20020492 Ver 1_Mitigation Evaluation_20080410

Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Date of Office Review: ?-4-Q- r)b Evaluator's Name(s):
Date of Report: I C (,j Report for Monitoring Year: -> 7
Date of Field Review: - -( o -C) R Evaluator's Name(s):
Other Individuals/Agencies Present:q,-\m C Cho (7 o ?t ,
Weather Conditions (today & recent):
Directions to Site:
(.Office Review Information:
Project Number: 20020492 Project History
Project Name: Berger Bank: Homestead

County(ies) Rowan Event Event Date

Basin & subbasin: Yadkin 03040102 Report Review - Wetlands 2/16/2007
Report Review - Streams 3/12/2007 j
Nearest Stream: Site Visit - Wetlands 3/16/2007
Water Quality Class of Nearest Stream: Site Visit - Streams 3/16/2007
Mitigator Type: Mitigation Ba Report Review - Streams 2/5/2008
DOT Status: non-DOT
Total Mitigation on Site
Wetland: 21.6 acres
Stream: 2500 linear feet
Buffer:
Approved mitigation plan available? Yes No
Monitoring reports available? Yes No
Problem areas identified in reports? Yes No
Problem areas addressed on site? Yes No
Mitigation required on site: *Add significant project-related events: reports,
Associated impacts (if known): received, construction, planting, rePairs, etc.
I---- -- -_
During office review, note success criteria and evaluate each component based on monitoring report
results. Record relevant data in Sections II and III.
On back of sheet, note other information found during office review and/or to be obtained during site visit
II. Summary of Results:
Monitoring Success Success
Mitigation Component Year (report) (field) Resolved,
20020492-3 5.8 acres Wetland Creation 5
20020492-4 0.4 acres Wetland Preservation 5
20020492-1 12.8 acres Wetland Restoration 5
20020492-2 2.6 acres Wetland Enhancement 5
20020492-5 2500 linear feet Stream (Intermittent) Restoration 5
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 2
Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this project is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this project:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):

Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 2
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
Component: 5.8 acres Wetland Creation Component ID: 20020492-3
Description:
Location within project:
III
S
.
uccess Criteria Evaluation:
-
HYDROLOGY - Approved Success Criteria:
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
within 12" of surface continually for at least 5 to 12.5% of growing / Inundated L
season (assuming normal precipitation)
Saturated in upper 12 inches
Monitoring report indicates success es No Drift lines
Observational field data agrees? es No Drainage patterns in wetlands
based on mitigation plan? Yes No Sediment deposits
based on wetland type? Yes No Water marks
List any remaining hydrology issues to address (e.g. remaining ditches , excessive water, etc.):

i
ILS - A ro d S
pp ve uccess Criteria. NA
Are soils hydric or becoming hydric? es o
List indicators of hydric soils:
LGC4
ist any remaining soil issues to address (e.g. erosion, upland areas, etc.):
VEGETATION - Approved Success Criteria: Dominant Plant Species
native woody species/acre: 320 thru year 3, 288 @ year 4, at Species Story TPA/'/ cover
least 90% of forested portions achieve 260 @ end of year 5;
YYLC'? (J?A
herbaceous >85% cover by native species UAJ-J
i
Monitoring report indicates success? es No
i ?-l1C Ytd c?tc
Average TPA for entire site (per report): ZSJ L,
C l? l,k? y-o-A Cti, 4 c,+Ko ,A ? c,'V r >
Observational field data agrees? es No
based on community composition? No
based on TPA and/or % cover?
e No I
j Vegetation planted on site? (:k No
li
Date of last planting:
Vegetation growing successfully? es NoY C(c
Specific vegetation plots or site locations with little to no vegetation:
Estimated acreage or site percentage of unvegetated areas:
Invasive species on site (species, location(s), and % cover):
List any remaining vegetation issues to address (e.g. plant survival, concerns, etc.):
aCJ, USS S5i c? b?O UCI-L-j SY1l,,?
Cti'LX v' v7 6- ,
`?-? 0 Sze
\-0 \-0 UR ?JYk" -lam ZSb:>eA_v?
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 1 of 8
Wetland Mitigation Project Evaluations: Information Table
NC Division of Water Quality
NCWAM - Approved Success Criteria or Evaluative Techniques: NCWAM Type on Site:
NA Coastal
Riverine
Monitoring report indicates success? Yes No Riparian
Observational field data agrees? Yes No Non-riparian (wetter)
Attach NCWAM analysis results to this report. Non-riparian (drier)
List any remaining NCWAM issues to address (e.g. functionality, developing wetland type, etc.):
MITIGATION SUCCESS:
Compared to the approved mitigation plan, this component is: successful partially successful unsuccessful
List specific reasons for lack of success for this component:
Additional comments (e.g. DWQ follow-up actions, recommendations, etc.):
During site visit, document representative conditions and areas of concern. Observe preservation and
enhancement areas that may not have specific success criteria. Label and attach photos to this report.
Attach maps showing photo locations, areas of concern, and important field observations.
Additional notes related to evaluation of this component:
Version 1.0 (August 22, 2007) Page 2 of 8
`` \\\? II I O
\
\
(\\ ( J/ i \ \_ - ? \ ( ?-, \ .? ?\ \ \ \ ?,, It
\l \\ \ \
e"4 Q
' a
s
a
d 8
W

a
00
U)
( Rio / \,/4\ o
3. m > El
CD Imi
1
N
j/ o
1 1 3 o A C, ??I 4?./ \ I o o L)
El Em o\ cop m Of of c,
In,
-C cu cm o ?2
c) U) -j E
/K) 595 O \? (n U)
.? v o a?
U) C
\ L\ I ll ??p _? `?+,p rod' ? 0C' /?+ ?"?/(/Ly{?J?? i' ? / L cO _C N rt+ N L
X1 Ei °j 01,D I
3 N
/
698.0".,i00'0
W N N V7 ?.?
-70.2 -. Lam- C? -? S ??C(
J_ 0.? J X --
/ 706.\??i-\

\\\ ?\ Ql6g
`0 689 CL--/.-J/f ?_-
I -688 - . ?/ _-
I B85?- `\ III / \ ??I ?m?
F(+ 684- \ ?- ?- rr
E
?Q 682-
-u` 686
\I-?I s ?I i
I
? R J
? ?
(U N I
x "J U)
\ x N 1 ?r N
\ s ?_
?o
-MV
CLUJ OD
?\j`il'
CD
0
cn
\p
LLI
yr
0
3

0 0
Z Q
a
M

W
a- Z

0 a

N
2z
QO c/)
z C
Cl) Q

z
z w i- w O w

J
?
U)
oo Q
? Iii

N
L.L
0
H
/? o

3

U)
O
Z
w 0
°
Z 0
z
z
<
DO
cn
wZ CL
D
W U
Z W a
O °
,f z
Q
O 2
O Q
?- ID
wov
LLJ z (D Q5
O

` W Of U)
o
m Q N
(n O ?-0z
5 I- o ?L
O
Cl)
w

=o?

z
0 ? / \ \\
yam
, 2? , ? ??II I ( --
f
O \.--
'
s
4\\?/'
L
El I-
LF)
x C)
3: El
I I?\ ° \ /i\/ 11 r \ l
0
\ s
??< I it I II
co X.
?? \ \ \\
C7 \