20150994 Ver 3_401 Application_20170117

Pre -Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WQC 3884
PSNC T-01 Replacement Project Phase II
Polk, Rutherford and Cleveland Counties, N.C.
S&ME Project No. 7435-16-013
Submitted on Behalf of:
PSNC Energy
100 SCANA Parkway, MC 202
Cayce, S.C. 29033
Prepared by:
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28273
January 9, 2017

•
January 9, 2017
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801
Attention: Mr. David Brown, P.G
N.C. Division of Water Resources
401 Wetlands Unit
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins
Reference: Pre -Construction Notification: NWP No. 12/WQC No. 3884
PSNC Line T-01 Replacement Project Phase II
Polk, Rutherford and Cleveland Counties, North Carolina
S&ME Project No. 7435-16-013
Dear Mr. Brown and Ms. Higgins:
On behalf of our client, PSNC Energy (PSNC), S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) is pleased to submit this application for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. in accordance with Nationwide Permit (NWP) No. 12 and the corresponding
North Carolina Water Quality Certification (WQC) No. 3884. The proposed project will involve
construction of approximately 48 miles of natural gas pipeline that is compliant with current federally -
mandated requirements.
This PCN is being provided to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for approval, and complies with
all applicable conditions of NWP No. 12. Written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (NCDWR) is also required in part because the proposed project does not meet condition
numbers 10 and 16 of WQC No. 3884, as specified below:
Condition No. 10: The proposed gas line will not cross all streams within the project corridor at a near -
perpendicular angle. A majority of the new line will be installed within the existing Line T-01 utility
easement, where not all streams are crossed within the tolerance identified in the aforementioned WQC.
Similarly, not all streams within proposed greenfield segments of the project will be crossed at a near
perpendicular angle for a variety of reasons, including to preserve landowner property value by abutting
existing property lines, and topographic, natural resources or engineering -related constraints.
Condition No. 16: The proposed project will require a combined temporary and permanent construction
easement greater than 40 -foot wide at stream and wetland crossings where the pipe will be installed. In
upland areas, the work will occur within either a 95 -or 110 -foot wide area (combined permanent and
temporary easements), depending on the location of the existing pipe. In general, the workspace will be
S&ME, Inc. 19751 Southern Pine Boulevard I Charlotte, NC 28273 1 p 704.523.4726 1 f 704.525.3953 1 www.smeinc.com

Pre -Construction Notification S&ME Project No. 7435-16-013
PSNC T-01 Replacement Project Phase II January 9. 2017
narrowed to 80 feet or less at stream/wetland crossings. In most of these areas, an 80 -foot wide
easement is required to safely accommodate the equipment and work space necessary to install the 24 -
inch pipe. A natural gas pipeline is present within the existing maintained easement. The 80 -foot wide
proposed working corridor is necessary to maintain safe distances between the existing pipeline and the
proposed replacement pipeline, as well as provide additional space for equipment to work safely over the
existing pipeline. While there is no formal guidance regarding the distance that must be maintained
between installed pipelines, the industry standard is a minimum of 10 feet. Where the new easement will
parallel an existing easement, a portion of the proposed 80 feet will lie within the existing corridor, based
on the proximity of the existing pipeline to the edge of the existing easement. At four locations where
conventional crossings are proposed and the subject streams are wider than 35 feet, additional temporary
workspace in excess of 30 feet will be required.
By copy of this correspondence and completed PCN, we are requesting your written concurrence with this
NWP No. 12 permit application. If you have questions or need additional information, please feel free to
contact us at 704.523.4726.
Sincerely,
S&ME
P7=5 -
Joey Lawler, PWS
Project Manager
[e-mail]
Senior Reviewed by Chris Stahl, PE
Dave Homans
Natural Resources / GIS Project Professional
[e-mail]

Pre -Construction Notification S&ME Project No. 7435-16-013
PSNC T-01 Phase II Pipeline Project January 9. 2017
Contents
1.0 General Project Information...............................................................................1
1.1 General Vegetative Conditions.......................................................................................1
1.2 Jurisdictional Areas.......................................................................................................... 3
2.0 Description of the Proposed Work....................................................................4
2.1 General Pipeline Construction........................................................................................4
2.2 Stream/Wetland Crossing Methods............................................................................... 5
Conventional Bore and HDD.......................................................................................................................5
Conventional Isolation Installation..............................................................................................................6
2.3 Additional Construction..................................................................................................8
3.0 Proposed Project Impacts.....................................................................................8
4.0 Avoidance and Minimization............................................................................. 9
5.0 Additional Regulatory Considerations...........................................................10
5.1 Federally -Protected Species..........................................................................................10
5.2 Historic and Cultural Resources...................................................................................13
5.3 Sediment and Erosion Control......................................................................................13
5.4 Mitigation........................................................................................................................14
5.5 SEPA Compliance...........................................................................................................15
Figures
Figure 1 - Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2-9 - USGS Topographic Map
Figures 10-40 - Aerial Photographs
Appendices
Appendix I —
Completed PCN and Agent Authorization Letter
Appendix II —
Representative Site Photographs
Appendix III
— Impact Tables
Appendix IV
— Jurisdictional Impact Drawings (Figures 41-207)
Appendix V —
Typical Stream and Wetland Impact Detail Drawings
Appendix VI
— General Restoration Plan
Appendix VII
— Agency Correspondence and DCM Acceptance Letter

Pre -Construction Notification S&ME Project No. 7435-16-013
PSNC T-01 Phase II Pipeline Project January 9. 2017
1.0 General Project Information
The proposed project consists of replacement of an aging segment of 8 -inch pipeline with a new 24 -inch
diameter steel pipeline, approximately 48 miles in length, beginning near Mill Spring, North Carolina and
ending near a proposed station site near Kings Mountain, North Carolina. Safe, reliable operation of
PSNC's pipeline system, along with the safety of their customers and employees, are PSNC's main goals.
Like any natural gas utility, the operation and maintenance of PSNC's pipeline system is subject to
extensive state and federal regulations and requirements. At the Federal level, these regulations fall under
the Department of Transportation (D.O.T.), specifically — the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA). To that end, the primary purpose of the proposed project is to replace the old
pipeline with a new one that is compatible with current federally -mandated safety and inspection
requirements, and is capable of increasing service capabilities and reliability for PSNC's customers in this
portion of North Carolina.
In general, the project route begins at the terminus of the recent Phase 1 of the Line T-01 Replacement
Project (Action ID 2015-00487) approximately one mile west of the intersection of N.C. State Highway 9
and N.C. State Highway 108, adjacent to Silver Creek Road near Mill Spring in Polk County (35.306819°N,
82.174132°W). A majority of the new pipeline (approximately 77 percent) will be installed within the
existing, maintained easement. The remaining 23 percent of the pipe will be constructed in a new,
permanent greenfield easement. The new permanent easement was necessary to avoid areas adjacent to
the existing pipeline that have become developed to the extent that installation of the pipe was not
practicable. In these greenfield areas, the new permanent easement will not exceed 50 feet in width.
PSNC proposes to maintain a 50 -feet easement in these areas for visibility concerns, as previously noted,
and for consistency with maintenance of existing pipeline easement.
The location of the project corridor is depicted on the Site Vicinity Map (Figure 1), USGS Topographic
Maps (Figures 2-9) and 2014 Aerial Photographs (Figures 10-40).
The project area is located in the Piedmont physiographic province in the Upper Broad River Basin
(03050105). General land use in the vicinity of the project corridor consists of a mix of undeveloped
woodland, residential areas, livestock pasture and open fields. Portions of the project corridor are located
close to areas composed of commercial and light industrial development.
Photographs of typical project area conditions are included in Appendix II. The project corridor consists
of the stabilized disturbance area of the existing pipeline easement, and is abutted by young successional
forest, mature hardwood forest, pasture/agricultural fields and maintained lawn areas.
1.1 General Vegetative Conditions
The project corridor consists of a variety of land cover types, including the stabilized disturbance area of
the existing active pipeline easement, young successional forest, mature hardwood and mixed pine -
hardwood forest, agricultural fields and maintained lawn areas. Primarily, the proposed pipeline
replacement project will be carried out within areas that are formerly cleared, active agricultural areas, and
shrubby edge habitat dominated by typical aggressive edge colonizing plants under intact forest canopy
of varying habitat types and in varying successional stages. A smaller percentage of the project will occur
in cross-country routes that do not adjoin an existing utility line.

Pre -Construction Notification S&ME Project No. 7435-16-013
PSNC T-01 Phase II Pipeline Project January 9. 2017
As the primary work area will consist of actively -maintained easement, vegetation types within this area
consist of intergrades of sunlight -influenced edge characteristics, and often a mix of opportunistic, sub -
mature woody vegetation. Although conditions of the vegetative community in the narrow, linear project
area do not uniformly lend to characterization per a natural area classification system, using the habitat
types described in the Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth Approximation
(Schafale, Michael P., NCNHP), natural communities encountered within and along the proposed project
route include Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest (Piedmont subtype), Basic Mesic Forest (Piedmont Subtype),
Rich Cove Forest, Dry-Mesic—Oak Hickory Forest, Dry Oak -Hickory Forest, Piedmont/Low Mountain
Alluvial Forest, Piedmont/Mountain Levee Forest, Low Elevation Seep, Piedmont Headwater Stream Forest
(Typic Subtype), and Piedmont Alluvial Forest.
The existing, non -forested T-01 utility corridor comprised the largest land use type observed. Although
vegetation within this regularly -maintained easement varied greatly, general species observed included
fescue (Festuca sp.), goldenrod (Solidago spp.), ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), sawtooth blackberry
(Rubus argutus), Chinese bushclover (Lespedeza cuneata), common blue violet (Viola sororia), white clover
(Trifolium repens), sweet vernalgrass (Anthoxonthum odoratum), dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium),
American pokeweed (Phytolocca americana), winged sumac (Rhus copollina), poison ivy (Toxicodendron
radicans), wineberry (R. phoenicolasius), little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), dandelion (Taraxacum
officinale), Queen Anne's lace (Daucus carota), muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia), kudzu (Pueraria
montana), and a number of other grasses and volunteer species. Woody saplings observed within less -
frequently maintained portions of the utility easements included sassafras (Sassafras albidium), sweetgum
(Liquidambarstyraciflua), tulip tree (Liriodendron tulipifera), red maple (Acerrubrum), box elder (Acer
negundo), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense), and black cherry (Prunus
serotina).
Forested areas adjacent to the existing cleared easement that were dominated by hardwood species
typically included American beech (Fagus grandifolia), tulip tree, red maple, southern red oak (Quercus
falcata), box elder, green ash, willow oak (Q. phellos), river birch (Betula nigra), post oak (Q. stellata), and
white oak (Q. alba) in the canopy. Subcanopy species typically included American holly (Ilex opaca),
flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), persimmon (Diospyros virginiana), eastern red cedar (Juniperus
virginiana), American beech, and sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum). Shrubs included spicebush (Lindera
benzoin), eastern sweetshrub (Calyconthus floridus), paw paw (Asimina triloba), mountain -laurel (Kalmia
latifolia,) sassafras, amur honeysuckle bush (Lonicera moackii), Chinese privet, and multiflora rose (Rosa
multiflora). Dominant vines in deciduous wooded areas included crossvine (Anisostichus capreolatus),
muscadine grape, roundleaf greenbriar (Smilax rotundifolia), Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica),
Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), and poison ivy. Herbaceous vegetation typically included
sawtooth blackberry, wineberry, little bluestem, goldenrod, giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea), hairy
Solomon's seal (Polygonatum pubescens), Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), partridge berry
(Mitchella repens), ebony spleenwort (Asplenium platyneuron), little brown jug (Hexastylis arifolia),
clubmoss (Lycopodium flabelliforme), spotted wintergreen (Chimaphila maculata), and downy rattlesnake
plantain (Goodyera pubescens).
Forested areas adjacent to the existing cleared easement that were dominated by pine species included
loblolly pine (Pinus taedo), shortleaf pine (P. echinota), and Virginia pine (P. virginiana) in the overstory.
Additional species observed included red maple, sweetgum, tulip tree, southern red oak, Eastern red -
cedar and American beech. Shrubs included sassafras, flowering dogwood, and Chinese privet. Typical
woody vines included Virginia creeper, poison ivy, roundleaf greenbrier, muscadine grape, and Japanese
honeysuckle. Herbaceous vegetation in pine forested areas include Christmas fern, Japanese stilt -grass,
Canada wild ginger (Asarum canadense), and various grasses.

Pre -Construction Notification S&ME Project No. 7435-16-013
PSNC T-01 Phase II Pipeline Project January 9. 2017
The project corridor also passed through numerous areas than can be classified as successional forest.
Such areas included those that were clear-cut or thinned for timbering, or those that were cleared but not
otherwise developed, and are in the early -to -mid stages of re -vegetation. Typical tree species in these
areas included black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia), green ash, box elder, sweetgum, tulip tree, red maple,
loblolly pine and black cherry. Shrubs in the area included sassafras, amur honeysuckle bush, Chinese
privet and multiflora rose. Woody vines in successional forested areas included roundleaf greenbrier,
poison ivy, kudzu, and Virginia creeper. Typical herbaceous vegetation included sawtooth blackberry,
dogfennel, arrowleaf tearthumb (Persicaria sagittate), American pokeberry, various panic grasses (Panicum
spp.), red and white clover (Trifolium spp.), and other grass species.
In addition to the general land use types identified above, the project corridor also passed through large
areas of active agricultural land. A majority of these areas included herbaceous cultivated crops and hay
field grasses, while also common were active horse or cattle pastures. Species located in pastureland
included fescue, barnyard grass (Echinochloa crusgalli), horse nettle (Solanum carolinense), broadleaf
signal grass (Brachiaria platyphylla), Johnson grass (Sorghum holepense), sawtooth blackberry, dogfennel,
crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis), buttercup (Ranunculus spp.), goldenrod, American pokeberry, partridge
pea (Chamaecrista fasciculate), morning glory (Ipomoea purpurea), ragweed, little bluestem, red and white
clover, and various grasses.
1.2 Jurisdictional Areas
S&ME wetland professionals delineated Waters of the U.S. within a majority of the project corridor in May
through July 2016. Additional field visits were subsequently conducted through November 2016 to assess
re-routed areas, access roads, and laydown areas. The delineation was conducted utilizing currently
accepted methods for wetland determination, as set forth in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual and the corresponding Eastern Mountain and Piedmont Region USACE Regional
Supplement Guide, which states that under normal circumstances, an area must demonstrate the
presence of 3 components to be considered jurisdictional: 1) hydrophytic vegetation, 2) hydric soils, and
3) wetland hydrology. When necessary, stream assessments were conducted in accordance with NCDWR
and USACE guidelines.
Areas determined to be jurisdictional wetlands were dominated by red maple, sweetgum, American
hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana), black willow (Salix nigra), river birch, green ash, boxelder, and tulip tree.
Shrubs included Chinese privet, American holly, spice bush, and buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis).
Woody vines in typical wetland areas included poison ivy, muscadine grape, and roundleaf greenbrier
Herbaceous vegetation includes netted -chain fern (Woodwardia areolato), sensitive fern (Onoclea
sensibilis), common lady fern (Athyrium filix-femino), cinnamon fern (Osmundastrum cinnamomeum),
common rush (Juncus effusus), sedges (Carex. spp.), jewelweed (Impatiens capensis), giant cane,
possumhaw (Viburnum nudum), spiked false -nettle (Boehmeria cylindrica), green arrow arum (Peltandra
virginica), Japanese stilt -grass (Microstegium vimineum), prostrate knotweed (Polygonum aviculare), and
various grasses.
The boundaries of jurisdictional areas were identified in the field using Global Positioning System (GPS)
units capable of sub -meter accuracy. The field review resulted in delineation of 57 wetland or open water
areas and 107 streams within the proposed work area. Of these, all 57 of the wetland areas and 101 of
the streams will be affected by the project. Jurisdictional features are depicted on the Jurisdictional
Impact drawings, included in Appendix IV.
3

Pre -Construction Notification S&ME Project No. 7435-16-013
PSNC T-01 Phase II Pipeline Project January 9. 2017
A Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (Pre -JD) package that included USACE Stream
Assessment Sheets, NCDENR Stream Identification Sheets, and Routine Wetland Determination Data
forms for each general type of wetland observed was initially provided to the USACE on October 14, 2016.
Representatives of the USACE (David Brown and Steve Kichefski) and NCDWR (Kevin Mitchell) visited the
project site on November 17, 2016 to approve the delineation and verify the location/classification of
affected features. A revised Request for Pre -JD that reflected reductions in the proposed workspace
(review area) as well as minor adjustments to the proposed route was re -submitted on January 5 2017.
2.0 Description of the Proposed Work
2.1 General Pipeline Construction
Construction of the new pipeline will first involve demarcation of clearing limits, jurisdictional boundaries,
and other associated workspaces, etc. In high ground areas, up to an additional 50 feet of temporary
workspace (TWS) adjacent to the existing easement will be required to safely install the new pipe. At
stream and wetland crossings, the TWS will be reduced to 30 feet, and the pipe will be installed within the
existing, maintained easement. In wetland areas, efforts will be made to remove surface vegetation in a
manner that minimizes disturbance of the substrate and prevents exposure of soil. If necessary,
temporary equipment crossings will be installed along one side of the easement to facilitate equipment
passage, cross over streams, and prevent excessive rutting and ground disturbance in the wetlands.
Appropriate sediment and erosion control (S&EC) measures will be installed as clearing proceeds to
prevent sedimentation of jurisdictional features.
Grubbing and below -ground vegetation removal will be minimized within wetlands or along stream
banks. Where the pipe will be installed by conventional means (e.g. "open -trench" or "isolation"),
grubbing will be limited, to the extent practicable, to the trench line. Select upland portions of the
easement may require rough grading to facilitate safe passage of equipment, and to prepare a suitably -
level work surface. Within wetland areas where extensive rutting or soil disturbance may occur, timber
mats are planned for use to provide work and travel space for equipment.
Following preparation of the work area and installation of necessary S&EC measures, the trench will be
excavated along the "non -working" side of the easement. Subsurface disturbance will only be conducted
within the trench line at wetlands and stream crossings. Stump removal or light grading may occur on the
working side of the easement if required for safety reasons. The work will be performed from the timber
mats placed along the working side of the easement. In certain areas, including wetlands and fields
supporting crops, efforts will be made to segregate topsoil from the subsoil. If necessary, trench breakers
(temporary barriers generally constructed of sand bags or similarly suitable material) will be installed
within the trench to slow the flow of subsurface water.
In general, approximately 55 -foot lengths of the 24 -inch pipe will be trucked to the site from temporary
storage yards, strung along the easement and placed on skids (wooden pedestals). Specialized machines
will be used to bend individual segments of pipe to fit the contours of the trench where necessary. The
pipe segments will be welded together, x-rayed, the structural integrity and surface coating inspected,
and then lowered into the trench. Segments of the trench may require dewatering or "padding" to
prevent large rocks or other debris from coming in contact with the pipe. Permanent trench breakers will
then be installed where necessary and the trench backfilled. In areas where segregation of the subsoil
and topsoil is required, the topsoil will be replaced last. Affected areas will then be "cleaned up" by
M

Pre -Construction Notification S&ME Project No. 7435-16-013
PSNC T-01 Phase II Pipeline Project January 9. 2017
rough -grading and temporary seeding (if necessary), followed by final grading, permanent seeding and
mulching to restore the easement as closely as possible to pre -disturbance contours and conditions.
All work within wetlands and streams will be conducted in accordance with the applicable permits. Best
Management Practices (BMP's) will be employed at all stream and wetland crossings to help prevent
siltation or inadvertent discharges to a Waters of the U.S. Jurisdictional Impact drawings associated with
each individual stream and wetland crossing are included in Appendix IV.
2.2 Stream/Wetland Crossing Methods
There are many factors that affect selection of an appropriate and constructible installation method for a
natural gas pipeline. Typical methods of installation include HDD (horizontal directional drilling),
conventional bores, and /or conventional isolation. Regulatory implications, environmental impacts, cost,
constructability, and pipeline integrity are considered during the design and maintenance of pipelines and
thus the selection of crossing methodology. In the upper Piedmont, topography and geology (the
presence of subsurface rock) are major factors that often contribute to making "trenchless" installation an
option that is not practicable or feasible.
The use of conventional trench construction is often the preferred method, as it allows the pipeline to be
installed at a consistent 4-5 feet depth below land surface for a far greater length when compared to
trenchless installation. Maintaining a normal depth is critical to the safety and integrity of the pipeline. As
the depth of cover increases, so does the difficulty in locating, exposing, and performing routine
maintenance required for transmission pipelines.
Less environmentally invasive installation methods, such as HDD and bores, are considered during the
design process. However, estimates from leading industry contractors indicate that the use of HDD
construction in areas where conventional trench construction is feasible increases the anticipated cost of
each crossing by 500% to 800%, depending on a number of site-specific factors. Location specific
conditions, such as topography, physical barriers, subsurface conditions, etc. dictate how much cost
savings will be achieved at any stream or wetland crossing and those factors can significantly increase the
cost and risk of HDD as a crossing methodology. Additionally, the physical characteristics of the pipe,
such as the bending radius on a 24" pipeline, require any bore to traverse at a minimum distance of
around 950 feet.
Conventional Bore and HDD
All named and major stream channels that will be affected by the proposed replacement project were
assessed for suitability of bore or HDD pipe installation. It was determined that such methods of
installation were practicable at 6 locations. Factors used to determine the most appropriate method of
installation included:
® Physical limitations with respect to bending radius (flexibility) of the 24 -inch pipe
® Existing subsurface geologic conditions
Existing topography and slope to accommodate acceptable entry and exit angle
® Availability of suitable additional workspace necessary to construct bore pits or set up drill rig and
associated equipment
® Presence of existing utilities/infrastructure in relation to the new pipe
® Accessibility of the site for the specialized equipment
Availability of additional land for pipe stringing, welding and pullback operations

Pre -Construction Notification S&ME Project No. 7435-16-013
PSNC T-01 Phase II Pipeline Project January 9. 2017
® Additional costs associated with use of "trenchless" technology given the project scale
Additionally, it should be noted that use of HDD increases the risk of an inadvertent release of drilling
fluid to the stream, and the amount of time required to complete the operation. Inadvertent returns are
difficult to anticipate, can be difficult to locate, and can be difficult to remediate. They typically occur as a
result of fractures in subsurface rock or unconsolidated materials located in the subsurface environment.
While geotechnical investigations can provide a narrow window of understanding with respect to the
surrounding subsurface conditions, they cannot detect all conditions. Once drilling fluid has found
fractures, water columns, or unconsolidated material within which to move, there is no way to predict
where surface releases may occur. Inadvertent returns are often detected visually for smaller returns near
the easement; however, larger returns are typically detected as a loss of pressure in the fluid being
pumped through the annulus of the drill. Fluid pressure and easement conditions are constantly
monitored by trained pipeline professionals; however, dependent on site geological conditions adjacent
to the annulus of the drill, high volume/high pressure fluid can be lost quickly, and oftentimes occur in
areas within which it is difficult to assess and/or access for clean-up (e.g. densely forested areas outside of
the easement).
As previously stated, the cost associated with HDD technology is significantly more than conventional
methodology due to limited specialist drilling companies, the aforementioned sub -surface conditions, and
the cost of specialized equipment (e.g. drilling bits for varying conditions, and specialized pipe and pipe
coatings). The likelihood of inadvertent return also adds to the cost and risk of a HHD crossing due to the
resulting extended drilling duration, additional costs for remediation, and potential for discharge to
sensitive areas that can occur with inadvertent returns.
Conventional bore installation will be employed for one stream crossing, but was not considered a viable
option for many locations. Where the new line will be installed within an existing maintained easement,
the proximity to the additional PSNC pipelines precludes the safe excavation of the required bored pits.
In other areas, and in general for the project overall, many of the streams crossed are incised or located at
the bottom of steep, relatively narrow valleys, making excavation of the bore pit and stockpiling of the
soils within the corridor difficult. As the bore pit must be excavated to a depth at which the bore can
extend beneath the substrate of a stream or wetland, additional shoring of the pit would be necessary to
meet safety standards.
Conventional Isolation Installation
Throughout the project corridor where conventional isolation construction is proposed at stream
crossings, dam and pumps or flume systems will be used to divert clean water flow around the work area
until the crossing is completed. Typically, crossings of minor streams (less than 10 -feet wide) can be
completed within 24 -hours of initiation. For larger waterbodies or those where specialized equipment for
excavations in rock are required, it may be necessary to extend this time frame. But in any event, once
work affecting streams or wetlands is initiated, it will be carried to completion in an expeditious manner to
minimize the period of disturbance. Affected stream banks will then be restored to near pre -construction
contour. Coir matting and a native riparian seed mix will be applied to restore vegetation. Typical details
for a dam and pump and flume methodology for isolation of the trench excavation are included in
Appendix V.
[.1

Pre -Construction Notification
S&ME Project No. 7435-16-013
PSNC T-01 Phase II Pipeline Project January 9. 2017
Typical BMPs used in connection with conventional isolation methodology include the following:
® Crossings will be executed in as minimal amount of time necessary. Where possible, 24-hour
installation and restoration will occur.
® Sufficient equipment to execute the crossing in an expeditious, environmentally responsible
manner will be available on site prior to initiation of the crossing.
All crossings will be conducted during anticipated low flow conditions.
® Local weather conditions will be monitored such that, to the extent possible, stormwater events
will be avoided during and immediately following installation of the pipe.
® The crossings will be monitored during installation by personnel experienced in stream and
wetland crossing procedures, familiar with site conditions, and knowledgeable in North Carolina
environmental regulations. The monitor shall have the authority to stop work should conditions
change and additional or different measures be needed. This professional will be on-site from the
initiation (preparatory stages) through to the completion (e.g. implementation of the restoration
plan).
* Sufficient qualified staffing will be maintained for the project duration such that compliance
monitoring activities associated with pipeline installation in other locations do not take
precedence over crossings.
* The upstream and downstream crossing points will be sealed to isolate the crossing for pipeline
installation "in the dry." Clean steel plates, sand bags, or similar measures will be inserted to
temporarily dam the flow. Steel plates will be cleaned prior to use on streams using
biodegradable products or heat. On both sides of the installed plates (both upstream and
downstream) sandbags will additionally be placed to secure the plates, reinforce the damming of
water, and provide a secondary barrier to seepage. The excavated trench will be monitored for
groundwater intrusion and, if noted, excess water will be pumped to a discharge site located 50'-
100' from the top of bank of the receiving stream. Discharged water from the trench will be
filtered through an appropriate E&SC measure.
Where possible, the top 6-12 inches of streambed substrate will be stockpiled separately from the
subgrade material and kept saturated during the installation.
® Pumps shall be obtained and staged prior to executing the crossing. Back-up pumps shall be
kept on-site should the primary pump(s) malfunction, or to control high flows. All pumps will
have screened intakes and will be placed in secondary -containment for the duration of the
installation. In the event an unforeseen weather event occurs during installation, pumps near the
crossing will be monitored 24 -hours a day until normal flow conditions are present.
e Pump flow rates will be monitored to ensure adequate flow is achieved such that water neither
accumulates behind the upstream dam nor is discharged too rapidly on the downstream side. At
the downstream discharge location, flow discharge rates shall be controlled such that scouring of
the stream bed and/or banks does not occur. Efforts will be made to aerate the water prior to its
downstream discharge into the receiving stream.
* Removal of in -stream control devices will be conducted in such a manner as to allow a gradual re-
introduction of flowing water into the channel.
® Banks will be restored in a careful manner, achieving pre -construction contours to the extent
practical.
® A cover crop and specialized riparian seed mix will be applied for the entire length of banks
disturbed by the crossing. Coir matting with appropriate shear strength will additionally be
installed to anchor the seeding and the banks.

Pre -Construction Notification S&ME Project No. 7435-16-013
PSNC T-01 Phase II Pipeline Project January 9. 2017
Stream crossings will be monitored for stability following construction and for the duration of the
pipeline construction. Restoration will be considered complete when herbaceous vegetation
reaches 80 -percent coverage.
Where HDD methodology is employed, the crossing will be monitored in the event an inadvertent
return of drilling fluid occurs. All such occurrences that affect jurisdictional waters will be
immediately contained using hay bales or other similar physical barrier, remediated to the extent
practical, and reported to the USACE within 48 -hours of detection. Please note that in the event
an inadvertent release occurs outside of the proposed construction corridor, additional
coordination with land -owners, regulatory agents, contractors, etc. may be required, and cleanup
will be initiated as soon as possible.
All disturbed areas within wetlands or on stream banks will be seeded with a customized seed mix. For
wetlands, seed mix application will extend 10 -feet landward of the jurisdictional boundary; for streams,
seed mix application will extend 50 -feet landward of the top of bank. Stream banks temporarily affected
by trenching or placement of equipment bridges will be stabilized with a native seed mix specifically
designed for riparian areas, and will be stabilized with biodegradable coir matting. Affected wetland areas
will be seeded with a native wetland seed mix; however, no heavy mulching will occur within wetlands.
2.3 Additional Construction
Project -wide, permanent impacts associated with placement of pipes and/or fill material will total 30 linear
feet of stream and 0.006 acre of wetland associated with construction of a permanent access road.
3.0 Proposed Project Impacts
Project -wide wetland impacts are summarized in Table 1 below:
Table 1: Summary of Proiect-wide Wetland Im
Temporary Impacts Permanent Open Water Impacts Permanent Wetland Impacts (Fill
(Fill placement) Placement and Conversion)
2.373 0 0.434
Total, project -wide construction of the project will result in impacts to 2.807 acres of wetlands or open
waters. Of these impacts, 2.373 acres will be temporary, and 0.434 acres will be permanent. The
permanent impacts will result from conversion of forested wetlands to emergent wetlands within new
permanent right-of-way through periodic mowing. Permanent loss of Waters of the U.S. will occur
through placement of fill material into a wetland for construction of a permanent access road. The
remaining wetland impacts associated with the project are temporary in nature, and will occur as a result
of trench excavation, temporary side casting of material and placement of timber mats for the equipment
crossings. Forested wetland areas that are cleared within temporary workspaces will be permitted to
revegetate back to their original condition, and are thus considered temporary disturbance impacts and
not permanent conversion impacts. It should be noted that temporary workspace (TWS) has been
reduced at stream and wetland crossings to the extent practicable. Impacts associated with each
individually -identified wetland area within the proposed project disturbance limits are identified in
Appendix III and depicted on the figures in Appendix IV.
H

Pre -Construction Notification S&ME Project No. 7435-16-013
PSNC T-01 Phase II Pipeline Project January 9. 2017
The project will result in impacts to 11,143 If of jurisdictional streams. These impacts are broken down by
type in Table 2 below:
Table 2: Summary of Project -wide Stream Impacts
As indicated, a majority of the impacts are associated with placement of equipment bridges and isolation
crossing methods (clean water bypass via dam -and -pump or dam -and -flume) around a segment of bank
that will be excavated to accommodate placement of the pipe. Thirty linear feet (If) of permanent impact
will result from pipe placement within a stream for construction of a permanent access road.
Following construction, disturbed wetlands within the permanent easement will be vegetated with
herbaceous cover, while those within the TWS will be seeded and allowed to return to a forested
condition. Affected portions of the streams will be reconstructed to their pre -disturbance dimension and
profile, and stabilized using coir matting and vegetative plantings, without use of riprap or hard armoring,
unless such material was their prior to construction. Typical stream and wetland crossings details are
included in Appendix V of this submittal.
4.01 Avoidance and Minimization
To avoid and minimize impacts to waters of the U.S. within the project corridor, PSNC proposes to install
the new gas pipeline within their existing, maintained easement to the extent practicable. Where PSNC
was not able to install in existing maintained easement, the proposed new easement was routed through
greenfield areas. Where greenfield routes are proposed, the new pipe cannot be installed in the existing
easement due to development that has established or has been proposed, and would inhibit construction
or present public safety concerns.
As indicated, the total width of the work area has been reduced to 80 feet at stream and wetland
crossings. At four stream crossings (SA43, SA44, SA72 and SA79), the project Engineer determined that
greater than 80 feet of workspace would be required to safely install the new pipe and access
bridge. More than 80 feet of workspace was also required at one wetland (WA68) and at one
stream/wetland complex (SA110/WA72), where workspaces to accommodate a drill rig are required.
Where streams are trenched for pipe installation, impacts will be minimized by stabilizing the temporarily -
affected banks with coir matting and seeding with a native riparian seed mix. Stream sedimentation
impacts will be minimized through the use of the dry -ditch construction methods, such as bypass
pumping though silt bags or temporary de -watering structures, or by use of dam and flumes. Wetland
impacts will be minimized during construction through the use of equipment mats at crossings and trench
plugs to prevent alterations to wetland hydrology.
Additionally, construction equipment operating within the wetland will be limited to that equipment
necessary for clearing, excavation, pipe installation and restoration activities. Wetland vegetation will be
cut at ground level, leaving existing root systems in place to promote re -growth. To the extent
Pipeline Construction Activities/Crossings
Culvert Placement for Access Road
Temporary
Permanent
Permanent
11,113
0
30
As indicated, a majority of the impacts are associated with placement of equipment bridges and isolation
crossing methods (clean water bypass via dam -and -pump or dam -and -flume) around a segment of bank
that will be excavated to accommodate placement of the pipe. Thirty linear feet (If) of permanent impact
will result from pipe placement within a stream for construction of a permanent access road.
Following construction, disturbed wetlands within the permanent easement will be vegetated with
herbaceous cover, while those within the TWS will be seeded and allowed to return to a forested
condition. Affected portions of the streams will be reconstructed to their pre -disturbance dimension and
profile, and stabilized using coir matting and vegetative plantings, without use of riprap or hard armoring,
unless such material was their prior to construction. Typical stream and wetland crossings details are
included in Appendix V of this submittal.
4.01 Avoidance and Minimization
To avoid and minimize impacts to waters of the U.S. within the project corridor, PSNC proposes to install
the new gas pipeline within their existing, maintained easement to the extent practicable. Where PSNC
was not able to install in existing maintained easement, the proposed new easement was routed through
greenfield areas. Where greenfield routes are proposed, the new pipe cannot be installed in the existing
easement due to development that has established or has been proposed, and would inhibit construction
or present public safety concerns.
As indicated, the total width of the work area has been reduced to 80 feet at stream and wetland
crossings. At four stream crossings (SA43, SA44, SA72 and SA79), the project Engineer determined that
greater than 80 feet of workspace would be required to safely install the new pipe and access
bridge. More than 80 feet of workspace was also required at one wetland (WA68) and at one
stream/wetland complex (SA110/WA72), where workspaces to accommodate a drill rig are required.
Where streams are trenched for pipe installation, impacts will be minimized by stabilizing the temporarily -
affected banks with coir matting and seeding with a native riparian seed mix. Stream sedimentation
impacts will be minimized through the use of the dry -ditch construction methods, such as bypass
pumping though silt bags or temporary de -watering structures, or by use of dam and flumes. Wetland
impacts will be minimized during construction through the use of equipment mats at crossings and trench
plugs to prevent alterations to wetland hydrology.
Additionally, construction equipment operating within the wetland will be limited to that equipment
necessary for clearing, excavation, pipe installation and restoration activities. Wetland vegetation will be
cut at ground level, leaving existing root systems in place to promote re -growth. To the extent

Pre -Construction Notification S&ME Project No. 7435-16-013
PSNC T-01 Phase II Pipeline Project January 9. 2017
practicable, wetland topsoil will be segregated from the underlying subsoil in areas disturbed by
trenching, except in areas with standing water or saturated soils, or where no topsoil is evident. Total
disturbance through streams and wetlands is limited to the existing 50 -foot easement and 3 -foot TWS for
a majority of the route.
5.0 Additional Regulatory Considerations
The project will comply with all applicable conditions of NWP 12 and WQC 3884, with the exception of
those noted previously. The width of the TWS and the permanent easement will not exceed 80 feet at
most wetland and stream crossings. The proposed alignment makes use of existing easement to the
maximum extent practicable. As mentioned, PSNC has endeavored to limit the clearing of greenfield
easement. Of the proposed 48.5 miles to be constructed, 11.4 miles will be established as greenfield
easement. Where the new easement will be established, the route was selected to avoid environmental
resources to the extent practicable.
All stream work will be performed "in the dry" by isolating the work area through use of dam and pump -
around or dam and flume systems. Following construction, stream and wetland crossings will be restored
to original grade and contour. The proposed project will not result in permanent changes in pre -
construction elevation contours or stream dimension, pattern or profile. Excess material will be removed
to a high ground disposal area. Affected wetland areas will be restored in accordance with the attached
Restoration Plan (Appendix VI) following completion of the work.
Based on our experience with similar projects involving impacts authorized under NWP No. 12, it is our
understanding that pipeline construction impacts to streams and emergent wetlands will be considered
temporary if these areas are restored to original pre -construction contours once construction is
completed, and do not involve the permanent placement of hard armor in streams.
5.1 Federally -Protected Species
To comply with applicable sections of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 (16 USC 1531-1543),
S&ME initially consulted with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the North Carolina Natural
Heritage Program (NCNHP). S&ME provided scoping packages to the USFWS and the North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) on March 25, 2016. The scoping packages included depictions
of the route overlain on the appropriate USGS topographic maps and aerial photographs in digital format,
along with a Google Earth' kmz file of the proposed alignment. The scoping packages requested that
each agency review records they may have had relating to rare, endangered, or threatened species, or
high quality natural communities within the vicinity of the project corridor, and provide comment. S&ME
also consulted the NCNHP GIS database Virtual Workroom and Element Occurrence (EO) Database, and
received a report on March 25, 2016.
The list of NCNHP records relating to rare, listed species, significant natural communities or habitat
areas/managed conservation lands identified the following federally -protected element occurrences
within one mile of the project route:
* EO ID Nos. 22332, 10585, 21302, 22332, 6228 and 15583: Dwarf -flowered heartleaf (Hexasty(is
nanif(ora) — federally threatened
10

Pre -Construction Notification
S&ME Project No. 7435-16-013
PSNC T-01 Phase II Pipeline Project January 9. 2017
The report also identified multiple occurrences of state -listed species, but none that carry federal
protection. With respect to significant natural communities or habitat areas/managed conservation lands,
the NCNHP identified the following sites within a one -mile radius of the project route:
+ Sand Run/Cliffside Natural Area
® Green River Gameland
® Pacolet Area Conservation Preserve
® NC Division of Mitigation Services Easements
The NCWRC responded with an April 20, 2016, letter that listed a number of streams with significant
resources and notable adjacent features that could be affected by the project:
® Green River in Polk County. The Green River hosts the Seagreen Darter [Etheostoma thalassinum,
NC Significantly Rare (SR)] and Carolina Foothills Crayfish (Cambarus johni, NC SR).
+ Broad River in Rutherford County, which hosts Seagreen Darter (NC SR) and Carolina Foothills
Crayfish (NC SR).
+ Floyds Creek in Rutherford County, which hosts Carolina Foothills Crayfish (NC SR).
+ Sandy Run/Cliffside Natural Area, a designated natural area by the NCNHP. This natural area
roughly follows the boundary of a population of Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora,
US and NC Threatened).
® Beaverdam Creek in Cleveland County, which also hosts Carolina Foothills Crayfish (NC SR).
+ The USFWS recently listed the Northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) as threatened
under the ESA. The Northern long-eared bat may be present within or in the vicinity of the
project site.
Although the USFWS did not respond with written comment, Bryan Tompkins with the USFWS attended
an agency pre -application meeting with S&ME and PSNC personnel on May 31, 2016, and provided the
following general comments. Mr. Tompkins offered the following comments:
® Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf — if identified and impacts are likely, options would be to mitigate
(payment) or avoid, include re-routing alignment, transplanting plants to properties adjacent to
the existing easement or a protected area. He indicated that USFWS would work with S&ME to
find suitable options.
+ White Irisette — Comments were similar to that for dwarf -flowered heartleaf. If identified and
impacts are likely, options would be to mitigate (payment) or avoid, include re-routing alignment,
transplanting plants to properties adjacent to the existing easement or a protected area.
+ Northern Long -Eared Bat — PSNC could likely either rely on the 4d rule, or perform tree -cutting
outside of maternity season — June 1 through July 31. The 4d rule cannot be used if a known
roost tree is located within 150 feet of the route, or if known hibernacula are located within 0.25 -
mile of the route. Performing tree -cutting outside of maternity season could bolster a "Not Likely
to Adversely Affect" finding.
® Indiana Bat — the only record in the county is at the town of Bat Cave, which is not proximate to
the project site. Accordingly, no further action for Indiana bat is required.
+ USFWS requested inclusion of pollinator species in upland seed mixes. USFWS indicated any
amount of areas with pollinators would be appreciated and could provide some examples of
preferred species.
The NCNHP and NCWRC correspondence is included in Appendix VII.
11

Pre -Construction Notification S&ME Project No. 7435-16-013
PSNC T-01 Phase II Pipeline Project January 9. 2017
Following the agency scoping and literature review, S&ME conducted pedestrian reviews for terrestrial
species along the project corridor over a period ranging from April 2016 through July 2016, primarily to
accommodate blooming periods of some of the plant species. Additional, small-scale field investigations
were conducted at targeted areas, as minor route changes were implemented, or further assessment was
deemed necessary.
During the field reconnaissance, the approximate project centerline was identified as the existing gas line
easement. In areas of greenfield development, the centerline was identified either via a surveyed cut line
or by means of a global positioning system (GPS) device. S&ME personnel then spread out perpendicular
to the center line and walked parallel meandering transects within the corridor. In areas meeting the
habitat requirements for protected species (i.e., presence of associate species, correct slope aspect, known
soil types, etc.), multiple additional transects or grid transects were walked to adequately review the area.
In areas that did not exhibit known habitat characteristics for the target species, S&ME personnel used a
spot-check methodology, looking for potential microhabitats. If protected species were positively
identified during the review, a GPS data point was recorded and photographs and notes were taken. The
same procedure was followed when S&ME could not positively identify the species (e.g., due to absence
of key identifying floral features), but suspected that it may be protected. Results of the assessment were
summarized and provided to the USFWS and the USACE in an October 31, 2016 report. A summary of
findings identified in the report is provided below.
Multiple populations of dwarf -flowered heartleaf were observed within the project corridor.
These populations were observed in wooded areas adjacent to the existing T-01 maintenance
corridor. At these locations, the proposed temporary workspace was eliminated in order to avoid
impacts, or the proposed new easement was routed away from the population.
® Other than dwarf -flowered heartleaf, no individuals of the federally -protected flora or faunal
species identified for survey above were observed during the pedestrian reconnaissance of the
cleared and maintained existing project corridor easement.
Habitat for two terrestrial faunal species, Indiana bat and northern long-eared bat, does exist in
the project area.
A GIS assessment of land cover within the project area and an adjacent one -kilometer wide
corridor determined that the amount of forested area affected by the proposed project relative to
the surrounding area was minimal. Further, the project should not have a significant effect on
northern long-eared bat because a majority of the pipe will be installed within an existing utility
corridor that is already cleared of woody vegetation, and most of the clearing is scheduled to
occur prior to the summer habitat season.
With respect to Indiana bat, this species is listed as a current occurrence for Rutherford County
only because it was identified near the town of Bat Cave, which is not proximate to the project
site.
S&ME concluded that the proposed project is unlikely to adversely affect populations of federally -
protected flora and fauna or their critical habitat. In the event that these species are encountered
during construction in areas not previously identified, work in that area will be temporarily stopped
and the USFWS will be contacted for consultation.
Following USFWS review of the October 31, 2016 report, the agency responded with a November 7, 2015
letter stating that they concurred with S&ME's findings, and concluded that the requirements under
section 7 of the Act are fulfilled. A copy of the November 7, 2016 USFWS letter is included in Appendix
VII.
12

Pre -Construction Notification S&ME Project No. 7435-16-013
PSNC T-01 Phase II Pipeline Project January 9. 2017
5.2 Historic and Cultural Resources
S&ME submitted an agency scoping letter to the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
on May 2, 2016. The SHPO responded in a May 24, 2016 letter recommending a comprehensive survey of
the project corridor be conducted by an experienced archaeologist. Accordingly, S&ME archaeologists
conducted an archaeological survey of the project corridor from June 16 through October 19, 2016.
Results of the survey were provided in an October 2016 report that was provided to SHPO. As a result of
the investigations, no previously recorded archaeological sites were re -located, and 23 new archaeological
sites and isolated finds were identified. Twenty-one of the 23 archaeological sites are recommended not
eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Site 31CL138 is a prehistoric lithic
scatter that was not fully delineated and appears to retain intact stratigraphy; additional work is
recommended at site 31CL138 to fully delineate the site and determine the extent of intact deposits prior
to making a NRHP recommendation. However, because the pipeline corridor was moved from this
location and will not impact site 31CL138, no further work at the site was recommended for this
undertaking.
Site 31CL134** is the Graham Family Cemetery, an early nineteenth to early twentieth century family
cemetery, that is recommended eligible for the NRHP under Criterion B, for its association with Colonel
William Graham, and under Criterion C, as good example of funerary art and gravestone forms, as well as
a family cemetery landscape from the early 1800s to the early 1900s. Current plans for the pipeline
replacement project have established a 100 -foot buffer from the southern edge of 31CL134** to the
pipeline replacement activities. The area surrounding the cemetery will not be used as a lay down area or
for temporary work space. As the project is currently planned, S&ME feels that avoidance measures have
been established and recommends no additional work at site 31CL134**.
At the time of this submittal, we have not received a response from SHPO. We anticipate that upon
completion of the review of the report, SHPO will concur with S&ME's findings that the project should not
affect archaeological resources. Correspondence from SHPO will be forwarded to the USACE upon its
receipt.
5.3 Sediment and Erosion Control
A separate Erosion and Sedimentation Control (E&SC) Plan will be prepared and submitted to the North
Carolina Division of Environment and Natural Resources — Division of Land Resources (NCDENR-DLR). The
E&SC plan will specify the appropriate E&SC and Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the most
recent version of the "North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual."
Through early cooperation and planning with NCDENR-DLR staff, PSNC and S&ME are currently designing
an E&SC plan to employ numerous measures that meet or exceed specifications governing the proper
design, installation, operation, and maintenance of S&EC measures and BMPs. The E&SC plan will be
submitted to NCDENR — DLR, and approval received prior to initiation of construction.
Construction supervisors directing crews responsible for installation and maintenance of erosion control
measures will be experienced in North Carolina S&EC measures, pipeline construction as it relates to
E&SC measures and BMPs, and will be responsible for completing the required NCDENR — DWR self -
inspection forms. These forms will be completed for disturbed areas at least once per 7 calendar days and
within 24 hours of a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inch per 24-hour period. Multiple rain gauges will be
located along the construction corridor and monitored daily.
13

Pre -Construction Notification S&ME Project No. 7435-16-013
PSNC T-01 Phase II Pipeline Project January 9. 2017
Per current NCDENR guidance, areas disturbed during clearing or construction operations will be
temporarily or permanently seeded and mulched when construction activities will not occur within a
period of 7 or 14 days on a particular section of the pipeline.
Waterbars will be spaced at appropriate intervals based on existing slope. Sediment tubes (Filtrexx
FilterSoxx, or Engineer approved equivalent) will be spaced at similar intervals in areas where construction
occurs within, or partially within, existing natural gas easements. Due to the presence of 1 or more
existing below -ground natural gas pipelines, mass grading above the existing lines is not feasible, so the
denuded portion of these areas should be limited to the pipeline trench and areas immediately adjacent
to it. Water bars and sediment tubes will be installed at the base of slopes up -gradient of streams or
wetlands.
Silt fence will be installed along the top -of -bank at streams and at wetland boundaries maintaining a 10 -
foot buffer between the silt fence and the jurisdictional feature. Silt fence will be installed such that it, in
combination with other measures approaching streams and wetlands, dissipates and directs flow away
from the crossing. Additionally, sediment tubes or wattles will be utilized at stream and wetland crossings
to provide a sediment barrier that can be temporarily removed to allow equipment access to bridges or
timber mats. Dewatering of trenches within streams and wetlands will be discharged through a filter bag
or other temporary S&EC control structure.
Construction activities within wetlands will be conducted from timber mats. Where clearing operations
occur in wetlands, low ground pressure equipment will be used in areas beyond those protected by
timber mats. Construction activities within streams will be conducted "in the dry" through the use of
either flumes or a pump -around bypass. Temporary spoil piles associated with stream crossings will be
set back a minimum of 10 feet from the top of bank and protected with a row of silt fence on the down -
gradient portions of the stockpile. Temporary bridges will be utilized at stream crossings so that
equipment can safely cross the stream. Bridges will be wrapped in geotextile fabric and have plywood
sideboards to prevent sediment from entering the stream being crossed.
5.4 Mitigation
A majority of the proposed project impacts are temporary. Streams and wetlands affected by installation
of the pipe within the existing easement will be restored to their original grade and contour upon
completion of the work. However, approximately 30 linear feet of stream (SA68) and 0.006 acre of
wetland (WA43) will be permanently affected by fill or culvert placement for improvement of existing
access roads. In addition, approximately 0.428 acre of forested wetlands will be converted to herbaceous
wetlands due to construction of the maintenance corridor in areas where the new pipe must deviate from
the existing easement.
As such, project -wide "mitigatable" impacts are limited to 0.434 acre of wetlands. The permanent stream
impacts are below the 150 -If threshold where compensatory mitigation is required. Accordingly, we do
not anticipate that purchase of stream mitigation credit through a private bank or in -lieu fee program will
be required.
However, the permanent wetland fill and wetland conversion impacts will require mitigation. PSNC plans
to purchase the appropriate amount of mitigation credit (0.50 acre) from the NC Division of Mitigation
Services (DCM) in the Upper Broad River Basin (HUC 03050105). An acceptance letter from DCM is
included in Appendix VII.
14

Pre -Construction Notification
SWE Project No. 7435-16-013
PSNC T-01 Phase II Pipeline Project January 9. 2017
General mitigation has also been provided by avoidance and minimization procedures implemented
during the design phase of the proposed project. Impacts to streams and wetlands within the project
corridor will be minimized by: 1) extensive installation of the pipe within the existing, maintained
easement; 2) reduction of impacts within new greenfield easement through avoidance; 3) Use of
trenchless crossing methodology where feasible; and 4) by eliminating temporary workspace through
wetlands and streams.
5.5 SEPA Compliance
The proposed project does not involve use of public monies or state-owned land. As such, it does not
require preparation of an environmental document under the State Environmental Policy Act,
15

Figures

41
asw-vpm,
OWNS
3
_j
U 0
w
LL
Of (D z
B0
-j
wz z UJ
"0
0
wz LIS >
w
OF
—i
W Z Q
C)
L)
U)
z
11 %
-
FLL
w
Of
z
ED
F1 LL
All"
)
LLJ w
6i
_j
a.
�2
Proposed Pipe Centerline
Topo Map Extents (Figures 2-9)
,77 �,
0 3 6
FIGURE
NO.
Potential Waters of the U.S. Figure Extents (Figures 10-40)
Miles
L -PLM.-L'
LWjVMM�,j-e,41
E
W-PAALi
ce)
z
L
CY)O
W
b.•is�iF
<
0
Rulhvo�rmcft,
1#41dds
7
IF cw*w
#Jknb"a
4*1
41
m chw
15
4.
HALmzh�
Q
ro
If
w �Vbd,
'd b,
ZIP
5
\,00"
7
8
LU
=
35
9
LU
C'?
<U)
-17
LU 0
z
M
3
_j
U 0
w
LL
Of (D z
B0
-j
wz z UJ
"0
0
wz LIS >
w
OF
—i
W Z Q
C)
L)
U)
z
11 %
-
FLL
w
Of
ED
F1 LL
All"
)
LLJ w
_j
a.
�2
Proposed Pipe Centerline
Topo Map Extents (Figures 2-9)
,77 �,
0 3 6
FIGURE
NO.
Potential Waters of the U.S. Figure Extents (Figures 10-40)
Miles

, +
"
. I
a ..
.� EE MAP 10 (' s '"I �' byl" �Y� I.� o m =
- -
s 1 N z
CP./
Y I II� i I
r' r
.Y
1' o o _ '• yy,. f" n- • i.. _ ,- ._i y '�k ; "% ' �' - I J A
i'+�•� L+'
�. - . t •_. �. -' • ___ry : � — ham: _ �.� _� lY.- - / __ _ ,�.:. _..� -- O O
51
117
SI
ILL
11
Cn d
'��= d� s � : t '�+� •,� ,tea .' _ " �
791
Ur
'3
• _ l 4 fr
:
r
Y,
u ,
Ep_"V-1
41D
rte# - �f4�r / f - s -f _c 'k�_ ' r 9•` �j ,-
� — .�I -__l � "�, � ,� � „ `-'�•- ter' to 4yL.� �..
,
AAP .M
'� r •,�� S
: 4x Q
-73- I 4 l _ _
F 1 /
Y.
' ti
,
_ e
k
4� .. r ° 'I �.1;..,- _}`r,�' I• - '.. 4 r'' �.I:.. / a ��, = _i.,�rti' " .,rte..• LU iv
T
■per Cn N
_.I f rr SEE
MAP 13 r d Q
cQ S O
+
i l d
a lY Q a
f' I4 `ry'r H W w
W W w E
® i
*_ aLU Z
-
_ J Z
" •' a _. f , +
LL
e.
dJJ
v " {j � � �
1•l • �_- Z T
as
LIJ
Proposed Pipe CenterlineOf
NWI Wetlands-
������ Access Roads
- :�,•. I. � ., ,' �• .,.. r �_ t� FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: 0 2,000 4,000 / 4 *•" a
NWI WETLANDS OBTAINED FROM USFWS. BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM USGS. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS:
STATED OTHERWISE. , .fes, E
F E
;.. ,r. � d �.: � s _. ' •.... .-' s'. - - ..- f "_. - ___ .,,(IN -77i•

FI .+
AP ! `
r.. �. ,I 1 � 1 v,_- - �t �i ,..• ,�,.< ��� °r�Il s .r'" �,a-. 17�—� I � "� _ y,� ,'.1�•, � O � �
af
f _ --
� tv 111 -._1
�Yu U "F . - . ' " " 1 •°�...: _ _ _ Ji :. S3 ,'�-� , _A _ � % i_-yt _r� _� t ' � •'i; � - `� p •- i '� '
_ y a
r
N
,. -. _:__ _ , ,. ' .. ! t_- ., - .� Yr�.-7 ; , - "r r e�l � •ti `L ; , A.".ar. L 1
i.
'!' '',.., ra e.. _ J ''._. 'Y+' ,l" -' -7 s',- .� 4. }'\`-_''1vl° •• i *� `. r '_� �I '° r ire - II LSA
�'.. f . .rte •... ..�, , r _' I I, F- r �r - ._ \� u. 1 k •'ro,� .. 1 - - _ F- M
ILL
i
s K
x.. _..
p
4k 7
t
}
f
Id 1
• "+. _ +, ,i. is - -_ -� � - -' F 4 1. l • i _ _ ,,.._� , i ..
i
-4. ` �i_,.rla..i-c_ '. i 1 ,1 _. �#F° •.. �. � ��1 �Ijq-.•.i _ II '' �I fid._.-- ��' - - - i
�-'',,,,,,,,� s i �r� - __ s - ?� _ f'ilFa ! 1 `'�� '� I"r y,� e t 4 %_. i` "a "� "y,-�'y�a �. q i !� . - a,...e M1�` •� � `- {` -
e _ _
_ •, s -IN
r
I I' •_ .l 'i _ _� Is) i 't� '.'. e" _=gym- �Fn"I�.i ii f",'<-fie- yl ! i Ffn'., ..
`ca
`cp
f
-.. ti ._-. :.; �� -'ti:`_ .�`l. •'b .:-_ _'"do- Y :`-. 'I 'sS.'
1 . ,'� ., ,I Y asa r,•- _ P_ "�. i I ..,._� ,c "�� - r l,� y` ` u , - ,A\°"1, - _ / -
i
'� P � ! �y �I '_ ' , ,. , � `:R.�, •_, i * ' I • 1' � �/ . ^'_-x514 � -_ • Pti.
.,
;r
s
Y
—
_y
_
a-
LU
SEE U) o
+ YA
1 �^: ,,, . c •. , j
sE•
I I_ a c� z
_' a Q o
-jk ,
a " P5 w —
• 1
iLU
11'��QQ.��JJ� w
P
k•
,
'
V I
i P
� �
e
'mpr.
I
e� " / I I � w a
I
,^ � •.—._fti':.4".. ! it _ ar/ \'i .Fy/ �iILLi
'-. �'_- '" f !, 1 -,.tea +r . ' iY it � -.; � '• . ��.. H �
1
p p
{ 1WLU
Proposed Pipe Centerline* 114 __ l5 ' Ste• : k o'{it111x a p;' D
�}}, -Of
`,,
�'�1
w
NWI Wetlands -- • " i .,,, , -� �, ". � ��`�- r v '; '�,-.�.
a''` .. :-:- _.- _-sr•--- --tea ' 'i ,. " I .. d m
' 11111 - _s-_ _ 1 _; :... ,.-Y+x °t,�`�—.5 '.°k•,•. _ L _• -•t}
,.
Access
Roads
i
FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: 0 `21000 �! X4,000 _
NWI WETLANDS OBTAINED FROM USFWS. BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM USGS. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS
STATED OTHERWISE. __ a "� ". / 1 - Y\ _ �•'.,. II' =�:ri<' ..

or
•� p
MAP
Z p
_ p= 4° • " "
Lu
k,
o°
o 0
- co
�; •- r
r '
LO
slEE MAP 19LL ILL r' -
r
IF kj
• rr
,Y , a . k� f ° ' . - .,s .� ' J A. , L f ,1 I�--r �' "'"`{ i � ''� 1. �• •e �`Y:�'�i ! Y�',��' �.� r }"' ,. + kl' " � , «�� � ,
meg.`
•-� - 5
P
Q .
S a .
j-
.
+N qL
a
jar f
3e 7777
a.
• i
SES MAP 2 — Q
W
i
�1
a t
7.
.
/L)
;.` .„�k, r/' / Q`1,'-1,. a Q o
ti
Of
y
W
Luw
p
' W
o -. Wlw.��
5 . • �-- •�° _ t ,Itis; � • ,r
1 P
•�i �. W -
V V/
•
.1 >� '� ham, .•_. , LL d'
w UJ
Proposed Pipe Centerline = Of~
1sh;
NWI Wetlands
<I Access Roads �:Y' ' ' r
• , Lro� /' Y° FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: 0. 2,000 4,000
NWI WETLANDS OBTAINED FROM USFWS. BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM USGS. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSESIle
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS w (/ 4
STATED OTHERWISE..7t
(IN FEET) J'' n °

U �r , z -. ° L '�✓i r -.mak 1%
Y
a .
Ln
m p
1 , ,
z
a }-T a •4 i. :_ !� ` '� ' 1 Fq;- _ • ''� -r - - �M • - F r- ly
—yy T
, h 1,'� s e7 - . - '. - ., _ P a � _ ,ti' • �' ' - 'y ,"r J r I ' •� � -ni: °+` a _ - M
h i i y z ! • -,I T-
- ° •^ -- t ej II IO
y
- - U
_ L ,
-'
I
'
LL,
je
r
�•an
a�P4' -... �;' .G .s.. • :>y ' _ • .. `� '4,, _ , a • ` s`t '.k, ,.a,l� ��y _ � a�s''S a
, s 7
'
A
r '
06
`•
e _
,
d
r
e
r.,
x
�f
. y$ g
, � w --� -,,a .,d` r -•�°I '8 4.yr,a
1 *" F • I
P-14 e
a.
` ,:.a
'4
— ,
i
s
d
:a rA P 2
_ —
S Y SE 5
Of
uj
, '--- '''.--•�a�+." I. � � •s -r•—, "4'^e. .qP C' �. _ ,. „ _ _ �!'1• :1.. ., �'1�•'' 8 - �4 L `of
gay. Y � • � ' � �i�, U) o
-. " .'a � r _ '� 3. Y � '1•� �. � .I _. .. ;, .. C r af''r�j — � �r u ■ 'v,'�- . i ° TM1. Q O
u- ., Ww Xy a :. 'b• '�4� , _. " r + �Isry., '14 i _ .." } h r_ ' m e. _ iai " i " a, ad .. E: f Z- 1 = Z E
. •,;" _ _ _ - ":YI . 1`v, 93•x: _ f .",, - p s ,�J'�•.`�',p� B + .,,y r` _ _ 5... iF - ', e o
Lu
, Z
., ,`tie.. F� - N Q O
_ 4l 4 LL
z
.-_'Y ,-' #'.1. ;rte _ r-•.,, y �, I I X1,,,:5- ' J a
y,'`i`.�, •E�'i - `!k. '•.y`pn_. - r 7� -_.�L }�� r W W a
f _ •F
- a �� LLIZ
- •,f a �''�• -� _r � (n
41 1
Il zZ O
a J
r — s.
P 216 Of
` EZ.7
d
A. Lt
.,
+ _ _
~ I�
.„ ' .' & * �- �.' v _,' .,� 1 .e _y .., __ P' F rte.° a �� •' � � � ' �4', � Y �� E � N � P Z
'-a
Proposed Pipe Centerline
aha' P a
Ofr--
y, y
NWI Wetlands o M
Access Roads � �-� - - ��" _ � r a %°F, '� � � �4- d ��•�` - '' ^1+-�. �,�� a M
FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: 0 4. 2,000 dt4000 `T', r c. ` _ } i ^ I -rT. y d
NWI WETLANDS OBTAINED FROM USFWS. BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM USGS. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES yy pr ,,w = �• +'°' - - - r�4 •. C
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESSFf �, '�'� • `.4•° - _ wd. ,+'4` I J
STATED OTHERWISE.{
E
Y,`�� (IN FEET) rFl �'� /'' 'f _ '+isP fir•"+
::.

13 - ;: -' —�-' / _ '-{ 'I % `4 • -- •.'_'44Y".#. ,q ``mow;, �,. r,v. ; f • I+ q
ji
44}�jIY
-,-Co
r_
�'. E-MAP 6
+'' T 1/ 6 4e rJ s.. r' rr c•=-' .. '''. Y' - @' •I I rq ,�+, `, I -F'y
:gym •r"' ' .I- ���'�' Y. s I i �•'.. I - • � _
v
= ell 'F
LO
_ Ay
Y�-
Y`�y
-1•, —_T.•a.®'
%
i -i'. .. �•.• ,-,,•_ e a : 1�`;, /^ I :/.,°• J5 : �.. 't ,c_�abs+- .a ,/ i `.tea+:�A ,: :.. � .- . S,.
e Y k � '
:•,
.,r.• ' x jW
2
. `•-•.. ,'R • ,i r•4..y. � ,..'- .a ipa� I_ w��• , i -•.�.' ;.. /� _:, •," �� •.. _',� •.v-v� �.'. e �_ ..� � �V � t'.
aU
t
SEE � � I p- •• �.r ,
del+ 1,
S
} I /•, le/' +, �Y �^'� ` �Y i I F.,� I _ � FSP
v
� �, :-,.tom ,�p� °� ,_ b . C.� •b •.94
ca,
6• � T�
• tee,.
r
1.
e
e,
MAP 28
- --, Y
•
/ - Q
-- _ O
I
'- i F �''i - ��'/ m : r: f++.,r � ti� f �_ "y— �i. � , ,�- _f 'r/ , - •:a_ ,� f � Y' , F •- _ - w = oN
e•
f r d
SEE MAP 29 u' _U w o
a�Q s
_. •
:. -zz�
°°� K US w w
_ U
LU
- . T-
"�— = `'eft y _ F_ d Q
LU C,
- - p' m
C,.
IF e
ULJ LIJ-
I
/ � c
Proposed Pipe CenterlineY`� 4 . • -, I .., - - x Fr•7 YV r D
r_
NWI Wetlands _` _ i� '•k� iY� _ —__ --
I. f-13
_ J
Access Roads
s
_ - -�
4 r. ..�� .:•��'�°a.. • e f.._--�_ + r;•d - _
O
—/ •' 'l F '\. ` , nc.^.; v "'` i, - '--__� r�°N �i FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: -0 __-` 2000,Y" 4,000
NWI WETLANDS OBTAINED FROM USFWS. BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM USGS. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES _4- _ j={•_� y y- _ I a. , •s -:\+ti
a ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS
STATED OTHERWISE. ''• _ 1+ kA -
(INfEET) _ ,,, t"` Y
-
v

6]lzh-AL ki
Alf)Y
l J
•a r
`t
ti a
°
L3 �� v ro i_ <� ice} _j_ }
- _ !, �,i �.,-v •�_ '' wi ..,k w • II • ■
• SEEM
� � • � `'' � • • `�, ` . i �.� " � $,,. - � - , �,� �''f
• - - r � ria - -� o 0
. , , ''tr-, . -��I tea. �'` , .° . � f � .• F _ _, '�` �' °'��� � �
r - :� M
JIL
°
N
C C::�
z
5 ^.
. � �'�.. :` O 4 •••`�I'' I " :-�4Y.. e _.� . ' �fi� ... J DJ �
a
r 3 0
�, -� `• . k SEE M:AP � '� � _ • I � N• �, " X• � ' _ .r f`= I -•- - v a
a
Ad 111�
6
r
i
X
r _
�a ,y C
Mumcop AArpW
s,
,
i, -:
•
•
' t�lw Ile Iv
,
•..s
1° I°
"I--• ]tel •,� • • jjY�'p�j :. . • . '. -- = - _ --------------
------- ia'.. I ,'ea�.;dl'
— --- -
ISJ •� — - ---------------------
001%-�
�I • �`- �. r + - - � - „Y+ i n ha l i, X -- ------ -- - -
I F..
�#a1 -•y D
..
. I Y 37
r Y
� i .,•�,,�-,�' it � %I I !t-•{'" _r•�, Y� -
�
a
a
-�;r a�
a
uj
_
' x w
_ • r
i
r
s
x , , •. a a. .. - _
!
f t�
:
,, SE
#' . , • U Cw o
rY - -
- �`. T ii �_ -`ti� . "- `4. "! ..I _ ¢» _ I' ! 9 e �1• �, 1 •�� �1 z o
w w w
z z
w o"
L -�Y. ° �i, it ",•I - ''•, ' i , •" �••,.. 7r - I V F r R' .,• ;''. ' �� a V z Q of
_..
i'
i
�X
f ;
,
Ito LLO
''�, �. + ,,__ • ,_____. _ I X�,., ;,r_ � Vii• -- .� �,�Ii�� - �
a r � I •
4.. - • '-..i .., . . i ,"F i ,�.. r, " ~ ''e __,., � � • i �— •'I �'f I 4�_ � h w W
Proposed Pipe CenterlineOf
t °• fr, 4'° J
� 11 'yam. a �.., - � _ II^��,'• ",,.' : ,I� i 1 — , Y° �•- �h ,I 4 + �
NWI Wetlands
r r
10
y ^ �
• f O
.ee�ee Access Roads'
•i _ -
_NO
REFERENCE: 0 2,000 4,000 r,,: " Yeo �6 --4y �' ° cr
i I �
NWI WETLANDS OBTAINED FROM USFWS. BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM USGS. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES =11t _ t •, v
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS � - .• `'�
STATED OTHERWISE. I •;,- _ �w
1
a p I (IN FEET)

q — braI
------------
---------------------------------------- rl_ -----------------------------------
7
_ _--- ---------------------- ---- Q a
_ t
,.. 'r4'- � a,. r •.r '■, ek_'1 : , -,, ��"'Y '`` °: �'..' - -_ 5. Y sF' _ �.� �a ` �� �sts' •°-+*- - - • ^.�lay:!< " . i {, , , — _ M
N•` --ti
-w..' av r I, I•_ a•. I111A14 . a .. - ''t ti Y i -�� • L. ! �� a
1 ,
r• _
r
o O0' -. Y _ 1 _ r� _ ._, I` _. .rte _ Ln
s
r
�7 I f" .1',L _ -tea ,•a..�` '""" :' • 'h'' _
''• I'{' "-: � ",: —.,Y _ f,—.-� �y I .. i4D-'
•,:: ' �1� , _4'a4 wl `: i7 rY.. f I '`"�.r,,• - rd� - '�':�^ `•` ,f; f'r -
i
-le•
. _ r
w
I ♦� MA _
set-
., _- {rte
IN.-.
N.
el
-'.
y5,
"
- '� -. -...tib r � , ,. •-1+v-.t •:. •. _ 0�
r
5I •'--_ a-• " y Y .. ,.. b-, _ _ _ Y ��`�' I" I -. *. ••s
•� �" y"-" '•._�, ._ .,. r� .. O ,. :. , I tly°
,
it
i
1" „ '4. V •, . _ '� `'+tea,. ,i -
}
,L
}^day
r
' O, ,__ ,I�I�' ``J ''4.f+f' ; Y - I , •' 1. - Y ( '' O _ _ `�, + y °- - ._ a = !1' o
-�� r �'I, .aI"I �- 'S f. j .� � - � ^� • .•�f,Y a �� ��I' , * "`a.' I �I �� II s f � G I- E
a,.: i .. a:. ; . ;''y ��--♦'� ,ate 7� -A '� _ Y� > �, i! a Z
Y.
r
+F wa
i
�`--:: ^• � �_ Y � t e� �,Y 4 •' _ ,, , y •, vim-- � -,,5 � �, '- I - � w � -
__ l
E
r _
.. U Z U 'I
+iNN, 'k r --'i`'•.-__ ` Y rr -S:4I 1 .• _ - U) o
- - - a
Z
v U)m
1
ILL
ULj U-1
a
ti
a
{"�rrka'v
V
„".
Proposed Pipe Centerline i,{' I - t? O
I s
Of
I'•µ 00
NWI Wetlands14
o
1
Access Roads
---_�.ti° :, . T o' t- Y. _ . •„_� :, r' ,_ � - '. ".,•'�.���s^ yF'�' � �^�'�'k - I ''�� � �� +t!^ � _ �.i I �4Ydrt, ani r. _ a
REFERENCE: 2,000f 'i Ir 4,0001 n h a Y' ^ Ia . _ e a
FIGURE NO.
NWI WETLANDS OBTAINED FROM USFWS. BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM USGS. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES u'4• ' '• L
21
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS
STATED OTHERWISE. t. _ -, #'• :rte '-' .. ®fi °
FEET)

1
p _ L
. .. L'h .'ts} ..'_.. �1 '`. •, ''.,. .. :' ,r= r.J L '.._ss. �'—� � �f -!� i
n a^
r
i� 6
_ v .. r tiff -. ..� ,, t ..• . - ° �i �`- � i A - !.; 5 � ^4 � ,�' YI�1 ! � p �
-' _ ,T.,- - '•, .q{ i.!tl �j,�. *._ 'sem i •• eq Tl., ,_ T a - 9` ,m I Y �- _ �f"'M1f _
4
�`. _- ---; v I .�.,.� -` /l'r .�;- _ � � 'I ': •.,:•�. - u - tl - 'f I � � - Ifllle, .. � .. a- - _ � +�4�" _�_ •�'^ � s � as a... r��-, <•- ' t�'` � �'
I Ilb
gEE P {7 3•' _d" ' ii o Ln
�,.
co
-� - _
.-mss � • W W
0 O
. 4
}3
•
. r•
4
�v
af
co
Cd
f : _ , y14
Ar
14
7.it 4:1+ #.,>� ^, ,- e� 1 •Iz". - .! Q r
AL
W o
i
, : e L
24 Z
--' u 4. - . - _. - • ,- _ - ry + ..lel ' - G tl—' ipE
O
• ,
U
Of (D Z a
uj
5�T
-w
z E
LIS Uzi
x
- ,
U) p 4
^
_
_.i
r
°`� • '.�..� Iwo �'. _ .:ed Ir 7-=-.s,l. iCh _ �1a . - . - • r.- - -+tis Ir--„-r_���., 5�t �.. tl - _ � � �
,n
0
Z S h
Proposed Pipe Centerline�Y'
Of
NWI Wetlands M
,9
eyµ _ :'mar.,
Access Roads
,rF�� - { y� � , • FIGURE NO. d
- REFERENCE: 0. 2,000 y4,00 wsl,: ..I_ u I ; } r , • a_
NWI WETLANDS OBTAINED FROM USFWS. BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM USGS. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS-'+� �N� , t. I I ', ,.`-._i' •,
STATED OTHERWISE.
r

M -� �'� , k a f r"' k �•.� " . NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME
SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES
.r
WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE
Pd'
otential Tributary SAO
.} 96 LF in Project Area t� ; t,,s' 1z _ a, r NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. z
Perennial Flow 6i Q
af
ti yi (55 k Ro y_PRIeE.. $ t f I
?�J
Y
LO
co
it--... W
ILL
Potential Tributary SA06 dp < p
(LITTLE WHITE OAK CREEK) M , a: ii 4! % U IY
'4
e
81 LF in Project Area d� �L : '. - ` F f v) a
Perennial Flow
fJ
a
11 t
O
1
nn er'
s .
,
�1
i Y
.. ,
R
l Ali
66
4 :
k "
e
le I, ,�N4-fd Potential Tributary SA07 z4 i ; 5 11
'� rf4 108 LF in Project Area
I-
f r Perennial Flow
ea °
,.. .. � _; -r' R �,,: a .., • c °-
� 1
I`
b
a
'I
,
�'" �#`,, ;:..' •':-:n ��1 r ,`. gyp_.'. - .. '�� •- e - � �, ', �,�, ,#, � ''I J
^.r
.�" ,� os" +Ir.. 30 •-_,. Vit. r t_, moi.' N
-
p4,
I
-. _: ,•-
-1 M.`WJ ,. L >v s �[6•.iit �''' '`� :.j: �� 4 W =
'�� �?: tfa ,, �... _ �:�•i '� li�- r,._ F',' r-: �'t. a+"]• _ b _ 'l '6 6 t. Q d• c
Potential Tributary SA 08 O
r.f' , _- ;'I'" 1 I N. rtfa - f.a '�: t %0 22 LF in Project Area `x Z x
�M r" -re , F F - _ Y• _ '• �> L „ Intermittent Flow d O o
W
S; i) o
c
,
,
Project Area (-607 ac.) tea' y , ¢� ,, Potential Open Water OWA02 Q
11:� 0.020 ac. In Project Area $Ka s r H W E
x '� !G,�ym. ...i v,,, - t-�.:._ #,i _ '='ro'.. - - a t'M�` " a. A, 11A Z Z W
Proposed Pipe Centerline. ,,• h„ t; v'' '.� w �.,`, 4��� w o t N' 0 W W LIJ>
a ,.
�. Access Roads by ^a a U Z U a
Culvert `�• a. y �4 d }: + Q J Q —
-
4"o't'�'!'f' a °+' 'd. �`' w•r alr-q, O p E
k. Potential Stream Banks ' Far ' rs °ry4 r?k, LU 0 z
a �
Potential Open Water r
' °d a
LL
of
d
�q5 � T
Potential Wetland :. ,• , . �. ,.� , : _ _ ,, ,� ,,�' .- :.. , 9 sem- `•
Of
•
Wetland Data Points -
..+A`o
0 Upland Data Points
FIGURE NO
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH7l 2005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS F2.
p 500 + ` "
•
_r
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM INC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES : I _ + 17. _�,- 1 000 -+ -•Yte
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON - I _ t `✓��? } 4' - 1 1
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.,';. NNrFEET �' °'' c y• '(���� yti..,f I' s} } •t a t`' 'e•

+
ai• {yam
� v <
[ 4 7
90 <Fa/ Tr%b I "
-- r %
5" Pere ArO' � 1
nn/ac °tgre A �O
..� � .' 99 � �r; /ops, a �_ .� ; �` °I '`�.� °°,I 1,, I,• -}I
k, A. r
1 f
16
N1
rc
Ail
eb
x00+'' t M . ",.• : -� 7
Oehti I
nter�7 pr°1e
$ ' { ���xpv tient F� tv req 7? " ��{,.�•�—_. , , m
� e A
' 'Dote r o
7g <Fa%-
jpyr,c - to 10
Ota r
ter"47er� F/tqr
xpp . 0 alt r
yeaawa eY e q a
Project Area (-607 ac.) r °rest
Proposed Pipe Centerline
4*,, `'Ali ki LD
Access Roads
Culvert , 4 ' o
R
11_';-_L_,1. TESIDES"
Potential Stream Banks
Potential Open Water
® Potential Wetland
r -..
Wetland Data Points.
0 Upland Data Points
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH7l 2005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM INC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES 0 '500 1,000
ONLY, ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
(IN FEET)
NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME /1 i
SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES )/
"� ' `' \�g��✓ WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE _
NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. z 0
�'. • , �. :sem :. j, A•=� r �a.„ � � a � a
"
56
j 20 LO
� _;� :-•mrd' _ _. ��, 1 t-r's€a; `*r -� •t r° �4r. : ,
t
LO
J. 1
At
0 CO
ILL ILL rl-
a 'I t ter{` ,,,• Jyk, '
i"
z
11 6
-71
4 'l
p a ..! X++. ,.y' •�rj , .may _
202 Q
6 M/pFac, /n et/ary Z
a O A a
s ° °te , He role WC O
� �, ,,� (tij c'a/ Trb «,. aawat ctgre 77 �,`'"a"� 1• . - -�� , �
�a Aer in ArO �RFF SC08 t LU = o
U) o
} z
f a o 0
AAA,,! ,w o
' "t* " h - Ve d C7 Q a
N •ii',
2 #a € } o o' I f O LLJ LL E
A
i� I 2sxO o, LN o p . , t' ��> a rk4 ., - o Z Z a
t.
AV
�PMg� + _ - _ � Lu w
p 7 r a J... ' U J a
N 93 �Fa/ Tt%b J Q a p m
4 *Fr J'u /Hier �n °rO1eta� 3' Q 0- Q a
! o I I,/tie °t y C04" `- w
+t �, nt FjO rea �' j t y ` " a '! - W Of d' E
A/ .. yr ., .� w - 1 ¢ r r "'-," y yy�y e a laa
�I c
�r Ti •��j�� ^ LLI W _
Ali
a ..
v
' Fa
FIGURE NO.
d
. :
. - _ <y I + ,y° yk,>t ''-S -4 i ,r .� _ _.., '' 'ytl• I 4'' ��;•L ��; �S Gi'#,�
12

NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME ^'
SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER 2016 FEATURE BOUNDARIES , V
Z
WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE }
NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. z Q
r s •e � �
I
ti a �• �f a
cn aw. ,� r u q4R u
R
Y ,.: j ,. .'�_k ... - � �-_...� . _. V .. � , 9Y - � �` _ ,� i :la �,>a��r'• .. '•_t' . � . �r - r..,�.. a ti+Mr - � O C4
�` x _"�——•-- i; �f� 'Ci 6 , --ra"r I Imo.. Rf ;i�° a .. -
LSA O
r
_
LSA
r
40
a. / . ' 'B I',pl °'i 4 4 I 4 •�,_4 w w
R� 9 ,a . 1 up _ ,4 C•.+a �, Y, ! 01 _ + ° , 1 P /I.:r.: J 0
�, F,/ r'b l d ° R h 7A R �l 4t 4ti U
r
A 4 V E a, a 4 a
;.a ' .¢ er pr to "'•-�. O ' ,�_ >� '', s .�, t . r ���,'�, ` .Y , � ' - — = I .�" � � ° rr{_ �a, �. % Cn
e�0i �leoi S o mti y t,
r
G' - Ii t . , A� •, ;, _ � v i�;�=`� 4 �.. �p„�: -,. ' '+� -.b, k "Y -s•• + �Ri' .. �� ,�� .,4k'';
4 t R r y
rz.a y •.:- .i+' .'-_,¢ ,.� � �5a
t 'T .. ,., •' : --.. '. r : ,; .. r. ,.:$ `. 'a ;a al x ' i� - - '"N!. 'a• x { r- i -i••- ,
a s _
• i
p• r `
'� _ _ °'r.t•.'. ate
ca
fes_: i i, � i� f �M t_r. F . a• - '- .''- '•,i ` A �/�A ��/t -• F'', ` �b - .. - i _
.... - { .i ”„ 'v� - I . • ^ ' -.... x .,,.. .. , .,' ' �,.Ier --�w�-,�{4� _ I� erCan r0 . aI• - .�'4 6, r qn•
v Y.
•� r
t
` a
`iQjj
a °
°
"
O
s''41
, R -.•�R ',f''' ��-- -._ .�•___- '"j �: O Fel/pFAr`�Ay� .- fir'• °Lr
Oleo/ Cj2 d a
=' ! r' see area s� t
z
rr _
-, .•a., .a'f*f r. a 't.+` - � �---_�!. .. _y_� aar R',�' f �t L.
a
u
myna
. aylr t _ : f � _' •.. �5 '`a' "": � 1 . I : r I . t�.F?: _, . 5 .?ti; Q
as -I• ,, _ ��-• '4 ���' -'i�� -. t ,... �� _.I _ - _ ,;e .� ``'_�° ° -x- —
.'
�•' ��� g � ..•-_ - n,* .-9�^�, acri., ia��,r`9 -.'I e �;.'� y _" of " O - ir. ��,,,-::�:�.: - - _LIJ_
(n � o
a ,
'•• s
_ t �'' 0
+ d U o
� tr
F. s W U
^
° fl ,'^11.•�l +.° ., ' ,r7S�<t/a/ "�0
O zProject Area (-607 ac.) i p
a
• ay.�-a O a Of J
I- W
z W
p p
Proposed Pipe Centerlines z a
, �'r:' ,° I b: , . I t.T - -e .. - r iAr a. - °R. . � '� _ d '4+` _ � ere '°r0 • taP " >��. � � ` O w w W �
.. tUJ
Access Roads -A F " � °�� � �� _' , r ,a *._ ;° � "�'�`a � ,' i,�io%yre�j2 � �, d w z v
V
.�
CIL Z
CulvertOf
a
u F .
b _
Potential Stream Banks F i ,i. a' "+` �`— Z
r
Potential Open Water ~
p ., �, Q w LL
w Z
- - m
Potential Wetland ', ^, . . '� .,+ �, - � - � ,�� F ;-;'�� = Sr�GSae
Of
•"s :r e•6i + °..;t '�.. �. x ''#'"..b ' _ ,I '' R - n�rtJO J M
�> Wetland Data Points
0 Upland Data Points
Ti :� f 'S ♦F ,,tS _ '.. -,,. t ,rY .:Ce -iY �-. _ _ N
A
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH? 12005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS * 1' FRRO x ton i ,!
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES 0 ti� ,' 500 1,000 , • -" _ _ R ,+�'Aw
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON 13
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
•,_\ (IN FEET)
ia .t,.
.- i

r. i
NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME
` - >r ��� "'� I � •' SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRIL AND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES
WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE w _
r>'
� NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR '} �•� � z �
'` � - �'. •�` - � .s ..� �+Q °rte' � •a�.y y —° ° * • s r ai r _ h'" • r, ~ �
M i
Potential Tributary SC14 > �, R v� - +�:% : _ P� , . � ti Ikf�
148 LF in Project Area
Perennial Flow d �: µJ • ,, }�.' r� .
rl '� r n r • k �,}'• i'+ � V y4�•- 5 �a � �i.��''t.. Vii. a
.4k.. -y, - --,-. •ice.. ,•``�,y. - ,,;. +_ 't.` -z-+ ifi.-- ,.ice - ,� •. 3' �`.[. �'•9'` `v , - M
Jet
,sem ,• �. ,:_ �r � � 'w.� - . �'*�'�+°'f� ,���+ Dir - bid, _ O O
yah'' O
ILL
�"-'� r ` ,j-1"��'"-� �'."�,,zA� i' `r ,-`II. -s _ - U Q'
. - `...; } - Y .`. h i'' 'r+l w.' 4'M ,,, _ - t .i: I' .r4 t -a •�.'-+,'� .-arc y,¢Jy, -
�•
Potential Tributary SD10 4 -
r h °''i'" �
150 LF in Project Area
Perennial Flow J
�9
> ' cf -
OOR
Potential Wetland WD10 F�
PFO ac. d Project Area
PFO Headwater Forest
_
•-: sic -,� �^ 1� 1�, ei J � P J :.ham
Potential Wetland WE02
0.006 ac. in Project Area w
PFO Headwater Forest Q
+ �,. .� �,_ �• Potential Tributary SE02 ` �. � �' '�. -rr ;.�-11iG�'r f LL � o
101 LF in Project Area U
x0 j
Perennial Flow ° h, o
.. ' �� Iryr - p w =
.'. w cn I— o
- - - - r; ,Wr=3.. - _ Q of
N
_,: „ ;-,�,.� max, � _ l I' � �. .+ . •' � � .>� d o
-
Potential Tributar y O
•{ #{,:J�y ° II• g� I, p `� a; 81 LF in Project Area U d
„ 1 �r_ # 1
ABRAMS & MOORE RD + 39yx0 Perennial Flow (' 0 o
Project Area (-607 ac.) �. _ - _ w
w a
"�J r
#�` r •L O H w J
• J' _:
- _.;.
Proposed Pipe Centerline �, r� t o O z z a
- - w LU
'� ` . _� _ 1 ', �•'--y, dry �{+� • d _ w W
Access Roads ,1 I JY,is, _-, v o� I d z U a
Culvert
Q
LU c)f
r '
J I
a a
Potential Stream Banks1 ` *� ter° "� GZ Q o a
r
ABRAMS & MOORE RD 2LL
Potential Open Water �� Potential Wetland WE01 w w ?
�rr z
` ti •� =• - f.. � 0.004 ac. in Project � _
Potential Wetland �" y_ j h
h } i. , �"..�y�-� i� PFO Headwater Forest O a
Wetland Data Points 2 ,.•+' c h
0 Upland Data Points�0\<° a
diF I' ]"--9•�y.9 - a
FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH? 12005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS
0 .. �� 500 1,000 ;
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES .. I -
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON 4
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. —_ *^ ' `�•_ a., n I `' �. ''� ' aiy h,•. ' -
(IN FEET)-n..,�r�. i I ' o- � q .�qt � p • ' �\yr-A= '• -
Nn. ?sr3"�b' ,, : i'r, R . J - � a .,ba., r �• t'. , \�' .. . C • RP# � , i'.'�P aat� \ ' ' -: r�. �'i � _ .. .. ..

" ., Com\ „ RIVER CRESS P _ r' w co,
K
— " - NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY &M C'o
S E-/,eRDARD
SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES `v
W
ERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE
NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
q z
" rCD
-
Y'� '1! r•.,, �'4 Y`c "a _ •R�' __`"--�- - es -lo �':.. 5 f " w �P •`^"' _�.,.� +` !' ~ Q'
'uvt-
:.' + enta rrole0 + rL b
Pot tF InP F\ow �� ,e_ r
3
Y
f
.-� , - `�., _ ..����'' e, !. �•` 33g erenn�a\
,... .-. F.`� 'j +, ""P,._ -.I �'1 .:_.. "5�.�., ,:."-'. '- F'� r"� ,�•a� _. .-., l�"'- -'l .. ,!"AF.- - rf � - CD
O
h
b r
:R - - - (�/ °� �. ,. .: •.,- :.. ,"a- ( .. _may `..• _ ,f, '41'". i• LO 6. ., ... ,, -r. �. .., ® �.7�' , �..- �•.. i -,i: ,� •kyp�.d fir: ly,i`n�j6 t, 1. z
,. • ` ! - - ..• '.,�. , , : +� .'' .'fah . .'4 n �.• r'R�6-�i1P y:. `"a - "°' 1 •.:. _ II
t , r 6. �7 Ar _: [_I, .,,:,ll� • ` r r ti a �o� - " p3 . A4 ,. I _ LO' r. '.. ! v a t' N' 1..1"..P !; s:.. ..., -r: - ..e...- ,L�` -'�R: - "�' Utar � - .x• � s �'' �J,...�t - U �
ntira\ S o ect P'i4 J r`
rr tr\butar ea _ _ _ zry Poteg \ F m Pr a O
4., � '`'..l+I°. ,•,; � � ntra\ ectpr '_ � �'- . , ., .::-',- , .. � � ;.. 4 .. ; 24 enn\a 4s� ..g � - U �
Pots 00N y.�.. r, � - { ,*•r�r r , ! 'i�" !-," � a `\nte rrrr\O,. en+r. I "� X: ' • :!� ` r � ,�'•" ig +" & �+6 `' ft k.: y Per "*�Ft ca L�. '�:` re,. #P 3#'•� F .,r .
4
,
-w„
:�_ -.y r .��: _.,: r. �o'� it °Fr1��• �� I .its•. f� fll• _'_ _ _ I, "., � .`. '.'•. :Y_. �"'F ia'
,
'
t
ctpre os_
gel." C. .�n Fore
potentira PrO�e st 46 "r°4• �, _� " '� s ti �I
s;a p04 Ovate S+p.14
o.
Nead
Tea P - s °
!
y:Po206 \ F In P\a\ F\Ow
. a
03
r amt• `IAA nd W � � eren
WeerO\e° Pes P
a \ t r
'T P 04 a° m ater F°r - r
Vo
� ..,,� . ��. -, ...,. -_i:.. '• `... "'::' _ __ :'� "i.. "�'�. F� �_.e '�;'k '.syr fir' y Y d --,._.i�_ fit.
PFO � P
r!' F. ' .�. ' -.! 'a'"•._3'" - a. .. `'. `r r`e '�° -i,
a
2. � �, ! o � �.: _ .r , �-fi•._��. •_ r � -. ""+ � $'� it '�'.,.. -... � ,are ° ._"• '°s'C•' , ""�'_ �s#"�.,i -
ry1 bl - ,�`._ .r.. _- ,!,[,� � _...;._ Tl. ,Y •- "' .... ,... .. '".. ;"e:. v.�. h .N __, F� A � _J' 1— I ._.
�;� }r` I . ' }`:.� Po 9-— �aJ -fir .M•,I ` 'z.- -r{ .• ti G.'i
'.rIF `
t,.. - y; i . .;r r. .. : -..r C:" _._.,_ °!k' ',s•"� drr % { 'lr :F:- :':- lGl,:•.,d. •, Fg'""J.,� Q
_
,fly - fi.. �. .r.. _.,. r;•. - ':_ ., .. ..:- '. •. Q .',^'!" `I � t. _ter .^ .,r•P� w-+"�_
476,
- _ � I '". 'a. • <.a -- _ _ a � k ..�,4+.\ �:. Y !°,: 'y'°'�` "=MSF r _ �^,.._F 1� _ '� � O �
a I ! Q o
.ti
EA -RIDGE RD 'Pr4 !_: _ _Sr ,., r' f' ! Utar
k sP . z. �� I " ' trio Pr
w o
tents\ prole6t _, r r _
r5.� Q
z
.. �•. P E
d p'MBROS, .' .,,- �w +� ,.Y .,, >S r.. 9,_I" • - = a z
r
`'-'� 'r „ _ o r r•al, ,i �.� I .rl i el '-I a �. Q
Iy„ r .. x !. -7' 3'.`: p. i6 P.+,.a' ° i .;F . , w a
.. , ,
_• -., _ -t.'`_ .� : a :b, . ie: �. =V°• Y�' ""� �5 •a� 5� �• � - O � � o
� `i
Project Area (-607 ac.) "9k ,,> !, I. s \ I tigr-� (7 Z
Proposed Pipe Centerline _ _ z , k I ti' �_. f? ,: O w w > a
�'
rr.rr� R ,o� w
Access Roads �•. r" z c
',.--.,' r- r!" F M\L-L•EFt L r•"+ f°''�g ° t;'i�A °�'�, - �d J Q a o
o
a
Culvert �
sN":.+'u -~ -e _ic'u ,• p -_,Pyr 4,� R�r'I° .' m."r; ��, L W E
Potential Stream Banks s-��^ Q
,p
r �:�: ! 'e:y, ",. pfi4.. -''S� r 'rs��l ••, - .t I�, L 5 .l""•, wx 7a,i. " •1p '�.;+. L E
Potential Open Water P Ci-
­4 'r M - 1• .. �* " p + ri i - - W W 3
I�
Q
_
.;
®
Z
Potential Wetland ,7; \P� I"+. ''si''. - a
QO PE'A RIDGE RD^ o
�O Wetland Data Points r3, UNGO
YO _ M
•O Upland Data Points ..' `
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH7I 2005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS " •,[�'- � � � "+" 4 � ! + s ,'• I • Y z� � — 7--,-
ONLY.
-.� "-�ti _ ,- ,y^fir•
ONLY. ALL FIEATUURE LIOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE HAPPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON .r O `, 5OO 1 OOO _ , T - �' •, ! r I
BASE r 15
' CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.AVIS
' •, (IN FEET) ' -
-
t _
t_ ` Al :�..rr' -�.• "'�"' :r

� a.}~�'' y � 't, i e -`+y 'V .I I .� '*'" ,�. ? I :" �'=S •tib ! .- r+.'.i' ' '" Q � �-'
OL I �• i 4 ! I' I +
f 21
LO 0
W
p I � h• ° ti a ' ° ' d I _ Ln
�'i � •,� e� 4 O t ` e �,'J � �: :, i'C ;,: � .i ;�. 1� ga _. ,� �'k� 5rr' .
.44 r - T/ +,k,. p0 f II tea,.. --ter_.. .,m '' •, '.+ _ % '� E�' .� - -
mop
ca
I
v■ y
,
I I - r'•
s1 f r:',. <'•4•t �```' �.,' s -` '
y t
r v
1
.= �p ��I ��,' I• F �_�r `4 �J. .}p�..:a '.,'t .5.r . .. � .v• � _'r ,. xf '�� - _
My
r EE I
4. --
_y..'a J,_ 'i m s"'"m..v., l C f ° " - '�dr + p":•,. II ' ---" m _ �, 'g"
,
Z
ry4 i a _._ 'r - - F't Yi'F a 1 l F F' A' a ,'j• J
` o
b f to oo ► •`?` ti ''. d (n I— o
O
ISM ., . ti * o r• • �
J.°
Ota, li
G Trib ��
of
¢
a I— Z Q
' . r4 1 4-+--•� � rw' rens . oieot �'l � o� -a F n� 9 I " p' � I ^ � w, I d V a
!.'1I� p 'w•"} } ps4�F'ini��Tr�ib4t ; r+ I,I' +"I ° r - w
w 190
z-607 ac.)
Project Of. I.— UJ
EW
Proposed Pipe Centerline zw z a
uJ -�
w w
Access Roads r -' y �` _ ,°' p%� o °teht� Aere Oroje ar S •_` d w z U a
004 ai IV, nniai ogre q t9 V U
�� "e726htiai S go t/an Fipw z
Culvert LL - r- rr <F. Trib tton, �.. _ Q a ¢
i "'. /rater +n Ar 4ta� /ana w o
Potential Stream Banks o d i _ �/� sq ara a W Of o E
rte., tle tqr 78 wo z
Fjow ea ory , o a
,FL LL
Potential Open Waterf `-: •. .�-_ �o II,4 �� -do -= w w
G VINEYA.' "
• RD pFt, +,m Sry yti 1 ' ,I '+' , r+�. + c, 'F ,::: - Z S m
Potential Wetland APOZzr.,, f' o , + o
+. p2 'kOf
%• +
Wetland Data Points F c �� Y
r.
• { r'� r ,t¢' ,I ,. III �' , s J idY � o
Upland Data Points,
tl '
FIGURE NO.
i -
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH7I 2005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS
a
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES 0 500 1,000
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON16
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. .. -...:.'S '°.� f f:-�
` (IN FEET) `. d - r + -0 A`}r``

NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME %I
f SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES J (/
f }a WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE _
°• ! F`Y
r�` NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. O m
i J >
- 4 5 r i •...-.b w �
= r,
16
iF
J,
,
,
LID C�
L' 3
• -i x0 . • .I p0 j . Iw.f'/' ! w . .�.` _ "`}' ,+ # - G-f� .' _ i, ' 'rm' a - o.µ = F- M
•� r
W w
•_-': '\ � �6 c'Qq y r�b4 _ '�''' ii+ - � �. � _.;t' �,:.,� `ern �! -t � _�* - �P�• ,... v 0
- S
i Sle ee �, F�. S ',.5... ,r..C,9Ap ter.. p re. ., +�,.�,• _ r 4" -
�, ,�^ -...-rte .s�'�s+�• �-"-�.�.�--�_,r __� '� , ��� c /�C•/O�'f�� S. . -....- "�.e'�•� �l\I • X• G - _ � _- -� � � -
•' --' _ '° �� .° �`•-, .�. `� a r4 eft _ '�� � "�F,4 - _ Z , ` -`•; � J � -
A
O 0.= --'
to -
.. • .. - a_r. .� •+ p{• -. O� �fjd ;r ,- ,amu ,'•�t�'� i.n#`� ,
r
c/00�OrOdijOvp
-.na leC �L9-
;,
�v -o
't '�*'� ' @Y_ca
Jai .. -i
,:. '. Y '� '_ �^ "><�"� �Q fid ,�t• `+ � L•,r - ��II •'
f
'.'..,_-. ^ • `' `-'�"-� _r'-.._ .f y,••,`', a/A�'f,9 S,9? y•, --_ �_�. �'y�(f,�'• r,,.r�F ,,r •-
,r.
. '�., rea 1 - �' _ _
-
�'''^�-�. _. t. --.'"•-.•. "141`,-.- '°',.' .;. c. .. } .alb " � s .� w� - `.+d. •��a ;�' '� ''+� `,� '. ^'• a ....yet 7-�4�. ,.,. •r,., _-•: `�
--'.s •:-;- .. —.�-__ e. -F .... r ". ,' : :: � °• .�. y J' vy-i4 �.i' - ,_ ,rs
• -__-+r-} '.'�. t _ "•ti 'C3 W C� r ; ;' � � _ �'n+ y '' �• - r�_ AO/ t"y+'���^ '•., '� '. t1aw
- • ti._ !.,,� w ,�'d "1' p^• -, i �:.,; :.. r ' , ° _ • a ,p -^, 'J , .'�
9',,. ..,� ,a,,. Lys:• - r �, ?.:-' _' 2Q �fj o•'4. - "ya _.; _
_ . y
� Q
+. ti ,,�. t'. ,', f f • a .. - ..., I 1 r,,,2. \A'G
4
ea �. r1 ,. S. t 7 �•
_ � _ s r •, , ,._ �. , . `•- O • :_�'� gam" -�'" _ � GR r '�W'I'
of
.. �Y►�`�. 4 .-r ": ',. .,,�.- _ ,. .'�".;r...F _ ,';.� a�,�" is ...s„ ,;.,� +.:h •^ R�Fk a� I .:7�,_. = d O o
9 .. `4.v y _,,: y.: �� ' fi P 9 ,A` - *• _ Chi I I— _
e
'
.F• .may ".i '+,..}• r. 44=. •;,r..'. I r••.. '_ �4nj._ �' '�-r #', '
t. LU O a
_ :.f.•:'. Y . ! = • - . �, y •�s ! bl .+t.,, l N Y .d'' T -v :'K' - , > O
Project Area (-607 ac.) � ..rl� ,. w •�, �`.-+ ., �, r� ;,;' „6 *• ,: � c� z
,.'ice-•'_'- _`•-a _ ,: '` - .nom�A i., 9�p��• y q `r$ _ AOfe 'i.,• . O W ¢ x
Proposed Pipe Centerline. a=- �,i:' z z
H
_- e 1 a
f . ~ i
-,. * ,-i-.- � j flyaa*',gll®:./7feAi7A�i,64 + ;• - - U w Q
Access Roads �,`_`� 1,�,�.—�-�a "+ 9 �,, _�. yrt rai rOletdp i ,r "'. d w Z U a
v •. ! « _` $ + -` � +:.._. w _ ''�fferJf Cf S,9 ,'b J Q U) C m
s�:,
S .,4 >l z% "• 9' y ? M. " i, 3 {f �/O area �'9 1- +' `r ®•eT - { _J a Z o
Culvert �� ,.:. .„-�.��_ !� '` i I i I'~S Q a Q
, =n
a
" _ ,' w.. e 1 ,, ' , ,, '+ A Y ''�:�' , .�_ 'r
Potential Stream Banks _ " '�`" _ o
.
. aL�:< :4. ,: I,: .� r4. _ �r*n :,: ,�' :+", . •r � t � +1 �•'� � O a
LL
Potential Open Water Z
© -
® Potential Wetland r e _J ~
a
�. pti q. - r ,� ; ;:=,1 r ° w ,, �` - •" `c as J5�i1 • O
v �
Wetland Data Points eoUM t �a-14�� -'- °''' Y
a='
- r J ,h
00 Upland Data Points _ rFl < rl+,ip, erg .��
T o
1 r R• .: s. t.}-'1# y 4 r'I� +1% �'r:. f , -. — _ V - '•1, ' �° - m
;• REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH? 12005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS - - ' '' �` "tr"'� ' '' ='�,g� •
BASE MAPPING OBTAI1,000
NED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES 5OO
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON18
_1 `'`•''� '' ''� _ O°
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
_ . � a , (IN FEET) ,+�e�,-'��� {t r-• � �'1ili '/#��' ,

&M >
NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U S WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY
I � S E -+i�'. �`
�1e
X. " r i`� 11 �'* _ SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES t� "
F• �'` ' ' ,'`� ,.y� WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE
C&NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. r N
�., ++ Oak . - - •. I�lr�+"�1 vIF O - - -
I
o.,
XO ._ I• A :. .. -. ,:�,r' ' =+� � �t . icy, �� .� �¢ _ _� ,, .��
•u
R i4kX11, M
" O ' C4
LID
00 ye Oodha yv.' 'Fe , �. w i II O
I. TtLO
O[ydfecfq�g08 } IF -;a#'. ` *+
0
t• G .`e '.^-.• : r� ed ,.• 5 'P�-''.. r _ ,y 4''�Ir, +I - - w W
U O
4 1
�•+` r "i - •i `} 1441 1,
..r
a
z ':�' iu +' "� sF ¢-y, _ ' °ry6. + 71r ;. �(;'' , Il,y .,s. y e .'*.•k-`J£es� ,.`� F• 'F.._ °i'' _ ,-'!• +�•
. ,,� , � F�-.�•:.� � ,,,. _ �'.• � a,.��y .&• - J i+',�r �a v, C , !b, � � y �' _ 'r ' 4 ># .-',sl .
� � FP'r -. . � , ��, , } i•.- �' .�` - e''r�t-' e�j . ,P• _ �'i •,-. - N�j4 _�," iF _ 113= ,
• r.
4
q rt ,tr✓ , F ' : L` r ,r 2���RF Trib IM. -
. , , i `5 ti •,.• ,. � VYr o - •a. :�•, A03
�'° � x • tl t �_... ere A� C / ;� :, � - ,
1
T
q
'UI.. 4'" 'r di•CXO•9re r �if
1+1
i .. } i e
v
d
r
. t r, _'y .' =,7" i', �i�• . r s�q AAs _ k
, _•..,` 7.:rw �' _` �• � 4 i..e _ u„ : '. _y�� 1 �.r'� 5°' v1 R w r v T - _ ��� i _ __ � �'• � _ " � v. 'F �,
r
lilt
46•Q�Oy z
r_"'-.' ` : -i: <fi, j ',� a +,'+ ) ti8,•s,-+ a- ^y!` \p ��. :P� f" L •'F +� °-4 s� r'�. J
•. - .. � .,� •.... @ � ?:`+�:� ;: ',P , :- �� _ - _ ^� SSS,•_,ILI
•'i< ; _ {" • •• �� ' � - J �,.. ' s_ .. '.: ' r i ,- F. • ,� � - ' 'fiy, _ - tiF .�i'I :i'• a 6� - - � •� � ' f a o
5
_1 P, �.; 'Y. l,it•`k, - ?',,$P +'.lst'r.-_�1.+:•�t'- ti. iF . ti,.- �e +''' t:i �:.€': W
IF
it
.,,. " '�- _;: :• ..... _.. _. _. •.t. .. `vii. t.• �.� �'��
f
a
t'
• 1 6 @
_ P
Project Area (-607 ac.)-- _ °•,f,%NI; l 'P r C7 of 0 z -
•
ar3".
r rx P1 -p " Xa� l O H W W
4-
Proposed Pipe Centerline P ' y•o d ro O w W a
if
r _ W
Access Roads q °'' `' >- ', , ` a rt y w ,� S�q�F Lu z v a
a
Culvert R. r, ✓. ' �w� o Q Q a
. a
IP
Potential Stream Banks "" x #; '± M1} , WLU
o
s
Lw
LL
a
Potential Open Water LU LU
iVO
® Potential Wetland 71. c
J "#� r
Wetland Data Points
M
:f
p o
56 Upland Data Points ' r►'. ; k$'ia °
FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH? 12005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS
0 of � 500 - ,00 y '
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES # 1 10
19q ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON _. '_ "' ,
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. -- -:© (IN FEET)
I--

NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME
SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES
1 ``' �" ` *- ^ J ' ��►�' WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE
NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. o m
;F rte, - ,; y • . t �5 ' �` 'K 6i r9 Q
•
f
-
_
LID
C) C4
Mt'`Q�
t .:_ ° F
A ;. r •.,, F/O ea 1 -' ,. 'f"1r �F ti_I; �:' e. !2 LLI W
8 Ch' fair ,.' 4 ' a ma 3 •.- g U a
rbi-
<c. p q O', t o f
7_/0- S t
e �a ASO fd� � i! � � �
4,4
re C o
R: ee R qS p e , I ., , 'I
a/c/p'03g�fiai Jar
l T
'-,, T �," � �'A._ - � .- O: ., •.. - aa�Z� �g'ja:�i -. q„fa = '' •. - ,o ;�.. `-�' ?'. �+, '� '� `e
-'_ . __ , ,_i�'-.y,. .., ;. a r��• � Ore a .' .' T' �� ; 5�F`_ - `' - �- rl' • I � • I I �3
ca
_ -- ".S.�P t _� "" _. _- _ •lF•W - �''��+.'� Ali:: - s iq - _,i . _
T
^i�F -
, r
'
;}. ,'.oy+`�$�' -• � OiN , 'f ' � r�'•tti. �:�"`� y � _e" A ew I ' � , � F �x e �•;
72
.� r' �,,,•, _ S 3i ,�. 5�, . 7<�di,r
• r �• � y�., c ' �'°ytF'� ��jia/ofec � S �R� � �,� � � � �. T �, � *'t: ' _ a _.'I `�,,. � , �� j ;, :_ t.
red
SR OOKMONrAVE o
`„
•cv
, R,j D•
C �+ Q
r yu
- I`rt BOBBINS D
- 1
'k`+rn •. , �\_\ O[�. - Q'�XO -� � /..�'�' •.q, �I - �^ ° - m Q IY O
_ t
* QPM �a Aayti o
r
4 a
�•F r_i. •r ui
0: 00 ,-.. ,- meq` I '.�' f° .�...Il�ni.`_. e Fl, O 0
+
Project Area (-607 ac.) + �° $ �r ,: , a Q
_ f •Y ;r �� O C .-Zr . �`'k. w J E
Proposed Pipe Centerline °� o: ' �y z z
n'� r�Fk ' h y_ a+- W w
` 0
O t .� } a `a
Access Roads -, �, a w z v
Culvert y r 9 t '' . oo
�Q,S, j�. - J Z
a
Lu
Potential Stream Banks yf o koo
711
LL
ip � + W' z
Potential Open Water 'r • . w w
_
z S
.. ® Potential Wetland+ �, R * J
j f k ..- o
� Of
Wetland Data Points #� a ' �. , �'rr",�`� � • a � � .,��� ;' �', ����,�� J
M�N a roo
�O Upland Data PointsORN° A
R LAKE RD
M
ST
BASEMAN:
_ FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH7I20054-FOOTCONTOURS 5� �� �� +y' - ���^, '� , f- W�
0 500 1,000, 20
PING OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES �'
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON
1 t
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. ` ' ap,'- •, YF '
a "NeIN FEET) ..
_ ..:.'.• F^.p_.._' . 'e mfr _ r • -7`'

NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME
—'; SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER 2016 FEATURE BOUNDARIES
a • �� �r _ .��-•` �"'�°- �%�':.' ;°" r • '^ + '�j°�j..'� �� � WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE
NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. o m 0
lip z
r
Off'. - Ofe zti i F} d O ,
21ML
E Dir49
T M
41 -
VV(D
NpR•TH, h ; q
srf f
.. _ OOLEAF'RD 1 `• A A%q O
4 e Ar0✓ 4 ai - P �,RO ' �I r. F c��
.
w '-'-' �
..-
0fehf ra
A.
SQ fj'�/ ,� O ' %7:pf/a +',Q Ser/e�, � '1 `'•` .�, ' �r�' `5 i' -�� �—� " _,1•
4f ;�
4 ~b
q �'' ,� it " e7j� role a� , . a afer 'qre 4 pxO.r s-' :. :} • �5� men v �I J+s'kf
• ; �
' %a//.Ofgr S,93 . ':;�, �C`°r a �h �.. • - c� F• _ �: r •e° s�' A' �Q- '�ap,�' o' .�.�k, i .4 c `,`t, fIle
+ }� � •
• i
a y r nil"'r9l' i'� 82 hfjd/ i�CST
A r
P
A
4 '
•.' -P' f � � i��s. lyy,,: ,,.,, ��°:.,-..-,-_ '°-,�-..�'1 - �.� 'I. 'O hf/ n�% '/eC is -•,'.- "'SCO' �•si. _ + '- - ..7 " rt •qua+ -0. �•�
"' .- -:; `.--.,: -:. �, �, t., Fj��dc �@ A/O�rea A7 �� 'f'� �✓'f �' r!• 'tiaR•�'
°
'� �� ',�� � � �. `.�`. •' aid °Je !'1/,9 .. b; 6*+ " ` 1 '•� t• - - - _�°�_¢ i,k• �1•�F_i" s., .+P '•� +. - �' $ -_
s. t
�� 0., r • ` WIL
y erA /qr f6 ' 1, ; k _ v }"a /, ', y + • �y : h
�,kF `4 ere 7 A 4f Ox } Ofe
4 J , r f
-
_ d" ry';' 9r 3 �•,# �aj'�/oc�gre qAo ,p _ y.. �. A <A,a/T,ib '•';• ,,`y `. �`� ~.mt s ' �., P ° P'aI ' `d ` . Q
_ ,. ' p T'� d �' : •F� a'"h ere Ofd P - u �.+ .+� -' .� ti �+11 , �, Z
<'
t
�' '� � ��i�`M - Thr r•'� � ti- Off' 3 "-� p7%a�°JC��,/ � .c,t'�"�.' �` ,-� ✓�f i� �°5 J
' �' •'-� ``' °= .�3�`� e - . ,:t - � `r �L a ,�°, 4.�,``;"„pz +CST.. �+, ,r,j:;. ,.�;�� N
a -'P•, # .m• f ' r' "p =s ` . -r �+ •tiMe _ = d O o
(
v
' -_t� `' a -' ?.._ •- -• � .tali?.. .f , 'a' _ Z
1 :;'.'�• .. • - . • - . ., v. ", .:� f i YF •nN 1 °6.r', 1u - v y_ ,rt w _ !' .. ..L, R �N. i—
sr r d LV
t
w O a
F
t �
_T
1 li
Project Area (-607 ac.) c a c�SFaRM�o V f . ter. - C7 }
Q a
L
H z z aProposed Pipe CenterI`wwline W
e+ I.. � .•Y , y� _ -- � � ��*: A ;� Sc,Qfd� - n1 { if _ � d � U � a
Access Roads
r z;
d .,..i' :;. A pi P' ' ,' l I'• '..-
-
"b
a' -a .;•: °'• ar- ` J wQ an J 4 OL.,
p aoa
"
Potential Stream Banks � LU
E
°rJc P 'fT`u LL
LIL
Potential Open Water w w Z
Z
l411x
® Potential Wetland
v .:•, - i �+. •. • J rF7.., J, r . r �_�r� a t. j"° - 4
,..dP
Wetland Data Points � �'•
rb k7 1 �•, '` f. ti' w ash J 4 �• sr ?74 ;fid M
..;LfF rE-'�aJ' }a-", •`".!R M'" ' .. ;b n 1 a ," CS�.^*.f _ r -,t �;- d
0 Upland Data Points,¢-
•._ - �
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH? 12005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS
U� t ,:.
BASEMAPPING OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES 500.. 1,000 ,•'y,, �. -i, -.,� ;9 - - {
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON a�! :.. '� '� ¢ c a - Vii•.. _+
21
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. "e : a-_ •. ;f •c _ _ "`•,, 'q i a� _r. -
z a JIN FEET)"

NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME
m, 1 = ��, ` ■ SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES
i
2
y �Q a WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE,
}.' °� _ i Py ■ NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR.
74
a^�' z'+ r - i+• :y� P ten, ' <X, 15• ° �%�/ ! D
-
•-" :__- .;s '. � _. +; "'�� - , . Mr _ e _y. _ JERK M
,� =' x _
fi
- -
O
APr
�
• - �2 iia/ °'�. t' II
-a
•
t. , x •�-� ere Ar 4t + _ r �P w W
U Q'
O"r
AL_
/ .. .�.. �, ..� m�" "tom° _a''^ _ ;
.,
gg e , �
/�rQ,gC d/%.: '�t- .',�.• r46 _ `y' �4iV � s'�'<' ,+ t
x S
,' a ��, : 9 9� /� rjb � K..;fe... • . �. -' i E �-" ,!; A ,: 1 t ; *ra ,,, , � a y . a Q �/
Aroie 787y_Ik
�y
A r /h T dp feh
c
/2 d '+ , : , e -1�a re Ar fay •'+ � j _ ,� +� �
w .
i h O/ of
q
AO
r e 772 hti noGGES O,
_` pCCF
i
is
z:
�a J,E IX a
r 4y _ r0, fey, 'ORROWnST .
2! Ole - ,2 ..�. s.. _ v' le - ,< � _ -°:,; s•, '•
Of Cf,9
,. a ._-,.- ..., ^• `-•. .d'.. y-7 - -�- ;� :- - A,C aC .�ef p '9r 9 o>�.•�'� ++'a!�=: _',,.- ..�:. �. - re qOs•. -
4 dry /• d •-fig . - ;w. .a.' S ,
:
14
u
RpvEFtO s - 'i F4-, x w$ M Ate. 1`�S s;T*. - Q
4# GG��A.G �,s'
q
p
a.
•� O r- - y l' x,A O�p�bSafja/� r 3 t U) I- o
y
'i _• .. _ - �a ,,• OffO ArO. ha • - a' '^ , yCyCr� E
_
#fo hacgr 'cS4� a o
a
c .? w p
o
1rx , rpm PHILLIPS DR
C50 _ Opq ��OkpUT .. k LL O o
Project Area (-607 ac.) NPL/1 �Z
\0o •;":b. ', r - .a O Z W Q E
Proposed Pipe Centerline ~ z a
� W W w
S DR ,. U J ¢
�. Access Roads - w'� a w Z U a
x
, - 1 _ Q a o
Culvert !' ¢ g $� s s. ° $ °� $ ':may " ?v �kS/MCSWAIN RD i w d U)Q
ter,
a
.• j _ - _
`o . w o
Potential Stream Banks Z
EL R k'
W_
r � i , r. 0 L)
Potential Open Water -+ a #a 4 yor # F 000, z41
ti w w
.: _
® Potential Wetland �r J
r
GSWAIN-RD
Wetland Data Points
`., - 4 r.'Mf w ; t . , ti , ., 2 ... -`�"�f�.rN�, `.•�..` y,� � � t J M
o- ,44#�-+`� � � c•t•. �" w• IF ., 1 �. }��* - �. a .� =F- -4 � � F. `�'�4}��'�C�, *`Y� � � g�0- - Z , ,I -` � a coo
O Upland Data Points - .. - _ �+ • } _; ''
p 4LL o
.a.
T Eli!
T,.,, IGURE NO. d
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH7I 2005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS 0
-� - "_ -s +ii
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES' , ,� IAPACHE'?RL' _ :- : +'f• "� J+F
500 1,000
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON - - s 3 d i - •4a - _ �' 22
-r! x
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. al _n. -
(IN
_ J✓1 s ' �, a°ie`.• a.�r- r 't �-r . _ .' '# y—MORROW DR`

e ; I NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME /I ,
SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES (/
WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE _
M, 0pp`Dht;a NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. N z
, A c ; ef/ , �-•. a" ,Q�. !, rim a ' ° r - � � � � : I _ 4 � � �
� aha •• �� � -•: oe-. - � F�7y, � ; � : ' ,� _ e ' �" Q �
p .\ SS Ole
Se °
o tq
a
r
co
LO
b
{ O h Optehf�a/ r �:y I!,k. r ° +�� i`� - ? 4'¢,, 1r'i'^ • r f, !I F- LO
M
a x Sd 6L . J at J�DE-SAC— U
LU
'
r
,
, _` ep t O _ I ti ' a + r� - �3 a �n
NO' a
op
Ile
.. MISE � v - • da
00
,
r O"r O"�. _-1:-'-a• -F, a "->...- f � � � .� � . ,�°�.YI .i � � a 'r t
s a
,+E
Iq
,. � _, . •' � �, � .R � 4. ^.}- ": ",. a •. + ' if� F � I '�" p
v 1 f t
y _ IRF i,6�
40
t
A Ilk,
• y .fl
a e
! ,k
`�, I ��''� � ' � � 4 9 �i � .C��T� . � ..� ^^�O `.•.. � � h'('yy
P'
'„ '! , •. ''�'� � d end
t
`n R
n
y� d
H �F oxq r SANDY OAK_ Z
k.' R JO
terms . h ��T • =s
e
o y, ,:. I o� o77ehf; +a �G..- r.?w Q c
CD
o L a r�
O�d•a
O azew
z oxo
27
r ` e d a F Opp o
—607 ac.) �� zProjectArea
_
T%A/,P-LNC ,� O I– W I j E
Proposed Pipe Centerline ^ J, ., y� z z a
p p it . r' _
AO r O W W w
111111 �el ' � _ZPANCAKE' aAccess Roads 77LU
o
. `ems w.. Aer �A{6{jl `Uz
} fl# J Q d Q r
Culvert ,.' _ eh .° a. a a
_.
4 t
:°may � a ti • • /'I"/F �, A �- , I
{r�.. Of.
'r` Potential Stream Banks ��LU
" Oo�
pLLA� Q
ZPotential Open Water O
A
do
S.
® 1. , : s_ _ Ie '
_jPotentlal Wetland
W Ofo
�O Wetland Data Points M
'+ T
Y
90 Upland Data Points
NO.
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH7l 2005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS a
0 500 1,000
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM INC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES - ��
.R
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON 1 ,..,..
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. ;� • -- _ ` �. J F•
(IN FEET) �u' J r' ;

„, NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&MEF4
SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES =�
* ' 4%4� WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE
NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. LTON'RD.t o zZ
Y
R4
ILL
,
v �
e 1. : %,
poten . 4ti•' ,} �R el�i` r.. ti.1 a f Fl. if; C4
- moi' � ', y
��Z � �O 0.038 t/al Wetla 1 , ' ° F S� ° %fes � a y, a �c rya � 4 . 11 z LSA
'I
P r
r y �. x PEM/P ac �n pr nd Wq2 36, / fa n M
FO i •� , °' ,” ,� � "t ,sem&� s _ � U
,_, ^^ • : Nea dw ctArea a: ' �1- 4� V'� y`rr. w w
y.• "A, ater �'
f a o Forest rl a 1 y ,' ' °gym , VFR' L U
R f
Cn a
F:<U - , - ° - _ 6'. Fv.. 19 -. �,•S; ,� -
r , -VlVlgN.w n►� r r
F
T {1 1
AY t
r O '
J
- 1
ten� CUD
s'a
1_
a�` •�, �'� � . PJ °�; �p . . a , _ � ', `r^ ,. � ,•° - '+�' ter. , ,� �. '
• ,�� 111
Tri
F- �' •' � I � . • Fin pro.beear $q57
'r f p Perennial F/ctArea r a I �,r� r 4111 IX °`'
h'
s
ote
I1� _ T a Ow r
00S �'tla 1-be'ii->y f b r
4yca
a n r
,� e-. ,, �._ �''' _--22J PFM C. ,n Pro• d Wg2s ,, ,. .... < :i ",I .. '�;_' .4__.+ 4' :�i,C• i:. .':,� `a�"- -1y-:- _ I� y,:-�•.,. u
y .e
, L
4t I '� � I. � 5•, '., GLy �,, . er FOr w q. c�. r•�.r . � �O 1 3 _ ,, a.,� d :� ,�5' -�-.t fly � "�'
-;. -;`, � est ° ° -,� - b _ i x ' - r�". , p0 ,. 7p '. ���,� :.:: ' { . •-�;'4 , A� �, .r-� �°51 - -
11i
-
r
Ri in ro1e ctA
Wg2jr z _ F
� • 4f f
; ... _t ? � .• e.: ? . : c� ,� s . _ * 4'.t �`� - serine
- P
-- • . ,� _x _ � Ove ,4 °IZi+SW am1) FOres
PR_ 1 G,'°,
7 T
• v
f 5 ;1 A S OQY d Q
+, I` O/y--' p p� , r M 5, 444 '°
-':- '°vy..• _ F`_ ! L �rT�. - 'r ` 1 , `` "h 4 i' `JI •F Fes. �'',+, y �` '-'` Z
y ,yt : x• ' „ '"'- f .. -'' _ - r e,°'i 5 :7 J
r
r . `
,
r "
4
te
6
�-
u
a
r„ �' f, i 1. Potents 4 186CF!n r/butar S r '. o-. ;�. t = a z 0
;, �,. r (SEGO alFTribut a Y Pere Protect A53 w ° ! ' t (L I- o
.� ' -. '-�•-r4 6g��DgROq� Sg52 q nnlalFlo�Area '~ �: — � G �+: 6��' L O
r- w 2A/O- i'e n ProJec
S r t i O D
Project Area (-607 ac.) a x�t r ennialF/oWrea s r- � ,1 � z
'-•-
O
Proposed Pipe Centerline ,I•'. w"' `_®--r �cc, a ,. y4' Pp iti i t'LU E
a a d' Z Z w
O
OLU
I -�' '�•5: KEL•L-Y- -,_.., °-t 'wqY 1. 3RD•ST , •• tentia/ 'e.- w w w Uj
RD Alf — * b, : -, o o M/ p 52 t/a _ U J a
t � t �, g. ,-f ,ii x pF 0.1 We 's. w
r 1#' ' SS/ ac / nd Vy `1'• w o
`- o
Access Roads -. f I , _ P n *, d z U
r :� "" 4 it ^� FON roJec q28*�� UQ
r: ! - _ 4 nP tArea U) o
tSi ,� f :X r dal Fresh �O J Z
Culvertryl q, 1 r MIDpFr Water �y a d Q
Marsh w Q m
Potential Stream Banks DEAr �P LU Z
Ot Ro °s _ _ potent y , potsLL
Q O a
1 +°.r:, O.Ou1 aal Wetland t �` ' 141 iF, Tributar ~ z
L
xy
Potential Open Water 'n Pro Wg2g r in Pro• sqs ''°� LU w
o .Ai PFO Seely ctArea "Perennial F/ctArea 5, Z
® Potential Wetland~ k
A 76
Wetland Data Points
°:� ell.. ..` .., _ � �� � :; •. .. .,°° � I �'� ,:. ��'• °t -e. ��' ,{Z '".,_v-_ £ d �
}
..
0 Upland Data Points
• .V
i
- -ri
FIGURE NO. d
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH? / 2005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS
0 500' 1,000
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM INC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES a :�" O"J _� ��
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON - -
i, CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. tiGL 1 1 '�` C S.' - r+`
T (IN FEET) J \ 41

y "`�`,, w� . ti �• - "�'Sii NOTE; POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME
w$ F_ • . __� SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES
WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE _
NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. O m
CD
• YI ,. - is r _",P^ '�� _ Q af
le 4LD
• . �.__.-'' _ gOSSM �`* �' • ray` a ti�-,,,,.
r ?
r oORFROr
E
o _ e
eY' .:� ,. ,. �,, � � , • t ROS :•r. -x. ,.
_ r .r r1• • aa•' ' '' C`� I 1 z
LO
ILL
_ • .. r' �°
,
fk _ .a'' w r IT'" q,m �.a�+ :. ; .. .4 q", • �,f ..'.w, -• "a, _ ` 1 .A. U)
r_ A
tP .r.� MOORE-•.•.'MCC "T- - ,-�-,hr•Si ,a! '",, t �- ;._`� �',� .,,5. •` .,. _` - g -.,,4_ --ems..
-1 �' .i -RD
=. .-.... O 1 ,.•- r p TR R 'Q - z -c _t ''',y' s.°x ''�.''y 1 :.�a.' '%..'y...e '7-.- w ' f- "-r,ys"s,/ ., -_ '_• ,I -_"
■ , x
ir
O t' e4'— O. o� C �:v ! f A`M, k• :'yr I aAllr _ t_ 1 F, *V';
/A i' _° . � ' - �� _ �,' rt• 4: E � f • O s t _ ••' �,: - rt `,'Y ' '.h "i. R •, �i'jt � r � a r (! "'� � a' �' _�,NI''
�• ! e - ' arr' Y Q r . .. 4... i -, PP: •
,u e
2
.', :i r -y. tw' � :C r. �• -, r ��- i:a� ... -��. ti " -Ll I � i4 •" !
., -, o. � r�i4,+ � " �. �� !}• �--�.•Lii ,,,, ^fir",`'�P •'1. ; `y'.: ��-• 84r�' :, pl '`, 'A� � !s �+�i i li' �•y-i.i4R k. ``a O-'
_ - -:
.r: _ -
Ir 1
,st.:h•, y��ki- ��r}_;" �jlal i ����„ - Y" "51: ' _ .,+ykl` �4 yf. I,a 4 -`i'-4 +jE �' �I ar�':'4 a *, 'DQBINS-RD.—
•,(G0'a ' _ ^� �a •e. ca
y,
.ra.+ +.'• .Y`U, iu �r _. ".-. s,.. s Pr .. ,,1`_ r "--Op ,+� 'P- �, _ F7 .rj 1 ' I .'!G. '•Ij 'l'�1,`•�,:: '!' 4 -.
:._ �E Y ,! - • - � -R, .+:, t: ,�, _ .- #,u -,, "' i, �F-'�•. ^,D
tie .<... "-'. ,�,:Y �- !.pu' �: �. � ,e•,�f`�•.- yj ' - __ �,_ . ' k�.1.. Ta' _ t_ '�- S/O Iltj"" '•!;_' � g ��'.4er', r Ira,�' �'� ��.` iP'Fi' °�'�(
..w1� 1}, ' , �. �� _I + Y' ."+,-. -. r Cr',1�, r�5,r, _°� •� �Y '*si F'� �,,. meq�, p_ �k
#-
FL A
ikLI-
f AZ
..>t`'... "._ k �:' " �� F t 4 ' v. ,� __ 4r;. xp � �',�' ',� 4 "�� i n � - "� I k 5 ,., � ..;�`• or - -
". _ �. Ik .: O� , `� � � x ptn °�.�. 4', - •, w: `#� 'k . \ �c 'a.kl �' -; B .. �.r -+� 1 _ < - ._
P �
t a fR ST I 4- h •9 '
. s y •r
" � -" •'�yi .+�, � i � S711..r• �.. �FRGENE`RD'' i+.k ,� pot ' f� � �'i� ��a • i•? rj i�l
:•• �w entia t " 'k
* ` t " `� • ?02 CF.. Tributar . s k y..-d�� y k Q
(,� v
_S: J`, e_ r6�11 r potentia pere, Prolectgs'456 ;d a e r w U o
010 l w tl n a F/o
a 3 .� ae a s -rr.�. I •DriOB_B: I€' xQ*`'"t� F .. 'm 1Jr '�i' �, r j, �. u" eg'.'1 t ''a" .` ;Ir'Ij':F c PFM Heca" d�nw PatrenJre�orPersreotJe3� w �
—W43o=ote} O
FZLh/tNS 'LLE RD Sg wp0t
=—110.
t003¢ re
F Ll
ioZ/w�PePoiFCtAVV
01 (-607 ac.) k PFoSeectea 0U
�
ooaoyT
UJ _J 2
Proposed Pipe Centerline F r `� r dr' r s ',' `> Z z Q
ILLI ILLI
+�. -'�,•, ,- ..+F �,�, dim •F' i. a.. � ^ - -. ; ,r.Y '�' '*F ..,,a�•� Z � U J Q
QL ILLI
Access Roads y r°" o ..d �'t rf ,=- d w Z U
Culvert r4 I r'f j't _ ��Oy� p Ap F' iS Q ¢ a Z a
s J a
Ile-VT,,r �r r r { . 4Fy 0' E
Potential Stream Banks e, Df Z
Potential Open Water o� .. , x " �; S �, y, 95iFa/Tr'butar S r -. w w Z
n
P Pr, A58
Potential Wetland ��v .'' {` + � .•{t � ` erenniaiFCt rea z
�i OVZ -Of
pl' y aA. �t •�¢ ,,�, r " y - ,••_�}-6 a®, F o
Wetland Data Points
i, � ` it 'F_': Yn A, 'il t' Ryf i � e P I �' ' � �'�•� � • ' - - O o
O Upland ?f_ OLD
Data Points a
MO R M
99 �� i ti O �� i"" O ESBORO; xp0 FIGURE NO. r
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH? 12005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS 0 500 1,000 eB/ 4 + 4 M F J • *�'+ o
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES
_ ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON O '� �`^ / k'�tr kl s- `Y 25
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Z. 9
I
(IN FEET)
r
. s 'r!' -. .�•�':._,s ". - - g. \ ,�:•":'e ^ ,� • i"1�'1 �� _ �'<! ,v, �'•, .. 3"Ita_`I".e x'+-- . a ..� ry .fur•.. ��

sg ti `I k. NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME
-
.�• `®
\-;A
SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES
' e y WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE _
' NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. o m
4
_el i1g.
°M
e y .+
14 .,
O 04
OLD MOORESBO
_ �. dl�• _ OR$"' 1 �.R �Ils" 'i. r9j�' ' LO O C4
P8$�1f%a/ b P\� - r l'�JI��s..rt .a+xo- �I F Ln
pFi Tr�oJetar 4S8 t
T
O er al t 14� w'
x I :-
O a I•" r I ,r R QO &
p M s'
41*
04EWOOFSeO,Q I M' _-- + ,r �? I'°°� . • �,',
Z �y O 4 -
O l+
Al
N'RD
� .'` '•.�rN '`'. - ..:: ,"..,_-- '.� :...� %^�^O �'--* � s - �i', .
03
" . . 15 I k E I
+` * ;d it
, eVLA
e
, e
_ x �� c
�„ 1. ..._� �.r. �L`� � -.t i 1,P''I •'•`1 . � ., ' - '+ �r'o�� ! a•.. i I �" I t 7
` 1
� .� • � � "•,� _ _> , �'� `�." III � �Wa � � ,• �` �� e, y � Q
T X
757
_ I
`. 3gF3 �•.' � - 5by _-*^�z- .—� �.+�f °00`(�y--`.-��'�, � - .. K �•'-1 � � r`a�.i.�r �k�" �'iy :�� _ _ " ,�s . 1't _ U o
I o
�aR 4�
s '
O O
l
.•." ' .7 rlr t� S I—
':+' �_ ' �I � I, �' � � � f5 I ,.�'� �; . I � � ' � O � � � ��^ a�y.�°e » I k' ' a L �•i � •�. d
�, w ire I 5 y e' ' q w O
IV
Project Area (-607 ac.) p �"- .,,s /FR f ` �� - 'L'-� '• {#I .` I�r Of cD o -a
O 5 i' Afb I4 ,. d p' Q x
v
Proposed Pipe Centerline: *' Y' _,. z a
' _ .• _
x z�
' r �`' - y� www LU
LU
Access Roads i,-_ Y +`.� eo w ,.o . :. s +�►' a w z v a
. 'i4- o
ry.
r k � * � J� � � � .c� t.p" � i`T• � ;- '.� ( �Itl S '-.r � I C..) (n � m
Culvert hll, Q
- 1 ;. a
Ui
Of
Potential Stream Banks
LJ.I D Z
e
"._ ,. - .•',:5 • �, >.' aiu.. t5�...Fy .=..r �Y'i
i EBBLEDR s �I'`:d.. i. 1' t. PL Q H of
w
Potential Open Water
#` „,'{r� =z�, -�`` rr{4. :j�L w w ?
"tom
Potential Wetland • � ��' �,,° , �':'� s '�:�� ><�° �.;' � �* � a
�O Wetland Data Points �G c� M
*O Upland Data Points "°ti/
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH? 0
12005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS �' f.y LNOR
� �� �'d " .L' 4 a; A � 1 .-'- `�•M" w' ..+F s " � Orti s to Cf
'1,0100
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM INC00
C ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES � :'� � - �- 5, , 4 .�- � '' ' r `�- '• ,y. r` � "'��,,Ip _
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON FF+ r 4 5 = '+y ° "-, I, ° I-, �*"_� 0 '� F i y
26
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. �' - - A" +_`•.� '� ;;�� _ "'+� • SNI: - ,},_�. r,, ; ail
•• w.:.:; �.., r .:P'o_(IN FEET) to __ 8 �. t ✓. _ _ �°

NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME
�'' IL 50
SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES
WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE
� yw NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR PoteP a#r s'{tr' ; .E iL
123OGCRtarSq6j ''_.'T., , -.4�+ Y 0 0
00 eF In Je EK R /� N
; w P P rennP F/ow e N § S'O OVE.RD�
r° r
a/ a -A
°ten a '. Y''�,
.+ F p Ma P tea _ 4, �►* -
O o 1 W tlan t I 4'
P O/ Ea �n ro. tWA36 � �• � ,& , Lr) �
+a Y,f , .a r ',
eadW area ate
,ter PO q �,� -LID
ti 4<<. w M
` y - gyp
�, e 41 a. F py Q O
�•. Potentia' ' - �$'` a
100 CF nTpbUtar s rP / .v• F Yti."
Per roJect '462
enn/a/F Area
_
°tent;,/ qw w.4 { ' '
LUr
P 0.123 et �•,+Mt , a, a n
EM/PFO ac "I Pr 37
;y• ,wF ,. —�t Y t �, ,# •::�
Ott Ct -■ ;a-_. �__.—.. .:-T; '�. _ , ,�. 7JAK
e om/aAre¢ • k �;
5 tea
w.
p.141 ac et
to a/ T i' "r FM/ pF� °Jectgrea8
PO nti b P
». S
15SGROGrCRtar SA63 .b r r :5 eep"j!1,'��".' '{4 a 4 `' m M i •-
(,F In P EEK,O ';-.3 �y .*,c•y
l �. Perennla�Flctgrea z�'' a r s
T
_ C ,
_ y
�.P' �.;:k'�--_-. ..°- -aal;.., ".•� = .. .,y �!. ..�'" r.hl;. Y 3:•..w. .•� , .K.'�•ti �rt•,.,;r-.' �.. -
41 J� ♦ +i-=��
e, f
ot
po f k Q
ti
' i ► ' 3`r l tents 3 z
r :• ' . Bg;Fal TrPbUt, P a
.�
Here °JectArea 64 83 LF j/, TribUtar P l I 4 y §
ji h pr g
tial 1
r r F , , 'a
F/OW a PerProtect SA65 �.`° '�' y, _ Q o
r a 4 ;
ti V, ennl,/ F/ Area o
Cn
o
r •.
y
I, r q
w r ' 0 0
x
.. .. � �� � 5 -RD - — 7 -,�" # ,i {g �,:� 5 �a f • i. e�A.f4 !fi � ,, _ .'�*' d o
•
' ,er' ARRILL, a .3�. i .... O - - ,, rv1 e'"{- -�' • - W O a
II 55,E
'6, _ y ° ` ' 6L, m HARRILL RD,._ -
til
Project Area (-607 ac.) ". PO g�. C7
a� ' t �, ,. •. -• `+Y t - i... _ _ - - 130 CF T ributar w t" `� O I— W w
• V dY
Proposed Pipe Centerline *' in s w z z a
? ,' Gk ' Perenni rOJectgre 66 _ W W w
������ r + `2` r.� ° �" `ti 4,O a/F/oW a 1 4 d W U J o
Access Roads -4 .,!�- w z v a
r
"�1 Mr`_r -- ' tr " d
Culvert' J z
a Q a
Of E
Potential Stream Banks W o Z
Y , P
� � � � °ten * �� � Y� _,5 Q o
. r. y a 3` LL a
Potential Open Water ;* .' _ o o a/ r '` +,-
p P 03 ac / etland w ] .� w tL W W
a n r 3 } Z d
Potential Wetland,. �: �. ,�' to 4 *� He
" - *� r4:_{ J
:a !:',�. •.'� +`� {• w .,; _.4 �-: , 4, �N I• 4 _ " '•�". Ty�i -�c',, „ 3
Y e t
Wetland Data PointslOg M
_ o
O Upland Data Points `,,. sy�Fs a M
:
-
•
4N• r
0 00 000 .. FIGURE NO
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH7l 2005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS O� { i . ' O -
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES �� 5 1,
_
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON - }�� w, � � .;" _' s r `• "- - ��
27
STATED OTHERWISE. (IN FEET) *� , �} '•,
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS S

NOTE; POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME
SyPR�s a e}'+r `a '► En. SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES FMS p'
lti • flft_ r WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE Ol m =
4 NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. SP>'0
/ G z
u
CD
af
�Z,.-
*.'
,U ` �' $ � 51
19 Trib Oin Litar 3ere Protect 67 x0FAre/OLO
OLSAOM,•s.94P 11;d 4� i T, ., Ote•�T -.�...-.'.'_ . �y 1 • ' ' >'..'�`'` � ,`� '�'.' 4.. .. .i���Cn 0 per n proJect SEMPen Ar nied_77gred7r7.{� .
jn utaro C 7 4y wFt`
_x+�, _ Pere °fA
x
--- _ P nnl red 2�Ai ..ate e T
. .•F .,, w► _ '. °� nt%a - dl Flol-y ..."d"r ,. + -;� .. ' ,'
- _ jr
d
}p x �'. °`" M lleaaproje� q'445
PEIL
Water F ea
y
rest
O r •}
F - ..•� .! 5 . 't,4�f ' ..mit „� �, .,.
- it +�' • .' _ •F '3, �.-� •*�:�+. � !^a a •..� _
,
Y r I_ .�-..; �t �'. ,• ' a• .;'e �, r a...a R '�'' ..1 M ` � � '6k � ��F _ � — x t •. M� ti u kms.
��-�- N.
{ TT
a
t l;
r`
- it Q
j - 1- ' ..
potentia/ Tr. 'd' ."'`�� P'1'r r ,; ; �. IL z
I
Fin ro. r SA�7 �F O
erennidl/otArea', z.
j
IY�i� i J ' ,,:.. ti - :'w 9 � � �4Jx POte mss. �� a .` 1 .y r• P` - - v._ _ � o
' ' F (SAV) �' `r a O
_ 1*� • 'w.r ''s i { d9 v r� "1 n " 1q0 i PyRUN� SAS? ° d z o
x F q h
'k = P n role U a
a - 5r �Ox�O erennja/ F/otArea w O d
a. 1F•`. ' .:. a:; ". til c' - `; , - N q O }
W LL
Project Area (-607 ac.) �"� a . 4 �. L7 Q
Proposed Pipe Centerline-� O w w
-
1 w w
w W
Access Roads a _ x y .,� x potentia/ `` a w z v
y ti s.w ,y n * ^�Oh� pEM/PFOO'��prOjryeet
d�Vi44j l� C�^EARWAT l•�`e J J a z a
Culvert - a ��c: Hed tq RRD Q
_ dW rea .`. E a Q a
. ater w
Potential Stream Banks Forest l �� U
._ WOf E
LL
le
*� 7 .
Potential Open Water - a_ I �'� kp �
Z S
Potential Wetland ,• f I , . , _ ,�. o° J
130entid/ Trb �h o
Wetland Data Points L y �FinP "tars M
y0 Upland Data Points perennjd/ FLOW red 3 0� d
.- . �.-. y } ; •' , .. -+- - ---.
FIGURE NO. d
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH7l 2005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS sy 00
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM INC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES 0 500 1,000 ` .. .E x ��
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON /d' } o-. '�`"�
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
(IN FEET) !, '_t..x �C ' + rsn1'

U. NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME
D/EARW 4o •3 * �'k.J SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES
WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE _
} +
ED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. �
NOT BEEN SURVEYz
u,
y6i 1 i f V
41 'k
rJo
�W K Rlp� t.�` t t �rj� e
Q) GFQQ `` t _ E,,, ROB tiR,', r •f
Ilk
-- ✓ - O: -'x '°'+, 1 ,F `., s+. .,ta =' P y. .. ,P.,J - Vit' +f . GJ
r •.
+ 1 ,rr Jy
LSA
rn
prLO
i �' � � = ° • y � MSG �. � at � U M
NOMESTEAD'AV _ -s Y Y O� $ qr*�'�e ATEpR� F d- =ti a J ILL r'_
14
X E TE a
VV_H
47.
,
J.
er
a,
s- ^ x0 t, 'tea h , w, .. – ""iT`'C- . #*t z. •y, to ". _
f .:' - ^0 .. .� - .� _,_�. ... i � al,y .}., y. �y� ��� v ��.�.•r � 'Y�ry �.. yr'r� k � - . ..y _
OLIVER
AV—
i IIJf
,i ,f i c •,. -• i e— 5 -s, c�
t. .ei
. 1q
X _
°nn
+~ ;y �' � =.!•i? .�'y" �,�:* ���, r'� :Pry- u"�` y�'.i. -_-��r'v':*"S��"
:
_ "'y � E•
1 � P,■` • , , '• ' . _ - ,,,.ice. _ � ,°• ��a a a F �L � .: .���+ NO � �- '•, p .
e. ver y a-• v . a u �^ " lSMESTEADgV f
1 dp �i r•. " }' c .:�'... aw - Q
Firi
I� r,
-
,a; .� ,.. � � !'� �� �. '� ' � . �. iF• ' � v' 1. � � ' ,ry}� � - +� ,0�' _ ` r�, �a �.� y . I.•'v''�ir `� _J
e ,
Y
d�nf Y}•. f 4
i
,y
U
�°f X Pptent. �" 1 ». ILL]_
631
O r'
a F 8
• ._ ,� * , rs :.. o - ter Forest a `+a, �reca �•r d ~' o
L
..a.' ;c: �iP:. - Potential
Project Area (-607 ac.) '' : �, -- ��' Aw-2 �F Trib„tdr
' = 10 { 4
in P Sq' `+ , ' o `qp
:I Q a Q
P rO ct �g A'.
:a. ..._ - ''" enniai Fi Are d di {, � H w w
Proposed Pipe Centerline ;-.. , I *� 'y T. w w �
"•t ._ •yew i `„aR ., _ �A"rt D9 `.'. �u?' F d�' `- O = W w
Access Roads f '.,... c r "S _ v } � h- - 1 y r # =s �� +.ryp- g �� d w Z U a
'.
Fin9 -- k +,6 0' O p U
H9VENLN/'\SEG J�a �..., �C'G % �.I' x� 4' G.R.O� �.� Q�Fir rat �} a Q ap
Culvert ' y 7�'+4 HOLLAND DR_ - ..'-# ' AV W
DEHA R of r-
Potential Stream Banks _ _ TDR Z
r o - �� � Q O
CPN "_ LL
s
Potential Open Water 4l - # �G� `�,,, _ s' o°` w w =
Z
Ji.r-, • � yr °y' �, _:- =„•-'t. - - v �e � ' :.+:,. "�'�"�. f . -� � '� � '•q — � _ cp�U _ Z = °'
s'�R• ,�•• a -. _.... ''y '1� ,� I—
® Potential Wetland F _
,Wetland Data Points o coN c\R •-• `" ��*� . ° I �' J
y a_ ,t r '' y a., P • S ay7. .-•AV
M
O COC µ r f' �, c y_ GREENrAV a ti •:k t. "1y fi
'%' -
V 46
0 Upland Data Points o`" <�'" — eeTHE�s a
. �� -• � } 1�'9/i '�' + `_ q. ' .. !• 7F m.. ' ' �-, �--.f' �__ ' r'�' ,, . — 's' - a g �' �`•% s ate_. r
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH? 12005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS '' T ? ' + • - a ` r F a
rt 0 ! 500 '1,000
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM INC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES - - r ' - --" - MEMOR/A `�' e a _ _ t �,r•.
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON
p_ • .. m 29
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
x r _ ,�• ,
(IN FIE T) ET , �'- '`�„ _ _ r �" - `
a.s tl x , a_ , �• .a. u Ih fs.
-

; •3d~ f` 17?.Ngy.';' NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME
SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRIL AND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES
WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE > _
#
NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED GISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. z
f'
t 7 yr "� « w. - F is ELWINNERS'CIRCL
M. e
r" ""' -�, '�' •� • . " :,,yy ,. n . ' •.. � S Tp� 1,v
�� ' >-+c, • "`3: . 9 FJ�, r`". r �,'°s .mak`�,�r:�+ ti �a•� a G
LSA
p0,D °`` f�, .�,� ST n �dv - ,y rM I I Z
•
+ qi =e' cPf' LSA
y
_ ,N
_t y yILLILL
i
Uf
¢ t
ti
13 of al TribUfa - , gF
U 6 CF r F'
1
jeCtgrAa76q BROpICSAV�_
Q7
1;.
ca
".;tq. .9 'i'- y $r _ I h �i , ryt4 fF• 7
Y e. ✓
1 •
t
g d;
i
I'll,
• : ," l- ,�`�':. �� � __ _ „tee_. _ _ � #*, � �� � � ��"a5� �,o �
r' Pole f –
,'
� .•, �,� � X14 .� LFinP far 3 '* �;�� t.
Pe role A T6g
reahi cl gr
- is Ofgn / -
a y 0.010 Wetla`�- r ,1 - U h
= PFO ac. in P �cf Wg0 leer _
z N ro 3
63 r t Badwater or
f 'F * I / :. J, a
es o
— t �" w
rr a`.1 Y `•'• ,:, .zak..1 ...,, r- _ ,�, r" .,,� • - e i.:ro w O a
O> o
Project Area (-607 ac.)e eRo Sh✓' d �.. -;> O O z
` �" ,: `'� c.7 c�4_-- _- f F. ti� S ING-CT -r �.� •�.- d � Q a
Proposed Pipe Centerline +a,e4po R g ` ;'n 0 z z
w _ __z W W W
I
Access Roads - •, �.{ VF.
a W z v a
r
ter,¢•{ F e Q a o
:. y
Culvert �� �° : �� �� ti . +., m`
j�
-
Potential Stream Banks F" 1 4�' � } `�"P N F +° �°: +" ` W o
R6LLG
Potential Open Water e' _ " • n F x� ° ~ Z
p y�
®Potential Wetland • _ � ~ kti .� � _ ,� •;�. ,�. ''� �' � ' � - � � � a
Wetland Data Points ,,..� ..a o: o Y
L f1a. COLL
Upland Data Polnts , - A:' eGE.Av
E
FIGURE NO. d
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH7l 2005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS 1-' QP ; 1
0 f- 500 1 000 J m, , , u — !_ �' _�
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM INC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES t . , ! .. 30
ONLY ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ONI Gj , - F II, t' '•.�— .�-_�.: - _
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. '" 3 :
%� (IN FEET). dA '

TV V
—� { ,NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME n'
.� 14 SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES
WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE
NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. o >m 0
Z 6i CD
'
t a*
If "
> r Q) t COLLEGE AV O
�l
} o i (BE ntiai Tri
utar y
,r z
q 4 AVERD S803 ,�� ++
0 1 2 LF in p .CREEK) <• h s,' F II
roles _ ticr` �}���
Peren tArea _ F LO
Flo g L'� :_
ILL
ILL
JT x
O r
,: 4# �`�it- J, .,�� • 7�., hx _ _ _i'^ _ 76 i.i � r i '-4``gyp. U) d
R
+k�
55 1;, • - J+4.
044F V
" Cc;9�i tip
' 4s�
+ _ 3+• 1'. F it
r ii—�•+ r - '• _R•', -r 9 �', o ... ,-'
s' a �, 00 i ,• _ , M'' , . - SLE
10,
caJ
Potent,
145 LF in Tributar S80 *+,.1 ` - t w •""h '_ ;p
Peren Prolectgrea
`�� — ••4, ,.` � . �S. � nial Flow � ,�� r•" F� � �' :.,�'� -_ `- —7�` ,�,,#_
yr'd r - :a •.`k �, y: i t f - p —_ AG�Q -r-t- COLLEGE
AV
Ar
qw•.
• �%y y y 4 r '. �O 7� .P.. li.. r �Y ��� ' -'~ ;' '4.F a = ,r� '• t"5=F -`' s. O
'
t r. o Pt P tentiai Tri ' q 1 F f- _ w -Z 4_
.r •� y�4 _ �j r ., a, _ Op (HAWK' butar SA7 �' '�y' ' r, a - Q F- o
# r.r ^^ L NS gRANC 9 r.
te' Prolect a� a a
367PerennialAre 1�W. 2 z o
ss r
r
� � e.
00 3 .,�Q-P _ �;. • - - tlll .. f's w 0
RR. 11 IOw a
Project Area (-607 ac.) I' f +� s + Potential Wetl .� w �z .' z
�.. 0.023 ac. and WAS o { _ Q a Q
F <:a* , ►.
PEM Prolectgrea2 s .. - H w
Proposed Pipe Centerline r �_ Z", k - seep O Zz w UJ
� a
�. Access Roads _� ,•�'}; 4 o o a a w z v
;�.
+, aCO
Culvert :; G�J�G�� F #. �" Q a z
Otentiai
butar ' •- , W IY E
kt a,t+� 4 •# �5e� "f f x� P143 LF in Prolect SA80 O czi
1{ _ i
Potential Stream Banks
r + - - Q o
a _ H
' _
Potential Open Water, ittent
low w w z
Interrn '
Y
^ • h
Potential Wetland
Of o
�O Wetland Data Points M
a
00 Upland Data Points�M1 `i ,° + e
F
r +' d { �{+ ti • y 4 , - , FIGURE NO. d
REFERENCE: 20 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH7I2005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS 0 500 1,000 + wft'�,T- '� r • ` Ip ° 00
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM INC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES — f ,F,;.Y. '•,, 'w ' " x-.
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON a'�' 7i''.`,' - '•�„ tf�y '+' �! �h # 31
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. r�"• ,,�$ 4F �`'� ' s''" ^�
(IN FEET)

4
NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME +^
SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES VA
.a
WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE
+ + NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. r w� oCN
af
m
UJ
CD
t P
to A
BR OO KSIDE PL
LO
_ M
"
�,.��y, 1�° ;I SOS !•O r „ O
�tR LO
-,.. - •: ' ^� ,,��5y:r a_ , � F, � : � �' � i� � 'L o � ' b !� � , � _ e�i'�� �.. ' r I., f,, ��-1 F .� C - .�+r . _ ?�-� p ' * " � I I z LSA
t �
� t F
J �' v M
•
00 Y J �
i,
qaA O " 2
1. O .. W _ e
f � �� • f € 00 � _ �-� NE RD,..v- �iiy.;S,•,�i�_ ... , � _ _ - O
F F R `
5 �k
r
185 •. � �:-_•. :.. ? � �•'��7 >r�' ':� � '�` _ - `-
r -r
• t. r m jam' .. . - "� c yY,
+ ja
-
6
00
I
ca
% Tbib 4-A
rIL
l4 F
L=
= V
s,�•"- 1 d� - -
;f �' e:'' �^4 .• �l ^�s I , +
_ ,7} /may
f .rot., ,.\ t 'r.y' ,r .? '.t , - : P •• k= .+w . *-.�_,.._' —i. -. y F . ,t `� P � lE y -,�.
P 1860 0
9 �F . Ufar �0 ,Ep. R' r ♦ $ a. 'w; ti k i
role t q81 o ii
f `.
Perennia/ C Area q r o • v w, A h' �[�1 i .I k i{ k: ?" Q o
F/ I- • i � � Y ?', 4 M via • � / 1 N
ow o l5}00 � �o .� f/' I L •,--''-- f � • ate` V
18 x �'° i � t.1 4� de r • 'v f Y : LIJ = q
01
_ 4 ' Patent%dl Tr• .. 4 ^OOp S.s �-•-z `�" ':t r .i, wS9 - w i ._ Q
121 CF ibUtar = O
Lo
r F Inter ;n Project SCO 3q.., '. - '- 2 a z o
'.
_ O
w x
ItTent to e ' o M Opx p l I—
w , . f I Ppte LU OU
} �� i' o o r'¢ - * _ F ^ I u �FtR31 TrtbUt O >_ 0 o
Project Area 607 ac. f A �5 BRoq q �' _ _ z
o TICUSI DR + .� F Dd r 8 U
q CP
o VE Pew n Prole tR/VFRI �" 4, 4 O I- w
p p i' ; v. r �pAo' n ia/ Fjo Area _ ~ z z W a
Proposed Pipe Centerline I „tet w �� O w w >
I �, perry y ► w = w W
Access Roads,. f �f - g_ , til �� I' z U a
��� a
4 0 U) p m
a .,
r t * �r a x x J Q d
_J z o'
Culvert
o- Q
Potential Stream Banks i • _ P ,k. f °f� �' •_ W I LU O E
t +; I W �
y s r �rc I ,I I Oo a z L)
LL
Potential Open Water ?
� e
UJ
Potential Wetland �� _=• ° — 'P
-,P' _ • x F
Wetland Data Points*"*'
0.
i'_. 0 J M
WAYDR
0 Upland Data Points
RIVER WO OD OR
` • .". �:. .. .• � Ilk .;_` "
t.•_ - _ IGURE NO
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH? 12005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS 0 500 ? '~' 1,000 4� - u —
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES - •-. ��
? +a
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON , ; �.+� `I a �y+'�i -
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. ,�- I IF I .�7"F :�" ,+!'I
(IN FEET) �; lav .` +• '.

'
_. CCBOU THEY HAVE
NOTE POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S.U S WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S E r'
' SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRIL AND SEPTEMBER, 2016 FEATURE BOUNDARIES
WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB METER ACCURACY; T E } _
NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. o m p
z
6i
Sk
r
,
L• ,
I �
A r
�r � / .k F • l ° p p
"'_�, �'�� �W - �' _ �x� - '. �.,�,, - •� � ,,T 4 yin �•'�:., �• Ty, '
.,� � - F, �' y rS 4 ' �� sib f• .f ' '.i � y M1 iM1'R � ..�4� � �.
,9.. ......_-, _ - to ', _ .. '.• ra �... •.. ,1.. � � _ � ., ..," .r, .r d -
e .,r _ •'.. . I - : mei; .. � F . i" ,: .' ,t 'q. J
'•s
r _
J 6i ILL
... •r y "
C'
4
- ,.�� +i r r' .r:. r,, 4 s. ". •e. ,.. I ��•' ,y - ... 'o1r TM.� - - C� D-'
co
i
I •F
4 POt
P}
r ;r esti T .' r. • r ' f � ; �' `r;+'�.'rr� � � � �` f , =cM1y ��
ws
r yy
T1F n
v
c` _
- Peo%F.eCoerqS
A88renn.,�•�,+ :� . � �`�' - _� ,_6lnPrreara
.. /
_ ty
Z.
_
'. `. r � r• •`-� ''.. -: CED •, -
'* f }.ARCIRCE
m
T
o
C ri2,,r�
R CIRC E
R y
1v`. r rYr
;lel. / DRi'-� fr+�C� _
e .. '•_ O „s -e,� ca�,y
y '. �_"Aj
' .• g _'� `_'sib._+ y. •
' t x .:,� °k'' •}: r - o Otent•
�-
° Per oJect 9p rel w
4v '• `,r '� ;> t ,' en Ars �1 �'r�+ - .
i
eav
-, y 4 +5 k. o.o1s t'al Wet
/an F
T 4 M a ro
- PF in
e,Headw lectgre
at F a r I_
,
,s r R erg s x,
., ore # t I r Q
J
i et- ";+,� ';... 5� '� ;:! `,� e# _•--.+ - _ { ,Ox ''' �.J �, ,. fur .,� ,� 'r ;�'.' - O
�:_ ,P _. `*y - rp;•: �'q �Sd p�� `,-IL
r i y +ri F
, '• a ;' . h -�
l _
=ERALD VALLEY DR -y y;. ,. : , -•.:- z.' } �'�, o '� `�.,` '�. • t` _ �F •, W 4
--n
yyY n
4
y ^ 1 �w N
r i. 4 -'v 5 'R gr e , F y +:.:.�>t.' ... a a T •_'. -i n _, �\ A .F. y - P •1'. . 5Y Q LL
_
_17
- C
,
—' y +q. _m , ,,` ` ;,ter "�-I I - .eM1 a :a •.� r .. w O a
, L i W
• e wr' �
o
Project Area (-607 ac.) r,r ot8 UF r Utar /r .. -, �� a Q
Pty /b x
R._ f s .: o, M1 F w J E
af
i5 f y -y 4 „ : y P /n Pro' A91 , y ~ w
Proposed Pipe Centerline ��� ,5 /` ` erenhi leotgre �'•F, z �` = O w w >
.�'alF/ow a , 4�- W w
! y ,.. P +ems. r-'. s*' U J a
Access Roads a o ; ,• r� oten_ ti ,�; �: a W z U a
IsY e 5 y x,00 t%a/ Wef/ a �t �_ n Q d p o
_ T• -
Culvert QO I �r _ '� ` 'I EM/ I n Pr le� WA61 +. oo€ Q a Q
r r PFO Seep rea ^�� W p Z
- ,%
Potential Stream Banks ,"� ,y o
,
r
Potential Open Water w w Z
z _rPotential Wetland titiq� lam' 5 I',a 5 OfJ
qR sr�°,�.. rt r Ip a. ripe .� oo
�> Wetland Data Points o Y
rte ! t " �•- .a oo J g
a
Upland Data Points "` •;v,• .,�-, .,� _
ti
e
FIGURE NO,
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH7 l 2005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS r •
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM INC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES 0 500, 1,000 i—'' �,�__,r } ;„ - a F—" re "� DqV �O 33
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
L (IN FEET) yRD "� ,

NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME
PS1 nt%dl Tr%b SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES V
Fin p War S WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE
_
l'erenniroJectgrea 82 NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR.p/Ow o m
F Poteaf
..- i y . • ! .. ",'u� r 6 �... 1F-
9 ? L , . -b Y a r IS s
r
t
pr S 6 r j k= 't`
_�.. Pee "/a/let e Q r1 �� ,r r r'` ,. 7 y , `-` '' f i j` r•+�•., i `° L
ro�dr A9 °' � r {
..._.
FCtgr a • +y !' ' ,f•?' s O,QS
Foote
h 132ItF nTr%bUtar
P Prole SA9g
"Ienn� F ctgrea
P a/ /o � e,�4. Ln O
i 0.03p ted/ Wet/a W F LSj
Pot pEMi FOc- in P oJnod yyq 3.'a ,' Q �.a ` �o`st� � + - �" . _ 4 '.a . `f U `h
85 Trib
ea ea r + L w w
O CFa/ Utar P Ne rater Fr 6SO �'` II. 4M 1 _ ..,. , ' Q O
Inter n protect SA93 °rest.,', a
Pnitte Area i I °
,.: # ,_ I'
. r .6 . •; N � K � . 'd � X S /ti �' ,a � '�'� v ; � i�,ir • a �, - ,+�i � - r . � - , .� ,i' ,
,
-. _._� _-. ,- °,•. = ..,...'`'" `, r r. - `�'.~ �,. ,' a` ',' ', .gY 'y, .vim i `iM'. r'ab �'4'. A'qa. rr �'r tlt +
vt � .: r � - t �#� - '�'-. - "7:. y,a � °l�"' ;Jh: .. !�' � � : ' ,.��'�k : �,.: -_.z a ' _ � �,.. _ •�'�: �. "
I .. i'_ �:' � .• ,. �" �-. ". M1' ti° .' _ &`, e � tn7. .titf� 1 . �+ � p., Y:• �u' ,� v� _ by ,, -; a
Ica
• �}. `' •'k 4.' +Jif C' ,, Jp " i F` a.��': "4 P. ' I.�.}V • y,
41
.sem `'{M _e , MF
a
_ - Oen r- , Y,`'1,16w , ;..r.' •' -•�
94 t r. ??• a' LF r/but "�k ! o .f.
, J
1 � ,
0 t r r' : ° P .. Perenn rolectgreg86-
".'"'. : Flo
�I'. T'``• a`j,�'.'#, , `•''q ' 3 #; q' ° �, •4 7a . • r - - 'ti`s•
2
L
a
:::.y.._ te. ..M +# r $I' �.,• r "' A°kv i S'f + fi''' - ,Y +t •+° :y
o f SPARROW.Ci 3 i;: .y ra_,�•. 'il.,.'' .�`,_. a.. .•.' �s ,,T "�- r_I wr - Q
a S y •,r,I @ Pt, 1. +.. .1 -..�• z
GOA s %s` a 'r. + �f ;�?� x�. a.._ 's c' O
U
n ., , � � :., � �� '�' d; � �,+ ! �•., �' � 6q LF l Tr�bUtar + �� ;a.''P >r' ^ w _ � 'a w = o
U) I- o
P e�dnn Ct 1 - IY
r „ .
� o
fq' , srYR `YDR aLd ' r gal F/Ow rea s�C%c' _
°
a,'.�. t1* p. :r GRASSY MEA 0 o
off; U
Q ai a i � .:4 "V .E�' a: `cam �. td+j)�,.�• _ _ w '0 d
li ~
�ITE.pR �O O w
QOaof
Z w wProjectArea (-607 ac.) RAN>Proposed Pipe Centerline t
o
o
Access Roads �' s , % I°.,o �`� °4' S+ a w z v a
{°
o
A -Vi m O h ' Q , U m
5 k F
Culvert ..' _ "r 'S'. r -.-, .,•..,,� �r 4 ,,+ -- y7-�,''If ,�° >. ,-; ,:+z. `��,4^��•O\Q� -k . - ...,�� — a Q Q
e. a Q a
. _. ..y a ®C •' '3._
Potential Stream Banks ,Y :. . ` ; ,� . .''L • � '_ W Z
r
.. _{arr" i � _ � �' � .:.. •�. ` �,- .1 `• 111 ~ .4 '
LLOf zPotential Open Water r ? o � � �s. '� � _ M ar3t._ '1 I � �``�. _ _ °, � '° a r•'` � r..,kr� aaL �'�: w w
® Potential Wetland .,'gyp N . �3JL
,k. J
o
Wetland Data Points-
` # r' f '+�',�';yL41; t d - e�..+`tr E ° =� • ."°.'' L
Upland Data Points
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH7l 2005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS
0 500 1,000
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES �k �y e'i +. !I ," � �'•*,++{c�r�� _ ',� ' C)
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON ��
�' �,/a * + '�� ° 2 d
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. r 4 -`.. yl �. • aT ' •' b_r
(IN FEET) ; Ir
_
.: -sY -'. .. .�-.. .:.�$ I 'r. ,, 'Sri + .M ? ,,-_�"'S.. •` a

_xURc
NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME
SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES
WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-METER ACCURACY, THEY HAVE
4162
_ NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR.`'* , o m
�.
Z
v {b • .. c n�` . I y _ z
O1PRp pq S.
Y.. s.''�J••_.` _� f° RP, aAs: "_.�y gip;_ "' `-�':'I! - r,�.o- .,...� r>r:��'? �•r W e
v ++
i.
y 1 i a. + - e - - FRSRp 4 �► 0
'I 'sem k.
r,r Q APF
,�++
M
.5da
,.ir
LO
I X
+00 0.Q pt%dl W@,# P :. "•! "L 9Q _r ¢ T• 4 II Oz
2 16 ac tlan r.• °testi 4 2i; v ,,,•. IO
`'
' .:. PFO Ne In Prole WC01 r - :I 0.01 al Wetla r, ° , 4 SA .� i' �. o • we S,`N !'� <:s y�r U M
adWate tArea, PFMiP ac" In Pr nd WA6 +.. O e l RO�HER a ., _ T71Y P ��a �, W W
r F o 5 �i \d� GPAFR
�■ Forest ' ! , 3. F O NeadWaeCtArea a ,,. ' `l*r d� h : 3�• * ,� _ �d,�^ a
E
,... ,4 .. r r;.:,;....
o ter Foe "„ , - �� Uaf
d
4
x� e I p v `� ` __ r I 5 r • y l,. s r6_ - t�`� _
_ a
�' ��� 7:_t/ Yr, �r3'`. O. _-�.- ry0 � - sy , � `ky p.. - , : ���a �, -a'- ;�` Ir ,X r yy_•i � ,' -
� m; •, �."" . ,!. •;Y �N. - �s;- �� � �`" •moi y I � �. ,t # -
,,,�� ,;✓•" ..:� ' .Y �. n. " �'g�'�'P`-"�,s�� . r ' � �a4 �, '�;. kv47.e„"�._?'•[� wFs� -.:�, �_,+p�` ,:i'a�' e . y + � ,F}.'da€
nhri - f P ",' . , •, ., ¢, ..� Q.., #'i rk,
1Q$CF% butar °tent%a/�"a ; �SSh�r+ k�O Y
p Pro glpp c. 0.00 Wetl I t • + T q�
n AS $ -
�# ' P In a y�W- � '•,:, ,.., ..:
/e°t _ s:p,, 1 aC. n `
n/a/ F/oW Are
l? FM Head�Pr°Jectg q6g
a
Ater FOre ea
'�� , � , � �,� aF:'.X. :. �s.}k'°rt. r'.'".+,,.. .,�. �.ia:--.h �, ,+�,. ,:� I .� I •a Xp .a -.,. y �,1( ,e, _ ,r_•• ,
st
Y Rgey .,,,IX 7 r. ,' /•e. .p1.'-� X 45, - - it . 5 II ''F :. i, 'z� .a _
t
. -+•. ,.: �,•; r°:", ". � � / ..`-�'lti�. - t�'. , �' '` _ �.. r•. I n ?F,� ", _fir?` ..ar
Jf
c� T
��, @ ,�". e '.� . ` � :.;'' - 'a _ - _a �. �t�. _ :,9f.'r` _ `h 15.E - yy i. ' ,• - �*`' :•�'- �'. - F �-. L
,• - •ar Y: I,. •�",p i `x, P`
J.n '�,�,� 4�h _ ` r � X 3,:' °tent%al .,, - `.r• - �
.a,`''
+ r
r
} Y
X a °u t r ', _.�:; - • , _ r ''_ty� e e'!.! lh PrO. Sq 1pa -i., t,4 -"- /i _�
a ,� •. ,�:. � --'- `�. X..' �' c l4' .,• ,p t' � 5a�'tti � � e 'qa.�s� Pe
! ti � .� ,,, T•q� �k Tei ,dad i _ U
.,.:' 'a '`�': `:'/ - "'A'! f-' .y ,y/.��, ''�. ,!.. -.>. r 6'. �. tips A.h'.0 Y� ,+s•«: 'r. a.#•P.• ,p, r.'n���p'.`A�i _ o
.,r, e� r , �: - _ d�,. j -"►� a, ....._ ' 9,.. ;e " *r+.;. -,? ° t' ...+.yr"'1 �.. •F..: 'r" �; W =
y 5 t
o
a.Li ~' o
a
2
Xee" I X •y. �_j. ,'' ,. ..:,x
s?
�V Q i o: hr a �•
O
.-eft, nd acroS QProject Area (-607 ac.) 0WaterFoZw
Eyr;I__ W
Proposed Pipe CenterlineJ91 Q
111111 • r .. .. r rv.�' °' d .-.` _ _ '�'•' U Wo
Access Roads 1 r ' �� ,* c -e' r "� E: ' d w z U a
"
U CD
I
,i
4
Culvert _-r �, ' " . :, _ : `',. 4, 5 _J ¢ a
.
g a
4 r- e
Potential Stream Banks �,-. a + o ' R W _
1 # I rX y 1, 2165+00bit
LL
"' a
Z#
Ih
Potential Open Water .''l a e „``,', i''�" } ' ��� J'` w w
RD
Potential Wetland f _
.. ... X . ,
® $ �
th
r w 1r. • d,l "e'Fe'� +!-_w` .11+.mss- •4+br.`,Q <� we* .t- KSpN
S
o. y - rX' _ :. ,... a. ,x . i, SPC , o
Wetland Data Points �" r 4 `! `, 20 b J
00 Upland Data Points
- ` r ev: h,,. . ,` �•+� ... :- '^ > K .•.. + £' _ iY` d - " Y 'qP' {. f FIGURE NO. d
0 :' h 500, - 1,000 .'3
, REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH7l 2005 4-FOOT CONTOURS 1
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM INC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES`-t;_, T! .yr r ,L3 a,.� ,;` ,,�,� FYI �.. O w O C
• ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED, THEY ARE NOT BASED ONS :` _ - :�" Yy, `y "I� - _ ,- & . ij, cn - -V-1
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. F� :: , `. - r.,'. - - -r. , I°- - - •,a '' - o
-+ PtrPF�.`� ay'(IN ET) .bl, s•_ - i o
:x
a e i �
FE S�

NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME n'
r' w SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES ' Y
WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE
F NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR._ N 0
t oil,O� F � Q
v
k' •5.. .�*` a a' 9I
1.
) 0.A �
+ .
co
ILI
"
LO
\�� 1 V �ci r LO
�� r ..r �� -� Ike � I � sti+ t ���� � 1 ' � a 6i U �
UJ
V i
n 4 Y •'bik 4`7
kid
Y� ­#-r_,�=.j,,�
jY.= v0 tv - ` •"f"�'� + i{
4. .
e -
Avr
n t,Ole k , .. �.,.
'PO
d ��
r'
caPONoFR g ;
h_....,s �� POten " �+
F
• M
k ,# l pib t r S
kp F°'fit ren litT
rpi�� tAr A�p4 _ p , ✓
O �' pe y
Ow
ell
e
} - �, .o.:. ^P . ; sY �,s 'r s— -�'[ls..a�',4 K" 'W`u' @� •rte, _ .xt• •i �F ,%e
. i,Sc .. Z
:.: .} f ",. •`: 'K.Y+i _ r .. u.. `, k y Q .y r .-� 'c "�:� •�-•+•� * ._ � _ _
{`.•° __R. A - -' ~ :N.• i : g:,•., '"�.1.. �. p• 1gtr... .. 5 ; y r �`Y' . _ 1•, �" - i ' f _`�-. O
��,I �' 33` '-5 h'•yt :, 'r �. � , i � � ,, ..��e ,.ei'. >t Y• . 4 -`'6•'; .. },��_A,, ,•c �-•, y _ }-L
A 1.. '�: is °�E: �` ° `.r"'� x• POt�xre I •` �. ^j '�T „ h ..,�w'• Q o
:'
'
00 y.FR 11', v :LF, Tr/bUtar w U o
�,■' m " ,i: z. I ! pe l'roJeo SA1ptit
g w •. I U) o
reran/a Are g f Q c
RU Flo a o a ` = O
NY I O s r_ W n" E
- • a _
q , I x a o
, s
N RO c , aPl
ti
G7
'�- • '�ew� f '�r -�-ti y .ti .�x •: ' O a r� - LU
p
Pa
a
tential d
17
PF 0.01 wetl O
1 ao o hd o
Project Area (-607 ac.) ;4,I�a .r ,v 4 Y ti Ftij inP Wq C7 z -
b °
Botto r Jeo 6g .`� a of
k 'w
rnlan tAre �' Q x
.�,, Rpm . y s � , � ,r a Nara a � H w � e
a'W Id"Co ,' r9� o wo w
m� Proposed Pipe Centerline { kMgN 4 ,� _° ,. ,, }? Xo oaFore z LU w � a
r SARA'L•N�—w .•,' �' 1Rp .,_" �yi' 't' I1�Sb� st _ W w
11 11 a - 9-. 4 • • f' ,,,rl °F'�-'_7..:.o- _ _ �i Q
Access Roads. d z v a
W
•�!' k �+R`' eas' .' M"� ` "" �'�. a9 r ( .�,p '• - POte _''.•@ a: ..-:. ' Q d z 'ao
w J
Culvert (eUra/Tributr LU
a
Potential Stream Banks - .. +fit "'- ac -._o� em r ,`'qy �a'. � e� 53kFnAP0CRFEK 107 WQf z
r
-Jet rea `', 'Y a o O a
Potential Open Water low
LL
=t `
® Potential Wetland "r.`. tiRo�-:�`k �, a; _ - 0•/i ntia/wet
5Uac. /n land w O o
•
2
O v b Rivewro
rieSaectgrAeWetland Data Points 6g Y
o
a c� M
d MP Forest
� O o
J . �j 'ro - t `- �`'•�°�
Upland Data Points'
:. • � ° _ i b _. • _pT �� _ - ,: tf ,,'i � -� � �o� � y w.. .� r v.4 qe �..� M
FIGURE N
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH7l 2005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS +•
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM INC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES D �� 0 500 1,000 n + "+ f t �� +�'-' V? `* it T` `Y°•�.. i% %rte
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEYARE NOT BASED ON x - rat„`°S•' �?at - ti_' x` '�'� /'a. `ate .. yti+s, j ,
, 36
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. 4 "x �''` •"
(IN FEET) r'. y_@ j " �.
I •. r � ... � 8 :'a�d.� .A. IF •- � � -�
Y

07
NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BYS &ME
M '
I.:•i ;1 `'"Jw c?n , . •� SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIESs `
Na
4
WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY
��e` ��'.atih ,. � ,§ ,I4, .', PFM_0P.°ta _nR'atiC a/ Wn. •
_ ,.,
s`. �. 'Y"..# r _ t - . ,� .,•. r k HAVEW oNC4
m
NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. Q
p
0 e a z 4
SS nPreWdq%iverineOlt"S "Ilea 0'
_p
�'tl Tor
i„ OreSt
wam
^^O O c i s r a
h@ 4 �.
Ote
titin "t_. d� P p 1q ntlalwetland + } *1 - r� r A7� 1 '`1 ° LO O C4
�. ,
a
SS Riverine PLO
ro1ectgA�� �y'f r + J f II z
w a a 1 4 �"{ '� r
ame '� ,.- ,� ,.. '. ,;. _ - .
°Pores - -'r : �. �'w� �a T r4 Imo' 7 1 w
b y, r: M rIF w
�' v
ilo ts'
em JF k
POt°n
F s moo° (B Tributa
Eq r,
�31F SON OR Sq X08 °' it ,
,n EE y
Pr°� KJ
•
O Per eet r y
` , - .,� '�. , + +, • �
ate-• F C°', r+�r'. •r
n 1�
-, y�. .. • ^'R i. .T :..tom -'--_:ti= -'h f. •Y -f ' �i r�r - I - `. IS Cd
YI-• .F �•n, i=I-.
@I �•' ._ `i,� �. r y-:-.gs •1�`._ _ ' X 4I^� '.. h'�s•L hIM, F
R y I 5
"�y ti
P°
ten • z
ti
- Pro aaliWPtland
-'ar
Bead rO1 FtAr
1 ate. I O ? = �-
�1 Y k z
I T. r Nry ater Ore.t
a
.''�y` '9 @ a•- 1,`Y li OXO e-- _--�eY '� , ', 1 �,� V •r. Y -
B I
'+'S 4+ry
2�1
,
3
POt@nt% 4'P 14- 1t i -- O
63 �F / Tr'bE+tar��� T � i sn r F ()fo
r w h P in prO Sq i O Y . I
{ i y iX41 S erenni �etAre `. I w 4
3/ O a 3 1� U)
� = o
I—
•�
o E
?�
,
r
Project Area ( 607 ac.) �k - �` ti o Y �r , * Q Of cD z a
%O n t F I— UJ J
Proposed Pipe Centerline w w >
a
w
Access Roads �•' `{yam A 4 _ oo 'L z% v a
4 T 1
p n
Culvert ' ;' '}: Ir .�� �r Q _Ja Q
%a
Ly
E
Of
Potential Stream Banks �, ` - z' �L ° k I , ' Q
00
F1 of
LsPotential Open Water z
�
Potential Wetland I—
ZaZ
Wetland Data Points ,.,4t r �'`q + .. ``• -_ •�''. ` 't�' ���' ,Y
c) M
. ; •'• : �Y ' ' y,� �.`L � ,yam i • ' . 9' � � _ a..ia_ r .. ,� .. — ♦ a -
a r.
Upland Data Points �.., r .� .; m s , ,�`„ �� ` �F �� D
z-
FIGURE NO. d
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH7 12005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS �R ' e „`+
0 . .1 000 x :: h. o
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES _ +;5.. �"' . • ' ,A, .f �-.-
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON '` �' ''"4' '" -_- sf •�" '"-r - +� m `F` L x0 37
L
' CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE,,,, L
3 * t, -(IN FEET) s ' ' L,, ,_ w'' ,, s f + �'°,r WAGON RD ` `b _ '` B "`V'�L

%a P ' I"`� .��6+ 9'"' r * 'C : ' NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME 4� r
�. SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES
WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE _
T' NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR.OL o m
- ,,ra , •y 'If,
11 z
CD
W Q
`:- O ° :•'� �,-� ��� Y _ F.;i`��•- k,� ' t� r 4#f o°°c��,',•-� f� $
211
r i• .fit , _
t
•
a
V.ens,� ty
2 �F Utar, ..,L _ g, „F. L p
a T Pe ect 1 r "° I I I
' ^ r , y.LO
LIt
oA
e re ter. F
W M
s
'' 1• ... I f ._ _-• of •-,+. .-.. 0. • '• «Y '''A _+moi` U a
f
Ir a I _
�I.F Potentia/ :.
4 �' Y I• x 9p LF inTp�butar S
R. a' r c A 2 _g er
�nOh PerenniatJF/off rea 11 i * O
O+ P fey�JQG
a/
inTnbqP
Utar ". '+_ . .: -,T v ��v� r^�Y.
SA 03
113
. c+ ere etA
p r a
. _ _ a}
r.
a
44
L �
z
y
Pote
M
rl
r ��
A°(h ` d t �� } 81 114 in Prp e NChi1 14 ; = U
,/ .. .. r
h qRo v r' `'. rennia tAreaFV 4
1 + w 4
,
a.
F * -• - , } - ro: _ - Y;.,; '"`-'-;°:fit-- �! •:.. +: - a .. _ +,' �4'v �M i �°'F k _ O d
y - _
4 1 � )
i
Project -607 ac. '4 �a. , }r r:'� O FL 4� + ' d Z
Ui
Proposed Pipe Centerline _'� ..-�, _ • �' ;.�, �, r- � N �, •` O
'�_ �'N� _ t' w
Access Roads -_ ��- ` __— - — •' o a w z U o
'' r •+,,' ,.r. -`F.. - }•-y.s- �T• IFIL "�_-.�r, a'00 , - pOten *•' _- �'�, J V a a�
a
Culvert ' d n ,. -.. I s ry� tial _ J z -
1 ::, .. • �. .� e_:- r.L - g t a } s: ,1 - In Pr but SA1 }' w m
' a
94C o" 2 �' �'
U, _ K F �nt r Jet 0
Potential Stream Banks .,. .�4 ~'; ° "�c; P71 ote.. ernitterytF Area F
;1
LU O
a- �►'F 1r l �� 5 Tr/b 't a w a
Potential Open Water• n Pro' SA1 0 w w =
Per lett 1� M titi,
OZt ^ tir .=i I �q f IF nnia/ F/o Area x0 EDF(�N - : z_ m
® Potential Wetland�OGN 4`° ii
e
� rfi
Wetland Data Points
0 o
0 Upland Data Points
��! � �, : ,..., . / �' .' ;,fir a��} • ^
F•e_-:. _-_..- .-- Y ' -'I __-....zl Y FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH7I20054-FOOT CONTOURS 'Fs N:� q
+- fi r (3
0 500 1 000 ,+F++ b- �_"` • .
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM INC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES - ' ' .r_ ti Q
hr
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ON e - i+` s- ''i. }� ".'- i a'�—'p j��.'..• `V� v
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE. - _ ,{ _ -, B • ' �P .� "�i' - 4 '`�
(IN FEET)

NOTE' POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY
S E
SCIENT, 2016. FEATURE
ES
WERE LIOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE STS BETWEEN APRILAND BOF SUB METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE _
NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. N m
�itp tat` Pte a - : , ' , z — z
6i CD
°<er<t�00 _ , toON \off Y`• - s . j �I Q
Q F �r ria\ o 0
$\ Qeter I , 4 e
p xp e '
R
V.
•S1 y_ ,, hO\ T'I' L0 O
d. O , O, i {. S'� a}` CL_ Q• ,yi!!� II z r-
v v x0 at ea a" `y ti' a!a 51{ at. w
C\jR z ' 6i r`
r 2 1 ��tt to�ec\03i a I:.. fF A,� • y i a;.`r.i Q O
U a
_ ,: e.1 `y •},•'I it �.,
• - � xO , - �1, �. rrF " E. • 1 ^ �,. , -�. i , •. s # # y+:,,x;"'i � tl�" '++ rp
r `
, , ,. .. ,� t .• .- �. a a`'�'S*. �l4 � �ti tom* . .�, -
% ' r� •,* v
r�.k.e,y�. 1
},s�• ,`. .bp }''ryJ,.�i 4,
T ✓
•�•"
ma
N\ DAIRY_ * 4
,f� I ' r 1 tl' i �r - �M! Pr yY""��� `� 1 k �F 1 e ; y, 5 •1. "'�' '� Z71.
a-,;,1#
° Y _ -
' - -
ii
..�--_ i _ _ -. i - i•., Rte. .. a �,� ���n• •.r�r _ __ ,�- .�-:
ca
r
~ 1" / .: ••� b� � � SL' i _ ;:g- �� y trl Y�.-^ �. i., ��.. '1 c� -.�.. F.'St� .�1. :7�
_ ..... 5 _ .- '.,� %,, . • ` _ - .. yo-
< 'F a,�, 16'• x� �.,.w•�. } � � I •�. F y�. .-�.. �5 rx- � ryfa
5
Pw
_.,:a, , ...�-� .. ,,�,-: �A. _. _. :- _•�R'!, � I `--a.. ,�., ,Y'fE��+`,�.. .e w� l'r --�:'�'! �. �rar. C � tst �'
I:
�r ,.. � , , r`•s' :... ,.,, :• +, :� I :.. ..� . -. -,. , -i Yy,r i ��1' ' �' _ � p ' 1 1a';`�a. -r. , 1'. •� _
5•
,
' �' .�.y' y, _�� � -, 6x0 , a ,�� � � �r �'_�� '>�,: `J, - #� `�''� , p• }'p'1 y `�'S �!''� •',$ 1
,.• +'Kl_,,+lf. , L� p - f pff-. '°.-•.. `r^ j 1 i ' p= �.lR -ati r'I�•''. __1 ..✓#l; *%}.sS ., {K. `,� •gyp
~• I+ k - '' ;' d to _ 4 '�r= , S , ''p''�,- -r rE �,.r
c\p o°d 9 • 'a}� �. t,o-` _Pw LZ
14 `,- I-• $,yr a<�ePt°a�atd� �g-, ,��'r rb; ,� o;r - }y,.p-''' *st` 1 z
R -VEDA-D
�?, , � L:: i i"iy��rrs� - I R �, � •, __ ti , a oP<F. Offa° �:\a`fie<�Qatoa1e�c\atd
�ea o -- • .�:'� �,�° Ix
D ��a
. .:
' 0
Q p1b6W. p A.. %
2465+
R ��� 4 �;�# y 4 ' w =
-� .L __.-__ p , c .ai• , , .<.• �PPt1a� 1 •
tr
,XO6 aa�ect\FPiees
pLi '-� •,`}* �'�,'I+, *_1M�tla'`� . �$- ��f�.
' Qa
O°t O
_oao
0
�
y-tl �* a
'• - * y 4 `' °<e°< �F tyro\ ._ i* ,. * . - ,r , _ { ' '. # i > °
z \ \ s -
ProjeetArea (-607 ac.) Q 1a$ Pete h L �., '' , ,�' tl IL "p Of z
L i dof
4R'-�L'kY•h��:+P�,lIL '�"�5# +. 'w. °' _� O i. -w Q E
Proposed Pipe Centerline',,, w a
.�'� _ ..�'�,� •:` - ;..-. �� :� - i5y�ap. � ' �P � _ .� - ��, ��M1,�. +y�. S.t�e�"' ' • fes, '�� •'' f � w W w
Access Roads r # : - , ; `P _• 6: �y.,., z
-
� a
} o
'S
w
Culvert_ �„ `
Potential Stream Banks r" + rs�• . �. - .- ,.e`N _� p
� � ARVET�?P•,., ��1 t; { Q O � a
Potential Open Water:' r. w
yf 4 w -
,1 _ _ iy.�;,',iw. {•4F'` Z S y
p i
k
Of
Potential Wetland I K -u `tif�a#
Wetland Data Points ,
�` Ir
0 Upland Data Points a �� zi•' I �pG�ti W�' s.. *:.
p 6;y - 5 " p��. . -6'.• _=� _� - r° . - ":#I - ar
- , . .. -'•, . _ ,' _ { •� — A a :_ t4-�,:' �'•a y . R 1 FIGURE NO. d
0 500ry °;., .. 1,000", ' �k O� !
BASE REFEMAPP NG OBTAINED FROM NRENCE: 2015 AERIAL OTOOGMRAPHTHIS ZMAP S FOR INFORMATIONAL 005 4 -FOOT OPURPOSES at •�•—'+ ,.- T6,� _ ;•� $ M ,'y
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT BASED ONo,, 39
WISE. ,.y..
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHER `<.. (IN FEET) * {�,- �O!' `�•_ '
- - � .. .,. ° � -•.., �`� ��_ ..' +�,'�' �-� a�� �.,. s . \ . • _ _-s-� � _mow=- r_ � � a a_. � .

NOTE: POTENTIAL WATERS OF THE U.S. WERE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY S&ME
f I� • e +-' SCIENTISTS BETWEEN APRILAND SEPTEMBER, 2016. FEATURE BOUNDARIES
r Y
', "" �• ' WERE LOCATED WITH GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -METER ACCURACY; THEY HAVE
1.7.,TM _ '.:, �.a • NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. , o m 0
1J
w
, rd �� �'" � � 1' �� '� -' � 1i' �,,y�� v�ye.y` f•,� l q,. pq¢
:
x t. • 4 IP 2L
^
y
..._... __. :- LSA
'^ J i y , r LO
co
Ic
ILL
Q O
t°
(51
o10
x
s.
y. _ '� 4� � ��j ,�?, is O a_m I - as a -.,� , ,. 3°' I '`••,� � r . ..'M� � a ��- � �-.i
,. _ii, lS . P 'k�dQe, +'� ��'•;. .� i - _f� tl n �.. '.F •"P�� P �.; qiP
:.�' t CJS ' i r ✓, I r r� ME
Sc1
c
5�
u
� ��,'' l��oe- ,6h ,; `i_ � tT. i� 1;� y. , I' �* �•. p:t�, �' �j`�t�j�' ��FL*5�a I f- 'k�.�� �, '� ,
2535+00✓�
�
'PA T-TERSON.RO
t- '
9. �'. [7 � ,,t ,;�'.", t,.r. � � '�' I eE .y� � A a5Y .I. �}->•" i �°F •. , -
'ca
f7
'RQ,
. • •, �4/ ` `P. ��V �♦ �4` +,r++ _ it r Y,<aa` . ew•�`6 „�,'r. 4 + r
y , i . � 2 � ,.., x0� a(`i` , � (Gi`� 1 � "I =,'�� t I � i .t � '� �" � ! � � •ti " . � .`, * �,
d
p
0`
P +
6 z
ry4�
t � 6
�1
1 .� . • %ry.� ° . r * jr _ F - I ..ri 'Y . � ave .� t •� I� 0
LIJ c?
Ij
,• '- ' v x0
, s 7ia.
,. a z
i AwN
41,
dGROAN 0 o
Project Area (-607 ac.) .. y w*b , w o� �. L7 a c�
UJ
Proposed Pipe Centerline $ u� O www
,r ,•�`Y
Access Roads _ .� ,.�q y � �.y o w zbk
v a
fQQ
a a ¢
Culvert , t-: F ._' 'a a .�� -.4 N I., ate. � z
a ° _
Of E
Potential Stream BanksFGR01//V
� o 0
]� W
y NQ LL
Potential Open Water y d RO _ ~ ofLi
ULI
Z
z = N
Potential WetlandOf
Wetland Data Points:�I+rt. a ` M
..Upland Data Points
�- �. ° • f''{r ` d FFIGURE NO. r
REFERENCE: 2015 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH712005 4 -FOOT CONTOURS 0 —''500 r1Y000�} _ I fa
BASE MAPPING OBTAINED FROM NC ONEMAP. THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ,—`' ,,_ - '` , ,'� -•-_ ' •I• , �'' d" O
r _ (1
ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED, THEY ARE NOT BASED ON .y F ^'�'•• itl * r~`�" ,� - �G �„ 40
CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
g
' � '+ (IN FEET) ", �°. - •, � •. y +O�

Appendix I:
Completed PCN and Agent Authorization Form

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 12 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
FE Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Line T-01 Replacement Project Phase II
2b.
County:
Polk, Rutherford and Clevelland
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Mill Spring to Kings Mountain
2d.
Subdivision name:
N/A
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Project area is a linear utility easement that crosses multiple parcels
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Utility Company
4b.
Name:
Aaron Schwartz, PE
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
PSNC - A SCANA Company
4d.
Street address:
220 Operations Way, MC221
4e. City, state, zip:
Cayce, SC 29033
4f.
Telephone no.:
[phone]
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
[e-mail]
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Joey Lawler, PWS.
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
S&ME, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
5d.
City, state, zip:
Charlotte, N.C. 28723
5e. Telephone no.:
704.523.4726
5f.
Fax no.:
704.525.3853
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Project area is a linear utility easement that crosses
multiple parcels
1b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.284898°N Longitude: -
81.785833°W
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
316 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Multiple waterbodies, including Green River, Broad River,
and Second Briad River
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Multiple classifications
2c.
River basin:
Upper Broad (03050105)
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
A majority of the work will take place within an existing, maintained natural gas pipeline easement. Poritons of the project
will also consist of greenfield development. General land use in the vicinity of the project corridor consists of a mix of low
density residential areas, agriculture, pasture, and forest. Portions of the project corridor are also located near
commercial and light industrial development.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
2.878 Acres of wetlands and open waters in the project area.
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
11,758 LF of perennial and intermittent streams are located within the project area.
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The primary purpose of the proposed project is to replace an aging segment of pipeline with a new pipeline that is
compatible with current federally -mandated safety and inspection requirements, and is capable of increasing service
capabilities and reliability for PSNC's customers in the general service area.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Construction of the new pipeline will first involve demarcation of clearing limits, jurisdictional boundaries, and other
associated workspaces etc. In high ground areas, up to an additional 60 feet of temporary workspace (TWS) adjacent to
the existing easement will be required to safely install the new pipe. At stream and wetland crossings, the TWS will be
reduced to 30 feet, and the remainder of the work will be conducted within the permanent easement. Appropriate
sediment and erosion control (S&EC) measures will be installed as clearing proceeds to prevent sedimentation of
jurisdictional features.
No grubbing or below -ground vegetation removal will occur within wetlands or along stream banks outside of the
construction corridor. Where the pipe will be installed by conventional means (e.g. "open -trench" or "isolation"), grubbing
will be limited, to the extent practicable, to the trench line. Select upland portions of the easement may require rough
grading to facilitate safe passage of equipment, and to prepare a suitably -level work surface. Within wetland areas where
extensive rutting or soil disturbance may occur, timber mats are planned for use to provide work and travel space for
equipment.
Following preparation of the work area and installation of necessary S&EC measures, the trench will be excavated along
the "non -working" side of the easement. Subsurface disturbance will only be conducted within the trench line at wetlands
and stream crossings. Stump removal or light grading may occur on the working side of the easement if required for
safety reasons. The work will be performed from the timber mats placed along the working side of the easement. In
certain areas, including wetlands and fields supporting crops, efforts will be made to segregate topsoil from the subsoil. If
necessary, trench breakers (temporary barriers generally constructed of sand bags or similarly suitable material) will be
installed within the trench to slow the flow of subsurface water.
In general, approximately 80 -foot lengths of the 24 -inch pipe will then be trucked to the site from temporary storage yards,
strung along the easement and placed on skids (wooden pedestals). Specialized machines will be used to bend
individual segments of pipe to fit the contours of the trench where necessary. The pipe segments will be welded together,
x-rayed, and inspected coating and structural integrity, and then lowered into the trench. Segments of the trench may
require dewatering or "padding" to prevent large rocks or other debris from coming in contact with the pipe. Permanent
trench breakers will then be installed where necessary and the trench backfilled. In areas where segregation of the
subsoil and topsoil is required, the topsoil will be replaced last. Affected areas will then be "cleaned up" by rough -grading
and temporary seeding (if necessary), followed by final grading, permanent seeding and mulching to restore the
easement as closely as possible to pre -disturbance contours and conditions.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: A Request for Pre -JD) was initially provided to
the USACE on October 14, 2016. Representatives of the
USACE (David Brown and Steve Kichefski) and NCDWR
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
(Kevin Mitchell) visited the project site on November 17,
2016 to approve the delineation. A revised Request for Pre -
JD that reflected reductions in the proposed workspace
(review area) as well as minor adjustments to the proposed
route was re -submitted on January 45 2017.
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary ❑Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: S&ME, Inc.
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Written verification of the Pre --JD is currently pending with the USACE.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
N/A
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
This is the second phase of the overall T-01 replacement project. As this phase runs between the Mill Spring compressor
and the Transco Pipeline tie in point, it is being considered as a single and complete project for permitting purposes
because it can operate in the absence of other phases of the overall T-01 replacement project.
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments: See Wetland/Open Water Impact Table in Appendix III.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments: See Stream Impact Table in Appendix III
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑ PEI T
03 ❑ PEI T
04 ❑ PEI T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: See Wetland/Open Water Impact Table in Appendix III.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled I Excavated Flooded I Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
6b. 6c. 6d.
Buffer impact
number - Reason
Permanent (P) or for
Temporary (T) impact
B1 ❑P❑T
B2 ❑P❑T
B3 ❑P❑T
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Other:
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6e. I 6f. I 6g.
Buffer
Stream name mitigation
required?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: No riparian buffer impacts will occur.
Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
(square feet) (square feet)
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D.
Impact Justification and Mitigation
1.
Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
See cover letter for details.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
See cover letter for details.
2.
Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a.
Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c.
If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3.
Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a.
Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b.
Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c.
Comments:
4.
Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a.
Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
0 linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
0 square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
0 acres
4h.
Comments:
5.
Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a.
If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
Page 8of13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes ® No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
Buffer mitigation is not required.
6h. Comments:
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments: .
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Project is an underground utility.
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative
description of the plan:
N/A
❑ Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
❑ Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
El USMP❑
apply (check all that apply):
Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): N/A
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
The project is not considered "growth -inducing" in that its purpose to replace a segment of existing natural gas pipleine,
and while providing additonal service capacity, is not expected to serve as an impetus for development.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Project conditions will specify that hydrotest water will be appropriately discharged through a dewatering structure located
in well-vegeted area in high ground so as not to create a water quality violation.
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5.
Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a.
Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b.
Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
E] Raleigh
5c.
If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Asheville
5d.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Based on a December 7, 2016 letter from the USFWS, requirements under section 7 of the Act have been fulfilled. A
copy of USFWS letter is included in Appendix VII.
6.
Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a.
Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://ocean.floridamarine.org/efh_coral/ims/viewer.htm
7.
Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a.
Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b.
What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
S&ME conducted an archaeological survey of the project corridor from June 16 through October 19, 2016. Results of the
survey were provided in an October 2016 report that was provided to SHPO. No previously recorded archaeological sites
were re -located, and 23 new archaeological sites and isolated finds were identified. Twenty-one of the 23 archaeological
sites are recommended not eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places (NRNP). S&ME
recommended that no further work was necessary.
We anticipate that upon completion of the review of the report, SHPO will concur with S&ME's findings that the project
should not affect archaeological resources. Correspondence from SHPO will be forwarded to the USACE upon its receipt.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a.
Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b.
If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: All necessary floddplain encroachment permits will be obtained
from the respective county/municipal floodplain administrators prior to project construction.
8c.
What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA mappping
Joey Lawler, PWS
01.09.2017
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

• � �A

Appendix II:
Representative Site Photographs

Representative Photographs
Line T-01 Replacement Project —Phase I I
Project #: 7435-16-013
Sheet 1 of 6
I�S&ME
v
O
l
t'
,• �tii�
1.e SITCD
~
—
_
Q
Q)
� c
'_
- `•ria.
Q�
1
J
Q-
AWL—
-
O
fF !
O
Location / Orientation
Representative of active agriculture areas
II
1
Remarks
Agricultural areas consist primarily of horse and cattle
pasture.
v
O
Co
fF !
�,
II
Location / Orientation
Representative existing gasline easement.
2
Remarks
This is a typical easement on the west side of project;
note
existing stream.

Representative Photographs
Line T-01 Replacement Project —Phase I I
Project #: 7435-16-013
Sheet 2 of 6
I�S&ME
N4-*
co
t
y
CO
I
N
fir. .. .. �
1•x
r e
a 4'
a `r
�
1iwF
Pr
(0
I
r s
L
�
Q
Location / Orientation
Representative existing easement
Location / Orientation
Representative existing easement
3
This is a typical of existing easement passing through
Remarks
Second view of typical easement through active cattle
hayfield on west side of project.
pasture.
co
0
N
.Q
Q
�
1iwF
Pr
(0
I
J
Location / Orientation
Representative existing easement
4
Remarks
This is a typical of existing easement passing through
hayfield on west side of project.

Representative Photographs
Line T-01 Replacement Project —Phase I I
Project #: 7435-16-013
Sheet 3 of 6
AM W
i
A A;VW.
cc
CL
IZ
Location / Orientation Representative existing easement
5 Remarks This is a typical easement crossing of a stream on the west
side of route
[•
O
Cq
+�
4�
yryyyj
C,
. .
- o—t!
*
a
�}'� •�
� ! '� TIS: .. ,�.
ai
i
AIA
1
a
Su
�
•
�, i. Y. y� l.�.
Jhi 'Iy•.j =' y
�-`s�IP �::°�1 � y��• �i
' i. ��'„ ,.dY
Location / Orientation
Representative existing easement
6
Remarks
This is a typical easement with small floodplain pool on the
west side of the route.

Representative Photographs
Line T-01 Replacement Project —Phase I I
Project #: 7435-16-013
Sheet 4 of 6
4�S&ME
0
N
T
M
N
(0
(6
J
{Y�
o_
m
N
L
0
cam'
O
a
Location / Orientation
Representative active edge
7
Remarks
This is a typical seep wetland outside the edge of the
8
Remarks
existing easement.
T
N
(0
(6
J
N
L
Q
cam'
O
a
O
Location / Orientation
Representative greenfield route
8
Remarks
This is a typical headwater forested wetland located away
from the existing easement.

Representative Photographs
Line T-01 Replacement Project —Phase I I
Project #: 7435-16-013
Sheet 5 of 6
'!S&ME
a.
O
N
L
U
(4
75
N
0
Location / Orientation Representative greenfield route
10 Remarks This is a typical bottomland hardwood forest outside of the
existing easement.
Jw•F- a 6
O
t�
-
-
CL
O
O
Location / Orientation
Representative existing easement
9
Remarks
This is a typical stream crossing within the existing
easement.
a.
O
N
L
U
(4
75
N
0
Location / Orientation Representative greenfield route
10 Remarks This is a typical bottomland hardwood forest outside of the
existing easement.

Representative Photographs
Line T-01 Replacement Project —Phase I I
Project #: 7435-16-013
Sheet 6 of 6
I�S&ME
T
Location / Orientation Representative active ROW
11 Remarks This is a hardwood forest with stream adjacent to and
approaching the edge of the existing easement.

Appendix III:
Impact Tables

STREAM IMPACT TABLE
Impact
Temporary
Permanent
Stream Name
Station
Flow Regime
Impact Type
Latitude
Longitude
Ma No.
Impact (LF)
Im act (LF)
Temporary disturbance /
SAOlA
41
6+21
Perennial
123
0
35.306697
82.174082
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA02
42
17+87
Intermittent
81
0
35.306843
82.170548
trenched pipeline crossing
SA01B
Temporary disturbance /
43
50+75
Perennial
280
0
35.306937
82.159683
(Canal Creek)
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA03
44
52+23
Intermittent
31
0
35.306838
82.15906
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA04
45
76+96
Perennial
117
0
35.305827
82.150913
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA05
46
85+55
Perennial
96
0
35.305246
82.148113
trenched pipeline crossing
SA06
Temporary disturbance /
47
108+62
Perennial
81
0
35.302916
82.141007
(Little White Oak Creek)
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA07
48
122+37
Perennial
108
0
35.301083
82.136963
trenched pipeline crossing
SA08
49
139+52
Intermittent
Temporary disturbance
22
0
35.297879
82.133349
Temporary disturbance /
SA10
50
171+00
Perennial
90
0
35.295278
82.123396
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA12
51
183+61
Intermittent
104
0
35.293811
82.119543
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA13
52
192+74
Intermittent
79
0
35.292756
82.116762
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SC04
53
218+51
Intermittent
93
0
35.29247
82.109424
trenched pipeline crossing
SC08
Temporary disturbance /
54
239+92
Perennial
86
0
35.295875
82.103761
(Machine Creek)
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SC06
55
263+91
Perennial
93
0
35.298273
82.096277
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SC11
56
299+92
Perennial
145
0
35.299361
82.084415
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SC12
57
321+35
Perennial
151
0
35.297937
82.077517
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SC14
58
347+14
Perennial
148
0
35.297412
82.069013
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SD10
59
377+09
Perennial
150
0
35.295185
82.05938
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SE02
60
388+77
Perennial
101
0
35.29276
82.056881
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SE01
61
418+28
Perennial
81
0
35.289179
82.048956
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SD06
62
438+08
Intermittent
8
0
35.286332
82.04331
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SD05
63
439+10
Perennial
339
0
35.286369
82.042891
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SD03
64
455+84
Perennial
249
0
35.2843
82.037974
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SG02
65
468+66
Perennial
206
0
35.281942
82.036305
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SF01
66
483+62
Perennial
103
0
35.278682
82.036512
trenched pipeline crossing
SA17
Avoided (HDD) /temporary
67
567+19
Perennial
30
0
35.271172
82.013792
(Green River)
bridge crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA18
68
582+16
Intermittent
126
0
35.271178
82.00899
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA19
69
602+29
Perennial
64
0
35.273471
82.002844
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA21
70
629+17
Perennial
109
0
35.27626
81.995098
trenched pipeline crossing
SA22
71
657+77
Perennial
Avoided (HDD)
0
0
35.276416
81.985607
(Broad River)
Temporary disturbance /
SA24
72
677+53
Perennial
52
0
35.277391
81.979091
trenched pipeline crossing
SA25
Temporary disturbance /
73
705+45
Perennial
126
0
35.27858
81.969871
(Grays Creek)
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA27
74
733+26
Perennial
74
0
35.278835
81.96058
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA28
75
743+07
Perennial
201
0
35.279224
81.957018
trenched pipeline crossing
SA29
76
753+83
Intermittent
Temporary disturbance
42
0
35.279566
81.953775
SA31
Temporary disturbance /
77
797+44
Perennial
127
0
35.280234
81.939396
(Jarretts Creek)
trenched pipeline crossing
SA34
Temporary disturbance /
78
868+73
Perennial
85
0
35.282215
81.915637
(Richardson Creek)
trenched pipeline crossing
SA35
79
868+90
Intermittent
Temporary disturbance
47
0
35.282317
81.915601
Temporary disturbance /
SA36
80
869+71
Perennial
121
0
35.282249
81.91535
trenched pipeline crossing

STREAM IMPACT TABLE
Impact
Temporary
Permanent
Stream Name
Station
Flow Regime
Impact Type
Latitude
Longitude
Ma No.
Im act (LF)
Im act (LF)
SA37
81
937+18
Perennial
Temporary disturbance
79
0
35.283474
81.893565
Temporary disturbance /
SA38
82
938+18
Perennial
54
0
35.283501
81.893245
trenched pipeline crossing
SA39
83
938+43
Perennial
Temporary disturbance
46
0
35.283497
81.893147
Temporary disturbance /
SA40
84
955+28
Perennial
134
0
35.28352
81.886951
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA41
85
957+47
Perennial
82
0
35.283712
81.886778
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA42
86
981+73
Perennial
100
0
35.284257
81.878681
trenched pipeline crossing
SA43
Temporary disturbance /
87
991+91
Perennial
115
0
35.284586
81.875297
(Flo ds Creek)
trenched pipeline crossing
SA44
Temporary disturbance /
88
1021+07
Perennial
184
0
35.285305
81.865602
(Bracketts Creek)
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA46
89
1033+73
Perennial
72
0
35.285567
81.86142
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA45
90
1034+75
Perennial
181
0
35.28563
81.861089
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA47
91
1053+91
Perennial
112
0
35.286336
81.85473
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA49
92
1147+85
Perennial
115
0
35.288766
81.825736
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA51
93
1210+19
Perennial
111
0
35.289166
81.80646
trenched pipeline crossing
SA52
94
1234+93
Perennial
Avoided (HDD)
0
0
35.2871
81.798634
(Second Broad River)
SA53
95
1236+35
Perennial
Avoided (HDD)
0
0
35.286914
81.798218
Temporary disturbance /
SA55
96
1250+85
Perennial
141
0
35.285568
81.793601
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA56
97
1318+52
Perennial
202
0
35.281233
81.77201
trenched pipeline crossing
SA57
Temporary disturbance /
98
1326+56
Perennial
56
0
35.280929
81.769311
(Hills Creek)
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA58
99
1340+04
Perennial
95
0
35.279825
81.765087
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA59
100
1354+06
Perennial
85
0
35.278133
81.760891
trenched pipeline crossing
SA61
Temporary disturbance /
101
1426+81
Perennial
123
0
35.273406
81.737454
(Grog Creek)
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA62
102
1450+63
Perennial
100
0
35.27165
81.729826
trenched pipeline crossing
SA63
Temporary disturbance /
103
1452+32
Perennial
156
0
35.271406
81.729447
(Grog Creek)
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA64
104
1468+23
Perennial
88
0
35.270268
81.72416
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA65
105
1469+19
Perennial
83
0
35.270198
81.723845
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA66
106
1481+94
Perennial
130
0
35.269192
81.719876
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA67
107
1512+23
Perennial
190
0
35.266903
81.710025
trenched pipeline crossing
Permenant loss due to access
road culvert installation (no
SA68
108
1524+92
Perennial
0
30
35.266254
81.705876
impact outside of road area due
to bore
Temporary disturbance /
SA69
109
1536+71
Perennial
67
0
35.26569
81.702019
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA71
110
1557+23
Perennial
143
0
35.264049
81.695434
trenched pipeline crossing
SA72
Temporary disturbance /
111
1562+25
Perennial
140
0
35.263142
81.694104
(Sand Run)
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA73
112
1579+69
Perennial
160
0
35.261752
81.688547
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA75
113
1638+36
Perennial
102
0
35.256536
81.670179
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA76A
114
1696+71
Perennial
136
0
35.253391
81.651022
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA76B
115
1710+28
Perennial
126
0
35.252323
81.646712
trenched pipeline crossing
S1303
Temporary disturbance /
116
1761+29
Perennial
142
0
35.249433
81.630196
(Beaverdam Creek)
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
S1304
117
1786+23
Perennial
145
0
35.246253
81.622904
trenched pipeline crossing
SA79
Temporary disturbance /
118
1807+29
Perennial
367
0
35.244544
81.616218
(Hawkins Branch)
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA80
119
1815+42
Intermittent
143
0
35.244129
81.613402
trenched pipeline crossing

STREAM IMPACT TABLE
Impact
Temporary
Permanent
Stream Name
Station
Flow Regime
Impact Type
Latitude
Longitude
Ma No.
Impact (LF)
Im act (LF)
Temporary disturbance /
SA81A
120
1863+53
Perennial
69
0
35.237675
81.600698
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SC03A
121
1864+53
Perennial
121
0
35.237741
81.600378
trenched pipeline crossing
SA87
122
1910+78
Perennial
Avoided (HDD)
0
0
35.238783
81.587365
(First Broad River)
Temporary disturbance /
SA88
123
1949+24
Perennial
86
0
35.23592
81.575028
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA90
124
1964+91
Perennial
85
0
35.234828
81.569943
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA91
125
1988+50
Perennial
118
0
35.233036
81.56234
trenched pipeline crossing
SA92
126
2009+70
Perennial
Temporary disturbance
51
0
35.231357
81.555601
Temporary disturbance /
SA93
127
2009+94
Intermittent
85
0
35.231276
81.555544
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA94
128
2013+95
Perennial
99
0
35.231003
81.554266
trenched pipeline crossing
SA95
129
2014+51
Perennial
Temporary disturbance
132
0
35.231038
81.554018
Temporary disturbance /
SA96
130
2047+64
Perennial
94
0
35.228806
81.54334
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA98
131
2059+45
Perennial
64
0
35.228102
81.539472
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA100
132
2106+05
Perennial
105
0
35.223359
81.526374
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA102
133
2145+60
Perennial
153
0
35.222531
81.514721
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA104
134
2217+15
Perennial
62
0
35.217242
81.494077
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA106
135
2233+19
Perennial
79
0
35.216405
81.488815
trenched pipeline crossing
SA107
136
2254+25
Perennial
Avoided (HDD)
0
0
35.215005
81.482005
(Buffalo Creek)
SA108
137
2290+15
Perennial
Avoided (HDD)
0
0
35.212083
81.470543
(Beason Creek)
SA110
138
2298+52
Perennial
Temporary disturbance
63
0
35.211296
81.467906
Temporary disturbance /
SA111
139
2358+05
Perennial
62
0
35.206854
81.448697
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA112
140
2369+42
Perennial
90
0
35.206087
81.445054
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA113
141
2374+86
Perennial
79
0
35.205583
81.443321
trenched pipeline crossing
SA114
Temporary disturbance /
142
2390+22
Perennial
81
0
35.20453
81.438342
(Long Branch)
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA117
143
2415+38
Perennial
56
0
35.202919
81.430163
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA120
144
2422+52
Intermittent
94
0
35.202383
81.427878
trenched pipeline crossing
SA119
Temporary disturbance /
145
2430+34
Perennial
81
0
35.201598
81.425632
(Long Branch)
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SH01
146
2453+14
Perennial
82
0
35.196621
81.422792
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary disturbance /
SA121
147
2468+65
Perennial
148
0
35.192533
81.422778
trenched pipeline crossing
Totals:
11,113
30

WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Temporary
Permanent
Wetland
Impact
Station
WAM Class
Impact Type
Impact
Impact
Latitude
Longitude
ID
Map No.
Acre
Acre
Temporary ground disturbance /
OWA02
148
139+26
Open Water
0.020
0.000
35.297842
82.13346
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WC07
149
218+24
Headwater Forest
0.052
0.000
35.292382
82.109464
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance/
trenched pipeline crossing /
WC11
150
243+64
Headwater Forest
permanent conversion of forested
0.058
0.145
35.296428
82.10264
vegetation to emergent in new
utility corridor.
Temporary ground disturbance /
WC12
151
300+15
Seep
clearing of forested vegeation in
0.008
0.000
35.299444
82.084356
temporary workspace
Temporary ground disturbance/
trenched pipeline crossing /
WD10
152
376+96
Headwater Forest
permanent conversion of forested
0.004
0.042
35.295046
82.059486
vegetation to emergent in new
utility corridor.
Temporary ground disturbance/
permanent conversion of forested
WE02
153
388+70
Headwater Forest
0.002
0.004
35.292766
82.056948
vegetation to emergent in new
utility corridor.
Temporary ground disturbance/
trenched pipeline crossing /
WE01
154
418+19
Headwater Forest
permanent conversion of forested
0.000
0.004
35.289134
82.049025
vegetation to emergent in new
utility corridor.
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing /
WD07
155
455+64
Headwater Forest
permanent conversion of forested
0.000
0.004
35.284229
82.038016
vegetation to emergent in new
utility corridor.
Temporary ground disturbance/
trenched pipeline crossing /
WD06
156
457+20
Headwater Forest
permanent conversion of forested
0.000
0.004
35.284018
82.037555
vegetation to emergent in new
utility corridor.
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA02
157
602+68
Bottomland Hardwood
0.004
0.000
35.273335
82.0029
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA03
158
629+02
Bottomland Hardwood
0.018
0.000
35.276294
81.995158
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA04
159
677+63
Seep
0.018
0.000
35.277522
81.979083
clearing of forested vegeation in
temporary workspace
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA05
160
704+66
Floodplain Pool
0.026
0.000
35.278598
81.970121
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA08
161
777+53
Headwater Forest
0.158
0.000
35.280285
81.945966
clearing of forested vegeation in
temporarV workspace
WAll
162
869+92
Headwater Forest
Temporary ground disturbance
0.034
0.000
35.282356
81.915261
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA14
163
937+97
Headwater Forest
0.064
0.000
35.283372
81.893141
clearing of forested vegeation in
temporarV workspace
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA15
164
956+76
Seep
0.049
0.000
35.283621
81.887011
clearing of forested vegeation in
temporary workspace
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA16
165
957+32
Headwater Forest
0.054
0.000
35.283653
81.886814
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA18
166
1034+05
Headwater Forest
0.012
0.000
35.285451
81.861306
clearing of forested vegeation in
temporarV workspace
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA19
167
1035+08
Seep
0.015
0.000
35.285568
81.860935
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
OWA06
168
1061+17
Open Water
0.005
0.000
35.286604
81.852325
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA20
169
1061+73
Bottomland Hardwood
0.065
0.000
35.286594
81.852099
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WG03
170
1096+84
Seep
0.002
0.000
35.288854
81.841397
trenched pipeline crossing

WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Temporary
Permanent
Wetland
Impact
Station
WAM Class
Impact Type
Impact
Impact
Latitude
Longitude
ID
Map No.
Acre
Acre
Temporary ground disturbance/
trenched pipeline crossing /
WG04
171
1103+01
Seep
permanent conversion of forested
0.013
0.013
35.288571
81.839551
vegetation to emergent in new
utility corridor.
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA21
172
1147+28
Headwater Forest
0.116
0.000
35.288783
81.825858
clearing of forested vegeation in
temporary workspace
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA23
173
1201+10
Headwater Forest
0.038
0.000
35.289978
81.809348
clearing of forested vegeation in
tem1porarV workspace
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA26
174
1210+37
Headwater Forest
0.005
0.000
35.289087
81.806458
trenched pipeline crossing
Conversion of forested vegetation
WA27
175
1233+75
Riverine Swamp Forest
to emergent within new permanent
0.000
0.062
35.287299
81.798996
easement.
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA28
176
1240+52
Non -Tidal Freshwater Marsh
0.152
0.000
35.286513
81.79689
clearing of forested vegeation in
temporary workspace
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA29
177
1251+08
Seep
clearing of forested vegeation in
0.001
0.000
35.285379
81.793585
temporary workspace
WA30
178
1318+04
Headwater Forest
Temporary ground disturbance
0.010
0.000
35.281345
81.772189
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA31
179
1318+63
Seep
0.034
0.000
35.281178
81.77202
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA36
180
1426+94
Headwater Forest
0.001
0.000
35.273387
81.737457
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA37
181
1448+91
Bottomland Hardwood
0.123
0.000
35.271711
81.730414
clearing of forested vegeation in
temporary workspace
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA38
182
1454+00
Seep
0.141
0.000
35.271339
81.728791
clearing of forested vegeation in
temlporarV workspace
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA39
183
1481+62
Headwater Forest
0.003
0.000
35.269149
81.720018
trenched pipeline crossing
Permanent wetland fill for creation
WA43
184
1525+03
Headwater Forest
of a new 30' wide access road
0.000
0.006
35.266322
81.705797
corridor.
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA45
185
1536+95
Headwater Forest
0.008
0.000
35.265532
81.701916
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA47
186
1580+82
Headwater Forest
0.076
0.000
35.261592
81.688173
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA48
187
1638+01
Headwater Forest
0.012
0.000
35.256499
81.67027
clearing of forested vegeation in
temporarV workspace
Temporary ground disturbance /
W1303
188
1719+81
Headwater Forest
clearing of forested vegeation in
0.010
0.000
35.251516
81.643726
temporary workspace
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA52
189
1805+35
Seep
0.023
0.000
35.244458
81.616843
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA60
190
1964+50
Headwater Forest
0.015
0.000
35.234825
81.570146
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA61
191
1988+79
Seep
0.002
0.000
35.232907
81.562318
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA63
192
2014+99
Headwater Forest
0.030
0.000
35.230888
81.553919
clearing of forested vegeation in
temporary workspace
Temporary ground disturbance/
trenched pipeline crossing /
WC01
193
2095+66
Headwater Forest
permanent conversion of forested
0.010
0.006
35.223751
81.529805
vegetation to emergent in new
utility corridor.
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA65
194
2114+71
Headwater Forest
clearing of forested vegeation in
0.017
0.000
35.224627
81.524698
temporary workspace
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA66
195
2131+96
Headwater Forest
0.001
0.000
35.223485
81.519037
trenched pipeline crossing

WETLAND IMPACT TABLE
Temporary
Permanent
Wetland
Impact
Station
WAM Class
Impact Type
Impact
Impact
Latitude
Longitude
ID
Map No.
Acre
Acre
Temporary ground disturbance/
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA67
196
2161+46
Headwater Forest
permanent conversion of forested
0.014
0.037
35.220693
81.510143
vegetation to emergent in new
utility corridor.
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA68
197
2248+44
Bottomland Hardwood
0.071
0.000
35.215461
81.483868
clearing of forested vegeation in
temporary workspace
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA69
198
2260+39
Riverine Swamp Forest
clearing of forested vegeation in
0.110
0.000
35.214736
81.479964
temporary workspace
Temporary ground disturbance /
WA70
199
2265+94
Riverine Swamp Forest
0.014
0.000
35.214046
81.478645
trenched pipeline crossing
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA71
200
2274+91
Riverine Swamp Forest
0.142
0.000
35.213346
81.475425
clearing of forested vegeation in
temporarV workspace
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA72
201
2297+90
Headwater Forest
0.441
0.000
35.211509
81.468045
clearing of forested vegeation in
temporary workspace
Temporary ground disturbance/
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA77
202
2470+01
Bottomland Hardwood
permanent conversion of forested
0.072
0.084
35.192183
81.422573
vegetation to emergent in new
utility corridor.
Temporary ground disturbance/
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA79
203
2472+54
Bottomland Hardwood
permanent conversion of forested
0.000
0.007
35.191502
81.422282
vegetation to emergent in new
utility corridor.
Temporary ground disturbance/
trenched pipeline crossing /
WA78
204
2473+22
Headwater Forest
permanent conversion of forested
0.000
0.016
35.191358
81.422119
vegetation to emergent in new
utility corridor.
Totalsd 2.373 1 0.434

Appendix IV:
Jurisdictional Impact Drawings

LEGEND N
ti
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE o z o
L9
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE Q
0 0
f'
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING) 0 0
PARCELS II o�
I o
Z
STREAM CENTERLINE
IU M
M
STREAM BANKS < 0 ~
CULVERTS
I w
STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
_
" --------- ---- - _
------------
o,
------------
-�, Stream Crossing ID SA01 B "
_ Local Waterway Canal Creek
°._ Longitude 35.306937°N
Q
Latitude 82.159683°W z
.. ►_ ' J
Flow Regime Perennial
- - - ---. - Cowardin Classification R3 vi n
N O= �
_ - - HGM Code Riverine U U D_
........ ----I �
�
' -' LF in ROW 280 a � � °
----------------- ;v po
"`-' o ; LF Permanent Impact 0J a (D Q
LF Temporary Impact 280 Z ) LU LU >
O 0 wU�
'N Temporary disturbance / trenched H V v u
�o pipeline crossing U ¢
a -
z
Impact Description pw o
I . LL
m LU -j
None CD aZ =
' J
IC
Additional Notes Y
I J
0
D_
I
I
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB- FIGURE NO.
0 40 80 1 METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYAREGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED �/�
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR -„J(
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
(IN FEET) BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

0 40 80
(IN FEET)
I
I
I4�
I
I
APPROXIMATE
TEMPORARY
BRIDGE LOCATION
LEGEND
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT (PROPOSED)
PARCELS
> - -- STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
STREAM IMPACTS:
■ ■ TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
= N STREAM IMPACT AVOIDANCE AREA
Stream Crossing ID
SA17
Local Waterway
Green River
Longitude
35.271172'N
Latitude
82.013792°W
Flow Regime
Perennial
Cowardin Classification
R3
HGM Code
Riverine
81
0
30
LF in ROW
LF Permanent Impact
LF Temporary Impact
Avoided (bore) / temporary bridge
Impact Description crossing
A 30 -foot wide temporary bridge for
equipment access is proposed, which
Additional Notes may result in temporary fills for bridge
footings and temporary bank
E disturbance.
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEYARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION. UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
oLn
d o
II O
O Ln
z
LOUM
M
LU W I'-
Q o
U tY
cn a
Q
z
J
0
Q
C = U
N w =
N <
H a
- 0
Q U ~z
E
U O
la LuU
0
J ~' D- Er Q
to -- LUJ
Z i Z Z �
Lu w
O > �U�
w Z U
p a o
w o
d O
0 o 0
L.-
w w
a Z H
N J
FIGURE NO.
67
Y
J
0
a
s
0
M
a

LEGEND N
ti
--® PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE o z o
L9
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE Q
0 0
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
—
-. PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING) o
o
`�-- — PARCELSo
o Ln
z
>--- STREAM CENTERLINE
U M
IJJ W �
STREAM BANKS Q O
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS o
STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA LLI
WA03
WA03\
�WA03 \�
WA03 w
Stream Crossing ID SA21
Local Waterway UT to Broad River
- -4
Longitude 35.276260°N
Latitude 81.995098°W
Flow Regime Perennial
Cowardin Classification R3 u
cn =
I,D HGM Code Riverine U = a- U
_ LF in ROW 109 a .N w o
' O� U
U o
LF Permanent Impact 0J - a 0 Q
LF Temporary Impact 109 Z M W w >
O m U
\ Temporary disturbance / trenched v CZ0 U
I' pipeline crossing U i D_ o
1 I Impact Description p N w
U) 0
' None w w
I I 11 \ I Additional Notes Y
I I I
of
� a �
o FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -
0 40 80 I I I METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
I WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR 0
1, INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEYARE NOT
(IN FEET) I I BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

LEGEND N
-° PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE o m p
z p
L9' HDD Q a
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
Y PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING) o
" o
PARCELS II o
0
Z
STREAM CENTERLINEL0
F M
U
STREAM BANKS �~
Q o
� U �
STREAM IMPACTS: C0 0-
STREAM IMPACT AVOIDANCE AREA
\ Uj
1.0
�
------- �� - �- t
-----------------------
--
Stream Crossing ID SA22
Local Waterway Broad River
t Longitude 35.276416°N
Latitude 81.985607°W z
o
-
--- -
---._.--�� = Flow Regime Perennial Q
_--------------- \ = c = U
-- ""--'--- Cowardin Classification R3 N u
Cn
HGM CodeRiverine U U a-
\� LF in ROW 73 a E L
� 0
LF Permanent Impact 0a 0 z
Qw
w
LF Temporary Impact 0 Z 16-Lzu Lzu w
Avoided (bore) LU z 0
j z
Impact Description p
` w
to O
O
k it
' No equipment access crossing is N z _
proposed. N J
Additional Notes Y
J
0
d
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB- FIGURE NO.
0 40 80 METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED 71
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEYARE NOT
(IN FEET) BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

I
I
N
I
I
I�
40
80
ti
o
z o
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
Q
L
---
0
0
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
o
0
PARCELS
��
C?
C?
o
Z
STREAM CENTERLINE
U M
STREAM BANKS0
Q
f
I
I
I
N
I
I
I�
40
80
(IN FEET)
r� r
-------
-------- - - - - - -
LEGEND
N
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
ti
o
z o
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
Q
L
---
0
0
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
o
0
PARCELS
��
C?
C?
o
Z
STREAM CENTERLINE
U M
STREAM BANKS0
Q
~
o
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
U
Q�
a
STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
Uj
z
03
Stream Crossing ID
SA55
Local Waterway
UT to Second Broad River
Longitude
35.285568°N
Latitude 81.793601 °W
Flow Regime Perennial
Cowardin Classification I R3
HGM Code Riverine
LF in ROW 141
LF Permanent Impact
LF Temporary Impact
Impact Description
Additional Notes
0
141
Temporary disturbance / trenched
pipeline crossing
None
LU
U)
as
a-
0
O 0 }
U a of
E z z
LU w
''dU CO
w z
CJ a-
0
0 a
Q w
w
z_
J
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB- FIGURE NO.
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT 96
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Q
z
J
0
0
0
z
0
U
0
z
Q
J
LU
LU
J
0
0
z
0
0
LL
w
E-
Y
J
0
d

OF
,w
I`I
PROPOSED '
30' LONG CULVERT
FOR PERMANENT '
ACCESS ROAD
MILE
_ FIGURE NO.
— y REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -
0 40 = 80 - ^^o='� METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED w
N O8 WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
IINFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
(IN FEET \�� BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
LEGEND N
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
oN
z o
°
kk-
BORE (CONVENTIONAL)
Q
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
o
0
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
0
ACCESS ROAD CORRIDOR
II
}
's
0
k
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
F M
S
w
0
'
1
PARCELS
<
°
�4
a
>--- STREAM CENTERLINE
p
STREAM BANKS
WA44
_
y
Uj
V
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
_
CULVERTS
V ti•.
•
Z
STREAM IMPACTS:
WA43
PERMANENT STREAM IMPACT AREA
--
p
STREAM IMPACT AVOIDANCE AREA
Z
Q
`o
Stream Crossing ID
SA68
Local Waterway
UT to Sandy Run
� o .1-
l'
11►
,�/
f _
Longitude
35.266254°N
^
-
-'r _ -
Q
Z
Latitude
81.705876°W
I'y
Flow Regime
Perennial
Cowardin Classification
R3
� .
u
'
k
Cn
Q
= a- °z0
HGM Code
Riverine
`--
I
5
I
LF in ROW
66
a
� 0
5
2
0 0 o
LF Permanent Impact
30J
- a 0 Q
I.
0
a
Z
_Jw
LU LU >
LF Temporary Impact
°
Permenant loss due to access road
O
H
m LULU
.� 0 U
ti
I
culvert installation (no impact outside of
U
¢ o 0
ti
}
IImpact
Description
road area due to conventional bore)
p
CO D_ Q
Q Ui
I
0
k
I
IW
cA o 0
1
I
LU UJ
Permanent access road will cross the
ti
I
stream using a culvert sized to convey
J
yy
I
Additional Notes
a 25 year storm event and properly
Y
I
buried to pass aquatic life.
o
I
a
_ FIGURE NO.
— y REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -
0 40 = 80 - ^^o='� METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED w
N O8 WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
IINFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
(IN FEET \�� BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

s
0
M
'
LEGEND N
7
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
z o
'-
BORE (CONVENTIONAL)
o L
r
; LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
o
ell
r
•---�
s
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
o
�,
C)
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)II
q
Ln
o
PARCELS
Z
F M
r
r
UM
~
STREAM CENTERLINE
Q
o
-------�
i
,;
STREAM BANKS
U
co
0
o
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
Uj
CULVERTS
STREAM IMPACTS:
'` ,
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
-
J
le
_
Stream Crossing ID
SA75
Local Waterway
UT to Sandy Run
•'
Longitude
35.256536'N
:\ •'�
z
Latitude
81.670179°W
_
o
Q
Flow Regime
Perennial
Q
Cowardin Classification
R3
N o
U 0 a z
HGM Code
Riverine
.r
a .N w o
LF in ROW
102
- --- -
o o o
--
o
LF Permanent Impact
J U aofQ
LF Temporary Impact
102
w J
Z M W w
w
O m UJ
Temporary disturbance / trenched
H v U
Impact Description
pipeline crossing
U ¢ a o
ti W o
Cn
to 0 0
it
w w
None
z =
r
o��
Additional Notes
Y
+
J
D-
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
FIGURE NO.
F
0 4�� '( • O 80
p'
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
113
`f
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
(IN FEET)
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
`
'
s
0
M

I II I+ LEGEND N ,
I
I I j PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE z o
I
7, �I io LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE o
ti
I 11 TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
SI, I ti PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING) o �,
-A y I o
PARCELS
4
STREAM CENTERLINE F C,
w ti
STREAM BANKS
I � a
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
y 091 CULVERTS
�.
STREAM IMPACTS: Uj
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
.I
Stream Crossing ID SA80
1 Local Waterway UT to Hawkins Branch
I I Longitude 35.244129°N
Q
Latitude 81.6134020W z
o
o - Flow Regime Intermittent Q
Cowardin Classification R4 .. u
__- N Q 0�
HGM Code
I Riverine U = o_ z
- LF in ROW 143 a .N w o
0 o ago
LF Permanent Impact J U 0 z
Qw
LF Temporary Impact 143 Z w w w
2 U LU
-_ -
` l Temporary disturbance / trenched H v U
pipeline crossing U c -J o z
Impact Description p CD w
<A80 W U)o
None w w
Additional Notes Y
a
z�
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -
FIGURE NO.
0 40 80 - - METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED 119
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
(IN FEET) BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE,
a
s
6
d

I �
I I
I ♦♦ S
I I �•9
Ib: I ♦ �
L I
I
... �'� >3p � r
]WEffm�4i
LEGEND
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT (PROPOSED)
PARCELS
>--- STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
CULVERTS
STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
i
Stream Crossing ID SA81A
' t Local Waterway UT to First Broad River
� 4
Longitude 35.237675°N
Latitude 81.600698°W
Flow Regime Perennial
Cowardin Classification R3
HGM Code Riverine
LF in ROW 69
LF Permanent Impact 0
LF Temporary Impact 69
Temporary disturbance / trenched
Impact Description pipeline crossing
Though clearing and upland
disturbance will occur throughout the
1
Additional Notes temporary workspace, disturbance
below the OHWM will be limited to an
80' corridor, as shown.
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
® BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
oLn
d o
iio
O Ln
z
LOUM
M
ILL W J � ~
U Q�
cn a
Q
z
J
0
U
LU =
C
a� a o
L)= F- z
Q N w o
d 0 ') U
U 0
J U a of
aEzzw
ZO Mww>
+L+ wZ U
D
p a
a-
00
a
00 ILL] o
U LLO
ww
z =
J ~
FIGURE NO.
120
Y
J
0
a

� r
f i f Al r`
/ r
Jr• � � r1 r
- I
I ) I [ r t
I �
o . ,
r '
I
I, I
r
r1
I ' '
P � I
I
i� iI I Y
I {
0 40 80
(IN FEET)
L—=
I
I
i
I
II
I
5
5
LEGEND
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
PARCELS
>- e e STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
CULVERTS
STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
1I Stream Crossing ID I SA88 II
1I Local Waterway I UT to First Broad River II
Longitude I 35.235920°N II
Latitude 81.575028°W
r" Flow Regime Perennial
Cowardin Classification R3
0
o I HGM Code Riverine
LF in ROW 86
LF Permanent Impact 0
LF Temporary Impact I 86
Impact Description
1 I Additional Notes
WA5,8% s i
\\
1�
I
k
Temporary disturbance / trenched
pipeline crossing
None
oLn
d o
ii o
o "LO'
UM
M
LLQ W r'-
U<
12�
co a
Q
z
J
O
U
LU =
CQ
= 0
U =o
a 0 a o
LU
O U o
J U a of
J
F- w
Lu
Z www
O m 2:U J
i w z U
U C Jao
0
00 aQ
(n oo w 0
� U) 0
LU w
z_
T-
E-
-J J
FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED 12 3
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
jI INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
Ii BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Y
J
U
d
r
7
I
!
's
I
I
I
14
I
`
I
�
I
�
I
I {
0 40 80
(IN FEET)
L—=
I
I
i
I
II
I
5
5
LEGEND
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
PARCELS
>- e e STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
CULVERTS
STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
1I Stream Crossing ID I SA88 II
1I Local Waterway I UT to First Broad River II
Longitude I 35.235920°N II
Latitude 81.575028°W
r" Flow Regime Perennial
Cowardin Classification R3
0
o I HGM Code Riverine
LF in ROW 86
LF Permanent Impact 0
LF Temporary Impact I 86
Impact Description
1 I Additional Notes
WA5,8% s i
\\
1�
I
k
Temporary disturbance / trenched
pipeline crossing
None
oLn
d o
ii o
o "LO'
UM
M
LLQ W r'-
U<
12�
co a
Q
z
J
O
U
LU =
CQ
= 0
U =o
a 0 a o
LU
O U o
J U a of
J
F- w
Lu
Z www
O m 2:U J
i w z U
U C Jao
0
00 aQ
(n oo w 0
� U) 0
LU w
z_
T-
E-
-J J
FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED 12 3
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
jI INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
Ii BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Y
J
U
d

--- - -
-------------
L
--- L
i_____ - - - - - - 1-- - - _ -_ - - -`�
S5 —
40 80 r
(IN FEET) r�
y\
N
..
yk
ti
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
4k
h
s.
LEGEND
N
ti
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
z o
L9
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
Q
_ - -
0
0
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
0
0
o
PARCELS
II
C,
o
Z
STREAM CENTERLINE
UM
STREAM BANKS0
Q
M
~
o
STREAM IMPACTS:
U
C/)
Q�
0 -
TEMPORARY
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
Stream Crossing ID
SA106
Local Waterway
UT to Buffalo Creek
Longitude
35.216405°N
Latitude 81.488815°W
Flow Regime Perennial
Cowardin Classification I R3
HGM Code
LF in ROW
LF Permanent Impact
LF Temporary Impact
Impact Description
Additional Notes
Riverine
79
0
79
Temporary disturbance / trenched
pipeline crossing
None
LU
CO
c D_
U
N w
0 O }
U a
EzZ
cv w w
w z
U
Q CO
CD D_
o w
C o
LU
z_
J
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB- FIGURE NO.
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED 13 5
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Q
z
J
O
Q
U
O
z
O
U
0
z
J
LU
LU
U
D
z
0
O
w
E-
Y
J
O
d

J
LEGEND
N
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
z o
HDD
w L
Q
a
0�
1
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
o
0
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
II
Ln
o
PARCELS
F M
I�
�''
- - - STREAM CENTERLINE
Q
UM
Uj
o r'_
I
STREAM BANKS
U
Q�
o
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
LU
STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
ak �
r�
Stream Crossing ID
SA110
Local Waterway
UT to Beason Creek
Longitude
35.211296°N
,S
Latitude
81.467906°W
,k
,o
�'
Q
Flow Regime
Perennial
-•
_
Cowardin Classification
R3
Q
ti r ti
N_
U o zz
HGM Code
Riverine
�l fi I
it
63
a o o
LF in ROW
LF Permanent Impact
0
U a z
Q
63
Z M w w w
LF Temporary Impact
o. ti
�I y �,�ti•,�
,
f�
Temporary disturbance
o 2EU�
U Q a o
�� o�=
o_j z
Impact Description
p w Q
1 5
C Of
Q
4 4 4 4
1 I
to o O
Disturbance due to required location of
Z =
i j '� 41 1•k�
i+
HDD bore entry / exit work area.
J
i
ti 1'
�l
�k
ir{
Additional Notes
J
it
Pf
a4
i
5
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF BUB-
FIGURE NO.
r
�, I a� •+
O 40 80
•
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYAREGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
138
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
�,�
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
(IN FEET)
54f
'
J

' I
MEDELIN RD
ell I
WA74
-� q7 .
78'r,
e�
40 80
(IN FEET)
LEGEND N
ti
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE z o
- - - LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE Q
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING) 0 0
PARCELS
C?
0LO
Z
STREAM CENTERLINE Ln
U M
Uj
STREAM BANKSU 0 ~
�
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS a
STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA Uj
z
Stream Crossing ID SA120
Local Waterway LIT to Long Branch
Longitude 35.202383°N
Q
Latitude 81.427878°W
0
Flow Regime Intermittent Q
U
Cowardin Classification R4 u =
cn =
HGM CodeRiverine U c a
_
LF in ROW 94 a vi
00,0
LF Permanent Impact 0J U a 0 z
<EzZw
LF Temporary Impact 94 Z w w >
Ow
Temporary disturbance / trenched t— C/)v U
pipeline crossing U c ¢ a o
Impact Description a c-4 a <
C Uj 0
aIr Ir
j C 0 0
Nw w
None
z_ �
J �
Additional Notes Y
J
0
a
S
M1 REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB- FIGURE NO.
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED 144
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
--------------------------
WA74
-� q7 .
78'r,
e�
40 80
(IN FEET)
LEGEND N
ti
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE z o
- - - LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE Q
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING) 0 0
PARCELS
C?
0LO
Z
STREAM CENTERLINE Ln
U M
Uj
STREAM BANKSU 0 ~
�
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS a
STREAM IMPACTS:
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA Uj
z
Stream Crossing ID SA120
Local Waterway LIT to Long Branch
Longitude 35.202383°N
Q
Latitude 81.427878°W
0
Flow Regime Intermittent Q
U
Cowardin Classification R4 u =
cn =
HGM CodeRiverine U c a
_
LF in ROW 94 a vi
00,0
LF Permanent Impact 0J U a 0 z
<EzZw
LF Temporary Impact 94 Z w w >
Ow
Temporary disturbance / trenched t— C/)v U
pipeline crossing U c ¢ a o
Impact Description a c-4 a <
C Uj 0
aIr Ir
j C 0 0
Nw w
None
z_ �
J �
Additional Notes Y
J
0
a
S
M1 REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB- FIGURE NO.
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED 144
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

1
1 �
LEGEND
N
-° PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
oN
zZ o
Ln
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
Q
--�
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT (PROPOSED)
o
"
o
o
PARCELS
II
o
STREAM CENTERLINE
1 '
Ud
M
W ti
STREAM BANKS
Q
o
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
o
1 '
STREAM IMPACTS:
�
TEMPORARY STREAM IMPACTAREA
Uj
I
1 �
I �
1 �
1
� 1
�- -
Stream Crossing ID
SH01
ki
SHo4 ,
Local Waterway
UT to Long Branch
WG05
1 _ ;
Longitude
35.196621'N
Latitude
81.422792°W
Flow Regime
Perennial
— _ ,----= - -
R3
u =
Cowardin Classification
— -�
N Q
HGM Code
Riverine
'
r~' a� a
U U
�w
LF in ROW
82Q
a
1 ,
o opo
—�
....'
LF Permanent Impact
0J
U a 0 Q
1 1
82
Q-- _jW
Z M w w >
LF Temporary Impact
k
-J
— — —w
1 1 k
Temporary disturbance / trenched
z
I— T U U)
k
pipeline crossing
U Cn Q azi
Impact Description
p/� o w Q
I
D N 0
2 LL
1 I
W C/) 0
it
None
Z =
I 1 r
Additional Notes
J
' I
U
� 1
D_
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATION WAS DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
FIGURE NO.
1
0 40 80 ' ;
2455+00
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYAREGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
146
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
(IN FEET) ► 1' I
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

s
��FUrALIlk
LEGEND
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
PARCELS
>- -- STREAM CENTERLINE
STREAM BANKS
JURISDICTIONAL OPEN WATERS
CULVERTS
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS:
0 TEMPORARY OPEN WATER IMPACT
r
II I Wetland Crossing ID
--- e -'
40 80
(IN FEET)
J
Local Waterway
Longitude
Latitude
WAM Classification
OWA02
UT to Little White Oak Creek
82.133460°W
35.297842°N
Open Water
Cowardin Classfication I PUB
HGM Code I Riverine
Acres Permanent Impact 10.000
Acres Temporary Impact 10.020
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing
Impact Description
I None
0
Additional Notes
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
' METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
Y BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
LO
O
0 0
O Ln
II z 7
UM
M
-j W ti
Q o
U Q�
cn a
n
Q
z_
J
O
_ Q
U
J =
CO
N = O
a-
z
LUQ
a o
L opo
U 5 c z
J IY Q
Q z Z w
Z MJJ>
O�U�
F-
' U Z U
U 5 ao
D o a a Q
to Q it o
tY 0 0
O �
J J
z_
J �
FIGURE NO
C
d

` WCb9 SCIS
- - - ,WC09
we. 0.
I V IC09
A
NXp " '
I_ M
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
LEGEND
Wetland Crossing ID
WC07
N
UT to Little White Oak Creek
Longitude
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
o
m =
Latitude
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
N
z
Headwater Forest
J
o
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PEM
-
LU T-
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT (PROPOSED)
Riverine
0.000LU
U)
H= o
V q a- z
Q N rJ
Acres Permanent Impact
PARCELSo
Ln
0
00,
0.052
g o o >- o
Ln
0- - STREAM CENTERLINE
II
°
Temporary ground disturbance/
Q z LU w
trenched pipeline crossing
'
STREAM BANKS
w
w ti
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
a
o
a
p tiD_
uvi
�ow� o
o
LU -U
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS:
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -
FIGURE NO
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYAREGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED 149
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION. UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
J
Wetland Crossing ID
WC07
Local Waterway
UT to Little White Oak Creek
Longitude
82.109464°W
Latitude
35.292382°N
Q
z
WAM Classification
Headwater Forest
J
o
Cowardin Classfication
PEM
-
LU T-
HGM Code
Riverine
0.000LU
U)
H= o
V q a- z
Q N rJ
Acres Permanent Impact
o
Acres Temporary Impact
0.052
g o o >- o
J U a of
Temporary ground disturbance/
Q z LU w
trenched pipeline crossing
ZO 2 2E � J
Impact Description
H m LU z
Ua-z
p tiD_
�ow� o
o
LU -U
None
LU w
z_ _
J �
Additional Notes
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -
FIGURE NO
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYAREGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED 149
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION. UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
J

OWA06
-
0
- o A - - SA48�
- I WA'2 0
or-
--- -
`---------- ~
40 80
(IN FEET)
LEGEND
N
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE o m =
N
Z
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
Ln
PARCELS o 0
o Ln
>- -- STREAM CENTERLINE II z
STREAM BANKS w ti
JURISDICTIONAL OPEN WATERS C/) a
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS: Uj
TEMPORARY OPEN WATER IMPACT
Wetland Crossing ID OWA06
Local Waterway UT to Floyds Creek
Longitude 81.852325°W
Latitude 135.286604°N
WAM Classification I Open Water
Cowardin Classfication I PUB
HGM Code
Acres Permanent Impact
Acres Temporary Impact
Impact Description
Additional Notes
Riverine
0.000
0.005
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing
None
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION. UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
N
H
V
a
J
Z
O
F-
U_
0
Cn
J
U)
c D_
N U
O �
U 5 }
D_ 0
LU
z z
LU J
d J z
U
Q a
co a-
0
O?
J
z_
J
FIGURE NO
•
Q
z
J
0
U
0
z
0
U
0
z
Q
J
J
J
J
U
D
z
0
0
J
Y
J
0
D-
J
ka,
-
0
- o A - - SA48�
- I WA'2 0
or-
--- -
`---------- ~
40 80
(IN FEET)
LEGEND
N
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE o m =
N
Z
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
Ln
PARCELS o 0
o Ln
>- -- STREAM CENTERLINE II z
STREAM BANKS w ti
JURISDICTIONAL OPEN WATERS C/) a
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS: Uj
TEMPORARY OPEN WATER IMPACT
Wetland Crossing ID OWA06
Local Waterway UT to Floyds Creek
Longitude 81.852325°W
Latitude 135.286604°N
WAM Classification I Open Water
Cowardin Classfication I PUB
HGM Code
Acres Permanent Impact
Acres Temporary Impact
Impact Description
Additional Notes
Riverine
0.000
0.005
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing
None
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION. UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
N
H
V
a
J
Z
O
F-
U_
0
Cn
J
U)
c D_
N U
O �
U 5 }
D_ 0
LU
z z
LU J
d J z
U
Q a
co a-
0
O?
J
z_
J
FIGURE NO
•
Q
z
J
0
U
0
z
0
U
0
z
Q
J
J
J
J
U
D
z
0
0
J
Y
J
0
D-
J

LEGEND
N
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE o m =
_ o
N
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE F I? �:
a
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT (PROPOSED)
LO
PARCELS o 0
_-- o
s ,-- ® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS !I z
LO
TVA W WETLAND IMPACT AREAS: J T w
�
-
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT 0 a
Uj
US 221 A HWY
. I
1NG03 _ _ _ _ _ Wetland Crossing ID WG03
----
Local Waterway UT to Second Broad River
Longitude 81.841397°W
_ Latitude 35.288854°N z
WAM Classification Seep o
Cowardin Classfication PEM
w
HGM Code Slopetm = o
Acres Permanent Impact 0.000 U '� ~ z
Q a
0
Acres Temporary Impact 0.002 �_ o o } o
—_ J L) a(Dz
°"� _ _ _ Temporary ground disturbance / Q z z w
- - - - s trenched pipeline crossing 0 W w w
.. -- - - Impact Description LU z
_----------- ---- U Q a
♦ �. M a ¢
--
`,
LL
Nonew w
z =
Additional Notes
Y
`♦ J
♦ p
♦ d
♦♦FIGURE NO.
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -
0 40 80 `� METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED 17 0
` WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
�♦ INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
(IN FEET) `. BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

-------------
----------------------- y�
-------- ;
--------------------------- ----------------
Jco
Z
V
LEGEND
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
PARCELS
>- -- STREAM CENTERLINE
JURISDICTIONAL OPEN WATERS
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS:
0 TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
Wetland Crossing ID
Local Waterway
Longitude
Latitude
WAM Classification
WA21
UT to Second Broad River
81.825858°W
35.288783°N
Headwater Forest
Cowardin Classfication PFO/ PEM
HGM Code Riverine
Acres Permanent Impact 0.000
Acres Temporary Impact 0.116
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing / clearing of
Impact Description forested vegeation in temporary
workspace
Wetland is emergent within existing
permanent easement. Cleared
Additional Notes temporary workspaces will be
permitted to revegetate naturally back
to original condition.
Ln
0
C) C?
o Ln
z
UM
M
LLQ Uj ti
Q O
U
co a
Q
z
J
O
0�
*
Q
Jco
Z
V
LEGEND
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
PARCELS
>- -- STREAM CENTERLINE
JURISDICTIONAL OPEN WATERS
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS:
0 TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
Wetland Crossing ID
Local Waterway
Longitude
Latitude
WAM Classification
WA21
UT to Second Broad River
81.825858°W
35.288783°N
Headwater Forest
Cowardin Classfication PFO/ PEM
HGM Code Riverine
Acres Permanent Impact 0.000
Acres Temporary Impact 0.116
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing / clearing of
Impact Description forested vegeation in temporary
workspace
Wetland is emergent within existing
permanent easement. Cleared
Additional Notes temporary workspaces will be
permitted to revegetate naturally back
to original condition.
Ln
0
C) C?
o Ln
z
UM
M
LLQ Uj ti
Q O
U
co a
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB- I
FIGURE NO. d
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED /�
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR 1
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Q
z
J
O
0�
o
Q
= U
o
J T-
CO CO
F-
o
Q �
a O
x
U
=
a- z
o
Q
aLU
cn
U o
o> - o
°
U
a- of
J
a�
J
z Z J
N
O
W W LU
U J
E
a
U
Q a o
0
r
J z
D_ Q
a
-
�air
o ULL
a
~ Q
J J
z
-
z =
~
m
J
0
Y
�
J
O
M
o
a-
6
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB- I
FIGURE NO. d
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED /�
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR 1
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.

QUINN RD
�v
� ;
0
860
..,--------
... -----
.
Ilk
40 80
(IN FEET)
SAW
`•.
.gyp_
Jam..
LEGEND
N
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE o m =
N
Z
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
Ln
PARCELS o 0
o "'
- - STREAM CENTERLINE !I z
STREAM BANKS U w ti
a O
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS C/) a
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS:
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
Wetland Crossing ID WA23
0
Local Waterway UT to Second Broad River
Longitude 81.809348°W
Latitude 35.289978°N
WAM Classification Headwater Forest
Cowardin Classfication I PEM/PFO
HGM Code I Riverine
Acres Permanent Impact 10.000
Acres Temporary Impact 10.038
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing / clearing of
Impact Description forested vegeation in temporary
workspace
Wetland is emergent within existing
permanent easement. Cleared
Additional Notes temporary workspaces will be
permitted to revegetate naturally back
to original condition.
� I I
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
,F
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
J
CO
Q
c a
N LU
0 0 }
U a
�Zz
J J
w z
U
Q a-
M D_
N J
a�
J
z
J
FIGURE NO
173
Q
z
J
O
Q
U
O
z
O
U
0
z
Q
J
J
J
J
U
0
z
Q
D
O
J
_
Y
J
O
a
0
m
0
6
d

rf
9'
I
a ,
I
— '+
� B '
PROPOSED
30' LONG CULVERT
FOR PERMANENT
ACCESS ROAD
� I
0 40 80 I
I
(IN FEET)
CP
LEGEND
+ '
'6 4
7
ti
N
V
ti o
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
0
�
o
m
=
�
1
I
I
V
y
II
7
Z
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
ACCESS ROAD CORRIDOR
Z
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
�.
Co
CP
LEGEND
+ '
'6 4
7
ti
N
ti o
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
o
m
=
�
1
I
I
y
II
7
CP
LEGEND
N
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
o
m
=
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
Z
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
ACCESS ROAD CORRIDOR
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
0
LSj
0
O
�
PARCELS
"
Z
W
>- - STREAM CENTERLINE
Iii
ti
STREAM BANKS
Q
C/)
o
a
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
CULVERTS
BORE (CONVENTIONAL)
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS:
- WETLAND IMPACTAVOIDED
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
Wetland Crossing ID
Local Waterway
Longitude
Latitude
WAM Classification
WA43
UT to Sandy Run
81.705797°W
35.266322°N
Headwater Forest
I Cowardin Classfication I PEM/PFO
HGM Code I Riverine
Acres Permanent Impact 10.006
Acres Temporary Impact 10.000
Permanent wetland fill for creation of a
new 30' wide access road corridor.
Impact Description
Filled areas within the wetland be
appropriately piped to allow flow
Additional Notes between remaining sections of the
wetland. Impacts within existing ROW
will be avoided with a conventional
bore.
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB—
, + METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYAREGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
+I INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
y BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Q
z
J
0
_ Q
0
J =
CO
Q
as a 0
z
Q N LU 0
00,0
J U a- Of
__J J
LU
Z J W W
O U Z U
U
¢Ca,
z
p ch D-
ir
0
J J
z
J �
FIGURE NO
•
Y
J
0
D—
J

e
f
el
LEGEND
N
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
o
m
=
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
Z
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
PARCELS
o
Ln
0
o
�- - STREAM CENTERLINE
!I
Z
#
U
w
ti
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
C/)
a
Z
fF
{
CULVERTS
f
el
LEGEND
N
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
o
m
=
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
Z
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
PARCELS
o
Ln
0
o
�- - STREAM CENTERLINE
!I
Z
STREAM BANKS
U
w
ti
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
C/)
a
CULVERTS
I++F BORE (CONVENTIONAL)
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS:
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
I
- Wetland Crossing ID WA48
' Local Waterway UT to Sandy Run
Longitude 81.670270°W
Latitude 35.256499°N
WAM Classification Headwater Forest
Coward!n Classfication PFO
` 5P' HGM Code Riverine
�- Acres Permanent Impact 0.000
0
g _ s Acres Temporary Impact 0.012
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing / clearing of
t Impact Description forested vegeation in temporary
`p75_ I. - workspace
l
i
�I Wetland is emergent within existing
a permanent easement. Cleared
Additional Notes temporary workspaces will be
permitted to revegetate naturally back
O� to original condition.
O�Np,Fz
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -
0 40 80 METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYAREGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
(IN FEET) r oBASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Q
z
J
O
U
J =
co
a� a o
U = z
Q N LU 0
opo
J U a- �
__J LUJ
Z LULUw
O_J
LU Z U
d
U
¢az
p coD-
Cn 'q it 0
o
J J
z T_
J �
FIGURENO
187
J

w
r
r�
I .
I I
.6o I I r
I I
I
I I
" . 1N1303
I
I •I
II I
I c6
ti I
I I I
40 80
l I +f
(IN FEET) �y r
7
LEGEND
Uj
z
N
Wetland Crossing ID
W1303
Local Waterway
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
Longitude
o
m
=
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
35.251516°N
N
z
Cowardin Classfication
PFO
w
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
U)
HGM Code
Riverine
0.000
_
E o_
L) N w
Acres Permanent Impact
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
Acres Temporary Impact
0.010
�_ 0
PARCELS
o
Q z z
Ln
0
clearing of forested vegeation in
ZO 2E J
Impact Description
temporary workspace
o
- - STREAM CENTERLINE
U Qa
!I
z
O
STREAM BANKS
LU
U
permitted to revegetate naturally back
w
ti
JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
J
C/)
a
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS:
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
Uj
z
Wetland Crossing ID
W1303
Local Waterway
UT to Beaverdam Creek
Longitude
81.643726°W
Latitude
35.251516°N
WAM Classification
Headwater Forest
Cowardin Classfication
PFO
w
U)
HGM Code
Riverine
0.000
_
E o_
L) N w
Acres Permanent Impact
Acres Temporary Impact
0.010
�_ 0
JUD-Of
Temporary ground disturbance /
Q z z
clearing of forested vegeation in
ZO 2E J
Impact Description
temporary workspace
� am LU Z
U Qa
M D-
O
Cleared temporary workspaces will be
LU
permitted to revegetate naturally back
z
Additional Notes
to original condition.
J
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYAREGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEYARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION. UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
FIGURE NO
Q
z
J
0
Q
0
0
z
0
U
0
z
J
J
J
J
0
0
z
Q
D
0
LL
J
T-
E-
-J
-
J
0
D-
9

T W �Q
* { AZ
4
� <(/
4Q
121
M
--_ y----neo----�.
_ '
41
� o
ro
.r
0 40 80
(IN FEET)
i
,��---------------------------------
LEGEND
N
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE o m =
Z
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
1 TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
LSj
PARCELS o 0
o
- - STREAM CENTERLINE !I Z
STREAM BANKS U w ti
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS C/) a
III I BORE (CONVENTIONAL)
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS: Uj
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
Wetland Crossing ID WA52
Local Waterway Hawkins Branch
Longitude 81.616843°W
Latitude 35.244458°N <
z
J
WAM Classification Seep o
Cowardin Classfication PEM - U
LU =
HGM Code Slope < o
= D- z
Acres Permanent Impact 0.000 Q N 0 o
LU
Acres Temporary Impact 0.023 �_ o o >-
0
U a_ �
Temporary ground disturbance / Q z Z w
trenched pipeline crossing ZO w w
Impact Description
U
¢az
LO w Q
�Cn <� o
None
w w
z_ _
J ~
Additional Notes
Y
J
O
D -
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -
FIGURE NO.
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYAREGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED w
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR yV[
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
- '-- - --' BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
J

40
LEGEND
'a I� PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
Y I LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
i f TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
a i
' R NEW PERMANENT EASEMENT (PROPOSED)
4. r
PARCELS
i ® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
' I BORE CONVENTIONAL
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS:
PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
' I
p
• W �
209�._.w Z
uJ I
a I
,
• r
,
, r ,
,
� a
♦ ��
i
,
.r' f ♦
L
80 n .r �♦
(IN FEET)f
Wetland Crossing ID
Local Waterway
Longitude
Latitude
WAM Classification
WC01
UT to Logan Branch
81.529805°W
35.223751 ON
Headwater Forest
Cowardin Classfication I PFO
HGM Code I Riverine
Acres Permanent Impact 0.006
Acres Temporary Impact 0.010
Temporary ground disturbance /
trenched pipeline crossing / permanent
Impact Description conversion of forested vegetation to
emergent in new utility corridor.
Cleared temporary workspaces will be
permitted to revegetate naturally back
Additional Notes to original condition.
a REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
TER
ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
I— BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Ln
0
0 0
o Ln
ii Z
0 M
M
w ti
Q 0
O Q�
cn a
Q
z
J
0
_ Q
0
LU T-
CO C
UQ
T- z
Q Nw o
a 0 0
0 0
J U a- of
LU -i
Z www
O d U Z U
U�o
¢az
pT- D_
0cir 0
o
0
LU w
z T-
J �
FIGURE NO
193
Y
J
0
d

OF'
Uj
lq
ti
�1L
03
45
N
Wetland Crossing ID
WA68
Lys
Local Waterway
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
Longitude
o
m
=
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
35.215461 ON
WAM Classification
Z
5
Cowardin Classfication
PFO/ PEM
k
w
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
U)
HGM Code
Riverine
0.000
R`
i I ,
I '
I '
,
d
,
J i WA68
,
r• f
• r�
0 40 80
(IN FEET)
0
0
h
N
LEGEND
Uj
z
03
N
Wetland Crossing ID
WA68
Lys
Local Waterway
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
Longitude
o
m
=
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
35.215461 ON
WAM Classification
Z
Cowardin Classfication
PFO/ PEM
w
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
U)
HGM Code
Riverine
0.000
_
o_
ca 9 w
Acres Permanent Impact
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
Acres Temporary Impact
0.071
I
I
R`
i I ,
I '
I '
,
d
,
J i WA68
,
r• f
• r�
0 40 80
(IN FEET)
0
0
h
N
LEGEND
Uj
z
03
N
Wetland Crossing ID
WA68
Lys
Local Waterway
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
Longitude
o
m
=
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
35.215461 ON
WAM Classification
Z
Cowardin Classfication
PFO/ PEM
w
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
U)
HGM Code
Riverine
0.000
_
o_
ca 9 w
Acres Permanent Impact
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
Acres Temporary Impact
0.071
- 0 >-
PARCELS
Temporary ground disturbance /
o
Ln
0
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
Impact Description
forested vegeation in temporary
LU Z
o
Z
workspace
U Q D_
0 coD_
(.0 UiUi
w
HDD
ui
N�N
L.I. 2
ti
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS:
Q
0
Z
o
a
TEMPORARY
temporary workspaces will be
WETLAND IMPACT
permitted to revegetate naturally back
to original condition. Additional corridor
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Q
z
J
O
Q
0
O
z
O
U
0
z
J
W
LU
0
0
z
Q
0
O
LL
w
E-
Y
J
O
a
Uj
z
03
fa
Wetland Crossing ID
WA68
Lys
Local Waterway
Buffalo Creek
Longitude
81.483868°W
Latitude
35.215461 ON
WAM Classification
Bottomland Hardwood
Cowardin Classfication
PFO/ PEM
w
U)
HGM Code
Riverine
0.000
_
o_
ca 9 w
Acres Permanent Impact
Acres Temporary Impact
0.071
- 0 >-
— � 0
Temporary ground disturbance /
< LU
E- z
trenched pipeline crossing / clearing of
Z LU
2 w
Impact Description
forested vegeation in temporary
LU Z
workspace
U Q D_
0 coD_
(.0 UiUi
N�N
L.I. 2
Wetland is emergent within existing
permanent easement. Cleared
Z
Additional Notes
temporary workspaces will be
J
permitted to revegetate naturally back
to original condition. Additional corridor
width is reqired for HDD entry/exit
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
FIGURE NO.
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
197
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
Q
z
J
O
Q
0
O
z
O
U
0
z
J
W
LU
0
0
z
Q
0
O
LL
w
E-
Y
J
O
a

40 80
(IN FEET)
f
LEGEND
z
N
Wetland Crossing ID
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
o
m =
Buffalo Creek
-
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
N
�
Z
Latitude
35.214736°N
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
Riverine Swamp Forest
Cowardin Classfication
PFO
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
w
PARCELS
U)
0
4
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
C)
!I
o
Z
Acres Temporary Impact
W
�_ o 0 }
HDD
Iii
ti
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS:
Q
0
o
a
TEMPORARY
clearing of forested vegeation in
WETLAND IMPACT
Impact Description
temporary workspace
40 80
(IN FEET)
f
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEYARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION. UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
FIGURE NO
Q
z_
J
0
Q
0
0
z
0
U
0
z
J
J
J
J
U
0
z
0
0
J
Y
J
0
O_
d
Uj
z
Wetland Crossing ID
WA69
Local Waterway
Buffalo Creek
Longitude
81.479964°W
Latitude
35.214736°N
WAM Classification
Riverine Swamp Forest
Cowardin Classfication
PFO
w
U)
HGM Code
Riverine
0.000
_
o_
c
a ( w
Acres Permanent Impact
Acres Temporary Impact
0.110
�_ o 0 }
JUD_�
Temporary ground disturbance /
Q z z
clearing of forested vegeation in
LU J
Impact Description
temporary workspace
m U Z
U Qa-
(.0 it
LU
Cleared temporary workspaces will be
permitted to revegetate naturally back
z
Additional Notes
to original condition.
J
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB-
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEYARE NOT
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION. UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
FIGURE NO
Q
z_
J
0
Q
0
0
z
0
U
0
z
J
J
J
J
U
0
z
0
0
J
Y
J
0
O_
d

i I - 650-.
� I
r
,
r o
it
r ,
f
o I 1 tl
r
N I �
0 40 80
(IN FEET)
titi
1ti
�
��
O�•
y
I •1
r'
Longitude
f•
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
f
o
m
=
i
Q
z
N
z
1
o
titi
1ti
�
��
Local Waterway
y
I •1
�
Longitude
81.475425°W
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
LEGEND
WA71
Lys
Local Waterway
Buffalo Creek
N
Longitude
81.475425°W
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE
o
m
=
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
Q
z
N
z
1
o
TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
Q
Cowardin Classfication
PSS
PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
- O
PARCELS
HGM Code
Riverine
0.000
o
=
'N
Ln
0
® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS
o
z
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS:
0.142
�_
o
�
Uj
M
'
~
Or TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
J
J
0
a �
a
Temporary ground disturbance /
Q
z Z LU
trenched pipeline crossing / clearing of
Wetland Crossing ID
WA71
Lys
Local Waterway
Buffalo Creek
Longitude
81.475425°W
Latitude
35.213346°N
Q
z
WAM Classification
Riverine Swamp Forest
o
Q
Cowardin Classfication
PSS
- O
LU T-
HGM Code
Riverine
0.000
Q
=
'N
U)
= o
a z
.
Acres Permanent Impact
Acres Temporary Impact
0.142
�_
o
o >- o
J
)
a �
Temporary ground disturbance /
Q
z Z LU
trenched pipeline crossing / clearing of
2E U w w
Impact Description
forested vegeation in temporary
v
workspace
U
�
Q a o
p
D
T-
~
a
U �
O
Wetland is emergent within existing
LU UJ
permanent easement. Cleared
Z T-
Additional Notes
temporary workspaces will be
J
permitted to revegetate naturally back
Y
to original condition.
o
a
REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB- I
FIGURE NO,
METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYA REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED /� O O
WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT 1
BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE,
a
s
6
M
d

/ kGr a LEGEND
N
PROPOSED PIPE CENTERLINE o m =
- Z
, LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
•-- Q
1 TEMPORARY WORKSPACE
I
i 4 A PERMANENT EASEMENT (EXISTING)
� I
�NPARCELS o 0
Ln
�- - STREAM CENTERLINE !I o
r U M
STREAM BANKS J U ti
ti ti ® JURISDICTIONAL WETLANDS W a
5
5 by HDD
WETLAND IMPACT AREAS:Uj
4 TEMPORARY WETLAND IMPACT
WA72
ZZ
Wetland Crossing ID WA72
4 Local Waterway UT to Beason Creek
Longitude 81.468045°W
ti
Latitude
35.211509°N z
1 3,, WAM Classification Headwater Forest 0
Cowardin Classfication PFO
ir U _
'OM1.. ,° HGM Code Riverine in =
H D- 0
r•. Acres Permanent Impact 0.000 U '_ ~ z
CL (n _j
0
Acres Temporary Impact 0.441 2 o 0 >- o
— U cD z
r o
Temporary ground disturbance/ Q z Z LU
trenched pipeline crossing /clearing of Lu w LU
° Impact Description forested vegeation in temporary U v
workspace U _j o 0
Cnti0
Q W Of
0
1 ti I y Wetland is emergent within existing 0�
�I ti4 'ti '�I ti, yy permanent easement. Cleared z =
I > ,
Additional Notes temporary workspaces will be
� � 1 .� t ,, � '� I � �•
a permitted to revegetate naturally back J
5 'll I i A it o to original condition. Additional corridor 0
width is reqired for HDD entry/exit
I I I' �t ti� a` ,' II �I �� o°�•
I I I I �� REFERENCE: JURISDICTIONAL FEATURE LOCATIONS WERE DETERMINED USING GPS UNITS CAPABLE OF SUB -
FIGURE No.
0 40 I I 80 .} , i' f r METER ACCURACY, BUT HAVE NOT BEEN SURVEYED BYAREGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. PROPOSED /� O
,I 'M1'`. WORKSPACES, ACCESS ROADS AND PIPE LOCATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY TRC. THIS MAP IS FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALL FEATURE LOCATIONS DISPLAYED ARE APPROXIMATED. THEY ARE NOT 1
` (IN FEET) �- BASED ON CIVIL SURVEY INFORMATION, UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE.
J

Appendix V:
Typical Stream and Wetland Impact Details

6 -INCH CURB OR
HIGHER TO CONTAIN
SEDIMENT OR DEBRIS
DECK WIDTH FOR
WIDEST EQUIPMENT
CROSS-SECTION A -A'
UNDERSIDE OF BRIDGE DECK MUST BE
WRAPPED WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO
PREVENT SEDIMENT OR DEBRIS FROM
PUSHING THROUGH THE CRACKS
TEMPORARY BRIDGE NOTES:
THE FOLLOWING IS A SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION AND MIGRATION MEASURES TO BE FOLLOWED AT ALL TEMPORARY
BRIDGE CROSSINGS.
1. A PRE -FABRICATED BRIDGE OR FLATBED RAILCAR, FLEXI-FLOAT OR FLUMED VEHICLE CROSSING MAY BE
SUBSTITUTED FOR THE TEMPORARY BRIDGE.
BETWEEN DECK TIMBERS.
2. INSTALL THE BRIDGE IN A MANNER THAT WILL MINIMIZE SEDIMENT ENTERING THE WATER. STRINGERS MUST BE
3.
4.
DESIGNED TO SUPPORT THE LOADS EXPECTED ON THE BRIDGE. CURBS AT LEAST 6 -INCH HIGH MUST BE INSTALLED
STEEL OR LOG STRINGER
ALONG THE EDGE OF THE DECK TO CONTAIN SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS ON THE BRIDGE. FASTENERS CONNECTING
TO BE DESIGNED BY AN
COMPONENTS MUST BE STRONG ENOUGH TO HOLD THEM IN POSITION DURING THE LIFE OF THE BRIDGE.
ENGINEER TO SUPPORT
TEMPORARY CRIB ABUTMENTS MAY BE FILLED WITH ROCK OR COBBLE, OR MAY BE SOLID TIMBER ROTATED 90
DEGREES IN ALTERNATIVE LAYERS. RIP -RAP EROSION PROTECTION IS TO BE PLACED AROUND THE CRIBS AND ON
EXPECTED LOADS
ANY FILL SLOPES PROJECTING INTO THE WATER.
LOCATE SO
TRENCHING DOES
NOT AFFECT BRIDGE
TEMPORARY BRIDGE
3.
4.
ROAD APPROACHES LEADING TO THE BRIDGE MUST BE RAISED AND STABLE SO EQUIPMENT LOADS ARE SUPPORTED
A SUFFICIENT DISTANCE BACK FROM THE WATER TO REDUCE POTENTIAL SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS ENTERING THE
STREAM FROM EQUIPMENT TRACKS. DO NOT USE SOIL TO CONSTRUCT OR STABILIZE EQUIPMENT BRIDGES. IF CUTS
ARE NEEDED TO OBTAIN A SATISFACTORY GRADE, THEY ARE TO BE DUG WITH SIDE DITCHES AND STABLE SLOPES.
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE TO BE INSTALLED TO KEEP SEDIMENT ON LAND (E.G., SILT
FENCING, FILTER CLOTH, RIP -RAP, SEED AND MULCH, ETC.).
PERIODICALLY CHECK BRIDGE INSTALLATION AND REMOVE ANY BUILD-UP OF SEDIMENT OR DEBRIS ON THE BRIDGE.
k
o
o Z
c
w
5.
BRIDGES SHOULD BE SECURELY ANCHORED AT ONE END USING STEEL CABLE OR CHAIN TO PREVENT THE BRIDGE
TRENCH
FROM FLOATING DOWNSTREAM AND POSSIBLY CAUSING AN OBSTRUCTION TO THE FLOW. ANCHORING AT ONLY
z
ONE END WILL PREVENT CHANNEL OBSTRUCTION IN THE EVENT THAT FLOOD WATERS FLOAT THE BRIDGE.
(V
ACCEPTABLE ANCHORS ARE LARGE TREES, BOULDERS, OR DRIVEN STEEL ANCHORS.
w^
6.
TEMPORARY CRIB ABUTMENTS SHOULD BE PLACED PARALLEL TO, AND ON, STABLE BANKS SUCH THAT THE
STRUCTURE IS AT OR ABOVE, BANKFULL DEPTH TO PREVENT THE ENTRAPMENT OF FLOATING MATERIALS AND
DEBRIS.
o x
TOP OF BANK
TOP OF BANK
J
A
A'
w
7.
DUE TO SITE CONSTRAINTS, BRIDGE LENGTHS MAY EXCEED A SINGLE 40 -FEET SPAN. IN THESE INSTANCES, TO
ENSURE SAFE WORK CONDITIONS A TEMPORARY PIER(S) MAY BE REQUIRED WITHIN THE STREAM. IF A TEMPORARY
PIER(S) IS REQUIRED IT IS TO BE DESIGNED BY AN ENGINEER TO SUPPORT EXPECTED LOADS AND WITHSTAND
~ rl
STREAM
STREAM
ANTICIPATED STREAM FORCES DUE TO DISCHARGE DURING STORM EVENTS.
_
FLOW
z
_
FLOW
�i
U
BRIDGE LENGTH (40 -FEET MAX)
z
DECK
TOP OF BANK
TOP OF BANK
CURB
N
ROCK OR COARSE
JI GRAVEL
SILT FENCE
BRIDGE APPROACH TO BE
ADEQUATELY STABILIZED
PLAN VIEW
STEEL OR LOG STRINGER
USE CORDUROY OR OTHER
SUITABLE MATERIAL TO N.W.L. TEMPORARY CRIB
FORM STABLE APPROACH TEMPORARY CRIB — ABUTMENT SET BACK MIN.
ROADS WHERE NECESSARY ABUTMENT 6.5 -FEET FROM TOP OF BANK
NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE (TYP.)
RIPRAP TOE PROTECTION
(IF NECESSARY)
UNDISTURBED STREAM BANK
`— ENSURE ADEQUATE OPENING TO
ALLOW ANTICIPATED INCREASE IN
BRIDGE PROFILE STREAM DISCHARGE
PROJECT NUMBER
7435-16-013
FIGURE NUMBER
D1
FIGURE NAME
TEMPORARY
BRIDGE

20 -FEET MIN.
o
_0 R
20 -FEET MIN.
SILT FENCES
o
(INSTALL SECOND ROW OF SILT
PUMP AROUND
FENCE 2 FEET LANDWARD OF
5
7\,
� o
HOSE
SINGLE ROW AS NEEDED BASED
ON CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD)
TEMPORARY
BRIDGE
_
SEDIMENT TUBE
I
z
OR EARTHEN BERM
COFFER
Lu
DAM
PROPOSED
PIPELINE
= w
= w
U
U
wQ
wQ
uj
m
~ m
O
J<�SUBGRADE
SILT.
SPOIL PILE
BAG
STREAM BED
r SUBSTRATE SPOILS
20 -FEET MIN.
20 -FEET MIN.
STREAM
TRENCH DEWATERING HOSE
FLOW
SCREENED INTAKE
DURING CONSTRUCTION
TYPICAL PUMP AROUND STREAM CROSSING
H
w w
V
w a
Ln N
Q �
Lu �
~O
Z
z
Q
:2 <
cr Lu
a ac
LU G
LU w
LU F.-
U -
6 wO w
�n w
•-• w
L '
Lu O
Lu m
LL Cz
0
00
PUMP AROUND STREAM CROSSING NOTES:
1. REFER TO AUTHORIZED PERMITS FOR ADDITIONAL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL
REQUIREMENTS.
2. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT OPERATE WITHIN STREAMS OR TRAVERSE STREAMS
WITHOUT THE USE OF TEMPORARY BRIDGES.
3. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS WITHIN EDGES OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT.
CONSTRUCT DAMS USING SANDBAGS COVERED WITH CLEAN 20 MIL HDPE LINER OR CLEAN
STEEL PLATE DRIVEN INTO THE STREAM BANKS AND STREAM BED. USE SANDBAGS TO SHORE
STEEL PLATE IF NEEDED. CONTRACTOR MAY USE OTHER MATERIALS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR AND THE OWNER.
4. THE HEIGHT OF THE COFFER DAM SHALL BE CALCULATED BY USING H/4 + 1 -FEET WHERE H =
HEIGHT OF STREAM BANK IN FEET WITH A 2 -FEET MINIMUM DAM HEIGHT. ADDITIONAL
HEIGHT MAY BE REQUIRED BASED ON FLOW CONDITIONS AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL DEWATER AREA BETWEEN DAMS AND ENSURE TIGHT SEAL OF DAMS
PRIOR TO TRENCHING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PASSING ALL WATER
WHICH IS TO BE FILTERED THROUGH A SILT BAG PLACED ON APPROPRIATE E&SC MEASURE.
INSTALL SILT FENCE ON THREE DOWNGRADIENT SIDES OF SILT BAG. DEWATERING PUMPS
SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT.
6. SCREEN PUMP INTAKES TO MINIMIZE ENTRAINMENT OF AQUATIC LIFE. PLACE PUMP INTAKE
UPSTREAM OF UPSTREAM COFFER DAM. PLACE BYPASS HOSE OUTSIDE OF STREAM BANKS
WITH DISCHARGE DOWNSTREAM OF DOWNSTREAM COFFER DAM BEFORE COMMENCING
BYPASS. TAKE MEASURES TO PREVENT STREAMBED SCOUR AT PUMP DISCHARGE. TAKE
REASONABLE MEASURES TO PREVENT INTAKE FROM SUCTIONING THE STREAM SUBSTRATE.
7. THE PUMP(S) SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO CONVEY NORMAL STREAM FLOW. HAVE
STANDBY PUMPS AND GENERATORS CAPABLE OF HANDLING 100% OF ANTICIPATED FLOW
ON-SITE IN CASE OF PUMP FAILURE OR A RAIN EVENT. CONTINUOUSLY MONITOR THE DAM
AND PUMPS TO ENSURE PROPER OPERATION THROUGHOUT THE WATERBODY CROSSING. ALL
PUMPS SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT TO REDUCE POTENTIAL FOR
FUEL SPILLS.
8. ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHOULD BE MADE PERPENDICULAR TO THE STREAM TO THE EXTENT
PRACTICAL OR AS SHOWN ON PERMITTED PLANS. INSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO
THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT STREAM CROSSINGS. EXTEND SILT FENCE 20 -FEET
MINIMUM ON BOTH SIDES OF EDGE OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OR AS SHOWN ON
PLANS.
9. LIMIT THE REMOVAL OF VEGETATION TO THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AREA. ONLY HAND
CLEARING IS ALLOWED ON STREAM BANKS AND WITHIN 10 -FEET OF TOP OF BANK.
10. STREAM CROSSINGS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED "IN THE DRY" DURING LOW FLOW
CONDITIONS. LOCAL WEATHER CONDITIONS SHALL BE MONITORED IN ORDER TO AVOID
ANTICIPATED RAINFALL EVENTS DURING, OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING, INSTALLATION OF
THE PIPE.
11. CROSSINGS SHALL BE EXECUTED IN THE MINIMAL AMOUNT OF TIME NECESSARY; BEGIN
INSTREAM WORK IN THE MORNING, INSTALLATION AND RESTORATION SHALL OCCUR WITHIN
A 24-HOUR PERIOD TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL. IN NO INSTANCE SHOULD
INSTALLATION AND RESTORATION EXCEED 48 HOURS WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR.
12. CONTRACTOR SHALL ATTEMPT TO SEGREGATE STREAM BED SUBSTRATE FROM SUBGRADE.
13. NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN STREAMS, WETLANDS OR
RIPARIAN AREAS BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THOSE DEPICTED ON THE DRAWINGS.
14. ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONTOURS TO FULLEST EXTENT
PRACTICAL, ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. AFTER SUBGRADE HAS BEEN BACKFILLED
APPLY STREAM SUBSTRATE, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL.
15. IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES REQUIRE EQUIPMENT TO CROSS THE STREAM, TEMPORARY
BRIDGING WILL BE USED.
16. ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY IN ORDER TO PROTECT AFFECTED
STREAMS & WETLANDS AND PREVENT VIOLATIONS OF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS.
PROJECT NUMBER
7435-16-013
FIGURE NUMBER
D3
FIGURE NAME
PUMP AROUND
STREAM CROSSING
o
a ry
Z Z
0
5
� o
PROJECT NUMBER
7435-16-013
FIGURE NUMBER
D3
FIGURE NAME
PUMP AROUND
STREAM CROSSING

20 -FEET MIN. 20 -FEET MIN.
0
SILT FENCE-----
ENCES(INSTALL
o
a ry
(INSTALLSECOND ROW OF SILT
Z Z
0
5
o
FENCE 2 FEET LANDWARD OF
�
$ a
z
Lu Lu
SINGLE ROW AS NEEDED BASED
u
wa
ON CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD)
TEMPORARY
Q N
BRIDGE
=
w
SEDIMENT TUBE
z
z 0
Lu
OR EARTHEN BERM
COFFER
Q
>-
DAM
Q
0
PROPOSED
Lu
PIPELINE
= w
W
= w
lJ:
�W
a
U�
LU
ww
LU IIIIJi
a
�
o w
Ln w
... w
OLu
�
SUBGRADE
Lu p
rf)
o z
SILT.
SPOIL PILE
°O
BAG'
BED
FSTREAM
SUBSTRATE SPOILS
20 -FEET MIN.
20 -FEET
MIN.
TRENCH DEWATERING HOSE
STREAM
FLOW
DURING CONSTRUCTION
TYPICAL FLUME STREAM CROSSING
FLUME STREAM CROSSING NOTES:
1. REFER TO AUTHORIZED PERMITS FOR ADDITIONAL LOCAL, STATE, AND
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS.
2. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT OPERATE WITHIN STREAMS OR TRAVERSE
STREAMS WITHOUT THE USE OF TEMPORARY BRIDGES.
3. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY COFFER DAMS WITHIN EDGES OF CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT. CONSTRUCT DAMS USING SANDBAGS COVERED WITH CLEAN 20 MIL
HDPE LINER. CONTRACTOR MAY USE OTHER METHODS FOLLOWING APPROVAL FROM
THE ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTOR AND THE OWNER.
4. THE HEIGHT OF THE COFFER DAM SHALL BE CALCULATED BY USING H/4 + 1 -FEET
WHERE H = HEIGHT OF STREAM BANK WITH A 2 -FEET MINIMUM DAM HEIGHT.
ADDITIONAL HEIGHT MAY BE REQUIRED BASED ON FLOW CONDITIONS AT THE TIME
OF CONSTRUCTION.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL DEWATER AREA BETWEEN DAMS AND ENSURE TIGHT SEAL OF
DAMS PRIOR TO TRENCHING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PASSING
ALL WATER WHICH IS TO BE FILTERED THROUGH A SILT BAG. INSTALL SILT FENCE ON
THREE DOWNGRADIENT SIDES OF SILT BAG. DEWATERING PUMPS SHALL BE PLACED
WITHIN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT TO REDUCE POTENTIAL FOR FUEL SPILLS.
6. INSTALL FLUME PIPE AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 12 -INCHES OF COVER OR X
DIAMETER OF PIPE FOR FLUMES GREATER THAN 36 -INCH IN DIAMETER. CONTRACTOR
IS RESPONSIBLE TO SIZE FLUME PIPE TO ADEQUATELY ACCOMMODATE BANK FULL
FLOWS. ALIGN FLUME PIPE(S) TO PREVENT BANK EROSION AND STREAMBED SCOUR.
7. ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHOULD BE MADE PERPENDICULAR TO THE STREAM TO THE
EXTENT PRACTICAL. INSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT AT STREAM CROSSINGS. EXTEND SILT FENCE 20 -FEET MINIMUM ON BOTH
SIDES OF EDGE OF CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OR AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
8. LIMIT THE REMOVAL OF VEGETATION TO THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AREA. ONLY
HAND CLEARING IS ALLOWED ON STREAM BANKS AND WITHIN 10 -FEET OF TOP OF
BANK.
9. STREAM CROSSINGS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED "IN THE DRY" DURING LOW FLOW
CONDITIONS. LOCAL WEATHER CONDITIONS SHALL BE MONITORED IN ORDER TO
AVOID ANTICIPATED RAINFALL EVENTS DURING, OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING,
INSTALLATION OF THE PIPE.
10. CROSSINGS SHALL BE EXECUTED IN THE MINIMAL AMOUNT OF TIME NECESSARY;
BEGIN INSTREAM WORK IN THE MORNING, INSTALLATION AND RESTORATION SHALL
OCCUR WITHIN A 24-HOUR PERIOD TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL. IN NO
INSTANCE SHOULD INSTALLATION AND RESTORATION EXCEED 48 HOURS WITHOUT
APPROVAL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITOR.
11. CONTRACTOR SHALL ATTEMPT TO SEGREGATE STREAM BED SUBSTRATE FROM
SUBGRADE.
12. DO NOT REMOVE FLUME PIPE DURING TRENCHING, PIPELAYING, OR BACKFILLING
ACTIVITIES, OR INITIAL STREAMBED RESTORATION EFFORTS.
13. NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN STREAM S,WETLANDS,
OR RIPARIAN AREAS BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THOSE DEPICTED ON THE DRAWINGS.
14. ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONTOURS TO FULLEST
EXTENT PRACTICAL, ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED. AFTER SUBGRADE HAS
BEEN BACKFILLED APPLY STREAM SUBSTRATE, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL.
15. IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES REQUIRE EQUIPMENT TO CROSS THE STREAM,
TEMPORARY BRIDGING WILL BE USED.
16. ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC MEASURES MAY BE NECESSARY IN ORDER TO PROTECT
AFFECTED STREAMS & WETLANDS AND PREVENT VIOLATIONS OF WATER QUALITY
STANDARDS.
w
_z
N ,.1
w
~ 1� UO
J
a
V
i v
F�--1
oU
z
I
N
PROJECT NUMBER
7435-16-013
FIGURE NUMBER
D4
FIGURE NAME
FLUME STREAM
CROSSING
a
z
0
a
V
O
H
z
D
O
V
a
F-
D D
2
o
a ry
Z Z
0
5
o
�
$ a
w
_z
N ,.1
w
~ 1� UO
J
a
V
i v
F�--1
oU
z
I
N
PROJECT NUMBER
7435-16-013
FIGURE NUMBER
D4
FIGURE NAME
FLUME STREAM
CROSSING
a
z
0
a
V
O
H
z
D
O
V
a
F-
D D
2

20 -FEET MIN.
RIPARIAN SEEDING AREA
TO EXTEND A MIN. OF
10 -FEET LANDWARD
SILT FENCE
(INSTALL SECOND ROW OF SILT
FENCE 2 FEET LANDWARD OF
SINGLE ROW AS NEEDED BASED
ON CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD)
10 -FEET MIN.
20 -FEET MIN.
A 0
Lu w
u
Lu a
Ln a-
a(A
Lu a
�o
10 -FEET 10 -FEET w
MIN. MIN. Q
LuO
Lu
a a
_�
u "' w w
LL
af of Ow
cp L w
u
w
wO
w m
0
00
STREAM
FLOW
PT A IST VTT: W
INSTALL COIR
MATTING
(SEE NOTE 3)
20 -FEET MIN.
u w 5 -FEET MIN. u w
Uj
�m �m
BACKFILLED PROPOSED PIPELINE
CROSS-SECTION
POST -CONSTRUCTION STREAM CROSSING NOTES:
1. REFER TO AUTHORIZED PERMITS FOR ADDITIONAL LOCAL, STATE, AND
FEDERAL BMP REQUIREMENTS.
2. FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION, ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHALL BE
RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONTOURS, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT
PRACTICAL.
3. ONCE ORIGINAL STREAM BANK CONTOURS HAVE BEEN
RE-ESTABLISHED TO FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL, DISTURBED STREAM
BANKS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH RIPARIAN SEED MIX (SEE RIPARIAN
SEED SPECIFICATIONS), AND COIR MATTING WITH THE FOLLOWING
SPECIFICATIONS:
MINIMUM SHEAR STRENGTH VALUE >/= TO 2.25 LBS/SQ. FT.
AND APPROVED BY ENGINEER
4. COIR MATTING SHALL EXTEND FROM 10 FEET LANDWARD OF THE TOP
OF BANK DOWNSLOPE TO THE TOE OF BANK. DO NOT INSTALL
MATTING IN STREAM BED. RIPARIAN SEED MIX SHALL EXTEND FROM
10 -FEET LANDWARD OF THE TOP OF BANK DOWNSLOPE TO THE TOE
OF BANK.
5. ONCE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE STREAM
CROSSING ARE COMPLETE, EXTEND SILT FENCE ACROSS THE ENTIRE
EXTEND COIR MATTING EASEMENT ALONG THE TOP OF THE BANK AND PARALLEL TO THE
10 -FEET LANDWARD STREAM.
FROM TOP OF BANK 6. PERMANENT MAINTAINED ACCESS CORRIDORS SHALL BE RESTRICTED
TO THE MINIMUM WIDTH PRACTICAL AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 50 -FEET
IN WIDTH.
COIR MATTING TO BE
INSTALLED PER
MANUFACTURERS
SPECIFICATIONS
�m
INSTALL COIR
0�
MATTING
a ry
(SEE NOTE 3)
ZZ
y�
20 -FEET MIN.
7
10 -FEET MIN.
20 -FEET MIN.
A 0
Lu w
u
Lu a
Ln a-
a(A
Lu a
�o
10 -FEET 10 -FEET w
MIN. MIN. Q
LuO
Lu
a a
_�
u "' w w
LL
af of Ow
cp L w
u
w
wO
w m
0
00
STREAM
FLOW
PT A IST VTT: W
INSTALL COIR
MATTING
(SEE NOTE 3)
20 -FEET MIN.
u w 5 -FEET MIN. u w
Uj
�m �m
BACKFILLED PROPOSED PIPELINE
CROSS-SECTION
POST -CONSTRUCTION STREAM CROSSING NOTES:
1. REFER TO AUTHORIZED PERMITS FOR ADDITIONAL LOCAL, STATE, AND
FEDERAL BMP REQUIREMENTS.
2. FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION, ALL STREAM CROSSINGS SHALL BE
RESTORED TO ORIGINAL CONTOURS, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT
PRACTICAL.
3. ONCE ORIGINAL STREAM BANK CONTOURS HAVE BEEN
RE-ESTABLISHED TO FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL, DISTURBED STREAM
BANKS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH RIPARIAN SEED MIX (SEE RIPARIAN
SEED SPECIFICATIONS), AND COIR MATTING WITH THE FOLLOWING
SPECIFICATIONS:
MINIMUM SHEAR STRENGTH VALUE >/= TO 2.25 LBS/SQ. FT.
AND APPROVED BY ENGINEER
4. COIR MATTING SHALL EXTEND FROM 10 FEET LANDWARD OF THE TOP
OF BANK DOWNSLOPE TO THE TOE OF BANK. DO NOT INSTALL
MATTING IN STREAM BED. RIPARIAN SEED MIX SHALL EXTEND FROM
10 -FEET LANDWARD OF THE TOP OF BANK DOWNSLOPE TO THE TOE
OF BANK.
5. ONCE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE STREAM
CROSSING ARE COMPLETE, EXTEND SILT FENCE ACROSS THE ENTIRE
EXTEND COIR MATTING EASEMENT ALONG THE TOP OF THE BANK AND PARALLEL TO THE
10 -FEET LANDWARD STREAM.
FROM TOP OF BANK 6. PERMANENT MAINTAINED ACCESS CORRIDORS SHALL BE RESTRICTED
TO THE MINIMUM WIDTH PRACTICAL AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 50 -FEET
IN WIDTH.
COIR MATTING TO BE
INSTALLED PER
MANUFACTURERS
SPECIFICATIONS
Z
0
a
V
0
PROJECT NUMBER
7435-16-013
FIGURE NUMBER
D5
FIGURE NAME
POST -CONSTRUCTION
STREAM CROSSING
0�
a ry
ZZ
y�
z
o
$ a
Z
0
a
V
0
PROJECT NUMBER
7435-16-013
FIGURE NUMBER
D5
FIGURE NAME
POST -CONSTRUCTION
STREAM CROSSING

20 -FEET MIN. -
10 -FEET MIN.
(UNLESS OTHERWISE
DEPICTED ON DRAWINGS)
SILT FENCE
(INSTALL SECOND ROW OF SILT
FENCE 2 FEET LANDWARD OF
SINGLE ROW AS NEEDED BASED
ON CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD)
20 -FEET MIN.
WETLAND CROSSING NOTES:
PRE -CONSTRUCTION
1. REFER TO AUTHORIZED PERMITS FOR ADDITIONAL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL BMP
REQUIREMENTS.
2. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT OPERATE WITHIN STREAMS OR TRAVERSE STREAMS
WITHOUT THE USE OF TEMPORARY BRIDGES WHEN STREAMS OCCUR WITHIN A WETLAND
COMPLEX.
3. INSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT WETLAND CROSSINGS
PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING (PRE -CONSTRUCTION).
4. INSTALL TIMBER MATS FOR TRAVEL LANE THROUGH WETLAND AREA AND EXTEND A MINIMUM OF
10 -FEET LANDWARD FROM THE EDGE OF WETLAND. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN WETLANDS
WILL BE CONDUCTED FROM TIMBER MATS. WHERE CLEARING OPERATIONS OCCUR IN WETLANDS,
LOW GROUND PRESSURE EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED AND MIXING OF TOPSOIL AND SUBSOIL
PREVENTED IN AREAS BEYOND THOSE PROTECTED BY TIMBER MATS.
5. NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN WETLANDS, WATERS OR RIPARIAN
AREAS BEYOND THE PERMITTED DISTURBANCE LIMITS. DEWATERING SHALL BE CONDUCTED
THROUGH SILT BAG OR SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURE THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE
EASEMENT AND OUTSIDE OF ANY WETLANDS AREA.
6. SEGREGATE TOPSOIL WHEN STOCKPILING EXCAVATED WETLAND SOIL. TOPSOIL SHOULD BE
STORED IN A MANNER TO MAINTAIN SEED BANK. REPLACE TOPSOIL AFTER BACK FILLING TRENCH
20 -FEET MIN.
10 -FEET MIN.
(UNLESS OTHERWISE
DEPICTED ON DRAWINGS)
20 -FEET MIN.
Lu Lu
V
w
Ln N
Q Y
U, of
~O
z�Lu
}
a�
��
Lu
d d
H Lu
LU w
LU
Ow
Ln w
w
wO
Lu m
U-
6
00
7. ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, WETLAND CROSSINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL
CONTOURS, TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL.
8. FOLLOWING PIPE INSTALLATION, REINSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT AT WETLAND CROSSINGS.
9. FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION, DISTURBED AREAS ASSOCIATED WITH TEMPORARY WETLAND
CROSSINGS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH A NATIVE SEED MIX (SEE NATIVE WETLAND SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONS). THIS SEED MIX WILL BE INSTALLED WITH A TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SPECIES
AND WILL COVER THE DISTURBED WETLANDS AND EXTEND 10 -FEET LANDWARD FROM THE
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY.
10. DO NOT APPLY MULCH OR SOIL AMENDMENTS WITHIN WETLANDS.
WETLAND CROSSING MAINTENANCE NOTES:
o�
a ry
1. INSPECT SILT FENCE AT LEAST WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT THAT EXCEEDS 0.5 INCHES
Z Z
y
s
PROJECT NUMBER
�o
7435-16-013
FIGURE NUMBER
$ a
NEXT RAIN.
D6
WETLAND CROSSING MAINTENANCE NOTES:
1. INSPECT SILT FENCE AT LEAST WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT THAT EXCEEDS 0.5 INCHES
z
PROJECT NUMBER
WITHIN A 24 HOUR PERIOD.
7435-16-013
FIGURE NUMBER
2. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE
NEXT RAIN.
D6
3. REMOVE ALL SILT FENCE AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA TO GRADE
FIGURENAME
PRE -CONSTRUCTION
AND STABILIZE IT AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED.
WETLAND
CROSSING

10 -FEET MIN.
(UNLESS OTHERWISE
DEPICTED ON DRAWINGS)
SILT FENCE
(INSTALL SECOND ROW OF SILT
FENCE 2 FEET LANDWARD OF
SINGLE ROW AS NEEDED BASED
ON CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD)
20 -FEET MIN.
7 — 7
COMPOST FILTER
SOCK OR EARTHEN
BERM
u
z
w
_m
u LU
zY
Lu ,Q
F- m
20 -FEET MIN.
—� — �
\1/ \4/
\4/ \1/ 14/
TIMBER MATS
WETLAND
PILE
NATIVE WETLAND
SEEDING AREA
DURING CONSTRUCTION
WETLAND CROSSING NOTES:
1. REFER TO AUTHORIZED PERMITS FOR ADDITIONAL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL BMP
REQUIREMENTS.
2. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT OPERATE WITHIN STREAMS OR TRAVERSE STREAMS
WITHOUT THE USE OF TEMPORARY BRIDGES WHEN STREAMS OCCUR WITHIN A WETLAND
COMPLEX.
3. INSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AT WETLAND CROSSINGS
PRIOR TO CLEARING AND GRUBBING (PRE -CONSTRUCTION).
4. INSTALL TIMBER MATS FOR TRAVEL LANE THROUGH WETLAND AREA AND EXTEND A MINIMUM OF
10 -FEET LANDWARD FROM THE EDGE OF WETLAND. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN WETLANDS
WILL BE CONDUCTED FROM TIMBER MATS. WHERE CLEARING OPERATIONS OCCUR IN WETLANDS,
LOW GROUND PRESSURE EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED AND MIXING OF TOPSOIL AND SUBSOIL
PREVENTED IN AREAS BEYOND THOSE PROTECTED BY TIMBER MATS.
5. NO WASTES, SPOILS, SOLIDS OR FILLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN WETLANDS, WATERS OR RIPARIAN
AREAS BEYOND THE PERMITTED DISTURBANCE LIMITS. DEWATERING SHALL BE CONDUCTED
THROUGH SILT BAG OR SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURE THAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE
EASEMENT AND OUTSIDE OF ANY WETLANDS AREA.
6. SEGREGATE TOPSOIL WHEN STOCKPILING EXCAVATED WETLAND SOIL. TOPSOIL SHOULD BE
STORED IN A MANNER TO MAINTAIN SEED BANK. REPLACE TOPSOIL AFTER BACK FILLING TRENCH
20 -FEET MIN.
7
10 -FEET MIN.
(UNLESS OTHERWISE
DEPICTED ON DRAWINGS)
I
;cj,/ PROPOSED PIPELINE
_m
u LU
z�
Lu Q
� w
rn
20 -FEET MIN.
z�
Lu w
u
w a
Q�
Lu
~O
z�
z�
w Q
as
H -
w w
w
Ll -
6 o w
Ln W
Ll
w O
Lu m
LJ__ x
O W
00
7. ONCE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, WETLAND CROSSINGS SHALL BE RESTORED TO ORIGINAL
CONTOURS, TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL.
8. FOLLOWING PIPE INSTALLATION, REINSTALL SILT FENCE PERPENDICULAR TO THE CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT AT WETLAND CROSSINGS.
9. FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION, DISTURBED AREAS ASSOCIATED WITH TEMPORARY WETLAND
CROSSINGS WILL BE STABILIZED WITH A NATIVE SEED MIX (SEE NATIVE WETLAND SEEDING
SPECIFICATIONS). THIS SEED MIX WILL BE INSTALLED WITH A TEMPORARY GROUNDCOVER SPECIES
AND WILL COVER THE DISTURBED WETLANDS AND EXTEND 10 -FEET LANDWARD FROM THE
JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARY.
10. DO NOT APPLY MULCH OR SOIL AMENDMENTS WITHIN WETLANDS
WETLAND CROSSING MAINTENANCE NOTES:
1. INSPECT SILT FENCE AT LEAST WEEKLY AND AFTER EACH RAINFALL EVENT THAT EXCEEDS O.S INCHES
WITHIN A 24 HOUR PERIOD.
2. REMOVE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE VOLUME FOR THE
NEXT RAIN.
3. REMOVE ALL SILT FENCE AND UNSTABLE SEDIMENT DEPOSITS AND BRING THE AREA TO GRADE
AND STABILIZE IT AFTER THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN PROPERLY STABILIZED.
PROJECT NUMBER
7435-16-013
FIGURE NUMBER
D7
FIGURE NAME
WETLAND
CROSSING
Z
0
a
V
0
o�
<N
Z Z
0
�o
PROJECT NUMBER
7435-16-013
FIGURE NUMBER
D7
FIGURE NAME
WETLAND
CROSSING
Z
0
a
V
0

Appendix VI:
General Restoration Plan

GENERAL RESTORATION PLAN
Line T-01 Replacement Project Phase II
Polk, Rutherford and Cleveland Counties, North Carolina
The proposed project has been designed to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts where
practicable. As part of mitigation for unavoidable impacts, the following plan shall be
implemented to restore temporarily -affected wetlands and streams. This plan entails restoration
of temporarily -disturbed areas to their original contours and conditions to the degree
practicable upon project completion. No fills or spoils of any kind will be permanently placed
within wetlands or along the stream banks. Further, disturbed wetland areas and streambanks
will be permanently stabilized with a native vegetative cover. The measures outlined below will
be specified in the contract documents prepared for construction of the proposed project.
Proposed restoration activities will include the removal of placed fill material and restoration of
original pre -disturbance contours. Excavated material shall be returned to the trench to the
extent possible, and remaining material relocated and retained on an upland site. Excavated
topsoil will be stockpiled separately, kept viable, and then replaced uniformly over the area of
excavation from which it was removed. The native seed mix identified in Table 1 below will be
utilized within temporarily -disturbed streambanks and riparian areas.
Table 1: Riparian Seed Mix*
Species Common Name Percentage of Mix
Panicum rigidulum
Redtop panicgrass
23
Elymus virginicus
Virginia wild rye
20
Chasmanthium latifolium
River oats
20
Panicum anceps
Beaked panicgrass
18
Sorghastrum nutans
Indiangrass
10
Arrostis hyemalis
Winter bentgrass
4
Eupatorium coelestinum
Mistflower
3
Juncus coriaceus
Leathery rush
2
100
* Riparian Seed Mix to be applied to all disturbed streambanks, extending 10 feet landward. Recommended application rate: 20 lbs.
per acre
Substitutions to the species identified in Table 1 may be made based on availability and
approval of an S&ME Biologist.
S&ME, Inc. 19751 Southern Pine Boulevard I Charlotte, NC 28273 1 p 704.523.4726 1 f 704.525.3953 1 www.smeinc.com

General Restoration Plan Page 2
Line T-01 Replacement Project Phase II
The native seed mix identified in Table 2 below will be utilized within temporarily -disturbed
wetlands.
Table 2: Wetland Seed Mix*
Sped6t Common Name Percentage of Mix
Panicum rigidulum
Redtop panicgrass
28
Panicum anceps
Beaked panicgrass
20
Elymus virginicus
Virginia wild rye
16
Carex lurida
Lurid (Shallow) sedge
8
Carex lupulina
Hop sedge
7
Carex squarrosa
Squarrose Sedge
5
Juncus effusus
Soft rush
3
Saururus cernuus
Lizard's tail
2
Scirpus cyperinus
Woolgrass
2
Eupatorium coelestinum
Mistflower
2
Bidens aristosa
Showy tickseed
2
Hibiscus moscheutos
Crimson rosemallow
2
Juncus tenuis
Path rush
1
Scirpus atrovirens
Green bulrush
1
Vernonia noveboracensis
New York ironweed
1
100
Riparian Seed Mix to be applied to all disturbed wetland areas. In the event of overlap, Riparian mix (Table 1) should be used.
Recommended application rate: 20 lbs. per acre.
To provide quicker cover, the mixes specified in Tables 1 and 2 should also be augmented with
the appropriate cover/companion species, as identified in Table 3.
Table 2: Cover/Companion Crops
Species
s sn season
Mix
Notes:
Secale cerea(e
Cereal or Early Spring or
30 lbs/acre
Grows 3-4' tall, but not a
Winter rye Fall
strong a competitor.
Lolium perenne
Perennial rye Early Fall or
20-50%
Shorter rye; lasts about 2
Spring
years, then dies out.
Brown Top Spring,
Good germination; dies off
Urocloa ramose
Millet Summer
Q
20-50%
with frost; does not tolerate
mowing.
Additional information related to streambank restoration activities is included on the Typical
Stream and Wetland Crossing Details.
S&ME, Inc.

General Restoration Plan
Line T-01 Replacement Project Phase II
Restoration Plan Prepared By:
S&ME, Inc.
9711 Southern Pine Blvd.
Charlotte, N.C. 28273
704.523.4726
Contact: Joey Lawler, PWS
[e-mail]
Riparian (ERNMX-307) and wetland (ERNMX-308) seed mixes are available at:
Ernst Seeds
8884 Mercer Pike
Meadville, PA 16335
800.873.3321
814.336.2404
http://www.ernstseed.com/
Local Suppliers of suitable alternative native seed mixes and plant material:
Mellow Marsh Farm
1312 Woody Store Road
Siler City, N.C. 27344
919.742.1200
919.742.1280 fax
www.mellowmarshfarm.com
Natives
550 East Westinghouse Boulevard
Charlotte, N.C. 28273
688.527.1177
688.527.1133
plants@ plantnative.net
S&ME, Inc.
Page 3

Appendix VII:
Agency Correspondence and DCM Acceptance Letter

NORTH C.ARULI A Lit FAIR I MEN I 01 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
Pot i4kCrorV irk coma" MUM
E WC LAI r. r DiNoc1tor $4-crell4ty
+Ckln W*tr, r MArugorr+ l Trust Fund
March 25, 2016
Ashley Steele
S&ME, Inc.
3201 Spring Forest Road
Raleigh, NC 27616
[e-mail]
RE: PSNC Proposed T-001; 7435-16-013
Dear Ashley Steele:
NCNHDE-1435
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information
about natural heritage resources from our database that have been compiled for the project referenced
above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary submitted
with your request for information. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences'
table and map.
Also attached is a table summarizing rare species and natural communities that have been documented
within a one -mile radius of the project boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that these natural
heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists and is included for
reference. In the event that rare species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that
we may update our records. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed area within a one -mile
radius, if any, are also included in this report.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning,
project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory
decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written
notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications.
Maps of NC Natural Heritage Program data may not be redistributed without permission from the NCNHP.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence
if a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Heritage Area (RHA), or an occurrence of a Federally -
listed species is documented within or near the project area.
Thank you for your inquiry. If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need
additional assistance, please contact John Finnegan at john.finnegan o_ncdenr.gov or 919.707.8630.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
Page 1 of 6

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Intersecting the Project Area
PSNC Proposed T-001
Project No. 7435-16-013
March 25, 2016
NCNHDE-1435
Element Occurrences Documented Within Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name
Common Name
Last Element Accuracy Federal
State
Global State
Group
Observation Occurrence Status
Status
Rank Rank
Date Status
Crustacean 31034 Cambarus johni
Carolina Foothills
2010-06-09 Current 3 -Medium ---
Significantly
G3 S3
Crayfish
Rare
Freshwater Fish 32469 Etheostoma thalassinum
Seagreen Darter
2011-05-11 Current 3 -Medium ---
Significantly
G4 S3
Rare
Freshwater Fish 32482 Etheostoma thalassinum
Seagreen Darter
2013-07-24 Current 3 -Medium ---
Significantly
G4 S3
Rare
Freshwater Fish 32486 Etheostoma thalassinum
Seagreen Darter
1999-10-26 Current 3 -Medium ---
Significantly
G4 S3
Rare
Vascular Plant 22332 Hexastylis naniflora
Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf 2002-04-25 Current 3 -Medium Threatened
Threatened
G3 S3
Natural Areas Documented Within Project Area
Site Name
Representational Rating Collective Rating
Sandy Run/Cliffside Natural Area
R5 (General)
C5 (General)
Managed Areas Documented Within Project Area
Managed Area Name Nw— Owner Owner Type
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services State
NOTE: If the proposed project intersects with a conservation/managed area, please contact the landowner directly for additional information. If the project intersects with a Dedicated Nature Preserve (DNP), Registered Natural
Heritage Area (RHA), or Federally -listed species, NCNHP staff may provide additional correspondence regarding the project.
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on March 25, 2016; source: NCNHP, Q4 October 2015. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 6

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
PSNC Proposed T-001
Project No. 7435-16-013
March 25, 2016
NCNHDE-1435
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
Scientific Name
Common Name
Last
Element
Accuracy
Federal
State
Global
State
Group
Observation
Occurrence
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
Date
Status
Crustacean
31034
Cambarus johni
Carolina Foothills
2010-06-09
Current
3 -Medium
---
Significantly
G3
S3
Crayfish
Rare
Crustacean
33479
Cambarus spicatus
Broad River Spiny
2013-07-24
Current
3 -Medium
Species of
Special
G3
S2
Crayfish
Concern
Concern
Freshwater Fish
32469
Etheostoma thalassinum
Seagreen Darter
2011-05-11
Current
3 -Medium
---
Significantly
G4
S3
Rare
Freshwater Fish
32489
Etheostoma thalassinum
Seagreen Darter
2013-07-24
Current
3 -Medium
---
Significantly
G4
S3
Rare
Freshwater Fish
32482
Etheostoma thalassinum
Seagreen Darter
2013-07-24
Current
3 -Medium
---
Significantly
G4
S3
Rare
Freshwater Fish
32486
Etheostoma thalassinum
Seagreen Darter
1999-10-26
Current
3 -Medium
---
Significantly
G4
S3
Rare
Freshwater Fish
32494
Etheostoma thalassinum
Seagreen Darter
2004-06-22
Current
3 -Medium
---
Significantly
G4
S3
Rare
Mayfly
35294
Cercobrachys etowah
a caenid mayfly
1995-05-15
Current
3 -Medium
---
Significantly
G4
S2
Rare
Natural
28200
Acidic Cove Forest (Typic---
2010
Current
3 -Medium
---
---
G5
S4
Community
Subtype)
Natural
5945
Basic Mesic Forest
---
2006
Current
3 -Medium
---
---
G3G4
S3S4
Community
(Piedmont Subtype)
Natural
657
Basic Mesic Forest
---
1998
Current
2 -High
---
---
G3G4
S3S4
Community
(Piedmont Subtype)
Natural
5259
Chestnut Oak Forest (Dry---
2010
Current
4 -Low
---
---
G5
S5
Community
Heath Subtype)
Natural
30295
Chestnut Oak Forest
---
2010
Current
4 -Low
---
---
G4G5
S4
Community
(Herb Subtype)
Natural
7295
Dry-Mesic Oak --Hickory
---
2010
Current
3 -Medium
---
---
G4G5
S4
Community
Forest (Piedmont
Subtype)
Page 3 of 6

Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic
EO ID
Scientific Name Common Name
Last
Element
Group
10585
Hexastylis naniflora
Observation
Occurrence
Vascular Plant
21302
Hexastylis naniflora
Date
Status
Natural
12000
Low Elevation Seep ---
2006
Current
Community
6228
(Piedmont/Mountain
Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf
2001-04-03
Vascular Plant
15583
Springhead Subtype)
Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf
1995-1996
Natural
30121
Low Montane Red Oak ---
2010
Current
Community
Pachysandra
Forest
1993-10-08
S3
Natural
18098
Montane Oak --Hickory ---
2010
Current
Community
Quercus prinoides
Forest (Acidic Subtype)
1956-10
Vascular Plant
Natural
30120
Montane Oak --Hickory ---
2010
Current
Community
Symphyotrichum laeve
Forest (Basic Subtype)
1936-10-07
Reptile
16799
Sistrurus miliarius Pigmy Rattlesnake
1971 -PRE
Historical
Vascular Plant
9374
Collinsonia verticillata Whorled Horsebalm
1993-10-07
Current
Vascular Plant
23935
Hackelia virginiana
Virginia Stickseed
1968 -PRE
Vascular Plant
10585
Hexastylis naniflora
Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf
2002-04-25
Vascular Plant
21302
Hexastylis naniflora
Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf
2002-07-04
Vascular Plant
22332
Hexastylis naniflora
Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf
2002-04-25
Vascular Plant
6228
Hexastylis naniflora
Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf
2001-04-03
Vascular Plant
15583
Hexastylis naniflora
Dwarf -flowered Heartleaf
1995-1996
Vascular Plant
5509
Orbexilum macrophyllum Bigleaf Scurfpea
1899
Vascular Plant
8976
Pachysandra
Allegheny Spurge
1993-10-08
S3
Low
procumbens
Concern
Vascular Plant
7968
Quercus prinoides
Dwarf Chinquapin Oak
1956-10
Vascular Plant
18717
Quercus prinoides
Dwarf Chinquapin Oak
1956-09
Vascular Plant
23244
Symphyotrichum laeve
Smooth Blue Aster
1936-10-07
5 -Very
var. laeve
Significantly
G5
Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Low
Site Name
Rare Peripheral
Representational Rating
3 -Medium
Green River Plantation Basic Forest
R2 (Very High)
G3
Sandy Run/Cliffside Natural Area
R5 (General)
Threatened
Sandy Run/Lovelace Natural Area
R5 (General)
S3
Page 4 of 6
Historical
Current
Current
Current
Current
Current
Historical
Current
Historical
Historical
Historical
Accuracy
Federal
State
Global
State
Status
Status
Rank
Rank
1 -Very
---
---
G2
S1
High
4 -Low
---
---
G4?
S4?
4 -Low
---
---
G4G5
S4S5
3 -Medium
---
---
G3
S3
5 -Very
---
Special
G5
S3
Low
Concern
3 -Medium
---
Special
G3G4
S2
Concern
Vulnerable
5 -Very
---
Significantly
G5
S2
Low
Rare Peripheral
3 -Medium
Threatened
Threatened
G3
S3
3 -Medium
Threatened
Threatened
G3
S3
3 -Medium
Threatened
Threatened
G3
S3
2 -High
Threatened
Threatened
G3
S3
2 -High
Threatened
Threatened
G3
S3
4 -Low
Species of
Special
GX
SX
Concern
Concern
Historical
3 -Medium
---
Endangered
G4G5
S1
4 -Low
---
Endangered
G5
S1
4 -Low
---
Endangered
G5
S1
5 -Very
---
Significantly
G5T5
S1S2
Low
Rare Peripheral
Collective Rating
C4 (Moderate)
C5 (General)
C5 (General)

Natural Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Site Name Representational Rating
White Oak Creek Non -Alluvial Wetland R3 (High)
White Oak Mountain/Tryon Peak R1 (Exceptional)
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Name Owner
Green River Game Land NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Pacolet Area Conservancy Preserve
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement
NC Division of Mitigation Services Easement
Green River Game Land DNP
Pacolet Area Conservancy
NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services
NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services
NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services
NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services
NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services
NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services
NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services
NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services
NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services
NC DEQ, Division of Mitigation Services
NC Wildlife Resources Commission
Collective Rating
C4 (Moderate)
C1 (Exceptional)
Owner Type
State
Private
State
State
State
State
State
State
State
State
State
State
State
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve.org/contenVhelp. Data query generated on March 25, 2016; source: NCNHP, Q4 October 2015. Please resubmit your
information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 5 of 6

NHDE-1435. PSNC Proposed T-_001
March 25, ZD16 1:29$,591
.5 25 a 16rrl
El ProJuck Dovndwy ® MonpoW Aria fFJAREA)
4 2
'13uNBun�mF1.
red Pralmt Boundary �
7. C1..I.FIL. '�:a�Ls�. s-0el alp. T�s'S'T6+: I' :�v F. �c- ,roti
v LmG.
03G.5 nrr. SF""_: MIUJA :;c:l.aac I:;K +acture• 1._ V dw* _+P- e
NHP fVartur�ll Arra j:NNF,l�4}
Page 6 of 6
17A -#r ry I y"L
° : r
r.*l N oil;
Y I
t*.Fmdr, c
--
-.6 1.
II�uYlrl
-- 11
waaL. JrF t"A 11 E31 fN,
taRJFf s ill[
i rs4
J
s�
�Nid5
�i1rF91N2
.; ,., +r
ter.
Y PA
�i�11yYYicr
'
1
Ikihn
ale 111 J,
March 25, ZD16 1:29$,591
.5 25 a 16rrl
El ProJuck Dovndwy ® MonpoW Aria fFJAREA)
4 2
'13uNBun�mF1.
red Pralmt Boundary �
7. C1..I.FIL. '�:a�Ls�. s-0el alp. T�s'S'T6+: I' :�v F. �c- ,roti
v LmG.
03G.5 nrr. SF""_: MIUJA :;c:l.aac I:;K +acture• 1._ V dw* _+P- e
NHP fVartur�ll Arra j:NNF,l�4}
Page 6 of 6

9 North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 9
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
April 20, 2016
Mr. Joey Lawler
S&ME
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28723
SUBJECT: Comments on PSNC Line T-001 Phase II Project
Polk, Rutherford, and Cleveland Counties
Dear Mr. Lawler:
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) received your
March 25, 2016 letter about the T-001 Phase Il Pipeline Replacement Project. You requested
records relating to trout waters, rare, endangered, or threatened species, protected/managed
lands, conservation easements, or high quality natural communities in the vicinity of the project
corridor and recommendations and comments in the interests of NCWRC. Our comments are
offered for your consideration under provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466
et. seq.) and Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-
667d).
PSNC intends to replace 47 miles of gas pipeline in or adjacent to existing easements. The line
crosses multiple streams in Polk, Rutherford, and Cleveland Counties in the Broad River basin.
It crosses a number of streams with significant aquatic resources and notable adjacent features,
including the following:
1. Green River in Polk County. The Green River hosts the Seagreen Darter [Etheostoma
thalassinum, NC Significantly Rare (SR)] and Carolina Foothills Crayfish (Cambarus johni,
NC SR).
2. Broad River in Rutherford County, which hosts Seagreen Darter (NC SR) and Carolina
Foothills Crayfish (NC SR).
3. Floyds Creek in Rutherford County, which hosts Carolina Foothills Crayfish (NC SR).
4. Sandy Run/Cliffside Natural Area, a designated natural area by the NC Natural Heritage
Program. This natural area roughly follows the boundary of a population of Dwarf -flowered
Heartleaf (Hexastylis naniflora, US and NC Threatened).
5. Beaverdam Creek in Cleveland County, which also hosts Carolina Foothills Crayfish (NC
SR).
Mailing Address: Habitat Conservation • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fax: [phone]

Line T-001 Phase II Project Page 2 April 20, 2016
Polk, Rutherford, Cleveland Co
We have the following general recommendations:
1. Wetlands and streams within the site boundaries should be identified through on-site
surveys prior to any land disturbing activities. If wetlands and/or streams will be
impacted by construction activities, then the project should be coordinated with the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers and the N.C. Division of Water Resources.
2. Avoid or minimize impacts to wetlands during construction. In addition to providing
wildlife habitat, wetland areas perform important functions of flood control and water
quality protection. Temporarily disturbed wetland areas should be returned to original
soils and contours, and reseeded with annual small grains appropriate for the season (e.g.
oats, millet, rye, or wheat) and should be allowed to revert to natural wetland vegetation.
3. Avoid or minimize stream crossings. Where the line does cross streams, the crossings
should be near perpendicular (75' to 105) to stream flow. Disturbed stream banks and
wetlands should be restored to original contours and re -vegetated with native plant
species.
4. The directional bore (installation of utilities beneath the riverbed, avoiding impacts to the
stream and buffer) stream crossing method should be used for utility crossings wherever
practicable. The open cut stream crossing method should be used only when water level
is low and stream flow is minimal. The directional bore method is particularly
recommended for larger streams, such as the Broad River, Green River, First Broad
River, and Second Broad River, as well as any other streams that support rare or listed
species.
5. Avoid equipment maintenance in the immediate vicinity of streams, make stream
crossings as narrow as possible, minimize stream bank disturbance, avoid spraying of
herbicides, and cut woody vegetation so that stumps can resprout.
6. Sediment and erosion controls measures should be installed prior to any land clearing or
construction. These measures should be routinely inspected and properly maintained.
Excessive silt and sediment loads can have numerous detrimental effects on aquatic
resources including destruction of spawning habitat, suffocation of eggs, and clogging of
gills of aquatic species.
7. The US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) recently listed the Northern long-eared bat
(Myotis septentrionalis) as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. The Northern
long-eared bat may be present within or in the vicinity of the project site. Therefore, the
project may impact this species and consultation with the USFWS may be required. For
more information, please see
http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/nleb/KeyFinal4dNLEB.html or
contact the USFWS at [phone].
8. If any right -of way vegetation maintenance work is performed a part of this replacement
project, we recommend that it generally be avoided between April 1 and October 1 to
minimize impacts to ground nesting birds.
9. Where feasible, work within the existing easement to minimize impacts to terrestrial
wildlife habitat. Avoid the removal of large trees at the edges of easement corridors. Use
woody debris and logs from any corridor clearing to establish brush piles and downed
logs adjacent to the cleared right-of-way to improve habitat for wildlife.
10. Re -seed all disturbed areas with seed mixtures that are beneficial to wildlife; avoid fescue
based mixtures because fescue is invasive and provides little benefit to wildlife. Native,

Line T-001 Phase II Project Page 3 April 20, 2016
Polk, Rutherford, Cleveland Co
annual small grains appropriate for the season are preferred and recommended. Allowing
the corridor area to re -vegetate into a brush/scrub habitat would maximize benefits to
wildlife. For areas adjacent to residential areas, a native shrub/grass option may be
beneficial.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Please contact me at
[phone] if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Andrea Leslie
Mountain Region Coordinator, Habitat Conservation Program
Ec: Shari Bryant, NCWRC
Allen Ratzlaff, US Fish and Wildlife Service

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, North Carolina 28801
December 7, 2016
Mr. Joey Lawler
S&ME, Inc.
9751 Southern Pine Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
Dear Mr. Lawler:
Subject: Federally Listed Species Assessment, PSNC Energy's (PSNC) Proposed 48 -Mile
T-OIA Gas Pipeline Replacement Project — Phase II, located in Polk, Rutherford, and
Cleveland Counties, North Carolina (S&ME Project No. 7335-16-013)
Dear Mr. Lawler:
On May 31, 2016, Mr. Bryan Tompkins of this office met with you and representatives from the
US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), North Carolina Division of Water Resources, and PSNC
at a pre -application meeting held at the NCDENR office. In that meeting Mr. Tompkins
informed you of the potential impacts that the project could have on federally listed species. He
requested that surveys for federally listed species be conducted within suitable habitat areas
along the pipeline corridor. On November 10, 2016, we received a copy of your Protected
Species Assessment for the subject project. We have reviewed the information you presented
and are providing the following comments in accordance with the provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.§4321 et seq.) (NEPA); the Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667e), and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
According to the information that you presented, PSNC is proposing to replace about 48 -miles of
existing 8 -inch natural gas pipeline with a 24 -inch pipeline. The pipeline replacement will extend
from Mill Spring in Polk County to Kings Mountain in Cleveland County. About 40 miles of the
pipeline replacement will occur within the existing, maintained pipeline easement. Installation of

the new pipeline will deviate from the existing corridor at several locations totaling about 8 miles
in length. The areas adjacent to the existing pipeline corridor consists of wooded areas, open
fields, agricultural areas, and commercial/residential/light industrial development. The pipeline
replacement will require numerous stream and wetland crossings and PSNC will be applying for a
Nationwide Permit from the Corps to authorize the impacts. The project will result in about
605.10 acres of disturbance. About 402.86 acres of the project disturbance area consists of non -
forested areas and existing pipeline corridor and about 202.24 acres of forested land occurs within
the land disturbance area associated with the project.
Federally Listed Species — According to the information provided, S&ME personnel conducted
surveys for federally listed species known to occur within Polk, Rutherford, and Cleveland
Counties throughout the proposed project area (existing pipeline corridor and proposed areas of
new disturbance). Surveys and assessments were conducted over a period ranging from May
2016 to August 2016. Surveys were conducted for dwarf -flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis
naniflora) which is currently federally listed as a threatened species; as well as small -whorled
pogonia (Isotria medeoloides), rock gnome lichen (Gymnoderma lineare), and white irisette
(Sisyrinchium dichotomum) which are all currently federally listed as endangered species.
Although suitable habitat for rock gnome lichen, white irisette, and small -whorled pogonia was
found to occur within the project area, no individuals of these species were found. S&ME
determined the project "may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect" these species. We
concur with S&ME's "not likely to adversely affect" determination for rock gnome lichen, white
irisette, and small -whorled pogonia.
S&ME conducted surveys for dwarf -flowered heartleaf in areas of suitable habitat within the
project area. Twelve populations (totaling about 1,588 individual plants) of dwarf -flowered
heartleaf were found during surveys. S&ME positively identified seven of the twelve
populations of dwarf -flowered heartleaf. The other five populations were found outside of the
flowering period (April -May) so positive identification was not possible. Although these
populations could not be positively identified, S&ME is treating these populations as dwarf -
flowered heartleaf and they have been included in Table 1: Summary of Dwarf -Flowered
Heartleaf Locations found on page 9 of the Protected Species Assessment. S&ME indicates that
no dwarf -flowered heartleaf populations will be directly impacted by the proposed project;
however, land clearing operations associated with the project could result in indirect effects to
some individuals that occur within 15 -feet of the existing easement or proposed temporary
workspace. Of the 1,588 dwarf -flowered heartleaf plants that occur within the project area, only
13 (less than 0.0 1 %) plants were found to occur within 15 -feet of the existing easement or
proposed temporary workspace. PSNC has eliminated temporary workspaces at locations where
the plants were identified and a section of the proposed permanent and temporary easements
were re-routed to avoid direct and indirect impacts to the dwarf -flowered heartleaf populations.
Additionally, PSNC has agreed to the following measures to further minimize potential indirect
effects associated with the project: 1) Identified plant locations will be depicted on the project
alignment sheets and notes regarding their avoidance will be included in the property line list of
special conditions; 2) Strict boundary control of project easements will be followed. Brightly
colored barricade fencing (construction fence) will be installed along the edge the temporary
2

work space closest to the population prior to construction; and 3) A pre -construction meeting
with clearing and construction contractors will be conducted to review the reason for the
construction fencing and reiterate the importance of limiting the work areas to the bounds of the
fencing. All trees to be cut will be felled into construction/disturbed areas and away from dwarf -
flowered heartleaf populations. S&ME has determined that the proposed project "may affect,
but is not likely to adversely affect" dwarf -flowered heartleaf. We commend PSNC for taking
steps to avoid direct impacts to this species. If the above listed minimization measures are
included in the permit and implemented into the project plans, we can concur with S&ME's "not
likely to adversely affect" determination for the proposed project.
Habitat for the federally threatened northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrianalis) and Indiana
bat (Myotis sodalis), which is currently federally listed as an endangered species, was also found
to be present within the project area. S&ME concluded that the project is "not likely to
adversely affect" Indiana bat because the only occurrence record for this species is at Bat Cave in
Rutherford County and is not near the project area. We concur with the "not likely to adversely
affect" determination for Indiana bat. In regards to northern -long eared bat, no known roost trees
occur within 150 -feet of the proposed pipeline corridor and no know hibernacula occur within
0.25 -mile of the pipeline corridor. The nearest known occurrence of northern -long eared bat is
about 5 -miles from the pipeline corridor. As indicated, the proposed project will require the
clearing of about 202 -acres of forested land although most of the tree clearing activities will be
conducted outside of the recommended maternity roosting moratorium of May 15 -August 15.
Further S&ME conducted an assessment of forested area affected by the project compared to the
surrounding area. S&ME established a one kilometer corridor along the proposed pipe centerline
with a land area of about 19,120 acres. Using the 2011 National Land Cover Database, S&ME
found that about 46.3% (8,853 -acres of the 19,120 -acres) were forested. Therefore, the 202.24 -
acres of proposed clearing will result in a 2.3% reduction of forested land within the one
kilometer corridor. Because: 1) the project site is over 5 -miles away from the nearest known
occurrence; 2) there is a large amount of suitable habitat adjacent to the site and in the
surrounding area; 3) the project will result in a relatively small amount of loss of forested habitat;
and 4) a majority of the forest clearing associated with the project will be conducted outside of
the summer maternity roost season, S&ME has determined that the project "may affect, not
likely to adversely affect" northern long-eared bat. For these reasons, and because the
probability of "take" that could occur from this project is discountable, we concur with S&ME's
"may affect, not likely to adversely affect" determination for northern long-eared bat.
We concur with the determinations made by S&ME for the above listed species. Further, we
believe that a "no effect" determination is warranted for all other federally listed species known
to occur in Polk, Rutherford, and Cleveland Counties. Therefore, we believe the requirements
under section 7 of the Act are fulfilled. However, obligations under section 7 of the Act must be
reconsidered i£ (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect
listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is
subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is
listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action.
3

Utility Line Crossings. In the interest of reducing impacts to natural resources, utility crossings
(i.e., sewer, gas, and water lines) should be kept to a minimum, and all utility infrastructure
(including manholes) should be kept out of riparian buffer areas. If a utility crossing is
necessary, we recommend that you first consider the use of directional boring. Directional
boring under streams significantly minimizes impacts to aquatic resources and riparian buffers.
If directional boring cannot be used and trenching is determined to be the only viable method,
every effort should be made to ensure that impacts to in -stream features are minimized and stable
upon completion of the project. Our past experiences with open -trench crossings indicate that
this technique increases the likelihood for future lateral movement of the stream (which could
undercut or erode around the utility line), and the correction of such problems could result in
costly future maintenance and devastating impacts to natural resources. Therefore, as much
work as possible should be accomplished in the dry, and the amount of disturbance should not
exceed what can be successfully stabilized by the end of the workday. In -stream work should
avoid the spring fish -spawning season and should consider forecasted high-flow events.
Regardless of the crossing method, all utility lines should cross streams perpendicularly. We
strongly encourage that a qualified biologist monitor the work area until the work is complete in
order to identify any additional on-site impact -minimization measures. The Service may be
available to assist you in this effort.
To determine if any maintenance is required, the work site should be monitored at least every
3 months during the first 24 months and annually thereafter. Moreover, we recommend the
development of a riparian monitoring and maintenance program that would outline procedures
for the prompt stabilization of streambanks near the utility crossing (should any streambank
erosion or destabilization occur) throughout the life of this project.
Project Recommendations - We are concerned about the introduction and spread of invasive
exotic species in association with the proposed project. Without active management, including
the revegetation of disturbed areas with native species, project corridors will likely be sources of
(and corridors for) the movement of invasive exotic plant species. Exotic species are a major
contributor to species depletion and extinction, second only to habitat loss. Exotics are a factor
contributing to the endangered or threatened status of more than 40 percent of the animals and
plants on the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants.' It is estimated
that at least 4,000 exotic plant species and 2,300 exotic animal species are now established in the
United States, costing more than $130 billion a year to control.b Additionally, the
U.S. Government has many programs and laws in place to combat invasive species (see
www.invasivespecies.gov). Specifically, Section 2(a)(3) of Executive Order 13112 - Invasive
Species (February 3, 1999) directs federal agencies to "not authorize, fund, or carry out actions
that it believes are likely to cause or promote the introduction or spread of invasive species in the
aD.S. Wilcove, D. Rothstein, J. Dubow, A. Phillips, and E. Losos. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in
the United States. BioScience 48:607-615.
bD. Pimentel, L. Lach, R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous
species in the United States. BioScience 50:53-65.
4

United States or elsewhere." Despite their short-term erosion -control benefits, many exotic
species used in soil stabilization seed mixes are persistent once they are established, thereby
preventing the reestablishment of native vegetation. Many of these exotic plants' are also
aggressive invaders of nearby natural areas, where they are capable of displacing
already -established native species. Therefore, we strongly recommend that only species native
to the natural communities within the project area be used in association with all aspects of this
project.
We also recommend that seeds for native plants that are beneficial to pollinators be included in
the seed mixes. Pollinators, such as most bees, some birds and bats, or other insects, including
moths and butterflies, play a crucial role in the reproduction of flowering plants and in the
production of most fruits and vegetables. Over 75 percent of flowering plants and about
75 percent of crops are pollinated by these pollinators. A recent study of the status of pollinators
in North America by the National Academy of Sciences found that populations of honey bees
(which are not native to North America) and many wild pollinators are declining. Declines in
wild pollinators are a result of loss, degradation, and fragmentation of habitat and disease; while
declines in honey bees has also been linked to disease. Because loss of habitat and diminished
native food sources have decreased the populations and diversity of pollinators throughout the
country, we recommend that development projects be sited in areas that are previously disturbed
(fallow fields, closed industrial sites, etc.) or sites that do not impact mature forests, streams, or
wetlands. To offset the overall impacts of development and/or to increase the habitat and species
diversity within the project area, we further recommend the following measures be implemented
into project design:
1. Throughout the site, sow native seed mixes with plant species that are beneficial to
pollinators. Taller -growing pollinator plant species should be planted around the
periphery of the site and anywhere on the site where mowing can be restricted during
the summer months. Taller plants, not mowed during the summer, would provide
benefits to pollinators, habitat to ground-nesting/feeding birds, and cover for small
mammals. Low-growing/groundcover native species should be planted in areas that
need to be maintained. This would provide benefits to pollinators while also
minimizing the amount of maintenance, such as mowing and herbicide treatment.
Using a seed mix that includes milkweed species (milkweed is an important host plant
for monarch butterflies) is especially beneficial. The following Web site provides a
comprehensive list of native plant species that benefit pollinators:
https: //mail.google. com/mail/u/0/#advanced-search/subject=pollinator&subset=
all&has=anita&within= l d&sizeoperator=s_sl&sizeunit=s_smbll4j0366dba7d3bda?
projector= 1.
Additional information regarding plant species, seed mixes, and pollinator habitat
requirements can be provided upon request. Attachment 1 of this letter includes a
°Lists of invasive exotic plants can be found at http://www.tneppc.org/and http://www. invasive.org/eastern/srs/
(exotic wildlife links) on the Internet.
5

sample upland mix that can be used in conjunction with a fast growing erosion control
seed mix for overall soil stability and pollinator benefits.
2. Provide nesting sites for pollinator species. Different pollinators have different
needs for nesting sites. Therefore, we recommend designing the solar facility to
maintain a diverse array of habitats to accommodate varied pollinators, from
hummingbirds to butterflies to bees. Hummingbirds typically nest in trees or shrubs
while many butterflies lay eggs on specific host plants. Most bees nest in the ground
and in wood or dry plant stems. For additional information and actions that can be
taken to benefit pollinators please visit the following Web site:
http://wwwfivs.govlpollinatorslpollinatorpageslyourhelp.html.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments. If we can be of assistance or if you
have any questions, please contact Mr. Bryan Tompkins of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 240.
In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log Number
4-2-17-065.
Sincerely,
- - original signed - -
Janet Mizzi
Field Supervisor
E -copy:
Mr. David Brown, US Army Corps of Engineers, Asheville Regulatory Field Office
0

Attachment I — Sample Upland Meadow Seed Mix for NC Piedmont
This is an example upland pollinator seed mix that is suitable for the project site. This list is not
an all-inclusive list nor does a pollinator planting project need to include all of these species. I
can help to customize a seed mix for the project area which could decrease costs if requested.
20% Indiangrass, NC Ecotype (Sorghastrum nutans, NC Ecotype)
• 18% Beaked Panicgrass, SC Ecotype (Panicum ancgps, SC Ecotype)
• 14% Little Bluestem, Piedmont NC Ecotype (Schizachyrium scoparium, Piedmont NC
Eco e
• 10% Virginia Wildrye, PA Ecotype (Elymus virginicus, PA Ecotype)
• 6% Purpletop, Southeastern VA Ecotype (Tridens flavus, Southeastern VA Ecotype)
• 3% Bigtop Lovegrass, VA Ecotype (Eragrostis hirsuta, VA Ecotype)
• 3% Blackeyed Susan, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype (Rudbeckia hirta, Coastal Plain NC
Ecotype)
• 2.5% Sensitive Pea, NC Ecotype (Chamaecrista nictitans, NC Ecotype)
2% Lanceleaf Coreopsis, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype (Coreopsis lanceolata, Coastal Plain
NC Ecotype)
2% Spiked Wild Indigo, NC Ecotype (Baptisia albescens, NC Ecotype)
• 2% Winter Bentgrass, NC Ecotype (Agrostis hyemalis, NC Ecotype)
2% Slender Bushclover, VA Ecotype (Lespedeza virginica, VA Ecotype)
• 2% Scaly Blazing Star, VA Ecotype (Liatris squarrosa, VA Ecotype)
2% Appalachian Beardtongue, SC Ecotype (Penstemon laevigatus, SC Ecotype)
• 2% Wild Quinine, NC Ecotype (Parthenium integrifolium, NC Ecotype)
2% Slender Indiangrass, NC Ecotype (Sorphastrum elliottii, NC Ecotype)
• 1% Grassleaf Blazing Star, NC Ecotype Liatris graminifolia (L. pilosa), NC Ecotype)
• 1% Mistflower, VA Ecotype (Eupatorium coelestinum (Conoclinium c.), VA Ecotype)
• 1% Splitbeard Bluestem, VA Ecotype (Andropogon ternarius, VA Ecotype)
• 1% Spotted Beebalm, Coastal Plain SC Ecotype (Monarda punctata, Coastal Plain SC
Ecot)Te
• 1% Orange Coneflower, Northern VA Ecotype (Rudbeckia fulgida var. fulgida, Northern
VA Ecotype)
• 0.5% Late Purple Aster, NC Ecotype (Aster patens, NC Ecotype)
• 0.5% Wild Indigo, Coastal Plain SC Ecotype (Baptisia tinctoria, Coastal Plain SC
Ecotype)
• 0.5% Anise Goldenrod, GA Ecotype (Solidago odora, GA Ecotype)
• 0.5% Gray Goldenrod, VA Ecotype (Solidago nemoralis, VA Ecotype)
• 0.5% Swamp (Narrowleaf) Sunflower, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype (Helianthus
angustifolius, Coastal Plain NC Ecotype)
Total: 100%
7

1-171,
L1'"'7
120
3000
July
k',, Y
Governor
Sea etan'