0 50 100 200
Feet
Ci-earWater USDA Soils Map
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Figure 4

'7
TANK*
fk
Pn%
T4*
tit
7.
mt
.,Z
f,4
Project Boun
dar),
-7
!. r"t,
777
N
l
A �7
!. r"t,
777

Legend
100 -YR Floodplain
' Project Boundary
Drawn by: KAY 1.11.17; CEC Project# 315
I IGII-.,IIGI 1 CAIIIIGIJ `'I— .J"\../I
,1
Project ndary
N
0 500 1,000 2,000
Feet
CLearWaLer FEMA Floodplain Map
Buncombe County, FEMA Map Service Center
North Carolina Map Panel 9617
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801 Figure 6

Jurisdictional Determination Information

Jurisdictional Determination Request
„
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on-line at: http•//www saw usace army mil/Missions/Re ug_latolyPermitProgram.aspx , by
telephoning: 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed' below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
Version: December 2013 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD may not
be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985. If you or
your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you
should also request a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural
Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: December 2013 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: Site is located off Sand Hill Road
City, State: Candler, North Carolina
County: Buncombe
Directions: Take 1-240 W to S Bear Creek Rd in Lower Hominy; Take Sand Hill Rd to NC -112 in Lower Hominy
Turn right onto NC -112; Site is located on left approximately 0.2mi
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 9617-81-1177-00000
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Clement Riddle
Mailing Address: 32 Clayton Street, Asheville, NC 28801
Telephone Number: 828-698-9800
Electronic Mail Address i: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: Fletcher Partners, Inc./Mr.William Newman
Mailing Address: 1091 Hendersonville Road
Asheville, NC 28803-1873
Telephone Number: N/A
Electronic Mail Addressi: N/A
0 Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
1 If available
Z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
Version: December 2013 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein,
do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps)
to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-site investigations
and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction
under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899.
See Agent Authorization Form
Property Owner (please print)
Property Owner Signature
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
Date
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does include a delineation.
F] I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
This request does NOT include a delineation.
F1I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS5 and provide an aaproved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation.
F] I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
✓❑ I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
4 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
5 Waters of the United States
Version: December 2013 Page 4

jurisdictional Determination Request
F. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
❑✓ Size of Property or Project Area Approximately 9 acres
F] I verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
F-1Completed and signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form6.
❑ Project Coordinates:
Latitude
Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11 x 17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
❑ Aerial Photography of the project area
❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
6 See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008
Version: December 2013 Page S

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable)?:
Wetlands:
F] Wetland Data Sheets
a
701
Upland Data Sheets
Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
1-1 USACE Assessment Forms
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
■ All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
■ Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
■ Locations of photo stations
■ Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
W] Project Coordinates: 35.539680 Latitude -82.637552 Longitude
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
✓❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
W✓ Aerial Photography of the project area
V✓ USGS Topographic Map
W✓ Soil Survey Map
❑✓ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site Plan,
previous delineation maps)
1987 Manual Regional Supplements and Data forms can be found at:
http://www usace army mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/reg supp.aspx
Wetland and Stream Assessment Methodologies can be found at:
http://Portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/set file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupld=38364 and,
http•//www saw usace army mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/publicnotices/2013/NCSAM Draft User Manual 130318.pdf
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 6

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
1-7 Wetland Data Sheets
0
IN
Upland Data Sheets
Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
USACE Assessment Forms
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
• All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
• Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
• Locations of photo stations
• Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
Version: December 2013 Page 7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard-
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11"x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 11"x17", may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
(1) PLATS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
Must be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
❑ Must be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
❑ Must be legible
1-1 Must include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
F] Must include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes
and bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
Must clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
F] Must clearly identify the known surveyed point(s) used as reference (e.g. property
corner, USGS monument)
F1When wetlands are depicted:
• Must include acreage (or square footage) of wetland polygons
• Must identify each wetland polygon using an alphanumeric system
Version: December 2013 Page 8

Jurisdictional Determination Request
❑ When tributaries are depicted:
• Must include either a surveyed, approximate centerline of tributary with
approximate width of tributary OR surveyed Ordinary High Water Marks
(OHWM) of tributary
• Must identify each tributary using an alphanumeric system
• Must include linear footage of tributaries and calculated area (using approximate
widths or surveyed OHWM)
• Must include name of tributary (based on the most recent USGS topographic
map) or, when no USGS name exists, identify as "unnamed tributary"
all depicted WoUS (wetland polygons and tributary lines) must intersect or tie -to
surveyed project/property boundaries
❑ Must include the location of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment
reaches
E] Must include, label accordingly, and depict acreage of all waters not currently
subject to the requirements of the CWA (e.g. "isolated wetlands", "non -
jurisdictional waters"). NOTE: An approved JD must be conducted in order to
make an official Corps determination that a particular waterbody or wetland is not
jurisdictional.
Must include and survey all existing conveyances (pipes, culverts, etc.) that
transport WoUS
Version: December 2013 Page 9

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(2) CERTIFICATION LANGUAGE
F1When the entire actual Jurisdictional Boundaryis depicted:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat accurately depicts the boundary of the jurisdiction
of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the undersigned on this date.
Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, the determination of
Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five (5) years from
this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the appropriate Regional
Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
F] When uplands may be present within a depicted Jurisdictional Boundary:
include the following Corps Certification language:
"This certifies that this copy of this plat identifies all areas of waters of the United States
regulated pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act as determined by the
undersigned on this date. Unless there is change in the law or our published regulations,
this determination of Section 404 jurisdiction may be relied upon for a period not to exceed
five years from this date. The undersigned completed this determination utilizing the
appropriate Regional Supplement to the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual."
Regulatory Official:
Title:
Date:
USACE Action ID No.:
Version: December 2013 Page 10

Jurisdictional Determination Request
(3) GPS SURVEYS
For Surveys prepared using a Global Positioning System (GPS), the Survey must include
all of the above, as well as:
1-1 be at sub -meter accuracy at each survey point.
include an accuracy verification:
One or more known points (property corner, monument) shall be located with the
GPS and cross-referenced with the existing traditional property survey (metes and
bounds).
include a brief description of the GPS equipment utilized.
Version: December 2013 Page 11

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD):
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:North Carolina County/parish/borough: Buncombe City: Candler
Center coordinates of site (]at/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35.539680°l, Long. -82.637552°.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: UT Hominy Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) into which the aquatic resource flows: French Broad
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): French Broad 06010105
Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
SECTION II: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There M"navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in the
review area. [Required]
® Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
it Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There Iff "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): t
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent watersZ (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
] Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. Identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non -wetland waters: 1,099 linear feet: 3-5 width (ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: 0.02 acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on: Eslslis6ed b}„0.'M
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
91 Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
' Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
Z For purposes of this form, an RPW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
1 Supporting documentation is presented in Section III. F.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section III.A.1 and Section III.D.1. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections III.A.1 and 2
and Section III.D.1.; otherwise, see Section III.B below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent':
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY):
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non -navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section HI.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section III.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section III.B.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.0 below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size: Fick List
Drainage area: 'Pick List
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW.
❑ Tributary flows through tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are Pick List river miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick Liam river miles from RPW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters are Pick List aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
Identify flow route to TNW5:
Tributary stream order, if known:
° Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the and
West.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e.g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply
Tributary is: ❑ Natural
❑ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
❑ Manipulated (man -altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes:.
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply):
❑ Silts ❑ Sands
❑ Cobbles ❑ Gravel
❑ Bedrock ❑ Vegetation. Type/% cover:
❑ Other. Explain:
❑ Concrete
❑ Muck
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes. Explain:
Tributary geometry:
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope): %
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for:
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year:,
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume:
Surface flow is: Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: . Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
❑ Bed and banks
❑ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
❑ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
❑ the presence of litter and debris
❑ changes in the character of soil
❑ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
❑ shelving
❑ the presence of wrack line
❑ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
❑ sediment sorting
leaf litter disturbed or washed away
❑ scour
sediment deposition
❑ multiple observed or predicted flow events
❑ water staining
❑ abrupt change in plant community
❑ other (list):
El Discontinuous OHWM Explain:
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply):
High Tide Line indicated by: So
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects
❑ survey to available datum;
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
❑ physical markings;
❑ physical markings/characteristics
❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list):
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored,
oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
6A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
']bid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2. Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type. Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain:
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is: Explain:
Surface flow is:
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow: KIM. Explain findings:
❑ Dye (or other) test performed:
(c) Wetland Adjacency Determination with Non-TNW:
❑ Directly abutting
❑ Not directly abutting
❑ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
❑ Ecological connection. Explain:
❑ Separated by berm/barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximity (Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are river miles from TNW.
Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Flow is from:
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
❑ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
❑ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
❑ Habitat for:
❑ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
❑ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
❑ Other environmentally -sensitive species. Explain findings:
❑ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if an
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis:
WWI
Approximately ( ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
Directly abuts? WN) Size (in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TNWs. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section IIID:
Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section III.D:
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section IIID:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS. THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY):
TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
® TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: 0.0 acres.
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: Continuous bed and bank, prescence of flow without precipitation.
�t❑ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section 111.13. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
® Tributary waters: 1,099 linear feet 3-5 width (ft).
Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Non-RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Ig Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands.
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW: Wetland discharges directly to Stream 2 (S2).
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section III.B and rationale in Section III.D.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.02 acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
® Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: 0.00 acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III.C.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6), or
® Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below).
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA -STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):10
® which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
IInterstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
8See Footnote # 3.
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III.D.6 of the. Instructional Guidebook.
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CRA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non -wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
Wetlands: acres.
F. NON -JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements.
Q Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
Other: (explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for irrigated agriculture), using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
® Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non -wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non -wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case file and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 1:24K Enka Quad.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
M National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
100 -year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):NCCGIA (2015).
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
Q Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
Appli cab] e/supporting case law:
® Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD: This JD form applies to all streams and wetland on site.

F- letcrner F,artners (+/- y HL)
i Ott 1
1I� I I
Legend
�r Data Form
Stream
Culvert
— Contours
Wetland
— — Project Boundary
Buncombe County,
North Carolina
i
CLearWater
If,.
Jurisdictional wetlands and waters identified on this map have been located within
sub -meter accuracy utilizing a Trimble mapping grade Global Positioning System
(GPS) and the subsequent differential correction of that data. GPS points may
demonstrate uncorrectable errors due to topography, vegetative cover, and/or
multipath signal error.
Note: The illustrated wetland and stream locations are approximate. These areas
have been flagged in the field; however, they have not been surveyed. Although
Clearwater Environmental Consultants, Inc. (CEC) is confident in our assessment,
the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is the only agency that can make final
decisions regarding jurisdictional wetland and waters of the US delineations.
Therefore, all preliminary determinations are subject to change until written
verification is obtained. CEC strongly recommends that written verification be
obtained from the Corps prior to closing on the property, beginning any site work, or
making any legal reliance on this determination.
This map was prepared by CEC using the best information available to CEC at the
time of production. This map is for informational purposes only and should not be -
used to determine precise boundaries, roadways, property boundary lines, nor legal
descriptions. This map shall not be construed to be an official survey of any data
depicted.
Source Data: Topo and Project Boundary are from Buncombe County.
Potentially Jurisdictional Water
Wetland (AQ Stream (LF)
W 1 0.02 Sl 710
I S2 389
32 Clayton Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
Total 0.02 Total 1 1,099
Project Boundary
I N
0 50 100 200
Feet
Stream & Wetland
Delineation Map
Delineated December 21, 2016
Figure 7

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
ProjecVSite: -� 1 q / FL ESci+c 12 PAi?tNErt S City/County: R u r.) c o rA 3E Sampling Date: it / r o 1 1 ro
Applicant/Owner: State: N t Sampling Point: W )
Investigalor(s): JZ N V- ieA Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): -f, r S L oP C I Du p r E S. s io►,[i Local relief (concave, convex, none): r o r J c •. v Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L12#2 N Lat: 35 • X39 32 v Long: — HZ • Ca 3 5 Datum: NA [i) b:S
Soil Map Unit Name: DVOS til u.peh L080 I I To S ',Eec[..rr S«?CS RAeEL,I F--ao0e+1 NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _ i No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
W E'tt.n >J b I
%F
Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes )e No
Yes X No
Welland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) _ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_
High Water Table (A2) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_
Saturation (A3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (131) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_
Sediment Deposits (132) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CO
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_
Drift Deposits (83) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
_( Geomorphic Position (D2)
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (05)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No V Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No ( Depth (inches):
Hydrology Present? Yes '� No
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth (inches): I
Welland
_
[includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
us Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: _; a
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. -
50% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 115' 1
1.
2.
3.
4.
5,
6.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
=
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1 S t _
1. L -INT -PA ►Bfr.»oir.l 5 'i-_ _
:�)ampiing Point: w
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Z (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: Z (B)
Percent of Dominant Species .
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 o U I • (A/B)
Prevalence Index worKsneet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 = O
FACW species U
x 2 =
FAC species i. S
x 3 = 5
FACU species Z
x 4 = j
UPL species O
x 5 = U
Column Totals: ? -I-
(A) t?% (B)
Prevalence Index = BIA = 2-
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
�( 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is153.W
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Total Cover I Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height,
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes �_ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0
50% of total cover:
2. 5 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: -5
)
y
/
1. MTc aoStFf,lvr� V­Jrsw
0V11Nft
15
2.LOrJLcCP-A-SAjPo0-LCA
rJ- J�kc.
3.1'1 G-.! S -t 9 0r.n t z .r
> n.1 S G
Z - `I FACJ
4. C A Q E it lt- _
Z t -f
5.,S O L1 I1 rat • A S P
_� ___J
6. p IAN Jd rA CP
2 IJ
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
�iL = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
,�1 20% of total cover: S .
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
3v )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 It (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 It (1 to 6 m) in height,
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes �_ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

Sampling Point: w I
JVIL -
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features Texture Remarks
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc
°I5 Io NJ R p /� C _ ��All L��r^
'Type: C=Concentration D=Depletion, RM=
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Hislic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Hislic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
US Army Corps of Engineers
duced Matrix MS Masked Sand Grains 'Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sods'.
Dark Surface (57)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_
Polyvalue Below Surface (Se) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_
Y Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF 12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes )( No
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: 311 I FtFTcr16F_ PAOT"FyC City/County: P�u"cor.ni3.E Sampling Date: I %7o / I(e
ApplicanUOwner: State: NL Sampling Point: U P t. t
Investigator(s): 1201r 4ANI Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc,): 1 I? t t i a i? F Local relief (concave, convex, none): Co ay T v Slope (%): L 1.
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): L Q Q N Lat: Long: $ Z. G 3 3 o Datum: tJ A 1} 'A
Soil Map Unit Name: kA in ' C L-A" 2 "rte b FE�?cENI S LOPES NWI classification:
Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes )f No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes_ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
ct innnnnRv nF FINnINGS - Attach site mat) showing samplinq point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes No—y— Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No x within a Wetland? Yes No V
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Lroi) A7Q -Tv WETIP0b t ,
uvnoAl A!_V
. Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired• check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
_
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
_
Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_
Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (CS)
_
Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_
Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
_
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (04)
_
_ Aquatic Fauna (Bi 3)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No _2 Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No )_
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: a ) % Cover Species? Status
1. L't2-cot)Crl7R„r.1 IruL-1Pir6>zA 5 �_ FAcV
2.1Lj-pi05 5I20RuS - 1;— —Y `/
3. QOE2t,r)t AcRA 5 Y FAC,
4. C .�FQc.i� FA�IJk-t n. `:. r
5.
b.
2 0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover:
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: (S 1
1.
3
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: S 1
1._
Sampling Point: V111_ \
Dominance Test wor{csneet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: O (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: S (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 1 . (Al B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by.
OBL species o
x 1 = O
FACW species
x2= O
FAC species o
x 3 = O
FACU species Z S
x 4= t a g
UPL species 0
x 5 =
Column Totals: _IIS
(A) 1 A (B)
Prevalence Index = BIA = f. O
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 . Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
5•
6.
= Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric sal and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
5o% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size: C; )
`J Y
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
1. POLyST1 c w a aL ac, 5 - X Vid � [ C f A <.,7
2.
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 R (6 m) or more in height and less
3
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
4.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
5
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
6.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
7
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
B•
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
g
It (1 m) in height.
10. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height
11.
5 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: ?_ .15 20% of total cover: 1
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: �n )
1.
2.
4
5. Hydrophytic
Total Cover Vegetation
Present? Yes No�_
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks! (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
S PA R S C I-1 G R 1-� P c- C —1 L- A-/ C fz
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

cnu
Sampling Point: OF L ►
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth MatrixRedox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
D'1Z lov lz "04 f°V )uC� 5JL'f cevAM
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_ Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Reduced Matrix MS -Masked Sand Grains 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils'.
Dark Surface (S7)
—2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No_
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2 0