20170003 Ver 1_401 Application_20161216

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Mr. David L. Shaeffer
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
151 Patton Avenue
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Mr. Alan Johnson
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
610 East Center Street, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115
Ms. Karen Higgins
NCDEQ
Division of Water Resources
Wetlands & Storm Water Branch
512 North Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
Mr. Byron Hamstead
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa St.
Asheville, NC 28801
December 21, 2016
PAID
Leonard S. Rindner. PLLC.
201 70003
oC�C�CQdC�n
U
[IF C302016
DEQ -WATER RE
401 & BUFFER
Subiect: Request for Pre -Construction Notification for NWP 29 and Approved
Jurisdictional Determination for the Valencia Phases IG, IH, and II , Huntersville.
Mecklenbu�Coun�, NC
Ms. Higgins and Messrs. Shaeffer, Johnson and Hamstead,
Enclosed is a request for Nationwide Permits 29 and a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
associated with the proposed residential site known as Valencia (Phase IG, IH, and II) in
Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, NC. As detailed in the attached Delineation Map, the site
consists of 1,833 linear feet of streams and 0.25 acres of wetlands. Proposed permanent impacts
associated with the project total approximately 111 linear feet of a seasonal tributary (RPW
NVB) and approximately 0.0 15 acres of onsite wetlands (Wetland NVE).
As a background, previous phases have been constructed and additional phases are currently
under construction. These areas were evaluated and delineated in 2012 and have an approved
jurisdictional determination under AID: 2012-01311. Currently there are three bottomless arch
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] [phone]
[e-mail] 1 [e-mail]

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
culverts that provide access to phases which were constructed without impacts/permits. Phases
IG, 1H, and 11 are the last phases to access upland portions of development in which only road
crossing impact is being requested. Storm water BMPs are being installed on phases that are
currently under construction as well as the phases associated with this application (see Overall
Erosion/Grading Plan that depicts the locations of these phases in relation to the others).
Also enclosed is a copy of our Threatened/Endangered Species Evaluation for the site in which
no listed species were identified within the project area. The site is wooded which may be
considered summer roosting habitat for the listed Northern Long Eared Bat. However, we have
consulted with the latest guidance associated with the Final 4(d) ruling and there are no known
hibernation and/or roosts sites within a 45 -mile radius of the project area. Based on this
information we believe that the project meets the exemption criteria for the 4(d) rule and formal
USFWS concurrence is not required.
We believe that the site plan has been designed to avoid and minimize impacts to aquatic
resources on the site while still providing needed access to develop the site as proposed. We
appreciate the opportunity to submit this information and please contact me if you have any
questions, [phone] or email at amanda.jones cr,wetlands-epi com.
Sincerely,
Amanda Jones Heath Caldwell
Regulatory Specialist Environmental Scientist
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.com Asheville Office:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB 550 Suite 10, PMB 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] [phone]
[e-mail] 2 [e-mail]

Permit Application

Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
NX Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
NX Yes N No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
N Yes NX No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Valencia Subdivision Phases 1 H, 1 G, 11
2b. County:
Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Huntersville
2d. Subdivision name:
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Multiple parcels owners - see attached map
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent Q Other, specify: Owner
4b. Name:
Robert Bowman
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
Bowman Development Group
4d. Street address:
13815 Cinnabar Place
4e. City, state, zip:
Huntersville, NC 28078
4f. Telephone no.:
704-875-9704 ext. 101
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
S. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Amanda Jones
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC - Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group
5c. Street address:
1070 Tunnel Road, Building 1, Suite 10, PMB 283
5d. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28805
5e. Telephone no.:
828-708-7059
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
Multiple parcels - see attached map
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.4037 Longitude: -80.8265
1 c. Property size:
67.5 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
South Prong Clarke Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
Class C
2c. River basin:
03040105 Rocky
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
A majority of the site is composed of forested areas. General land use in the vicinity consists of residential development.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.25
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 1,833
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Installation of a culvert and rip rap for site access/connectivity.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Excavation and grading of the site will use standard equipment - excavator, trackhoe, dump trucks, etc.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (includingall prior phases)in the past?
❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
El Preliminary E] Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known):
Agency/Consultant Company: WEPG
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Approved Jurisdictional Determination request attached as part of this application.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands Q Streams — tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Culvert
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.01
W2 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.005
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.015
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 P
Culvert
Stream NVB
INT
Corps
8
81
S2 P
Fill
Stream NVB
INT
Corps
8
30
S3 -
Choose one
-
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
-
S5 -
Choose one
S6 -
Choose one
-
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
111
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivii ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d. 5e.
Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
61 -
Yes/No
B2 -
Yes/No
B3 -
Yes/No
B4 -
Yes/No
B5 -
Yes/No
B6 -
Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The site plan was designed to avoid onsite surface water features to the maximum extent practicable while still incorporating necessary site
development and viable access. Impacts to site surface waters associated with the proposed development were limited through site location, plan
design and location/orientation of lots, access routes and existing/proposed utilities. Of the 0.25 wetland acres and 1833LF of streams onsite, only
0.015 wetland acres and 111 LF of stream will be impacted as part of this project.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Construction techniques will implement approved erosion control methods to avoid/minimize impacts to onsite/adjacent offsite receiving conveyances.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
11 Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
❑ Yes OX No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ❑X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
31.08%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑x Yes ❑ No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Stormwater on the site will be handled/treated by eleven BMPs as shown on the attached exhibits. The stormwater plan has not been approved yet
since Mecklenburg County requires a copy of the 401 certification before they will approve the stormwater plan. However, the plan as proposed meets
their current guidelines and is expected to be approved once the 404/401 permits are received.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Mecklenburg County
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
Mecklenburg County
❑X Phase II
❑ NSW
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
ElCoastal counties
❑HQW
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
S. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
El Yes
❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
El Yes
❑X No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
E] Yes
No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
No future phases anticipated.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Wastewater on the site will be carried to nearest WWTP for treatment via proposed and existing utility line infrastructure.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
-
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A threatened/endangered species assessment was conducted in which no species were identified. Habitat does exist for the Northern Long Eared Bat
but is exempt as noted in cover letter. Report is included.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
No essential fish habitat in this region.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
SHPO's website: http://gis.nedcr.gov/hpoweb/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑X Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
No grading or fill will occur within the designated floodplain as part of this project.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
http://polaris3g.mecklenburgcountync.gov/
Heath Digitally signed by Heath Caldwell
DN: cn=Heath Caldwell, o=WEPG,
Heath Caldwell
ou, email=heath.caldwell@wetlands-
Caldwell elag.com,c=us
12-21-2016
Date: 2016.12.14 09:52:38 -0600'
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Kintner, PLIC,
Aunt Authorization Letter
The purpose of this forin is to authorize our firm to act on your behalf in matters related to aquatic
resource (i.e. stream/wetlands) identification/mapping and regulatory permitting. The
undersigned, who are either registered property owners or legally authorized to conduct due
diligence activities on the property as identified below, do hereby authorize associates of
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC, Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group (WEPG) to act on my
behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance, and acceptance of applicable
permit(s) and/or certification(s).
Project/Site Name: Valencia Subdivision
Property Address: 9723 Andres Dttany Drive, Huntensville, NC 28078
Parcel Identification Number (PN: 01927101A, 019271018, 01920315, 01920314, 01927113, 01927517, 01937105 and
01939105
Select one: I anii the current property owner
Name: Robert Bowman
Company: Bowman Development Group
Mailing Address: 13815 Cinnabar Place, Huntersville, NC 28078
Telephone Number: 704-875-9704 ext. 101
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Owner / Interested Buyer* /
A-1101114
Date
* The Interested Biown'Other acknowledges that an agreement and/or formal contract to purchase and/or conduct
due diligence activities exists between the current property owner and the signatory of this authorization in cases
where the property Is not owned by the signatory.
Charlotte Office: www.wetlands-epg.coni Asheville O►flce:
10612-D Providence Rd. 1070 Tunnel Rd., Bldg. I
PMB SSO Suite 10, PM8 283
Charlotte, NC 28277 Asheville, NC 28805
[phone] [phone]
len.rindnerC&wetlands•epg.com 2 amanda.lones ?Pwedands-epg.com

no
Maps/Plans

Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
[e-mail]
[phone]
www.wetiands-epg.com

SOUTHPRONG
CLARKE CREEK
s
1
} a
Legend
QProsed Boundary
t
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
.e
FIGURE NO.
3
m
7
J
LOCATION
Lat: 35.4037 °N
Long: -80.8265 2W
HUC:03040105,,
ROCKY
USGS QUAD
Corneilus, NC
13'Na1
VALENCIA SITE I Drawn By
Mecklenburg Co., NC HAC
J s<
Reviewed By:
LSR
DATE:
USGS MAP — WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY 10/25/16
SUBJECT TO USACE VERIFICATION

E n B ...-�.. I
r
EnD
VII k D,
EnB
w•
MQ 'Sor,tf�_
iB
nD i
IrB , / Wk6
W
E t.
W'
EnD
WkD _WkD ` !
ME
WK'WWkE
►'7AN4l�
Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
len. rindner@wetlands-epg. coni
[phone]
www.wetlands-epg.com

m
CE
FIGURE NO. VALENCIA SITE Drawn By: Reviewed By:
5 �AIEDf`
Mecklenburg Co., INC HAC LSR
DATE:
PUBLISHED SOIL MAP — WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY 10/25/16
SUBJECT TO USACE VERIFICATION

1 1
1�
F111 NNU-SE
r; 1
VALENCIA SITE
FIGURE NO.
7 A /C Dr" Mecklenburg Co., NC
Drawn By: Reviewed By:
HAC LSR
DATE:
AERIAL MAP — WATERS OF THE U.S.
EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY 10/25/16
SUBJECT TO USACE VERIFICATION

E : F Flow Path: Jurisdictional features on the site flow
N ?" into an unnamed tributary to South Prong Clarke
,
Creek, to South Prong Clarke Creek, to Clarke Creek
y hen to Rocky River (TNW).
I
AL
T
y:
A..
i
t4, •
. P
_
Legend ,:. • .. _. •�- F �_ �,
.,• a`
4k
42-
Flow Path _ �` �' s•;.,.Y
C
c
_ Project Boundary `` -.� .. 3�'-� • '' �
.} 0 0.375 0.75 1.5
Miles
_
FIGURE NO. VALENCIA SITE Drawn By: Reviewed By:
8 Wetlands and Environmental Planning Group Mecklenburg Co., NC HAC LSR
Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC.
Navigation Pathway Map DATE:
\• 10/24/2016
,,.4, *Approximate boundary /

phases constructed orrrently under constructionurisdictional
Cious
Determinationproved
by USACE in 2012
II
i
i.
f
}`1
y
s phases constructed or
�.
ntly under construction
sdicdonal Determination
rapproved
by USACE in 2012
I
APPROXIMATE STUDY
AREA LIMITS FOR 2016
JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION UPDATES
a04) 9Z2277
r 1Lji
VALENCIA SITE
Mecklenburg County, NC
1 I'
I
(2016 Parcels for USACE JD)
APPROXIMATE MAP
EXISTING CONDITIONS
su�ccr ro usncc/rvcownEv A�rlcnr or.

Sheet Index:
0.0 - Sheet Index
0.1 -Vicinity Map
1.0 - Existing Conditions (500 scale)
2.0 - Overall Site Layout (500 scale)
2.1 - Site Plan (200 scale)
2.2 - Site Plan (200 scale)
3.0 - Phase 1 H Proposed Pipe Culvert Enlargement
4.0 - Phase 1 H Proposed Pipe Culvert Cross Sections
NOT
,t.�..M
17-13-M
DAM
n-3D-2ma
@- t r
SHEET
INDEX
0.0

D
r
m
1
ti
r
peo�tte21 Sherri
IS uotn4� S
1-Irme �
r c r g VAI .F NCIA SU6DIVIS!Oly r 9 1 t fa
n ! T ri O IAS[.5 1 G,1 H. 11 f W i
t1(INir KSVII I.P.rXN T!tlAl0IlY1
.oPmrrt c -'v n 1
• a "LI' 1'1315 CrVu494 �. y 0;uNCO)
r 4
•t' 1!, �p+,. n :A%;XINA lCJ>b 1 /TZTZ� i

— f
- � _~��` _ IXISTING BOTTONIESS
R, - CULVERT (A) WATERS OF THEUS
. 'y \�` "1. -•_ 1 - SEASONAL RPWNVF
_-
EXISTING BOTTOMLESS
CULVERT(C) "-� ����;y/' -` �y�•- _ _ WATERSOFTHEUS �!��yL�
PERENNIALRRN ��i�i2'=r
='C•.� -� \ SOUTH PRONG CIARKE CREEK
WATERSOFTHEUS �• `� -`.ti •..\_• �\ ._ _ _ ����
SEASONAL RPWNVF •, - - fir„, a�
WATERS OF THE US
PERENNIAL RPWNS
NOT FOR
aS CONSTRUCTION
EXISTING SEWER LINE
WATER OF THEUS
i 14r
SEASONAL RPWNC i - '-� '` ,r _ti _ , - - �� f — �. ..� - - / n. yr✓ F._+�
WATER OF THE US
WETLANDNG
v
J.
WATERS OF THE US L` , i;a rf• L v _ _ "- - •-� -
SEASONALRPNNF-
-
- - is y L , � Y ,,.� � �3' 't... • � �' - _ � $ r _ lA
WATER OF THE
US
WETLANDNT
t >
b,
j Y' I
. ' L
r
i
V
EXISTING SEINER LINE _ � i , . ,, • • , s I i �'Y i I 1r S •,J) �r - _ -
-Tr
EXISTING BOTTOMLESS t'• - ,4 ' j ��..' 1 .. EXISTING SEMER
LINE
CULVERT (Bl '�"`,� - 1 �•.y' ..j' 'I�1, • ---_ _ _ \ 'l �. Ily 1 — y-
✓..". ("'I .. / r �..' , -' WATERSOFTHEUS
EXISTING SEWER LINE - _ - _ r. - ; r (• r F _ WETLAND NVE
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
I k
SEE SHEET 30
WATERSOFTHEUS$ ♦ "qr,
OPENWATER POND 1
EXISTING
CULVERT RPE WATERS OF THE US
SEASONAL RPWNVB
,
+,. •.;5.^>+.r + I - SEE SHEET 30
WATERS OF THE VS
WETLAND NB •�K y )y r' - WATERS OF THEUS SCALE. r 500'
z 1 'r SEASONAL RPWNVA
i
- WATERSOFTHEUS
PROJECT �It
I3_NUN
WATERSOFTHEUS i pyl _ — — 41�-- - - WETLAND NVC DATE -.SEASONAL RPWNA 1� 2plr
LEGEND:
p — o
volms
up tw ..�
Vern" IIIIImil
OIL
GRAPHIC SCALE EXISTING
ONDITIONS
)
500 0 250 500 1000
,;j 1.0

WATERS OF THE US
SEASONAL RPWNF
NO IMPACT
WATER OF THE USrri 'ai .1; ®��ti�'�J:
Lip
NO IMPACT
�!'•:11�e�F;�. �I;!�(�.�'�,� ��n�l .,:y� / 1 f '�I tT_ WETLANDNT
Li�
%: '1M�°r :+/'QIP _ —`•``r '�'
ALI am 1111 pa lkj ;N.
r W,
�� t•4 W,
SEASONAL RPW
PERMA ENT MI
��► err VittVIM' 11 LFo SEE SHEET 30
YOETLANDN8-
NOIMPACT
ENLARGEMENT
WATERS Of THEUS
HpF rs�+a.�z1(.�{ -
r PROPOSED MAP
SHEET C-21
- "�4�
14'
LEGEND:
NN 'fit`-�`_-.
. t • -_�' _—
�,1t.\ _
—.� ��_�' 7 '\
DOW 9104
3}�y�Mr I
PROPOSED BMP
ra.rs= o,.►
GRAPHIC SCALE
-
— - 500 0 250 500
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
di J,
K-
WATERS OF THE US
SEASONAL RPWNF
NO IMPACT
WATER OF THE USrri 'ai .1; ®��ti�'�J:
Lip
NO IMPACT
�!'•:11�e�F;�. �I;!�(�.�'�,� ��n�l .,:y� / 1 f '�I tT_ WETLANDNT
Li�
%: '1M�°r :+/'QIP _ —`•``r '�'
ALI am 1111 pa lkj ;N.
r W,
�� t•4 W,
SEASONAL RPW
PERMA ENT MI
��► err VittVIM' 11 LFo SEE SHEET 30
YOETLANDN8-
NOIMPACT
WATERS Of THEUS
HpF rs�+a.�z1(.�{ -
r PROPOSED MAP
SEASONAL RPNNA
NO IMPACT
- "�4�
14'
LEGEND:
DOW 9104
GRAPHIC SCALE
-
— - 500 0 250 500
SCALE: 1' - 500'
PROJECT NUMBEF,
17-13-003
DATE--
11-30-2016
ATE11-3D-2016
o.. y .0
OVERALL
SITE
1000 PLAN
2.0

WATERS OF THE US
SEASONAL RPW NVF
NO IMPACT
i y��isO
NOT FOR
\ 7 y'•
CONSTRUCTION
,• / 1..1/,I, �' i .r -iY �` _ wit/a�I•-ml
It
PROPOSED BMP
t WATERS OF THEUS
WETLAND NVE
r1 11r{ __ PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
PERMANENT IMPACT 7 c
559 SF Q v
� - ��� '��,^. .` 1 _r ,f�j ` •. SEE SHEET 30 V1 _ � � z
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT = S u
PERMANENT IMPACT C -_`o
SEE SHEET 30 O L -
WATERS OF THE US
_ I1II1 1= SEASONAL RPW NVB Q L2
.1 ti xyMt" Illiill{ - s I, PERMANENT IMPACT
111 LF
_ __ _ ` . ,I • — SEE SHEET 30 1 =
6 _j�; d
- ►I
t4cw of
show
08: at
_ \ ,
NMTERS OF THEUS
SEASONAL RPW NVA
NO IMPACT SCALE.- I' 200•
PROJECT NULIBM
17-13-055
DATE
11-30-2016
LEGEND. 0-0, r
Off. sk ttar
amt talloarc
oslw¢woa-v-�r
- — -»r— —
vows aoa
SITE
GRAPHIC SCALE PLAN
200 0 100 200 400 200 SCALE
2.1

T N VALENCIA5U6
N DIVISION
t rry co) y'� o �^ ASES IG, 1, II "
g PHHo ■P F
is D ' �I � : T �H PUNT LP.SYILIL.NJRT A:JUl4 ;o _I r
N y z m i Y o = C �l
pp a'_WNAn C_ LOPA!NT G•:wJ1 l�0 y
mIaa IS GWNGa4o FLA:!
nuNr�s civ, Nunn uo� INa 2e��b O
c'+o+> 675 91w2

f
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTMIN
PERMANENT IMPACT
CULVERT: 449 SF 10010 ACRES
RIP RAP. 210 SF 10001! ACRES
✓ 1
PERMANENT BARACT Z
SEE
SHEET 40
/ m
Q0..1y�yx
PERMANENT IMPACT Lj L H '
-- '• J CULVERT: 81 LF 10 ONSACRES -i
RIP RAP: 30 LF 10003SACRES Q x =
SCALL 1' - 20'
PRO,ECT N1R6ER
17-137067
- DANE
LEGEND: 11-30-2016
♦ v �l ` "own aua
Down 41=
s A w WA
IM rner MFA
PHASE IH
`I PROPOSED
\ GRAPHIC SCALE PIPE
CULVERT
2� 0 10 20 40 ENLARGEMENT

EXISTING GRADE
730-
120
30-720
710
700
690-
0+00
90=0+00
60" RCP, CLASS III
INLET INV. ELEV.: 699.00
OUTLET INV. ELEV.: 696.00
LENGTH = 61.0'
SLOPE = 3.7%
0+75 1+00 1+00 1+25 1+50
UPSTREAM HEADWALL AT SEASONAL RPW NVA
PIPE TO BE BURIED
1-F7 MINIMUM INTO
EXISTING CREEK BED
VERTICAL GRAPHIC SCALE
1 INCH = 2 FEET
60" RCP. CLASS 111 2 0 1 2 4
INLET INV. ELEV.: 699.00
EXISTING GRADEOUTLET INV. ELEV.: 696.00
LENGTH = 81.0
FSLOPE = 3.7%
cca�rA� �!n�s
ra�L'ii"almt
r+.
NOT FPR
CONSTRUCTION
SCALE: I' . 20J
PROJECT NUMBER:
17-13-06.5
DATE:
11-30-2016
a
OF r
0+25 0+50 0+75 1+00 1+00 1+25 1+50 • PHASE I H
PROPOSED PIPE
DOWNSTREAM HEADWALL AT SEASONAL RPW NVA CROSS
PIPE TO BE BURIED SECTIONS
1 -FT MINIMUM INTO •,,
EXISTING CREEK BED
j 4.0

C
O
;4-0
c�
.E
v
4
w
LA
.Jurisdictional
Determination Information

Jurisdictional Determination Request
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
to the appropriate Corps Field Office (or project manager, if known) via mail, electronic mail, or
facsimile. A current list of county assignments by Field Office and project manager can be
found on-line at: httl2://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latoryPermitPro r�px , by
telephoning: 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below:
ASHEVILLE REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]

Jurisdictional Determination Request
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E and F.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part G.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that all JD
requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to proceed with the
determination, which may include inspection of the property when necessary. This form must be
signed by the current property owner to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for JD
requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) projects will be
conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: Corps approved and preliminary JDs identify
the limits of CWA (and RHA, if applicable) jurisdiction for the particular site identified in your
request. The JD may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should request a certified wetland determination from the local office of
the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
7 Property Information Valencia Subdivision Phases 1 H, IG, I I
Address: 9723 Andres Duany Drive, Huntersville, NC 28078
County: Mecklenburg
Heading north from Charlotte on 1-77 take exit 19A for NC -115. Travel 2.9 miles on NC -115 and turn right onto South Main Street. Travel
Directions: 0.1 miles and turn right onto Dellwood Drive. Travel 0.5 miles and turn right onto Serenity Street. Take 2nd exit on round -a -bout and travel
0.4 miles onto Banter Lane. The site will be on your right.
Parcel Index Number (PIN): 01927101A, 019271016, 01920315, 01927314, 01927113, 01927517,
01937105 and 01939105
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Leonard S. Rindner, PLLC,
Wetlands & Environmental Planning Group (WEPG)
Mailing Address: 10612-D Providence Road, PMB 550, Charlotte NC 28277
Telephone Number: 704-904-2277
Electronic Mail Address: len.rindner(2wetland s-epg com
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
❑✓ Name: Robert Bowman, Bowman Development Group
Mailing Address: 13815 Cinnabar Place, Huntersville, NC 28078
Telephone Number: 704-875-9704 ext. 101
Electronic Mail Address 3:[e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant4
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
1 If available
Z Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3 If available
4 Must attach completed Agent Authorization Form
3

jurisdictional Determination Request
E. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION TYPE
Select One:
F1I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
I am requesting that the Corps investigate the property/project area for the presence or
absence of WoUS6 and provide an approved JD for the property identified herein. This
request does NOT include a request for a verified delineation. (proceed to F and G
below).
❑ I am requesting that the Corps delineate the boundaries of all WoUS on a property/project
area and provide an approved JD (this may or may not include a survey plat).
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps evaluate and approve a delineation of WoUS (conducted
by others) on a property/project area and provide an approved JD (may or may not
include a survey plat).
F. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area (attached). This Map must clearly depict the boundaries
of the area of evaluation.
7 Size of Property or Project: 66.75 acres
FI verify that the property (or project) boundaries have recently been surveyed and marked
by a licensed land surveyor OR are otherwise clearly marked or distinguishable.
G. JD REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS OR AGENCIES
(1) Preliminary JD Requests:
F-1Completedand signed Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form.
❑ Project Coordinates: Latitude Longitude 35.4037 N/-80.8265 W
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
❑ Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
6 Waters of the United States
See Appendix A of this Form. From Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 08-02, dated June 26, 2008

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Aerial Photography of the project area
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Delineation Information (when applicable):
Wetlands:
Wetland Data Sheets
Upland Data Sheets
Landscape Photos, if taken
Tributaries:
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
USACE Assessment Forms
Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
Locations of photo stations
Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
(2) Approved JDs including Verification of a Delineation:
7 Project Coordinates: 35.4037 N/-80.8265 W
Maps (no larger than 11x17) with Project Boundary Overlay:
Large and small scale maps that depict, at minimum: streets, intersections, towns
Aerial Photography of the project area
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
A Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps)
Delineation Information (when applicable):
tlands:
Wetland Data Sheets
Upland Data Sheets
Tributaries:
USACE Assessment Forms
Other Assessment Forms
(when appropriate)
8 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
9 Delineation information must include, at minimum, one wetland data sheet for each wetland/community type.
0

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Landscape Photos, if taken
Field Sketch overlain on legible Map that includes:
All aquatic resources (for sites with multiple resources, label and identify)
Locations of wetland data points and/or tributary assessment reaches
Locations of photo stations
Approximate acreage/linear footage of aquatic resources
Supporting Jurisdictional Information (for Approved JDs only)
Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form(s) (also known as "Rapanos
Form(s)")
❑ Map(s) depicting the potential (or lack of potential) hydrologic connection(s),
adjacency, etc. to navigable waters.
I. REQUESTS FOR CORPS APPROVAL OF SURVEY PLAT
Prior to final production of a Plat, the Wilmington District recommends that the Land
Surveyor electronically submit a draft of a Survey Plat to the Corps project manager for
review.
Due to storage limitations of our administrative records, the Corps requires that all hard-
copy submittals include at least one original Plat (to scale) that is no larger than 11"x17"
(the use of match lines for larger tracts acceptable). Additional copies of a plat, including
those larger than 1 I"x17', may also be submitted for Corps signature as needed. The
Corps also accepts electronic submittals of plats, such as those transmitted as a Portable
Document Format (PDF) file. Upon verification, the Corps can electronically sign these
plats and return them via e-mail to the requestor.
Plats submitted for approval must:
be sealed and signed by a licensed professional land surveyor
❑ be to scale (all maps must include both a graphic scale and a verbal scale)
❑ be legible
❑ include a North Arrow, Scale(s), Title, Property Information
❑ include a legible WoUS Delineation Table of distances and bearings/metes and
bounds/GPS coordinates of all surveyed delineation points
clearly depict surveyed property or project boundaries
7

Jurisdictional Determination Request
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
0 PIN#:01920315
Name: C&D Management Company LLC
Mailing Address: 19141 West Catawba Avenue, Cornelius, NC 28031
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Addresss:
0 Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of
conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of
the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
Michael Griffin, Member/Manager December 20, 2016
Property Owner Date
(please print)
Property Owner Signature
5 If available

Jurisdictional Determination Request
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
© PIN#: 01937105 and 01937105
Name: Bowman Development Group Inc.
Mailing Address: 13815 Cinnabar Place, Huntersville, NC 28078
Telephone Number: 704-875-9704
Electronic Mail Address5: bowman3l @gmail.com
FAProof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION4
I, the undersigned, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of
conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of
the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
46A
Property bwner Date
(please print)
Property towner Signature
ri
S If available
4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
91 PIN#: 01927101 A, 01927101 B and 01920314
Name: Southside Neighborhood LLC.
Mailing Address: 13815 Cinnabar Place, Huntersville, NC 28078
Telephone Number: 704-875-9704
Electronic Mail Address3:[e-mail]
Proof of Ownership Attached (e.g. a copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record data)
D. PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION''
I, the undersigned, do authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of
conducting on-site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of
the U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
eir
Property Owner Date
(please print)
Signature
5 If available
4

\
•
/
Waters
of the US Perennial RPW
/
`
South Prong Clarke Creek
Approximate Acreage
Waters of the US
//
Waters of the US
-
Perennial RPW NS
// --
i •
an —
Seasonal RPW NC
-
Total Site Acres: 66.75
Waters of the US Acres: 1.779
(- 430 If, 0.059 ac)
(- 180 It, 0.021 ac)
Total Upland Acres: 64.971
_
Waters of the US
�
�
--
Wetland NG
Upland Data
(- 0.08 ac)
For,„ (DP4) Waters of the US
-
Seasonal RPW NVF
Wetland Dan (- 5001f, 0.46 ac)
/
Waters of the US
Form (DP3)
�- —
Wetland NT
(- 0.03 ac)
Waters of the US l
US
Seasonal RPW NF i -_•
Wetland NVE
"/`�'
0.09 ac)
�
Existing pipe
/••'-j
i r -
-
Waters of the US.'
/-��
Waters of the US
Seasonal RPW NVB"
'
penwater Pond 1
(- 1501f, 0-014 ac)
(- 1.34 acres)
Prepared For
-
- -
Waters of the US
Waters of the US
- (
-�` •••••""•
Seasonal RPW NVA
Wetland NVC
Bowman Development
(
Existing culvert
(- 85 If, 0.006 ac)
(-0,025)
Group
'
13815 Cinnabar Place
Waters of the US
••..............
Huntersville, NC 28078
[phone]
Wetland NB
(- 0.025 acres)
)
Waters of the US
/
Seasonal RPW NA-�'"`�
PROJECT BOUNDARY
(- 258 If, 0.018 acres)
'•
STUDY LIMITS
_
'/�
66.75 acres)
'
st
- `�
.•�
/
Leorwd S. R— PLLC
-
;704) 904-2277
LEGEND
VALENCIA PHASE 1G,
•
..... Non-jurisdictional gullylswale
1H, AND 11
110 Waters of the US streamlRPW
LOCATION
Mecklenburg
® Waters of the US Wetland
Lat: 35.40459 °N
County, NC
Y
Photograph number and
direction
jf
t■ • Long: - 80.82715 2W
HUC: 03040105
APPROXIMATE MAP
Waters of the United States
- Previous phasesor
!i
Rocky
.oasrum.uxrosrs or lr
currently under construction
.,,..,,. ,,,,
I
me�corousnccmcorovramrnnox
m
(Approved by USACE in 2012)
--
f1/1LI6

FIGURE NO.
Wetlands
December 14, 2016
This nap =s for yeneral reference only Ttte USF asp a ,l 1 I IJ61r
Service rs not resp—sale for the accwacy n wrrenmess of tie
tease data shave o "s map All—,llarsds muted data shwio
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Other hii, used � amo Cance —th "my", etada,a round nn the
wedands r,+aperw wet. sue
Estuarine and Marine Wetland ® Freshwater Fond Riverine
® Freshwater Emergent Wetland . Lake
VALENCIA PHASE 1G, 1H, AND 11
Mecklenburg County, NC
USFWS NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY MAP
Subject to USACE verification
IMS 9a7a try
Drawn By: Reviewed By: Date:
P1K LSR 12/13/16
Prepared for.
Acres:
Bowman Development Group -66.75
13815 Cinnabar Place /
Huntersville, NC 28078

PHOTO 3: Waters of the US Seasonal RPW NA at origin (view upslope).
Valencia Phase 1G, 1H, and 11: Mecklenburg County, NC
Representative Landscape Photos; Taken 07/20/16, 09/16/16, 10/21/16, 10/25/16
Wetlands and Ermronmenal Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner. PLLC.

*'A A40 s.t
dry. x.
j
As tr
7Zv, •*.
s � keel � V •f

x V, rte ,.Al - �% YYYYii
ry'
Is
I le
Afv �
'r-
0

V�
Mir
LRR � •
AIA
•, ': '^ � may. '� •` ,; i'^'� 4r'
Ar
tow
.'rl,� t -• � "fit � - q � `�' � � c

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Valencia Phase 1 G, 1 H, and 11 City/County: Mecklenburg County Sampling Date: 10/25/16
Applicant/Owner: Bowman Development Group State: NC Sampling Point: DP4:UPLD
Investigator(s): WEPG Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): valley Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0 - 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 35.4058 N Long: 80.8273 W Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: ME: Wilkes loam, 15 - 25% slopes NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N , Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks: Upland data form paired to Wetland NG.
Abnormally dry to drought conditions
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired:
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (B14)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
—Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
X Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP4:UPL NG
6.
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
12.5 20% of total cover:
1. Liriodendron tulipifera
15
Y
FACU
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5
Total Number of Dominant
(A)
2. Liquidambar stvraciflua 10 Y FAC
1. Ulmus alata
3. Acer rubrum
10
Y
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 11
(B)
3.
4.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Percent of Dominant ecies
4.
4.
-
5•
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
That Are OBL, FACW or or 45%
(AIB)
6.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
25
= Total Cover
35
=Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
5
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum Plot size: 30'
( )
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
509'0 of total cover:
17.5 209'0 of total cover:
7
OBL species x 1 =
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Saplina Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
3. Phytolacca americana 10 Y FACU
4
FACW species x 2 =
1. Ulmus alata
15
Y
FACU
FAC species x 3 =
2.Acer rubrum
10
Y
FAC
FACU species x 4 =
3. Liquidambar stvraciflua
5
Y
FAC
UPL species x 5 =
4'
Column Totals: (A)
(B)
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
30
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
12.5 20% of total cover:
5
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1. Ulmus alata
15
Y
FACU
- 3 - Prevalence Index is _<3.0'
- 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
2. 10 Y FACU
3.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
4.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
6•
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
25
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover:
12.5 20% of total cover:
5
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum Plot size: 30'
( )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Microstegium vimineum
30
Y
FAC
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
2. Verbesina occidentalis 10 Y FACU
3. Phytolacca americana 10 Y FACU
4
5. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
8 herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9. ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11 Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 25 20% of total cover: 10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
1.
2.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:DP4: upid NG
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % _Tym' Loc Texture Remarks
0-20 7.5YR 4/4 inn Sandy Clav Loam
RM=Reduced
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses IF 12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Valencia Phase 1G, 1H, and 11 City/County: Mecklenburg County Sampling Date: 10/25/16
Applicant/Owner: Bowman Development Group State: NC Sampling Point: DP3:Wtld NG
Investigator(s): WEPG Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): valley Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 0 — 2%
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 35.4058 N Long: 80.8275 W Datum: WGS84
Soil Map Unit Name: WkE: Wilkes loam, 15 — 25% slopes NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N , Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks: Wetland data form for Wetland NG. Also representative of Wetlands NT, NB, NVC, and NVE.
Abnormally dry to drought conditions
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
X Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
X High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
X Drainage Patterns (610)
X Saturation 03)
X Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
X Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
X FAC -Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0 - 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0-6
Saturation Present? Yes X No
Depth (inches): 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP3:Wtld NG
5.
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
% Cover Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Fraxinus pennsYlvanica
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
20
Y
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 11 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
2. Liquidambar stvraciflua 10 Y FAC
3. Acer rubrum
10
Y
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 11 (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
4. Salix nigra 5 N OBL
5•
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 100% (A/B)
6.
45
= Total Cover
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
22.5 20% of total cover:
9
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
FACW species x 2 =
1•Alnus serrulata
10
Y
OBL
FAC species x 3 =
2. Acer rubrum
10
Y
FAC
species x 4 =
3. Liquidambar stvraciflua
5
Y
FAC
UPL s
PL species x 5 =
4'
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
25
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
12.5 20% of total cover:
5
- 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
30' }
x 2 - Dominance Test Is >50%
1. Alnus serrulata
25
Y
OBL
- 3 - Prevalence Index Is:53.01
- 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
2. Liquidambar stvraciflua 10 Y FAC
3.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
6•
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
35
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover:
17.5 20% of total cover:
7
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
30' )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Microstegium vimineum
50
Y
FAC
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
2. LVcopus viminicus 20 Y OBL
3. Boehmeria cylindrica 15 N FACW
4
5.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
6
7.
$
9•
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30' }
1. Toxicodendron radicans
85 = Total Cover
42.5 20% of total cover: 17
10 Y FAC
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes X No
2.
3.
4.
5.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 5 20% of total cover: 2
Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2,0

SOIL
Sampling Point:DP3: Wtld NG
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
-0-2 7.5YR 3/4 100 Sandy Clay Loam
2-20 10 YR 5/2 95 7.5 YR 5/8 5 C PL Sandy Clay Loam
'Tvoe: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. `Location: PL=Pore Lininq, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (FB)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Data Point: S1
Name: pRPW NS
Date:
10/25/16 1 Evaluator: r WEPG
Eastin : - 80.82784 W
Project:
Valencia Phase 1G, 1H, 11: Waters of the US pRPW NS
Northing: 35.40613 N
Total Points:^
0
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30"`
a
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
u
A. Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3. In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
2
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
1
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
0
9. Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
10. Natural valley
0 1
0.5
1
1.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
3
Geomorphology
Subtotal
a Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
2
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
1
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
.5
16. Organic debris lines orrack lines
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
.piles
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
No = 0
1
Yes
= 3
3
Crayfish
0
0.5
Hydrology
Subtotal
.5
C. Biology
18.
Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19.
Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
3
20.
Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
1
21.
Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22.
Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
.5
23.
Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
.5
24.
Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
25.
Algae
0
0.5 1
1
1.5
.5
26.
Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=
0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Bioloqy
Subtotal
" perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes:
Adapted from NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
Origins.
(version 4.11)

STREAM REACH EVALUATION FORM
Data Point: S2
Name: sRPW NVF
Date: 10/25/16 Evaluator: WEPG Eastin : -80.82297 W
Project: Valencia Phase 1G, 1 H, 11: Waters of the US sRPW NVF Northing: 35.40676 N
Total Points:''
Weak
Stream is at least intermittent if > 19 or perennial if > 30
ry
(right -click the purple number and left -click Update Field to summarize points)
.. ,
A.
Geornorphology Geomorphology
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
SCORE
1a.
Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2
2.
Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
2
3.
In -channel structure: riffle- / step- pool sequence
0
1
2
3
1
4.
Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
1
5.
Active/relic floodplain
0
1
2
3
2
6.
Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
1
7.
Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
2
8.
Headcuts
0
1
2
3
1
9.
Grade controls
0
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
10.
Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Geomor holoSubtotal
y ;
B Man-made ditches are not rated: see discussion in NCDWQ Manual
B. Hydrology
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
0
13. Iron Oxidizing Bacteria
0
1
2
3
0
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
1
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
1
16. Organic debris lines or piles Wrack lines
0
0.51
22.
1.5
.5
17. Soil -based Evidence of high water table?
1
No = 0
Yes = 3
0
Crayfish
0
0.5
Hydrology
Subtotal
UT, 7M
C. Biology
18.
Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
19.
Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
2
20.
Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
0
22.
Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
23.
Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
24.
Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
0
25.
Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
.5
26.
Wetland plants in streambed
FACW=
0.75, OBL= 1.5, Other= 0
0
Biology
Subtotal..a�.
* perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See page 35 of NCDWQ manual.
Notes.-
otes:Adapted
Adaptedfrom NCDWQ: Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and their
Origins.
(version 4.11)

Waters of the US Wetland NB
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
DEPRESS
Area
0.025 ACRE
RPWWD
35.40334
-80.82704 South Prong Clarke Creek
Waters of the US Openwater Pond 1
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
DEPRESS
Area
1.34 ACRE
IMPNDMNT
35.40431
-80.82718 South Prong Clarke Creek
Waters of the US Wetland NT
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
DEPRESS
Area
0.03 ACRE
RPWWD
35.40516
-80.82706 South Prong Clarke Creek
Waters of the US Welland NG
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
DEPRESS
Area
0.08 ACRE
RPWWD
35.40557
-80.82739 South Prong Clarke Creek
Waters of the US Wetland NVC
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
DEPRESS
Area
0.025 ACRE
RPWWD
35.4047
-80.82235 South Prong Clarke Creek
Waters of the US Wetland NVE
NORTH CAROLINA
PFO
DEPRESS
Area
0.09 ACRE
RPWWD
35.40574
-80.82291 South Prong Clarke Creek
Waters of the US Seasonal RPW NA
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
RIVERINE
Linear
268 FOOT
RPW
35.40304
-80.82694 South Prong Clarke Creek
Waters of the US Seasonal RPW NF
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
RIVERINE
Linear
220 FOOT
RPW
35.40503
-80.82702 South Prong Clarke Creek
Waters of the US Seasonal RPW NC
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
RIVERINE
Linear
180 FOOT
RPW
35.40589
-80.82746 South Prong Clarke Creek
Waters of the US Seasonal RPW NVA
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
RIVERINE
Linear
85 FOOT
RPW
35.40471
-80.82249 South Prong Clarke Creek
Waters of the US Seasonal RPW NVB
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
RIVERINE
Linear
150 FOOT
RPW
35.4048
-80.82239 South Prong Clarke Creek
Waters of the US Seasonal RPW NVF
NORTH CAROLINA
R4
RIVERINE
Linear
500 FOOT
RPW
35.40676
-80.82297 South Prong Clarke Creek
Waters of the US Perennial RPW NS
NORTH CAROLINA
R3
RIVERINE
Linear
430 FOOT
RPW
35.40613
-80.82784 South Prong Clarke Creek

APPROXIMATE JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND AND STREAM DIMENSIONS
WETLANDS
Acres
TRIBUTARIES
LF
Acres
Waters of the US Wetland NB
0.025
Waters of the US Seasonal RPW NA
268
0.018
Waters of the US Wetland NT
0.03
Waters of the US Seasonal RPW NF
220
0.025
VALENCIA PHASE 1G,
Waters of the US Wetland NG
0.08
Waters of the US Seasonal RPW NC
180
0.021
1H, AND 11
Waters of the US Wetland NVC
0.025
Waters of the US Seasonal RPW NVA
85
0.006
Mecklenburg County, NC
Waters of the US Wetland NVE
0.09
Waters of the US Seasonal RPW NVB
150
0.014
Waters of the US Seasonal RPW NVF
500
0.046
Waters of the US Perennial RPW NS
430
0.059
WOUS TABLE
Notes:
SUBTOTAL
0.25
SUBTOTAL
1833.00
0.189
Waters of the US Openwater Pond 1
1.34
TOTAL WETLAND
1.59
TOTAL TRIBUTARIES
1833.00
0.189
Prepared For:
TOTAL SITE ACREAGE
66.75
Bowman Development
Group
TOTAL WATERS OF THE US ACREAGE
1.779
13815 Cinnabar Place
Huntersville, NC 28078
TOTAL UPLAND ACRES
64,971
[phone]
Wetlands and Emrironmental Planning Group Leonard S. Rindner. MLC.