The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNC0001422_LVSuttonSARP_Rev0_AppendixE_20161201Appendix E Aquifer Pumping Test Memo 50 South Belcher Rd Suite 116 Clearwater, Florida 33765 813-792-4820 www.geosyntec.com M E M O R A N D U M Date: 19 May 2015 To: Matt Gozdor Geosyntec Consultants From: Michael Callahan and Matthew Wissler, P.G. Geosyntec Consultants RE: DRAFT Summary of Duke Sutton Aquifer Performance Test At the request of Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (DEP), Geosyntec Consultants (Geosyntec) provided multidisciplinary environmental and geotechnical services for developing design plans for Onsite Landfill and CCR Basin Final Closure at the L.V. Sutton site (Sutton). As part of these multidisciplinary environmental and geotechnical services, a hydrogeologic characterization was conducted within the 1971 Ash Basin. This characterization consisted of a 46-hour constant-rate pumping test and the associated background and recovery monitoring, as well as, additional slug tests within the 1971 Ash Basin. The methods and results are provided in the following sections. Methods Four observation wells (PT-1, PT-2, PT-3, and PT-4) were used to monitor the response in the surficial aquifer during the pumping test within the 1971 Ash Basin (Figure 1). Observation wells were constructed of two inch diameter schedule 40 poly-vinyl chloride (PVC), additional well construction details and boring logs can be found in Appendix A. Observation wells PT-1 and PT-2 were located approximately 5 and 11 ft south of the pumping well EW-1, and observation wells PT-3 and PT-4 were located approximately 4 and 10 ft east of pumping well EW-1. Observation wells PT-1 and PT-2 were both screened at a depth of 25 to 40 ft below ground surface (bgs), corresponding to the upper sand unit of the surficial aquifer. Observation wells PT-3 and PT-4 were both screened at a depth of 59 to 69 ft bgs, corresponding to the lower sand unit of the surficial aquifer. The observation wells and the pumping well were outfitted with stand-alone pressure transducers (In -Situ, Level Troll 700 Data Loggers®). Additionally, water- DRAFT Summary of Duke Sutton Aquifer Performance Test 19 May 2015 Page 2 of 4 level measurements were collected manually to evaluate data set integrity. Water quality parameters including field parameters (pH, conductivity, oxidation-reduction potential [ORP], dissolved oxygen, and temperature) were also monitored during the test. Monitoring wells MW- 1A and PZ-105, located to the east (MW-1A) and southwest (PZ-105) of pumping well EW-1, were used as background monitoring wells during the pumping test (Figure 1). The reasoning for the background well selection was to determine potential background effects from the canal (PZ-105) and to the higher ground elevations to the east of the testing area (MW-1A). The pumping test period lasted a total of approximately 10 days including background monitoring, the constant-rate test, and recovery. The background portion of the test started at 1500 13 March 2015 and ended with the initiation of the extraction phase of the constant-rate test at 1900 18 March 2015. The extraction phase of the constant-rate test lasted until 1630 20 March 2015. Recovery was monitored in the observation wells until 1400 23 March 2015. Water level data from pumping and recovery phases for the observation wells was analyzed in HydroSOLVE’s (V 4.50) AQTESOLV using the Moench (1997) and Neuman (1974) methods. In addition to the constant-rate pumping test, slug tests were conducted to estimate the in-situ saturated hydraulic conductivity within the 1971 Ash Basin. Pneumatic slug tests were performed on the four observation wells (PT-1, PT-2, PT-3, and PT-4) and one of the background monitoring wells (MW-1B) (Figure 1). Several trials were conducted at each of the wells and the results of the slug tests were analyzed in HydroSOLVE’s (V 4.50) AQTESOLV using the Hvorslev (1951) and Bouwer-Rice (1976) methods. Since the water table elevation was consistently above the top of the well screen elevation during the duration of these tests, the Hvorslev (1951) method was considered to be a suitable analysis in addition to the Bouwer-Rice (1976) method (Batu, 1998). Results A summary of the pumping test results are included as Table 1. Manual water levels measured during the pumping test are summarized and presented in Table 2. In most instances, manual water levels correlated with water level measured from the pressure transducers. However, inadequate clearance due to pump drop pipe and electrical leads within the well casing at EW-1 prevented accurate manual water level measurements from being conducted at the pumping well. The data collected from manual measurements and from pressure transducers at each well were inspected to identify any data drift which may have occurred during the pumping test. Review of the data indicated the data drift was less than 0.1 feet and therefore was considered adequate for analysis without drift correction (Appendix B). The results of the water quality monitoring are DRAFT Summary of Duke Sutton Aquifer Performance Test 19 May 2015 Page 3 of 4 presented as Table 3. Little change was documented among the water quality parameters. Small increases in conductivity, pH, and temperature were recorded near the end of the pumping test. Curve matches were developed using both professional judgment and automatic matching techniques. Numerical solver results are provided in Appendix C. Water level data was analyzed from both the pumping phase and recovery phase of the pumping test. In general, hydraulic conductivity values derived from the pumping phase were lower than values derived from the recovery phase. The geometric mean of hydraulic conductivity for the pumping phase data was 266.5 feet per day (ft/day), compared to 431 ft/day for the recovery phase data. The overall geometric mean of the hydraulic conductivity was 339.2 ft/day and ranged from 220.2 to 613.8 ft/day. Transmissivity values ranged from 1.06 x 104 to 2.95 x 104 feet squared per day (ft2/day). A summary of the slug-test results are included as Table 4 and numeric solver results are included in Appendix D. The geometric mean hydraulic conductivity was 67.9 feet per day (ft/day). Hydraulic conductivity values ranged from 22.5 to 189.6 ft/day. As is typically when comparing hydraulic conductivities between slug-test and pumping test data, an order of magnitude difference between the two values was observed (Butler and Healey, 1998). Typically, hydraulic conductivities derived from slug tests are lower and less representative than the larger scale and longer duration pumping tests. Slug tests usually have much smaller volumes of water being displaced and reflect the hydraulic conductivity of a small volume of the ground near the well (Schwartz and Zhang, 2003). DRAFT Summary of Duke Sutton Aquifer Performance Test 19 May 2015 Page 4 of 4 References Batu, V. 1998. Aquifer Hydraulics: A Comprehensive Guide to Hydrogeologic Data Analysis. New York: Wiley. Bouwer, H. and R.C. Rice, 1976. A Slug Test Method for Determining Hydraulic Conductivity of Unconfined Aquifers with Completely or Partially Penetrating Wells. Water Resources Research. 12(3): 423-428. Butler, J.J. and J.M. Healey, 1998. Relationship Between Pumping-Test and Slug-Test Parameters: Scale Effect or Artifact? Ground Water. 36(2): 305-313. Hvorslev, M.J., 1951. Time Lag and Soil Permeability in Groundwater Observations. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Bulletin 36, Vicksburg, Mississippi. 50p. Moench, A.F., 1997. Flow to a Well of Finite Diameter in a Homogeneous, Anisotropic Water Table Aquifer. Water Resources Research. 33(6): 1397-1407. Neuman, S.P., 1974. Effect of Partial Penetration on Flow in Unconfined Aquifers Considering Delayed Gravity Response. Water Resources Research. 10(2): 303-312. Schwartz, F.W. and H. Zhang, 2003. Fundamentals of Ground Water. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. * * * * * * Attachments TABLES TABLE 1: Pumping Test Inputs and Results EW-1 Well Diameter (in)4 Screen interval (ft bgs)23.7-48.7 Well Depth (ft bgs)48.7 Screen Length (ft) [AQTESOLV "L"]25 Confined or Unconfined Aquifer unconfined Ground Surface Elevation (ft)NA TOC Elevation (ft NGVD 29)GS + 3.12 Selected Well Configuration [1]Partial Penetrating X Coordinates (relative to pumping well)(ft)0.00 Y Coordinates (relative to pumping well)(ft)0.00 Pre-test Depth-to-groundwater (ft)24.84 Pre-test water column height (ft) [AQTESOLV H]26.98 Water level above top of well screen [AQTESOLV d]1.98 Inside Radius of Well Casing (ft) [AQTESOLV r(c)]0.167 Radius of Well (ft) [AQTESOLV r(w)]0.333 Well Skin Radius (ft) [AQTESOLV r(sk)]0.333 Formation Saturated Thickness (ft) [AQTESOLV b]46.35 Vertical-to-Horizontal hydraulic conductivity anisotropy ratio [AQTESOLV Kv/Kh]0.1 Test Phase (Pumping or Recovery)NA Pumping Recovery Pumping Recovery Pumping Recovery Pumping Recovery Transmissivity (T) (ft2/day)NA 1.58E+04 2.18E+04 1.69E+04 1.69E+04 1.06E+04 1.46E+04 1.08E+04 1.92E+04 Storage (S) (unitless)NA 9.76E-07 2.73E-02 2.53E-06 4.21E-03 9.76E-07 6.43E-02 3.38E-06 0.006676 Specific Yield (Sy) (unitless)NA 0.002 0.000 0.001 0.010 0.271 2.766 0.044 0.1183 Calculated Hydraulic Conductivity (K) (ft/day)NA 341.3 470.2 363.9 365.2 220.2 304.3 226.1 401.8 Test Phase (Pumping or Recovery)NA Pumping Recovery Pumping Recovery Pumping Recovery Pumping Recovery Transmissivity (T) (ft2/day)NA 1.17E+04 2.40E+04 1.50E+04 1.83E+04 1.06E+04 2.95E+04 1.09E+04 2.19E+04 Storage (S) (unitless)NA 3.85E-04 1.98E-02 1.95E-04 5.90E-03 2.34E-03 1.20E-04 3.55E-04 5.28E-05 Specific Yield (Sy) (unitless)NA 0.020 0.002 0.004 0.029 0.341 0.001 0.055 0.001 Calculated Hydraulic Conductivity (K) (ft/day)NA 253.0 517.3 323.5 395.2 220.0 613.8 228.2 457.9 Hydraulic Conductivity Summary ft/day Moench (1997) Geomean:326.7 Neuman (1974) Geomean:352.1 Overall Geomean:339.2 Specific Yield Summary Unitless Moench (1997) Geomean:0.02 Neuman (1974) Geomean:0.01 Overall Geomean:0.01 Note(s): in = inches ft = feet BGS = below ground surface TOC = top of casing NGVD = National Geodetic Vertical Datum GS = ground surface ft2/day = feet squared per day ft/day = feet per day cm/sec = centimeters per second 0.1 PT-3 PT-4 47.95 37.81 0.083 0.250 0.250 47.81 NA GS + 2.98 ft Partial Penetrating 9.66 0.00 24.67 0.1 10 2 59.5-69.5 69.5 10 48.01 0.167 46.30 0.1 unconfined 48.17 38.01 0.083 0.250 unconfined NA GS + 2.96 ft Partial Penetrating 3.97 0.00 24.6524.81 18.61 3.61 0.083 0.250 NA GS + 3.12 ft Partial Penetrating 0.00 -11.56 1.20E-01 24.73 19.19 4.09 0.083 0.167 0.167 46.32 0.1 cm/sec 1.15E-01 1.24E-01 Constant Rate Pumping Test Analysis PT-1 2 25.8-40.8 40.8 PT-2 2 25.3-40.3 40.3 2 59.7-69.7 69.7 We l l I n f o r m a t i o n Un c o n f i n e d A n a l y s e s R e s u l t s S u m m a r y Ne u m a n ( 1 9 7 4 ) Mo e n c h ( 1 9 9 7 ) -5.31 15 unconfined NA GS + 3.02 ft Partial Penetrating 0.00 0.167 15 unconfined TABLE 2: Summary of the Manual Water Level Measurements Recorded During the APT Date/Time EW-1 PT-1 PT-2 PT-3 PT-4 MW-1A MW-1B MW-18 PZ-105 3/18/2015 18:55 --24.47 24.59 24.40 24.40 -------- 3/18/2015 19:05 --24.93 24.93 24.51 24.51 -------- 3/18/2015 19:10 --24.97 24.96 24.52 24.53 -------- 3/18/2015 19:15 --25.01 24.99 24.53 24.53 -------- 3/18/2015 19:30 --25.01 24.97 24.53 24.53 -------- 3/18/2015 19:45 --25.03 25.01 24.55 24.54 -------- 3/18/2015 20:00 --25.05 25.02 24.56 24.55 10.03 10.12 10.60 -- 3/18/2015 20:30 --25.06 25.05 24.58 24.58 -------- 3/18/2015 21:08 --25.09 25.08 24.60 24.60 -------- 3/18/2015 21:30 --25.11 25.10 24.60 24.60 -------- 3/18/2015 22:00 --25.12 25.11 24.60 24.60 10.08 10.12 10.61 -- 3/18/2015 23:00 --25.14 25.13 24.61 24.61 -------- 3/19/2015 0:00 --25.15 25.13 24.64 24.63 10.07 10.13 10.61 -- 3/19/2015 1:00 --25.17 25.16 24.64 24.64 -------- 3/19/2015 2:00 --25.18 25.18 24.65 24.65 10.08 10.14 10.62 -- 3/19/2015 3:00 --25.20 25.18 24.66 24.67 -------- 3/19/2015 4:00 --25.22 25.19 24.67 24.68 10.09 10.15 10.63 -- 3/19/2015 5:00 --25.22 25.21 24.67 24.69 -------- 3/19/2015 6:00 --25.24 25.22 24.69 24.70 10.09 10.16 10.63 -- 3/19/2015 7:00 --25.25 25.24 24.69 24.70 -------- 3/19/2015 8:00 --25.26 25.23 24.72 24.71 10.10 10.16 10.63 -- 3/19/2015 9:00 --25.27 25.25 24.72 24.72 -------- 3/19/2015 10:00 --25.28 25.27 24.73 24.72 10.10 10.17 10.63 -- 3/19/2015 11:00 --25.29 25.25 24.75 24.73 -------- 3/19/2015 12:00 --25.29 25.26 24.73 24.73 -------- 3/19/2015 13:00 --25.30 25.28 24.75 24.74 10.10 10.19 10.65 -- 3/19/2015 14:00 --25.30 25.28 24.75 24.76 10.12 10.18 10.64 -- 3/19/2015 15:00 --25.31 25.28 24.76 24.75 -------- 3/19/2015 16:00 --25.31 25.29 24.76 24.75 10.12 10.19 10.65 -- 3/19/2015 17:00 --25.32 25.30 24.77 24.77 -------- 3/19/2015 18:00 --25.32 25.31 24.78 24.78 10.12 10.19 10.65 -- 3/19/2015 19:00 --25.33 25.31 24.78 24.78 -------- 3/19/2015 20:00 --25.34 25.32 24.78 24.78 10.18 10.20 10.65 -- 3/19/2015 21:00 30.98 25.34 25.32 24.77 24.78 -------- 3/19/2015 22:00 34.00 25.35 25.32 24.78 24.80 10.18 10.27 10.74 18.33 3/19/2015 23:00 33.12 25.35 25.33 24.78 24.81 -------- 3/20/2015 0:00 31.90 25.35 25.33 24.79 24.81 10.08 10.17 10.63 18.18 3/20/2015 1:00 32.90 25.35 25.33 24.80 24.80 -------- 3/20/2015 2:00 32.80 25.37 25.34 24.81 24.81 10.08 10.17 10.63 18.19 3/20/2015 3:00 29.60 25.36 25.32 24.79 24.80 -------- 3/20/2015 4:00 32.20 25.38 25.37 24.81 24.82 10.09 10.17 10.63 18.20 3/20/2015 5:00 32.85 25.37 25.35 24.82 24.82 -------- 3/20/2015 6:00 33.50 25.38 25.35 24.81 24.82 10.08 10.17 10.63 18.19 Start Pumping at 3/18/2015 19:00:25 DTW (ft BTOC) TABLE 2: Summary of the Manual Water Level Measurements Recorded During the APT Date/Time EW-1 PT-1 PT-2 PT-3 PT-4 MW-1A MW-1B MW-18 PZ-105 DTW (ft BTOC) 3/20/2015 7:00 33.65 25.38 25.37 24.82 24.82 -------- 3/20/2015 8:00 33.95 25.38 25.36 24.84 24.82 10.09 10.17 10.63 18.20 3/20/2015 9:00 33.62 25.40 25.36 24.86 24.84 -------- 3/20/2015 10:00 33.61 25.39 25.37 24.85 24.83 -------- 3/20/2015 11:00 33.10 25.40 25.38 24.85 24.84 10.10 10.18 10.64 18.19 3/20/2015 12:00 33.15 25.40 25.38 24.85 24.83 -------- 3/20/2015 13:00 34.20 25.40 25.38 24.85 24.83 10.11 10.18 10.64 18.19 3/20/2015 14:00 33.75 25.40 25.38 24.85 24.85 -------- 3/20/2015 15:00 33.65 25.41 25.39 24.85 24.85 10.11 10.20 10.64 18.19 3/20/2015 16:00 34.30 25.41 25.39 24.84 24.83 -------- Note(s): DTW = depth to water ft = feet BTOC = below top of casing Stop Pumping at 3/20/2015 16:34:06 TABLE 3: Water Quality Parameters Date/time pH Conductivity (µs/cm)ORP (mV)DO (mg/L)Temperature (°C) 3/18/2015 20:00 7.13 875 -347.0 2.14 21.5 3/18/2015 21:08 7.13 864 -338.0 2.47 21.3 3/18/2015 22:00 7.16 871 -205.7 3.06 21.2 3/18/2015 23:00 7.13 863 -212.3 3.30 21.3 3/19/2015 0:00 7.15 863 -197.0 3.20 21.2 3/19/2015 1:00 7.15 868 -188.0 3.30 21.4 3/19/2015 2:00 7.13 870 -183.0 3.50 21.6 3/19/2015 3:00 7.14 859 -187.9 2.76 21.4 3/19/2015 4:00 7.14 864 -184.0 3.10 21.3 3/19/2015 5:00 7.15 867 -183.1 3.18 21.3 3/19/2015 6:00 7.16 863 -184.0 2.58 20.9 3/19/2015 7:00 7.17 867 -180.8 3.08 21.1 3/19/2015 8:00 7.14 868 -183.0 2.96 21.6 3/19/2015 9:00 7.14 868 -174.0 2.41 21.2 3/19/2015 10:00 7.13 866 -168.0 2.70 21.5 3/19/2015 11:00 7.36 869 -185.0 3.73 21.5 3/19/2015 12:00 7.19 861 -140.0 3.16 21.8 3/19/2015 13:00 7.16 866 -131.0 2.67 21.8 3/19/2015 14:00 7.21 868 -124.0 2.96 21.4 3/19/2015 15:00 7.20 868 -119.0 3.00 21.5 3/19/2015 16:00 7.12 865 -121.0 3.28 21.6 3/19/2015 17:00 7.14 860 -128.0 3.44 21.6 3/19/2015 18:00 7.19 865 -115.0 3.13 21.3 3/19/2015 19:00 7.15 859 -111.0 3.25 21.1 3/19/2015 20:00 7.10 866 -114.0 2.83 21.3 3/19/2015 21:00 7.18 861 -114.6 3.08 20.6 3/19/2015 22:00 7.14 862 -130.1 2.61 20.1 3/19/2015 23:00 7.19 858 -139.5 3.90 20.2 3/20/2015 0:00 7.17 860 -141.1 3.22 20.9 3/20/2015 1:00 7.17 859 -147.4 2.75 21.1 3/20/2015 2:00 7.17 857 -153.5 3.58 21.1 3/20/2015 3:00 7.19 851 -162.2 3.34 21.1 3/20/2015 4:00 7.16 856 -145.0 3.61 21.4 3/20/2015 5:00 7.18 854 -183.8 3.42 21.3 3/20/2015 6:00 7.17 852 -153.7 3.25 21.4 3/20/2015 7:00 7.18 795 -158.0 3.36 21.6 3/20/2015 8:00 ---------- 3/20/2015 9:00 7.19 851 -109.0 5.10 20.4 3/20/2015 10:00 7.22 981 -115.0 2.80 21.4 3/20/2015 11:00 ---------- 3/20/2015 12:00 7.29 987 -134.0 3.28 21.5 3/20/2015 13:00 7.32 942 -131.0 3.10 21.9 3/20/2015 14:00 7.36 981 -160.0 3.14 22.0 3/20/2015 15:00 7.30 967 -182.0 2.70 22.2 3/20/2015 16:00 7.42 980 -189.0 3.29 22.3 Note(s): µs/cm = microsiemens per centimeter ORP = oxidation-reduction potential mV = millivolts DO = dissolved oxygen mg/L = milligrams per liter TABLE 4: Slug Testing Inputs and Results Well Diameter (in) Screen interval (ft bgs) Well Depth (ft bgs) Screen Length (ft) [AQTESOLV "L"] Confined or Unconfined Aquifer Ground Surface Elevation (ft) TOC Elevation (ft NGVD 29) Slug Test Trial #1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 Test Date Pre-test Depth-to-groundwater (ft)10.25 10.25 10.25 24.73 24.73 24.73 24.73 24.81 24.81 24.81 24.81 24.81 24.65 24.65 24.65 24.67 24.67 24.67 24.67 Pre-test water column height (ft) [AQTESOLV H]17.75 17.75 17.75 19.29 19.29 19.29 19.29 18.61 18.61 18.61 18.61 18.61 48.01 48.01 48.01 47.81 47.81 47.81 47.81 Initial displacement (ft) [AQTESOLV H(0)]5.751 5.446 5.287 2.16 3.85 3.74 2.93 3.67 4.95 5.03 4.62 5.60 5.84 6.43 4.83 6.34 6.04 6.47 5.83 Water level above top of well screen [AQTESOLV d]12.75 12.75 12.75 4.09 4.09 4.09 4.09 3.61 3.61 3.61 3.61 3.61 38.01 38.01 38.01 37.81 37.81 37.81 37.81 Inside Radius of Well Casing (ft) [AQTESOLV r(c)] Radius of Well (ft) [AQTESOLV r(w)] Well Skin Radius (ft) [AQTESOLV r(sk)] Formation Saturated Thickness (ft) [AQTESOLV b]61.75 61.75 61.75 46.32 46.32 46.32 46.32 46.30 46.30 46.30 46.30 46.30 46.35 46.35 46.35 46.36 46.36 46.36 46.36 Vertical-to-Horizontal hydraulic conductivity anisotropy ratio [AQTESOLV Kv/Kh] Hvorslev (1951)185.1 177.9 189.6 142.8 68.3 85.9 116.8 41.0 30.9 35.7 36.2 32.8 65.1 64.3 78.5 77.9 88.0 87.3 88.1 Bouwer-Rice (1976)149.8 188.0 153.4 104.3 49.8 62.7 85.3 29.8 22.5 26.0 26.3 23.9 55.4 54.8 66.8 66.4 74.9 74.3 75.0 (ft/day)(cm/sec) Geomean of all analysis 67.9 2.40E-02 Note(s): in = inches ft = feet BGS = below ground surface TOC = top of casing NGVD = National Geodetic Vertical Datum GS = ground surface ft/day = feet per day cm/sec = centimeters per second An a l y s i s R e s u l t s 0.083 0.167 0.167 0.250 In p u t P a r a m e t e r s 3/25/2015 3/25/2015 3/25/2015 3/25/2015 0.083 0.167 0.167 0.250 0.083 0.083 0.250 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 unconfined unconfined 0.250 0.083 0.083 3/25/2015 NA GS + 2.98 ft 0.083 10 27.0 41.0 40.3 69.7 69.5 5 15 15 10 2 22-27 25.8-40.8 25.3-40.3 59.7-69.7 59.5-69.5 We l l I n f o r m a t i o n 2 2 2 2 NA NA NA GS + 1 ft GS + 3.02 ft GS + 3.12 ft NA GS + 2.96 ft unconfined unconfined unconfined MW-1B PT-1 PT-2 PT-3 PT-4 FIGURES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MW-1B MW-18 PT-2 PT-1 PT-3 PT-4 3.97' 9.66' 5.31' 11.56' EW-1 LIGHT-POLE GENERATOR LEGEND APPROXIMATE BASIN AND LANDFILL OUTLINE APPROXIMATE COOLING POND OUTLINE APPROXIMATE LAY OF LAND AREA (LOLA) OUTLINE EXISTING MAJOR GROUND ELEVATION CONTOUR GEOSYNTEC PUMP TEST LOCATION EXISTING GEOSYNTEC PIEZOMETER HISTORICAL MONITORING WELL NOTES: 1. PT-1 AND PT-2 ARE LOCATED IN UPPER INTERVAL OF SAND UNIT. 2. PT-3 AND PT-4 ARE LOCATED IN LOWER INTERVAL OF SAND UNIT. 3. PZ-105 , MW-1A, MW-1B AND MW-18 ARE BACKGROUND MONITORING LOCATIONS. N COOLING POND 1984 ASH BASIN 1984 ASH BASIN (2006 INTERIOR CONTAINMENT AREA) GREENFIELD LANDFILL AREA 1971 ASH BASIN LOLA CA N A L 300'0 SCALE IN FEET PROJECT NO: FIGURE L.V. SUTTON PUMP TEST WITHIN 1971 BASIN MAY 2015 1 PUMP TEST LOCATION BLOWUP APPROXIMATE DISCHARGE LINE TO DITCH PZ-105 LEGEND LIGHT-POLE GENERATOR PUMPING WELL (EW-1) OBSERVATION PIEZOMETER FOR WELL PUMP TEST PT-1 1 SCALE: 1"=5' DETAIL PUMP TEST CONFIGURATION- N 1 - 5 APPENDIX A Well Construction and Lithology Logs WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD This form can be used for single or multiple wells 1. Well Contractor Information: Malcolm Coogan Well Contractor Name 2540 NC Well Contractor Certification Number Mid -Atlantic Drilling Inc. Company Name 2. Well Construction Permit #: List all applicable well permits (i.e. County, State, Variance, Injection, etc) 3. Well Use (check well use): Water Supply Well: ❑Agricultural ❑Municipal/Public ❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply) ❑Residential Water Supply (single) ❑Industrial/Commercial ❑Residential Water Supply (shared) ❑Irrigation Non -Water Supply Well: OMonitoring ❑Recovery Injection Well: ❑Aquifer Recharge ❑Groundwater Remediation ❑Aquifer Storage and Recovery ❑Salinity Barrier ❑Aquifer Test ❑Stormwater Drainage ❑Experimental Technology ❑Subsidence Control ❑Geothermal (Closed Loop) ❑Tracer ❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Return) ❑Other explain under #21 Remarks) 4. Date Well(s) Completed: 03/12/2015 Well ID# PT-1 5a. Well Location: Duke Energy Progress Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable) 801 Sutton Steam Plant Road, Wilmington, 28401 Physical Address, City, and Zip New Hanover County Parcel Identification No. (PIN) 5b. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees: (ifwell field, one lat/long is sufficient) 34.29092 N 77.98623 W 6. Is (are) the we8(s): ❑Permanent or OTemporary 7. Is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or BNo If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the repair under *21 remarks section or on the back of this form. 8. Number of wells constructed: 1 For multiple a jection or non -water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, you can submit one form. 9. Total well depth below land surface: 40.8 (ft ) For multiple wells list all depths if d8erent (example- 3@200' and 2@100') 10. Static water level below top of casing: 24.69 (fL) If water level is above casing, use "+" 11. Borehole diameter: 4 (in.) 12. Well construction method: Mud Rotary (i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.) For Internal Use ONLY: 14. WATER ZONES FROM TO DESCRIPTION ft. ft. ft ft 15.OUTER CASING for multi -cased wells OR LINER if a licable FROM I TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL ft. t fL in. 16. INNER CASING OR TUBING eothermal closed-10010) FROM TO I DIAMETER I THICKNESS I MATERIAL -3.1 fL 25.8 fL 2 i"' I SCH40 PVC ft ft. in. 17. SCREEN FROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE THICKNESS MATERIAL 25.8 ft- 40.8 It- 2 r"' 0.01 SCH40 PVC ft ft. in. 19. GROUT FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METMOD & AMOUNT 0 ft. 18 fL CEM-Bentonil Slurry through Tremie pipes ft. ft. ft. fL 19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK if i licable FROM TO MATERL4L EMPLACEMENT MErMOD 22 fL 40.8 fL #2 Sand Pour fL ft. 20. DRILLING LOG attach additional sheets ifnecessary) FROM TO DESCRIPTION color, hardness, soil/mck type, grain aiz etc. 0 fL 14 fL Ash 14 fL 40.8 fL Tan/Gray Fine to Medium SAND ft ft. fL ft. fL ft ft fL fL fL 21. REMARKS Bentonite seal from 18 to 22 feet 22. Certification: 3/30/2015 /46&fC.itifird W 11-Contra or Date By signing this form, 1 hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy of this record has been provided to the well owner. 23. Site diagram or additional well details: You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary. SUBMITTAL INSTUCTIONS 24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well construction to the following: Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 24b. For Iniection Wells ONLY: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well construction to the following: Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program, FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 276"-1636 13a. Yield (gP m) Method of test: 24c. For Water Supply & Iniection Wells: Also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of 13b. Disinfection type: Amount: well construction to the county health department of the county where constructed. Form GW-1 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Resources Revised August 2013 WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD This form can be used for single or multiple wells 1. Well Contractor Information: William M. Wiggins Well Contractor Name 3470-A NC Well Contractor Certification Number Mid -Atlantic Drilling Inc. Company Name 2. Well Construction Permit #: List all applicable well permits (i.e. County, State, Variance, Injection, etc.) 3. Well Use (check well use): Water Supply Well: ❑Agricultural ❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply) ❑Industrial/Commercial Non -Water Supply Well: ❑Aquifer Recharge ❑Aquifer Storage and Recovery ❑Aquifer Test ❑Experimental Technology ❑Geothermal (Closed Loop) ❑Geothennal (Heating/Cooling ❑Municipal/Public ❑Residential Water Supply (single) ❑Residential Water Supply (shared) ❑Groundwater Remediation ❑Salinity Barrier ❑Stormwater Drainage ❑Subsidence Control ❑Tracer ❑Other (explain under 421 4. Date Wells) Completed: 03/11/2015`,lell ID# PT-2 5a. Well Location: Duke Energy Progress Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable) 801 Sutton Steam Plant Road, Wilmington, 28401 Physical Address, City, and Zip New Hanover County Parcel Identification No. (PIN) 5b. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees: (if well field, one lab9ong is sufficient) 34.29090 N 77.98624 W 6. Is (are) the well(s): ❑Permanent or ❑Temporary 7. Is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or 0No If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the repair under 921 remarks section or on the back of this form. 8. Number of wells constructed: 1 For multiple injection or non -water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, you can submit one form. 9. Total well depth below land surface: 40.3 (ft) For multiple wells list all depths ifdierent (erample- 3@200' and 2@1001 10. Static water level below top of casing: 24.79 (ft.) If water level is above casing, use "+" It. Borehole diameter: 4 (in.) 12. Well construction method: Mud Rotary (i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.) For Internal Use ONLY: 14. WATER ZONES FROM TO DESCRIPTION ft ft. ft ft- 15. OUTER CASING for mRlti�ase� wells OR LINER if a livable FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATFRiAt. ft. I ft in. 16. INNER CASING OR TUBING eothermal closed -loon) FROM TO DIAMETER I THICKNESS I MATERIAL -3.1 ft 25.3 ft 2 in SCH40 PVC ft. ft. in. 17.SCREEN FROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE THICKNESS MATERIAL 25.3 ft 40.3 ft 2 in. 0.01 SCH40 PVC ft ft in. 18. GROUT FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT 0 ft 15 ft CEM-Bentonil Slurry through Tremie pipes ft ft ft. ft 19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK if 81310liC2ble FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD 22 ft 40.3 f" #2 Sand Pour ft ft 20. DRILLING LOG attach additional sheets if necessary) FROM TO DESCRDMON color, hardness, soiVmck type, grain sae, etc 0 & 14 ft Ash 14 ft 40.3 ft Tan/Gray Fine to Medium SAND ft ft. ft. ft. ft ft. ft ft ft ft 21. REMARKS Bentonite seal from 15 to 22 feet 22. Certification: Tn C?Dfj70 3/30/2015 Signa of ert fled Well Contractor I V Date By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance with I5A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy of this record has been provided to the well owner. 23. Site diagram or additional well details: You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary. SUBMITTAL INSTUCTIONS 24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well construction to the following: Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 24b. For Infection Wells ONLY: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well construction to the following: Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program, FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1636 13a. Yield m 24c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells: (gP ) Method of test: Also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of 13b. Disinfection type: Amount: well construction to the county health department of the county where constructed. Form GW-1 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Resources Revised August 2013 WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD This form can be used for single or multiple wells For Internal Use ONLY: 1. Well Contractor Information: William M. Wiggins Well Contractor Name 3470-A NC Well Contractor Certification Number Mid -Atlantic Drilling Inc. Company Name 2. Well Construction Permit #: List all applicable well permits (i.e. County, State, Variance, Injection, etc.) 3. Well Use (check well use): Water Suppl} ❑Agricultural ❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply) ❑Industrial/Commercial Non -Water Supply Well: ❑Aquifer Recharge ❑Aquifer Storage and Recovery ❑Aquifer Test ❑Experimental Technology ❑Geothermal (Closed Loop) ❑Geothermal (Heatine/Coolin¢ ❑Municipal/Public ❑Residential Water Supply (single) ❑Residential Water Supply (shared) ❑Groundwater Remediation ❑Salinity Barrier ❑Stormwater Drainage ❑Subsidence Control ❑Tracer ❑Other (explain under #21 Remarks 4. Date Well(s) Completed: 03/9/2015 Well ID# PT-3 5a. Well Location: Duke Energy Progress Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable) 801 Sutton Steam Plant Road, Wilmington, 28401 Physical Address, City, and Zip New Hanover County Parcel Identification No. (PIN) 5b. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees: (if well field, one latAong is sufficient) 34.29092 N 77.98621 W 6. Is (are) the well(s): ❑Permanent or QTemporary 7. Is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or allo If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the repair under fi21 remarks section or on the back of this form. 8. Number of wells constructed: 1 For multiple injection or non -water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, you can submit one form. 9. Total well depth below land surface: 69.7 (ft.) For multiple wells list all depths if different (example- 3@200' and 2@1001) 10. Static water level below top of casing: 24.60 (ft,) If water level is above casing, use "+" 11. Borehole diameter: 6 (in.) 12. Well construction method: Mud Rotary (i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.) 14. WATER ZONES FROM TO DESCRIPTION ft. ft. ft ft. 15.OUTER CASING for malti cased wells OR LINER if a ticable FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL ft ft in. 16. INNER CASING OR TUBING eothermal closed-loo FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS I MATERIAL -3 ft' 59.7 ft. 2 in. SCH40 PVC ft ft in. 17. SCREEN FROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE THICKNESS MATERIAL 59.7 ft 69.7 ft' 2 in. 0.01 SCH40 PVC ft ft. in. ]8. GROUT FROM I TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT 0 ft. 53 fL CEM-Bentonil Slurry through Tremie pipes ft ft ft ft 19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK if a licable FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD 58 fL 69.7 ff• #2 Sand Pour ft ft. 20. DRILLING LOG attach additional sheets if necessary) FROM TO DESCRIPTION color, hardness soil/rock in size, etc) 0 ft 13.7 ft. Ash 13.7 fL 69.7 fL Tan/Gray Fine to Medium SAND ft ft & ft. ft ft ft ft ft ft. 21. REMARKS Bentonite seal from 53 to 58 feet 22. Certification: nAi.&,wi m /t/, - 3/30/2015 Signature of Certified Well Contractor 04 Date By signing this form. I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy of this record has been provided to the well owner. 23. Site diagram or additional well details: You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary. SUBMITTAL INSTUCTIONS 24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well construction to the following: Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Uuit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 24b. For Iniection Wells ONLY: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well construction to the following: Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program, FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 13a. Yield (gp m) Method of test: 24c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells: Also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of 13b. Disinfection type: Amount: well construction to the county health department of the county where constructed. Form GW-I North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Resources Revised August 2013 WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD This form can be used for single or multiple wells 1. Well Contractor Information: William M. Wiggins Well Contractor Name 3470-A NC Well Contractor Certification Number Mid -Atlantic Drilling Inc. Company Name 2. Well Construction Permit #: List all applicable well permits (i.e. County, State, Variance, Injection, etc.) 3. Well Use (check well use): Water Supply Well: ❑Agricultural ❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply) ❑ Industrial/Commerciat Non -Water Supply ❑Aquifer Recharge ❑Aquifer Storage and Recovery ❑Aquifer Test ❑Experimental Technology ❑Geothermal (Closed Loop) ❑Geothermal (Heatine/Coolin¢ ❑Municipal/Public ❑Residential Water Supply (single) ❑Residential Water Supply (shared) ❑Groundwater Remediation ❑Salinity Barrier ❑Stormwater Drainage ❑Subsidence Control ❑Tracer ❑Other (explain under #21 1 4. Date Well(s) Completed: 03/11/2015 Weil ID# PT-4 5a. Well Location: Duke Energy Progress Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (ifapplicable) 801 Sutton Steam Plant Road, Wilmington, 28401 Physical Address, City, and Zip New Hanover County Parcel Identification No. (PIN) 5b. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees (ifwell field, one IaUlong is sufficient) 34.29092 N 77.98620 6. Is (are) the well(s): ❑Permanent or ❑Temporary W 7. Is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or ElNo If this is a repair, fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the repair under r21 remarks section or on the back of this form. 8. Number of wells constructed: 1 For multiple injection or non -water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, you can submit one form. 9. Total well depth below land surface: 69.5 (ft.) For multiple wells list all depths if different (example- 3@200' and 2@1001 10. Static water level below top of casing: 24.62 (ft.) If water level is above casing, use "_ I1. Borehole diameter: 6 (in.) Mud Rot For Internal Use ONLY: 14. WATER ZONES FROM TO I DESCRIPTION ft. ft. ft. ft 15. OUTER CASING for multi cased wells OR LINER if a ticable FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL ft. ft in. 16. INNER CASING OR TUBING eothermal closed -too FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL -3 ft 59.5 ft 2 in.SCH40 PVC ft ft in. 17. SCREEN FROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE THICKNESS MATERIAL 59.5 ft 69.5 ft 2 in. 0.01 SCH40 PVC ft ft in. 19. GROUT FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METMOD & AMOUNT 0 ft 52 ft- CEM-Bentonil Slurry through Tremie pipes ft ft ft ft 19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK if a ticable FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METMOD 57 ft 69.5 ft #2 Sand Pour ft ft 20. DRILLING LOG attach additional sheets if necessary) FROM TO DESCRIPTION color, hardness, soil/mck type, zrain sae, etc. 0 ft 13.7 ft- Ash 13.7 ft 69.5 ft Tan/Gray Fine to Medium SAND ft ft. ft ft. ft ft. ft. ft. ft. ft 21. REMARKS Bentonite seal from 52 to 57 feet 22. Certification: 9,kb 2L " eW&2o&Xm 3/30/2015 Signature of Certified Well Contractor# V Date By signing this form, I hereby certify that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0100 or 15A NCAC 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy of this record has been provided to the well owner. 23. Site diagram or additional well details: You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary. SUBMITTAL INSTUCTIONS 24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well construction to the following: Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 24b. For Infection Wells ONLY: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well 12. Well construction method: ary construction to the following: (i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.) Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program, FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1636 13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test: 24c. For Water Supply & Injection Wells: Also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of 13b. Disinfection type: Amount: well construction to the county health department of the county where constructed. Form GW-1 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Resources Revised August 2013 WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD This form can be used for single or multiple wells For Internal Use ONLY: 1. Well Contractor Information: Malcolm Coogan Well Contractor Name 2540 NC Well Contractor Certification Number Mid -Atlantic Drilling Inc. Company Name 2. Well Construction Permit #: List all applicable wellpermits (i.e. County, State, Variance, Injection, etc.) 3. Well Use (check well use): Water Supply Well: ❑Agricultural ❑Geothermal (Heating/Cooling Supply) ❑ IndustriaVCommerc ial Non -Water Supply Well: (OMonitoring ❑Aquifer Recharge ❑Aquifer Storage and Recovery ❑Aquifer Test ❑Experimental Technology ❑Geothermal (Closed Loop) ❑Municipal/Public ❑Residential Water Supply (single) ❑Residential Water Supply (shared) ❑Groundwater Remediation ❑Salinity Barrier ❑Stonnwater Drainage ❑Subsidence Control []Tracer ❑Other (explain trader #21 4. Date Well(s) Completed: 03/13/2015 Well ID# EW-1 5a. Well Location: Duke Energy Progress Facility/Owner Name Facility ID# (if applicable) 801 Sutton Steam Plant Road, Wilmington, 28401 Physical Address, City, and Zip New Hanover County Parcel Identification No. (PIN) 5b. Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees: (ifwell field, one lat/long is sufficient) 34.29093 N 77.98624 W 6. Is (are) the well(s): ❑Permanent or ❑Temporary 7. Is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or ElNo If this is a repair, fell out known well construction information and explain the nature of the repair under 421 remarks section or on the back of this form. 8. Number of wells constructed: 1 For multiple injection or non -water supply wells ONLY with the same construction, you can submit one form. 9. Total well depth below land surface: 48.7 00 For multiple wells list all depths i(diffenent (example- 3@200' and 2@1001 10. Static water level below top of casing: 24.8 (ft.) Ifwater level is above casing, use "+" 11. Borehole diameter: 8 (in.) 12. Well construction method: Mud Rotary (i.e. auger, rotary, cable, direct push, etc.) 14. WATER ZONES FROM TO I DESCRIPTION ft ft ft ft 15. OUTER CASING for multi -cased wells OR LINER if a tieable FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL ft ft in. 16. INNER CASING OR TUBING eothermal closed-looul FROM TO DIAMETER T THICKNESS I MATERIAL -3.2 ft 23.7 ft 4 in. SCH40 PVC ft ft in. 17. SCREEN FROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE THICKNESS MATF'.Riei 23.7 ft 48.7 ft 4 1D 0.01 SCH40 PVC ft. ft in. 18. GROUT FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD & AMOUNT 0 ft' 15 ft CEM-Bentonil Slurry through Tremie pipes ft ft ft ft 19. SAND/GRAVEL PACK if applicable FROM TO I MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD 18.8 ft 48.7 ft #2 Sand Pour ft ft 20. DRILLING LOG attach additional sheets if necessary) FROM TO DESCREMON color, hardness, soittmck in sae, ete. 0 ft 14 ft Ash 14 ft 48.7 ft Tan/Gray Fine to Medium SAND ft ft ft ft ft ft. ft ft ft ft. 21. REMARKS Bentonite seal from 15 to 18.8 feet 22. Certification: ��/" - //�"_ " 3/30/2015 Si tti a 46.1 Well Cont < ctor Date 8y signing this form, I hereby ceritfy, that the well(s) was (were) constructed in accordance with 15.4 NCAC 02C .0100 or 1 SA NC,4C 02C .0200 Well Construction Standards and that a copy of this record has been provided io the well owner. 23. Site diagram or additional well details: You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary. SUBMITTAL INSTUCTIONS 24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well construction to the following: Division of Water Resources, Information Processing Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 24b. For Iniection Wells ONLY: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well construction to the following: Division of Water Resources, Underground Injection Control Program, FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1636 13a. Yield (gpm) Method of test: 24c. For Water Supply & Iniection Wells: Also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of 13b. Disinfection type: Amount: well construction to the county health department of the county where consWcted. Form GW-I North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Division of Water Resources Revised August 2013 tlOF-TH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT Of NATURAL RESOURCES AND COMMUtliTY DEvaOPMENT DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL.MANAGEMENT -GAOt.NlWATef SSCTIOH P.O.SOX 27887 -AALElGH,H.c.27S11.PHONe (911l)733-6083 WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD FOR OFFICE USE ONlV Quad.No.~erlalNo. Lat.long. Minor Basin _ Basin Code _ Header Ent.GW-1 Ent._ DRILLING CONTRACTOR cz;p;e fl\.;,12...'/4-<;d'\'1'(. DRILLER -REGISTRATION NUMBER 4:<:1=c..STATE WELL CONSTRUCTIONPERMITNUMBER:___ To 'I,'2. 1.WELL LOCATION:(Show sketch of the location below) Nearest Town:\J.)\\V'{)\'D670f\ L.\}.SUrrQl,A By:',,-r cRoad,Community,or Subdivision and Lot No.) 2 OWNER (w&()\.\J'\',~VOuJE!?P.L0.\-'''':'".I ADORESS --------r;:;=~:':"i';=:_=_:;-::-,:------(Street or Aoute No,) County:\~\".,) Depth From Q W\P>.'.(\O,\\\;:Q ORILLING LOG eFOrmatlOn Description=rp'~O\L -----I. Zip CodaStateCityorTown 3.DATE DRILl.ED I '2 -It.:et'J.USE OF WELL _ 4.TOTAL DEPTH '2:7'CUTTiNGS COLLECTED 0 Yes 0 No 5.DOES WELL REPLACE eXISTING WELL?0 Yes Q:g NoI 6.STATIC WATER LEVEL:(Q FT.(J abo",TOP OF CASING. I I ca below TOP OF CASING IS FT.ABOVe !..AND SURFACE. 1.VIELD (gpm):b I \f~METHOD OF TEST _ .I 8.WATER ZONES (d~Plh):-----9-1------~------ If additional space Is needed use back of form. w~il I 6 LOCAnON SKETCH (Show direction and distance from at least two State Roads. or other map reference points) MElt."od Amount _.J,rt+JJ.r:r~l1;.l..!1oc;:._ Wall Thickness MaterialDepthIDiameterorW.I~tlFt. To ZZ Ft.Zlf ~f'\JC To Ft., To Fl .. Depth I tJ~3terial From _'.10<0:...-_To ''5 Ft.c..'etrP'..J\f/uwe _ From To'Ft.,_ From_O~_ From _ From _ 11.GROUT; 9.CHLORINATION:Type _ 10.CASING: 12.SCREEN: Depth Diamltter Slot Size Material From "J."'2...I To '27'Ft._Z,:.:<-J'_in.,QOJO In.S:,I-f 40 From To Fl.in.in._ MaterialSize From To Ft.in.in._ 13.GRAVEL PACK:*", Depth From To Ft._ From __-:--_To Ft.....,• 14.AE MA AKS;...::7"---1.'\\~~~;}L..l.l\Yu.~~~;U:'PsN:mq.bt......lf:;J'-\.J.o\.:.\JmllOrll.Lfj~-..::::1'o.Io!-.J,;,l!..O::llottt~·N'SL.U:.;u.E,,---.p~-lio.!:ii!¢l:1l!C·-J.li1Cb::-TI...1..U.lIce"~sc.~g.::.lt~o6O..!.:~_ r DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THiS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH IS NCAC 2C.WELL CONSTRUCTION STAN:)ARDS •.~ND THAT A COpy OF THIS RECORD HAS,8~EN PROVIDED TO THE WELt.OWNER. :",_,~:~.- ::.'.1.t:".h.':.,...1 SIO;·J"TURE OF CC~JT:::J.CTC'Fl OR ;GE'iT :..'..~ Start using drilling mud at begining of boring Trace organic wood was observed at 4.9 ft bgs 1-2-1 1-1-1 5-6-7 4-3-5 5-7-7 8-7-10 0.9 1.5 1.1 0.9 1.0 0.9 SILT (ML) (Ash); gray; wet; very loose SILT (ML) (Ash); gray; wet; very loose Top 0.5': SILTY SAND (SM) (Ash and Surficial Aquifer); gray; wet; medium dense Bottom 0.6': fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer); brown and gray; wet; medium dense Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer); gray and tan; wet; loose Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer); tan and brown; wet; loose Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer); gray and tan; wet; medium dense Fine to coarse grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer); gray and tan; wet; medium dense Grout Bentonite seal (Continued Next Page) Well Construction BORING LOG GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNICAL INFORMATION BORING DATE:3/11/2015 PROJECT NAME:L.V. Sutton Final Closure Plan PROJECT NO:GC5770 SITE LOCATION:Wilmington, North Carolina GEOSYNTEC REPRESENTATIVE:Mustafa Erten DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Mid-Atlantic Drilling DRILLER NAME:William Wiggins BOREHOLE DIA:4" RIG TYPE:CME 45C Track Rig (Serial # 273964) SAMPLING METHOD:SPT with Split Spoon DRILLING METHOD:Mud Rotary NORTHING:198428 (Hand-held GPS) EASTING:2306217 (Hand-held GPS) BOREHOLE ID:PT-2 (within the 1971 Basin) GROUND ELEVATION:33 ft (NAVD88) (Approximate) All depths referenced to ground surface. Total Depth: 40.3 ft bgs Page 1 of 2 Geosyntec Consultants 1300 South Mint Street #410 Charlotte, NC 28203 El e v . (f t , NA V D 8 8 ) 30 25 20 15 10 5 De p t h (f t ) -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 CommentsN-Value 10 20 30 400 50 SP T Bl o w s Re c o v e r y ( f t ) Pa t t e r n Lithologic Description gravel was observed at 38.5 ft bgs 10-15-18 6-6-7 1.1 0.8 Fine to coarse grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer); gray and tan; wet; dense Fine to coarse grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer); gray and tan; wet; medium dense End of Boring at 40.3 feet bgs. Filter Pack (Sand) Screen Well Construction BORING LOG GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNICAL INFORMATION BORING DATE:3/11/2015 PROJECT NAME:L.V. Sutton Final Closure Plan PROJECT NO:GC5770 SITE LOCATION:Wilmington, North Carolina GEOSYNTEC REPRESENTATIVE:Mustafa Erten DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Mid-Atlantic Drilling DRILLER NAME:William Wiggins BOREHOLE DIA:4" RIG TYPE:CME 45C Track Rig (Serial # 273964) SAMPLING METHOD:SPT with Split Spoon DRILLING METHOD:Mud Rotary NORTHING:198428 (Hand-held GPS) EASTING:2306217 (Hand-held GPS) BOREHOLE ID:PT-2 (within the 1971 Basin) GROUND ELEVATION:33 ft (NAVD88) (Approximate) All depths referenced to ground surface. Total Depth: 40.3 ft bgs Page 2 of 2 Geosyntec Consultants 1300 South Mint Street #410 Charlotte, NC 28203 El e v . (f t , NA V D 8 8 ) 0 -5 De p t h (f t ) -35 -40 CommentsN-Value 10 20 30 400 50 SP T Bl o w s Re c o v e r y ( f t ) Pa t t e r n Lithologic Description Started using drilling mud 2-1-2 2-1-1 4-6-6 3-3-5 7-8-8 10-9-9 1.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 SILT (ML) (Ash); some gravel; black; wet; very loose SILT (ML) (Ash); black to gray; wet; very loose Top 0.2': SILT (ML) (Ash); gray; wet; medium dense Bottom 0.8': fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer); black to tan; wet; medium dense Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer); tan; wet; loose Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer); tan; wet; medium dense Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer); tan; wet; medium dense Grout (Continued Next Page) Well Construction BORING LOG GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNICAL INFORMATION BORING DATE:3/9/2015 PROJECT NAME:L.V. Sutton Final Closure Plan PROJECT NO:GC5770 SITE LOCATION:Wilmington, North Carolina GEOSYNTEC REPRESENTATIVE:Michael Martin DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Mid-Atlantic Drilling DRILLER NAME:William Wiggins BOREHOLE DIA:6" RIG TYPE:CME 45C Track Rig (Serial # 273964) SAMPLING METHOD:SPT with Split Spoon DRILLING METHOD:Mud Rotary NORTHING:198435 (Hand-held GPS) EASTING:2306226 (Hand-held GPS) BOREHOLE ID:PT-3 (within the 1971 Basin) GROUND ELEVATION:33 ft (NAVD88) (Approximate) All depths referenced to ground surface. Total Depth: 70 ft bgs Page 1 of 3 Geosyntec Consultants 1300 South Mint Street #410 Charlotte, NC 28203 El e v . (f t , NA V D 8 8 ) 30 25 20 15 10 5 De p t h (f t ) -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 CommentsN-Value 10 20 30 400 50 SP T Bl o w s Re c o v e r y ( f t ) Pa t t e r n Lithologic Description Grout between 41' and 53' bgs may contain cave-in native soils (predominantly sand) 10-18-20 6-5-5 5-4-5 4-3-4 3-1-2 2-1-1 1-2-1 2-3-5 6-5-5 1.0 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.9 0.5 0.9 Fine to coarse grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer); gray tan; wet; dense Fine to coarse grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer); gray tan; wet; loose Fine to coarse grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer); tan orange; wet; loose Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Surficial Aquifer); tan gray; wet; loose Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Possible Surficial Aquifer); tan gray; wet; very loose Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Possible Surficial Aquifer); tan gray; wet; very loose Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Possible Surficial Aquifer); tan gray; wet; very loose Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Possible Surficial Aquifer); orange brown; wet; loose Fine to medium grained SAND (SP) (Possible Surficial Aquifer); orange; wet; loose Bentonite seal (Continued Next Page) Well Construction BORING LOG GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNICAL INFORMATION BORING DATE:3/9/2015 PROJECT NAME:L.V. Sutton Final Closure Plan PROJECT NO:GC5770 SITE LOCATION:Wilmington, North Carolina GEOSYNTEC REPRESENTATIVE:Michael Martin DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Mid-Atlantic Drilling DRILLER NAME:William Wiggins BOREHOLE DIA:6" RIG TYPE:CME 45C Track Rig (Serial # 273964) SAMPLING METHOD:SPT with Split Spoon DRILLING METHOD:Mud Rotary NORTHING:198435 (Hand-held GPS) EASTING:2306226 (Hand-held GPS) BOREHOLE ID:PT-3 (within the 1971 Basin) GROUND ELEVATION:33 ft (NAVD88) (Approximate) All depths referenced to ground surface. Total Depth: 70 ft bgs Page 2 of 3 Geosyntec Consultants 1300 South Mint Street #410 Charlotte, NC 28203 El e v . (f t , NA V D 8 8 ) 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 De p t h (f t ) -35 -40 -45 -50 -55 -60 CommentsN-Value 10 20 30 400 50 SP T Bl o w s Re c o v e r y ( f t ) Pa t t e r n Lithologic Description 7-9-10 4-6-7 0.8 1.0 Fine to coarse grained SAND (SP) (Possible Surficial Aquifer); orange gray; wet; medium dense SILTY SAND (SM) (Peedee Aquifer); gray; wet; medium dense End of Boring at 70.0 feet bgs. Filter Pack (Sand) Screen Well Construction BORING LOG GENERAL INFORMATION TECHNICAL INFORMATION BORING DATE:3/9/2015 PROJECT NAME:L.V. Sutton Final Closure Plan PROJECT NO:GC5770 SITE LOCATION:Wilmington, North Carolina GEOSYNTEC REPRESENTATIVE:Michael Martin DRILLING CONTRACTOR:Mid-Atlantic Drilling DRILLER NAME:William Wiggins BOREHOLE DIA:6" RIG TYPE:CME 45C Track Rig (Serial # 273964) SAMPLING METHOD:SPT with Split Spoon DRILLING METHOD:Mud Rotary NORTHING:198435 (Hand-held GPS) EASTING:2306226 (Hand-held GPS) BOREHOLE ID:PT-3 (within the 1971 Basin) GROUND ELEVATION:33 ft (NAVD88) (Approximate) All depths referenced to ground surface. Total Depth: 70 ft bgs Page 3 of 3 Geosyntec Consultants 1300 South Mint Street #410 Charlotte, NC 28203 El e v . (f t , NA V D 8 8 ) -30 -35 De p t h (f t ) -65 -70 CommentsN-Value 10 20 30 400 50 SP T Bl o w s Re c o v e r y ( f t ) Pa t t e r n Lithologic Description APPENDIX B Pumping and Recovery Phase Plots Pumping Starts Pumping Ends 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 3/18/15 12:00 3/19/15 0:00 3/19/15 12:00 3/20/15 0:00 3/20/15 12:00 3/21/15 0:00 3/21/15 12:00 3/22/15 0:00 De p t h t o W a t e r (F e e t B e l o w T o p o f C a s i n g ) Date and Time EW-1 Drawdown and Recovery Data Pressure Transducer Water Level Pumping Starts Pumping Ends 10.6 10.8 11 11.2 11.4 11.6 11.8 12 3/18/15 12:00 3/19/15 0:00 3/19/15 12:00 3/20/15 0:00 3/20/15 12:00 3/21/15 0:00 3/21/15 12:00 3/22/15 0:00 De p t h t o W a t e r (F e e t B e l o w T o p o f C a s i n g ) Date and Time PT-1 Drawdown and Recovery Data Pressure Transducer Water Level Manual Water Levels Pumping Starts Pumping Ends 12 12.2 12.4 12.6 12.8 13 13.2 3/18/15 12:00 3/19/15 0:00 3/19/15 12:00 3/20/15 0:00 3/20/15 12:00 3/21/15 0:00 3/21/15 12:00 3/22/15 0:00 De p t h t o W a t e r (F e e t B e l o w T o p o f C a s i n g ) Date and Time PT-2 Drawdown and Recovery Data Pressure Transducer Water Level Manual Water Level Pumping Starts Pumping Ends 10.4 10.6 10.8 11 11.2 11.4 3/18/15 12:00 3/19/15 0:00 3/19/15 12:00 3/20/15 0:00 3/20/15 12:00 3/21/15 0:00 3/21/15 12:00 3/22/15 0:00 De p t h t o W a t e r (F e e t B e l o w T o p o f C a s i n g ) Date and Time PT-3 Drawdown and Recovery Data Pressure Transducer Water Level Manual Water Level Pumping Starts Pumping Ends 10.8 10.9 11 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 11.5 3/18/15 12:00 3/19/15 0:00 3/19/15 12:00 3/20/15 0:00 3/20/15 12:00 3/21/15 0:00 3/21/15 12:00 3/22/15 0:00 De p t h t o W a t e r (F e e t B e l o w T o p o f C a s i n g ) Date and Time PT-4 Drawdown and Recovery Data Pressure Transducer Water Level Manual Water Level APPENDIX C Pumping Test Solver Files 0.01 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-1_Moench.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 08:13:39 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: EW-1 Test Date: 3/18/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.362 WELL DATA Pumping Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) EW-1 0 0 Observation Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) PT-1 0 -5.31 SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Moench T = 1.581E+4 ft2/day S = 9.755E-7 Sy = 0.001981 ß = 0.004757 Sw = 0.r(w) = 0.333 ft r(c) = 0.167 ft alpha = 1.0E+13 sec-1 0.01 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: C:\Users\mcallahan\Desktop\PT-1_Neuman.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 16:45:22 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: EW-1 Test Date: 3/18/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft WELL DATA Pumping Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) EW-1 0 0 Observation Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) PT-1 0 -5.31 SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Neuman T = 1.172E+4 ft2/day S = 0.0003849 Sy = 0.01971 ß = 0.005726 0.01 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 0.01 0.1 1. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: C:\Users\mcallahan\Desktop\PT-2_Moench.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 16:41:41 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: EW-1 Test Date: 3/18/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1062 WELL DATA Pumping Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) EW-1 0 0 Observation Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) PT-2 0 -11.56 SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Moench T = 1.685E+4 ft2/day S = 2.526E-6 Sy = 0.001364 ß = 0.006607 Sw = 0.r(w) = 0.333 ft r(c) = 0.04195 ft alpha = 1.0E+13 sec-1 0.01 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 0.01 0.1 1. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: C:\Users\mcallahan\Desktop\PT-2_Neuman.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 16:44:52 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: EW-1 Test Date: 3/18/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft WELL DATA Pumping Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) EW-1 0 0 Observation Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) PT-2 0 -11.56 SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Neuman T = 1.498E+4 ft2/day S = 0.000195 Sy = 0.003761 ß = 0.005899 0.01 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-3_Moench.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 08:17:21 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: EW-1 Test Date: 3/18/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 48.01 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 14.13 WELL DATA Pumping Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) EW-1 0 0 Observation Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) PT-3 3.97 0 SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Moench T = 1.057E+4 ft2/day S = 9.755E-7 Sy = 0.2712 ß = 0.09659 Sw = 0.r(w) = 0.333 ft r(c) = 0.167 ft alpha = 1.0E+13 sec-1 0.01 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: C:\Users\mcallahan\Desktop\PT-3_Neuman.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 16:44:22 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: EW-1 Test Date: 3/18/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 48.01 ft WELL DATA Pumping Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) EW-1 0 0 Observation Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) PT-3 3.97 0 SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Neuman T = 1.056E+4 ft2/day S = 0.002338 Sy = 0.3414 ß = 0.1034 0.01 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-4_Moench.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 08:19:26 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: EW-1 Test Date: 3/18/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 47.81 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 2.532 WELL DATA Pumping Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) EW-1 0 0 Observation Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) PT-4 9.66 0 SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Moench T = 1.081E+4 ft2/day S = 3.382E-6 Sy = 0.04415 ß = 0.1034 Sw = 0.r(w) = 0.333 ft r(c) = 0.167 ft alpha = 1.0E+13 sec-1 0.01 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: C:\Users\mcallahan\Desktop\PT-4_Neuman.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 16:43:54 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: EW-1 Test Date: 3/18/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 47.81 ft WELL DATA Pumping Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) EW-1 0 0 Observation Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) PT-4 9.66 0 SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Neuman T = 1.091E+4 ft2/day S = 0.0003545 Sy = 0.05504 ß = 0.1117 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 1.0E+5 1.0E+6 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-1_Moench_Recovery.aqt Date: 05/19/15 Time: 08:32:37 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: EW-1 Test Date: 3/18/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.0007609 WELL DATA Pumping Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) EW-1 0 0 Observation Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) PT-1 0 -5.31 SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Moench T = 2.178E+4 ft2/day S = 0.02734 Sy = 0.0004314 ß = 1.0E-5 Sw = 0.r(w) = 0.333 ft r(c) = 0.167 ft alpha = 1.0E+13 sec-1 0.1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 1.0E+5 1.0E+6 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-1_Neuman_Recovery.aqt Date: 05/19/15 Time: 08:35:09 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: EW-1 Test Date: 3/18/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft WELL DATA Pumping Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) EW-1 0 0 Observation Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) PT-1 0 -5.31 SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Neuman T = 2.396E+4 ft2/day S = 0.01975 Sy = 0.002104 ß = 1.246E-5 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 1.0E+5 1.0E+6 0.01 0.1 1. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-2_Moench_Recovery.aqt Date: 05/19/15 Time: 08:34:51 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: EW-1 Test Date: 3/18/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.8042 WELL DATA Pumping Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) EW-1 0 0 Observation Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) PT-2 0 -11.56 SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Moench T = 1.691E+4 ft2/day S = 0.004212 Sy = 0.009895 ß = 0.05002 Sw = 0.r(w) = 0.333 ft r(c) = 0.04195 ft alpha = 1.0E+13 sec-1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 1.0E+5 1.0E+6 0.01 0.1 1. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-2_Neuman_Recovery.aqt Date: 05/19/15 Time: 08:34:39 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: EW-1 Test Date: 3/18/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft WELL DATA Pumping Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) EW-1 0 0 Observation Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) PT-2 0 -11.56 SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Neuman T = 1.83E+4 ft2/day S = 0.005901 Sy = 0.02921 ß = 0.006396 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 1.0E+5 1.0E+6 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-3_Moench_Recovery.aqt Date: 05/19/15 Time: 08:34:23 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: EW-1 Test Date: 3/18/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 48.01 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 27.82 WELL DATA Pumping Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) EW-1 0 0 Observation Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) PT-3 3.97 0 SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Moench T = 1.461E+4 ft2/day S = 0.06431 Sy = 2.766 ß = 0.1902 Sw = 0.r(w) = 0.333 ft r(c) = 0.167 ft alpha = 1.0E+13 sec-1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 1.0E+5 1.0E+6 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-3_Neuman_Recovery.aqt Date: 05/19/15 Time: 08:34:02 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: EW-1 Test Date: 3/18/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 48.01 ft WELL DATA Pumping Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) EW-1 0 0 Observation Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) PT-3 3.97 0 SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Neuman T = 2.947E+4 ft2/day S = 0.0001201 Sy = 0.001 ß = 0.0001584 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 1.0E+5 1.0E+6 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-4_Moench_Recovery.aqt Date: 05/19/15 Time: 08:33:46 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: EW-1 Test Date: 3/18/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 47.81 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 1.314 WELL DATA Pumping Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) EW-1 0 0 Observation Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) PT-4 9.66 0 SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Moench T = 1.921E+4 ft2/day S = 0.006676 Sy = 0.1183 ß = 0.05365 Sw = 0.r(w) = 0.333 ft r(c) = 0.167 ft alpha = 1.0E+13 sec-1 1. 10. 100. 1000. 1.0E+4 1.0E+5 1.0E+6 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\APT\PT-4_Neuman_Recovery.aqt Date: 05/19/15 Time: 08:33:15 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: EW-1 Test Date: 3/18/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 47.81 ft WELL DATA Pumping Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) EW-1 0 0 Observation Wells Well Name X (ft)Y (ft) PT-4 9.66 0 SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Neuman T = 2.189E+4 ft2/day S = 5.282E-5 Sy = 0.001 ß = 0.0003159 APPENDIX D Slug Test Solver Files 0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\MW-1B_1_BR.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:12:48 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: MW-1B Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 61.75 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 5.751 ft Static Water Column Height: 17.75 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 17.75 ft Screen Length: 5. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.083 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 149.8 ft/day y0 = 6.163 ft 0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\MW-1B_1_H.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:15:33 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: MW-1B Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 61.75 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 5.751 ft Static Water Column Height: 17.75 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 17.75 ft Screen Length: 5. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.083 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 185.1 ft/day y0 = 6.162 ft 0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\MW-1B_2_BR.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:17:08 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: MW-1B Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 12.75 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 5.446 ft Static Water Column Height: 17.75 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 51.5 ft Screen Length: 5. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.083 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 188. ft/day y0 = 5.462 ft 0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\MW-1B_2_H.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:18:52 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: MW-1B Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 61.75 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 5.446 ft Static Water Column Height: 17.75 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 17.75 ft Screen Length: 5. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.083 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 177.9 ft/day y0 = 5.462 ft 0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\MW-1B_3_BR.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:20:41 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: MW-1B Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 61.75 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 5.287 ft Static Water Column Height: 17.75 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 17.75 ft Screen Length: 5. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.083 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 153.4 ft/day y0 = 5.447 ft 0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\MW-1B_3_H.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:22:30 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: MW-1B Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 61.75 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 5.287 ft Static Water Column Height: 17.75 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 17.75 ft Screen Length: 5. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.083 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 189.6 ft/day y0 = 5.446 ft 0. 40. 80. 120. 160. 200. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-1_1_BR.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:24:02 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-1 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 2.16 ft Static Water Column Height: 19.29 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 19.09 ft Screen Length: 15. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 104.3 ft/day y0 = 2.152 ft 0. 40. 80. 120. 160. 200. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-1_1_H.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:25:38 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-1 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 2.16 ft Static Water Column Height: 19.29 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 19.09 ft Screen Length: 15. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 142.8 ft/day y0 = 2.151 ft 0. 20. 40. 60. 80. 100. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-1_2_BR.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:27:24 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-1 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 3.85 ft Static Water Column Height: 19.29 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 19.09 ft Screen Length: 15. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 49.84 ft/day y0 = 3.486 ft 0. 20. 40. 60. 80. 100. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-1_2_H.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:28:42 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-1 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 3.85 ft Static Water Column Height: 19.29 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 19.09 ft Screen Length: 15. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 68.27 ft/day y0 = 3.486 ft 0. 40. 80. 120. 160. 200. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-1_3_BR.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:30:06 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-1 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 3.74 ft Static Water Column Height: 19.29 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 19.09 ft Screen Length: 15. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 62.73 ft/day y0 = 3.794 ft 0. 40. 80. 120. 160. 200. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-1_3_H.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:31:21 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-1 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 3.74 ft Static Water Column Height: 19.29 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 19.09 ft Screen Length: 15. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 85.93 ft/day y0 = 3.794 ft 0. 40. 80. 120. 160. 200. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-1_4_BR.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:33:07 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-1 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 2.93 ft Static Water Column Height: 19.29 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 19.09 ft Screen Length: 15. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 85.26 ft/day y0 = 2.93 ft 0. 40. 80. 120. 160. 200. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-1_4_H.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:34:09 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-1 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.32 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 2.93 ft Static Water Column Height: 19.29 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 19.09 ft Screen Length: 15. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 116.8 ft/day y0 = 2.929 ft 0. 6. 12. 18. 24. 30. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_1_BR.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:35:31 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-2 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 3.67 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 29.81 ft/day y0 = 3.587 ft 0. 6. 12. 18. 24. 30. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_1_H.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:36:50 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-2 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 3.67 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 40.96 ft/day y0 = 3.587 ft 0. 10. 20. 30. 40. 50. 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_2_BR.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:38:07 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-2 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 4.95 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 22.47 ft/day y0 = 5.337 ft 0. 10. 20. 30. 40. 50. 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_2_H.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:40:31 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-2 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 4.95 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 30.88 ft/day y0 = 5.337 ft 0. 8. 16. 24. 32. 40. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_3_BR.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:43:33 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-2 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 5.03 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 25.97 ft/day y0 = 5.158 ft 0. 8. 16. 24. 32. 40. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_3_H.aqt Date: 05/13/15 Time: 17:45:00 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-2 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 5.03 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 35.7 ft/day y0 = 5.158 ft 0. 6. 12. 18. 24. 30. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_4_BR.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:40:10 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-2 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 4.62 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 26.34 ft/day y0 = 4.667 ft 0. 6. 12. 18. 24. 30. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_4_H.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:41:36 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-2 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 4.62 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 36.2 ft/day y0 = 4.666 ft 0. 10. 20. 30. 40. 50. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_5_BR.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:42:54 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-2 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 5.6 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 23.88 ft/day y0 = 5.829 ft 0. 10. 20. 30. 40. 50. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-2_5_H.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:44:00 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-2 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.3 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 5.6 ft Static Water Column Height: 18.61 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 18.61 ft Screen Length: 15. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.167 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 32.82 ft/day y0 = 5.829 ft 0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-3_1_BR.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:45:16 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-3 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 5.84 ft Static Water Column Height: 48.01 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 48.01 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 55.44 ft/day y0 = 5.846 ft 0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-3_1_H.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:46:18 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-3 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 5.84 ft Static Water Column Height: 48.01 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 48.01 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 65.07 ft/day y0 = 5.846 ft 0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-3_2_BR.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:47:21 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-3 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 6.43 ft Static Water Column Height: 48.01 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 48.01 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 54.75 ft/day y0 = 6.855 ft 0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-3_2_H.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:48:18 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-3 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 6.43 ft Static Water Column Height: 48.01 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 48.01 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 64.26 ft/day y0 = 6.855 ft 0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-3_3_BR.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:49:15 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-3 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 4.83 ft Static Water Column Height: 48.01 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 48.01 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 66.84 ft/day y0 = 5.101 ft 0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20. 0.001 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-3_3_H.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:50:45 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-3 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.35 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 4.83 ft Static Water Column Height: 48.01 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 48.01 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 78.45 ft/day y0 = 5.101 ft 0. 1.4 2.8 4.2 5.6 7. 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-4_1_BR.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:52:13 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-4 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.36 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 6.34 ft Static Water Column Height: 47.81 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 47.81 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 66.36 ft/day y0 = 6.817 ft 0. 1.4 2.8 4.2 5.6 7. 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-4_1_H.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:53:08 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-4 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.36 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 6.34 ft Static Water Column Height: 47.81 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 47.81 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 77.92 ft/day y0 = 6.817 ft 0. 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6. 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-4_2_BR.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:54:03 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-4 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.36 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 6.04 ft Static Water Column Height: 47.81 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 47.81 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 74.94 ft/day y0 = 6.367 ft 0. 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6. 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-4_2_H.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:54:58 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-4 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.36 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 6.04 ft Static Water Column Height: 47.81 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 47.81 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 88. ft/day y0 = 6.367 ft 0. 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6. 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-4_3_BR.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:56:05 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-4 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.36 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 6.47 ft Static Water Column Height: 47.81 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 47.81 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 74.34 ft/day y0 = 6.849 ft 0. 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6. 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-4_3_H.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:57:00 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-4 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.36 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 6.47 ft Static Water Column Height: 47.81 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 47.81 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 87.3 ft/day y0 = 6.849 ft 0. 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6. 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-4_4_BR.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:58:00 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-4 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.36 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 5.83 ft Static Water Column Height: 47.81 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 47.81 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice K = 75.03 ft/day y0 = 6.609 ft 0. 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6. 0.01 0.1 1. 10. Time (sec) Di s p l a c e m e n t ( f t ) WELL TEST ANALYSIS Data Set: P:\Projects\GC5592 (Duke Sutton)\Slug and APT Analysis\PT-4_4_H.aqt Date: 05/14/15 Time: 07:58:53 PROJECT INFORMATION Company: Geosyntec Client: Duke Sutton Location: SC Test Well: PT-4 Test Date: 3/25/2015 AQUIFER DATA Saturated Thickness: 46.36 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1 WELL DATA (New Well) Initial Displacement: 5.83 ft Static Water Column Height: 47.81 ft Total Well Penetration Depth: 47.81 ft Screen Length: 10. ft Casing Radius: 0.083 ft Well Radius: 0.25 ft SOLUTION Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Hvorslev K = 88.09 ft/day y0 = 6.608 ft