20170037 Ver 1_401 Application_20170117

KL E/NFEL OER
Bright People. Right Solutions. � n
� 0037
TRANSMITTAL
To: Nbl uffer Permit Unit; Date: January 4, 201
16 it 'Service, Center Reference No: 20163469.001A
"A -2'i699-1617 Copies to:
Subject: Water Quality and Stream Buffer Permit Application - Piedmont Natural Gas Line 6 Application
We are sending the following: ® Attached ❑ Under separate cover
Pre-Construciton Notification and support documentation (5 -copies included)
Via:
❑ Messenger/Courier
❑ First Class Mail
® FedEx
❑ United Parcel
❑ DHL
❑ Lone Star Overnight
❑ Freight
❑ Other
bitted:
4s Requested
or Approval
�r Your Use
Review & Comment
By -
Remarks:
Ilan Oravetz
ct Manager
D
;A�v 0 2017

KL EINF"EL OER
Bright People. Right Solutions.
Street Address. City State Zip • Phone metro • Direct • Fax fax

i
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes X❑ No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
PNG Line 6 OPP Facility
2b. County:
Northampton
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Pleasant Hill
2d. Subdivision name:
not applicable
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
not applicable
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
see attached
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
see attached
3c. Responsible Parry (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
f1iV 0 2 01
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
01 -WATER RESOURCES
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

W
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Utility Easement Holder
4b. Name:
Jason Brown, Project Manager
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Piedmont Natural Gas
4d. Street address:
4720 Piedmont Row Dr
4e. City, state, zip:
Charlotte, NC 28210
4f. Telephone no.:
704-731-4681
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Jonathan Oravetz
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Kleinfelder
5c. Street address:
8933 Western Way Suite 12
5d. City, state, zip:
Jacksonville, FL 32256
5e. Telephone no.:
904-538-9171
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
see attached
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 36.534 Longitude: -77.561
1 c. Property size:
5.42 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Jacks Swamp
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
2c. River basin:
Roanoke
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is an existing utility easement and regulator station. The site included herbaceous upland and wetland environments within a maintained
ROW. Land use in the general vicinity is residential and agriculture.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.43
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 0
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Construct a overpressure prevention (OPP) facility associated with existing pipeline.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
A permanent gravel access road will be constructed across W -RA for access to construct a Over Pressure Protection (OPP) facility. The road will
impact 0.10 acres of herbaceous wetlands and the OPP facility will impact 0.04 acres of wetland.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project(including all priorphases) in thepast?
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
®Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Jonathan oravetz
Agency/Consultant Company: Kleinfelder
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Wetland areas were reviewed by Tasha Alexander (ACOE) on July 27, 2016
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The proposed OPP facility is part of a larger upgrade/replacement of PNG Line 6.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ❑ Streams – tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W-RA P
Fill
Non-Tidal Freshwater Marsh
No
Corps
0.1
W-OPPN P
Fill
Non-Riverine Swamp Forest
Yes/No
Corps
0.04
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
-
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
—t
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.14
2h. Comments:
Wetland impacts area related to construction of a permanent gravel access road for construction access and OPP facility. Gravel road to remain for
maintenance access to OPP facility.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1
Choose one
-
S2
Choose one
-
S3 -
Choose one
_
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
_
S6 -
Choose one
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form – Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
02 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d. 5e.
Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled Excavated
Flooded
Filled Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impact is related to access and construction of OPP facility. The road has been located within the existing ROW and the OPP facility has been sited to
avoid wetlands, and impacts only a small comer of wetland W-OPP
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
The proposed road was located within the existing ROW and co -located on an existing unimproved access paths. The OPP facility must maintain a
minimum distance from the existing pipeline and was sited as to avoid wetland W-OPP to the maximum extent practical.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete If Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments: No mitigation is proposed as the gravel road is located within an existing maintained ROW. Construction of the road is
located within an existing un -improved path and no forest resources are required to be cleared for construction. Wetland
impacts associated with the OPP facility are 0.04 acres in total size and considered to be de minimis.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes © No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes Q No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
the project does not impact stream buffers and therefore no diffuse plan is required.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
100% of wetland impact
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
The project basin does not require and stormwater management plan.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
not applicable
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Northampton county
❑ Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
USMP
apply (check all that apply):
® Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
El Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
[]Session Law 2006-246
[]Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
Not applicable
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes Q No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑Yes Q No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes ❑ No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
El Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
no waste water will be generated from the proposed project.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
Impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program; Informal consultation with John Ellis at USFWS.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
then: are no surface water or open water environments onsite
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ®No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
File search and consultation with North Carolina State office of Archaeology on June 21 and 23, 2016.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain d nation?
FEMA Pannel #3721402100J
jorM4-6e) �a�2� Z
1- �- 261
Applicant/Agenfs Printed Name
P lie 1inthkAnt's Signature
Date
(Ag is signature is vat my If an authorization
l4 a applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Document Path: G:\Piedmont_NG\20163955.001A-Line6-OPP\5HP\NWP-Figs\Location.mxd
¢a
Milestown Rd
'yds
Pg
�'
se
Project Location
Pd
.jack 54
M
Pleasant
Hill
® ,;st; Swanio
0 1,500 3,000 N 4
Feet '
0
The Information included on this graphic representation has been compiled from a
variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. Weinfelder makes no
representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness,
timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. This document is not intended
for use as a land survey product nor is Jr designed or intended as a construction
design document The use or misuse of the information contained on this graphic
representation is at the sole risk of the party using or misusing the information.
Macon Price k
PROJECT N0.20163955.001 A Figure
DRAWN: 8-10-16 Location Map
("KLE/NF-ELDAER DRAWN BY: JO 1
Bright People. Right Solutions. CHECKED BY: LM OPP Facility
�i FILE NAME: PNG Line 6
www. kleinfelder.com See Document Path Above Northampton County, North Carolina

Dc:~jment Path. G:\Piedmont_NG\20163955.001A-Line6-OPP\SHP\NWP-Figs\Wet-impact.mxd

United States Department of the Interior
ap '
N ' FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
_ Raleigh ES Field Office
y ,e Post Office Box 33726
�Rc" 3 's Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
August 19, 2016
Jonathan Oravetz
Kleinfelder
8933 Western Way, Suite 12
Jacksonville, FL 32256
Re: Piedmont Natural Lias Line 6, Phase 1 — Northampton and Halifax Counties, NC;
Dear Mr. Oravetz:
This letter is to inform you that a list of all federally -protected endangered and threatened species
with known occurrences in North Carolina is now available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's (Service) web page at http://www.fws.gov/raleigh. Therefore, if you have projects that
occur within the Raleigh Field Office's area of responsibility (see attached county list), you no
longer need to contact the Raleigh Field Office for a list of federally -protected species.
Our web page contains a complete and frequently updated list of all endangered and threatened
species protected by the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)(Act), and a list of federal species of concern) that are known to occur in
each county in North Carolina.
Section 7 of the Act requires that all federal agencies (or their designated non-federal
representative), in consultation with the Service, insure that any action federally authorized,
funded, or carried out by such agencies is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any
federally -listed endangered or threatened species. A biological assessment or evaluation may be
prepared to fulfill that requirement and in determining; whether additional consultation with the
Service is necessary. In addition to the federally -protected species list, information on the
species' life histories and habitats and information on completing a biological assessment or
evaluation and can be found on our web page at http://w%vw.fivs.gov/raleigh. Please check the
web site often for updated information or changes.
I The term "federal species of concern" refers to those species which the Service believes might be in need of
concentrated conservation actions. Federal species of concern receive no legal protection and their designation does
not necessarily imply that the species will eventually be proposed for listing as a federally endangered or threatened
species. However, we recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid or minimize adverse impacts to
federal species of concern.

If your project contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species known to be
present within the county where your project occurs, the proposed action has the potential to
adversely affect those species. As such, we recommend that surveys be conducted to determine
the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of North Carolina Natural
Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys.
If you determine that the proposed action may affect (i.e., likely to adversely affect or not likely
to adversely affect) a federally -protected species, you should notify this office with your
determination, the results of your surveys, survey methodologies, and an analysis of the effects
of the action on listed species, including consideration of direct, indirect, and cumulative effects,
before conducting any activities that might affect the species. If you determine that the proposed
action will have no effect (i.e., no beneficial or adverse, direct or indirect effect) on federally
listed species, then you are not required to contact our office for concurrence (unless an
Environmental Impact Statement is prepared). However, you should maintain a complete record
of the assessment, including steps leading to your determination of effect, the qualified personnel
conducting the assessment, habitat conditions, site photographs, and any other related articles.
With regard to the above -referenced project, we offer the following remarks. Our comments are
submitted pursuant to, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Based on the information provided and other information available, it appears that the proposed
action is not likely to adversely affect any federally -listed endangered or threatened species, their
formally designated critical habitat, or species currently proposed for listing under the Act at
these sites. We believe that the requirements of section 7(a)(2) of the Act have been satisfied for
your project. Please remember that obligations under section 7 consultation must be
reconsidered if: (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered; (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review; or, (3) a new species
is listed or critical habitat determined that may be affected by the identified action.
However, the Service is concerned about the potential impacts the proposed action might have
on aquatic species. Aquatic resources are highly susceptible to sedimentation. Therefore, we
recommend that all practicable measures be taken to avoid adverse impacts to aquatic species,
including implementing directional boring methods and stringent sediment and erosion control
measures. An erosion and sedimentation control plan should be submitted to and approved by
the North Carolina Division of Land Resources, Land Quality Section prior to construction.
Erosion and sedimentation controls should be installed and maintained between the construction
site and any nearby down -gradient surface waters. In addition, we recommend maintaining
natural, vegetated buffers on all streams and creeks adjacent to the project site.
The North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission has developed a Guidance Memorandum (a
copy can be found on our website at (http://wmv.fws.gov/mleigh) to address and mitigate
secondary and cumulative impacts to aquatic and terrestrial wildlife resources and water quality.
We recommend that you consider this document in the development of your projects and in
completing an initiation package for consultation (if necessary).
2

We hope you find our web page useful and informative and that following the process described
above will reduce the time required, and eliminate the need, for general correspondence for
species' lists. If you have any questions or comments, please contact John Ellis of this office at
(919) 8564520 ext. 26.
Sincerely,
P e Benjamin
field Supervisor

List of Counties in the Service's Raleigh Field Office Area of Responsibility
Alamance
Perquimans
Beaufort
Person
Bertie
Pitt
Bladen
Randolph
Brunswick
Richmond
Camden
Robeson
Carteret
Rockingham
Caswell
Sampson
Chatham
Scotland
Chowan
Tyrrell
Columbus
Vance
Craven
Wake
Cumberland
Warren
Currituck
Washington
Dare
Wayne
Duplin
Wilson
Durham
Edgecombe
Franklin
Gates
Granville
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Hertford
Hoke
Hyde
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Martin
Montgomery
Moore
Nash
New Hanover
Northampton
Onslow
Orange
Pamlico
Pasquotank
Pender
►.1

North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Ramona M. Bartos, Administrator
Governor Pat McCrory
Secretary Susan Kluttz
August 19, 2016
Terri Russ
Environmental Services, Inc.
4901 Trademark Drive
Raleigh, NC 27610
trussna,esinc.cc
Office of Archives and History
Deputy Secretary Kevin Cherry
Re: Piedmont Natural Gas Line 6 Replacement, Phase I, Northampton, Halifax, Nash, Edgecombe, and
Wilson Counties, ER 16-0539
Dear Ms. Russ:
Thank you for your letter of July 15, 2016, detailing your meeting with Assistant State Archaeologist Susan
Myers of the Office of State Archaeology July 1, 2016, concerning the above project.
Of the twenty-three archaeological sites located within or in proximity to the project area, five are
recommended for revisits to establish their boundaries and evaluate those portions of the sites within the
project corridor for their eligibility for the National Register of Historic Places. These sites are: 31ED22,
31NP279, 31WL188, 31WL197, and 31WL293. In addition, it is recommended that 31WL195, a cemetery,
be revisited to clearly mark it for avoidance in the field. Please describe the means for its avoidance—for
example, by a perimeter fence and buffer.
The following properties have been previously determined not eligible for listing in the National Register
of Historic Places:
31HX175, 31HX178, 31HX180, 31HX263, 3INP 161, 31NP162, 3INP 163, 3INP 164, 3INP 165, 31NP166,
3INP 167, 31NP168, 31NP169, 31NP170, 31NP213, 31WL196, and 31WL212 because of a lack of
integrity and inability to contribute to an understanding of the area's prehistory or history
Based on their topographic and hydrologic setting, nine areas proposed within new pipeline location routes
or re-routes are recommended for archaeological survey. These are as depicted in your memo of July 12,
2016, and named Survey Area 1 through Survey Area 9.
Location: 109 East Jones Street, Raleigh NC 27601 Mailing Address: 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 Telephone/Fax: [phone]-6599

We recommend a comprehensive survey be conducted by an experienced archaeologist to identify and
evaluate the significance of archaeological remains that may be damaged or destroyed by the proposed
project. Potential effects on unknown resources must be assessed prior to the initiation of construction
activities.
Two copies of the resulting archaeological survey report, as well as one copy of the appropriate site forms,
should be forwarded to us for review and comment as soon as they are available and well in advance of any
construction activities.
A list of archaeological consultants who have conducted or expressed an interest in contract work in North
Carolina is available at http://www.archaeology.ncdcr.gov/ncarch/resource/consultants.htm. The
archaeologists listed, or any other experienced archaeologist, may be contacted to conduct the
recommended survey.
No archaeological survey is recommended along those portions of the proposed pipeline running parallel to
the existing pipeline.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106 codified at 36
CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above comment,
contact Renee Gledhill -Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919-807-6579 or
environmental.reviewa,ncdcr.�ov. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the
above referenced tracking number.
Sincerely,
6",,Ramona M. Bartos
cc: Laura Mills, Kleinfelder, LauraMillsakleinfelder.com

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
4901 Trademark Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27610
919-212-1760 / Facsimile 919-212-1707
www.environmentalservicesinc.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: Laura Mills
FROM: Terri Russ, Senior Archaeology Manager
DATE: 6/23/2016
RE: Piedmont Natural Gas Line 6 Replacement: Cultural Resources
Research conducted by ESI at the North Carolina Office of State Archaeology (OSA) on 21 June
2016 revealed that 23 previously recorded archaeological sites are located within or in close
proximity to the project study area (Table 1). Most of these sites are located within a 150 -foot
buffer on either side of the proposed replacement pipeline or adjacent access roads. These sites are
described (in the order in which they were originally recorded) below.
Table 1: Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites within or in Close Proximity to Project Area
Site
Component
NRHP
Date
Project
Comments
ESI
Status
Recorded
Type
Recommendations
31ED22
P
U
1960
Unknown
No site information was available
Revisit
Coded as Unassessed; however,
31 HX 175
P
U1
1995
Sewer Line
site form and report indicates site
No Further Work
has been destroyed by borrow pit
activities
Industrial
Located very close to proposed
31HX178
P
U
1997
line. Test excavations
Revisit
Park
recommended by original recorder.
31HX180
P
NE
1997
Industrial
No Further Work
Park
31HX263
P/H
NE
2008
Cell Tower
No Further Work
Pipeline;
31NP161
P/H
NE
1990,
NCDOT
No Further Work
2011
Widening
31NP162
P/H
NE
1990
Pipeline
No Further Work
1990;
Pipeline;
Originally recorded as Unassessed;
31NP163
H
NE
2014
Solar Farm
later investigations determined site
No Further Work
is Not Eligible.
1/6

Site
Component
NRHP
Date
Project
Comments
ESI
Status
Recorded
Type
Recommendations
31NP164
P
NE
1990
Pipeline
Located well outside of project
No Further Work
area
31NP165
H
NE
1990
Pipeline
No Further Work
31NP166
H
NE
1990
Pipeline
Located well outside of project
No Further Work
area
31NP167
P
NE
1990
Pipeline
Located well outside of project
No Further Work
area
31NP168
P
NE
1990
Pipeline
No Further Work
31NP169
P
U
1990
Pipeline
Located well outside of project
No Further Work
area
31NP 170
P
U
1990
Pipeline
Located well outside of project
No Further Work
area
31NP213
P
NE
1992
Transmission
No Further Work
Line
31NP279
H
U
2011
NCDOT
Early 20th century domestic
Revisit
Widening
structural remains
Artifacts spanning thousands of
31 WL 188
P
U
1992
None
years. Exact location of site within
Revisit
agricultural field needs to be
determined.
Cemetery very close to or within
proposed corridor. 2Probably Not
31 WL195
P/H
NEz
1992
Landfill
Eligible, but should revisit to
Revisit
ensure no disturbance to unmarked
raves
31 WL196
P
NE
1992
Landfill
No Further Work
Site was coded as Not Eligible,
however, no subsurface testing was
31WL197
P
U/NE3
1992
Landfill
ever conducted. Site should be
Revisit
shovel tested to determine if intact
deposits are present within the
ro osed corridor.
Site was coded as Not Eligible,
however, no subsurface testing was
31 WL212
P
U/NE3
1992
Landfill
ever conducted. Site should be
Revisit
shovel tested to determine if intact
deposits are present within the
proposed corridor.
31 WL293
P
U
2006
Unknown
No site information was available
Revisit
Civil War
H
U
N/A
None
Landowner claims a cemetery is
Historic Research;
Cemetery
located within the HDD area.
Revisit
Prehistoric; H— Historic,, P/H= Both Prehistoric & Historic
U= Unassessed for NRNP eligibility; NE= Not Eligible for NRNP
Site 31 ED22 was recorded in 1960 as an unidentified prehistoric site. No additional information
was available for the site, and the site has not been assessed for its National Register of Historic
Places (NRHP) status. It is recommended that the site location be revisited in order to determine if
the site is located within the proposed project study area, and if so, whether the site contains intact
subsurface deposits or could be considered eligible for the NRHP.
Ten of these archaeological sites (31NP161-170) were recorded in 1990 during an archaeological
survey for a 7.6 mile -long section of the then -proposed natural gas pipeline (Lautzenheiser 1990).
Two of the 10 sites (31NP169 and 31NP170) were recorded outside of the 50 -foot wide survey
corridor and were not assessed for their NRHP eligibility. Both sites are located well outside of the
2/6

current project study area and will not be affected by the proposed construction. Of the remaining
sites recorded during the original pipeline survey, all but one was considered not eligible for the
NRNP. Site 31NPI63, recorded as the remains of an historic domestic structure, was not further
evaluated at the time, as the proposed gas pipeline was to be re-routed to avoid adverse impacts to
the site. The site was revisited in 2014 during a survey for a proposed solar farm (Deetz 2014). It
was determined at that time that the pipeline had not been re-routed and had instead, bisected the
approximately 100-x-100 foot archaeological site. The 2014 investigations fully delineated the
archaeological site through close -interval shovel testing of the undisturbed portions of the site.
Three positive shovel tests yielded late nineteenth to early twentieth century materials from the
surface or plowzone; no intact, subsurface deposits were recorded. The site was recommended not
eligible for the NRNP. No further work is recommended for any of these archaeological sites.
A 1992 survey of a 400 -acre tract for a proposed landfill east of Wilson recorded 24 archaeological
sites, four of which (31WL195-197; 31WL212) are located in close proximity to the project study
area (Hargrove 1992). Site 31WL195 consists of a nineteenth and twentieth century cemetery
containing several unmarked graves. The cemetery is located along the east side of Landfill Road
and may be impacted by the proposed pipeline. It is recommended that this cemetery be revisited to
determine if the proposed project corridor will impact marked or unmarked graves within the
cemetery boundaries.
Site 31WL196 consisted of a small scatter of prehistoric artifacts and was recommended not eligible
for the NRNP. Sites 31 WL 197 and 31 WL212 are large prehistoric lithic and ceramic artifact
scatters located in an agricultural field on the east side of landfill road. Based on the archaeological
report, it does not appear that either site 31 WL 197 or 31 WL212 was shovel tested to fully delineate
the site boundaries or determine the presence or absence of subsurface deposits. It is recommended
that these two sites be revisited to determine if the site boundaries extend into the project study area,
and if so, if the portions of the site(s) located within the project study area contain intact subsurface
deposits.
An archaeological survey conducted in 1992 for the Roanoke Valley 230kV transmission line in
Northampton and Halifax counties recorded 10 archaeological sites, one of which (31NP213)
appears to be located within the project study area (Browning 1992). This dense scatter of
prehistoric Archaic lithic artifacts was determined not eligible for the NRHP. No further work is
recommended at this location.
Site 31WL188 was recorded by a local amateur archaeologist in 1992. The site, located in an
agricultural field on the west side of Landfill Road, purportedly yielded hundreds of artifacts
spanning the Paleoindian, Archaic, and Woodland periods. No subsurface testing of the site was
conducted, and the site's boundaries have not clearly been defined. As the archaeological site
boundaries may extend into the project study area, it is recommended that this site be revisited and
its boundaries delineated in order to determine if the proposed pipeline will have an adverse effect
on the site.
A 1995 survey for the proposed Weldon sewer line improvements recorded a single archaeological
site, 31 HX 175 (Lautzenheiser and Holm 1995). This site consisted of lithic materials recovered
from the disturbed soil surrounding a graded and disturbed borrow pit. This site was recommended
not eligible for the NRHP. No further work is recommended at this location.
3/6

A 1997 archaeological survey for the proposed Halifax Industrial Park recorded eight
archaeological sites, two of which (31HX178 and 31HX180) are mapped as being within or
immediately adjacent to the project study area (Brady and Lautzenheiser 1997). Site 31HX178,
located in an agricultural field on the western side of the existing gas pipeline, consisted of
numerous prehistoric surface artifacts. Five shovel tests excavated within the site boundaries
recovered artifacts from intact, sub-plowzone deposits. Additional testing of this site was
recommended to determine its eligibility for the NRHP (Brady and Lautzenheiser 1997: 17). Site
31HX180 consisted of a low-density prehistoric artifact scatter located on the east side of the
existing pipeline. The site was recommended not eligible for the NRNP. It is recommended that site
31HX178 be revisited to determine if the site boundaries extend into the project study area and to
assess the site's NRHP eligibility. No further work is recommended at site 31HX180.
A 2008 archaeological survey for a proposed communications tower recorded a single
archaeological site (31HX263; O'Neal 2008). This site appears to be located within or adjacent to
the horizontal directional drilling platform located east of Ponderosa Road on the south side of the
Roanoke River. Close -interval shovel testing recorded a prehistoric woodland and twentieth century
historic artifact scatter. The site was recommended not eligible for the NRNP; no further work is
recommended for this site location.
In 2011, Costal Carolina Research conducted an archaeological survey and evaluation on behalf of
the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) for the widening of US 158 from east
of Weldon to the Murfreesboro Bypass (Bamann et al. 2011). A total of 70 archeological sites were
recorded. One of these, 31NP161, was previously recorded during the 1990 pipeline survey and was
determined at that time to be not eligible for the NRNP. Site 31NP279, recorded during the 2011
survey, appears to be located within or in close proximity to the project study area. Site 31NP279
consists of the remains of an early twentieth century domestic structure. A standing brick well
house and subsurface paved brick pathway were recorded during the investigation. Only the portion
of the site located within the NCDOT project corridor was subjected to subsurface testing. While
this portion of the archaeological site was determined not eligible for the NRNP, the remainder of
the site remains unassessed. It is recommended that the site be revisited to determine if the site
boundaries extend into the project study area.
Site 31 WL293 was recorded in 2006. This site appears to be within or in close proximity to the
existing pipeline; however, no site information was available for this prehistoric archaeological site.
It is recommended that the site be revisited to determine if the site boundaries extend into the
project study area.
In addition to the previously recorded sites, an area purportedly containing a Civil War -era
cemetery is located on the north side of West 2nd Street in Weldon near the Roanoke Canal. This
information was provided by a landowner to crew attempting to conduct test boring for proposed
horizontal directional drilling, citing concerns for potential disturbance to gravesites. While a
preliminary map check did not reveal any previously recorded cemetery in this vicinity, it is
recommended that the area be revisited and additional historical research be conducted to determine
if any unmarked graves are located in this portion of the proposed project area.
In summary, of the 23 previously recorded archaeological sites located within or in close proximity
to the project study area, 15 have been determined not eligible for the NRNP. No further work is
recommended for these archaeological site locations (see Table 1). Seven of the previously
recorded archaeological sites (Sites 31ED22, 31HX178, 31NP279, 31WL188, 31WL197,
4/6

31 WL212, and 31 WL293) were either not sufficiently investigated or additional work was
recommended in order to determine the NRHP status of the sites. ESI recommends that these sites
be subjected to field investigations to determine 1) if the site boundaries extend into the proposed
project area and if so, 2) if the sites contain significant, intact subsurface deposits or meet other
criteria for NRHP eligibility.
Previously recorded archaeological site 31WL195, though recommended not eligible for the NRHP,
is an historic cemetery with both marked and unmarked graves. This cemetery should be revisited to
determine if the proposed project corridor will impact any marked or unmarked graves within the
cemetery boundaries.
The landowner -reported Civil War -era cemetery purportedly located within or adjacent to the
project area should be investigated on a level sufficient to document whether any unmarked graves
are likely to be located in this portion of the proposed project area. While it appears unlikely that
there is a cemetery in this location, it is recommended that this area be revisited and additional
historical research be conducted in an attempt to locate any information about known or
documented cemeteries in the vicinity.
In addition to revisiting these known and purported site locations, it is possible that the SHPO will
require additional archaeological survey of any new locations impacted by the proposed pipeline.
References
Brady, Ellen and Loretta Lautzenheiser
1997 Archaeological Survey, Halifax Industrial Park, Halifax County, North Carolina.
Coastal Carolina Research. Ms. on file, Office of State Archaeology, Raleigh, North
Carolina.
Browning, Lyle E.
1992 Roanoke Valley Non -Utility Generation 230kV Line, Phase IIntensive Cultural
Resources Survey, Halifax and Northampton Counties, North Carolina. Browning &
Associates, Ltd. Ms. on file, Office of State Archaeology, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Deetz, Eric
2014 Archaeological delineation of Site 31NP163**, Proposed Construction of 5MW
Hemlock Solar Farm, Garysburg, Northampton County, North Carolina.
Commonwealth Cultural Resources Group. Ms. on file, Office of State Archaeology,
Raleigh, North Carolina.
Hargrove, Thomas
1992 An Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Wilson County Landfill, Drivers Store
Vicinity, Wilson County, North Carolina. Prepared for Robert J. Goldstein &
Associates, Inc. Ms. on file, Office of State Archaeology, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Lautzenheiser, Loretta
1990 Archaeological Survey of a Proposed Natural Gas Pipeline, Northampton County,
North Carolina. Coastal Carolina Research. Ms. on file, Office of State
Archaeology, Raleigh, North Carolina.
5/6

Lautzenheiser, Loretta and Mary Ann Holm
1995 Archaeological Survey, Proposed Improvements to the Weldon Sewer System,
Halifax County, North Carolina. Coastal Carolina Research. Ms. on file, Office of
State Archaeology, Raleigh, North Carolina.
AN

EASEMENT
Return Recorded Document To: Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc
169 S. Winstead Ave
Rocky Mount, NC 27804
Attn: Ron Norman
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA LINE NO. 427
COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON PROJECT NO. 27-51320
PARCEL ID # 4031-36-4328 PARCEL NO. NORT-002
PARCEL ID # 4021-44-0411 PARCEL NO. NORT-003
THIS "EASEMENT" is made and granted as of this3O day of November, 2016, from 1-95 ENTERPRISES LLC
("Grantor", whether one or more), to PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC., a North Carolina corporation
("Piedmont").
WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of, or has an interest in, that property situated in Pleasant Hill Township, Northampton
County, North Carolina, as more particularly described in the instrument recorded in Book 870, Page 164, Book 870,
Page 153, Northampton County Registry (the "Property").
NOW, THEREFORE, Grantor for and in consideration of the sum of $50,960.00 and other valuable consideration, the
receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, and conveys unto
Piedmont, its successors and assigns the following easement(s) and right(s) of way under, upon, over, through and
across the Property:
Permanent Easement. A perpetual easement for purposes of constructing, installing, maintaining, operating, repairing,
altering, replacing, removing, relocating, inspecting, upgrading and protecting one or more pipelines and appurtenant
facilities (including, without limitation, valves, markers, cathodic protection equipment, and anode beds) for the
transportation of natural gas (collectively, "Facilities") under, upon, over, through, and across the Property
(the "Permanent Easement Area"), as shown on the survey attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Survey") some or all of
which Facilities (including additional pipelines) may be installed now and/or in the future; provided in no event shall
Piedmont construct or permit to be constructed or maintain any structures above ground within the Permanent Easement
Area except for markers, cathodic protection test stands and the above ground utility station and related appurtenances
as described herein. The Survey is incorporated herein by reference. All Facilities shall be and remain the property of
Piedmont and may be removed by it at any time and from time to time. Piedmont shall be responsible for all property
taxes actually assessed against Piedmont by any government agency related to the Facilities including any utility station
as described herein; however, for the avoidance of doubt, Piedmont shall not be responsible for any real or personal
property taxes unrelated to the Facilities for which Grantor shall be responsible. In the event that Grantor is directly
assessed real or personal property taxes on the Facilities by any government agency, Grantor shall give Piedmont written
notice of the tax bill prior to payment and Piedmont shall have a reasonable opportunity to investigate and/or contest the
tax bill and shall then make payment or reimburse Grantor for such real or personal property taxes on the Facilities.
Piedmont shall have all rights necessary or convenient for the full use and enjoyment of the rights herein granted,
including, without limitation: (1) reasonable access within the Permanent Easement Area, and (2) to keep the Permanent
Easement Area cleared of trees (including limbs and overhanging foliage), buildings, structures, and any other
obstructions (collectively, "Obstructions"), except for Obstructions approved by Piedmont in writing pursuant to
Piedmonts policies, guidelines or procedures regarding land use within easements (the "Guidelines"); provided Piedmont
shall have no right to construct or permit to be constructed or maintain any structures above ground within the Permanent
Easement Area except for markers and the above ground utility station and related appurtenances as described herein.
Grantor shall not install or maintain, or permit to be installed or maintained, any Obstructions within the Easement Area
except as approved in writing by Piedmont.
Temporary Construction Easement. The temporary and exclusive right to use the temporary construction easement
area shown in the attached "Exhibit A" (the "TCE Area") for construction activities including, without limitation, installing
temporary fencing around the TCE Area and laying, storing, erecting, or parking equipment, vehicles, materials, fill,
components, parts, and tools within the TCE Area during construction of the Facilities, which temporary right shall
terminate upon the earlier of Piedmont placing such Facilities in service and release of Piedmont from its obligations
under all permits issued for construction of such Facilities including, without limitation, all sedimentation and erosion
control permits or March 31, 2019. Piedmont shall have all rights necessary or convenient for the full use and enjoyment
of the TCE Area, including without limitation (1) reasonable access within the TCE Area and (2) to keep the TCE Area
cleared of Obstructions. Upon completion of construction and the Facilities being placed in service, Piedmont shall
restore the TCE Area to substantially the same condition as it existed prior to Piedmont's entry thereon.
PPAB 31270440
PPAB 3445005v

Utility Station Site Easement. A perpetual easement for the purposes of erecting, constructing, maintaining, operating,
altering, relocating, repairing, upgrading, replacing, removing, inspecting and protecting one or more utility stations or
sites (including, without limitation, meter stations, valve sites, launcher and/or receiver sites or regulator stations) and all
appurtenances used in connection therewith, for the transportation and/or control of natural gas, under, upon, over,
through, and across that portion of the Property designated "USSE Area" on the Survey ("the USSE Area").
Piedmont shall have all rights necessary or convenient for the full use and enjoyment of the USSE Area, including, without
limitation: (1) reasonable access to and from the USSE Area within the Permanent Easement Area and Access
Easement Area;(2) to clear and keep cleared the USSE Area of any and all Obstructions; (3) to install fencing around the
USSE Easement Area; (3) to exclude all persons, including Grantor, from any fenced portions of the USSE Area; and (5)
to install landscaping within or around the USSE Area to screen the utility station site as may be desired by Piedmont or
required by any governmental authority.
Permanent Access Easement. A perpetual access easement for the purposes of ingress, egress, and regress, upon,
over, and across that portion of the Property designated "Access Easement Area" on the Survey ("the Access Easement
Area").
Piedmont shall have the right, but not the obligation, to keep the Access Easement Area cleared of Obstructions and have
the right to construct, reconstruct, maintain, repair, improve, and use roads or driveways within the Access Easement
Area (including, without limitation, grading, graveling, and installing culverts). Any roads or driveways constructed by
Piedmont within the Access Easement Area shall be constructed at Piedmont's sole expense. Piedmont may install gates
within the Access Easement Area, provided that Grantor has a reasonable means of using any gates locked by Piedmont
Piedmont shall not install or permit to be installed any permanent structures in the Access Easement Area except for
fences and gates.
For purposes of this EASEMENT, the term "Easements" shall refer collectively to all easements described above and the
term "Easement Areas" shall refer collectively to all the easement areas described above.
Grantor's Reservation of Rights. Grantor reserves the right to use the Property and Easement Areas for all purposes
that do not unreasonably interfere with the rights granted herein and that are not inconsistent with the rules and
regulations of the North Carolina Utilities Commission, the Guidelines, or any applicable federal, state, or local law, rule,
or regulation. Grantor shall obtain written approval from Piedmont prior to making any use of the Easement Areas.
Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding: (A) Grantor shall not: (1) unreasonably interfere with Piedmont's access
to or maintenance of the Facilities or the Easement Areas, or (2) endanger the safety of Grantor, Piedmont, the general
public, or the Facilities; and (B) Piedmont shall not (1) unreasonably interfere with Grantor's access to, development of or
maintenance of the remainder of the Property, except as provided for herein; provided however, this subsection (13)(1)
shall not impair or otherwise interfere with the rights granted to Piedmont herein to construct, install, maintain, operate,
repair, alter, replace, remove, relocate, inspect, upgrade and protect one or more pipelines and appurtenant facilities
within the Easement Areas in accordance with this Agreement, or (2) endanger the safety of Grantor or its successors,
Piedmont, the general public.
Damages. Piedmont shall be responsible for actual damage to: (1) the land within the Property and Easement Areas;
and (2) improvements and annual crops located on the Property that are not in violation of the terms hereof, provided that
such damage must be caused by Piedmont in exercising the rights granted herein, and provided further that a claim is
made by Grantor within three (3) years after such damages are discovered by Grantor (which for this purpose shall
exclude discovery by Grantor's agents, tenants, guests, invites, or other persons unless such persons notify Grantor of
such damages). Piedmont shall restore and level the surface of the Easement Areas to, as nearly as can be reasonably
done, the same condition as prior to Piedmont's use of the Easement Areas. Piedmont shall not be liable for any damage
caused to Obstructions caused or created by Grantor or permitted to be caused or created by Grantor or improvements
installed by Grantor or caused by or permitted to be caused by Grantor in violation of the terms hereof and may remove
them at Grantor's expense.
No Waiver or Additional Representations. The failure by either party to exercise and/or enforce any of the rights,
privileges, and Easements herein described shall not be construed as a waiver or abandonment of any such rights,
privileges and easements, and either party thereafter may exercise and/or enforce, at any time and from time to time, any
or all of them.
Existing Pipeline Easement. Piedmont has an existing easement across the Property recorded at Deed Book 665,
Page 213, in the Northampton County Registry and shown on the Survey. ("Existing Pipeline Easement"). Nothing herein
shall be deemed to affect, after, supersede or replace the Existing Pipeline Easement. The Existing Pipeline Easement
shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding the execution and recordation of this Easement.
Ownership of the Property. Grantor represents, warrants and covenants that it is the lawful owner of the Property and
has the right to convey the rights set forth herein and that the Property is free from all encumbrances, except for
encumbrances of record.
Indemnification of Grantor. Except for Grantor's gross negligence or willful misconduct, Piedmont agrees to indemnify
and hold Grantor harmless from all loss, cost and expense (including but not limited to reasonable legal fees and
reasonable fees and expenses of experts, if necessary and applicable) on account of the death of or injury to any person
or persons or the damage to or the destruction of any property (including but not limited to wetlands, timber and crops)
arising out of the construction, use and maintenance of the Easement Areas or pipeline(s). Such indemnification shall
not include damage to timber for which Grantor is compensated at the time of the execution of this Easement.
Authorization. The person signing this Easement for each party represents that the person has the authority to sign on
behalf of the entity for which the person is signing and that the Easement is binding on each party.
To have and to hold said rights, privileges, and easements unto Piedmont, its affiliates, successors, and assigns.
Piedmont, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to assign, license, lease, or otherwise transfer, in whole or in
PPAB 3127044v3
PPAB 3445005v

part, this EASEMENT, or any rights granted herein, to any person or entity, including but not limited to, any affiliated
parent or subsidiary entity of Piedmont, for the uses and purposes expressly stated herein. This EASEMENT shall run
with the land and inure to the benefit of and be binding upon Grantor, Piedmont and their respective heirs, successors and
assigns.
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
PPAB 31270440
PPAB 3445005v

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Easement has been signed under seal by Grantor, as of the date first above written.
GRANTOR:
I-95 Enterpri
By:
-,/-�
Name: Richard C. Lowe
Title: Manager
STATE OF V
COUNTY OF
I, Glll. t 0 P-) , a Notary Public of 1012 b C4 W County, State of
_A Waa_ do hereby certify that Richard C. Lowe Manager of 1-95
Enterprises LLC, a Michigan limited liability company, personally appeared before me
this day and acknowledged that by authority duly given and as the act of the limited liability company the foregoing
Easement was signed in its name by him or her in such capacity.
Witness my hand and official seal this th,3 ay of , 20L4
My commission expires: .5 "
STATE OF /1)aii CAa0Lf.iA
COUNTY OF MFS y L N 12Ut4
JULIE K. LANE
NOTARY CPUBLICOUNT),ST TE OF MICHIGAN
My Commission Expi Mav 2017
4ctlnp in the County of en _
PIEDMONT;
Piedmon Natural Gas Company, Inc.
By: n
Name: I L
261
Title: VAIWK %F I.o P^J�S�baw
I, 4 Nnt_g l..JAyµf. IWaa£LIL, ) 2. a Notary Public of County, State of
tJ1pVk C4iZoL-jrJA do hereby certify that ADAM L. 5pt2`i of Piedmont Natural Gas Company,
Inc., a 1J4a-rt C,,;ao,-4 A corporation, personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged that by
authority duly given and as the act of the limited liability company the foregoing Easement was signed in its name by him
or her in such capacity.
Witness my hand and official seal this the H day of 40Vfw6£►L 2010
y NOTARY )f
MY
COMMISSION EXPIRES
t0/Ly2019 V
2.
PUBUG kJ
PPAB 31270440
PPAB 3445005vl
My commission expires: 10 1a3 I

AREA TABLE
POWMENT - N'A EXHIBIT A `
ACCESS EASD/ENT N/A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (TCR) N/A E BTE
UTILITY STATION STE EASEMENT (USSE) 0.27 AC Sl'JNL- 1' 6D'
so 30 0 BO TIF I
1
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCA
U56i AREA
/�/TRACT
�
.4328
PN: 4021-26-743e SES LLC,
TRILBY T. WALL T LOING
D.& 924. PG. 971 MPGI ANY. 1 I
4 ,3&7i uPN: TRACT
4021-2%= BUIND
ID
��
GAS PIPELINE
COMPANY. LIC, A
�O DELAWARE LIMITEDAN
h LIABILITY COMPANY
z
D.B. 563. PG 754 0
u SSE AREA ry
GRAVEL
�V I
� I T
� I
REBAR FOUND I f
W 1,016.127.79 I 0
EE 2,422749.24
R NADSZ ;!RS 2011
^ 19.6 - B
g 56621'06 W 191.CV(TOTAL) .y '
IRON PIPE FOUND N.C. IIWY 48
A
u- 1 M&HS 64 6C PUBLIC
NAD63 (NSRS 2011) TRACT /003-
- PIN: 4021-M-0411
1-95 ENTERPRISES LLL.
A MICHIGAN UNITED
30- 1 20• 11 I LIABILITY COMPANY
20'�. D.B. 670, PG. 153
y� SY TRACT A
r2S I z F I I 1pWmlpnq
PIN: 4021-25-6960
VIRGBDA ELECTRIC i zwa ,¢7, I I �N /
& POWER CO
D.B. sss, PG. 793 SE zW I <W I SEALS = 2
L-4649
GRAVEL
r„
NOTESBtALtRNC ; I I I I �i� p9 rTL
A 1. AREA BY COgmNA1E COIWUTAINIL �rrlrrNlU1N,1\\�``
2 ALL 04TANCES ARE NOPoZONTAL ORQU110. N LK f1I1VCY :ERIE.
S 511B,6T ro ANY AND ALL Fjl4MDRTL RIGHTS-OF-w11V. OF Di15 AM ICE CI.ERX O. 4 DAMM A. NRR. C[RRFY THAT ACT PLAT WAS ORAMN
AS TIE SATE YAr APPEAR RFLORD N 71E RE,GSTER OF OE®5 OFFICE a7RK UNOEIR MY BUPOM ON FROM AN ACTUAL BIALYEY MAGE
LT0lR; Tow OR eoUan TAX OFi10E3, 004 MOON YAY HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED BY UNDER W SUFvtvSIW Cl
OL9fmP1fOM RECORDED N
q /RESQVMVE USL BOOK 870. PAGE 1604 THAT THIS BOUNDAlSS NOT
i 1 THIS SURVEY Is mTOOM FCR THE PURPOSM OF EASEMENTA=9`DW UR
ONLY, AND IB SURVEYED ARE V NOCATEO AS ORA- FROM
NOT INTENDED TO BE A BOUFW" NVEY OF UK LANDS SHOWIEREOA INFORMATION FOND N 9004 & PAGE AS NOTED: THAT THE
L NC CIaD -- AS SHOW HEREON ARE BASED UPON GPS OBSRVATONS RATIO OF PREOSIW 6 1:10.000: AND THAT THIS NAP LEST"
_ UIIUDNG NCW NETWORK RMsYsiDl AW ARE REFDEII�D To THE NAD 93(NiRS THE REaIAREMENTS of THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR
2011) OA7llM. CO/BED FACTOR 1.000I214C IF SNOW. VERTICAL POSfiNRQ AMC LAID SIIRVEYINO W NORTH (12 NCAC 5&1600}
THIS
MAP H 10 y BEER
(EEDD 12A). /�'� /
L CHIS MAP HAS NOT Y A REVERED A A LOCAL BONT R E UL AGENCY FAR /�/�
COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPUV,BLE NAND IIEVLLAPLENT RE[AAAOONS.
RANO A CLARK,RK, PLS PLS L -INS
LEGEND EASEMENT FOR j _ (Y r. -
?=IM
C'.
r, A lam nx m 08 �n VOW
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC. Rgwd orrelDrs,
®TRW PPE SET PG PAGE ACROSS THE LANDS OF B9,a NEST ""cu SIEEr. HATE 100
• CGMPutED POWT (NOF SET) R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY GR0715BORp, NORTH CARONA 27400
-95 ENTERPRISES LLC, NC FIRM LICENSE NO. C-430ofD1ATn roLE I
S ------ FM NENT EAM09T AREA A MICHIGAN LIMITED DRAWN BM. SRM/J"REti6 GN5
g ------ DOSING PVIIW rA4Y DATE: 04/06/16 05/13/2016
RIGHT or WAY LIABILffY COMPANY
AD C T� ARY WE N.C. HIGHWAY 46 im N0. 1529.00 00/02!!016
DEm BOON 670. PAGE 164 GREW OPEf: UN 06/13/206
A ((A BOurmARl UNE PLEASANT HILL TOWNSHIP, NOR RAWTON COUNTY. N.C.
y N000S LEE PROJE4T / 2751320 TRACT / 002 PAGE 1 OF 1
—ow—ou— ovEwEAD M1ElTr

AREA TABLE
1.21 AC
ACCESS ENEASEMENT�T 0.53 AC EXHIBIT A
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (TCE) 1.75 AC A
UTILITY STATION SITE EASEMENT (USSE) 0.52 AC SCALE: 1" - 200'
POC (PE & AE #2) 200 100 0 200 '
1/2" REBAR FOUND WITH CAP 1 L .-
N: 1,016,068.32 POB(PE) POB (AE #2) �r„w
E. 2,422,759.11 5 L1ct _
NA083 (NSRS 2011) _ POS(TCE)— 8
N.C. HW1' 48 1 L9,— -- s
60' PUBLIC R/W
• Y <..' o
PIN: 4021-25-6960
c.
VIRGINIA ELECTR!C
ACCESS
do POWER CC
EREEA T
D.B. 655, PC, 783
58517'28"E
AREA #2
(`208.93'
i
15' TICE AREA
J 1�
I
rn 1
PIN: 4021-25-1503
I
t
COLUMBIA GAS
L4
TRANSMISSION CORP 1„ F N
I
D.B. 661. PG. 101 a o w
1
d'� i0'
JfD I
0
0 0
1
vin
ZV
z I
G- I
co
y W
X�
N84'59'58W
20.00'
POB (USSE)
nPOS
¢
35.21'
(AE 1
I
_
C)
L16 'n LT7 0191
WT -RAND "WRA-A"
20.00'
USSE AREA
S03'21'00'W
ACCESS
EASEMENT L74
AREA #1
� L13 I
n I
1
I
1
1
1
_ _ I
1
POC (USSE do AE#I) 1
Y IRON PIPE FOUND 1
I
N: 1,014,943.70 1 '
E. 2,422.463.95 I
NAD83 (NSRS 2011) 1
PIN: 4021-14-5789
'RILBY T. WALL
D.B. 924, PG. 931
N•
AND
AN
TCE AREA
30' EXISTING PIPELINE EASEMENT
D.B. 665. PG
.99, 205, 182. 187, 190, 193, 196,
$ 208; O.B. 67C, PG. 31
30' EXISTING PANDA EASEMENT
D.B. 668, PG. 354
TRACT #003
PIN: 402144-0411
I-95 ENTERPRISES LLC
A MICHIGAN LIMITED
LIABILITY COMPANTY
D.B. 870, PG. 153
TRACT A
j_ 35' TCE AREA
f
T20' PERMANENT
EASEMENT AREA
LINE LEGEND
n.L — — — — — — PERMANENT EASEMENT AREA
EXISTING PIPELINE EASEMENT
O TCE AREA
— — — —
SUBJECT
BOUNDARY LINEADJOI`BOUNDARY LINE\`�111CAJR
1I1
(ADO SURVEYED)
BOUNDARY LINE
mwwwYYY1r>. WOODS UNE
—OHV—«HIL— OVERHEAD UTILITY = SEAL
LINE TABLE
PERMANENT
ACCESS
20' PERMANENT
EREEA T
EASEMENT AREA
20' ACCESS EASELHEUr
N87'06'42"E
AREA #2
L2
15' TICE AREA
J 1�
20.12'
30' EXISTING PIPELINE EASEMENT
D.B. 665. PG
.99, 205, 182. 187, 190, 193, 196,
$ 208; O.B. 67C, PG. 31
30' EXISTING PANDA EASEMENT
D.B. 668, PG. 354
TRACT #003
PIN: 402144-0411
I-95 ENTERPRISES LLC
A MICHIGAN LIMITED
LIABILITY COMPANTY
D.B. 870, PG. 153
TRACT A
j_ 35' TCE AREA
f
T20' PERMANENT
EASEMENT AREA
LINE LEGEND
n.L — — — — — — PERMANENT EASEMENT AREA
EXISTING PIPELINE EASEMENT
O TCE AREA
— — — —
SUBJECT
BOUNDARY LINEADJOI`BOUNDARY LINE\`�111CAJR
1I1
(ADO SURVEYED)
BOUNDARY LINE
mwwwYYY1r>. WOODS UNE
—OHV—«HIL— OVERHEAD UTILITY = SEAL
NOTES ....._ I • I . 1,..
1. AREA BY COORDINATE COMPUTATION.
2. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND. N US SURVEY FEET.
3. SUBJECT TO ANY AND ALL EASEMENTS. R047S-OF-WAY, STREETS AND ASSESSMO T5.
AS THE SAME MAY APPEAR OF RECORD IN THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE. CLERK OF
COURT. TOWN OR COUNTY TAX OFFICES OR WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED BY
PRESCRIPTIVE USE
4. THIS SURVEY 15 INTENDED FOR THE PURPOSES OF EASEMENT ACQUISITION ONLY. AND 15
NOT INTENDED TO BE A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON.
S NC GRID COORDINATES AS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON GPS OBSERVATIONS
UTILIZING NCGS' NETWORK RTK SYSTEM AND ARE REFERENCED TO THE NAD 83(NSRS
2011) DATUM. COMBINED FACTOR 1.000121485 IF SHOWN. VERTICAL POSITIONS ARE
REFERENCED TO NAW m (GEOID 12A).
S. THIS MAP HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY FOR
COMPUARCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
L-4649:
i%'o
,, �Ip'A• C�P��:
WWII/IIIIII11111`V
4 DAVID A. CLARK CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SIRERV1S10N (DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED M
BOOK 870, PACE 153); THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT
SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM
INFORMATION FOUND N BOOK & PAGE AS NOTED: THAT THE
RATIO OF PRECISION IS 1:10,000: AND THAT THIS MAP MEETS
THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR
IANO_� NORTH 9AROUNA (12 NCAC 56.1600).
P.IZSI6
DAVID A. CLARK, PLS L-4649
LEGEND
LINE TABLE
PERMANENT
WETLAND
EASEMENT
AREA
AREA
N87'06'42"E
NOTES ....._ I • I . 1,..
1. AREA BY COORDINATE COMPUTATION.
2. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND. N US SURVEY FEET.
3. SUBJECT TO ANY AND ALL EASEMENTS. R047S-OF-WAY, STREETS AND ASSESSMO T5.
AS THE SAME MAY APPEAR OF RECORD IN THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE. CLERK OF
COURT. TOWN OR COUNTY TAX OFFICES OR WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED BY
PRESCRIPTIVE USE
4. THIS SURVEY 15 INTENDED FOR THE PURPOSES OF EASEMENT ACQUISITION ONLY. AND 15
NOT INTENDED TO BE A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON.
S NC GRID COORDINATES AS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON GPS OBSERVATIONS
UTILIZING NCGS' NETWORK RTK SYSTEM AND ARE REFERENCED TO THE NAD 83(NSRS
2011) DATUM. COMBINED FACTOR 1.000121485 IF SHOWN. VERTICAL POSITIONS ARE
REFERENCED TO NAW m (GEOID 12A).
S. THIS MAP HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY FOR
COMPUARCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
L-4649:
i%'o
,, �Ip'A• C�P��:
WWII/IIIIII11111`V
4 DAVID A. CLARK CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SIRERV1S10N (DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED M
BOOK 870, PACE 153); THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT
SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM
INFORMATION FOUND N BOOK & PAGE AS NOTED: THAT THE
RATIO OF PRECISION IS 1:10,000: AND THAT THIS MAP MEETS
THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR
IANO_� NORTH 9AROUNA (12 NCAC 56.1600).
P.IZSI6
DAVID A. CLARK, PLS L-4649
LEGEND
LINE TABLE
]�
RTeema] I and Sumyors, Inc.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
NC FIRM UCENSE NO. C-1362
LINE
BEARING
LENGTH
U
N87'06'42"E
60.36'
L2
N87'06'42'E
20.12'
L3
503'21'00'W
329.20'
L4
S05'00'02"W
600.13'
L5
N87'06'42"E
20.12'
L6
S03'21'00'W
331.61
L7
505'00'02"W
600.42'
L8
N84'59'58W
20.00'
L9
N87'06'42'E
35.21'
L10
503'21'00'W
96.27'
L11
N86'39'00'W
20.00'
L12
S03'21'00'W
239.45'
L13
N85'13'36"W
30.00'
L14
N85'13'36"W
150.00'
L15
NO5'00'02'E
150.00'
L16
585'13'36"E
57.32'
L17
S85'1 3'36"E
150.00'
LIS
S05'00'02"W
150.00'
L19
S85'13'36"E
30.00"
L20
S05'00'02"W
150.00'
L21
NO3'21'00'E
279.56'
NOTES ....._ I • I . 1,..
1. AREA BY COORDINATE COMPUTATION.
2. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND. N US SURVEY FEET.
3. SUBJECT TO ANY AND ALL EASEMENTS. R047S-OF-WAY, STREETS AND ASSESSMO T5.
AS THE SAME MAY APPEAR OF RECORD IN THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE. CLERK OF
COURT. TOWN OR COUNTY TAX OFFICES OR WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED BY
PRESCRIPTIVE USE
4. THIS SURVEY 15 INTENDED FOR THE PURPOSES OF EASEMENT ACQUISITION ONLY. AND 15
NOT INTENDED TO BE A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON.
S NC GRID COORDINATES AS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON GPS OBSERVATIONS
UTILIZING NCGS' NETWORK RTK SYSTEM AND ARE REFERENCED TO THE NAD 83(NSRS
2011) DATUM. COMBINED FACTOR 1.000121485 IF SHOWN. VERTICAL POSITIONS ARE
REFERENCED TO NAW m (GEOID 12A).
S. THIS MAP HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY FOR
COMPUARCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
L-4649:
i%'o
,, �Ip'A• C�P��:
WWII/IIIIII11111`V
4 DAVID A. CLARK CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE
UNDER MY SIRERV1S10N (DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED M
BOOK 870, PACE 153); THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT
SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM
INFORMATION FOUND N BOOK & PAGE AS NOTED: THAT THE
RATIO OF PRECISION IS 1:10,000: AND THAT THIS MAP MEETS
THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR
IANO_� NORTH 9AROUNA (12 NCAC 56.1600).
P.IZSI6
DAVID A. CLARK, PLS L-4649
LEGEND
EASEMENT FOR
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.
ACROSS THE LANDS OF
1-95 ENTERPRISES, LLC
A MICHIGAN LIMITED
LIABILITY COMPANY
N.C. HIGHWAY 48
DEED BOOK 870, PAGE 153
PLEASANT HILL TOWNSHIP,
NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, N.C.
PROJECT # 2751320 TRACT # 003j
]�
RTeema] I and Sumyors, Inc.
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
NC FIRM UCENSE NO. C-1362
♦ROM FOUND
@M PIPE SET
• COMPUTED POINT (NOT SET)
lc�UTILITY POLE
B PINCH IDP FOUND
D.B. D® BOOK
P.B. PLAT BOOK
PAGE
R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY
DRAWN BY. SRM/.BH REVISIONS
DATE: 04/06/16 04/20/16 08/23/16
Jpg N0. 1329.00 04/22/18
iCREW CHIEF: JM 04/26/16
07/07/16
PAGE 1 OF 2

2
i
! i ICE AREA
20' PERMANENT
EASEMENT AREA
30' EXISTING PIPELINE EASEMENT
D.B. 665, p
H 193, 196, 199 182, 187, 190,
D.B. 670, PG. 310, 208, & 213;
I 30' EXISTING PANDA EASELHENT
D.B. 668, PG. 354
1
I
i TRACT #003
' ' 1 PIN: 4021 44 0411
I I-95 ENTERPRISES LLC
i A MICHIGAN LIIvII'i`ED
1 LIABILITY COMPANY
THS AREA PERMANENT V&7LAND
EASEMENT AREA
AREA
LINE TABLE
AREA TABLE
BEARING
LENGTH
L22
S43'SO'27'W
127.63'
PERMANENT EASEMENT
1'21 AC
EXHIBIT
A
N33 -6'22'W
27.66'
ACCESS EASEMENT
0.53 AC
1.65'
L26
S43W27'W
106.06'
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (TCE)
1.75 AC
20.08'
L28
100.78'
UTILITY STATION SHE EASEMENT (USSE)
10.52 AC
SCALE: 1' 200'
1•=60
STREAM
/
'SRA'LINE
200 100 0
e
200
11G
-----`�11111uuUr����
TRACT 07 —
C
PERMANENT EASEMENT AREA '04i
EASEMENT
•YeM1
TCE AREAPtPEUNE =�� Q4�.
SUBJECT WAY— SEAL —
♦ A NORTH CAROLINA
c j / COPORA TION \
LINE
L-4649 .
AD OIN
0.8. 1006, PG. 554 \
P.B. 27. PG 173 \ r•rrvwvwwv♦
R BOUNDARY UNE
(NOT SURVEYED) f� {Q� ~
WOODS UNE�•�•:
IN: 4021-14-5789
p 1. AREA BY COORDINATE COMPUTATION.
lIA71117P`♦♦
TR LBY
D.B. 9247 PC.. 931
L DANA A. CLARK. CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN
( AS THE SAME MAY APPEAR OF RECORD IN THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE, CLERK OF
UNDER MY SUPEIMON FROM AN ACTUAL SURVE
2
i
! i ICE AREA
20' PERMANENT
EASEMENT AREA
30' EXISTING PIPELINE EASEMENT
D.B. 665, p
H 193, 196, 199 182, 187, 190,
D.B. 670, PG. 310, 208, & 213;
I 30' EXISTING PANDA EASELHENT
D.B. 668, PG. 354
1
I
i TRACT #003
' ' 1 PIN: 4021 44 0411
I I-95 ENTERPRISES LLC
i A MICHIGAN LIIvII'i`ED
1 LIABILITY COMPANY
THS AREA PERMANENT V&7LAND
EASEMENT AREA
AREA
�i r i
I-
l• I
D.B. 870, PG. 153
1 L TRACT A
LINE TABLE
UNE
BEARING
LENGTH
L22
S43'SO'27'W
127.63'
L23
N161B'29'W
7.17'
L24
N33 -6'22'W
27.66'
L25
N51'09'48W
1.65'
L26
S43W27'W
106.06'
L27
NSTTxJ'46-W
20.08'
L28
N43'S0'27'E
100.78'
�i r i
I-
l• I
D.B. 870, PG. 153
1 L TRACT A
I H
- /• -
•
••i�$;
WETLAND - L I .
I I
•. ti " �, .:: •:.�% .
,
CA OF STREAM
�J
N17.%
�• •' '•
IS BOUNDARY LIN.
�.
/
4021-13-3075•�51REA_
-
'SRA •"•
WIN CITY RIFLE CLUB INC/
/ .�2 � . .
,r`yb
A NORTH CAROUNA ♦
• / :.:- - . . - -
-
COPORATION SEE DETAIL "A'
D.B. 897, PG. 450
/ / _ S�.--
DETAIL "A'
1•=60
STREAM
/
'SRA'LINE
LEEGM
♦
-----`�11111uuUr����
TRACT 07 —
C
PERMANENT EASEMENT AREA '04i
EASEMENT
_--_--_
PIN: 4021-2222-0749
TWIN CITY RIFLE CLUB INC—
TCE AREAPtPEUNE =�� Q4�.
SUBJECT WAY— SEAL —
♦ A NORTH CAROLINA
c j / COPORA TION \
LINE
L-4649 .
AD OIN
0.8. 1006, PG. 554 \
P.B. 27. PG 173 \ r•rrvwvwwv♦
R BOUNDARY UNE
(NOT SURVEYED) f� {Q� ~
WOODS UNE�•�•:
SUR,:
OVERHEAD UTILITY %q ♦�
p 1. AREA BY COORDINATE COMPUTATION.
lIA71117P`♦♦
2 ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND. IN US SURVEY FEET.
J. SUB,ECT TO ANY AND ALL EASEMENTS, RIGHTS—OF—WAY. STREETS AND ASSESSMENTS,
L DANA A. CLARK. CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN
( AS THE SAME MAY APPEAR OF RECORD IN THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OFFICE, CLERK OF
UNDER MY SUPEIMON FROM AN ACTUAL SURVE
I COURT. TOWN OR COUNTY TAX OFFICES. OR WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED BY
UNDER MY SUPVr4SM (DEED DESCRIPTION RECORDED N
PRESCRIPTIVE USE.
BOOK 870. PACE 1531- THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT
4. THIS SURVEY IS INTENDED FOR THE PURPOSES OF EASEMENT ACQUISITION ONLY. AND IS
NOT INTENDED TO BE A BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE LANDS SHOWN HEREON.
SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED AS DRAWN FROM
INFORMATION FOUND N BOOK & PAGE AS NOTED: THAT THE
.I 5. NC GRID COORDINATES AS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPM! GPS OBSERVATIONS
UTILIZING NCGS• NETWORK RTK SYSTEM AND ARE REFERENCED TO THE NAD 83(NSRS
RATIO OF PRECISION 15 1:10.000: AND 7HA7 THIS MAP MEETS
THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR
2071) DATUM. COMBINED FACTOR 1.000121485 IF SHOWN, VERTICAL POSITIONS ARE
?
tANO 5�1RVEYING IN (12 NCAC 56.1600).
REFERENCED TO NAVD 86 (GEOID 12A).
6. THIS MAP HAS NOT BEET REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY FOR
i /N/f1R7H
i!�Fl�
COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND DE`F'OPMENT REGULATIONS
—/l _4"'/•
DAVID x C`ARK, PIS L-4649
1 LEGEND
EASEMENT FOR
�p+
♦REEIAR FOUND
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY,
INC.
Reeanal LandT�"rs, Inc.
@)IRON PIPE FOUND
ACROSS THE LANDS OF
8642 WEST MARKET STREET, SUITE 100
4 O PIPE SET
L MIM
1-95 ENTERPRISES,
LLC
GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA 27409
NC FIRM LICENSE NOL C-1352
• coMPUTED vaNT (NOT sET)
POLE
A MICHIGAN LIMITED
DRAWN BY: SRM/JBHj REVISIONS
'crUTLrTY
B PINCH TOP FOUND
LIABILITY COMPANY
DATE: 04/06/16 04/20/16 08/23/16
D.B. D® BOOKN.C.
HIGHWAY 48
DEED BOOK 870. PAGE
753
JOB NO. '529.00 04/22/18
s PB. PLAT BOOK
ILL
CRE F: JIM 1 04/26/16
R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY
NOPAGE RTHAMPTTOHN COUNTY.HN.C.
o7/m/1s
PROJECT 111 2751320
TRACT 111 003
PAGE 2 OF 2

Total Compensation Agreement for Permanent Easement,
Temporary Construction Easement and Damages ("Agreement")
Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. ("PNG")
Line 6 Corridor Replacements
Project Tract # NORT-002 and -003
Landowner Name: I-95 Enterprises, LLC, A Michigan Limited Liability Company
Address: Attn: Richard C. Lowe, Manager
2375 Woodlake Dr., Ste 380
Okemos, MI 48864
In consideration of the right(s) of way and/or easement(s) dated November _, 2016 (collectively,
"Easement") granted by Landowner to PNG, PNG agrees to pay to Landowner the following amounts:
1. Permanent Easement: 1.21 acres X $ per acre 7 260.00
2. Temporary Easement: 1.75 acres X $ per acre 10 500.00
3. Access Easement: 0.66 acres X $ per acre 6,460.00
4. Utility Station Site: 0.79 acres X $ per acre 26 740.00
5. Signing Bonus:
6. Additional Easement Acreage Allowance:
0
7. Multiple Line Rights Payment: _rods X $ 1.00 per rod 0
8. Damages: (List type, i.e. timber, crops, landscaping, etc.)
Timber 4.40 acres X $
per acre 8,800.00
Crops _acres X $
per acre 0
Other: Severance of 1.05 acres
5 500.00
Other: Professional Services (see below)
Total Damage Cost:
-JAM.
This Agreement shall be governed by North Carolina law.
TOTAL COMPENSATION
65,260.00
741,
Landowner's signature
Date
Land is signatur y Date
_ 1l le-* izcl�,
Pied mo t Natural Gas Land Agent Signature Date
Qp.jN"1 P O�3-j-Lk-
PPA13 3471352v 1-07132016 1027/2016