Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20160804 Ver 1_More Info Received - Email_20170109Burdette, Jennifer a From: Hughes, Emily B CIV USARMY CESAW (US) < Emily.B.Hughes@usace.army.mil > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2017 3:49 PM To: 'Pete_Benjamin@fws.gov'; 'John_Ellis@fws.gov'; Pace Wilber - NOAA Federal; Ken Riley - NOAA Federal; Holliman.Daniel@epa.gov; Govoni, Daniel; Burdette, Jennifer a; Coats, Heather; Coburn, Chad Cc: Owens, Jennifer L CIV USARMY CESAW (US); Castens, Pamela G CIV (US) Subject: Eagle Island Dike Raise to 50ft EA UPDATE Good Day All, Hope you had a wonderful holiday. This email is to inform you all that the Final EA/FONSI for the subject project is still in motion and anticipated to be out on the street by mid/late February. The past couple months have been spent tying up loose ends which are summarized below: 1. Revised Mitigation: All of the agencies replied to our October 26, 2016 letter stating our revised mitigation plan for impacts to 35.45 acres of tidal freshwater marsh was acceptable. We received a reservation letter from the Lower Cape Fear Umbrella Mitigation Bank for purchase of 35.5 credits. 2. 401 Application: The 401 application was on hold pending the approved revised mitigation plan. Processing continued and a Public Notice was issued November 28 (no comments were received) and the 401 Certification is to be issued NLT January 16, 2017. 3. Construction window: PNA within the project area has been identified by the Mean High Water (MHW) line, which is also the 2ft contour line. The construction of toe berms would impact approximately 2.85 acres of PNA tidal area waterward of MHW surrounding Eagle Island, the majority being on the west side adjacent to the Brunswick River. To avoid impacts to fisheries within the PNA areas, every effort will be made to construct the toe berms outside of the April 1 -July 31 anadromous fish window proposed by NMFS in their email dated Nov 22, 2016. This should protect species from turbidity and acoustic effects of construction during their upriver migration. If construction cannot be limited to this timeframe, coordination with environmental agencies will occur prior to work within these areas. 4. Temporary construction impacts: This topic was not previously addressed in the Draft EA, but will be in the Final. A 5-10 foot construction buffer will be placed around the limits of the entire toe berm where disturbance is likely. Within this area, the following may occur: Cutting back of phragmites, silt fence installation, placement of coir logs/hay bales, and use of logging mats if heavy equipment will be working within wetlands. Furthermore, to address open water areas located below MHW subject to ebb and flow of tides, coffer dams may be erected to isolate the area from tidal influence. Rock (rip -rap) may be used within the toe berm footprint to provide long-term stabilization of the toe berm. Turbidity curtains may also be erected to prevent turbidity within the receiving waters. These will be proactive measures taken and any materials/structures used/installed will be removed upon stabilization of the toe berm. Note: temporary impacts will not be mitigated for. Please comment on any of the above proposed measures by this Friday, January 13. You may respond in email or please feel free to call me. We hope to have the FONSI signed in the next month so please help us to have all issues resolved by then. Thanks & Happy New Year! Emily Environmental Resources Section, Wilmington District US Army Corps of Engineers 69 Darlington Ave. Wilmington, NC 28403 (910) 251-4635 Emily.b.hughes@usace.army.mil